Among the more than 800,000 files released from a case related to Jeffrey Epstein by the Department of Justice on Friday (Jan 31), was a document suggesting the sex offender’s Xbox LIVE account was banned as he was registered as a sex offender in 2013. The revelation came to light through the emails released in the latest dump of documents on Epstein.Microsoft banned Epstein’s gaming profile following an agreement with the New York State Attorney General’s office that required the company to remove all sex offenders from its online gaming community to protect users, especially children.According to the email sent to Epstein’s “jeevacation” email address on December 19, 2013, his account was “permanently suspended due to harassment, threats, and/or abuse of other players. This conduct has been determined to be severe, repeated, and/or excessive.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/key-takeaways-from-latest-batch-of-epstein-file-dump-mentions-of-trump-musk-and-more-1769849456585/1769849456587">Key takeaways from latest batch of Epstein file dump: Mentions of Trump, Musk and more</a>A second email read, “This message is to notify you that Xbox LIVE has permanently suspended the Xbox LIVE account associated with this email address. This action is based on the New York Attorney General’s partnership with Microsoft and other online gaming companies to remove New York registered sex offenders from online gaming services to minimize the risk to others, particularly children. As a result, any Xbox LIVE account associated with this email address will not be able to connect to Xbox LIVE.”Epstein had been a registered sex offender since 2008, when he was convicted on two counts of procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting a prostitute in Florida. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison. However, he only served 13 months and was placed on the national sex offender registry as part of a plea deal.It was not clear whether Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who also appeared in the documents, knew about Epstein’s account being suspended.

New DOJ files show Jeffrey Epstein’s Xbox LIVE account was permanently suspended in 2013, according to emails released in the final batch of documents linked to his case.

Among the more than 800,000 files released from a case related to Jeffrey Epstein by the Department of Justice on Friday (Jan 31), was a document suggesting the sex offender’s Xbox LIVE account was banned as he was registered as a sex offender in 2013. The revelation came to light through the emails released in the latest dump of documents on Epstein. Microsoft banned Epstein’s gaming profile following an agreement with the New York State Attorney General’s office that required the company to remove all sex offenders from its online gaming community to protect users, especially children. According to the email sent to Epstein’s “jeevacation” email address on December 19, 2013, his account was “permanently suspended due to harassment, threats, and/or abuse of other players. This conduct has been determined to be severe, repeated, and/or excessive.” Also read | Key takeaways from latest batch of Epstein file dump: Mentions of Trump, Musk and more A second email read, “This message is to notify you that Xbox LIVE has permanently suspended the Xbox LIVE account associated with this email address. This action is based on the New York Attorney General’s partnership with Microsoft and other online gaming companies to remove New York registered sex offenders from online gaming services to minimize the risk to others, particularly children. As a result, any Xbox LIVE account associated with this email address will not be able to connect to Xbox LIVE.” Epstein had been a registered sex offender since 2008, when he was convicted on two counts of procuring a child for prostitution and soliciting a prostitute in Florida. He was sentenced to 18 months in prison. However, he only served 13 months and was placed on the national sex offender registry as part of a plea deal. It was not clear whether Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who also appeared in the documents, knew about Epstein’s account being suspended.

New DOJ files show Jeffrey Epstein’s Xbox LIVE account was permanently suspended in 2013, according to emails released in the final batch of documents linked to his case.

Epstein was permanently banned from Xbox Live – DOJ’s new files reveal why

The documents, disclosed as part of a large release of investigative material, include memos and interview notes describing how jail officials allegedly staged a decoy operation to divert media attention while Epstein’s body was removed.

Was a ‘fake body’ used to mislead media after Epstein’s death? What newly released records reveal

After the release of fresh documents in the Epstein Files, the Republican Congressman from Kentucky, Thomas Massie, hit out at the US Department of Justice. Massie is also the person who co-sponsored the bill that required the release of the files in the sexual offence cases. He called out the department over "illegal redactions and delay" in complying with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. He took to the social media platform X and wrote, “DOJ did break the law by making illegal redactions and by missing the deadline.”

He also asked, “Who’s controlling the DOJ X account on Christmas Eve and using words like “dope' to refer to reporters?”&nbsp;"DOJ did break the law by making illegal redactions and by missing the deadline. By the way, who’s controlling the DOJ X account on Christmas Eve and using words like “dope” to refer to reporters?" He wrote.&nbsp;This came after Axios reported that the WHite House has now started managing the Department of Justice’s X account. The report said that it was with the aim of managing the narrative around the Epstein Files.

After the release of fresh documents in the Epstein Files, the Republican Congressman from Kentucky, Thomas Massie, hit out at the US Department of Justice. Massie is also the person who co-sponsored the bill that required the release of the files in the sexual offence cases.

After the release of fresh documents in the Epstein Files, the Republican Congressman from Kentucky, Thomas Massie, hit out at the US Department of Justice. Massie is also the person who co-sponsored the bill that required the release of the files in the sexual offence cases. He called out the department over "illegal redactions and delay" in complying with the Epstein Files Transparency Act. He took to the social media platform X and wrote, “DOJ did break the law by making illegal redactions and by missing the deadline.”

After the release of fresh documents in the Epstein Files, the Republican Congressman from Kentucky, Thomas Massie, hit out at the US Department of Justice. Massie is also the person who co-sponsored the bill that required the release of the files in the sexual offence cases.

‘Who’s controlling DOJ’s X account?’: Thomas Massie calls out DOJ for delaying Epstein Files release

The newly released tranche of Epstein files by the Department of Justice (DOJ) mentions a woman saying that Donald Trump once watched her uncle kill her newborn and dump the body into the river. Her claim appears in an FBI document. The woman, who has not been named, says she was 13 at the time. As per the document, the woman said, "[Trump] participated regularly in paying money to force me to [redacted] with him and he was present when my uncle murdered my newborn child and disposed of the body in Lake Michigan." She claims that she reached out to the FBI on 8 March 2020, and told them that she was sex trafficked by her uncle and Jeffrey Epstein in 1984 at the age of 13. She was pregnant, and her newborn baby girl was killed and disposed of “because I gave birth to her while in the middle of this sex trafficking ordeal", she told the FBI.&nbsp;“I told [the FBI agent] some other important information about other high-profile individuals involved in my sex trafficking and the murder and disposal of my newborn daughter because I gave birth to her while in the middle of this ordeal,” the woman told the FBI, as per the documents. According to her, she contacted the FBI to get details of an NYPD detective whom she claimed had called her a few days before the murder.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/epstein-files-unverified-fbi-tip-trump-mar-a-lago-party-1766568516877">Epstein files allege Trump held 'party for prostitutes' in Mar-a-lago</a><h2>Epstein sex trafficked the woman, FBI documents state</h2>She said that she talked to the detective for "about 20 or 30 minutes" about being "sex trafficked" by her "uncle and Jeffrey Epstein in 1984." The woman said the incident happened “mostly from a yacht in Lake Michigan originating from Mona Lake, MI." She stated that Donald Trump was a witness to the incident and was present at the time her baby was killed.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-s-secret-science-plan-to-create-genetically-superior-humans-1766648025499/embed&nbsp;Epstein Files continue to tumble out, and on Wednesday, the DOJ announced it had discovered over 1 million documents. It is currently working on redacting the data of victims and said it will later release the files. In a social media post on Wednesday, the department said that the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the FBI told them “that they have uncovered over a million more documents potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.” It added, “We have lawyers working around the clock to review and make the legally required redactions to protect victims, and we will release the documents as soon as possible,” the statement said. It said it would take a few more weeks to release them because of the sheer volume.&nbsp;

Epstein files released by the Department of Justice (DOJ) carry an account of a woman who claims she was sex trafficked by Epstein when she was pregnant. She claims her newborn baby was killed in front of her and thrown into the river, with Trump being a witness to it.

The newly released tranche of Epstein files by the Department of Justice (DOJ) mentions a woman saying that Donald Trump once watched her uncle kill her newborn and dump the body into the river. Her claim appears in an FBI document. The woman, who has not been named, says she was 13 at the time. As per the document, the woman said, "[Trump] participated regularly in paying money to force me to [redacted] with him and he was present when my uncle murdered my newborn child and disposed of the body in Lake Michigan." She claims that she reached out to the FBI on 8 March 2020, and told them that she was sex trafficked by her uncle and Jeffrey Epstein in 1984 at the age of 13. She was pregnant, and her newborn baby girl was killed and disposed of “because I gave birth to her while in the middle of this sex trafficking ordeal", she told the FBI. “I told [the FBI agent] some other important information about other high-profile individuals involved in my sex trafficking and the murder and disposal of my newborn daughter because I gave birth to her while in the middle of this ordeal,” the woman told the FBI, as per the documents. According to her, she contacted the FBI to get details of an NYPD detective whom she claimed had called her a few days before the murder. Also Read: Epstein files allege Trump held 'party for prostitutes' in Mar-a-lago Epstein sex trafficked the woman, FBI documents state She said that she talked to the detective for "about 20 or 30 minutes" about being "sex trafficked" by her "uncle and Jeffrey Epstein in 1984." The woman said the incident happened “mostly from a yacht in Lake Michigan originating from Mona Lake, MI." She stated that Donald Trump was a witness to the incident and was present at the time her baby was killed. https://www.wionews.com/videos/epstein-s-secret-science-plan-to-create-genetically-superior-humans-1766648025499/embed Epstein Files continue to tumble out, and on Wednesday, the DOJ announced it had discovered over 1 million documents. It is currently working on redacting the data of victims and said it will later release the files. In a social media post on Wednesday, the department said that the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the FBI told them “that they have uncovered over a million more documents potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.” It added, “We have lawyers working around the clock to review and make the legally required redactions to protect victims, and we will release the documents as soon as possible,” the statement said. It said it would take a few more weeks to release them because of the sheer volume.

Epstein files released by the Department of Justice (DOJ) carry an account of a woman who claims she was sex trafficked by Epstein when she was pregnant. She claims her newborn baby was killed in front of her and thrown into the river, with Trump being a witness to it.

Epstein Files: Trump witnessed the killing of my newborn baby, 13-year-old girl claimed

The US Justice Department has hinted at another massive release of documents tied to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, saying it has received more than one million additional records. But when will these files be dropped? Here's everything you need to know.<h2>When can we expect new Epstein files?</h2>In a post on X, the Donald Trump DOJ revealed that it has received around one million more documents "potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case" but stopped short of giving a timeline for when the public will see them.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/sick-of-epstein-files-redactions-internet-sleuths-have-discovered-a-hack-to-read-everything-here-s-how-1766553752960">Sick of Epstein files redactions? This hack will allow you to read almost EVERYTHING</a>In a brief statement posted Wednesday (Dec 24), the department said the files were handed over by the FBI and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Officials said teams were now working "around the clock" to review the material and apply redactions meant to protect victims before publication."We will release the documents as soon as possible," the Justice Department said, adding that the sheer volume of material meant the process could take "a few more weeks".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the FBI have informed the Department of Justice that they have uncovered over a million more documents potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The DOJ has received these documents from SDNY and the FBI to review…&mdash; U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/2003901580341334257?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 24, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Cover-up allegations resurface</h2>The announcement immediately triggered accusations of stalling and a cover-up scheme on Capitol Hill. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, who have been pushing for full disclosure under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, said the delay only deepened public suspicion.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/new-epstein-files-put-trump-back-in-the-spotlight-jet-trips-and-disturbing-memo-on-his-love-for-nubile-girls-emerge-1766540433065">New Epstein files put Trump back in the spotlight: Disturbing letter reveals his love for 'nubile girls' and grabbing 's****h'</a>Representative Robert Garcia accused the administration of shielding powerful figures who abused women and girls. "The White House is openly engaged in a cover-up protecting Epstein's co-conspirators and the powerful men who abused women and girls", he said, noting it was "outrageous that the DOJ has illegally withheld over 1 million documents from the public". Notably, under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, there was a December 19 deadline for the release.Garcia also demanded testimony from Attorney General Pam Bondi to explain why the release has dragged on.&nbsp;

When will the next Epstein files be released? The DOJ says it has received over 1 million new Epstein-related records, but when will we see them? All we know.

The US Justice Department has hinted at another massive release of documents tied to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, saying it has received more than one million additional records. But when will these files be dropped? Here's everything you need to know. When can we expect new Epstein files? In a post on X, the Donald Trump DOJ revealed that it has received around one million more documents "potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case" but stopped short of giving a timeline for when the public will see them. Also read | Sick of Epstein files redactions? This hack will allow you to read almost EVERYTHING In a brief statement posted Wednesday (Dec 24), the department said the files were handed over by the FBI and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Officials said teams were now working "around the clock" to review the material and apply redactions meant to protect victims before publication. "We will release the documents as soon as possible," the Justice Department said, adding that the sheer volume of material meant the process could take "a few more weeks".

When will the next Epstein files be released? The DOJ says it has received over 1 million new Epstein-related records, but when will we see them? All we know.

Trump DOJ 'finds' million new Epstein files after January 19 release deadline. When will they be released?

