In what is seen as an attempt by United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer's effort to distance himself from Iranian attack jointly launched by Israel and the US, he said on Sunday (local time) that his country was “not involved.” He made the clarification in a video message and expressed his concern about the British nationals in Gulf countries, while also calling out Iran for its ‘dangerous’ retaliation and attacking the countries that did not attack Tehran. However, in what is seen a balance tactics by Starmer, he said that he will allow the US to use British bases for “ specific and limited defensive purpose.” Batting for “negotiated settlement”, Starmer said that absence of Supreme Leader Khamenei did not stop Iran from launching these strike and Tehran's approach is becoming even more “reckless.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-analysts-see-oil-touching-100-on-gulf-tensions-1772431189366/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-analysts-see-oil-touching-100-on-gulf-tensions-1772431189366/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-nothing-has-changed-in-our-military-capability-says-iran-s-fm-abbas-araghchi-1772397747507">‘Nothing has changed in our military capability,’ says Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Sharing a video message on X, Starmer said, "Yesterday, I spoke to you about the situation in the Gulf and explained that the United Kingdom was not involved in the strikes on Iran. Over the last two days, Iran has launched sustained attacks across the region at countries that did not attack them. They've hit airports and hotels where British citizens are staying," he said. Describing the situation as "clearly a dangerous" one, Starmer noted that there are "at least 200,000 British citizens in the region, residents, families on holiday and those in transit." He urged them to "please register their presence and follow Foreign Office travel advice," adding, "I know this is a deeply worrying time and we will continue to do all we can to support you." Starmer said British armed forces stationed in the region were also at risk.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/attacks-on-iran-will-continue-until-all-of-our-objectives-are-achieved-trump-issues-fresh-warning-1772408635896">Attacks on Iran will ‘continue until all of our objectives are achieved’: Trump issues fresh warning</a>&nbsp;Briefing on Britain's non-involvement in offensive strikes, he said that British jets are in the air as part of “coordinated defensive operations” in the Gulf as Iran is striking “British interests and putting British people at huge risk.” He confirmed that Trump can use UK bases for attack on Iran, saying, “The United States has requested permission to use British bases for that specific and limited defensive purpose. We have taken the decision to accept this request, to prevent Iran firing missiles across the region, killing innocent civilians, putting British lives at risk, and hitting countries that have not been involved.”

UK PM Keir Starmer said Britain will allow the US to use its bases for limited defensive action against Iranian missile threats but will not join offensive strikes. He warned Iran’s attacks endanger British citizens and forces in the Gulf, stressing collective self-defence under international law.

In what is seen as an attempt by United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer's effort to distance himself from Iranian attack jointly launched by Israel and the US, he said on Sunday (local time) that his country was “not involved.” He made the clarification in a video message and expressed his concern about the British nationals in Gulf countries, while also calling out Iran for its ‘dangerous’ retaliation and attacking the countries that did not attack Tehran. However, in what is seen a balance tactics by Starmer, he said that he will allow the US to use British bases for “ specific and limited defensive purpose.” Batting for “negotiated settlement”, Starmer said that absence of Supreme Leader Khamenei did not stop Iran from launching these strike and Tehran's approach is becoming even more “reckless.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-analysts-see-oil-touching-100-on-gulf-tensions-1772431189366/embed Also Read: ‘Nothing has changed in our military capability,’ says Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi Sharing a video message on X, Starmer said, "Yesterday, I spoke to you about the situation in the Gulf and explained that the United Kingdom was not involved in the strikes on Iran. Over the last two days, Iran has launched sustained attacks across the region at countries that did not attack them. They've hit airports and hotels where British citizens are staying," he said. Describing the situation as "clearly a dangerous" one, Starmer noted that there are "at least 200,000 British citizens in the region, residents, families on holiday and those in transit." He urged them to "please register their presence and follow Foreign Office travel advice," adding, "I know this is a deeply worrying time and we will continue to do all we can to support you." Starmer said British armed forces stationed in the region were also at risk. Also Read: Attacks on Iran will ‘continue until all of our objectives are achieved’: Trump issues fresh warning Briefing on Britain's non-involvement in offensive strikes, he said that British jets are in the air as part of “coordinated defensive operations” in the Gulf as Iran is striking “British interests and putting British people at huge risk.” He confirmed that Trump can use UK bases for attack on Iran, saying, “The United States has requested permission to use British bases for that specific and limited defensive purpose. We have taken the decision to accept this request, to prevent Iran firing missiles across the region, killing innocent civilians, putting British lives at risk, and hitting countries that have not been involved.”

UK PM Keir Starmer said Britain will allow the US to use British bases for a limited defensive purpose against Iranian missile threats but will not join offensive strikes. He warned Iran’s attacks risk British lives in the Gulf and stressed support for collective self-defence&nbsp;

UK not backing Trump in Iran operation? PM Starmer responds to US request for using British bases

United States President Donald Trump set up a situation room at the Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida as the first missiles hit Iran on Saturday. The White House released images from the room, showing how it was a major security scare.

United States President Donald Trump set up a situation room at the Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida as the first missiles hit Iran on Saturday. The White House released images from the room, showing how it was a major security scare.

White House errs big time with images from Trump's Mar-a-Lago situation room during Operation Epic Fury

IDF accused Iran of firing cluster munitions at a densely populated area in Israel to maximise civilian harm, calling it a war crime. Cluster bombs release multiple submunitions over wide areas, often leaving unexploded ‘duds’ that pose long-term risks to civilians. Know more about it.

IDF accused Iran of firing cluster munitions at a densely populated area in Israel to maximise civilian harm, calling it a war crime. Cluster bombs release multiple submunitions over wide areas, often leaving unexploded ‘duds’ that pose long-term risks to civilians. Know more about it.

What is cluster bomb? IDF claims Iran fired missile with munitions at civilian area in Israel

Israeli officials argue that Tehran’s missile arsenal gives it the ability to strike targets across the region, including Israeli territory and US military facilities in the Middle East.

Israeli officials argue that Tehran’s missile arsenal gives it the ability to strike targets across the region, including Israeli territory and US military facilities in the Middle East.

Iran’s missiles could strike Israel and US bases! Here’s why Israel wants curbs and Tehran draws the line

Iranians chanted anti-Khamenei slogans in Tehran as US-Iran tensions escalated. Trump warned he could “do something very tough” despite ongoing nuclear talks, keeping strike options open. Protests that began over Iran’s economic crisis have eased

Iranians chanted anti-Khamenei slogans in Tehran as US-Iran tensions escalated. Trump warned he could “do something very tough” despite ongoing nuclear talks, keeping strike options open. Protests that began over Iran’s economic crisis have eased

‘Will do something tough’: Trump keeps attack options open as Iranians chant anti-Khamenei slogans

Ahead of Netanyahu’s US visit, Iran warned Washington against Israel’s “destructive” influence on nuclear talks. Tehran said the US must act independently. While both sides signal cautious optimism, Trump reiterated that Iran must forgo nuclear weapons, warning of “tough” action if talks fail.

Ahead of Netanyahu’s US visit, Iran warned Washington against Israel’s “destructive” influence on nuclear talks. Tehran said the US must act independently. While both sides signal cautious optimism, Trump reiterated that Iran must forgo nuclear weapons

'Both Israel and Iran want a deal': Trump's BIG statement after Tehran warns US against Netanyahu's 'destructive' influence on nuclear talks

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has accused Israel of trying to assassinate him during last month’s intense 12-day conflict between the two countries. Speaking in an interview with US media figure Tucker Carlson, Pezeshkian said, “They did try, yes. They acted accordingly, but they failed.”He added that the attack happened while he was attending a meeting, “It was not the United States that was behind the attempt on my life. It was Israel. I was in a meeting… they tried to bombard the area in which we were holding that meeting.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-complete-disappointment-kash-patel-once-pushed-epstein-conspiracies-now-leads-trump-s-fbi-and-dismisses-them-but-maga-isn-t-buying-it-1751892825511">‘Complete disappointment’: Kash Patel once pushed Epstein conspiracies, now leads Trump’s FBI and dismisses them, but MAGA&nbsp;isn’t&nbsp;buying&nbsp;it</a>His comments appeared to refer to Israel’s large-scale bombing campaign on Iranian territory launched on 13 June, which reportedly killed several senior Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists.<h2>Over 900 killed in Iran during Israeli strikes</h2>The airstrikes came just days before Tehran and Washington were set to resume nuclear negotiations on 12 April. Iran’s judiciary said that more than 900 people were killed across the country during the Israeli attacks. Israel, in turn, faced a wave of retaliatory drone and missile strikes that killed 28 people, according to Israeli officials.The war marked a rare confrontation between the two nations and saw the United States join Israel in targeting key Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz.<h2>Pezeshkian says Iran open to nuclear talks, if trust is restored</h2>Despite the deadly conflict, President Pezeshkian expressed readiness to return to nuclear negotiations, but said trust was a major concern. “We see no problem in re-entering the negotiations,” Pezeshkian told Carlson. However, he warned that Iran needed guarantees from Washington, “There is a condition… for restarting the talks. How are we going to trust the United States again?”Referring to the recent airstrikes, he added, “We re-entered the negotiations, then how can we know for sure that in the middle of the talks the Israeli regime will not be given the permission again to attack us?”

The airstrikes came just days before Tehran and Washington were set to resume nuclear negotiations on 12 April. Iran’s judiciary said that more than 900 people were killed across the country during the Israeli attacks.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has accused Israel of trying to assassinate him during last month’s intense 12-day conflict between the two countries. Speaking in an interview with US media figure Tucker Carlson, Pezeshkian said, “They did try, yes. They acted accordingly, but they failed.” He added that the attack happened while he was attending a meeting, “It was not the United States that was behind the attempt on my life. It was Israel. I was in a meeting… they tried to bombard the area in which we were holding that meeting.” Also read: ‘Complete disappointment’: Kash Patel once pushed Epstein conspiracies, now leads Trump’s FBI and dismisses them, but MAGA isn’t buying it His comments appeared to refer to Israel’s large-scale bombing campaign on Iranian territory launched on 13 June, which reportedly killed several senior Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists. Over 900 killed in Iran during Israeli strikes The airstrikes came just days before Tehran and Washington were set to resume nuclear negotiations on 12 April. Iran’s judiciary said that more than 900 people were killed across the country during the Israeli attacks. Israel, in turn, faced a wave of retaliatory drone and missile strikes that killed 28 people, according to Israeli officials. The war marked a rare confrontation between the two nations and saw the United States join Israel in targeting key Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. Pezeshkian says Iran open to nuclear talks, if trust is restored Despite the deadly conflict, President Pezeshkian expressed readiness to return to nuclear negotiations, but said trust was a major concern. “We see no problem in re-entering the negotiations,” Pezeshkian told Carlson. However, he warned that Iran needed guarantees from Washington, “There is a condition… for restarting the talks. How are we going to trust the United States again?” Referring to the recent airstrikes, he added, “We re-entered the negotiations, then how can we know for sure that in the middle of the talks the Israeli regime will not be given the permission again to attack us?”

The airstrikes came just days before Tehran and Washington were set to resume nuclear negotiations on 12 April. Iran’s judiciary said that more than 900 people were killed across the country during the Israeli attacks.

‘They tried to kill me’: Iran’s president says Israel tried to assassinate him during 12-day war

Donald Trump ranted against former US president Barack Obama after Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware) compared the former's Israel-Iran negotiations to Obama's Iran agreement. Now he is being mocked on social media for his outburst and the "noise" he is known to make about everything. On Monday morning, Trump took to Truth Social to proclaim loudly that comparing him with Obama is almost criminal. Trump wrote, "Tell phony Democrat Senator Chris Coons that I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama, who paid them $Billions under the stupid 'road to a Nuclear Weapon JCPOA (which would now be expired!), nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities."&nbsp;Notably, Coons suggested that the Trump administration is considering entering into deal with Iran similar to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) struck by former President Obama. He was discussing on Fox News the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Coons suggested that the Trump administration is mulling a $30 billion deal with Iran that would allow for the development of civilian nuclear facilities.&nbsp;<h2>What did Coons say about Trump and Iran?</h2>&nbsp;“I’ll just note that President Trump, by press accounts, is now moving towards negotiation and offering Iran a deal that looks somewhat similar to the Iran deal that was offered by Obama, tens of billions of dollars of incentives and reduced sanctions in exchange for abandoning their nuclear program,” Coons said in his Sunday interview. Trump went berserk over the suggestion and called Coons a "SleazeBag". "Never heard of this ridiculous idea,” the president wrote late Friday on Truth Social.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-political-suicide-split-govt-better-musk-continues-tirade-against-trump-s-big-beautiful-bill-here-s-what-he-says-now-1751270025759">Musk continues tirade against Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Here's what he says now</a><h2>Social media mocks Trump</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, Trump's tirades and the habit of shouting about everything he does in the world are making him a subject of mockery on the internet. His repeated use of the word "OBLITERATED" especially came under fire. A user wrote on X, "Who in the world taught them this word 'OBLITERATED'?"&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-envoy-continues-communication-with-iran-white-house-1751337889365/embed&nbsp;Another user cited how Trump was wrong about everything he claims to have done. "Trump barking again: 'We obliterated Iran's nuclear facilities.' Reality check: You obliterated nothing but your own credibility. Iran never begged you, and never will. You were never open for diplomacy — only for Israel's script... The harsh truth? You weren't feared — just ignored. History will remember your threats as noise, not strategy."&nbsp;Another user called Trump an "utter clown" for making noise about his role in the Iran-Israel crisis. One person couldn't believe that the president of a country broke protocol to toot his own horn even before officials could confirm that anything had happened. "He violated a military standard by immediately suggesting success without waiting for intelligence level confirmation. He is truly unhinged." &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump has become the subject of mockery on social media for shouting at the top of his lungs about everything he does. Trump is angry and irritated after he was compared to Barack Obama by Senator Chris Coons.

Donald Trump ranted against former US president Barack Obama after Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware) compared the former's Israel-Iran negotiations to Obama's Iran agreement. Now he is being mocked on social media for his outburst and the "noise" he is known to make about everything. On Monday morning, Trump took to Truth Social to proclaim loudly that comparing him with Obama is almost criminal. Trump wrote, "Tell phony Democrat Senator Chris Coons that I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama, who paid them $Billions under the stupid 'road to a Nuclear Weapon JCPOA (which would now be expired!), nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities." Notably, Coons suggested that the Trump administration is considering entering into deal with Iran similar to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) struck by former President Obama. He was discussing on Fox News the US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Coons suggested that the Trump administration is mulling a $30 billion deal with Iran that would allow for the development of civilian nuclear facilities. What did Coons say about Trump and Iran? “I’ll just note that President Trump, by press accounts, is now moving towards negotiation and offering Iran a deal that looks somewhat similar to the Iran deal that was offered by Obama, tens of billions of dollars of incentives and reduced sanctions in exchange for abandoning their nuclear program,” Coons said in his Sunday interview. Trump went berserk over the suggestion and called Coons a "SleazeBag". "Never heard of this ridiculous idea,” the president wrote late Friday on Truth Social. Also Read: Musk continues tirade against Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Here's what he says now Social media mocks Trump Meanwhile, Trump's tirades and the habit of shouting about everything he does in the world are making him a subject of mockery on the internet. His repeated use of the word "OBLITERATED" especially came under fire. A user wrote on X, "Who in the world taught them this word 'OBLITERATED'?" https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-envoy-continues-communication-with-iran-white-house-1751337889365/embed Another user cited how Trump was wrong about everything he claims to have done. "Trump barking again: 'We obliterated Iran's nuclear facilities.' Reality check: You obliterated nothing but your own credibility. Iran never begged you, and never will. You were never open for diplomacy — only for Israel's script... The harsh truth? You weren't feared — just ignored. History will remember your threats as noise, not strategy." Another user called Trump an "utter clown" for making noise about his role in the Iran-Israel crisis. One person couldn't believe that the president of a country broke protocol to toot his own horn even before officials could confirm that anything had happened. "He violated a military standard by immediately suggesting success without waiting for intelligence level confirmation. He is truly unhinged."

