US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 29) announced that a purchaser had been identified for social media app TikTok, which is on the brink of being banned in the United States because it is owned by a Chinese company, and vowed to reveal the buyer in two weeks.&nbsp;"We have a buyer for TikTok," US President Donald Trump was quoted saying in an interview on Fox's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, adding that Chinese President Xi Jinping "will probably do it."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-pressure-on-the-aggressor-is-needed-zelensky-urges-us-support-after-russia-launches-biggest-aerial-attack-1751202156102">'Pressure on the aggressor is needed': Zelensky urges US support after Russia launches 'biggest aerial attack'</a>&nbsp;Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump said that he will grant TikTok another new 90-day reprieve to look for a non-Chinese buyer, the White House announced on Tuesday (Jun2 18), the third time he has deferred a threatened ban on the video-sharing app. A federal law mandating the sale or ban of TikTok on national security grounds was set to come into effect on the eve of Trump's inauguration in January.&nbsp;"President Trump will be issuing yet another Executive Order later this week to continue keeping TikTok operational. As he has stated numerous times, President Trump doesn't want TikTok to go dark," Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a release. "This extension will be 90 days, during which the administration will be working to see this deal closed so the American people can continue to use TikTok knowing that their data is protected and secure."&nbsp;Trump, whose 2024 re-election campaign had been dependent on social media, previously stated he liked the video-sharing app. "I have a small warm place in my heart for TikTok," Trump told NBC News in an early May interview. "If it requires an extension, I'd be happy to extend it."

We have a buyer for TikTok says Trump withholds buyers name

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 29) announced that a purchaser had been identified for social media app TikTok, which is on the brink of being banned in the United States because it is owned by a Chinese company, and vowed to reveal the buyer in two weeks. "We have a buyer for TikTok," US President Donald Trump was quoted saying in an interview on Fox's Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo, adding that Chinese President Xi Jinping "will probably do it." Also Read: 'Pressure on the aggressor is needed': Zelensky urges US support after Russia launches 'biggest aerial attack' Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump said that he will grant TikTok another new 90-day reprieve to look for a non-Chinese buyer, the White House announced on Tuesday (Jun2 18), the third time he has deferred a threatened ban on the video-sharing app. A federal law mandating the sale or ban of TikTok on national security grounds was set to come into effect on the eve of Trump's inauguration in January. "President Trump will be issuing yet another Executive Order later this week to continue keeping TikTok operational. As he has stated numerous times, President Trump doesn't want TikTok to go dark," Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a release. "This extension will be 90 days, during which the administration will be working to see this deal closed so the American people can continue to use TikTok knowing that their data is protected and secure." Trump, whose 2024 re-election campaign had been dependent on social media, previously stated he liked the video-sharing app. "I have a small warm place in my heart for TikTok," Trump told NBC News in an early May interview. "If it requires an extension, I'd be happy to extend it."

The US president signed an executive order on June 19 to extend the deadline for TikTok's closure by another 90 days

'We have a buyer for TikTok', says Trump; withholds buyer’s name

Elon Musk launched a fresh wave of criticism against President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation on June 28, calling the Senate’s revised 940-page bill “utterly insane and destructive”. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO warned that the legislation would lead to “immense strategic harm” and cost millions of American jobs. “The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!” Musk wrote on X. “It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.”The Senate is working through the weekend in a race against time, as Republicans aim to pass the bill before Trump’s self-imposed Independence Day deadline. The newly released 940-page draft includes significant changes from the House version passed last month by a single vote. In a bid to satisfy budget rules and shore up wavering GOP (Grand Old Party) support, the updated bill features steeper cuts to Medicaid, reworked tax provisions, and modified timelines for phasing out clean energy subsidies.A central criticism of the bill, including from some Republicans, is its projected $3 trillion increase to the federal deficit over the next decade, as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). While the GOP holds a majority in both chambers, the bill has sparked internal divisions, particularly over its deep spending cuts and subsidies for fossil fuel sectors, including a new credit for coal used in steel production.<h2>Musk’s energy interests in the crosshairs</h2>Musk’s criticism highlights the bill’s potential blow to clean energy sectors. The legislation includes provisions that would raise taxes on solar, battery, wind, geothermal, and nuclear energy projects, areas central to Tesla’s energy business. He warned that the bill would undermine America’s future industries while artificially propping up outdated sectors like coal.One controversial inclusion: a subsidy for coal used in steel production. Simultaneously, the Senate version proposes a gradual rollback of clean energy tax credits, offering reduced incentives through 2027 before eliminating them entirely in 2028.Tesla produces battery storage systems and solar photovoltaic solutions, and Musk warned the bill could cripple innovation just as global demand for clean tech is growing. “This is political suicide for the Republican Party,” he later added, warning of long-term consequences.<h2>A feud rekindled</h2>Musk’s remarks come just weeks after a public fallout with President Trump, sparked by the tech magnate’s earlier denunciation of the bill as a “disgusting abomination”. Musk, a major GOP donor who once led the now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), briefly reconciled with Trump after walking back some of his harsher posts.However, the comments suggest renewed tensions. Musk previously threatened to withhold political donations and called out lawmakers who supported the legislation, accusing them of betraying the American public.In a particularly heated exchange earlier this month, Musk insinuated Trump was connected to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, an allegation made without evidence. While both parties had attempted to move past the dispute, it remains unclear whether Musk’s latest broadside will rupture the uneasy peace.<h2>What else is inside the new draft?</h2>The latest version includes a swathe of policy changes designed to appease various GOP factions:Social security tax breaks: The Senate bill enhances tax deductions for seniors, raising the amount from $4,000 (in the House version) to $6,000. However, these benefits taper off for higher-income individuals.Medicaid overhaul: The Senate draft imposes the strictest-ever work requirements on enrollees, including adults with children aged 15 and over. It also reduces provider taxes from 6 per cent to 3.5 per cent by 2031, although a $25 billion rural hospital fund was added to placate critics.SNAP restrictions: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps) would see new work requirements for childless, able-bodied adults, and states would be required to contribute more funding.Overtime and tips tax relief: The Senate version retains the House’s promise to eliminate taxes on overtime pay and tips—a key Trump campaign pledge—but phases out the benefit for individuals earning over $150,000.Child tax credit: The Senate proposes a permanent increase to $2,200 (versus $2,500 in the House bill) and lowers eligibility thresholds by requiring only one parent to have a Social Security number.State and local tax (SALT) cap: To win over moderates, the cap on SALT deductions would rise from $10,000 to $40,000 for joint filers under $500,000 income, but only until 2030.<h2>Activist backlash</h2>Tesla shares fell 14 per cent following Musk’s initial attacks on the bill, as Trump hinted at reconsidering government contracts involving Musk’s companies. Meanwhile, activist groups organised “anti-celebration” protests on Musk’s 54th birthday, condemning his links to the Trump administration and far-right political elements in Europe.Democrats, though largely sidelined in the process, have lambasted the bill. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labelled it a “reckless, regressive and reprehensible GOP tax scam” and vowed to use it as campaign fodder in next year’s midterms.Trump, meanwhile, has taken to social media to push for swift passage: “It’s time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work and send this bill to my desk as soon as possible!”

Elon Musk says GOP megabill will destroy jobs and hurt innovation as the legislation proposes provisions that would raise taxes on solar, battery, wind, geothermal, and nuclear energy projects.

Elon Musk launched a fresh wave of criticism against President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending legislation on June 28, calling the Senate’s revised 940-page bill “utterly insane and destructive”. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO warned that the legislation would lead to “immense strategic harm” and cost millions of American jobs. “The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!” Musk wrote on X. “It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.” The Senate is working through the weekend in a race against time, as Republicans aim to pass the bill before Trump’s self-imposed Independence Day deadline. The newly released 940-page draft includes significant changes from the House version passed last month by a single vote. In a bid to satisfy budget rules and shore up wavering GOP (Grand Old Party) support, the updated bill features steeper cuts to Medicaid, reworked tax provisions, and modified timelines for phasing out clean energy subsidies. A central criticism of the bill, including from some Republicans, is its projected $3 trillion increase to the federal deficit over the next decade, as estimated by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). While the GOP holds a majority in both chambers, the bill has sparked internal divisions, particularly over its deep spending cuts and subsidies for fossil fuel sectors, including a new credit for coal used in steel production. Musk’s energy interests in the crosshairs Musk’s criticism highlights the bill’s potential blow to clean energy sectors. The legislation includes provisions that would raise taxes on solar, battery, wind, geothermal, and nuclear energy projects, areas central to Tesla’s energy business. He warned that the bill would undermine America’s future industries while artificially propping up outdated sectors like coal. One controversial inclusion: a subsidy for coal used in steel production. Simultaneously, the Senate version proposes a gradual rollback of clean energy tax credits, offering reduced incentives through 2027 before eliminating them entirely in 2028. Tesla produces battery storage systems and solar photovoltaic solutions, and Musk warned the bill could cripple innovation just as global demand for clean tech is growing. “This is political suicide for the Republican Party,” he later added, warning of long-term consequences. A feud rekindled Musk’s remarks come just weeks after a public fallout with President Trump, sparked by the tech magnate’s earlier denunciation of the bill as a “disgusting abomination”. Musk, a major GOP donor who once led the now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), briefly reconciled with Trump after walking back some of his harsher posts. However, the comments suggest renewed tensions. Musk previously threatened to withhold political donations and called out lawmakers who supported the legislation, accusing them of betraying the American public. In a particularly heated exchange earlier this month, Musk insinuated Trump was connected to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, an allegation made without evidence. While both parties had attempted to move past the dispute, it remains unclear whether Musk’s latest broadside will rupture the uneasy peace. What else is inside the new draft? The latest version includes a swathe of policy changes designed to appease various GOP factions: Social security tax breaks: The Senate bill enhances tax deductions for seniors, raising the amount from $4,000 (in the House version) to $6,000. However, these benefits taper off for higher-income individuals. Medicaid overhaul: The Senate draft imposes the strictest-ever work requirements on enrollees, including adults with children aged 15 and over. It also reduces provider taxes from 6 per cent to 3.5 per cent by 2031, although a $25 billion rural hospital fund was added to placate critics. SNAP restrictions: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (food stamps) would see new work requirements for childless, able-bodied adults, and states would be required to contribute more funding. Overtime and tips tax relief: The Senate version retains the House’s promise to eliminate taxes on overtime pay and tips—a key Trump campaign pledge—but phases out the benefit for individuals earning over $150,000. Child tax credit: The Senate proposes a permanent increase to $2,200 (versus $2,500 in the House bill) and lowers eligibility thresholds by requiring only one parent to have a Social Security number. State and local tax (SALT) cap: To win over moderates, the cap on SALT deductions would rise from $10,000 to $40,000 for joint filers under $500,000 income, but only until 2030. Activist backlash Tesla shares fell 14 per cent following Musk’s initial attacks on the bill, as Trump hinted at reconsidering government contracts involving Musk’s companies. Meanwhile, activist groups organised “anti-celebration” protests on Musk’s 54th birthday, condemning his links to the Trump administration and far-right political elements in Europe. Democrats, though largely sidelined in the process, have lambasted the bill. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labelled it a “reckless, regressive and reprehensible GOP tax scam” and vowed to use it as campaign fodder in next year’s midterms. Trump, meanwhile, has taken to social media to push for swift passage: “It’s time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work and send this bill to my desk as soon as possible!”

Elon Musk says GOP megabill will destroy jobs and hurt innovation as the legislation proposes provisions that would raise taxes on solar, battery, wind, geothermal, and nuclear energy projects.

Elon Musk slams Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ as Senate vote nears

Iran could begin enriching uranium again "in a matter of months," despite the damage to its nuclear facilities from recent US and Israeli airstrikes, the head of the UN's atomic watchdog said on Saturday (Jun 28). In an interview, Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said Iran retained the capacity to resume parts of its nuclear programme sooner than many expected. Even as US President Donald Trump and his administration continue to claim that Iran's nuclear sites were "obliterated" and its programme set back by "decades", Grossi in an ominous warning said "some is still standing" and that Tehran could be producing enriched uranium soon.<h2>IAEA chief's warning</h2>Speaking during an interview with CBS News, Rafael Grossi said that Iran "can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that".His remarks cast doubt on US President Donald Trump's repeated assertions that Iran's nuclear ambitions had been set back decades by the June 22 bombings, in which the US struck three Iranian sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Those strikes followed Israel's air campaign that began on June 13, targeting a dozen Iranian military and nuclear-related sites.Trump said the US attack, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer," used "bunker buster" bombs to obliterate Iran's underground enrichment infrastructure. But if Grossi is to be believed, "Some is still standing."Acknowledging concerns about the location of Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium — estimated at 408.6 kilograms, enriched to 60 per cent purity — which, if further refined, would be enough for nine nuclear bombs — the IAEA chief admitted: "We don't know where this material could be.""So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification," he added.His statement comes as Iranian lawmakers have voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, and Tehran has denied Grossi's request to inspect the bombed sites, particularly Fordow — the main uranium enrichment facility."We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened," noted Grossi.<h2>US backs IAEA's critical verification need</h2>Even as Grossi voiced uncertainty regarding claims that Iran moved its enriched uranium stockpile before US strikes, Trump denied that such a thing could happen. In an interview with Fox News, the POTUS insisted, "It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice...They didn't move anything."Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday expressed firm backing for the IAEA and its leadership amid threats from hardline Iranian lawmakers who have called for Grossi's arrest or even execution.Underscoring Washington's support for "the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran," he commended Grossi and his team for their "dedication and professionalism.""Calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of IAEA Director General Grossi are unacceptable and should be condemned," he added.

Even as US President Donald Trump and his administration continue to claim that Iran's nuclear sites were "obliterated" and its programme set back by "decades", Grossi in an ominous warning said "some is still standing" and that Tehran could be producing enriched uranium soon.

Iran could begin enriching uranium again "in a matter of months," despite the damage to its nuclear facilities from recent US and Israeli airstrikes, the head of the UN's atomic watchdog said on Saturday (Jun 28). In an interview, Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said Iran retained the capacity to resume parts of its nuclear programme sooner than many expected. Even as US President Donald Trump and his administration continue to claim that Iran's nuclear sites were "obliterated" and its programme set back by "decades", Grossi in an ominous warning said "some is still standing" and that Tehran could be producing enriched uranium soon. IAEA chief's warning Speaking during an interview with CBS News, Rafael Grossi said that Iran "can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that". His remarks cast doubt on US President Donald Trump's repeated assertions that Iran's nuclear ambitions had been set back decades by the June 22 bombings, in which the US struck three Iranian sites: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Those strikes followed Israel's air campaign that began on June 13, targeting a dozen Iranian military and nuclear-related sites. Trump said the US attack, dubbed "Operation Midnight Hammer," used "bunker buster" bombs to obliterate Iran's underground enrichment infrastructure. But if Grossi is to be believed, "Some is still standing." Acknowledging concerns about the location of Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium — estimated at 408.6 kilograms, enriched to 60 per cent purity — which, if further refined, would be enough for nine nuclear bombs — the IAEA chief admitted: "We don't know where this material could be." "So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification," he added. His statement comes as Iranian lawmakers have voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, and Tehran has denied Grossi's request to inspect the bombed sites, particularly Fordow — the main uranium enrichment facility. "We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened," noted Grossi. US backs IAEA's critical verification need Even as Grossi voiced uncertainty regarding claims that Iran moved its enriched uranium stockpile before US strikes, Trump denied that such a thing could happen. In an interview with Fox News, the POTUS insisted, "It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice...They didn't move anything." Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday expressed firm backing for the IAEA and its leadership amid threats from hardline Iranian lawmakers who have called for Grossi's arrest or even execution. Underscoring Washington's support for "the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran," he commended Grossi and his team for their "dedication and professionalism." "Calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of IAEA Director General Grossi are unacceptable and should be condemned," he added.

Even as US President Donald Trump and his administration continue to claim that Iran's nuclear sites were "obliterated" and its programme set back by "decades", Grossi in an ominous warning said "some is still standing" and that Tehran could be producing enriched uranium soon.

IAEA chief warns Iran can resume uranium enrichment 'in months,' counters Trump's 'obliterated' nuclear sites claim

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 29) once again slammed Israeli prosecutors over Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial, calling it a "political witch hunt." In a post on Truth Social, Trump stressed that it is "terrible" what they are doing to Netanyahu.Calling Netanyahu a "War Hero", Trump said that Netanyahu is a Prime Minister who did a "fabulous job working with the United States" to bring great success in getting rid of the dangerous nuclear threat in Iran.He further hinted that Netanyahu is right now in the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas, which will include getting the hostages back."How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING (Cigars, Bugs Bunny Doll, etc.). It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure. This travesty of “Justice” will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations," Trump wrote.He continued to slam the prosecutors, calling it "INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu."The United States of America spends billions of dollars a year, far more than on any other nation, protecting and supporting Israel, he said."We are not going to stand for this. We just had a Great Victory with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu at the helm — And this greatly tarnishes our Victory. LET BIBI GO, HE’S GOT A BIG JOB TO DO!," Trump said.Just days after the Israel-Iran war ended, Trump in another post wrote that Bibi and he just went through hell together, fighting a "very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran."He stressed that this is the first time a sitting Israeli prime minister has ever been on trial, a "politically motivated case, “concerning cigars, a Bugs Bunny doll, and numerous other unfair charges” in order to do him great harm. ""Bibi Netanyahu’s trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State," he said.&nbsp;

Calling Netanyahu a "War Hero", Trump said that Netanyahu is a Prime Minister who did a "fabulous job working with the United States" to bring great success in getting rid of the dangerous nuclear threat in Iran.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 29) once again slammed Israeli prosecutors over Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial, calling it a "political witch hunt." In a post on Truth Social, Trump stressed that it is "terrible" what they are doing to Netanyahu. Calling Netanyahu a "War Hero", Trump said that Netanyahu is a Prime Minister who did a "fabulous job working with the United States" to bring great success in getting rid of the dangerous nuclear threat in Iran. He further hinted that Netanyahu is right now in the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas, which will include getting the hostages back. "How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING (Cigars, Bugs Bunny Doll, etc.). It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure. This travesty of “Justice” will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations," Trump wrote. He continued to slam the prosecutors, calling it "INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu." The United States of America spends billions of dollars a year, far more than on any other nation, protecting and supporting Israel, he said. "We are not going to stand for this. We just had a Great Victory with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu at the helm — And this greatly tarnishes our Victory. LET BIBI GO, HE’S GOT A BIG JOB TO DO!," Trump said. Just days after the Israel-Iran war ended, Trump in another post wrote that Bibi and he just went through hell together, fighting a "very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran." He stressed that this is the first time a sitting Israeli prime minister has ever been on trial, a "politically motivated case, “concerning cigars, a Bugs Bunny doll, and numerous other unfair charges” in order to do him great harm. " "Bibi Netanyahu’s trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State," he said.

