The US could rely on air strikes, cyber attacks and economic blockades to neutralise Iran, avoiding a costly ground invasion and minimising troop risks.

The US could rely on air strikes, cyber attacks and economic blockades to neutralise Iran, avoiding a costly ground invasion and minimising troop risks.

Missiles, not troops: How the US can defeat Iran without invading or occupying

Does Iran have chemical weapons? The US accuses Tehran of developing pharmaceutical-based agents that target the central nervous system. These ‘silent’ weapons, potentially mountable on missiles or drones pose a threat arguably deadlier than conventional explosives.

Does Iran have chemical weapons? The US accuses Tehran of developing pharmaceutical-based agents that target the central nervous system. These ‘silent’ weapons, potentially mountable on missiles or drones pose a threat arguably deadlier than conventional explosives.

‘More deadly than missiles?’ Does Iran have chemical or unconventional weapons

The US Air Force holds a distinct technological edge with its vast stealth fleet, but Iran’s dense, mobile air defence network and mountainous terrain create a formidable challenge.

The US Air Force holds a distinct technological edge with its vast stealth fleet, but Iran’s dense, mobile air defence network and mountainous terrain create a formidable challenge.

Who has the edge? US air power versus Iran’s layered defence

The United States has started pulling troops out of strategic military installations in the Middle East as a preventive step amid rising regional instability, particularly tensions involving Iran, a US official told news agency Reuters. This move follows a warning issued by Tehran earlier on Wednesday (January 14), in which Iranian authorities said neighbouring countries hosting American forces would be targeted if the US launches an attack on Iran.&nbsp;Separately, news agency AFP reported that US personnel stationed at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar were instructed to leave the facility. Several troops were asked to depart by Wednesday evening, according to the report. Al Udeid is the largest US military base in the region. Iran’s warning came shortly after US President Donald Trump publicly urged Iranian demonstrators to continue protesting and to seize control of their institutions, a statement that fueled speculation about potential American involvement as Iran grapples with widespread unrest.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-us-needs-greenland-for-the-purpose-of-national-security-says-president-donald-trump-1768399881005">'Greenland vital for the Golden Dome we are building', says president Donald Trump</a>&nbsp;With regards to the media reports circulating about the departure of certain personnel from Al Udeid Air Base, the International Media Office of the State of Qatar issued a statement. It said, “With reference to circulating media reports regarding the departure of certain personnel from Al Udeid Air Base, the International Media Office (IMO) of the State of Qatar states that such measures are being undertaken in response to the current regional tensions.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/-india-urges-citizens-avoid-non-essential-iran-travel-1768402258768/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/-india-urges-citizens-avoid-non-essential-iran-travel-1768402258768/embed</a>&nbsp;“The IMO reaffirms that the State of Qatar continues to implement all necessary measures to safeguard the security and safety of its citizens and residents as a top priority, including actions related to the protection of critical infrastructure and military facilities. The IMO further notes that should any developments arise, it will be communicated through the official designated channels.”

US withdraws troops from important Middle East bases amid escalating tensions with Iran: Report

The United States has started pulling troops out of strategic military installations in the Middle East as a preventive step amid rising regional instability, particularly tensions involving Iran, a US official told news agency Reuters. This move follows a warning issued by Tehran earlier on Wednesday (January 14), in which Iranian authorities said neighbouring countries hosting American forces would be targeted if the US launches an attack on Iran. Separately, news agency AFP reported that US personnel stationed at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar were instructed to leave the facility. Several troops were asked to depart by Wednesday evening, according to the report. Al Udeid is the largest US military base in the region. Iran’s warning came shortly after US President Donald Trump publicly urged Iranian demonstrators to continue protesting and to seize control of their institutions, a statement that fueled speculation about potential American involvement as Iran grapples with widespread unrest. Also Read: 'Greenland vital for the Golden Dome we are building', says president Donald Trump With regards to the media reports circulating about the departure of certain personnel from Al Udeid Air Base, the International Media Office of the State of Qatar issued a statement. It said, “With reference to circulating media reports regarding the departure of certain personnel from Al Udeid Air Base, the International Media Office (IMO) of the State of Qatar states that such measures are being undertaken in response to the current regional tensions.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/-india-urges-citizens-avoid-non-essential-iran-travel-1768402258768/embed “The IMO reaffirms that the State of Qatar continues to implement all necessary measures to safeguard the security and safety of its citizens and residents as a top priority, including actions related to the protection of critical infrastructure and military facilities. The IMO further notes that should any developments arise, it will be communicated through the official designated channels.”

The US is reportedly withdrawing troops from key Middle East bases after Iran warned it would strike American facilities amid escalating tensions in the region

Israel uses a 6-layer air defence network including Iron Dome, David's Sling, Arrow 2, Arrow 3, C-Dome, and the new laser-based Iron Beam to intercept threats from rockets to space-based missiles.

Israel uses a 6-layer air defence network including Iron Dome, David's Sling, Arrow 2, Arrow 3, C-Dome, and the new laser-based Iron Beam to intercept threats from rockets to space-based missiles.

'6 layers of defence': How Israel can block drones and cruise missiles coming towards it

From Qatar's Al Udeid to Bahrain's 5th Fleet, here are 7 key US military bases in the Middle East within range of Iranian missiles.

From Qatar's Al Udeid to Bahrain's 5th Fleet, here are 7 key US military bases in the Middle East within range of Iranian missiles.

From Qatar to Bahrain: US military bases Iran could attack in case of war

Iran on Tuesday (Jan 13) accused the United States of deliberately trying to manufacture a pretext for US military intervention in the nation. This comes after US President Donald Trump urged "Iranian patriots" to continue protesting, promising that “HELP IS ON ITS WAY” while threatening "strong action" over Tehran's violent crackdown on nationwide protests.Accusing the US of trying to stage a "regime change", Iran's mission to the United Nations said Washington was trying to create a justification for the use of force by stoking instability inside the country.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-tells-citizens-to-leave-iran-now-amid-unrest-and-internet-blackouts-us-to-attack-iran-donald-trump-1768351709165">US tells citizens to 'leave Iran now' amid unrest and internet blackouts</a><h2>Iran slams the United States</h2>In a statement posted on X, Iran’s mission to the United Nations said "US fantasies and policy toward Iran are rooted in regime change," accusing Washington of relying on a familiar mix of pressure tactics. According to Tehran, sanctions, threats, and what it called "engineered unrest, and chaos" were being used as the "modus operandi to manufacture a pretext for military intervention". The mission vowed that Trump's "playbook" would "fail again" like the "12-day war of aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran in June 2025".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-in-the-crosshairs-as-trump-announces-25-tariff-on-iran-trade-partners-protest-death-toll-rises-to-648-1768273204068">India in the crosshairs as Trump announces 25% tariff on Iran trade partners</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">U.S. fantasies and policy toward Iran are rooted in regime change, with sanctions, threats, engineered unrest, and chaos serving as the modus operandi to manufacture a pretext for military intervention. This playbook has failed before. The Iranian people will defend their… <a href="https://t.co/aBvww5JqWQ">pic.twitter.com/aBvww5JqWQ</a>&mdash; I.R.IRAN Mission to UN, NY (@Iran_UN) <a href="https://twitter.com/Iran_UN/status/2011210880613302537?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 13, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What did Trump say?</h2>In his post, the POTUS asked Iranians to “KEEP PROTESTING” and urged them to “TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS”. Calling on them to note down the names of those responsible for deaths and abuse in amid the ongoing protests, he vowed “They will pay a big price”. Trump's candid statement has raised fears that the US may attack Iran soon.The Republican president added that he had suspended all talks with Iranian officials until what he described as the “senseless killing of protesters” ends, before adding, “HELP IS ON ITS WAY”.&nbsp;

According to the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) at least 1,847 protesters have been killed in Iran since demonstrations began on 28 December. The victims, it said, include nine minors, 135 government-affiliated personnel, and nine civilians. HRANA reports that these numbers bring the total deaths to 2,000.

Iran has accused the United States of trying to engineer a pretext for military intervention by fuelling unrest and pushing for regime change. Here's what Tehran said.

