National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

The British couple who were detained by the Taliban have been released, news agency AFP reported on Friday (September 19). The couple, Peter and Barbie Reynolds, were in detention sicne a few months and were freed after the mediation by Qatar.&nbsp;"Barbie and Peter Reynolds have been safely released from detention in Afghanistan following mediation led by Qatar. The Qataris had been engaged with the Afghan authorities for many months, working in close coordination with the British government," the official said, on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter told AFP.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-give-bad-publicity-press-should-tv-networks-lose-licences-for-criticising-trump-us-president-says-maybe-1758268297257">Should TV networks lose licences for opposing Trump? US president says 'maybe'</a>&nbsp;The Talibanauthorities also confirmed the release of the couple.&nbsp;"Two British nationals named Peter and Barbara Reynolds, who had violated the laws of Afghanistan, were released from custody today following the judicial process," Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Qahar Balkhi said on social media, the French news agency reported.&nbsp;"The Qataris had been engaged with the Afghan authorities for many months, working in close coordination with the British government," he added.&nbsp;What was the case?&nbsp;The couple, in their late 70s, who spent decades of their life educating Afghan girls, were detained in a crackdown by the Taliban.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/palestinian-statehood-is-uk-s-moral-responsibility-the-british-colonial-legacy-behind-creation-of-israel-displacement-of-palestinians-1758271560701">Palestinian statehood recognition: Why it's Britain’s moral responsibility</a>&nbsp;Peter Reynolds, 79, and his wife, Barbie, 75, were detained by the current Afghanistan government led by the Taliban on February 1, 2025. They were scheduled to appear in court for the case proceeding on Saturday (March 13), but at the "last moment," they were informed that the hearing had been delayed.&nbsp;The couple who had been running training projects in Afghanistan for 18 years - including one that involved training mothers and children - spent months in jail.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/not-just-b-2-bombers-us-deployed-many-other-weapons-in-iran-strike-how-did-it-rack-up-a-636-million-bill-secret-document-reveals-cost-breakdown-1758266951037">Not just B-2 bombers, US used many other weapons in Iran strike, Pentagon shows</a>&nbsp;

The British couple who were detained by the Taliban have been released, news agency AFP reported on Friday (September 19). The couple, Peter and Barbie Reynolds, were in detention sicne a few months and were freed after the mediation by Qatar.


The British couple who were detained by the Taliban have been released, news agency AFP reported on Friday (September 19). The couple, Peter and Barbie Reynolds, were in detention sicne a few months and were freed after the mediation by Qatar. "Barbie and Peter Reynolds have been safely released from detention in Afghanistan following mediation led by Qatar. The Qataris had been engaged with the Afghan authorities for many months, working in close coordination with the British government," the official said, on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter told AFP. Also read: Should TV networks lose licences for opposing Trump? US president says 'maybe' The Talibanauthorities also confirmed the release of the couple. "Two British nationals named Peter and Barbara Reynolds, who had violated the laws of Afghanistan, were released from custody today following the judicial process," Foreign Ministry spokesman Abdul Qahar Balkhi said on social media, the French news agency reported. "The Qataris had been engaged with the Afghan authorities for many months, working in close coordination with the British government," he added. What was the case? The couple, in their late 70s, who spent decades of their life educating Afghan girls, were detained in a crackdown by the Taliban. Also read: Palestinian statehood recognition: Why it's Britain’s moral responsibility Peter Reynolds, 79, and his wife, Barbie, 75, were detained by the current Afghanistan government led by the Taliban on February 1, 2025. They were scheduled to appear in court for the case proceeding on Saturday (March 13), but at the "last moment," they were informed that the hearing had been delayed. The couple who had been running training projects in Afghanistan for 18 years - including one that involved training mothers and children - spent months in jail. Also read: Not just B-2 bombers, US used many other weapons in Iran strike, Pentagon shows

The British couple who were detained by the Taliban have been released, news agency AFP reported on Friday (September 19). The couple, Peter and Barbie Reynolds, were in detention sicne a few months and were freed after the mediation by Qatar.&nbsp;

Taliban release British couple, Peter and Barbie, after Qatar mediation. Here's all about the case

US President Donald Trump said on Friday (October 05) some TV networks should have their licences "taken away", as he backed America's broadcast watchdog in a row over the suspension of late-night TV host Jimmy Kimmel. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, President Trump accused television networks of being biased against him. “I have read some place that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily [in last year’s election],” he said. “They give me only bad publicity [and] press. I mean, they’re getting a licence. I would think maybe their licence should be taken away,” he added.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-i-didn-t-want-him-trump-says-he-barred-mayor-of-london-khan-from-king-s-state-banquet-at-windsor-here-s-how-sadiq-reacted-1758263997801">'I didn’t want him': Trump says he barred 'Mayor of London Khan' from King’s state banquet at Windsor - Here's how Sadiq reacted</a><h2>Why was Jimmy Kimmel taken off air?</h2>ABC has suspended late-night host Jimmy Kimmel “indefinitely” after comments he made about the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah. Kimmel suggested the suspect may have been a Trump supporter, but officials later said he was “indoctrinated with leftist ideology.” ABC pulled the show after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), led by a Trump appointee, warned of possible regulatory action.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-blocks-400-million-in-taiwan-military-aid-as-us-chases-trade-deal-with-china-1758255835032">Trump trying to woo Xi? Trump blocks $400 MILLION in Taiwan military aid as US chases trade deal with China</a><h2>What exactly did Kimmel say?</h2>In his monologue, Kimmel, 57, accused Trump allies of trying to spin the shooting for political gain. He said the “MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them” and compared Trump’s reaction to the killing to “how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish.” Kimmel later condemned the attack and expressed “love” for the Kirk family.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/abc-pulls-jimmy-kimmel-off-air-indefinitely-fcc-over-charlie-kirk-tyler-robinson-comments-all-you-need-to-know-1758162312719">'Hit some new lows': ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel off air ‘indefinitely' as FCC chief threatens action over Kirk comments - All you need to know</a><h2>How has the FCC responded?</h2>FCC chair Brendan Carr called Kimmel’s comments “the sickest conduct possible” and warned broadcasters could face action if they did not intervene. “We’re going to continue to hold these broadcasters accountable to the public interest, and if broadcasters don’t like that simple solution, they can turn their licence in to the FCC,” he told Fox News. Carr praised Nexstar Media, one of the largest station owners, for dropping Kimmel’s show. Nexstar is currently seeking FCC approval for a $6.2bn merger with Tegna.Former President Barack Obama criticised the Trump administration, saying it had taken cancel culture to a “new and dangerous level” by using regulatory threats to silence journalists and commentators.Kimmel’s suspension has drawn support from other late-night hosts. On a special episode of The Daily Show, Jon Stewart mocked Trump’s leadership, calling himself a “patriotically obedient host” of an “administration-compliant” programme. He referred to Trump as a “dear leader” who had been “gracing England with his legendary warmth and radiance.”

Trump backed the FCC in a row over Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, criticising TV networks as biased and suggesting that their licences be revoked. This comes after ABC pulled the Kimmel show after controversial comments on Charlie Kirk murder.

US President Donald Trump said on Friday (October 05) some TV networks should have their licences "taken away", as he backed America's broadcast watchdog in a row over the suspension of late-night TV host Jimmy Kimmel. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, President Trump accused television networks of being biased against him. “I have read some place that the networks were 97% against me, again, 97% negative, and yet I won and easily [in last year’s election],” he said. “They give me only bad publicity [and] press. I mean, they’re getting a licence. I would think maybe their licence should be taken away,” he added. Also read: 'I didn’t want him': Trump says he barred 'Mayor of London Khan' from King’s state banquet at Windsor - Here's how Sadiq reacted Why was Jimmy Kimmel taken off air? ABC has suspended late-night host Jimmy Kimmel “indefinitely” after comments he made about the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in Utah. Kimmel suggested the suspect may have been a Trump supporter, but officials later said he was “indoctrinated with leftist ideology.” ABC pulled the show after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), led by a Trump appointee, warned of possible regulatory action. Also read: Trump trying to woo Xi? Trump blocks $400 MILLION in Taiwan military aid as US chases trade deal with China What exactly did Kimmel say? In his monologue, Kimmel, 57, accused Trump allies of trying to spin the shooting for political gain. He said the “MAGA gang” was “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them” and compared Trump’s reaction to the killing to “how a four-year-old mourns a goldfish.” Kimmel later condemned the attack and expressed “love” for the Kirk family. Also read: 'Hit some new lows': ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel off air ‘indefinitely' as FCC chief threatens action over Kirk comments - All you need to know How has the FCC responded? FCC chair Brendan Carr called Kimmel’s comments “the sickest conduct possible” and warned broadcasters could face action if they did not intervene. “We’re going to continue to hold these broadcasters accountable to the public interest, and if broadcasters don’t like that simple solution, they can turn their licence in to the FCC,” he told Fox News. Carr praised Nexstar Media, one of the largest station owners, for dropping Kimmel’s show. Nexstar is currently seeking FCC approval for a $6.2bn merger with Tegna. Former President Barack Obama criticised the Trump administration, saying it had taken cancel culture to a “new and dangerous level” by using regulatory threats to silence journalists and commentators. Kimmel’s suspension has drawn support from other late-night hosts. On a special episode of The Daily Show, Jon Stewart mocked Trump’s leadership, calling himself a “patriotically obedient host” of an “administration-compliant” programme. He referred to Trump as a “dear leader” who had been “gracing England with his legendary warmth and radiance.”

Trump backed the FCC in a row over Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension, criticising TV networks as biased and suggesting that their licences be revoked. This comes after ABC pulled the Kimmel show after controversial comments on Charlie Kirk murder.

'They give bad publicity, press': Should TV networks lose licences for criticising Trump? US president says 'maybe'

There is increasing pressure on the UK to recognise the statehood of Palestine, with reports even suggesting that Prime Minister Keir Starmer is likely to do so. If it happens, it would be an act of natural justice, because Britain’s colonial-era actions directly contributed to the creation of Israel, leading to the displacement of Palestinian populations from their land.<h2>The Legacy of Empire: Britain's direct role in Palestine and the creation of Israel&nbsp;</h2>Between 1920 and 1948, Britain governed Palestine under a League of Nations Mandate following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. The Mandate system was formally intended to prepare the territory for self-governance. However, Britain embedded within it the Balfour Declaration of 1917 — a statement issued by Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour promising to support the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. The declaration also vaguely stated that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities,” who at that time formed the overwhelming majority of the population.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-palestinian-state-what-is-the-only-disagreement-trump-had-with-uk-pm-1758216100921">'Palestinian state...': What is the only 'disagreement' Trump had with UK PM</a><h2>Palestine and Israel: A demographic re-engineering by Britain for economic reasons</h2>Palestinian Arabs comprised over 85 per cent of the population in the early 1920s. Yet, their national aspirations were sidelined as Britain facilitated and legitimised waves of Jewish immigration and land acquisition under the terms of the Mandate. These policies were informed by a range of motives, including post-war diplomacy, geopolitical strategy, and the desire to maintain influence over critical trade routes such as the Suez Canal and emerging oil infrastructure in the Middle East. By 1947, Jewish ownership of land had increased to about 6.6 per cent — up from less than 3 per cent in 1918. Jews became roughly one-third of the total population, mostly concentrated in urban and coastal areas such as Tel Aviv, Haifa, and parts of Jerusalem.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-he-disagrees-with-starmer-over-recognising-palestine-1758217841269/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-he-disagrees-with-starmer-over-recognising-palestine-1758217841269/embed</a><h2>Partition, War, and the ‘Nakba’ exodus: How Israel came into being</h2>The 1936–1939 Arab Revolt fiercely challenged British rule and protested the acceleration of Jewish immigration and land dispossession. The British response was brutal and involved the deployment of tens of thousands of troops, mass arrests, and executions. The revolt was eventually crushed. It left the Palestinian national movement weakened. After the Second World War, Britain, now exhausted and facing increasing violence from both Arab and Jewish armed groups, referred the issue of Palestine to the newly formed United Nations.In 1947, the UN General Assembly proposed a Partition Plan (Resolution 181), which sought to divide Palestine into two states: a Jewish state covering approximately 56 per cent of the territory, and an Arab state covering about 43 per cent, with Jerusalem placed under international administration. This plan marked the first official two-state framework, though it was deeply contested. At the time, Jews constituted about one-third of the population and owned a small fraction of the land, yet were allocated the larger portion.&nbsp;Britain, torn by internal disagreements and wary of taking sides, abstained from the UN vote on the partition.&nbsp;By May 1948, Britain fully withdrew its forces, leaving behind a power vacuum and worsening instability.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/israel-s-ministry-of-culture-decides-to-withdraw-funds-for-israeli-oscars-after-a-film-on-palestine-wins-top-award-1758188639708">Israel's Ministry of Culture decides to withdraw funds for 'Israeli Oscars' after a film on Palestine wins top award</a><h2>Israel declares independence, wins war, and controls most of Palestinian territory</h2>On 14 May 1948, Israel declared independence. The next day, 15 May, neighbouring Arab armies — including Egypt, Jordan (then Transjordan), Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq — launched a military intervention, leading to the first Arab-Israeli war.Despite being newly established, Israel was far from defenceless. It inherited a well-organised paramilitary structure, chiefly the Haganah, which was transformed into the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). Israel also received significant arms shipments from erstwhile Czechoslovakia, and benefited from international fundraising and the support of thousands of Jewish volunteers from abroad, known as Mahal.&nbsp;Britain did not support Israel militarily during the war, and maintained an arms embargo on both sides. However, its earlier policies under the Mandate had laid much of the institutional and demographic groundwork that made Israel’s military success possible.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-is-mahmoud-khalil-us-judge-rules-for-deportation-of-pro-palestinian-activist-to-syria-or-algeria-1758196738933">Who is Mahmoud Khalil? US judge rules for deportation of pro-Palestinian activist to Syria or Algeria</a><h2>How Israel managed to control most of Palestine&nbsp;</h2>By the end of the war, Israel controlled 78 per cent of historic Palestine, far beyond what had been allocated under the UN plan. This included key cities like Jaffa, Haifa, and Acre.More than 750,000 Palestinians were expelled or fled their homes during this period, a mass displacement known as the Nakba — Arabic for “catastrophe”.&nbsp;Over 400 Palestinian villages were depopulated and many were deliberately destroyed. During and after the Nakba, large numbers of Palestinian refugees were forced into camps in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, which today constitute the core Palestinian territories.&nbsp;These two territories, now governed individually and fragmented by decades of conflict, are separated by around 70 kilometres of Israeli land, as you can see from the map in the picture.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-joins-142-nations-in-backing-un-declaration-votes-for-palestinian-state-1757705925445">India joins 142 nations in backing UN declaration, votes for Palestinian state</a><h2>Britain built the imperial geography of Palestine with maps drawn abroad</h2>Even today, the effects of Britain’s colonial architecture remain etched into the physical and political geography of the Palestinian question — from the configuration of settlements and roads to the demarcation of borders and land registries.&nbsp;Many of the railways, road networks, and administrative boundaries still trace their origins back to maps drawn in London or Geneva.&nbsp;These imperial-era lines continue to define the contours of division, dispossession, and control.The Nakba was not merely an unintended side effect of conflict. It was the result of a decades-long process of settler colonialism — a political project supported, at various points, both tacitly and overtly by British imperial policy.&nbsp;Britain had committed to facilitating the establishment of a Jewish national home while promising to protect the rights of the Arab majority.But in practice, this dual obligation produced systemic inequity. Palestinians were excluded from meaningful sovereignty by a system designed to serve imperial and settler interests.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/palestine-president-abbas-writes-to-pm-modi-seeks-support-on-gaza-ambassador-shawesh-1753208673231">Palestine President Abbas writes to PM Modi, seeks support on Gaza: Ambassador Shawesh</a><h2>British recognition of Palestine would be a form of restorative justice</h2>As outlined here, Britain bears direct historical responsibility for a colonial process that denied Palestinians the very statehood it now hesitates to acknowledge. This responsibility is not merely rhetorical — it is deeply embedded in decades of policy choices that shaped the dispossession, disempowerment, and displacement of an entire people.No amount of warfare is going to solve this problem. Can talks succeed where violence has failed? One side would argue — and international law supports this — that Palestinians have a right to sovereignty, dignity, and territorial integrity. But others argue that recognising Palestinian statehood would be incompatible with Israel’s right to exist and secure its borders — a view that has underpinned decades of political stalemate.Yet Britain, the state most historically responsible for the roots of the conflict remains on the sidelines.&nbsp;Meanwhile, European allies such as Spain, Ireland, and Norway have already extended formal recognition of Palestine. France, Belgium, Slovenia, and Malta have expressed strong support and are reportedly considering similar steps.<h2>Britain’s recognition of Palestine would be the closing of the colonial loop. But will it solve the problem?</h2>If it happens, Britain’s recognition of Palestine would be a "full circle" moment in the tumultuous history of the region. It would require the difficult but necessary admission that Britain helped enable one people’s independence while obstructing another’s. Britain cannot undo the past, but recognition would symbolically confront that legacy.&nbsp;It would represent a form of justice long delayed — an attempt to restore some measure of balance in a region still shaped by the consequences of imperial borders and colonial betrayals.For Britain, recognising Palestine is not merely a symbolic act — it is a moral reckoning long overdue.&nbsp;It would not by itself resolve the conflict, but it would affirm the principle that historical injustice cannot be left unaddressed forever: justice, after all, begins with acknowledgement.&nbsp;And for Palestinians, that acknowledgement is now more than a century overdue.&nbsp;Whether it will lead to peace, or provoke yet another war, is a question no one can answer.&nbsp;But without justice, peace will remain a distant dream

