• Wion
  • /India News
  • /'Having spyware is not wrong, the question is...': SC's BIG statement on government's alleged use of Pegasus spyware

'Having spyware is not wrong, the question is...': SC's BIG statement on government's alleged use of Pegasus spyware

'Having spyware is not wrong, the question is...': SC's BIG statement on government's alleged use of Pegasus spyware

Story highlights

India News | The Indian Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 29) asked what is wrong if the Pegasus spyware is used against terrorists. The apex court said that using pegasus is not wrong as India can not sacrifice its national security.

The Indian Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 29) asked what is wrong if the Pegasus spyware is used against terrorists. The apex court said that using pegasus is not wrong as India can not sacrifice its national security.

Aso read: Pegasus maker NSO group accountable in 'Whatsapp hacking case', rules US judge

The SC bench led by Justice Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh made the judgement while hearing a batch of petitions seeking an enquiry into the allegations that the BJP-led government is allegedly using Israeli software for snooping.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

The court said that it's important to determine against whom the software is used for spying.

Aso read: Israel-based NSO admits hacking 1,400 WhatsApp users with Pegasus spyware, unsealed court docs reveal

“What’s wrong if the country uses the spyware, what’s wrong if it is used against terrorists?" SC asked. “We can’t sacrifice national security," the bench added.

“Having spyware is not wrong, the real question is against whom it has been used," said Justice Surya Kant.

Aso read: Spain reopens Pegasus probe, Spain PM Pedro Sanchez's phone infected by spyware

The court will hold the next hearing on July 30.

The court further said that it would not disclose any report that puts the security of the country at risk.

“Any report which touches the security and sovereignty of the country will not be touched. However individuals who want to know whether they are included can be informed. Yes, individual apprehension must be addressed, but it cannot be made a document for discussion on the streets," the bench observed.

During the hearing, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for one of the petitioners, submitted that there is a US district court judgment.

“WhatsApp itself has disclosed here. Not a third party. WhatsApp has said about the hacking," Sibal said.

Aso read: Pahalgam terror attack | 'How much lower will you go:' Dhawan slams Shahid Afridi for 'pointless' anti-Indian Army comments

About the Author

Share on twitter

Gulshan Parveen

Passionate about international politics and social issues, Gulshan analyses key global events, from geopolitical conflicts and US politics to international diplomacy and social mov...Read More

Trending Topics