
Lawmakers in the United Kingdom will vote on the historic assisted dying bill at the end of this month. The proposed legislation, details of which were released on Tuesday (Nov 12), will make assisted dying legal in England and Wales.
It states the requirements for ending one's life, besides clearly setting out hardline safeguards, including lengthy prison sentences for coercion.
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater proposed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill and said she believed she had put forward "the best possible legislation".
She further warned MPs that the parliament may not get another chance to vote on the issue for another decade. Notably, several MPs are concerned over the potential for mission creep and coercion.
Leadbeater promised that the legislation would contain the “strictest protections and safeguards of any legislation anywhere in the world”. The MPs would cast their first vote on the proposals on Nov 29.
If the bill passes, more amendments might be considered before further voting in the House of Commons and Lords. It would take several more months for it to become effective.
The proposals include an expected lifespan of six months and a clear wish to die that is "free from coercion or pressure". Doctors won't be allowed to administer the life-ending medicine and the patient would be able to take it themselves.
Also Read:'Strangulation marks' found on neck of woman who died in Sarco suicide pod: Investigators
Anyone found breaking the law could face a punishment of up to 14 years in prison. All the recommendations made in the bill have come after years of debate in the parliament.
Those supporting the bill say that it clearly outlines the role of doctors and provides oversight from judges, something that was missing in the previous attempts to legalise assisted dying. The doctors will be required to be satisfied that the person is eligible to end their own life, and was not "coerced or pressured" into making the decision.
Meanwhile, those against the bill say that it still leaves gaps. They say that questions remain over the safeguards and the bill is missing provisions against “doctor shopping” if a patient is not satisfied with the answer they get from the first doctor.
They also ask whether a six-month prognosis includes people who are refusing to get treatment and whether doctors will have an assumption of mental capacity.
Responding to criticism, Leadbeater said that the Nov 29 vote is just the first step and the bill would be further scrutinised in the later stages.
She added that it had been a “thorough and robust process" and had been scrutinised by medical and legal experts, the palliative care and hospice sectors, and disability rights activists and faith leaders. People who had witnessed a loved one die in difficult circumstances were also part of the process.