National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Sep 19) signed a proclamation hiking the annual fee for H-1B visas to $100,000. The H-1B program allows American companies to bring in highly skilled foreign workers, many of them from countries like India. Now, every visa application will cost employers $100,000 a year on top of existing filing fees and salaries. "They (US-based companies) need workers, we need great workers. This proclamation ensures that America will now get good workers," said Trump as he signed the proclamation in the Oval Office on Friday.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-elect-a-rapist-expect-to-get-fu-ed-britons-troll-trump-as-windsor-castle-lights-up-with-epstein-images-1758075915188">'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll 'dick-tator' Trump, light up Windsor Castle with Epstein images</a><h2>Companies on board with the $100,000 visa fee?</h2>US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick claimed that "all the big companies are on board" with the plan and insisted that this would mean more jobs for Americans. "They have to pay the government $100,000, then they have to pay the employee. So it's just not economic. If you're going to train somebody, you're going to train one of the recent graduates from one of the great universities across our land, train Americans, stop bringing in people to take our jobs," he added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-boasts-us-forces-blasted-another-boat-with-drug-traffickers-en-route-to-poison-americans-three-narcoterrorists-killed-watch-1758329745438">Trump says US blasted 3rd boat with drugs ‘en route to poison Americans’. Watch</a>Calling the 'H1-B non-immigrant visa programme' the "most abused visa system,' Trump's Trump'sWhite House Staff Secretary Will Scharf said that the step would allow only "highly skilled labourers who work in fields that Americans don't work in to come into the United States of America"."This will ensure that the people they're bringing in are actually very highly skilled and that they're not replaceable by American workers," he said.Since taking office in January, Trump has implemented several measures to crack down on immigration. However, the decision to raise the H-1B visa fee is one of his most notable efforts that significantly revamps the temporary employment visa system.

US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation that imposes a new annual fee of $100,000 on H-1B visa applications. Here's all you need to know.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Sep 19) signed a proclamation hiking the annual fee for H-1B visas to $100,000. The H-1B program allows American companies to bring in highly skilled foreign workers, many of them from countries like India. Now, every visa application will cost employers $100,000 a year on top of existing filing fees and salaries. "They (US-based companies) need workers, we need great workers. This proclamation ensures that America will now get good workers," said Trump as he signed the proclamation in the Oval Office on Friday. Also read | 'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll 'dick-tator' Trump, light up Windsor Castle with Epstein images Companies on board with the $100,000 visa fee? US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick claimed that "all the big companies are on board" with the plan and insisted that this would mean more jobs for Americans. "They have to pay the government $100,000, then they have to pay the employee. So it's just not economic. If you're going to train somebody, you're going to train one of the recent graduates from one of the great universities across our land, train Americans, stop bringing in people to take our jobs," he added. Also read | Trump says US blasted 3rd boat with drugs ‘en route to poison Americans’. Watch Calling the 'H1-B non-immigrant visa programme' the "most abused visa system,' Trump's Trump'sWhite House Staff Secretary Will Scharf said that the step would allow only "highly skilled labourers who work in fields that Americans don't work in to come into the United States of America". "This will ensure that the people they're bringing in are actually very highly skilled and that they're not replaceable by American workers," he said. Since taking office in January, Trump has implemented several measures to crack down on immigration. However, the decision to raise the H-1B visa fee is one of his most notable efforts that significantly revamps the temporary employment visa system.

US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation that imposes a new annual fee of $100,000 on H-1B visa applications. Here's all you need to know.

Trump slaps $100,000 fee on H-1B visas, Indian tech workers to be hit hardest

US President Donald Trump, along with First Lady Melania Trump, is on an unprecedented 2nd trip to the UK, and was greeted by Britons brandishing signs calling him a 'small dick-tator,' and slamming him for his Jeffrey Epstein connection. Choice images from the anti-Trump protests here:

'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll 'dick-tator' Trump, light up Windsor Castle with Epstein images

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Sep 19)announced that US forces had destroyed another suspected drug trafficking vessel in international waters, killing three people on board. This is the third US strike in international waters in recent days. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the strike took place somewhere in the US Southern Command's area of operations, which spans Central and South America and the Caribbean. He did not specify the exact location, though past attacks in recent weeks have been carried out off the Venezuelan coast.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-are-hunting-you-trump-shares-shocking-video-of-fresh-strike-on-venezuelan-boat-reveals-3-narcoterrorists-killed-watch-1757992478375">'We are hunting you': Trump shares shocking video of fresh strike on Venezuelan boat; reveals 3 ‘narcoterrorists’ killed. Watch!</a><h2>Traffickers en route "to poison Americans"</h2>According to Trump, intelligence confirmed the “lethal kinetic strike” was carried out on his orders and claimed that the boat was transporting narcotics "along a known narcotrafficking passage en route to poison Americans." He shared a video clip showing a speedboat locked in crosshairs before being hit by ordnance and bursting into flames.

He claimed that the boat belonged to a “Designated Terrorist Organization,” but failed to mention which. “No U.S. Forces were harmed in this strike,” he said, adding, &nbsp;“STOP SELLING FENTANYL, NARCOTICS, AND ILLEGAL DRUGS IN AMERICA, AND COMMITTING VIOLENCE AND TERRORISM AGAINST AMERICANS!!!”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/after-trump-blames-left-for-radicalising-charlie-kirk-killer-damning-study-on-how-domestic-terrorists-are-mostly-right-wing-vanishes-from-doj-website-1758086933683">DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death</a><h2>How legal are the US strikes in international waters?</h2>Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth have earlier defended the initial strike, insisting the targets were known cartel operatives. However, questions over legality and evidence are mounting. Amid reports that the US violated international law, the Daily Mail, citing a source familiar with the operation, previously alleged that the US "did not even know if there were drugs on the boat," suggesting the strike was meant to "illicit a response from (President Nicolás) Maduro and provoke him" into retaliating, "show his true colours". The Trump administration has not yet provided proof that any of the vessels were carrying narcotics.However, Venezuela's leftist President Nicolas Maduro has accused the United States of pursuing regime change in his country under the guise of an operation to combat drug trafficking.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

For the third time this month, US President Donald Trump has announced that American forces have destroyed a suspected drug trafficking vessel in international waters, killing three people on board.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Sep 19)announced that US forces had destroyed another suspected drug trafficking vessel in international waters, killing three people on board. This is the third US strike in international waters in recent days. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the strike took place somewhere in the US Southern Command's area of operations, which spans Central and South America and the Caribbean. He did not specify the exact location, though past attacks in recent weeks have been carried out off the Venezuelan coast. Also read | 'We are hunting you': Trump shares shocking video of fresh strike on Venezuelan boat; reveals 3 ‘narcoterrorists’ killed. Watch! Traffickers en route "to poison Americans" According to Trump, intelligence confirmed the “lethal kinetic strike” was carried out on his orders and claimed that the boat was transporting narcotics "along a known narcotrafficking passage en route to poison Americans." He shared a video clip showing a speedboat locked in crosshairs before being hit by ordnance and bursting into flames.

For the third time this month, US President Donald Trump has announced that American forces have destroyed a suspected drug trafficking vessel in international waters, killing three people on board.

Trump boasts US blasted another boat in international waters, says three drug traffickers ‘en route to poison Americans,’ killed. Watch

Three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets reportedly violated Estonia’s airspace over the Baltic Sea in a 12-minute incursion on Friday and were intercepted by NATO, which called it proof of Moscow’s “reckless” behaviour. Nato spokesperson Allison Hart confirmed the incident, saying it had “responded immediately and intercepted the Russian aircraft” and describing it as “yet another example of reckless Russian behaviour”. The Estonian defence forces said the MiG-31s were intercepted by Italian F-35 fighter jets based in Ämari, Estonia, as part of the transatlantic defence alliance’s air policing mission over the Baltic Sea.&nbsp;The jets did not have flight plans, had turned their transponders off, and were not communicating with air traffic control, it said.&nbsp;The EU’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, a former Estonian prime minister, accused Moscow of an “extremely dangerous provocation” and said the latest Russian violation of NATO’s eastern borders “further escalates tensions in the region”.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today&#39;s violation of Estonia&#39;s airspace by Russian military aircraft is an extremely dangerous provocation. This marks the third such violation of EU airspace in days and further escalates tensions in the region. The EU stands in full solidarity with Estonia (1/2)&mdash; Kaja Kallas (@kajakallas) <a href="https://twitter.com/kajakallas/status/1969052127688348027?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;The president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, said Europe “stands with Estonia” and would “respond to every provocation with determination”.“As threats escalate, so will our pressure,” she said, calling on the EU’s 27 member states to swiftly approve the bloc’s 19th package of sanctions against Moscow.