If it happens, Britain's recognition of Palestine would be an act of historical justice, acknowledging its colonial-era role in Palestinian displacement and the creation of Israel during the Mandate era. It is essential not to forget the baggage of history that continues to bleed people

There is increasing pressure on the UK to recognise the statehood of Palestine, with reports even suggesting that Prime Minister Keir Starmer is likely to do so. If it happens, it would be an act of natural justice, because Britain’s colonial-era actions directly contributed to the creation of Israel, leading to the displacement of Palestinian populations from their land. The Legacy of Empire: Britain's direct role in Palestine and the creation of Israel Between 1920 and 1948, Britain governed Palestine under a League of Nations Mandate following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. The Mandate system was formally intended to prepare the territory for self-governance. However, Britain embedded within it the Balfour Declaration of 1917 — a statement issued by Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour promising to support the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. The declaration also vaguely stated that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities,” who at that time formed the overwhelming majority of the population. Also read: 'Palestinian state...': What is the only 'disagreement' Trump had with UK PM Palestine and Israel: A demographic re-engineering by Britain for economic reasons Palestinian Arabs comprised over 85 per cent of the population in the early 1920s. Yet, their national aspirations were sidelined as Britain facilitated and legitimised waves of Jewish immigration and land acquisition under the terms of the Mandate. These policies were informed by a range of motives, including post-war diplomacy, geopolitical strategy, and the desire to maintain influence over critical trade routes such as the Suez Canal and emerging oil infrastructure in the Middle East. By 1947, Jewish ownership of land had increased to about 6.6 per cent — up from less than 3 per cent in 1918. Jews became roughly one-third of the total population, mostly concentrated in urban and coastal areas such as Tel Aviv, Haifa, and parts of Jerusalem. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-says-he-disagrees-with-starmer-over-recognising-palestine-1758217841269/embed Partition, War, and the ‘Nakba’ exodus: How Israel came into being The 1936–1939 Arab Revolt fiercely challenged British rule and protested the acceleration of Jewish immigration and land dispossession. The British response was brutal and involved the deployment of tens of thousands of troops, mass arrests, and executions. The revolt was eventually crushed. It left the Palestinian national movement weakened. After the Second World War, Britain, now exhausted and facing increasing violence from both Arab and Jewish armed groups, referred the issue of Palestine to the newly formed United Nations. In 1947, the UN General Assembly proposed a Partition Plan (Resolution 181), which sought to divide Palestine into two states: a Jewish state covering approximately 56 per cent of the territory, and an Arab state covering about 43 per cent, with Jerusalem placed under international administration. This plan marked the first official two-state framework, though it was deeply contested. At the time, Jews constituted about one-third of the population and owned a small fraction of the land, yet were allocated the larger portion. Britain, torn by internal disagreements and wary of taking sides, abstained from the UN vote on the partition. By May 1948, Britain fully withdrew its forces, leaving behind a power vacuum and worsening instability. Also read: Israel's Ministry of Culture decides to withdraw funds for 'Israeli Oscars' after a film on Palestine wins top award Israel declares independence, wins war, and controls most of Palestinian territory On 14 May 1948, Israel declared independence. The next day, 15 May, neighbouring Arab armies — including Egypt, Jordan (then Transjordan), Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq — launched a military intervention, leading to the first Arab-Israeli war. Despite being newly established, Israel was far from defenceless. It inherited a well-organised paramilitary structure, chiefly the Haganah, which was transformed into the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). Israel also received significant arms shipments from erstwhile Czechoslovakia, and benefited from international fundraising and the support of thousands of Jewish volunteers from abroad, known as Mahal. Britain did not support Israel militarily during the war, and maintained an arms embargo on both sides. However, its earlier policies under the Mandate had laid much of the institutional and demographic groundwork that made Israel’s military success possible. Also read: Who is Mahmoud Khalil? US judge rules for deportation of pro-Palestinian activist to Syria or Algeria How Israel managed to control most of Palestine By the end of the war, Israel controlled 78 per cent of historic Palestine, far beyond what had been allocated under the UN plan. This included key cities like Jaffa, Haifa, and Acre. More than 750,000 Palestinians were expelled or fled their homes during this period, a mass displacement known as the Nakba — Arabic for “catastrophe”. Over 400 Palestinian villages were depopulated and many were deliberately destroyed. During and after the Nakba, large numbers of Palestinian refugees were forced into camps in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, which today constitute the core Palestinian territories. These two territories, now governed individually and fragmented by decades of conflict, are separated by around 70 kilometres of Israeli land, as you can see from the map in the picture. Also read: India joins 142 nations in backing UN declaration, votes for Palestinian state Britain built the imperial geography of Palestine with maps drawn abroad Even today, the effects of Britain’s colonial architecture remain etched into the physical and political geography of the Palestinian question — from the configuration of settlements and roads to the demarcation of borders and land registries. Many of the railways, road networks, and administrative boundaries still trace their origins back to maps drawn in London or Geneva. These imperial-era lines continue to define the contours of division, dispossession, and control. The Nakba was not merely an unintended side effect of conflict. It was the result of a decades-long process of settler colonialism — a political project supported, at various points, both tacitly and overtly by British imperial policy. Britain had committed to facilitating the establishment of a Jewish national home while promising to protect the rights of the Arab majority. But in practice, this dual obligation produced systemic inequity. Palestinians were excluded from meaningful sovereignty by a system designed to serve imperial and settler interests. Also read: Palestine President Abbas writes to PM Modi, seeks support on Gaza: Ambassador Shawesh British recognition of Palestine would be a form of restorative justice As outlined here, Britain bears direct historical responsibility for a colonial process that denied Palestinians the very statehood it now hesitates to acknowledge. This responsibility is not merely rhetorical — it is deeply embedded in decades of policy choices that shaped the dispossession, disempowerment, and displacement of an entire people. No amount of warfare is going to solve this problem. Can talks succeed where violence has failed? One side would argue — and international law supports this — that Palestinians have a right to sovereignty, dignity, and territorial integrity. But others argue that recognising Palestinian statehood would be incompatible with Israel’s right to exist and secure its borders — a view that has underpinned decades of political stalemate. Yet Britain, the state most historically responsible for the roots of the conflict remains on the sidelines. Meanwhile, European allies such as Spain, Ireland, and Norway have already extended formal recognition of Palestine. France, Belgium, Slovenia, and Malta have expressed strong support and are reportedly considering similar steps. Britain’s recognition of Palestine would be the closing of the colonial loop. But will it solve the problem? If it happens, Britain’s recognition of Palestine would be a "full circle" moment in the tumultuous history of the region. It would require the difficult but necessary admission that Britain helped enable one people’s independence while obstructing another’s. Britain cannot undo the past, but recognition would symbolically confront that legacy. It would represent a form of justice long delayed — an attempt to restore some measure of balance in a region still shaped by the consequences of imperial borders and colonial betrayals. For Britain, recognising Palestine is not merely a symbolic act — it is a moral reckoning long overdue. It would not by itself resolve the conflict, but it would affirm the principle that historical injustice cannot be left unaddressed forever: justice, after all, begins with acknowledgement. And for Palestinians, that acknowledgement is now more than a century overdue. Whether it will lead to peace, or provoke yet another war, is a question no one can answer. But without justice, peace will remain a distant dream

If it happens, Britain's recognition of Palestine would be an act of historical justice, acknowledging its colonial-era role in Palestinian displacement and the creation of Israel during the Mandate era. It is essential not to forget the baggage of history that continues to bleed people

Palestinian statehood recognition is UK’s moral responsibility. The British colonial legacy behind creation of Israel, displacement of Palestinians

The Pentagon has confirmed that American aircraft deployed a mix of precision bombs and rockets during Operation Midnight Hammer, the strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities earlier this year. Budget documents show the use of GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bombs (SDBs), laser-guided APKWS II rockets, and GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker-busters.While the B-2 stealth bombers are known to have dropped 14 MOPs on sites at Fordow and Natanz, less is known about how other aircraft contributed. One US submarine, likely the USS Georgia, also launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Isfahan nuclear site.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-i-didn-t-want-him-trump-says-he-barred-mayor-of-london-khan-from-king-s-state-banquet-at-windsor-here-s-how-sadiq-reacted-1758263997801">'I didn’t want him': Trump says he barred 'Mayor of London Khan' from King’s state banquet at Windsor - Here's how Sadiq reacted</a><h2>How big was the strike package?</h2>According to the Pentagon, 125 aircraft took part in the mission, including F-22 Raptors, F-35 fighters, and dozens of refuelling tankers. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the US used “decoys” and “high-speed suppression weapons” to clear Iranian air defences before the bombers struck. “The US protection package employed high-speed suppression weapons to ensure safe passage of the strike package,” he told reporters after the mission.<h2>Why is the Pentagon reallocating funds now?</h2>The details surfaced in a budget reprogramming document released in August. It shows Washington seeking Congressional approval to shift money to replace weapons expended in the strike.The document states, “This reprogramming action addresses funds for the replacement of defence articles expended in support of Israel through U.S. combat operations executed at the request of and in coordination with Israel and for the defence of Israeli territory, personnel, or assets during attacks by Iran, and subsequent or anticipated attacks by Iran and its proxies.”<h2>How much will replacements cost?</h2>The budget breakdown includes:• $123 million to replace the MOPs dropped on Iran’s nuclear sites.• $2.3 million for Small Diameter Bombs.• $3.3 million for APKWS II rockets.• $9.9 million for temporary lodging of US personnel.• $498 million for Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) interceptors used to shield Israel.If the $123 million figure covers the 14 MOPs used, that would put the average cost per bomb at almost $8.8 million.<h2>Why were rockets included in the budget?</h2>The inclusion of APKWS II rockets has raised questions. The rockets are usually fired by F-15s, F-16s, A-10s, and helicopters, and can target drones or cruise missiles. Analysts believe they were more likely used in defending Israel from Iranian drone and missile barrages rather than in a direct strike on nuclear sites.

The Pentagon revealed Operation Midnight Hammer on Iran’s nuclear sites used B-2 MOPs, Tomahawks, precision bombs, and rockets, costing $636 million to replace weapons and support Israel’s defence.

The Pentagon has confirmed that American aircraft deployed a mix of precision bombs and rockets during Operation Midnight Hammer, the strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities earlier this year. Budget documents show the use of GBU-39/B Small Diameter Bombs (SDBs), laser-guided APKWS II rockets, and GBU-57/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) bunker-busters. While the B-2 stealth bombers are known to have dropped 14 MOPs on sites at Fordow and Natanz, less is known about how other aircraft contributed. One US submarine, likely the USS Georgia, also launched more than two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at the Isfahan nuclear site. Also read: 'I didn’t want him': Trump says he barred 'Mayor of London Khan' from King’s state banquet at Windsor - Here's how Sadiq reacted How big was the strike package? According to the Pentagon, 125 aircraft took part in the mission, including F-22 Raptors, F-35 fighters, and dozens of refuelling tankers. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the US used “decoys” and “high-speed suppression weapons” to clear Iranian air defences before the bombers struck. “The US protection package employed high-speed suppression weapons to ensure safe passage of the strike package,” he told reporters after the mission. Why is the Pentagon reallocating funds now? The details surfaced in a budget reprogramming document released in August. It shows Washington seeking Congressional approval to shift money to replace weapons expended in the strike. The document states, “This reprogramming action addresses funds for the replacement of defence articles expended in support of Israel through U.S. combat operations executed at the request of and in coordination with Israel and for the defence of Israeli territory, personnel, or assets during attacks by Iran, and subsequent or anticipated attacks by Iran and its proxies.” How much will replacements cost? The budget breakdown includes: • $123 million to replace the MOPs dropped on Iran’s nuclear sites. • $2.3 million for Small Diameter Bombs. • $3.3 million for APKWS II rockets. • $9.9 million for temporary lodging of US personnel. • $498 million for Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) interceptors used to shield Israel. If the $123 million figure covers the 14 MOPs used, that would put the average cost per bomb at almost $8.8 million. Why were rockets included in the budget? The inclusion of APKWS II rockets has raised questions. The rockets are usually fired by F-15s, F-16s, A-10s, and helicopters, and can target drones or cruise missiles. Analysts believe they were more likely used in defending Israel from Iranian drone and missile barrages rather than in a direct strike on nuclear sites.

The Pentagon revealed Operation Midnight Hammer on Iran’s nuclear sites used B-2 MOPs, Tomahawks, precision bombs, and rockets, costing $636 million to replace weapons and support Israel’s defence.

Not just B-2 bombers, US deployed many other weapons in Iran strike. How did it rack-up a $636 million bill? Secret document reveals cost breakdown

A key US vaccine advisory panel has recommended against giving a combined vaccine that protects against preventable diseases like measles and chickenpox to children aged four or under. This recommendation comes just days after reports emerged that the Trump administration plans to link 25 child deaths to Covid vaccines. The move aligns with the anti-vaccine stance of current Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, even as medical experts warn that such actions could cause confusion, reduce vaccine uptake, and lead to a resurgence of preventable childhood diseases across America.<h2>What did the vaccine panel say about the MMRV vaccine?</h2>The MMRV vaccine is a combination shot that protects against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (chickenpox). On Thursday (Sep 18), the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — an expert panel under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — voted 8-3 to recommend that children aged four and under not receive the combined MMRV vaccine. Instead, they recommended giving separate MMR and varicella (chickenpox) shots. The panel cited a slightly increased risk of febrile seizures in children aged 12 to 23 months when given the combined MMRV shot, compared to receiving the MMR and varicella vaccines separately. While these seizures are rare and typically not dangerous, the panel used this data to support their recommendation.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-administration-planning-to-link-covid-vaccine-shots-to-child-deaths-in-controversial-anti-vax-push-1757746954672">Trump administration planning to link COVID vaccine shots to child deaths in controversial anti-vax push</a>They also proposed reconsidering the timing of other childhood vaccinations, including the hepatitis B vaccine, which is usually given at birth, and delaying its administration where possible.The seizure risk associated with MMRV has been acknowledged in prior CDC guidance, though the risk is rare—about one additional seizure per 2,300 to 2,600 vaccinated children.<h2>US plans to link Covid-19 vaccines to child deaths</h2>These changes came just days after multiple US media outlets reported that the Trump administration plans to present data allegedly linking 25 child deaths to Covid-19 vaccines at an upcoming ACIP meeting. The claims are said to be based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national vaccine safety surveillance programme in the US. However, public health experts have repeatedly cautioned that VAERS reports do not prove causality. Anyone can submit a VAERS report, and these reports are not verified. The existence of a report does not mean the vaccine caused the death or adverse event.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/cancer-immunotherapy-breakthrough-russian-vaccine-enteromix-demonstrates-100-per-cent-efficacy-in-trials-ready-for-rollout-1757226810346">Cancer immunotherapy breakthrough: Russian vaccine Enteromix demonstrates 100 per cent efficacy in trials, ready for rollout</a><h2>Public health experts warn of eroding trust in vaccines</h2>Experts warn that these anti-vaccine shifts risk undermining decades of public health progress. Altering long-standing vaccine schedules—particularly under political influence—could fuel vaccine hesitancy. If uptake drops due to confusion or fear, diseases like measles, mumps, and chickenpox—which mainly affect children—could resurge. Measles is particularly contagious and had been nearly eradicated in parts of the world due to widespread immunisation.While the CDC’s Vaccines for Children (VFC) programme will still cover MMRV in many cases, there is concern that insurance coverage, Medicaid, and logistics (more clinic visits, more injections) may complicate vaccine uptake.Meanwhile, amid allegations of politicising the CDC, critics have noted that the composition of the ACIP panel has recently changed, with several vaccine-sceptic members added—raising concerns about the scientific rigour of decisions being made.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/america-to-lose-covid-vaccine-trump-rfk-jr-planning-to-pull-covid-vaccine-from-us-market-within-months-report-1756121006138">America to lose COVID vaccine? Trump, RFK Jr. planning to pull COVID vaccine from US market 'within months': Report</a><h2>How risky is replacing MMRV with separate shots?</h2>The medical risk of switching from MMRV to separate MMR and varicella vaccines is small. The cited seizure risk, while slightly elevated with MMRV, is rare (roughly 1 in 2,500) and almost all children recover fully.However, logistical challenges arise with more appointments and injections, increasing the likelihood that children miss or delay one of the shots. These delays can reduce immunity and increase vulnerability to outbreaks.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-scientists-express-concern-over-russias-new-cancer-vaccine-785420/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-scientists-express-concern-over-russias-new-cancer-vaccine-785420/embed</a><h2>Policy confusion could reduce protection for American children</h2>Restricting or de-prioritising combined vaccines like MMRV could result in fewer children receiving timely and complete immunisation. This increases the likelihood of outbreaks of serious, preventable illnesses. Similarly, misleading the public by citing unverified VAERS reports to link vaccines to child deaths—without scientific evidence—could influence parents to delay or skip vaccinations.There is no established causal link between Covid vaccines and child deaths as claimed. Official reviews from the CDC, FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and independent panels have not validated such a link.Historical data shows that when vaccine uptake drops or schedules are disrupted, outbreaks of diseases like measles or whooping cough follow—often with serious consequences for children.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science-tech/cancer-treatment-with-just-one-vaccine-nhs-rolls-out-5-minute-super-jab-that-will-truly-transform-livescancer-treatment-with-just-one-vaccine-nhs-rolls-out-5-minute-super-jab-that-will-truly-transform-lives-9021485">Cancer treatment with just one vaccine: NHS rolls out 5-minute ‘super-jab’ that will ‘truly transform lives’</a><h2>Politics is the biggest disease affecting Americans</h2>There is growing concern that recent actions by the Trump administration—particularly through the restructured CDC advisory panel and its vaccine recommendations—may be prioritising political ideology over medical science.While individual risk factors should always be carefully considered, public health experts stress that these policy changes may lead to lower immunisation rates, greater public confusion, and preventable disease outbreaks—effectively putting American children at greater risk.&nbsp;

A CDC panel under Trump administration has advised against MMRV vaccine for kids aged under four. This is sparking fears of lower vaccine uptake and disease outbreaks. The move came amid reports that CDS is going to link Covid vaccines to children's deaths.



