Why is world’s largest aircraft carrier making headlines for toilets? The USS Gerald R. Ford has arrived near Israel amid rising tensions with Iran, but reports of repeated sanitation breakdowns have drawn attention.

Now, the US Navy has released a statement. Scroll down to read more.

US Navy downplays USS Gerald R Ford's toilet problem as aircraft carrier arrives near Israel ahead of possible Iran strike

Iran’s foreign minister says a nuclear agreement with the United States is “within reach” ahead of upcoming talks in Geneva, emphasizing that diplomacy must take priority for a fair and equitable deal. Tehran reiterated its readiness to defend its sovereignty, warning that any U.S. strike, even limited , would be regarded as an act of aggression and met with a strong response.

US-Iran Tensions: Iran Says Nuclear Deal Within Reach, Warns Any US Strike Considered Aggression

As tensions rise between the United States and Iran, reports surfaced showing American military troops served luxury meals, creating a buzz on social media amid US President Donald Trump’s threats. A cryptic post surfaced on X showing an image of a meal served to military personnel consisting of steak, lobster, crab, and pie. The post has sparked rumours of a possible US military action in Iran, with a popular belief of a ‘last meal’ before deployment to war zones.“US Troops received menus including steak, pie, crab legs &amp; lobster,” the post read. Resharing the post, a retired military pilot in the United States Air Force, Buzz Patterson, wrote a cryptic message: “IYKYK. It’s on.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">IYKYK. It’s on. <a href="https://t.co/9ldEenICVw">https://t.co/9ldEenICVw</a>&mdash; Buzz Patterson (@BuzzPatterson) <a href="https://twitter.com/BuzzPatterson/status/2024991584723562994?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Why steak and lobster meal spark rumours?</h2>While there is no official confirmation, a common belief suggests the US military serves its troops a ‘last meal’ with a fancy menu including steak, lobster, and pie, before sending them on a war front. Some link the hearty meal to a dangerous deployment or an extended mission. The theory has circulated on social media for years and often resurfaces during periods of geopolitical tensions.Notably, surf-and-turf meals are also served to US military personnel on holidays, special occasions, or as morale boosters.The recent post has fueled speculation of a possible US military strike on Iran, given heightened tensions between the two nations.<h2>US military served lavish meal before June strikes?</h2>Last year, in June, similar reports surfaced on social media on June 18 after military soldier Antonia Lopez posted a lavish meal video that went viral on social media. The day also coincided with the US Army’s birthday. In the clip, Lopez showed that she was given steak, lobster, caprese salad, asparagus, hush puppies, a baked potato, shrimp cocktail, fruit salad, garlic bread, cake, and pecan pie in the meal.Days after the video was posted, the United States carried out military strikes on Iranian targets on June 22.<h2>Trump to assassinate Khamenei?</h2>Meanwhile, reports emerge that Trump is weighing options that go far beyond diplomacy. According to an Axios report citing multiple sources, Trump is considering multiple scenarios, including one that involves the assassination of Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Seyyed Imam Ali Khameneiand his potential successor, his son, Mojtaba.&nbsp;

A viral post showing US troops served steak and lobster sparked rumours of a “last meal” before a possible Iran strike. The tradition is often linked to deployments.

As tensions rise between the United States and Iran, reports surfaced showing American military troops served luxury meals, creating a buzz on social media amid US President Donald Trump’s threats. A cryptic post surfaced on X showing an image of a meal served to military personnel consisting of steak, lobster, crab, and pie. The post has sparked rumours of a possible US military action in Iran, with a popular belief of a ‘last meal’ before deployment to war zones. “US Troops received menus including steak, pie, crab legs & lobster,” the post read. Resharing the post, a retired military pilot in the United States Air Force, Buzz Patterson, wrote a cryptic message: “IYKYK. It’s on.”

A viral post showing US troops served steak and lobster sparked rumours of a “last meal” before a possible Iran strike. The tradition is often linked to deployments.

‘Last meal’ before strikes on Iran? Why US military’s lobster, steak feast might be bad for Khamenei

As tensions simmer between Washington and Tehran, US President Donald Trump is weighing options that go far beyond diplomacy, suggest reports. The POTUS is reportedly considering "taking out" the nation's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Imam Ali Khamenei, his son and the mullahs. Here's what we know.<h2>Trump to order Ayatollah's assassination?</h2>According to an Axios report citing multiple sources, Trump is considering multiple scenarios, including one that involves the assassination of Iran's supreme leader and his potential successor, his son, Mojtaba.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-claims-breakthrough-in-geneva-talks-vance-says-tehran-ignoring-trump-s-red-lines-1771375814136">Iran claims breakthrough in Geneva talks, Vance says Tehran ignoring Trump's 'red lines'</a>"They have something for every scenario. One scenario takes out the ayatollah and his son and the mullahs," a senior Trump advisor told the publication. However, the adviser insisted that Trump has not decided yet, "What the president chooses no one knows. I don't think he knows."Another senior official on the Trump administration confirmed that the plan to kill Khamenei and his son Mojtaba was presented to Trump weeks ago.<h2>Trump ‘keeping his options open’</h2>"Trump is keeping his options open. He could decide on an attack at any moment," including direct action against the country’s top leadership, said a third person in the Trump administration.<h2>Military pressure builds</h2>The reports surfaced as Trump on Thursday (Feb 19) acknowledged he is considering a limited strike on Iran, if the nation did not strike a deal with the US within 10-15 days. When asked directly by a reporter, he replied, "The most I can say, I am considering it."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-ahead-of-us-iran-talks-in-geneva-warns-iran-of-consequences-if-nuclear-deal-fails-what-bout-uss-abraham-lincoln-1771295379775">Trump, ahead of US-Iran talks in Geneva, warns Tehran of 'consequences' if nuclear deal fails</a>In recent weeks, the US has ramped up its military presence in the Middle East. After deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier group earlier this year, Washington ordered a second aircraft carrier, the Gerald Ford, to head to the region. The move is widely seen as leverage, aimed at pushing Tehran to curb its nuclear programme.Trump has warned that "bad things" would happen if Iran does not reach a deal before his deadline expires.&nbsp;<h2>Talks continue</h2>The latest escalation comes even as negotiations inch forward. Following talks in Geneva, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said a draft proposal could be ready within days and would be handed to US envoy Steve Witkoff after final approval in Tehran.Araghchi pushed back on claims that Washington demanded zero uranium enrichment. "We have not offered any suspension, and the US side has not asked for zero enrichment," he said in an interview to US TV network MS NOW. The focus, he insisted, is ensuring Iran’s nuclear programme "is peaceful and would remain peaceful forever". &nbsp;

As tensions rise between Washington and Tehran, reports say President Donald Trump is weighing options that go beyond diplomacy, including a scenario involving the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his son Mojtaba. Here's all we know.

As tensions simmer between Washington and Tehran, US President Donald Trump is weighing options that go far beyond diplomacy, suggest reports. The POTUS is reportedly considering "taking out" the nation's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Imam Ali Khamenei, his son and the mullahs. Here's what we know. Trump to order Ayatollah's assassination? According to an Axios report citing multiple sources, Trump is considering multiple scenarios, including one that involves the assassination of Iran's supreme leader and his potential successor, his son, Mojtaba. Also read | Iran claims breakthrough in Geneva talks, Vance says Tehran ignoring Trump's 'red lines' "They have something for every scenario. One scenario takes out the ayatollah and his son and the mullahs," a senior Trump advisor told the publication. However, the adviser insisted that Trump has not decided yet, "What the president chooses no one knows. I don't think he knows." Another senior official on the Trump administration confirmed that the plan to kill Khamenei and his son Mojtaba was presented to Trump weeks ago. Trump ‘keeping his options open’ "Trump is keeping his options open. He could decide on an attack at any moment," including direct action against the country’s top leadership, said a third person in the Trump administration. Military pressure builds The reports surfaced as Trump on Thursday (Feb 19) acknowledged he is considering a limited strike on Iran, if the nation did not strike a deal with the US within 10-15 days. When asked directly by a reporter, he replied, "The most I can say, I am considering it." Also read | Trump, ahead of US-Iran talks in Geneva, warns Tehran of 'consequences' if nuclear deal fails In recent weeks, the US has ramped up its military presence in the Middle East. After deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier group earlier this year, Washington ordered a second aircraft carrier, the Gerald Ford, to head to the region. The move is widely seen as leverage, aimed at pushing Tehran to curb its nuclear programme. Trump has warned that "bad things" would happen if Iran does not reach a deal before his deadline expires. Talks continue The latest escalation comes even as negotiations inch forward. Following talks in Geneva, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said a draft proposal could be ready within days and would be handed to US envoy Steve Witkoff after final approval in Tehran. Araghchi pushed back on claims that Washington demanded zero uranium enrichment. "We have not offered any suspension, and the US side has not asked for zero enrichment," he said in an interview to US TV network MS NOW. The focus, he insisted, is ensuring Iran’s nuclear programme "is peaceful and would remain peaceful forever".

