• Wion
  • /World
  • /Japanese Supreme Court deems sterilisation as precondition for sex-change unconstitutional

Japanese Supreme Court deems sterilisation as precondition for sex-change unconstitutional

Japanese Supreme Court deems sterilisation as precondition for sex-change unconstitutional

Court

Japan's Supreme Court has said that a law that requires transgender people in the country to undergo sterilisation before gender-change surgery is unconstitutional, reported Nikkei newspaper.

The strilisation requirement was previously denounced by several international organisations including the European court of human rights saying that such a condition was discriminatory and infringed upon human rights.

The Japanese Supreme Court's grand bench consisting 15 justices deemed the condition to sterilise unconstitutional. The court had ruled in 2019 that the requirement was constitutional.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

Although the latest decision was welcomed by rights groups, the judges' decision to ask a lower court to deliberate on a separate clause has led to disappointment. This clause requires that genitals of the people who want to change gender resemble those of the gender they wish to change into.

“This decision was very unexpected and I’m very surprised,” The Guardian quoted the unnamed plaintiff who it said was a transgender woman under the age of 50.

Human Rights Watch (HRW) said that the government must now follow up.

“The government is under the obligation to make any laws constitutional so the government now needs to act quickly to remove the clause,” said Kanae Doi, director of HRW in Japan.

The law in Japan mandates that people wishing to undergo sex-change should present diagnosis of gender dysphoria and in addition meet five requirements.

These are,

-Being at least 18 years old.

-Being unmarried

-Not having children who are underage.

-Having genitals that resemble those of the opposite gender.

-Not having reproduction glands or having ones which have lost function permanently.

The lawyers for the plaintiff said that the last two requirement were violative of the plaintiff's constitutional right of pursuit of happiness and living without discrimination.

Transgender rights have remained a controversial issue in Japan.