A key US vaccine advisory panel has recommended against giving a combined vaccine that protects against preventable diseases like measles and chickenpox to children aged four or under. This recommendation comes just days after reports emerged that the Trump administration plans to link 25 child deaths to Covid vaccines. The move aligns with the anti-vaccine stance of current Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, even as medical experts warn that such actions could cause confusion, reduce vaccine uptake, and lead to a resurgence of preventable childhood diseases across America. What did the vaccine panel say about the MMRV vaccine? The MMRV vaccine is a combination shot that protects against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (chickenpox). On Thursday (Sep 18), the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — an expert panel under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — voted 8-3 to recommend that children aged four and under not receive the combined MMRV vaccine. Instead, they recommended giving separate MMR and varicella (chickenpox) shots. The panel cited a slightly increased risk of febrile seizures in children aged 12 to 23 months when given the combined MMRV shot, compared to receiving the MMR and varicella vaccines separately. While these seizures are rare and typically not dangerous, the panel used this data to support their recommendation. Also read: Trump administration planning to link COVID vaccine shots to child deaths in controversial anti-vax push They also proposed reconsidering the timing of other childhood vaccinations, including the hepatitis B vaccine, which is usually given at birth, and delaying its administration where possible. The seizure risk associated with MMRV has been acknowledged in prior CDC guidance, though the risk is rare—about one additional seizure per 2,300 to 2,600 vaccinated children. US plans to link Covid-19 vaccines to child deaths These changes came just days after multiple US media outlets reported that the Trump administration plans to present data allegedly linking 25 child deaths to Covid-19 vaccines at an upcoming ACIP meeting. The claims are said to be based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national vaccine safety surveillance programme in the US. However, public health experts have repeatedly cautioned that VAERS reports do not prove causality. Anyone can submit a VAERS report, and these reports are not verified. The existence of a report does not mean the vaccine caused the death or adverse event. Also read: Cancer immunotherapy breakthrough: Russian vaccine Enteromix demonstrates 100 per cent efficacy in trials, ready for rollout Public health experts warn of eroding trust in vaccines Experts warn that these anti-vaccine shifts risk undermining decades of public health progress. Altering long-standing vaccine schedules—particularly under political influence—could fuel vaccine hesitancy. If uptake drops due to confusion or fear, diseases like measles, mumps, and chickenpox—which mainly affect children—could resurge. Measles is particularly contagious and had been nearly eradicated in parts of the world due to widespread immunisation. While the CDC’s Vaccines for Children (VFC) programme will still cover MMRV in many cases, there is concern that insurance coverage, Medicaid, and logistics (more clinic visits, more injections) may complicate vaccine uptake. Meanwhile, amid allegations of politicising the CDC, critics have noted that the composition of the ACIP panel has recently changed, with several vaccine-sceptic members added—raising concerns about the scientific rigour of decisions being made. Also read: America to lose COVID vaccine? Trump, RFK Jr. planning to pull COVID vaccine from US market 'within months': Report How risky is replacing MMRV with separate shots? The medical risk of switching from MMRV to separate MMR and varicella vaccines is small. The cited seizure risk, while slightly elevated with MMRV, is rare (roughly 1 in 2,500) and almost all children recover fully. However, logistical challenges arise with more appointments and injections, increasing the likelihood that children miss or delay one of the shots. These delays can reduce immunity and increase vulnerability to outbreaks. https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-scientists-express-concern-over-russias-new-cancer-vaccine-785420/embed Policy confusion could reduce protection for American children Restricting or de-prioritising combined vaccines like MMRV could result in fewer children receiving timely and complete immunisation. This increases the likelihood of outbreaks of serious, preventable illnesses. Similarly, misleading the public by citing unverified VAERS reports to link vaccines to child deaths—without scientific evidence—could influence parents to delay or skip vaccinations. There is no established causal link between Covid vaccines and child deaths as claimed. Official reviews from the CDC, FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and independent panels have not validated such a link. Historical data shows that when vaccine uptake drops or schedules are disrupted, outbreaks of diseases like measles or whooping cough follow—often with serious consequences for children. Also read: Cancer treatment with just one vaccine: NHS rolls out 5-minute ‘super-jab’ that will ‘truly transform lives’ Politics is the biggest disease affecting Americans There is growing concern that recent actions by the Trump administration—particularly through the restructured CDC advisory panel and its vaccine recommendations—may be prioritising political ideology over medical science. While individual risk factors should always be carefully considered, public health experts stress that these policy changes may lead to lower immunisation rates, greater public confusion, and preventable disease outbreaks—effectively putting American children at greater risk.

A CDC panel under Trump administration has advised against MMRV vaccine for kids aged under four. This is sparking fears of lower vaccine uptake and disease outbreaks. The move came amid reports that CDS is going to link Covid vaccines to children's deaths.&nbsp;

Trump govt putting American kids in danger? CDC panel suggests curbs to vaccine that prevents measles and chickenpox, amid 'Covid shot deaths' probe

US President Donald Trump has claimed he personally stopped London Mayor Sadiq Khan from attending the King’s state banquet at Windsor Castle. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump said, “I think the Mayor of London Khan is among the worst mayors in the world… I asked that he not be there. He wanted to be there, as I understand, I didn’t want him.” A source close to the mayor, however, told BBC that Sir Sadiq never sought an invite.<h2>What did Trump say about Sadiq Khan?</h2>Trump repeated his long-held criticism of the London mayor, describing him as a “disaster” on immigration and accusing him of failing to deal with crime. “I think he’s done a terrible job. Crime in London is through the roof,” the president said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-blocks-400-million-in-taiwan-military-aid-as-us-chases-trade-deal-with-china-1758255835032">Trump trying to woo Xi? Trump blocks $400 MILLION in Taiwan military aid as US chases trade deal with China</a><h2>How did Khan’s team respond?</h2>In response, a source close to the mayor dismissed Trump’s comments and said his politics was about spreading fear. “Trump’s politics is one of fear and division. This includes talking down our great capital city,” the source said. They added, “London is a global success story, it’s open, dynamic and safer than major US cities. Perhaps that’s one of the reasons record numbers of Americans are choosing to make London their home.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-warns-us-tariff-threats-against-india-china-won-t-work-1758250362891">‘Ancient civilisations won’t bend’: Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work'</a><h2>Why have the two clashed for years?</h2>The feud between the pair goes back to 2015, when Sir Sadiq condemned Trump’s call to ban Muslims from travelling to the US. Since then, Trump has branded him a “stone-cold loser” and a “nasty person”, while the mayor accused the president of stirring up far-right politics. During Trump’s first state visit in 2019, Khan allowed the famous “Trump baby” blimp to fly over London.<h2>What happened during Trump’s UK visit?</h2>The president’s second state visit was marked by royal ceremony and thousands of protesters in Parliament Square. Four men were arrested after images of Trump and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were projected on Windsor Castle just before the banquet.

Donald Trump claimed he blocked London Mayor Sadiq Khan from the King’s Windsor Castle banquet, renewing his feud by criticising Khan’s record on crime and immigration, though Khan’s team dismissed the allegations.

US President Donald Trump has claimed he personally stopped London Mayor Sadiq Khan from attending the King’s state banquet at Windsor Castle. Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump said, “I think the Mayor of London Khan is among the worst mayors in the world… I asked that he not be there. He wanted to be there, as I understand, I didn’t want him.” A source close to the mayor, however, told BBC that Sir Sadiq never sought an invite. What did Trump say about Sadiq Khan? Trump repeated his long-held criticism of the London mayor, describing him as a “disaster” on immigration and accusing him of failing to deal with crime. “I think he’s done a terrible job. Crime in London is through the roof,” the president said. Also read: Trump trying to woo Xi? Trump blocks $400 MILLION in Taiwan military aid as US chases trade deal with China How did Khan’s team respond? In response, a source close to the mayor dismissed Trump’s comments and said his politics was about spreading fear. “Trump’s politics is one of fear and division. This includes talking down our great capital city,” the source said. They added, “London is a global success story, it’s open, dynamic and safer than major US cities. Perhaps that’s one of the reasons record numbers of Americans are choosing to make London their home.” Also read: ‘Ancient civilisations won’t bend’: Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work' Why have the two clashed for years? The feud between the pair goes back to 2015, when Sir Sadiq condemned Trump’s call to ban Muslims from travelling to the US. Since then, Trump has branded him a “stone-cold loser” and a “nasty person”, while the mayor accused the president of stirring up far-right politics. During Trump’s first state visit in 2019, Khan allowed the famous “Trump baby” blimp to fly over London. What happened during Trump’s UK visit? The president’s second state visit was marked by royal ceremony and thousands of protesters in Parliament Square. Four men were arrested after images of Trump and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein were projected on Windsor Castle just before the banquet.

Donald Trump claimed he blocked London Mayor Sadiq Khan from the King’s Windsor Castle banquet, renewing his feud by criticising Khan’s record on crime and immigration, though Khan’s team dismissed the allegations.

'I didn’t want him': Trump says he barred 'Mayor of London Khan' from King’s state banquet at Windsor - Here's how Sadiq reacted

The case of the missing father, Travis Decker, who was named the prime suspect in the killing of his three daughters earlier this year, might finally be reaching an end after three months. The police say that they have recovered what are possibly the remains of the Washington father who has been on the run since his three girls were found dead on June 2. The remains were found south of the town of Leavenworth during a search, the Chelan County Sheriff’s Office said. A DNA analysis will be done to confirm whether they belong to Travis. The case of the missing girls who were later found dead shook the country. Paityn Decker, 9; Evelyn Decker, 8; and Olivia Decker, 5, were found dead near a Washington state campground after a search was initiated following a missing persons complaint by their mother, Whitney Decker.&nbsp;<h2>What is the Travis Decker case?</h2>The 32-year-old separated from his wife in 2023, and Whitney got full custody of the children. Travis was battling mental health issues, and so Whitney petitioned the court to "put restrictions in place on his parenting", her lawyer Arianna Cozart said earlier. However, he was granted visitation rights and could see the children for three hours on Fridays and eight hours every other weekend. Whitney said that everything was going fine and there were no red flags before May 30, when things changed. Travis was supposed to bring back the girls by 8 pm. When he did not show up, Whitney contacted the police. She suspected something was wrong since Travis wasn't answering her calls. Police found on May 31 that he did not reach the "planned 5K running event" either. The Wenatchee Police Department announced that the three girls were missing and described Travis as a "homeless" man who lived in his "vehicle or at various hotels/motels or at campgrounds in the area." An Amber alert was not sent out as officials said the case did not meet the criteria at the time.&nbsp;<h2>Travis Decker case - Dead bodies of three girls is found</h2>On June 2, the police found Travis Decker's vehicle near the Rock Island Campground in Chelan County. The three girls were later found dead at the scene, with their hands zip-tied and faces covered with plastic. Decker was nowhere to be found. &nbsp;More zip ties and plastic bags were discovered "strewn throughout the area," along with "two hand prints of blood" on the tailgate of the truck. A manhunt was launched for Decker, who police learnt had received extensive military training and was capable of surviving in the wild. He had been deployed to Afghanistan in 2014 and transferred to the Washington National Guard in 2021, according to a spokesperson for the Washington State Military Department.&nbsp;Soon, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the US Marshal's Office also joined the search operation. Gradually, more details about Travis's mental health condition emerged. Whitney's lawyer, Cozart, said that he suffered from PTSD and would often wake up screaming in the middle of the night, soaking the bed, and only getting one or two hours of sleep. An autopsy ruled suffocation as the cause of death and the manner of death homicide, the Chelan County Sheriff's Office said in a statement.&nbsp;<h2>Travis Decker searched for how to move to Canada</h2>On June 10, officials said they believed they had tracked Decker to an area near the remote campsite where his daughters were found dead days earlier. The Chelan County Sheriff's Office said in a statement that a hiking party saw a man who looked unprepared for the trail and was avoiding others. ABC News reported that Travis made several searches for moving to Canada, including "how does a person move to Canada" and "how to relocate to Canada," according to an affidavit obtained by the publication.&nbsp;After weeks of search, the police said in a statement that it was highly unlikely that Travis was still alive, and so they shifted their resources to search for his remains.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Travis Decker case: The Washington father is suspected of killing his three young daughters. The police said they have found remains that presumably belong to Travis. Here is all about the tragic case in which a father killed his own daughters.

The case of the missing father, Travis Decker, who was named the prime suspect in the killing of his three daughters earlier this year, might finally be reaching an end after three months. The police say that they have recovered what are possibly the remains of the Washington father who has been on the run since his three girls were found dead on June 2. The remains were found south of the town of Leavenworth during a search, the Chelan County Sheriff’s Office said. A DNA analysis will be done to confirm whether they belong to Travis. The case of the missing girls who were later found dead shook the country. Paityn Decker, 9; Evelyn Decker, 8; and Olivia Decker, 5, were found dead near a Washington state campground after a search was initiated following a missing persons complaint by their mother, Whitney Decker. What is the Travis Decker case? The 32-year-old separated from his wife in 2023, and Whitney got full custody of the children. Travis was battling mental health issues, and so Whitney petitioned the court to "put restrictions in place on his parenting", her lawyer Arianna Cozart said earlier. However, he was granted visitation rights and could see the children for three hours on Fridays and eight hours every other weekend. Whitney said that everything was going fine and there were no red flags before May 30, when things changed. Travis was supposed to bring back the girls by 8 pm. When he did not show up, Whitney contacted the police. She suspected something was wrong since Travis wasn't answering her calls. Police found on May 31 that he did not reach the "planned 5K running event" either. The Wenatchee Police Department announced that the three girls were missing and described Travis as a "homeless" man who lived in his "vehicle or at various hotels/motels or at campgrounds in the area." An Amber alert was not sent out as officials said the case did not meet the criteria at the time. Travis Decker case - Dead bodies of three girls is found On June 2, the police found Travis Decker's vehicle near the Rock Island Campground in Chelan County. The three girls were later found dead at the scene, with their hands zip-tied and faces covered with plastic. Decker was nowhere to be found. More zip ties and plastic bags were discovered "strewn throughout the area," along with "two hand prints of blood" on the tailgate of the truck. A manhunt was launched for Decker, who police learnt had received extensive military training and was capable of surviving in the wild. He had been deployed to Afghanistan in 2014 and transferred to the Washington National Guard in 2021, according to a spokesperson for the Washington State Military Department. Soon, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the US Marshal's Office also joined the search operation. Gradually, more details about Travis's mental health condition emerged. Whitney's lawyer, Cozart, said that he suffered from PTSD and would often wake up screaming in the middle of the night, soaking the bed, and only getting one or two hours of sleep. An autopsy ruled suffocation as the cause of death and the manner of death homicide, the Chelan County Sheriff's Office said in a statement. Travis Decker searched for how to move to Canada On June 10, officials said they believed they had tracked Decker to an area near the remote campsite where his daughters were found dead days earlier. The Chelan County Sheriff's Office said in a statement that a hiking party saw a man who looked unprepared for the trail and was avoiding others. ABC News reported that Travis made several searches for moving to Canada, including "how does a person move to Canada" and "how to relocate to Canada," according to an affidavit obtained by the publication. After weeks of search, the police said in a statement that it was highly unlikely that Travis was still alive, and so they shifted their resources to search for his remains.