&nbsp;<h2>‘Incursion unprecedentedly brazen’</h2>&nbsp;Estonia's foreign ministry condemned the incursion as “brazen”. Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said Friday’s incursion was “unprecedentedly brazen”.Echoing her words, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on X, “We will respond to every provocation with determination while investing in a stronger Eastern flank.”&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Europe stands with Estonia in the face of Russia’s latest violation of our airspace. We will respond to every provocation with determination while investing in a stronger Eastern flank. As threats escalate, so too will our pressure. I call on EU leaders to swiftly approve our…&mdash; Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) <a href="https://twitter.com/vonderleyen/status/1969058467374919902?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;&nbsp;Tensions have been rising on Nato’s eastern border since Russian drones flew over Polish territory last week. Moscow did not immediately comment.&nbsp;WATCH: Russian Mig-31 Fighters Breach NATO Airspace Over Estonia<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-mig-31-fighters-breach-nato-airspace-over-estonia-1758306012680/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-mig-31-fighters-breach-nato-airspace-over-estonia-1758306012680/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Estonian govt to request NATO Article 4 consultations</h2>&nbsp;Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal later said his government had “decided to request NATO Article 4 consultations”.Article 4 of the NATO treaty formally starts urgent consultations within the 32-member alliance, which ties the US and many European nations on collective defence. Estonia’s foreign ministry said it summoned the Russian chargé d’affaires “to lodge a protest” over Friday’s incursion.&nbsp;Tensions have escalated between the NATO military alliance and Russia since Moscow launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.&nbsp;In response to Russia's incursions into Poland and Romania, NATO pledged to move troops and fighter jets eastwards.Planes from the UK, France, Germany, and Denmark are all taking part in air defence missions over Poland in a bid to bolster the alliance's eastern flank.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said Friday’s incursion was “unprecedentedly brazen”. Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal later said his government had “decided to request NATO Article 4 consultations”.

Three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets reportedly violated Estonia’s airspace over the Baltic Sea in a 12-minute incursion on Friday and were intercepted by NATO, which called it proof of Moscow’s “reckless” behaviour. Nato spokesperson Allison Hart confirmed the incident, saying it had “responded immediately and intercepted the Russian aircraft” and describing it as “yet another example of reckless Russian behaviour”. The Estonian defence forces said the MiG-31s were intercepted by Italian F-35 fighter jets based in Ämari, Estonia, as part of the transatlantic defence alliance’s air policing mission over the Baltic Sea. The jets did not have flight plans, had turned their transponders off, and were not communicating with air traffic control, it said. The EU’s top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, a former Estonian prime minister, accused Moscow of an “extremely dangerous provocation” and said the latest Russian violation of NATO’s eastern borders “further escalates tensions in the region”.

Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said Friday’s incursion was “unprecedentedly brazen”. Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal later said his government had “decided to request NATO Article 4 consultations”.

NATO jets intercept Russian warplanes violating Estonian airspace

In what is a clear thaw in the India-Canada relationship, both sides have agreed to "reactivate" key dialogues, suspended during former Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau's tenure, and reinstate diplomatic staff. The development comes during the visit of Canada's deputy foreign minister&nbsp;, David Morrison, to Delhi for key meetings with top Ministry of External Affairs officials, including foreign secretary Vikram Misri.&nbsp;On Friday, MEA's Secretary East P. Kumaran and visiting Canadian deputy FM David Morrison held pre-foreign office consultations in the Indian national capital, and were joined by other top officials from both 2 sides, including AS, Americas division Nagaraj Naidu.During the talks, both sides agreed to start "necessary steps to reactivate bilateral dialogue mechanisms" in trade, defence, energy, civil nuclear, security and law enforcement, critical minerals, space, science and technology, and agriculture, a statement announced. Both sides have also agreed to 'constructively address capacity-related issues' at respective missions and consulates. The announcement coincided with the talks between India's national security advisor Ajit Doval with his Canadian counterpart.Remember, India-Canada ties deteriorated under Trudeau, who, under his Prime Ministership, alleged Indian involvement in the 2023 killing of India India-listed Khalistani terrorist, Hardeep Singh Nijjar. The action was seen by Delhi as part of Trudeau's domestic vote bank politics with support for Khalistani extremists. This led to diplomatic expulsions, reduction of diplomatic staff, and suspension of trade talks. A reduction of diplomatic staff meant a delay in visa issuance, impacting people-to-people ties.A MEA statement said, that the pre foreign office consultations "provided an opportunity to review the state of India–Canada bilateral relations" as both sides "reaffirmed the importance of India–Canada ties, anchored in shared democratic values, respect for the rule of law" and "commitment to the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity", which basically means address India's concerns over Khalistani issues, something that Ottawa has assured regularly.&nbsp;The Canadian government, through recent CSIS intelligence and Finance Ministry reports, has acknowledged Khalistani extremists using Canada for fundraising and planning violence against India. This marks a shift, validating India's concerns and prompting calls for enhanced security measures.The key talks came amid restoration of the high commissioners, something that was announced during PM Modi and Canadian PM Mark Carney's bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G7 summit in&nbsp;Kananaskis in June of this year. During the June talks, both leaders reached an understanding to restore stability in ties after months of public showdown.

During the talks, both sides agreed to start necessary steps to reactivate bilateral dialogue mechanisms in trade, defence, energy, civil nuclear, security and law enforcement, critical minerals, space, science and technology, and agriculture, a statement announced.

In what is a clear thaw in the India-Canada relationship, both sides have agreed to "reactivate" key dialogues, suspended during former Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau's tenure, and reinstate diplomatic staff. The development comes during the visit of Canada's deputy foreign minister , David Morrison, to Delhi for key meetings with top Ministry of External Affairs officials, including foreign secretary Vikram Misri. On Friday, MEA's Secretary East P. Kumaran and visiting Canadian deputy FM David Morrison held pre-foreign office consultations in the Indian national capital, and were joined by other top officials from both 2 sides, including AS, Americas division Nagaraj Naidu. During the talks, both sides agreed to start "necessary steps to reactivate bilateral dialogue mechanisms" in trade, defence, energy, civil nuclear, security and law enforcement, critical minerals, space, science and technology, and agriculture, a statement announced. Both sides have also agreed to 'constructively address capacity-related issues' at respective missions and consulates. The announcement coincided with the talks between India's national security advisor Ajit Doval with his Canadian counterpart. Remember, India-Canada ties deteriorated under Trudeau, who, under his Prime Ministership, alleged Indian involvement in the 2023 killing of India India-listed Khalistani terrorist, Hardeep Singh Nijjar. The action was seen by Delhi as part of Trudeau's domestic vote bank politics with support for Khalistani extremists. This led to diplomatic expulsions, reduction of diplomatic staff, and suspension of trade talks. A reduction of diplomatic staff meant a delay in visa issuance, impacting people-to-people ties. A MEA statement said, that the pre foreign office consultations "provided an opportunity to review the state of India–Canada bilateral relations" as both sides "reaffirmed the importance of India–Canada ties, anchored in shared democratic values, respect for the rule of law" and "commitment to the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity", which basically means address India's concerns over Khalistani issues, something that Ottawa has assured regularly. The Canadian government, through recent CSIS intelligence and Finance Ministry reports, has acknowledged Khalistani extremists using Canada for fundraising and planning violence against India. This marks a shift, validating India's concerns and prompting calls for enhanced security measures. The key talks came amid restoration of the high commissioners, something that was announced during PM Modi and Canadian PM Mark Carney's bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Kananaskis in June of this year. During the June talks, both leaders reached an understanding to restore stability in ties after months of public showdown.

During the talks, both sides agreed to start "necessary steps to reactivate bilateral dialogue mechanisms" in trade, defence, energy, civil nuclear, security and law enforcement, critical minerals, space, science and technology, and agriculture, a statement announced.

India, Canada agree to reactivate bilateral dialogues, work to reinstate diplomatic staff

A US federal judge struck down President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times newspaper on Friday over its reporting on him over the decades, including his links to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. US District Judge Steven Merryday said Trump violated a federal rule requiring applicants to outline in a short and plain statement why they deserve relief from the court. He emphasised that a lawsuit cannot be used as a forum for insults or a platform to vent against opponents.&nbsp;A legal complaint, the judge said, is not “a protected platform to rage against an adversary”. He gave Trump 28 days to file an amended complaint.&nbsp;In a post on Truth Social earlier this week, Trump signalled he would sue the New York Times, claiming the newspaper has been “allowed to freely lie, smear and defame me for far too long”.&nbsp;Merryday wrote that a complaint should “fairly, precisely, directly, soberly, and economically inform the defendants of the nature and content of the claims”.&nbsp;“A complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective—not a protected platform to rage against an adversary,” he added.&nbsp;In a Truth Social post on Monday, Trump accused the US newspaper of engaging in a “decades-long method of lying about your favourite President, my family, business, MAGA and our nation”. Trump also said the lawsuit would be filed in Florida.&nbsp;“The Times has engaged in a decades-long method of lying about your favourite President (me!), my family, business, the America First Movement, MAGA, and our nation as a whole. I am proud to hold this once respected ‘rag’ responsible, as we are doing with the fake news networks such as our successful litigation against George Slopadopoulos/ABC/Disney, and 60 Minutes/CBS/Paramount, who knew that they were falsely smearing me through a highly sophisticated system of document and visual alteration, which was, in effect, a malicious form of defamation, and thus, settled for record amounts,” he added.&nbsp;Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein long before his crimes became public and also denied writing a sexually suggestive letter in the book or creating the drawing of a curvaceous woman that frames the letter. The entry bears Trump’s name and what appears to be his signature.&nbsp;Before NYT, the US president sued The Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, for its reporting on the Epstein files.&nbsp;The sex scandal has led to repercussions beyond the US, with the UK recalling its ambassador to Washington over his alleged links to Epstein.&nbsp;Epstein died in a New York jail in 2019 while facing sex abuse charges. His aide Ghislaine Maxwell is serving a prison sentence for assisting him.

Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein long before his crimes became public and also denied writing a sexually suggestive letter in the book or creating the drawing of a curvaceous woman that frames the letter. The entry bears Trump’s name and what appears to be his signature.

A US federal judge struck down President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against the New York Times newspaper on Friday over its reporting on him over the decades, including his links to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. US District Judge Steven Merryday said Trump violated a federal rule requiring applicants to outline in a short and plain statement why they deserve relief from the court. He emphasised that a lawsuit cannot be used as a forum for insults or a platform to vent against opponents. A legal complaint, the judge said, is not “a protected platform to rage against an adversary”. He gave Trump 28 days to file an amended complaint. In a post on Truth Social earlier this week, Trump signalled he would sue the New York Times, claiming the newspaper has been “allowed to freely lie, smear and defame me for far too long”. Merryday wrote that a complaint should “fairly, precisely, directly, soberly, and economically inform the defendants of the nature and content of the claims”. “A complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective—not a protected platform to rage against an adversary,” he added. In a Truth Social post on Monday, Trump accused the US newspaper of engaging in a “decades-long method of lying about your favourite President, my family, business, MAGA and our nation”. Trump also said the lawsuit would be filed in Florida. “The Times has engaged in a decades-long method of lying about your favourite President (me!), my family, business, the America First Movement, MAGA, and our nation as a whole. I am proud to hold this once respected ‘rag’ responsible, as we are doing with the fake news networks such as our successful litigation against George Slopadopoulos/ABC/Disney, and 60 Minutes/CBS/Paramount, who knew that they were falsely smearing me through a highly sophisticated system of document and visual alteration, which was, in effect, a malicious form of defamation, and thus, settled for record amounts,” he added. Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein long before his crimes became public and also denied writing a sexually suggestive letter in the book or creating the drawing of a curvaceous woman that frames the letter. The entry bears Trump’s name and what appears to be his signature. Before NYT, the US president sued The Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch, for its reporting on the Epstein files. The sex scandal has led to repercussions beyond the US, with the UK recalling its ambassador to Washington over his alleged links to Epstein. Epstein died in a New York jail in 2019 while facing sex abuse charges. His aide Ghislaine Maxwell is serving a prison sentence for assisting him.

Trump has said he cut ties with Epstein long before his crimes became public and also denied writing a sexually suggestive letter in the book or creating the drawing of a curvaceous woman that frames the letter. The entry bears Trump’s name and what appears to be his signature.

Judge dismisses Trump’s $15 billion lawsuit against NYT over Epstein reporting

Ahead of the start of the annual United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) session next week that will see many Western countries recognising the "state of Palestine", the Palestinian ambassador to India, Abdallah M Abu Shawesh, has termed the action coming "late". Many western countries like France, the UK, Canada, and Australia have announced that they will recognise the Palestinian state during the week of the 80th UN General Assembly (UNGA) session that begins on September 22nd, coinciding with the "2 state solution conference", co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France.&nbsp;Speaking to WION, the Ambassador said, "'We expect western countries to recognise us, they came late. The UK came very late, ' but added, "but recognition is an important step. He explained that the recognition will "build step by step, a legal framework for our state".&nbsp;Around 149 countries recognise Palestine, and the upcoming announcements by Western states are aimed at advancing Palestinian statehood amid the Gaza crisis and hoping to halt the Israeli offensive in the strip that started after the Hamas terror attack of October 2023. Asked how hopeful he is on the emergence of the "state of Palestine", he said, "We have hope, we are on the right side of history, and he is 100% confident".&nbsp;The ambassador slammed the US for denying visa entry/revoking visas for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and other members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Palestinian Authority (PA), thus impacting the leadership's presence at the UNGA session. He termed the action "illegal" and pointed out how, in 1988, the US banned Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat from attending the UNGA session, and the session took place at the United Nations in Geneva. That year, UNGA voted 151-2 (U.S. and Israel against, UK abstaining) to hold a special session in Geneva, where Arafat could attend without US visa restrictions.&nbsp;Asked about India's policy on Palestine, he said, "we get support from lot of people in India", and that "India was the first non-Arab and non-Muslim state in 1988 to recognise Palestine. It is running number of projects in Palestine, especially west bank needed for daily life". He added, "India is very heavy political power...they can help Palestine people. India gives all the space, to listen to us".&nbsp;India advocates for a sovereign, independent, and viable Palestinian state living side by side with Israel in peace, within secure and recognized borders. It has also provided significant aid to Palestine, including financial contributions to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), capacity-building programs, and budgetary support to the Palestinian Authority. Historically, India has supported Palestine’s full membership in the United Nations.

Around 149 countries recognise Palestine, and the upcoming announcements by Western states are aimed at advancing Palestinian statehood amid the Gaza crisis and hoping to halt the Israeli offensive in the strip that started after the Hamas terror attack of October 2023.

Ahead of the start of the annual United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) session next week that will see many Western countries recognising the "state of Palestine", the Palestinian ambassador to India, Abdallah M Abu Shawesh, has termed the action coming "late". Many western countries like France, the UK, Canada, and Australia have announced that they will recognise the Palestinian state during the week of the 80th UN General Assembly (UNGA) session that begins on September 22nd, coinciding with the "2 state solution conference", co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. Speaking to WION, the Ambassador said, "'We expect western countries to recognise us, they came late. The UK came very late, ' but added, "but recognition is an important step. He explained that the recognition will "build step by step, a legal framework for our state". Around 149 countries recognise Palestine, and the upcoming announcements by Western states are aimed at advancing Palestinian statehood amid the Gaza crisis and hoping to halt the Israeli offensive in the strip that started after the Hamas terror attack of October 2023. Asked how hopeful he is on the emergence of the "state of Palestine", he said, "We have hope, we are on the right side of history, and he is 100% confident". The ambassador slammed the US for denying visa entry/revoking visas for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and other members of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Palestinian Authority (PA), thus impacting the leadership's presence at the UNGA session. He termed the action "illegal" and pointed out how, in 1988, the US banned Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat from attending the UNGA session, and the session took place at the United Nations in Geneva. That year, UNGA voted 151-2 (U.S. and Israel against, UK abstaining) to hold a special session in Geneva, where Arafat could attend without US visa restrictions. Asked about India's policy on Palestine, he said, "we get support from lot of people in India", and that "India was the first non-Arab and non-Muslim state in 1988 to recognise Palestine. It is running number of projects in Palestine, especially west bank needed for daily life". He added, "India is very heavy political power...they can help Palestine people. India gives all the space, to listen to us". India advocates for a sovereign, independent, and viable Palestinian state living side by side with Israel in peace, within secure and recognized borders. It has also provided significant aid to Palestine, including financial contributions to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), capacity-building programs, and budgetary support to the Palestinian Authority. Historically, India has supported Palestine’s full membership in the United Nations.

Around 149 countries recognise Palestine, and the upcoming announcements by Western states are aimed at advancing Palestinian statehood amid the Gaza crisis and hoping to halt the Israeli offensive in the strip that started after the Hamas terror attack of October 2023.