As tensions rise between Washington and Tehran, reports say President Donald Trump is weighing options that go beyond diplomacy, including a scenario involving the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his son Mojtaba. Here's all we know.

Did Trump order Iran supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei's assassination? Here's what new report suggests

US President Donald Trump on Friday (February 20) called on Iran’s leadership to enter negotiations for what he described as a “fair deal,” while sharply condemning the government’s human rights record and voicing concern for its citizens. Speaking at the White House, Trump drew a distinction between Iran’s rulers and its population, saying the Iranian people were enduring severe hardship. He referenced what he described as a deadly crackdown, claiming that 32,000 individuals had been killed in a short span of time, the first occasion on which he cited a specific figure.&nbsp;Trump also alleged that Iranian authorities had planned to execute hundreds of detainees, describing public hangings carried out by crane. He said he warned Tehran that any execution would trigger an immediate response from the United States. According to Trump, after his warning, Iran abandoned plans to execute 837 prisoners. “They didn’t hang them,” he said, adding that he had been told no executions ultimately took place.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-absolutely-ashamed-of-certain-members-of-court-trump-lashes-out-at-supreme-court-over-tariff-decision-1771612420264">Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court</a>&nbsp;Earlier in the day, Trump hinted he was weighing the possibility of a limited military strike as leverage to push Iran toward negotiations, though he did not elaborate on what such action might involve. Reiterating his sympathy for ordinary Iranians, Trump said they had been forced to live under extremely harsh conditions.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed</a>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump on Thursday (February 19) warned Iran that it has 10 to 15 days to reach what he described as a “meaningful deal” or face serious repercussions, raising the prospect of military action in the Middle East. In response, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the president of the Security Council warning that any strike on Iran would render US bases, facilities and other assets “legitimate targets.”&nbsp;Amid the escalating war of words, US military deployments in the region have reportedly increased, with American forces said to be prepared for possible action as early as this weekend. The United States has also moved the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group closer to Iranian waters, signaling heightened readiness as tensions intensify.

US President Donald Trump urges Iran to negotiate a “fair deal,” warned against executions, criticised Tehran’s crackdown, and hinted at possible military action

US President Donald Trump on Friday (February 20) called on Iran’s leadership to enter negotiations for what he described as a “fair deal,” while sharply condemning the government’s human rights record and voicing concern for its citizens. Speaking at the White House, Trump drew a distinction between Iran’s rulers and its population, saying the Iranian people were enduring severe hardship. He referenced what he described as a deadly crackdown, claiming that 32,000 individuals had been killed in a short span of time, the first occasion on which he cited a specific figure. Trump also alleged that Iranian authorities had planned to execute hundreds of detainees, describing public hangings carried out by crane. He said he warned Tehran that any execution would trigger an immediate response from the United States. According to Trump, after his warning, Iran abandoned plans to execute 837 prisoners. “They didn’t hang them,” he said, adding that he had been told no executions ultimately took place. Also Read: Trump announces new 10% global tariff; says ‘absolutely ashamed’ of US Supreme Court Earlier in the day, Trump hinted he was weighing the possibility of a limited military strike as leverage to push Iran toward negotiations, though he did not elaborate on what such action might involve. Reiterating his sympathy for ordinary Iranians, Trump said they had been forced to live under extremely harsh conditions. https://www.wionews.com/videos/asim-munir-abandons-pakistan-army-soldiers-kidnapped-by-bla-1771607681128/embed US President Donald Trump on Thursday (February 19) warned Iran that it has 10 to 15 days to reach what he described as a “meaningful deal” or face serious repercussions, raising the prospect of military action in the Middle East. In response, Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the president of the Security Council warning that any strike on Iran would render US bases, facilities and other assets “legitimate targets.” Amid the escalating war of words, US military deployments in the region have reportedly increased, with American forces said to be prepared for possible action as early as this weekend. The United States has also moved the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group closer to Iranian waters, signaling heightened readiness as tensions intensify.

US President Donald Trump urges Iran to negotiate a “fair deal,” warned against executions, criticised Tehran’s crackdown, and hinted at possible military action

'32,000 people were killed during crackdown in Iran', says Donald Trump

Trump has given Iran 10-15 days to agree to a nuclear deal, warning of further action if it refuses. Tehran says US bases in the region could be targeted if tensions escalate further.

Will US strike Iran? Trump sets deadline as Tehran warns of retaliation

According to a report, President Trump has withdrawn his backing for Sir Keir Starmer’s agreement to transfer the Chagos Islands to Mauritius after the UK declined to permit British bases to be used for strikes against Iran. As per reports, President Trump has stepped back from supporting the arrangement after the UK declined to authorise American use of key UK-based facilities for possible military action. The bases in question include Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire, which hosts US heavy bombers stationed in Europe.&nbsp;Existing bilateral agreements require Washington to obtain advance approval from London before launching operations from British territory. Sources indicate the UK government has not yet granted permission, citing legal concerns. Officials are wary that facilitating such an attack could expose Britain to accusations of breaching international law, particularly if it is deemed to have prior knowledge of an unlawful military action. The issue was reportedly discussed during a recent phone call between the president and the prime minister, where Iran’s nuclear programme and the prospect of US military action were addressed. Shortly afterwards, Trump publicly criticised the proposed Chagos Islands deal.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-11-jets-shot-in-india-pak-war-trump-changes-figures-again-hikes-tally-of-fighter-planes-1771511733690">‘11 jets shot in India-Pak war’: Trump changes figures again, hikes tally of fighter planes</a>&nbsp;The UK’s position on pre-emptive military action has long been cautious. In the lead-up to the Iraq War, legal advice to the government maintained that force was lawful only in cases of self-defence against an imminent or actual attack, unless authorised by a UN resolution. In a social media statement, Trump referenced both Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford as potential launch points should Iran refuse to negotiate over its nuclear ambitions. He suggested such action could prevent a possible strike on the UK or its allies, implying that British participation would be justified under international law.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/rare-sighting-of-phantom-jellyfish-in-deep-sea-antarctic-waters-reveal-hidden-predator-1771517701509/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/rare-sighting-of-phantom-jellyfish-in-deep-sea-antarctic-waters-reveal-hidden-predator-1771517701509/embed</a>&nbsp;The UK government continues to defend the Chagos agreement, arguing that transferring the territory to Mauritius would strengthen long-term security and prevent costly international litigation. The estimated financial implications of the deal are reported to be around £35 billion. Ministers have reaffirmed their intention to move forward with the legislation, emphasising that national security remains the overriding priority. However, officials have privately acknowledged that the arrangement is unlikely to proceed without US consent, describing the current diplomatic climate as challenging.

UK refuses US request to use RAF bases for potential strikes on Iran

According to a report, President Trump has withdrawn his backing for Sir Keir Starmer’s agreement to transfer the Chagos Islands to Mauritius after the UK declined to permit British bases to be used for strikes against Iran. As per reports, President Trump has stepped back from supporting the arrangement after the UK declined to authorise American use of key UK-based facilities for possible military action. The bases in question include Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire, which hosts US heavy bombers stationed in Europe. Existing bilateral agreements require Washington to obtain advance approval from London before launching operations from British territory. Sources indicate the UK government has not yet granted permission, citing legal concerns. Officials are wary that facilitating such an attack could expose Britain to accusations of breaching international law, particularly if it is deemed to have prior knowledge of an unlawful military action. The issue was reportedly discussed during a recent phone call between the president and the prime minister, where Iran’s nuclear programme and the prospect of US military action were addressed. Shortly afterwards, Trump publicly criticised the proposed Chagos Islands deal. Also Read: ‘11 jets shot in India-Pak war’: Trump changes figures again, hikes tally of fighter planes The UK’s position on pre-emptive military action has long been cautious. In the lead-up to the Iraq War, legal advice to the government maintained that force was lawful only in cases of self-defence against an imminent or actual attack, unless authorised by a UN resolution. In a social media statement, Trump referenced both Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford as potential launch points should Iran refuse to negotiate over its nuclear ambitions. He suggested such action could prevent a possible strike on the UK or its allies, implying that British participation would be justified under international law. https://www.wionews.com/videos/rare-sighting-of-phantom-jellyfish-in-deep-sea-antarctic-waters-reveal-hidden-predator-1771517701509/embed The UK government continues to defend the Chagos agreement, arguing that transferring the territory to Mauritius would strengthen long-term security and prevent costly international litigation. The estimated financial implications of the deal are reported to be around £35 billion. Ministers have reaffirmed their intention to move forward with the legislation, emphasising that national security remains the overriding priority. However, officials have privately acknowledged that the arrangement is unlikely to proceed without US consent, describing the current diplomatic climate as challenging.

