• Wion
  • /India News
  • /Is relentless coverage on coronavirus pandemic spreading gloominess?

Is relentless coverage on coronavirus pandemic spreading gloominess?

Is relentless coverage on coronavirus pandemic spreading gloominess?

A paramedic uses an oximeter to check the oxygen level of a patient inside an ambulance while waiting to enter a COVID-19 hospital for treatment, amidst the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Ahmedabad, India

There are a string of stories attached to thecoronavirus pandemic but they have been highlighted by the fourth pillar of society, that is, media.

Journalists have been the invisible front-line workers of this pandemic. While viewers havestayed home,reporters ventured out to report the latest developments about the novel coronavirus.

Whether it was the first wave of the pandemic or the second, the news is always on the top ofthe agenda.Every day of the last year, WION'steam cameto work, riskingthemselves and their families to tell the stories that need to be shared.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

However, there are some people whowant rosier pictures and positive spins.Whatsapp forwards ask toquarantine the media because they spread negativity. But the media did not create the pandemic, itonly reports it.

There is a direct link between the content you consume and your mental space.

There are people who say that relentless reporting on the second wave - is spreading negativity.

More than 3,000 Indians are dying every day from the coronavirus.It reinforces the seriousness of thepandemic.

The media regularly answers a series of most frequently asked questions. However, there are people who take it too far andspread fear, panic, and misinformation.

The media can play a positive role by checking facts and busting myths by avoidinga half-baked approach.

Knowledge is power and can act as thebiggest weapon to combat COVID-19.

The more viewers know about the pandemic,the better equipped they areto face it.

Today the matter reached the apex court of India, that is the Supreme Court.

Is the pandemic coverage too negative?

The Supreme Court of India said that thefree flow of information must continue.It slammed the clampdown on social media posts and accounts asking for help and said that it wouldamount to contempt of court.

The second instance was on reporting discussions inside court rooms.

A few days back,the Madras High Court came down heavily on the Election Commission.

The court said the EC should be booked for murder for its negligence.

The EC went to the Supreme Court and said the media should be prevented from covering this bit of news.

The top court flatly rejected this. It said such reportage was in public interest...

It gives the mediano joy to tell viewers these stories of suffering. But the reality is that India is suffering.

If the pandemic coverage is genuinely affecting the mental space of viewers they canswitch off the television or avoid reading news.But remember, this is not the same as ignorance. The media cannotpretend the pandemic doesn't exist.

So WIONwill keep beaming these images of long lines outside hospitals, signboardsthat say 'no oxygen', and people walking around without masks. These are supposed to be a constant reminder of how serious our problem is. Aconstant reminder to the governments that theyneed to act urgently.

When millions of your countrymen are suffering, is positivity even possible?

The news reflects the ground situation, and the ground situation right now is completely negative.