Brussels

The European Commission was wrong to redact details of multi-billion-euro deals it struck to secure Covid vaccines during the coronavirus pandemic, an EU court said on Wednesday.

Advertisment

The commission failed to show how divulging indemnification details would harm the commercial interests of the pharmaceutical groups supplying the vaccines, the EU General Court ruled.

Also read: Biden calls Kamala Harris a potential 'president' candidate for United States

It also failed a "public interest" test by keeping secret the names of the EU officials involved, the court said.

Advertisment

The ruling hands a victory to EU lawmakers and individuals who had requested the details from 2.7 billion euros' ($2.95 billion)) worth of Covid vaccine purchase agreements the commission had negotiated in 2020-2021.

The commission -- run by President Ursula von der Leyen, who is in trouble separately for allegedly keeping secret and deleting text messages with the boss of Pfizer over vaccine purchases -- had offered only redacted versions of the contracts it had signed.

It argued that releasing the blacked-out details would jeopardise the commercial relationships with the pharmaceutical companies, notably where it came to liability and indemnification in the event of vaccine defects.

Advertisment

The commission had also argued that it needed to keep private the identities and words used by members of its team who negotiated the deals.

Also read: Over 60 Palestinians killed in Israeli airstrikes across Gaza Strip

But the EU court upheld "in part" the lawsuits lodged by those seeking access to those details "and annuls the Commission's decisions in so far as they contain irregularities".

"The Commission did not demonstrate that wider access to those clauses would actually undermine the commercial interests of those undertakings," it said.

Also, it found that those behind the lawsuit had demonstrated the public interest of having access to the personal details of the commission's vaccine-negotiating team.

"It was only by having the names, surnames and details of the professional or institutional role of the members of the team in question that they could have ascertained whether or not the members of that team had a conflict of interests," the court said.

The commission has until late September to lodge an appeal before the European Court of Justice if it wants to challenge the ruling of the General Court.

Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.