US President Donald Trump has become the subject of mockery on social media for shouting at the top of his lungs about everything he does. Trump is angry and irritated after he was compared to Barack Obama by Senator Chris Coons.

'Who in the world taught them this word OBLITERATED?' Netizens mock Trump for his rant against Obama

Iran’s judiciary has revealed that at least 71 people were killed in Israel’s attack on Tehran’s Evin prison, a notorious facility where many political prisoners and dissidents have been held. Judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir said in a post on the official Mizan news agency website on Sunday that those killed included staff, soldiers, prisoners, and members of visiting families. It was not possible to independently verify the claim. Several prison buildings were hit in the June 23 attack, the day before the ceasefire between Israel and Iran came into effect, and prompted concerns from rights groups about the safety of the inmates.&nbsp;The news of the prison attack was quickly overshadowed by an Iranian attack on a US base in Qatar the same day, which caused no casualties.Jahangir did not share details of the casualty figures but said the attack had hit the prison’s infirmary, engineering building, judicial affairs, and visitation hall, where visiting family members were killed and injured.&nbsp;<h2>‘Evin prison a symbol of the Iranian regime’s repression’</h2>&nbsp;The New York-based Centre for Human Rights in Iran criticised Israel for striking the prison that is a symbol of the Iranian regime’s repression.The group said Iran was legally obligated to protect the prisoners held in Evin, and slammed authorities in Tehran for their “failure to evacuate, provide medical assistance, or inform families” following the attack.&nbsp;Jahangir said some of those injured were treated on site, while others were sent to hospitals.Iran had not shared any death figures till now, but on Saturday it confirmed that top prosecutor Ali Ghanaatkar—whose prosecution of dissidents, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, led to widespread criticism by human rights groups—had been killed in the attack.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Foreign reporters from <a href="https://twitter.com/Reuters?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Reuters</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/AJEnglish?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AJEnglish</a> , <a href="https://twitter.com/AP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AP</a>, <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RT_com</a>, and others visited Evin Prison after Israel’s deadly strike. The attack killed 71, including staff, inmates, and visiting families. What happened in Evin must not be forgotten.<a href="https://t.co/KfnbottQKU">https://t.co/KfnbottQKU</a>&mdash; mizan news agency (@Mizannews_En) <a href="https://twitter.com/Mizannews_En/status/1939336744035332590?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 29, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists killed: Israel</h2>&nbsp;Israel attacked Iran on June 13 in a bid to destroy the country’s nuclear programme.After the ceasefire, Israel claimed it killed around 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites.&nbsp;In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted, but those that got through caused damage and killed 28 people.&nbsp;While both sides have adhered to truce, Abdolrahim Mousavi, the chief of staff for Iran’s armed forces, said in a conversation with Saudi Arabia’s defence minister that the country is prepared if there were to be another surprise Israeli attack.“We did not initiate the war, but we responded to the aggressor with all our might, and since we have complete doubts about the enemy’s adherence to its commitments, including the ceasefire, we are prepared to give them a strong response if they repeat the aggression,” Mousavi said, according to Iranian state TV agency IRNA.

After the ceasefire, Israel claimed it killed around 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel.

Iran’s judiciary has revealed that at least 71 people were killed in Israel’s attack on Tehran’s Evin prison, a notorious facility where many political prisoners and dissidents have been held. Judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir said in a post on the official Mizan news agency website on Sunday that those killed included staff, soldiers, prisoners, and members of visiting families. It was not possible to independently verify the claim. Several prison buildings were hit in the June 23 attack, the day before the ceasefire between Israel and Iran came into effect, and prompted concerns from rights groups about the safety of the inmates. The news of the prison attack was quickly overshadowed by an Iranian attack on a US base in Qatar the same day, which caused no casualties. Jahangir did not share details of the casualty figures but said the attack had hit the prison’s infirmary, engineering building, judicial affairs, and visitation hall, where visiting family members were killed and injured. ‘Evin prison a symbol of the Iranian regime’s repression’ The New York-based Centre for Human Rights in Iran criticised Israel for striking the prison that is a symbol of the Iranian regime’s repression. The group said Iran was legally obligated to protect the prisoners held in Evin, and slammed authorities in Tehran for their “failure to evacuate, provide medical assistance, or inform families” following the attack. Jahangir said some of those injured were treated on site, while others were sent to hospitals. Iran had not shared any death figures till now, but on Saturday it confirmed that top prosecutor Ali Ghanaatkar—whose prosecution of dissidents, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, led to widespread criticism by human rights groups—had been killed in the attack.

After the ceasefire, Israel claimed it killed around 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel.

At least 71 killed in Israel’s strike on Tehran’s notorious Evin prison, says Iran’s judiciary

Iran has said it is open to a new nuclear agreement that could see its stockpile of highly enriched uranium transferred abroad. The announcement came through Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, in a written interview with Al-Monitor. It is the most detailed official statement since the end of a 12-day war involving strikes by the United States and Israel on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.“We would be prepared to transfer our stockpiles of 60% and 20% enriched uranium to another country and have them transferred out of Iranian territory in return for receiving yellowcake,” Iravani said. This marked a departure from Iran’s previous position, which strongly opposed such a transfer.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-holds-mass-funeral-for-military-leaders-killed-in-israeli-strikes-1751096752493">Iran holds mass funeral for military leaders killed in Israeli strikes</a><h2>400kg of enriched uranium still missing</h2>While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium. Roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity is reportedly missing. Former top UN nuclear official Olli Heinonen told Eye for Iran, “One should not relax because this material as such is enough for 10 nuclear weapons if it is enriched further to 90%.” The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has yet to confirm the location of this stockpile.<h2>Iran backs regional nuclear cooperation</h2>In addition to exporting uranium, Iran has also shown interest in a regional nuclear consortium. Iravani said Tehran is willing to collaborate with countries in the region that operate nuclear reactors, including on fuel supply and safety standards. “We are willing to collaborate with all countries in our region… if such a move is a complementary initiative and not a substitute for Iran’s domestic nuclear program,” Iravani said.The United States reportedly pitched this idea before the war, with the potential involvement of Saudi Arabia, Oman, the UAE, Qatar, and the US. The plan includes supplying enriched uranium for civilian use in exchange for partial sanctions relief.<h2>No clear location for proposed consortium</h2>The question of where the enrichment would take place remains unresolved. Iran has insisted that enrichment must continue on its soil. Despite this, Iravani gave the strongest endorsement yet of the consortium plan, saying, “A consortium could very well be one of the forms such cooperation might take.”Asked whether Iran would limit enrichment to such a consortium operating inside the country, he said, “In principle, we have no objection to that; however, we should consider it based on the details of any potential proposals we receive.”<h2>NPT membership still stands, says Iran</h2>Iran’s parliament recently passed a law restricting cooperation with the IAEA, raising concerns that it could be distancing itself from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iravani clarified that this was not the case. “It does not signify Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT,” he said, adding that any deal with the US must still respect Iran’s rights under the treaty.

While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium.

Iran has said it is open to a new nuclear agreement that could see its stockpile of highly enriched uranium transferred abroad. The announcement came through Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, in a written interview with Al-Monitor. It is the most detailed official statement since the end of a 12-day war involving strikes by the United States and Israel on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. “We would be prepared to transfer our stockpiles of 60% and 20% enriched uranium to another country and have them transferred out of Iranian territory in return for receiving yellowcake,” Iravani said. This marked a departure from Iran’s previous position, which strongly opposed such a transfer. Also read: Iran holds mass funeral for military leaders killed in Israeli strikes 400kg of enriched uranium still missing While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium. Roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity is reportedly missing. Former top UN nuclear official Olli Heinonen told Eye for Iran, “One should not relax because this material as such is enough for 10 nuclear weapons if it is enriched further to 90%.” The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has yet to confirm the location of this stockpile. Iran backs regional nuclear cooperation In addition to exporting uranium, Iran has also shown interest in a regional nuclear consortium. Iravani said Tehran is willing to collaborate with countries in the region that operate nuclear reactors, including on fuel supply and safety standards. “We are willing to collaborate with all countries in our region… if such a move is a complementary initiative and not a substitute for Iran’s domestic nuclear program,” Iravani said. The United States reportedly pitched this idea before the war, with the potential involvement of Saudi Arabia, Oman, the UAE, Qatar, and the US. The plan includes supplying enriched uranium for civilian use in exchange for partial sanctions relief. No clear location for proposed consortium The question of where the enrichment would take place remains unresolved. Iran has insisted that enrichment must continue on its soil. Despite this, Iravani gave the strongest endorsement yet of the consortium plan, saying, “A consortium could very well be one of the forms such cooperation might take.” Asked whether Iran would limit enrichment to such a consortium operating inside the country, he said, “In principle, we have no objection to that; however, we should consider it based on the details of any potential proposals we receive.” NPT membership still stands, says Iran Iran’s parliament recently passed a law restricting cooperation with the IAEA, raising concerns that it could be distancing itself from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iravani clarified that this was not the case. “It does not signify Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT,” he said, adding that any deal with the US must still respect Iran’s rights under the treaty.

While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium.

'In return for yellowcake': Iran ready to send enriched uranium abroad after war

Oil prices are heading for their worst weekly decline since March 2023, with traders stripping out any risk premium built up over fears of a wider Israel–Iran conflict in West Asia. Despite last week’s dramatic escalation, markets see no significant supply disruption as a ceasefire holds, pushing benchmark crude prices back to pre-conflict levels.<h2>War premium fades as ceasefire holds</h2>As per Reuters, Brent crude futures rose 35 cents, or 0.52 per cent, to US$68.08 a barrel in early trade on Friday, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained 40 cents, or 0.61 per cent, to US$65.64. Yet both benchmarks remain on track for a weekly fall of about 12 per cent—their steepest drop in more than two years. Prices had jumped to five-month highs earlier this week after US strikes targeted Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, fuelling fears of an all-out war that could threaten West Asian oil exports.&nbsp;&nbsp;But those gains quickly evaporated after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire deal on Tuesday, easing fears of a supply shock. As per Reuters, traders swiftly priced out the geopolitical risk that had driven the rally.<h2>Analysts see oversupply despite conflict</h2>According to Reuters, analysts note that while tensions remain, there is no visible impact on physical oil supply so far. Macquarie analysts wrote in a note on Thursday: “Absent the threat of significant supply disruption, we still view oil as fundamentally oversupplied, with our 2025 balances indicating a roughly 2.1 million barrels per day surplus.”&nbsp;Macquarie has slightly raised its WTI price forecast by US$2 to account for a modest ongoing geopolitical risk premium. But the broader outlook remains bearish, with global supplies seen as ample and OPEC+ still holding spare production capacity.<h2>US inventory draw offers limited support</h2>Even as the war premium vanished, oil prices found some support midweek from signs of tightening US stockpiles. As per Reuters, US government data showed crude oil and fuel inventories declined in the most recent reporting week, reflecting higher refinery utilisation and demand. Phil Flynn, senior analyst at the Price Futures Group, told Reuters the market was “starting to digest the fact that crude oil inventories are very tight all of a sudden.” Despite that, the bullish impulse proved limited, with the broader market narrative dominated by relief that West Asian energy infrastructure remained unharmed.&nbsp;Beyond the ceasefire in West Asia, traders are also watching US monetary policy for clues about demand. As reported by the Wall Street Journal, President Trump may announce his choice for the next Federal Reserve chair earlier than usual—a move that has fuelled market bets on possible interest rate cuts. Lower US rates could typically stimulate economic activity and energy demand, offering a potential tailwind for oil prices.&nbsp;&nbsp;But for now, the dominant factor this week has been the unwinding of war-driven price gains, as traders conclude the Israel–Iran ceasefire has largely defused the immediate threat of major supply disruptions.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Brent crude rose slightly to $68.08, while WTI reached $65.64, but both are on track for a 12% drop. Analysts indicate an oversupply persists despite geopolitical tensions, and US inventory draws provided limited support. 

Oil prices are heading for their worst weekly decline since March 2023, with traders stripping out any risk premium built up over fears of a wider Israel–Iran conflict in West Asia. Despite last week’s dramatic escalation, markets see no significant supply disruption as a ceasefire holds, pushing benchmark crude prices back to pre-conflict levels. War premium fades as ceasefire holds As per Reuters, Brent crude futures rose 35 cents, or 0.52 per cent, to US$68.08 a barrel in early trade on Friday, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained 40 cents, or 0.61 per cent, to US$65.64. Yet both benchmarks remain on track for a weekly fall of about 12 per cent—their steepest drop in more than two years. Prices had jumped to five-month highs earlier this week after US strikes targeted Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, fuelling fears of an all-out war that could threaten West Asian oil exports. But those gains quickly evaporated after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire deal on Tuesday, easing fears of a supply shock. As per Reuters, traders swiftly priced out the geopolitical risk that had driven the rally. Analysts see oversupply despite conflict According to Reuters, analysts note that while tensions remain, there is no visible impact on physical oil supply so far. Macquarie analysts wrote in a note on Thursday: “Absent the threat of significant supply disruption, we still view oil as fundamentally oversupplied, with our 2025 balances indicating a roughly 2.1 million barrels per day surplus.” Macquarie has slightly raised its WTI price forecast by US$2 to account for a modest ongoing geopolitical risk premium. But the broader outlook remains bearish, with global supplies seen as ample and OPEC+ still holding spare production capacity. US inventory draw offers limited support Even as the war premium vanished, oil prices found some support midweek from signs of tightening US stockpiles. As per Reuters, US government data showed crude oil and fuel inventories declined in the most recent reporting week, reflecting higher refinery utilisation and demand. Phil Flynn, senior analyst at the Price Futures Group, told Reuters the market was “starting to digest the fact that crude oil inventories are very tight all of a sudden.” Despite that, the bullish impulse proved limited, with the broader market narrative dominated by relief that West Asian energy infrastructure remained unharmed. Beyond the ceasefire in West Asia, traders are also watching US monetary policy for clues about demand. As reported by the Wall Street Journal, President Trump may announce his choice for the next Federal Reserve chair earlier than usual—a move that has fuelled market bets on possible interest rate cuts. Lower US rates could typically stimulate economic activity and energy demand, offering a potential tailwind for oil prices. But for now, the dominant factor this week has been the unwinding of war-driven price gains, as traders conclude the Israel–Iran ceasefire has largely defused the immediate threat of major supply disruptions. (With inputs from the agencies)

Oil prices face their steepest weekly decline since March 2023, dropping due to reduced risk premiums as a ceasefire holds between Israel and Iran.