Iran on Tuesday (Jan 13) accused the United States of deliberately trying to manufacture a pretext for US military intervention in the nation. This comes after US President Donald Trump urged "Iranian patriots" to continue protesting, promising that “HELP IS ON ITS WAY” while threatening "strong action" over Tehran's violent crackdown on nationwide protests. Accusing the US of trying to stage a "regime change", Iran's mission to the United Nations said Washington was trying to create a justification for the use of force by stoking instability inside the country. Also read | US tells citizens to 'leave Iran now' amid unrest and internet blackouts Iran slams the United States In a statement posted on X, Iran’s mission to the United Nations said "US fantasies and policy toward Iran are rooted in regime change," accusing Washington of relying on a familiar mix of pressure tactics. According to Tehran, sanctions, threats, and what it called "engineered unrest, and chaos" were being used as the "modus operandi to manufacture a pretext for military intervention". The mission vowed that Trump's "playbook" would "fail again" like the "12-day war of aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran in June 2025". Also read | India in the crosshairs as Trump announces 25% tariff on Iran trade partners

Iran has accused the United States of trying to engineer a pretext for military intervention by fuelling unrest and pushing for regime change. Here's what Tehran said.&nbsp;

Iran accuses US of plotting 'regime change' after Trump tells protesters, 'HELP IS ON ITS WAY'

The US State Department on Tuesday (Jan 13) said that US citizens should leave Iran now and “if safe to do so, consider departing Iran by land to Armenia or Türkiye”. The US virtual embassy for Iran in a statement on its website, advised Americans to “plan alternative means of communication” given ongoing “internet outages” and “have a plan for departing that does not rely on US government help”. This comes hours after US President Donald Trump called on protesters in Iran to take control of state institutions, expressing support for the ongoing protests. Amid increasing protests in Iran, Trump, in a Truth Social post, urged "Iranian patriots" to continue protesting, promising that “HELP IS ON ITS WAY”.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-in-the-crosshairs-as-trump-announces-25-tariff-on-iran-trade-partners-protest-death-toll-rises-to-648-1768273204068">India in the crosshairs as Trump announces 25% tariff on Iran trade partners</a><h2>US embassy for Iran circular&nbsp;</h2>The US embassy, while asking citizens to leave Iran, said that “dual nationals must exit Iran on Iranian passports”. It said that the “Iranian government does not recognise dual nationality and will treat U.S.-Iranian dual nationals solely as Iranian citizens,” before adding that Americans were at high risk of “questioning, arrest, and detention in Iran”.&nbsp;Iranian officials may detain individuals simply for having a US passport or for demonstrating&nbsp;a connection to the United States, it added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-help-is-on-its-way-iranian-patriots-keep-protesting-says-trump-and-urges-protestors-to-take-over-institutions-in-iran-1768316314730">'HELP IS ON ITS WAY. KEEP PROTESTING', says Trump as protests intensify in Iran</a><h2>What did Trump say?</h2>In his post, the POTUS asked Iranians to “KEEP PROTESTING” and urged them to “TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS”. Calling on them to note down the names of those responsible for deaths and abuse in amid the ongoing protests, he vowed “They will pay a big price”. Trump's candid statement has raised fears that the US may attack Iran soon.The Republican president added that he had suspended all talks with Iranian officials until what he described as the “senseless killing of protesters” ends, before adding, “HELP IS ON ITS WAY”.

According to the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) at least 1,847 protesters have been killed in Iran since demonstrations began on 28 December. The victims, it said, include nine minors, 135 government-affiliated personnel, and nine civilians. HRANA reports that these numbers bring the total deaths to 2,000.&nbsp;

The US State Department has urged Americans to leave Iran immediately, warning of internet outages and limited consular help. Citizens were advised to exit by land via Armenia or Türkiye if safe.

The US State Department on Tuesday (Jan 13) said that US citizens should leave Iran now and “if safe to do so, consider departing Iran by land to Armenia or Türkiye”. The US virtual embassy for Iran in a statement on its website, advised Americans to “plan alternative means of communication” given ongoing “internet outages” and “have a plan for departing that does not rely on US government help”. This comes hours after US President Donald Trump called on protesters in Iran to take control of state institutions, expressing support for the ongoing protests. Amid increasing protests in Iran, Trump, in a Truth Social post, urged "Iranian patriots" to continue protesting, promising that “HELP IS ON ITS WAY”. Also read | India in the crosshairs as Trump announces 25% tariff on Iran trade partners US embassy for Iran circular The US embassy, while asking citizens to leave Iran, said that “dual nationals must exit Iran on Iranian passports”. It said that the “Iranian government does not recognise dual nationality and will treat U.S.-Iranian dual nationals solely as Iranian citizens,” before adding that Americans were at high risk of “questioning, arrest, and detention in Iran”. Iranian officials may detain individuals simply for having a US passport or for demonstrating a connection to the United States, it added. Also read | 'HELP IS ON ITS WAY. KEEP PROTESTING', says Trump as protests intensify in Iran What did Trump say? In his post, the POTUS asked Iranians to “KEEP PROTESTING” and urged them to “TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS”. Calling on them to note down the names of those responsible for deaths and abuse in amid the ongoing protests, he vowed “They will pay a big price”. Trump's candid statement has raised fears that the US may attack Iran soon. The Republican president added that he had suspended all talks with Iranian officials until what he described as the “senseless killing of protesters” ends, before adding, “HELP IS ON ITS WAY”.

The US State Department has urged Americans to leave Iran immediately, warning of internet outages and limited consular help. Citizens were advised to exit by land via Armenia or Türkiye if safe.

US tells citizens to 'leave Iran now' amid unrest and internet blackouts

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (January 13) called on protesters in Iran to take control of state institutions, expressing support for the ongoing protests. In a post on Truth Social, Trump urged ‘Iranian patriots’ to continue protesting, saying that help is on its way. He also asked protesters to note down the identities of those responsible for violence and abuse, warning that Iran’s leadership would face severe consequences. Trump added that he had suspended all talks with Iranian officials until what he described as the ‘senseless killing of protesters’ comes to an end. In his post on Truth Social, Trump said, “Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY. MIGA!!! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-warns-day-of-reckoning-retribution-is-coming-in-minnesota-after-ice-agent-shooting-1768314768951">Trump warns ‘DAY OF RECKONING &amp; RETRIBUTION IS COMING!’ in Minnesota after ICE agent shooting</a>

The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) has reported that 1,847 protesters have been killed in Iran since demonstrations began on 28 December. According to the organisation, the victims include nine individuals under the age of 18, 135 government-affiliated personnel, and nine civilians. HRANA says these figures bring the total death toll to 2,000.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/leonardo-dicaprio-created-100-memes-in-30-seconds-golden-globes-2026-1768315872175/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/leonardo-dicaprio-created-100-memes-in-30-seconds-golden-globes-2026-1768315872175/embed</a><h2>Dutch FM summons Iranian ambassador to Hague</h2>The Dutch foreign minister has called in Iran’s ambassador to condemn Tehran’s violent suppression of anti-government protests, becoming the first European country to publicly announce such action. “I have summoned the Iranian ambassador to formally protest the excessive violence against peaceful protesters, large-scale arbitrary arrests and internet shutdowns,” David van Weel said on Tuesday (January 13) in a statement posted on X. Iran’s foreign ministry called in the ambassadors of the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and France on Tuesday to object to their governments’ public backing of the protests, according to a state-run broadcaster.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (January 13) urged protestors in Iran to ‘take over institutions’ in the country in his latest post on Truth Social

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (January 13) called on protesters in Iran to take control of state institutions, expressing support for the ongoing protests. In a post on Truth Social, Trump urged ‘Iranian patriots’ to continue protesting, saying that help is on its way. He also asked protesters to note down the identities of those responsible for violence and abuse, warning that Iran’s leadership would face severe consequences. Trump added that he had suspended all talks with Iranian officials until what he described as the ‘senseless killing of protesters’ comes to an end. In his post on Truth Social, Trump said, “Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price. I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY. MIGA!!! PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.” Also Read: Trump warns ‘DAY OF RECKONING & RETRIBUTION IS COMING!’ in Minnesota after ICE agent shooting

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (January 13) urged protestors in Iran to ‘take over institutions’ in the country in his latest post on Truth Social

'HELP IS ON ITS WAY. IRANIAN PATRIOTS, KEEP PROTESTING', says Trump and urges protestors to 'take over institutions in Iran'

The US has deployed F-35s, bombers, and tankers to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar amid rising Iran tensions. As CENTCOM's forward HQ, the base is critical for projecting American air power. This move strengthens deterrence and extends the reach of US forces across the Middle East.

The US has deployed F-35s, bombers, and tankers to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar amid rising Iran tensions. As CENTCOM's forward HQ, the base is critical for projecting American air power. This move strengthens deterrence and extends the reach of US forces across the Middle East.

Why Al Udeid Air Base matters now: US deploys F-35s, bombers and tankers amid rising Iran tensions

The US military employs 'standoff' warfare to strike Iran without entering its airspace. Key assets include Tomahawk Block V missiles with a 1,600 km range, stealthy JASSM-ERs, and Ohio-class submarines carrying 154 missiles. These technologies allow precise remote attacks.

The US military employs 'standoff' warfare to strike Iran without entering its airspace. Key assets include Tomahawk Block V missiles with a 1,600 km range, stealthy JASSM-ERs, and Ohio-class submarines carrying 154 missiles. These technologies allow precise remote attacks.

What makes it so powerful? Know how the US can strike Iran without entering its airspace

The US maintains a powerful 'Ring of Steel' around Iran with bases in Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE. Supporting 50,000 troops, stealth fighters, and naval fleets, this network ensures rapid strike capability and robust missile defence across the Middle East.

The US maintains a powerful 'Ring of Steel' around Iran with bases in Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE. Supporting 50,000 troops, stealth fighters, and naval fleets, this network ensures rapid strike capability and robust missile defence across the Middle East.