Calling Netanyahu a "War Hero", Trump said that Netanyahu is a Prime Minister who did a "fabulous job working with the United States" to bring great success in getting rid of the dangerous nuclear threat in Iran.

'LET BIBI GO': Trump slams Israel's prosecutors over Netanyahu corruption trial, calls it 'POLITICAL WITCH HUNT'

Eric Trump has suggested that he, or another member of the Trump family, could run for president in the future, saying the road to the White House would be an “easy one” if he chose to take it.In a recent interview with the Financial Times, the 41-year-old, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/khamenei-left-out-of-iran-israel-ceasefire-report-claims-tehran-agreed-to-trump-s-offer-without-consulting-supreme-leader-1751113614134">Khamenei left out? Iran agreed to ceasefire without consulting Supreme Leader</a>“The real question is: ‘Do you want to drag other members of your family into it?’ … Would I want my kids to live the same experience over the last decade that I’ve lived?” he said.“You know, if the answer was yes, I think the political path would be an easy one, meaning, I think I could do it. And by the way, I think other members of our family could do it too.”<h2>Politics might run in the family</h2>Unlike his siblings, Donald Jr. and Ivanka Trump, Eric has largely stayed out of the political spotlight. He has focused instead on the family’s business empire since his father first entered the White House in 2017.However, he admitted he’s kept a close watch on politics and said he’s not impressed by many of the people in office. “I’ve found myself wholly unimpressed by half the politicians I’ve seen. I think I could do the job very effectively,” he said.When asked whether the 2024 election would be the last time a Trump name appeared on the ballot, he left the door open. “I don’t know … Time will tell. But there are more people than just me,” he added. Still, he acknowledged the toll public life has taken on his family.“The question is, do you want to do it? And do you want to subject the people that you love to the brutality of this system? And I’m not sure if I can answer that question yet,” Eric said.<h2>“We didn’t profit from politics,” says Eric Trump</h2>Eric Trump also addressed long-standing accusations that the Trump family has used politics for personal profit. “If there’s one family that hasn’t profited off politics, it’s the Trump family,” he said. He argued that the presidency had actually cost the family.“In fact, I would sit there and say that we [would have] had many more zeros behind our name had my father not run in the first place. The opportunity cost, the legal cost, the toll it’s taken on our family has been astronomical,” Trump said.According to Eric, the family has spent close to $500 million defending themselves from what he called “Russia shams, fake hoaxes, [and] dirty dossiers about the unthinkable”.

Eric Trump, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost.

Eric Trump has suggested that he, or another member of the Trump family, could run for president in the future, saying the road to the White House would be an “easy one” if he chose to take it. In a recent interview with the Financial Times, the 41-year-old, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost. Also read: Khamenei left out? Iran agreed to ceasefire without consulting Supreme Leader “The real question is: ‘Do you want to drag other members of your family into it?’ … Would I want my kids to live the same experience over the last decade that I’ve lived?” he said. “You know, if the answer was yes, I think the political path would be an easy one, meaning, I think I could do it. And by the way, I think other members of our family could do it too.” Politics might run in the family Unlike his siblings, Donald Jr. and Ivanka Trump, Eric has largely stayed out of the political spotlight. He has focused instead on the family’s business empire since his father first entered the White House in 2017. However, he admitted he’s kept a close watch on politics and said he’s not impressed by many of the people in office. “I’ve found myself wholly unimpressed by half the politicians I’ve seen. I think I could do the job very effectively,” he said. When asked whether the 2024 election would be the last time a Trump name appeared on the ballot, he left the door open. “I don’t know … Time will tell. But there are more people than just me,” he added. Still, he acknowledged the toll public life has taken on his family. “The question is, do you want to do it? And do you want to subject the people that you love to the brutality of this system? And I’m not sure if I can answer that question yet,” Eric said. “We didn’t profit from politics,” says Eric Trump Eric Trump also addressed long-standing accusations that the Trump family has used politics for personal profit. “If there’s one family that hasn’t profited off politics, it’s the Trump family,” he said. He argued that the presidency had actually cost the family. “In fact, I would sit there and say that we [would have] had many more zeros behind our name had my father not run in the first place. The opportunity cost, the legal cost, the toll it’s taken on our family has been astronomical,” Trump said. According to Eric, the family has spent close to $500 million defending themselves from what he called “Russia shams, fake hoaxes, [and] dirty dossiers about the unthinkable”.

Eric Trump, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost.

Trump’s son for president next? Eric Trump hints at White House run, says it would ‘be easy’

The US Supreme Court decision on Thursday (June 26) gave a major boost to the nation's Grand Old Party as it pushes to enforce the Executive Order to end birthright citizenship. It limited the power of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions, a legal tool earlier used by the courts to limit enforcement. However, this does not solidify the attempt of the Trump administration to scrap birthright citizenship; it only means that the executive order will be revisited in the lower court again. So the ultimate fate of the policy remains uncertain.&nbsp;<h2>What is Birthright Citizenship?</h2>"All persons born or naturalised in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,” 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. It grants automatic citizenship to the children born within the US jurisdiction. This was done especially to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship.&nbsp;<h2>What is the Executive Order?</h2>Executive Order 14160, signed by US President Donald Trump, aims to end automatic citizenship granted to the children born in the US to undocumented migrants and temporary visa holders. Multiple lower courts quickly issued injunctions to block the order. However, Thursday's Supreme Court ruling limits the scope of such injections issued by the lower courts.<h2>What is next?</h2>Democratic leader Chuck Schumer wrote in a post on X, “an unprecedented and terrifying step toward authoritarianism, a grave danger to our democracy, and a predictable move from this extremist MAGA court.”Trump called it a “monumental victory for the Constitution," the separation of powers and the rule of law.&nbsp;The Justices agreed that courts were issuing orders that overreach to everyone instead of the parties involved in the court. There had been 40 such orders since Trump took office for his second term.The court's ruling gives a 30-day grace period for the enforcement of the policy. It is up to the lower courts how they interpret the ruling and tailor their orders to comply with it. But jurisdictions without any active challenge will be able to enforce the policy. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal Justice of the Supreme Court, warns that this justice will result in a patchwork of citizenship. This will lead to a “fractured identity of citizenship” between the 22 states that sued and the rest of the country. So the rights of a newborn will vary within the country depending on the zip code.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Following Thursday's ruling of the Supreme Court Trump administration has received a major boost in its attempt to enforce the Executive Order to end birthright citizenship in America. But the ultimate fate of the policy remains uncertain.

The US Supreme Court decision on Thursday (June 26) gave a major boost to the nation's Grand Old Party as it pushes to enforce the Executive Order to end birthright citizenship. It limited the power of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions, a legal tool earlier used by the courts to limit enforcement. However, this does not solidify the attempt of the Trump administration to scrap birthright citizenship; it only means that the executive order will be revisited in the lower court again. So the ultimate fate of the policy remains uncertain. What is Birthright Citizenship? "All persons born or naturalised in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,” 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. It grants automatic citizenship to the children born within the US jurisdiction. This was done especially to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship. What is the Executive Order? Executive Order 14160, signed by US President Donald Trump, aims to end automatic citizenship granted to the children born in the US to undocumented migrants and temporary visa holders. Multiple lower courts quickly issued injunctions to block the order. However, Thursday's Supreme Court ruling limits the scope of such injections issued by the lower courts. What is next? Democratic leader Chuck Schumer wrote in a post on X, “an unprecedented and terrifying step toward authoritarianism, a grave danger to our democracy, and a predictable move from this extremist MAGA court.” Trump called it a “monumental victory for the Constitution," the separation of powers and the rule of law. The Justices agreed that courts were issuing orders that overreach to everyone instead of the parties involved in the court. There had been 40 such orders since Trump took office for his second term. The court's ruling gives a 30-day grace period for the enforcement of the policy. It is up to the lower courts how they interpret the ruling and tailor their orders to comply with it. But jurisdictions without any active challenge will be able to enforce the policy. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal Justice of the Supreme Court, warns that this justice will result in a patchwork of citizenship. This will lead to a “fractured identity of citizenship” between the 22 states that sued and the rest of the country. So the rights of a newborn will vary within the country depending on the zip code.

Following Thursday's ruling of the Supreme Court Trump administration has received a major boost in its attempt to enforce the Executive Order to end birthright citizenship in America. But the ultimate fate of the policy remains uncertain.

What does Supreme Court ruling mean for the birthright citizenship in America?

Russian President Vladimir Putin has signalled a shift in Moscow’s military spending strategy, announcing a planned cut in defence expenditure from next year. The statement, made during a press conference in Minsk, comes as NATO member states move in the opposite direction, agreeing to raise collective defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035. Putin acknowledged that Russia’s military budget, which currently stands at 6.3 per cent of GDP, 13.5 trillion rubles ($172 billion), which is unsustainable in the long term.&nbsp;<h2>Domestic pressures behind Moscow’s spending rethink</h2>&nbsp;“We paid for it with inflation, but now we are fighting this inflation,” he said, as reported by RT. Defence expenditure is expected to account for nearly a third of Russia’s 2025 federal budget, the highest since the Cold War. However, falling energy revenues, slowing growth, and a widening fiscal deficit have raised concerns in Moscow. The finance ministry has revised the 2025 budget deficit to 1.7 per cent of GDP, up from an earlier forecast of 0.5 per cent.&nbsp;Despite the announcement, Western analysts remain sceptical. Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia has significantly expanded military production and personnel recruitment, with defence plants operating at full capacity and financial incentives offered to boost enlistment. The suggestion of a cut, observers argue, may reflect more a rhetorical positioning than a confirmed policy shift.&nbsp;<h2>NATO’s new posture reflects strategic reset</h2>&nbsp;NATO leaders this week agreed on a sweeping new defence framework, raising the alliance’s target from 2 per cent to 5 per cent of GDP over the next decade. The plan allocates 3.5 per cent for core military capabilities and 1.5 per cent for broader security functions such as cyber defence, energy infrastructure, and logistical mobility. Speaking at the summit in The Hague, NATO officials said the move was essential to address the “long-term threat posed by Russia” and ensure alliance readiness in a more contested global environment.&nbsp;Putin criticised the decision, suggesting that the increased NATO spending would largely benefit the United States’ military-industrial complex. “Let them (NATO) spend. It won't make them safer, and it will hurt them socially and economically,” he said, according to RT. He added, “So who is preparing for some kind of aggressive actions? Us or them?”&nbsp;<h2>A fractured peace and uncertain calculations</h2>&nbsp;The divergence underscores the erosion of post–Cold War strategic stability. With negotiations between Russia and Ukraine stalled and no agreement on key territorial issues, the broader security architecture appears to be entering a new phase. While Russia seeks to ease budgetary strain, NATO's posture marks a firm commitment to long-term deterrence—one that may redefine European defence for the coming decade.&nbsp;

Putin acknowledged that Russia’s military budget, which currently stands at 6.3 per cent of GDP, 13.5 trillion rubles ($172 billion), which is unsustainable in the long term.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has signalled a shift in Moscow’s military spending strategy, announcing a planned cut in defence expenditure from next year. The statement, made during a press conference in Minsk, comes as NATO member states move in the opposite direction, agreeing to raise collective defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035. Putin acknowledged that Russia’s military budget, which currently stands at 6.3 per cent of GDP, 13.5 trillion rubles ($172 billion), which is unsustainable in the long term. Domestic pressures behind Moscow’s spending rethink “We paid for it with inflation, but now we are fighting this inflation,” he said, as reported by RT. Defence expenditure is expected to account for nearly a third of Russia’s 2025 federal budget, the highest since the Cold War. However, falling energy revenues, slowing growth, and a widening fiscal deficit have raised concerns in Moscow. The finance ministry has revised the 2025 budget deficit to 1.7 per cent of GDP, up from an earlier forecast of 0.5 per cent. Despite the announcement, Western analysts remain sceptical. Since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia has significantly expanded military production and personnel recruitment, with defence plants operating at full capacity and financial incentives offered to boost enlistment. The suggestion of a cut, observers argue, may reflect more a rhetorical positioning than a confirmed policy shift. NATO’s new posture reflects strategic reset NATO leaders this week agreed on a sweeping new defence framework, raising the alliance’s target from 2 per cent to 5 per cent of GDP over the next decade. The plan allocates 3.5 per cent for core military capabilities and 1.5 per cent for broader security functions such as cyber defence, energy infrastructure, and logistical mobility. Speaking at the summit in The Hague, NATO officials said the move was essential to address the “long-term threat posed by Russia” and ensure alliance readiness in a more contested global environment. Putin criticised the decision, suggesting that the increased NATO spending would largely benefit the United States’ military-industrial complex. “Let them (NATO) spend. It won't make them safer, and it will hurt them socially and economically,” he said, according to RT. He added, “So who is preparing for some kind of aggressive actions? Us or them?” A fractured peace and uncertain calculations The divergence underscores the erosion of post–Cold War strategic stability. With negotiations between Russia and Ukraine stalled and no agreement on key territorial issues, the broader security architecture appears to be entering a new phase. While Russia seeks to ease budgetary strain, NATO's posture marks a firm commitment to long-term deterrence—one that may redefine European defence for the coming decade.

Putin acknowledged that Russia’s military budget, which currently stands at 6.3 per cent of GDP, 13.5 trillion rubles ($172 billion), which is unsustainable in the long term.

Russia weighs military spending cuts as NATO targets 5% defence boost! Here’s why

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was not involved in approving the recent ceasefire agreement with Israel, according to a report by Iran International. The truce, reportedly proposed by US President Donald Trump, was approved by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and President Masoud Pezeshkian without consulting Khamenei.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-in-return-for-yellowcake-iran-ready-to-send-enriched-uranium-abroad-after-war-but-400kg-of-enriched-uranium-still-missing-1751111917685">'In return for yellowcake': Iran ready to send enriched uranium abroad after war</a>A source close to the deliberations told Iran International that the council had intended to respond quickly to the American offer. However, at the time, Khamenei could not be reached. The ceasefire decision was taken and conveyed without his knowledge.Meanwhile, Iran on Saturday (Jun 28) slammed US President Donald Trump for his "disrespectful and unacceptable" comments about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.Trump, in a social media post, claimed that he had saved Khamenei from being assassinated, only to be met, in his view, with "ingratitude". Trump's latest comments, posted on his Truth Social platform, he claimed he knew the exact location of Khamenei during the US strikes and had prevented both Israeli and US forces from taking action against the Iranian supreme leader."I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH," Trump wrote in all caps, adding that Khamenei "does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'."“But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more,” Trump added, exhorting Iran to return to the negotiating table.Slamming Trump, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on X said that if the President of the United States (POTUS) was "genuine" about wanting a deal, he should "put aside" his "disrespectful and unacceptable tone".On Thursday (June 26), Khamenei delivered his first public address since the truce took effect. In a televised message, he claimed victory over Israel and said the United States had “gained nothing”.“The Zionist regime, with all its noise and claims, was nearly brought to its knees. The United States gained nothing and received a harsh slap in return,” he said.<h2>Trump warns, then softens tone after ceasefire</h2>Before the ceasefire was announced, Trump had warned that the US knew Khamenei’s location, calling him an “easy target”. He also said American patience was wearing thin. “Regime change takes chaos,” Trump said. “We don’t want to see so much chaos, so we’ll see how it does.” Trump also confirmed plans for new talks with Iran in the coming week, as Washington looks to restart stalled nuclear negotiations.

Iran on Saturday (Jun 28) slammed US President Donald Trump for his "disrespectful and unacceptable" comments about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was not involved in approving the recent ceasefire agreement with Israel, according to a report by Iran International. The truce, reportedly proposed by US President Donald Trump, was approved by Iran’s Supreme National Security Council and President Masoud Pezeshkian without consulting Khamenei. Also read: 'In return for yellowcake': Iran ready to send enriched uranium abroad after war A source close to the deliberations told Iran International that the council had intended to respond quickly to the American offer. However, at the time, Khamenei could not be reached. The ceasefire decision was taken and conveyed without his knowledge. Meanwhile, Iran on Saturday (Jun 28) slammed US President Donald Trump for his "disrespectful and unacceptable" comments about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Trump, in a social media post, claimed that he had saved Khamenei from being assassinated, only to be met, in his view, with "ingratitude". Trump's latest comments, posted on his Truth Social platform, he claimed he knew the exact location of Khamenei during the US strikes and had prevented both Israeli and US forces from taking action against the Iranian supreme leader. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH," Trump wrote in all caps, adding that Khamenei "does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'." “But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more,” Trump added, exhorting Iran to return to the negotiating table. Slamming Trump, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on X said that if the President of the United States (POTUS) was "genuine" about wanting a deal, he should "put aside" his "disrespectful and unacceptable tone". On Thursday (June 26), Khamenei delivered his first public address since the truce took effect. In a televised message, he claimed victory over Israel and said the United States had “gained nothing”. “The Zionist regime, with all its noise and claims, was nearly brought to its knees. The United States gained nothing and received a harsh slap in return,” he said. Trump warns, then softens tone after ceasefire Before the ceasefire was announced, Trump had warned that the US knew Khamenei’s location, calling him an “easy target”. He also said American patience was wearing thin. “Regime change takes chaos,” Trump said. “We don’t want to see so much chaos, so we’ll see how it does.” Trump also confirmed plans for new talks with Iran in the coming week, as Washington looks to restart stalled nuclear negotiations.