US support for the Chagos Islands deal falters after the United Kingdom hesitates to allow American use of British bases in potential strikes on Iran

Iran’s atomic energy chief Mohammad Eslami on Thursday (Feb 19) said that no nation can deprive Tehran of its right to nuclear enrichment. His remarks come after US President Donald Trump once again threatened the Islamic Republic with military action following indirect nuclear talks in Geneva.“The basis of the nuclear industry is enrichment. Whatever you want to do in the nuclear process, you need nuclear fuel,” said Eslami, in a video published by Etemad daily. “Iran’s nuclear programme is proceeding according to the rules of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and no country can deprive Iran of the right to peacefully benefit from this technology.”The remarks come after a second round of negotiations mediated by Oman was held between Iran and the United States in Geneva on Tuesday (Feb 17). The talks followed an initial round of discussions held in Oman on February 6 after talks collapsed when Israel launched strikes on Iran. The US also joined the brief military escalation targeting Tehran’s nuclear facilities.On Wednesday (Feb 18), Trump warned the British against giving up sovereignty over the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean, saying that the Diego Garcia airbase might be needed to “eradicate a potential attack” by Iran.“Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime — An attack that would potentially be made on the United Kingdom, as well as other friendly Countries,” he wrote on his Truth Social platform.Meanwhile, CNN reported that amid the US military build-up in the Middle East, the White House has been briefed that the American forces could be ready for an attack by the weekend, but Trump has yet to make a final decision to authorise such military action on Iran.&nbsp;

Iran’s atomic chief Mohammad Eslami said Tehran cannot be denied its right to nuclear enrichment amid renewed US threats. Trump warned of possible military action as tensions escalate.

Iran’s atomic energy chief Mohammad Eslami on Thursday (Feb 19) said that no nation can deprive Tehran of its right to nuclear enrichment. His remarks come after US President Donald Trump once again threatened the Islamic Republic with military action following indirect nuclear talks in Geneva. “The basis of the nuclear industry is enrichment. Whatever you want to do in the nuclear process, you need nuclear fuel,” said Eslami, in a video published by Etemad daily. “Iran’s nuclear programme is proceeding according to the rules of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and no country can deprive Iran of the right to peacefully benefit from this technology.” The remarks come after a second round of negotiations mediated by Oman was held between Iran and the United States in Geneva on Tuesday (Feb 17). The talks followed an initial round of discussions held in Oman on February 6 after talks collapsed when Israel launched strikes on Iran. The US also joined the brief military escalation targeting Tehran’s nuclear facilities. On Wednesday (Feb 18), Trump warned the British against giving up sovereignty over the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean, saying that the Diego Garcia airbase might be needed to “eradicate a potential attack” by Iran. “Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime — An attack that would potentially be made on the United Kingdom, as well as other friendly Countries,” he wrote on his Truth Social platform. Meanwhile, CNN reported that amid the US military build-up in the Middle East, the White House has been briefed that the American forces could be ready for an attack by the weekend, but Trump has yet to make a final decision to authorise such military action on Iran.

Iran’s atomic chief Mohammad Eslami said Tehran cannot be denied its right to nuclear enrichment amid renewed US threats. Trump warned of possible military action as tensions escalate.

‘No country can deprive Iran’: Tehran’s atomic energy chief reiterates nuclear enrichment rights amid tensions with US

The US military is reportedly prepared to launch strikes on Iran as early as this weekend, as tensions rise between Washington and Tehran amid the US President’s repeated threats. This comes amid a significant US military buildup in the Middle East as the Iranian side claims “good progress” was made in the indirect nuclear talks with the United States in Geneva on Tuesday (Feb 17).According to a CNN report, citing sources familiar with the matter, the White House has been briefed that the American forces could be ready for an attack by the weekend, but Trump has yet to make a final decision to authorise such military action on Iran. One source warned that Trump has privately argued both for and against a military action and polled advisors and allies to decide the best course of action against Tehran.On Wednesday (Feb 18), top administration security officials met in the White House Situation Room to discuss the situation, a person familiar with the meeting told CNN. Trump was also briefed by special envoy Steve Witkoff and advisor Jared Kushner about the indirect talks held a day earlier. It was not clear whether Trump would make a decision by this weekend.The development was first reported by CBS News, which reported that the Pentagon is moving some of its personnel temporarily out of the Middle East ahead of a potential attack or counterattacks by Iran if the US goes ahead with its operation against Tehran.Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in about two weeks for discussions.<h2>‘Iran would be very wise to make a deal’</h2>During a press briefing on Wednesday (Feb 18), White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt warned Iran that it would be “very wise” to make a deal with Trump and his administration.Leavitt said that there are “many reasons and arguments that one could make for a strike against Iran”, but diplomacy is always the first option for the US president. She added that the administration had “a very successful operation in June that targeted Iran's nuclear facilities” and declined to discuss whether a potential atack on Iran would be coordinated with Israel.“Iran would be very wise to make a deal with President Trump and with his administration,” she said.

The US may strike Iran as early as this weekend amid rising tensions, as per reports. Trump has not made a final decision, while the White House urges Tehran to make a nuclear deal.

The US military is reportedly prepared to launch strikes on Iran as early as this weekend, as tensions rise between Washington and Tehran amid the US President’s repeated threats. This comes amid a significant US military buildup in the Middle East as the Iranian side claims “good progress” was made in the indirect nuclear talks with the United States in Geneva on Tuesday (Feb 17). According to a CNN report, citing sources familiar with the matter, the White House has been briefed that the American forces could be ready for an attack by the weekend, but Trump has yet to make a final decision to authorise such military action on Iran. One source warned that Trump has privately argued both for and against a military action and polled advisors and allies to decide the best course of action against Tehran. On Wednesday (Feb 18), top administration security officials met in the White House Situation Room to discuss the situation, a person familiar with the meeting told CNN. Trump was also briefed by special envoy Steve Witkoff and advisor Jared Kushner about the indirect talks held a day earlier. It was not clear whether Trump would make a decision by this weekend. The development was first reported by CBS News, which reported that the Pentagon is moving some of its personnel temporarily out of the Middle East ahead of a potential attack or counterattacks by Iran if the US goes ahead with its operation against Tehran. Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in about two weeks for discussions. ‘Iran would be very wise to make a deal’ During a press briefing on Wednesday (Feb 18), White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt warned Iran that it would be “very wise” to make a deal with Trump and his administration. Leavitt said that there are “many reasons and arguments that one could make for a strike against Iran”, but diplomacy is always the first option for the US president. She added that the administration had “a very successful operation in June that targeted Iran's nuclear facilities” and declined to discuss whether a potential atack on Iran would be coordinated with Israel. “Iran would be very wise to make a deal with President Trump and with his administration,” she said.

The US may strike Iran as early as this weekend amid rising tensions, as per reports. Trump has not made a final decision, while the White House urges Tehran to make a nuclear deal.

US to attack Iran this weekend? Report claims military is prepared but Trump…

The S-400 is a highly computerised system. Operation Silicon Siege reportedly involves using AI to identify "Zero-Day" vulnerabilities in the system’s firmware. 