What makes the US Middle East base network powerful enough to attack Iran?

The US has deployed nearly 50,000 troops to the Middle East to ensure regional stability. From logistics hubs in Kuwait to airbases in Qatar, this surge aims to deter aggression and protect allies.

The US has deployed nearly 50,000 troops to the Middle East to ensure regional stability. From logistics hubs in Kuwait to airbases in Qatar, this surge aims to deter aggression and protect allies.

50,000 military personnel? Why has the US deployed soldiers in the Middle East

Amid rising American intervention threats as the Trump administration continues to mount pressure, Iran's Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Monday (Jan 12) reiterated his warning, saying that Iran's military will teach "an unforgettable lesson" to US President Donald Trump in case of a fresh attack on the country amid intensifying protests. He cautioned that "The great Iranian nation has never allowed the enemy to achieve its goals" and will not allow it in future also. "The great Iranian nation has never allowed the enemy to achieve its goals," he said, flanked by the slogans "Death to Israel, Death to America" in Persian, and vowing the Iranian military would teach US President Donald Trump "an unforgettable lesson" in case of a new attack.&nbsp;Addressing a pro-government rally in Tehran, Ghalibaf described Iran's response against protests as "war against terrorists," and underlined that the Islamic Republic is fighting a "four-front war", including economic war, psychological war, a war against terrorists and a "military war" against the United States and Israel.&nbsp;Earlier, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf warned that Tehran would consider American military and commercial bases “legitimate targets” for retaliation if Washington intervenes militarily.&nbsp;Qalibaf's remarks come amid the Trump Administration's mounting rhetoric as protests in the Islamic Republic entered their third week. The US president repeatedly cautioned Iranian authorities against using brutal force to quell the protests and warned that the US would get involved if protesters were killed and would hit the country where it hurts.&nbsp;Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pm-modi-german-chancellor-merz-share-car-ride-vow-to-deepen-strategic-ties-india-germany-european-union-car-ride-1768216724311"> PM Modi, German Chancellor Merz share car ride; vow to deepen ties in strategic sectors</a>&nbsp;According to a US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, nearly 490 people died in brutal crackdowns on protests in Iran, of these killed 48 individuals belonged to security forces. It anticipates the death toll will go up in the coming days. Meanwhile, the US President Donald Trump said that Iran's leadership, led by Supreme Leader Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has reached out to him to negotiate amid threats of US military action and added that a meeting is being planned for the purpose.&nbsp;Trump, however, repeated his threat, saying that the United States may take action before the meeting. Protesters have demanded the end of the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei-led regime. Anti-regime chants filled the streets of Tehran, while Iran's exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, the son of Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Shah, has hinted that he would return and urged protesters to continue the demonstrations.&nbsp;

Donald Trump claimed that the Iranian leadership reached out to him to negotiate amid US threats and that a meeting is being set up for talks between Washington and Tehran.

Amid rising American intervention threats as the Trump administration continues to mount pressure, Iran's Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Monday (Jan 12) reiterated his warning, saying that Iran's military will teach "an unforgettable lesson" to US President Donald Trump in case of a fresh attack on the country amid intensifying protests. He cautioned that "The great Iranian nation has never allowed the enemy to achieve its goals" and will not allow it in future also. "The great Iranian nation has never allowed the enemy to achieve its goals," he said, flanked by the slogans "Death to Israel, Death to America" in Persian, and vowing the Iranian military would teach US President Donald Trump "an unforgettable lesson" in case of a new attack. Addressing a pro-government rally in Tehran, Ghalibaf described Iran's response against protests as "war against terrorists," and underlined that the Islamic Republic is fighting a "four-front war", including economic war, psychological war, a war against terrorists and a "military war" against the United States and Israel. Earlier, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf warned that Tehran would consider American military and commercial bases “legitimate targets” for retaliation if Washington intervenes militarily. Qalibaf's remarks come amid the Trump Administration's mounting rhetoric as protests in the Islamic Republic entered their third week. The US president repeatedly cautioned Iranian authorities against using brutal force to quell the protests and warned that the US would get involved if protesters were killed and would hit the country where it hurts. Also Read: PM Modi, German Chancellor Merz share car ride; vow to deepen ties in strategic sectors According to a US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, nearly 490 people died in brutal crackdowns on protests in Iran, of these killed 48 individuals belonged to security forces. It anticipates the death toll will go up in the coming days. Meanwhile, the US President Donald Trump said that Iran's leadership, led by Supreme Leader Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has reached out to him to negotiate amid threats of US military action and added that a meeting is being planned for the purpose. Trump, however, repeated his threat, saying that the United States may take action before the meeting. Protesters have demanded the end of the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei-led regime. Anti-regime chants filled the streets of Tehran, while Iran's exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, the son of Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Shah, has hinted that he would return and urged protesters to continue the demonstrations.

Donald Trump claimed that the Iranian leadership reached out to him to negotiate amid US threats and that a meeting is being set up for talks between Washington and Tehran.

Iranian military will teach 'an unforgettable lesson' to Trump if US attacks Iran: Parliament speaker

Israel’s integrated defense shield contrasts with Iran’s heavy missile network. Advanced interceptors like Iron Dome and Arrow 3 face long-range systems like the S-300 and Bavar-373.

Israel’s integrated defense shield contrasts with Iran’s heavy missile network. Advanced interceptors like Iron Dome and Arrow 3 face long-range systems like the S-300 and Bavar-373.

How can it make a difference in war? How Iran’s air defences compare with Israel’s

Iran’s air defence relies on the Russian S-300 and local Bavar-373 to counter U.S. threats. While formidable against older jets, the network faces challenges from stealth technology, electronic jamming and saturation attacks.

Iran’s air defence relies on the Russian S-300 and local Bavar-373 to counter U.S. threats. While formidable against older jets, the network faces challenges from stealth technology, electronic jamming and saturation attacks.

'US vs Iran': What Iran’s air defenses can and cannot stop

A US-Iran war could push oil to $150, crash stock markets, and spike global inflation. Shipping costs may rise 50 per cent, hitting importers like India hard.

A US-Iran war could push oil to $150, crash stock markets, and spike global inflation. Shipping costs may rise 50 per cent, hitting importers like India hard.

‘US vs Iran’: What would it mean for the world economy?

The relationship is a Strategic Partnership, not a Military Alliance. The support provided would be material (weapons), informational (intelligence), and political (UN vetoes), rather than combat-based.

The relationship is a Strategic Partnership, not a Military Alliance. The support provided would be material (weapons), informational (intelligence), and political (UN vetoes), rather than combat-based.

Could Iran’s allies, like Russia, come to its defence if the US strikes?

US sanctions on Iran are failing as Tehran utilises a 'ghost fleet' and Chinese buyers to export 1.7 million barrels of oil daily. By bypassing the US dollar and using ship-to-ship transfers, Iran generated $43 billion in 2024, proving old economic weapons ineffective.

US sanctions on Iran are failing as Tehran utilises a 'ghost fleet' and Chinese buyers to export 1.7 million barrels of oil daily. By bypassing the US dollar and using ship-to-ship transfers, Iran generated $43 billion in 2024, proving old economic weapons ineffective.

'US vs Iran': Why sanctions no longer work the way they once did

Before 1979, Iran was Washington's closest ally in the Persian Gulf. The Islamic Revolution dismantled this relationship overnight, replacing a pro-Western monarchy with a theocratic republic that viewed the US as the “Great Satan”

Before 1979, Iran was Washington's closest ally in the Persian Gulf. The Islamic Revolution dismantled this relationship overnight, replacing a pro-Western monarchy with a theocratic republic that viewed the US as the “Great Satan”

'From allies to enemies': How the 1979 Iranian Revolution shattered U.S.-Iran relations

In January 2026, U.S.-Iran tensions have pushed WTI oil to $59, but a record 3.8 million bpd surplus limits gains. Unrest in Iran and U.S. sanctions threaten the Strait of Hormuz, risking flows to India and China.

In January 2026, U.S.-Iran tensions have pushed WTI oil to $59, but a record 3.8 million bpd surplus limits gains. Unrest in Iran and U.S. sanctions threaten the Strait of Hormuz, risking flows to India and China.

U.S. vs. Iran: How a war could affect global oil prices

Iran's parliament echoed with 'Death to America' chants as lawmakers discussed protests shaking the nation. With 116 dead and a total internet blackout, the government blames US interference.

Iran's parliament echoed with 'Death to America' chants as lawmakers discussed protests shaking the nation. With 116 dead and a total internet blackout, the government blames US interference.