Iran on Saturday (Jun 28) slammed US President Donald Trump for his "disrespectful and unacceptable" comments about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Was Khamenei left out of Iran-Israel ceasefire? Report claims Tehran agreed to Trump's offer without consulting Supreme Leader

Iran on Saturday (Jun 28) sharply rebuked US President Donald Trump for his "disrespectful and unacceptable" remarks about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The condemnation comes as Trump, in a social media post, claimed that he had saved Khamenei from being assassinated—only to be met, in his view, with "ingratitude". Trump's latest comments, posted on his Truth Social platform, sparked fury in Tehran. He claimed he knew the exact location of Khamenei during the US strikes and had prevented both Israeli and US forces from taking lethal action against the Iranian supreme leader."I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH," Trump wrote in all caps, adding that Khamenei "does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'."“But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more,” Trump added, exhorting Iran to return to the negotiating table.<h2>Araghchi slams Trump</h2>Slamming Trump, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on X said that if the President of the United States (POTUS) was "genuine" about wanting a deal, he should "put aside" his "disrespectful and unacceptable tone"."If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt supporters," he posted on his X account. Referring to the recent escalations in the region, the Iranian minister said that "The proud and resilient people of Iran," who forced the Israeli regime to "RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened" by Iranian missiles "do not take kindly to Threats and Insults".Soaring tensionsTensions have been soaring since the US joined Israel in coordinated airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities last weekend, marking a dramatic turn in the 12-day conflict that began on June 13. While the effectiveness of the strikes remains disputed, they mark the most direct American military action against Iran's nuclear infrastructure in years.

Slamming Trump, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on X said that if the President of the United States (POTUS) was "genuine" about wanting a deal, he should "put aside" his "disrespectful and unacceptable tone".

Iran on Saturday (Jun 28) sharply rebuked US President Donald Trump for his "disrespectful and unacceptable" remarks about Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The condemnation comes as Trump, in a social media post, claimed that he had saved Khamenei from being assassinated—only to be met, in his view, with "ingratitude". Trump's latest comments, posted on his Truth Social platform, sparked fury in Tehran. He claimed he knew the exact location of Khamenei during the US strikes and had prevented both Israeli and US forces from taking lethal action against the Iranian supreme leader. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH," Trump wrote in all caps, adding that Khamenei "does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'." “But no, instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more,” Trump added, exhorting Iran to return to the negotiating table. Araghchi slams Trump Slamming Trump, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on X said that if the President of the United States (POTUS) was "genuine" about wanting a deal, he should "put aside" his "disrespectful and unacceptable tone". "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt supporters," he posted on his X account. Referring to the recent escalations in the region, the Iranian minister said that "The proud and resilient people of Iran," who forced the Israeli regime to "RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened" by Iranian missiles "do not take kindly to Threats and Insults". Soaring tensions Tensions have been soaring since the US joined Israel in coordinated airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities last weekend, marking a dramatic turn in the 12-day conflict that began on June 13. While the effectiveness of the strikes remains disputed, they mark the most direct American military action against Iran's nuclear infrastructure in years.

Slamming Trump, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on X said that if the President of the United States (POTUS) was "genuine" about wanting a deal, he should "put aside" his "disrespectful and unacceptable tone".

Iran slams Trump's 'ugly and ignominious death' remark on Khamenei, says Israel had to ‘run to daddy’

The US Senate on Friday (Jun 27) narrowly blocked an effort to curb President Donald Trump's authority to launch further military action against Iran without congressional approval. This comes just days after he ordered airstrikes targeting Tehran's nuclear programme. The vote on the war powers' resolution, as per reports, failed 47-53, falling just short of the 51 votes required for passage. The voting was largely along party lines, with only a few notable defections. The resolution sought to reassert Congress's constitutional role in decisions of war and peace.<h2>Trump's war powers remain in place</h2>Reports suggest that Republican Senator Rand Paul broke ranks to support the measure curbing Trump's war powers, while Democrat John Fetterman, a vocal supporter of Israel, sided with Republicans in Trump's support. Ahead of the vote tally, Senator Tim Kaine, the democrat who introduced the resolution, told the Senate, "I think the events of this week have demonstrated that war is too big to be consigned to the decisions of any one person."Trump, meanwhile, made clear on Friday that he would not hesitate to order more strikes if future intelligence suggests Iran was resuming uranium enrichment at levels of concern."Sure, without question, absolutely," Trump said during a press briefing, when asked about the possibility of a second wave of bombings.<h2>Tensions over strike transparency</h2>The resolution came amid growing frustration from Democrats, many of whom said they were briefed by administration officials on the recent Iran strikes but not given meaningful details—like target locations or intelligence justifications.Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters he had received advance notice that a strike was imminent but said officials refused to disclose the operational specifics.Meanwhile, questions continue to swirl around President Trump's claim that the Iranian nuclear facilities targeted in the strikes were "completely destroyed." A preliminary classified assessment, leaked to the press, reportedly found that while the bombings caused significant damage, they may have only delayed Iran's nuclear program by a few months.After a classified Senate briefing on Thursday, lawmakers said they were still waiting for a clearer picture."The point is: We don’t know," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) after the briefing. "Anybody who says we know with certainty is making it up because we have no final battle damage assessment.""Certainly, this mission was successful insofar as it extensively destroyed and perhaps severely damaged and set back the Iranian nuclear arms program. But how long and how much really remains to be determined by the intelligence community itself," he added.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Iran war powers resolution blocked by US Senate; Trump can strike Tehran again, whenever he wants, without Congress authorisation

The US Senate on Friday (Jun 27) narrowly blocked an effort to curb President Donald Trump's authority to launch further military action against Iran without congressional approval. This comes just days after he ordered airstrikes targeting Tehran's nuclear programme. The vote on the war powers' resolution, as per reports, failed 47-53, falling just short of the 51 votes required for passage. The voting was largely along party lines, with only a few notable defections. The resolution sought to reassert Congress's constitutional role in decisions of war and peace. Trump's war powers remain in place Reports suggest that Republican Senator Rand Paul broke ranks to support the measure curbing Trump's war powers, while Democrat John Fetterman, a vocal supporter of Israel, sided with Republicans in Trump's support. Ahead of the vote tally, Senator Tim Kaine, the democrat who introduced the resolution, told the Senate, "I think the events of this week have demonstrated that war is too big to be consigned to the decisions of any one person." Trump, meanwhile, made clear on Friday that he would not hesitate to order more strikes if future intelligence suggests Iran was resuming uranium enrichment at levels of concern. "Sure, without question, absolutely," Trump said during a press briefing, when asked about the possibility of a second wave of bombings. Tensions over strike transparency The resolution came amid growing frustration from Democrats, many of whom said they were briefed by administration officials on the recent Iran strikes but not given meaningful details—like target locations or intelligence justifications. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters he had received advance notice that a strike was imminent but said officials refused to disclose the operational specifics. Meanwhile, questions continue to swirl around President Trump's claim that the Iranian nuclear facilities targeted in the strikes were "completely destroyed." A preliminary classified assessment, leaked to the press, reportedly found that while the bombings caused significant damage, they may have only delayed Iran's nuclear program by a few months. After a classified Senate briefing on Thursday, lawmakers said they were still waiting for a clearer picture. "The point is: We don’t know," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) after the briefing. "Anybody who says we know with certainty is making it up because we have no final battle damage assessment." "Certainly, this mission was successful insofar as it extensively destroyed and perhaps severely damaged and set back the Iranian nuclear arms program. But how long and how much really remains to be determined by the intelligence community itself," he added.

Iran war powers resolution blocked by US Senate; Trump can strike Tehran again, whenever he wants, without Congress authorisation

US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump’s war powers on Iran; POTUS can strike Tehran again, whenever he wants, without Congress authorisation

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) said that the US will reach a deal with India, adding that his administration will be sending letters very quickly to most countries for the deal. Trump was speaking at the media briefing at the White House, discussing several pressing issues.The US president said that a "full trade barrier dropping", while talking about the India-US trade deal."India...we will reach a deal. We will be going to have a &nbsp;full trade barrier dropping," he said, adding, "I am not sure this will be all happening ...but we are going to wait for it."While talking about the deal with China and the UK, the US president said that it is through and the administration will "send letters very quickly to most countries for the deal."Earlier on Thursday, Trump said a "very big" trade deal with India could be on the cards. This comes days after Trump signed a new agreement with China.Speaking at the “Big Beautiful Bill” event at the White House, Trump said the US was “going to open up India,” further hinting at significant progress in a trade agreement."Everybody wants to make a deal and have a part of it. Remember a few months ago, the press was saying, 'You really have anybody of any interest? Well, we just signed with China yesterday. We are having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one. Where we're going to open up India, in the China deal, we are starting to open up China," he said.This comes as a senior-level Indian delegation, led by Chief negotiator Rajesh Agarwal, reached Washington to hold discussions on the possible trade deal.The US has been raising concerns over high tariffs by India on automobiles and agriculture products apart from other barriers to trade. Moreover, the discussions are also focused on reducing sector specific tariffs on steel, aluminium and auto parts.&nbsp;

While talking about the deal with China and the UK, the US president said that it is through and the administration will "send letters very quickly to most countries for the deal."

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) said that the US will reach a deal with India, adding that his administration will be sending letters very quickly to most countries for the deal. Trump was speaking at the media briefing at the White House, discussing several pressing issues. The US president said that a "full trade barrier dropping", while talking about the India-US trade deal. "India...we will reach a deal. We will be going to have a full trade barrier dropping," he said, adding, "I am not sure this will be all happening ...but we are going to wait for it." While talking about the deal with China and the UK, the US president said that it is through and the administration will "send letters very quickly to most countries for the deal." Earlier on Thursday, Trump said a "very big" trade deal with India could be on the cards. This comes days after Trump signed a new agreement with China. Speaking at the “Big Beautiful Bill” event at the White House, Trump said the US was “going to open up India,” further hinting at significant progress in a trade agreement. "Everybody wants to make a deal and have a part of it. Remember a few months ago, the press was saying, 'You really have anybody of any interest? Well, we just signed with China yesterday. We are having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one. Where we're going to open up India, in the China deal, we are starting to open up China," he said. This comes as a senior-level Indian delegation, led by Chief negotiator Rajesh Agarwal, reached Washington to hold discussions on the possible trade deal. The US has been raising concerns over high tariffs by India on automobiles and agriculture products apart from other barriers to trade. Moreover, the discussions are also focused on reducing sector specific tariffs on steel, aluminium and auto parts.

While talking about the deal with China and the UK, the US president said that it is through and the administration will "send letters very quickly to most countries for the deal."

'Full trade barrier dropping': Trump says will reach a trade deal with India as Indian delegation reaches Washington

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) called the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions a "travesty for the rule of law", stressing that it is a "monumental victory for the Constitution". This comes after the US Supreme Court curbed the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions. Click on the headlines to know more&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-giant-win-in-scotus-trump-lauds-sc-s-ruling-on-limiting-injunctions-is-it-a-win-for-birthright-citizenship-order-1751040225493">'GIANT WIN in SCOTUS': Trump lauds SC's ruling on limiting injunctions - Is it a win for birthright citizenship order?</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751040370916.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'GIANT WIN in SCOTUS': Trump lauds SC's ruling on limiting injunctions - Is it a win for birthright citizenship order?"></figure>US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) called the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions a "travesty for the rule of law", stressing that it is a "monumental victory for the Constitution". This comes after the US Supreme Court curbed the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-is-ready-for-new-round-of-talks-in-istanbul-says-putin-1751035744136">Russia is ready for new round of talks in Istanbul, says Putin</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751035957085.png?rect=(0,160,960,720)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Russia is ready for new round of talks in Istanbul, says Putin"></figure>Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday (June 27) said that the peace demands of Russia and Ukraine were "absolutely contradictory", following two rounds of peace negotiations which have been unable to move the parties closer to a sought-after ceasefire. Russian and Ukrainian negotiators exchanged memorandums setting out their respective blueprints for how the three-year-old conflict should end at peace negotiations in Istanbul earlier this month. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/six-died-and-nearly-80-000-displaced-in-severe-flood-in-china-1751013484231">Six died and nearly 80,000 displaced in severe flood as China braces for second tropical cyclone in two weeks</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751023506533.jpg?rect=(0,240,1440,1080)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Six died and nearly 80,000 displaced in severe flood as China braces for second tropical cyclone in two weeks"></figure>Six died and more than 80,000 were displaced by a severe flood in Southwestern China's Guizhou province since Tuesday. The Duliu River in Rongjiang saw its most extreme flood ever, with water surging at a peak of 11,360 cubic meters per second and rising a staggering 11 meters above normal levels. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-iran-strike-sends-chilling-signal-to-nuclear-armed-north-korea-what-s-next-for-kim-jong-un-1751026259514">Trump’s Iran strike sends chilling signal to nuclear-armed North Korea. What's next for Kim Jong Un?</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751027067119.png?rect=(0,160,960,720)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Trump’s Iran strike sends chilling signal to nuclear-armed North Korea. What's next for Kim Jong Un?"></figure>While American B-2 bombers streak across Iran, bombing facilities related to Tehran's nuclear ambitions, policymakers and experts in East Asia were already preoccupied with a key question: What message does this send to North Korea, a nation whose nuclear program is much more advanced than that of Iran?&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/operation-red-wedding-how-israel-pulled-off-game-of-thrones-style-attack-on-iran-1751039143083">Operation Red Wedding: How Israel pulled off 'Game of Thrones' style attack on Iran</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751039351528.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Operation Red Wedding: How Israel pulled off 'Game of Thrones' style attack on Iran"></figure>The Israeli military this month executed a full-planned operation on June 13 to target Iranian nuclear facilities and eliminate its top military commanders. One of their operations was dubbed "Red Wedding" on the infamous Game of Thrones massacre, executing one of their biggest operations. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-charade-at-pak-s-behest-india-says-indus-treaty-arbitration-court-is-illegal-rejects-ruling-on-j-k-dams-1751037614772">‘Charade at Pak’s behest’: India says Indus Treaty arbitration court is itself illegal, rejects ‘ruling’ on J&amp;K dams</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751038289741.jpg?rect=(0,300,1200,900)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="‘Charade at Pak’s behest’: India says Indus Treaty arbitration court is itself illegal, rejects ‘ruling’ on J&amp;K dams"></figure>India has rejected a Court of Arbitration ruling that issued a “supplemental award” on its competence concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir, and called it a flagrant violation of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-engineering-issue-british-high-commission-issues-statement-on-f-35-fighter-jet-stuck-in-kerala-1751028170025">'Engineering issue': British High Commission issues statement on F-35 fighter jet stuck in Kerala</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751028450056.jpg?rect=(0,108,985,738)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Engineering issue': British High Commission issues statement on F-35 fighter jet stuck in Kerala"></figure>The British High Commission on Friday (June 27) issued a statement regarding the UK F35-B aircraft that was diverted to Thiruvananthapuram International Airport in India on June 14. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/not-diesel-but-water-19-vehicles-in-mp-chief-minister-s-convoy-towed-after-fuel-fiasco-watch-1751023083184">Not diesel but water! 19 vehicles in MP chief minister's convoy towed after fuel fiasco-WATCH</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751023320626.png?rect=(0,157,1325,994)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Not diesel but water! 19 vehicles in MP chief minister's convoy towed after fuel fiasco-WATCH"></figure>A total of 19 cars from Madhya Pradesh chief minister Mohan Yadav's convoy had to be towed on Thursday (June 26) as water was filled in instead of diesel. The incident took place at a petrol pump in Madhya Pradesh's Ratlam district where the chief minister was supposed to visit an event on Friday (June 27), news agency PTI reported. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/the-family-man-season-3-first-look-manoj-bajpayee-returns-as-shrikant-tiwari-jaideep-ahlawat-nimrat-kaur-play-antagonists-1751036486326">The Family Man Season 3 first look: Manoj Bajpayee returns as Shrikant Tiwari, Jaideep Ahlawat, Nimrat Kaur play antagonists</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751037357085.png?zoom=0.7&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="The Family Man Season 3 first look: Manoj Bajpayee returns as Shrikant Tiwari, Jaideep Ahlawat, Nimrat Kaur play antagonists"></figure>It’s finally happening! The much-awaited season 3 of The Family Man is coming soon. On Friday, makers provided the first glimpse of The Family Man 3, which will have Manoj Bajpayee reprising his role as Srikant Tiwari who impeccably fulfills his duties towards his country as an elite undercover spy while coping with the responsibilities of a doting father and husband in a middle-class family. Actress Priyamani also returns as his wife in the series. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/ecb-and-bcci-join-hands-against-saudi-proposed-500-million-t20-league-report-1751033718190">ECB and BCCI join hands against Saudi-proposed $500 million T20 league: Report</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250627/image-1751034533639.jpg?rect=(0,0,2048,1536)&amp;imwidth=800&amp;imheight=600&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="ECB and BCCI join hands against Saudi-proposed $500 million T20 league: Report"></figure>The England Cricket Board (ECB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) have reportedly joined hands against the newly proposed Saudi Arabia-backed T20 league. As reported by the UK-based news outlet the Guardian, the boards have agreed on not issuing No Objection Certificate (NOC) to its players - rendering them ineligible to take part in the league.&nbsp;