'Operation Silicon Siege': How Trump could use AI against Iran to take out S-400 defence system

According to a report in Axios, the Trump administration may be closer to launching a major military conflict in the Middle East than much of the American public realises, and such action could start soon. The report says that any US strike on Iran would likely extend far beyond a limited operation. Sources cited say it would resemble a sustained, weeks-long military campaign rather than a short, targeted strike like the one conducted in Venezuela last month.&nbsp;Per the report, officials expect any action to involve close coordination with Israel. Sources describe the potential campaign as broader and more threatening to Iran’s leadership than the 12-day conflict led by Israel last June, which the US later joined to strike Iran’s underground nuclear sites. The report emphasizes that a war of this scale would reverberate across the Middle East and shape the remainder of President Donald Trump’s time in office. Despite the stakes, it notes that there has been limited public discussion, with Congress and the public focused elsewhere.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-to-play-a-part-in-us-iran-nuclear-issue-kremlin-says-it-s-ready-to-take-tehran-s-enriched-uranium-1771416813337">Russia to play a part in US-Iran nuclear issue? Kremlin says it’s ready to take Tehran’s enriched uranium</a>&nbsp;According to the report’s breakdown, Trump nearly authorized strikes in early January following the Iranian regime’s deadly crackdown on protesters. When that moment passed, the administration pivoted to what the report describes as a dual strategy: continuing nuclear negotiations while simultaneously building up US military forces in the region. By assembling significant military assets while talks proceed, the report says, the administration has increased expectations that failure at the negotiating table would be followed by decisive military action. Sources cited indicate that prospects for a deal currently appear dim.&nbsp;The report highlights that Trump advisers Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff met in Geneva with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi for three hours on Tuesday. While both sides publicly characterized the meeting as productive, US officials reportedly remain skeptical that core differences can be resolved. Vice President JD Vance said in an interview, as cited in the report, that the discussions were positive in certain respects but made clear that Iran has yet to accept the president’s key conditions. Vance also indicated that Trump could conclude diplomacy has run its course if progress stalls.&nbsp;On the military front, the report describes a substantial US buildup: two aircraft carriers, approximately a dozen warships, hundreds of fighter aircraft, and multiple air defense systems either deployed or en route. It also notes that more than 150 U.S. cargo flights have transported weapons and ammunition to the region, with an additional 50 fighter jets, including F-35s, F-22s, and F-16s, recently dispatched.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-capitol-security-breach-man-detained-after-approaching-capitol-carrying-a-loaded-shotgun-1771412398300/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-capitol-security-breach-man-detained-after-approaching-capitol-carrying-a-loaded-shotgun-1771412398300/embed</a>&nbsp;The report suggests that the prolonged standoff may have dulled public awareness, even as the risk of large-scale conflict increases. Sources argue that the scale of military deployments and the administration’s rhetoric would make it difficult for Trump to step back absent significant Iranian concessions on its nuclear program. Advisers quoted in the report insist the buildup is not intended as a bluff.&nbsp;Regarding timing, the report says Israeli officials are preparing for a possible conflict within days and are advocating for an expansive campaign that could target not only Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities but potentially the regime itself. Some US sources, however, believe action could still be weeks away.&nbsp;&nbsp;The report also notes that US officials have given Iran a two-week window to present a detailed proposal following the latest round of talks. It draws a parallel to last June, when a similar two-week deadline preceded Trump’s decision to authorize Operation Midnight Hammer just days later.

'Boss is getting fed up': Trump closer to war with Iran, which could start soon, claims report 

According to a report in Axios, the Trump administration may be closer to launching a major military conflict in the Middle East than much of the American public realises, and such action could start soon. The report says that any US strike on Iran would likely extend far beyond a limited operation. Sources cited say it would resemble a sustained, weeks-long military campaign rather than a short, targeted strike like the one conducted in Venezuela last month. Per the report, officials expect any action to involve close coordination with Israel. Sources describe the potential campaign as broader and more threatening to Iran’s leadership than the 12-day conflict led by Israel last June, which the US later joined to strike Iran’s underground nuclear sites. The report emphasizes that a war of this scale would reverberate across the Middle East and shape the remainder of President Donald Trump’s time in office. Despite the stakes, it notes that there has been limited public discussion, with Congress and the public focused elsewhere. Also Read: Russia to play a part in US-Iran nuclear issue? Kremlin says it’s ready to take Tehran’s enriched uranium According to the report’s breakdown, Trump nearly authorized strikes in early January following the Iranian regime’s deadly crackdown on protesters. When that moment passed, the administration pivoted to what the report describes as a dual strategy: continuing nuclear negotiations while simultaneously building up US military forces in the region. By assembling significant military assets while talks proceed, the report says, the administration has increased expectations that failure at the negotiating table would be followed by decisive military action. Sources cited indicate that prospects for a deal currently appear dim. The report highlights that Trump advisers Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff met in Geneva with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi for three hours on Tuesday. While both sides publicly characterized the meeting as productive, US officials reportedly remain skeptical that core differences can be resolved. Vice President JD Vance said in an interview, as cited in the report, that the discussions were positive in certain respects but made clear that Iran has yet to accept the president’s key conditions. Vance also indicated that Trump could conclude diplomacy has run its course if progress stalls. On the military front, the report describes a substantial US buildup: two aircraft carriers, approximately a dozen warships, hundreds of fighter aircraft, and multiple air defense systems either deployed or en route. It also notes that more than 150 U.S. cargo flights have transported weapons and ammunition to the region, with an additional 50 fighter jets, including F-35s, F-22s, and F-16s, recently dispatched. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-capitol-security-breach-man-detained-after-approaching-capitol-carrying-a-loaded-shotgun-1771412398300/embed The report suggests that the prolonged standoff may have dulled public awareness, even as the risk of large-scale conflict increases. Sources argue that the scale of military deployments and the administration’s rhetoric would make it difficult for Trump to step back absent significant Iranian concessions on its nuclear program. Advisers quoted in the report insist the buildup is not intended as a bluff. Regarding timing, the report says Israeli officials are preparing for a possible conflict within days and are advocating for an expansive campaign that could target not only Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities but potentially the regime itself. Some US sources, however, believe action could still be weeks away. The report also notes that US officials have given Iran a two-week window to present a detailed proposal following the latest round of talks. It draws a parallel to last June, when a similar two-week deadline preceded Trump’s decision to authorize Operation Midnight Hammer just days later.

According to report, Trump may soon launch a major US-Israel military action against Iran as talks falter and regional forces rapidly build up

'Boss is getting fed up': Trump closer to war with Iran, which could start soon, claims report

President Donald Trump has made it clear: time is running out for Tehran. While indirect talks continue in Geneva and Oman, the White House has signaled that the window for "strategic submission" is closing.

'War is coming': 7 ways Trump could strike Iran in 2026

Iran on Tuesday (Feb 17) said that Washington and Tehran have reached an understanding after the vital US-Iran talks in Geneva. However, US President Donald Trump's second-in-command, Vice President JD Vance, claims that Iran has yet to acknowledge the United States' "red lines". This comes as Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called the Geneva talks "more constructive" than the previous round earlier this month.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-ahead-of-us-iran-talks-in-geneva-warns-iran-of-consequences-if-nuclear-deal-fails-what-bout-uss-abraham-lincoln-1771295379775">Trump, ahead of US-Iran talks in Geneva, warns Tehran of 'consequences' if nuclear deal fails</a><h2>Vance slams Iran over 'red lines'</h2>Talking to Fox News, Vance categorised the talks as productive, saying, " In some ways, it went well; they agreed to meet afterwards." However, he insisted that the Iranians did not seem willing to fall in line with POTUS Trump's terms. "But in other ways, it was very clear that the president has set some red lines that the Iranians are not yet willing to actually acknowledge and work through," said the US Vice President while appearing on "The Story with Martha MacCallum" programme.Vance said that while the US will "keep working on it," Trump has the discretion to decide the "natural end" of the diplomatic efforts, hinting at possible military intervention, which the POTUS had warned about in recent days. "We're going to keep on working it. But of course, the president reserves the ability to say when he thinks that diplomacy has reached its natural end," Vance said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-denies-link-to-three-oil-tankers-seized-by-india-near-mumbai-in-smuggling-probe-exclusive-economic-zone-stellar-ruby-asphalt-star-and-al-jafzia-1771292133669">Iran denies link to three oil tankers seized by India near Mumbai in smuggling probe</a><h2>What did Iran say about the talks?</h2>Following the Omani-mediated talks, which were aimed at averting the possibility of US military intervention to curb Iran's nuclear programme, Iran's foreign minister told the state television that "Ultimately, we were able to reach broad agreement on a set of guiding principles, based on which we will move forward and begin working on the text of a potential agreement".He claimed that once both sides had come up with draft texts of an agreement to avert conflict, "the drafts would be exchanged and a date for a third round (of talks) would be set". &nbsp;

After Geneva talks, Tehran claimed a “broad agreement” on guiding principles for a deal had been reached; however, US Vice President JD Vance says Iran still refuses to acknowledge Washington’s ‘red lines,’ keeping tensions and military threats in play.