Oil prices face steepest weekly fall in two years as West Asia war premium fades

Oil prices ticked up on Thursday after data showed a sharper-than-expected drop in US crude and gasoline inventories, underscoring strong fuel demand across the world’s largest economy. However, investor caution continues to cloud the market amid geopolitical uncertainty in West Asia and ambiguity surrounding future OPEC+ production policy, as per Reuters.<h2>US demand supports recovery</h2>Brent crude futures rose 12 cents to $67.80 per barrel in early Asian trade, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained 20 cents to reach $65.12. Both benchmarks had jumped nearly one per cent on Wednesday following signs of resilient demand from US consumers, as quoted by Reuters.Government data released by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) showed a significant drop of 5.8 million barrels in US crude inventories for the week ending June 20, well above analyst forecasts of a mere 797,000-barrel draw, according to Reuters.&nbsp;Gasoline inventories also fell sharply by 2.1 million barrels against expectations of a 381,000-barrel build. This coincided with a surge in fuel consumption, with gasoline supplied often used as a proxy for demand hitting its highest level since December 2021, as per EIA data cited by Reuters.“Some buyers are favouring solid demand indicated by falling inventories in US weekly statistics,” said Yuki Takashima, economist at Nomura Securities, as quoted by Reuters. He added that despite this bullish trend, “investors remain nervous, seeking clarity on the status of the Iran-Israel ceasefire”.<h2>Geopolitical jitters and OPEC+ decisions</h2>While tensions between Iran and Israel have eased following a US-brokered ceasefire, investors are watching closely for long-term diplomatic commitments. US President Donald Trump, in remarks on Wednesday, praised the cessation of hostilities but made it clear that Washington’s ‘maximum pressure’ campaign on Tehran, including oil sanctions remains in place, as per Reuters.&nbsp;However, Trump signalled a potential softening of enforcement, stating the US might allow limited leeway in oil transactions to help Iran “rebuild” its economy, provided talks on curbing its nuclear programme make progress, according to Reuters reporting.&nbsp;Market attention is also pivoting to production policy from the OPEC+ alliance. On Saturday, Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin suggested that the group, comprising the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies like Russia could advance its planned production hikes by almost a year, as quoted by Reuters.Such a move could inject fresh supply into the market, potentially capping oil price gains just as seasonal summer demand strengthens.<h2>What's next?&nbsp;</h2>Analysts are split on where oil prices go next. Takashima of Nomura forecasts that WTI could stabilise back in the $60–$65 per barrel range, levels seen before the West Asia flare-up, as per Reuters.&nbsp;While physical demand remains strong, traders are closely monitoring upcoming US-Iran talks, any shifts in OPEC+ output strategy, and broader macroeconomic signals from top consumers like China and India.With West Asia still fragile and major producers walking a tightrope between market share and price stability, oil markets remain delicately balanced.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Despite a bullish demand signal from the US, oil markets face volatility as traders weigh fragile West Asia peace and potential OPEC+ supply shifts.

Oil prices ticked up on Thursday after data showed a sharper-than-expected drop in US crude and gasoline inventories, underscoring strong fuel demand across the world’s largest economy. However, investor caution continues to cloud the market amid geopolitical uncertainty in West Asia and ambiguity surrounding future OPEC+ production policy, as per Reuters. US demand supports recovery Brent crude futures rose 12 cents to $67.80 per barrel in early Asian trade, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained 20 cents to reach $65.12. Both benchmarks had jumped nearly one per cent on Wednesday following signs of resilient demand from US consumers, as quoted by Reuters. Government data released by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) showed a significant drop of 5.8 million barrels in US crude inventories for the week ending June 20, well above analyst forecasts of a mere 797,000-barrel draw, according to Reuters. Gasoline inventories also fell sharply by 2.1 million barrels against expectations of a 381,000-barrel build. This coincided with a surge in fuel consumption, with gasoline supplied often used as a proxy for demand hitting its highest level since December 2021, as per EIA data cited by Reuters. “Some buyers are favouring solid demand indicated by falling inventories in US weekly statistics,” said Yuki Takashima, economist at Nomura Securities, as quoted by Reuters. He added that despite this bullish trend, “investors remain nervous, seeking clarity on the status of the Iran-Israel ceasefire”. Geopolitical jitters and OPEC+ decisions While tensions between Iran and Israel have eased following a US-brokered ceasefire, investors are watching closely for long-term diplomatic commitments. US President Donald Trump, in remarks on Wednesday, praised the cessation of hostilities but made it clear that Washington’s ‘maximum pressure’ campaign on Tehran, including oil sanctions remains in place, as per Reuters. However, Trump signalled a potential softening of enforcement, stating the US might allow limited leeway in oil transactions to help Iran “rebuild” its economy, provided talks on curbing its nuclear programme make progress, according to Reuters reporting. Market attention is also pivoting to production policy from the OPEC+ alliance. On Saturday, Rosneft CEO Igor Sechin suggested that the group, comprising the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies like Russia could advance its planned production hikes by almost a year, as quoted by Reuters. Such a move could inject fresh supply into the market, potentially capping oil price gains just as seasonal summer demand strengthens. What's next? Analysts are split on where oil prices go next. Takashima of Nomura forecasts that WTI could stabilise back in the $60–$65 per barrel range, levels seen before the West Asia flare-up, as per Reuters. While physical demand remains strong, traders are closely monitoring upcoming US-Iran talks, any shifts in OPEC+ output strategy, and broader macroeconomic signals from top consumers like China and India. With West Asia still fragile and major producers walking a tightrope between market share and price stability, oil markets remain delicately balanced. (With inputs from the agencies)

Oil prices rise on strong US demand and inventory draw, but West Asia tensions and OPEC+ policy keep markets on edge.

Oil prices rise as US crude draw points to firm demand; West Asia risks still linger

Iran has finally admitted that its nuclear facilities have in fact been “badly damaged” in the US strikes. Esmail Baghaei, the spokesman of Iran’s foreign ministry, told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged.” However, he refused to share any details of the damage or the status of the nuclear facilities.&nbsp; “Yes, our nuclear installations have been badly damaged. That’s for sure because [they have] come under repeated attacks,” he said. “I have nothing to add on this issue because it’s a matter of technical issue,” he added, noting that the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) and other relevant agencies are taking note of it. The Iranian admission comes after some contradictory reports questioned the ‘obliteration’ of the country’s nuclear programme.&nbsp;On June 22, the US carried out Operation Midnight Hammer and dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on the three nuclear facilities in Iran—Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan—from its B-2 stealth bombers. The US strikes were aimed at destroying Iran’s nuclear programme, after the ongoing talks between the two countries failed to yield any result.&nbsp;Baghaei also hailed Iranians for their resoluteness and said, “Our people were massacred by Israel’s aggression. That’s war crimes, crimes against humanity and they [Israel] have to be held accountable”.&nbsp;“But the point is our people showed they are resolute in their defence of national security and sovereignty,” he added.&nbsp;<h2>‘Victory for everybody,’ says Trump</h2>&nbsp;Earlier in the day, US President Donald Trump hailed his ‘success’ in bringing the war between Iran and Israel to an end. Speaking to reporters at the Hague, he said that his decision to join Israel’s strikes against Iran ended the war, calling it a “victory for everybody”.Trump also rejected reports of an initial assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency and said that the findings were “inconclusive”. The report had claimed that the US strikes had only set back Iran’s nuclear programme by months.&nbsp;“The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don’t know. It could’ve been very severe. That’s what the intelligence suggests,” Trump told reporters.“It was very severe. It was obliteration. Iran’s nuclear programme has been put back decades,” he added.&nbsp;<h2>‘Tehran would not try to rebuild its nuclear facilities’</h2>&nbsp;Trump also added that Tehran would not try to rebuild its nuclear facilities and would instead opt for a diplomatic path towards reconciliation. “I’ll tell you, the last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now. They want to recover,” he said.On being asked if the US would attack Iran again if it tried to resume its nuclear enrichment programme, Trump said, “Sure”.&nbsp;Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, also told Fox News that the US and Israel had achieved their objective of “total destruction of the enrichment capacity” in Iran.&nbsp;Israel had also struck the Iranian nuclear facilities, saying that it aimed to thwart Tehran’s nuclear programme.&nbsp;However, the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, is yet to conduct an assessment of Iran’s nuclear facilities.IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that his ‘number 1 priority’ was to get his inspectors back to Iran’s nuclear sites to assess the impact of the US and Israeli military strikes, and verify its stockpile of enriched uranium.

On June 22, the US carried out Operation Midnight Hammer and dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on the three nuclear facilities in Iran—Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan—from its B-2 stealth bombers. The US strikes were aimed at destroying Iran’s nuclear programme.

Iran has finally admitted that its nuclear facilities have in fact been “badly damaged” in the US strikes. Esmail Baghaei, the spokesman of Iran’s foreign ministry, told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged.” However, he refused to share any details of the damage or the status of the nuclear facilities. “Yes, our nuclear installations have been badly damaged. That’s for sure because [they have] come under repeated attacks,” he said. “I have nothing to add on this issue because it’s a matter of technical issue,” he added, noting that the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran (AEOI) and other relevant agencies are taking note of it. The Iranian admission comes after some contradictory reports questioned the ‘obliteration’ of the country’s nuclear programme. On June 22, the US carried out Operation Midnight Hammer and dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on the three nuclear facilities in Iran—Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan—from its B-2 stealth bombers. The US strikes were aimed at destroying Iran’s nuclear programme, after the ongoing talks between the two countries failed to yield any result. Baghaei also hailed Iranians for their resoluteness and said, “Our people were massacred by Israel’s aggression. That’s war crimes, crimes against humanity and they [Israel] have to be held accountable”. “But the point is our people showed they are resolute in their defence of national security and sovereignty,” he added. ‘Victory for everybody,’ says Trump Earlier in the day, US President Donald Trump hailed his ‘success’ in bringing the war between Iran and Israel to an end. Speaking to reporters at the Hague, he said that his decision to join Israel’s strikes against Iran ended the war, calling it a “victory for everybody”. Trump also rejected reports of an initial assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency and said that the findings were “inconclusive”. The report had claimed that the US strikes had only set back Iran’s nuclear programme by months. “The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don’t know. It could’ve been very severe. That’s what the intelligence suggests,” Trump told reporters. “It was very severe. It was obliteration. Iran’s nuclear programme has been put back decades,” he added. ‘Tehran would not try to rebuild its nuclear facilities’ Trump also added that Tehran would not try to rebuild its nuclear facilities and would instead opt for a diplomatic path towards reconciliation. “I’ll tell you, the last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now. They want to recover,” he said. On being asked if the US would attack Iran again if it tried to resume its nuclear enrichment programme, Trump said, “Sure”. Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, also told Fox News that the US and Israel had achieved their objective of “total destruction of the enrichment capacity” in Iran. Israel had also struck the Iranian nuclear facilities, saying that it aimed to thwart Tehran’s nuclear programme. However, the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, is yet to conduct an assessment of Iran’s nuclear facilities. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that his ‘number 1 priority’ was to get his inspectors back to Iran’s nuclear sites to assess the impact of the US and Israeli military strikes, and verify its stockpile of enriched uranium.

On June 22, the US carried out Operation Midnight Hammer and dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on the three nuclear facilities in Iran—Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan—from its B-2 stealth bombers. The US strikes were aimed at destroying Iran’s nuclear programme.

‘Badly damaged’: Iran's first admission of damage to its nuclear facilities in US strikes

United States President Donald Trump decided to join the Iran-Israel war this week and gave the go-ahead to use bunker-busting bombs to strike three key Iranian nuclear sites and their underground bunkers: the Fordow fuel-enrichment plant, the Natanz nuclear facility, and the Isfahan nuclear technology centre. The Pentagon codenamed it Operation Midnight Hammer. This was the first time the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), the 30,000-pound bomb, was ever used. The B-2 stealth bomber was engaged in the operation, as it is the only aircraft that can carry the monster bomb. Trump tooted his horn, saying that they had successfully taken out Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. But have they? A report by CNN suggests that Iran's nuclear program doesn't seem to have been destroyed and has only been pushed back by a few months. This has been claimed by early US intelligence.&nbsp;<h2>Iran's ultra-tough concrete saved the day?</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, Iran has affirmed that the attacks did not affect it in any way. Scientists think that this could be true, if history is anything to go by. In fact, Iran's underground nuclear facilities could be partially or wholly intact. Iran might have been trying to build the nuclear bomb for years, but there is one race that it has seemingly already won - a highly resilient concrete. Experts say they have heard about Iran and its ultra-tough concrete. It is believed to be a world leader in the new technology of Ultra High Performance Concrete, or UHPC, Popular Mechanics reported. Rumours of a bunker-buster bomb failing terribly in the late 2000s hint at Iran's strength in the field of concrete.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-iran-move-enriched-uranium-stockpile-to-secret-nuclear-sites-before-us-strike-leaked-intel-report-suggests-so-1750829772928">Did Iran move enriched uranium stockpile to 'secret nuclear sites' before US strike? Leaked intel report suggests so</a>&nbsp;<h2>A bunker-buster bomb failed got stuck on the surface&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Reportedly, a bunker-buster bomb hit a bunker in Iran at the time. But, instead of smashing through it, the bomb got embedded in the surface and failed to explode or cause any destruction. A bomb-disposal team was called in to remove the bomb. This is when experts sat up and took notice of the advancements in concrete technology in Iran.&nbsp;<h2>UHPC concrete is stronger and too strong for today's bombs</h2>&nbsp;UHPC is a type of concrete that is way more advanced than regular concrete. Earlier, concrete rated as "high strength" had a yield of 5,000 pounds per square inch (psi). There were some that went up to 10,000 psi. But UHPC can withstand 40,000 psi or more. This is because in this technology, concrete is turned into a composite material by adding steel or other fibres. They hold the concrete together and prevent it from cracking. Stephanie Barnett, Ph.D, of the University of Portsmouth in the UK, who works to develop stronger concrete to protect civilian buildings from terrorist attacks, told Popular Mechanics, "Instead of getting a few large cracks in a concrete panel, you get lots of smaller cracks. The fibres give it more fracture energy."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-insists-iran-nuclear-sites-completely-destroyed-denies-leaked-us-intel-report-1750824123756">Trump insists Iran nuclear sites 'completely destroyed'; denies leaked US intel report</a>&nbsp;An open-source Chinese study compared normal high-strength concrete with fibre-reinforced UHPC. It noted that projectiles smashed through the reinforced concrete targets, but the UHPC targets only had minor cracking. The bombs “either embedded in or rebounded from” the targets. The United States Air Force had also launched a project to study bunkers made of UHPC. It was reportedly feared that even the 5,000-pound bombs would not get through UHPC. Then it got the 21,000-pound Massive Ordnance Air Blast, "mother of all bombs". This is the biggest bomb one can fly, with only the B-2 Spirit strategic bomber capable of doing so.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-intelligence-says-main-components-of-nuke-programmme-not-destroyed-1750819190440/embed&nbsp;Experts say that even the biggest and toughest bomb could not get through UHPC. Gregory Vartanov of Toronto-based Advanced Materials Development Corp claims that current bombs cannot break down the high-grade UHPC. "Penetrators with monolithic cases made from materials such as … Eglin Steel … cannot penetrate bunkers made from UHPC,” he wrote in Aerospace &amp; Defense Technology magazine in February 2021. &nbsp;

Irans nuke program hit? Scientists say Iran has some ultra-tough concrete made using advanced technology, which could have saved its underground nuclear sites.