Top 10 world news Trump lauds SCs ruling on limiting injunctions Russia ready for fresh talks with Ukraine and more

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) called the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions a "travesty for the rule of law", stressing that it is a "monumental victory for the Constitution". This comes after the US Supreme Court curbed the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions. Click on the headlines to know more 'GIANT WIN in SCOTUS': Trump lauds SC's ruling on limiting injunctions - Is it a win for birthright citizenship order? US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) called the Supreme Court ruling on nationwide injunctions a "travesty for the rule of law", stressing that it is a "monumental victory for the Constitution". This comes after the US Supreme Court curbed the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions. Russia is ready for new round of talks in Istanbul, says Putin Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday (June 27) said that the peace demands of Russia and Ukraine were "absolutely contradictory", following two rounds of peace negotiations which have been unable to move the parties closer to a sought-after ceasefire. Russian and Ukrainian negotiators exchanged memorandums setting out their respective blueprints for how the three-year-old conflict should end at peace negotiations in Istanbul earlier this month. Six died and nearly 80,000 displaced in severe flood as China braces for second tropical cyclone in two weeks Six died and more than 80,000 were displaced by a severe flood in Southwestern China's Guizhou province since Tuesday. The Duliu River in Rongjiang saw its most extreme flood ever, with water surging at a peak of 11,360 cubic meters per second and rising a staggering 11 meters above normal levels. Trump’s Iran strike sends chilling signal to nuclear-armed North Korea. What's next for Kim Jong Un? While American B-2 bombers streak across Iran, bombing facilities related to Tehran's nuclear ambitions, policymakers and experts in East Asia were already preoccupied with a key question: What message does this send to North Korea, a nation whose nuclear program is much more advanced than that of Iran? Operation Red Wedding: How Israel pulled off 'Game of Thrones' style attack on Iran The Israeli military this month executed a full-planned operation on June 13 to target Iranian nuclear facilities and eliminate its top military commanders. One of their operations was dubbed "Red Wedding" on the infamous Game of Thrones massacre, executing one of their biggest operations. ‘Charade at Pak’s behest’: India says Indus Treaty arbitration court is itself illegal, rejects ‘ruling’ on J&K dams India has rejected a Court of Arbitration ruling that issued a “supplemental award” on its competence concerning the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir, and called it a flagrant violation of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960. 'Engineering issue': British High Commission issues statement on F-35 fighter jet stuck in Kerala The British High Commission on Friday (June 27) issued a statement regarding the UK F35-B aircraft that was diverted to Thiruvananthapuram International Airport in India on June 14. Not diesel but water! 19 vehicles in MP chief minister's convoy towed after fuel fiasco-WATCH A total of 19 cars from Madhya Pradesh chief minister Mohan Yadav's convoy had to be towed on Thursday (June 26) as water was filled in instead of diesel. The incident took place at a petrol pump in Madhya Pradesh's Ratlam district where the chief minister was supposed to visit an event on Friday (June 27), news agency PTI reported. The Family Man Season 3 first look: Manoj Bajpayee returns as Shrikant Tiwari, Jaideep Ahlawat, Nimrat Kaur play antagonists It’s finally happening! The much-awaited season 3 of The Family Man is coming soon. On Friday, makers provided the first glimpse of The Family Man 3, which will have Manoj Bajpayee reprising his role as Srikant Tiwari who impeccably fulfills his duties towards his country as an elite undercover spy while coping with the responsibilities of a doting father and husband in a middle-class family. Actress Priyamani also returns as his wife in the series. ECB and BCCI join hands against Saudi-proposed $500 million T20 league: Report The England Cricket Board (ECB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) have reportedly joined hands against the newly proposed Saudi Arabia-backed T20 league. As reported by the UK-based news outlet the Guardian, the boards have agreed on not issuing No Objection Certificate (NOC) to its players - rendering them ineligible to take part in the league.

Here are the top 10 stories from across the world

Top 10 world news: Trump lauds SC's ruling on limiting injunctions; Russia ready for fresh talks with Ukraine, and more

On a stage meant to uphold the ideals of transparency and truth, the White House press briefing room has long been a symbol of America’s commitment to a free press. But on Thursday morning (June 26), that symbol took a hit. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt made headlines not for policy clarifications or presidential announcements, but for publicly questioning the journalistic integrity of CNN national security reporter Natasha Bertrand. In doing so, Leavitt didn’t just single out a reporter—she triggered a deeper debate about where the line lies between government accountability and institutional intimidation of the press.<h3>The incident</h3>During the press briefing on Thursday (June 26), Leavitt launched a pointed attack on Bertrand, criticising her past reporting. During the briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also called out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand. She said, “This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump to push fake and false narrative. She should be ashamed of herself. And that's not what reporting is. That's not what reporting is. Journalism is trying to find the facts and the truth.” It’s not the first time a government official has taken issue with a reporter’s work, but the context matters. This wasn’t a private complaint or an offhand remark. It was a public rebuke from the White House podium—arguably the most powerful communications platform in the country—against a journalist from one of the nation’s largest networks.<h3>The bigger picture</h3>While Leavitt’s comments may have played well to certain partisan audiences who view mainstream media as inherently biased, they also represent something more troubling: the normalisation of public officials attacking individual reporters by name. In democracies, government and media are expected to operate in tension—each holding the other accountable. But when that tension devolves into targeted delegitimisation, we inch toward a dangerous erosion of democratic norms.&nbsp;Natasha Bertrand, who has reported extensively on intelligence and national security, is no stranger to controversy or criticism. But what distinguishes this episode is the public nature of the condemnation—and the power imbalance behind it. When someone in Leavitt’s position calls out a journalist during an official briefing, the chilling effect goes far beyond the individual. It sends a message to the broader press corps: tread carefully, or be next.<h3>Is this justified scrutiny or institutional pressure?</h3>Some may argue that calling out perceived media bias is fair game—after all, journalists aren’t above criticism. But that defense misses the point. The issue here isn’t whether reporters should be held accountable. They absolutely should. The question is: Who gets to do that, and how?&nbsp;There are mechanisms for challenging inaccurate reporting—editorial rebuttals, fact-checks, ombudsman reviews, or even interviews to set the record straight. What shouldn't happen is the use of an official government pulpit to discredit specific journalists, especially those involved in covering sensitive political or security matters.&nbsp;In this case, Leavitt’s attack on Bertrand wasn’t an offhand deflection. It was a deliberate attempt to question her credibility. The political optics are hard to ignore.<h3>A pattern worth watching</h3>This isn’t an isolated incident. Around the world, governments that wish to avoid scrutiny often begin by undermining the credibility of the press. We’ve seen this playbook before—in Russia, Turkey, Hungary, and elsewhere. Discredit the journalist, question the platform, and soon, the public no longer trusts any version of the truth but the one they’re handed.In the US, press freedom is protected by the First Amendment, but legal protections mean little if public trust in journalism is steadily corroded by attacks from the highest levels of power.<h3>The line we cannot cross</h3>The freedom of the press is not just about protecting journalists from censorship—it’s about ensuring that no public official can dictate which questions are valid or which messengers are allowed to ask them.&nbsp;Karoline Leavitt may believe she was defending the administration from media bias. But in doing so from the podium of the White House press room, she stepped into territory where free societies should never feel comfortable: where the government judges the legitimacy of the press. In the end, the story isn’t about Bertrand alone. It’s about the signal this moment sends. If calling out a journalist by name becomes normalised from the highest office in the land, then the next reporter may hesitate before asking the uncomfortable question—and that, more than any partisan debate, is the real threat to democracy.&nbsp;(Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

Who gets to judge the media Trumps Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt remarks raises questions on journalistic freedom

On a stage meant to uphold the ideals of transparency and truth, the White House press briefing room has long been a symbol of America’s commitment to a free press. But on Thursday morning (June 26), that symbol took a hit. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt made headlines not for policy clarifications or presidential announcements, but for publicly questioning the journalistic integrity of CNN national security reporter Natasha Bertrand. In doing so, Leavitt didn’t just single out a reporter—she triggered a deeper debate about where the line lies between government accountability and institutional intimidation of the press. The incident During the press briefing on Thursday (June 26), Leavitt launched a pointed attack on Bertrand, criticising her past reporting. During the briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also called out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand. She said, “This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump to push fake and false narrative. She should be ashamed of herself. And that's not what reporting is. That's not what reporting is. Journalism is trying to find the facts and the truth.” It’s not the first time a government official has taken issue with a reporter’s work, but the context matters. This wasn’t a private complaint or an offhand remark. It was a public rebuke from the White House podium—arguably the most powerful communications platform in the country—against a journalist from one of the nation’s largest networks. The bigger picture While Leavitt’s comments may have played well to certain partisan audiences who view mainstream media as inherently biased, they also represent something more troubling: the normalisation of public officials attacking individual reporters by name. In democracies, government and media are expected to operate in tension—each holding the other accountable. But when that tension devolves into targeted delegitimisation, we inch toward a dangerous erosion of democratic norms. Natasha Bertrand, who has reported extensively on intelligence and national security, is no stranger to controversy or criticism. But what distinguishes this episode is the public nature of the condemnation—and the power imbalance behind it. When someone in Leavitt’s position calls out a journalist during an official briefing, the chilling effect goes far beyond the individual. It sends a message to the broader press corps: tread carefully, or be next. Is this justified scrutiny or institutional pressure? Some may argue that calling out perceived media bias is fair game—after all, journalists aren’t above criticism. But that defense misses the point. The issue here isn’t whether reporters should be held accountable. They absolutely should. The question is: Who gets to do that, and how? There are mechanisms for challenging inaccurate reporting—editorial rebuttals, fact-checks, ombudsman reviews, or even interviews to set the record straight. What shouldn't happen is the use of an official government pulpit to discredit specific journalists, especially those involved in covering sensitive political or security matters. In this case, Leavitt’s attack on Bertrand wasn’t an offhand deflection. It was a deliberate attempt to question her credibility. The political optics are hard to ignore. A pattern worth watching This isn’t an isolated incident. Around the world, governments that wish to avoid scrutiny often begin by undermining the credibility of the press. We’ve seen this playbook before—in Russia, Turkey, Hungary, and elsewhere. Discredit the journalist, question the platform, and soon, the public no longer trusts any version of the truth but the one they’re handed. In the US, press freedom is protected by the First Amendment, but legal protections mean little if public trust in journalism is steadily corroded by attacks from the highest levels of power. The line we cannot cross The freedom of the press is not just about protecting journalists from censorship—it’s about ensuring that no public official can dictate which questions are valid or which messengers are allowed to ask them. Karoline Leavitt may believe she was defending the administration from media bias. But in doing so from the podium of the White House press room, she stepped into territory where free societies should never feel comfortable: where the government judges the legitimacy of the press. In the end, the story isn’t about Bertrand alone. It’s about the signal this moment sends. If calling out a journalist by name becomes normalised from the highest office in the land, then the next reporter may hesitate before asking the uncomfortable question—and that, more than any partisan debate, is the real threat to democracy. (Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.)

Karoline Leavitt spent nearly two minutes ranting about Bertrand during her White House press briefing, accusing the CNN reporter of publishing a “false narrative” and having a history of reporting false information

Who gets to judge the media? Trump's Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt remarks raises questions on journalistic freedom

While American B-2 bombers streak across Iran, bombing facilities related to Tehran's nuclear ambitions, policymakers and experts in East Asia were already preoccupied with a key question: What message does this send to North Korea, a nation whose nuclear program is much more advanced than that of Iran? Experts warn that Washington's military interventions might make Pyongyang more determined to step up its weapons program and expand coordination with Russia, as well as harden its leader Kim Jong Un's conviction that nuclear weapons are the ultimate defense against US-enforced regime change.&nbsp;Even after years of attempts to dissuade North Korea from keeping its nuclear weapons program, the Kim regime is believed to have several nuclear weapons, along with missiles capable of reaching the United States – thus, any potential military attack on the Korean Peninsula would have immensely greater risks.&nbsp;President Trump's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities will inevitably further strengthen the legitimacy of North Korea's long-held policy of regime survival and nuclear armament," Lim Eul-chul, a professor of North Korean studies at South Korea's Kyungnam University was quoted saying to CNN. "North Korea views the recent US air strike as a preemptive military attack and will probably speed up efforts to improve its own preemptive nuclear missile capability," added Lim.&nbsp;That speed, experts warn, might be delivered by way of Russian support, as a result of an emerging military romance the two neighbors have embarked upon since Moscow invaded Ukraine. Since it was formally established in 2024, North Korea's strategic alliance with Russia has emerged as a very important economic and military lifeline for Pyongyang in the face of continuing Western sanctions.&nbsp;"Under the strategic partnership with Russia, Pyongyang will tend to proceed to cooperative weapons development, cooperative military drills, technology exchange, and increased mutual interdependence in economic and military areas," Lim explained.&nbsp;North Korea has dispatched over 14,000 troops and millions of ammunition, including missiles and rockets, to support Russia's invasion, says a report by the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team (MSMT), a program composed of 11 United Nations members. Russia has returned the favour by supplying North Korea with diverse precious pieces of weaponry and technology, such as air defense systems, anti-aircraft missiles, electronic warfare capabilities and refined petroleum.&nbsp;These activities "enables North Korea to finance its military projects and continue to expand its ballistic missiles programmes, which are themselves illegal under several (UN Security Council resolutions), and acquire first-hand exposure to contemporary warfare," the study showed.&nbsp;In Kim's view, recent US military intervention in Iran is following a disturbing pattern of logic: countries without nuclear power, from Iraq and Libya to Iran, are susceptible to US intervention, Victor Cha, Korea chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies was quoted saying to CNN. North Korea, having now tested six nuclear devices and built long-range missiles, regards its arsenal as non-negotiable.&nbsp;As described by Cha, Washington's attacks against Tehran's nuclear facilities will certainly make an indelible mark on the Kim regime. "The strikes against Iran will only reinforce two things for North Korea, neither one of which plays well for US policy," he said. "One: the US has no use-of-force alternative for North Korea's nuclear program like they did with Israel and Iran. Two: the attack only confirms in Kim Jong Un's mind his commitment to continue seeking and having a nuclear arsenal."&nbsp;And the difference between Iran and North Korea is dramatic, especially when it comes to nuclear weapons. Iran, on the other hand, has not yet produced a deliverable nuclear weapon and its uranium enrichment had still fallen below the level for weaponisation, the International Atomic Energy Agency's most recent estimate said.&nbsp;It had also engaged in years of diplomatic efforts with the US and Western nations regarding its nuclear program, diplomacy that was ostensibly still active when Trump authorised B-2 stealth bombers to release "bunker busting" bombs on Iran's nuclear sites. North Korea is estimated to have between 40 and 50 warheads, as well as the capability to deliver them throughout the region and possibly even to the US mainland.

Trumps Iran strike sends chilling signal to nuclear armed North Korea Whats next for Kim Jong Un

While American B-2 bombers streak across Iran, bombing facilities related to Tehran's nuclear ambitions, policymakers and experts in East Asia were already preoccupied with a key question: What message does this send to North Korea, a nation whose nuclear program is much more advanced than that of Iran? Experts warn that Washington's military interventions might make Pyongyang more determined to step up its weapons program and expand coordination with Russia, as well as harden its leader Kim Jong Un's conviction that nuclear weapons are the ultimate defense against US-enforced regime change. Even after years of attempts to dissuade North Korea from keeping its nuclear weapons program, the Kim regime is believed to have several nuclear weapons, along with missiles capable of reaching the United States – thus, any potential military attack on the Korean Peninsula would have immensely greater risks. President Trump's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities will inevitably further strengthen the legitimacy of North Korea's long-held policy of regime survival and nuclear armament," Lim Eul-chul, a professor of North Korean studies at South Korea's Kyungnam University was quoted saying to CNN. "North Korea views the recent US air strike as a preemptive military attack and will probably speed up efforts to improve its own preemptive nuclear missile capability," added Lim. That speed, experts warn, might be delivered by way of Russian support, as a result of an emerging military romance the two neighbors have embarked upon since Moscow invaded Ukraine. Since it was formally established in 2024, North Korea's strategic alliance with Russia has emerged as a very important economic and military lifeline for Pyongyang in the face of continuing Western sanctions. "Under the strategic partnership with Russia, Pyongyang will tend to proceed to cooperative weapons development, cooperative military drills, technology exchange, and increased mutual interdependence in economic and military areas," Lim explained. North Korea has dispatched over 14,000 troops and millions of ammunition, including missiles and rockets, to support Russia's invasion, says a report by the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team (MSMT), a program composed of 11 United Nations members. Russia has returned the favour by supplying North Korea with diverse precious pieces of weaponry and technology, such as air defense systems, anti-aircraft missiles, electronic warfare capabilities and refined petroleum. These activities "enables North Korea to finance its military projects and continue to expand its ballistic missiles programmes, which are themselves illegal under several (UN Security Council resolutions), and acquire first-hand exposure to contemporary warfare," the study showed. In Kim's view, recent US military intervention in Iran is following a disturbing pattern of logic: countries without nuclear power, from Iraq and Libya to Iran, are susceptible to US intervention, Victor Cha, Korea chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies was quoted saying to CNN. North Korea, having now tested six nuclear devices and built long-range missiles, regards its arsenal as non-negotiable. As described by Cha, Washington's attacks against Tehran's nuclear facilities will certainly make an indelible mark on the Kim regime. "The strikes against Iran will only reinforce two things for North Korea, neither one of which plays well for US policy," he said. "One: the US has no use-of-force alternative for North Korea's nuclear program like they did with Israel and Iran. Two: the attack only confirms in Kim Jong Un's mind his commitment to continue seeking and having a nuclear arsenal." And the difference between Iran and North Korea is dramatic, especially when it comes to nuclear weapons. Iran, on the other hand, has not yet produced a deliverable nuclear weapon and its uranium enrichment had still fallen below the level for weaponisation, the International Atomic Energy Agency's most recent estimate said. It had also engaged in years of diplomatic efforts with the US and Western nations regarding its nuclear program, diplomacy that was ostensibly still active when Trump authorised B-2 stealth bombers to release "bunker busting" bombs on Iran's nuclear sites. North Korea is estimated to have between 40 and 50 warheads, as well as the capability to deliver them throughout the region and possibly even to the US mainland.

Despite yearslong efforts to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program, the Kim regime is thought to possess multiple nuclear weapons, as well as missiles that can potentially reach the United States&nbsp;

Trump’s Iran strike sends chilling signal to nuclear-armed North Korea. What's next for Kim Jong Un?

The White House has found a new way to keep the humour intact after the United States President Donald Trump was called ‘Daddy’ by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The White House on Friday (June 27) posted a video showing a T-shirt design with Trump photo and ‘Daddy Home’ written in the background. The video had ‘Daddy Home’ track by Usher added to it. Trump's ‘Daddy’ saga began when Mark Rutte said that Trump behaved like a 'Daddy' in dealing with Iran and Israel. Rutte's remark was in response to Trump's usual comparison of Iran and Israel as “two school kids.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">America’s back. Daddy’s home. <a href="https://t.co/dmhpC5YRDm">pic.twitter.com/dmhpC5YRDm</a>&mdash; The White House (@WhiteHouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1938410263394328865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 27, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>How ‘Daddy’ saga began and how is it going?</h2>Ahead of boarding Air Force One to attend the NATO Summit in the Netherlands, Trump asked about violation of ceasefire by Israel and Iran. He &nbsp; angrily answered, "The two countries have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing, do you understand that?" Trump on June 24 declared that a ceasefire had been agreed between Israel and Iran and war had stopped, but both countries violated it soon after his announcement and fired missiles at each other. This was a major upset for Trump, who warned Israel against bombing Iran and lost his cool in front of reporters.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Don’t mess with Trump. Very harsh words for Israel (and Iran). The F bomb comment is probably the most accurate statement about this conflict that I have ever heard. <a href="https://t.co/f7xDIfNa9H">pic.twitter.com/f7xDIfNa9H</a>&mdash; Crowder CEO (@GmorganJr) <a href="https://twitter.com/GmorganJr/status/1937474472145047886?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 24, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

During a conversation with Mark Rutte in the Netherlands on the sidelines of the NATO Summit, Trump was asked by him about Iran and Israel. Trump compared the West Asian adversaries to “two kids in a school yard” who “fight like hell". He added, "You know, they fight like hell. You can't stop them. Let them fight for about two, three minutes, then it's easier to stop." Rutte interjected, laughing: “And then daddy has to sometimes use strong language to get them to stop,” referring to Trump's usage of the F-word. Trump laughed at Rutte's remark and said, “Everyone said 'Well, you have to use a certain word.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">NEW: Secretary General of NATO Mark Rutte refers to President Trump as ‘Daddy’ while Trump was talking about Israel &amp; Iran’s peace deal. Trump: They had a big fight. Like two kids in a schoolyard. Let them fight for about two minutes. Then it&#39;s easier to stop them. Rutte: And… <a href="https://t.co/dpG7C7bakY">pic.twitter.com/dpG7C7bakY</a>&mdash; Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) <a href="https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1937864879257669826?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Later, during a press briefing, a Sky News reporter asked Trump whether he saw NATO allies as his children in light of the nickname given by Rutte. Trump smiled at the question while Secretary of State Marco Rubio chuckled while standing behind him. "No, he likes me. I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard, OK…He did it very affectionately though, ‘Daddy, you’re my daddy,'” Trump said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Better angle of Marco Rubio&#39;s reaction after reporter asks a question to &quot;daddy&quot; Donald Trump <a href="https://t.co/iRsT26DhE5">pic.twitter.com/iRsT26DhE5</a>&mdash; Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) <a href="https://twitter.com/charliespiering/status/1937888346786746857?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

However, Rutte, during an interaction with Reuters, denied calling Trump ‘daddy’ while he praised the US president for his role in the Iran-Israel conflict. "In Europe, I sometimes hear countries say, 'Hey Mark, will the US stay with us?' and I said that sounds a bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'Are you still staying with the family?'" he said. “In that sense, I used the word 'daddy.' I was not calling President Trump that.” When asked whether this analogy implied that other NATO members are like children who are only now maturing, Rutte responded that they have already grown up but now recognise the need to take on greater responsibility.&nbsp;The White House appeared to lean into the humour, posting a playful edit of the moment on X (formerly Twitter). They shared the video of President Donald Trump at the NATO summit, set to the tune of Usher’s Daddy’s Home. Within minutes, “Daddy” became the internet’s favourite new moniker for Trump.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🎶 Daddy’s home… Hey, hey, hey, Daddy. President Donald J. Trump attended the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands. <a href="https://t.co/asJb5FD2Ii">pic.twitter.com/asJb5FD2Ii</a>&mdash; The White House (@WhiteHouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1938053287535616085?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 26, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Interestingly, this is not the first time Trump has been called ‘Daddy’. In a 2023 interview with former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, golfer John Daly <a href="https://www.tiktok.com/@tuckercarlson/video/7312855307552853294">said</a> he and fellow golfers “want Daddy Trump back.” Trump posted about the reference on Truth Social <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/111586208943521719">at the time</a> and <a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112315147940969000">again a few months later</a>. Daly has said he has called Trump “daddy” since the two met in 1992.

Donald Trump loves to give nicknames. However, after the recently held NATO Summit, he seems to be embracing one - ‘Daddy’. The White House is going gaga over it: Here's how it began and how it is going

The White House has found a new way to keep the humour intact after the United States President Donald Trump was called ‘Daddy’ by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The White House on Friday (June 27) posted a video showing a T-shirt design with Trump photo and ‘Daddy Home’ written in the background. The video had ‘Daddy Home’ track by Usher added to it. Trump's ‘Daddy’ saga began when Mark Rutte said that Trump behaved like a 'Daddy' in dealing with Iran and Israel. Rutte's remark was in response to Trump's usual comparison of Iran and Israel as “two school kids.”

Donald Trump loves to give nicknames. However, after the recently held NATO Summit, he seems to be embracing one - ‘Daddy’. The White House is going gaga over it: Here's how it began and how it is going

White House embraces Trump's ‘Daddy' nickname: How it began vs how it is going - WATCH all moments here

US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff sparked conversation about the Trump administration's next big announcement by saying that additional countries will join the Abraham Accords. Witkoff also noted that he and his team are working in coordination with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the State Department to "get more countries to come into the Abraham Accords. &nbsp;He made a similar prediction at an Israel Independence Day event last month. The Abraham Accords was Trump's first term's major achievement under the US' then Middle East man, <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-donald-trumps-middle-east-man-jared-kushner-working-behind-the-scenes-for-expansion-of-abraham-accords-9058520">Jared Kushner</a>. It was even said that Trump's West Asia tour earlier this year was an attempt to expand the Accords, which Trump holds very dear, and even wanted a Nobel Peace Prize for it.&nbsp;&nbsp;“We think we will have big announcements on countries that are coming into the Abraham Accords,” he said in a CNBC interview.&nbsp; One of the President's key objectives is that the Abraham Accords be expanded," Witkoff added. "We are hoping for normalisation across an array of countries that people never would have contemplated would come in, so we are excited for that prospect; it will also be a stabiliser in the Middle East," he also said. Robert Greenway, known as the architect of the accords, said that he is optimistic about the upcoming developments.&nbsp;&nbsp;Earlier, it was also hinted that Donald Trump had talks on the Abraham Accords during his West Asia tour earlier this year. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trumps-middle-east-trip-us-president-saudi-arabia-qatar-uae-syria-iran-nuclear-deal-russia-ukraine-ahmed-al-sharaa-mbs-boeing-9076557">Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates</a> (UAE) became a game-changer as he met Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, visited a mosque in Abu Dhabi and had several interactions with business leaders to religious leaders.&nbsp;<h2>What is Abraham Accords?</h2>Announced during the first term of Trump, the Abraham Accords is an agreement under which diplomatic relationship is established between Israel and several Arab states, on the mediation of the United States(US. In 2020, Bahrain and the UAE became the first Arab countries to recognise Israel after Jordan in 1996. Later, Sudan and Morocco also established diplomatic relationships with Israel. Donald Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who worked as his advisor to the President of the United States in his first term, was instrumental in the signing of this accord. Often referred to as an offwing of the Oslo Accords, the Abraham Accords were a part of Trump's peace plan that he announced in 2020. &nbsp;In the statement about the Abraham Accords, US said that the goal is to "promote interfaith and intercultural dialogue", "end radicalization and conflict", pursue a vision of peace, security, prosperity in the Middle East", and strengthen "peace based on mutual understanding and coexistence." It further said that the to achieve this goal, the US encourages expansion of "friendly relations" between Israel and its neighbours.&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>&nbsp;</h2>

US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff says there may be a big announcement regarding the Abraham Accords. Can US President Donald Trump convince more West Asian countries to be friends with Israel?

US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff sparked conversation about the Trump administration's next big announcement by saying that additional countries will join the Abraham Accords. Witkoff also noted that he and his team are working in coordination with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the State Department to "get more countries to come into the Abraham Accords. He made a similar prediction at an Israel Independence Day event last month. The Abraham Accords was Trump's first term's major achievement under the US' then Middle East man, Jared Kushner. It was even said that Trump's West Asia tour earlier this year was an attempt to expand the Accords, which Trump holds very dear, and even wanted a Nobel Peace Prize for it. “We think we will have big announcements on countries that are coming into the Abraham Accords,” he said in a CNBC interview. One of the President's key objectives is that the Abraham Accords be expanded," Witkoff added. "We are hoping for normalisation across an array of countries that people never would have contemplated would come in, so we are excited for that prospect; it will also be a stabiliser in the Middle East," he also said. Robert Greenway, known as the architect of the accords, said that he is optimistic about the upcoming developments. Earlier, it was also hinted that Donald Trump had talks on the Abraham Accords during his West Asia tour earlier this year. Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) became a game-changer as he met Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, visited a mosque in Abu Dhabi and had several interactions with business leaders to religious leaders. What is Abraham Accords? Announced during the first term of Trump, the Abraham Accords is an agreement under which diplomatic relationship is established between Israel and several Arab states, on the mediation of the United States(US. In 2020, Bahrain and the UAE became the first Arab countries to recognise Israel after Jordan in 1996. Later, Sudan and Morocco also established diplomatic relationships with Israel. Donald Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who worked as his advisor to the President of the United States in his first term, was instrumental in the signing of this accord. Often referred to as an offwing of the Oslo Accords, the Abraham Accords were a part of Trump's peace plan that he announced in 2020. In the statement about the Abraham Accords, US said that the goal is to "promote interfaith and intercultural dialogue", "end radicalization and conflict", pursue a vision of peace, security, prosperity in the Middle East", and strengthen "peace based on mutual understanding and coexistence." It further said that the to achieve this goal, the US encourages expansion of "friendly relations" between Israel and its neighbours.

US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff says there may be a big announcement regarding the Abraham Accords. Can US President Donald Trump convince more West Asian countries to be friends with Israel?

Witkoff says 'big announcement about Abraham Accords' expected: Can Trump ease Israel's relations with Arab nations?

US President Donald Trump announced making a deal with China and hinted at an upcoming big deal with India in the White House on Thursday (June 26). No further details were disclosed, though he emphasised ‘everybody, everybody wants to make a deal.’&nbsp;Trump said, “We just signed a trade deal with China. We're not going to make deals with everybody. But we're having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India, a very big one. We're going to open up India. In the China deal, we're starting to open up China. Things that never really could have happened, and the relationship with every country has been very good.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">US President Donald Trump hints at major trade deal with India, praises China agreement Watch!<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DonaldTrump?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DonaldTrump</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TradeDeal?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TradeDeal</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/China?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#China</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/India?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#India</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/US?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#US</a> <a href="https://t.co/FC1Nbc9WSL">pic.twitter.com/FC1Nbc9WSL</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1938421571661738436?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 27, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Now, as Trump teases a deal with India, not too long ago on May 28, his administration had urged a New York court against blocking or pausing the tariff order, as they believed it may disrupt the global order, which includes reigniting India-Pakistan tensions.&nbsp;Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had said to the court, "Both sides agreed to stop their military actions only after Donald Trump offered to expand trade with the countries in exchange for it.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/from-trump-card-to-trade-deal-soon-trump-s-commerce-secy-reflects-on-us-india-ties-amid-deportations-tariff-war-1748945730894">From 'Trump card' to 'trade deal soon': Trump's commerce secy reflects on US-India ties amid deportations, tariff war</a>&nbsp;As Trump assumed office for his second term earlier this year, he was certain to cut down on wasteful government spending and impose trade tariffs on countries dealing with the US. China’s tariff was the highest at a certain given time, which was later reduced substantially. The tariffs were paused, and when asked if there were plans to further the pause, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters, "Perhaps it could be extended, but that's a decision for the president to make."&nbsp;Trump also assured Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Lutnick, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are working overtime, making deals with other countries. During his address, Trump promised 90 deals in 90 days before the deadline of July 9.

US President Donald Trump announced making a deal with China and hinted at an upcoming big deal with India in the White House on Thursday (June 26).

US President Donald Trump announced making a deal with China and hinted at an upcoming big deal with India in the White House on Thursday (June 26). No further details were disclosed, though he emphasised ‘everybody, everybody wants to make a deal.’ Trump said, “We just signed a trade deal with China. We're not going to make deals with everybody. But we're having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India, a very big one. We're going to open up India. In the China deal, we're starting to open up China. Things that never really could have happened, and the relationship with every country has been very good.”

US President Donald Trump announced making a deal with China and hinted at an upcoming big deal with India in the White House on Thursday (June 26).

'Very big one': Trump hints at upcoming deal with India after signing trade agreement with China

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller made a large financial investment in Palantir, a tech company that could make millions of dollars under US President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policies, said watchdog group Project on Government Oversight. Palantir plays a substantial role in the work of US immigration officials. Since Miller works closely with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) department, his investment in the firm is raising red flags.&nbsp;According to Miller’s public financial disclosure report, he owns between $100,001 and $250,000 in assets at the company. He reportedly bought the stocks in 2021, after Trump left the White House following his first term in office. However, he enacted his plan to ramp up immigration enforcement sometime before.&nbsp;&nbsp;Last month, the Trump administration tapped Palantir to build a massive system that would allow federal agencies to share their data with each other in a better manner. The huge database would serve as a surveillance tool for the United States. The company is also set to be involved with the US Navy's warship-building efforts.&nbsp;Miller’s role in Immigration and Customs Enforcement and his financial stake in Palantir raise concerns over potential conflicts of interest. Any update of digital systems at the DHS could make Palantir a likely beneficiary.&nbsp;Trump's immigration crackdown is already likely to make profits for many surveillance and private prison companies. Now, one of his closest advisers may also become a beneficiary.&nbsp;Virginia Canter, chief counsel for ethics and anti-corruption at Democracy Defenders Fund, told Project on Government Oversight that Miller was walking a thin line. “If he hasn’t stepped over the line, he’s just on the verge of it,” Canter said.&nbsp;&nbsp;She further added, “I just don’t think anybody would be comfortable with him keeping this stock.”&nbsp;

Since Miller works closely with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) department, his investment in the firm is raising red flags.

White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller made a large financial investment in Palantir, a tech company that could make millions of dollars under US President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policies, said watchdog group Project on Government Oversight. Palantir plays a substantial role in the work of US immigration officials. Since Miller works closely with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) department, his investment in the firm is raising red flags. According to Miller’s public financial disclosure report, he owns between $100,001 and $250,000 in assets at the company. He reportedly bought the stocks in 2021, after Trump left the White House following his first term in office. However, he enacted his plan to ramp up immigration enforcement sometime before. Last month, the Trump administration tapped Palantir to build a massive system that would allow federal agencies to share their data with each other in a better manner. The huge database would serve as a surveillance tool for the United States. The company is also set to be involved with the US Navy's warship-building efforts. Miller’s role in Immigration and Customs Enforcement and his financial stake in Palantir raise concerns over potential conflicts of interest. Any update of digital systems at the DHS could make Palantir a likely beneficiary. Trump's immigration crackdown is already likely to make profits for many surveillance and private prison companies. Now, one of his closest advisers may also become a beneficiary. Virginia Canter, chief counsel for ethics and anti-corruption at Democracy Defenders Fund, told Project on Government Oversight that Miller was walking a thin line. “If he hasn’t stepped over the line, he’s just on the verge of it,” Canter said. She further added, “I just don’t think anybody would be comfortable with him keeping this stock.”

Since Miller works closely with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) department, his investment in the firm is raising red flags.