Iran on Tuesday (Feb 17) said that Washington and Tehran have reached an understanding after the vital US-Iran talks in Geneva. However, US President Donald Trump's second-in-command, Vice President JD Vance, claims that Iran has yet to acknowledge the United States' "red lines". This comes as Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called the Geneva talks "more constructive" than the previous round earlier this month. Also read | Trump, ahead of US-Iran talks in Geneva, warns Tehran of 'consequences' if nuclear deal fails Vance slams Iran over 'red lines' Talking to Fox News, Vance categorised the talks as productive, saying, " In some ways, it went well; they agreed to meet afterwards." However, he insisted that the Iranians did not seem willing to fall in line with POTUS Trump's terms. "But in other ways, it was very clear that the president has set some red lines that the Iranians are not yet willing to actually acknowledge and work through," said the US Vice President while appearing on "The Story with Martha MacCallum" programme. Vance said that while the US will "keep working on it," Trump has the discretion to decide the "natural end" of the diplomatic efforts, hinting at possible military intervention, which the POTUS had warned about in recent days. "We're going to keep on working it. But of course, the president reserves the ability to say when he thinks that diplomacy has reached its natural end," Vance said. Also read | Iran denies link to three oil tankers seized by India near Mumbai in smuggling probe What did Iran say about the talks? Following the Omani-mediated talks, which were aimed at averting the possibility of US military intervention to curb Iran's nuclear programme, Iran's foreign minister told the state television that "Ultimately, we were able to reach broad agreement on a set of guiding principles, based on which we will move forward and begin working on the text of a potential agreement". He claimed that once both sides had come up with draft texts of an agreement to avert conflict, "the drafts would be exchanged and a date for a third round (of talks) would be set".

After Geneva talks, Tehran claimed a “broad agreement” on guiding principles for a deal had been reached; however, US Vice President JD Vance says Iran still refuses to acknowledge Washington’s ‘red lines,’ keeping tensions and military threats in play.

Iran claims breakthrough in Geneva talks, Vance says Tehran ignoring Trump's 'red lines'

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that any prospective deal between the United States and Iran over its nuclear program must go beyond pausing uranium enrichment and instead mandate the full dismantling of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, including removing enriched material and eliminating enrichment capabilities. His statement adds pressure to negotiations as diplomats from both sides prepare for the next round of talks.

US-Iran Talk: Netanyahu Demands All Uranium Leave Iran Ahead Geneva Talks

The US previously struck Iran’s nuclear facilities during operations in 2025, and now two aircraft carriers, USS Gerald R. Ford and USS Abraham Lincoln, along with guided-missile destroyers, fighter jets and surveillance aircraft, are being positioned in and around Middle East waters.

Radar blackout over Tehran? How EA-18G Growlers on USS Abraham Lincoln and Gerald R. Ford could blind Iran’s military

US President Donald Trump said Friday that a change of government in Iran would be the "best thing that could happen," as he sent a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East to ratchet up military pressure on the Islamic Republic.Trump's comments were his most overt call yet for the toppling of Iran's clerical establishment, and came as he pushes on Washington's arch-foe Tehran to make a deal to limit its nuclear program.At the same time, the exiled son of the Iranian shah, toppled in the 1979 Islamic revolution, renewed his calls for international intervention following a bloody crackdown on protests by Tehran."Seems like that would be the best thing that could happen," Trump told reporters at the Fort Bragg military base in North Carolina when a journalist asked if he wanted "regime change" in Iran.Trump declined to say who he would want to take over in Iran from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but he added that "there are people."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nancy-guthrie-kidnapping-police-detain-at-least-three-people-as-search-for-savannah-guthrie-s-mother-continues-for-13th-day-1771046319379">Nancy Guthrie kidnapping: Police detain at least three as search for Savannah Guthrie's mother continues for 13th day</a>He has previously backed off full-throated calls for a change of government in Iran, warning that it could cause chaos, although he has made threats towards Khamenei in the past.Speaking earlier at the White House, Trump said that the USS Gerald R. Ford -- the world's largest warship -- would be "leaving very soon" for the Middle East to up the pressure on Iran."In case we don't make a deal, we'll need it," Trump said.The giant vessel is currently in the Caribbean following the US overthrow of Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro. Another carrier, the USS Abraham Lincoln, is one of 12 US ships already in the Middle East.<h2>'Terribly difficult'&nbsp;</h2>When Iran began its crackdown on protests last month -- which rights groups say killed thousands -- Trump initially said that the United States was "locked and loaded" to help demonstrators.But he has recently focused his military threats on Tehran's nuclear program, which US forces struck last July during Israel's unprecedented 12-day war with Iran.The protests have subsided for now but US-based Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's last shah, urged international intervention to support the Iranian people."We are asking for a humanitarian intervention to prevent more innocent lives being killed in the process," he told the Munich Security Conference.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/nikhil-gupta-pleads-guilty-to-khalistani-leader-gurpatwant-singh-pannun-murder-for-hire-case-1771043208912">Nikhil Gupta pleads guilty to Khalistani leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun murder-for-hire case</a>It followed a call by the opposition leader, who has not returned to his country since before the revolution, for Iranians at home and abroad to continue demonstrations this weekend.Videos verified by AFP showed people in Iran this week chanting anti-government slogans as the clerical leadership celebrated the anniversary of the Islamic revolution.Iran and the United States, who have had no diplomatic relations since shortly after the revolution, held talks on the nuclear issue last week in Oman. No dates have been set for new talks yet.The West fears the program is aimed at making a bomb, which Tehran denies.The head of the UN nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said Friday that reaching an accord with Iran on inspections of its processing facilities was possible but "terribly difficult."<h2>Reformists released</h2>Trump said after talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this week that he wanted to continue talks with Iran, defying pressure from his key ally for a tougher stance.The Israeli prime minister himself expressed skepticism at the quality of any agreement if it didn't also cover Iran's ballistic missiles and support for regional proxies.According to the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, 7,008 people, mostly protesters, were killed in the recent crackdown, although rights groups warn the toll is likely far higher.More than 53,000 people have also been arrested, it added.The Norway-based Iran Human Rights (IHR) NGO said "hundreds" of people were facing charges linked to the protests that could see them sentenced to death.Figures working within the Iranian system have also been arrested, with three politicians detained this week from the so-called reformist wing of Iranian politics supportive of President Masoud Pezeshkian.The three -- Azar Mansouri, Javad Emam and Ebrahim Asgharzadeh -- were released on bail Thursday and Friday, their lawyer Hojjat Kermani told the ISNA news agency.&nbsp;

Trump's comments were his most overt call yet for the toppling of Iran's clerical establishment, and came as he pushes on Washington's arch-foe Tehran to make a deal to limit its nuclear program.

US President Donald Trump said Friday that a change of government in Iran would be the "best thing that could happen," as he sent a second aircraft carrier to the Middle East to ratchet up military pressure on the Islamic Republic. Trump's comments were his most overt call yet for the toppling of Iran's clerical establishment, and came as he pushes on Washington's arch-foe Tehran to make a deal to limit its nuclear program. At the same time, the exiled son of the Iranian shah, toppled in the 1979 Islamic revolution, renewed his calls for international intervention following a bloody crackdown on protests by Tehran. "Seems like that would be the best thing that could happen," Trump told reporters at the Fort Bragg military base in North Carolina when a journalist asked if he wanted "regime change" in Iran. Trump declined to say who he would want to take over in Iran from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but he added that "there are people." Also read | Nancy Guthrie kidnapping: Police detain at least three as search for Savannah Guthrie's mother continues for 13th day He has previously backed off full-throated calls for a change of government in Iran, warning that it could cause chaos, although he has made threats towards Khamenei in the past. Speaking earlier at the White House, Trump said that the USS Gerald R. Ford -- the world's largest warship -- would be "leaving very soon" for the Middle East to up the pressure on Iran. "In case we don't make a deal, we'll need it," Trump said. The giant vessel is currently in the Caribbean following the US overthrow of Venezuela's Nicolas Maduro. Another carrier, the USS Abraham Lincoln, is one of 12 US ships already in the Middle East. 'Terribly difficult' When Iran began its crackdown on protests last month -- which rights groups say killed thousands -- Trump initially said that the United States was "locked and loaded" to help demonstrators. But he has recently focused his military threats on Tehran's nuclear program, which US forces struck last July during Israel's unprecedented 12-day war with Iran. The protests have subsided for now but US-based Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's last shah, urged international intervention to support the Iranian people. "We are asking for a humanitarian intervention to prevent more innocent lives being killed in the process," he told the Munich Security Conference. Also read | Nikhil Gupta pleads guilty to Khalistani leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannun murder-for-hire case It followed a call by the opposition leader, who has not returned to his country since before the revolution, for Iranians at home and abroad to continue demonstrations this weekend. Videos verified by AFP showed people in Iran this week chanting anti-government slogans as the clerical leadership celebrated the anniversary of the Islamic revolution. Iran and the United States, who have had no diplomatic relations since shortly after the revolution, held talks on the nuclear issue last week in Oman. No dates have been set for new talks yet. The West fears the program is aimed at making a bomb, which Tehran denies. The head of the UN nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said Friday that reaching an accord with Iran on inspections of its processing facilities was possible but "terribly difficult." Reformists released Trump said after talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu earlier this week that he wanted to continue talks with Iran, defying pressure from his key ally for a tougher stance. The Israeli prime minister himself expressed skepticism at the quality of any agreement if it didn't also cover Iran's ballistic missiles and support for regional proxies. According to the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, 7,008 people, mostly protesters, were killed in the recent crackdown, although rights groups warn the toll is likely far higher. More than 53,000 people have also been arrested, it added. The Norway-based Iran Human Rights (IHR) NGO said "hundreds" of people were facing charges linked to the protests that could see them sentenced to death. Figures working within the Iranian system have also been arrested, with three politicians detained this week from the so-called reformist wing of Iranian politics supportive of President Masoud Pezeshkian. The three -- Azar Mansouri, Javad Emam and Ebrahim Asgharzadeh -- were released on bail Thursday and Friday, their lawyer Hojjat Kermani told the ISNA news agency.