'Death to America': Chants heard in Iran's Parliament as lawmakers discuss the protests shaking the nation

Iran has firmly rejected the creation of a transport corridor near its border as part of a US-brokered peace deal between Azerbaijan and Armenia. The route, officially called the “Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity,” was announced at the White House on Friday as a key element of the agreement aimed at ending decades of hostility between the two nations. It would connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave, passing close to Iranian territory, and give the United States development rights.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-will-not-show-any-mercy-iran-probes-20-arrests-over-alleged-israel-links-after-deadly-war-1754753216639">'Will not show any mercy': Iran probes 20 arrests over alleged Israel links after deadly war</a>Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Tasnim news agency that Tehran would not permit the plan to go ahead. “With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered,” Velayati warned. He called the idea “an impossible notion” and predicted it would become “a graveyard for Trump’s mercenaries”.<h2>Iran fears security risks and loss of regional links</h2>Iran has consistently opposed the proposed corridor, also known as the Zangezur route, fearing it could sever its connection to Armenia and the wider Caucasus while bringing foreign forces closer to its frontier. “We have the right to defend our interests in a completely powerful manner,” Velayati said, noting that Iran had already conducted multiple military drills in the area to demonstrate its readiness.The Iranian foreign ministry, while welcoming the peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan, voiced “concern over the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in any way and form, especially in the vicinity of common borders”. It added that such actions would “disrupt the security and lasting stability of the region”.<h2>A long and bitter conflict</h2>Armenia, a Christian-majority nation, and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan have a long history of conflict, particularly over the disputed Karabakh region. The two countries fought wars over the territory, most recently in 2023, when Azerbaijan regained control in a rapid offensive, triggering the mass exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. A senior White House official, speaking anonymously, claimed Armenia would gain a major ally from the peace deal, describing the United States as “an enormous strategic commercial partner, probably the most enormous and strategic in the history of the world”. “The losers here are China, Russia and Iran,” the official added.

Iran rejected the proposed “Trump Route” near its border, part of a US-brokered Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal, warning it threatens regional security and vowing to block its implementation.

Iran has firmly rejected the creation of a transport corridor near its border as part of a US-brokered peace deal between Azerbaijan and Armenia. The route, officially called the “Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity,” was announced at the White House on Friday as a key element of the agreement aimed at ending decades of hostility between the two nations. It would connect Azerbaijan to its Nakhichevan exclave, passing close to Iranian territory, and give the United States development rights. Also read: 'Will not show any mercy': Iran probes 20 arrests over alleged Israel links after deadly war Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, told Tasnim news agency that Tehran would not permit the plan to go ahead. “With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered,” Velayati warned. He called the idea “an impossible notion” and predicted it would become “a graveyard for Trump’s mercenaries”. Iran fears security risks and loss of regional links Iran has consistently opposed the proposed corridor, also known as the Zangezur route, fearing it could sever its connection to Armenia and the wider Caucasus while bringing foreign forces closer to its frontier. “We have the right to defend our interests in a completely powerful manner,” Velayati said, noting that Iran had already conducted multiple military drills in the area to demonstrate its readiness. The Iranian foreign ministry, while welcoming the peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan, voiced “concern over the negative consequences of any foreign intervention in any way and form, especially in the vicinity of common borders”. It added that such actions would “disrupt the security and lasting stability of the region”. A long and bitter conflict Armenia, a Christian-majority nation, and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan have a long history of conflict, particularly over the disputed Karabakh region. The two countries fought wars over the territory, most recently in 2023, when Azerbaijan regained control in a rapid offensive, triggering the mass exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. A senior White House official, speaking anonymously, claimed Armenia would gain a major ally from the peace deal, describing the United States as “an enormous strategic commercial partner, probably the most enormous and strategic in the history of the world”. “The losers here are China, Russia and Iran,” the official added.

Iran rejected the proposed “Trump Route” near its border, part of a US-brokered Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal, warning it threatens regional security and vowing to block its implementation.

'Graveyard for Trump’s mercenaries': Iran vows to block US-brokered Azerbaijan-Armenia corridor near its border

Iran has warned that it will respond “in a more decisive manner” if the United States or Israel attacks again, following earlier military strikes on its nuclear facilities. The warning came from Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday, in reaction to US President Donald Trump’s threat to “wipe out” Iran’s nuclear programme if it resumes atomic activity. “If aggression is repeated, we will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner and in a way that will be IMPOSSIBLE to cover up,” Araghchi said in a post on X.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-hamas-must-relinquish-control-palestinian-pm-calls-on-hamas-to-surrender-disarm-as-france-two-state-solution-for-israel-palestine-at-un-1753736040288">'Hamas must relinquish control': Palestinian PM calls on Hamas to surrender, disarm as France two-state solution for Israel, Palestine at UN</a><h2>Iran says military pressure won’t stop its nuclear progress</h2>Araghchi also said that if there were genuine concerns about Iran’s nuclear work, then negotiations, not threats, would be more effective. “If there are concerns about the possible diversion of our nuclear program into non-peaceful purposes, the ‘military option’ proved incapable, but a negotiated solution may work,” he said.It is still unclear how much damage was caused by the US strikes, which followed a surprise Israeli bombing campaign. Israel had claimed it was acting to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. The Israeli attacks disrupted the ongoing US-Iran nuclear talks that had restarted in April.<h2>Trump defends strikes, says US will act again if needed</h2>Speaking during a visit to Scotland on Monday, Donald Trump insisted the previous air strikes had been successful. “They can start again. If they do, we’ll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it,” Trump said. Iran had responded to the earlier attacks with missile strikes on Israeli cities and a US base in Qatar, though Trump had downplayed the response at the time.<h2>Dispute over uranium enrichment remains key obstacle</h2>The key sticking point between the US and Iran has long been over uranium enrichment. Iran insists it has a right to enrich uranium, while Washington considers that a “red line”. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has noted that Iran is currently the only country without nuclear weapons enriching uranium up to 60%, just below the 90% needed for a bomb. Tehran has denied it is pursuing nuclear weapons and said it is open to talks on enrichment levels, but not the right itself. In his post, Araghchi added, “No one in their right mind would abandon the fruits of tremendous investment in homegrown and peaceful technology just because of foreign&nbsp;bullying.”

Iran warned it will respond more decisively if attacked again by the US or Israel, following strikes on nuclear sites and threats from President Trump to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran has warned that it will respond “in a more decisive manner” if the United States or Israel attacks again, following earlier military strikes on its nuclear facilities. The warning came from Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday, in reaction to US President Donald Trump’s threat to “wipe out” Iran’s nuclear programme if it resumes atomic activity. “If aggression is repeated, we will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner and in a way that will be IMPOSSIBLE to cover up,” Araghchi said in a post on X. Also read: 'Hamas must relinquish control': Palestinian PM calls on Hamas to surrender, disarm as France two-state solution for Israel, Palestine at UN Iran says military pressure won’t stop its nuclear progress Araghchi also said that if there were genuine concerns about Iran’s nuclear work, then negotiations, not threats, would be more effective. “If there are concerns about the possible diversion of our nuclear program into non-peaceful purposes, the ‘military option’ proved incapable, but a negotiated solution may work,” he said. It is still unclear how much damage was caused by the US strikes, which followed a surprise Israeli bombing campaign. Israel had claimed it was acting to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. The Israeli attacks disrupted the ongoing US-Iran nuclear talks that had restarted in April. Trump defends strikes, says US will act again if needed Speaking during a visit to Scotland on Monday, Donald Trump insisted the previous air strikes had been successful. “They can start again. If they do, we’ll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it,” Trump said. Iran had responded to the earlier attacks with missile strikes on Israeli cities and a US base in Qatar, though Trump had downplayed the response at the time. Dispute over uranium enrichment remains key obstacle The key sticking point between the US and Iran has long been over uranium enrichment. Iran insists it has a right to enrich uranium, while Washington considers that a “red line”. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has noted that Iran is currently the only country without nuclear weapons enriching uranium up to 60%, just below the 90% needed for a bomb. Tehran has denied it is pursuing nuclear weapons and said it is open to talks on enrichment levels, but not the right itself. In his post, Araghchi added, “No one in their right mind would abandon the fruits of tremendous investment in homegrown and peaceful technology just because of foreign bullying.”

Iran warned it will respond more decisively if attacked again by the US or Israel, following strikes on nuclear sites and threats from President Trump to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.

'Will not hesitate': Iran warns US, Israel of ‘impossible to cover up’ retaliation if attacked again after Trump's total 'wipe out' warning

US President Donald Trump expressed anger on Tuesday (24 June) after both Israel and Iran broke a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered just hours earlier, even using an expletive to describe the situation.<h2>Trump: ‘Israel needs to calm down’</h2>As he left for the NATO Summit in Hauge from the White House, Trump told reporters, “I gotta get Israel to calm down now.” He accused Israel of immediately launching fresh strikes despite agreeing to the truce.“As soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen,” Trump said.Clearly frustrated, the president swore on the camera saying, “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | US President Donald Trump says, &quot;They (Iran) violated, but Israel violated it too. As soon as we made the deal, Israel came out and dropped a load of bombs... We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the f***… <a href="https://t.co/0N4ddhpWul">pic.twitter.com/0N4ddhpWul</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1937472166913528065?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

While Trump said that both Iran and Israel had violated the ceasefire, he appeared especially frustrated with Tel Aviv.“I’m not sure they did it intentionally,” he said, adding, “I don’t like the fact that Israel went out this morning at all. And I’m going to see if I can stop it.” On Iran, Trump claimed its nuclear programme had been destroyed and would “never rebuild”, though he admitted he was “not happy with Iran either”.Taking to Truth Social, Trump posted a strongly worded message directed at Israel, writing, “ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES”Trump had earlier celebrated the ceasefire agreement after the 12-day war, on his social media platform, saying both nations had approached him at the same time, asking for peace.“Israel &amp; Iran came to me, almost simultaneously, and said, ‘PEACE!’” he wrote. “The World, and the Middle East, are the real WINNERS! Both Nations will see tremendous LOVE, PEACE, AND PROSPERITY in their futures.”