A video on social media surfaced showing that text blacked out in PDF files related to the Epstein case can be revealed by simply copying and pasting it. The workaround, now viral online, has sparked fresh debate over digital redaction practices and document security.&nbsp;From the video, it appears that some redactions were done poorly—black bars over text without removing the underlying data, allowing copy-paste to reveal it. Similar instances were also confirmed on several social media that include Reddit, TikTok, and Threads.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Users on TikTok realizing they can just copy and paste the &quot;redacted&quot; text from Epstein file PDFs to read what it says <a href="https://t.co/eboS6kOsqE">pic.twitter.com/eboS6kOsqE</a>&mdash; Mike Rundle (@flyosity) <a href="https://twitter.com/flyosity/status/2003487819587821613?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Earlier, the release of Epstein files, which were heavily redacted, faced heavy criticism on social media after the US Department of Justice on Friday (December 19, 2025) released several documents related to its investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.&nbsp;The release made public featured photographs of former president Bill Clinton and other prominent figures who were part of Epstein’s wealthy social circle, such as Mick Jagger and Michael Jackson. Large sections of the files, however, were obscured by heavy redactions. The tight control exercised by officials under President Donald Trump’s administration fuelled scepticism over whether the disclosures would put to rest long-running conspiracy theories about an alleged high-level cover-up.&nbsp;The US Department of Justice said the redactions were necessary to safeguard victims’ identities, but many social media users remained unconvinced. Instead, the extensive blackouts became the subject of widespread ridicule, with memes and jokes quickly circulating online after the documents were released.<h3>Social media is flooded with different reactions, memes</h3>After the video surfaced on the social media platform X, netizens flooded the comment section with their mixed opinions and multiple memes. One of the netizens wrote," For a brief instant I thought “ain’t no way, they can’t be THIS incompetent,” then in the same breath I remembered who was in charge again. Comedy."&nbsp;The next said,"Redacted text in PDFs often isn’t truly removed, just hidden visually, making copy-paste reveal original content."&nbsp;Another wrote,"To the intern who knew this was going to happen and chose to keep their mouth shut."&nbsp;"Wait wait.. what if whomever redacted the files is actually a defender of truth and wanted this to happen," the next also said.

The release of Epstein files, which were heavily redacted, faced heavy criticism on social media after the US Department of Justice on Friday (December 19, 2025) released several documents related to its probe into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

A video on social media surfaced showing that text blacked out in PDF files related to the Epstein case can be revealed by simply copying and pasting it. The workaround, now viral online, has sparked fresh debate over digital redaction practices and document security. From the video, it appears that some redactions were done poorly—black bars over text without removing the underlying data, allowing copy-paste to reveal it. Similar instances were also confirmed on several social media that include Reddit, TikTok, and Threads.

The release of Epstein files, which were heavily redacted, faced heavy criticism on social media after the US Department of Justice on Friday (December 19, 2025) released several documents related to its probe into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Can ‘Redacted’ Epstein Files be read? Here's what viral clip reveals about blacked-out text

Being mentioned in the Epstein files does not indicate wrongdoing, but the new files released by US Justice Department on the late paedophile-sex trafficker leave more questions than answers. Here is what we know


Epstein  files latest: Letter seeking 'inappropriate friends', another fake one to abuser Nasser, Trump links. what's in the new dump?

The Epstein file drops have become a source of fascination for one and all, with their horrific pictures and twisted stories. The latest document dump, which featured 11,034 documents, has uncovered concerning photos and documents from the archives; however, the blacked-out bits, aka the redactions, have become a source of irritation for many. Now, internet sleuths and amateur hackers have come up with a hack to uncover most of what's been redacted. Here's how you can do it too.<h2>How can I bypass the Epstein Files redactions?</h2>The fresh release of files tied to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein has taken an unexpected turn, after online users discovered that some of the Justice Department's redactions can be undone with little more than basic copy and paste tools.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/new-epstein-files-put-trump-back-in-the-spotlight-jet-trips-and-disturbing-memo-on-his-love-for-nubile-girls-emerge-1766540433065">New Epstein files put Trump back in the spotlight: Disturbing letter reveals his love for 'nubile girls' and grabbing 's****h'</a>The Department of Justice on Monday published more than 11,000 documents under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Many of the pages were heavily blacked out, with names and passages obscured. Within hours, however, users on X began sharing a workaround that appeared to expose some of the hidden text.According to several posts that quickly went viral, portions of the redacted material could be highlighted, copied and pasted into another document, revealing what was meant to remain concealed. One post describing the method drew millions of views, with users accusing the department of sloppy handling of a politically sensitive release.<h2>Step-by-step instructions on how to see redacted info</h2>There are even step-by-step video tutorials that walk viewers through the process step by step, mocking the redaction technique and questioning how such an error made it into a high-profile federal disclosure. Others claimed that searching within the documents caused redacted names to reappear, including repeated references to US President Donald Trump.Watch one here:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Young Girl Figures Out How To Bypass Some Of The Redactions From The Epstein Files. Follow <a href="https://twitter.com/KaganDunlapShow?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@KaganDunlapShow</a> <a href="https://t.co/AB1sscBU4z">pic.twitter.com/AB1sscBU4z</a>&mdash; Kagan.Dunlap (@Kagan_M_Dunlap) <a href="https://twitter.com/Kagan_M_Dunlap/status/2003562314734412133?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The discovery poured fuel on long-running suspicions that the files were being selectively censored. Trump's name appears numerous times across the document dump, reflecting his friendship with Epstein. Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing in the case, and has repeatedly said he cut ties with Epstein years before the financier’s 2019 death in a New York jail.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/house-democrats-drop-epstein-photos-from-disturbing-paedophilic-lolita-quotes-on-bosoms-to-price-tag-for-girls-shocking-pics-reveal-bill-gates-1766131614452">Epstein files: Disturbing paedophilic quotes on bosoms to price tags for girls, here's what shocking new pics reveal</a>Some of the newly exposed passages relate to civil litigation surrounding Epstein’s estate. One document describes large payments made over several years to young women, allegedly authorised by executors of Epstein’s assets. Other sections allege efforts to silence victims and destroy evidence, though no new criminal charges have been announced. Officials have not directly addressed the technical flaw that allowed some redactions to be bypassed.

Epstein files redactions exposed: Can blacked-out names and information really be revealed? Yes, online users have found a way. No hacking needed. Scroll down to see the step-by-step workaround.

The Epstein file drops have become a source of fascination for one and all, with their horrific pictures and twisted stories. The latest document dump, which featured 11,034 documents, has uncovered concerning photos and documents from the archives; however, the blacked-out bits, aka the redactions, have become a source of irritation for many. Now, internet sleuths and amateur hackers have come up with a hack to uncover most of what's been redacted. Here's how you can do it too. How can I bypass the Epstein Files redactions? The fresh release of files tied to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein has taken an unexpected turn, after online users discovered that some of the Justice Department's redactions can be undone with little more than basic copy and paste tools. Also read | New Epstein files put Trump back in the spotlight: Disturbing letter reveals his love for 'nubile girls' and grabbing 's****h' The Department of Justice on Monday published more than 11,000 documents under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Many of the pages were heavily blacked out, with names and passages obscured. Within hours, however, users on X began sharing a workaround that appeared to expose some of the hidden text. According to several posts that quickly went viral, portions of the redacted material could be highlighted, copied and pasted into another document, revealing what was meant to remain concealed. One post describing the method drew millions of views, with users accusing the department of sloppy handling of a politically sensitive release. Step-by-step instructions on how to see redacted info There are even step-by-step video tutorials that walk viewers through the process step by step, mocking the redaction technique and questioning how such an error made it into a high-profile federal disclosure. Others claimed that searching within the documents caused redacted names to reappear, including repeated references to US President Donald Trump. Watch one here:

Epstein files redactions exposed: Can blacked-out names and information really be revealed? Yes, online users have found a way. No hacking needed. Scroll down to see the step-by-step workaround.

Sick of Epstein files redactions? Internet sleuths have discovered a hack to read almost EVERYTHING. Here's how

A second wave of documents linked to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein has put US President Donald Trump back at the centre of a controversy the White House had hoped to move past. Released on Tuesday (Dec 23), the latest batch of Epstein files includes thousands of pages of previously unseen material from the federal investigation into Epstein. Unlike the earlier, heavily redacted release last week, the new tranche contains repeated references to Trump and sheds fresh light on the former friendship between the two men.<h2>What the new Epstein files reveal about Trump-Epstein</h2>The initial release had drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers and victims' advocates, who accused the United States Department of Justice of selectively blacking out material that mentioned Trump. However, Tuesday's documents appear to undercut that claim, placing Trump prominently in internal notes, emails and prosecutorial records. It even includes detailed flight logs that prove Trump flew on Epstein's private jet. This contradicts the Justice Department's dismissal of reports that Trump flew on his then friend's jet.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-concerned-for-big-boy-clinton-as-ex-prez-challenges-doj-to-release-all-epstein-files-someone-is-being-protected-1766471370994">Trump concerned for 'big boy' Clinton as ex-prez challenges DOJ to release ALL Epstein files: 'Someone is being protected'</a><h2>Private jet links resurface</h2>Among the most closely watched disclosures is a January 2020 memo from New York federal prosecutors investigating Epstein's longtime associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. The note states that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet eight times between 1993 and 1996, more frequently than had been publicly known. One flight reportedly included only Epstein, Trump and an unidentified 20-year-old passenger. "Records we received yesterday reflect that Donald Trump travelled on Epstein's private jet many more times than previously has been reported (or that we were aware)," it says.<h2>Justice Department jumps to Trump's defence</h2>Within hours of the release, the Justice Department issued a statement defending the president, saying some of the material contained "untrue and sensationalist claims" about Trump. The department stressed that Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.Trump had previously sought to block the release of the files, arguing that they risked unfairly damaging people who "innocently met" Epstein. But mounting pressure from both Democrats and Republicans eventually forced him to sign a law mandating the full disclosure of the records, reflecting widespread public suspicion that powerful figures had long been shielded from scrutiny.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/house-democrats-drop-epstein-photos-from-disturbing-paedophilic-lolita-quotes-on-bosoms-to-price-tag-for-girls-shocking-pics-reveal-bill-gates-1766131614452">Epstein files: Disturbing paedophilic quotes on bosoms to price tags for girls, here's what shocking new pics reveal</a><h2>Disputed claims</h2>The Justice Department moved quickly to debunk a handwritten letter released Tuesday that was attributed to Epstein and addressed to imprisoned former gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar. In it, the sex convict can be seen complaining to Nassar that the "president shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by he loved to 'grab snatch.'"The FBI said that it "has confirmed this alleged letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar is FAKE,", noting it was postmarked three days after Epstein's death and was mailed from Virginia, despite Epstein being jailed in New York.

New Epstein files released Dec 23 place Donald Trump back in focus. Citing internal DOJ records and flight logs, they show Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s jet eight times in the 1990s. It also has a disturbing letter about Trump's penchant for ‘grabbing’. Here's what we know.

A second wave of documents linked to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein has put US President Donald Trump back at the centre of a controversy the White House had hoped to move past. Released on Tuesday (Dec 23), the latest batch of Epstein files includes thousands of pages of previously unseen material from the federal investigation into Epstein. Unlike the earlier, heavily redacted release last week, the new tranche contains repeated references to Trump and sheds fresh light on the former friendship between the two men. What the new Epstein files reveal about Trump-Epstein The initial release had drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers and victims' advocates, who accused the United States Department of Justice of selectively blacking out material that mentioned Trump. However, Tuesday's documents appear to undercut that claim, placing Trump prominently in internal notes, emails and prosecutorial records. It even includes detailed flight logs that prove Trump flew on Epstein's private jet. This contradicts the Justice Department's dismissal of reports that Trump flew on his then friend's jet. Also read | Trump concerned for 'big boy' Clinton as ex-prez challenges DOJ to release ALL Epstein files: 'Someone is being protected' Private jet links resurface Among the most closely watched disclosures is a January 2020 memo from New York federal prosecutors investigating Epstein's longtime associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. The note states that Trump flew on Epstein's private jet eight times between 1993 and 1996, more frequently than had been publicly known. One flight reportedly included only Epstein, Trump and an unidentified 20-year-old passenger. "Records we received yesterday reflect that Donald Trump travelled on Epstein's private jet many more times than previously has been reported (or that we were aware)," it says. Justice Department jumps to Trump's defence Within hours of the release, the Justice Department issued a statement defending the president, saying some of the material contained "untrue and sensationalist claims" about Trump. The department stressed that Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. Trump had previously sought to block the release of the files, arguing that they risked unfairly damaging people who "innocently met" Epstein. But mounting pressure from both Democrats and Republicans eventually forced him to sign a law mandating the full disclosure of the records, reflecting widespread public suspicion that powerful figures had long been shielded from scrutiny. Also read | Epstein files: Disturbing paedophilic quotes on bosoms to price tags for girls, here's what shocking new pics reveal Disputed claims The Justice Department moved quickly to debunk a handwritten letter released Tuesday that was attributed to Epstein and addressed to imprisoned former gymnastics doctor Larry Nassar. In it, the sex convict can be seen complaining to Nassar that the "president shares our love of young, nubile girls. When a young beauty walked by he loved to 'grab snatch.'" The FBI said that it "has confirmed this alleged letter from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Nassar is FAKE,", noting it was postmarked three days after Epstein's death and was mailed from Virginia, despite Epstein being jailed in New York.

New Epstein files released Dec 23 place Donald Trump back in focus. Citing internal DOJ records and flight logs, they show Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s jet eight times in the 1990s. It also has a disturbing letter about Trump's penchant for ‘grabbing’. Here's what we know.

New Epstein files put Trump back in the spotlight: Disturbing letter reveals his love for 'nubile girls' and grabbing 's****h'

Jeffrey Epstein’s story is a classic example of how people distance themselves from someone whose hospitality they enjoyed, whether knowing or not knowing of his criminal activities. The new tranche of Epstein files reveals not much, except some more heavily redacted text and strategically concealed photos. The only thing it really reveals is the activities of the American elite. At the top, everyone is connected. Epstein can be described whichever way one wants: a financial whizz kid who had deep links with the business, academic, entertainment and political world, or a paedophile-pimp who hosted, wined and dined the rich and the famous while secretly collecting compromising material about them.<h2>Epstein file names: From entertainers to politicians, royals and everyone in between</h2>While an undue amount of attention is focused on Bill Clinton’s ties with Epstein, there is no denying that incumbent president Donald Trump also had a pally relationship with the late disgraced financier. The talk of a ‘client list’ of Epstein – for whom he allegedly supplied girls – is still in the conspiracy theory realm. But the photos tell a level of everyone's &nbsp;familiarity with Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/melania-trump-link-in-epstein-files-first-lady-s-documentary-director-brett-ratner-in-new-photos-released-1766387633331">Melania Trump link in Epstein files: First Lady’s documentary director Brett Ratner in new photos released</a>&nbsp;The names include former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, Virgin Atlantic founder Richard Branson, and figures such as former US vice-president Al Gore, former UK royal Sarah Ferguson, former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and former US Treasury secretary Larry Summers.From the entertainment world, there’s Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson, Diana Ross, Chris Tucker, David Copperfield and Kevin Spacey. Other familiar names that surface in various documents or social references include Naomi Campbell, Woody Allen, Courtney Love, Ralph Fiennes, David Blaine, journalist Michael Wolff, and academics such as Noam Chomsky and the late Stephen Hawking.Also read: &nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/in-pics-epstein-files-new-photos-show-michael-jackson-kevin-spacey-and-other-high-profile-figures-1766204935927/1766204935928">In pics | Epstein files new photos show Michael Jackson, Kevin Spacey, and other high-profile figures</a> There are also mentions of news anchor Walter Cronkite and musician Phil Collins, alongside technology and media figures such as Elon Musk, Sergey Brin, Peter Thiel and former YouTube chief executive Salar Kamangar, all appearing in different contexts rather than as allegations.Many individuals had already appeared in the 2024 unsealed court filings from the Giuffre v. Maxwell case.&nbsp;In the new files, Donald Trump, Ehud Barak and (now-former) Prince Andrew are again referenced, largely through photographs, contact lists or travel records rather than as fresh claims.Most of them are mentioned in flight logs, photos, emails, stays at Epstein properties, meeting photos and documents, and in redacted parts of the Epstein files.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/doj-releases-first-batch-of-epstein-files-former-us-president-bill-clinton-features-prominently-1766243930733/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/doj-releases-first-batch-of-epstein-files-former-us-president-bill-clinton-features-prominently-1766243930733/embed</a>Business people like Bill Gates and Leslie Wexner of Victoria’s Secret, Leon Black and Glenn Dubin are also mentioned in some form or the other, reinforcing the breadth of Epstein’s social reach across finance and philanthropy.<h2>Not guilty until proven, but…</h2>The presence of these people in the Epstein files, either released in December or before, does not imply any wrongdoing. In other words, none is guilty by association.&nbsp;But it clearly shows that Epstein, with some help from Maxwell, was a constant social climber.&nbsp;He exchanged favours for access. The favours could be flying someone on his planes, hosting them at his properties, or appearing at parties, social or academic events with them.&nbsp;<h2>Everyone knew Epstein, or Epstein knew everyone&nbsp;</h2>Everyone in the political, business or entertainment crème de la crème of late 1990s to late 2010s America had some association with Epstein.Even then, the onion is not peeled in full. We may never know exactly what the people knew about Epstein, or what Epstein knew about them. Some people, like Clinton’s spokesperson, are finding the alibi that Clinton stopped all contact after Epstein’s criminal activities and involvement in prostitution came to light. But that is only a technical clarification. Some people, like Andrew, continued to be in touch after the Palm Beach, Florida case, which Epstein managed to survive legally.Everyone now wants to distance themselves from Epstein.&nbsp;And Epstein is not coming back to tell the truth as he died in custody in 2019 before trial. This only reinforces conspiracy theorists who say he was ‘bumped off’ in jail. The truth is somewhere in between.

The latest dump of Epstein files reveals hardly anything new. But they exposed the depth of elite connections across politics, business and entertainment, with the paedophile as the central character. Power, access and silence shaped Epstein’s world, and he's not around to prove anyone guilty

Jeffrey Epstein’s story is a classic example of how people distance themselves from someone whose hospitality they enjoyed, whether knowing or not knowing of his criminal activities. The new tranche of Epstein files reveals not much, except some more heavily redacted text and strategically concealed photos. The only thing it really reveals is the activities of the American elite. At the top, everyone is connected. Epstein can be described whichever way one wants: a financial whizz kid who had deep links with the business, academic, entertainment and political world, or a paedophile-pimp who hosted, wined and dined the rich and the famous while secretly collecting compromising material about them. Epstein file names: From entertainers to politicians, royals and everyone in between While an undue amount of attention is focused on Bill Clinton’s ties with Epstein, there is no denying that incumbent president Donald Trump also had a pally relationship with the late disgraced financier. The talk of a ‘client list’ of Epstein – for whom he allegedly supplied girls – is still in the conspiracy theory realm. But the photos tell a level of everyone's familiarity with Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Also read: Melania Trump link in Epstein files: First Lady’s documentary director Brett Ratner in new photos released The names include former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, Virgin Atlantic founder Richard Branson, and figures such as former US vice-president Al Gore, former UK royal Sarah Ferguson, former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and former US Treasury secretary Larry Summers. From the entertainment world, there’s Mick Jagger, Michael Jackson, Diana Ross, Chris Tucker, David Copperfield and Kevin Spacey. Other familiar names that surface in various documents or social references include Naomi Campbell, Woody Allen, Courtney Love, Ralph Fiennes, David Blaine, journalist Michael Wolff, and academics such as Noam Chomsky and the late Stephen Hawking. Also read: In pics | Epstein files new photos show Michael Jackson, Kevin Spacey, and other high-profile figures There are also mentions of news anchor Walter Cronkite and musician Phil Collins, alongside technology and media figures such as Elon Musk, Sergey Brin, Peter Thiel and former YouTube chief executive Salar Kamangar, all appearing in different contexts rather than as allegations. Many individuals had already appeared in the 2024 unsealed court filings from the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. In the new files, Donald Trump, Ehud Barak and (now-former) Prince Andrew are again referenced, largely through photographs, contact lists or travel records rather than as fresh claims. Most of them are mentioned in flight logs, photos, emails, stays at Epstein properties, meeting photos and documents, and in redacted parts of the Epstein files. https://www.wionews.com/videos/doj-releases-first-batch-of-epstein-files-former-us-president-bill-clinton-features-prominently-1766243930733/embed Business people like Bill Gates and Leslie Wexner of Victoria’s Secret, Leon Black and Glenn Dubin are also mentioned in some form or the other, reinforcing the breadth of Epstein’s social reach across finance and philanthropy. Not guilty until proven, but… The presence of these people in the Epstein files, either released in December or before, does not imply any wrongdoing. In other words, none is guilty by association. But it clearly shows that Epstein, with some help from Maxwell, was a constant social climber. He exchanged favours for access. The favours could be flying someone on his planes, hosting them at his properties, or appearing at parties, social or academic events with them. Everyone knew Epstein, or Epstein knew everyone Everyone in the political, business or entertainment crème de la crème of late 1990s to late 2010s America had some association with Epstein. Even then, the onion is not peeled in full. We may never know exactly what the people knew about Epstein, or what Epstein knew about them. Some people, like Clinton’s spokesperson, are finding the alibi that Clinton stopped all contact after Epstein’s criminal activities and involvement in prostitution came to light. But that is only a technical clarification. Some people, like Andrew, continued to be in touch after the Palm Beach, Florida case, which Epstein managed to survive legally. Everyone now wants to distance themselves from Epstein. And Epstein is not coming back to tell the truth as he died in custody in 2019 before trial. This only reinforces conspiracy theorists who say he was ‘bumped off’ in jail. The truth is somewhere in between.

The latest dump of Epstein files hardly revealed anything new. But they exposed the depth of elite connections across politics, business and entertainment, with the paedophile as a central character. Power, access and silence shaped Epstein’s world, and he's not around to prove anyone guilty

Epstein knew them all: What files release reveals about the American elite and the nature of friendships

The US Justice Department said Sunday (Dec 22) that a photograph containing an image of President Donald Trump has been restored to its online Epstein files database after being temporarily removed for review. The image, released late Friday as part of a large dump of records related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, shows a desk drawer containing several photographs. People were quick to spot that one of the pictures appears to show Trump alongside Epstein’s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell and others. However, soon after the picture was removed, triggering widespread condemnation.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-are-epstein-files-still-redacted-doj-denies-cover-up-meant-to-shield-trump-1766367317764">Why are Epstein files still redacted? DOJ denies cover-up meant to shield Trump</a><h2>Protecting victims or Trump?</h2>The photograph disappeared from the Justice Department's website on Saturday, prompting speculation and accusations of political interference. In a statement posted on X, the department said the image had been taken down temporarily to determine whether additional redactions were needed to protect victims."The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims," the statement said. "Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review."After that review, officials concluded that the photograph did not depict any of Epstein's victims. "It was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction," the department said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://t.co/ZbpE6Uq6xh">pic.twitter.com/ZbpE6Uq6xh</a>&mdash; U.S. Department of Justice (@TheJusticeDept) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheJusticeDept/status/2002843217633632644?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 21, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting underage girls for Epstein.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/house-democrats-drop-epstein-photos-from-disturbing-paedophilic-lolita-quotes-on-bosoms-to-price-tag-for-girls-shocking-pics-reveal-bill-gates-1766131614452">Epstein files: Disturbing paedophilic quotes on bosoms to price tags for girls, here's what shocking new pics reveal</a><h2>'Biggest coverups in American history'?</h2>The brief removal of the image quickly drew criticism from Democrats in Congress. House Oversight Committee Democrats publicly questioned Attorney General Pam Bondi, asking whether the takedown signaled a broader effort to conceal information. In a post on X, they asked, "is this true? What else is being covered up? We need transparency for the American public."Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer also weighed in, warning on social media that the incident raised concerns about transparency. "If they're taking this down," he wrote, "they’re taking this down, just imagine how much more they’re trying to hide … This could be one of the biggest coverups in American history".

The DOJ has restored an Epstein file photo, which shows Trump. This was done after the photo was briefly removed, allegedly “for review,” to protect victims. The takedown sparked backlash and allegations of a cover-up.

The US Justice Department said Sunday (Dec 22) that a photograph containing an image of President Donald Trump has been restored to its online Epstein files database after being temporarily removed for review. The image, released late Friday as part of a large dump of records related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, shows a desk drawer containing several photographs. People were quick to spot that one of the pictures appears to show Trump alongside Epstein’s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell and others. However, soon after the picture was removed, triggering widespread condemnation. Also read | Why are Epstein files still redacted? DOJ denies cover-up meant to shield Trump Protecting victims or Trump? The photograph disappeared from the Justice Department's website on Saturday, prompting speculation and accusations of political interference. In a statement posted on X, the department said the image had been taken down temporarily to determine whether additional redactions were needed to protect victims. "The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims," the statement said. "Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review." After that review, officials concluded that the photograph did not depict any of Epstein's victims. "It was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction," the department said.

The DOJ has restored an Epstein file photo, which shows Trump. This was done after the photo was briefly removed, allegedly “for review,” to protect victims. The takedown sparked backlash and allegations of a cover-up.

Trump photo vanishes from Epstein files, then reappears. DOJ claims it was deleted 'out of an abundance of caution'

The US Justice Department on Sunday (Dec 21) rejected claims that it redacted newly released Jeffrey Epstein files to shield President Donald Trump, as backlash grew over what victims and lawmakers described as a heavily censored and incomplete disclosure. A tranche of Epstein-related records was released on Friday (Dec 19). The release contained many pages blacked out and several photographs obscured, which triggered anger among survivors of the late sex offender. Critics accused the administration of failing to comply with a law mandating the full release of all Epstein files.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/house-democrats-drop-epstein-photos-from-disturbing-paedophilic-lolita-quotes-on-bosoms-to-price-tag-for-girls-shocking-pics-reveal-bill-gates-1766131614452">Epstein files: Disturbing paedophilic quotes on bosoms to price tags for girls, here's what shocking new pics reveal</a><h2>Not protecting Trump</h2>Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Sunday denied any political interference, telling NBC's Meet the Press that the department was "not redacting information around President Trump." When asked whether any material had been removed for political reasons, Blanche said, "Absolutely, positively not."One of the most controversial decisions involved censoring group photographs that included Trump. Blanche said the images were initially removed out of "concern" for the women pictured. The Justice Department later reposted the photos without alterations after determining "there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted."<h2>Democrats slam Trump admin redactions</h2>Democratic lawmakers, however, remain unconvinced. Representative Jamie Raskin accused Trump of blocking transparency, arguing that the redactions amounted to a cover-up. "It's all about covering up things that, for whatever reason, Donald Trump doesn't want to go public, either about himself (or) other members of his family, friends," Raskin told CNN.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-rewrites-white-house-history-with-brutal-plaques-mocking-biden-and-obama-see-pics-here-1766025457861">Trump rewrites White House history with brutal plaques mocking Biden and Obama. See pics HERE</a>The released material included images of former president Bill Clinton and references to high-profile figures such as Mick Jagger and Michael Jackson. Officials said the redactions were meant to protect victims' privacy, but the scale of the blackouts has only intensified public suspicion.<h2>MAGA base miffed by the release?</h2>Criticism also came from within Trump's own party. Republican Representative Thomas Massie said the release violated both the spirit and letter of the law. Speaking on CBS's Face the Nation, Massie claimed a 60-count indictment implicating prominent individuals had not been made public, calling it a case of "selective concealment.""They're flouting the spirit and the letter of the law. It's very troubling the posture that they've taken. And I won't be satisfied until the survivors are satisfied," said Massie.Trump had initially opposed releasing the files tied to Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Facing pressure from Congress, including Republicans, he ultimately signed legislation compelling their release.

The US Justice Department denied redacting Epstein files to protect Trump, saying edits were to shield victims. Lawmakers and survivors slammed the heavily blacked-out release as a cover-up, with criticism coming from Democrats and Trump allies alike over “selective concealment.”

The US Justice Department on Sunday (Dec 21) rejected claims that it redacted newly released Jeffrey Epstein files to shield President Donald Trump, as backlash grew over what victims and lawmakers described as a heavily censored and incomplete disclosure. A tranche of Epstein-related records was released on Friday (Dec 19). The release contained many pages blacked out and several photographs obscured, which triggered anger among survivors of the late sex offender. Critics accused the administration of failing to comply with a law mandating the full release of all Epstein files. Also read | Epstein files: Disturbing paedophilic quotes on bosoms to price tags for girls, here's what shocking new pics reveal Not protecting Trump Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Sunday denied any political interference, telling NBC's Meet the Press that the department was "not redacting information around President Trump." When asked whether any material had been removed for political reasons, Blanche said, "Absolutely, positively not." One of the most controversial decisions involved censoring group photographs that included Trump. Blanche said the images were initially removed out of "concern" for the women pictured. The Justice Department later reposted the photos without alterations after determining "there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted." Democrats slam Trump admin redactions Democratic lawmakers, however, remain unconvinced. Representative Jamie Raskin accused Trump of blocking transparency, arguing that the redactions amounted to a cover-up. "It's all about covering up things that, for whatever reason, Donald Trump doesn't want to go public, either about himself (or) other members of his family, friends," Raskin told CNN. Also read | Trump rewrites White House history with brutal plaques mocking Biden and Obama. See pics HERE The released material included images of former president Bill Clinton and references to high-profile figures such as Mick Jagger and Michael Jackson. Officials said the redactions were meant to protect victims' privacy, but the scale of the blackouts has only intensified public suspicion. MAGA base miffed by the release? Criticism also came from within Trump's own party. Republican Representative Thomas Massie said the release violated both the spirit and letter of the law. Speaking on CBS's Face the Nation, Massie claimed a 60-count indictment implicating prominent individuals had not been made public, calling it a case of "selective concealment." "They're flouting the spirit and the letter of the law. It's very troubling the posture that they've taken. And I won't be satisfied until the survivors are satisfied," said Massie. Trump had initially opposed releasing the files tied to Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Facing pressure from Congress, including Republicans, he ultimately signed legislation compelling their release.

The US Justice Department denied redacting Epstein files to protect Trump, saying edits were to shield victims. Lawmakers and survivors slammed the heavily blacked-out release as a cover-up, with criticism coming from Democrats and Trump allies alike over “selective concealment.”

Why are Epstein files still redacted? DOJ denies cover-up meant to shield Trump

A federal judge in New York has ruled that the US Department of Justice can publicly release grand jury records from Jeffrey Epstein’s 2019 sex trafficking case. In the ruling, US District Judge Richard Berman has reversed his previous decision to keep the material sealed, citing a new law passed by Congress requiring the Justice Department to release files about Epstein. “The Court hereby grants the Government’s motion in accordance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act and with the unequivocal right of Epstein victims to have their identity and privacy protected,” he wrote in the four-page ruling. He explained that he agreed with attorneys for Epstein survivors, who he said wrote to the court to say that disclosure “CANNOT come at the expense of the privacy, safety, and protection of sexual abuse and sex trafficking victims.”&nbsp;Berman also referenced language from the law that laid out the type of personal material that should be withheld, including survivors’ personal and medical files. It’s unclear when the materials will be released. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking in July 2019.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-plans-to-seek-five-year-social-media-history-of-foreign-tourists-before-entry-1765384997336">US plans to seek five-year social media history of foreign tourists before entry</a>&nbsp;The Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law by US President Donald Trump last month, requires the Justice Department to release investigative material related to Epstein by 19 December, including unclassified records, documents, and communications, but lets the department withhold files that involve active criminal investigations or raise privacy concerns.&nbsp;Earlier this month, a federal judge in Florida ordered the release of other grand jury investigation material related to Epstein from 2005 and 2007. A similar request had been rejected months earlier.&nbsp;In August, before the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed, Berman rejected the Justice Department’s request to unseal grand jury materials. He argued at the time that the government had not reached the necessary bar to release the documents and said, “The government has already undertaken a comprehensive investigation into the Epstein case and, not surprisingly, has assembled a ‘trove’ of Epstein documents, interviews, and exhibits.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/dgca-orders-urgent-inspections-at-11-airports-to-ensure-smooth-operations-after-indigo-chaos-1765367066081">DGCA orders urgent inspections at 11 airports to ensure smooth operations after IndiGo chaos</a>&nbsp;“The government’s 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials,” the August ruling said.Berman also said in August that a factor in his decision not to approve the government’s motion was “possible threats to victims’ safety and privacy.”&nbsp;In 2019, Epstein died by suicide in jail, where he was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. His death has sparked conspiracy theories for years, including from some close allies of the president.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-rajiv-gandhi-brought-evms-sir-done-several-times-under-nehru-indira-also-shah-slams-opposition-1765377338762">‘Rajiv Gandhi brought EVMs, SIR done several times under Nehru, Indira also’: Shah slams Opposition</a>&nbsp;The move comes a day after a separate judge ordered the release of grand jury records related to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for her role in facilitating Epstein’s abuse. During her trial, prosecutors argued Maxwell recruited and groomed girls, some as young as 14, between 1994 and 2004, before they were abused by Epstein. She is serving a 20-year sentence.&nbsp;The administration’s handling of the Epstein case sparked rare fractures within the president’s base. In July, Trump disavowed supporters who pushed for the release of the files, calling them “weaklings.” Shortly before the legislation passed, after it became obvious that the bill had overwhelming support, the president reversed the course and called for Republicans to vote for it.

In 2019, Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. His death sparked conspiracy theories for years, including from some close allies of the president. The administration’s handling of the Epstein case sparked rare fractures within the president’s base.

A federal judge in New York has ruled that the US Department of Justice can publicly release grand jury records from Jeffrey Epstein’s 2019 sex trafficking case. In the ruling, US District Judge Richard Berman has reversed his previous decision to keep the material sealed, citing a new law passed by Congress requiring the Justice Department to release files about Epstein. “The Court hereby grants the Government’s motion in accordance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act and with the unequivocal right of Epstein victims to have their identity and privacy protected,” he wrote in the four-page ruling. He explained that he agreed with attorneys for Epstein survivors, who he said wrote to the court to say that disclosure “CANNOT come at the expense of the privacy, safety, and protection of sexual abuse and sex trafficking victims.” Berman also referenced language from the law that laid out the type of personal material that should be withheld, including survivors’ personal and medical files. It’s unclear when the materials will be released. Epstein was charged with sex trafficking in July 2019. Also Read: US plans to seek five-year social media history of foreign tourists before entry The Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law by US President Donald Trump last month, requires the Justice Department to release investigative material related to Epstein by 19 December, including unclassified records, documents, and communications, but lets the department withhold files that involve active criminal investigations or raise privacy concerns. Earlier this month, a federal judge in Florida ordered the release of other grand jury investigation material related to Epstein from 2005 and 2007. A similar request had been rejected months earlier. In August, before the Epstein Files Transparency Act passed, Berman rejected the Justice Department’s request to unseal grand jury materials. He argued at the time that the government had not reached the necessary bar to release the documents and said, “The government has already undertaken a comprehensive investigation into the Epstein case and, not surprisingly, has assembled a ‘trove’ of Epstein documents, interviews, and exhibits.” Also Read: DGCA orders urgent inspections at 11 airports to ensure smooth operations after IndiGo chaos “The government’s 100,000 pages of Epstein files and materials dwarf the 70 odd pages of Epstein grand jury materials,” the August ruling said. Berman also said in August that a factor in his decision not to approve the government’s motion was “possible threats to victims’ safety and privacy.” In 2019, Epstein died by suicide in jail, where he was awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. His death has sparked conspiracy theories for years, including from some close allies of the president. Also Read: ‘Rajiv Gandhi brought EVMs, SIR done several times under Nehru, Indira also’: Shah slams Opposition The move comes a day after a separate judge ordered the release of grand jury records related to Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 for her role in facilitating Epstein’s abuse. During her trial, prosecutors argued Maxwell recruited and groomed girls, some as young as 14, between 1994 and 2004, before they were abused by Epstein. She is serving a 20-year sentence. The administration’s handling of the Epstein case sparked rare fractures within the president’s base. In July, Trump disavowed supporters who pushed for the release of the files, calling them “weaklings.” Shortly before the legislation passed, after it became obvious that the bill had overwhelming support, the president reversed the course and called for Republicans to vote for it.

In 2019, Epstein died by suicide while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. His death sparked conspiracy theories for years, including from some close allies of the president. The administration’s handling of the Epstein case sparked rare fractures within the president’s base.

US judge orders release of Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records from 2019 sex trafficking case

A bizarre custom-made chess set commissioned by sex trafficker, paedophile Jeffrey Epstein has come to light, adding another unsettling detail to the late financier’s sordid legacy. Photos of the custom chess board show Epstein cast as the king piece, flanked by nine women in their 20s posing provocatively, who were eventually sculpted into the other chess pieces on the board. Pictures of the bizarre chess set were obtained by TMZ.<h2>Epstein 'the King'?</h2>The TMZ report suggests that with the custom chess board, "Epstein made himself the king on his own chessboard, lording over his queens -- literally!"Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/epstein-files-33-000-pages-released-yet-they-re-heavily-redacted-full-transparency-or-just-a-pacifier-for-maga-1756890944032">Epstein files: 33,000 pages released, yet they're heavily redacted. 'Full transparency' or just a pacifier for MAGA?</a>As per the report, the project was carried out in 2016 at a New York photo studio - yes, the same year Donald Trump became the US president for the first time. The weird project involved about 600 photos and produced a full 36-piece set. Each king bore Epstein’s likeness in black or white robes, complete with a crown.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🇺🇸♟️ FLASH | Selon le site TMZ, Jeffrey Epstein aurait fait fabriquer en 2016 un « jeu d’échecs humain » où il se faisait représenter comme le roi et où des femmes figuraient les pions. Il s’était fait photographier comme modèle pour incarner le roi, tandis que d’autres femmes… <a href="https://t.co/EEEVH8k4p6">pic.twitter.com/EEEVH8k4p6</a>&mdash; Cerfia (@CerfiaFR) <a href="https://twitter.com/CerfiaFR/status/1970117381629383062?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The women, described as glamorous and confident, reportedly told staff they were part of a “chess club” but offered little explanation of its nature. They returned multiple times to pose provocatively in striking outfits, their images eventually turned into 3D-printed pawns, bishops, rooks, knights, and queens. Meanwhile, Epstein only appeared toward the end to be photographed himself, despite confessing he didn’t know the number of pieces on a standard board. It must be noted that in 2016, Epstein had already been convicted for soliciting a teenage girl for prostitution. He had also served a 13-month prison sentence.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-in-the-white-house-sex-offender-s-former-butler-claims-trump-made-him-a-job-offer-after-2016-win-1754730020385">Epstein in White House? Sex offender's former butler claims Trump made him a job offer after 2016 win</a><h2>How much did Epstein shell out to always be the king in the chess game?</h2>The cost of the project was around $5,000 — a trivial expense for Epstein, whose fortune was valued at more than $600 million before his 2019 death while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.Epstein died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking underage girls. His death was ruled a suicide, but it has fuelled years of conspiracy theories and suspicions, particularly among supporters of President Donald Trump.The resurfacing of the chess set comes as fresh controversy swirls around Epstein’s ties to public figures, including Prince Andrew, Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, and Trump's ex-DOGE chief Elon Musk.

A custom-made chess set commissioned by sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein has come to light. In the disturbing chess set, Epstein is cast as the king piece while multiple women seem to be mere pawns. All you need to know.

A bizarre custom-made chess set commissioned by sex trafficker, paedophile Jeffrey Epstein has come to light, adding another unsettling detail to the late financier’s sordid legacy. Photos of the custom chess board show Epstein cast as the king piece, flanked by nine women in their 20s posing provocatively, who were eventually sculpted into the other chess pieces on the board. Pictures of the bizarre chess set were obtained by TMZ. Epstein 'the King'? The TMZ report suggests that with the custom chess board, "Epstein made himself the king on his own chessboard, lording over his queens -- literally!" Also read | Epstein files: 33,000 pages released, yet they're heavily redacted. 'Full transparency' or just a pacifier for MAGA? As per the report, the project was carried out in 2016 at a New York photo studio - yes, the same year Donald Trump became the US president for the first time. The weird project involved about 600 photos and produced a full 36-piece set. Each king bore Epstein’s likeness in black or white robes, complete with a crown.

A custom-made chess set commissioned by sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein has come to light. In the disturbing chess set, Epstein is cast as the king piece while multiple women seem to be mere pawns. All you need to know.

Epstein crowned himself ‘King’ in unsettling custom chess set, women cast as pawns — photos emerge

The newly released documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate suggest that the convicted sex offender was also in contact with influential figures, including Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Steve Bannon. The documents provided by Jeffrey Epstein’s estate to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and partially released by its Democratic members, include daily schedules, flight logs, financial ledgers, and phone message records spanning nearly three decades. The latest batch contains 8,544 documents in total. The House Committee is investigating the convicted sex offender and his ties to a wide network of powerful political figures.&nbsp;About six pages include meeting schedules appearing to show appointments with Bannon as well as venture capitalist Peter Thiel while one scheduling note mentions Musk joining a potential trip to Epstein’s island.Prince Andrew is also listed in the documents as a passenger on Epstein’s aircraft, with financial disclosures provided to the committee suggesting evidence of payments from Epstein to an individual listed as “Andrew.”&nbsp;The mention of the names in the documents does not indicate wrongdoing.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-defence-minister-khawaja-asif-fumbles-seven-times-in-unsc-speech-gets-trolled-watch-1758895298255">Pakistan defence minister Khawaja Asif fumbles seven times in UNSC speech, gets trolled | Watch</a>&nbsp;“It should be clear to every American that Jeffrey Epstein was friends with some of the most powerful and wealthiest men in the world,” Oversight committee spokesperson Sara Guerrero said in a statement on Friday.“Every new document produced provides new information as we work to bring justice for the survivors and victims,” she added. “Oversight Democrats will not stop until we identify everyone complicit in Epstein’s heinous crimes.”House Democrats have argued for Attorney General Pam Bondi to “release all the files now,” Guerrero said.&nbsp;One mention appears to be an itinerary noting a tentative trip by Musk to Epstein’s island in the US Virgin Islands on December 6, 2014. The schedule includes a handwritten note: “Is this still happening?” Other entries include a planned lunch with tech billionaire Peter Thiel in late 2017, and a breakfast with former Trump strategist Steve Bannon in February 2019—months before Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/london-court-dismisses-terrorism-charge-against-kneecap-rapper-mo-chara-1758889592454">London court dismisses terrorism charge against Kneecap rapper Mo Chara</a>&nbsp;Besides there are ledgers showing payments for “massages” connected to Prince Andrew, and detailed flight logs of Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and others flying together between New Jersey and Florida as early as 2000. Epstein’s ties to Prince Andrew and Microsoft founder Bill Gates have already drawn extensive scrutiny.&nbsp;WATCH: Tomahawk missiles would bring Moscow within Kyiv's strike range<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/tomahawk-missiles-would-bring-moscow-within-kyiv-s-strike-range-1758911748353/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/tomahawk-missiles-would-bring-moscow-within-kyiv-s-strike-range-1758911748353/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Committee Democrats said the files reveal how Epstein continued to cultivate relationships with the wealthiest and most powerful men long after his controversial plea deal.&nbsp;Republicans on the panel criticised Democrats for releasing the information unilaterally, arguing the move was politically motivated. A GOP spokesperson accused Democrats of “cherry-picking documents” and withholding files that allegedly reference Democratic officials. Further disclosures are expected in the coming weeks.

Oversight committee spokesperson Sara Guerrero said on Friday that every new document provides new information and helps bring justice for the survivors and victims. She further said that the Oversight Democrats will not stop until they identify everyone complicit in Epstein’s heinous crimes.

The newly released documents from Jeffrey Epstein’s estate suggest that the convicted sex offender was also in contact with influential figures, including Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Steve Bannon. The documents provided by Jeffrey Epstein’s estate to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and partially released by its Democratic members, include daily schedules, flight logs, financial ledgers, and phone message records spanning nearly three decades. The latest batch contains 8,544 documents in total. The House Committee is investigating the convicted sex offender and his ties to a wide network of powerful political figures. About six pages include meeting schedules appearing to show appointments with Bannon as well as venture capitalist Peter Thiel while one scheduling note mentions Musk joining a potential trip to Epstein’s island. Prince Andrew is also listed in the documents as a passenger on Epstein’s aircraft, with financial disclosures provided to the committee suggesting evidence of payments from Epstein to an individual listed as “Andrew.” The mention of the names in the documents does not indicate wrongdoing. Also Read: Pakistan defence minister Khawaja Asif fumbles seven times in UNSC speech, gets trolled | Watch “It should be clear to every American that Jeffrey Epstein was friends with some of the most powerful and wealthiest men in the world,” Oversight committee spokesperson Sara Guerrero said in a statement on Friday. “Every new document produced provides new information as we work to bring justice for the survivors and victims,” she added. “Oversight Democrats will not stop until we identify everyone complicit in Epstein’s heinous crimes.” House Democrats have argued for Attorney General Pam Bondi to “release all the files now,” Guerrero said. One mention appears to be an itinerary noting a tentative trip by Musk to Epstein’s island in the US Virgin Islands on December 6, 2014. The schedule includes a handwritten note: “Is this still happening?” Other entries include a planned lunch with tech billionaire Peter Thiel in late 2017, and a breakfast with former Trump strategist Steve Bannon in February 2019—months before Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges. Also Read: London court dismisses terrorism charge against Kneecap rapper Mo Chara Besides there are ledgers showing payments for “massages” connected to Prince Andrew, and detailed flight logs of Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and others flying together between New Jersey and Florida as early as 2000. Epstein’s ties to Prince Andrew and Microsoft founder Bill Gates have already drawn extensive scrutiny. WATCH: Tomahawk missiles would bring Moscow within Kyiv's strike range https://www.wionews.com/videos/tomahawk-missiles-would-bring-moscow-within-kyiv-s-strike-range-1758911748353/embed Committee Democrats said the files reveal how Epstein continued to cultivate relationships with the wealthiest and most powerful men long after his controversial plea deal. Republicans on the panel criticised Democrats for releasing the information unilaterally, arguing the move was politically motivated. A GOP spokesperson accused Democrats of “cherry-picking documents” and withholding files that allegedly reference Democratic officials. Further disclosures are expected in the coming weeks.

Oversight committee spokesperson Sara Guerrero said on Friday that every new document provides new information and helps bring justice for the survivors and victims. She further said that the Oversight Democrats will not stop until they identify everyone complicit in Epstein’s heinous crimes.

Elon Musk, Steve Bannon, Peter Thiel among new names in third batch of Epstein files released by Democrats

In a latest development, The Duchess of York Sarah Ferguson, wife of Prince Andrew, has been dropped as patron by four charities following the resurfacing of a 2011 email in which she referred to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as her “supreme friend.” Julia's House, a children's hospice supporting families in Dorset and Wiltshire, was the first to cut ties with Ferguson, stating that it was "inappropriate" for her to remain in the position. Shortly afterwards, the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, the Children's Literacy Charity, and Prevent Breast Cancer also confirmed they had ended their association with the duchess. Meanwhile, the Teenage Cancer Trust, where she has served as a patron for 35 years, announced it is currently reviewing the matter.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/judge-dismisses-trump-s-15-billion-lawsuit-against-nyt-over-epstein-reporting-1758302396889">Judge dismisses Trump’s $15 billion lawsuit against NYT over Epstein reporting</a><h2>Sarah Ferguson's ties with Epstein</h2>A 2011 email sent by Sarah Ferguson to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has come to light, in which she described him as her "supreme friend." This email termed as a ‘letter of apology’, contradicts her earlier public statements where she distanced herself from Epstein, calling her past involvement a "huge mistake" and acknowledging his criminal actions. A spokesperson for the Duchess explained that the email was written under legal advice to calm Epstein amid his threats of a defamation lawsuit, and emphasised that she still deeply regrets any connection with him. Notably, the email was written years after Epstein was convicted in 2008. Despite his imprisonment, Ferguson’s contact with Epstein continued, with Prince Andrew also photographed with Epstein in 2010.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-in-the-white-house-sex-offender-s-former-butler-claims-trump-made-him-a-job-offer-after-2016-win-1754730020385">Epstein in White House? Sex offender's former butler claims Trump made him a job offer after 2016 win</a>&nbsp;This comes as the Trump administration faces massive pressure to release the Epstein files. The release of information related to Sarah Ferguson - another royalty - only increased calls in the US for more transparency regarding Epstein’s high-profile associations. Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Last week, when US President Donald Trump visited the UK, his image with the convicted sex offender was projected onto Windsor Castle.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/short-videos/trump-in-uk-activists-project-trump-epstein-video-on-windsor-castle-ahead-of-royal-welcome-1758079216578">Trump in UK: Activists Project Trump–Epstein Video on Windsor Castle Ahead of Royal Welcome</a>

An email from Sarah Ferguson to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2011, calling him her "supreme friend," has resurfaced. The backlash has led to her removal as patron from several UK charities. Ferguson's team in her defence said that Ferguson it was sent to defuse a legal threat from Epstein.

In a latest development, The Duchess of York Sarah Ferguson, wife of Prince Andrew, has been dropped as patron by four charities following the resurfacing of a 2011 email in which she referred to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as her “supreme friend.” Julia's House, a children's hospice supporting families in Dorset and Wiltshire, was the first to cut ties with Ferguson, stating that it was "inappropriate" for her to remain in the position. Shortly afterwards, the Natasha Allergy Research Foundation, the Children's Literacy Charity, and Prevent Breast Cancer also confirmed they had ended their association with the duchess. Meanwhile, the Teenage Cancer Trust, where she has served as a patron for 35 years, announced it is currently reviewing the matter. Read More | Judge dismisses Trump’s $15 billion lawsuit against NYT over Epstein reporting Sarah Ferguson's ties with Epstein A 2011 email sent by Sarah Ferguson to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has come to light, in which she described him as her "supreme friend." This email termed as a ‘letter of apology’, contradicts her earlier public statements where she distanced herself from Epstein, calling her past involvement a "huge mistake" and acknowledging his criminal actions. A spokesperson for the Duchess explained that the email was written under legal advice to calm Epstein amid his threats of a defamation lawsuit, and emphasised that she still deeply regrets any connection with him. Notably, the email was written years after Epstein was convicted in 2008. Despite his imprisonment, Ferguson’s contact with Epstein continued, with Prince Andrew also photographed with Epstein in 2010. Read More | Epstein in White House? Sex offender's former butler claims Trump made him a job offer after 2016 win This comes as the Trump administration faces massive pressure to release the Epstein files. The release of information related to Sarah Ferguson - another royalty - only increased calls in the US for more transparency regarding Epstein’s high-profile associations. Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Last week, when US President Donald Trump visited the UK, his image with the convicted sex offender was projected onto Windsor Castle. Read More | Trump in UK: Activists Project Trump–Epstein Video on Windsor Castle Ahead of Royal Welcome

An email from Sarah Ferguson to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2011, calling him her "supreme friend," has resurfaced. The backlash has led to her removal as patron from several UK charities. Ferguson's team in her defence said that Ferguson it was sent to defuse a legal threat from Epstein.