Trump's comments were his most overt call yet for the toppling of Iran's clerical establishment, and came as he pushes on Washington's arch-foe Tehran to make a deal to limit its nuclear program.

Trump says regime change in Iran would be 'best thing,' sends second aircraft carrier to region

The US commands superior cyber resources and budget, while Iran relies on asymmetric tactics and proxies. A direct conflict would see American military dominance but significant economic damage from Iranian disruptors.

Who would win? Comparing the cyber power of the US and Iran in case of a war

Major General Amir Hatami is the current Commander-in-Chief of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army (Artesh), having assumed the role in June 2025 following a major reshuffle of Iran’s military leadership. A veteran of the Iran-Iraq war and former Defence Minister.

Who is Iran’s army chief, Major General Amir Hatami?

US President Trump relies on the B-2 Spirit for strikes on Iran because it is the only aircraft that can carry the 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker buster. Its stealth technology allows it to go into enemy airspace undetected, as proven during the 2025 strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Why Trump relies more on the B-2 bomber for US strikes against Iran than any other aircraft

US President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order threatening tariffs on Iran's trade partners, after he pledged a further round of talks with Tehran next week.The order, effective from Saturday, called for a fresh "imposition of tariffs" on countries still doing business with Iran.It comes amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran, with an American naval group led by an aircraft carrier in Middle Eastern waters and indirect talks held on Tehran's nuclear program in Oman on Friday.The levies "may be imposed on goods imported into the United States that are products of any country that directly or indirectly purchases, imports, or otherwise acquires any goods or services from Iran", the order said.Trump issued a threat of 25 per cent tariffs on any country trading with Iran last month.This order establishes a process for the administration to impose tariffs on goods from those countries.The rate is to be determined by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, although the order specifies that it could be "for example" 25 per cent, the level first mentioned by the US president in mid-January.Tariffs would affect trade with a number of countries, including Russia, Germany, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.More than a quarter of Iran's trade is with China, with $18 billion in imports and $14.5 billion in exports in 2024, according to World Trade Organization data.The talks on Friday in Muscat, mediated by Oman, were the first between the two foes since the United States joined Israel's war with Iran in June with strikes on nuclear sites."We likewise had very good talks on Iran," Trump told reporters on board Air Force One en route to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, adding, "we're going to meet again early next week."Diplomatic relations between Iran and the US broke down with the 1979 Islamic Revolution that brought the current government into power after hostages were taken at the US embassy in Tehran for 444 days.Direct engagement has been rare in the decades since.Iran remains under an internet blackout amid a harsh government crackdown on economic protests that began in December across the country.The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) said Friday it has confirmed 6,505 protesters were killed, as well as 214 members of the security forces and 61 bystanders.

Iran remains under an internet blackout amid a harsh government crackdown on economic protests that began in December across the country.

US President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order threatening tariffs on Iran's trade partners, after he pledged a further round of talks with Tehran next week. The order, effective from Saturday, called for a fresh "imposition of tariffs" on countries still doing business with Iran. It comes amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran, with an American naval group led by an aircraft carrier in Middle Eastern waters and indirect talks held on Tehran's nuclear program in Oman on Friday. The levies "may be imposed on goods imported into the United States that are products of any country that directly or indirectly purchases, imports, or otherwise acquires any goods or services from Iran", the order said. Trump issued a threat of 25 per cent tariffs on any country trading with Iran last month. This order establishes a process for the administration to impose tariffs on goods from those countries. The rate is to be determined by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, although the order specifies that it could be "for example" 25 per cent, the level first mentioned by the US president in mid-January. Tariffs would affect trade with a number of countries, including Russia, Germany, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates. More than a quarter of Iran's trade is with China, with $18 billion in imports and $14.5 billion in exports in 2024, according to World Trade Organization data. The talks on Friday in Muscat, mediated by Oman, were the first between the two foes since the United States joined Israel's war with Iran in June with strikes on nuclear sites. "We likewise had very good talks on Iran," Trump told reporters on board Air Force One en route to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, adding, "we're going to meet again early next week." Diplomatic relations between Iran and the US broke down with the 1979 Islamic Revolution that brought the current government into power after hostages were taken at the US embassy in Tehran for 444 days. Direct engagement has been rare in the decades since. Iran remains under an internet blackout amid a harsh government crackdown on economic protests that began in December across the country. The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) said Friday it has confirmed 6,505 protesters were killed, as well as 214 members of the security forces and 61 bystanders.

Iran remains under an internet blackout amid a harsh government crackdown on economic protests that began in December across the country.

Trump signs executive order imposing tariffs on Iran's trade partners

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Feb 6) said that his team held "very good talks" with the Iranians during an indirect dialogue in Oman. The POTUS also said that the two sides would meet again early next week." This comes even as America announced fresh sanctions aimed at curbing Iran's oil exports.<h2>'Very good talks'</h2>Talking to reporters onboard the Air Force One en route to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, Trump said, "We likewise had very good talks on Iran.""We're going to meet again early next week," he said. However, he ominously added that Iran will face "very steep" consequences without a deal. "If they don't make a deal, the consequences are very steep." Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-hopefully-we-won-t-have-to-use-it-trump-confirms-very-big-very-powerful-ships-heading-to-iran-1769735829348">‘Hopefully we won’t have to use it’: Trump confirms ‘very big, very powerful ships’ heading to Iran</a> Meanwhile, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who led Tehran's delegation, said that the talks "focused exclusively" on the Iranian nuclear programme. This programme, the West believes, is aimed at making an atomic bomb. However, Iran counters and insists it is peaceful."In a very positive atmosphere, our arguments were exchanged, and the views of the other side were shared with us," Araghchi told Iranian state TV. He noted that the two sides had "agreed to continue negotiations."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/epstein-files-trump-andrew-clinton-and-more-the-11-prominent-names-listed-in-fbi-presentation-for-alleged-abuse-of-minors-1770354719231">Epstein Files: Trump, Andrew, Clinton and more - The 11 'prominent names' listed in FBI presentation for alleged abuse of minors</a><h2>Iran won't give up on enriching uranium</h2>Talking to Reuters, a regional diplomat briefed by Iran on Friday said insisted that the Islamic Republic would not budge on its right to enrich uranium inside Iran. However, the nation was willing to discuss the "level and purity" of enrichment or a regional consortium, said the diplomat adding that Tehran believed the US negotiators "seemed to understand Iran’s stance on the enrichment … and they showed flexibility about Tehran’s demands."

US President Donald Trump said the United States held “very good talks” with Iran during indirect negotiations in Oman and confirmed that both sides plan to meet again early next week. However, he also issued an ominous warning.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Feb 6) said that his team held "very good talks" with the Iranians during an indirect dialogue in Oman. The POTUS also said that the two sides would meet again early next week." This comes even as America announced fresh sanctions aimed at curbing Iran's oil exports. 'Very good talks' Talking to reporters onboard the Air Force One en route to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, Trump said, "We likewise had very good talks on Iran." "We're going to meet again early next week," he said. However, he ominously added that Iran will face "very steep" consequences without a deal. "If they don't make a deal, the consequences are very steep." Also read | ‘Hopefully we won’t have to use it’: Trump confirms ‘very big, very powerful ships’ heading to Iran Meanwhile, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who led Tehran's delegation, said that the talks "focused exclusively" on the Iranian nuclear programme. This programme, the West believes, is aimed at making an atomic bomb. However, Iran counters and insists it is peaceful. "In a very positive atmosphere, our arguments were exchanged, and the views of the other side were shared with us," Araghchi told Iranian state TV. He noted that the two sides had "agreed to continue negotiations." Also read | Epstein Files: Trump, Andrew, Clinton and more - The 11 'prominent names' listed in FBI presentation for alleged abuse of minors Iran won't give up on enriching uranium Talking to Reuters, a regional diplomat briefed by Iran on Friday said insisted that the Islamic Republic would not budge on its right to enrich uranium inside Iran. However, the nation was willing to discuss the "level and purity" of enrichment or a regional consortium, said the diplomat adding that Tehran believed the US negotiators "seemed to understand Iran’s stance on the enrichment … and they showed flexibility about Tehran’s demands."