Trump had earlier celebrated the ceasefire agreement after the 12-day war, on his social media platform, saying both nations had approached him at the same time, asking for peace.

US President Donald Trump expressed anger on Tuesday (24 June) after both Israel and Iran broke a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered just hours earlier, even using an expletive to describe the situation. Trump: ‘Israel needs to calm down’ As he left for the NATO Summit in Hauge from the White House, Trump told reporters, “I gotta get Israel to calm down now.” He accused Israel of immediately launching fresh strikes despite agreeing to the truce. “As soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen,” Trump said. Clearly frustrated, the president swore on the camera saying, “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing.”

Trump had earlier celebrated the ceasefire agreement after the 12-day war, on his social media platform, saying both nations had approached him at the same time, asking for peace.

‘What the f*** they’re doing’: Trump drops F-BOMB on camera after Israel, Iran violate ceasefire | WATCH

Iran fired several ballistic missiles at US military installations in Qatar on Monday (June 23), just days after the United States launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran targeted Al Udeid Air Base, the largest American military facility in the Middle East.Qatar’s Defence Ministry confirmed its air defences had intercepted the attack, and no injuries were reported. Still, the Qatari government condemned the incident as “a flagrant violation of Qatar’s sovereignty and airspace.”A US defence official said Iran launched “short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles” and had notified Qatari and American officials beforehand to help avoid casualties.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-thanks-iran-for-early-notice-was-tehran-s-missile-attack-on-us-bases-in-qatar-just-for-show-1750710034107">Trump thanks Iran for ‘early notice’: Was Tehran’s missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show?</a><h2>What is Al Udeid Air Base?</h2>Located just outside Doha, Al Udeid serves as the forward headquarters for US Central Command’s air operations across the Middle East. It is home to nearly 8,000 American troops, alongside British forces who rotate through the facility.The base plays a vital role in supporting US operations in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and other parts of the region. Known also as Abu Nakhla Airport, it has the longest runway in the Gulf, capable of handling some of the largest military aircraft in the world.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-flagrant-violation-of-sovereignty-qatar-breaks-silence-after-iranian-missile-strike-on-us-base-in-doha-full-statement-1750701095817">'Flagrant violation of sovereignty': Qatar breaks silence after Iranian missile strike on US base in Doha - FULL STATEMENT</a>Qatar began hosting US forces at Al Udeid in 2000, and the partnership was formalised in 2002 with an agreement allowing a long-term American presence on Qatari soil. In 2024, CNN reported that the US extended its military stay in Qatar by another ten years.While the attack on Al Udeid initially appeared to be a major escalation, signs suggest it was a highly choreographed move by Tehran. No US forces were harmed, and an early warning was given to Qatari and US officials.

Located just outside Doha, Al Udeid serves as the forward headquarters for US Central Command’s air operations across the Middle East. It is home to nearly 8,000 American troops, alongside British forces who rotate through the facility.

Iran fired several ballistic missiles at US military installations in Qatar on Monday (June 23), just days after the United States launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran targeted Al Udeid Air Base, the largest American military facility in the Middle East. Qatar’s Defence Ministry confirmed its air defences had intercepted the attack, and no injuries were reported. Still, the Qatari government condemned the incident as “a flagrant violation of Qatar’s sovereignty and airspace.” A US defence official said Iran launched “short-range and medium-range ballistic missiles” and had notified Qatari and American officials beforehand to help avoid casualties. Also read: Trump thanks Iran for ‘early notice’: Was Tehran’s missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? What is Al Udeid Air Base? Located just outside Doha, Al Udeid serves as the forward headquarters for US Central Command’s air operations across the Middle East. It is home to nearly 8,000 American troops, alongside British forces who rotate through the facility. The base plays a vital role in supporting US operations in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and other parts of the region. Known also as Abu Nakhla Airport, it has the longest runway in the Gulf, capable of handling some of the largest military aircraft in the world. Also read: 'Flagrant violation of sovereignty': Qatar breaks silence after Iranian missile strike on US base in Doha - FULL STATEMENT Qatar began hosting US forces at Al Udeid in 2000, and the partnership was formalised in 2002 with an agreement allowing a long-term American presence on Qatari soil. In 2024, CNN reported that the US extended its military stay in Qatar by another ten years. While the attack on Al Udeid initially appeared to be a major escalation, signs suggest it was a highly choreographed move by Tehran. No US forces were harmed, and an early warning was given to Qatari and US officials.

Located just outside Doha, Al Udeid serves as the forward headquarters for US Central Command’s air operations across the Middle East. It is home to nearly 8,000 American troops, alongside British forces who rotate through the facility.

What is Al Udeid Air Base? Inside LARGEST US military base in Middle East Iran just targeted in Qatar

US President Donald Trump has said he is still open to diplomacy with Iran but questioned why the Iranian people shouldn’t remove their government if it refuses to negotiate. His comments came after American B-2 bombers struck three of Iran’s key nuclear sites over the weekend.Speaking on Fox News, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn’t the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-18-hour-flight-mid-air-refuellings-how-us-fooled-iran-with-decoy-b-2-bombers-and-hit-three-nuclear-facilities-1750682313639">'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities</a><h2>Trump contradicts officials with ‘regime change’ post</h2>Although senior US officials have consistently said that regime change is not the aim of American policy, Trump posted on social media Sunday, “Why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???”The strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities marked a major escalation in US involvement in the conflict, with Washington now backing Israel’s campaign to shut down Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-iran-s-secret-cyber-war-how-tehran-tel-aviv-are-waging-war-online-and-why-us-is-in-the-crossfire-1750610574082">Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?</a><h2>White House confident Iran’s nuclear sites are destroyed</h2>Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night.”She added, “We have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran’s enriched uranium was stored.” Leavitt insisted the president would not have approved the strikes unless he believed they would be effective.<h2>IAEA chief says Iran’s uranium stockpile unaccounted for</h2>Rafael Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the agency cannot confirm where Iran’s near-weapons-grade nuclear material is currently located. He has called for inspectors to be allowed back into Iran to examine the impact of the strikes and assess the situation on the ground. Speaking to CNN, Grossi noted that Iran has roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, close to the 90% required to make a nuclear bomb.General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Monday it was still “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been entirely eliminated. He said assessments were ongoing and that further analysis would be needed in the&nbsp;coming&nbsp;days.

Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated.”

US President Donald Trump has said he is still open to diplomacy with Iran but questioned why the Iranian people shouldn’t remove their government if it refuses to negotiate. His comments came after American B-2 bombers struck three of Iran’s key nuclear sites over the weekend. Speaking on Fox News, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn’t the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?” Also read: '18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities Trump contradicts officials with ‘regime change’ post Although senior US officials have consistently said that regime change is not the aim of American policy, Trump posted on social media Sunday, “Why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???” The strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities marked a major escalation in US involvement in the conflict, with Washington now backing Israel’s campaign to shut down Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Also read: Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire? White House confident Iran’s nuclear sites are destroyed Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night.” She added, “We have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran’s enriched uranium was stored.” Leavitt insisted the president would not have approved the strikes unless he believed they would be effective. IAEA chief says Iran’s uranium stockpile unaccounted for Rafael Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the agency cannot confirm where Iran’s near-weapons-grade nuclear material is currently located. He has called for inspectors to be allowed back into Iran to examine the impact of the strikes and assess the situation on the ground. Speaking to CNN, Grossi noted that Iran has roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, close to the 90% required to make a nuclear bomb. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Monday it was still “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been entirely eliminated. He said assessments were ongoing and that further analysis would be needed in the coming days.

Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated.”