United States President Donald Trump decided to join the Iran-Israel war this week and gave the go-ahead to use bunker-busting bombs to strike three key Iranian nuclear sites and their underground bunkers: the Fordow fuel-enrichment plant, the Natanz nuclear facility, and the Isfahan nuclear technology centre. The Pentagon codenamed it Operation Midnight Hammer. This was the first time the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), the 30,000-pound bomb, was ever used. The B-2 stealth bomber was engaged in the operation, as it is the only aircraft that can carry the monster bomb. Trump tooted his horn, saying that they had successfully taken out Iran’s underground nuclear facilities. But have they? A report by CNN suggests that Iran's nuclear program doesn't seem to have been destroyed and has only been pushed back by a few months. This has been claimed by early US intelligence. Iran's ultra-tough concrete saved the day? Meanwhile, Iran has affirmed that the attacks did not affect it in any way. Scientists think that this could be true, if history is anything to go by. In fact, Iran's underground nuclear facilities could be partially or wholly intact. Iran might have been trying to build the nuclear bomb for years, but there is one race that it has seemingly already won - a highly resilient concrete. Experts say they have heard about Iran and its ultra-tough concrete. It is believed to be a world leader in the new technology of Ultra High Performance Concrete, or UHPC, Popular Mechanics reported. Rumours of a bunker-buster bomb failing terribly in the late 2000s hint at Iran's strength in the field of concrete. Also Read: Did Iran move enriched uranium stockpile to 'secret nuclear sites' before US strike? Leaked intel report suggests so A bunker-buster bomb failed got stuck on the surface Reportedly, a bunker-buster bomb hit a bunker in Iran at the time. But, instead of smashing through it, the bomb got embedded in the surface and failed to explode or cause any destruction. A bomb-disposal team was called in to remove the bomb. This is when experts sat up and took notice of the advancements in concrete technology in Iran. UHPC concrete is stronger and too strong for today's bombs UHPC is a type of concrete that is way more advanced than regular concrete. Earlier, concrete rated as "high strength" had a yield of 5,000 pounds per square inch (psi). There were some that went up to 10,000 psi. But UHPC can withstand 40,000 psi or more. This is because in this technology, concrete is turned into a composite material by adding steel or other fibres. They hold the concrete together and prevent it from cracking. Stephanie Barnett, Ph.D, of the University of Portsmouth in the UK, who works to develop stronger concrete to protect civilian buildings from terrorist attacks, told Popular Mechanics, "Instead of getting a few large cracks in a concrete panel, you get lots of smaller cracks. The fibres give it more fracture energy." Also Read: Trump insists Iran nuclear sites 'completely destroyed'; denies leaked US intel report An open-source Chinese study compared normal high-strength concrete with fibre-reinforced UHPC. It noted that projectiles smashed through the reinforced concrete targets, but the UHPC targets only had minor cracking. The bombs “either embedded in or rebounded from” the targets. The United States Air Force had also launched a project to study bunkers made of UHPC. It was reportedly feared that even the 5,000-pound bombs would not get through UHPC. Then it got the 21,000-pound Massive Ordnance Air Blast, "mother of all bombs". This is the biggest bomb one can fly, with only the B-2 Spirit strategic bomber capable of doing so. https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-intelligence-says-main-components-of-nuke-programmme-not-destroyed-1750819190440/embed Experts say that even the biggest and toughest bomb could not get through UHPC. Gregory Vartanov of Toronto-based Advanced Materials Development Corp claims that current bombs cannot break down the high-grade UHPC. "Penetrators with monolithic cases made from materials such as … Eglin Steel … cannot penetrate bunkers made from UHPC,” he wrote in Aerospace & Defense Technology magazine in February 2021.

Iran's nuke program hit? Scientists say Iran has some ultra-tough concrete made using advanced technology, which could have saved its underground nuclear sites.

Is Iran's concrete unbreakable? Scientists believe even 'mother of all bombs' cannot shatter it

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that Israel and the United States “cannot impose unjust aspirations by force”, as a fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel was announced after 12 days of fighting.“The Islamic Republic of Iran was forced into the military conflict to defend itself, and I hope that we will never be forced to fight again,” Pezeshkian told United Arab Emirates President Mohammed bin Zayed said during a phone call, according to the official IRNA news agency.&nbsp;<h2>‘Iran ready to resolve issues at negotiating table’</h2>&nbsp;The Iranian president also signalled Tehran’s readiness for diplomacy. Citing Pezeshkian, Iran’s state-affiliated outlet Noor News reported that “Tehran is prepared to talk and defend the rights of the Iranian people at the negotiating table.”&nbsp;Pezeshkian also said that his country was not seeking nuclear weapons but will continue to defend its “legitimate rights”.“We expect you to explain to them, in your dealings with the United States, that the Islamic Republic of Iran is only seeking to assert its legitimate rights,” Pezeshkian said during the call with the UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed.&nbsp;<h2>‘Israel and Iran wanted to stop the war, equally,’ says Trump</h2>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump has said in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social that both Iran and Israel wanted the war to end.&nbsp;“Both Israel and Iran wanted to stop the War, equally!” he said in his post, adding, “It was my great honor to Destroy All Nuclear facilities &amp; capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!”&nbsp;The president earlier lashed out at both countries, saying that they had violated a ceasefire announced by him.&nbsp;<h2>Don’t want regime change in Iran: Trump</h2>&nbsp;Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while travelling to the Netherlands for a Nato summit, Trump said he does not want a regime change in Iran.&nbsp;Asked if he wants a regime change in Iran, Trump said, “No. If there was, there was, but no I don’t want it. I’d like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible.”&nbsp;“Regime change takes chaos, and ideally we don’t want to see so much chaos,” he added.

The Iranian president also signalled Tehran’s readiness for diplomacy. Citing Pezeshkian, Iran’s state-affiliated outlet Noor News reported that “Tehran is prepared to talk and defend the rights of the Iranian people at the negotiating table.”

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that Israel and the United States “cannot impose unjust aspirations by force”, as a fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel was announced after 12 days of fighting. “The Islamic Republic of Iran was forced into the military conflict to defend itself, and I hope that we will never be forced to fight again,” Pezeshkian told United Arab Emirates President Mohammed bin Zayed said during a phone call, according to the official IRNA news agency. ‘Iran ready to resolve issues at negotiating table’ The Iranian president also signalled Tehran’s readiness for diplomacy. Citing Pezeshkian, Iran’s state-affiliated outlet Noor News reported that “Tehran is prepared to talk and defend the rights of the Iranian people at the negotiating table.” Pezeshkian also said that his country was not seeking nuclear weapons but will continue to defend its “legitimate rights”. “We expect you to explain to them, in your dealings with the United States, that the Islamic Republic of Iran is only seeking to assert its legitimate rights,” Pezeshkian said during the call with the UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed. ‘Israel and Iran wanted to stop the war, equally,’ says Trump US President Donald Trump has said in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social that both Iran and Israel wanted the war to end. “Both Israel and Iran wanted to stop the War, equally!” he said in his post, adding, “It was my great honor to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!” The president earlier lashed out at both countries, saying that they had violated a ceasefire announced by him. Don’t want regime change in Iran: Trump Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while travelling to the Netherlands for a Nato summit, Trump said he does not want a regime change in Iran. Asked if he wants a regime change in Iran, Trump said, “No. If there was, there was, but no I don’t want it. I’d like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible.” “Regime change takes chaos, and ideally we don’t want to see so much chaos,” he added.

The Iranian president also signalled Tehran’s readiness for diplomacy. Citing Pezeshkian, Iran’s state-affiliated outlet Noor News reported that “Tehran is prepared to talk and defend the rights of the Iranian people at the negotiating table.”

Iran president says Israel and US ‘cannot impose unjust aspirations by force’

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised both Israel and Iran for breaching a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered, singling out Israel for striking targets after the truce deadline had passed.<h2>Trump: ‘I’m not happy’ with Israel’s actions</h2>Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.”“I gotta get Israel to calm down now,” Trump said as he left the White House, Reuters reports.“Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen," he added.“We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing,” Trump told reporters/Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-thanks-iran-for-early-notice-was-tehran-s-missile-attack-on-us-bases-in-qatar-just-for-show-1750710034107">Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? A face-saving move meant for de-escalation</a>He said that he was not happy with either country, but especially Israel.Trump also posted a warning to Israel on his Truth Social platform, writing in capital letters, “ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES”This message came just hours after both Israel and Iran reportedly accepted a US-proposed ceasefire to halt their 12-day conflict.<h2>Ceasefire brokered after ‘simultaneous’ calls for peace</h2>Announcing the agreement on Truth Social, Trump claimed both nations had reached out to him at the same time to ask for peace.“Israel &amp; Iran came to me, almost simultaneously, and said, ‘PEACE!’” he wrote. “The World, and the Middle East, are the real WINNERS! Both Nations will see tremendous LOVE, PEACE, AND PROSPERITY in their futures.”He also said that Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been “destroyed” and would “never rebuild”.The Israeli government confirmed it had agreed to Trump’s ceasefire proposal, stating it had successfully neutralised the “dual existential threat” posed by Iran’s nuclear programme and ballistic missiles.However, Tel Aviv warned that it remained ready to act if Tehran violated the terms of the truce. “The military has been instructed to maintain a high level of alertness,” an Israeli spokesperson&nbsp;said.

Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.”

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised both Israel and Iran for breaching a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered, singling out Israel for striking targets after the truce deadline had passed. Trump: ‘I’m not happy’ with Israel’s actions Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.” “I gotta get Israel to calm down now,” Trump said as he left the White House, Reuters reports. “Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen," he added. “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing,” Trump told reporters/ Also read: Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? A face-saving move meant for de-escalation He said that he was not happy with either country, but especially Israel. Trump also posted a warning to Israel on his Truth Social platform, writing in capital letters, “ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES” This message came just hours after both Israel and Iran reportedly accepted a US-proposed ceasefire to halt their 12-day conflict. Ceasefire brokered after ‘simultaneous’ calls for peace Announcing the agreement on Truth Social, Trump claimed both nations had reached out to him at the same time to ask for peace. “Israel & Iran came to me, almost simultaneously, and said, ‘PEACE!’” he wrote. “The World, and the Middle East, are the real WINNERS! Both Nations will see tremendous LOVE, PEACE, AND PROSPERITY in their futures.” He also said that Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been “destroyed” and would “never rebuild”. The Israeli government confirmed it had agreed to Trump’s ceasefire proposal, stating it had successfully neutralised the “dual existential threat” posed by Iran’s nuclear programme and ballistic missiles. However, Tel Aviv warned that it remained ready to act if Tehran violated the terms of the truce. “The military has been instructed to maintain a high level of alertness,” an Israeli spokesperson said.

Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.”

'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS': Trump 'unhappy' with Israel for attacking Iran; says both nations 'violated ceasefire'

Sirens were sounded in northern Israel amid claims that Iran fired a new ballistic missile, even as a ceasefire was supposed to take effect. Visuals on social media also showed Iranian missiles over Jordan. This came despite US President Donald Trump's warning that the ceasefire should not be violated as it is time for “peace.” Israel also said that they have agreed for a ceasefire but warned against any violations. Iranian media, quoting state TV, said that news about a missile attack by Iran on Israel after the ceasefire was “denied”.&nbsp;Earlier, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that military operations “to punish Israel for its aggression continued until the very last minute, at 4am.” This was before the ceasefire came into effect. So, has Iran violated the ceasefire, here's what we know so far:&nbsp;<ol><li>Iran’s military denied that it fired missiles at Israel hours after a ceasefire was supposed to begin, Iranian state television reported. The report quoted the general staff of Iran’s armed forces, which includes its regular military and its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, as making the denial.</li><li>Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Iran had “completely violated” the ceasefire. Katz said he instructed the Israeli military to resume targeting Iranian paramilitary and government targets.&nbsp;</li><li>According to Tasnim News Agency, the claim of missile launches is Israel's psychological operations to induce a dichotomy between diplomacy and the battlefield.</li><li>IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir said that the they ‘will strike with force after Iran’s grave violation of the ceasefire.’&nbsp;</li><li>Meanwhile, Qatar summoned the Iranian ambassador after Iran attacked the major US military base on Qatari soil following American strikes on its nuclear facilities</li><li>Iranian state television earlier reported that a ceasefire had begun in its war with Israel, even as Israel warned the public of a new missile barrage launched from Iran.</li><li>Iran accuses Israel of conducting strikes after ceasefire announcement. "The Israel regime launched three waves of attacks on sites in Iranian territory until 9:00 am (0530 GMT) today," a spokesman for the armed forces command was quoted as saying on state TV, without providing further details.</li></ol><h2>Trump announced ceasefire after entering Iran-Israel war</h2>Earlier today, Trump announced the ceasefire and called the world and the people of the Middle East the “real winners.” Trump spoke about “RIGHTEOUSNESS &amp; TRUTH” and added that the future for Israel &amp; Iran is unlimited and filled with great promise. After his announcement, Trump went on a spree congratulating himself for ending the war. Taking to Truth Social, Trump first congratulated the world, declaring that “it is time for peace.” Stating that the Iran-Israel war “could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East,” he added that this ceasefire is an example of “Peace though strength.” The announcement came on a day when Iran struck an American base in Qatar in retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear sites using B-2 bombers.&nbsp;In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” &nbsp;

Despite US President Donald Trump's warning that the ceasefire should not be violated, Israel has claimed that Iran has fired missile but Tehran has denied the reports 

Sirens were sounded in northern Israel amid claims that Iran fired a new ballistic missile, even as a ceasefire was supposed to take effect. Visuals on social media also showed Iranian missiles over Jordan. This came despite US President Donald Trump's warning that the ceasefire should not be violated as it is time for “peace.” Israel also said that they have agreed for a ceasefire but warned against any violations. Iranian media, quoting state TV, said that news about a missile attack by Iran on Israel after the ceasefire was “denied”. Earlier, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that military operations “to punish Israel for its aggression continued until the very last minute, at 4am.” This was before the ceasefire came into effect. So, has Iran violated the ceasefire, here's what we know so far: Iran’s military denied that it fired missiles at Israel hours after a ceasefire was supposed to begin, Iranian state television reported. The report quoted the general staff of Iran’s armed forces, which includes its regular military and its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, as making the denial. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Iran had “completely violated” the ceasefire. Katz said he instructed the Israeli military to resume targeting Iranian paramilitary and government targets. According to Tasnim News Agency, the claim of missile launches is Israel's psychological operations to induce a dichotomy between diplomacy and the battlefield. IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir said that the they ‘will strike with force after Iran’s grave violation of the ceasefire.’ Meanwhile, Qatar summoned the Iranian ambassador after Iran attacked the major US military base on Qatari soil following American strikes on its nuclear facilities Iranian state television earlier reported that a ceasefire had begun in its war with Israel, even as Israel warned the public of a new missile barrage launched from Iran. Iran accuses Israel of conducting strikes after ceasefire announcement. "The Israel regime launched three waves of attacks on sites in Iranian territory until 9:00 am (0530 GMT) today," a spokesman for the armed forces command was quoted as saying on state TV, without providing further details. Trump announced ceasefire after entering Iran-Israel war Earlier today, Trump announced the ceasefire and called the world and the people of the Middle East the “real winners.” Trump spoke about “RIGHTEOUSNESS & TRUTH” and added that the future for Israel & Iran is unlimited and filled with great promise. After his announcement, Trump went on a spree congratulating himself for ending the war. Taking to Truth Social, Trump first congratulated the world, declaring that “it is time for peace.” Stating that the Iran-Israel war “could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East,” he added that this ceasefire is an example of “Peace though strength.” The announcement came on a day when Iran struck an American base in Qatar in retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear sites using B-2 bombers. In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.”

Despite US President Donald Trump's warning that the ceasefire should not be violated, Israel has claimed that Iran has fired missile but Tehran has denied the reports&nbsp;

Did Iran break ceasefire with Israel hours after Trump warned against violation? Here's what we know

The growing tensions between Iran and Israel have made people all over the world worried about a bigger war, with some fearing that World War 3 could begin. Recently, reports confirmed that the United States launched attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites, using massive 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs to hit hidden underground targets. These strikes, along with Israel’s air attacks on Tehran, have increased tensions in the region and added to global fears about what might happen next. In the middle of this rising danger, US President Donald Trump said that both Iran and Israel had asked him to help bring 'peace.' He announced a possible ceasefire plan, but despite his move, the situation is still dangerous, and people are afraid that a worldwide war could break out at any time.&nbsp;Reacting strongly, Russia’s Ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, criticised the US strikes on Iran. He warned that America’s actions had opened a 'Pandora’s box' that could bring serious risks for global safety.&nbsp;If the conflict grows into a world war, many countries may get involved, though some places might stay safer because of their location, neutrality, or stability.&nbsp;The British newspaper, Metro, highlights a few countries and regions that could offer safety if World War III happens:&nbsp;Antarctica Far from nuclear powers, Antarctica’s southern location makes it one of the safest places during a nuclear war. Its huge size can provide space for refuge, though its freezing conditions make living there very hard.&nbsp;Iceland Known as one of the world’s most peaceful nations, Iceland always stayed out of major wars and has never participated in any world war till now. Its remote location means it’s less likely to see fighting, though small amounts of nuclear fallout could still reach it.&nbsp;New Zealand With a neutral policy and strong peace record, New Zealand is protected by its mountains and distance from conflict zones. It hasn’t taken part directly in military fights, though it has given financial help to Ukraine.&nbsp;Switzerland Famous for staying neutral, especially during World War II, Switzerland is protected by mountains and has many nuclear shelters.&nbsp;&nbsp;Greenland Greenland’s far-off location and small population make it an unlikely target in a global war. Its neutral position reduces the chance of getting involved.&nbsp;Indonesia Indonesia’s foreign policy focuses on peace, and its neutral stand keeps it away from big global conflicts.&nbsp;Tuvalu This tiny island nation has few people and little infrastructure, so it’s not a likely target. Its position between Australia and Hawaii helps it to stay isolated.&nbsp;Argentina Argentina has plenty of farmland and could produce food even in a nuclear winter. Though it has seen past conflicts, it could still be a safe place because of its food supply.&nbsp;Bhutan Bhutan has stayed neutral since 1971. Its mountains and location make it easier to protect from outside dangers.&nbsp;Chile Chile’s long coast and natural resources make it a safe and sustainable choice. It also has strong infrastructure compared to other South American nations.&nbsp;Fiji Fiji’s remote location, peaceful nature and thick forests make it a good place to live during wars. It has a small army and scores well on peace rankings.&nbsp;South Africa South Africa has rich land, clean water and good infrastructure. Its resources could help its people during a global crisis.

Recently, reports confirmed that the United States launched attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites, using massive 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs to hit hidden underground targets. 

The growing tensions between Iran and Israel have made people all over the world worried about a bigger war, with some fearing that World War 3 could begin. Recently, reports confirmed that the United States launched attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites, using massive 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs to hit hidden underground targets. These strikes, along with Israel’s air attacks on Tehran, have increased tensions in the region and added to global fears about what might happen next. In the middle of this rising danger, US President Donald Trump said that both Iran and Israel had asked him to help bring 'peace.' He announced a possible ceasefire plan, but despite his move, the situation is still dangerous, and people are afraid that a worldwide war could break out at any time. Reacting strongly, Russia’s Ambassador to the UN, Vassily Nebenzia, criticised the US strikes on Iran. He warned that America’s actions had opened a 'Pandora’s box' that could bring serious risks for global safety. If the conflict grows into a world war, many countries may get involved, though some places might stay safer because of their location, neutrality, or stability. The British newspaper, Metro, highlights a few countries and regions that could offer safety if World War III happens: Antarctica Far from nuclear powers, Antarctica’s southern location makes it one of the safest places during a nuclear war. Its huge size can provide space for refuge, though its freezing conditions make living there very hard. Iceland Known as one of the world’s most peaceful nations, Iceland always stayed out of major wars and has never participated in any world war till now. Its remote location means it’s less likely to see fighting, though small amounts of nuclear fallout could still reach it. New Zealand With a neutral policy and strong peace record, New Zealand is protected by its mountains and distance from conflict zones. It hasn’t taken part directly in military fights, though it has given financial help to Ukraine. Switzerland Famous for staying neutral, especially during World War II, Switzerland is protected by mountains and has many nuclear shelters. Greenland Greenland’s far-off location and small population make it an unlikely target in a global war. Its neutral position reduces the chance of getting involved. Indonesia Indonesia’s foreign policy focuses on peace, and its neutral stand keeps it away from big global conflicts. Tuvalu This tiny island nation has few people and little infrastructure, so it’s not a likely target. Its position between Australia and Hawaii helps it to stay isolated. Argentina Argentina has plenty of farmland and could produce food even in a nuclear winter. Though it has seen past conflicts, it could still be a safe place because of its food supply. Bhutan Bhutan has stayed neutral since 1971. Its mountains and location make it easier to protect from outside dangers. Chile Chile’s long coast and natural resources make it a safe and sustainable choice. It also has strong infrastructure compared to other South American nations. Fiji Fiji’s remote location, peaceful nature and thick forests make it a good place to live during wars. It has a small army and scores well on peace rankings. South Africa South Africa has rich land, clean water and good infrastructure. Its resources could help its people during a global crisis.

Recently, reports confirmed that the United States launched attacks on Iran’s nuclear sites, using massive 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs to hit hidden underground targets.&nbsp;

If World War 3 erupts, these countries can offer safest refuge. Check their names

Iran launched a missile attack on a US air base in Qatar on Monday night (June 24), just hours before President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Tehran and Israel. The Iranian attack, in response to the bombardment of its nuclear facilities by Israel and the US, suddenly threw the small nation of Qatar into focus. The constitutional monarchy with a large Indian population, Qatar, reportedly played a role in bringing about the latest ceasefire. However, it's nothing new for the Arab nation, which has been a regional peace broker for years now. Here is what you should know about Qatar, and why it has such significant influence in the region, far above its size.<h2>Where is Qatar?</h2>Qatar is a small country in West Asia on the northeastern coast of the Arabian Peninsula. Located in the Qatar Peninsula, Qatar's only land border is with Saudi Arabia, the larger nation which held influence over its tiny neighbour till much of 20th century before relations soured. Qatar is only 11,571 square kilometres in size, slightly less than the US state of Connecticut. Sandwiched between the arid Arab desert and a shoreline of beaches and dunes, Qatar is a country rich in resources, particularly natural gas. In terms of per capita income, Qatar is often listed among the wealthiest countries. It is one of the biggest exporters of liquefied natural gas (LNG).<h2>88 per cent of people in Qatar are foreigners, most from India</h2>Qatar, a Sunni-majority nation, has a population of just over 3.1 million, much smaller compared to the largest in the region, Saudi Arabia, which has 36 million people. Nearly 88 per cent of the Qatari population is of foreign origin. Indians are the largest expat population, comprising of nearly 22 per cent of the foreigners. There are some 830,000 Indians, working as doctors, engineers, teachers, businesspeople and blue-collar workers.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-launches-annunciation-of-victory-operation-iran-strikes-us-al-udeid-air-base-in-qatar-1750740709101/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-launches-annunciation-of-victory-operation-iran-strikes-us-al-udeid-air-base-in-qatar-1750740709101/embed</a><h2>How Qatar's influence grew as a mediator in conflicts</h2>Qatar had an important, albeit understated, role in global affairs since the late 20th century under former emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani. Qatar had close relations with the US, which built the Al Udeid Air Base in the Arab country in 1996. The base, attacked by Iran on Monday (June 24), is the forward headquarters for US Central Command or CENTCOM, which directs American military operations in the region that includes Egypt in the west to Kazakhstan in the east.&nbsp; Under the current emir, Sheikh Tamim ibn Hamad Al Thani, who assumed the throne in 2013, Qatar emerged as a key nation for mediating global conflicts. In the past two decades, Qatar has mediated in, or hosted mediations of, several high-profile wars. These include the long-standing US-Taliban conflict that ended in the American troop exit from the South Asian nation after the Taliban takeover in 2021. Qatar was a key player in hostage and prisoner swap mediations between Ukraine and Russia in the ongoing war. Even before the 2023 October 7 terror attack that led to the Israel-Hamas war, Qatar has been mediating between the Jewish nation and the Palestinian militant organisation, which had its political headquarters in Doha, the Qatari capital. Qatar also mediated in releasing several of the Israeli hostages taken to Gaza by Hamas after the 2023 attack. &nbsp;Qatar was a mediator in conflicts and crises in Sudan, Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq too.<h2>But, clout-building also had its cost for Qatar</h2>But exerting such outsized influence had its cost for Qatar, particularly in the form of diplomatic tussles and even a boycott by fellow Arab nations, led by Saudi Arabia. Qatar was influenced by Saudi Arabia till 1990s, which often treated it like a vassal state. &nbsp;But mediation in conflicts improved its global standing. It was also a strategy to protect the country from foreign interventions, particularly from larger neighbours Saudi and UAE. This race for influence led to a crisis in 2017, when fellow Arab nations in the Gulf Cooperation Council announced a boycott of Qatar. That boycott, wherein Saudi, Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE accused Qatar of supporting terrorism, went on till 2021. Qatari aircraft and ships were blocked from the territory of these countries, and Saudi Arabia closed the only land border between the two nations. Many exports into the country from these neighbours were halted, including even essential goods.<h2>Al Jazeera network: A multiplier of Qatari influence that fell out of favour in the region</h2>The Al Jazeera TV network, founded in 1996 with funding from the state of Qatar, was one major step in the nation's path towards building its influence in the region and the world. Ten years later, it launched Al Jazeera English, which spoke to a global audience. Oddly enough, the channel, unlike the reality of Qatar as an absolute constitutional monarchy, became the voice of democracy in many countries in the region and outside. Of particular importance was how its journalism supported many anti-establishment movements during the Arab Spring of 2010-2012.&nbsp; Qatar faced allegations of supporting what many in the region felt were US intelligence-supported, orchestrated regime changes. &nbsp;The diplomatic boycott was among the results of those tensions. Qatar was accused of interfering in the internal affairs of other nations, often using Al Jazeera as a tool to amplify its views. It was also criticised for maintaining relations with Iran, the Shia power of the region. In Egypt, Qatar supported the elected government of Muslim Brotherhood in the wake of the Arab Spring, but UAE backed the regime led by military leader Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. That became one of the immediate triggers for the diplomatic boycott.&nbsp;&nbsp;The attack on the US air base hosted by Qatar is the first instance of Qatar directly coming under fire in a raging war in the region. It possibly reflects the reality that the nation may not be immune to future conflicts even if it has the military presence of the most powerful nation in the world.

Exerting an outsized influence had its cost for Qatar, particularly in the form of diplomatic tussles and even a boycott by fellow Arab nations, led by Saudi Arabia. Iran attack on the US air base hosted by it is the latest instance.

Iran launched a missile attack on a US air base in Qatar on Monday night (June 24), just hours before President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Tehran and Israel. The Iranian attack, in response to the bombardment of its nuclear facilities by Israel and the US, suddenly threw the small nation of Qatar into focus. The constitutional monarchy with a large Indian population, Qatar, reportedly played a role in bringing about the latest ceasefire. However, it's nothing new for the Arab nation, which has been a regional peace broker for years now. Here is what you should know about Qatar, and why it has such significant influence in the region, far above its size. Where is Qatar? Qatar is a small country in West Asia on the northeastern coast of the Arabian Peninsula. Located in the Qatar Peninsula, Qatar's only land border is with Saudi Arabia, the larger nation which held influence over its tiny neighbour till much of 20th century before relations soured. Qatar is only 11,571 square kilometres in size, slightly less than the US state of Connecticut. Sandwiched between the arid Arab desert and a shoreline of beaches and dunes, Qatar is a country rich in resources, particularly natural gas. In terms of per capita income, Qatar is often listed among the wealthiest countries. It is one of the biggest exporters of liquefied natural gas (LNG). 88 per cent of people in Qatar are foreigners, most from India Qatar, a Sunni-majority nation, has a population of just over 3.1 million, much smaller compared to the largest in the region, Saudi Arabia, which has 36 million people. Nearly 88 per cent of the Qatari population is of foreign origin. Indians are the largest expat population, comprising of nearly 22 per cent of the foreigners. There are some 830,000 Indians, working as doctors, engineers, teachers, businesspeople and blue-collar workers. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-launches-annunciation-of-victory-operation-iran-strikes-us-al-udeid-air-base-in-qatar-1750740709101/embed How Qatar's influence grew as a mediator in conflicts Qatar had an important, albeit understated, role in global affairs since the late 20th century under former emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani. Qatar had close relations with the US, which built the Al Udeid Air Base in the Arab country in 1996. The base, attacked by Iran on Monday (June 24), is the forward headquarters for US Central Command or CENTCOM, which directs American military operations in the region that includes Egypt in the west to Kazakhstan in the east. Under the current emir, Sheikh Tamim ibn Hamad Al Thani, who assumed the throne in 2013, Qatar emerged as a key nation for mediating global conflicts. In the past two decades, Qatar has mediated in, or hosted mediations of, several high-profile wars. These include the long-standing US-Taliban conflict that ended in the American troop exit from the South Asian nation after the Taliban takeover in 2021. Qatar was a key player in hostage and prisoner swap mediations between Ukraine and Russia in the ongoing war. Even before the 2023 October 7 terror attack that led to the Israel-Hamas war, Qatar has been mediating between the Jewish nation and the Palestinian militant organisation, which had its political headquarters in Doha, the Qatari capital. Qatar also mediated in releasing several of the Israeli hostages taken to Gaza by Hamas after the 2023 attack. Qatar was a mediator in conflicts and crises in Sudan, Lebanon, Yemen and Iraq too. But, clout-building also had its cost for Qatar But exerting such outsized influence had its cost for Qatar, particularly in the form of diplomatic tussles and even a boycott by fellow Arab nations, led by Saudi Arabia. Qatar was influenced by Saudi Arabia till 1990s, which often treated it like a vassal state. But mediation in conflicts improved its global standing. It was also a strategy to protect the country from foreign interventions, particularly from larger neighbours Saudi and UAE. This race for influence led to a crisis in 2017, when fellow Arab nations in the Gulf Cooperation Council announced a boycott of Qatar. That boycott, wherein Saudi, Bahrain, Egypt and the UAE accused Qatar of supporting terrorism, went on till 2021. Qatari aircraft and ships were blocked from the territory of these countries, and Saudi Arabia closed the only land border between the two nations. Many exports into the country from these neighbours were halted, including even essential goods. Al Jazeera network: A multiplier of Qatari influence that fell out of favour in the region The Al Jazeera TV network, founded in 1996 with funding from the state of Qatar, was one major step in the nation's path towards building its influence in the region and the world. Ten years later, it launched Al Jazeera English, which spoke to a global audience. Oddly enough, the channel, unlike the reality of Qatar as an absolute constitutional monarchy, became the voice of democracy in many countries in the region and outside. Of particular importance was how its journalism supported many anti-establishment movements during the Arab Spring of 2010-2012. Qatar faced allegations of supporting what many in the region felt were US intelligence-supported, orchestrated regime changes. The diplomatic boycott was among the results of those tensions. Qatar was accused of interfering in the internal affairs of other nations, often using Al Jazeera as a tool to amplify its views. It was also criticised for maintaining relations with Iran, the Shia power of the region. In Egypt, Qatar supported the elected government of Muslim Brotherhood in the wake of the Arab Spring, but UAE backed the regime led by military leader Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. That became one of the immediate triggers for the diplomatic boycott. The attack on the US air base hosted by Qatar is the first instance of Qatar directly coming under fire in a raging war in the region. It possibly reflects the reality that the nation may not be immune to future conflicts even if it has the military presence of the most powerful nation in the world.

Qatar has been a regional peace broker for years now, but its clout is not well-liked by bigger neighours. The attack on the US air base hosted by Qatar is the first instance of Qatar directly coming under fire in a raging war in the region.

Where is Qatar? How tiny Arab nation went from a clout builder to target of Iranian attack

The escalating military confrontation between Iran and the United States has sent shockwaves through global aviation, grounding key flights across the West Asia and forcing airlines to absorb mounting costs from longer detours, suspended routes, and disrupted schedules. After Iran fired missiles at the US Al Udeid airbase in Qatar on Monday, airlines across Europe, Asia, and the West Asia moved swiftly to cancel or reroute dozens of flights, triggering a ripple effect across global travel.&nbsp;As per Reuters, the missile attack, claimed by Iran as retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear facilities—temporarily closed Qatar’s airspace and disrupted operations at Doha’s Hamad International Airport, a critical global hub. The UAE also paused flights at Dubai International Airport, the world’s busiest international terminal.<h2>Over 30 airlines affected as Gulf airspace shuts down</h2>According to aviation data firms Cirium and Flightradar24, more than 20 commercial aircraft bound for Doha were diverted mid-air. Another four heading to Dubai turned back. Meanwhile, Bahrain temporarily closed its airspace, adding to the bottleneck.&nbsp;Major carriers including British Airways, Japan Airlines, Finnair, Iberia, Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Air India either suspended or rerouted flights.&nbsp;Air India confirmed on Monday it had halted operations to the West Asia, as well as flights to Europe and the US East Coast, until further notice. Some flights were returned to their origin airports, others diverted, and many were re-routed over alternate corridors.<h2>The rising cost of disruption: More fuel, crew and delays</h2>For airlines, the cost impact is already visible.&nbsp;Aviation analyst John Strickland, as quoted by BBC, said detours add significant fuel expenses, reduce aircraft availability, and disrupt crew schedules. “Each longer routing increases operational costs sharply. Airlines must account for fuel burn, flight timing limitations, and legal crew rest requirements.”&nbsp;In financial terms, airlines could face cost increases of 10–15 per cent per affected flight, industry insiders told CNBC. Rerouting flights north via Turkey or south over Saudi Arabia adds up to 90 minutes of flying time, reducing daily aircraft utilisation, a key metric for profitability. And with much of Russia and Ukraine’s airspace already closed due to the ongoing war, airlines now have fewer alternate corridors available.<h2>Airspace map tightening: A global chokepoint</h2>The West Asia serves as a crucial artery for long-haul traffic connecting Europe, Asia, and Australia. According to Reuters, airports in Dubai and Doha handle nearly 400,000 passengers per day, with Abu Dhabi seeing another 80,000.&nbsp;Since the Israel–Iran conflict began, commercial aircraft have increasingly avoided airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. Aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions reported that around 1,400 daily flights now need rerouting, primarily over Turkey or the Red Sea corridor, increasing traffic congestion and fuel demand.<h2>Airlines issue fresh advisories</h2>Qatar Airways resumed operations Tuesday after the reopening of the country’s airspace. “We’ve deployed extra ground staff at Hamad International Airport to support passengers,” the airline said, urging travellers to check flight status before travel.&nbsp;Emirates Airlines confirmed it rerouted several flights on June 23 but did not cancel operations. It said it is now flying routes “well distanced from conflict areas.”IndiGo Airlines issued a safety update, saying it is “prudently and progressively resuming” West Asia routes, but is actively monitoring the security situation.<h2>Governments issue security advisories</h2>Governments around the world have now issued advisories in light of the worsening security climate.The US State Department issued a “worldwide caution” advisory, warning of “disruptions to travel and potential demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad” due to the Israel–Iran conflict.&nbsp;The UK Foreign Office, as per BBC, urged travellers to “avoid non-essential travel to the Middle East,” particularly to Qatar, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, and parts of Israel.India’s Ministry of External Affairs also issued a travel advisory, requesting Indian citizens to “postpone non-essential travel to the Gulf region” and register with Indian embassies abroad if they’re already in affected areas.<h2>What it means for passengers and airlines?</h2>Passengers should prepare for flight delays, longer travel times, rebookings, and possible cancellations, experts said. According to aviation risk firm International SOS, the situation is fluid and subject to change daily.&nbsp;Stranded passengers at Doha and Dubai reported long waits, limited food access, and high uncertainty about onward travel. As per BBC, several hundred passengers spent Monday night in Hamad Airport lounges, awaiting updates.<h2>What lies ahead?&nbsp;</h2>While some airspace has reopened, the uncertainty remains. “Every mile rerouted is a dollar burned,” aviation analyst John Strickland told BBC. “If this persists, some carriers may suspend Gulf routes altogether.”&nbsp;Airlines are bracing for longer-term turbulence, logistical, financial, and political. For now, the message to travellers is clear: expect disruption. Monitor airline websites. Follow travel advisories. And don’t assume tomorrow’s flight will operate as planned.&nbsp;The missile strike may have lasted minutes, but its aftershocks are set to reverberate through global aviation for weeks. For the Gulf, a strategic flight corridor, the skies remain contested. And for passengers, what was once a smooth layover is now a high-stakes waiting game.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Following Iran missile attack on the US Al Udeid airbase, airlines such as British Airways, Emirates, and Qatar Airways cancelled or rerouted flights, disrupting schedules and inflating operational costs by 10 to15% per flight. '

The escalating military confrontation between Iran and the United States has sent shockwaves through global aviation, grounding key flights across the West Asia and forcing airlines to absorb mounting costs from longer detours, suspended routes, and disrupted schedules. After Iran fired missiles at the US Al Udeid airbase in Qatar on Monday, airlines across Europe, Asia, and the West Asia moved swiftly to cancel or reroute dozens of flights, triggering a ripple effect across global travel. As per Reuters, the missile attack, claimed by Iran as retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear facilities—temporarily closed Qatar’s airspace and disrupted operations at Doha’s Hamad International Airport, a critical global hub. The UAE also paused flights at Dubai International Airport, the world’s busiest international terminal. Over 30 airlines affected as Gulf airspace shuts down According to aviation data firms Cirium and Flightradar24, more than 20 commercial aircraft bound for Doha were diverted mid-air. Another four heading to Dubai turned back. Meanwhile, Bahrain temporarily closed its airspace, adding to the bottleneck. Major carriers including British Airways, Japan Airlines, Finnair, Iberia, Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Air India either suspended or rerouted flights. Air India confirmed on Monday it had halted operations to the West Asia, as well as flights to Europe and the US East Coast, until further notice. Some flights were returned to their origin airports, others diverted, and many were re-routed over alternate corridors. The rising cost of disruption: More fuel, crew and delays For airlines, the cost impact is already visible. Aviation analyst John Strickland, as quoted by BBC, said detours add significant fuel expenses, reduce aircraft availability, and disrupt crew schedules. “Each longer routing increases operational costs sharply. Airlines must account for fuel burn, flight timing limitations, and legal crew rest requirements.” In financial terms, airlines could face cost increases of 10–15 per cent per affected flight, industry insiders told CNBC. Rerouting flights north via Turkey or south over Saudi Arabia adds up to 90 minutes of flying time, reducing daily aircraft utilisation, a key metric for profitability. And with much of Russia and Ukraine’s airspace already closed due to the ongoing war, airlines now have fewer alternate corridors available. Airspace map tightening: A global chokepoint The West Asia serves as a crucial artery for long-haul traffic connecting Europe, Asia, and Australia. According to Reuters, airports in Dubai and Doha handle nearly 400,000 passengers per day, with Abu Dhabi seeing another 80,000. Since the Israel–Iran conflict began, commercial aircraft have increasingly avoided airspace over Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan. Aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions reported that around 1,400 daily flights now need rerouting, primarily over Turkey or the Red Sea corridor, increasing traffic congestion and fuel demand. Airlines issue fresh advisories Qatar Airways resumed operations Tuesday after the reopening of the country’s airspace. “We’ve deployed extra ground staff at Hamad International Airport to support passengers,” the airline said, urging travellers to check flight status before travel. Emirates Airlines confirmed it rerouted several flights on June 23 but did not cancel operations. It said it is now flying routes “well distanced from conflict areas.” IndiGo Airlines issued a safety update, saying it is “prudently and progressively resuming” West Asia routes, but is actively monitoring the security situation. Governments issue security advisories Governments around the world have now issued advisories in light of the worsening security climate. The US State Department issued a “worldwide caution” advisory, warning of “disruptions to travel and potential demonstrations against US citizens and interests abroad” due to the Israel–Iran conflict. The UK Foreign Office, as per BBC, urged travellers to “avoid non-essential travel to the Middle East,” particularly to Qatar, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, and parts of Israel. India’s Ministry of External Affairs also issued a travel advisory, requesting Indian citizens to “postpone non-essential travel to the Gulf region” and register with Indian embassies abroad if they’re already in affected areas. What it means for passengers and airlines? Passengers should prepare for flight delays, longer travel times, rebookings, and possible cancellations, experts said. According to aviation risk firm International SOS, the situation is fluid and subject to change daily. Stranded passengers at Doha and Dubai reported long waits, limited food access, and high uncertainty about onward travel. As per BBC, several hundred passengers spent Monday night in Hamad Airport lounges, awaiting updates. What lies ahead? While some airspace has reopened, the uncertainty remains. “Every mile rerouted is a dollar burned,” aviation analyst John Strickland told BBC. “If this persists, some carriers may suspend Gulf routes altogether.” Airlines are bracing for longer-term turbulence, logistical, financial, and political. For now, the message to travellers is clear: expect disruption. Monitor airline websites. Follow travel advisories. And don’t assume tomorrow’s flight will operate as planned. The missile strike may have lasted minutes, but its aftershocks are set to reverberate through global aviation for weeks. For the Gulf, a strategic flight corridor, the skies remain contested. And for passengers, what was once a smooth layover is now a high-stakes waiting game. (With inputs from the agencies)

The US-Iran military tensions have severely impacted global aviation, leading to the grounding of major flights in the West Asia.

Airlines cancel flights and reroute over escalating West Asia missile tensions

Hours before US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said that Iran is not a nation that surrenders. Khamenei's statement came after Iran launched missile strikes on a US military base in Qatar in retaliation for America's strike on three of its nuclear sites. Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, stating that it is an end to the 12-day war. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that ‘there is no agreement on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations’.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Those who know the Iranian people and their history know that the Iranian nation isn’t a nation that surrenders.&mdash; Khamenei.ir (@khamenei_ir) <a href="https://twitter.com/khamenei_ir/status/1937255046372295137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Trump announces ceasefire between Iran and Israel</h2>US President Donald Trump late on June 23 announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, stating that it is an end to 12-day war. This came on a day when Iran struck an American base in Qatar in retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear sites using B-2 bombers. Trump wrote on Truth Social, "It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a complete and total ceasefire (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ended!"&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explosions-heard-in-iraq-s-baghdad-minutes-after-trump-s-israel-iran-ceasefire-announcement-1750730771217">Explosions heard in Iraq's Baghdad minutes after Trump's Israel-Iran ceasefire announcement</a><h2>US enters Iran-Israel war</h2>In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” In response, Iranian missiles targeted the largest US military base in West Asia, Al-Udeid. Al-Udeid is home to the US military's headquarters for all air operations in the region.&nbsp; &nbsp;As America entered the war, Donald Trump said that ‘there will either be peace or tragedy.’ "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” Trump said in a press briefing at the Oval Office. US Vice President JD Vance said that America's war is against Iran's nuclear facilities and not Iran. Vance reiterated Trump’s claims of destroying nuclear facilities, but also added that Iran would be unable to ‘rebuild the nuclear capability in the future.’ The US carried out a strike in Iran using B-2 bombers, including the first-ever use of a 30,000-pound (14,000 kilograms) GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, also known as bunker busters, in combat.&nbsp; &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran; however, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said this ahead of the ceasefire announcement

Hours before US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said that Iran is not a nation that surrenders. Khamenei's statement came after Iran launched missile strikes on a US military base in Qatar in retaliation for America's strike on three of its nuclear sites. Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, stating that it is an end to the 12-day war. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that ‘there is no agreement on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations’.

US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran; however, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said this ahead of the ceasefire announcement

'Those who know Iranian people...': Khamenei's BIG statement on 'surrender' before Trump's ceasefire announcement

Oil prices plunged to over one-week lows on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump declared that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire, easing fears of prolonged conflict and potential disruptions to oil supplies in the West Asia. As per Reuters, Brent crude futures dropped $2.69, or 3.76 per cent, to $68.79 a barrel as of 0006 GMT. Earlier in the session, prices fell more than 4 per cent to their lowest since June 11.&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude fell $2.70, or 3.94 per cent, to $65.46 per barrel—its weakest since June 9—after sliding nearly 6 per cent earlier in the day.<h2>Trump confirms ceasefire timeline</h2>President Trump announced on Monday that both sides had reached a “complete and total” ceasefire. As quoted by Reuters, Iran is to begin the ceasefire immediately, with Israel following after 12 hours. If peace holds, the war, now 12 days old, will officially end within 24 hours.&nbsp;The truce comes days after the US carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a move that had pushed oil prices to five-month highs and triggered fears of broader regional escalation.<h2>Oil market sheds war premium</h2>Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, told Reuters, “The risk premium built into crude oil last week has all but evaporated.” Traders appear to be unwinding positions that had been built up on the expectation of wider conflict and potential supply shocks.&nbsp;Iran is OPEC’s third-largest crude oil producer, and an easing of hostilities is expected to facilitate the resumption of its oil exports. This is a key factor behind the pullback in oil prices, which had surged in recent sessions on fears of supply disruptions.<h2>Resistance levels cap recovery</h2>Despite the decline, analysts say oil prices may still face strong technical resistance. Sycamore added that the recent sell-off reinforces a price ceiling between $78.40, marking the highs of October 2024 and June 2025 and $80.77, the current year-to-date high.&nbsp;According to Reuters, both Brent and WTI benchmarks had rallied more than 7 per cent in the previous session before reversing gains following Trump’s ceasefire announcement. As markets digest the truce, attention now turns to its implementation and durability. A stable ceasefire could allow Iranian oil to flow more freely, bringing relief to importers and potentially easing inflationary pressures globally.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Analysts noted that the war risk premium has largely dissipated, but technical resistance may limit further recovery as markets assess the ceasefire sustainability.

Oil prices plunged to over one-week lows on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump declared that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire, easing fears of prolonged conflict and potential disruptions to oil supplies in the West Asia. As per Reuters, Brent crude futures dropped $2.69, or 3.76 per cent, to $68.79 a barrel as of 0006 GMT. Earlier in the session, prices fell more than 4 per cent to their lowest since June 11. Meanwhile, US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude fell $2.70, or 3.94 per cent, to $65.46 per barrel—its weakest since June 9—after sliding nearly 6 per cent earlier in the day. Trump confirms ceasefire timeline President Trump announced on Monday that both sides had reached a “complete and total” ceasefire. As quoted by Reuters, Iran is to begin the ceasefire immediately, with Israel following after 12 hours. If peace holds, the war, now 12 days old, will officially end within 24 hours. The truce comes days after the US carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, a move that had pushed oil prices to five-month highs and triggered fears of broader regional escalation. Oil market sheds war premium Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, told Reuters, “The risk premium built into crude oil last week has all but evaporated.” Traders appear to be unwinding positions that had been built up on the expectation of wider conflict and potential supply shocks. Iran is OPEC’s third-largest crude oil producer, and an easing of hostilities is expected to facilitate the resumption of its oil exports. This is a key factor behind the pullback in oil prices, which had surged in recent sessions on fears of supply disruptions. Resistance levels cap recovery Despite the decline, analysts say oil prices may still face strong technical resistance. Sycamore added that the recent sell-off reinforces a price ceiling between $78.40, marking the highs of October 2024 and June 2025 and $80.77, the current year-to-date high. According to Reuters, both Brent and WTI benchmarks had rallied more than 7 per cent in the previous session before reversing gains following Trump’s ceasefire announcement. As markets digest the truce, attention now turns to its implementation and durability. A stable ceasefire could allow Iranian oil to flow more freely, bringing relief to importers and potentially easing inflationary pressures globally. (With inputs from the agencies)

Oil prices fell to over one-week lows after President Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, easing conflict fears. Brent crude declined by 3.76% to $68.79 and WTI fell 3.94% to $65.46.

Oil prices drop to one-week low as Trump announces Israel–Iran ceasefire

Iran’s limited response — just six missiles, with no major damage — points to a desire to show they did respond, without inviting massive US escalation. In military terms, it was a gesture, not a game-changer.

With domestic outrage brewing over the US strike, Tehran likely needed a headline-grabbing move for internal audiences, showing defiance without crossing the point of no return.

Attack on Qatar: Why Iran's retaliation against B-2 Bomber strike feels like firecrackers in a storm?

The US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest American military facility in the Middle East, housing thousands of US troops, fighter jets, bombers, and surveillance assets. Targeting this base sends a direct warning to Washington.

The US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest American military facility in the Middle East, housing thousands of US troops, fighter jets, bombers, and surveillance assets. Targeting this base sends a direct warning to Washington.

Why Iran chose to target Qatar? Strategic reasons behind Tehran’s retaliation against B-2 Bomber strikes

10 days ago, Israel struck Iran under Operation Rising Lion, now US has also entered the war. How this war in West Asia unfolded in the past 10 days: IN PICS

10 days ago, Israel struck Iran under Operation Rising Lion, now US has also entered the war. How this war in West Asia unfolded in the past 10 days: IN PICS

Charred buildings, missiles in the sky and Trump: 10 days of Iran-Israel war, images show how it unfolded

The Israel Defence Forces on Sunday (June 22) said that it hit the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) surface-to-surface missile engine production site in Shahroud. The IDF revealed that the site was 2000 km away and it was hit because of “its planetary mixers and critical machinery used in the production of engines for missiles launched by the Iranian regime toward Israel.” The Israeli Air Force fighter jets earier flew over Iranian territory and struck storage facilities containing long-range surface-to-surface missiles, known as “Khorramshahr,” in the Yazd area - for the first time. Earlier today, Iran launched in what it described as the “20th wave” of retaliatory strikes on Israel using a wave of missile attacks, including the powerful ‘Khorramshahr-4’.&nbsp;&nbsp;In a video, the IDF explained how it damaged the surface-to-surface missile engine production site in Shahroud. “This strike is part of the effort to damage the Iranian regime’s surface-to-surface missile production industry, which is intended to manufacture thousands of missiles in the coming years,” it said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🎯 IDF STRIKE 2,000KM AWAY: An IRGC surface-to-surface missile engine production site in Shahroud, Iran was struck. The site was struck for its planetary mixers and critical machinery used in the production of engines for missiles launched by the Iranian regime toward Israel.… <a href="https://t.co/GucJSdDtuv">pic.twitter.com/GucJSdDtuv</a>&mdash; Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) <a href="https://twitter.com/IDF/status/1936846329436602811?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The IDF also said that approximately 30 IAF fighter jets, with guidance from the IDF Intelligence Directorate, struck dozens of military targets throughout Iran on Sunday with over 60 munitions. In parallel, missile launchers were struck in Isfahan, Bushehr, and Ahvaz. Strikes were also conducted on military sites involved in the production of aerial defense batteries, the ‘Third Brigade’ UAV command center, and a UAV storage facility near the command centre.<h2>US hits Iran in major escalation</h2>In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.”

The IDF revealed that it has hit a site in Iran that was 2000 km away and it was Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) surface-to-surface missile engine production site in Shahroud

The Israel Defence Forces on Sunday (June 22) said that it hit the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) surface-to-surface missile engine production site in Shahroud. The IDF revealed that the site was 2000 km away and it was hit because of “its planetary mixers and critical machinery used in the production of engines for missiles launched by the Iranian regime toward Israel.” The Israeli Air Force fighter jets earier flew over Iranian territory and struck storage facilities containing long-range surface-to-surface missiles, known as “Khorramshahr,” in the Yazd area - for the first time. Earlier today, Iran launched in what it described as the “20th wave” of retaliatory strikes on Israel using a wave of missile attacks, including the powerful ‘Khorramshahr-4’. In a video, the IDF explained how it damaged the surface-to-surface missile engine production site in Shahroud. “This strike is part of the effort to damage the Iranian regime’s surface-to-surface missile production industry, which is intended to manufacture thousands of missiles in the coming years,” it said.

The IDF revealed that it has hit a site in Iran that was 2000 km away and it was Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) surface-to-surface missile engine production site in Shahroud

How Israel hit Iran's surface-to-surface missile engine production site that was 2,000 km away

In a big statement, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev claimed on Sunday (June 22) that a “number of countries are ready to supply Iran with nuclear warheads" after the US joined Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Medvedev, who has served as Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council since 2020, blamed America for entangling the conflict. He said that the Iranian leadership has survived and, in all probability, it will continue the enrichment of nuclear material, and thereby the development of nuclear weapons, after this strike by the US.&nbsp;&nbsp;"Iran’s political regime has survived — and in all likelihood, has come out even stronger. The people are rallying around the country’s spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it...The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads," he said.&nbsp;Stating the dangers of the escalating war on Israel and US, he said, "Israel is under attack, explosions are rocking the country, and people are panicking. The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon."&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250622/image-1750592419740.png"></figure><h2>Russian reaction on US strike&nbsp;</h2>The Russian news agency TASS had earlier reported that Putin has no plans to speak to Trump after the US strikes on Iran but a call can be arranged if need be. The Russian foreign ministry in a statement "strongly condemned" the United States' bombings of nuclear sites in Iran, calling the attacks "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law". "It is already clear that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security."&nbsp;&nbsp;Earlier today, addressing a press conference in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that his country reserves its right to defend itself because the United States “betrayed diplomacy”. Abbas Araghchi said that there is no room for diplomacy with the West, but called Russia “a friend of Iran.” The Iranian foreign minister also informed that he will fly to Moscow today and have a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday.&nbsp;&nbsp;“Russia is a friend of Iran and we enjoy a strategic partnership. We always consult with each other and coordinate our positions. I will have serious consultations with the Russian president tomorrow, and we will continue to work with each other,” Araghchi said, noting that Russia was one of the signatories of the JCPOA.<h2>US enters Iran-Israel war</h2>In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” &nbsp;As America entered the war, Donald Trump said that ‘there will either be peace or tragedy.’ "This cannot continue. There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump told a press briefing at the Oval Office. He also conveyed the goal of the US' strikes, saying, "Our Objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”&nbsp;

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev blamed America for entangling the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel

In a big statement, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev claimed on Sunday (June 22) that a “number of countries are ready to supply Iran with nuclear warheads" after the US joined Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Medvedev, who has served as Deputy Chairman of Russia’s Security Council since 2020, blamed America for entangling the conflict. He said that the Iranian leadership has survived and, in all probability, it will continue the enrichment of nuclear material, and thereby the development of nuclear weapons, after this strike by the US. "Iran’s political regime has survived — and in all likelihood, has come out even stronger. The people are rallying around the country’s spiritual leadership, including those who were previously indifferent or opposed to it...The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads," he said. Stating the dangers of the escalating war on Israel and US, he said, "Israel is under attack, explosions are rocking the country, and people are panicking. The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon." Russian reaction on US strike The Russian news agency TASS had earlier reported that Putin has no plans to speak to Trump after the US strikes on Iran but a call can be arranged if need be. The Russian foreign ministry in a statement "strongly condemned" the United States' bombings of nuclear sites in Iran, calling the attacks "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law". "It is already clear that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security." Earlier today, addressing a press conference in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that his country reserves its right to defend itself because the United States “betrayed diplomacy”. Abbas Araghchi said that there is no room for diplomacy with the West, but called Russia “a friend of Iran.” The Iranian foreign minister also informed that he will fly to Moscow today and have a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday. “Russia is a friend of Iran and we enjoy a strategic partnership. We always consult with each other and coordinate our positions. I will have serious consultations with the Russian president tomorrow, and we will continue to work with each other,” Araghchi said, noting that Russia was one of the signatories of the JCPOA. US enters Iran-Israel war In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” As America entered the war, Donald Trump said that ‘there will either be peace or tragedy.’ "This cannot continue. There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump told a press briefing at the Oval Office. He also conveyed the goal of the US' strikes, saying, "Our Objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev blamed America for entangling the ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel

'Many countries ready to supply nuclear warheads...': BIG statement by Putin's aide after US strike on Iran

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Saturday (June 21) that his country's response to continued Israeli "aggression" will be "more devastating", as fighting in West Asia continued for the ninth day. He also said that his country will not halt nuclear activity "under any circumstances." This comes after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held talks with European counterparts in an attempt to prevent an escalation of the ongoing situation.&nbsp;&nbsp;"Our response to the continued aggression of the Zionist regime will be more devastating," said Pezeshkian during a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, according to the official IRNA news agency. "We are ready to discuss and cooperate to build confidence in the field of peaceful nuclear activities, however, we do not agree to reduce nuclear activities to zero under any circumstances," Pezeshkian added.<h2>Iran-Israel faceoff at UNHRC</h2>A day earlier, Iran’s foreign minister Araghchi condemned the Israeli attacks against the Islamic Republic as a “betrayal of diplomacy" with the US and called the attacks on nuclear facilities “grave war crimes”. He added that Israel's strike on Iran on June 13 was to derail Tehran and Washington's efforts to craft a “promising agreement” on the Iranian nuclear program. Araghchi, making his first trip abroad since the strikes began, denounced Israel’s attack as an “outrageous act of aggression.”&nbsp;In response, Israel’s United Nations ambassador Danny Danon slammed Tehran for seeking help from the international community. Slamming Iran, Danon said, “How dare you write five letters last week to this assembly to demand a session and ask the international community for sympathy? How dare you ask the international community to protect you from the consequences of your own genocidal agenda? You are not a victim. You are not even a diplomat. You are a wolf pretending to be a diplomat, and we are done pretending otherwise.”

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said also said that his country will not halt nuclear activity "under any circumstances."

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Saturday (June 21) that his country's response to continued Israeli "aggression" will be "more devastating", as fighting in West Asia continued for the ninth day. He also said that his country will not halt nuclear activity "under any circumstances." This comes after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held talks with European counterparts in an attempt to prevent an escalation of the ongoing situation. "Our response to the continued aggression of the Zionist regime will be more devastating," said Pezeshkian during a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, according to the official IRNA news agency. "We are ready to discuss and cooperate to build confidence in the field of peaceful nuclear activities, however, we do not agree to reduce nuclear activities to zero under any circumstances," Pezeshkian added. Iran-Israel faceoff at UNHRC A day earlier, Iran’s foreign minister Araghchi condemned the Israeli attacks against the Islamic Republic as a “betrayal of diplomacy" with the US and called the attacks on nuclear facilities “grave war crimes”. He added that Israel's strike on Iran on June 13 was to derail Tehran and Washington's efforts to craft a “promising agreement” on the Iranian nuclear program. Araghchi, making his first trip abroad since the strikes began, denounced Israel’s attack as an “outrageous act of aggression.” In response, Israel’s United Nations ambassador Danny Danon slammed Tehran for seeking help from the international community. Slamming Iran, Danon said, “How dare you write five letters last week to this assembly to demand a session and ask the international community for sympathy? How dare you ask the international community to protect you from the consequences of your own genocidal agenda? You are not a victim. You are not even a diplomat. You are a wolf pretending to be a diplomat, and we are done pretending otherwise.”

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian said also said that his country will not halt nuclear activity "under any circumstances."

'WE ARE READY...': Iranian President Pezeshkian warns of 'more devastating' response to Israel, issues BIG statement on nuclear activity

As conflict between Iran and Israel intensifies, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has transferred key authority to the Supreme Council of the Iranian military, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as per a report.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to a report by Iran Insight, Khamenei has been relocated to an underground bunker in Lavizan, northeast Tehran, along with close family members, including his son Mojtaba and he has transferred the powers to IRGC. &nbsp;The report came ahead of Khamenei's televised address in which he threatened US against getting directly involved with Israel in the conflict with Iran. He also stated that "Iran will not surrender", in what is being seen as his response to US president Donald Trump.&nbsp;Trump had demanded "unconditional surrender" and had said that US and Israel knows about the whereabouts of Khamenei.Iran Insight also reported that the new delegation of authority is seen as a precaution to ensure continuity of command if Khamenei is killed.&nbsp;Netanyahu said that if Israel were to kill Khamenei, the ongoing war could end. &nbsp;Israel’s Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Khamenei could meet the same fate as former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. US President Trump stepped up his rhetoric against Iran's supreme leader saying that he &nbsp;will not killed "for now," while demanding “unconditional surrender.”<h2>Can the Supreme Leader transfer power to the IRGC?</h2>Under Iran's system of government, Khamenei has supreme command of the armed forces, the power to declare war, and can appoint or dismiss senior figures including military commanders and judges. Constitutionally, the process of succession is mentioned in Article 107 and Article 111, as mentioned in Iranian government website. The Assembly of Experts is responsible for appointing the new Supreme Leader. If the Supreme Leader dies, resigns, or is removed, the Assembly of Experts must meet immediately to appoint a successor.&nbsp;However, as per 1979 Constitution of Iran, the Supreme Leader cannot formally transfer political power to either the IRGC or the regular military. The supreme leader is the commander-in-chief, but military, though powerful, is not a governing institution in a formal constitutional sense.&nbsp;&nbsp;Nevertheless, in practice, due to overwhelming powers of the Supreme leader, he can empower IRGC leaders and military men by appointing them to top political, military, and economic roles. He can also expand their role in governance, security, and economy.&nbsp;<h2>Line of succession and hierarchy in the Iranian government&nbsp;</h2>The line of succession after Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is not publicly fixed or formally designated. Son of the supreme leader - Mojtaba Khamenei - is seen as the top contender due to close ties with IRGC. Next is Sadeq Larijani, mmber of the Guardian Council and Expediency Council and former head of the judiciary. Several high-ranking clerics like Ahmad Khatami and Alireza Arafi are also in line. There has been no formal announcement about the transfer of power to military yet.&nbsp;The hierarchy in the Iranian government is layered with Supreme Leader Khamenei at the top - holding ultimate authority over all branches of government, the military, and key policy decisions. Then comes the Guardian Council that is a powerful 12-member body that plays a key role in controlling who can run for office and shaping Iran’s political landscape. It includes 6 clerics appointed by the Supreme Leader. Alongside this is the Assembly of experts, consisting of 88 elected clerics, elected by public vote, but candidates are vetted by the Guardian Council. After this, comes the president, judiciary and expediency council.

According to a report, Khamenei has been relocated to an underground bunker and has transferred key authority the Iranian military including IRGC

As conflict between Iran and Israel intensifies, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has transferred key authority to the Supreme Council of the Iranian military, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), as per a report. According to a report by Iran Insight, Khamenei has been relocated to an underground bunker in Lavizan, northeast Tehran, along with close family members, including his son Mojtaba and he has transferred the powers to IRGC. The report came ahead of Khamenei's televised address in which he threatened US against getting directly involved with Israel in the conflict with Iran. He also stated that "Iran will not surrender", in what is being seen as his response to US president Donald Trump. Trump had demanded "unconditional surrender" and had said that US and Israel knows about the whereabouts of Khamenei. Iran Insight also reported that the new delegation of authority is seen as a precaution to ensure continuity of command if Khamenei is killed. Netanyahu said that if Israel were to kill Khamenei, the ongoing war could end. Israel’s Defence Minister Israel Katz said that Khamenei could meet the same fate as former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. US President Trump stepped up his rhetoric against Iran's supreme leader saying that he will not killed "for now," while demanding “unconditional surrender.” Can the Supreme Leader transfer power to the IRGC? Under Iran's system of government, Khamenei has supreme command of the armed forces, the power to declare war, and can appoint or dismiss senior figures including military commanders and judges. Constitutionally, the process of succession is mentioned in Article 107 and Article 111, as mentioned in Iranian government website. The Assembly of Experts is responsible for appointing the new Supreme Leader. If the Supreme Leader dies, resigns, or is removed, the Assembly of Experts must meet immediately to appoint a successor. However, as per 1979 Constitution of Iran, the Supreme Leader cannot formally transfer political power to either the IRGC or the regular military. The supreme leader is the commander-in-chief, but military, though powerful, is not a governing institution in a formal constitutional sense. Nevertheless, in practice, due to overwhelming powers of the Supreme leader, he can empower IRGC leaders and military men by appointing them to top political, military, and economic roles. He can also expand their role in governance, security, and economy. Line of succession and hierarchy in the Iranian government The line of succession after Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is not publicly fixed or formally designated. Son of the supreme leader - Mojtaba Khamenei - is seen as the top contender due to close ties with IRGC. Next is Sadeq Larijani, mmber of the Guardian Council and Expediency Council and former head of the judiciary. Several high-ranking clerics like Ahmad Khatami and Alireza Arafi are also in line. There has been no formal announcement about the transfer of power to military yet. The hierarchy in the Iranian government is layered with Supreme Leader Khamenei at the top - holding ultimate authority over all branches of government, the military, and key policy decisions. Then comes the Guardian Council that is a powerful 12-member body that plays a key role in controlling who can run for office and shaping Iran’s political landscape. It includes 6 clerics appointed by the Supreme Leader. Alongside this is the Assembly of experts, consisting of 88 elected clerics, elected by public vote, but candidates are vetted by the Guardian Council. After this, comes the president, judiciary and expediency council.

