Row breaks out over WHO trial casting doubt on remdesivir as COVID-19 drug

WION Web Team
New York, New York, United States of America Published: Oct 16, 2020, 09:51 PM(IST)

Remdesivir Photograph:( AFP )

Story highlights

Gilead Sciences Inc., the US company that developed the drug, said the findings appeared inconsistent with evidence from other studies validating the clinical benefit of the drug.

A row broke out on Friday over a World Health Organisation (WHO) clinical trial which concluded that the anti-viral drug remdesivir had little or no impact on a patient's chances of surviving COVID-19.

Notably, a concoction of remdesivir with a few other drugs was used to treat US President Donald Trump's coronavirus infection.

Gilead Sciences Inc., the US company that developed the drug, said the findings appeared inconsistent with evidence from other studies validating the clinical benefit of the drug.

"We are concerned the data from this open-label global trial has not undergone the rigorous review required to allow for constructive scientific discussion," Gilead said in a statement.

But Richard Peto, an independent statistician hired by the WHO to scrutinise the results of its Solidarity trial, dismissed Gilead's criticism.

"It's a reliable result, don't let anybody tell you otherwise, because they'll try to," Peto said adding, "this is real world evidence."

Earlier in the day, the UN health agency said remdesivir appeared to have little or no effect on keeping people alive or on the length of hospital stays among patients with the respiratory disease.

Its trial was conducted on 11,266 adult patients in over 30 countries and its findings may shift the focus of treatments away from antivirals such as remdesivir to new monoclonal antibodies which the WHO has said could be added to its studies.

Gilead, which quickly repurposed what it had developed as an Ebola drug when the COVID-19 pandemic began, said that other, smaller remdesivir trials showed the treatment cut COVID-19 recovery time by five days and helped reduce the risk of death in some patients who were getting oxygen.

Peto, an Oxford University professor emeritus, said the smaller trial's perceived benefit in keeping people alive could have been mere "chance".

"And you've got to randomise in large numbers," Peto said. "There isn't sufficient emphasis based on the need for large numbers if you want really reliable results."

For the remdesivir arm of the WHO's Solidarity trial, 2,743 patients were given remdesivir, compared to 2,708 in the control group. Gilead's study had 1,062 participants.

"The real disappointment is that remdesivir has also failed in a larger number of cases and in the 'real world setting'," Clemens Wendtner, Chief Physician of Infectiology and Tropical Medicine at Munich's Schwabing Clinic, said.

The WHO's trial also found that other medicines repurposed since the pandemic began -- malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, anti-HIV drug combination lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon -- offered little or no benefit to COVID-19 patients.

The hydroxychloroquine and anti-HIV studies were abandoned earlier this year, and interferon was dropped on Thursday.

Guidance on how countries should deploy remdesivir will come in two or three weeks after a data review, WHO officials said.

Remdesivir was given emergency use authorisation from the US Food and Drug Administration on May 1.

The European Union has also given remdesivir emergency authorisation and agreed to a 1 billion euro ($1.2 billion) remdesivir deal on Tuesday, weeks after Gilead was informed by the WHO about the results of the Solidarity trial.

The European Medicines Agency said it would review the trial data "to see if any changes are needed to the way these medicines are used."

(with inputs from agencies)

Read in App