Another 'royal' addition to Epstein saga? Duchess of York Sarah Ferguson calls Jeffrey 'supreme friend' in old email, gets dropped from 4 UK charities

FBI Director Kash Patel, who is currently facing scrutiny over the investigation into the killing of US President Donald Trump’s ally Charlie Kirk, on Tuesday (Sep 16) said that there is no “credible information” in the law enforcement files that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to other individuals. He further went on to blame the past administrations for committing the “original sin” in the case.Speaking at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Patel said, “There is no credible information, none.” He added, “If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.”Targeting former US attorney Alex Acosta, who first prosecuted Epstein’s case and served as a Labor Secretary during Trump’s first term, Patel said, “The original sin in the Epstein case was the way it was initially brought by Mr. Acosta back in 2006. The original case involved a very limited search warrant or set of search warrants, and didn’t take as much investigatory material as it should have seized.”“If I were the FBI director then, it wouldn’t have happened,” he further claimed.Responding to the pressure from Democrats and Republicans to reveal more details about the case during the hearing, Patel said that his answers on the matter were “not going to satisfy many, many, many people.”Patel has previously discussed the case involving the convicted sex offender, who killed himself in prison during the trial related to additional charges, on podcasts and suggested that there has been no cover-up.Earlier in July, the Justice Department said that Epstein did not keep a client list, adding that no further releases of information related to the case would be warranted.“The Department of Justice and the FBI never releases information on investigations that are not credible, and we don’t release the names of victims who aren’t credible, but at the same time, we don’t release the names of victims who were credible,” Patel said.“And so the information we are releasing now is historic, and it is also to the maximum capacity that the law allows. And I know that’s not going to satisfy many, many, many people, but if they wanted it done right, then the investigation from its origination should have been done right, and he [Epstein] should not have been given a ‘Get Out of Jail Free cad’ to do jail on the weekends for 12 hours a day, and he should have been investigated fully for the entirety of his crime and criminal enterprise, not just from 1997 to 2001,” he added.

Earlier in July, the Justice Department said that Epstein did not keep a client list, adding that no further releases of information related to the case would be warranted.

FBI Director Kash Patel, who is currently facing scrutiny over the investigation into the killing of US President Donald Trump’s ally Charlie Kirk, on Tuesday (Sep 16) said that there is no “credible information” in the law enforcement files that convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein trafficked young women to other individuals. He further went on to blame the past administrations for committing the “original sin” in the case. Speaking at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Patel said, “There is no credible information, none.” He added, “If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.” Targeting former US attorney Alex Acosta, who first prosecuted Epstein’s case and served as a Labor Secretary during Trump’s first term, Patel said, “The original sin in the Epstein case was the way it was initially brought by Mr. Acosta back in 2006. The original case involved a very limited search warrant or set of search warrants, and didn’t take as much investigatory material as it should have seized.” “If I were the FBI director then, it wouldn’t have happened,” he further claimed. Responding to the pressure from Democrats and Republicans to reveal more details about the case during the hearing, Patel said that his answers on the matter were “not going to satisfy many, many, many people.” Patel has previously discussed the case involving the convicted sex offender, who killed himself in prison during the trial related to additional charges, on podcasts and suggested that there has been no cover-up. Earlier in July, the Justice Department said that Epstein did not keep a client list, adding that no further releases of information related to the case would be warranted. “The Department of Justice and the FBI never releases information on investigations that are not credible, and we don’t release the names of victims who aren’t credible, but at the same time, we don’t release the names of victims who were credible,” Patel said. “And so the information we are releasing now is historic, and it is also to the maximum capacity that the law allows. And I know that’s not going to satisfy many, many, many people, but if they wanted it done right, then the investigation from its origination should have been done right, and he [Epstein] should not have been given a ‘Get Out of Jail Free cad’ to do jail on the weekends for 12 hours a day, and he should have been investigated fully for the entirety of his crime and criminal enterprise, not just from 1997 to 2001,” he added.

Earlier in July, the Justice Department said that Epstein did not keep a client list, adding that no further releases of information related to the case would be warranted.

‘If I were the FBI director then...’: Kash Patel takes a dig at former attorney Alex Acosta for ‘original sin’ on Epstein case

Prince Andrew could be "destroyed" by more than 100 secret emails contained in the so-called Epstein Files, The Mail on Sunday has reported. According to the report, the cache of emails includes "incriminating" correspondence between the Duke of York and paedophile, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The documents are among hundreds of thousands being reviewed by the US Congress before their expected release. Citing a source, the publication reports that the emails were “embarrassing and incriminating, and he (Prince Andrew) could be destroyed.” Here's all we know about the Prince Andrew-Jeffrey Epstein emails.<h2>Forget Peter Mandelson, Andrew would face worse</h2>Speaking to the publication, one person in the know predicted that Prince Andrew would face a worse fallout than Peter Mandelson. Lord Mandelson was forced to step down as Britain's ambassador to Washington last week after emails between him and Epstein surfaced, including one in which Mandelson urged the disgraced financier to fight back against his conviction. "If you think what happened to Peter Mandelson is bad, you have no idea what will happen when the Andrew emails are released," the source told the paper.<h2>Prince Andrew could face criminal charges</h2>David Boies, the lawyer who represented Andrew's accuser Virginia Giuffre, said he believes there was enough evidence to warrant a criminal investigation into the prince. Andrew has consistently denied Giuffre's claims that she was trafficked to him by Epstein. In 2022, he settled a civil case with her for a reported £12 million, without admitting liability.Emails already in the public domain have shed light on Andrew's contact with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. In 2011, one email — widely attributed to the prince — told Epstein: "Keep in close touch and we'll play some more soon!!" In 2015, Andrew emailed Maxwell asking for information about Giuffre, to which she replied, "Have some info. Call me when you have a moment."The Mail on Sunday says at least 100 more emails exist, including from a Pipex account linked to Andrew and listed in Epstein's notorious "black book" alongside several phone numbers for the duke. Sources claim these messages include exchanges with both Epstein and Maxwell about social meetings and logistics.US lawmakers are now considering whether to invite Andrew and Mandelson to testify before the House Oversight Committee. While British citizens cannot be subpoenaed, declining such an invitation would be politically damaging, one source said.

A bombshell trove of Epstein emails — some allegedly involving Prince Andrew — is being reviewed in Washington, with insiders warning the Duke of York could be “destroyed.” Here's all you need to know.

Prince Andrew could be "destroyed" by more than 100 secret emails contained in the so-called Epstein Files, The Mail on Sunday has reported. According to the report, the cache of emails includes "incriminating" correspondence between the Duke of York and paedophile, convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The documents are among hundreds of thousands being reviewed by the US Congress before their expected release. Citing a source, the publication reports that the emails were “embarrassing and incriminating, and he (Prince Andrew) could be destroyed.” Here's all we know about the Prince Andrew-Jeffrey Epstein emails. Forget Peter Mandelson, Andrew would face worse Speaking to the publication, one person in the know predicted that Prince Andrew would face a worse fallout than Peter Mandelson. Lord Mandelson was forced to step down as Britain's ambassador to Washington last week after emails between him and Epstein surfaced, including one in which Mandelson urged the disgraced financier to fight back against his conviction. "If you think what happened to Peter Mandelson is bad, you have no idea what will happen when the Andrew emails are released," the source told the paper. Prince Andrew could face criminal charges David Boies, the lawyer who represented Andrew's accuser Virginia Giuffre, said he believes there was enough evidence to warrant a criminal investigation into the prince. Andrew has consistently denied Giuffre's claims that she was trafficked to him by Epstein. In 2022, he settled a civil case with her for a reported £12 million, without admitting liability. Emails already in the public domain have shed light on Andrew's contact with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. In 2011, one email — widely attributed to the prince — told Epstein: "Keep in close touch and we'll play some more soon!!" In 2015, Andrew emailed Maxwell asking for information about Giuffre, to which she replied, "Have some info. Call me when you have a moment." The Mail on Sunday says at least 100 more emails exist, including from a Pipex account linked to Andrew and listed in Epstein's notorious "black book" alongside several phone numbers for the duke. Sources claim these messages include exchanges with both Epstein and Maxwell about social meetings and logistics. US lawmakers are now considering whether to invite Andrew and Mandelson to testify before the House Oversight Committee. While British citizens cannot be subpoenaed, declining such an invitation would be politically damaging, one source said.

A bombshell trove of Epstein emails — some allegedly involving Prince Andrew — is being reviewed in Washington, with insiders warning the Duke of York could be “destroyed.”

Bombshell! New 'embarrassing and incriminating' Epstein emails could 'destroy' Prince Andrew: Report

House Oversight Committee Democrats on Monday (September 8) released what they claim is a personal note from US President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, included in a 2003 birthday tribute book. The page reportedly contains a short handwritten message, Trump’s signature, and a sketch of a curvaceous woman. The message refers to a “wonderful secret,” which Democrats say raises serious questions. In a post on X, the Oversight Democrats wrote: “We now have the birthday message Trump insisted never existed. He wrote about a ‘wonderful secret’ they shared. What is he hiding? Release the documents.” According to the committee, the alleged note reads: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-aide-navarro-labels-india-and-brics-vampires-claims-they-re-sucking-us-blood-dry-in-latest-bizarre-tirade-1757378876520">Trump aide Navarro labels India and BRICS 'vampires' claims they're 'sucking US blood dry' in latest bizarre tirade</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Hey VP <a href="https://twitter.com/JDVance?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JDVance</a>, turns out the story isn’t bullshit, and your boss lied about the birthday note. You going to apologize now amirite? <a href="https://t.co/HlFO9hHg2t">https://t.co/HlFO9hHg2t</a> <a href="https://t.co/njOuEqwwHx">pic.twitter.com/njOuEqwwHx</a>&mdash; Robert Garcia (@RobertGarcia) <a href="https://twitter.com/RobertGarcia/status/1965145894174818485?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the panel’s ranking member, added on X: “We got the Epstein note Trump denied. It’s time to end this cover-up.” The Trump camp responded almost immediately, rejecting the claim outright. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt blasted the report as fabricated, saying: “This so-called ‘birthday card’ is entirely fake. The Wall Street Journal’s own reporting proves it.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/drone-strike-or-accident-greta-thunberg-s-gaza-bound-flotilla-ship-catches-fire-1757381225223">Greta Thunberg's Gaza-bound flotilla catches fire after alleged 'drone strike'. Did Israel attack her ship?</a>&nbsp;She continued, “President Trump did not write the note, did not sketch the image, and we will fight this with every legal tool available.” Leavitt also criticised WSJ reporter Joe Palazzolo, accusing him of publishing the story the moment he asked for comment. “This is a classic example of fake news meant to fuel the Democrats’ Epstein hoax,” she said. Back in July, when the Wall Street Journal first disclosed parts of the alleged note, Trump dismissed the story. “That’s not how I write, that’s not how I talk, and I don’t draw,” he said. He later filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the Journal, accusing it of knowingly pushing a false narrative.

House Oversight Committee Democrats on Monday (September 8) released what they claim is a personal note from Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, included in a 2003 birthday tribute book. The page reportedly contains a short handwritten message, Trump’s signature, and a sketch of a curvaceous woman. 

House Oversight Committee Democrats on Monday (September 8) released what they claim is a personal note from US President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, included in a 2003 birthday tribute book. The page reportedly contains a short handwritten message, Trump’s signature, and a sketch of a curvaceous woman. The message refers to a “wonderful secret,” which Democrats say raises serious questions. In a post on X, the Oversight Democrats wrote: “We now have the birthday message Trump insisted never existed. He wrote about a ‘wonderful secret’ they shared. What is he hiding? Release the documents.” According to the committee, the alleged note reads: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.” Also Read: Trump aide Navarro labels India and BRICS 'vampires' claims they're 'sucking US blood dry' in latest bizarre tirade

House Democrats release alleged 2003 Trump note to Epstein mentioning ‘a pal’ and a ‘wonderful secret’. Trump’s team denies authenticity, calling it fake

The 'wonderful secret' behind 'a pal is a wonderful thing': Trump-Epstein note sparks fresh controversy

House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday (Sep 5) made a shocking remark about US President Donald Trump and convicted sex trafficker and paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. While defending Trump over the mounting criticism over the delayed release of the notorious Epstein files, Johnson claimed that the POTUS was once an FBI informant in the Epstein case. His statement comes as Trump recently labelled the bipartisan push for the release of the files a "Democrat Hoax".<h2>Trump: Business tycoon, US president and an FBI informant?</h2>Speaking to reporters, Johnson claimed that Trump had been an FBI informant for decades. Defending Trump's 'hoax' remarks, the House Speaker said that the Republican was not saying that "Epstein did is a hoax." Clarifying Trump's ramblings, Johnson said that the POTUS believed that what Epstein did was "a terrible, unspeakable evil".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/epstein-files-33-000-pages-released-yet-they-re-heavily-redacted-full-transparency-or-just-a-pacifier-for-maga-1756890944032">Epstein files: 33,000 pages released, yet they're heavily redacted. 'Full transparency' or just a pacifier for MAGA?</a>Reiterating a previous claim Trump made, he added, "When he first heard the rumour, he kicked him out of Mar-A-Lago," before adding, "He was an FBI informant trying to take this down.""The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered these unspeakable harms. It's detestable to him; he and I have spoken about this, as recently as 24 hours ago," Johnson told reporters.<h2>Trump's 'Democrat hoax' statement</h2>Donald Trump, while talking to reporters, had dismissed calls for greater transparency in the Epstein case, saying, "It's really a Democrat hoax because they're trying to get people to talk about something that's totally irrelevant to the success that we have had as a nation since I have been president."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/epstein-in-the-white-house-sex-offender-s-former-butler-claims-trump-made-him-a-job-offer-after-2016-win-1754730020385">Epstein in the White House? Sex offender's former butler claims Trump made him a job offer after 2016 win</a>Johnson's claim that Trump was an FBI informant in the Epstein sex trafficking case follows conflicting claims by the disgraced financier's former butler. In a no-holds-barred interview with The Telegraph, Valdson Vieira Cotrin, who was sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's butler for 18 years and was in charge of managing his Paris estate, recalled how the disgraced financier was offered a job in Trump's first government.&nbsp;&nbsp;

House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed that US President Donald Trump was an FBI informant in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case while seeking to defend the president amid criticism over his ‘Democrat hoax’ statement.