'Take away power of this regime': Trump 'still interested' in Iran diplomacy but asks why Iranians don’t overthrow 'violent' regime

On June 22, the United States launched airstrikes on Iran’s key nuclear facilities, marking another escalation in a tense, 10-day-long conflict involving Israel and Iran. The strikes, which targeted Iran’s uranium enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, seem to have far-reaching consequences for global oil markets as the world witnesses a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape.The US attack follows days of mounting speculation about whether the Donald Trump-led administration would intervene in the conflict between Israel and Iran. While Israel had already been bombing Iranian sites for over a week, the US airstrikes have taken the conflict to a new level. Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia.For years, the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway between Oman and Iran—has been a focal point of geopolitical tensions. This vital chokepoint facilitates the transit of about 20 per cent of the world’s crude oil, making any potential disruption here a major concern for oil-dependent economies worldwide.<h2>Oil prices surge as a direct consequence of the conflict</h2>Following the US strikes, oil prices have already begun to show signs of volatility, with Brent Crude futures surging by 11 per cent over the past week.&nbsp;On June 22, as the markets opened, prices were hovering around $80 per barrel, fuelled by the uncertainty surrounding the conflict and the potential for further disruption. Analysts believe this is just the beginning, with prices expected to rise even more if the conflict continues to intensify.A supply disruption, particularly a blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, would have catastrophic effects on global oil prices. Already, analysts warn that crude oil prices could rise by 15 per cent to 20 per cent if the conflict results in a daily loss of 1.1 million barrels in production.&nbsp;More severe disruptions could push Brent crude prices above $90 per barrel or even $100 per barrel if Iran retaliates by targeting oil infrastructure or closing off key shipping lanes.<h2>Global oil supply faces a murky situation</h2>The global oil market is already in a precarious position, with OPEC+ planning a production hike in July, increasing output by 4.11 million barrels per day. Despite this, analysts remain concerned that these measures may not be sufficient to cushion the shock of an escalation in the Gulf.&nbsp;Given that Iran is the third-largest member of OPEC+, the loss of its oil exports could exacerbate supply shortages, leading to even higher prices.Though some analysts believe that global supply can be stabilised through increased output from other OPEC members, the region’s fragile geopolitical situation makes this approach uncertain.&nbsp;Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait, among others, also rely on the Strait of Hormuz for shipping their crude, and any serious disruption could lead to further instability in the region.<h2>India’s vulnerability as an oil-dependent economy at risk</h2>For India, the stakes are particularly high. The country relies heavily on oil imports from West Asia, with around 40 per cent of its oil and over 50 per cent of its LNG transiting through the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;If the waterway is blocked, India could face significant economic consequences, including soaring fuel prices and inflation.India consumes approximately 5.5 million barrels of oil per day, with 1.5 million barrels passing through the Strait. The potential disruption of this critical shipping lane could push oil prices much higher, further adding to inflationary pressures in the country.&nbsp;According to experts, any blockade of the Strait would likely push India’s crude oil costs higher, which in turn would affect the country’s GDP by around 0.5 per cent for every $10 increase in crude prices.The country’s oil marketing companies, such as HPCL, BPCL, and Indian Oil, would feel the brunt of this price spike, as would sectors like aviation, paint manufacturers, and tyre companies that rely on oil products. This could also lead to a potential slowdown in India’s economic growth, particularly in the face of rising inflation.To mitigate these risks, India’s Petroleum Minister, Hardeep Puri, has assured that the country is diversifying its crude oil sources. India plans to cut refined product exports and explore alternative suppliers if the Strait is blocked.&nbsp;Puri emphasised, “We have enough diversified supplies of crude, and even if there were to be a disruption, we can source it from alternative suppliers.”<h2>Iran’s threat to close the Strait: An existential move?</h2>One of the most significant threats arising from this conflict is Iran’s repeated warnings that it may close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US and Israeli military actions. While Iran has made similar threats in the past, it has never followed through, as doing so would also harm its own oil exports.However, the current situation is different. With the US now directly involved in the conflict, the risk of an Iranian retaliation is higher than ever. Experts believe that if Iran does take such an extreme step, it could severely disrupt global oil flows, particularly for countries like India and China, which are major importers of Iranian oil.While closing the Strait would certainly hurt global oil supply, it could also backfire on Iran, as the country depends on this route for its own oil exports. China, Iran’s largest oil trading partner, is unlikely to stand by as its oil shipments are affected. China’s influence in this situation could pressure Iran to reconsider any drastic actions.<h2>Fragile peace or an all-out oil war?</h2>As the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates, oil markets remain on edge. If the situation devolves into an all-out confrontation, the consequences for the global economy could be severe.&nbsp;For now, experts suggest that the geopolitical risk premium on oil will remain high, and the global oil market will have to navigate a delicate balance between supply disruptions and geopolitical manoeuvring.As the situation develops, much will depend on how quickly Iran decides to retaliate, whether the US will escalate its involvement, and how OPEC+ members respond to the changing supply dynamics.

Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia.

On June 22, the United States launched airstrikes on Iran’s key nuclear facilities, marking another escalation in a tense, 10-day-long conflict involving Israel and Iran. The strikes, which targeted Iran’s uranium enrichment sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, seem to have far-reaching consequences for global oil markets as the world witnesses a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape. The US attack follows days of mounting speculation about whether the Donald Trump-led administration would intervene in the conflict between Israel and Iran. While Israel had already been bombing Iranian sites for over a week, the US airstrikes have taken the conflict to a new level. Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia. For years, the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow waterway between Oman and Iran—has been a focal point of geopolitical tensions. This vital chokepoint facilitates the transit of about 20 per cent of the world’s crude oil, making any potential disruption here a major concern for oil-dependent economies worldwide. Oil prices surge as a direct consequence of the conflict Following the US strikes, oil prices have already begun to show signs of volatility, with Brent Crude futures surging by 11 per cent over the past week. On June 22, as the markets opened, prices were hovering around $80 per barrel, fuelled by the uncertainty surrounding the conflict and the potential for further disruption. Analysts believe this is just the beginning, with prices expected to rise even more if the conflict continues to intensify. A supply disruption, particularly a blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, would have catastrophic effects on global oil prices. Already, analysts warn that crude oil prices could rise by 15 per cent to 20 per cent if the conflict results in a daily loss of 1.1 million barrels in production. More severe disruptions could push Brent crude prices above $90 per barrel or even $100 per barrel if Iran retaliates by targeting oil infrastructure or closing off key shipping lanes. Global oil supply faces a murky situation The global oil market is already in a precarious position, with OPEC+ planning a production hike in July, increasing output by 4.11 million barrels per day. Despite this, analysts remain concerned that these measures may not be sufficient to cushion the shock of an escalation in the Gulf. Given that Iran is the third-largest member of OPEC+, the loss of its oil exports could exacerbate supply shortages, leading to even higher prices. Though some analysts believe that global supply can be stabilised through increased output from other OPEC members, the region’s fragile geopolitical situation makes this approach uncertain. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait, among others, also rely on the Strait of Hormuz for shipping their crude, and any serious disruption could lead to further instability in the region. India’s vulnerability as an oil-dependent economy at risk For India, the stakes are particularly high. The country relies heavily on oil imports from West Asia, with around 40 per cent of its oil and over 50 per cent of its LNG transiting through the Strait of Hormuz. If the waterway is blocked, India could face significant economic consequences, including soaring fuel prices and inflation. India consumes approximately 5.5 million barrels of oil per day, with 1.5 million barrels passing through the Strait. The potential disruption of this critical shipping lane could push oil prices much higher, further adding to inflationary pressures in the country. According to experts, any blockade of the Strait would likely push India’s crude oil costs higher, which in turn would affect the country’s GDP by around 0.5 per cent for every $10 increase in crude prices. The country’s oil marketing companies, such as HPCL, BPCL, and Indian Oil, would feel the brunt of this price spike, as would sectors like aviation, paint manufacturers, and tyre companies that rely on oil products. This could also lead to a potential slowdown in India’s economic growth, particularly in the face of rising inflation. To mitigate these risks, India’s Petroleum Minister, Hardeep Puri, has assured that the country is diversifying its crude oil sources. India plans to cut refined product exports and explore alternative suppliers if the Strait is blocked. Puri emphasised, “We have enough diversified supplies of crude, and even if there were to be a disruption, we can source it from alternative suppliers.” Iran’s threat to close the Strait: An existential move? One of the most significant threats arising from this conflict is Iran’s repeated warnings that it may close the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for US and Israeli military actions. While Iran has made similar threats in the past, it has never followed through, as doing so would also harm its own oil exports. However, the current situation is different. With the US now directly involved in the conflict, the risk of an Iranian retaliation is higher than ever. Experts believe that if Iran does take such an extreme step, it could severely disrupt global oil flows, particularly for countries like India and China, which are major importers of Iranian oil. While closing the Strait would certainly hurt global oil supply, it could also backfire on Iran, as the country depends on this route for its own oil exports. China, Iran’s largest oil trading partner, is unlikely to stand by as its oil shipments are affected. China’s influence in this situation could pressure Iran to reconsider any drastic actions. Fragile peace or an all-out oil war? As the conflict between Israel and Iran escalates, oil markets remain on edge. If the situation devolves into an all-out confrontation, the consequences for the global economy could be severe. For now, experts suggest that the geopolitical risk premium on oil will remain high, and the global oil market will have to navigate a delicate balance between supply disruptions and geopolitical manoeuvring. As the situation develops, much will depend on how quickly Iran decides to retaliate, whether the US will escalate its involvement, and how OPEC+ members respond to the changing supply dynamics.