Western recognition for Palestinian State late but important step, says Palestine Ambassador Shawesh

A front of the United Nations Security Council-listed terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), operating under the alias Al-Murabitun, is set to hold a rally in Peshawar on September 25 to honor Yusuf Azhar, the brother of JeM chief Masood Azhar, killed during India’s counter-terrorism Operation Sindoor. According to an Indian intelligence dossier, the event, organised in the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), is expected to serve as a recruitment drive, with senior JeM leaders in attendance.&nbsp;The rally follows the devastating Indian strikes on JeM’s headquarters in Bahawalpur, where Masood Azhar lost several family members. Indian strikes, under operation Sindoor, came after the Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistani-trained terrorists. Pamphlets circulating for the event signal a major attempt by JeM to rally support and radicalise youth. The name Al-Murabitun is also of another terror group in West Africa that has links with al-Qa`ida.&nbsp;The rally comes days after JeM hosted a major recruitment drive in Garhi Habibullah town of Mansehra district, KPK. The rally that took place just hours before the India-Pakistan cricket match in Dubai on 14th September was led by Masood Ilyas Kashmiri, alias Abu Mohammad, a key figure in JeM’s operational restructuring. Wanted in India for being the mastermind in the 2018 Sunjuwan Army Camp attack in Jammu, he has been on NIA’s chargesheet, along with Masood Azhar and Abdul Rauf Asghar, for the terror attack.&nbsp;He made a fiery speech at the gathering, guarded by both JeM cadres armed with M4 rifles and local police officers, according to the intel dossier. In the over 30-minute speech, he glorified Osama bin Laden, reminding the audience that following the Kandahar hijack of IC-814, when Masood Azhar was freed from Delhi’s Tihar Jail and he returned to Pakistan. In the videos that have emerged on social media, he spoke about India’s operation Sindoor and how family members of Masood Azhar’s family were “turned to mince” during the Indian strikes. He also said that “Chief of Army Staff (now elevated to Field Marshal Asim Munir) personally ordered GHQ to direct military commanders to attend the funerals of JeM terrorist” killed in Indian strikes.&nbsp;Terror hubs moved to KPK&nbsp;Indian intelligence assessments indicate that Pakistan’s terrorist groups, including JeM and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), are shifting operations to KPK due to the vulnerability of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) to Indian strikes. The assessment from the Indian side is that movements are being conducted with “full awareness and direct facilitation of Pakistan's state structures” as “evidenced by overt JeM gatherings held under police protection”.&nbsp;Terror structures are also being expanded and built in the northwestern Pakistani province. JeM’s training facility at Mansehra has been undergoing expansion since Operation Sindoor, has emerged. Additionally, Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) is building a new training facility named “HM 313” in the Bandaai area of Lower Dir, KPK, overseen by ex-Pakistani commando Khalid Khan. Land was purchased in August 2024, and construction resumed in Post Operation Sindoor.

Pamphlets circulating for the event signal a major attempt by JeM to rally support and radicalise youth. The name Al-Murabitun is also of another terror group in West Africa that has links with al-Qa`ida.

A front of the United Nations Security Council-listed terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), operating under the alias Al-Murabitun, is set to hold a rally in Peshawar on September 25 to honor Yusuf Azhar, the brother of JeM chief Masood Azhar, killed during India’s counter-terrorism Operation Sindoor. According to an Indian intelligence dossier, the event, organised in the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), is expected to serve as a recruitment drive, with senior JeM leaders in attendance. The rally follows the devastating Indian strikes on JeM’s headquarters in Bahawalpur, where Masood Azhar lost several family members. Indian strikes, under operation Sindoor, came after the Pahalgam terror attack by Pakistani-trained terrorists. Pamphlets circulating for the event signal a major attempt by JeM to rally support and radicalise youth. The name Al-Murabitun is also of another terror group in West Africa that has links with al-Qa`ida. The rally comes days after JeM hosted a major recruitment drive in Garhi Habibullah town of Mansehra district, KPK. The rally that took place just hours before the India-Pakistan cricket match in Dubai on 14th September was led by Masood Ilyas Kashmiri, alias Abu Mohammad, a key figure in JeM’s operational restructuring. Wanted in India for being the mastermind in the 2018 Sunjuwan Army Camp attack in Jammu, he has been on NIA’s chargesheet, along with Masood Azhar and Abdul Rauf Asghar, for the terror attack. He made a fiery speech at the gathering, guarded by both JeM cadres armed with M4 rifles and local police officers, according to the intel dossier. In the over 30-minute speech, he glorified Osama bin Laden, reminding the audience that following the Kandahar hijack of IC-814, when Masood Azhar was freed from Delhi’s Tihar Jail and he returned to Pakistan. In the videos that have emerged on social media, he spoke about India’s operation Sindoor and how family members of Masood Azhar’s family were “turned to mince” during the Indian strikes. He also said that “Chief of Army Staff (now elevated to Field Marshal Asim Munir) personally ordered GHQ to direct military commanders to attend the funerals of JeM terrorist” killed in Indian strikes. Terror hubs moved to KPK Indian intelligence assessments indicate that Pakistan’s terrorist groups, including JeM and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM), are shifting operations to KPK due to the vulnerability of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) to Indian strikes. The assessment from the Indian side is that movements are being conducted with “full awareness and direct facilitation of Pakistan's state structures” as “evidenced by overt JeM gatherings held under police protection”. Terror structures are also being expanded and built in the northwestern Pakistani province. JeM’s training facility at Mansehra has been undergoing expansion since Operation Sindoor, has emerged. Additionally, Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) is building a new training facility named “HM 313” in the Bandaai area of Lower Dir, KPK, overseen by ex-Pakistani commando Khalid Khan. Land was purchased in August 2024, and construction resumed in Post Operation Sindoor.

Pamphlets circulating for the event signal a major attempt by JeM to rally support and radicalise youth. The name Al-Murabitun is also of another terror group in West Africa that has links with al-Qa`ida.

JeM front plans Peshawar rally to honor Masood Azhar’s family Killed in Operation Sindoor

Jailed former prime minister Imran Khan has accused Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir of inflicting “mental torture” on him and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in the Adiala Jail to “break them down” and force them into submission. Khan, 72, has been in jail for over two years in connection with multiple legal cases. He is currently imprisoned in the Adiala Jail at Rawalpindi. His wife, Bushra Bibi, was also sent to the same prison after the couple was convicted in the Al-Qadir Trust cases earlier this year.In a post shared on social media platform X, Khan said, “The mental torture being inflicted on me and (my wife) Bushra Begum in prison is being carried out by Asim Munir, and the sole purpose is to make us break down and submit.”&nbsp;Khan compared the alleged mistreatment to the cruelty of historical tyrants, saying, “As long as we are alive, we will not bow down before the cruelty of Yazid or the tyranny of the Pharaoh.”The former PM also accused Asim Munir of creating a climate of fear and lawlessness. “Gen Munir is using the army to create an atmosphere of lawlessness and fascism in our country. Asim Munir has left no stone unturned for the extension of his illegitimate rule for 10 years,” Khan claimed.&nbsp;WATCH: BREAKING: UNSC Votes to Reinstate Sanctions on Iran’s Nuclear Program<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-unsc-votes-to-reinstate-sanctions-on-iran-s-nuclear-program-1758298065665/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-unsc-votes-to-reinstate-sanctions-on-iran-s-nuclear-program-1758298065665/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Khan further alleged that Munir’s actions had worsened Pakistan’s ties with Afghanistan. He said the army chief had issued threats, expelled Afghan refugees, and even launched drone strikes to provoke conflict.&nbsp;Khan blamed the worsening economy on what he called “state oppression.” He said Pakistan was seeing record-low investment and rising debt. “In three years the national debt has doubled. Every Pakistani is now trapped in a quagmire of debt. Until a government of the people is established, it will not be possible to solve the country’s economic challenges,” he added.He also urged his party workers to mobilise for a rally in Peshawar on September 27, calling it crucial for the country’s future.

Pakistan’s former prime minister Imran Khan alleged that Gen Asim Munir’s actions had worsened Pakistan’s ties with Afghanistan. He said the army chief had issued threats, expelled Afghan refugees, and even launched drone strikes to provoke conflict.