House Speaker Mike Johnson on Friday (Sep 5) made a shocking remark about US President Donald Trump and convicted sex trafficker and paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. While defending Trump over the mounting criticism over the delayed release of the notorious Epstein files, Johnson claimed that the POTUS was once an FBI informant in the Epstein case. His statement comes as Trump recently labelled the bipartisan push for the release of the files a "Democrat Hoax". Trump: Business tycoon, US president and an FBI informant? Speaking to reporters, Johnson claimed that Trump had been an FBI informant for decades. Defending Trump's 'hoax' remarks, the House Speaker said that the Republican was not saying that "Epstein did is a hoax." Clarifying Trump's ramblings, Johnson said that the POTUS believed that what Epstein did was "a terrible, unspeakable evil". Also read | Epstein files: 33,000 pages released, yet they're heavily redacted. 'Full transparency' or just a pacifier for MAGA? Reiterating a previous claim Trump made, he added, "When he first heard the rumour, he kicked him out of Mar-A-Lago," before adding, "He was an FBI informant trying to take this down." "The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered these unspeakable harms. It's detestable to him; he and I have spoken about this, as recently as 24 hours ago," Johnson told reporters. Trump's 'Democrat hoax' statement Donald Trump, while talking to reporters, had dismissed calls for greater transparency in the Epstein case, saying, "It's really a Democrat hoax because they're trying to get people to talk about something that's totally irrelevant to the success that we have had as a nation since I have been president." Also read | Epstein in the White House? Sex offender's former butler claims Trump made him a job offer after 2016 win Johnson's claim that Trump was an FBI informant in the Epstein sex trafficking case follows conflicting claims by the disgraced financier's former butler. In a no-holds-barred interview with The Telegraph, Valdson Vieira Cotrin, who was sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's butler for 18 years and was in charge of managing his Paris estate, recalled how the disgraced financier was offered a job in Trump's first government.

House Speaker Mike Johnson claimed that US President Donald Trump was an FBI informant in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case while seeking to defend the president amid criticism over his ‘Democrat hoax’ statement.

Trump, Epstein and the FBI: Speaker Mike Johnson claims POTUS secretly helped take the paedophile down

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Sep 5) lashed out at the “confused and badly failing” Democratic Party over the Jeffrey Epstein case, saying that they don’t care about the victims. Rather, Trump claims, the Democrats befriended Epstein, socialised with them, travelled to his island and took his money. This comes days after the US House Oversight Committee on Tuesday (Sep 2) dropped the first batch of Jeffrey Epstein records online, hailing “full transparency”. However, the more than 33,000 pages that were released were heavily redacted documents.Taking aim at the Democrats in a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote, “They knew everything there was to know about Epstein, but now, years after his death, they, out of nowhere, are seeming to show such love and heartfelt concern for his victims. Does anybody really believe that? Where were they during his very public trials, and for all of those years before his death? The answer is, ‘nowhere to be found.’”“The now dying (after the DOJ gave thousands of pages of documents in full compliance with a very comprehensive and exacting Subpoena from Congress!) Epstein case was only brought back to life by the Radical Left Democrats because they are doing so poorly, with the lowest poll numbers in the history of the Party (16%), while the Republicans are doing so well, among the highest approval numbers the Party has ever had!” he added.<h2>‘Merely another Democrat hoax’</h2>Trump further alleged that Democrats don’t care about the victims, adding that they never did before as well, and went on to call it “merely another Democrat hoax, just like Russia, Russia, Russia, and all of the others.” Trump claimed that this was an attempt to deflect and distract “from the great success of a Republican President” and the “record setting” failure of the previous administration of former president Joe Biden and his party.The US President further demanded credit for the “great, even legendary, job” that the Republicans were doing, saying that it's time to end the “Democrat Epstein Hoax” as the Department of Justice has “done its job”.<h2>Redacted documents</h2>Meanwhile, the documents released by the US House Oversight Committee on Tuesday (Sep 2) left critics to wonder if this was accountability or just a political pacifier.“We’re in the process of uploading those documents for full transparency so everyone in America can see those documents,” said the Republican committee chairperson, James Comer. He added that the release was “going as quick as we can get them uploaded” and that they want the files to be public “as soon as possible.” However, many pointed out that what good is transparency if most of the content of the files is unreliable, given that some almost entire pages were blacked out.

Trump further alleged that Democrats don’t care about the victims, adding that they never did before as well, and went on to call it “merely another Democrat hoax”. He also demanded credit for the “legendary job” that the Republicans were doing.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Sep 5) lashed out at the “confused and badly failing” Democratic Party over the Jeffrey Epstein case, saying that they don’t care about the victims. Rather, Trump claims, the Democrats befriended Epstein, socialised with them, travelled to his island and took his money. This comes days after the US House Oversight Committee on Tuesday (Sep 2) dropped the first batch of Jeffrey Epstein records online, hailing “full transparency”. However, the more than 33,000 pages that were released were heavily redacted documents. Taking aim at the Democrats in a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote, “They knew everything there was to know about Epstein, but now, years after his death, they, out of nowhere, are seeming to show such love and heartfelt concern for his victims. Does anybody really believe that? Where were they during his very public trials, and for all of those years before his death? The answer is, ‘nowhere to be found.’” “The now dying (after the DOJ gave thousands of pages of documents in full compliance with a very comprehensive and exacting Subpoena from Congress!) Epstein case was only brought back to life by the Radical Left Democrats because they are doing so poorly, with the lowest poll numbers in the history of the Party (16%), while the Republicans are doing so well, among the highest approval numbers the Party has ever had!” he added. ‘Merely another Democrat hoax’ Trump further alleged that Democrats don’t care about the victims, adding that they never did before as well, and went on to call it “merely another Democrat hoax, just like Russia, Russia, Russia, and all of the others.” Trump claimed that this was an attempt to deflect and distract “from the great success of a Republican President” and the “record setting” failure of the previous administration of former president Joe Biden and his party. The US President further demanded credit for the “great, even legendary, job” that the Republicans were doing, saying that it's time to end the “Democrat Epstein Hoax” as the Department of Justice has “done its job”. Redacted documents Meanwhile, the documents released by the US House Oversight Committee on Tuesday (Sep 2) left critics to wonder if this was accountability or just a political pacifier. “We’re in the process of uploading those documents for full transparency so everyone in America can see those documents,” said the Republican committee chairperson, James Comer. He added that the release was “going as quick as we can get them uploaded” and that they want the files to be public “as soon as possible.” However, many pointed out that what good is transparency if most of the content of the files is unreliable, given that some almost entire pages were blacked out.

Trump further alleged that Democrats don’t care about the victims, adding that they never did before as well, and went on to call it “merely another Democrat hoax”. He also demanded credit for the “legendary job” that the Republicans were doing.

‘Dems don’t care about victims’: Trump lashes out over Jeffrey Epstein ‘hoax’, demands credit for ‘legendary’ job

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse took to Capitol Hill on Wednesday (September 3) to share deeply personal accounts of exploitation and intimidation, demanding lawmakers compel the Justice Department to release all remaining investigative files related to Epstein and his associates. For several of the women, it was the first time speaking publicly about their experiences. Their stories painted a chilling picture of manipulation, fear, and betrayal — not only by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell but also by a system that they say protected predators while silencing victims.<h2>Marina Lacerda: My education was replaced by abuse</h2>Marina Lacerda, originally from Brazil, said she was just 14 when she was introduced to Epstein with the promise of earning money by giving massages. At the time, she was juggling three jobs to help her family, but instead of opportunity, she says she was drawn into a cycle of abuse that lasted until she turned 17. She recalled leaving school before finishing 9th grade because she was required at Epstein’s house so frequently. What she once hoped would lead to stable work as his assistant ended abruptly when Epstein told her she had grown “too old.” “There are gaps in my memory that I cannot recover, no matter how hard I try,” Lacerda said. “The government holds documents that could help me understand my own story and begin to heal.” She questioned why she was never called to testify in earlier cases and why Epstein managed to evade meaningful punishment in 2008.<h2>Jena-Lisa Jones: I was terrified no one would believe me</h2>Jena-Lisa Jones, abused in Palm Beach beginning at age 14, said she had endured a difficult home life but was still an innocent teenager when Epstein targeted her. “I had never been more afraid in my life than that first time,” she said, recalling crying all the way home. Inside Epstein’s residence, she remembered seeing photos of him alongside influential figures — images that left her convinced no one would believe her story.<h2>Haley Robson: I felt I had no choice</h2>At 16, Haley Robson was a strong student with college ambitions when a classmate recruited her to give Epstein a massage. Once in the room, she said, he undressed and demanded sexual acts. Afterward, Epstein gave her $200 and pressured her into bringing other girls, promising the same payment for each recruit. “I felt I couldn’t say no — if I disobeyed, something bad would happen,” Robson recalled. Eventually, the stepmother of one girl alerted police, but Robson said authorities treated her as if she were the criminal. She urged lawmakers to unseal the files: “End the secrecy. Lift the curtain. Every member of Congress who resists this bill should be exposed.”<h2>Lisa Phillips: An international trafficker, not just a predator</h2>Lisa Phillips recounted being taken to Epstein’s private island in the Caribbean during a photoshoot in 2000. There, she said, she witnessed the scale of his influence, which extended into fashion, art, and entertainment. “This was not limited to underage girls in Florida,” she said, describing Epstein as an international trafficker shielded by powerful connections. Rejecting sympathy, she declared: “We are not here for pity. We are here to demand accountability.”<h2>Ongoing threats and silencing</h2>Other survivors described the lasting fear that continues today. Actress Anouska De Georgiou said she has been followed by cars and was warned by Epstein and Maxwell that speaking out could mean death. Annie Farmer, who along with her sister once tried to tell her story to Vanity Fair, said their account was suppressed under direct pressure from Epstein and Maxwell. “We know their names,” one survivor said, adding that the women have begun compiling their own list of individuals who were part of Epstein’s circle.<h2>Pressure mounts in Congress</h2>The testimonies came as bipartisan pressure builds in Congress to mandate the release of all Epstein-related investigative files. Representatives Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) are leading a discharge petition to force a House vote on legislation requiring the Justice Department to make the records public, with redactions to protect victims. Earlier this week, the House Oversight Committee released more than 33,000 pages of documents from the DOJ. But critics argue that most of the files were already public and heavily redacted, leaving key questions unanswered. Survivors say only full disclosure can deliver real accountability.