Stephen Miller raising red flags over investment in firm helping ICE deportations: Report

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the reporters on Thursday (June 26). During the briefing Karoline revealed the time when Iran, Israel and US agreed on the same thing. She said, “I can say that the time when Iran, Israel and US agreed on the same thing was the colour of the sky is blue.”&nbsp;The White House also accused Ayatollah Ali Khamenei of trying to "save face" after the Iranian supreme leader downplayed the impact of US strikes on Tehran's nuclear program. In her briefing, Karoline said, "Netanyahu expressed interest to come to DC and meet President Trump in the coming weeks. She added that President Trump is open to that but no final date for a meeting has been set yet." “Iranians were weeks away from completing nuclear weapons. There was ‘no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strike’ on Saturday (June 21), which had targeted three Iranian nuclear sites,” she added. Karoline went on to say that, "The contrast in leadership could not be more clear. Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars, in a failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance with a weak and ineffective deal. President Trump sent a fleet of American warplanes to destroy Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon. The United States and the entire world is safer because of the this presidents decisiveness.”&nbsp;“The President wants peace. He always has... We see a new era in which perhaps some of these Gulf and Arab states can sign on to the Abraham Accords," she added. On being asked about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', Karoline replied saying, “We expect that bill to be on the president's desk for signature by July 4th.”

Trump press secretary reveals when Iran, Israel, US agreed on same thing - Definitely not on nuclear program

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the reporters on Thursday (June 26). During the briefing Karoline revealed the time when Iran, Israel and US agreed on the same thing. She said, “I can say that the time when Iran, Israel and US agreed on the same thing was the colour of the sky is blue.” The White House also accused Ayatollah Ali Khamenei of trying to "save face" after the Iranian supreme leader downplayed the impact of US strikes on Tehran's nuclear program. In her briefing, Karoline said, "Netanyahu expressed interest to come to DC and meet President Trump in the coming weeks. She added that President Trump is open to that but no final date for a meeting has been set yet." “Iranians were weeks away from completing nuclear weapons. There was ‘no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strike’ on Saturday (June 21), which had targeted three Iranian nuclear sites,” she added. Karoline went on to say that, "The contrast in leadership could not be more clear. Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars, in a failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance with a weak and ineffective deal. President Trump sent a fleet of American warplanes to destroy Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon. The United States and the entire world is safer because of the this presidents decisiveness.” “The President wants peace. He always has... We see a new era in which perhaps some of these Gulf and Arab states can sign on to the Abraham Accords," she added. On being asked about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', Karoline replied saying, “We expect that bill to be on the president's desk for signature by July 4th.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was addressing the reporters on Thursday

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt briefed the reporters on Thursday (June 26). Karoline said, "Netanyahu expressed interest to come to DC and meet President Trump in the coming weeks. She added that President Trump is open to that but no final date for a meeting has been set yet." “Iranians were weeks away from completing nuclear weapons. There was ‘no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strike’ on Saturday (June 21), which had targeted three Iranian nuclear sites,” she added.&nbsp;Karoline went on to say that, "The contrast in leadership could not be more clear. Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars, in a failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance with a weak and ineffective deal.&nbsp;President Trump sent a fleet of American warplanes to destroy Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon. The United States and the entire world is safer because of the this presidents decisiveness.”&nbsp;“The President wants peace. He always has... We see a new era in which perhaps some of these Gulf and Arab states can sign on to the Abraham Accords," she added.&nbsp;On being asked about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', Karoline replied saying, "We expect that bill to be on the president's desk for signature by July 4th."&nbsp;On being asked about the the Miami Herald recently publishing a story saying the Trump administration was targeting migrant foster children. Karoline said, “I was aghast at the headline. It’s egregious to accuse this administration of trying to target foster children. That is not at all what is happening at the Department of Homeland Security.” “It’s another example of fake news. The May border numbers speak for themselves. Not a single illegal alien was allowed into this country… that means not a single child was allowed into this country possibly with human smugglers or human traffickers.”<h2>Karoline calls out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand</h2>During the briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also called out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand. She said, “This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump to push fake and false narrative. She should be ashamed of herself. And that's not what reporting is. That's not what reporting is. Journalism is trying to find the facts and the truth.”

President Trump open to visit from Netanyahu in DC says White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt briefed the reporters on Thursday (June 26). Karoline said, "Netanyahu expressed interest to come to DC and meet President Trump in the coming weeks. She added that President Trump is open to that but no final date for a meeting has been set yet." “Iranians were weeks away from completing nuclear weapons. There was ‘no indication to the United States that any of that enriched uranium was moved prior to the strike’ on Saturday (June 21), which had targeted three Iranian nuclear sites,” she added. Karoline went on to say that, "The contrast in leadership could not be more clear. Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars, in a failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance with a weak and ineffective deal. President Trump sent a fleet of American warplanes to destroy Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon. The United States and the entire world is safer because of the this presidents decisiveness.” “The President wants peace. He always has... We see a new era in which perhaps some of these Gulf and Arab states can sign on to the Abraham Accords," she added. On being asked about the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', Karoline replied saying, "We expect that bill to be on the president's desk for signature by July 4th." On being asked about the the Miami Herald recently publishing a story saying the Trump administration was targeting migrant foster children. Karoline said, “I was aghast at the headline. It’s egregious to accuse this administration of trying to target foster children. That is not at all what is happening at the Department of Homeland Security.” “It’s another example of fake news. The May border numbers speak for themselves. Not a single illegal alien was allowed into this country… that means not a single child was allowed into this country possibly with human smugglers or human traffickers.” Karoline calls out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand During the briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also called out CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand. She said, “This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump to push fake and false narrative. She should be ashamed of herself. And that's not what reporting is. That's not what reporting is. Journalism is trying to find the facts and the truth.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a briefing with reporters that Netanyahu expressed interest to come to DC and meet President Trump in the coming weeks. She added that President Trump is open to that but no final date for a meeting has been set yet

'President Trump open to visit from Netanyahu in DC', says White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday (June 26) got into a clash with one of the most senior reporters at the Pentagon, Fox News journalist Jennifer Griffin, when she asked about the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and enriched uranium in Iran.This comes days after the US attacked Iranian nuclear facilities including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, claiming that it has destroyed these facilities and Iran will not be able to make nuclear weapon.During a press conference on Thursday, Hegseth was addressing "intelligence leak" claims days after US President Donald Trump announced ceasefire.Hegseth aid that he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," he said.When his former colleague and Fox News reporter Griffin asked him about the movement of enriched uranium from the Fordow site, Hegseth dodged the question, and attacked Griffin with words."Because you cheer against Trump so hard, in your DNA and in your blood, cheer Against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad, you have to cheer against the efficacy," he said, addressing the media.Griffin asked Hegseth, "Are you certain none of that highly enriched uranium was moved?" Hegseth frustratedly replied, "Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally.”The Fox reporter did not like the remark, and said, "I take issue with that."Hegseth during the briefing said that strikes in Iran were highly successful, it was a resounding success and brought the end of the war. "Trump created the conditions to end war destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities", calling it a "historic moment."Meanwhile, Gen. Dan Caine said, “We received intel on Monday that Iran intended to attack US bases in the region. Patriot cruise were deployed from Korea and Japan. We were joined in this engagement with Qatari Patriot cruise. In the days preceding the fordo attacks Iranians tried to cover the shafts with concrete."&nbsp;&nbsp;

During a press conference on Thursday, Hegseth was addressing "intelligence leak" claims days after US President Donald Trump announced ceasefire.

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday (June 26) got into a clash with one of the most senior reporters at the Pentagon, Fox News journalist Jennifer Griffin, when she asked about the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and enriched uranium in Iran. This comes days after the US attacked Iranian nuclear facilities including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, claiming that it has destroyed these facilities and Iran will not be able to make nuclear weapon. During a press conference on Thursday, Hegseth was addressing "intelligence leak" claims days after US President Donald Trump announced ceasefire. Hegseth aid that he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," he said. When his former colleague and Fox News reporter Griffin asked him about the movement of enriched uranium from the Fordow site, Hegseth dodged the question, and attacked Griffin with words. "Because you cheer against Trump so hard, in your DNA and in your blood, cheer Against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad, you have to cheer against the efficacy," he said, addressing the media. Griffin asked Hegseth, "Are you certain none of that highly enriched uranium was moved?" Hegseth frustratedly replied, "Jennifer, you've been about the worst. The one who misrepresents the most intentionally.” The Fox reporter did not like the remark, and said, "I take issue with that." Hegseth during the briefing said that strikes in Iran were highly successful, it was a resounding success and brought the end of the war. "Trump created the conditions to end war destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities", calling it a "historic moment." Meanwhile, Gen. Dan Caine said, “We received intel on Monday that Iran intended to attack US bases in the region. Patriot cruise were deployed from Korea and Japan. We were joined in this engagement with Qatari Patriot cruise. In the days preceding the fordo attacks Iranians tried to cover the shafts with concrete."

During a press conference on Thursday, Hegseth was addressing "intelligence leak" claims days after US President Donald Trump announced ceasefire.

'You've been the worst!': Hegseth explodes at Fox journalist during Israel-Iran war briefing - Here's how it went

Moments after United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressed the media on Thursday morning (June 26) at the Pentagon on the strikes on Iran, US President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social saying, “One of the greatest, most professional, and most “confirming” News Conferences I have ever seen! The Fake News should fire everyone involved in this Witch Hunt, and apologize to our great warriors, and everyone else!”&nbsp;He further added, “The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!”

Speaking to the reporters, Hegseth said, “Strikes in Iran were highly successful, it was a resounding success and brought the end of the war. Trump created the conditions to end war destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities. What other presidents talked about, President Trump achieved. This is a historic moment."&nbsp;“Leaked preliminary report is based on lynchpin assumptions. Rafael Grossi also said that US strikes caused enormous damage. This is a historically successful mission." “32 NATO countries committed to spending 5%, historic change in continental security. What President Trump achieved at NATO yesterday was groundbreaking,” he further added.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Gen. Dan Caine said, “We received intel on Monday that Iran intended to attack US bases in the region. Patriot cruise were deployed from Korea and Japan. We were joined in this engagement with Qatari Patriot cruise. In the days preceding the fordo attacks Iranians tried to cover the shafts with concrete."&nbsp;Meanwhile, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a post on X said, “Thank you <a href="https://x.com/realDonaldTrump">@realDonaldTrump</a>. I was deeply moved by your heartfelt support for me and your incredible support for Israel and the Jewish people. I look forward to continue working with you to defeat our common enemies, liberate our hostages and quickly expand the circle of peace.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Thank you <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a>. I was deeply moved by your heartfelt support for me and your incredible support for Israel and the Jewish people. I look forward to continue working with you to defeat our common enemies, liberate our hostages and quickly expand the circle of peace. <a href="https://t.co/zRd6LYfMbY">https://t.co/zRd6LYfMbY</a> <a href="https://t.co/YCGN1dIu0d">pic.twitter.com/YCGN1dIu0d</a>&mdash; Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) <a href="https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/1938220829734514922?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 26, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

One of the greatest most confirming news conferences Trump after Hegseth addresses media on Iran strikes

Moments after United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressed the media on Thursday morning (June 26) at the Pentagon on the strikes on Iran, US President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social saying, “One of the greatest, most professional, and most “confirming” News Conferences I have ever seen! The Fake News should fire everyone involved in this Witch Hunt, and apologize to our great warriors, and everyone else!” He further added, “The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!”

‘The Fake News should fire everyone involved in this Witch Hunt, and apologize to our great warriors, and everyone else!’, President Trump posted on Truth Social

'One of the greatest, most confirming news conferences': Trump after Hegseth addresses media on Iran strikes

United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressed the media on Thursday morning (June 26) at the Pentagon on the strikes on Iran. Speaking to the reporters, Hegseth said, “Strikes in Iran were highly successful, it was a resounding success and brought the end of the war. Trump created the conditions to end war destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities. What other presidents talked about, President Trump achieved. This is a historic moment."&nbsp;“Leaked preliminary report is based on lynchpin assumptions. Rafael Grossi also said that US strikes caused enormous damage. This is a historically successful mission." “32 NATO countries committed to spending 5%, historic change in continental security. What President Trump achieved at NATO yesterday was groundbreaking,” he further added.&nbsp;Meanwhile, &nbsp;Gen. Dan Caine said, “We received intel on Monday that Iran intended to attack US bases in the region. Patriot cruise were deployed from Korea and Japan. We were joined in this engagement with Qatari Patriot cruise. In the days preceding the fordo attacks Iranians tried to cover the shafts with concrete."&nbsp;The Trump administration has been resolute that its strikes on three nuclear facilities on Saturday (June 21 ) in Iran were a success. Several media outlets have reported that a preliminary intelligence assessment found the bombings delayed Iran’s nuclear program by only a few months. President Trump and his cabinet have insisted the sites were “obliterated” and “destroyed”.&nbsp;Donald Trump's two top executives, on Wednesday (Jun 25) at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague, confirmed that a bombshell US intelligence report on Iran airstrikes was, in fact, leaked. They then quickly pivoted to denouncing the people behind the leak, calling the move politically motivated and demanding accountability. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio assumed an aggressive counteroffensive against the leaked preliminary Pentagon report that said that US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites only set the nation's nuclear programme back by a few months. Confirming the bombshell leak, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a NATO summit in the Netherlands alongside US President Donald Trump, sought to downplay the contents of the preliminary Pentagon assessment. While Trump continues to insist that the strikes caused a "total obliteration" of Iran’s nuclear capabilities, the leak, first reported by CNN and The New York Times, suggested that the underground facilities had survived the attack, with entrances sealed but no collapse of the critical subterranean infrastructure. Furthermore, the intel estimated that the damage had only caused a few months' setback to Iran's programme and not years, as Trump claimed.&nbsp;At the press conference, Hegseth accused unnamed insiders of leaking the report for political purposes and revealed that an FBI-led investigation was underway. "We are doing a leak investigation with the FBI now because this information is for internal purposes—battle damage investigation—and CNN and others are trying to spin it to try and make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success," he said.&nbsp;He defended the precision and power of the operation, saying that "When you talk to the people who built the bombs, understand what those bombs can do, and deliver those bombs, they landed precisely where they were supposed to." Hegseth claimed the Fordow facility, buried deep within a mountain, suffered "devastation," thanks to the "30,000 pounds of explosives", even as early assessments described the damage as "moderate to severe."&nbsp;Trump also conceded that the report was "correct" but lashed out at the press over the leaked report, singling out outlets by name. "CNN is scum, MSDNC is scum, the New York Times is scum," he told reporters. "They're bad people, they’re sick."&nbsp;“What they've done is they’ve tried to make this unbelievable victory into something less,” he said, insisting that the report's interpretation was off. Painting the reports as a way to get ratings, he added, ”The generals and all of the people who did a good job, they get demeaned by these idiots at CNN, who can't get ratings. The place is dying, nobody even wants to waste their time going on any of their shows, so they form what [sic] The New York Times, which is dying also. Without Trump, you wouldn't have a New York Times."

HISTORICALLY SUCCESSFUL MISSION says Pete Hegseth on Iran strikes

United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressed the media on Thursday morning (June 26) at the Pentagon on the strikes on Iran. Speaking to the reporters, Hegseth said, “Strikes in Iran were highly successful, it was a resounding success and brought the end of the war. Trump created the conditions to end war destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities. What other presidents talked about, President Trump achieved. This is a historic moment." “Leaked preliminary report is based on lynchpin assumptions. Rafael Grossi also said that US strikes caused enormous damage. This is a historically successful mission." “32 NATO countries committed to spending 5%, historic change in continental security. What President Trump achieved at NATO yesterday was groundbreaking,” he further added. Meanwhile, Gen. Dan Caine said, “We received intel on Monday that Iran intended to attack US bases in the region. Patriot cruise were deployed from Korea and Japan. We were joined in this engagement with Qatari Patriot cruise. In the days preceding the fordo attacks Iranians tried to cover the shafts with concrete." The Trump administration has been resolute that its strikes on three nuclear facilities on Saturday (June 21 ) in Iran were a success. Several media outlets have reported that a preliminary intelligence assessment found the bombings delayed Iran’s nuclear program by only a few months. President Trump and his cabinet have insisted the sites were “obliterated” and “destroyed”. Donald Trump's two top executives, on Wednesday (Jun 25) at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague, confirmed that a bombshell US intelligence report on Iran airstrikes was, in fact, leaked. They then quickly pivoted to denouncing the people behind the leak, calling the move politically motivated and demanding accountability. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio assumed an aggressive counteroffensive against the leaked preliminary Pentagon report that said that US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites only set the nation's nuclear programme back by a few months. Confirming the bombshell leak, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a NATO summit in the Netherlands alongside US President Donald Trump, sought to downplay the contents of the preliminary Pentagon assessment. While Trump continues to insist that the strikes caused a "total obliteration" of Iran’s nuclear capabilities, the leak, first reported by CNN and The New York Times, suggested that the underground facilities had survived the attack, with entrances sealed but no collapse of the critical subterranean infrastructure. Furthermore, the intel estimated that the damage had only caused a few months' setback to Iran's programme and not years, as Trump claimed. At the press conference, Hegseth accused unnamed insiders of leaking the report for political purposes and revealed that an FBI-led investigation was underway. "We are doing a leak investigation with the FBI now because this information is for internal purposes—battle damage investigation—and CNN and others are trying to spin it to try and make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success," he said. He defended the precision and power of the operation, saying that "When you talk to the people who built the bombs, understand what those bombs can do, and deliver those bombs, they landed precisely where they were supposed to." Hegseth claimed the Fordow facility, buried deep within a mountain, suffered "devastation," thanks to the "30,000 pounds of explosives", even as early assessments described the damage as "moderate to severe." Trump also conceded that the report was "correct" but lashed out at the press over the leaked report, singling out outlets by name. "CNN is scum, MSDNC is scum, the New York Times is scum," he told reporters. "They're bad people, they’re sick." “What they've done is they’ve tried to make this unbelievable victory into something less,” he said, insisting that the report's interpretation was off. Painting the reports as a way to get ratings, he added, ”The generals and all of the people who did a good job, they get demeaned by these idiots at CNN, who can't get ratings. The place is dying, nobody even wants to waste their time going on any of their shows, so they form what [sic] The New York Times, which is dying also. Without Trump, you wouldn't have a New York Times."

United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressed the media on Thursday morning (June 26) at the Pentagon on the strikes on Iran

'HISTORICALLY SUCCESSFUL MISSION', says Pete Hegseth on Iran strikes

India has repeatedly rejected the establishment of foreign military bases on its soil, including those of the United States of America, despite their growing defence partnership. This position stems from India’s longstanding commitment to strategic autonomy, a doctrine rooted in its post-colonial experience and non-aligned foreign policy. From Nehru to Modi, Indian leaders have maintained a clear stance that sovereignty must not be diluted by the permanent presence of foreign troops, regardless of diplomatic ties or logistical agreements. Unlike other smaller nations that accept US bases for added security, India views such arrangements as incompatible with its military self-sufficiency.<h2>India's military capability</h2>India’s military capabilities, ranging from nuclear deterrence to a large standing army and expanding naval and cyber assets, provide sufficient strategic depth. Instead of hosting foreign bases, India has opted for defence cooperation through limited-access agreements. Deals like LEMOA allow the US to refuel and restock at Indian facilities during joint operations or emergencies, but they do not permit basing rights. This arrangement further enables operational collaboration without compromising sovereignty.&nbsp;Hosting a US base in the country would also carry regional consequences, including potential friction with China and Russia. Moreover, several historical incidents, from the US Navy’s 7th Fleet sailing toward India in the 1971 liberation war to American opposition to India’s nuclear programme, might have fostered a cautious attitude in New Delhi toward US military intentions.<h2>Risks, Ramifications, and Alternative Pathways</h2>The absence of US bases in India is not merely a reflection of India’s position, but it also suits our current US strategic requirements. With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. From India’s perspective, allowing a base would invite geopolitical liabilities without tangible strategic gains. The recent missile strike on Al Udeid base in Qatar, during the Israel-Iran conflict, highlights the risks of becoming a target by hosting foreign forces. India seeks to avoid being drawn into conflicts unrelated to its national interest.Despite having closer ties through QUAD and joint military exercises like Malabar, New Delhi remains cautious. The concerns over potential disruption to long-standing partnerships, especially with Russia and past US policy decisions further strengthen India’s reluctance. In short, India’s refusal to host US military bases is a deliberate, calculated policy choice, and not an oversight or gap in the bilateral relationship.&nbsp;

With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. 

India has repeatedly rejected the establishment of foreign military bases on its soil, including those of the United States of America, despite their growing defence partnership. This position stems from India’s longstanding commitment to strategic autonomy, a doctrine rooted in its post-colonial experience and non-aligned foreign policy. From Nehru to Modi, Indian leaders have maintained a clear stance that sovereignty must not be diluted by the permanent presence of foreign troops, regardless of diplomatic ties or logistical agreements. Unlike other smaller nations that accept US bases for added security, India views such arrangements as incompatible with its military self-sufficiency. India's military capability India’s military capabilities, ranging from nuclear deterrence to a large standing army and expanding naval and cyber assets, provide sufficient strategic depth. Instead of hosting foreign bases, India has opted for defence cooperation through limited-access agreements. Deals like LEMOA allow the US to refuel and restock at Indian facilities during joint operations or emergencies, but they do not permit basing rights. This arrangement further enables operational collaboration without compromising sovereignty. Hosting a US base in the country would also carry regional consequences, including potential friction with China and Russia. Moreover, several historical incidents, from the US Navy’s 7th Fleet sailing toward India in the 1971 liberation war to American opposition to India’s nuclear programme, might have fostered a cautious attitude in New Delhi toward US military intentions. Risks, Ramifications, and Alternative Pathways The absence of US bases in India is not merely a reflection of India’s position, but it also suits our current US strategic requirements. With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. From India’s perspective, allowing a base would invite geopolitical liabilities without tangible strategic gains. The recent missile strike on Al Udeid base in Qatar, during the Israel-Iran conflict, highlights the risks of becoming a target by hosting foreign forces. India seeks to avoid being drawn into conflicts unrelated to its national interest. Despite having closer ties through QUAD and joint military exercises like Malabar, New Delhi remains cautious. The concerns over potential disruption to long-standing partnerships, especially with Russia and past US policy decisions further strengthen India’s reluctance. In short, India’s refusal to host US military bases is a deliberate, calculated policy choice, and not an oversight or gap in the bilateral relationship.

With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions.&nbsp;

No boots allowed: Why India refuses US military bases on its soil despite strategic ties

US President Donald Trump seems to be liking his new nickname - 'Daddy'! The White House has just dropped a one-minute video showing Trump’s arrival and interactions at the NATO summit set to the background track Daddy's Home by Usher. It all began when NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said that Trump behaved like a 'Daddy' in dealing with Iran and Israel. Rutte's remark was in response to Trump's usual comparison of Iran and Israel as “two school kids fighting.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🎶 Daddy’s home… Hey, hey, hey, Daddy. President Donald J. Trump attended the NATO Summit in The Hague, Netherlands. <a href="https://t.co/asJb5FD2Ii">pic.twitter.com/asJb5FD2Ii</a>&mdash; The White House (@WhiteHouse) <a href="https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1938053287535616085?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 26, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"They've had a big fight, like two kids in a schoolyard," Trump said, referring to Israel and Iran. "You know, they fight like hell. You can't stop them. Let them fight for about two, three minutes, then it's easier to stop." To that, Rutte responded: "And then Daddy has to sometimes use strong language," referring to Trump's usage of the F-word after Israel and Iran violated the ceasefire. Trump laughed at Rutte's remark and said, "Everyone said 'Well, you have to use a certain word." &nbsp;Ahead of boarding Air Force One to attend the NATO Summit in the Netherlands, Trump angrily said, when asked about violation of ceasefire by Israel and Iran, "The two countries have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing, do you understand that?" Trump on June 24 declared that a ceasefire had been agreed between Israel and Iran and war had stopped, but both countries violated it soon after Trump's announcement and fired missiles at each other. This was a major upset for Trump, who angrily warned Israel against bombing Iran and lost his cool in front of reporters.<h2>‘Daddy’ remark doesn't stop!</h2>During a press interaction on the sidelines of the NATO Summit, Trump was asked about Rutte's 'Daddy' remark, to which Trump responded, "He did it very affectionately," Trump said. "Daddy, you're my daddy." Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Rutte said he was not calling President Trump “daddy,” and the remark was a metaphor for US leadership. In an interview with Reuters, Rutte explained the context. He said, "And I said, that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'Hey, are you still staying with the family?' So, in that sense, I used 'daddy,' not that I was calling President Trump daddy." When asked if he was overpraising Trump to keep him happy amid ongoing complaints about NATO’s dependence on US support, Rutte said he didn't think so. "I think it's a bit of a question of taste," he remarked. Rutte called Trump a "good friend" of more than ten years, adding that he deserves the credit.

The White House has just dropped a one-minute video showing Trump arrival and interactions at the NATO summit set to the background track Daddy's Home by Usher.

US President Donald Trump seems to be liking his new nickname - 'Daddy'! The White House has just dropped a one-minute video showing Trump’s arrival and interactions at the NATO summit set to the background track Daddy's Home by Usher. It all began when NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said that Trump behaved like a 'Daddy' in dealing with Iran and Israel. Rutte's remark was in response to Trump's usual comparison of Iran and Israel as “two school kids fighting.”

The White House has just dropped a one-minute video showing Trump’s arrival and interactions at the NATO summit set to the background track Daddy's Home by Usher.

'Daddy' Trump impressed by his nickname? White House posts US president's NATO Summit video with THIS background track - Watch

United States President Donald Trump has gone from stating 2016 Iran Nuclear Deal “the stupidest deal of all time” to "e're oing to talk to them next week". While the previous remark was made by Trump in 2017 when he entered the White House for the first time, his latest remark comes in the aftermath of the Iran-Israel war. Trump has largely been known for his approach of 'isolation' to achieve his goal of 'America First.' While he continues to spread the same goal in his second term, his willingness to strike a deal with West Asian nations, including Iran, has not only surprised his critics but also his own MAGA base.<h2>Here we look at how Trump's approach to Iran has changed over the years</h2>1. During first term as President (2017–2021) Trump began his presidency by withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) in 2018, calling it “a horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made.” He then reinstated heavy sanctions on Iran’s economy, especially targeting oil exports, banking, and the Revolutionary Guard. His rhetoric was consistently aggressive, including statements like “<a href="https://x.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1130207891049332737">If Iran wants to fight, that will be the official end of Iran” (May 2019)</a>. One of the most provocative moments came in January 2020, when he ordered a drone strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, igniting fears of a full-scale war. He then justified his move saying, “<a href="https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-killing-qasem-soleimani/">We took action to stop a war… not to start one</a>.”&nbsp;2. Post-Presidency and Early 2024 Campaign Following his presidency, Trump’s tone cooled somewhat, focusing more on contrasting his approach with that of President Biden. In campaign speeches, he framed his first-term Iran policy as a deterrent success, claiming things were under control because Iran “wouldn’t even think of enriching uranium if I were in the White House.” While still critical of Iran, the emphasis shifted from threats to pointing out his record of strength and containment. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-china-can-buy-iranian-oil-undermines-years-of-sanctions-on-iran-1750913535553/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-china-can-buy-iranian-oil-undermines-years-of-sanctions-on-iran-1750913535553/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;3. Shift in tone in the second term as president By mid-2025, Trump’s position became more nuanced - hinting that if Trump doesn't want Iran as a friend, he doesn't want it as a foe either. After a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Trump told Israel to “<a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114737953503348541">stop dropping bombs</a>” &nbsp;on Iran, marking a rare moment of assertiveness toward a traditional US ally. At the same time, he publicly stated, “<a href="https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/114738521695017472">China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran</a>”, suggesting a possible softening of US sanctions enforcement. It also suggested that Trump wants Iran to continue their business despite the tensions in the region - a stance that has even shocked his MAGA base. While some say that Trump's statement is to stabilize global oil prices and leveraging trade dynamics with China, his comment that Iran's Supreme Leader would not be killed and that he doesnt want a “regime change” in Iran certainly hints at a change in discourse. He also made a striking remark at a NATO briefing: “They’re going to need money to put that country back into shape. We want to see that happen” - representing a notable shift from his earlier goal of total economic isolation for Iran.&nbsp;While the US president continues to frame Iran as a threat and has also said during the NATO Summit that he does not care about the agreement, and his goal is simple - "Iran should not have nuclear," his current stance is a focus on diplomacy and business and not assertive. He seems to be using war and strength to bring business deals in what may be called - a Trumpian diplomacy.

While US President Donald Trump continues to spread the ‘America First’ goal, his willingness to strike a deal with West Asian nations, including Iran, has not only surprised his critics but also his own MAGA base. So is Trump looking for a friend in Iran?

United States President Donald Trump has gone from stating 2016 Iran Nuclear Deal “the stupidest deal of all time” to "e're oing to talk to them next week". While the previous remark was made by Trump in 2017 when he entered the White House for the first time, his latest remark comes in the aftermath of the Iran-Israel war. Trump has largely been known for his approach of 'isolation' to achieve his goal of 'America First.' While he continues to spread the same goal in his second term, his willingness to strike a deal with West Asian nations, including Iran, has not only surprised his critics but also his own MAGA base. Here we look at how Trump's approach to Iran has changed over the years 1. During first term as President (2017–2021) Trump began his presidency by withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) in 2018, calling it “a horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made.” He then reinstated heavy sanctions on Iran’s economy, especially targeting oil exports, banking, and the Revolutionary Guard. His rhetoric was consistently aggressive, including statements like “If Iran wants to fight, that will be the official end of Iran” (May 2019). One of the most provocative moments came in January 2020, when he ordered a drone strike that killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, igniting fears of a full-scale war. He then justified his move saying, “We took action to stop a war… not to start one.” 2. Post-Presidency and Early 2024 Campaign Following his presidency, Trump’s tone cooled somewhat, focusing more on contrasting his approach with that of President Biden. In campaign speeches, he framed his first-term Iran policy as a deterrent success, claiming things were under control because Iran “wouldn’t even think of enriching uranium if I were in the White House.” While still critical of Iran, the emphasis shifted from threats to pointing out his record of strength and containment. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-china-can-buy-iranian-oil-undermines-years-of-sanctions-on-iran-1750913535553/embed 3. Shift in tone in the second term as president By mid-2025, Trump’s position became more nuanced - hinting that if Trump doesn't want Iran as a friend, he doesn't want it as a foe either. After a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Trump told Israel to “stop dropping bombs” on Iran, marking a rare moment of assertiveness toward a traditional US ally. At the same time, he publicly stated, “China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran”, suggesting a possible softening of US sanctions enforcement. It also suggested that Trump wants Iran to continue their business despite the tensions in the region - a stance that has even shocked his MAGA base. While some say that Trump's statement is to stabilize global oil prices and leveraging trade dynamics with China, his comment that Iran's Supreme Leader would not be killed and that he doesnt want a “regime change” in Iran certainly hints at a change in discourse. He also made a striking remark at a NATO briefing: “They’re going to need money to put that country back into shape. We want to see that happen” - representing a notable shift from his earlier goal of total economic isolation for Iran. While the US president continues to frame Iran as a threat and has also said during the NATO Summit that he does not care about the agreement, and his goal is simple - "Iran should not have nuclear," his current stance is a focus on diplomacy and business and not assertive. He seems to be using war and strength to bring business deals in what may be called - a Trumpian diplomacy.

While US President Donald Trump continues to spread the ‘America First’ goal, his willingness to strike a deal with West Asian nations, including Iran, has not only surprised his critics but also his own MAGA base. So is Trump looking for a friend in Iran?

From 'horrible, one-sided' deal to seeking new nuclear agreement: How Trump’s Iran stance has FLIPPED over the years

Indian-American Zohran Mamdani declared victory in New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday night (June 25) after former Governor Andrew Cuomo conceded defeat. While the final result will depend on the ranked-choice voting tally, <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-origin-zohran-mamdani-likely-to-win-new-york-city-democratic-mayoral-primary-who-is-he-1750826346189">Mamdani</a>, a 33-year-old democratic socialist appeared to be in a dominant position, AP reported. Even as Mamdani's final victory is awaited, US President Donald Trump slammed him and described his looks as ‘terrible’ and his voive ‘grating.’ In two posts on Truth Social, the US president not only criticised Mamdani but also Democratic leaders including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - who serves as US representative for New York's 14th congressional district. Trump also called Mamdani ‘100% communist lunatic.’&nbsp;“Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We’ve had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous. He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he’s not very smart, he’s got AOC+3, Dummies ALL, backing him, and even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him,” Trump said, adding in a sarcastic remark at the end - “Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!”<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250626/image-1750907575435.png"></figure>Further, criticising Democrats, Trump said that they should nominate Jasmine Crockett - whom he termed “Low IQ Candidate” for President and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rep. Ilhan Omar as Vice President, along with Mamdani - who will soon be New York Mayor. Trump declared that "the country is really screwed," poking fun at Democrats and expressing frustration over Mamdani's victory.&nbsp;“I have an idea for the Democrats to bring them back into “play.” After years of being left out in the cold, including suffering one of the Greatest Losses in History, the 2024 Presidential Election, the Democrats should nominate Low IQ Candidate, Jasmine Crockett, for President, and AOC+3 should be, respectively, Vice President, and three High Level Members of the Cabinet – Added together with our future Communist Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, and our Country is really SCREWED!”<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250626/image-1750907842348.png"></figure><h2>Who is Zohran Mamdani?</h2>Zohran Kwame Mamdani was born in Kampala, Uganda, but was brought up with his family in New York City, USA, at the age of 7. After graduating with a Bachelor's Degree in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College, he became an American citizen in 2018. He attended the Bronx High School of Science and later earned a degree in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College, where he co-founded the campus chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine. Mamdani and his wife, 27-year-old Brooklyn-based Syrian artist Rama Duwaji, met on the dating app Hinge. His mother, Mira Nair, is a celebrated film director and his father Professor Mahmood Mamdani, teaches at Columbia. Both of them are Harvard alumni. Mamdani's unique campaign went viral on social media and got the world talking as he spoke directly to the New York city’s massive South Asian population through a language they understood deeply: Bollywood - using pop culture refrences, iconic songs, etc.&nbsp;&nbsp;Senator Bernie Sanders hailed Mamdani’s win, saying, “You took on the political, economic and media establishment, and you beat them.” At his victory party in Queens, Mamdani quoted Nelson Mandela, saying, “It always seems impossible until it’s done. My friends, it is done.” Even Cuomo, conceding with grace, said, “Tonight is his night. He deserved it. He won.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">In the words of Nelson Mandela: it always seems impossible until it’s done. My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it. I am honored to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City. <a href="https://t.co/AgW0Z30xw1">pic.twitter.com/AgW0Z30xw1</a>&mdash; Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZohranKMamdani/status/1937728420156174626?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

As Mamdani is a few steps away from the mayor's post, US President Donald Trump has slammed him for what he described as terrible. He also called Indian-origin Mamdani 100% communist lunatic.