Jailed former prime minister Imran Khan has accused Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir of inflicting “mental torture” on him and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in the Adiala Jail to “break them down” and force them into submission. Khan, 72, has been in jail for over two years in connection with multiple legal cases. He is currently imprisoned in the Adiala Jail at Rawalpindi. His wife, Bushra Bibi, was also sent to the same prison after the couple was convicted in the Al-Qadir Trust cases earlier this year. In a post shared on social media platform X, Khan said, “The mental torture being inflicted on me and (my wife) Bushra Begum in prison is being carried out by Asim Munir, and the sole purpose is to make us break down and submit.” Khan compared the alleged mistreatment to the cruelty of historical tyrants, saying, “As long as we are alive, we will not bow down before the cruelty of Yazid or the tyranny of the Pharaoh.” The former PM also accused Asim Munir of creating a climate of fear and lawlessness. “Gen Munir is using the army to create an atmosphere of lawlessness and fascism in our country. Asim Munir has left no stone unturned for the extension of his illegitimate rule for 10 years,” Khan claimed. WATCH: BREAKING: UNSC Votes to Reinstate Sanctions on Iran’s Nuclear Program https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-unsc-votes-to-reinstate-sanctions-on-iran-s-nuclear-program-1758298065665/embed Khan further alleged that Munir’s actions had worsened Pakistan’s ties with Afghanistan. He said the army chief had issued threats, expelled Afghan refugees, and even launched drone strikes to provoke conflict. Khan blamed the worsening economy on what he called “state oppression.” He said Pakistan was seeing record-low investment and rising debt. “In three years the national debt has doubled. Every Pakistani is now trapped in a quagmire of debt. Until a government of the people is established, it will not be possible to solve the country’s economic challenges,” he added. He also urged his party workers to mobilise for a rally in Peshawar on September 27, calling it crucial for the country’s future.

Pakistan’s former prime minister Imran Khan alleged that Gen. Asim Munir’s actions had worsened Pakistan’s ties with Afghanistan. He said the army chief had issued threats, expelled Afghan refugees, and even launched drone strikes to provoke conflict.

‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief

The UK's foreign intelligence service MI6 on Friday launched a "dark web portal" to try to recruit spies in Russia and around the world by offering them a secure communication channel.The "Silent Courier" portal lets anyone with access to sensitive information relating to terrorism or hostile intelligence activity to securely contact the UK, the agency said.Instructions on accessing the portal are available on the verified YouTube channel of the Secret Intelligence Service, better known as MI6."Our virtual door is open to you," outgoing MI6 chief Richard Moore said to potential spies as he launched the portal.The intelligence agency, which achieved global fame through Ian Fleming's fictional agent James Bond, advised users to utilise the secure Tor browser to access the dark web, and to use devices and email accounts not linked to themselves so as not to rouse suspicions.If Tor is banned in their country, then people are advised to utilise VPNs, added the advice, which was posted in multiple languages."As the world changes, and the threats we're facing multiply, we must ensure the UK is always one step ahead of our adversaries," said Foreign Minister Yvette Cooper."Now we're bolstering their efforts with cutting-edge tech so MI6 can recruit new spies for the UK -- in Russia and around the world," she said.Moore has previously warned that his agency had "recently uncovered a staggeringly reckless campaign of Russian sabotage in Europe" as tensions continue to deepen over the war in Ukraine.

The intelligence agency, which achieved global fame through Ian Fleming fictional agent James Bond, advised users to utilise the secure Tor browser to access the dark web, and to use devices and email accounts not linked to themselves so as not to rouse suspicions.

The UK's foreign intelligence service MI6 on Friday launched a "dark web portal" to try to recruit spies in Russia and around the world by offering them a secure communication channel. The "Silent Courier" portal lets anyone with access to sensitive information relating to terrorism or hostile intelligence activity to securely contact the UK, the agency said. Instructions on accessing the portal are available on the verified YouTube channel of the Secret Intelligence Service, better known as MI6. "Our virtual door is open to you," outgoing MI6 chief Richard Moore said to potential spies as he launched the portal. The intelligence agency, which achieved global fame through Ian Fleming's fictional agent James Bond, advised users to utilise the secure Tor browser to access the dark web, and to use devices and email accounts not linked to themselves so as not to rouse suspicions. If Tor is banned in their country, then people are advised to utilise VPNs, added the advice, which was posted in multiple languages. "As the world changes, and the threats we're facing multiply, we must ensure the UK is always one step ahead of our adversaries," said Foreign Minister Yvette Cooper. "Now we're bolstering their efforts with cutting-edge tech so MI6 can recruit new spies for the UK -- in Russia and around the world," she said. Moore has previously warned that his agency had "recently uncovered a staggeringly reckless campaign of Russian sabotage in Europe" as tensions continue to deepen over the war in Ukraine.

The intelligence agency, which achieved global fame through Ian Fleming's fictional agent James Bond, advised users to utilise the secure Tor browser to access the dark web, and to use devices and email accounts not linked to themselves so as not to rouse suspicions.

‘Our virtual door is open’: UK launches dark web portal for foreign spies. Know details

The United Nations Security Council on Friday voted not to permanently lift economic sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, which means sweeping economic sanctions will be imposed on Tehran over its nuclear programme. The move triggers the so-called snapback mechanism, meaning that all UN sanctions in place before the 2015 nuclear accord will be reimposed on Tehran by September 28 if no major deal is reached by then. The resolution to block the sanctions fell in the Security Council by a vote of four to nine, delivering a major economic blow that Tehran claims is “politically biased”.&nbsp;Russia, China, Pakistan, and Algeria voted to stop the sanctions from being reintroduced, while nine Security Council members voted against sanctions relief. Two countries abstained.&nbsp;The vote follows a 30-day process launched in late August by Britain, France, and Germany—known as the E3—to reinstate the sanctions unless Tehran meets their demands.&nbsp;<h2>Britain, France, and Germany accused Tehran of JCPOA violations</h2>&nbsp;The measures include a conventional arms embargo, restrictions on ballistic missile development, asset freezes, travel bans, and a prohibition on the transfer of nuclear-related technology. The resolution was introduced by South Korea, which is chairing the Security Council this month.&nbsp;The sanctions will further complicate the situation for Iran as it grapples with economic strain and political unrest. In a letter to the Security Council last month, Britain, France, and Germany accused Tehran of multiple violations of the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, including amassing a uranium stockpile more than 40 times the agreement's limit.&nbsp;<h2>‘Politically biased and politically motivated,’ says Iran</h2>&nbsp;Iranian officials accuse the European trio of abusing the dispute mechanism contained in the 2015 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which allows for the application of sanctions under a “snapback mechanism”.“What Europeans are doing is politically biased and politically motivated … They are wrong on different levels by trying to misuse the mechanism embedded in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA),” Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh said.The Europeans offered to delay the snapback for up to six months if Iran restored access for UN nuclear inspectors and engaged in talks with the US.Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed that Tehran had presented a “reasonable and actionable plan” and insisted Iran remains committed to the NPT.But the E3 accuse Tehran of breaching the nuclear commitments, including by building up a uranium stock to more than 40 times the level permitted under the JCPOA. The UN’s nuclear watchdog board also said in June that Iran was not respecting international nuclear safeguards.&nbsp;WATCH: Trump-Xi talks on big Ts: Tariffs, TikTok &amp; Taiwan<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-xi-talks-on-big-ts-tariffs-tiktok-taiwan-1758294337650/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-xi-talks-on-big-ts-tariffs-tiktok-taiwan-1758294337650/embed</a>&nbsp;

The sanctions will further complicate the situation for Iran as it grapples with economic strain and political unrest. In a letter to the UNSC last month, Britain, France, and Germany accused Tehran of multiple violations of the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

The United Nations Security Council on Friday voted not to permanently lift economic sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme, which means sweeping economic sanctions will be imposed on Tehran over its nuclear programme. The move triggers the so-called snapback mechanism, meaning that all UN sanctions in place before the 2015 nuclear accord will be reimposed on Tehran by September 28 if no major deal is reached by then. The resolution to block the sanctions fell in the Security Council by a vote of four to nine, delivering a major economic blow that Tehran claims is “politically biased”. Russia, China, Pakistan, and Algeria voted to stop the sanctions from being reintroduced, while nine Security Council members voted against sanctions relief. Two countries abstained. The vote follows a 30-day process launched in late August by Britain, France, and Germany—known as the E3—to reinstate the sanctions unless Tehran meets their demands. Britain, France, and Germany accused Tehran of JCPOA violations The measures include a conventional arms embargo, restrictions on ballistic missile development, asset freezes, travel bans, and a prohibition on the transfer of nuclear-related technology. The resolution was introduced by South Korea, which is chairing the Security Council this month. The sanctions will further complicate the situation for Iran as it grapples with economic strain and political unrest. In a letter to the Security Council last month, Britain, France, and Germany accused Tehran of multiple violations of the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, including amassing a uranium stockpile more than 40 times the agreement's limit. ‘Politically biased and politically motivated,’ says Iran Iranian officials accuse the European trio of abusing the dispute mechanism contained in the 2015 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which allows for the application of sanctions under a “snapback mechanism”. “What Europeans are doing is politically biased and politically motivated … They are wrong on different levels by trying to misuse the mechanism embedded in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA),” Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh said. The Europeans offered to delay the snapback for up to six months if Iran restored access for UN nuclear inspectors and engaged in talks with the US. Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi claimed that Tehran had presented a “reasonable and actionable plan” and insisted Iran remains committed to the NPT. But the E3 accuse Tehran of breaching the nuclear commitments, including by building up a uranium stock to more than 40 times the level permitted under the JCPOA. The UN’s nuclear watchdog board also said in June that Iran was not respecting international nuclear safeguards. WATCH: Trump-Xi talks on big Ts: Tariffs, TikTok & Taiwan https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-xi-talks-on-big-ts-tariffs-tiktok-taiwan-1758294337650/embed

