New Delhi

My sincerest apologies for what may be an abundance of puns in this review.

Advertisment

The Nun II arrives in theatres like a solemn procession, its dark, foreboding presence promising to send shivers down your spine. Yet, as the gates of fear swing wide open, it's hard not to feel a sense of déjà vu. This sequel to 2018's The Nun plunges us back into the sinister world of Valak, but rather than evolving, it feels like a visit to a familiar haunted house — eerie, but ultimately predictable. Directed by Michael Chaves this time and featuring a returning cast led by Taissa Farmiga, Jonas Bloquet, and Bonnie Aarons, this installment is steeped in the gothic supernatural horror that's become a hallmark of The Conjuring Universe. 

But does it rise above its predecessor, or is it just another hymn in the same old sinister songbook? Let's dive deeper.

Also Read | Top 10 greatest horror movies of all time

Advertisment

What is The Nun II about?

The film picks up four years after the events of its predecessor, with Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) once again battling the titular Nun's unholy shenanigans at a boarding school in France. The premise certainly had potential, and promised to explore the backstory of Valak and the mysteries surrounding the cursed abbey. However, any hope for something truly substantial is quickly quashed as the film traverses a well-trodden path of horror tropes.

Advertisment

Jump scares galore

Jump scares, a staple of modern horror cinema, are in abundant supply here, and it's clear that they were meticulously scheduled into the script. Jump scares, as a rule of thumb, do not make for an immersive horror experience. Here, they lack even the element of surprise that can make them terrifying. Instead, they arrive predictably, much like the chiming of a church bell, robbing the film of any genuine suspense.

The atmosphere, at least initially, manages to create an aura of dread. The school's eerie corridors and dimly lit chambers terrify with a hint of the unknown lurking around every corner. The visuals do provide an unsettling backdrop for the unfolding horrors. The use of light, or its clever absence, is also good. Technically, it has all the makings of a well-made horror movie.

Yet, as the film progresses, Valak's antics and the film's various attempts to craft scares begin to feel less menacing and more like a rehearsed routine. The sense of foreboding gradually dissipates as the film gets increasingly, er, nun-scary.

Also Read | Talk to Me review: A psychological horror film that will chill you to the bone

The ending falls flat

Despite what I said above, the story has a certain depth that was missing in the original film. However, the film's ending, arguably its most crucial moment, is a rushed affair that leaves much to be desired. It's as though the director was hurrying to finish his confession before the church bells rang. The revelations and confrontations lack the emotional weight and depth needed to make them truly impactful, resulting in a hastily put together denouement.

The acting is good, but little else

On the acting front, the cast delivers commendable performances. Farmiga, in particular, brings a sense of determination and vulnerability to Sister Irene that resonates. (Also, in a few shots she looks like a spitting image of her mother, Vera Farmiga, who essays Lorraine Warren in The Conjuring movies.)

However, the actors' efforts are hindered by a script that fails to provide them with the material needed to shine. The cast's efforts can't save a story that feels like it's been exhumed from the cinematic graveyard of horror clichés.

The Nun II ultimately feels like a confessional gone wrong. It's a missed opportunity in a genre that could use some fresh, original voices. 

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.