US court orders review of Obama-era 'Dreamers' immigration programme

A US appeals court on Wednesday declared unlawful a programme that protects undocumented migrants brought to the country as children, but allowed it to remain in place for current recipients.

The ruling affirms a July 2021 decision by a federal judge to curb the programme. Wednesday's decision allows about 600,000 current enrollees to maintain their status but continues to block new applications.

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy now goes back to a lower court for review.DACAbeneficiaries are known as "Dreamers."

Add WION as a Preferred Source

President Joe Biden said he was disappointed by the ruling, which he said means "the lives of Dreamers remain in limbo."

"Today's decision is the result of continued efforts byRepublican state officials to strip DACArecipients of the protections and work authorization that many have now held for over a decade," he said in a statement.

"It is long past timefor Congress to pass permanent protections for Dreamers, including a pathway to citizenship."

Homeland security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a statement he is reviewing the decision and would work with the department of justice on a legal response.

DACA, instituted by then-president Barack Obama in 2012, covers around 700,000 people, conferring legal status on them, as well as the right to work. For many, America is the only country they have ever known.

In 2017, as part of his far wider push to limit immigration, then-president Donald Trump tried to dismantleDACA, insisting Obama had exceeded his constitutional powers.

DACArecipients received a temporary reprieve in June 2020 when the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 vote that the Trump administration had not provided sufficient justification for its attempts to end the programme.

It made clear it was ruling largely on procedural issues, and left open the possibility of further challenges.

DACAwas subsequently reinstated, and since taking office, Biden has looked to strengthen the programme, as well as initiate wider immigration reform.

But in July 2021, Texas-based Judge Andrew Hanen said Obama exceeded his authority when he institutedDACAby executive order. He called the order "unlawful."

The Biden administration appealed the decision. The department of homeland security also issued a final rule in August to codify the programme and protect it from legal challenges.

In Wednesday's decision, the appeals court said it did not have enough information to rule on the August regulation, which is set to take effect on October 31.

"The legal questions thatDACApresents are serious, both to the parties and to the public," the three-judge panel wrote in the ruling. "In our view, the defendants have not shown that there is a likelihood that they will succeed on the merits."

Democrats in Congress have also pushed for legislation that would permanently settle the status of the childhood arrivals, but immigration policies have long stalled in the face of Republican opposition.