The sanctions will further complicate the situation for Iran as it grapples with economic strain and political unrest. In a letter to the UNSC last month, Britain, France, and Germany accused Tehran of multiple violations of the deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

UNSC rejects resolution to extend relief, ‘snapback’ sanctions reimposed on Iran

The Estonian government claimed its airspace was violated by three Russian jets on Friday (September 19). The country's foreign ministry claimed that it had summoned Russia’s chargé d’affaires over the incident.&nbsp;“Russia has already violated Estonia’s airspace four times this year, which in itself is unacceptable. But today’s incursion, involving three fighter aircraft entering our airspace, is unprecedentedly brazen,” Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call</a>&nbsp;Three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets entered Estonian airspace over the Gulf of Finland without permission, and remained there for a total of 12 minutes, the ministry said.“Russia’s increasingly extensive testing of boundaries and growing aggressiveness must be met with a swift increase in political and economic pressure," the ministry added.&nbsp;“The fighter jets did not have flight plans, and their transponders were switched off. At the time of the airspace violation, the fighter jets did not have two-way radio communication with Estonian air traffic control,” it added.&nbsp;&nbsp;Reacting to this, the EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas accused Moscow of an “extremely dangerous provocation”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call</a>&nbsp;Kallas, a former Estonian prime minister, warned on X that the latest Russian violation on NATO's eastern rim "further escalates tensions in the region", adding that “the EU stands in full solidarity with Estonia.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-asim-munir-trying-to-make-us-break-down-imran-khan-alleges-mental-torture-on-self-wife-by-pak-army-chief-1758297971366">‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief</a>&nbsp;This came after Russian drones were allegedly violating the Polish and Romanian airspace earlier this month. Not just this, at the beginning of this month, the European Union's Chief Ursula von Der Leyen's plane's GPS system was hit by a radar jamming, and a Russian operation was suspected behind it.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year">Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year</a>

The Estonian government claimed its airspace was violated by three Russian jets on Friday (September 19). The foreign ministry claimed that it had summoned Russia’s chargé d’affaires over the incident.



The Estonian government claimed its airspace was violated by three Russian jets on Friday (September 19). The country's foreign ministry claimed that it had summoned Russia’s chargé d’affaires over the incident. “Russia has already violated Estonia’s airspace four times this year, which in itself is unacceptable. But today’s incursion, involving three fighter aircraft entering our airspace, is unprecedentedly brazen,” Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said. Also read: Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call Three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets entered Estonian airspace over the Gulf of Finland without permission, and remained there for a total of 12 minutes, the ministry said. “Russia’s increasingly extensive testing of boundaries and growing aggressiveness must be met with a swift increase in political and economic pressure," the ministry added. “The fighter jets did not have flight plans, and their transponders were switched off. At the time of the airspace violation, the fighter jets did not have two-way radio communication with Estonian air traffic control,” it added. Reacting to this, the EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas accused Moscow of an “extremely dangerous provocation” Also read: Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call Kallas, a former Estonian prime minister, warned on X that the latest Russian violation on NATO's eastern rim "further escalates tensions in the region", adding that “the EU stands in full solidarity with Estonia.” Also read: ‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief This came after Russian drones were allegedly violating the Polish and Romanian airspace earlier this month. Not just this, at the beginning of this month, the European Union's Chief Ursula von Der Leyen's plane's GPS system was hit by a radar jamming, and a Russian operation was suspected behind it. Also read: Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year

The Estonian government claimed its airspace was violated by three Russian jets on Friday (September 19). The country's foreign ministry claimed that it had summoned Russia’s chargé d’affaires over the incident.&nbsp;

Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year

Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas has been allowed to address the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) via video meeting after the US denied him a visa. The decision came on Friday (September 19).&nbsp;"The State of Palestine may submit a pre-recorded statement of its President, which will be played in the General Assembly Hall," the UNSC said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call</a>&nbsp;The decision was made under a resolution, adopted in a 145 to 5 vote with six countries abstaining, &nbsp;expresses concern and regret over the US decision to ban 80 top PA officials, and suggests that the US may have violated the UN Headquarters Agreement.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call</a>&nbsp;The resolution said that Abbas will be allowed to send a pre-recorded video statement to that conference, along with any sessions of the UN General Assembly’s subsequent high-level week during which leaders of countries around the world traditionally address the body.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year">Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year</a>&nbsp;What was India's stance?&nbsp;&nbsp;India voted in favour of Abbas to deliver a virtual address next week after the Trump administration cancelled his visa. The measure passed with 145 nations supporting it, while 5 countries (Israel, the United States, Palau, Paraguay, and Nauru) opposed it, and 6 abstained from voting.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-asim-munir-trying-to-make-us-break-down-imran-khan-alleges-mental-torture-on-self-wife-by-pak-army-chief-1758297971366">‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas has been allowed to address the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) via video meeting after the US denied him a visa. The decision came on Friday (September 19).



Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas has been allowed to address the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) via video meeting after the US denied him a visa. The decision came on Friday (September 19). "The State of Palestine may submit a pre-recorded statement of its President, which will be played in the General Assembly Hall," the UNSC said. Also read: Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call The decision was made under a resolution, adopted in a 145 to 5 vote with six countries abstaining, expresses concern and regret over the US decision to ban 80 top PA officials, and suggests that the US may have violated the UN Headquarters Agreement. Also read: Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call The resolution said that Abbas will be allowed to send a pre-recorded video statement to that conference, along with any sessions of the UN General Assembly’s subsequent high-level week during which leaders of countries around the world traditionally address the body. Also read: Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year What was India's stance? India voted in favour of Abbas to deliver a virtual address next week after the Trump administration cancelled his visa. The measure passed with 145 nations supporting it, while 5 countries (Israel, the United States, Palau, Paraguay, and Nauru) opposed it, and 6 abstained from voting. Also read: ‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief

Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas has been allowed to address the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) via video meeting after the US denied him a visa. The decision came on Friday (September 19).&nbsp;

Palestinian President Abbas to address UN assembly via video after US denies visa

The UK deported the first person, an Indian, under its new immigration scheme and a treaty with France. The man, whose identity has not been disclosed yet, entered the country illegally on a small boat across the English Channel in August, the UK Home Office said. UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood hailed the deportation as a landmark move in the government’s effort to curb illegal migration, saying, “This is an important first step to securing our borders. It sends a message to people crossing in small boats: if you enter the UK illegally, we will seek to remove you."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-asim-munir-trying-to-make-us-break-down-imran-khan-alleges-mental-torture-on-self-wife-by-pak-army-chief-1758297971366">‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief</a>&nbsp;“I will continue to challenge any last-minute, vexatious attempts to frustrate a removal in the courts. The UK will always play its part in helping those genuinely fleeing persecution, but this must be done through safe, legal, and managed routes – not dangerous crossings," she added.&nbsp;The British government is expected to offer the deported man a paid-for voluntary return to India. Under the scheme, he cannot apply for asylum in the UK and could face enforced deportation if he does not accept the voluntary return option.&nbsp;This came amid a rising surge in &nbsp;Indian nationals being detained under the UK’s immigration crackdown.&nbsp;Trade Secretary Peter Kyle told BBC Breakfast this week's removals were "the first steps and we will be ramping up from here". But he refused to comment on how many people the UK hoped to remove, saying: "We're not going to put a number that would cap our ability to get a grip on this situation."&nbsp;"Hundreds of illegal immigrants crossed the Channel today alone and Labour want applause for removing just two - both of whom will be replaced," he added.&nbsp;

The British government is expected to offer the deported man a paid-for voluntary return to India. Under the scheme, he cannot apply for asylum in the UK and could face enforced deportation if he does not accept the voluntary return option.