Indian-American Zohran Mamdani declared victory in New York City’s Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday night (June 25) after former Governor Andrew Cuomo conceded defeat. While the final result will depend on the ranked-choice voting tally, Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist appeared to be in a dominant position, AP reported. Even as Mamdani's final victory is awaited, US President Donald Trump slammed him and described his looks as ‘terrible’ and his voive ‘grating.’ In two posts on Truth Social, the US president not only criticised Mamdani but also Democratic leaders including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - who serves as US representative for New York's 14th congressional district. Trump also called Mamdani ‘100% communist lunatic.’ “Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We’ve had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous. He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he’s not very smart, he’s got AOC+3, Dummies ALL, backing him, and even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin’ Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him,” Trump said, adding in a sarcastic remark at the end - “Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!” Further, criticising Democrats, Trump said that they should nominate Jasmine Crockett - whom he termed “Low IQ Candidate” for President and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rep. Ilhan Omar as Vice President, along with Mamdani - who will soon be New York Mayor. Trump declared that "the country is really screwed," poking fun at Democrats and expressing frustration over Mamdani's victory. “I have an idea for the Democrats to bring them back into “play.” After years of being left out in the cold, including suffering one of the Greatest Losses in History, the 2024 Presidential Election, the Democrats should nominate Low IQ Candidate, Jasmine Crockett, for President, and AOC+3 should be, respectively, Vice President, and three High Level Members of the Cabinet – Added together with our future Communist Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, and our Country is really SCREWED!” Who is Zohran Mamdani? Zohran Kwame Mamdani was born in Kampala, Uganda, but was brought up with his family in New York City, USA, at the age of 7. After graduating with a Bachelor's Degree in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College, he became an American citizen in 2018. He attended the Bronx High School of Science and later earned a degree in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College, where he co-founded the campus chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine. Mamdani and his wife, 27-year-old Brooklyn-based Syrian artist Rama Duwaji, met on the dating app Hinge. His mother, Mira Nair, is a celebrated film director and his father Professor Mahmood Mamdani, teaches at Columbia. Both of them are Harvard alumni. Mamdani's unique campaign went viral on social media and got the world talking as he spoke directly to the New York city’s massive South Asian population through a language they understood deeply: Bollywood - using pop culture refrences, iconic songs, etc. Senator Bernie Sanders hailed Mamdani’s win, saying, “You took on the political, economic and media establishment, and you beat them.” At his victory party in Queens, Mamdani quoted Nelson Mandela, saying, “It always seems impossible until it’s done. My friends, it is done.” Even Cuomo, conceding with grace, said, “Tonight is his night. He deserved it. He won.”

As Mamdani is a few steps away from the mayor's post, US President Donald Trump has slammed him for what he described as 'terrible'. He also called Indian-origin Mamdani ‘100% communist lunatic.’&nbsp;

'He looks TERRIBLE': Trump slams '100% communist lunatic' Zohran Mamdani after he wins NYC's Democratic mayoral primary

In the latest, US President Donald Trump has spoken in support of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called for his trial to be cancelled. The latter has been charged with bribery, fraud and breach of trust. And this Trump calls a result of a ‘ridiculous witch hunt against their Great War Time Prime Minister’. Not too long ago after announcing the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Trump expressed his frustration as both sides violated the ceasefire announced by the American President.&nbsp;In his Truth Social post, Trump writes, “I was shocked to hear that the State of Israel, which has just had one of its Greatest Moments in History, and is strongly led by Bibi Netanyahu, is continuing its ridiculous Witch Hunt against their Great War Time Prime Minister! Bibi and I just went through hell together, fighting a very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran, and Bibi could not have been better, sharper, or stronger in his love for the incredible holy land. Anybody else would have suffered losses, embarrassment, and chaos!”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/palestinian-president-mahmoud-abbas-writes-to-trump-to-broker-peace-with-israel-1750892485656">Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas writes to Trump to broker peace with Israel</a>&nbsp;He continues, “Bibi Netanyahu was a warrior, like perhaps no other warrior in the history of Israel, and the result was something that nobody thought was possible, a complete elimination of potentially one of the biggest and most powerful nuclear weapons anywhere in the World, and it was going to happen, soon! We were fighting, literally, for those of Israel, and there is nobody in Israel’s history that fought harder or more competently than Bibi Netanyahu. Despite all of this, I just learned that Bibi has been summoned to Court on Monday for the continuation of this long-running politically motivated case, “concerning cigars, a Bugs Bunny doll, and numerous other unfair charges” in order to do him great harm.”&nbsp;“He has been going through this “Horror Show” since May of 2020 – unheard of! This is the first time a sitting Israeli Prime Minister has ever been on trial. Such a witch hunt, for a man who has given so much, is unthinkable to me. He deserves much better than this, and so does thes of Israel,” Trump added.&nbsp;He also called for the trial to be cancelled or pardoned immediately, “Bibi Netanyahu’s trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State. Perhaps there is no one that I know who could have worked in better harmony with the President of the United States, me, than Bibi Netanyahu. It was the United States of America that saved Israel, and now it is going to be the United States of America that saves Bibi Netanyahu. This Travesty of “JUSTICE” cannot be allowed.

In the latest, US President Donald Trump has spoken in support of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called for his trial to be cancelled. The latter has been charged with bribery, fraud and breach of trust. 

In the latest, US President Donald Trump has spoken in support of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called for his trial to be cancelled. The latter has been charged with bribery, fraud and breach of trust. And this Trump calls a result of a ‘ridiculous witch hunt against their Great War Time Prime Minister’. Not too long ago after announcing the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Trump expressed his frustration as both sides violated the ceasefire announced by the American President. In his Truth Social post, Trump writes, “I was shocked to hear that the State of Israel, which has just had one of its Greatest Moments in History, and is strongly led by Bibi Netanyahu, is continuing its ridiculous Witch Hunt against their Great War Time Prime Minister! Bibi and I just went through hell together, fighting a very tough and brilliant longtime enemy of Israel, Iran, and Bibi could not have been better, sharper, or stronger in his love for the incredible holy land. Anybody else would have suffered losses, embarrassment, and chaos!” Also read: Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas writes to Trump to broker peace with Israel He continues, “Bibi Netanyahu was a warrior, like perhaps no other warrior in the history of Israel, and the result was something that nobody thought was possible, a complete elimination of potentially one of the biggest and most powerful nuclear weapons anywhere in the World, and it was going to happen, soon! We were fighting, literally, for those of Israel, and there is nobody in Israel’s history that fought harder or more competently than Bibi Netanyahu. Despite all of this, I just learned that Bibi has been summoned to Court on Monday for the continuation of this long-running politically motivated case, “concerning cigars, a Bugs Bunny doll, and numerous other unfair charges” in order to do him great harm.” “He has been going through this “Horror Show” since May of 2020 – unheard of! This is the first time a sitting Israeli Prime Minister has ever been on trial. Such a witch hunt, for a man who has given so much, is unthinkable to me. He deserves much better than this, and so does thes of Israel,” Trump added. He also called for the trial to be cancelled or pardoned immediately, “Bibi Netanyahu’s trial should be CANCELLED, IMMEDIATELY, or a Pardon given to a Great Hero, who has done so much for the State. Perhaps there is no one that I know who could have worked in better harmony with the President of the United States, me, than Bibi Netanyahu. It was the United States of America that saved Israel, and now it is going to be the United States of America that saves Bibi Netanyahu. This Travesty of “JUSTICE” cannot be allowed.

In the latest, US President Donald Trump has spoken in support of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called for his trial to be cancelled. The latter has been charged with bribery, fraud and breach of trust.&nbsp;

It's a 'Witch Hunt': Trump demands cancellation of corruption trial against Benjamin Netanyahu

US President Donald Trump once again fumed at US media outlets over recent reports suggesting that strikes on Iran did not destroy Tehran’s nuclear programme. Describing the New York Times as “failing” and CNN as “fake news”, the US president said the news outlets were demeaning the “great work” done by B-2 B-2 stealth bombers pilots and were “wrong in doing so.” Calling the reporters “bad and sick people,” Trump once again hailed that the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities resulted in “total obliteration”.&nbsp;“We just caught the Failing New York Times, working with Fake News CNN, cheating again!” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. “They tried to demean the great work our B-2 pilots did, and they were wrong in doing so. These reporters are just BAD AND SICK PEOPLE.”&nbsp;He further added, “You would think they would be proud of the great success we had, instead of trying to always make our Country look bad. TOTAL OBLITERATION!” Shortly after, he posted again, “Israel just stated that the Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED! Thank you to our great B-2 pilots, and all others involved!”&nbsp;The CNN report, which was based on a classified assessment by the Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency, alleged that the US strikes only resulted in temporary damage to Iran’s nuclear programme and failed to eliminate enriched uranium stockpiles.&nbsp;However, the White House denied the reports, calling them “a clear attempt to demean President Trump.” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.”&nbsp;Earlier at the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Trump said, “As you know, it was complete total destruction, and CNN turned out to be fake news as always. That's why they have no credibility,” Trump raged Wednesday morning. “That's why they have no viewers, but we're going to read it to you if you haven't seen it.”

Calling the reporters “bad and sick people,” Trump once again hailed that the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities resulted in “total obliteration”.

US President Donald Trump once again fumed at US media outlets over recent reports suggesting that strikes on Iran did not destroy Tehran’s nuclear programme. Describing the New York Times as “failing” and CNN as “fake news”, the US president said the news outlets were demeaning the “great work” done by B-2 B-2 stealth bombers pilots and were “wrong in doing so.” Calling the reporters “bad and sick people,” Trump once again hailed that the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities resulted in “total obliteration”. “We just caught the Failing New York Times, working with Fake News CNN, cheating again!” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform. “They tried to demean the great work our B-2 pilots did, and they were wrong in doing so. These reporters are just BAD AND SICK PEOPLE.” He further added, “You would think they would be proud of the great success we had, instead of trying to always make our Country look bad. TOTAL OBLITERATION!” Shortly after, he posted again, “Israel just stated that the Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED! Thank you to our great B-2 pilots, and all others involved!” The CNN report, which was based on a classified assessment by the Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency, alleged that the US strikes only resulted in temporary damage to Iran’s nuclear programme and failed to eliminate enriched uranium stockpiles. However, the White House denied the reports, calling them “a clear attempt to demean President Trump.” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.” Earlier at the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Trump said, “As you know, it was complete total destruction, and CNN turned out to be fake news as always. That's why they have no credibility,” Trump raged Wednesday morning. “That's why they have no viewers, but we're going to read it to you if you haven't seen it.”

Calling the reporters “bad and sick people,” Trump once again hailed that the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities resulted in “total obliteration”.

‘Tried to demean great work our B-2 pilots did’: Trump blasts ‘BAD AND SICK’ media outlets

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (June 25) for a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in the Netherlands. This time, he changed his usual military-style outfit for a more formal suit.It was a notable change from their February meeting in the Oval Office, where their talks ended in a shouting match. During that exchange, Zelensky was criticised by a reporter for "not wearing a suit."This time, Zelensky wore a black jacket and shirt, more formal than his usual attire, though still not a full suit with matching trousers.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-zelensky-wants-it-what-is-patriot-missile-trump-plans-to-send-most-advanced-us-air-defence-system-to-ukraine-1750870908826">‘Zelensky wants it’: What is Patriot&nbsp;missile? Trump plans to send 'most advanced' US air defence system to Ukraine</a><h2>‘We covered all the truly important issues’</h2>This time, it seemed that the meeting between the two leaders went well. “I had a long and substantive meeting with President Trump. We covered all the truly important issues,” Zelensky posted on social media.He went on to thank both Trump and the United States, saying the meeting focused on achieving a ceasefire with Russia and working toward a lasting peace. “We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer. Details will follow,” Zelensky added.Following the meeting, which lasted 50 minutes, Trump said, “I wanted to know how he’s doing,” and said the meeting was “very nice” even though they “had little rough times” in the past. He added that he is “hopeful” that the three-year-long conflict between Russia and Ukraine can be resolved. Meanwhile, Zelensky said on social media that he had a “long and substantive” meeting with the US president. The two leaders discussed how to reach a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, he added.<h2>Pushing for air defence and sanctions</h2>Zelensky used the meeting to push for more weapons from the US, particularly the Patriot air defence missile system. Ukraine has been pressing Washington for these systems to shield its cities from Russian missile attacks.He is also said to have asked Trump to increase sanctions against the Russian government as a way to turn up pressure on President Vladimir Putin.<h2>Private talks, no official NATO seat</h2>Ukraine is not a NATO member, and Zelensky was not invited to take part in the official summit. However, he was granted a private meeting with Trump after Tuesday’s royal dinner in The Hague, hosted by the Dutch king.

It was a notable change from their February meeting in the Oval Office, where their talks ended in a shouting match. During that exchange, Zelensky was criticised by a reporter for "not wearing a suit."

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (June 25) for a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in the Netherlands. This time, he changed his usual military-style outfit for a more formal suit. It was a notable change from their February meeting in the Oval Office, where their talks ended in a shouting match. During that exchange, Zelensky was criticised by a reporter for "not wearing a suit." This time, Zelensky wore a black jacket and shirt, more formal than his usual attire, though still not a full suit with matching trousers. Also read: ‘Zelensky wants it’: What is Patriot missile? Trump plans to send 'most advanced' US air defence system to Ukraine ‘We covered all the truly important issues’ This time, it seemed that the meeting between the two leaders went well. “I had a long and substantive meeting with President Trump. We covered all the truly important issues,” Zelensky posted on social media. He went on to thank both Trump and the United States, saying the meeting focused on achieving a ceasefire with Russia and working toward a lasting peace. “We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer. Details will follow,” Zelensky added. Following the meeting, which lasted 50 minutes, Trump said, “I wanted to know how he’s doing,” and said the meeting was “very nice” even though they “had little rough times” in the past. He added that he is “hopeful” that the three-year-long conflict between Russia and Ukraine can be resolved. Meanwhile, Zelensky said on social media that he had a “long and substantive” meeting with the US president. The two leaders discussed how to reach a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, he added. Pushing for air defence and sanctions Zelensky used the meeting to push for more weapons from the US, particularly the Patriot air defence missile system. Ukraine has been pressing Washington for these systems to shield its cities from Russian missile attacks. He is also said to have asked Trump to increase sanctions against the Russian government as a way to turn up pressure on President Vladimir Putin. Private talks, no official NATO seat Ukraine is not a NATO member, and Zelensky was not invited to take part in the official summit. However, he was granted a private meeting with Trump after Tuesday’s royal dinner in The Hague, hosted by the Dutch king.

It was a notable change from their February meeting in the Oval Office, where their talks ended in a shouting match. During that exchange, Zelensky was criticised by a reporter for "not wearing a suit."

‘Yes, he OWNS a suit’: Zelensky ditches military gear for 'very nice' Trump meeting at NATO summit

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Wednesday (Jun 25) threatened to take legal action against Elon Musk’s SpaceX over falling debris and contamination from rocket launches across the border in the United States. During a press conference, Sheinbaum told reporters that the Mexican government was studying which international laws were being violated by the space company to file “the necessary lawsuits” as “there is indeed contamination”.&nbsp;On several occasions, SpaceX rocket explosions have resulted in debris washing up on Mexican beaches. Last week, a SpaceX Starship rocket exploded during a routine ground test at the Starbase headquarters in southern Texas, close to the Mexican border. &nbsp;Following the blast, a large fireball was seen erupting into the air, suggesting a setback to Musk’s dream of sending humans to Mars.&nbsp;Weeks before, debris from SpaceX’s Starship test flight reportedly washed up along the beaches in northern Mexico and parts of southern Texas, sparking concern among environmental groups. The debris included fragments of aluminium, plastic shards and several large tanks, said Conibio Global AC, a nonprofit environmental organisation.&nbsp;Sheinbaum added that Mexican officials are carrying out a “comprehensive review” of the environmental impacts of rocket launches in the bordering state of Tamaulipas.&nbsp;In early May, the US Federal Aviation Administration approved an increase in the annual for rocket launches for Musk’s space company from five to 25. It said that the increased frequency would not impact the environment adversely. The decision came despite conservative groups warning that the expansion could endanger sea turtles and shorebirds.&nbsp;The lawsuit would be the latest legal battle between Mexico and a US corporate giant. In May, Sheinbaum’s administration sued Google for renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the ‘Gulf of America’ in their Google Maps application. The tech giant made the changes for US users after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to change its name.

Last week, a SpaceX Starship rocket exploded during a routine ground test at the Starbase headquarters in southern Texas, close to the Mexican border.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum on Wednesday (Jun 25) threatened to take legal action against Elon Musk’s SpaceX over falling debris and contamination from rocket launches across the border in the United States. During a press conference, Sheinbaum told reporters that the Mexican government was studying which international laws were being violated by the space company to file “the necessary lawsuits” as “there is indeed contamination”. On several occasions, SpaceX rocket explosions have resulted in debris washing up on Mexican beaches. Last week, a SpaceX Starship rocket exploded during a routine ground test at the Starbase headquarters in southern Texas, close to the Mexican border. Following the blast, a large fireball was seen erupting into the air, suggesting a setback to Musk’s dream of sending humans to Mars. Weeks before, debris from SpaceX’s Starship test flight reportedly washed up along the beaches in northern Mexico and parts of southern Texas, sparking concern among environmental groups. The debris included fragments of aluminium, plastic shards and several large tanks, said Conibio Global AC, a nonprofit environmental organisation. Sheinbaum added that Mexican officials are carrying out a “comprehensive review” of the environmental impacts of rocket launches in the bordering state of Tamaulipas. In early May, the US Federal Aviation Administration approved an increase in the annual for rocket launches for Musk’s space company from five to 25. It said that the increased frequency would not impact the environment adversely. The decision came despite conservative groups warning that the expansion could endanger sea turtles and shorebirds. The lawsuit would be the latest legal battle between Mexico and a US corporate giant. In May, Sheinbaum’s administration sued Google for renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the ‘Gulf of America’ in their Google Maps application. The tech giant made the changes for US users after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to change its name.

Last week, a SpaceX Starship rocket exploded during a routine ground test at the Starbase headquarters in southern Texas, close to the Mexican border.&nbsp;

Elon Musk’s SpaceX to face legal troubles? Mexican president threatens to sue US company over rocket debris