• Wion
  • /World
  • /Federal judge releases over 1,800 pages of previously sealed evidence in Trump election subversion case - World News

Federal judge releases over 1,800 pages of previously sealed evidence in Trump election subversion case

Federal judge releases over 1,800 pages of previously sealed evidence in Trump election subversion case

File photo of former US president Donald Trump

A United States federal judge, on Friday (Oct 18), made more than 1,800 pages of previously sealed documents linked to the case involving former US President Donald Trump’s alleged attempts to subvert the 2020 presidential election. However, the recently unsealed documents contain little new information, as most of the pages were either redacted or already known to the public.

US District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan authorised their release, despite objections from Trump’s legal team. These documents relate to a 165-page motion filed by special counsel Jack Smith, which introduced new evidence against the former president.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

The released documents serve as an appendix to the previously unsealed motion, where Smith and his team argued that Trump could face criminal charges for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results. This lengthy appendix includes records that were mostly redacted and previously available to the public.

For example, parts of Trump's well-known phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger have been redacted. Hundreds of other pages were withheld entirely, marked only by the word “SEALED” in capital letters, along with basic formal information.

One volume includes sealed pages as well as tweets and social media posts by Trump, his campaign, and his allies, some of which were shared during the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol.

Among these posts is Trump’s infamous tweet from that day, which accused the-Vice President Mike Pence of lacking “the courage to do what should have been done” in supporting his efforts to contest the election outcome.

Additionally, the documents feature numerous claims of voter fraud during the 2020 election.

Prosecutors argue that Trump’s tweets should be admissible in court since they were neither personal or campaign-related, rather than part of his official duties as president.

(With inputs from agencies)

About the Author

Prapti Upadhayay

Prapti Upadhayay is a New Delhi-based journalist who reports on key news developments across India and global affairs, with a special focus on US politics. When not writing, she en...Read More