Experts warn that this could disrupt not only the regional balance of power but also the global oil supply chain, as Iran is a key oil exporter in West Asia.

US attacks Iranian nuclear sites: What lies ahead as geopolitical tensions rise

Global markets are bracing for turbulence after President Donald Trump announced a major US military strike on Iran on June 21, targeting key nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.&nbsp;The attack, announced by Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets.“All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, Fordow,” Trump wrote, calling the mission a “very successful attack” and declaring that “now is the time for peace.”&nbsp;However, investors and analysts believe peace may be a distant hope, with markets instead bracing for fallout from a deepening crisis.<h2>Markets brace for impact</h2>While global markets were closed for the weekend when the attack was announced, analysts warned of a potential knee-jerk reaction once trading resumes. US stock futures, oil benchmarks, and safe-haven assets like gold are all expected to be impacted.“I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher,” Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital, told Reuters. “This is going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil.”Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group told Reuters that while the initial reaction may be sharp, markets may stabilise if Iran pursues a peaceful resolution. “They’ve lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button on a peace deal,” Cox said, referencing the apparent destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.<h2>Oil prices surge amid supply fears</h2>The most immediate market impact is expected to be on oil. Brent crude futures have already surged 18 per cent since June 13, and the recent developments are likely to add further momentum.&nbsp;Analysts at Oxford Economics had recently warned that if the conflict disrupts the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil chokepoint, prices could skyrocket to $130 per barrel. That scenario could drive US inflation close to 6 per cent by year’s end.&nbsp;While Iran exports just 1.6 million barrels of oil per day, the real risk lies in the potential for Tehran to retaliate by blockading the Strait of Hormuz, through which a third of the world’s seaborne oil flows, and even a temporary closure of the strait would send shockwaves through global energy markets.However, analysts also noted that OPEC, particularly Saudi Arabia, has the capacity to cushion the blow. Saudi spare production capacity exceeds 3 million barrels per day, and OPEC has already ramped up supply in anticipation of potential disruptions.<h2>Gold and dollar to benefit from safety bid</h2>In times of geopolitical stress, investors tend to flock to traditional safe havens such as gold and the US dollar. Both assets are expected to benefit from the rising tensions.Gold, which had been trading steadily before the strike, could now see a strong rally as risk aversion climbs. The US dollar, which has stumbled in recent months amid economic uncertainty and interest rate concerns, may see short-term strength as global investors seek shelter.<h2>Equity markets may falter, but history suggests rebound</h2>Although equities are likely to sell off initially, historical patterns suggest the pullback could be short-lived. Data from previous West Asian conflicts, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 Saudi oil facility attacks, shows that markets often recover within months.“The S&amp;P 500 may initially fall, but history shows that it tends to be higher two months after these kinds of events,” analysts from Wedbush Securities told Reuters.Still, with Israel signalling that its operations will continue and Iran warning of “irreparable damage” in response to US military actions, the situation remains highly fluid.But it is not just the equity markets that are expected to take a hit, cryptocurrencies that have been soaring recently are also expected to feel the jitters of the attack.Whether the situation spirals into a wider war or stabilises through diplomacy remains to be seen. Trump’s move follows months of failed negotiations with Tehran and mounting tensions over Iran’s nuclear ambitions. While the president called for peace, the attack may have closed off diplomatic options.As markets reopen, all eyes will be on Iran’s next move and the world’s response.

The attack, announced by Donald Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets.

Global markets are bracing for turbulence after President Donald Trump announced a major US military strike on Iran on June 21, targeting key nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The attack, announced by Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets. “All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of bombs was dropped on the primary site, Fordow,” Trump wrote, calling the mission a “very successful attack” and declaring that “now is the time for peace.” However, investors and analysts believe peace may be a distant hope, with markets instead bracing for fallout from a deepening crisis. Markets brace for impact While global markets were closed for the weekend when the attack was announced, analysts warned of a potential knee-jerk reaction once trading resumes. US stock futures, oil benchmarks, and safe-haven assets like gold are all expected to be impacted. “I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed, and I think oil will open higher,” Mark Spindel, chief investment officer at Potomac River Capital, told Reuters. “This is going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil.” Jamie Cox of Harris Financial Group told Reuters that while the initial reaction may be sharp, markets may stabilise if Iran pursues a peaceful resolution. “They’ve lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button on a peace deal,” Cox said, referencing the apparent destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Oil prices surge amid supply fears The most immediate market impact is expected to be on oil. Brent crude futures have already surged 18 per cent since June 13, and the recent developments are likely to add further momentum. Analysts at Oxford Economics had recently warned that if the conflict disrupts the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil chokepoint, prices could skyrocket to $130 per barrel. That scenario could drive US inflation close to 6 per cent by year’s end. While Iran exports just 1.6 million barrels of oil per day, the real risk lies in the potential for Tehran to retaliate by blockading the Strait of Hormuz, through which a third of the world’s seaborne oil flows, and even a temporary closure of the strait would send shockwaves through global energy markets. However, analysts also noted that OPEC, particularly Saudi Arabia, has the capacity to cushion the blow. Saudi spare production capacity exceeds 3 million barrels per day, and OPEC has already ramped up supply in anticipation of potential disruptions. Gold and dollar to benefit from safety bid In times of geopolitical stress, investors tend to flock to traditional safe havens such as gold and the US dollar. Both assets are expected to benefit from the rising tensions. Gold, which had been trading steadily before the strike, could now see a strong rally as risk aversion climbs. The US dollar, which has stumbled in recent months amid economic uncertainty and interest rate concerns, may see short-term strength as global investors seek shelter. Equity markets may falter, but history suggests rebound Although equities are likely to sell off initially, historical patterns suggest the pullback could be short-lived. Data from previous West Asian conflicts, including the 2003 Iraq invasion and the 2019 Saudi oil facility attacks, shows that markets often recover within months. “The S&P 500 may initially fall, but history shows that it tends to be higher two months after these kinds of events,” analysts from Wedbush Securities told Reuters. Still, with Israel signalling that its operations will continue and Iran warning of “irreparable damage” in response to US military actions, the situation remains highly fluid. But it is not just the equity markets that are expected to take a hit, cryptocurrencies that have been soaring recently are also expected to feel the jitters of the attack. Whether the situation spirals into a wider war or stabilises through diplomacy remains to be seen. Trump’s move follows months of failed negotiations with Tehran and mounting tensions over Iran’s nuclear ambitions. While the president called for peace, the attack may have closed off diplomatic options. As markets reopen, all eyes will be on Iran’s next move and the world’s response.

The attack, announced by Donald Trump on Truth Social, marks a significant escalation in US involvement in West Asia and is expected to inject fresh volatility into global oil, equities, and commodities markets.

US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to rattle global markets, push investors to safe havens

A senior Iranian official has warned that Iran will escalate its attacks on Israel and may target the regional bases of any country that attempts to defend the Israeli government. Speaking to CNN on Friday, the official said, “Iran reserves the right – under international law, to respond decisively to this regime.”He further warned, “Any country that attempts to defend the regime against Iran’s operations will, in turn, see its regional bases and positions become new targets.”This warning came after reports that the United States and some other regional powers helped Israel intercept Iranian missiles.<h2>US warns Iran of ‘dire consequences’ if it hits American troops</h2>During an emergency meeting at the United Nations Security Council, US representative McCoy Pitt defended Israel’s military actions, stating they were in self-defence. “Every sovereign nation has the right to defend itself, and Israel is no exception,” he said.Pitt confirmed that the US was informed in advance about Israel’s strikes on Iran, but stressed, “The United States was not militarily involved in these strikes.” He added, “Our absolute, foremost priority is the protection of US citizens, personnel and forces in the region.”He issued a firm warning to Iran, “Let me be crystal clear: no government, proxy, or independent actor should target American citizens, American bases, or other American infrastructure in the region. The consequences for Iran would be dire.”<h2>Iran’s drone and missile retaliation damages Israeli cities</h2>Iran’s retaliation began with the launch of over 100 drones towards Israel. Many of them were intercepted by Israeli air defences. A second wave of missile attacks followed, and some of those missiles managed to hit targets inside Israeli cities.According to local reports, about 40 people were admitted to Israeli hospitals, with two in critical condition. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson Avichay Adraee confirmed that while most missiles were intercepted or failed to hit, “there are a limited number of buildings that were hit, some due to shrapnel from interception operations.”This conflict escalation comes in the wake of a major Israeli airstrike on 13 June. That operation targeted Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, killing several high-ranking officers, including Major General Mohammad Bagheri and Major General Hossein Salami.Iranian state media also reported the deaths of six nuclear scientists and 78 civilians, including women and children, as a result of the Israeli strike. Dozens more were reported injured.

Iran’s retaliation began with the launch of over 100 drones towards Israel. Many of them were intercepted by Israeli air defences. A second wave of missile attacks followed, and some of those missiles managed to hit targets inside Israeli cities.

