India: Supreme Court bans 'two-finger' test for rape & sexual assault; calls it patriarchal & sexist

Taking another progressive step, the Supreme Court of India on Monday prohibited the use of rather inhumane 'two-finger test' in cases of rape and sexual assaults.

Stating it was 'regrettable' that such practice continued, the Supreme Court bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli made the observations.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

"This court has time and again deprecated the use of two finger test in cases alleging rape and sexual assault. The so called test has no scientific basis."

Stating the testre-victimises and re-traumatises the women, the court warned that, "the two finger test must not be conducted."

"The test is based on an incorrect assumption that a sexually active woman cannot be raped. Nothing can be further from the truth."

Also watch:India: Supreme Court livestreams proceedings heard by five-judge bench

The bench made the observations while restoring conviction in a rape case and called the practice 'patriarchal' and 'sexist'.

"The probative value of a woman's testimony does not depend on her sexual history. It is patriarchal and sexist to suggest that a woman cannot be believed when she states that she was raped merely because she is sexually active."

In the concluding statements, the bench ordered the union government and state governments to ensure that guidelines laid down by the Department of Health and Family Welfare are implemented in government and private hospitals.

Read more: India's Supreme Court starts live-streaming cases, in historic first

The Indian Supreme Court lately has been taking a modern and progressive stance in dismantling the archaic ideas about the customs in society.

As reported by WION, the SC in August said that unmarried partnerships and queer relationships can also be considered family.

"Familial relationships may take the form of domestic, unmarried partnerships or queer relationships," said the court.

Read more:Indian SC says unmarried partnerships, queer relationships can also be considered as family

Further building upon its statement, the bench comprising of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna asserted that atypical family units are also entitled to equal protection of the law.

"A household may be a single parent household for any number of reasons, including the death of a spouse, separation, or divorce. Similarly, the guardians and caretakers (who traditionally occupy the roles of the "mother" and the "father") of children may change with remarriage, adoption, or fostering."

(With inputs from agencies)

WATCH WION LIVE HERE: