US vs China over South China Sea: Washington backs Philippines, Beijing hits back

Bigg Boss 20: Isha Rikhi evicted after three weeks in Salman Khan’s show

Musk plans to more than double xAI's chips to over 1.2 million Nvidia GPUs by year-end

After JU, clash erupts at SRFTI: BJP’s ‘Dimagi Naxal’ jibe sparks political firestorm after students protest RSS-linked event

‘Anti-social elements spreading false rumours’: LPU issues statement amid massive unrest over alleged rape

LPU students go on rampage, vandalise campus amid widespread protest: What's happening

Trump asked Xi to pressure Iran. China did not say yes — here’s what Beijing wants

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent hails global crackdown on Iranian banks and airlines

An OpenAI agent escaped its locked test cage again, by hiding questions in DNS lookups

'Our video was trimmed': LPU girls who featured in rape-denial video make U-turn

3 males killed, four others injured in shooting after fight at strip club in Detroit

'Victory for low-budget consumers': Raghav Chadha hails 30-day telecom recharge rules

Claude rebuilt the 1989 game 'Prince of Persia' by reusing the original's own code

Beyond metros: How Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities could drive India’s next AI wave

Tesla builds first Cybertruck with its own refined lithium: Elon Musk's $1 billion Texas bet pays off

IndiGo flight suffers tail strike in Bengaluru while landing; DGCA to probe incident

The US and China set up an AI 'red telephone', but skipped the rulebook

‘Terror suspects arrested near UK air base were looking to do big damage’: Trump

Russian envoy claims US tactics to contain India were revealed in ‘Freudian slip’

IND vs WI 1st ODI: Kohli breaks Sachin's most runs in one country record with unbeaten 139 as India thump West Indies by 8 wickets

Researchers rebuilt exactly how 700 AI agents hacked Hugging Face: a 900-link chain trick

‘Olympic inclusion is our major target’: WPA President Ishaun Singh on pool’s global ambitions

Nations League: Spain sink England at Wembley; Modric shines for Croatia

Why has Iran released no proof of life of Mojtaba Khamenei? Araghchi reveals...

'What kind of confession is this?': Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif’s 'terrorists would be roaming New York' remark goes viral, raises alarm online. Watch

South Korea demands apology from Ukraine over North Korean prisoners' transfer

Beyond BrahMos: India targets Rs 50,000 crore in defence exports with unmatched price edge

Sri Lankan Tamil migrant worker gets death sentence in Saudi Arabia, help sought from India

Muslim marriage cannot shield sex with minor wife from prosecution under POCSO: Delhi HC

'Can't help but draw painful parallels to Nirbhaya case': SC on latest incidents of rape cases in Delhi-NCR

99.9% more powerful - Scientists find boy who can recall memories from just 3 months of age

'FIRST LOOK from inside Noah’s Ark': Researchers share video from inside mysterious mound in Turkey

UNSC reform momentum grows: Russia, Portugal, Mauritius push for India's permanent seat bid

8 US marines injured in Iranian missile attack on vessel in Strait of Hormuz: Report

New OTT releases this week (September 28-October 4, 2026): Dupahiya 2, Pooja Meri Jaan, Ohh My Dog- 5 titles coming on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Afghanistan says 28 fighters killed in clash near Pakistan border, Islamabad denies

Ceuta migrant crisis: Protesters take to streets as Spain grapples with migrant challenge

LPU suspend classes, postpones exams as violence escalates over rape claims: What's happening

New York City wants a 'kill switch' on every AI, and will pay whistleblowers who report violations

Tesla may finally be turning a corner after two consecutive years of falling vehicle sales. The electric carmaker delivered 486,532 vehicles in the third quarter of 2026, comfortably beating analysts’ estimate of 456,896, according to Visible Alpha data. The stronger-than-expected numbers sent Tesla shares more than 5 per cent higher in early trading on October 2. More importantly, the result means the company now needs just 311,448 deliveries in the fourth quarter to avoid a third straight annual decline.<h2>Europe becomes key to Tesla’s recovery</h2>Tesla’s rebound comes as its performance in Europe improves after a difficult 2025.&nbsp;European sales had been hit by several factors, including political backlash against CEO Elon Musk and competition from cheaper Chinese electric vehicles. But registrations have recovered sharply this year. Tesla recorded stronger growth in markets including France and Denmark during the third quarter. Government incentives, easier comparisons with last year and growing interest in electric vehicles have all helped the recovery. The company’s Full Self-Driving technology could provide another boost. Tesla’s FSD software has now been approved in eight European countries, although its rollout remains gradual.<h2>Tesla no longer relying only on US incentives</h2>The result is particularly significant because a $7,500 US federal tax credit for EV buyers expired in September 2025. Tesla therefore faced a tougher US market comparison this year. Analysts have responded by raising their expectations for Tesla’s full-year deliveries. The latest consensus cited by Reuters puts 2026 deliveries at 1.82 million vehicles, up from 1.65 million in June.<h2>Musk’s bigger Tesla bet goes beyond cars</h2>Despite the delivery improvement, investors are increasingly looking beyond Tesla’s traditional car business.Elon Musk has positioned the company around artificial intelligence, robotaxis and humanoid robots. Tesla’s robotaxi service is already operating without an in-car safety supervisor in Texas and Florida, while the company has also introduced its purpose-built Cybercab into the Austin service. Tesla is due to report its full third-quarter financial results on October 21 after markets close. That report will show whether the delivery rebound is translating into stronger financial performance. For now, the latest figures give Tesla something it has been missing: evidence that its core vehicle business can return to growth.

Tesla delivered 486,532 vehicles in Q3 2026, beating Wall Street estimates by nearly 30,000. A recovery in Europe helped offset weaker US demand, putting the EV maker within 311,448 deliveries of ending its two-year annual sales decline.

Tesla may finally be turning a corner after two consecutive years of falling vehicle sales. The electric carmaker delivered 486,532 vehicles in the third quarter of 2026, comfortably beating analysts’ estimate of 456,896, according to Visible Alpha data. The stronger-than-expected numbers sent Tesla shares more than 5 per cent higher in early trading on October 2. More importantly, the result means the company now needs just 311,448 deliveries in the fourth quarter to avoid a third straight annual decline. Europe becomes key to Tesla’s recovery Tesla’s rebound comes as its performance in Europe improves after a difficult 2025. European sales had been hit by several factors, including political backlash against CEO Elon Musk and competition from cheaper Chinese electric vehicles. But registrations have recovered sharply this year. Tesla recorded stronger growth in markets including France and Denmark during the third quarter. Government incentives, easier comparisons with last year and growing interest in electric vehicles have all helped the recovery. The company’s Full Self-Driving technology could provide another boost. Tesla’s FSD software has now been approved in eight European countries, although its rollout remains gradual. Tesla no longer relying only on US incentives The result is particularly significant because a $7,500 US federal tax credit for EV buyers expired in September 2025. Tesla therefore faced a tougher US market comparison this year. Analysts have responded by raising their expectations for Tesla’s full-year deliveries. The latest consensus cited by Reuters puts 2026 deliveries at 1.82 million vehicles, up from 1.65 million in June. Musk’s bigger Tesla bet goes beyond cars Despite the delivery improvement, investors are increasingly looking beyond Tesla’s traditional car business. Elon Musk has positioned the company around artificial intelligence, robotaxis and humanoid robots. Tesla’s robotaxi service is already operating without an in-car safety supervisor in Texas and Florida, while the company has also introduced its purpose-built Cybercab into the Austin service. Tesla is due to report its full third-quarter financial results on October 21 after markets close. That report will show whether the delivery rebound is translating into stronger financial performance. For now, the latest figures give Tesla something it has been missing: evidence that its core vehicle business can return to growth.

Tesla delivered 486,532 vehicles in Q3 2026, beating Wall Street estimates by nearly 30,000. A recovery in Europe helped offset weaker US demand, putting the EV maker within 311,448 deliveries of ending its two-year annual sales decline.

Tesla car sales show signs of recovery as deliveries beat forecasts

Money from the cryptocurrency industry is playing a subtle but crucial role in the US midterm elections. From crypto-millionaire donors to crypto-linked super political action committees (super PACs), millions of dollars are flowing into the 2026 election campaign. Crypto companies have contributed roughly $206 million this election cycle, according to analyses by groups like Public Citizen based on Federal Election Commission (FEC) data. This makes crypto the largest corporate source of political contributions tracked so far, ahead of online betting and Big Tech and artificial intelligence companies. The figure has already surpassed the industry's $170 million contribution in the 2024 cycle.Some of the money is going to non-crypto-specific groups such as MAGA Inc., a super PAC aligned with President Donald Trump. The scale of the spending raises an important question: who are the people and organisations making this push, and what do they want? Here is a primer.<h2>Top donors to major crypto PACs</h2>The most prominent groups are the Fairshake network, Protect Progress, Defend American Jobs and the Digital Freedom Fund. They are backed by a relatively small group of crypto companies, venture capital firms and executives.Fairshake is the crypto industry's flagship bipartisan super PAC. Its major backers include Coinbase, Ripple Labs and Andreessen Horowitz, also known as a16z. As of 30 June, Fairshake had received almost $137 million in the 2026 election cycle and had about $127 million in cash on hand, according to FEC filings.Fairshake itself reported about $138 million in receipts in the 2026 cycle by the middle of the year, while the broader network is larger when its affiliated committees and transfers are included.The Digital Freedom Fund is a Republican-leaning super PAC backed heavily by Winklevoss Capital, associated with Gemini co-founders Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss. It reported $22.4 million in receipts through 30 June 2026. More than $21 million came from Winklevoss Capital Fund LLC. Payward Inc. contributed $1 million and investor Naval Ravikant contributed $100,000.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-administration-gains-access-to-voter-data-1790408108603/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-administration-gains-access-to-voter-data-1790408108603/embed</a><h2>What do they want? Why crypto firms and associated individuals are among the top corporate political donors in the midterms</h2>The funding , which goes to both Republicans and Democrats, is mainly aimed at electing and protecting candidates who support clearer federal rules for digital assets such as cryptocurrencies. The industry's political spending also supports independent advertising that does not always mention crypto directly. In many cases, the ads focus on candidates' broader records or other issues rather than explicitly discussing cryptocurrency policy. This approach was also prominent during the 2024 election cycle.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/bitcoin-surges-above-85-000-as-nearly-900-million-in-crypto-positions-are-liquidated-is-the-crypto-winter-over-1790004335800">Bitcoin surges above $85,000 as nearly $900 million in crypto positions are liquidated: Is the crypto winter over?</a><h2>More about Fairshake and others: Funding both sides</h2>Fairshake is an issue-focused group that backs pro-crypto candidates who favour American innovation in both parties. Its broader objective is to expand a pro-crypto congressional caucus.Fairshake transfers funds to its two main partisan affiliates: Defend American Jobs, which is Republican-focused, and Protect Progress, which is Democrat-focused. This allows the network to support candidates from both major parties while concentrating on their positions on digital-asset policy.Across the Fairshake network, receipts have reached hundreds of millions of dollars when the affiliated committees and wider corporate contributions are included. Fairshake and its affiliates have also spent tens of millions of dollars on primaries and early general-election activity.&nbsp;Fairshake has also announced a planned $30 million campaign against Democratic Senate candidate Sherrod Brown in Ohio. The spending is part of the industry's broader effort to influence races involving candidates viewed as supportive or hostile to crypto legislation.Digital Freedom Fund, a Republican-leaning super PAC backed heavily by the Winklevoss interests, is focused on Republican candidates supporting crypto-friendly policies.Its objectives include self-custody rights, developer protections, banking access for crypto firms and opposition to a US central bank digital currency.Stand With Crypto Alliance, a Coinbase-backed advocacy and pressure group, has also built a large grassroots base. In 2025, it reported more than 2.6 million advocates and chapters in all 50 states. By late September 2026, the organisation was referring to more than three million advocates. It grades politicians on their crypto positions, organises events and meetings with lawmakers, and supports candidates through endorsements and advertising.Smaller or related entities, such as Fellowship PAC, have also been active in some races.Beyond direct campaign spending, the crypto industry has deployed lobbyists, advocacy groups and executive engagement. Industry representatives regularly meet senators and House members from both parties to push legislation and influence agency rules.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-minted-over-1-billion-from-crypto-dealings-in-first-year-back-in-office-1782868287013">Trump minted over $1 billion from crypto dealings in first year back in office</a><h2>Who are the crypto millions supporting?&nbsp;</h2>During primaries, Fairshake had backed candidates in 57 races and won 53 of them by early October. On Monday, (Oct 5, Fairshake announced support for 32 House incumbents: 19 Republicans and 13 Democrats. All of the candidates supported in this latest round had voted for the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act when it passed the House in 2025.Among the Democratic House representatives receiving support are Janelle Bynum, Steven Horsford and Derek Tran. Republican priorities include Representatives French Hill, chair of the House Financial Services Committee, Bill Huizenga and Bryan Steil, who has a role on the committee's digital-assets subcommittee.Other Republicans supported by crypto money include Tom Emmer, Michelle Fischbach and Jason Smith. Democratic candidates supported by the industry include Pete Aguilar and Josh Gottheimer, among others.<h2>Crypto industry's priority is to reduce regulatory uncertainty</h2>The crypto industry has been rooting for the passage of market-structure legislation such as the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. The bill passed the House in 2025 by 294-134, but failed to advance in the Senate in September after a procedural vote fell short of the 60 votes needed. The Senate vote was 49-50, according to Reuters.The legislation aimed to clarify the respective jurisdictions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over digital assets. It also sought to establish rules for crypto issuance and trading and registration requirements for intermediaries, while reducing uncertainty created by enforcement-led regulation.The failure of the legislation has shifted the industry's focus towards the next Congress and continuing Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission rulemaking.The industry is also building on the earlier GENIUS Act, which had established a federal framework for stablecoins.Other areas of interest include banking access and integration of crypto firms with payment rails, as well as greater tax clarity on issues such as crypto mining, staking and rewards. The industry also wants clearer rules for peer-to-peer transactions while some advocacy groups oppose overly restrictive regulations and a retail central bank digital currency.<h2>Money matters, but criticism is there too</h2>Critics, including Public Citizen, oppose the use of unlimited super PAC spending to prioritise corporate policy goals over party loyalty. They argue that large contributions give companies and wealthy individuals greater leverage over candidates and public policy, including through both supportive and attack advertisements.The scale of crypto spending has therefore turned the 2026 midterms into an important test of how much influence a rapidly expanding industry can exert over Congress and the rules governing digital assets.

Crypto firms and investors are pouring hundreds of millions into the US midterms through super PACs and cash donations and campaign ads. They are backing pro-crypto candidates from both Republican and Democratic parties, seeking clearer digital-asset rules after the CLARITY Act stalled.

Money from the cryptocurrency industry is playing a subtle but crucial role in the US midterm elections. From crypto-millionaire donors to crypto-linked super political action committees (super PACs), millions of dollars are flowing into the 2026 election campaign. Crypto companies have contributed roughly $206 million this election cycle, according to analyses by groups like Public Citizen based on Federal Election Commission (FEC) data. This makes crypto the largest corporate source of political contributions tracked so far, ahead of online betting and Big Tech and artificial intelligence companies. The figure has already surpassed the industry's $170 million contribution in the 2024 cycle. Some of the money is going to non-crypto-specific groups such as MAGA Inc., a super PAC aligned with President Donald Trump. The scale of the spending raises an important question: who are the people and organisations making this push, and what do they want? Here is a primer. Top donors to major crypto PACs The most prominent groups are the Fairshake network, Protect Progress, Defend American Jobs and the Digital Freedom Fund. They are backed by a relatively small group of crypto companies, venture capital firms and executives. Fairshake is the crypto industry's flagship bipartisan super PAC. Its major backers include Coinbase, Ripple Labs and Andreessen Horowitz, also known as a16z. As of 30 June, Fairshake had received almost $137 million in the 2026 election cycle and had about $127 million in cash on hand, according to FEC filings. Fairshake itself reported about $138 million in receipts in the 2026 cycle by the middle of the year, while the broader network is larger when its affiliated committees and transfers are included. The Digital Freedom Fund is a Republican-leaning super PAC backed heavily by Winklevoss Capital, associated with Gemini co-founders Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss. It reported $22.4 million in receipts through 30 June 2026. More than $21 million came from Winklevoss Capital Fund LLC. Payward Inc. contributed $1 million and investor Naval Ravikant contributed $100,000. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-administration-gains-access-to-voter-data-1790408108603/embed What do they want? Why crypto firms and associated individuals are among the top corporate political donors in the midterms The funding , which goes to both Republicans and Democrats, is mainly aimed at electing and protecting candidates who support clearer federal rules for digital assets such as cryptocurrencies. The industry's political spending also supports independent advertising that does not always mention crypto directly. In many cases, the ads focus on candidates' broader records or other issues rather than explicitly discussing cryptocurrency policy. This approach was also prominent during the 2024 election cycle. Also read: Bitcoin surges above $85,000 as nearly $900 million in crypto positions are liquidated: Is the crypto winter over? More about Fairshake and others: Funding both sides Fairshake is an issue-focused group that backs pro-crypto candidates who favour American innovation in both parties. Its broader objective is to expand a pro-crypto congressional caucus. Fairshake transfers funds to its two main partisan affiliates: Defend American Jobs, which is Republican-focused, and Protect Progress, which is Democrat-focused. This allows the network to support candidates from both major parties while concentrating on their positions on digital-asset policy. Across the Fairshake network, receipts have reached hundreds of millions of dollars when the affiliated committees and wider corporate contributions are included. Fairshake and its affiliates have also spent tens of millions of dollars on primaries and early general-election activity. Fairshake has also announced a planned $30 million campaign against Democratic Senate candidate Sherrod Brown in Ohio. The spending is part of the industry's broader effort to influence races involving candidates viewed as supportive or hostile to crypto legislation. Digital Freedom Fund, a Republican-leaning super PAC backed heavily by the Winklevoss interests, is focused on Republican candidates supporting crypto-friendly policies. Its objectives include self-custody rights, developer protections, banking access for crypto firms and opposition to a US central bank digital currency. Stand With Crypto Alliance, a Coinbase-backed advocacy and pressure group, has also built a large grassroots base. In 2025, it reported more than 2.6 million advocates and chapters in all 50 states. By late September 2026, the organisation was referring to more than three million advocates. It grades politicians on their crypto positions, organises events and meetings with lawmakers, and supports candidates through endorsements and advertising. Smaller or related entities, such as Fellowship PAC, have also been active in some races. Beyond direct campaign spending, the crypto industry has deployed lobbyists, advocacy groups and executive engagement. Industry representatives regularly meet senators and House members from both parties to push legislation and influence agency rules. Also read: Trump minted over $1 billion from crypto dealings in first year back in office Who are the crypto millions supporting? During primaries, Fairshake had backed candidates in 57 races and won 53 of them by early October. On Monday, (Oct 5, Fairshake announced support for 32 House incumbents: 19 Republicans and 13 Democrats. All of the candidates supported in this latest round had voted for the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act when it passed the House in 2025. Among the Democratic House representatives receiving support are Janelle Bynum, Steven Horsford and Derek Tran. Republican priorities include Representatives French Hill, chair of the House Financial Services Committee, Bill Huizenga and Bryan Steil, who has a role on the committee's digital-assets subcommittee. Other Republicans supported by crypto money include Tom Emmer, Michelle Fischbach and Jason Smith. Democratic candidates supported by the industry include Pete Aguilar and Josh Gottheimer, among others. Crypto industry's priority is to reduce regulatory uncertainty The crypto industry has been rooting for the passage of market-structure legislation such as the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. The bill passed the House in 2025 by 294-134, but failed to advance in the Senate in September after a procedural vote fell short of the 60 votes needed. The Senate vote was 49-50, according to Reuters. The legislation aimed to clarify the respective jurisdictions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over digital assets. It also sought to establish rules for crypto issuance and trading and registration requirements for intermediaries, while reducing uncertainty created by enforcement-led regulation. The failure of the legislation has shifted the industry's focus towards the next Congress and continuing Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission rulemaking. The industry is also building on the earlier GENIUS Act, which had established a federal framework for stablecoins. Other areas of interest include banking access and integration of crypto firms with payment rails, as well as greater tax clarity on issues such as crypto mining, staking and rewards. The industry also wants clearer rules for peer-to-peer transactions while some advocacy groups oppose overly restrictive regulations and a retail central bank digital currency. Money matters, but criticism is there too Critics, including Public Citizen, oppose the use of unlimited super PAC spending to prioritise corporate policy goals over party loyalty. They argue that large contributions give companies and wealthy individuals greater leverage over candidates and public policy, including through both supportive and attack advertisements. The scale of crypto spending has therefore turned the 2026 midterms into an important test of how much influence a rapidly expanding industry can exert over Congress and the rules governing digital assets.

Crypto firms and investors are pouring hundreds of millions into the US midterms through super PACs and cash donations and campaign ads. They are backing pro-crypto candidates from both Republican and Democratic parties, seeking clearer digital-asset rules after the CLARITY Act stalled.

US Midterms 2026: Cryptocurrency industry money is playing a crucial role. What do donors want? Fairshake, super PACs and more

OpenAI is reportedly engaged in discussions with several UAE-based investment funds, including Abu Dhabi-based MGX, to help anchor a $30 billion financing round for the ChatGPT maker. These funds would come together to form a syndicate to invest in the round, with UAE investors jointly discussing a potential of up to $10 billion altogether. BlackRock Inc. is also said to be in talks to join this syndicate, according to Bloomberg. Sources also revealed that the fundraising is ongoing, and the details could change. However, OpenAI and BlackRock refused to comment on the development. Even representatives for MGX did not respond to requests for comment outside normal business hours. OpenAI is reportedly seeking to secure at least $30 billion in fresh capital at a valuation nearly $1.4 trillion, even as the firm pushes back plans for an initial public offering until at least next year at the earliest, pointing to its focus on AI safety work. This latest push follows OpenAI most recently raising a $122 billion round in March, which had valued the company at $852 billion at the time.&nbsp;Read more: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/oil-prices-fall-by-almost-2-as-g7-stockpile-release-offsets-strait-of-hormuz-supply-fears-1791260713210">Oil prices fall by almost 2% as G7 stockpile release offsets Strait of Hormuz supply fears</a><h3>Deep-pocketed investors</h3>Leading AI companies, including OpenAI and Anthropic PBC, have previously turned toward deep-pocketed investors in the Middle East to fulfil their intense capital requirements in order to develop and support cutting-edge artificial intelligence software. MGX, in particular, has already backed earlier funding rounds for both OpenAI and Anthropic, and according to Bloomberg News, the firm raised nearly $50 billion earlier this year specifically to ramp up its AI infrastructure investments. Beyond the UAE funds, OpenAI has reportedly been in conversation with the University of California's endowment, an existing investor, about joining this round, while current backers Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz have also reportedly discussed contributing. Thrive declined to offer a comment, and representatives for both Andreessen Horowitz and the University of California did not respond when reached. Notably, OpenAI is said to be approaching this round differently than is typical: rather than allowing investors to negotiate terms and compete to lead the round, the company is presenting its $1.4 trillion pre-money valuation as essentially fixed, even without having locked in a lead investor, a departure from the usual venture-funding playbook.

OpenAI is reportedly seeking to secure at least $30 billion in fresh capital at a valuation nearly $1.4 trillion, even as the firm pushes back plans for an initial public offering until at least next year at the earliest, pointing to its focus on AI safety work.

OpenAI is reportedly engaged in discussions with several UAE-based investment funds, including Abu Dhabi-based MGX, to help anchor a $30 billion financing round for the ChatGPT maker. These funds would come together to form a syndicate to invest in the round, with UAE investors jointly discussing a potential of up to $10 billion altogether. BlackRock Inc. is also said to be in talks to join this syndicate, according to Bloomberg. Sources also revealed that the fundraising is ongoing, and the details could change. However, OpenAI and BlackRock refused to comment on the development. Even representatives for MGX did not respond to requests for comment outside normal business hours. OpenAI is reportedly seeking to secure at least $30 billion in fresh capital at a valuation nearly $1.4 trillion, even as the firm pushes back plans for an initial public offering until at least next year at the earliest, pointing to its focus on AI safety work. This latest push follows OpenAI most recently raising a $122 billion round in March, which had valued the company at $852 billion at the time. Read more: Oil prices fall by almost 2% as G7 stockpile release offsets Strait of Hormuz supply fears Deep-pocketed investors Leading AI companies, including OpenAI and Anthropic PBC, have previously turned toward deep-pocketed investors in the Middle East to fulfil their intense capital requirements in order to develop and support cutting-edge artificial intelligence software. MGX, in particular, has already backed earlier funding rounds for both OpenAI and Anthropic, and according to Bloomberg News, the firm raised nearly $50 billion earlier this year specifically to ramp up its AI infrastructure investments. Beyond the UAE funds, OpenAI has reportedly been in conversation with the University of California's endowment, an existing investor, about joining this round, while current backers Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz have also reportedly discussed contributing. Thrive declined to offer a comment, and representatives for both Andreessen Horowitz and the University of California did not respond when reached. Notably, OpenAI is said to be approaching this round differently than is typical: rather than allowing investors to negotiate terms and compete to lead the round, the company is presenting its $1.4 trillion pre-money valuation as essentially fixed, even without having locked in a lead investor, a departure from the usual venture-funding playbook.

OpenAI is reportedly seeking to secure at least $30 billion in fresh capital at a valuation nearly $1.4 trillion, even as the firm pushes back plans for an initial public offering until at least next year at the earliest, pointing to its focus on AI safety work.

OpenAI in talks with UAE funds, BlackRock for $30 billion round at $1.4t valuation

Oil prices settled lower on Monday (Oct 05) as traders weighed a planned release of emergency crude and diesel stocks by the Group of Seven against renewed attacks around the Strait of Hormuz and continuing risks to Middle East supplies. December Brent crude futures fell 1.9 per cent to $100.32 a barrel, while December West Texas Intermediate futures dropped 1.8 per cent to $89.43 a barrel. Brent has now settled lower in three of the past five sessions, while WTI has declined for two consecutive days, according to FactSet data.<h2>G7 plans 100 million-barrel release</h2>G7 countries agreed on Friday (Oct 02) to coordinate the release of 100 million barrels of crude oil and fuel through the International Energy Agency over four months. A substantial portion of the release will involve diesel during the first 20 days.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russian-spies-left-faeces-in-finnish-mp-s-toilet-bizarre-home-intrusions-spark-intimidation-fears-1791258344095">‘Russian spies, faeces and Finnish MPs? Bizarre home intrusions spark intimidation fears</a>The IEA said about 325 million barrels of the 400 million barrels pledged under collective action announced in March have already been released. While Middle East crude exports have recovered significantly, refined-product flows, particularly diesel, remain severely constrained, the agency said.The US Department of Energy said 800,000 barrels of crude were released from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve last week. September releases were the smallest in six months. The reserve held 283 million barrels as of Friday, the lowest level since October 1982.<h2>Saudi Arabia cuts crude price</h2>Saudi Aramco cut the official selling price for November shipments of Arab Light crude to Asia by $3 a barrel, widening its discount to the Oman/Dubai benchmark to $5. The move came as crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz recovered, although freight costs remained elevated. MUFG analysts said tanker attacks, infrastructure disruptions and vessels operating without visible tracking signals were still limiting exports through the waterway.Meanwhile, seven OPEC+ members, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, agreed on Sunday to keep production levels unchanged in November.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uss-dwight-d-eisenhower-returns-to-port-for-aircraft-systems-assessment-after-growler-mishap-1791252806297">USS Dwight D. Eisenhower returns to port for aircraft systems assessment after Growler mishap</a><h2>Hormuz supply recovery remains fragile</h2>Saudi Arabia is loading crude from both its Persian Gulf and Red Sea coasts as exports recover. Kpler data showed Saudi crude shipments through the Strait rising from around 1.4 million barrels a day in late August to about 4.1 million barrels a day last week.The kingdom's East-West pipeline has also returned to flows of around 5.5 million barrels a day after being shut in mid-September following drone attacks. But the recovery remains vulnerable. UK Maritime Trade Operations said Sunday that a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz was struck by an unknown projectile, damaging its engine room. The crew was safe, and no environmental impact was reported. Seven vessel attacks have been reported around the strait since September 28, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Oil prices fell despite renewed attacks around the Strait of Hormuz as traders weighed a planned G7 release of 100 million barrels of crude and fuel. Brent settled at $100.32 a barrel while supply risks across the Middle East remain elevated.


Oil prices settled lower on Monday (Oct 05) as traders weighed a planned release of emergency crude and diesel stocks by the Group of Seven against renewed attacks around the Strait of Hormuz and continuing risks to Middle East supplies. December Brent crude futures fell 1.9 per cent to $100.32 a barrel, while December West Texas Intermediate futures dropped 1.8 per cent to $89.43 a barrel. Brent has now settled lower in three of the past five sessions, while WTI has declined for two consecutive days, according to FactSet data. G7 plans 100 million-barrel release G7 countries agreed on Friday (Oct 02) to coordinate the release of 100 million barrels of crude oil and fuel through the International Energy Agency over four months. A substantial portion of the release will involve diesel during the first 20 days. Also read | ‘Russian spies, faeces and Finnish MPs? Bizarre home intrusions spark intimidation fears The IEA said about 325 million barrels of the 400 million barrels pledged under collective action announced in March have already been released. While Middle East crude exports have recovered significantly, refined-product flows, particularly diesel, remain severely constrained, the agency said. The US Department of Energy said 800,000 barrels of crude were released from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve last week. September releases were the smallest in six months. The reserve held 283 million barrels as of Friday, the lowest level since October 1982. Saudi Arabia cuts crude price Saudi Aramco cut the official selling price for November shipments of Arab Light crude to Asia by $3 a barrel, widening its discount to the Oman/Dubai benchmark to $5. The move came as crude flows through the Strait of Hormuz recovered, although freight costs remained elevated. MUFG analysts said tanker attacks, infrastructure disruptions and vessels operating without visible tracking signals were still limiting exports through the waterway. Meanwhile, seven OPEC+ members, including Saudi Arabia and Russia, agreed on Sunday to keep production levels unchanged in November. Also read | USS Dwight D. Eisenhower returns to port for aircraft systems assessment after Growler mishap Hormuz supply recovery remains fragile Saudi Arabia is loading crude from both its Persian Gulf and Red Sea coasts as exports recover. Kpler data showed Saudi crude shipments through the Strait rising from around 1.4 million barrels a day in late August to about 4.1 million barrels a day last week. The kingdom's East-West pipeline has also returned to flows of around 5.5 million barrels a day after being shut in mid-September following drone attacks. But the recovery remains vulnerable. UK Maritime Trade Operations said Sunday that a tanker in the Strait of Hormuz was struck by an unknown projectile, damaging its engine room. The crew was safe, and no environmental impact was reported. Seven vessel attacks have been reported around the strait since September 28, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Oil prices fell despite renewed attacks around the Strait of Hormuz as traders weighed a planned G7 release of 100 million barrels of crude and fuel. Brent settled at $100.32 a barrel while supply risks across the Middle East remain elevated.

Oil prices fall by almost 2% as G7 stockpile release offsets Strait of Hormuz supply fears

India-US trade deal talks have reached a "plateau,", said Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on October 5. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, she claimed that a concessions or a reciprocal give-and-take from either side would be "very very difficult." She added that Washington wants to reduce deficit with India, and address perceived past losses."It's been a hard and very rigorously negotiated agreement. The negotiations are still ongoing. Although we'd like to believe that both sides have reached a plateau beyond which giving or taking might be very very difficult," said Sitharaman. "But maybe if there are rooms to operate from both sides would do it."US is one of the very few nation with which India runs a trade surplus. In the 2025-26 financial year, bilateral trade between the two nations hit a record $140.80 billion. India's exports to the US reached $87.32 billion while imports from the US stood at $53.49 billion. The US has been seeking to narrow its trade deficit with India, while New Delhi has been looking to secure greater market access and protect areas considered sensitive.Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-police-acp-vivek-bhagat-promoted-additional-dcp-journalist-harassment-1791218843042">'Rewarded for molestation?': Delhi Police ACP accused of harassing journalist promoted to Additional DCP</a>"Negotiation used to be the only platform through which countries could highlight the discrepancies, highlight the lopsidedness, and say would we want to correct this. And how would you correct it because you have demand in your country, I can supply, so open up on that," she said.“Now the imbalance is being sought to be addressed through other means, where you rightly said tariff has become weaponised,” said Nirmala sitharaman.Contrastingly India runs a massive trade deficit with India which has continued to widen since 2014. The bilateral trade volume between India and China for 2025-26 is at $151.10 billion. Driven by a 16% surge in industrial imports, China overtook the US to become India's single largest trading partner. While India runs a $112.16 billion deficit with China.&nbsp;"The trade imbalance with China for India, for instance, since 2014 has been growing exponentially," she said. "So I can probably take the same position with China because it's so lopsided it is terribly against me. But, no - you can't. You will have to talk it out. You will have to negotiate. You will have to have some give and take. That's the difference."On Saturday, United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that India-US trade deal was at final stages but not “imminent”.The current impasse follows a foundational framework for an interim trade agreement that both nations officially announced in February 2026.&nbsp;&nbsp;

India-US trade deal talks have reached a “plateau”, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said, citing difficulties over further concessions and trade imbalances.

India-US trade deal talks have reached a "plateau,", said Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on October 5. Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, she claimed that a concessions or a reciprocal give-and-take from either side would be "very very difficult." She added that Washington wants to reduce deficit with India, and address perceived past losses. "It's been a hard and very rigorously negotiated agreement. The negotiations are still ongoing. Although we'd like to believe that both sides have reached a plateau beyond which giving or taking might be very very difficult," said Sitharaman. "But maybe if there are rooms to operate from both sides would do it." US is one of the very few nation with which India runs a trade surplus. In the 2025-26 financial year, bilateral trade between the two nations hit a record $140.80 billion. India's exports to the US reached $87.32 billion while imports from the US stood at $53.49 billion. The US has been seeking to narrow its trade deficit with India, while New Delhi has been looking to secure greater market access and protect areas considered sensitive. Also Read:'Rewarded for molestation?': Delhi Police ACP accused of harassing journalist promoted to Additional DCP "Negotiation used to be the only platform through which countries could highlight the discrepancies, highlight the lopsidedness, and say would we want to correct this. And how would you correct it because you have demand in your country, I can supply, so open up on that," she said. “Now the imbalance is being sought to be addressed through other means, where you rightly said tariff has become weaponised,” said Nirmala sitharaman. Contrastingly India runs a massive trade deficit with India which has continued to widen since 2014. The bilateral trade volume between India and China for 2025-26 is at $151.10 billion. Driven by a 16% surge in industrial imports, China overtook the US to become India's single largest trading partner. While India runs a $112.16 billion deficit with China. "The trade imbalance with China for India, for instance, since 2014 has been growing exponentially," she said. "So I can probably take the same position with China because it's so lopsided it is terribly against me. But, no - you can't. You will have to talk it out. You will have to negotiate. You will have to have some give and take. That's the difference." On Saturday, United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said that India-US trade deal was at final stages but not “imminent”.The current impasse follows a foundational framework for an interim trade agreement that both nations officially announced in February 2026.

India-US trade deal talks have reached a “plateau”, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said, citing difficulties over further concessions and trade imbalances.

India-US trade deal talks hit ‘plateau’, Nirmala Sitharaman says

US President Donald Trump over the weekend announced that the US was not considering a Diesel export ban, after floating the idea last week. Importers reacted to a possible US diesel export ban because the global diesel market has almost no spare supply. The threat alone was enough to shake the world's fuel buyers.&nbsp;The Iran war and attacks on Gulf refineries cut Middle East output; China reduced its diesel exports. Then came the Houthis, who captured the Red Sea coast, skyrocketing prices. Refineries in Asia and India are actually taking the long way around the Cape of Good Hope to deliver refined products to Europe, or to bring West African crudes back to Asia. Similarly, Ukrainian drones have hit most of Russia's major refineries, and Russia has restricted fuel exports. So it's not just crude oil that is being taken out of the market; it's also these huge refineries that are being rendered useless.Europe's reliance on US diesel increased in 2026 as Gulf exports from Saudi Arabia and the UAE declined. US diesel exports reached a weekly record near 2 million barrels per day this summer. Top buyers include Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru, Morocco, France and the United Kingdom. Many of these countries have little refining capacity of their own.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-midterms-2026-democrats-house-senate-coin-flip-1791041722379">Democrats favoured to win House as US Senate race remains a coin flip</a><h2>How does it affect diesel prices?</h2>Crude oil isn't the only thing that's driving the world's fuel crisis. The gap between what crude costs and what diesel sells for is, and it has hit levels never seen before. The crack spread rose from about $20 a barrel to over $100 in late September. The overall Trading Economics Crack Spread Index hit its absolute record high of $75 per barrel on September 24, 2026. Additionally, the specific ultra-low sulfur diesel futures crack hit its absolute peak of $118 a barrel right in the middle of the month on September 16, 2026In 2025, the price of oil was about $65 a barrel, and the crack spread was about $20 a barrel, when added diesel was at $85 per barrel. In late September, Brent Crude was more than $100 a barrel, and the crack spread- the price of refining that barrel of oil was $118. It means diesel prices, which were $85 a barrel, rose to $218 a barrel, roughly three times. On October 2, it was somewhere around $187.53 a barrel for WTI Crude.If diesel is three times as expensive, then transportation is three times as expensive. About 10% of the cost of food comes from the transportation to get it to the store. Similarly, agricultural equipment, big and heavy, runs on diesel. Jet fuel is another refined product which is also facing the same situation.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-rules-out-us-diesel-export-ban-europe-fuel-supply-1791032335488">Trump rules out US diesel export ban as Europe pledges emergency fuel supply</a><h2>China is on a buying spree</h2>China magically cut back its imports by five and a half million barrels a day in mid-2026. But since September, China has started paying $135 a barrel for oil, and it's on a buying spree. As of October 4, 2026, Shanghai Crude is sitting at 892.00 Yuan per barrel. It's now cutting just two and a half million barrels a day from its normal imports. It has effectively suspended and heavily restricted refined oil product exports, including diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel, for the month of October. China implemented a similar ban on refined fuel exports earlier this year in March, then it allowed refiners to resume normal export quotas in July and August. China and the US are the two largest oil-refining nations on Earth, each processing roughly 17 to 18.5 million barrels of crude oil per day.Global diesel supply fell by about 3 million barrels out of 30 million barrels a day; roughly 10% is absent since September. Now, if the US bans its exports, then the world will not only face a fuel crisis, but will also be on the threshold of a food crisis.The G7 will deploy 100 million barrels of reserves over the next four months. G7 leaders also agreed to “refrain from export restrictions on energy and energy products between G7 countries” and called on producers to avoid measures that could exacerbate market tensions, according to their joint statement. According to the US Treasury, crude oil exports from the Persian Gulf are at or near prewar levels, although volumes remain volatile. Meanwhile, the US has sent a third aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf, raising the potential for escalation in the months-long conflict.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Global diesel supplies are tightening as refinery disruptions and export curbs push crack spreads to record levels, raising fears of higher fuel and food costs.

US President Donald Trump over the weekend announced that the US was not considering a Diesel export ban, after floating the idea last week. Importers reacted to a possible US diesel export ban because the global diesel market has almost no spare supply. The threat alone was enough to shake the world's fuel buyers. The Iran war and attacks on Gulf refineries cut Middle East output; China reduced its diesel exports. Then came the Houthis, who captured the Red Sea coast, skyrocketing prices. Refineries in Asia and India are actually taking the long way around the Cape of Good Hope to deliver refined products to Europe, or to bring West African crudes back to Asia. Similarly, Ukrainian drones have hit most of Russia's major refineries, and Russia has restricted fuel exports. So it's not just crude oil that is being taken out of the market; it's also these huge refineries that are being rendered useless. Europe's reliance on US diesel increased in 2026 as Gulf exports from Saudi Arabia and the UAE declined. US diesel exports reached a weekly record near 2 million barrels per day this summer. Top buyers include Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Peru, Morocco, France and the United Kingdom. Many of these countries have little refining capacity of their own. Also Read: Democrats favoured to win House as US Senate race remains a coin flip How does it affect diesel prices? Crude oil isn't the only thing that's driving the world's fuel crisis. The gap between what crude costs and what diesel sells for is, and it has hit levels never seen before. The crack spread rose from about $20 a barrel to over $100 in late September. The overall Trading Economics Crack Spread Index hit its absolute record high of $75 per barrel on September 24, 2026. Additionally, the specific ultra-low sulfur diesel futures crack hit its absolute peak of $118 a barrel right in the middle of the month on September 16, 2026 In 2025, the price of oil was about $65 a barrel, and the crack spread was about $20 a barrel, when added diesel was at $85 per barrel. In late September, Brent Crude was more than $100 a barrel, and the crack spread- the price of refining that barrel of oil was $118. It means diesel prices, which were $85 a barrel, rose to $218 a barrel, roughly three times. On October 2, it was somewhere around $187.53 a barrel for WTI Crude. If diesel is three times as expensive, then transportation is three times as expensive. About 10% of the cost of food comes from the transportation to get it to the store. Similarly, agricultural equipment, big and heavy, runs on diesel. Jet fuel is another refined product which is also facing the same situation. Also Read: Trump rules out US diesel export ban as Europe pledges emergency fuel supply China is on a buying spree China magically cut back its imports by five and a half million barrels a day in mid-2026. But since September, China has started paying $135 a barrel for oil, and it's on a buying spree. As of October 4, 2026, Shanghai Crude is sitting at 892.00 Yuan per barrel. It's now cutting just two and a half million barrels a day from its normal imports. It has effectively suspended and heavily restricted refined oil product exports, including diesel, gasoline, and jet fuel, for the month of October. China implemented a similar ban on refined fuel exports earlier this year in March, then it allowed refiners to resume normal export quotas in July and August. China and the US are the two largest oil-refining nations on Earth, each processing roughly 17 to 18.5 million barrels of crude oil per day. Global diesel supply fell by about 3 million barrels out of 30 million barrels a day; roughly 10% is absent since September. Now, if the US bans its exports, then the world will not only face a fuel crisis, but will also be on the threshold of a food crisis. The G7 will deploy 100 million barrels of reserves over the next four months. G7 leaders also agreed to “refrain from export restrictions on energy and energy products between G7 countries” and called on producers to avoid measures that could exacerbate market tensions, according to their joint statement. According to the US Treasury, crude oil exports from the Persian Gulf are at or near prewar levels, although volumes remain volatile. Meanwhile, the US has sent a third aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf, raising the potential for escalation in the months-long conflict.

Global diesel supplies are tightening as refinery disruptions and export curbs push crack spreads to record levels, raising fears of higher fuel and food costs.

Diesel crisis deepens as global supplies shrink, crack spreads hit record highs

US-Russia talks on ending the war in Ukraine will involve a multibillion-dollar oil deal for international assets such as oil fields, refineries and gas stations around the world owned by one of Russia's biggest energy companies, Lukoil, reported the US-based newspaper New York Times.&nbsp;The deal is contingent on the approval of the US and Russian governments. The deal was raised by Russian President Vladimir Putin during a September 5 meeting at the Kremlin with US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. He framed the asset sale as a way to show that Russian and US businesses could resume working together. According to the NYT, this deal is the latest attempt by US President Donald Trump to end the Russia-Ukraine war.&nbsp;<h2>Who else is in the deal?</h2>The leading group seeking Lukoil's assets includes American investors and Trump donor Todd Boehly, two Gulf groups related to Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and the US government.&nbsp;Todd Boehly, a billionaire co-owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, donated $1 million to Trump-aligned MAGA Inc. and Trump’s inauguration. He also fronted the consortium that bought Chelsea Football Club from Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich. The $5.2 billion takeover was officially completed in May 2022.Qatar-based Al-Khayyat Brothers, Moutaz and Ramez Al-Khayyat, are also part of the deal. They have attended Trump's inauguration in 2025. They, along with Kushner and Ivanka Trump, are also financing the multibillion-dollar luxury resort project in Albania, which has stirred up the Flamingo revolution.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/flydubai-flight-1073-what-happened-israel-terror-attack-1790876427952">Flydubai Flight 1073: How an in-flight brawl became a ‘jihadist terror’ attack</a>Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Abu Dhabi royal, controls investment funds backing the deal. They also have a stake in World Liberty Financial, the crypto entity co-founded by Witkoff and linked to the Trump family, which generated $799 million for Trump last year, according to the report.Sheikh Tahnoon also helps oversee Lunate, an Abu Dhabi fund that is among the largest stakeholders in Kushner’s private equity firm. Witkoff’s spokeswoman said he has “no conflict of interest and no financial stake in this matter.” It is unclear whether Kushner and Witkoff are likely to benefit from the deal, reported Times.The US International Development Finance Corporation, or DFC, is also seeking a stake with Kushner and Witkoff helping negotiate financial terms to ensure “a substantial upfront payment and profits interest for the United States.”<h2>What are Lukoil's assets?</h2>According to Lukoil's international assets are valued at $20-22 billion, including major energy infrastructure across roughly 30 countries across continents, spanning upstream oil and gas fields, vital European refineries, and hundreds of retail gas stations in Europe and the United States. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, US and Western sanctions have heavily restricted Lukoil's ability to operate or profit from these overseas holdings; the assets have effectively been traded at distressed or "fire sale" rates. Now the parties in the proposed deal believe that, following the government approval and subsequent removal of sanctions, the values are likely to skyrocket.

A group including Trump donor Todd Boehly, Gulf investors and the US government is seeking Lukoil's overseas oil and gas assets in a multibillion-dollar deal.

US-Russia talks on ending the war in Ukraine will involve a multibillion-dollar oil deal for international assets such as oil fields, refineries and gas stations around the world owned by one of Russia's biggest energy companies, Lukoil, reported the US-based newspaper New York Times. The deal is contingent on the approval of the US and Russian governments. The deal was raised by Russian President Vladimir Putin during a September 5 meeting at the Kremlin with US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. He framed the asset sale as a way to show that Russian and US businesses could resume working together. According to the NYT, this deal is the latest attempt by US President Donald Trump to end the Russia-Ukraine war. Who else is in the deal? The leading group seeking Lukoil's assets includes American investors and Trump donor Todd Boehly, two Gulf groups related to Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and the US government. Todd Boehly, a billionaire co-owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, donated $1 million to Trump-aligned MAGA Inc. and Trump’s inauguration. He also fronted the consortium that bought Chelsea Football Club from Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich. The $5.2 billion takeover was officially completed in May 2022. Qatar-based Al-Khayyat Brothers, Moutaz and Ramez Al-Khayyat, are also part of the deal. They have attended Trump's inauguration in 2025. They, along with Kushner and Ivanka Trump, are also financing the multibillion-dollar luxury resort project in Albania, which has stirred up the Flamingo revolution. Also Read: Flydubai Flight 1073: How an in-flight brawl became a ‘jihadist terror’ attack Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Abu Dhabi royal, controls investment funds backing the deal. They also have a stake in World Liberty Financial, the crypto entity co-founded by Witkoff and linked to the Trump family, which generated $799 million for Trump last year, according to the report. Sheikh Tahnoon also helps oversee Lunate, an Abu Dhabi fund that is among the largest stakeholders in Kushner’s private equity firm. Witkoff’s spokeswoman said he has “no conflict of interest and no financial stake in this matter.” It is unclear whether Kushner and Witkoff are likely to benefit from the deal, reported Times. The US International Development Finance Corporation, or DFC, is also seeking a stake with Kushner and Witkoff helping negotiate financial terms to ensure “a substantial upfront payment and profits interest for the United States.” What are Lukoil's assets? According to Lukoil's international assets are valued at $20-22 billion, including major energy infrastructure across roughly 30 countries across continents, spanning upstream oil and gas fields, vital European refineries, and hundreds of retail gas stations in Europe and the United States. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, US and Western sanctions have heavily restricted Lukoil's ability to operate or profit from these overseas holdings; the assets have effectively been traded at distressed or "fire sale" rates. Now the parties in the proposed deal believe that, following the government approval and subsequent removal of sanctions, the values are likely to skyrocket.

A group including Trump donor Todd Boehly, Gulf investors and the US government is seeking Lukoil's overseas oil and gas assets in a multibillion-dollar deal.

Trump-linked investors eye $20-22bn Lukoil assets in latest US-Russia talks to end Ukraine war

Zee has completed glorious 34 years with the guidance of group founder Dr Subhash Chandra. In 1992, the network brought to India its first private satellite television channel. Viewers looked for the vibrant blue, yellow, and pink logo on their screens as they tuned in. It brought children, parents, and grandparents together to watch shows; there was a little something for everyone.&nbsp;The world has evolved from those box TVs to sleek screens, and so have content and viewing patterns. Keeping up with the changing world, the network has relentlessly provided the audience with movies, music, live experiences, kids' entertainment, sports, and more.&nbsp;Taking to his social media handle, founder Subhash Chandra tweeted, “34 years back today, Zee was launched with just 5 people. ​That single step sparked an entire industry and resulted in employment for over 30 million people across India. ​A humble beginning that shaped an era, and the future promises to be even bigger.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">34 years of entertaining India - and the journey is only getting started. Yours Truly, ‘Z&#39;<a href="https://x.com/hashtag/34YearsOfZ?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#34YearsOfZ</a> <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/YoursTrulyZ?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#YoursTrulyZ</a> <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/AttentionEconomy?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AttentionEconomy</a> <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/Content?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Content</a> <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/Technology?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Technology</a> <a href="https://t.co/zpYC3IxGdC">pic.twitter.com/zpYC3IxGdC</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://x.com/WIONews/status/2106257137219608896?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 3, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The launch opened a new world of entertainment and sparked a new industry. It also paved the way for talent to shine and perform across every screen. The pioneer Zee is now set to take that legacy forward. The company says it will continue to take India to the world, narrating stories across languages and connecting audiences across platforms.&nbsp;Zee has also positioned itself at the pulse of a changing media ecosystem. It is taking technology in its stride and powering that evolution with artificial intelligence and machine learning, tools that make content discovery smarter and connections deeper.&nbsp;In the attention economy, the company said, every meaningful connection counts and creates new possibilities. Building on that belief, Zee said it aims to define the next three decades of entertainment. Summing up its journey, the company expressed gratitude to its viewers for the enchanting 34 years of pioneering vision and entertainment.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">34 years back today, Zee was launched with just 5 people. ​That single step sparked an entire industry and resulted in employment for over 30 million people across India. ​A humble beginning that shaped an era,and the future promises to be even bigger.&mdash; Subhash Chandra (@subhashchandra) <a href="https://x.com/subhashchandra/status/2105788840300752973?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 1, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Zee completes 34 years as India's media pioneer. Founder Subhash Chandra reflects on its growth from a 5-member team to generating over 30 million jobs, while laying out plans for AI-driven entertainment.

Zee has completed glorious 34 years with the guidance of group founder Dr Subhash Chandra. In 1992, the network brought to India its first private satellite television channel. Viewers looked for the vibrant blue, yellow, and pink logo on their screens as they tuned in. It brought children, parents, and grandparents together to watch shows; there was a little something for everyone. The world has evolved from those box TVs to sleek screens, and so have content and viewing patterns. Keeping up with the changing world, the network has relentlessly provided the audience with movies, music, live experiences, kids' entertainment, sports, and more. Taking to his social media handle, founder Subhash Chandra tweeted, “34 years back today, Zee was launched with just 5 people. That single step sparked an entire industry and resulted in employment for over 30 million people across India. A humble beginning that shaped an era, and the future promises to be even bigger.”

Zee completes 34 years as India's media pioneer. Founder Subhash Chandra reflects on its growth from a 5-member team to generating over 30 million jobs, while laying out plans for AI-driven entertainment.

Zee marks 34 years: Founder Subhash Chandra reflects on pioneering journey and AI-driven future

Indian stock market crashed again on Thursday, October 1; the single-day sell-off wiped out roughly ₹9.5 lakh crore in investors wealth within an hour during intraday trading. BSE Sensex shed 570.59 points or 0.79%. During the day, it plunged by as much as 1,187.41 points to hit a fresh 52-week low of 71,292.88. The NSE Nifty 50 dropped 198.50 points or 0.88% to settle at 22,421.95, recovering partially from an intraday low of 22,217.30.&nbsp;The biggest losers were the Nifty Auto Index, falling 3.46%; the FMCG index and the Nifty Metal fell 2.35%; Nifty Consumer Durables declined 1.91%; and Nifty Oil &amp; Gas dropped 1.32%. The biggest red flags were Auto and Consumer Durables, which fell by 5.9% and 6.2%, respectively, this week as weak monsoon data added to demand concerns.<h2>Eight consecutive weeks of loss</h2>Over the week, the Sensex declined 2.6%, while the Nifty fell more than 3%, wiping out more than ₹15 lakh crore. The markets will remain closed on Friday, October 2, on account of Gandhi Jayanti. This marks the eighth consecutive week of losses, the worst streak since 2001. It kicked off with a crash on Monday, losing ₹7.4 lakh crore, and concluded with another crash, losing ₹9.5 lakh crore.&nbsp;The current multi-week meltdown is the third-largest decline in the history of the Indian stock market. The longest streak was 10 weeks in 1993, the aftermath of the bubble burst in the Harshad Mehta scam; the BSE Sensex crashed by over 40% to 50%, a drop from the previous year's peak wiping out roughly ₹1lakh crore in market capitalisation.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/karnataka-blo-pressured-form-7-applications-muslim-voter-deletions-1790862243626">SIR: BLOs pressured to sign Form-7 applications seeking Muslim voter deletions in Karnataka</a><h2>Why is the market losing persistently?</h2>Unlike the previous historic streaks, this is not a scam or an asset bubble. It is rather a case of external shock as well as a combination of poor macroeconomic fundamentals. The headline GDP growth number is failing to wow the outgoing foreign investors.&nbsp;Foreign Portfolio Investors pulled over ₹35,861 crore out of Indian equities in September 2026 alone, driving total net outflows to over ₹129,187 crore for the first half of the ongoing financial year. The Indian Rupee has fallen to 96.31/$ by 37 paise, or roughly 0.5%. It is more and more inching closer to its historic low of &nbsp; ₹96.79 per dollar earlier in May 2026.&nbsp;&nbsp;The persistent driver has been US bond yields; the 10-year Treasury yield breached a level last seen in April 2002, before easing more than 4 basis points to 5.251%, while the 30-year Treasury bond also hit its highest in 24 years before pulling back to 5.61%. US stocks are also at record highs, and bonds are at multi-decade highs, so FPIs are flowing out of emerging economies.&nbsp;The Foreign Portfolio Investor outflows and the Indian Rupee are compounding each other's pain. FPI outflows mean they convert their rupee sale proceeds into US dollars, which in turn puts pressure on the rupee, and it depreciates. Again, loss in rupee value creates capital loss and pushes import costs higher. So it's a classic reflexivity feedback loop.&nbsp;&nbsp;It is easier to point to the ongoing oil shock, which is pushing crude oil prices to $100/bl, though it would be quite a simplistic explanation and does not account for 2025, when there was no war or oil shock; India was purchasing cheap Russian crude, refining it and selling it to European and other Asian markets, but the Rupee still fell by 4.9%. Weak corporate earnings, expanding CADs, FPI reluctance and the lack of a strong investment story are domestic problems. The rupee fell from about 84 to about 96 in under two years, with the RBI selling dollars to slow it; that is a lot of pressure.&nbsp;Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has suggested that FPIs will come and go, but domestic retail investors act as a "counterfoil" or "shock absorber" to foreign capital flight. She is not entirely right or wrong. The mechanics are correct, but the scale is not; domestic institutions and retail investors can not replace the scale of the capital of FPIs to prevent a fall. However, most of the FPIs are flying towards US tech stocks and south asian chip stock, specifically the AI growth story. India can hope that the AI bubble pops and capital will rotate back to Indian markets.&nbsp;

Indian stocks suffered another sharp sell-off as Sensex and Nifty extended losses, with FPI outflows, rupee weakness and high US yields weighing on markets.

Indian stock market crashed again on Thursday, October 1; the single-day sell-off wiped out roughly ₹9.5 lakh crore in investors wealth within an hour during intraday trading. BSE Sensex shed 570.59 points or 0.79%. During the day, it plunged by as much as 1,187.41 points to hit a fresh 52-week low of 71,292.88. The NSE Nifty 50 dropped 198.50 points or 0.88% to settle at 22,421.95, recovering partially from an intraday low of 22,217.30. The biggest losers were the Nifty Auto Index, falling 3.46%; the FMCG index and the Nifty Metal fell 2.35%; Nifty Consumer Durables declined 1.91%; and Nifty Oil & Gas dropped 1.32%. The biggest red flags were Auto and Consumer Durables, which fell by 5.9% and 6.2%, respectively, this week as weak monsoon data added to demand concerns. Eight consecutive weeks of loss Over the week, the Sensex declined 2.6%, while the Nifty fell more than 3%, wiping out more than ₹15 lakh crore. The markets will remain closed on Friday, October 2, on account of Gandhi Jayanti. This marks the eighth consecutive week of losses, the worst streak since 2001. It kicked off with a crash on Monday, losing ₹7.4 lakh crore, and concluded with another crash, losing ₹9.5 lakh crore. The current multi-week meltdown is the third-largest decline in the history of the Indian stock market. The longest streak was 10 weeks in 1993, the aftermath of the bubble burst in the Harshad Mehta scam; the BSE Sensex crashed by over 40% to 50%, a drop from the previous year's peak wiping out roughly ₹1lakh crore in market capitalisation. Also Read: SIR: BLOs pressured to sign Form-7 applications seeking Muslim voter deletions in Karnataka Why is the market losing persistently? Unlike the previous historic streaks, this is not a scam or an asset bubble. It is rather a case of external shock as well as a combination of poor macroeconomic fundamentals. The headline GDP growth number is failing to wow the outgoing foreign investors. Foreign Portfolio Investors pulled over ₹35,861 crore out of Indian equities in September 2026 alone, driving total net outflows to over ₹129,187 crore for the first half of the ongoing financial year. The Indian Rupee has fallen to 96.31/$ by 37 paise, or roughly 0.5%. It is more and more inching closer to its historic low of ₹96.79 per dollar earlier in May 2026. The persistent driver has been US bond yields; the 10-year Treasury yield breached a level last seen in April 2002, before easing more than 4 basis points to 5.251%, while the 30-year Treasury bond also hit its highest in 24 years before pulling back to 5.61%. US stocks are also at record highs, and bonds are at multi-decade highs, so FPIs are flowing out of emerging economies. The Foreign Portfolio Investor outflows and the Indian Rupee are compounding each other's pain. FPI outflows mean they convert their rupee sale proceeds into US dollars, which in turn puts pressure on the rupee, and it depreciates. Again, loss in rupee value creates capital loss and pushes import costs higher. So it's a classic reflexivity feedback loop. It is easier to point to the ongoing oil shock, which is pushing crude oil prices to $100/bl, though it would be quite a simplistic explanation and does not account for 2025, when there was no war or oil shock; India was purchasing cheap Russian crude, refining it and selling it to European and other Asian markets, but the Rupee still fell by 4.9%. Weak corporate earnings, expanding CADs, FPI reluctance and the lack of a strong investment story are domestic problems. The rupee fell from about 84 to about 96 in under two years, with the RBI selling dollars to slow it; that is a lot of pressure. Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has suggested that FPIs will come and go, but domestic retail investors act as a "counterfoil" or "shock absorber" to foreign capital flight. She is not entirely right or wrong. The mechanics are correct, but the scale is not; domestic institutions and retail investors can not replace the scale of the capital of FPIs to prevent a fall. However, most of the FPIs are flying towards US tech stocks and south asian chip stock, specifically the AI growth story. India can hope that the AI bubble pops and capital will rotate back to Indian markets.

Indian stocks suffered another sharp sell-off as Sensex and Nifty extended losses, with FPI outflows, rupee weakness and high US yields weighing on markets.

Indian stock market loses 8th straight week, ₹9.5 lakh crore wealth wiped out in an hour

US Senate Democrats on Wednesday blocked a bill that would have barred members of Congress from buying new stock in publicly traded companies, arguing the legislation did not go far enough and would have let lawmakers keep their portfolios. They said it was bundled with “poison pill” voter ID rules. The Stop Insider Trading Act failed in a 53–47 procedural vote, seven short of the 60 needed to open debate. The failure comes around five weeks before the midterm election on November 3.&nbsp;<h2>What was the Stop Insider Trading Act?</h2>The bill “generally prohibits Members of Congress and their spouses and dependent children from purchasing stocks and requires public notice before these individuals may sell stocks”. Specifically, members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children must file 7 and 14 days before “public notice of the intent to sell with the Clerk of the House of Representatives or the Secretary of the Senate." Failure to do so will attract a fee of $2,000 or 10% of the transaction value, or the net gain during the specific period, which can't be paid using “campaign donations or Members’ official allowances”.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/satish-acharya-instagram-account-restricted-india-election-commission-cartoon-1790791963028">‘Block! Block! Block!’: Cartoonist Satish Acharya’s Instagram account restricted in India</a><h2>Why did it fail?</h2>Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called the bill “a permission slip for corruption” and claimed that Republicans had designed it to fail. He said that the Senate Committee advanced a bipartisan ban last year and accused Republicans of ignoring it. Dick Durbin, Deputy of Chuck Schumer, dismissed it as a “meaningless” bill, "an inadequate congressional stock trading ban”, and “Republican messaging”.&nbsp;The primary reason the bill failed to clear the Senate was an entirely unrelated provision requiring a physical photo ID, birth certificate, or passport to cast federal mail-in or in-person ballots being attached to the bill. The bill also exempted executives and White House personnel, including the president, which was a glaring oversight considering the volume of trade related to Trump and his family businesses. Bloomberg <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2026-trump-stock-trades-congress/">reported </a>that from January 2025 to June 2026, Trump made nearly 28,700 trades, compared with 22,200 by all lawmakers combinedThe effort is the latest in the line of failed attempts to restore trust in the US Congress by banning them from trading and holding stocks. The best-known was the “Pelosi Act”, introduced by Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. It was dropped later; Trump publicly attacked Hawley, calling him a ‘second-tier’ senator.&nbsp;

Democrats blocked the Stop Insider Trading Act, saying its stock trading restrictions were inadequate and objecting to bundled voter ID rules.

US Senate Democrats on Wednesday blocked a bill that would have barred members of Congress from buying new stock in publicly traded companies, arguing the legislation did not go far enough and would have let lawmakers keep their portfolios. They said it was bundled with “poison pill” voter ID rules. The Stop Insider Trading Act failed in a 53–47 procedural vote, seven short of the 60 needed to open debate. The failure comes around five weeks before the midterm election on November 3. What was the Stop Insider Trading Act? The bill “generally prohibits Members of Congress and their spouses and dependent children from purchasing stocks and requires public notice before these individuals may sell stocks”. Specifically, members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children must file 7 and 14 days before “public notice of the intent to sell with the Clerk of the House of Representatives or the Secretary of the Senate." Failure to do so will attract a fee of $2,000 or 10% of the transaction value, or the net gain during the specific period, which can't be paid using “campaign donations or Members’ official allowances”. Also Read: ‘Block! Block! Block!’: Cartoonist Satish Acharya’s Instagram account restricted in India Why did it fail? Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called the bill “a permission slip for corruption” and claimed that Republicans had designed it to fail. He said that the Senate Committee advanced a bipartisan ban last year and accused Republicans of ignoring it. Dick Durbin, Deputy of Chuck Schumer, dismissed it as a “meaningless” bill, "an inadequate congressional stock trading ban”, and “Republican messaging”. The primary reason the bill failed to clear the Senate was an entirely unrelated provision requiring a physical photo ID, birth certificate, or passport to cast federal mail-in or in-person ballots being attached to the bill. The bill also exempted executives and White House personnel, including the president, which was a glaring oversight considering the volume of trade related to Trump and his family businesses. Bloomberg reported that from January 2025 to June 2026, Trump made nearly 28,700 trades, compared with 22,200 by all lawmakers combined The effort is the latest in the line of failed attempts to restore trust in the US Congress by banning them from trading and holding stocks. The best-known was the “Pelosi Act”, introduced by Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. It was dropped later; Trump publicly attacked Hawley, calling him a ‘second-tier’ senator.

Democrats blocked the Stop Insider Trading Act, saying its stock trading restrictions were inadequate and objecting to bundled voter ID rules.

US Senate Democrats block insider stock trading ban bill over voter ID rules

The Indian rupee has been depreciating against the US dollar almost steadily since the Covid pandemic. While this is consistent with the longer-term historical pattern of roughly 2 to 3 per cent average annual weakening, a key question being raised is that the Indian currency is the worst performer in Asia vis-à-vis the dollar. What could be the reasons? India’s higher inflation relative to the US, persistent current-account deficits and capital-flow volatility are among the obvious ones. India’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), has been managing the depreciation, mainly by selling dollars through open market operations. Here are the facts and figures.<h2>How Indian rupee depreciated against the US dollar since Covid pandemic</h2>The peak stress was felt in the pre-Covid period itself, when the Indian rupee was around 72 against the dollar. By the end of 2021, it was at around 75 to a dollar. A sharp drop happened at the end of 2022, to around 83 per dollar. Between 2023 and 2025, it hovered in the 82–85 range, which was considered a relatively stable phase. But by the end of 2025, the slide worsened to more than 90, breaching what could be termed a psychological barrier at the time. Currently, the rupee is at around 95, after testing record lows of around 96 to a dollar earlier this year.For the period from early 2020 to late 2026, this amounts to an overall substantial decline of around 30 per cent in nominal terms. If one takes the January 2022 average of 74.4 against late-2026 levels of 95, the depreciation is about 28 per cent.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-stock-market-crash-sensex-nifty-six-month-low-oil-fpi-rupee-1790610541704">Indian stock market crashes, 7.4 lakh crore wiped out: What is driving the fall?</a><h2>Indian rupee’s performance against Asian peer currencies</h2>During the Covid period, the depreciation was considered mild to moderate, as the Indian rupee was relatively resilient compared with some Asian peers, thanks to strong domestic recovery, capital inflows and RBI management. It was not the worst-hit currency in Asia at the time.But in 2022, it became one of the weakest Asian performers, down 10 to 11 per cent. This was also a period of several global economic and geopolitical events that affected fuel prices, one of the largest components of India’s import bill. These include aggressive rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve, which the RBI's monetary policy broadly mirrored, a resurgence of the US dollar, and oil price spikes driven by the Russia–Ukraine war.&nbsp;India imports close to 90 per cent of its crude oil requirement, leaving the rupee particularly exposed to energy-price shocks.This was also a period that saw foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) pulling out of India. Indian equities, with a relatively low number of companies involved in emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), were regional underperformers. &nbsp;Foreign investors reduced capital inflows that could otherwise have supported the rupee.As a result of these factors, India’s current account deficit widened significantly during this period.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/how-global-tensions-are-draining-strength-from-indian-rupee-1778835835916">How global tensions are draining strength from Indian rupee</a>&nbsp;The 2023–2024 period was relatively stable or modest. The rupee, in fact, often outperformed or matched peers in volatility terms, benefiting from higher Indian real yields, bond-index inclusion prospects and RBI interventions. It was at times among the more stable emerging-market or Asian currencies.But the weakness accelerated in late 2024–2025, with the rupee becoming Asia’s worst or near-worst performer, going down 4.9 per cent in 2025. A different but related set of events happened in this period. US tariffs on Indian exports, including secondary penalties linked to buying Russian oil, were one major factor. FPI equity outflows increased amid concerns about India’s growth and corporate earnings. Uncertainties about the US–India trade deal and persistent current-account pressure were also reasons.During this period, some other Asian currencies, such as the Malaysian ringgit, Thai baht, Taiwan dollar, Korean won and Singapore dollar, strengthened or held up better amid a softer dollar phase. Some of them were helped by trade surpluses or positive net international investment positions (NIIP), while India has a negative NIIP.In 2026, the situation worsened partly due to the start and continuation of the Iran–US–Israel war, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and the resulting pressure on oil prices, bringing in a higher import bill. Benchmark Brent crude has been swinging between $70 and nearly $110 per barrel during the first and second quarters of this financial year.Global bond-yield spikes, ongoing FPI caution and external deficits are adding to the pressure. But a steeper fall has been prevented through RBI interventions, as well as balance-of-payments measures such as attracting large deposits and borrowing inflows.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fed-rate-hike-4-percent-india-rupee-fpi-stock-market-inflation-1789659953082">Fed hikes rates to 4%: Why India’s rupee, FPI and stock market face pressure</a><h2>Structural and recurring reasons for the rupee underperformance</h2>The Indian rupee is being boxed in by these key factors: high oil-import dependence, current-account and trade deficits, capital-flow volatility, interest-rate differentials and global US dollar strength, and a negative NIIP.The RBI’s focus is to prevent a speculative attack on the rupee by curbing volatility, rather than defending the Indian currency at a specific level against the dollar. It intervenes through spot and forward sales in the foreign-exchange market and has built large reserves.In short, what the rupee is witnessing currently is an orderly, or crawling, depreciation rather than an outright crisis.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/rupee-hits-96-for-first-time-ever-1778996756301/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/rupee-hits-96-for-first-time-ever-1778996756301/embed</a><h2>Rupee’s nominal path reflects external vulnerabilities more than domestic factors</h2>India is on a positive trajectory when it comes to GDP growth. When one looks at rupee depreciation from a longer-term perspective, the average depreciation remains in the 2–3 per cent range. But the currency is witnessing uneven bursts around global shocks.When compared with other emerging-market currencies, India has shown greater resilience, buttressed by higher forex reserves, including inflows from remittances. It has, however, lagged behind surplus-running or less oil-dependent Asian currencies during periods of dollar softness or commodity stress.

The Indian rupee is one of Asia’s weakest currencies against the US dollar, but one needs to look deeper. India's oil dependence, capital outflows and deficits are among the reasons

The Indian rupee has been depreciating against the US dollar almost steadily since the Covid pandemic. While this is consistent with the longer-term historical pattern of roughly 2 to 3 per cent average annual weakening, a key question being raised is that the Indian currency is the worst performer in Asia vis-à-vis the dollar. What could be the reasons? India’s higher inflation relative to the US, persistent current-account deficits and capital-flow volatility are among the obvious ones. India’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), has been managing the depreciation, mainly by selling dollars through open market operations. Here are the facts and figures. How Indian rupee depreciated against the US dollar since Covid pandemic The peak stress was felt in the pre-Covid period itself, when the Indian rupee was around 72 against the dollar. By the end of 2021, it was at around 75 to a dollar. A sharp drop happened at the end of 2022, to around 83 per dollar. Between 2023 and 2025, it hovered in the 82–85 range, which was considered a relatively stable phase. But by the end of 2025, the slide worsened to more than 90, breaching what could be termed a psychological barrier at the time. Currently, the rupee is at around 95, after testing record lows of around 96 to a dollar earlier this year. For the period from early 2020 to late 2026, this amounts to an overall substantial decline of around 30 per cent in nominal terms. If one takes the January 2022 average of 74.4 against late-2026 levels of 95, the depreciation is about 28 per cent. Also read: Indian stock market crashes, 7.4 lakh crore wiped out: What is driving the fall? Indian rupee’s performance against Asian peer currencies During the Covid period, the depreciation was considered mild to moderate, as the Indian rupee was relatively resilient compared with some Asian peers, thanks to strong domestic recovery, capital inflows and RBI management. It was not the worst-hit currency in Asia at the time. But in 2022, it became one of the weakest Asian performers, down 10 to 11 per cent. This was also a period of several global economic and geopolitical events that affected fuel prices, one of the largest components of India’s import bill. These include aggressive rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve, which the RBI's monetary policy broadly mirrored, a resurgence of the US dollar, and oil price spikes driven by the Russia–Ukraine war. India imports close to 90 per cent of its crude oil requirement, leaving the rupee particularly exposed to energy-price shocks. This was also a period that saw foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) pulling out of India. Indian equities, with a relatively low number of companies involved in emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), were regional underperformers. Foreign investors reduced capital inflows that could otherwise have supported the rupee. As a result of these factors, India’s current account deficit widened significantly during this period. Also read: How global tensions are draining strength from Indian rupee The 2023–2024 period was relatively stable or modest. The rupee, in fact, often outperformed or matched peers in volatility terms, benefiting from higher Indian real yields, bond-index inclusion prospects and RBI interventions. It was at times among the more stable emerging-market or Asian currencies. But the weakness accelerated in late 2024–2025, with the rupee becoming Asia’s worst or near-worst performer, going down 4.9 per cent in 2025. A different but related set of events happened in this period. US tariffs on Indian exports, including secondary penalties linked to buying Russian oil, were one major factor. FPI equity outflows increased amid concerns about India’s growth and corporate earnings. Uncertainties about the US–India trade deal and persistent current-account pressure were also reasons. During this period, some other Asian currencies, such as the Malaysian ringgit, Thai baht, Taiwan dollar, Korean won and Singapore dollar, strengthened or held up better amid a softer dollar phase. Some of them were helped by trade surpluses or positive net international investment positions (NIIP), while India has a negative NIIP. In 2026, the situation worsened partly due to the start and continuation of the Iran–US–Israel war, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and the resulting pressure on oil prices, bringing in a higher import bill. Benchmark Brent crude has been swinging between $70 and nearly $110 per barrel during the first and second quarters of this financial year. Global bond-yield spikes, ongoing FPI caution and external deficits are adding to the pressure. But a steeper fall has been prevented through RBI interventions, as well as balance-of-payments measures such as attracting large deposits and borrowing inflows. Also read: Fed hikes rates to 4%: Why India’s rupee, FPI and stock market face pressure Structural and recurring reasons for the rupee underperformance The Indian rupee is being boxed in by these key factors: high oil-import dependence, current-account and trade deficits, capital-flow volatility, interest-rate differentials and global US dollar strength, and a negative NIIP. The RBI’s focus is to prevent a speculative attack on the rupee by curbing volatility, rather than defending the Indian currency at a specific level against the dollar. It intervenes through spot and forward sales in the foreign-exchange market and has built large reserves. In short, what the rupee is witnessing currently is an orderly, or crawling, depreciation rather than an outright crisis. https://www.wionews.com/videos/rupee-hits-96-for-first-time-ever-1778996756301/embed Rupee’s nominal path reflects external vulnerabilities more than domestic factors India is on a positive trajectory when it comes to GDP growth. When one looks at rupee depreciation from a longer-term perspective, the average depreciation remains in the 2–3 per cent range. But the currency is witnessing uneven bursts around global shocks. When compared with other emerging-market currencies, India has shown greater resilience, buttressed by higher forex reserves, including inflows from remittances. It has, however, lagged behind surplus-running or less oil-dependent Asian currencies during periods of dollar softness or commodity stress.

The Indian rupee is one of Asia’s weakest currencies against the US dollar, but one needs to look deeper. India's oil dependence, capital outflows and deficits are among the reasons

Why is Indian rupee the lowest-performing Asian currency against the US dollar? Reasons are not that simple

Five weeks ahead of the midterm election, the US economy is sending mixed signals. Growth and hiring are holding up; inflation is cooling slightly, with a change in calculation methodology, but remains elevated; and borrowing costs are at levels not seen in nearly two decades. US consumer confidence in the economy fell by 6.7 points to 81.9, down from 88.6 in August.&nbsp;“It’s bluster, it’s gaslighting for him to say the economy is the greatest ever,” said Darrick Hamilton, chief economist for the AFL-CIO, the nation’s main union federation.<h2>GDP growth was higher than expected for the quarter</h2>US GDP grew at a solid 2.2% pace from April, up from 1.5% in the second estimate, with consumer spending, investment, and exports as the main contributors. Gross domestic income, a separate measure of output, rose 2.6%.Consumer spending accounts for 70% of U.S. economic activity. Business investment, excluding housing, rose 9% in the second quarter, reflecting the AI investment boom. According to the late-September S&amp;P Global France Manufacturing PMI report, the manufacturing index fell slightly to 50.3 in September from 51.1 in August. Since 50 is the line for separation from contraction, manufacturing remains flat, despite a wartime production boost.&nbsp;“The economy is increasingly reliant on AI gains and the corresponding wealth effects boosting higher-income households’ spending power to fuel recent growth,” said Michael Pearce, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, as quoted by the Associated Press. “The economy remains sensitive to a sudden reversal of optimism on AI.’'Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/france-student-protests-400-minors-detained-teacher-shortage-schools-1790781303026">400 students detained in France: Why are students protesting?</a><h2>Jobs and inflation</h2>Private employers added 90,000 jobs in September, according to ADP, beating expectations of about 68,000. However, ADP data is not official Bureau of Labour Statistics data. Friday's BLS jobs report would provide further details on the job market, where forecasts range from 38,000 to 98,000.&nbsp;The Wall Street consensus is for a gain of 84,000 jobs, down from a 162,000 increase the prior month, and the unemployment rate to hold steady at 4.1%, partly driven by shrinking labour supply and discouraged workers withdrawing from the labour pool.&nbsp; August PCE inflation, the Fed's preferred gauge, came in cooler than forecast: 3.4% headline and 3.0% core, both well above the Fed's 2% target. CPI held at 3.4%. The PCE calculation had undergone a bureaucratic methodology change rather than a sudden cooling of actual economic price pressures. The BEA altered how it calculates inflation for three specific categories back to 2021: computer software, legal fees, and investment advice and artificially shed an estimated 0.3 percentage points directly off the core inflation rate.<h2>What does it mean for the midterm?</h2>Supporters of Trump can point to the GDP upgrade and cooler-than-expected inflation. Democrats will point to prices still rising at over 3%, mortgage and loan costs at multi-year highs, and an oil shock tied to the Iran war. Voters usually judge the economy by their own budgets. According to the BLS, over the last 12 months, fuel oil prices have soared 52%, while ground beef is up 7.2%, fish and seafood up 6.5%, coffee 6.1%, sugar and sweets 6.1% and electricity up 3.8%. So high price levels and borrowing costs may outweigh better headline numbers.&nbsp;

US growth is stronger than expected, but inflation, borrowing costs and weaker consumer confidence point to a mixed economic picture before the midterms.

Five weeks ahead of the midterm election, the US economy is sending mixed signals. Growth and hiring are holding up; inflation is cooling slightly, with a change in calculation methodology, but remains elevated; and borrowing costs are at levels not seen in nearly two decades. US consumer confidence in the economy fell by 6.7 points to 81.9, down from 88.6 in August. “It’s bluster, it’s gaslighting for him to say the economy is the greatest ever,” said Darrick Hamilton, chief economist for the AFL-CIO, the nation’s main union federation. GDP growth was higher than expected for the quarter US GDP grew at a solid 2.2% pace from April, up from 1.5% in the second estimate, with consumer spending, investment, and exports as the main contributors. Gross domestic income, a separate measure of output, rose 2.6%. Consumer spending accounts for 70% of U.S. economic activity. Business investment, excluding housing, rose 9% in the second quarter, reflecting the AI investment boom. According to the late-September S&P Global France Manufacturing PMI report, the manufacturing index fell slightly to 50.3 in September from 51.1 in August. Since 50 is the line for separation from contraction, manufacturing remains flat, despite a wartime production boost. “The economy is increasingly reliant on AI gains and the corresponding wealth effects boosting higher-income households’ spending power to fuel recent growth,” said Michael Pearce, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics, as quoted by the Associated Press. “The economy remains sensitive to a sudden reversal of optimism on AI.’' Also Read: 400 students detained in France: Why are students protesting? Jobs and inflation Private employers added 90,000 jobs in September, according to ADP, beating expectations of about 68,000. However, ADP data is not official Bureau of Labour Statistics data. Friday's BLS jobs report would provide further details on the job market, where forecasts range from 38,000 to 98,000. The Wall Street consensus is for a gain of 84,000 jobs, down from a 162,000 increase the prior month, and the unemployment rate to hold steady at 4.1%, partly driven by shrinking labour supply and discouraged workers withdrawing from the labour pool. August PCE inflation, the Fed's preferred gauge, came in cooler than forecast: 3.4% headline and 3.0% core, both well above the Fed's 2% target. CPI held at 3.4%. The PCE calculation had undergone a bureaucratic methodology change rather than a sudden cooling of actual economic price pressures. The BEA altered how it calculates inflation for three specific categories back to 2021: computer software, legal fees, and investment advice and artificially shed an estimated 0.3 percentage points directly off the core inflation rate. What does it mean for the midterm? Supporters of Trump can point to the GDP upgrade and cooler-than-expected inflation. Democrats will point to prices still rising at over 3%, mortgage and loan costs at multi-year highs, and an oil shock tied to the Iran war. Voters usually judge the economy by their own budgets. According to the BLS, over the last 12 months, fuel oil prices have soared 52%, while ground beef is up 7.2%, fish and seafood up 6.5%, coffee 6.1%, sugar and sweets 6.1% and electricity up 3.8%. So high price levels and borrowing costs may outweigh better headline numbers.

US growth is stronger than expected, but inflation, borrowing costs and weaker consumer confidence point to a mixed economic picture before the midterms.

US economy sends mixed signals weeks before midterms

The US bond market is in a severe sell-off; the 10-year US Treasury yield has surpassed 5.2%, the highest in 19 years. The 30-year yield jumped to over 5.5%. The Fed raised interest rates by 25 bps in September, while more than 70% in the market are predicting another rate hike by October. Investors, economists and fund managers are suggesting a structural macroeconomic shift; the era of cheap money is effectively over.&nbsp;Dr David Kelly, Chief Strategist at JP Morgan Asset Management, wrote earlier this month that the post-GFC (Global Financial Crisis) "New Normal" of low growth and ultra-cheap money has been shattered. He states the global economy has decisively pivoted into a structurally higher real-rate regime characterised by tougher long-term debt affordability.“The bond market is simply normalising after two decades of abnormally low interest rates,” Daniel Harenberg, lead global economist at Oxford Economics, wrote this month.<h2>Are higher interest rates unusual?</h2>Higher interest rates were characteristic of the great inflation era, when the US dollar shifted from the gold standard following the Vietnam War. 10-year yields ranged from 8% to over 15%. The period saw out-of-control inflation as high as over 14% in the US in 1980. This followed the great Paul Volcker Shock, which controlled the money supply and pushed rates over 20% in 1981; it resulted in a recession, but inflation was back to normal. Then followed by an era of moderation: the 1987 stock market crash, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the dotcom bubble, 9/11, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and three recessions, where yields were controlled between roughly 4.5-6.5% and maintained moderate growth until the global financial crisis of 2008.&nbsp;For a long-term investor who had been investing before the subprime crisis of 2008, high interest rates were actually quite usual. 10-year US Treasury yield over 5% was quite ordinary; if anything, the post-crisis period was quite bizarre: a zero interest rate, which fuelled the practice of carry trade, when fund managers in Japan and Europe would borrow cheaply and exchange it for US Treasuries and earn interest that was basically "free money". &nbsp;Then the "Negative Interest Rate Policy" &nbsp;era, where investors actually paid interest when borrowing from the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan. This carry trade and cheap money ballooned global debt to over $365 trillion. Developed economies from the OECD, including the US, UK, Japan, and France, are running huge deficits; they spent more than $3.3 trillion in bond interest collectively in 2025, more than their combined defence spending and their AI buildout.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israeli-settlers-attack-jalud-west-bank-palestinian-homes-1790682568830">Over 100 Israeli settlers attack West Bank village, burn Palestinian homes</a><h2>Why are high interest rates the new normal?</h2>The case for high interest rates rests on big deficits, sticky inflation, and restricted supply, keeping long-term yields structurally higher than after the GFC. Some strategists at JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are already discussing 10-year yields reaching 6%. We are seeing the same oil shock which was seen after the US dollar shifted from the gold standard. The Iran war is not coming to any conclusion, nor is the global oil trade being reset to the previous phase.&nbsp;The US suffers from a “total lack of fiscal discipline,” with deficits growing during both booms and busts, warned Howard Marks, co-founder of Oaktree Capital Management. US consumers are still spending money which they can't afford, with collective household debt rising over $18 trillion. Companies are issuing large amounts of debt to finance the data centres. Stock markets are slowing down, but the tech stocks are fighting the feds; the NASDAQ 100 and the Magnificent Seven are keeping the fight alive. Specifically, semiconductor stocks shrugged off rate hike and yield concerns as they rose by roughly 3%, with Anthropic's newly revealed IPO prospectus looming.&nbsp;Higher yields are making bonds a real competitor for equity money and raising the discount rate on future profits, which hits richly valued growth stocks hardest. Now the Feds, who will be expecting equity pain, are unlikely to stop until the AI capex spending softens. There is weakness in the AI buildout, which is its profit model; if the spending softens, there is a real risk of a bubble pop. The reverse can also be the case that US miraculously opens the Hormuz and oil flow is restored, and the Feds slash rates, the AI growth story continues.&nbsp;&nbsp;

US Treasury yields are at multi-year highs as inflation, oil prices, deficits and heavy debt challenge the post-2008 era of ultra-cheap money.

The US bond market is in a severe sell-off; the 10-year US Treasury yield has surpassed 5.2%, the highest in 19 years. The 30-year yield jumped to over 5.5%. The Fed raised interest rates by 25 bps in September, while more than 70% in the market are predicting another rate hike by October. Investors, economists and fund managers are suggesting a structural macroeconomic shift; the era of cheap money is effectively over. Dr David Kelly, Chief Strategist at JP Morgan Asset Management, wrote earlier this month that the post-GFC (Global Financial Crisis) "New Normal" of low growth and ultra-cheap money has been shattered. He states the global economy has decisively pivoted into a structurally higher real-rate regime characterised by tougher long-term debt affordability. “The bond market is simply normalising after two decades of abnormally low interest rates,” Daniel Harenberg, lead global economist at Oxford Economics, wrote this month. Are higher interest rates unusual? Higher interest rates were characteristic of the great inflation era, when the US dollar shifted from the gold standard following the Vietnam War. 10-year yields ranged from 8% to over 15%. The period saw out-of-control inflation as high as over 14% in the US in 1980. This followed the great Paul Volcker Shock, which controlled the money supply and pushed rates over 20% in 1981; it resulted in a recession, but inflation was back to normal. Then followed by an era of moderation: the 1987 stock market crash, the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the dotcom bubble, 9/11, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and three recessions, where yields were controlled between roughly 4.5-6.5% and maintained moderate growth until the global financial crisis of 2008. For a long-term investor who had been investing before the subprime crisis of 2008, high interest rates were actually quite usual. 10-year US Treasury yield over 5% was quite ordinary; if anything, the post-crisis period was quite bizarre: a zero interest rate, which fuelled the practice of carry trade, when fund managers in Japan and Europe would borrow cheaply and exchange it for US Treasuries and earn interest that was basically "free money". Then the "Negative Interest Rate Policy" era, where investors actually paid interest when borrowing from the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan. This carry trade and cheap money ballooned global debt to over $365 trillion. Developed economies from the OECD, including the US, UK, Japan, and France, are running huge deficits; they spent more than $3.3 trillion in bond interest collectively in 2025, more than their combined defence spending and their AI buildout. Also Read: Over 100 Israeli settlers attack West Bank village, burn Palestinian homes Why are high interest rates the new normal? The case for high interest rates rests on big deficits, sticky inflation, and restricted supply, keeping long-term yields structurally higher than after the GFC. Some strategists at JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs are already discussing 10-year yields reaching 6%. We are seeing the same oil shock which was seen after the US dollar shifted from the gold standard. The Iran war is not coming to any conclusion, nor is the global oil trade being reset to the previous phase. The US suffers from a “total lack of fiscal discipline,” with deficits growing during both booms and busts, warned Howard Marks, co-founder of Oaktree Capital Management. US consumers are still spending money which they can't afford, with collective household debt rising over $18 trillion. Companies are issuing large amounts of debt to finance the data centres. Stock markets are slowing down, but the tech stocks are fighting the feds; the NASDAQ 100 and the Magnificent Seven are keeping the fight alive. Specifically, semiconductor stocks shrugged off rate hike and yield concerns as they rose by roughly 3%, with Anthropic's newly revealed IPO prospectus looming. Higher yields are making bonds a real competitor for equity money and raising the discount rate on future profits, which hits richly valued growth stocks hardest. Now the Feds, who will be expecting equity pain, are unlikely to stop until the AI capex spending softens. There is weakness in the AI buildout, which is its profit model; if the spending softens, there is a real risk of a bubble pop. The reverse can also be the case that US miraculously opens the Hormuz and oil flow is restored, and the Feds slash rates, the AI growth story continues.

US Treasury yields are at multi-year highs as inflation, oil prices, deficits and heavy debt challenge the post-2008 era of ultra-cheap money.

US bond yields surge above 5.2%: Is the era of cheap money finally over?

China recently expanded the scope of overseas travel restrictions on some of its most important private-sector artificial intelligence and semiconductor executives to include their spouses and children, reports claimed. The aim is to limit the flight of sensitive technology and expertise from the country, according to reports in Bloomberg, Reuters and other outlets. Chinese government agencies notified relevant people that direct relatives of certain AI and chip executives must obtain official approval before travelling abroad. This includes even short trips, according to the reports. The measures would cover Chinese startup founders, senior researchers and executives at tech firms considered strategically important.<h2>The restrictions have been in place since earlier this year</h2>In May, China imposed overseas travel restrictions on some key and influential tech workers. They include AI professionals at Alibaba and DeepSeek. The additional move has now extended the restrictions to their spouses and children. Citing people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg reported that several executives have been informed that family travel requires government clearance. It is not clear if these curbs apply to every relative of every person, or only to immediate family members.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-reviews-meta-s-2-billion-manus-ai-deal-1775207661367/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-reviews-meta-s-2-billion-manus-ai-deal-1775207661367/embed</a><h2>China is strengthening its legal framework on the movement of talent</h2>China has been tightening controls on the movement of people linked to sensitive technologies, the latest of which is the new exit-and-entry rules that took effect on September 15. As per these restrictions, authorities can prevent citizens from leaving China in cases involving potential threats to industrial or technological security.A Reuters report said the rules can apply to people accused of violating technology import or export regulations when their conduct is seen as a threat to technology security. China’s State Council framed the regulations as safeguarding “national sovereignty, security, and development interests”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/the-us-and-china-set-up-an-ai-red-telephone-but-skipped-the-rulebook-1790523313514">The US and China set up an AI 'red telephone', but skipped the rulebook</a><h2>China worries about the transfer of Chinese technology and talent</h2>In March this year, the co-founders of Chinese AI startup Manus were blocked from leaving the country, as recorded by Human Rights Watch. At the time, US tech giant Meta was in talks to acquire Manus, a deal that was later blocked by the Chinese government.Chinese companies are accelerating investment in AI and advanced chips as Beijing treats elite AI and semiconductor expertise as a strategic asset amid its technology rivalry with the US. In this direction, Alibaba unveiled its Zhenwu V900 AI chip, which the Chinese company called a major step towards building domestic computing capacity and reducing reliance on foreign semiconductor technology.Beijing is now carefully monitoring and controlling the movement of people considered central to those capabilities. The measures do not amount to an outright ban on foreign travel, but they add a new layer of state approval for private-sector technology professionals and their immediate families.

China expanded the already-existing overseas travel curbs on top AI and semiconductor talent to their spouses and children. Prioritising tech security, China is tightening controls amid the US-China AI rivalry.

China recently expanded the scope of overseas travel restrictions on some of its most important private-sector artificial intelligence and semiconductor executives to include their spouses and children, reports claimed. The aim is to limit the flight of sensitive technology and expertise from the country, according to reports in Bloomberg, Reuters and other outlets. Chinese government agencies notified relevant people that direct relatives of certain AI and chip executives must obtain official approval before travelling abroad. This includes even short trips, according to the reports. The measures would cover Chinese startup founders, senior researchers and executives at tech firms considered strategically important. The restrictions have been in place since earlier this year In May, China imposed overseas travel restrictions on some key and influential tech workers. They include AI professionals at Alibaba and DeepSeek. The additional move has now extended the restrictions to their spouses and children. Citing people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg reported that several executives have been informed that family travel requires government clearance. It is not clear if these curbs apply to every relative of every person, or only to immediate family members. https://www.wionews.com/videos/china-reviews-meta-s-2-billion-manus-ai-deal-1775207661367/embed China is strengthening its legal framework on the movement of talent China has been tightening controls on the movement of people linked to sensitive technologies, the latest of which is the new exit-and-entry rules that took effect on September 15. As per these restrictions, authorities can prevent citizens from leaving China in cases involving potential threats to industrial or technological security. A Reuters report said the rules can apply to people accused of violating technology import or export regulations when their conduct is seen as a threat to technology security. China’s State Council framed the regulations as safeguarding “national sovereignty, security, and development interests”. Also read: The US and China set up an AI 'red telephone', but skipped the rulebook China worries about the transfer of Chinese technology and talent In March this year, the co-founders of Chinese AI startup Manus were blocked from leaving the country, as recorded by Human Rights Watch. At the time, US tech giant Meta was in talks to acquire Manus, a deal that was later blocked by the Chinese government. Chinese companies are accelerating investment in AI and advanced chips as Beijing treats elite AI and semiconductor expertise as a strategic asset amid its technology rivalry with the US. In this direction, Alibaba unveiled its Zhenwu V900 AI chip, which the Chinese company called a major step towards building domestic computing capacity and reducing reliance on foreign semiconductor technology. Beijing is now carefully monitoring and controlling the movement of people considered central to those capabilities. The measures do not amount to an outright ban on foreign travel, but they add a new layer of state approval for private-sector technology professionals and their immediate families.

China expanded the already-existing overseas travel curbs on top AI and semiconductor talent to their spouses and children. Prioritising tech security, China is tightening controls amid the US-China AI rivalry.

The Great AI talent Firewall: China curbs foreign travel of top engineers, executives and their families

Argentina's President Javier Milei on Monday (Sep 28) threatened to take the United Kingdom to an international tribunal over an offshore oil development near the Falkland Islands, escalating a long-running sovereignty dispute between Buenos Aires and London.Taking to X, Milei said that he had instructed Argentina's Foreign Ministry and government legal teams to begin arbitration proceedings over the Sea Lion project in the North Falkland Basin, which Buenos Aires considers an unlawful exploitation of resources in territory it claims as its own. Argentina's presidency confirmed that the proceedings would be initiated under Annex VII of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.“If within two weeks the United Kingdom does not stop the illegitimate exploitation, we will go to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” Milei wrote on X.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/arrogant-parasites-milei-blasts-un-over-falklands-dispute-warns-argentina-will-take-matters-into-our-own-hands-1790216586682">'Arrogant parasites': Milei blasts UN over Falklands dispute, warns Argentina will ‘take matters into our own hands’</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">DEFENDIENDO CON HECHOS Instruí a la Cancillería y a nuestros equipos jurídicos a iniciar el arbitraje internacional contra el Reino Unido por el saqueo ilegal de nuestros recursos a través del Proyecto Sea Lion en la Cuenca Malvinas Norte. Si en 2 semanas el Reino Unido no… <a href="https://t.co/JTaBcQ7RGT">https://t.co/JTaBcQ7RGT</a>&mdash; Javier Milei (@JMilei) <a href="https://x.com/JMilei/status/2104663036107641145?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 28, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What is the Sea Lion oil project?</h2>Sea Lion is an offshore oil field located about 220 kilometres north of the Falkland Islands, known as the Malvinas in Argentina.The project is operated by Israel's Navitas Petroleum, which holds a 65 per cent interest, while Britain's Rockhopper Exploration owns the remaining 35 per cent. The companies say they operate under petroleum licences granted by the Falkland Islands government.Navitas says the project has received final investment approval and that first oil is planned for March 2028. The first phase involves 11 subsea wells connected to a floating production, storage and offloading vessel.The companies have rejected Argentina's position and said their licences were lawfully issued by the Falkland Islands government with UK backing.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uss-dwight-d-eisenhower-mishap-4-sailors-injured-2-aviators-eject-during-aircraft-recovery-1790662951742">USS Dwight D. Eisenhower mishap: 4 sailors injured, 2 aviators eject during aircraft recovery</a><h2>Why Argentina is challenging the project</h2>Buenos Aires argues that unilateral development of natural resources in the disputed territory violates UN resolutions calling on Argentina and Britain to avoid actions that could complicate efforts to resolve their sovereignty dispute.Milei's government has already taken measures against companies and individuals linked to hydrocarbon activities around the Falklands. The latest move would take the dispute into international arbitration under the Law of the Sea Convention.<h2>UK backs Falkland Islanders' right to develop resources</h2>Britain maintains that the Falkland Islands are a British Overseas Territory and supports the islanders' right to develop their natural resources.The UK government earlier said that the Falkland Islands have the right to develop hydrocarbons for their own economic benefit and that it fully supports companies conducting lawful business there.&nbsp;

Argentina has escalated its long-running Falklands dispute with the UK, giving London two weeks to halt the Sea Lion oil project or face international arbitration. Javier Milei says the offshore development amounts to unauthorised exploitation of resources claimed by Argentina.

Argentina's President Javier Milei on Monday (Sep 28) threatened to take the United Kingdom to an international tribunal over an offshore oil development near the Falkland Islands, escalating a long-running sovereignty dispute between Buenos Aires and London. Taking to X, Milei said that he had instructed Argentina's Foreign Ministry and government legal teams to begin arbitration proceedings over the Sea Lion project in the North Falkland Basin, which Buenos Aires considers an unlawful exploitation of resources in territory it claims as its own. Argentina's presidency confirmed that the proceedings would be initiated under Annex VII of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. “If within two weeks the United Kingdom does not stop the illegitimate exploitation, we will go to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” Milei wrote on X. Also read | 'Arrogant parasites': Milei blasts UN over Falklands dispute, warns Argentina will ‘take matters into our own hands’

Argentina has escalated its long-running Falklands dispute with the UK, giving London two weeks to halt the Sea Lion oil project or face international arbitration. Javier Milei says the offshore development amounts to unauthorised exploitation of resources claimed by Argentina.

Falklands oil row: Argentina threatens legal action against UK over Sea Lion project, says ‘if within two weeks…’

Nvidia has announced a record $150 billion share buyback, taking its total repurchase authorisation to $235 billion as the chipmaker continues to benefit from strong demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure. The latest authorisation represents the largest increase in a US corporate share-buyback program, surpassing Apple's $110 billion buyback authorisation announced in 2024.<h2>Nvidia expands share buyback program</h2>A share buyback is when a company uses its own cash to purchase shares from the market. By reducing the number of shares in circulation, buybacks can increase earnings per share while returning capital to existing shareholders. NVIDIA plans to deploy the newly authorized funds through fiscal 2028. CEO Jensen Huang said the company's strong cash generation will allow it to invest in new technologies while also returning capital to shareholders. The announcement comes as NVIDIA continues to generate substantial cash from its expanding AI business. The company has also been using its financial resources to invest in AI companies and provide financing to some of its major customers.<h2>Nvidia's valuation and AI growth</h2>The buyback comes as NVIDIA's valuation has declined despite strong earnings growth. Its forward price-to-earnings multiple has fallen significantly from earlier levels, while NVIDIA's shares have gained more than 20 per cent this year. The company also forecasts around 70 per cent revenue growth for fiscal 2028, reinforcing its outlook amid questions over how long the current AI investment boom can continue.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uss-dwight-d-eisenhower-mishap-4-sailors-injured-2-aviators-eject-during-aircraft-recovery-1790662951742">USS Dwight D. Eisenhower mishap: 4 sailors injured, 2 aviators eject during aircraft recovery</a><h2>Nvidia launches AI security platform</h2>Alongside the buyback announcement, NVIDIA has unveiled an open-source AI security platform designed to prevent autonomous AI agents from carrying out unauthorised actions. The platform, called Open Agent Safety, includes Open Shell, which limits the access and authority of AI agents, and Sentry, a security layer designed to monitor their activities. The launch comes amid growing attention to the security risks associated with autonomous AI systems, particularly as AI agents become capable of interacting with external networks, applications and other digital systems.<h2>AI spending faces growing scrutiny</h2>NVIDIA's latest capital-allocation strategy comes as investors continue to assess the sustainability of heavy spending on AI infrastructure. The company is using its strong cash flows to fund investments, support its customers and return capital to shareholders through buybacks. At the same time, questions remain around the pace and durability of AI demand as technology companies continue committing billions of dollars to data centres, advanced chips and other AI infrastructure.

Nvidia announces a record $150 billion share buyback, taking its total repurchase authorization to $235 billion, while expanding AI investments

Nvidia has announced a record $150 billion share buyback, taking its total repurchase authorisation to $235 billion as the chipmaker continues to benefit from strong demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure. The latest authorisation represents the largest increase in a US corporate share-buyback program, surpassing Apple's $110 billion buyback authorisation announced in 2024. Nvidia expands share buyback program A share buyback is when a company uses its own cash to purchase shares from the market. By reducing the number of shares in circulation, buybacks can increase earnings per share while returning capital to existing shareholders. NVIDIA plans to deploy the newly authorized funds through fiscal 2028. CEO Jensen Huang said the company's strong cash generation will allow it to invest in new technologies while also returning capital to shareholders. The announcement comes as NVIDIA continues to generate substantial cash from its expanding AI business. The company has also been using its financial resources to invest in AI companies and provide financing to some of its major customers. Nvidia's valuation and AI growth The buyback comes as NVIDIA's valuation has declined despite strong earnings growth. Its forward price-to-earnings multiple has fallen significantly from earlier levels, while NVIDIA's shares have gained more than 20 per cent this year. The company also forecasts around 70 per cent revenue growth for fiscal 2028, reinforcing its outlook amid questions over how long the current AI investment boom can continue. Also Read: USS Dwight D. Eisenhower mishap: 4 sailors injured, 2 aviators eject during aircraft recovery Nvidia launches AI security platform Alongside the buyback announcement, NVIDIA has unveiled an open-source AI security platform designed to prevent autonomous AI agents from carrying out unauthorised actions. The platform, called Open Agent Safety, includes Open Shell, which limits the access and authority of AI agents, and Sentry, a security layer designed to monitor their activities. The launch comes amid growing attention to the security risks associated with autonomous AI systems, particularly as AI agents become capable of interacting with external networks, applications and other digital systems. AI spending faces growing scrutiny NVIDIA's latest capital-allocation strategy comes as investors continue to assess the sustainability of heavy spending on AI infrastructure. The company is using its strong cash flows to fund investments, support its customers and return capital to shareholders through buybacks. At the same time, questions remain around the pace and durability of AI demand as technology companies continue committing billions of dollars to data centres, advanced chips and other AI infrastructure.

Nvidia announces a record $150 billion share buyback, taking its total authorisation to $235 billion amid strong AI growth and rising scrutiny

AI giant Nvidia announces $150billion share buyback. Here's what it means for shareholders

Tata Trusts has proposed merging two operating companies with the Tata Group’s holding company in a move aimed at taking Tata Sons out of the Reserve Bank of India’s regulatory framework for non-banking financial companies and core investment companies and letting it remain unlisted.&nbsp;Tata Trusts, which holds a 66 per cent stake in Tata Sons, has proposed merging Tata Electronics Systems Solutions Private Limited (TESS) and Tata Consulting Engineers (TCE) with Tata Sons Private Limited, in the restructuring bid.&nbsp;The proposal would allow Tata Sons to retain its status as an unlisted private company if approved by the Tata Sons board and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).&nbsp;Tata Trusts has written to the company’s board asking it to approve the restructuring and apply to the RBI for the necessary no-objection certificate. “The Tata Trusts, along with TSPL, will engage with the RBI on all aspects of the proposed reorganisation,” the Trusts said in a statement.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/indian-origin-chirantan-cj-desai-to-lead-meta-s-enterprise-platform-report-directly-to-zuckerberg-1790611558019">Indian-origin Chirantan ‘CJ’ Desai to lead Meta’s Enterprise Platform, report directly to Zuckerberg</a>&nbsp;The plan aims to avoid public listing of Tata Sons after the RBI rejected its application to surrender its registration as a CIC earlier this month.&nbsp;As an upper-layer NBFC, Tata Sons is subject to enhanced regulatory requirements, including mandatory listing.&nbsp;The proposed restructuring would enlarge the company by absorbing two operating, non-financial businesses and give Tata Sons substantial operating revenues in addition to the income it earns from its investments in Tata Group companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Tata Trusts, the amalgamated entity would have had operating revenues of Rs 1,05,043 crore as of March 31, 2026, compared with an income of Rs 40,072 crore from financial assets.Operating revenues would constitute 64.3 per cent of the resultant entity’s total income, and on this basis, the restructured Tata Sons would not meet the RBI’s “principal business criteria” for classification as an NBFC.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/all-five-men-arrested-near-raf-fairford-over-suspected-bomb-plot-are-uk-nationals-from-london-police-1790603862339">All five men arrested near RAF Fairford over suspected bomb plot released on bail: Police</a>&nbsp;The restructuring will also take Tata Sons outside the definition of a CIC, as the entity would have aggregate net assets of Rs 2,00,158 crore, of which Rs 1,77,120 crore—or around 88.5 per cent—would comprise investments in group companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;This would bring the proportion below the 90-per cent threshold applicable to CICs. If the merger is completed, Tata Sons would operate businesses directly while continuing to act as the principal holding company of the Tata group.For nearly 80 years of its existence, Tata Sons had operating businesses and revenues that helped fund newer ventures of the group.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mojtaba-khamenei-says-enemy-forces-will-soon-be-driven-out-of-arabian-sea-1790598022820">Mojtaba Khamenei says ‘enemy forces’ will soon be driven out of Arabian Sea</a>&nbsp;The proposed merger can be implemented only after regulatory clearance. Tata Sons will have to obtain the RBI’s prior no-objection certificate. Once the restructuring is completed, Tata Sons will cease to qualify as a CIC and will be required to surrender its certificate of registration.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Trusts also linked the proposal to unanimous resolutions passed by the boards of the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and the Sir Ratan Tata Trust in July 2025. The two boards had agreed that all efforts should be made to preserve Tata Sons’ status as an unlisted private company.

The proposed restructuring would enlarge the company by absorbing two operating, non-financial businesses and give Tata Sons substantial operating revenues in addition to the income it earns from its investments in Tata Group companies.

Tata Trusts has proposed merging two operating companies with the Tata Group’s holding company in a move aimed at taking Tata Sons out of the Reserve Bank of India’s regulatory framework for non-banking financial companies and core investment companies and letting it remain unlisted. Tata Trusts, which holds a 66 per cent stake in Tata Sons, has proposed merging Tata Electronics Systems Solutions Private Limited (TESS) and Tata Consulting Engineers (TCE) with Tata Sons Private Limited, in the restructuring bid. The proposal would allow Tata Sons to retain its status as an unlisted private company if approved by the Tata Sons board and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). Tata Trusts has written to the company’s board asking it to approve the restructuring and apply to the RBI for the necessary no-objection certificate. “The Tata Trusts, along with TSPL, will engage with the RBI on all aspects of the proposed reorganisation,” the Trusts said in a statement. Also Read: Indian-origin Chirantan ‘CJ’ Desai to lead Meta’s Enterprise Platform, report directly to Zuckerberg The plan aims to avoid public listing of Tata Sons after the RBI rejected its application to surrender its registration as a CIC earlier this month. As an upper-layer NBFC, Tata Sons is subject to enhanced regulatory requirements, including mandatory listing. The proposed restructuring would enlarge the company by absorbing two operating, non-financial businesses and give Tata Sons substantial operating revenues in addition to the income it earns from its investments in Tata Group companies. As per Tata Trusts, the amalgamated entity would have had operating revenues of Rs 1,05,043 crore as of March 31, 2026, compared with an income of Rs 40,072 crore from financial assets. Operating revenues would constitute 64.3 per cent of the resultant entity’s total income, and on this basis, the restructured Tata Sons would not meet the RBI’s “principal business criteria” for classification as an NBFC. Also Read: All five men arrested near RAF Fairford over suspected bomb plot released on bail: Police The restructuring will also take Tata Sons outside the definition of a CIC, as the entity would have aggregate net assets of Rs 2,00,158 crore, of which Rs 1,77,120 crore—or around 88.5 per cent—would comprise investments in group companies. This would bring the proportion below the 90-per cent threshold applicable to CICs. If the merger is completed, Tata Sons would operate businesses directly while continuing to act as the principal holding company of the Tata group. For nearly 80 years of its existence, Tata Sons had operating businesses and revenues that helped fund newer ventures of the group. Also Read: Mojtaba Khamenei says ‘enemy forces’ will soon be driven out of Arabian Sea The proposed merger can be implemented only after regulatory clearance. Tata Sons will have to obtain the RBI’s prior no-objection certificate. Once the restructuring is completed, Tata Sons will cease to qualify as a CIC and will be required to surrender its certificate of registration. The Trusts also linked the proposal to unanimous resolutions passed by the boards of the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust and the Sir Ratan Tata Trust in July 2025. The two boards had agreed that all efforts should be made to preserve Tata Sons’ status as an unlisted private company.

The proposed restructuring would enlarge the company by absorbing two operating, non-financial businesses and give Tata Sons substantial operating revenues in addition to the income it earns from its investments in Tata Group companies.

Tata Trusts proposes Tata Sons rejig, merging two firms with it to avoid listing

Washington and Beijing have officially announced a "30-for-30" trade framework and published a list of goods that the US and China could tax at lower rates. The list covers about $30bn worth of "non-sensitive" goods on each side. This comes following the trade deal struck at last week's summit between the US President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping. The US have listed 77 categories of Chinese goods while China have listed 1,619 categories of American products. Neither nation has specified the exact new tariff percentages or an absolute activation date.Under the new Board of Trade, the two countries will consider the products "with a view toward providing reduced tariff treatment to those goods in a reciprocal manner."&nbsp;"The Trump Administration will continue to pursue fair, balanced, and reciprocal trade with China by ensuring compliance with commitments on agricultural and energy purchases, pursuing balanced trade in non-sensitive goods, and securing market access for American farmers, manufacturers, businesses, and workers," said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in a statement.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-stock-market-crash-sensex-nifty-six-month-low-oil-fpi-rupee-1790610541704">Indian stock market crashes, 7.4 lakh crore wiped out: What is driving the fall?</a><h2>What items are in the lists?</h2>China's list is dominated by food and farm goods, from beef, pork, poultry and seafood to cheese, grains, corn, wheat, butter, wine, and whiskey. The list also features around 150 varieties of wood and timber products. China will also import $10 million worth of US coal annually across both 2027 and 2028. China will also import high-value medical technology such as MRI scanners, pacemakers, surgical robots, and stents. However, US Soybeans, historically the largest American agricultural export to China, were excluded from the tariff cuts, it appears only as seeds for planting.The US list is far shorter; it features Chinese consumer commodities like toys, children's car seats, and holiday or Christmas decorations, microwave ovens, toasters, coffee makers, bed linen, tennis balls and fishing hooks.The Chinese Ministry of Commerce officially confirmed the product lists on Monday, saying that the sides would discuss “a reciprocal tariff reduction framework of $30 billion for $30 billion, aiming to reach a consensus”.“This arrangement will help stabilise China-US trade, create better conditions for Chinese exports of relevant products to the US, meet domestic market demand, and strengthen trade cooperation in agricultural products, energy, manufactured goods, and consumer goods,” the ministry said in a statement.&nbsp;

The US and China have unveiled lists covering $30 billion of goods each for possible reciprocal tariff cuts under a new ‘30-for-30’ trade framework.

Washington and Beijing have officially announced a "30-for-30" trade framework and published a list of goods that the US and China could tax at lower rates. The list covers about $30bn worth of "non-sensitive" goods on each side. This comes following the trade deal struck at last week's summit between the US President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping. The US have listed 77 categories of Chinese goods while China have listed 1,619 categories of American products. Neither nation has specified the exact new tariff percentages or an absolute activation date. Under the new Board of Trade, the two countries will consider the products "with a view toward providing reduced tariff treatment to those goods in a reciprocal manner." "The Trump Administration will continue to pursue fair, balanced, and reciprocal trade with China by ensuring compliance with commitments on agricultural and energy purchases, pursuing balanced trade in non-sensitive goods, and securing market access for American farmers, manufacturers, businesses, and workers," said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in a statement. Also Read: Indian stock market crashes, 7.4 lakh crore wiped out: What is driving the fall? What items are in the lists? China's list is dominated by food and farm goods, from beef, pork, poultry and seafood to cheese, grains, corn, wheat, butter, wine, and whiskey. The list also features around 150 varieties of wood and timber products. China will also import $10 million worth of US coal annually across both 2027 and 2028. China will also import high-value medical technology such as MRI scanners, pacemakers, surgical robots, and stents. However, US Soybeans, historically the largest American agricultural export to China, were excluded from the tariff cuts, it appears only as seeds for planting. The US list is far shorter; it features Chinese consumer commodities like toys, children's car seats, and holiday or Christmas decorations, microwave ovens, toasters, coffee makers, bed linen, tennis balls and fishing hooks. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce officially confirmed the product lists on Monday, saying that the sides would discuss “a reciprocal tariff reduction framework of $30 billion for $30 billion, aiming to reach a consensus”. “This arrangement will help stabilise China-US trade, create better conditions for Chinese exports of relevant products to the US, meet domestic market demand, and strengthen trade cooperation in agricultural products, energy, manufactured goods, and consumer goods,” the ministry said in a statement.

The US and China have unveiled lists covering $30 billion of goods each for possible reciprocal tariff cuts under a new ‘30-for-30’ trade framework.

US, China unveil ‘30-for-30’ trade framework: Which goods could get lower tariffs?

The Indian stock market crashed severely on September 28, dragging both BSE and NSE to a six-month low. The BSE Sensex fell by 1,124.02 points, 1.52%, to close at 72,771.72, while NSE Nifty 50 crashed 360.25 points, 1.56%, closing at 22,780.25, wiping out roughly ₹7.4 lakh crore in market cap in a single day.&nbsp;"Brent crude at $106 and the US 10-year yield at 5.2 per cent are strong headwinds that are weighing on markets. FPIs, after turning buyers in July and August, have again turned sellers in September. This scenario will keep the market under pressure in the near term," said Dr V K Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments.<h2>Markets underperforming for seven straight weeks&nbsp;</h2>The indices had already fallen for seven straight weeks, losing nearly 6%, now kicking off their eighth week with a crash on Monday, one of their longest such streaks on record. Out of 30 Sensex stocks, 29 closed lower. L&amp;T and Power Grid were among the major losers, while Adani Ports, HDFC Bank, Hindustan Unilever, Reliance Industries and SBI also declined more than 2%. Almost all of the top 10 Nifty 50 heavyweight stocks fell; out of the 50-stock pack, only 3 stocks managed to finish in the green: Infosys, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, and HDFC Life.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/eu-seeks-more-warships-red-sea-operation-aspides-bab-al-mandeb-1790608248696">EU seeks more warships for Red Sea mission as Bab al-Mandeb security worsens</a>If the market fails to recover by the end of this current week, it will officially mark an 8-week losing streak. According to historical data from Reuters, the longest consecutive weekly losing streak for the Nifty 50 over the last 25 years was nine weeks, recorded back in 2001, during a toxic combination of the Ketan Parekh securities scam, the global Dot-com bubble burst, and the global shock of the September 11 terrorist attacks at the World Trade Centre.&nbsp;<h2>What is happening in Dalal Street?</h2>The sell-off highlights how India's strong domestic growth story cannot insulate its financial markets from global shocks. External shockwaves are overpowering domestic strength. Today's crash, according to experts, has global triggers, but India is also falling harder because of its own weak spots.&nbsp;Trump rejected Iran's proposal on the Strait of Hormuz, pushing Brent Crude futures over $107 per barrel; US Treasury 10-year yields are at multiyear highs over 5.2%. Higher US bond yields can make dollar-denominated assets more attractive relative to emerging-market equities, pulling money out of emerging markets. Foreign investors sold ₹3,696 crore on Friday and about ₹18,500 crore through September 25.&nbsp;At the same time, it is also increasing pressure on the rupee; dropping 28 paise to a record closing low of 96.03 against the US Dollar. It tested an intraday low of 96.14; state-run banks reportedly sold US dollars on behalf of the RBI throughout the trading session.&nbsp;Prolonged energy shocks will inevitably trigger higher domestic inflation and force the RBI to tighten policy and hike interest rates at the October MPC meeting. Both FPI and a weakening rupee are collectively bringing down one another, accelerating the market crash. India's energy bill, which is largely dependent on imports, will increase and ultimately push more and more foreign investors out.&nbsp;

Sensex and Nifty plunged over 1.5% to six-month lows as crude oil, US bond yields, FPI selling and rupee weakness put pressure on Indian markets.

The Indian stock market crashed severely on September 28, dragging both BSE and NSE to a six-month low. The BSE Sensex fell by 1,124.02 points, 1.52%, to close at 72,771.72, while NSE Nifty 50 crashed 360.25 points, 1.56%, closing at 22,780.25, wiping out roughly ₹7.4 lakh crore in market cap in a single day. "Brent crude at $106 and the US 10-year yield at 5.2 per cent are strong headwinds that are weighing on markets. FPIs, after turning buyers in July and August, have again turned sellers in September. This scenario will keep the market under pressure in the near term," said Dr V K Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments. Markets underperforming for seven straight weeks The indices had already fallen for seven straight weeks, losing nearly 6%, now kicking off their eighth week with a crash on Monday, one of their longest such streaks on record. Out of 30 Sensex stocks, 29 closed lower. L&T and Power Grid were among the major losers, while Adani Ports, HDFC Bank, Hindustan Unilever, Reliance Industries and SBI also declined more than 2%. Almost all of the top 10 Nifty 50 heavyweight stocks fell; out of the 50-stock pack, only 3 stocks managed to finish in the green: Infosys, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, and HDFC Life. Also Read: EU seeks more warships for Red Sea mission as Bab al-Mandeb security worsens If the market fails to recover by the end of this current week, it will officially mark an 8-week losing streak. According to historical data from Reuters, the longest consecutive weekly losing streak for the Nifty 50 over the last 25 years was nine weeks, recorded back in 2001, during a toxic combination of the Ketan Parekh securities scam, the global Dot-com bubble burst, and the global shock of the September 11 terrorist attacks at the World Trade Centre. What is happening in Dalal Street? The sell-off highlights how India's strong domestic growth story cannot insulate its financial markets from global shocks. External shockwaves are overpowering domestic strength. Today's crash, according to experts, has global triggers, but India is also falling harder because of its own weak spots. Trump rejected Iran's proposal on the Strait of Hormuz, pushing Brent Crude futures over $107 per barrel; US Treasury 10-year yields are at multiyear highs over 5.2%. Higher US bond yields can make dollar-denominated assets more attractive relative to emerging-market equities, pulling money out of emerging markets. Foreign investors sold ₹3,696 crore on Friday and about ₹18,500 crore through September 25. At the same time, it is also increasing pressure on the rupee; dropping 28 paise to a record closing low of 96.03 against the US Dollar. It tested an intraday low of 96.14; state-run banks reportedly sold US dollars on behalf of the RBI throughout the trading session. Prolonged energy shocks will inevitably trigger higher domestic inflation and force the RBI to tighten policy and hike interest rates at the October MPC meeting. Both FPI and a weakening rupee are collectively bringing down one another, accelerating the market crash. India's energy bill, which is largely dependent on imports, will increase and ultimately push more and more foreign investors out.

Sensex and Nifty plunged over 1.5% to six-month lows as crude oil, US bond yields, FPI selling and rupee weakness put pressure on Indian markets.

Indian stock market crashes, 7.4 lakh crore wiped out: What is driving the fall?

Meta has appointed Indian-origin executive Chirantan Desai, aka CJ Desai, to lead its new Enterprise Platform as the company looks to bring its AI models, agents and technology stack to businesses. Desai, who was president and CEO of database company MongoDB Inc., has stepped down, effective immediately, to join Meta Platforms, where he will report directly to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.&nbsp;A release from Meta said that Chirantan Desai will head its new Enterprise Platform, which will help businesses use AI to grow and transform in new ways.Meta plans to leverage strengths that few other companies have, including advanced models, leading agents, large-scale infrastructure, and years of working closely with businesses.&nbsp;Meta aims to bring its full technology stack, including Muse Agent, Meta Business Agent, Muse API, Muse Code, and more, to businesses and developers to help them grow.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today we are starting Meta Enterprise Platform to help businesses use AI to grow and transform in new ways, and Chirantan &quot;CJ&quot; Desai will join Meta as Chief Enterprise Platform Officer. <a href="https://t.co/8VjGBu2WFK">https://t.co/8VjGBu2WFK</a>&mdash; Meta Newsroom (@MetaNewsroom) <a href="https://x.com/MetaNewsroom/status/2104551228709691504?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 28, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/all-five-men-arrested-near-raf-fairford-over-suspected-bomb-plot-are-uk-nationals-from-london-police-1790603862339">All five men arrested near RAF Fairford over suspected bomb plot released on bail: Police</a>&nbsp;Before MongoDB, Desai led product and engineering at Cloudflare and spent nearly eight years at ServiceNow as president and COO.&nbsp;With Desai on board, Meta Enterprise Platform will focus on turning its AI stack into products and services that companies can easily deploy across their businesses.“As with Muse, security and privacy are built into Meta’s enterprise products from the outset. Our goal is to make Meta the place enterprises come to scale their businesses. I’m incredibly grateful for the opportunity and looking forward to working with our customers along this journey,” Desai said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mojtaba-khamenei-says-enemy-forces-will-soon-be-driven-out-of-arabian-sea-1790598022820">Mojtaba Khamenei says ‘enemy forces’ will soon be driven out of Arabian Sea</a>&nbsp;The social media giant’s push into the AI agent market with its Muse personal AI assistant has seen a rush of consumer demand, overtaking OpenAI’s ChatGPT as the leading free iOS app.&nbsp;MongoDB’s board is looking for Desai’s replacement and has, for now, brought back Dev Ittycheria as interim president and CEO, the company said in its release on Monday.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/muslim-marriage-cannot-shield-sex-with-minor-wife-from-prosecution-under-pocso-delhi-hc-1790518457378">Muslim marriage cannot shield sex with minor wife from prosecution under POCSO: Delhi HC</a>&nbsp;MongoDB said in a statement that it “remains confident” in its business outlook and reaffirmed its guidance for Q3FY27 that it provided earlier this month.&nbsp;Desai’s move to Meta comes amid the Silicon Valley giant’s big bets on artificial intelligence (AI) and investor expectation of high returns on billions spent on AI infrastructure.&nbsp;Last week, Meta announced it is moving into the AI agent market with the Muse personal AI assistant. The product saw large demand and overtook OpenAI’s ChatGPT as the leading free iOS app.

Meta plans to leverage strengths that few other companies have, including advanced models, leading agents, infrastructure, and years of working closely with businesses. It aims to bring its full stack, including Muse Agent, Meta Business Agent, Muse API, Muse Code, to businesses.

Meta has appointed Indian-origin executive Chirantan Desai, aka CJ Desai, to lead its new Enterprise Platform as the company looks to bring its AI models, agents and technology stack to businesses. Desai, who was president and CEO of database company MongoDB Inc., has stepped down, effective immediately, to join Meta Platforms, where he will report directly to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. A release from Meta said that Chirantan Desai will head its new Enterprise Platform, which will help businesses use AI to grow and transform in new ways. Meta plans to leverage strengths that few other companies have, including advanced models, leading agents, large-scale infrastructure, and years of working closely with businesses. Meta aims to bring its full technology stack, including Muse Agent, Meta Business Agent, Muse API, Muse Code, and more, to businesses and developers to help them grow.

Meta plans to leverage strengths that few other companies have, including advanced models, leading agents, infrastructure, and years of working closely with businesses. It aims to bring its full stack, including Muse Agent, Meta Business Agent, Muse API, Muse Code, to businesses.

Indian-origin Chirantan ‘CJ’ Desai to lead Meta’s Enterprise Platform, report directly to Zuckerberg

The recent summit of US President Donald Trump and visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping was widely watched as heralding cooperation on key areas like critical minerals and artificial intelligence. While the two nations agreed on new mechanisms for cooperation on artificial intelligence and trade, no substantive comprehensive pacts were signed. So what's the reality compared to the buzz?<h2>No new supply deal on rare earths</h2>China controls roughly 90 per cent of global rare-earth processing capacity. A fact sheet issued by the White House on September 25 said the two sides will continue to work on the US concerns over shortages of rare earths and other critical minerals, aimed at returning shipments to “appropriate levels”. There was no mention of specific supply targets or commitments to eliminate export licensing controls. An official readout from China also did not highlight rare earths.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-xi-summit-xi-wraps-up-us-visit-with-21-gun-salute-as-trump-xi-lock-in-strategic-stability-1790391939259/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-xi-summit-xi-wraps-up-us-visit-with-21-gun-salute-as-trump-xi-lock-in-strategic-stability-1790391939259/embed</a>Chinese rare-earth exports to the US remained below historical levels ahead of the summit. The US had earlier raised concerns over China not fully meeting its prior commitments, with compliance estimated at around two-thirds. Chinese shipments of rare earth magnets to the US averaged about 504 tonnes a month in 2026, compared with 621 tonnes in 2024.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-xi-summit-startling-omissions-behind-the-great-meeting-1790483239695">Trump-Xi Summit: Startling omissions behind the ‘great meeting’</a><h2>AI dialogue continues, without a clear deal</h2>The Trump-Xi summit did not produce a formal agreement on AI development, safety standards, semiconductor exports or technology transfers, in spite of widespread anticipation.Perhaps the most significant outcome was a name change: from artificial intelligence to Super Intelligence, a term that the two leaders agreed to use for the relevant emerging technologies.The two sides will establish a US-China Super Intelligence Dialogue to discuss the risks and benefits of emerging technologies, with the next exchange expected in November 2026. A bilateral communication channel for super-intelligence incidents will be established.These arrangements came after the September 20–21 talks between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng.&nbsp;China, meanwhile, sought relief from US semiconductor controls affecting advanced AI models.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-xi-china-iran-war-strait-hormuz-pressure-tehran-1790531547788">Trump asked Xi to pressure Iran. China did not say yes — here’s what Beijing wants</a><h2>So, what was actually agreed upon?</h2>There has been progress on some other aspects of the bilateral ties, particularly on trade. The US and China extended their trade truce to January 10, 2027. Under the Board of Trade, the two sides agreed on more favourable tariff treatment covering $30 billion of non-sensitive goods.China agreed to import at least 10 million metric tonnes of US coal in 2027 and 2028.In November 2025, China had committed to suspend expanded rare-earth export controls and issue general licences covering several critical minerals, and in May 2026, it committed to address US concerns over supply shortages of minerals like yttrium, scandium, neodymium and indium.Shipment levels and licensing remain concerns for the US when it comes to rare earths. On AI, dialogue advanced, while semiconductor controls and technology transfers remained unresolved.&nbsp;

Trump-Xi summit produced an AI dialogue channel but no substantive pacts on rare-earth or AI technology. Rare-earth shipments, export licensing, and semiconductor controls remained unresolved.

The recent summit of US President Donald Trump and visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping was widely watched as heralding cooperation on key areas like critical minerals and artificial intelligence. While the two nations agreed on new mechanisms for cooperation on artificial intelligence and trade, no substantive comprehensive pacts were signed. So what's the reality compared to the buzz? No new supply deal on rare earths China controls roughly 90 per cent of global rare-earth processing capacity. A fact sheet issued by the White House on September 25 said the two sides will continue to work on the US concerns over shortages of rare earths and other critical minerals, aimed at returning shipments to “appropriate levels”. There was no mention of specific supply targets or commitments to eliminate export licensing controls. An official readout from China also did not highlight rare earths. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-xi-summit-xi-wraps-up-us-visit-with-21-gun-salute-as-trump-xi-lock-in-strategic-stability-1790391939259/embed Chinese rare-earth exports to the US remained below historical levels ahead of the summit. The US had earlier raised concerns over China not fully meeting its prior commitments, with compliance estimated at around two-thirds. Chinese shipments of rare earth magnets to the US averaged about 504 tonnes a month in 2026, compared with 621 tonnes in 2024. Also read: Trump-Xi Summit: Startling omissions behind the ‘great meeting’ AI dialogue continues, without a clear deal The Trump-Xi summit did not produce a formal agreement on AI development, safety standards, semiconductor exports or technology transfers, in spite of widespread anticipation. Perhaps the most significant outcome was a name change: from artificial intelligence to Super Intelligence, a term that the two leaders agreed to use for the relevant emerging technologies. The two sides will establish a US-China Super Intelligence Dialogue to discuss the risks and benefits of emerging technologies, with the next exchange expected in November 2026. A bilateral communication channel for super-intelligence incidents will be established. These arrangements came after the September 20–21 talks between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng. China, meanwhile, sought relief from US semiconductor controls affecting advanced AI models. Also read: Trump asked Xi to pressure Iran. China did not say yes — here’s what Beijing wants So, what was actually agreed upon? There has been progress on some other aspects of the bilateral ties, particularly on trade. The US and China extended their trade truce to January 10, 2027. Under the Board of Trade, the two sides agreed on more favourable tariff treatment covering $30 billion of non-sensitive goods. China agreed to import at least 10 million metric tonnes of US coal in 2027 and 2028. In November 2025, China had committed to suspend expanded rare-earth export controls and issue general licences covering several critical minerals, and in May 2026, it committed to address US concerns over supply shortages of minerals like yttrium, scandium, neodymium and indium. Shipment levels and licensing remain concerns for the US when it comes to rare earths. On AI, dialogue advanced, while semiconductor controls and technology transfers remained unresolved.

Trump-Xi summit produced an AI dialogue channel but no substantive pacts on rare earths or AI technology. Rare-earth shipments, export licensing, and semiconductor controls remained unresolved.

Trump-Xi Summit: What happened to AI and rare earths agreements? Buzz vs reality

The three-day crippling nationwide bank strike scheduled to begin from Monday has been deferred at the eleventh hour, giving a sigh of relief to businesses and customers after the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) and the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) reached an understanding on key issues, the union body said in a statement on Sunday night.&nbsp;All bank branches across the nation will now open and function as usual on Monday.&nbsp;The strike deferment decision was arrived at after a meeting between the IBA and UFBU at 9.30 pm on Sunday.&nbsp;As per the decision taken at the talks, a high-level committee comprising representatives of the IBA and UFBU will be formed immediately to discuss the demand for declaring all Saturdays of the month as holidays.&nbsp;The panel will examine all possible alternatives, consult stakeholders and seek to find a solution that is acceptable to all parties, including bank customers, the UFBU said.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Bank strike deferred after the meeting between the Indian Banks&#39; Association (IBA) and the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) tonight. <a href="https://t.co/SPJUwp63p2">pic.twitter.com/SPJUwp63p2</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2104264537168019510?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The committee will also discuss the Performance Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for Scale IV and above officers. The September 28 to 30 strike was called mainly over the demand of unions for a five-day working week. The UFBU, which represents a large share of bank employees, argues that staff face long working hours and should get off on every Saturday. Banks currently remain closed on the second and fourth Saturdays of each month. The Finance Ministry had appealed to bank employees to avoid a strike, warning of disruption to banking services. It said other demands of the union had been addressed in previous talks, including changes concerning family pensions, while a proposed performance-linked incentive scheme had been kept in abeyance. The proposed strike would have coincided with the half-yearly closing of banks on September 30. All public sector banks and regional rural banks had remained open on Sunday, September 27, to ensure that customers get an additional day for branch transactions to ensure their financial needs ahead of the strike for three consecutive days.

The strike deferment decision was arrived at after a meeting between the IBA and UFBU on Sunday. As per the decision, a high-level committee comprising representatives of the IBA and UFBU will be formed to discuss the demand for declaring all Saturdays of the month as holidays.

The three-day crippling nationwide bank strike scheduled to begin from Monday has been deferred at the eleventh hour, giving a sigh of relief to businesses and customers after the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) and the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) reached an understanding on key issues, the union body said in a statement on Sunday night. All bank branches across the nation will now open and function as usual on Monday. The strike deferment decision was arrived at after a meeting between the IBA and UFBU at 9.30 pm on Sunday. As per the decision taken at the talks, a high-level committee comprising representatives of the IBA and UFBU will be formed immediately to discuss the demand for declaring all Saturdays of the month as holidays. The panel will examine all possible alternatives, consult stakeholders and seek to find a solution that is acceptable to all parties, including bank customers, the UFBU said.

The strike deferment decision was arrived at after a meeting between the IBA and UFBU on Sunday. As per the decision, a high-level committee comprising representatives of the IBA and UFBU will be formed to discuss the demand for declaring all Saturdays of the month as holidays.

Bank unions defer 3-day strike from tomorrow after talks with IBA, committee set up

The US economy is facing renewed pressure from rising housing and energy costs, with mortgage rates climbing above 7 per cent as oil prices surged past $107 a barrel following fresh attacks linked to the Iran war. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate, the most common home loan in the United States, rose to 7.03 per cent this week, up from 6.3 per cent a year ago, according to Freddie Mac. The rate crossed the 7 per cent threshold for the first time since January 2025, adding another hurdle for prospective homebuyers.&nbsp;Mortgage rates had fallen below 6 per cent in late February, raising hopes that the US housing market could begin recovering from its prolonged slowdown. But rates subsequently moved higher after the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran on February 28. The increase has come as Americans are also dealing with elevated energy costs and broader economic uncertainty linked to the war in the Middle East. Since the conflict began, disruptions to oil shipments through the Persian Gulf have pushed up the cost of gasoline, diesel and heating oil.&nbsp;&nbsp;Economists have warned that sustained energy-price increases could eventually feed into prices across the wider US economy.The pressure is also visible in the bond market, which plays a key role in determining mortgage rates. The 10-year US Treasury yield has moved above 5 per cent, increasing borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. Inflation remains elevated as well. Consumer prices rose at an annual rate of 3.4 per cent in August, adding to concerns over how much longer interest rates will need to remain restrictive.&nbsp;Higher borrowing costs are already weighing on the housing market. Existing-home sales fell 2 percent in August from July, reaching their lowest level since June last year. At the same time, home prices continued to rise, increasing 1.5 percent annually in June, according to Cotality. The current housing environment is a sharp contrast to the pandemic-era boom. Mortgage rates fell as low as 2.65 percent in January 2021, triggering a wave of home buying, bidding wars and rapid price increases. As rates subsequently climbed, homeowners increasingly became reluctant to sell and give up historically low mortgage rates.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/netanyahu-at-un-mass-walkout-attack-on-mamdani-and-iran-threats-in-pics-1790284630014">Netanyahu at UN: Mass walkout, attack on Mamdani and Iran threats | In Pics</a><h2>Oil prices surge above $107</h2>The housing pressure comes as energy markets face another bout of volatility. Brent crude traded near $107 a barrel on Thursday, after earlier climbing above $108, as fresh attacks by Iran-aligned Houthi militants in Yemen against Saudi Arabia raised concerns about further disruption to oil supplies. US West Texas Intermediate crude also moved back above $95 a barrel.&nbsp;Saudi Arabia said it intercepted six ballistic missiles fired by the Houthis toward areas including Taif and the Yanbu region. Yanbu is home to a major oil export terminal on Saudi Arabia's Red Sea coast. Oil prices had initially eased earlier in the week on reports that Washington and Tehran could be exploring a diplomatic path to restore exports through the Persian Gulf. But renewed attacks and uncertainty surrounding the talks quickly pushed prices higher.&nbsp;The Strait of Hormuz remains central to the supply outlook. Saudi Arabia has been seeking alternative routes for exports, but those routes have also faced higher war-risk insurance costs. Only 10 commodity vessels crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday, below the 10-day moving average of 17, according to the information provided.<h2>Natural gas adds to energy pressure</h2>US natural gas prices have also moved sharply higher, adding another layer to the energy squeeze. Natural gas prices surged more than 6 percent following a pipeline-related disruption, taking prices roughly 28 per cent above their April 2026 low. The move comes at a sensitive time for energy markets, with investors already watching the impact of the Middle East conflict on global fuel supplies. Natural gas is particularly important for the US power sector, heating demand and industrial users.

US mortgage rates hit 7% as Brent crude tops $107 and natural gas prices surge, adding to housing, energy and inflation pressures on Americans

The US economy is facing renewed pressure from rising housing and energy costs, with mortgage rates climbing above 7 per cent as oil prices surged past $107 a barrel following fresh attacks linked to the Iran war. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate, the most common home loan in the United States, rose to 7.03 per cent this week, up from 6.3 per cent a year ago, according to Freddie Mac. The rate crossed the 7 per cent threshold for the first time since January 2025, adding another hurdle for prospective homebuyers. Mortgage rates had fallen below 6 per cent in late February, raising hopes that the US housing market could begin recovering from its prolonged slowdown. But rates subsequently moved higher after the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran on February 28. The increase has come as Americans are also dealing with elevated energy costs and broader economic uncertainty linked to the war in the Middle East. Since the conflict began, disruptions to oil shipments through the Persian Gulf have pushed up the cost of gasoline, diesel and heating oil. Economists have warned that sustained energy-price increases could eventually feed into prices across the wider US economy. The pressure is also visible in the bond market, which plays a key role in determining mortgage rates. The 10-year US Treasury yield has moved above 5 per cent, increasing borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. Inflation remains elevated as well. Consumer prices rose at an annual rate of 3.4 per cent in August, adding to concerns over how much longer interest rates will need to remain restrictive. Higher borrowing costs are already weighing on the housing market. Existing-home sales fell 2 percent in August from July, reaching their lowest level since June last year. At the same time, home prices continued to rise, increasing 1.5 percent annually in June, according to Cotality. The current housing environment is a sharp contrast to the pandemic-era boom. Mortgage rates fell as low as 2.65 percent in January 2021, triggering a wave of home buying, bidding wars and rapid price increases. As rates subsequently climbed, homeowners increasingly became reluctant to sell and give up historically low mortgage rates. Also Read: Netanyahu at UN: Mass walkout, attack on Mamdani and Iran threats | In Pics Oil prices surge above $107 The housing pressure comes as energy markets face another bout of volatility. Brent crude traded near $107 a barrel on Thursday, after earlier climbing above $108, as fresh attacks by Iran-aligned Houthi militants in Yemen against Saudi Arabia raised concerns about further disruption to oil supplies. US West Texas Intermediate crude also moved back above $95 a barrel. Saudi Arabia said it intercepted six ballistic missiles fired by the Houthis toward areas including Taif and the Yanbu region. Yanbu is home to a major oil export terminal on Saudi Arabia's Red Sea coast. Oil prices had initially eased earlier in the week on reports that Washington and Tehran could be exploring a diplomatic path to restore exports through the Persian Gulf. But renewed attacks and uncertainty surrounding the talks quickly pushed prices higher. The Strait of Hormuz remains central to the supply outlook. Saudi Arabia has been seeking alternative routes for exports, but those routes have also faced higher war-risk insurance costs. Only 10 commodity vessels crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday, below the 10-day moving average of 17, according to the information provided. Natural gas adds to energy pressure US natural gas prices have also moved sharply higher, adding another layer to the energy squeeze. Natural gas prices surged more than 6 percent following a pipeline-related disruption, taking prices roughly 28 per cent above their April 2026 low. The move comes at a sensitive time for energy markets, with investors already watching the impact of the Middle East conflict on global fuel supplies. Natural gas is particularly important for the US power sector, heating demand and industrial users.

US faces a fresh cost squeeze as mortgage rates top 7%, Brent crude surges above $107 and natural gas prices jump amid energy disruptions

US faces fresh cost crunch as mortgage rates hit 7%, oil tops $107 and gas prices surge

Oracle shares fell nearly 5% in pre-market trading on Thursday after reports that the company had invoked force majeure on a massive AI data centre project in New Mexico. The move is reportedly aimed at protecting Oracle from financial exposure if construction delays push the facility beyond its planned launch in 2028.&nbsp;&nbsp;The development puts a spotlight on the growing costs and risks behind the artificial intelligence boom. Oracle is not reportedly walking away from the project. Instead, it is seeking flexibility over payments as its infrastructure ambitions face construction, regulatory and financing challenges.<h2>Why has Oracle invoked force majeure?</h2>According to a Bloomberg report cited by Reuters, Oracle sent a force majeure notice to the project's developer, a unit of Blue Owl Capital. The notice is reportedly intended to delay payment obligations if the data centre, known as Project Jupiter, is delayed and fails to come online as planned.&nbsp;MarketScreener&nbsp;Force majeure is a contractual provision that can offer relief from certain obligations when extraordinary circumstances beyond a party's control disrupt a project. Whether it applies depends on the contract and the circumstances.&nbsp;Oracle is reportedly seeking to protect itself against delays and additional costs, rather than give up its role as the facility's main tenant. Reuters said it could not independently verify Bloomberg's report. Oracle and Blue Owl did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment.&nbsp;<h2>What is Project Jupiter and why does it matter?</h2>Project Jupiter is a major data centre campus in Doña Ana County, New Mexico, linked to Oracle's wider AI infrastructure expansion and its partnership with OpenAI. The facility is designed to support enormous computing workloads needed to train and run AI models. Such projects require substantial investment in buildings, power supply, cooling systems and specialised computing equipment.&nbsp;The New Mexico project has faced regulatory and local opposition, including disputes involving the proposed power infrastructure. Oracle said in a September 14 statement that the data centre campus and a proposed microgrid are separate facilities, and that construction of the data centre buildings does not require the air-quality permit at the centre of a separate legal proceeding.&nbsp;Oracle.<h2>Is Oracle abandoning its AI data centre plans?</h2>There is no confirmation that Oracle is exiting Project Jupiter. In fact, the reported notice appears aimed at protecting the company if the timeline slips, rather than cancelling its role.&nbsp;Oracle has said the project remains on schedule and that it is committed to New Mexico, according to a Bloomberg report cited by Yahoo Finance.&nbsp;Yahoo Finance The distinction matters. A payment delay would not necessarily mean the project is cancelled, nor does the reported notice establish the final cost or the extent of any financial relief. For investors, the key questions are whether construction can stay on schedule, how much the project will ultimately cost and whether Oracle's growing AI infrastructure commitments can deliver returns that justify the spending.&nbsp;The latest development underlines a central challenge for the AI industry: demand for computing power is rising rapidly, but building the facilities to meet it is proving complex, expensive and exposed to delays.