Travis Decker case: The Washington father is suspected of killing his three young daughters. The police said they have found remains that presumably belong to Travis. Here is all about the tragic case in which a father killed his own daughters.

The Travis Decker Case: Timeline of the tragedy in which three innocent girls lost their lives

President Donald Trump has refused to approve a military aid package for Taiwan worth more than $400 million as he pushes for a trade agreement with China, the Washington Post reported. The shipment, which included munitions and autonomous drones, was held back earlier this summer. Officials told Post that the decision could still be reversed, but marked a sharp change from Washington’s usual approach to supporting Taiwan. A White House official confirmed that the package had not yet been finalised.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-warns-us-tariff-threats-against-india-china-won-t-work-1758250362891">‘Ancient civilisations won’t bend’: Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work'</a><h2>What was included in the package?</h2>According to the report, the package would have been “more lethal” than earlier rounds of US aid, which have included munitions and drones. America has long supplied weapons to Taiwan to bolster its defences against China’s growing military strength.<h2>How does this fit into Trump’s China strategy?</h2>The pause in arms support comes as Trump looks to lower tensions with Beijing and secure a trade deal. The US president is expected to speak with Chinese leader Xi Jinping for the first time since June, in a call that could pave the way for negotiations over TikTok’s US operations and a possible meeting next month.<h2>What is Beijing saying?</h2>China views Taiwan as part of its territory and has consistently opposed American arms sales to Taipei. On Thursday, Chinese Defence Minister Dong Jun warned against “external interference” over the island. Xi has told China’s military to be ready to take Taiwan by 2027, though this does not mean an invasion is planned for that date.<h2>How does this compare to Biden’s approach?</h2>President Joe Biden used the Presidential Drawdown Authority to fast-track weapons to Taiwan three times while in office, alongside other long-term aid worth over $2 billion. Trump, however, has argued for a more transactional approach. He insists that wealthy allies like Taiwan should buy their own weapons rather than rely on American aid. He has made similar arguments with Ukraine.<h2>What has Taiwan been doing?</h2>Taipei has been raising its own defence spending in an attempt to reassure Washington. President Lai Ching-te recently approved new funding for drones and naval vessels. During Trump’s first term, Washington cleared nearly $20 billion in arms sales to Taiwan, mainly on high-cost platforms such as F-16 fighter jets and Abrams tanks.Since returning to the office, Trump has taken conflicting positions. He has launched a trade war with Beijing, while at the same time criticising Taipei for “stealing” the US semiconductor industry. His administration also cancelled planned meetings between US and Taiwanese defence officials and urged President Lai not to visit New York and Dallas in August. Still, Trump has repeatedly said that China will not invade Taiwan during his presidency.

Donald Trump blocked over $400m in US military aid to Taiwan, delaying drones and munitions, as he prioritises a trade deal with China, marking a significant shift in Washington’s Taiwan policy.

President Donald Trump has refused to approve a military aid package for Taiwan worth more than $400 million as he pushes for a trade agreement with China, the Washington Post reported. The shipment, which included munitions and autonomous drones, was held back earlier this summer. Officials told Post that the decision could still be reversed, but marked a sharp change from Washington’s usual approach to supporting Taiwan. A White House official confirmed that the package had not yet been finalised. Also read: ‘Ancient civilisations won’t bend’: Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work' What was included in the package? According to the report, the package would have been “more lethal” than earlier rounds of US aid, which have included munitions and drones. America has long supplied weapons to Taiwan to bolster its defences against China’s growing military strength. How does this fit into Trump’s China strategy? The pause in arms support comes as Trump looks to lower tensions with Beijing and secure a trade deal. The US president is expected to speak with Chinese leader Xi Jinping for the first time since June, in a call that could pave the way for negotiations over TikTok’s US operations and a possible meeting next month. What is Beijing saying? China views Taiwan as part of its territory and has consistently opposed American arms sales to Taipei. On Thursday, Chinese Defence Minister Dong Jun warned against “external interference” over the island. Xi has told China’s military to be ready to take Taiwan by 2027, though this does not mean an invasion is planned for that date. How does this compare to Biden’s approach? President Joe Biden used the Presidential Drawdown Authority to fast-track weapons to Taiwan three times while in office, alongside other long-term aid worth over $2 billion. Trump, however, has argued for a more transactional approach. He insists that wealthy allies like Taiwan should buy their own weapons rather than rely on American aid. He has made similar arguments with Ukraine. What has Taiwan been doing? Taipei has been raising its own defence spending in an attempt to reassure Washington. President Lai Ching-te recently approved new funding for drones and naval vessels. During Trump’s first term, Washington cleared nearly $20 billion in arms sales to Taiwan, mainly on high-cost platforms such as F-16 fighter jets and Abrams tanks. Since returning to the office, Trump has taken conflicting positions. He has launched a trade war with Beijing, while at the same time criticising Taipei for “stealing” the US semiconductor industry. His administration also cancelled planned meetings between US and Taiwanese defence officials and urged President Lai not to visit New York and Dallas in August. Still, Trump has repeatedly said that China will not invade Taiwan during his presidency.

Donald Trump blocked over $400m in US military aid to Taiwan, delaying drones and munitions, as he prioritises a trade deal with China, marking a significant shift in Washington’s Taiwan policy.

Trump trying to woo Xi? Trump blocks $400 MILLION in Taiwan military aid as US chases trade deal with China

Jimmy Kimmel is in the midst of controversy after his late-night show was pulled off the air abruptly for an indefinite period after he made remarks on the murder of the right-wing activist and ally of US President Donald Trump, Charlie Kirk. However, in the latest development, there are reports that the show is going around, but certain conditions have been set for the host. Let's delve into knowing more details.<h2>What is the ultimatum given to Jimmy Kimmel?</h2>As per the report of PEOPLE, Sinclair Broadcast Group, the largest owner of ABC, has stated that the show Jimmy Kimmel Live! can only come back on air if the host apologizes to Charlie Kirk's family and makes a personal donation to them and to Turning Point USA, the activist's non-profit.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/charlie-kirk-s-2017-tweet-about-jimmy-kimmel-resurfaces-after-abc-suspends-his-show-1758194366907">Charlie Kirk's 2017 tweet about Jimmy Kimmel resurfaces</a>&nbsp;In the press conference, Sinclair vice chairman Jason Smith said, "Mr. Kimmel's remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country. We believe broadcasters have a responsibility to educate and elevate respectful, constructive dialogue in our communities".<h2>What remarks did Jimmy Kimmel make that led to the cancellation of his late-night show?</h2>On September 15, Jimmy Kimmel, in the opening monologue of his show, mentioned Charlie Kirk's death and Tyler Robinson, who has been charged with murder. Jimmy Kimmel stated, "We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it," he said. "In between the finger-pointing, there was grieving".&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/donald-trump-reacts-as-abc-pulls-the-plug-on-jimmy-kimmel-s-late-night-show-great-news-for-america-1758165489963">Donald Trump reacts as ABC pulls the plug on Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show</a>&nbsp;Following this, he showed the clips of US President Donald Trump's reply when he was asked about Kirk's death. Trump had replied, "I think very good, and by the way, right there where you see all the trucks, they just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House," Trump replied, adding the new ballroom at the White House will "be a beauty". Kimmel then said, "Yes, he's at the fourth stage of grief: construction".&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/abc-pulls-jimmy-kimmel-off-air-indefinitely-fcc-over-charlie-kirk-tyler-robinson-comments-all-you-need-to-know-1758162312719">ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel off air ‘indefinitely' over Charlie Kirk comments</a><h2>Amid uproar, Charlie Kirk's tweet about Jimmy Kimmel resurfaces</h2>Since Jimmy Kimmel's show has been pulled out after his remarks on Charlie Kirk, a tweet of the latter about the late-night show host has now gone viral on social media. Charlie Kirk had written, "Jimmy Kimmel isn't funny".&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/jimmy-kimmel-net-worth-and-salary-how-much-does-abc-late-night-host-earn-1758180248257">Jimmy Kimmel net worth and salary: How much does the now suspended ABC late-night host earn?</a>&nbsp;For the unversed, on Sep 17, ABC announced that Jimmy Kimmel Live! would be “pre-empted indefinitely.”&nbsp;

In the latest development, the host Jimmy Kimmel has been asked to apologise and pay a certain amount to Charlie Kirk after he remarked on the late-night show. This comes after ABC decided to pull the plug for an indefinite period. 

Jimmy Kimmel is in the midst of controversy after his late-night show was pulled off the air abruptly for an indefinite period after he made remarks on the murder of the right-wing activist and ally of US President Donald Trump, Charlie Kirk. However, in the latest development, there are reports that the show is going around, but certain conditions have been set for the host. Let's delve into knowing more details. What is the ultimatum given to Jimmy Kimmel? As per the report of PEOPLE, Sinclair Broadcast Group, the largest owner of ABC, has stated that the show Jimmy Kimmel Live! can only come back on air if the host apologizes to Charlie Kirk's family and makes a personal donation to them and to Turning Point USA, the activist's non-profit. Also Read: Charlie Kirk's 2017 tweet about Jimmy Kimmel resurfaces In the press conference, Sinclair vice chairman Jason Smith said, "Mr. Kimmel's remarks were inappropriate and deeply insensitive at a critical moment for our country. We believe broadcasters have a responsibility to educate and elevate respectful, constructive dialogue in our communities". What remarks did Jimmy Kimmel make that led to the cancellation of his late-night show? On September 15, Jimmy Kimmel, in the opening monologue of his show, mentioned Charlie Kirk's death and Tyler Robinson, who has been charged with murder. Jimmy Kimmel stated, "We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it," he said. "In between the finger-pointing, there was grieving". Also Read: Donald Trump reacts as ABC pulls the plug on Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show Following this, he showed the clips of US President Donald Trump's reply when he was asked about Kirk's death. Trump had replied, "I think very good, and by the way, right there where you see all the trucks, they just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House," Trump replied, adding the new ballroom at the White House will "be a beauty". Kimmel then said, "Yes, he's at the fourth stage of grief: construction". Also Read: ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel off air ‘indefinitely' over Charlie Kirk comments Amid uproar, Charlie Kirk's tweet about Jimmy Kimmel resurfaces Since Jimmy Kimmel's show has been pulled out after his remarks on Charlie Kirk, a tweet of the latter about the late-night show host has now gone viral on social media. Charlie Kirk had written, "Jimmy Kimmel isn't funny". Also Read: Jimmy Kimmel net worth and salary: How much does the now suspended ABC late-night host earn? For the unversed, on Sep 17, ABC announced that Jimmy Kimmel Live! would be “pre-empted indefinitely.”

In the latest development, the host Jimmy Kimmel has been asked to apologise and pay a certain amount to Charlie Kirk after he remarked on the late-night show. This comes after ABC decided to pull the plug for an indefinite period.&nbsp;

Has Jimmy Kimmel been asked by ABC to apologise and donate to Charlie Kirk's family post remarks on show?

A 30-year-old man from Telangana was shot dead by police in California earlier this month after what has been described as a scuffle with his roommate. The man, identified as Mohammed Nizamuddin from Mahabubnagar district, had been living in the United States since 2016. He first moved to Florida for higher studies, completed his MS, and later worked as a software professional before relocating to California after a promotion, his family said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-warns-us-tariff-threats-against-india-china-won-t-work-1758250362891">‘Ancient civilisations won’t bend’: Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work'</a><h2>What do the family members say?</h2>Nizamuddin’s father, Mohammed Hasnuddin, said he learnt of the incident on 3 September through one of his son’s friends. In a letter to the external affairs minister S. Jaishankar, he wrote, “Today morning, I came to know he (Nizamuddin) was shot dead by Santa Clara Police and his mortal remains are in some hospital in Santa Clara, California. I do not know the actual reasons why the police shot him dead.” Hasnuddin has appealed to the central government to help bring his son’s body back to Mahabubnagar.<h2>How did the scuffle reportedly unfold?</h2>While details remain unclear, Hasnuddin said the fight between his son and the roommate appeared to be over a minor issue. A relative of Nizamuddin told ANI that the quarrel began over an air conditioner and later escalated into violence involving knives. The neighbour is said to have alerted police. “When the police entered the room, they asked the occupants to show their hands. One boy complied; the other did not. The police then fired four rounds, and the child was shot. It is extremely regrettable that, according to the reports, no proper inquiry took place and the shooting happened so quickly,” the relative said.<h2>What help are the family seeking?</h2>The family has urged both the Indian government and the Telangana government to intervene and ensure Nizamuddin’s mortal remains are brought back home. Majlis Bachao Tahreek (MBT) spokesperson Amjed Ullah Khan also posted Hasnuddin’s letter to the external affairs minister on social media platform X, appealing for urgent assistance.

Telangana man Mohammed Nizamuddin, a software professional in California, was fatally shot by Santa Clara police after a scuffle with his roommate. His grieving family seeks Indian government help for repatriation.

A 30-year-old man from Telangana was shot dead by police in California earlier this month after what has been described as a scuffle with his roommate. The man, identified as Mohammed Nizamuddin from Mahabubnagar district, had been living in the United States since 2016. He first moved to Florida for higher studies, completed his MS, and later worked as a software professional before relocating to California after a promotion, his family said. Also read: ‘Ancient civilisations won’t bend’: Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work' What do the family members say? Nizamuddin’s father, Mohammed Hasnuddin, said he learnt of the incident on 3 September through one of his son’s friends. In a letter to the external affairs minister S. Jaishankar, he wrote, “Today morning, I came to know he (Nizamuddin) was shot dead by Santa Clara Police and his mortal remains are in some hospital in Santa Clara, California. I do not know the actual reasons why the police shot him dead.” Hasnuddin has appealed to the central government to help bring his son’s body back to Mahabubnagar. How did the scuffle reportedly unfold? While details remain unclear, Hasnuddin said the fight between his son and the roommate appeared to be over a minor issue. A relative of Nizamuddin told ANI that the quarrel began over an air conditioner and later escalated into violence involving knives. The neighbour is said to have alerted police. “When the police entered the room, they asked the occupants to show their hands. One boy complied; the other did not. The police then fired four rounds, and the child was shot. It is extremely regrettable that, according to the reports, no proper inquiry took place and the shooting happened so quickly,” the relative said. What help are the family seeking? The family has urged both the Indian government and the Telangana government to intervene and ensure Nizamuddin’s mortal remains are brought back home. Majlis Bachao Tahreek (MBT) spokesperson Amjed Ullah Khan also posted Hasnuddin’s letter to the external affairs minister on social media platform X, appealing for urgent assistance.

Telangana man Mohammed Nizamuddin, a software professional in California, was fatally shot by Santa Clara police after a scuffle with his roommate. His grieving family seeks Indian government help for repatriation.

‘No proper inquiry’: Indian techie shot dead ‘by cops’ in US; father seeks Jaishankar’s help

Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov slammed Washington’s tariff threats, saying that “ancient civilisations” such as India and China will not bend to American ultimatums. Speaking on Russia’s Channel 1 programme The Great Game, Lavrov said US “demands” to cut energy ties with Moscow were backfiring. Instead of isolating Russia, he argued, they were pushing countries to “look for new energy markets, new resources, and pay more”.<h2>How did Lavrov describe India and China’s stance?</h2>Lavrov pointed to New Delhi and Beijing’s response to US pressure. “Both China and India are ancient civilisations, and to use this language with them, ‘either stop doing what I don’t like, or I will impose tariffs on you’, well, that won’t work,” he said. He added that beyond economic strain, there was also “moral and political opposition” to Washington’s approach.<h2>Why has the US targeted India over Russian oil?</h2>The Trump administration has repeatedly criticised India for continuing to buy oil from Moscow during the Ukraine war. Washington imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods in July, followed by another 25 per cent weeks later, taking the total to 50 per cent from 27 August. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro accused India of “profiteering” through Russian oil deals.“Indian refiners were in bed with Russian refiners immediately after the invasion. They make money off us via unfair trade and many workers get screwed,” Navarro told CNBC International. He further alleged that “Brahmins profiteering” were acting at the expense of ordinary Indians.<h2>What have US officials said about trade with India?</h2>Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also criticised India’s tariff system in a recent interview, saying, “India brags about having 1.4 billion people but won’t buy even a small amount of American corn.” He warned New Delhi to lower tariffs or face “a tough time” in trade relations with Washington.On new restrictions targeting Moscow, Lavrov dismissed concerns. “Frankly speaking, I don’t see any problem…. An enormous amount of sanctions, unprecedented for that period, were imposed during President Donald Trump’s first term,” he said. He added that during Joe Biden’s presidency, sanctions had “replaced diplomacy” as the West avoided compromise.

Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov criticised US tariff threats, insisting India and China, as “ancient civilisations,” will not yield to Washington’s ultimatums over Russian oil, sanctions, and energy ties during the Ukraine conflict.

Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov slammed Washington’s tariff threats, saying that “ancient civilisations” such as India and China will not bend to American ultimatums. Speaking on Russia’s Channel 1 programme The Great Game, Lavrov said US “demands” to cut energy ties with Moscow were backfiring. Instead of isolating Russia, he argued, they were pushing countries to “look for new energy markets, new resources, and pay more”. How did Lavrov describe India and China’s stance? Lavrov pointed to New Delhi and Beijing’s response to US pressure. “Both China and India are ancient civilisations, and to use this language with them, ‘either stop doing what I don’t like, or I will impose tariffs on you’, well, that won’t work,” he said. He added that beyond economic strain, there was also “moral and political opposition” to Washington’s approach. Why has the US targeted India over Russian oil? The Trump administration has repeatedly criticised India for continuing to buy oil from Moscow during the Ukraine war. Washington imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods in July, followed by another 25 per cent weeks later, taking the total to 50 per cent from 27 August. White House trade adviser Peter Navarro accused India of “profiteering” through Russian oil deals. “Indian refiners were in bed with Russian refiners immediately after the invasion. They make money off us via unfair trade and many workers get screwed,” Navarro told CNBC International. He further alleged that “Brahmins profiteering” were acting at the expense of ordinary Indians. What have US officials said about trade with India? Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also criticised India’s tariff system in a recent interview, saying, “India brags about having 1.4 billion people but won’t buy even a small amount of American corn.” He warned New Delhi to lower tariffs or face “a tough time” in trade relations with Washington. On new restrictions targeting Moscow, Lavrov dismissed concerns. “Frankly speaking, I don’t see any problem…. An enormous amount of sanctions, unprecedented for that period, were imposed during President Donald Trump’s first term,” he said. He added that during Joe Biden’s presidency, sanctions had “replaced diplomacy” as the West avoided compromise.

Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov criticised US tariff threats, insisting India and China, as “ancient civilisations,” will not yield to Washington’s ultimatums over Russian oil, sanctions, and energy ties during the Ukraine conflict.

‘Ancient civilisations won’t bend’: Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work'

The families of four victims who died in the Air India crash near Ahmedabad in June have filed a lawsuit in the United States against Boeing and aircraft parts manufacturer Honeywell, alleging negligence. According to the lawsuit, faulty fuel switches were responsible for the crash. The complaint also claims that the companies overlooked known design risks.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/ahemdabad-plane-crash-boeing-sued-by-air-india-crash-victim-families-1758194460787">Ahemdabad plane crash: Boeing sued by Air India crash victim families</a><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/ahemdabad-plane-crash-boeing-sued-by-air-india-crash-victim-families-1758194460787/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/ahemdabad-plane-crash-boeing-sued-by-air-india-crash-victim-families-1758194460787/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787 flying to London Gatwick, crashed shortly after departing from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people. only one passenger survived. Investigators are focusing on the fuel switches after preliminary findings indicated that the engines lost fuel supply immediately after takeoff. The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) previously stated that the fuel control switches used in Boeing planes are safe.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/air-india-ahmedabad-plane-crash-a-timeline-of-the-event-1750684004004">Air India Ahmedabad Plane Crash: A timeline of the event</a><h2>What did the initial investigation uncover?&nbsp;</h2>According to India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the Dreamliner initially took off normally but soon both engines lost power. The cockpit voice recorder captured one pilot asking the other, “Why did you shut off the fuel?” with the co-pilot replying, “I did not.” Investigators discovered that the fuel switches had been set to “CUTOFF,” which cut power to both engines. Although the crew switched them back to “RUN” within 14 seconds, activating an automatic engine restart, the plane had already lost essential thrust. This caused the aircraft to enter a sharp descent and crash into a nearby building just 32 seconds after takeoff. CCTV footage showed the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT), a backup power system used in the event of total engine failure. The AAIB also ruled out bird strikes, confirming no signs of birds in the area.&nbsp;Read More |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/air-india-crash-pilots-body-slams-report-claiming-captain-turned-off-fuel-switches-1752731385650">Air India crash: Pilots' body slams report claiming captain turned off fuel switches</a>

Families of four victims from the Air India Flight 171 crash near Ahmedabad filed a lawsuit in the US against Boeing and Honeywell, blaming faulty fuel switches for the accident. Investigations revealed engine power loss due to fuel cutoff switches

The families of four victims who died in the Air India crash near Ahmedabad in June have filed a lawsuit in the United States against Boeing and aircraft parts manufacturer Honeywell, alleging negligence. According to the lawsuit, faulty fuel switches were responsible for the crash. The complaint also claims that the companies overlooked known design risks. Ahemdabad plane crash: Boeing sued by Air India crash victim families https://www.wionews.com/videos/ahemdabad-plane-crash-boeing-sued-by-air-india-crash-victim-families-1758194460787/embed Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787 flying to London Gatwick, crashed shortly after departing from Ahmedabad, killing 260 people. only one passenger survived. Investigators are focusing on the fuel switches after preliminary findings indicated that the engines lost fuel supply immediately after takeoff. The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) previously stated that the fuel control switches used in Boeing planes are safe. Read More | Air India Ahmedabad Plane Crash: A timeline of the event What did the initial investigation uncover? According to India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the Dreamliner initially took off normally but soon both engines lost power. The cockpit voice recorder captured one pilot asking the other, “Why did you shut off the fuel?” with the co-pilot replying, “I did not.” Investigators discovered that the fuel switches had been set to “CUTOFF,” which cut power to both engines. Although the crew switched them back to “RUN” within 14 seconds, activating an automatic engine restart, the plane had already lost essential thrust. This caused the aircraft to enter a sharp descent and crash into a nearby building just 32 seconds after takeoff. CCTV footage showed the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT), a backup power system used in the event of total engine failure. The AAIB also ruled out bird strikes, confirming no signs of birds in the area. Read More | Air India crash: Pilots' body slams report claiming captain turned off fuel switches

Families of four victims from the Air India Flight 171 crash near Ahmedabad filed a lawsuit in the US against Boeing and Honeywell, blaming faulty fuel switches for the accident. Investigations revealed engine power loss due to fuel cutoff switches

Air India crash victims’ families sue Boeing and Honeywell, blames fuel switch design ‘defect’: Report

With an aim to put “maximum pressure on Iran and isolate its government,” the US government has decided to cancel the 2018 sanctions waiver for the important Iranian port of Chabahar. This decision will affect India, which is working on developing a terminal at the port. The US Department of State said that it is ending the sanctions exception given in 2018 under the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act (IFCA). This decision will be in effect from September 29.&nbsp;Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-prepared-to-achieve-fair-balanced-solution-iran-expresses-hope-after-nuclear-talks-with-european-powers-1758132064183">‘Prepared to achieve fair, balanced solution’: Iran expresses hope after nuclear talks with European powers</a><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/-big-setback-to-india-as-us-ends-sanctions-waiver-for-india-to-develop-chabahar-port-1758218744556/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/-big-setback-to-india-as-us-ends-sanctions-waiver-for-india-to-develop-chabahar-port-1758218744556/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-to-pressurise-iran-to-block-its-pursuit-of-a-nuclear-weapon-1758021650233">U.S. To Pressurise Iran To Block Its Pursuit of a Nuclear Weapon</a>&nbsp;India signed a 10-year agreement to manage the Chabahar port in Iran, which serves as a vital trade link to Afghanistan and Central Asia while bypassing Pakistan. This strategic port, developed by Indian Ports Global Limited and Iran’s Port &amp; Maritime Organisation, has been used for humanitarian aid shipments. However, the US decision to revoke sanctions waivers poses challenges to this partnership. The port's development had been slowed earlier due to US sanctions on Iran's nuclear activities.&nbsp;Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/rubio-tells-israel-u-s-will-maintain-maximum-pressure-on-iran-after-nuclear-strikes-1757992838271">Rubio tells Israel: U.S. Will maintain 'maximum pressure' on Iran after nuclear strikes</a><h2>How will this decision affect India</h2>This decision to revoke the US sanctions waiver on Chabahar port will impact India by increasing the risk of facing US sanctions for its involvement in the port’s development and operations. Since India is managing a terminal at Chabahar to boost trade with Afghanistan and Central Asia, the move could complicate its economic and strategic plans. It may also affect ongoing projects and investments related to the port, potentially limiting India’s ability to use Chabahar as a key trade route that bypasses Pakistan. Overall, it creates uncertainty and could slow down India’s efforts to strengthen regional connectivity and trade.

The U.S. revoked a 2018 sanctions waiver for Iran’s Chabahar Port, effective Sept 29, 2025, impacting India’s 10-year deal to operate a terminal there. The move threatens India’s strategic trade route to Afghanistan and Central Asia via the International North-South Transport Corridor.


With an aim to put “maximum pressure on Iran and isolate its government,” the US government has decided to cancel the 2018 sanctions waiver for the important Iranian port of Chabahar. This decision will affect India, which is working on developing a terminal at the port. The US Department of State said that it is ending the sanctions exception given in 2018 under the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act (IFCA). This decision will be in effect from September 29. Read more | ‘Prepared to achieve fair, balanced solution’: Iran expresses hope after nuclear talks with European powers https://www.wionews.com/videos/-big-setback-to-india-as-us-ends-sanctions-waiver-for-india-to-develop-chabahar-port-1758218744556/embed Read more | U.S. To Pressurise Iran To Block Its Pursuit of a Nuclear Weapon India signed a 10-year agreement to manage the Chabahar port in Iran, which serves as a vital trade link to Afghanistan and Central Asia while bypassing Pakistan. This strategic port, developed by Indian Ports Global Limited and Iran’s Port & Maritime Organisation, has been used for humanitarian aid shipments. However, the US decision to revoke sanctions waivers poses challenges to this partnership. The port's development had been slowed earlier due to US sanctions on Iran's nuclear activities. Read more | Rubio tells Israel: U.S. Will maintain 'maximum pressure' on Iran after nuclear strikes How will this decision affect India This decision to revoke the US sanctions waiver on Chabahar port will impact India by increasing the risk of facing US sanctions for its involvement in the port’s development and operations. Since India is managing a terminal at Chabahar to boost trade with Afghanistan and Central Asia, the move could complicate its economic and strategic plans. It may also affect ongoing projects and investments related to the port, potentially limiting India’s ability to use Chabahar as a key trade route that bypasses Pakistan. Overall, it creates uncertainty and could slow down India’s efforts to strengthen regional connectivity and trade.

The US revoked a 2018 sanctions waiver for Iran’s Chabahar Port, effective Sept 29, 2025, impacting India’s 10-year deal to operate a terminal there. The move threatens India’s strategic trade route to Afghanistan and Central Asia via the International North-South Transport Corridor

Trump targets Iran's Chabahar port in another blow to India, withdraws sanctions waiver: What it means

A powerful 7.8-magnitude earthquake hit off the coast of Russia’s Far East near the Kamchatka Peninsula on Friday, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS). The quake occurred approximately 128 kilometers east of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky at a shallow depth of 10 kilometers. In response, the US Pacific Tsunami Warning Center issued an alert, warning of potentially dangerous waves along surrounding coastlines. This tremor comes just days after another significant earthquake shook the same region.&nbsp;Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, located on the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia’s Far East, is part of the seismically active “Ring of Fire.” The Ring of Fire is a horseshoe-shaped zone around the edges of the Pacific Ocean known for its high seismic and volcanic activity. It is home to about 75% of the world’s active volcanoes and experiences around 90% of the world’s earthquakes.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">❗️ Magnitude 7.8 EARTHQUAKE strikes Russia’s Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky The latest in a series of massive quakes to hit the Kamchatka region TSUNAMI advisory issued <a href="https://t.co/KyajRgrbiE">pic.twitter.com/KyajRgrbiE</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1968756190235578660?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 18, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Is there a tsunami warning?</h2>Following the earthquake, tsunami warnings were swiftly issued for coastal areas in Russia, Japan, Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, and several other Pacific islands. In Kamchatka, authorities reported waves reaching 3 to 4 meters in height, leading to evacuations in several coastal towns, including Severo-Kurilsk, and urging residents to move inland immediately.&nbsp;&nbsp;Japan’s Meteorological Agency also alerted the public about possible tsunami waves of up to 3 meters along its Pacific coastline. Parts of the U.S. West Coast were placed under advisory as well, although the risk of severe flooding outside the immediate quake zone was considered minimal.&nbsp;The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) has stated that a tsunami threat is possible for areas of the Pacific located nearer to the earthquake's epicenter. However, the PTWC also noted that it is still too early to confirm if Hawaiʻi is at risk from a potential tsunami.

A 7.8-magnitude earthquake struck near Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula on Friday, 128 km east of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky at a depth of 10 km. The US Pacific Tsunami Warning Center issued an alert for possible hazardous waves. The quake follows another recent tremor in the region.

A powerful 7.8-magnitude earthquake hit off the coast of Russia’s Far East near the Kamchatka Peninsula on Friday, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS). The quake occurred approximately 128 kilometers east of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky at a shallow depth of 10 kilometers. In response, the US Pacific Tsunami Warning Center issued an alert, warning of potentially dangerous waves along surrounding coastlines. This tremor comes just days after another significant earthquake shook the same region. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, located on the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia’s Far East, is part of the seismically active “Ring of Fire.” The Ring of Fire is a horseshoe-shaped zone around the edges of the Pacific Ocean known for its high seismic and volcanic activity. It is home to about 75% of the world’s active volcanoes and experiences around 90% of the world’s earthquakes.

A 7.8-magnitude earthquake struck near Russia’s Kamchatka Peninsula on Friday, 128 km east of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky at a depth of 10 km. The US Pacific Tsunami Warning Center issued an alert for possible hazardous waves. The quake follows another recent tremor in the region.

Earthquake of 7.8 magnitude hits Russia's Kamchatka again - Is there a tsunami warning?

US President Donald Trump said Thursday (Sep 18) that he disagreed with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer over Britain's plan to recognise a Palestinian state. Starmer had announced in July that Britain would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in September unless Israel met certain conditions including reaching a ceasefire in Gaza. Addressing a press conference with Starmer at the UK prime minister's country residence Chequers, Trump spoke on a range of issues including Hamas, Israel-Gaza war and Russia-Ukraine war.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-must-begin-now-german-foreign-minister-calls-for-palestinian-state-recognition-says-it-s-only-path-that-1753975004595">'Must begin NOW': German foreign minister calls for Palestinian state recognition, says it's 'only path that...'</a>&nbsp;"I have a disagreement with the prime minister on that score -- one of our few disagreements," Trump said. Both leaders said that they discussed the deteriorating situation in Gaza during their meeting and agreed "the need for peace and a road map". France, Canada and other western countries are set to recognise a Palestine State at the United Nations next week even as the US has warned against it. "I want an end. I want the hostages released, not one not two, i want them released right now," said Trump. Starmer called the situation in Gaza "intolerable" and stressed the “need to get aid into Gaza at speed.”&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-violation-of-international-law-us-denies-visas-to-palestinian-officials-before-un-assembly-showdown-on-statehood-1756491012511">‘Violation of international law’: US denies visas to Palestinian officials before UN assembly showdown on statehood</a><h2>France, Canada to recognise the State of Palestine</h2>Netanyahu's statement comes ahead of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) session, where several countries, including France and Canada, will recognise the State of Palestine. French President Emmanuel Macron announced last month that France will recognise the state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September this year. In a letter to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, Macron expressed the urgency of ending the war in Gaza and protecting civilians. He also reaffirmed France’s support for an immediate ceasefire, the release of Israeli hostages, the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza, the disarmament of Hamas, and long-term development efforts for a future Palestinian state. Following the domino effect started by France, Australia, Canada, and Malta announced that they will recognise a Palestinian state. New Zealand also expressed its desire to recognise Palestine amid Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza plan.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/france-to-recognise-palestine-israel-condemns-move-hamas-says-welcoming-step-how-many-countries-have-recognised-palestinian-statehood-1753399319758">France to recognise Palestine, Israel condemns move, Hamas says 'welcoming step': How many countries have recognised Palestinian statehood?</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

At a Sep 18 press conference, Trump disagreed with Starmer’s plan to recognize a Palestinian state, calling it a rare point of contention. Both leaders discussed Gaza, stressing the need for peace and aid. Starmer hinted recognition could happen before the UNGA session

US President Donald Trump said Thursday (Sep 18) that he disagreed with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer over Britain's plan to recognise a Palestinian state. Starmer had announced in July that Britain would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in September unless Israel met certain conditions including reaching a ceasefire in Gaza. Addressing a press conference with Starmer at the UK prime minister's country residence Chequers, Trump spoke on a range of issues including Hamas, Israel-Gaza war and Russia-Ukraine war. Read More | 'Must begin NOW': German foreign minister calls for Palestinian state recognition, says it's 'only path that...' "I have a disagreement with the prime minister on that score -- one of our few disagreements," Trump said. Both leaders said that they discussed the deteriorating situation in Gaza during their meeting and agreed "the need for peace and a road map". France, Canada and other western countries are set to recognise a Palestine State at the United Nations next week even as the US has warned against it. "I want an end. I want the hostages released, not one not two, i want them released right now," said Trump. Starmer called the situation in Gaza "intolerable" and stressed the “need to get aid into Gaza at speed.” Read More | ‘Violation of international law’: US denies visas to Palestinian officials before UN assembly showdown on statehood France, Canada to recognise the State of Palestine Netanyahu's statement comes ahead of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) session, where several countries, including France and Canada, will recognise the State of Palestine. French President Emmanuel Macron announced last month that France will recognise the state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September this year. In a letter to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, Macron expressed the urgency of ending the war in Gaza and protecting civilians. He also reaffirmed France’s support for an immediate ceasefire, the release of Israeli hostages, the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza, the disarmament of Hamas, and long-term development efforts for a future Palestinian state. Following the domino effect started by France, Australia, Canada, and Malta announced that they will recognise a Palestinian state. New Zealand also expressed its desire to recognise Palestine amid Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza plan. Read More | France to recognise Palestine, Israel condemns move, Hamas says 'welcoming step': How many countries have recognised Palestinian statehood?

At a Sep 18 press conference, Trump disagreed with Starmer’s plan to recognize a Palestinian state, calling it a rare point of contention. Both leaders discussed Gaza, stressing the need for peace and aid. Starmer hinted recognition could happen before the UNGA session

'Palestinian state...': What is the only 'disagreement' Trump had with UK PM

During a state visit to the UK, US President Donald Trump emphasised the close relationship between the United States and India, particularly highlighting his strong bond with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Trump mentioned his recent phone call to Modi, where he wished him a happy birthday and discussed their mutual ties. “Just had a wonderful phone call with my friend, Prime Minister Narendra Modi. I wished him a very Happy Birthday! He is doing a tremendous job. Narendra: Thank you for your support on ending the War between Russia and Ukraine! President DJT," Trump posted on his social media Truth Social.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-i-don-t-know-him-actually-donald-trump-dodges-questions-on-peter-mandelson-s-sacking-amid-epstein-ties-controversy-1758212504341">'I don't know him actually': Donald Trump dodges questions on Peter Mandelson’s sacking amid Epstein ties controversy</a>&nbsp;Trump was addressing reporters after a bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. He commented on European nations purchasing oil from Russia and referenced his previous actions, including imposing significant tariffs on India. "I'm very close to India. I spoke with Prime Minister Modi just the other day to send my birthday wishes. We have a great relationship, and he released a very positive statement. We have a very good relationship and he put out a beautiful statement too. But I sanctioned them," Trump said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-re-enter-afghanistan-trump-shares-little-breaking-news-about-bagram-airbase-says-this-about-chinese-nuclear-weapons-1758209471330">US to re-enter Afghanistan? Trump shares 'breaking news' about Bagram Airbase, says 'Chinese nuclear weapons are made...'</a>&nbsp;He also took the opportunity to highlight his economic approach towards China, claiming that China is paying a “large tariff” to the United States under his administration. Trump noted that his stance on international trade is conditional on the actions of nations buying Russian oil, especially in the context of the ongoing Ukraine conflict. Furthermore, Trump suggested that a reduction in global oil prices would lead to Russia's withdrawal from the war in Ukraine. “If oil prices fall, Putin will have no choice but to end the war,” he asserted.

PM Modi a great friend, still sanctioned them: US President Donald Trump

During a state visit to the UK, US President Donald Trump emphasised the close relationship between the United States and India, particularly highlighting his strong bond with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Trump mentioned his recent phone call to Modi, where he wished him a happy birthday and discussed their mutual ties. “Just had a wonderful phone call with my friend, Prime Minister Narendra Modi. I wished him a very Happy Birthday! He is doing a tremendous job. Narendra: Thank you for your support on ending the War between Russia and Ukraine! President DJT," Trump posted on his social media Truth Social. Also Read: 'I don't know him actually': Donald Trump dodges questions on Peter Mandelson’s sacking amid Epstein ties controversy Trump was addressing reporters after a bilateral meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. He commented on European nations purchasing oil from Russia and referenced his previous actions, including imposing significant tariffs on India. "I'm very close to India. I spoke with Prime Minister Modi just the other day to send my birthday wishes. We have a great relationship, and he released a very positive statement. We have a very good relationship and he put out a beautiful statement too. But I sanctioned them," Trump said. Also Read: US to re-enter Afghanistan? Trump shares 'breaking news' about Bagram Airbase, says 'Chinese nuclear weapons are made...' He also took the opportunity to highlight his economic approach towards China, claiming that China is paying a “large tariff” to the United States under his administration. Trump noted that his stance on international trade is conditional on the actions of nations buying Russian oil, especially in the context of the ongoing Ukraine conflict. Furthermore, Trump suggested that a reduction in global oil prices would lead to Russia's withdrawal from the war in Ukraine. “If oil prices fall, Putin will have no choice but to end the war,” he asserted.

Trump reaffirms strong US-India ties, highlighting his recent call with PM Modi and his stance on Russian oil. He also criticised European nations and suggests that lower oil prices could end the Russia-Ukraine war

US President Donald Trump on Thursday took his bid to fire central bank governor Lisa Cook to the Supreme Court.Trump has sought to oust Cook from the Federal Reserve Board over allegations of mortgage fraud, but an appeals court ruled she could remain in her role for now. The ruling allowed Cook to participate in a two-day meeting this week during which the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates for the first time this year.&nbsp;In a filing with the Supreme Court, Solicitor General John Sauer asked that Trump be allowed to fire Cook immediately.Lower court rulings allowing her to remain in her post were "improper judicial interference with the President's removal authority," Sauer said. Federal Reserve governors can only be removed "for cause" and the solicitor general said Trump had determined that the mortgage fraud allegations make Cook "unfit to continue serving on the Federal Reserve Board."&nbsp;Among the alleged false statements attributed to Cook, she is accused of claiming two primary residences, one in Michigan and another in Georgia. Cook, who was appointed by Democratic president Joe Biden and is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board, has denied the allegations and has not been charged with a crime.&nbsp;She filed a lawsuit challenging Trump's bid to fire her, calling it an "unprecedented and illegal" move. The legal dispute marks the latest test of presidential powers under Trump, as the 79-year-old Republican moves forcefully to exert executive authority over all of government. By removing Cook, Trump could add another voice to the Fed's board to try and sway its decisions on interest rates. The Supreme Court's conservative majority recently allowed Trump to fire members of other independent government boards, but it created a potential carveout for the Fed in its ruling.&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The ruling allowed Cook to participate in a two-day meeting this week during which the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates for the first time this year

US President Donald Trump on Thursday took his bid to fire central bank governor Lisa Cook to the Supreme Court. Trump has sought to oust Cook from the Federal Reserve Board over allegations of mortgage fraud, but an appeals court ruled she could remain in her role for now. The ruling allowed Cook to participate in a two-day meeting this week during which the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates for the first time this year. In a filing with the Supreme Court, Solicitor General John Sauer asked that Trump be allowed to fire Cook immediately. Lower court rulings allowing her to remain in her post were "improper judicial interference with the President's removal authority," Sauer said. Federal Reserve governors can only be removed "for cause" and the solicitor general said Trump had determined that the mortgage fraud allegations make Cook "unfit to continue serving on the Federal Reserve Board." Among the alleged false statements attributed to Cook, she is accused of claiming two primary residences, one in Michigan and another in Georgia. Cook, who was appointed by Democratic president Joe Biden and is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board, has denied the allegations and has not been charged with a crime. She filed a lawsuit challenging Trump's bid to fire her, calling it an "unprecedented and illegal" move. The legal dispute marks the latest test of presidential powers under Trump, as the 79-year-old Republican moves forcefully to exert executive authority over all of government. By removing Cook, Trump could add another voice to the Fed's board to try and sway its decisions on interest rates. The Supreme Court's conservative majority recently allowed Trump to fire members of other independent government boards, but it created a potential carveout for the Fed in its ruling. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

The ruling allowed Cook to participate in a two-day meeting this week during which the Federal Reserve lowered interest rates for the first time this year

Donald Trump takes bid to fire Fed's Lisa Cook to Supreme Court

Erika Kirk has been appointed as the new CEO of Turning Point USA, succeeding her husband, Charlie Kirk, who co-founded the organisation and led it until his tragic death last week. The announcement was made by the group's board, which said, “We will not bow to evil, and we will continue to fight.” Charlie Kirk helped establish Turning Point USA in 2012, growing it into a powerful force in conservative circles, particularly in mobilizing young people to support Donald Trump’s MAGA movement.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-charlie-kirk-had-good-shot-of-being-us-president-one-day-trump-reveals-if-he-would-attend-tpusa-founder-s-funeral-1758207163043">'Charlie Kirk had good shot of being US president one day': Trump REVEALS if he will attend TPUSA founder's funeral</a>&nbsp;In a statement they said, “In Ecclesiastes, King Solomon wrote that mankind is to be tested by God. Today we are facing such a test, yet we also know that God has prepared us with everything we need to overcome this ordeal. It was the honor of our lives to serve as board members at Charlie’s side. Charlie prepared all of us for a moment like this one. He worked tirelessly to ensure Turning Point USA was built to survive even the greatest tests. And now, it is our great pride to announce Erika Kirk as the new CEO and Chair of the Board for Turning Point USA."&nbsp;“All of us at Turning Point USA have a special role in carrying Charlie Kirk’s mantle and completing his vision of bringing us all closer to our Lord and fostering a prosperous country for generations to come. As Charlie always said, ‘We have a country to save.’ We will not surrender or kneel before evil. We will carry on. The attempt to destroy Charlie’s work will become our chance to make it more powerful and enduring than ever before.”<h2>Who is Erika Kirk, widow of Charlie Kirk?</h2>Erika Kirk, the widow of Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA, has spent much of her life in the public spotlight. From her early days as Miss Arizona USA to her later role as a ministry leader and entrepreneur, Erika’s journey has been intertwined with a deep commitment to her Christian faith. As a wife and mother, she shared in Charlie’s outspoken beliefs, and their shared love story, founded on prayer and a common sense of purpose, shaped not only their marriage but the movement Charlie helped build—a legacy she now continues after his passing.&nbsp;The day before her world shifted dramatically, Erika shared a verse from Psalm 46:1, which reads, "God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble," reflecting her deep reliance on faith during uncertain times. A baptized Catholic, Erika attended Notre Dame Preparatory High School in Scottsdale, Arizona. She now hosts the podcast "Midweek Rise Up," where she offers a devotional series every Wednesday. She pairs this with "Monday Meditations," both aimed at providing listeners with spiritual encouragement and a reminder that "God’s got this."&nbsp;Erika and Charlie’s paths crossed in 2018, and after a long dinner together, Charlie felt certain she was the one for him. In an Instagram post on September 5, 2023, marking five years since their first meeting, Erika reminisced about their deep conversation in a New York City diner. Reflecting on the moment, she recalled Charlie’s words: "I'm going to date you."&nbsp;The couple was always intentional about their relationship, openly discussing the importance of dating with purpose. Charlie proposed to Erika in December 2020, and just a few months later, in May 2021, they married. In an emotional post accompanying their wedding photos, Erika expressed her love and admiration for Charlie, describing him as the man she had prayed for long before meeting him. She honored him for his leadership, his unwavering faith in God’s word, and his deep respect for her. "I am immeasurably blessed to call you my husband," she wrote.

Erika Kirk announced as CEO of Turning Point USA

Erika Kirk has been appointed as the new CEO of Turning Point USA, succeeding her husband, Charlie Kirk, who co-founded the organisation and led it until his tragic death last week. The announcement was made by the group's board, which said, “We will not bow to evil, and we will continue to fight.” Charlie Kirk helped establish Turning Point USA in 2012, growing it into a powerful force in conservative circles, particularly in mobilizing young people to support Donald Trump’s MAGA movement. Also Read: 'Charlie Kirk had good shot of being US president one day': Trump REVEALS if he will attend TPUSA founder's funeral In a statement they said, “In Ecclesiastes, King Solomon wrote that mankind is to be tested by God. Today we are facing such a test, yet we also know that God has prepared us with everything we need to overcome this ordeal. It was the honor of our lives to serve as board members at Charlie’s side. Charlie prepared all of us for a moment like this one. He worked tirelessly to ensure Turning Point USA was built to survive even the greatest tests. And now, it is our great pride to announce Erika Kirk as the new CEO and Chair of the Board for Turning Point USA." “All of us at Turning Point USA have a special role in carrying Charlie Kirk’s mantle and completing his vision of bringing us all closer to our Lord and fostering a prosperous country for generations to come. As Charlie always said, ‘We have a country to save.’ We will not surrender or kneel before evil. We will carry on. The attempt to destroy Charlie’s work will become our chance to make it more powerful and enduring than ever before.” Who is Erika Kirk, widow of Charlie Kirk? Erika Kirk, the widow of Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA, has spent much of her life in the public spotlight. From her early days as Miss Arizona USA to her later role as a ministry leader and entrepreneur, Erika’s journey has been intertwined with a deep commitment to her Christian faith. As a wife and mother, she shared in Charlie’s outspoken beliefs, and their shared love story, founded on prayer and a common sense of purpose, shaped not only their marriage but the movement Charlie helped build—a legacy she now continues after his passing. The day before her world shifted dramatically, Erika shared a verse from Psalm 46:1, which reads, "God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble," reflecting her deep reliance on faith during uncertain times. A baptized Catholic, Erika attended Notre Dame Preparatory High School in Scottsdale, Arizona. She now hosts the podcast "Midweek Rise Up," where she offers a devotional series every Wednesday. She pairs this with "Monday Meditations," both aimed at providing listeners with spiritual encouragement and a reminder that "God’s got this." Erika and Charlie’s paths crossed in 2018, and after a long dinner together, Charlie felt certain she was the one for him. In an Instagram post on September 5, 2023, marking five years since their first meeting, Erika reminisced about their deep conversation in a New York City diner. Reflecting on the moment, she recalled Charlie’s words: "I'm going to date you." The couple was always intentional about their relationship, openly discussing the importance of dating with purpose. Charlie proposed to Erika in December 2020, and just a few months later, in May 2021, they married. In an emotional post accompanying their wedding photos, Erika expressed her love and admiration for Charlie, describing him as the man she had prayed for long before meeting him. She honored him for his leadership, his unwavering faith in God’s word, and his deep respect for her. "I am immeasurably blessed to call you my husband," she wrote.

Charlie Kirk helped establish Turning Point USA in 2012, growing it into a powerful force in conservative circles, particularly in mobilising young people to support Donald Trump’s MAGA movement

During a press conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Thursday (September 18), US President Donald Trump avoided answering questions about Peter Mandelson's dismissal as US ambassador following his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. When asked about his stance on Mandelson's sacking, Trump replied, "I don't know him," and then redirected the question to Starmer, asking, "What do you think about that?"&nbsp;Starmer, responded straightforwardly, saying, “Some new information came to light last week that wasn't available at the time of his appointment, and based on that, I made the decision to let him go.” Trump, who has faced speculation over his own connections to Epstein, has previously denied any wrongdoing or close association with the financier. He denied having written a controversial letter for Epstein's 50th birthday, which appeared in a book with a woman's silhouette and a signature that Trump claims was forged.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-re-enter-afghanistan-trump-shares-little-breaking-news-about-bagram-airbase-says-this-about-chinese-nuclear-weapons-1758209471330">US to re-enter Afghanistan? Trump shares 'breaking news' about Bagram Airbase, says 'Chinese nuclear weapons are made...'</a>&nbsp;Ahead of the President's state dinner with King Charles, images of Trump and Epstein together were projected onto Windsor Castle, a reminder of the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Trump's past associations with the convicted sex offender.&nbsp;A week back, in a statement issued by the UK Foreign Office, the government confirmed that Mandelson would be removed from his role as ambassador to the United States. The decision followed the emergence of newly surfaced emails written by Mandelson that shed more light on the nature of his relationship with Epstein.&nbsp;&nbsp;“These communications reveal a significantly closer connection between Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein than was understood at the time of his appointment,” the statement noted. Officials also insisted that Downing Street was unaware of the extent of this association when Mandelson was selected for the post.&nbsp;The controversy reignited after the release of a Democratic report from the House Oversight Committee in the US, which included a birthday compilation that featured a previously undisclosed letter from Mandelson. In the letter, he referred to Epstein as “my best pal,” a remark that drew sharp criticism given Epstein’s criminal record as a convicted sex offender. Additional emails reveal Mandelson offering unwavering support to Epstein, writing that he was “following you closely and here whenever you need.” In one message, Mandelson even encouraged Epstein to “remember the Art of War” while dealing with legal authorities.

'I don't know him actually': Donald Trump dodges questions on Peter Mandelson’s sacking amid Epstein ties controversy

During a press conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Thursday (September 18), US President Donald Trump avoided answering questions about Peter Mandelson's dismissal as US ambassador following his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. When asked about his stance on Mandelson's sacking, Trump replied, "I don't know him," and then redirected the question to Starmer, asking, "What do you think about that?" Starmer, responded straightforwardly, saying, “Some new information came to light last week that wasn't available at the time of his appointment, and based on that, I made the decision to let him go.” Trump, who has faced speculation over his own connections to Epstein, has previously denied any wrongdoing or close association with the financier. He denied having written a controversial letter for Epstein's 50th birthday, which appeared in a book with a woman's silhouette and a signature that Trump claims was forged. Also Read: US to re-enter Afghanistan? Trump shares 'breaking news' about Bagram Airbase, says 'Chinese nuclear weapons are made...' Ahead of the President's state dinner with King Charles, images of Trump and Epstein together were projected onto Windsor Castle, a reminder of the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Trump's past associations with the convicted sex offender. A week back, in a statement issued by the UK Foreign Office, the government confirmed that Mandelson would be removed from his role as ambassador to the United States. The decision followed the emergence of newly surfaced emails written by Mandelson that shed more light on the nature of his relationship with Epstein. “These communications reveal a significantly closer connection between Peter Mandelson and Jeffrey Epstein than was understood at the time of his appointment,” the statement noted. Officials also insisted that Downing Street was unaware of the extent of this association when Mandelson was selected for the post. The controversy reignited after the release of a Democratic report from the House Oversight Committee in the US, which included a birthday compilation that featured a previously undisclosed letter from Mandelson. In the letter, he referred to Epstein as “my best pal,” a remark that drew sharp criticism given Epstein’s criminal record as a convicted sex offender. Additional emails reveal Mandelson offering unwavering support to Epstein, writing that he was “following you closely and here whenever you need.” In one message, Mandelson even encouraged Epstein to “remember the Art of War” while dealing with legal authorities.

Trump dodged questions about Mandelson’s firing over Epstein ties, claiming no connection, while Starmer said new information prompted the decision

Issuing a big statement, United States President Donald Trump on Thursday (Sep 18) said that efforts were underway to regain control of Afghanistan's Bagram Airbase, which the US had given up control on following the 2021 Taliban takeover of Afghanistan. Speaking at a press conference alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in UK, Trump suggested it could be considered "breaking news" and explained that the US was seeking the return of the base adding a China angle to it. This comes almost four months after Trump claimed that China is occupying the Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan.

<blockquote>United States President Donald Trump said, "We're trying to get it back, by the way," the president said of the airbase. "That could be a little breaking news. We're trying to get it back. Because they need things from us. We want that base back." The president said one reason the US wants control of the base is its location, saying it's an “hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons.”</blockquote>

Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-wants-to-play-us-vs-china-over-bagram-airbase-story-of-military-airfield-in-afghanistan-that-biden-left-in-2021-9072198">Trump wants to play US vs China over Bagram Airbase</a>&nbsp;In May this year, addressing the US troops at the Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, Trump said that the United States will keep Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, stressing, "We will not give it up." He stressed that it is just an hour away from China, claiming that China occupies it. “We are going to keep Bagram Airbase, we are not going to give that up because its one hour away from China. You know who occupies it now, China. Sadly, over the last four years, we saw a collapse in Afghanistan,” he added. Soon after Trump's claims, the Taliban had categorically denied reports of a Chinese presence at Afghanistan’s Bagram Airbase.&nbsp;Read more |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/us-woman-faye-hall-thanks-trump-after-release-by-taliban-in-afghanistan-8905840">US woman Faye Hall thanks Trump after release by Taliban in Afghanistan</a><h2>Story of Bagram Airbase</h2>Bagram Airbase is a major military airfield, located in the Parwan province of Afghanistan. The largest air base in Afghanistan lies about 60 km north of Kabul in the Parwan province. The airbase was built by the Soviet Union in 1950 and the USSR had control over it during the early days of the Cold War. During the Soviet-Afghan war, the airbase was fortified and started lodging military personnel from the USSR. The US came in the picturee in 1959, when then US President Dwight Eisenhower paid a visit to Afghanistan and landed in Bagram.&nbsp;&nbsp;In 1990, the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan, and the airbase was left abandoned. It then became the frontline between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance military. However, during the conflict, the airbase was severely damaged. Later in 2001 after the 9/11 terror attack, the US and its Western allies took over the Afghan airfield. For the next 20 years, they controlled the Bagram airbase, claiming that they were using it for America's "War on terrorism". In 2020, the US and the Taliban signed a deal to withdraw international forces from Afghanistan by May 2021.&nbsp;Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/taliban-urges-afghans-to-return-home-amid-us-travel-ban-1749364537130">Taliban urges Afghans to return home amid US travel ban</a>

At a Sept 18 press conference in UK, US President Trump revealed efforts to regain control of Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, which the U.S. abandoned after the 2021 Taliban takeover. He said, "We’re trying to get it back... they need things from us. We want that base back."

Issuing a big statement, United States President Donald Trump on Thursday (Sep 18) said that efforts were underway to regain control of Afghanistan's Bagram Airbase, which the US had given up control on following the 2021 Taliban takeover of Afghanistan. Speaking at a press conference alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in UK, Trump suggested it could be considered "breaking news" and explained that the US was seeking the return of the base adding a China angle to it. This comes almost four months after Trump claimed that China is occupying the Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan.

At a Sept 18 press conference in UK, US President Trump revealed efforts to regain control of Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, which the US abandoned after the 2021 Taliban takeover. He said, "We’re trying to get it back... they need things from us. We want that base back."

US to re-enter Afghanistan? Trump shares 'breaking news' about Bagram Airbase, says 'Chinese nuclear weapons are made...'

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (September 18) was asked about if free speech is under attack. Trump said that Kimmel "had very bad ratings" and “they should have fired him a long time ago. He is a horrible person.” He also criticised Kimmel for saying "a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk," adding, "You can call that free speech or not. He was fired for lack of talent."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/donald-trump-reacts-as-abc-pulls-the-plug-on-jimmy-kimmel-s-late-night-show-great-news-for-america-1758165489963">Donald Trump reacts as ABC pulls the plug on Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show: Great news for America</a><h2>Why was Jimmy Kimmel's show suspended?</h2>ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night talk show indefinitely after the comedian made remarks about the shooting of right-wing figure Charlie Kirk. In his monologue, Kimmel had criticised what he saw as political exploitation of the tragedy by the "Maga gang," referring to supporters of President Donald Trump. He also mocked the flag being flown at half-mast in Kirk's honour, suggesting it was an inappropriate show of grief.&nbsp;Kimmel's comments sparked a reaction from President Trump, who dismissed Kimmel's show for its "poor ratings" and suggested that the host was fired due to a lack of talent. Trump also accused Kimmel of making an offensive remark about Kirk, describing the late-night host’s actions as “not free speech.” The suspension came shortly after the head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Brendan Carr, threatened further action against Disney and ABC if Kimmel’s remarks weren’t addressed.&nbsp;&nbsp;Carr, who was appointed by Trump, warned that the companies could face consequences if they didn’t intervene, adding that there might be more regulatory work ahead for the FCC. The controversy centers around the tension between free speech, political commentary, and media influence, raising questions about whether public figures like Kimmel should face consequences for their outspoken views, especially when they critique or mock political figures.

'He is a HORRIBLE person with lack of talent': Trump attacks host Jimmy Kimmel after show suspension

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (September 18) was asked about if free speech is under attack. Trump said that Kimmel "had very bad ratings" and “they should have fired him a long time ago. He is a horrible person.” He also criticised Kimmel for saying "a horrible thing about a great gentleman known as Charlie Kirk," adding, "You can call that free speech or not. He was fired for lack of talent." Also Read: Donald Trump reacts as ABC pulls the plug on Jimmy Kimmel's late-night show: Great news for America Why was Jimmy Kimmel's show suspended? ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s late-night talk show indefinitely after the comedian made remarks about the shooting of right-wing figure Charlie Kirk. In his monologue, Kimmel had criticised what he saw as political exploitation of the tragedy by the "Maga gang," referring to supporters of President Donald Trump. He also mocked the flag being flown at half-mast in Kirk's honour, suggesting it was an inappropriate show of grief. Kimmel's comments sparked a reaction from President Trump, who dismissed Kimmel's show for its "poor ratings" and suggested that the host was fired due to a lack of talent. Trump also accused Kimmel of making an offensive remark about Kirk, describing the late-night host’s actions as “not free speech.” The suspension came shortly after the head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Brendan Carr, threatened further action against Disney and ABC if Kimmel’s remarks weren’t addressed. Carr, who was appointed by Trump, warned that the companies could face consequences if they didn’t intervene, adding that there might be more regulatory work ahead for the FCC. The controversy centers around the tension between free speech, political commentary, and media influence, raising questions about whether public figures like Kimmel should face consequences for their outspoken views, especially when they critique or mock political figures.

Jimmy Kimmel's show has been suspended indefinitely after controversial comments about Charlie Kirk's shooting. This has sparked a debate over free speech, with President Trump and the FCC weighing in on the issue

US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressed a press conference on Thursday (Sep 18), and both leaders paid tributes to right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk. Trump said that Kirk was assassinated for speaking his mind and described him as a great person who was passionate about helping the youth. He recalled telling Kirk that he had a strong chance of becoming President one day. Trump also confirmed that he would be attending Kirk’s memorial service on Sunday.&nbsp;<blockquote>"Kirk was heinously assassinated for speaking his mind. I told Kirk he had a “good shot someday at being president. He connected with the youth like no other…Young people are devastated following his death,” Trump said during the press conference.</blockquote>When asked about free speech and the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show, Trump came down heavily on Kimmel and said that he is a “terrible person” who lacks any real talent. The US President further said that his recent remarks about Charlie Kirk were completely out of line and only added to the growing list of reasons why he should no longer be on air. “His ratings were down, he should have anyways been canceled long ago,” Trump added.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/obama-breaks-silence-on-charlie-kirk-s-horrific-murder-slams-trump-s-white-house-for-using-violence-to-silence-debate-1758125712079">Obama breaks silence on Charlie Kirk's 'horrific' murder, slams Trump's White House for using violence to ‘silence debate’</a><h2>Charlie Kirk assasination case</h2>Right-wing activist and United States President Donald Trump ally Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday (Sep 10). He later succumbed to injuries. His death has caused a stir in the political landscape of America, with thousands demanding justice. Both sides of the spectrum are pointing fingers at the increasing gun violence in the United States. However, some also criticised Kirk and his views on gun violence. He was best known as the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a nonprofit that seeks to spread conservative ideas to students on US campuses. He launched it at age 18. Known for his staunch support of Donald Trump and provocative political style, Kirk was often described as the "youth whisperer" of the American right.&nbsp;A suspect named Tyler Robinson has been arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the murder case. Investigations have revealed several controversial things, including his alleged transgender partner, Lance Twiggs. Robinson is facing seven counts, including aggravated murder. Utah Governor Spencer Cox has confirmed that the authorities have pushed for the death penalty against him.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-capable-of-killing-anyone-ukraine-mp-makes-shocking-claims-against-zelensky-over-charlie-kirk-s-murder-here-s-what-he-said-1758109741195">'Capable of killing anyone': Ukraine MP makes shocking claims against Zelensky over Charlie Kirk's murder - Here's what he said</a>

Trump and Starmer paid tribute to Charlie Kirk, with Trump saying he was "assassinated for speaking his mind" and praising his connection with youth. Trump also slammed Jimmy Kimmel, calling him talentless and saying his show deserved cancellation.

US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressed a press conference on Thursday (Sep 18), and both leaders paid tributes to right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk. Trump said that Kirk was assassinated for speaking his mind and described him as a great person who was passionate about helping the youth. He recalled telling Kirk that he had a strong chance of becoming President one day. Trump also confirmed that he would be attending Kirk’s memorial service on Sunday. "Kirk was heinously assassinated for speaking his mind. I told Kirk he had a “good shot someday at being president. He connected with the youth like no other…Young people are devastated following his death,” Trump said during the press conference. When asked about free speech and the suspension of Jimmy Kimmel's show, Trump came down heavily on Kimmel and said that he is a “terrible person” who lacks any real talent. The US President further said that his recent remarks about Charlie Kirk were completely out of line and only added to the growing list of reasons why he should no longer be on air. “His ratings were down, he should have anyways been canceled long ago,” Trump added. Read More | Obama breaks silence on Charlie Kirk's 'horrific' murder, slams Trump's White House for using violence to ‘silence debate’ Charlie Kirk assasination case Right-wing activist and United States President Donald Trump ally Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday (Sep 10). He later succumbed to injuries. His death has caused a stir in the political landscape of America, with thousands demanding justice. Both sides of the spectrum are pointing fingers at the increasing gun violence in the United States. However, some also criticised Kirk and his views on gun violence. He was best known as the founder of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), a nonprofit that seeks to spread conservative ideas to students on US campuses. He launched it at age 18. Known for his staunch support of Donald Trump and provocative political style, Kirk was often described as the "youth whisperer" of the American right. A suspect named Tyler Robinson has been arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the murder case. Investigations have revealed several controversial things, including his alleged transgender partner, Lance Twiggs. Robinson is facing seven counts, including aggravated murder. Utah Governor Spencer Cox has confirmed that the authorities have pushed for the death penalty against him. Read More | 'Capable of killing anyone': Ukraine MP makes shocking claims against Zelensky over Charlie Kirk's murder - Here's what he said

Trump and Starmer paid tribute to Charlie Kirk, with Trump saying he was "assassinated for speaking his mind" and praising his connection with youth. Trump also slammed Jimmy Kimmel, calling him talentless and saying his show deserved cancellation.

'Charlie Kirk had good shot of being US president one day': Trump REVEALS if he will attend TPUSA founder's funeral

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (September 17) during a joint press conference along with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that TikTok helped him in his presidential campaign. He said, “We will speak to President Xi on Friday (September 18) regarding this issue. TikTok helped me a lot with my presidential campaign. I like TikTok, it has tremendous value. I used TikTok very legitimately and it did a good job for me.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-putin-let-me-down-trump-expresses-disappointment-amid-failing-russia-ukraine-peace-talks-as-uk-pm-demands-more-pressure-on-moscow-1758204605950">'Putin let me down': Trump in UK, admits Russia-Ukraine war is not easy to solve; UK PM demands 'more pressure' on Moscow</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">&quot;We have a deal on TikTok ... We have a group of very big companies that want to buy it,&quot; says US President Donald Trump <a href="https://t.co/bSoIQq5lub">pic.twitter.com/bSoIQq5lub</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1967961221912727583?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On Tuesday (September 16), President Donald Trump announced that the deadline for TikTok's potential ban in the United States would be extended again, this time until December 2025. He also said that a deal had been reached between the US and China over TikTok, with an ‘American buyer’ set to be revealed soon. The US has long insisted that TikTok's ownership should be transferred to an American company due to concerns over national security.&nbsp;Earlier, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent mentioned that Trump was prepared to “let TikTok go dark” while finalising the agreement. Speaking to reporters ahead of his trip to the UK, Trump confirmed that the deal was in place, adding that he would speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday, September 19, to finalize the details. "We have a deal on TikTok, I’ve reached an agreement with China, and I’ll be speaking to President Xi on Friday (September 19) to confirm everything," Trump told the press.&nbsp;This announcement came just one day after Bessent confirmed that a "framework" agreement had been established following two days of discussions with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Madrid. Bessent noted that the Wednesday (September 17), deadline for the TikTok shutdown had prompted the Chinese government to work toward a resolution, with a potential 90-day extension to finalise the deal. If this happens, it would mark the third time the deadline has been pushed back, extending the total delay to 270 days.&nbsp;&nbsp;While Bessent did not offer further details about the talks, he emphasized that the final agreement would maintain the “Chinese characteristics” of TikTok while addressing US concerns about national security. He also reiterated that Trump was prepared to allow the app to go offline if necessary during the negotiations. This marks the second time this year that both sides have claimed to be on the verge of a deal, following a previous attempt in March that ultimately fell through.

