&imwidth=800&imheight=600&format=webp&quality=medium)
Here is how the Durand Line, a colonial-era border drawn by the British and Tsarist Russia between what is now Pakistan and Afghanistan, continues to fuel conflict, tribal divisions, and militancy due to its disputed status and geopolitical legacy.
Pakistan-Afghanistan border clashes are once again escalating this week, as tensions rise between Islamabad and the Taliban government. At least 250 people have reportedly been killed in the most recent clashes, with Afghanistan claiming 58 Pakistani soldiers dead and 25 border posts captured—though independent verification is limited. At the heart of this ongoing conflict lies a colonial legacy: the Durand Line—an arbitrary border drawn by the British Empire. More than a century later, this line continues to divide communities, fuel violence, and define a bitter geopolitical rivalry in South Asia.
The Durand Line, a 2,640-kilometre frontier extending from the Iranian border in the west to the Chinese frontier in the east, cuts across traditional Pashtun tribal areas now split between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The line was drawn in 1893 during the "Great Game"—the geopolitical contest between the British Empire and Tsarist Russia over control of Central Asia. The agreement was signed between British Indian Foreign Secretary Sir Mortimer Durand and Afghan Emir Abdur Rahman Khan.
Its purpose was to define ‘spheres of influence’, not to serve as a permanent international border. Nevertheless, it became a lasting and contentious Pakistan-Afghanistan boundary that still divides the region today.
Also read: ‘Heavy clashes’ at Afghanistan-Pakistan border as Taliban forces retaliate days after Pak strikes
The Durand Line artificially divided major tribal groups, especially the Pashtuns and Baloch, with no regard for their centuries-old historical, cultural, linguistic, or familial ties. For many Afghans, it is a stark symbol of Britain’s “divide and rule” colonial policy, imposed to secure imperial interests rather than reflect the realities on the ground.
Afghan governments have never ratified the demarcation, viewing it as an unequal and coerced arrangement. The 1919 Treaty of Rawalpindi, signed after the Third Anglo-Afghan War, gave Afghanistan full independence in foreign affairs. Although the British reaffirmed the Durand Line in this treaty, Afghanistan never accepted it as a permanent border.
When Pakistan was formed in 1947, it inherited the Durand Line from British India. The line was recognised internationally, including by the United Nations.
However, every Afghan government since then—monarchist, republican, communist, mujahideen, and Taliban—has rejected the Durand Line. It is seen as a colonial relic that divided the Afghan nation and turned many tribal Afghans into "foreigners" within their own homeland.
This unresolved border remains a source of instability, cross-border militancy, and refugee flows.
To control the frontier, Pakistan has fenced nearly 98 per cent of the border. But Afghanistan views the fencing as illegitimate, even as several parts of the border remain porous, allowing militant groups to move across.
The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), for example, is alleged by Pakistan to operate from Afghan territory. In 2025, Pakistan reported at least 17 infiltration attempts, resulting in 202 fatalities.
The current clashes erupted after Pakistani airstrikes on alleged TTP hideouts, triggering Taliban reprisals. Similar incidents occurred in 2024 (16 clashes) and early 2025 (12 clashes), displacing thousands, according to United Nations estimates.
Political and military leaders on both sides frequently use the Durand Line to stir nationalist sentiments.
Taliban officials, including Deputy Foreign Minister Sher Mohammad Abbas Stanikzai and Defence Minister Mullah Yaqub, have labelled the line “imaginary” and “unacceptable”. Former President Hamid Karzai said Pakistan pressured him to recognise the line during his presidency.
On the Pakistani side, Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi insists the border is settled and essential for national security. Yet even former Prime Minister Imran Khan, who is Pashtun himself, has publicly questioned the legitimacy of the Durand Line, reflecting divisions within Pakistan.
The Durand Line remains unresolved, straining diplomatic ties and enabling militant movements on both sides.
More than a territorial line, it represents contested identity, sovereignty, and resistance—and a symbol of colonial injustice. Without dialogue, the Durand Line may continue to divide not only land, but lives.