US President Donald Trump said the United States held “very good talks” with Iran during indirect negotiations in Oman and confirmed that both sides plan to meet again early next week. However, he also issued an ominous warning.

Trump signals progress in Iran talks but ominously warns of 'steep' consequences

Iranian army chief Amir Hatami on Saturday (Jan 31) warned the United States and Israel against an attack on the Islamic Republic, saying that the country’s forces are on high alert after Washington deployed heavy military forces in the Gulf. He added that his country’s nuclear technology “cannot be eliminated” after US President Donald Trump said that he expected Iran to seek a deal to avoid an attack by American forces. This comes amid heightened tensions between the US and Iran after Trump deployed an “armada” in the Gulf.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/key-takeaways-from-latest-batch-of-epstein-file-dump-mentions-of-trump-musk-and-more-1769849456585">Key takeaways from latest batch of Epstein file dump: Mentions of Trump, Musk and more</a>“If the enemy makes a mistake, without a doubt it will endanger its own security, the security of the region, and the security of the Zionist regime,” said Hatami as per the official IRNA news agency. He added that Iran’s armed forces were “at full defensive and military readiness.”Hatami further said, “The nuclear science and technology of the Islamic Republic of Iran cannot be eliminated, even if scientists and sons of this nation are martyred.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/epstein-file-containing-trump-s-name-mysteriously-disappears-then-reappears-what-doj-said-1769836852561">Epstein file containing Trump’s name mysteriously disappears, then reappears – What DOJ said</a>Earlier on Friday (Jan 30), Trump warned Tehran of finalising a deal, or he will be sending a “larger number of ships to Iran”.“We’re now sending actually a larger number of ships to Iran,” Trump said, adding that his preference remained a peaceful accord. “Hopefully, we’ll make a deal.”“We have a large armada, flotilla, call it whatever you want, heading toward Iran right now,” Trump said, referring to an American naval carrier group in waters off Iran. “Hopefully we’ll make a deal. If we do make a deal, that’s good. If we don’t make a deal, we’ll see what happens.”Watch | Iran-backed militias issue warnings across West Asia <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-backed-militias-issue-warnings-across-west-asia-1769848536835/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-backed-militias-issue-warnings-across-west-asia-1769848536835/embed</a>

Iran’s army chief Amir Hatami warned the US and Israel against attacking Iran, saying its forces are on high alert and nuclear technology cannot be eliminated despite military threats.

Iranian army chief Amir Hatami on Saturday (Jan 31) warned the United States and Israel against an attack on the Islamic Republic, saying that the country’s forces are on high alert after Washington deployed heavy military forces in the Gulf. He added that his country’s nuclear technology “cannot be eliminated” after US President Donald Trump said that he expected Iran to seek a deal to avoid an attack by American forces. This comes amid heightened tensions between the US and Iran after Trump deployed an “armada” in the Gulf. Also read | Key takeaways from latest batch of Epstein file dump: Mentions of Trump, Musk and more “If the enemy makes a mistake, without a doubt it will endanger its own security, the security of the region, and the security of the Zionist regime,” said Hatami as per the official IRNA news agency. He added that Iran’s armed forces were “at full defensive and military readiness.” Hatami further said, “The nuclear science and technology of the Islamic Republic of Iran cannot be eliminated, even if scientists and sons of this nation are martyred.” Also read | Epstein file containing Trump’s name mysteriously disappears, then reappears – What DOJ said Earlier on Friday (Jan 30), Trump warned Tehran of finalising a deal, or he will be sending a “larger number of ships to Iran”. “We’re now sending actually a larger number of ships to Iran,” Trump said, adding that his preference remained a peaceful accord. “Hopefully, we’ll make a deal.” “We have a large armada, flotilla, call it whatever you want, heading toward Iran right now,” Trump said, referring to an American naval carrier group in waters off Iran. “Hopefully we’ll make a deal. If we do make a deal, that’s good. If we don’t make a deal, we’ll see what happens.” Watch | Iran-backed militias issue warnings across West Asia https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-backed-militias-issue-warnings-across-west-asia-1769848536835/embed

Iran’s army chief Amir Hatami warned the US and Israel against attacking Iran, saying its forces are on high alert and nuclear technology cannot be eliminated despite military threats.

‘Nuclear technology cannot be eliminated’: Iran warns US, Israel against attack

Spare a thought for the courageous Iranians who braved their brutal government in the belief that US President Donald Trump meant it when he issued a social media post saying that HELP IS ON THE WAY.Issued on January 13 after two nights of some of the largest anti-government protests in Iranian history, the posting said:Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING — TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY. MIGA!!! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.The help would come, Trump said, unless government forces would stop killing protesters. But the killing continued. Estimates of the death toll range from 6,159 (from an Iranian Human Rights group) to more than 30,000 ( from TIME magazine.. The Iranian government put the toll at 3,117.Trump never clarified how long he thought it would take help to arrive. But it is easy to see why some Iranians thought it would be soon —in the form or air strikes or a special operations attack on the model of the daring attack on Caracas that resulted in the capture and abduction of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro just ten days before the “help is on the way” promise.What was on the way was what Trump called “a massive armada” –the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier accompanied by three guided missile destroyers. The strike group, part of America’s overwhelming military superiority, arrived in the Indian Ocean on January 26 within striking distance to possible targets in Iran.Killing demonstrators as a trigger for American action has disappeared from the White House vocabulary, which instead switched to long-standing American demands for Iranian policy changes.Though the demands have not been officially announced, American and European officials said they included an end to all enrichment of uranium, limits on the number and range of ballistic missiles and breaking links with the armed groups serving as proxies for the Tehran rulers. The groups include Lebanon-based Hezbollah and Gaza’s Hamas.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-hopefully-we-won-t-have-to-use-it-trump-confirms-very-big-very-powerful-ships-heading-to-iran-1769735829348">‘Hopefully we won’t have to use it’: Trump confirms ‘very big, very powerful ships’ heading to Iran</a>Trump drew parallels between the vast naval force assembled in the waters off Venezuela before Maduro was snatched and the new build-up in striking distance of Iran and urged its leaders to negotiate a deal on its nuclear programme. “Time is running out, it is truly of the essence,” he told reporters.One of the options under discussion by Trump and his closest aides, according to sources close to the White House, are air strikes on Iranian leaders and security forces to trigger another round of popular protests so widespread that the leadership of the regime would have to change.But the protest movement has been so cowed and weakened by the slaughter of thousands in recent days that it takes a large dose of optimism to consider it a possibility.While pondering the options, Washington has run into an unexpected obstacle: vocal opposition to a military strike from America’s closest allies in the region – Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Republic, Qatar and Oman. Saudi Arabia has ruled out the use of its airspace and territory for a U.S. attack. &nbsp;The reason is fear that Iran could retaliate with attacks on U.S. allies – and worries that chaos could ensue in Iran if the regime fell. &nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-warns-us-its-forces-have-fingers-on-the-trigger-astrump-threatens-tehran-with-major-destruction-1769650180755">Iran warns US its forces have ‘fingers on the trigger’ as Trump threatens Tehran with ‘major destruction’</a>Another outcome that is part of the considerations is direct attacks on U.S. installations. While Iran’s arsenal of ballistic missiles shrank during the 12-day war with Israel last year, it is thought to have enough left to hit most of the military bases the U.S. maintains in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.The biggest U.S. military institution in the Middle East is al Udeid airbase, which houses more than 10,000 Americans and is the headquarters of the U.S. Central Command, which coordinates air operations across Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan. As the prospect of war drew nearer, several hundred U.S. military have been evacuated from the base.One of the darkest scenarios for Iranian retaliation would be laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman. A critical global trade route, it carries about a fifth of liquefied natural gas exports and a quarter of oil worldwide. Mining that waterway would seriously damage the global economy.On the diplomatic front, Iran suffered a long-delayed blow from the European Union on Thursday (January 29); EU foreign ministers designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist organisation. Meeting in Brussels, the ministers also froze the assets and banned visas for 15 individuals.EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said the move was “long overdue”, a nod to Washington which designated the Revolutionary Guards a terrorist group in 2019. “Terrorist is indeed how you call a regime that crushes its own people’s protests in blood.”

