Amid the US blockade of sanctioned Venezuelan oil tankers, President Nicolás Maduro has ordered the Navy to escort the country’s oil tankers. This came as reports said President Donald Trump wants US oil firms to enter the Latin American country’s energy market. These developments, amid the escalating so-called anti-narcotics raids on Venezuelan ships, are leading to strong suspicions that the tensions are actually about oil, in order to force the entry of American oil giants. If that happens, it wouldn’t be the first time. American energy companies were in Venezuela a century ago, and stayed there for decades, before being thrown out after exploitative practices that drained the nation’s resources while the people did not benefit. Here is the story of American oil firms in Venezuela.
What the reports said about re-entry of American oil firms in Venezuela
Trump administration is clearly planning for a post-Maduro Venezuela, in which US oil companies might enter the nation's energy market. The Politico reported that the Trump administration has been asking US oil companies if they would consider returning to Venezuela if Maduro were no longer in power. It said the White House has reached out privately to US oil firms to gauge interest in returning to Venezuelan oil production if Maduro falls or flees. The firms have reportedly declined, citing political risk, low oil prices, and the deterioration of Venezuela’s oil infrastructure.
US oil firms were in Venezuela nearly a century ago
Oil was discovered in Venezuela more than a century ago, mainly starting from the Maracaibo Basin in 1914. Since then, Standard Oil - which later became ExxonMobil - Gulf Oil, and other major oil firms dominated Venezuela’s energy industry for decades. By the 1930s, mostly American and some British-Dutch oil firms controlled nearly 98 per cent of Venezuela’s production.
Trending Stories
When American oil profits went to the US
When American companies operated in Venezuela, their profits were repatriated to the US, with almost no significant reinvestment in local development or infrastructure. It became clear to Venezuelans that the oil wealth was only benefiting foreign shareholders rather than local populations. Neither the local communities, nor the Venezuelan state receive much benefit, and the resentment led to nationalist sentiments.
Poor treatment of labour, environmental and social damage
The American and other oil firms in Venezuela had a poor track record on labour relations. The oil extraction was causing pollution, and water sources were contaminated. Local farming and fishing communities bore the brunt. In the 1920s and 1930s, several complaints were made about destroyed freshwater supplies and impacts on indigenous and rural populations.
Authoritarian rulers gave favourable concessions
Under dictator Juan Vicente Gómez (1908–1935), American companies received generous terms and conditions to operate, including low taxation and large land concessions. This was part of the larger corruption of the dictatorship, which was propped up by foreign powers as it submitted to their interests.
1940s reforms and nationalisation
In 1943, Venezuela introduced a Hydrocarbons Law. This made sure that the government got 50 per cent of the energy profits, in the first move towards greater government control.
In 1976, Venezuela moved for full nationalisation of oil under President Carlos Andrés Pérez and created PDVSA (Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A.). This effectively started the end of foreign energy dominance.
Under the socialist leader Hugo Chávez, the contracts with US companies, which they said was bringing investment and technology to Venezuela, were scrapped. The nationalisation was further strengthened during the 2007–2010 Chávez era, in which the government sought majority control in joint ventures with multinationals.
Venezuela viewed this as a sovereign right over its resources; while Chavez supporters saw it as correcting historical exploitation. These policies were continued by Maduro, who came to power after Chavez died of cancer.
The ouster and arbitration fights of American oil giants in Venezuela
Some US companies like Chevron agreed and stayed, but others, mainly ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips, refused, and their assets were seized. This led to major arbitration disputes, with the companies alleging that there were expropriations without adequate compensation.
As Venezuela offered only limited payouts, the companies claimed billions of dollars in losses. After many years of disputes, international tribunals ruled in favour of the firms, with ExxonMobil winning some $1.6 billion in compensation in 2014, while ConocoPhillips won nearly $8.7 billion in 2019. But much of this compensation is yet to be paid.
Chevron is the only major US firm in Venezuela
Chevron continued to operate in Venezuela through joint ventures with PDVSA. There is criticism that this money helped the Maduro regime. US sanctions waivers in past years allowed limited operations of some American companies. Trump revoked some of the waivers and is essentially blockading the oil trade of Venezuela to pressure Maduro.
It is true that foreign companies built the oil industry of Venezuela. The US views nationalisations as theft of investments, but these investments often came at the expense of the welfare Venezeualans.

&imwidth=800&imheight=600&format=webp&quality=medium)
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
)
)
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
)
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
)
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))
&im=FitAndFill=(700,400))







