Consequences of BREXIT

Britain would no longer be subject to EU budget rules and it would be able to run shortfalls with no admonishment from European Commission. Photograph:( Getty )

WION New Delhi, India Jun 24, 2016, 07.27 AM (IST)
Britain is expected to submit an application to leave the European Union (EU) following Thursday's referendum, after which it would have two years to negotiate an exit. Below are possible consequences for Britain and the EU of a Brexit.


Britain would no longer be subject to EU budget rules, which limit a government's budget deficit to 3 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and public debt to 60 per cent of GDP. It could therefore run whatever budget shortfall it wants without admonishment from the European Commission and other EU ministers. It would also be free from the Commission's monitoring and advice on future actions.


Financial services firms based in Britain, from banks to clearing houses and funds, could lose their money-spinning EU "passports", which allows them to sell services across the 28-nation bloc with low costs and a single set of rules.

The passporting system has contributed to making London one of the world's most important financial centres. UK has been a gateway to European financial market for Non-EU banks based in UK. Some American, Japanese and other non-European banks that have European headquarters in London have said they would consider moving parts of their business inside the European Union, in the event of a BREXIT.

Capital Requirement regulations is legislated through Financial Conduct Authority Handbook and Prudential Regulation Authority Handbook. BREXIT would not likely cause any immediate change in these requirements, however, a certain divergence might be expected in the future.

Individuals and Corporates are covered under EU's insolvency regulations. This is relevant to banks in their dealings with their borrowers with operations in Member States of EU. Unless replaced by an alternative agreement with the EU or individual EU Member State, banks lending to such borrowers who take enforcement proceedings and/or institute insolvency proceedings in the UK, may find themselves exposed to the risk of competing insolvency proceedings being commenced in one or more other jurisdictions and of not being able to rely on the primacy of the UK proceedings.

Market volatility has caused concerns among borrowers for being exposed to lending risks.

BREXIT would have an impact on capital market instruments. The bond instruments issued in UK, may be amended by borrowers given the conditions in UK post BREXIT. Amendments in syndicate agreements would be costly and ineffective as decisions would be delayed and inadequate.


The rest of the EU has a trade surplus in goods of about 100 billion Euros ($110 billion) with Britain, while Britain exports some 20 billion Euros in services than it imports, principally due to financial services.

BREXIT campaigners say if would be in the EU's interest to agree a free trade deal with Britain even if it leaves the bloc.

However, there tends to be more of a focus on goods than services in free trade deals. Switzerland, where financial services are a larger share of GDP than in Britain, has no general access to EU financial service markets and runs a financial services trade deficit with the bloc.


British companies acquiring EU peers would still need approval from the UK competition watchdog and the European Commission, resulting in more legal costs and the risk that each delivers a different ruling.

Britain will have a free hand to aid ailing companies or industries without fear of EU action but it will also not be able to oppose subsidies granted by EU governments to their own national champions.


Leaving the EU could make UK energy infrastructure investment costlier and delay new projects at a time when the country needs to plug a looming electricity supply gap.

The uncertainty after BREXIT could make energy investors demand higher returns for the risk of less favourable conditions. Oil and gas majors, BP and Shell are among energy companies who warned about the potential downside.


Britain is the second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases in Europe and its utilities are among the largest buyers of carbon permits in the EU Emission Trading System (ETS).

Although most analysts believe Britain will remain in the cap-and-trade scheme, the vote is viewed as bearish for the market as Britain would no longer be able to drive tough reforms to drive up the price.

BREXIT would also disrupt the bloc's plans to share out the burden of its Paris climate change pledge.

The environmentally minded also worry that EU climate targets would be less ambitious without British leadership to balance against more reluctant member states such as coal-dependent Poland.


A BREXIT could call into question EU agreements on open airspace that have granted the region's airlines unlimited access to the skies of fellow member states, benefiting both UK and EU airlines.

It would also affect transatlantic routes because of the EU-U.S. Open Skies agreement, which gives British airlines unlimited flying rights to the United States.


Along with France, Britain is the leading foreign policy power in the EU, boasting a large military and close ties with the United States. After a BREXIT, Washington has made clear it will be less interested in London as an ally because of a perceived loss of influence.

Britain would no longer be bound by joint EU positions, for instance on economic sanctions against Russia. Britain would remain a member of NATO.


Britain has multiple exemptions from justice and home affairs policies, notably not being part of bloc's Schengen zone of free travel.

It is not clear what restrictions Britain might place on foreign arrivals. The EU has vowed to respond in kind.

Britain currently recognises other EU members' arrest warrants, exchanges police information, including personal data, and is a member of the bloc's police agency Europol. Its future involvement, including access to EU databases, could diminish, meaning less cooperation on policing and fighting crime.


With the impact of BREXIT on several sectors of UK, Britain's biggest banks have put forward their list of demands to the politicians.

1. Exit from the EU should be made smoothly over time, so there is no change over time

2. UK should negotiate to attain a mechanism similar to the passport regime, so that UK operating firms have access to continental market

3. Promote competitiveness of London financial market implying that the UK politicians should promote a level playing field in global financial regulation, throwing the UK fully into a leading role in the G20, Financial Stability Board, Basel Committee, World Bank and International Monetary Fund. It also means slashing red tape.

4. Banks and finance firms are keen to ensure that the finance sector is not cut off from the international jobs market. This implies that Britain should press the case for continued access to skilled talent from the EU and the rest of the world in order to boost the UK’s competitiveness. The banks are also lobbying for accommodating immigration rules.


Australia lost $56 billion in a day after BREXIT result was clear.

Asian stocks are dumped as Global economic conditions remain uncertain.

Wall Street and British Sterling also observed a slump. 

For markets, BREXIT signals failure of monetary policy and change in political attitude that may encourage governments around the world pursue more inward-looking policies,thus, restricting free flow of trade and finance. 

(With inputs from Reuters)