According to a report, Khamenei has been relocated to an underground bunker and has transferred key authority the Iranian military including IRGC

Khamenei hands power to IRGC - BUT can he? Who can takeover after Supreme Leader | Constitutional deets, hierarchies EXPLAINED

Rising tensions between Israel and Iran have put global investors on high alert, with growing fears that deeper United States involvement could spark a dramatic spike in oil prices and derail hopes of interest rate cuts.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to a detailed report by Reuters, markets are preparing for a range of outcomes, from inflation shocks to supply chain disruptions should the conflict escalate further.&nbsp;So far, oil has been the most affected asset class, while equities and bonds remain largely unmoved, but that calm may not last.<h2>Oil prices soar on supply disruption fears</h2>As per Reuters, Brent crude futures have surged as much as 18 per cent since 10 June, touching a five-month high of $79.04 per barrel on Thursday.&nbsp;&nbsp;US crude prices have also risen by around 10 per cent over the past week, driven by fears of potential strikes on Iranian oil infrastructure or the strategic Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Despite this, the S&amp;P 500 index has shown little overall movement, though analysts caution that markets are underestimating the potential fallout.&nbsp;&nbsp;“If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today’s WTI price and that is where things get negative,” Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth, told Reuters.<h2>Oxford Economics models $130 oil risk</h2>According to Reuters, analysts at Oxford Economics have modelled three potential conflict scenarios, ranging from de-escalation to a complete halt in Iranian oil output, and the worst-case scenario: a closure of the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;In the most severe case, oil prices could surge to $130 per barrel, pushing US inflation to nearly 6 per cent by the end of 2025.&nbsp;&nbsp;“Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about second-round effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the US this year,” Oxford Economics noted in a client memo, as quoted by Reuters.<h2>Market reacts&nbsp;</h2>Despite the oil price shock, equity markets have so far remained stable. Historical data cited by Reuters shows that in past Middle East conflicts — including the 2003 Iraq War and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities — the S&amp;P 500 typically dipped briefly before recovering.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to research from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro, the index slipped 0.3 per cent in the first three weeks after such events but gained 2.3 per cent on average two months later.&nbsp;However, analysts caution that history may not be a reliable guide if the US military enters the conflict. “Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil,” Citigroup analysts wrote in a note, as per Reuters.<h2>What about Dollar?&nbsp;</h2>The US dollar, which has already weakened in 2025 amid concerns over declining US exceptionalism And may initially benefit from&nbsp;safe-haven demand if fighting escalates.&nbsp;&nbsp;But longer-term, it could fall if Washington commits to a prolonged ground conflict, analysts say.&nbsp;“We recall that after the attacks of 9/11 and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened,” Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note to clients, as reported by Reuters.<h2>Why it matters?</h2>The stakes for global markets are rising fast. A major supply shock in oil, particularly involving Iran could derail global disinflation trends, delay interest rate cuts, and hit household spending just as central banks hoped for a soft landing.&nbsp;&nbsp;While stock markets have shown resilience in past crises, this time the convergence of war, energy risk, and policy uncertainty may stretch investor optimism.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, President Donald Trump is expected to make a decision on potential US military action in the next two weeks, a move that could determine whether the Middle East crisis becomes a full-blown economic shock.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Brent crude jumps 18% as Israel–Iran tensions escalate; Oxford Economics warns of $130 oil and surging inflation if the Strait of Hormuz closes. Markets brace for Trump response amid rising economic risk.

Rising tensions between Israel and Iran have put global investors on high alert, with growing fears that deeper United States involvement could spark a dramatic spike in oil prices and derail hopes of interest rate cuts. According to a detailed report by Reuters, markets are preparing for a range of outcomes, from inflation shocks to supply chain disruptions should the conflict escalate further. So far, oil has been the most affected asset class, while equities and bonds remain largely unmoved, but that calm may not last. Oil prices soar on supply disruption fears As per Reuters, Brent crude futures have surged as much as 18 per cent since 10 June, touching a five-month high of $79.04 per barrel on Thursday. US crude prices have also risen by around 10 per cent over the past week, driven by fears of potential strikes on Iranian oil infrastructure or the strategic Strait of Hormuz. Despite this, the S&P 500 index has shown little overall movement, though analysts caution that markets are underestimating the potential fallout. “If you get disruption to supply of oil product on the global marketplace, that is not reflected in today’s WTI price and that is where things get negative,” Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth, told Reuters. Oxford Economics models $130 oil risk According to Reuters, analysts at Oxford Economics have modelled three potential conflict scenarios, ranging from de-escalation to a complete halt in Iranian oil output, and the worst-case scenario: a closure of the Strait of Hormuz. In the most severe case, oil prices could surge to $130 per barrel, pushing US inflation to nearly 6 per cent by the end of 2025. “Although the price shock inevitably dampens consumer spending because of the hit to real incomes, the scale of the rise in inflation and concerns about second-round effects likely ruin any chance of rate cuts in the US this year,” Oxford Economics noted in a client memo, as quoted by Reuters. Market reacts Despite the oil price shock, equity markets have so far remained stable. Historical data cited by Reuters shows that in past Middle East conflicts — including the 2003 Iraq War and the 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities — the S&P 500 typically dipped briefly before recovering. According to research from Wedbush Securities and CapIQ Pro, the index slipped 0.3 per cent in the first three weeks after such events but gained 2.3 per cent on average two months later. However, analysts caution that history may not be a reliable guide if the US military enters the conflict. “Geopolitical tensions have been mostly ignored by equities, but they are being factored into oil,” Citigroup analysts wrote in a note, as per Reuters. What about Dollar? The US dollar, which has already weakened in 2025 amid concerns over declining US exceptionalism And may initially benefit from safe-haven demand if fighting escalates. But longer-term, it could fall if Washington commits to a prolonged ground conflict, analysts say. “We recall that after the attacks of 9/11 and running through the decade-long US presence in Afghanistan and Iraq, the USD weakened,” Thierry Wizman, global FX and rates strategist at Macquarie Group, said in a note to clients, as reported by Reuters. Why it matters? The stakes for global markets are rising fast. A major supply shock in oil, particularly involving Iran could derail global disinflation trends, delay interest rate cuts, and hit household spending just as central banks hoped for a soft landing. While stock markets have shown resilience in past crises, this time the convergence of war, energy risk, and policy uncertainty may stretch investor optimism. As per Reuters, President Donald Trump is expected to make a decision on potential US military action in the next two weeks, a move that could determine whether the Middle East crisis becomes a full-blown economic shock. (With inputs from the agencies)

Rising Israel–Iran tensions and fears of US involvement are fuelling oil price spikes and threatening to derail global rate-cut hopes, per Reuters.

Middle East tensions rattle oil markets as investors brace for worst-case US involvement

The United States has announced a new round of sanctions targeting entities and individuals linked to Iran’s defence industry and Yemen’s Houthi group.&nbsp;&nbsp;The measures, unveiled by the Trump administration on Friday, are aimed at disrupting Tehran’s access to sensitive defence-related machinery and cracking down on illicit oil trading networks that support the Houthis.&nbsp;According to a statement from the US Treasury Department, the sanctions target eight entities, one individual, and one vessel allegedly involved in supplying components used in Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programmes.&nbsp;&nbsp;A separate action was also taken against four individuals, 12 companies, and two vessels tied to the Houthis’ alleged oil smuggling operations.<h2>Sanctions&nbsp;on Iran’s defence procurement</h2>As per Reuters, the US Treasury accused the sanctioned actors of assisting Iran in acquiring dual-use machinery and components that support the regime’s unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), missile, and asymmetric weapons capabilities.&nbsp;“The United States remains resolved to disrupt any effort by Iran to procure the sensitive, dual-use technology, components, and machinery that underpin the regime’s ballistic missile, unmanned aerial vehicle, and asymmetric weapons programs,” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the statement, as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;As per Reuters, the department identified two Hong Kong-based shipping firms, Unico Shipping Co Ltd and Athena Shipping Co Ltd, among the blacklisted entities. These companies allegedly facilitated the transportation of machinery for Iran’s defence industry.&nbsp;The latest sanctions are part of Washington’s broader effort to limit Iran’s weapons proliferation capacity, which the US argues continues to pose a direct threat to regional stability, particularly in the Middle East.<h2>Action against Houthi oil smuggling network</h2>In a separate statement, the Treasury also announced counterterrorism-related sanctions on what it called a network of individuals and companies engaged in illicit oil trading and shipping operations on behalf of Yemen’s Houthi rebels.&nbsp;As reported by Reuters, the sanctions target four individuals, 12 entities, and two vessels accused of importing oil and other goods to finance the Houthis’ war effort. The US government has previously accused the Iran-aligned group of using oil smuggling to fund its operations, including attacks on commercial shipping routes in the Red Sea.&nbsp;While the Houthis claim to be resisting foreign intervention in Yemen, the US and its allies have blamed the group for repeated missile and drone strikes targeting international shipping and regional adversaries, particularly Saudi Arabia and Israel.<h2>Broader geopolitical context</h2>The new sanctions come at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East, with Iran continuing to back armed proxies across the region.&nbsp;&nbsp;The US has ramped up its enforcement efforts in recent months as part of a wider campaign to contain Iran’s regional influence and limit its ability to finance hostile activities through third-party networks.&nbsp;The sanctions also reflect the Trump administration’s continued policy of economic pressure on Iran, with a particular focus on curbing its missile and drone development programmes.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, Washington’s approach has involved targeting supply chains and logistics firms, especially those operating in Asia and the Gulf to sever Iran’s access to critical manufacturing inputs.<h2>What the sanctions mean?</h2>Entities and individuals named in the sanctions will have their assets frozen within US jurisdiction, and US persons are generally barred from conducting transactions with them.&nbsp;&nbsp;The move is also likely to complicate international shipping and trade for the blacklisted companies, particularly those operating in Hong Kong and the Middle East.&nbsp;The US has reiterated that it will continue to use financial tools to degrade the capabilities of actors that threaten international peace, whether through illicit defence procurement or oil smuggling.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Amid rising regional tensions, the Trump administration targets Iran-linked defence firms and a Houthi oil smuggling network with new sanctions aimed at curbing missile proliferation and illicit financing.

The United States has announced a new round of sanctions targeting entities and individuals linked to Iran’s defence industry and Yemen’s Houthi group. The measures, unveiled by the Trump administration on Friday, are aimed at disrupting Tehran’s access to sensitive defence-related machinery and cracking down on illicit oil trading networks that support the Houthis. According to a statement from the US Treasury Department, the sanctions target eight entities, one individual, and one vessel allegedly involved in supplying components used in Iran’s ballistic missile and drone programmes. A separate action was also taken against four individuals, 12 companies, and two vessels tied to the Houthis’ alleged oil smuggling operations. Sanctions on Iran’s defence procurement As per Reuters, the US Treasury accused the sanctioned actors of assisting Iran in acquiring dual-use machinery and components that support the regime’s unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), missile, and asymmetric weapons capabilities. “The United States remains resolved to disrupt any effort by Iran to procure the sensitive, dual-use technology, components, and machinery that underpin the regime’s ballistic missile, unmanned aerial vehicle, and asymmetric weapons programs,” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the statement, as quoted by Reuters. As per Reuters, the department identified two Hong Kong-based shipping firms, Unico Shipping Co Ltd and Athena Shipping Co Ltd, among the blacklisted entities. These companies allegedly facilitated the transportation of machinery for Iran’s defence industry. The latest sanctions are part of Washington’s broader effort to limit Iran’s weapons proliferation capacity, which the US argues continues to pose a direct threat to regional stability, particularly in the Middle East. Action against Houthi oil smuggling network In a separate statement, the Treasury also announced counterterrorism-related sanctions on what it called a network of individuals and companies engaged in illicit oil trading and shipping operations on behalf of Yemen’s Houthi rebels. As reported by Reuters, the sanctions target four individuals, 12 entities, and two vessels accused of importing oil and other goods to finance the Houthis’ war effort. The US government has previously accused the Iran-aligned group of using oil smuggling to fund its operations, including attacks on commercial shipping routes in the Red Sea. While the Houthis claim to be resisting foreign intervention in Yemen, the US and its allies have blamed the group for repeated missile and drone strikes targeting international shipping and regional adversaries, particularly Saudi Arabia and Israel. Broader geopolitical context The new sanctions come at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East, with Iran continuing to back armed proxies across the region. The US has ramped up its enforcement efforts in recent months as part of a wider campaign to contain Iran’s regional influence and limit its ability to finance hostile activities through third-party networks. The sanctions also reflect the Trump administration’s continued policy of economic pressure on Iran, with a particular focus on curbing its missile and drone development programmes. As per Reuters, Washington’s approach has involved targeting supply chains and logistics firms, especially those operating in Asia and the Gulf to sever Iran’s access to critical manufacturing inputs. What the sanctions mean? Entities and individuals named in the sanctions will have their assets frozen within US jurisdiction, and US persons are generally barred from conducting transactions with them. The move is also likely to complicate international shipping and trade for the blacklisted companies, particularly those operating in Hong Kong and the Middle East. The US has reiterated that it will continue to use financial tools to degrade the capabilities of actors that threaten international peace, whether through illicit defence procurement or oil smuggling. (With inputs from the agencies)

The US has imposed fresh sanctions on Iran’s defence suppliers and Houthi oil smugglers to disrupt missile development and illicit financing in the Middle East.

US imposes fresh sanctions on Iran-linked defence firms and Houthi oil network

iran-israel-war

Iran Israel War, News on Iran Israel War, stories on Iran Israel War, articles on Iran Israel War, Iran Israel War stories at Wion, Iran Israel War news, Iran Israel War latest news

iran israel-war

UK not backing Trump in Iran operation? PM Starmer responds to US request for using British bases

White House errs big time with images from Trump's Mar-a-Lago situation room

What is cluster bomb? Iran fired missile with munitions at civilians in Israel

Iran’s missiles could strike Israel and US bases! Here’s why Israel wants curbs

Iranians chant anti-Khamenei slogans as Trump keeps attack options open

Iran warns US against Netanyahu's 'destructive' influence; Trump responds

‘They tried to kill me’: Iran’s president says Israel tried to assassinate him

'Who in the world taught them this word OBLITERATED?' Netizens mock Trump

At least 71 killed in Israel’s strike on notorious Evin prison, says Iran

'In return for yellowcake': Iran ready to send enriched uranium abroad after war

Oil prices face steepest weekly fall in two years as West Asia war premium fades

Oil prices rise as US crude draw points to firm demand

‘Badly damaged’: Iran admits damage to its nuclear facilities in US strikes

Is Iran's concrete unbreakable? Scientists believe even 'mother of all bombs' cannot shatter it

Iran president says Israel and US ‘cannot impose unjust aspirations by force’

'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS': Trump 'unhappy' with Israel for attacking Iran

Did Iran break ceasefire with Israel despite Trump's warning?

If World War 3 erupts,these countries can offer safest refuge. Check their names

Why was Qatar attacked? How tiny Arab nation went from clout builder to target

Airlines cancel flights and reroute over escalating West Asia missile tensions

Khamenei's BIG statement on 'surrender' before Trump's ceasefire announcement

Oil prices drop to one-week low as Trump announces Israel–Iran ceasefire

Why Iran's retaliation against B-2 Bomber feels like firecrackers in a storm?

Why Iran chose to target Qatar? Strategic reasons behind Tehran’s retaliation

10 days of Iran-Israel war, images show how it unfolded

Israel hit Iran's surface-to-surface missile engine production site