'I like TikTok. It helped me with my presidential campaign': US President Donald Trump ahead of deal with China

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (September 17) during a joint press conference along with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that TikTok helped him in his presidential campaign. He said, “We will speak to President Xi on Friday (September 18) regarding this issue. TikTok helped me a lot with my presidential campaign. I like TikTok, it has tremendous value. I used TikTok very legitimately and it did a good job for me.” Also Read: 'Putin let me down': Trump in UK, admits Russia-Ukraine war is not easy to solve; UK PM demands 'more pressure' on Moscow

US President Donald Trump during a joint press conference along with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that TikTok helped him in his presidential campaign and that he will speak to President Xi on Friday regarding the issue

US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressed a press conference on Thursday (Sep 18). While Starmer criticised Russian President Vladimir Putin saying that his real face is out with his renewed offensive against Ukraine, Trump confessed that he thought solving Russia-Ukraine war would be “easiest” for him, but that is not the case and the Russian president has “let him down.” However, he expressed confidence that he will get this done. Before coming to power in his second term, Trump had said that he would end the Russia-Ukraine war in a day. His latest remark comes almost a month after Trump hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin for talks in Alaska stating that this would lead to peace deal - but nothing has transpired so far.&nbsp;<blockquote>"I thought Russia-Ukraine war was the easiest to stop but Putin has let me down...I thought it may be easiest....As you know, we are working for solution of Israel and Gaza..we are working to solve so many conflicts...we will get Israel-Gaza done...likewise, Russia and Ukraine will also be done, but you never know in war," Trump said.</blockquote>Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-starmer-sign-groundbreaking-tech-partnership-praise-priceless-us-uk-relations-1758191689676">Donald Trump, Keir Starmer sign 'groundbreaking' tech partnership, praise priceless US-UK relations</a>&nbsp;"In recent days, Putin has shown his true face mounting the biggest attack since the invasion began, with yet more bloodshed, yet more innocents killed, and unprecedented violations of NATO airspace," Starmer said during his opening remarks to a press conference. "These are not the actions of someone who wants peace. So we've discussed today how we can build our defenses to further support Ukraine, and decisively increase the pressure on Putin to get him to agree a peace deal that will last," Starmer added. Trump also added that Russian soldiers are being killed more than Ukrainian soldiers. He also declared that the war wouldn't have happened if he was the President.&nbsp;Read More |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-highest-honours-trump-praises-the-royals-king-charles-hails-us-president-s-personal-commitment-to-peace-1758142112723">'Highest honours...': Trump praises the Royals; King Charles hails US president's 'personal commitment' to peace</a><h2>Trump, Starmer sign 'groundbreaking' tech partnership</h2>On Thursday (September 18), US President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer officially signed a landmark technology partnership aimed at boosting collaboration in areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and nuclear energy. Describing the deal as "groundbreaking," Starmer said that its significance, calling it the largest investment package in British history. He also highlighted that in May, the UK became the first nation to secure a trade deal with the US during his second term, calling it a priority because of the strength and depth of the bilateral ties. Prime Minister Starmer spoke to the UK’s global influence, pointing out that while the country may not match the US in sheer economic size, it "punches above its weight" and is a leader in sectors like quantum computing, artificial intelligence, life sciences, and financial services.&nbsp;Read More |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-brings-the-beast-to-uk-it-carries-fridge-full-of-his-blood-type-here-s-why-1758136655667">Trump brings ‘The Beast’ to UK - It carries fridge full of his blood type because...</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;

Trump admitted the Russia-Ukraine war is harder to resolve than expected, saying Putin “let him down.” Starmer condemned Putin’s renewed offensive and NATO airspace violations. Both leaders pledged continued efforts to secure lasting peace in Ukraine.

US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressed a press conference on Thursday (Sep 18). While Starmer criticised Russian President Vladimir Putin saying that his real face is out with his renewed offensive against Ukraine, Trump confessed that he thought solving Russia-Ukraine war would be “easiest” for him, but that is not the case and the Russian president has “let him down.” However, he expressed confidence that he will get this done. Before coming to power in his second term, Trump had said that he would end the Russia-Ukraine war in a day. His latest remark comes almost a month after Trump hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin for talks in Alaska stating that this would lead to peace deal - but nothing has transpired so far. "I thought Russia-Ukraine war was the easiest to stop but Putin has let me down...I thought it may be easiest....As you know, we are working for solution of Israel and Gaza..we are working to solve so many conflicts...we will get Israel-Gaza done...likewise, Russia and Ukraine will also be done, but you never know in war," Trump said. Read More | Donald Trump, Keir Starmer sign 'groundbreaking' tech partnership, praise priceless US-UK relations "In recent days, Putin has shown his true face mounting the biggest attack since the invasion began, with yet more bloodshed, yet more innocents killed, and unprecedented violations of NATO airspace," Starmer said during his opening remarks to a press conference. "These are not the actions of someone who wants peace. So we've discussed today how we can build our defenses to further support Ukraine, and decisively increase the pressure on Putin to get him to agree a peace deal that will last," Starmer added. Trump also added that Russian soldiers are being killed more than Ukrainian soldiers. He also declared that the war wouldn't have happened if he was the President. Read More | 'Highest honours...': Trump praises the Royals; King Charles hails US president's 'personal commitment' to peace Trump, Starmer sign 'groundbreaking' tech partnership On Thursday (September 18), US President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer officially signed a landmark technology partnership aimed at boosting collaboration in areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and nuclear energy. Describing the deal as "groundbreaking," Starmer said that its significance, calling it the largest investment package in British history. He also highlighted that in May, the UK became the first nation to secure a trade deal with the US during his second term, calling it a priority because of the strength and depth of the bilateral ties. Prime Minister Starmer spoke to the UK’s global influence, pointing out that while the country may not match the US in sheer economic size, it "punches above its weight" and is a leader in sectors like quantum computing, artificial intelligence, life sciences, and financial services. Read More | Trump brings ‘The Beast’ to UK - It carries fridge full of his blood type because...

Trump admitted the Russia-Ukraine war is harder to resolve than expected, saying Putin “let him down.” Starmer condemned Putin’s renewed offensive and NATO airspace violations. Both leaders pledged continued efforts to secure lasting peace in Ukraine.

'Putin let me down': Trump in UK, admits Russia-Ukraine war is not easy to solve; UK PM demands 'more pressure' on Moscow

The United States has rescinded visas for Indian business leaders and their families due to their involvement in trafficking precursors for fentanyl, a synthetic opioid fueling a deadly crisis in the US. According to the American embassy in Delhi, this move will also prevent future visa applications for those individuals and their immediate relatives. The embassy emphasised its ongoing commitment to combating drug trafficking, asserting that people or organizations involved in the illicit production and distribution of drugs to the US would face severe consequences, including travel restrictions.&nbsp;The US Embassy India in a post on X said, “Stopping the flow of fentanyl and its precursors into the United States is one of our highest priorities. We have revoked visas for company executives and family for the unlawful involvement in controlled substance trafficking, including fentanyl. Those who facilitate the flow of illicit drugs into our country will not gain access to it. We thank our counterparts in the Government of India for their continued cooperation in addressing this transnational threat.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/what-does-italy-s-new-ai-law-really-say-heres-everything-you-should-know-about-it-1758194586361">What does Italy’s new AI law really say? Here’s everything you should know about it</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Stopping the flow of fentanyl and its precursors into the United States is one of our highest priorities. We have revoked visas for company executives and family for the unlawful involvement in controlled substance trafficking, including fentanyl. Those who facilitate the flow of… <a href="https://t.co/atWupz7WLG">pic.twitter.com/atWupz7WLG</a>&mdash; U.S. Embassy India (@USAndIndia) <a href="https://twitter.com/USAndIndia/status/1968628066034274349?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 18, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Although no specific names were mentioned, the embassy noted that top executives of companies linked to the trafficking of fentanyl precursors would also be flagged for scrutiny when applying for US visas. The embassy expressed appreciation for India's cooperation in tackling this global issue, noting that addressing the cross-border threat of drug trafficking can only be achieved through joint efforts between both governments.<h2>What is Fentanyl?</h2>Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid 50 times stronger than heroin, has become a significant contributor to overdose deaths in the US. In February, US authorities identified fentanyl as the leading cause of death among adults aged 18 to 45. The US also pointed to China as a major source of fentanyl-related substances, leading to trade tensions and increased tariffs. Fentanyl, initially approved in the 1960s as a painkiller, has since become a primary driver of opioid-related fatalities, with the Centers for Disease Control reporting over 48,000 deaths in 2024 alone. The drug’s potency makes even a tiny dose—just two milligrams—potentially lethal.

Why are Indian business leaders suddenly facing US visa denials? Here's what the American Embassy said...The US has revoked visas for Indian business people linked to fentanyl precursor trafficking. Their families also face travel bans

The United States has rescinded visas for Indian business leaders and their families due to their involvement in trafficking precursors for fentanyl, a synthetic opioid fueling a deadly crisis in the US. According to the American embassy in Delhi, this move will also prevent future visa applications for those individuals and their immediate relatives. The embassy emphasised its ongoing commitment to combating drug trafficking, asserting that people or organizations involved in the illicit production and distribution of drugs to the US would face severe consequences, including travel restrictions. The US Embassy India in a post on X said, “Stopping the flow of fentanyl and its precursors into the United States is one of our highest priorities. We have revoked visas for company executives and family for the unlawful involvement in controlled substance trafficking, including fentanyl. Those who facilitate the flow of illicit drugs into our country will not gain access to it. We thank our counterparts in the Government of India for their continued cooperation in addressing this transnational threat.” Also Read: What does Italy’s new AI law really say? Here’s everything you should know about it

The US has revoked visas for Indian business people linked to fentanyl precursor trafficking. Their families also face travel bans. The move aims to combat the fentanyl crisis affecting American public health

Why are Indian business leaders suddenly facing US visa denials? Here's what the American Embassy said...

Channel 4 on September 17 aired a documentary-style special, titled Trump vs the Truth, debunking over 100 of President Trump's ‘untruths, falsehoods, and distortions'. This is the longest uninterrupted ‘reel of untruths’ ever broadcast on a television. It was broadcast on Wednesday night; the timing of the broadcast will juxtapose with Trump's visit. It will contain some of the hilarious lies like “stopped $50m being sent to Gaza to buy condoms for Hamas”, to more serious lies, like sending $300bn to Ukraine in wartime aid.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/brazil-plane-crash-spacex-cocaine-1758172641153">Australian pilot carrying 400 lbs SPACE X branded cocaine crashes and dies in Brazil</a>&nbsp;They showed 100 lies back to back with a fact-checking paragraph next to it.&nbsp;For example,&nbsp;LIE - India and Pakistan have been fighting in Kashmir for thousands of years.&nbsp;FACT CHECK - India and Pakistan have not been fighting in Kashmir for a thousand years; the border between them existed for 78 years. It was created in the 1947 partition.LIE - We’ve cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300 and 1,400, 1,500%.FACT CHECK- A 100 per cent reduction would make prescription drugs free. A 1400 per cent reduction means drug companies have to pay for it.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trump-heaven-fundraising-email-2025-1757180908672">Donald Trump appeals supporters for $15 donations to help him 'Get to Heaven'</a>&nbsp;The show was a direct response to the US President's UK Visit. According to Channel 4's Chief Content Officer, Ian Katz, Trump vs the Truth was an attempt to show "how disorientating and dangerous the world becomes when the most powerful man on earth shows little regard for the truth". In addition to the programming, Channel 4 dedicated a night of programming to the theme, with a Trump impersonator delivering false information during continuity. This is Channel 4's latest attempt to go back to disruptive journalism.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-world-cup-trophy-oval-office-gold-1755971861416">Trump’s gold obsession: President tried to snag FIFA’s World Cup trophy for his Oval Office, snubbed by FIFA President</a><h2>&nbsp;</h2>

Channel 4 aired Trump vs the Truth on September 17, exposing over 100 falsehoods by Donald Trump. The special fact-checked claims, from bizarre to serious, coincided with Trump’s UK visit.

Channel 4 on September 17 aired a documentary-style special, titled Trump vs the Truth, debunking over 100 of President Trump's ‘untruths, falsehoods, and distortions'. This is the longest uninterrupted ‘reel of untruths’ ever broadcast on a television. It was broadcast on Wednesday night; the timing of the broadcast will juxtapose with Trump's visit. It will contain some of the hilarious lies like “stopped $50m being sent to Gaza to buy condoms for Hamas”, to more serious lies, like sending $300bn to Ukraine in wartime aid. Also Read: Australian pilot carrying 400 lbs SPACE X branded cocaine crashes and dies in Brazil They showed 100 lies back to back with a fact-checking paragraph next to it. For example, LIE - India and Pakistan have been fighting in Kashmir for thousands of years. FACT CHECK - India and Pakistan have not been fighting in Kashmir for a thousand years; the border between them existed for 78 years. It was created in the 1947 partition. LIE - We’ve cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300 and 1,400, 1,500%. FACT CHECK- A 100 per cent reduction would make prescription drugs free. A 1400 per cent reduction means drug companies have to pay for it. Also Read: Donald Trump appeals supporters for $15 donations to help him 'Get to Heaven' The show was a direct response to the US President's UK Visit. According to Channel 4's Chief Content Officer, Ian Katz, Trump vs the Truth was an attempt to show "how disorientating and dangerous the world becomes when the most powerful man on earth shows little regard for the truth". In addition to the programming, Channel 4 dedicated a night of programming to the theme, with a Trump impersonator delivering false information during continuity. This is Channel 4's latest attempt to go back to disruptive journalism. Also Read: Trump’s gold obsession: President tried to snag FIFA’s World Cup trophy for his Oval Office, snubbed by FIFA President

Channel 4 aired Trump vs the Truth on September 17, exposing over 100 falsehoods by Donald Trump. The special fact-checked claims, from bizarre to serious, coincided with Trump’s UK visit.

British broadcaster Channel 4 marks Trump's UK visit airing special 'TRUMP vs THE TRUTH'

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Taliban release British couple, Peter and Barbie, after Qatar mediation. Here's all about the case

Should TV networks lose licences for opposing Trump? US president says 'maybe'

Palestinian statehood recognition: Why it's Britain’s moral responsibility

Not just B-2 bombers, US used many other weapons in Iran strike, Pentagon shows

War on vaccines: US panel seeks curbs on crucial vaccine amid 'Covid shot probe'

Trump says he barred 'Mayor of London Khan' from King’s state banquet at Windsor

Travis Decker Case: Timeline of tragedy in which three innocent lives were lost

Trump blocks $400 MILLION in Taiwan military aid as US chases deal with China

Has Jimmy Kimmel been asked to apologise and donate to Charlie Kirk's family?

Indian techie shot dead ‘by cops’ in US; father seeks Jaishankar’s help

Russia warns US tariff threats against India, China 'won't work'

Air India crash victims’ families sue Boeing and Honeywell

Trump targets Iran's Chabahar port in another blow to India

Earthquake of 7.8 magnitude hits Russia's Kamchatka again - Is there a tsunami warning?

'Palestinian state...': What is the only 'disagreement' Trump had with UK PM

PM Modi a great friend, still sanctioned them: US President Donald Trump

Donald Trump takes bid to fire Fed's Lisa Cook to Supreme Court

Erika Kirk announced as CEO of Turning Point USA

'I don't know him actually': Trump dodges questions on Peter Mandelson’s sacking

Trump shares 'little breaking news' about Afghanistan's Bagram Airbase

'He is a HORRIBLE person with lack of talent': Trump attacks host Jimmy Kimmel

'Charlie Kirk had good shot of being US president one day': Trump

'I like TikTok. It helped me with my presidential campaign', says Donald Trump

Putin let me down: Trump FINALLY admits Russia-Ukraine war is not easy to solve

Here's why Indian business leaders suddenly facing US visa denials. Deets inside

Channel 4 marks Trump's UK visit airing special 'TRUMP vs THE TRUTH'