US Congress releases 33k Epstein files: Survivors break silence by speaking out publicly for the first time

Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse took to Capitol Hill on Wednesday (September 3) to share deeply personal accounts of exploitation and intimidation, demanding lawmakers compel the Justice Department to release all remaining investigative files related to Epstein and his associates. For several of the women, it was the first time speaking publicly about their experiences. Their stories painted a chilling picture of manipulation, fear, and betrayal — not only by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell but also by a system that they say protected predators while silencing victims. Marina Lacerda: My education was replaced by abuse Marina Lacerda, originally from Brazil, said she was just 14 when she was introduced to Epstein with the promise of earning money by giving massages. At the time, she was juggling three jobs to help her family, but instead of opportunity, she says she was drawn into a cycle of abuse that lasted until she turned 17. She recalled leaving school before finishing 9th grade because she was required at Epstein’s house so frequently. What she once hoped would lead to stable work as his assistant ended abruptly when Epstein told her she had grown “too old.” “There are gaps in my memory that I cannot recover, no matter how hard I try,” Lacerda said. “The government holds documents that could help me understand my own story and begin to heal.” She questioned why she was never called to testify in earlier cases and why Epstein managed to evade meaningful punishment in 2008. Jena-Lisa Jones: I was terrified no one would believe me Jena-Lisa Jones, abused in Palm Beach beginning at age 14, said she had endured a difficult home life but was still an innocent teenager when Epstein targeted her. “I had never been more afraid in my life than that first time,” she said, recalling crying all the way home. Inside Epstein’s residence, she remembered seeing photos of him alongside influential figures — images that left her convinced no one would believe her story. Haley Robson: I felt I had no choice At 16, Haley Robson was a strong student with college ambitions when a classmate recruited her to give Epstein a massage. Once in the room, she said, he undressed and demanded sexual acts. Afterward, Epstein gave her $200 and pressured her into bringing other girls, promising the same payment for each recruit. “I felt I couldn’t say no — if I disobeyed, something bad would happen,” Robson recalled. Eventually, the stepmother of one girl alerted police, but Robson said authorities treated her as if she were the criminal. She urged lawmakers to unseal the files: “End the secrecy. Lift the curtain. Every member of Congress who resists this bill should be exposed.” Lisa Phillips: An international trafficker, not just a predator Lisa Phillips recounted being taken to Epstein’s private island in the Caribbean during a photoshoot in 2000. There, she said, she witnessed the scale of his influence, which extended into fashion, art, and entertainment. “This was not limited to underage girls in Florida,” she said, describing Epstein as an international trafficker shielded by powerful connections. Rejecting sympathy, she declared: “We are not here for pity. We are here to demand accountability.” Ongoing threats and silencing Other survivors described the lasting fear that continues today. Actress Anouska De Georgiou said she has been followed by cars and was warned by Epstein and Maxwell that speaking out could mean death. Annie Farmer, who along with her sister once tried to tell her story to Vanity Fair, said their account was suppressed under direct pressure from Epstein and Maxwell. “We know their names,” one survivor said, adding that the women have begun compiling their own list of individuals who were part of Epstein’s circle. Pressure mounts in Congress The testimonies came as bipartisan pressure builds in Congress to mandate the release of all Epstein-related investigative files. Representatives Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) are leading a discharge petition to force a House vote on legislation requiring the Justice Department to make the records public, with redactions to protect victims. Earlier this week, the House Oversight Committee released more than 33,000 pages of documents from the DOJ. But critics argue that most of the files were already public and heavily redacted, leaving key questions unanswered. Survivors say only full disclosure can deliver real accountability.

Epstein survivors share harrowing abuse stories, also urged Congress to fully release all the DOJ files and deliver long-denied justice through full transparency

'We know their names': Epstein survivors break silence by speaking out publicly, press Congress for full release of files

A United States Congressional committee on Tuesday(Aug 2) released as many as 33,295 pages of documents and several videos related to convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. It was released in response to a subpoena issued by the House Oversight Committee. One of the biggest revelations made in the files that are now made public includes the footage of the area outside the sex offender's New York prison cell on the night he died. It also punctures Attorney General Pam Bondi’s explanation about the missing minute in the videos released earlier. If nothing else, the files have brought back the spotlight on the Trump administration's alleged attempt to whitewash Epstein's client list.<h2>What is in the video?</h2>The video includes 13 hours and 41 seconds of recording from outside the New York prison cell where Epstein was lodged. It covers the timing from August 9 evening to August 10 morning of 2019. According to the Daily Beast, the new video fills in that missing minute between 11:59 p.m. on August 9, 2019, and midnight on August 10, 2019. Earlier, a minute from timecode 23:00 to 00:00 was missing. Bondi had then said that the "missing minute" was just the jail's camera system resetting each night. In the new footage, a number of guards are visible working near Epstein’s cell. The extra minute is contained within two additional hours of footage from the new files, according to the BBC.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-losing-support-epstein-files-increases-republican-divide-as-johnson-nikki-haley-want-us-govt-to-be-release-the-list-1752644542555">Trump losing support? Epstein Files increases Republican divide as Johnson, Nikki Haley want US govt to release the list</a><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-house-committee-releases-over-33-000-pages-of-epstein-files-1756883620899/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-house-committee-releases-over-33-000-pages-of-epstein-files-1756883620899/embed</a>&nbsp;<h2>Ghislaine Maxwell's interview with DOJ</h2>The US Department of Justice on Friday (Aug 22) released transcript and audio of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche's July interview with convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell. According to the tapes, she denied ever seeing Donald Trump behave inappropriately, calling him “cordial” and a “gentleman,” and refuted knowledge of any Epstein “client list” or blackmail scheme. Maxwell also rejected suggestions that she introduced Epstein to the British royals, calling such claims “a flat untruth.” She cast doubt on Epstein’s reported suicide, suggesting it may have been the result of inmate violence within the prison. Additionally, she denied any wrongdoing by other public figures like Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, or Prince Andrew. The DOJ reportedly granted her limited immunity for the interview, and later transferred her to a lower-security prison, raising speculation about possible behind-the-scenes arrangements.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/melania-involved-in-epstein-saga-new-claims-surfaces-amid-rising-pressure-on-trump-to-release-controversial-documents-1753604162319">Melania involved in Epstein saga? New claims surface amid rising pressure on Trump to release controversial documents</a><h2>What are the Epstein Files?</h2>The Epstein files are a collection of legal documents, court records, and investigative materials connected to Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier accused of operating a sex trafficking ring involving underage girls. These files have been in the news due to Epstein’s links to high-profile figures in politics, business, and entertainment. A major part of the Epstein files comes from court cases, a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most outspoken accusers. In early 2024, hundreds of pages of these court documents were unsealed, revealing names, emails, and testimonies involving powerful individuals; however, large portions remain sealed or redacted. Jeffrey Epstein died under controversial circumstances in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019. Giuffre also died by suicide at her farm in Western Australia in April 2025.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-finally-releasing-epstein-files-here-s-what-he-told-pam-bondi-to-do-after-letter-row-this-scam-1752805484181">Trump FINALLY releasing Epstein Files? Here's what he told Pam Bondi to do after letter row</a>

A US Congressional committee released 33,295 pages and videos about Jeffrey Epstein, including 13+ hours of footage outside his NY prison cell the night he died. The video fills a previously missing minute, challenging Attorney General Pam Bondi’s explanation about it

A United States Congressional committee on Tuesday(Aug 2) released as many as 33,295 pages of documents and several videos related to convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. It was released in response to a subpoena issued by the House Oversight Committee. One of the biggest revelations made in the files that are now made public includes the footage of the area outside the sex offender's New York prison cell on the night he died. It also punctures Attorney General Pam Bondi’s explanation about the missing minute in the videos released earlier. If nothing else, the files have brought back the spotlight on the Trump administration's alleged attempt to whitewash Epstein's client list. What is in the video? The video includes 13 hours and 41 seconds of recording from outside the New York prison cell where Epstein was lodged. It covers the timing from August 9 evening to August 10 morning of 2019. According to the Daily Beast, the new video fills in that missing minute between 11:59 p.m. on August 9, 2019, and midnight on August 10, 2019. Earlier, a minute from timecode 23:00 to 00:00 was missing. Bondi had then said that the "missing minute" was just the jail's camera system resetting each night. In the new footage, a number of guards are visible working near Epstein’s cell. The extra minute is contained within two additional hours of footage from the new files, according to the BBC. Read More | Trump losing support? Epstein Files increases Republican divide as Johnson, Nikki Haley want US govt to release the list https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-house-committee-releases-over-33-000-pages-of-epstein-files-1756883620899/embed Ghislaine Maxwell's interview with DOJ The US Department of Justice on Friday (Aug 22) released transcript and audio of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche's July interview with convicted sex offender Ghislaine Maxwell. According to the tapes, she denied ever seeing Donald Trump behave inappropriately, calling him “cordial” and a “gentleman,” and refuted knowledge of any Epstein “client list” or blackmail scheme. Maxwell also rejected suggestions that she introduced Epstein to the British royals, calling such claims “a flat untruth.” She cast doubt on Epstein’s reported suicide, suggesting it may have been the result of inmate violence within the prison. Additionally, she denied any wrongdoing by other public figures like Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, or Prince Andrew. The DOJ reportedly granted her limited immunity for the interview, and later transferred her to a lower-security prison, raising speculation about possible behind-the-scenes arrangements. Read More | Melania involved in Epstein saga? New claims surface amid rising pressure on Trump to release controversial documents What are the Epstein Files? The Epstein files are a collection of legal documents, court records, and investigative materials connected to Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier accused of operating a sex trafficking ring involving underage girls. These files have been in the news due to Epstein’s links to high-profile figures in politics, business, and entertainment. A major part of the Epstein files comes from court cases, a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most outspoken accusers. In early 2024, hundreds of pages of these court documents were unsealed, revealing names, emails, and testimonies involving powerful individuals; however, large portions remain sealed or redacted. Jeffrey Epstein died under controversial circumstances in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019. Giuffre also died by suicide at her farm in Western Australia in April 2025. Read More | Trump FINALLY releasing Epstein Files? Here's what he told Pam Bondi to do after letter row

A US Congressional committee released 33,295 pages and videos about Jeffrey Epstein, including 13+ hours of footage outside his NY prison cell the night he died. The video fills a previously missing minute, challenging Attorney General Pam Bondi’s explanation about it

Missing minute of Epstein's prison cell on night of his death exposes Pam Bondi's 'false' explanation: What it revealed

A House of Representatives committee on Tuesday (Sep 2) released the first batch of records from its probe into Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender whose case continues to stir political controversy for US President Donald Trump. More than 33,000 pages tied to Epstein and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell have been posted on the House Oversight Committee's website after being handed over by the Justice Department. This comes after the committee had subpoenaed the US Justice Department for the Epstein files. Last month, the first batch of these documents was handed over.<h2>For full transparency</h2>Committee chairperson James Comer, in a statement, said, "We're in the process of uploading those documents for full transparency so everyone in America can see those documents," adding that the release was happening "as quick as we can get them uploaded." "We want those to be public as soon as possible."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/after-trump-elon-musk-dragged-into-epstein-scandal-as-ghislaine-maxwell-says-this-1756103832613">After Trump, Elon Musk dragged into Epstein scandal as Ghislaine Maxwell says this...</a><h2>What did the newly released Epstein files reveal?</h2>It is not yet clear what new information is contained in the documents made public on Tuesday. Thousands of the documents, as per AFP, are heavily redacted. Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the House committee, noted that much of the material had already been made public in past releases.The Oversight Committee, in a statement, asserted that the documents have been redacted to protect "victim identities" and remove "any child sexual abuse material." It added that more records are expected in the coming weeks.On Tuesday, the committee also heard private testimony from several victims. "The stories were horrific and infuriating," said Garcia on X. "In the days and weeks ahead, we will be hearing more from these victims."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-latest-wild-plan-reopen-insane-asylums-like-joker-s-arkham-amid-his-crime-crackdown-here-s-what-he-said-1756784333958">Trump's latest wild plan: Reopen 'insane asylums' like Joker's Arkham amid his crime crackdown. Here's what he said</a>Epstein died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking underage girls. His death was ruled a suicide, but it has fuelled years of conspiracy theories and suspicions, particularly among supporters of President Donald Trump. Many believe powerful figures in politics and entertainment were shielded from scrutiny, while federal investigators in July rejected claims of a "client list" or blackmail scheme. &nbsp;

The House Oversight Committee has released the first batch of over 33,000 pages of records from its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender whose case continues to fuel conspiracy theories. Here's what we know.

A House of Representatives committee on Tuesday (Sep 2) released the first batch of records from its probe into Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender whose case continues to stir political controversy for US President Donald Trump. More than 33,000 pages tied to Epstein and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell have been posted on the House Oversight Committee's website after being handed over by the Justice Department. This comes after the committee had subpoenaed the US Justice Department for the Epstein files. Last month, the first batch of these documents was handed over. For full transparency Committee chairperson James Comer, in a statement, said, "We're in the process of uploading those documents for full transparency so everyone in America can see those documents," adding that the release was happening "as quick as we can get them uploaded." "We want those to be public as soon as possible." Also read | After Trump, Elon Musk dragged into Epstein scandal as Ghislaine Maxwell says this... What did the newly released Epstein files reveal? It is not yet clear what new information is contained in the documents made public on Tuesday. Thousands of the documents, as per AFP, are heavily redacted. Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the House committee, noted that much of the material had already been made public in past releases. The Oversight Committee, in a statement, asserted that the documents have been redacted to protect "victim identities" and remove "any child sexual abuse material." It added that more records are expected in the coming weeks. On Tuesday, the committee also heard private testimony from several victims. "The stories were horrific and infuriating," said Garcia on X. "In the days and weeks ahead, we will be hearing more from these victims." Also read | Trump's latest wild plan: Reopen 'insane asylums' like Joker's Arkham amid his crime crackdown. Here's what he said Epstein died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking underage girls. His death was ruled a suicide, but it has fuelled years of conspiracy theories and suspicions, particularly among supporters of President Donald Trump. Many believe powerful figures in politics and entertainment were shielded from scrutiny, while federal investigators in July rejected claims of a "client list" or blackmail scheme.

The House Oversight Committee has released the first batch of over 33,000 pages of records from its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender whose case continues to fuel conspiracy theories. Here's what we know.