While pondering the options, Washington has run into an unexpected obstacle: vocal opposition to a military strike from America’s closest allies in the region – Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Republic, Qatar and Oman. 

Spare a thought for the courageous Iranians who braved their brutal government in the belief that US President Donald Trump meant it when he issued a social media post saying that HELP IS ON THE WAY. Issued on January 13 after two nights of some of the largest anti-government protests in Iranian history, the posting said: Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING — TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY. MIGA!!! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. The help would come, Trump said, unless government forces would stop killing protesters. But the killing continued. Estimates of the death toll range from 6,159 (from an Iranian Human Rights group) to more than 30,000 ( from TIME magazine.. The Iranian government put the toll at 3,117. Trump never clarified how long he thought it would take help to arrive. But it is easy to see why some Iranians thought it would be soon —in the form or air strikes or a special operations attack on the model of the daring attack on Caracas that resulted in the capture and abduction of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro just ten days before the “help is on the way” promise. What was on the way was what Trump called “a massive armada” –the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier accompanied by three guided missile destroyers. The strike group, part of America’s overwhelming military superiority, arrived in the Indian Ocean on January 26 within striking distance to possible targets in Iran. Killing demonstrators as a trigger for American action has disappeared from the White House vocabulary, which instead switched to long-standing American demands for Iranian policy changes. Though the demands have not been officially announced, American and European officials said they included an end to all enrichment of uranium, limits on the number and range of ballistic missiles and breaking links with the armed groups serving as proxies for the Tehran rulers. The groups include Lebanon-based Hezbollah and Gaza’s Hamas. Also read | ‘Hopefully we won’t have to use it’: Trump confirms ‘very big, very powerful ships’ heading to Iran Trump drew parallels between the vast naval force assembled in the waters off Venezuela before Maduro was snatched and the new build-up in striking distance of Iran and urged its leaders to negotiate a deal on its nuclear programme. “Time is running out, it is truly of the essence,” he told reporters. One of the options under discussion by Trump and his closest aides, according to sources close to the White House, are air strikes on Iranian leaders and security forces to trigger another round of popular protests so widespread that the leadership of the regime would have to change. But the protest movement has been so cowed and weakened by the slaughter of thousands in recent days that it takes a large dose of optimism to consider it a possibility. While pondering the options, Washington has run into an unexpected obstacle: vocal opposition to a military strike from America’s closest allies in the region – Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Republic, Qatar and Oman. Saudi Arabia has ruled out the use of its airspace and territory for a U.S. attack. The reason is fear that Iran could retaliate with attacks on U.S. allies – and worries that chaos could ensue in Iran if the regime fell. Also read | Iran warns US its forces have ‘fingers on the trigger’ as Trump threatens Tehran with ‘major destruction’ Another outcome that is part of the considerations is direct attacks on U.S. installations. While Iran’s arsenal of ballistic missiles shrank during the 12-day war with Israel last year, it is thought to have enough left to hit most of the military bases the U.S. maintains in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The biggest U.S. military institution in the Middle East is al Udeid airbase, which houses more than 10,000 Americans and is the headquarters of the U.S. Central Command, which coordinates air operations across Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan. As the prospect of war drew nearer, several hundred U.S. military have been evacuated from the base. One of the darkest scenarios for Iranian retaliation would be laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman. A critical global trade route, it carries about a fifth of liquefied natural gas exports and a quarter of oil worldwide. Mining that waterway would seriously damage the global economy. On the diplomatic front, Iran suffered a long-delayed blow from the European Union on Thursday (January 29); EU foreign ministers designated Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps as a terrorist organisation. Meeting in Brussels, the ministers also froze the assets and banned visas for 15 individuals. EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said the move was “long overdue”, a nod to Washington which designated the Revolutionary Guards a terrorist group in 2019. “Terrorist is indeed how you call a regime that crushes its own people’s protests in blood.”

While pondering the options, Washington has run into an unexpected obstacle: vocal opposition to a military strike from America’s closest allies in the region – Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Republic, Qatar and Oman.&nbsp;

Trump’s Iran conundrum: Choosing between bad options

On Wednesday (January 28), US President Donald Trump issued a stern warning to Iran, saying a powerful naval force led by the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln was heading toward the country and urging Tehran to enter negotiations over its nuclear program. Posting on Truth Social, Trump wrote the fleet was larger than one previously deployed near Venezuela and said it was advancing rapidly “with great strength, energy, and purpose.” He warned that the armada was fully prepared to carry out its mission swiftly and forcefully if required.&nbsp;Trump said he wanted Iran to “come to the table” and reach what he called a fair agreement that would prevent it from obtaining nuclear weapons. He stressed that time was running short and described the situation as urgent. Recalling a previous clash, Trump referenced “Operation Midnight Hammer,” which he described as a devastating strike after Iran refused to negotiate. He cautioned that any future confrontation would be even more severe and urged Iranian leaders to avoid that outcome.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-casualties-deaths-ukraine-war-most-since-world-war-2-1769598128149">A generation lost: Russia's 1.2mn casualties in Ukraine war most for any country since World War 2</a><h2>See Donald Trump's Truth Social post below</h2>

<h2>US announces multi-day air drill amid Iran tensions</h2>On Tuesday (January 27), amid escalating tensions with Iran, the US military expanded its footprint in the Middle East, with US Central Command (CENTCOM) announcing a major air exercise. The Ninth Air Force, operating as Air Forces Central (AFCENT), said it has launched a multi-day readiness drill designed to demonstrate its ability to quickly deploy, disperse, and sustain air combat operations throughout CENTCOM’s area of responsibility. AFCENT said that the exercise aims to strengthen the dispersal of aircraft and personnel, enhance coordination with regional allies, and improve the execution of flexible response options in an evolving security environment.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/imran-khan-s-health-under-scrutiny-pti-warns-of-permanent-vision-loss-1769600139770/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/imran-khan-s-health-under-scrutiny-pti-warns-of-permanent-vision-loss-1769600139770/embed</a>

'Next attack will be far worse': Trump warns Iran of Armada in new social media threat

On Wednesday (January 28), US President Donald Trump issued a stern warning to Iran, saying a powerful naval force led by the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln was heading toward the country and urging Tehran to enter negotiations over its nuclear program. Posting on Truth Social, Trump wrote the fleet was larger than one previously deployed near Venezuela and said it was advancing rapidly “with great strength, energy, and purpose.” He warned that the armada was fully prepared to carry out its mission swiftly and forcefully if required. Trump said he wanted Iran to “come to the table” and reach what he called a fair agreement that would prevent it from obtaining nuclear weapons. He stressed that time was running short and described the situation as urgent. Recalling a previous clash, Trump referenced “Operation Midnight Hammer,” which he described as a devastating strike after Iran refused to negotiate. He cautioned that any future confrontation would be even more severe and urged Iranian leaders to avoid that outcome. Also Read: A generation lost: Russia's 1.2mn casualties in Ukraine war most for any country since World War 2 See Donald Trump's Truth Social post below

In his new Truth Social media post, US President Donald Trump has warned Iran, saying that a massive Armada is heading to Iran. It is moving quickly, with great power, enthusiasm, and purpose

us-iran

Us Iran, News on Us Iran, stories on Us Iran, articles on Us Iran, Us Iran stories at Wion, Us Iran news, Us Iran latest news

us iran

US Navy downplays USS Gerald R Ford's toilet problem as aircraft carrier arrives near Israel ahead of possible Iran strike

US-Iran Tensions: Iran Says Nuclear Deal Within Reach, Warns Any US Strike Considered Aggression

‘Last meal’ before Iran strike? US military’s lobster feast sparks war fears

Trump ordered Khamenei assassination? Here's what new report suggests

'32,000 people were killed during crackdown in Iran', says Donald Trump

Will US strike Iran? Trump sets deadline as Tehran warns of retaliation

UK refuses US request to use RAF bases for potential strikes on Iran

Iran’s atomic energy chief reiterates nuclear enrichment rights amid US tensions

US to attack Iran this weekend? Report claims military is prepared but Trump…

How Trump could use AI against Iran to take out S-400 defence system

'Boss is getting fed up': Trump closer to war with Iran, claims report

'War is coming': 7 ways Trump could strike Iran in 2026

Iran claims breakthrough in Geneva talks, Vance says Tehran ignoring 'red lines'

US-Iran Talk: Netanyahu Demands All Uranium Leave Iran Ahead Geneva Talks

How EA-18G Growlers on USS Abraham Lincoln & Ford could blind Iran’s military

Trump says regime change in Iran would be 'best thing'