A senior Iranian official has warned that Iran will escalate its attacks on Israel and may target the regional bases of any country that attempts to defend the Israeli government. Speaking to CNN on Friday, the official said, “Iran reserves the right – under international law, to respond decisively to this regime.” He further warned, “Any country that attempts to defend the regime against Iran’s operations will, in turn, see its regional bases and positions become new targets.” This warning came after reports that the United States and some other regional powers helped Israel intercept Iranian missiles. US warns Iran of ‘dire consequences’ if it hits American troops During an emergency meeting at the United Nations Security Council, US representative McCoy Pitt defended Israel’s military actions, stating they were in self-defence. “Every sovereign nation has the right to defend itself, and Israel is no exception,” he said. Pitt confirmed that the US was informed in advance about Israel’s strikes on Iran, but stressed, “The United States was not militarily involved in these strikes.” He added, “Our absolute, foremost priority is the protection of US citizens, personnel and forces in the region.” He issued a firm warning to Iran, “Let me be crystal clear: no government, proxy, or independent actor should target American citizens, American bases, or other American infrastructure in the region. The consequences for Iran would be dire.” Iran’s drone and missile retaliation damages Israeli cities Iran’s retaliation began with the launch of over 100 drones towards Israel. Many of them were intercepted by Israeli air defences. A second wave of missile attacks followed, and some of those missiles managed to hit targets inside Israeli cities. According to local reports, about 40 people were admitted to Israeli hospitals, with two in critical condition. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson Avichay Adraee confirmed that while most missiles were intercepted or failed to hit, “there are a limited number of buildings that were hit, some due to shrapnel from interception operations.” This conflict escalation comes in the wake of a major Israeli airstrike on 13 June. That operation targeted Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, killing several high-ranking officers, including Major General Mohammad Bagheri and Major General Hossein Salami. Iranian state media also reported the deaths of six nuclear scientists and 78 civilians, including women and children, as a result of the Israeli strike. Dozens more were reported injured.

Iran’s retaliation began with the launch of over 100 drones towards Israel. Many of them were intercepted by Israeli air defences. A second wave of missile attacks followed, and some of those missiles managed to hit targets inside Israeli cities.

‘Any country that defends Israel…’: Iran’s stern warning to nations after reports of US helping Tel Aviv intercept missiles

Following the pre-emptive air strikes, Iran remains defiant in its pursuit of nuclear power, underscoring not just its resilience but also doubling down with its rhetoric, claiming it as its ‘sovereign right’ to nuclear enrichment and missile power.&nbsp;"One should not speak to such a predatory regime except in the language of power," Iran declared, “The world now better understands Iran’s insistence on the right to enrichment, nuclear technology, and missile power.”While this seems like the usual rhetoric from Iran but the timing, tone, and consequences of this declaration point to a significant escalation in the region.<h2>Iran ditching the diplomatic playbook</h2>For years, Iran has walked a thin line between its nuclear ambitions and, at the same time, insisting it was committed to peaceful energy use, by remaining a party to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)But this latest statement is devoid of any diplomatic pretence. Instead, it embraces an unambiguous and confrontational assertion, one that leaves the talks in Oman in the dark. Iran will pursue its nuclear plans as a national right but not as a diplomatic concession; furthermore, its refusal to comment on the diplomatic talks with the United States hints at the end of the era of nuclear negotiation, as it is approaching weapon-grade uranium enrichment.&nbsp;This comes as a response to Israel's covert and overt operations in Iran, which targeted 100 nuclear and military sites, and killed several top leaders in its armed forces. The air strike, which had used US intelligence, had outraged Iran. Though the United States maintain the strike was unilateral from Israel, it has claimed awareness about the planning of the same. US President Donald Trump has changed his tone from professing caution and restraint to Israel to pride and praise of its military excellence, which leaves little room for the resumption of the talks.&nbsp;This should raise concern across the world, as Iran is not just any simple nation; it is a theocratic state which believes it has a divine right to rule. It poses as the leader of the Islamic world, but this rhetoric is not just for deterrence but of ideological conviction and narrative dominance. Tehran's bold posture will embolden its proxies like Hezbollah, Houthi, Iraqi Militia and Hamas and will destabilise the region.More than anything, this implies a strategic failure or at least a setback for the United States' foreign policies, which failed to contain Iran diplomatically. Israel is acting independently, and possibly with U.S. approval, even if it's unofficial. For critics, US policy is more reactive than strategic. The US perceived Iran as weak, and it might remain silent or retaliate slowly; instead, it took the situation to silently exit the JCPOA.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Iran has declared its unwavering right to nuclear and missile capabilities, rejecting diplomacy and signaling a hardline shift. This bold stance raises fears of regional escalation and global fallout.

Following the pre-emptive air strikes, Iran remains defiant in its pursuit of nuclear power, underscoring not just its resilience but also doubling down with its rhetoric, claiming it as its ‘sovereign right’ to nuclear enrichment and missile power. "One should not speak to such a predatory regime except in the language of power," Iran declared, “The world now better understands Iran’s insistence on the right to enrichment, nuclear technology, and missile power.” While this seems like the usual rhetoric from Iran but the timing, tone, and consequences of this declaration point to a significant escalation in the region. Iran ditching the diplomatic playbook For years, Iran has walked a thin line between its nuclear ambitions and, at the same time, insisting it was committed to peaceful energy use, by remaining a party to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) But this latest statement is devoid of any diplomatic pretence. Instead, it embraces an unambiguous and confrontational assertion, one that leaves the talks in Oman in the dark. Iran will pursue its nuclear plans as a national right but not as a diplomatic concession; furthermore, its refusal to comment on the diplomatic talks with the United States hints at the end of the era of nuclear negotiation, as it is approaching weapon-grade uranium enrichment. This comes as a response to Israel's covert and overt operations in Iran, which targeted 100 nuclear and military sites, and killed several top leaders in its armed forces. The air strike, which had used US intelligence, had outraged Iran. Though the United States maintain the strike was unilateral from Israel, it has claimed awareness about the planning of the same. US President Donald Trump has changed his tone from professing caution and restraint to Israel to pride and praise of its military excellence, which leaves little room for the resumption of the talks. This should raise concern across the world, as Iran is not just any simple nation; it is a theocratic state which believes it has a divine right to rule. It poses as the leader of the Islamic world, but this rhetoric is not just for deterrence but of ideological conviction and narrative dominance. Tehran's bold posture will embolden its proxies like Hezbollah, Houthi, Iraqi Militia and Hamas and will destabilise the region. More than anything, this implies a strategic failure or at least a setback for the United States' foreign policies, which failed to contain Iran diplomatically. Israel is acting independently, and possibly with U.S. approval, even if it's unofficial. For critics, US policy is more reactive than strategic. The US perceived Iran as weak, and it might remain silent or retaliate slowly; instead, it took the situation to silently exit the JCPOA.

Iran has declared its unwavering right to nuclear and missile capabilities, rejecting diplomacy and signalling a hardline shift. This bold stance raises fears of regional escalation and global fallout.

Iran remains defiant for nuclear power, ditching diplomatic playbook

us-iran

Us Iran, News on Us Iran, stories on Us Iran, articles on Us Iran, Us Iran stories at Wion, Us Iran news, Us Iran latest news

us iran

Missiles, not troops: How the US can defeat Iran without invading or occupying

‘More deadly than missiles?’ Does Iran have chemical or unconventional weapons

Who has the edge? US air power versus Iran’s layered defence

US withdraws troops from key Middle East bases amid rising tensions: Report

How Israel can block drones and cruise missiles coming towards it

From Qatar to Bahrain: US military bases Iran could attack in case of war

Iran accuses US of plotting 'regime change' after Trump says 'HELP ON ITS WAY'

US tells citizens to 'leave Iran now' amid unrest and internet blackouts

'HELP IS ON ITS WAY. KEEP PROTESTING', says Trump as protests intensify in Iran

Why Al Udeid Air Base matters as US deploys jets and bombers amid Iran tensions

What makes it powerful? How the US can strike Iran without entering its airspace

What makes the US Middle East base network powerful enough to attack Iran?

50,000 military personnel? Why has the US deployed soldiers in the Middle East

Iranian military will teach 'an unforgettable lesson' to Trump if US attacks Iran: Parliament speaker

How Iran’s air defences compare with Israel’s and why it matters in war

'US vs Iran': What Iran’s air defenses can and cannot stop

‘US vs Iran’: What would it mean for the world economy?

Could Iran’s allies, like Russia, come to its defence if the US strikes?

'US vs Iran': Why sanctions no longer work the way they once did

How the 1979 Iranian Revolution shattered U.S.-Iran relations

U.S. vs. Iran: How a war could affect global oil prices

‘Death to America’: Chants echo in Iran’s Parliament as protests intensify

Iran vows to block US-brokered Azerbaijan-Armenia corridor near its border

'Will not hesitate': Iran warns US, Israel of retaliation if attacked again

‘What the f***’: Trump drops F-BOMB after Israel, Iran violate ceasefire

What is Al Udeid Air Base? Inside the US stronghold Iran just targeted in Qatar