Oracle shares fell nearly 5% in pre-market trading after reports it issued a force majeure notice on its New Mexico Project Jupiter data centre. The move could allow payment delays if construction setbacks push the AI facility beyond its planned 2028 launch

Oracle shares fell nearly 5% in pre-market trading on Thursday after reports that the company had invoked force majeure on a massive AI data centre project in New Mexico. The move is reportedly aimed at protecting Oracle from financial exposure if construction delays push the facility beyond its planned launch in 2028. The development puts a spotlight on the growing costs and risks behind the artificial intelligence boom. Oracle is not reportedly walking away from the project. Instead, it is seeking flexibility over payments as its infrastructure ambitions face construction, regulatory and financing challenges. Why has Oracle invoked force majeure? According to a Bloomberg report cited by Reuters, Oracle sent a force majeure notice to the project's developer, a unit of Blue Owl Capital. The notice is reportedly intended to delay payment obligations if the data centre, known as Project Jupiter, is delayed and fails to come online as planned. MarketScreener Force majeure is a contractual provision that can offer relief from certain obligations when extraordinary circumstances beyond a party's control disrupt a project. Whether it applies depends on the contract and the circumstances. Oracle is reportedly seeking to protect itself against delays and additional costs, rather than give up its role as the facility's main tenant. Reuters said it could not independently verify Bloomberg's report. Oracle and Blue Owl did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. What is Project Jupiter and why does it matter? Project Jupiter is a major data centre campus in Doña Ana County, New Mexico, linked to Oracle's wider AI infrastructure expansion and its partnership with OpenAI. The facility is designed to support enormous computing workloads needed to train and run AI models. Such projects require substantial investment in buildings, power supply, cooling systems and specialised computing equipment. The New Mexico project has faced regulatory and local opposition, including disputes involving the proposed power infrastructure. Oracle said in a September 14 statement that the data centre campus and a proposed microgrid are separate facilities, and that construction of the data centre buildings does not require the air-quality permit at the centre of a separate legal proceeding. Oracle. Is Oracle abandoning its AI data centre plans? There is no confirmation that Oracle is exiting Project Jupiter. In fact, the reported notice appears aimed at protecting the company if the timeline slips, rather than cancelling its role. Oracle has said the project remains on schedule and that it is committed to New Mexico, according to a Bloomberg report cited by Yahoo Finance. Yahoo Finance The distinction matters. A payment delay would not necessarily mean the project is cancelled, nor does the reported notice establish the final cost or the extent of any financial relief. For investors, the key questions are whether construction can stay on schedule, how much the project will ultimately cost and whether Oracle's growing AI infrastructure commitments can deliver returns that justify the spending. The latest development underlines a central challenge for the AI industry: demand for computing power is rising rapidly, but building the facilities to meet it is proving complex, expensive and exposed to delays.

Oracle shares fell nearly 5% in pre-market trading after reports it issued a force majeure notice on its New Mexico Project Jupiter data centre. The move could allow payment delays if construction setbacks push the AI facility beyond its planned 2028 launch

Oracle shares fall 5% as costly AI infrastructure project raises investor questions

The Union government on Wednesday cut basic customs duty (BCD) on crude and refined edible oils to lower import costs for cooking oils and provide some relief to consumers ahead of the festive season.The Centre has reduced the BCD on crude soybean oil and crude palm oil to 5% from 10%, according to a Finance Ministry notification issued on Wednesday.&nbsp;The basic customs duty for crude sunflower oil has been brought down to nil from 10%, while the duty on refined sunflower oil has been lowered to 22.5% from 32.5%.&nbsp;The duty on refined soybean and refined palm oil has also been reduced to 27.5% from 32.5%. The revised duties will take effect from Thursday, September 24.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jaishankar-meets-rubio-on-unga-sidelines-raises-delhi-s-concern-over-russia-sanctions-law-1790179886768">Jaishankar meets Rubio on UNGA sidelines, raises Delhi’s concern over Russia sanctions law</a>&nbsp;The government has made the changes by amending its earlier customs notification of 24 October 2025.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The Central Government has reduced the basic customs duty (BCD) on crude Soybean Oil and crude Palm Oil from 10% to 5% and on refined Soybean Oil and refined Palm Oil from 32.5% to 27.5%. Further, the BCD on crude Sunflower Oil has been reduced from 10% to Nil, while the BCD on… <a href="https://t.co/uCbfaFouTS">pic.twitter.com/uCbfaFouTS</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2102805283215225040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Edible oil prices rose sharply over the past year</h2> The government has slashed duties as edible oil prices have risen sharply over the past year in a bid to ease pressure on household budgets ahead of the festive season, with Navratri beginning on 11 October, followed by Dussehra on 20 October and Diwali on 8 November. As per data from the consumer affairs ministry, as of 23 September, retail prices of soybean oil rose to Rs 166.87 per kg from Rs 146.44 per kg a year ago. Sunflower oil price had risen to Rs 194.26 a kg from Rs 162.56 a kg a year ago, while palm oil was at Rs 153.89 a kg from Rs 132.28 per kg. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/unwarranted-factually-incorrect-no-locus-standi-india-hits-back-at-oic-over-kashmir-remarks-1790171577064">‘Unwarranted, factually incorrect, no locus standi’: India hits back at OIC over Kashmir remarks</a><h2>Domestic production covers only 40% of demand</h2> India’s edible oil demand is around 26 million tonnes annually, while domestic production can cover only up to 40% of this requirement. India’s heavy dependence on imports leaves domestic edible oil prices exposed to global price movements, freight costs and currency fluctuations. Edible oil imports jumped to 1.48 million tonnes in July from 1.1 million tonnes in June, an increase of about 35% month-on-month.

The Central government has slashed basic customs duty as edible oil prices have risen sharply over the past year. The move is a bid to ease pressure on household budgets in the festive season, with Navratri beginning on 11 October, followed by Dussehra on 20 October and Diwali on 8 November.

The Union government on Wednesday cut basic customs duty (BCD) on crude and refined edible oils to lower import costs for cooking oils and provide some relief to consumers ahead of the festive season. The Centre has reduced the BCD on crude soybean oil and crude palm oil to 5% from 10%, according to a Finance Ministry notification issued on Wednesday. The basic customs duty for crude sunflower oil has been brought down to nil from 10%, while the duty on refined sunflower oil has been lowered to 22.5% from 32.5%. The duty on refined soybean and refined palm oil has also been reduced to 27.5% from 32.5%. The revised duties will take effect from Thursday, September 24. Also Read: Jaishankar meets Rubio on UNGA sidelines, raises Delhi’s concern over Russia sanctions law The government has made the changes by amending its earlier customs notification of 24 October 2025.

The Central government has slashed basic customs duty as edible oil prices have risen sharply over the past year. The move is a bid to ease pressure on household budgets in the festive season, with Navratri beginning on 11 October, followed by Dussehra on 20 October and Diwali on 8 November.

Govt slashes duty on edible oils to curb price rise ahead of festive season

US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are set to meet in Washington on Thursday (Sep 24), with trade once again at the centre of a relationship that has swung between tariff escalation and uneasy truces.The two countries have pulled back from the extraordinary tariff battle that pushed US duties on Chinese imports as high as 145 per cent and China's retaliatory tariffs to 125 per cent. But the underlying disputes have not disappeared. Tariffs, rare earths, agricultural purchases and technology controls remain unresolved, while new disagreements over artificial intelligence and sanctions linked to Iran are adding fresh complications.The latest talks are expected to focus on keeping the current trade truce intact. That arrangement is due to expire on November 10 unless Washington and Beijing extend it. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said maintaining the truce was a focus of recent discussions with Chinese officials.Here are the main economic disputes Trump and Xi will have to navigate.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-russia-sanctions-bill-trump-100-percent-tariff-india-china-1789610901670">Trump gets new power to hit India, China with up to 100% tariffs as US Senate clears Russia sanctions bill</a><h2>Tariffs: the biggest unresolved trade fight</h2>Tariffs remain the most visible sign of the US-China trade conflict. Trump's return to the White House triggered a new round of tariff action in 2025, followed by Chinese retaliation. At the height of that confrontation, Washington's tariffs on Chinese goods reached 145 per cent while Beijing's duties on American imports climbed to 125 per cent. Talks in Geneva and later negotiations in South Korea brought those rates down and created a temporary ceasefire.That truce remains fragile. Different US estimates show that Chinese goods still face substantially higher tariffs than imports from many other major trading partners.The question now is whether Trump and Xi will simply extend the existing arrangement or try to widen it into a more durable trade framework.The US has also been discussing a proposed $30 billion reduction package covering so-called non-critical goods, while Beijing could make additional purchases of American products.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/spy-vs-spy-as-xi-meets-trump-a-12-year-history-of-us-china-espionage-accusations-wion-decodes-1790071582437">SPY VS SPY: As Xi meets Trump, a 12-year history of US-China espionage accusations | WION Decodes</a><h2>Rare earths: China's leverage over US industry</h2>Rare earths have emerged as one of Beijing's most powerful economic levers. These minerals and the magnets made from them are essential to products ranging from electronics and electric vehicles to advanced military equipment. China dominates the processing of many critical minerals, a dependency that Washington has increasingly treated as a national security concern. The US Commerce Department has described China's position in critical-mineral processing as a vulnerability for American industry.China tightened export controls on rare earths in 2025 during the trade confrontation. Those restrictions became a major bargaining point in negotiations with Washington.As part of the late-2025 agreement, Beijing suspended the implementation of broader export restrictions and agreed to facilitate exports of rare earths and other critical minerals to US users. Washington, in return, suspended or reduced some of its trade measures.But the issue is not settled. Ahead of the latest summit, US officials have been pushing for more consistent supplies, while Chinese shipments of rare earth magnets to the United States fell in August, according to Chinese customs data cited by the Financial Times.For Washington, the dispute is about reducing dependence on China. For Beijing, rare earths provide leverage in negotiations because alternative supply chains cannot be built quickly.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/china-may-have-gained-access-to-us-s-classified-f-35-jets-parts-meant-for-repairs-diverted-to-hong-kong-sparking-pentagon-inquiry-1789789538070">China may have gained access to US's classified F-35 jets; parts meant for repairs diverted to Hong Kong, sparking Pentagon inquiry</a><h2>Agriculture: promises versus deliveries</h2>American farm exports have repeatedly featured in Trump-Xi negotiations, particularly soybeans. The two countries have used agricultural purchases as part of broader trade bargains, with China agreeing to buy US farm products in exchange for changes in American tariffs and restrictions.But Washington has continued to question whether Beijing has fully met some commitments from previous agreements. Bessent said this week that “some deliverables” under an earlier Trump-Xi agreement had not been completely fulfilled.Agriculture is therefore both a commercial issue and a political one for the Trump administration, because China is a major market for American farmers.Recent talks have included expectations of further US agricultural purchases. Reuters reported that China was on track to meet a commitment to buy 25 million metric tonnes of US agricultural products annually through 2028, while additional imports were also being discussed.The broader disagreement is over whether purchase commitments can produce a lasting rebalancing of trade or merely form part of temporary summit deals.<h2>Semiconductors and AI: trade is becoming technology policy</h2>The US-China trade dispute is no longer just about goods crossing borders. It increasingly extends to the technology needed to produce them.Washington has restricted China's access to some advanced semiconductors and chipmaking technologies, citing national security concerns. Beijing has responded with its own controls and measures affecting foreign companies and strategic technologies.The US Trade Representative's 2026 report said it had determined that China's targeting of the semiconductor industry for dominance creates economic and national security risks for the United States. Washington has announced a Section 301 tariff measure on Chinese semiconductors, initially set at zero but scheduled to rise from June 2027.Artificial intelligence has now been added to that technology dispute.Bessent said recent US-China discussions included creating a mechanism for the two countries to notify each other about AI incidents with national security implications. The upcoming summit is also expected to address AI safety and the rules surrounding increasingly powerful models.<h2>Fentanyl chemicals and trade restrictions</h2>The flow of chemicals used to manufacture illicit fentanyl has been another source of tension.Washington has accused Chinese suppliers of being a major source of precursor chemicals and has used tariffs and other trade measures to pressure Beijing.China agreed in late 2025 to tighten controls on designated chemicals and take measures to curb the flow of fentanyl precursors. The United States subsequently reduced part of its fentanyl-related tariff burden.But the issue remains active. China has introduced additional export controls on precursor chemicals ahead of Xi's visit, showing that the subject remains part of the wider economic relationship.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-signs-greenland-security-deal-with-denmark-paving-way-for-two-new-us-military-bases-1790128313245">Trump signs Greenland security deal with Denmark, paving way for two new US military bases</a><h2>Iran sanctions add another layer</h2>The Iran conflict is not traditionally a US-China trade dispute, but it is increasingly tied to the economic relationship.The Trump administration's sanctions campaign against Iran has put pressure on Chinese companies and financial institutions that conduct business with Tehran. Washington has so far avoided directly targeting Beijing, but US officials have held discussions with their Chinese counterparts over the issue.Bessent said the subject was raised during recent talks with Chinese officials and that Chinese financial authorities had been engaged in discussions.That creates another potential point of friction just as Washington is trying to preserve its trade truce with Beijing.<h2>What is at stake at the Trump-Xi meeting?</h2>The US and China remain deeply economically intertwined despite the trade war. US goods trade with China totalled $414.6 billion in 2025, while services trade added another $80 billion, according to US government figures. The US goods deficit with China was $202.7 billion that year.The immediate issue is whether the two leaders can keep the current truce from unravelling before its November 10 expiry. Beyond that lies a much harder question: whether the world's two largest economies can manage their competition without repeatedly returning to tariffs, export controls and retaliatory measures.

Donald Trump and Xi Jinping meet in Washington on Thursday with a fragile US-China trade truce at stake. Tariffs remain unresolved, but rare earths, farm purchases, semiconductors, AI and Iran sanctions could make the talks far more complicated.

US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are set to meet in Washington on Thursday (Sep 24), with trade once again at the centre of a relationship that has swung between tariff escalation and uneasy truces. The two countries have pulled back from the extraordinary tariff battle that pushed US duties on Chinese imports as high as 145 per cent and China's retaliatory tariffs to 125 per cent. But the underlying disputes have not disappeared. Tariffs, rare earths, agricultural purchases and technology controls remain unresolved, while new disagreements over artificial intelligence and sanctions linked to Iran are adding fresh complications. The latest talks are expected to focus on keeping the current trade truce intact. That arrangement is due to expire on November 10 unless Washington and Beijing extend it. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said maintaining the truce was a focus of recent discussions with Chinese officials. Here are the main economic disputes Trump and Xi will have to navigate. Also read | Trump gets new power to hit India, China with up to 100% tariffs as US Senate clears Russia sanctions bill Tariffs: the biggest unresolved trade fight Tariffs remain the most visible sign of the US-China trade conflict. Trump's return to the White House triggered a new round of tariff action in 2025, followed by Chinese retaliation. At the height of that confrontation, Washington's tariffs on Chinese goods reached 145 per cent while Beijing's duties on American imports climbed to 125 per cent. Talks in Geneva and later negotiations in South Korea brought those rates down and created a temporary ceasefire. That truce remains fragile. Different US estimates show that Chinese goods still face substantially higher tariffs than imports from many other major trading partners. The question now is whether Trump and Xi will simply extend the existing arrangement or try to widen it into a more durable trade framework. The US has also been discussing a proposed $30 billion reduction package covering so-called non-critical goods, while Beijing could make additional purchases of American products. Also read | SPY VS SPY: As Xi meets Trump, a 12-year history of US-China espionage accusations | WION Decodes Rare earths: China's leverage over US industry Rare earths have emerged as one of Beijing's most powerful economic levers. These minerals and the magnets made from them are essential to products ranging from electronics and electric vehicles to advanced military equipment. China dominates the processing of many critical minerals, a dependency that Washington has increasingly treated as a national security concern. The US Commerce Department has described China's position in critical-mineral processing as a vulnerability for American industry. China tightened export controls on rare earths in 2025 during the trade confrontation. Those restrictions became a major bargaining point in negotiations with Washington. As part of the late-2025 agreement, Beijing suspended the implementation of broader export restrictions and agreed to facilitate exports of rare earths and other critical minerals to US users. Washington, in return, suspended or reduced some of its trade measures. But the issue is not settled. Ahead of the latest summit, US officials have been pushing for more consistent supplies, while Chinese shipments of rare earth magnets to the United States fell in August, according to Chinese customs data cited by the Financial Times. For Washington, the dispute is about reducing dependence on China. For Beijing, rare earths provide leverage in negotiations because alternative supply chains cannot be built quickly. Also read | China may have gained access to US's classified F-35 jets; parts meant for repairs diverted to Hong Kong, sparking Pentagon inquiry Agriculture: promises versus deliveries American farm exports have repeatedly featured in Trump-Xi negotiations, particularly soybeans. The two countries have used agricultural purchases as part of broader trade bargains, with China agreeing to buy US farm products in exchange for changes in American tariffs and restrictions. But Washington has continued to question whether Beijing has fully met some commitments from previous agreements. Bessent said this week that “some deliverables” under an earlier Trump-Xi agreement had not been completely fulfilled. Agriculture is therefore both a commercial issue and a political one for the Trump administration, because China is a major market for American farmers. Recent talks have included expectations of further US agricultural purchases. Reuters reported that China was on track to meet a commitment to buy 25 million metric tonnes of US agricultural products annually through 2028, while additional imports were also being discussed. The broader disagreement is over whether purchase commitments can produce a lasting rebalancing of trade or merely form part of temporary summit deals. Semiconductors and AI: trade is becoming technology policy The US-China trade dispute is no longer just about goods crossing borders. It increasingly extends to the technology needed to produce them. Washington has restricted China's access to some advanced semiconductors and chipmaking technologies, citing national security concerns. Beijing has responded with its own controls and measures affecting foreign companies and strategic technologies. The US Trade Representative's 2026 report said it had determined that China's targeting of the semiconductor industry for dominance creates economic and national security risks for the United States. Washington has announced a Section 301 tariff measure on Chinese semiconductors, initially set at zero but scheduled to rise from June 2027. Artificial intelligence has now been added to that technology dispute. Bessent said recent US-China discussions included creating a mechanism for the two countries to notify each other about AI incidents with national security implications. The upcoming summit is also expected to address AI safety and the rules surrounding increasingly powerful models. Fentanyl chemicals and trade restrictions The flow of chemicals used to manufacture illicit fentanyl has been another source of tension. Washington has accused Chinese suppliers of being a major source of precursor chemicals and has used tariffs and other trade measures to pressure Beijing. China agreed in late 2025 to tighten controls on designated chemicals and take measures to curb the flow of fentanyl precursors. The United States subsequently reduced part of its fentanyl-related tariff burden. But the issue remains active. China has introduced additional export controls on precursor chemicals ahead of Xi's visit, showing that the subject remains part of the wider economic relationship. Also read | Trump signs Greenland security deal with Denmark, paving way for two new US military bases Iran sanctions add another layer The Iran conflict is not traditionally a US-China trade dispute, but it is increasingly tied to the economic relationship. The Trump administration's sanctions campaign against Iran has put pressure on Chinese companies and financial institutions that conduct business with Tehran. Washington has so far avoided directly targeting Beijing, but US officials have held discussions with their Chinese counterparts over the issue. Bessent said the subject was raised during recent talks with Chinese officials and that Chinese financial authorities had been engaged in discussions. That creates another potential point of friction just as Washington is trying to preserve its trade truce with Beijing. What is at stake at the Trump-Xi meeting? The US and China remain deeply economically intertwined despite the trade war. US goods trade with China totalled $414.6 billion in 2025, while services trade added another $80 billion, according to US government figures. The US goods deficit with China was $202.7 billion that year. The immediate issue is whether the two leaders can keep the current truce from unravelling before its November 10 expiry. Beyond that lies a much harder question: whether the world's two largest economies can manage their competition without repeatedly returning to tariffs, export controls and retaliatory measures.

Donald Trump and Xi Jinping meet in Washington on Thursday with a fragile US-China trade truce at stake. Tariffs remain unresolved, but rare earths, farm purchases, semiconductors, AI and Iran sanctions could make the talks far more complicated.

Trump-Xi Jinping Meeting 2026: What are the biggest trade disputes between the US and China?