&imwidth=800&imheight=600&format=webp&quality=medium)
The Egypt summit, led by Trump, focused on ceasefire and aid but avoided explicity mention of Palestinian statehood and Hamas disarmament. The core issues are thus left for future. What was the language of the summit texts?
Two of the key aspects of Israel's war in Gaza were the future of Palestinian statehood and the disarming of Hamas. Neither of these were prominently mentioned at the peace summit in Egypt aimed at ending the Israel-Hamas war ongoing since 2023. This has left the core issues unresolved, leaving room for future conflicts. Much of what happened at Sharm el-Sheikh on Monday (Oct 13) was about Donald Trump. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not present; reportedly, Turkey's Erdoğan successfully discouraged Trump from inviting him to Egypt. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas was present, but he does not control Gaza; Hamas does. It is not clear who represented Hamas, as much of its political and military leadership was wiped out by Israel during the war.
The Sharm El-Sheikh Summit was co-chaired by Donald Trump and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, and attended by leaders of more than 20 countries to endorse the first phase of a US-brokered Gaza ceasefire and peace plan agreed by Hamas and Israel on October 8. The summit happened even as all 20 living Israeli hostages held by Hamas were released in exchange for over 1,900 Palestinian prisoners from Israel. On record, the summit's focus was on international backing for the ceasefire, future governance of Gaza, security, and humanitarian aid.
With neither belligerent of the war fully present, the summit was mostly a symbolic signing ceremony for the initial phase of the ceasefire plan. The most important questions remained unanswered: full Israeli withdrawal, Gaza reconstruction—which is estimated to cost around $53 billion—and post-war governance. Those matters, it appears, will be tackled in future negotiations.
The summit produced two primary documents:
1. The Trump Declaration for Enduring Peace and Prosperity, which was dubbed as the "peace document" or "agreement," was signed by the US president, el-Sisi, and leaders from Qatar and Turkey. The language was broad, containing commitments to support the ceasefire and stressing regional stability, security, and economic prosperity. This largely symbolic document focused on upholding the first phase of the peace plan. It did not delve into specifics regarding Gaza's governance or the disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups.
2. A joint statement was issued by Trump, Qatar, Egypt, and Turkey. This statement was also vague about Palestinian statehood or Hamas disarmament. It stressed "equality between Israelis and Palestinians," a vision of "tolerance, dignity, and equal opportunity for every person... regardless of race, faith, or ethnicity." It also spoke of collective efforts to end the war and foster peace.
Absent from the proceedings, or documents, of the summit were any binding resolutions on the most contentious issues.
The documents and summit discussions included indirect references to Palestinian statehood but nothing explicit. Egyptian President el-Sisi explicitly warned during the summit that "only the creation of a Palestinian state could offer a durable end to the conflict." The joint statement's stress on equality between Israelis and Palestinians was interpreted by some analysts as a subtle nod to statehood aspirations, as was the presence of Mahmoud Abbas.
Most of the summit remarks and documents prioritised cessation of hostilities over political changes on the ground for Palestinians. Implementation of the ceasefire appeared more important than addressing deeper political issues.
Interestingly, the documents avoided direct mentions of Hamas by name. Thus, the main actor of the war was absent from the summit, having relied on Qatari and Egyptian mediators. There was no explicit condemnation of the 7 October 2023 terror attack by Hamas on Israel that set off the war. The signed declaration and joint statement did not mention Hamas but praised "regional leaders" (implicitly including Qatar and Egypt) for brokering the deal with Hamas and acknowledged their "very important role."
The texts did not include binding language on Hamas disarmament, which remains a sticking point earmarked for later phases of negotiations.
But prior to the Egypt summit, Hamas had outrightly rejected disarmament as "out of the question." Germany’s Foreign Minister, Annalena Baerbock, stated that some states were "exerting pressure on Hamas to disarm for further talks."
The Egypt declaration focused on "security" broadly, leaving disarmament and Hamas’s future role—such as its exclusion from Gaza governance—for future negotiation.
Also read: ‘Pakistan, India going to live very nicely together’: Trump says at Gaza peace summit in Egypt
The one clear achievement was to secure the international community's approval for the truce, with optimism that it would hold. As for the rest, it was largely a procedural and symbolic event intended for optics. While celebrating the ceasefire’s start, the summit deferred thornier issues like Palestinian statehood and Hamas disarmament to future talks, possibly to avoid derailing momentum for peace on the ground.
In short, Gaza now has a fragile peace, and the Egypt summit left several crucial questions unanswered. Let’s wait for phase two of the talks.