The UK deported the first person, an Indian, under its new immigration scheme and a treaty with France. The man, whose identity has not been disclosed yet, entered the country illegally on a small boat across the English Channel in August, the UK Home Office said. UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood hailed the deportation as a landmark move in the government’s effort to curb illegal migration, saying, “This is an important first step to securing our borders. It sends a message to people crossing in small boats: if you enter the UK illegally, we will seek to remove you." Also read: ‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief “I will continue to challenge any last-minute, vexatious attempts to frustrate a removal in the courts. The UK will always play its part in helping those genuinely fleeing persecution, but this must be done through safe, legal, and managed routes – not dangerous crossings," she added. The British government is expected to offer the deported man a paid-for voluntary return to India. Under the scheme, he cannot apply for asylum in the UK and could face enforced deportation if he does not accept the voluntary return option. This came amid a rising surge in Indian nationals being detained under the UK’s immigration crackdown. Trade Secretary Peter Kyle told BBC Breakfast this week's removals were "the first steps and we will be ramping up from here". But he refused to comment on how many people the UK hoped to remove, saying: "We're not going to put a number that would cap our ability to get a grip on this situation." "Hundreds of illegal immigrants crossed the Channel today alone and Labour want applause for removing just two - both of whom will be replaced," he added.

The British government is expected to offer the deported man a paid-for voluntary return to India. Under the scheme, he cannot apply for asylum in the UK and could face enforced deportation if he does not accept the voluntary return option.

UK deports Indian man, first under new immigration scheme. Details inside

For decades, NATO’s ‘nuclear sharing’ arrangements have placed United States tactical nuclear weapons on allied soil. Five European nations have long been acknowledged as hosts, Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey. In recent years, reports have suggested that the United Kingdom may once again be hosting American nuclear weapons, bringing the total to six. This quiet but consequential practice remains central to debates over alliance security, sovereignty, and non-proliferation.&nbsp;<h2>Where the weapons are stored</h2>&nbsp;The weapons involved are US B61 gravity bombs, deployed in secure vaults at allied air bases. Belgium hosts them at Kleine Brogel, Germany at Büchel, Italy at both Aviano and Ghedi, the Netherlands at Volkel, and Turkey at Incirlik. The estimated stockpile across these locations is about 100 warheads, though precise figures are never publicly confirmed. In 2025, reports indicated that the United Kingdom, which had ended its hosting role in 2008, may once again be included, reintroducing American warheads at a Royal Air Force base.&nbsp;Canada hosted weapons under the control of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), rather than NATO, until 1984, and Greece until 2001.&nbsp;Although these weapons sit on foreign soil, they remain under the control and custody of the United States at all times. The bombs are fitted with safety and security devices that prevent unauthorised use. Host-nation air forces, however, maintain dual-capable aircraft and train for the possibility of delivering the weapons in the event of a conflict. This arrangement extends Washington’s nuclear deterrent to its European allies while giving those countries a direct role in nuclear planning, without transferring actual ownership or control of the weapons.&nbsp;<h2>Oversight and controversy</h2>&nbsp;The practice has been controversial since its inception. Supporters argue that nuclear sharing demonstrates solidarity within NATO and deters adversaries by extending the US nuclear umbrella to Europe. Critics counter that it undermines global non-proliferation efforts, since it places nuclear weapons in countries that are officially non-nuclear under international treaties. Transparency is limited: exact numbers, storage conditions, and operational readiness are kept secret, and no international body directly monitors the deployments.&nbsp;Today, six nations are understood to host US nuclear weapons under NATO arrangements. For Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, and possibly once more the United Kingdom, the role comes with both reassurance and risk.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Although these weapons sit on foreign soil, they remain under the control and custody of the United States at all times. The bombs are fitted with safety and security devices that prevent unauthorised use.

For decades, NATO’s ‘nuclear sharing’ arrangements have placed United States tactical nuclear weapons on allied soil. Five European nations have long been acknowledged as hosts, Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey. In recent years, reports have suggested that the United Kingdom may once again be hosting American nuclear weapons, bringing the total to six. This quiet but consequential practice remains central to debates over alliance security, sovereignty, and non-proliferation. Where the weapons are stored The weapons involved are US B61 gravity bombs, deployed in secure vaults at allied air bases. Belgium hosts them at Kleine Brogel, Germany at Büchel, Italy at both Aviano and Ghedi, the Netherlands at Volkel, and Turkey at Incirlik. The estimated stockpile across these locations is about 100 warheads, though precise figures are never publicly confirmed. In 2025, reports indicated that the United Kingdom, which had ended its hosting role in 2008, may once again be included, reintroducing American warheads at a Royal Air Force base. Canada hosted weapons under the control of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), rather than NATO, until 1984, and Greece until 2001. Although these weapons sit on foreign soil, they remain under the control and custody of the United States at all times. The bombs are fitted with safety and security devices that prevent unauthorised use. Host-nation air forces, however, maintain dual-capable aircraft and train for the possibility of delivering the weapons in the event of a conflict. This arrangement extends Washington’s nuclear deterrent to its European allies while giving those countries a direct role in nuclear planning, without transferring actual ownership or control of the weapons. Oversight and controversy The practice has been controversial since its inception. Supporters argue that nuclear sharing demonstrates solidarity within NATO and deters adversaries by extending the US nuclear umbrella to Europe. Critics counter that it undermines global non-proliferation efforts, since it places nuclear weapons in countries that are officially non-nuclear under international treaties. Transparency is limited: exact numbers, storage conditions, and operational readiness are kept secret, and no international body directly monitors the deployments. Today, six nations are understood to host US nuclear weapons under NATO arrangements. For Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, and possibly once more the United Kingdom, the role comes with both reassurance and risk.

Although these weapons sit on foreign soil, they remain under the control and custody of the United States at all times. The bombs are fitted with safety and security devices that prevent unauthorised use.

How many NATO allies host America’s nuclear weapons today?

A top Lashkar-e-Taiba commander has admitted that the Markaz Taiba terror camp in Muridke, in Pakistan’s Punjab province, was destroyed in India’s Operation Sindoor on May 7, contradicting Pakistan’s claims till now and confirming that India’s precision strikes hit the intended target. The Muridke camp is the headquarters of the LeT in Pakistan. In a video that has gone viral on social media, LeT commander Qaasim is seen standing amidst the rubble of the erstwhile camp in Muridke while two excavators are seen working in the background. Qaasim also admitted that many ‘big’ terrorists, whom he called Mujahideen, got trained in the camp and achieved ‘faiz’, thereby validating and justifying India’s precision strike on the camp, said a Hindustan Times report.&nbsp;“I am standing in front of the Markaz Taiba in Muridke... It was destroyed in the attack [during Operation Sindoor]. We will be rebuilding it and making it even bigger... From here, big names in the Mujahideen got trained here and achieved Faiz [Victory],” he said in the video.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🚨 🇵🇰👺 After Jaish commander ilyas kashmiri now Lashkar-e-Taiba Commander Qaasim has torn apart Pakistan’s lies on Muridke terror camps. 👉 Standing in front of the demolished Markaz E Taiba camp, which destroyed in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/OperationSindoor?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#OperationSindoor</a>, he admits that many terrorists… <a href="https://t.co/S80p9wLSFy">pic.twitter.com/S80p9wLSFy</a>&mdash; OsintTV 📺 (@OsintTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/OsintTV/status/1968865125567226361?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Qaasim’s admission comes just days after Jaish-e-Mohammed commander Ilyas Kashmiri made similar remarks about the destruction of JeM’s Bahawalpur base and added that India’s air strikes had ‘torn apart’ group chief Masood Azhar’s family.The LeT commander’s admission on camera contradicts the denials by Pakistan’s authorities so far and confirms that the Markaz-e-Taiba was indeed destroyed in Operation Sindoor. WION could not verify the authenticity of the social media video.&nbsp;<h2>Lashkar’s Qaasim urges young to join Daura-e-Suffa training</h2>&nbsp;In another video, Qaasim is seen urging young people to join the Daura-e-Suffa training programme, and highlighting the significance of Markaz-e-Taiba. He said the training programme includes basic combat training and jihadi indoctrination, further exposing the real purpose of the camp.Markaz Taiba was established in Muridke in the year 2000 and is the most crucial training centre of LeT in Pakistan. The complex holds arms and physical training facilities, as well as dawa’h and radicalisation for terror entities, both from within Pakistan and abroad.&nbsp;<h2>Who is funding the reconstruction of LeT’s headquarters?</h2>&nbsp;An earlier report by ANI news agency, citing intelligence inputs, said that Pakistan is directly funding the reconstruction of the LeT headquarters Markaz-e-Taiba in Muridke.It said LeT has already been allocated PKR 4 crore by the government, while the estimated total cost of the reconstruction will be around PKR 15 crore.A dossier prepared by agencies said, “LeT cadres have launched fundraising campaigns under the guise of “flood relief”, repeating a historical pattern where humanitarian aid was diverted to terror infrastructure. In 2005, nearly 80% of earthquake relief funds collected by LeT’s front, Jamaat-ud-Dawa, were channelled into building militant camps.”&nbsp;WATCH: Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov Slams US, Says Threats to India And China Won't Work | WION<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-foreign-minister-lavrov-slams-us-says-threats-to-india-and-china-won-t-work-wion-1758283536601/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russian-foreign-minister-lavrov-slams-us-says-threats-to-india-and-china-won-t-work-wion-1758283536601/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;India had launched precision strikes on the key strongholds of Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba under Operation Sindoor on May 7 in retaliation for the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed 26 innocent lives.

Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Qaasim’s admission comes just days after Jaish-e-Mohammed commander Ilyas Kashmiri made similar remarks about the destruction of JeM’s Bahawalpur base and added that India’s air strikes had ‘torn apart’ group chief Masood Azhar’s family.

A top Lashkar-e-Taiba commander has admitted that the Markaz Taiba terror camp in Muridke, in Pakistan’s Punjab province, was destroyed in India’s Operation Sindoor on May 7, contradicting Pakistan’s claims till now and confirming that India’s precision strikes hit the intended target. The Muridke camp is the headquarters of the LeT in Pakistan. In a video that has gone viral on social media, LeT commander Qaasim is seen standing amidst the rubble of the erstwhile camp in Muridke while two excavators are seen working in the background. Qaasim also admitted that many ‘big’ terrorists, whom he called Mujahideen, got trained in the camp and achieved ‘faiz’, thereby validating and justifying India’s precision strike on the camp, said a Hindustan Times report. “I am standing in front of the Markaz Taiba in Muridke... It was destroyed in the attack [during Operation Sindoor]. We will be rebuilding it and making it even bigger... From here, big names in the Mujahideen got trained here and achieved Faiz [Victory],” he said in the video.

Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Qaasim’s admission comes just days after Jaish-e-Mohammed commander Ilyas Kashmiri made similar remarks about the destruction of JeM’s Bahawalpur base and added that India’s air strikes had ‘torn apart’ group chief Masood Azhar’s family.

Lashkar commander confirms Indian strikes wrecked Muridke terror camp in Pakistan

Pakistan’s defence minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif has said the country’s nuclear capability could be extended ('will be made available') to Saudi Arabia under a newly signed mutual defence pact, in what can be described as an explicit acknowledgement that Islamabad has placed the kingdom under its nuclear umbrella.&nbsp;Speaking in an interview with Geo TV on Thursday night, Khawaja Asif responded to a question about whether 'the deterrence that Pakistan gets from nuclear weapons' will be made available to Saudi Arabia.&nbsp;“Let me make one point clear about Pakistan’s nuclear capability: that capability was established long ago when we conducted tests. Since then, we have forces trained for the battlefield. What we have, and the capabilities we possess, will be made available to (Saudi Arabia) according to this agreement,” Asif responded, according to a report by the Associated Press (AP).&nbsp;<h2>A historic pact between longstanding allies</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>On Wednesday, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a mutual defence treaty in Riyadh, attended by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir. The pact has a NATO Article 5-like provision that stipulates that “any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both,” effectively binding the two militaries closer together.&nbsp;The pact is seen as a deepening of a decades-long relationship. Saudi Arabia has long been linked to Pakistan’s nuclear programme, with retired Brigadier General Feroz Hassan Khan noting that Riyadh provided significant financial support that sustained nuclear development during periods when Pakistan was under international sanctions.&nbsp;<h2>Regional implications and Israel factor</h2>&nbsp;Analysts view the timing of the pact as significant, following Israeli strikes in Qatar that killed senior Hamas leaders. The move is widely seen as a message to Israel, long regarded as the Middle East’s only nuclear-armed state, though never officially declared as such.&nbsp;Pakistan’s arsenal is estimated at around 170 warheads, close to India’s 180, according to the latest data. Its Shaheen-III ballistic missile, capable of carrying nuclear or conventional warheads, has a range of 2,750 kilometres, enough to reach Israel.&nbsp;The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which maintains monitoring agreements with both Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, has not publicly commented on the implications of the pact. Asif, however, used his interview to criticise Israel for never formally disclosing its nuclear arsenal to the IAEA.&nbsp;The announcement comes as Gulf Arab states increasingly question the reliability of the United States as a long-term security guarantor.&nbsp;

Speaking in an interview with Geo TV on Thursday night, Defence Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif responded to a question about whether “the deterrence that Pakistan gets from nuclear weapons” will be made available to Saudi Arabia.

Pakistan’s defence minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif has said the country’s nuclear capability could be extended ('will be made available') to Saudi Arabia under a newly signed mutual defence pact, in what can be described as an explicit acknowledgement that Islamabad has placed the kingdom under its nuclear umbrella. Speaking in an interview with Geo TV on Thursday night, Khawaja Asif responded to a question about whether 'the deterrence that Pakistan gets from nuclear weapons' will be made available to Saudi Arabia. “Let me make one point clear about Pakistan’s nuclear capability: that capability was established long ago when we conducted tests. Since then, we have forces trained for the battlefield. What we have, and the capabilities we possess, will be made available to (Saudi Arabia) according to this agreement,” Asif responded, according to a report by the Associated Press (AP). A historic pact between longstanding allies On Wednesday, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan signed a mutual defence treaty in Riyadh, attended by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir. The pact has a NATO Article 5-like provision that stipulates that “any aggression against either country shall be considered an aggression against both,” effectively binding the two militaries closer together. The pact is seen as a deepening of a decades-long relationship. Saudi Arabia has long been linked to Pakistan’s nuclear programme, with retired Brigadier General Feroz Hassan Khan noting that Riyadh provided significant financial support that sustained nuclear development during periods when Pakistan was under international sanctions. Regional implications and Israel factor Analysts view the timing of the pact as significant, following Israeli strikes in Qatar that killed senior Hamas leaders. The move is widely seen as a message to Israel, long regarded as the Middle East’s only nuclear-armed state, though never officially declared as such. Pakistan’s arsenal is estimated at around 170 warheads, close to India’s 180, according to the latest data. Its Shaheen-III ballistic missile, capable of carrying nuclear or conventional warheads, has a range of 2,750 kilometres, enough to reach Israel. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which maintains monitoring agreements with both Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, has not publicly commented on the implications of the pact. Asif, however, used his interview to criticise Israel for never formally disclosing its nuclear arsenal to the IAEA. The announcement comes as Gulf Arab states increasingly question the reliability of the United States as a long-term security guarantor.

Speaking in an interview with Geo TV on Thursday night, Defence Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif responded to a question about whether “the deterrence that Pakistan gets from nuclear weapons” will be made available to Saudi Arabia.

'Will be made available..': Pak says its nuclear arsenal could be extended to Saudi Arabia under new defence pact

Late-night comedy hosts took jabs at US President Donald Trump a day after Jimmy Kimmel’s show was suspended following his comments about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. ABC pulled the plug on Kimmel’s show on Wednesday following his remarks on Monday and Tuesday’s episodes about Kirk’s assassination. In a show of solidarity, several late-night comedy hosts like Jimmy Fallon, Stephen Colbert, and Jon Stewart took to their own shows to react to the move, mocking the US President, who had celebrated the suspension.&nbsp;<h2>‘How dare you, sir!’</h2>&nbsp;Jon Stewart returned to The Daily Show and claimed that the program was ‘government-approved’. He referred to Trump as ‘Our Great Father’ and ‘Dear Leader’ and even joked about Trump’s recent visit to the United Kingdom. Stewart played a clip of a reporter’s question about Kimmel and whether free speech was under attack in America.&nbsp;“How dare you, sir! How dare you, sir!” Stewart bellowed. “What outfit are you with, sir, the Antifa-Herald Tribune?”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Jon Stewart’s first monologue since Jimmy Kimmel was fired: <a href="https://t.co/T1HkIgfViQ">pic.twitter.com/T1HkIgfViQ</a>&mdash; Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) <a href="https://twitter.com/SpencerHakimian/status/1968901205385412850?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;When the audience booed, Stewart, in a panic, tried to shush them. A group of correspondents delivered a message in unison and showered the president with over-the-top praise, pretending that they lived in a dictatorship.<h2>Stephen Colbert defends Kimmel</h2>&nbsp;Host Stephen Colbert, whose Late Night show was cancelled last month by CBS said he stands with Kimmel and his staff.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🚨NEW: Stephen Colbert&#39;s opening tonight will forever be remembered as one of the most powerful moments of late-night comedy in modern history. This is a must-watch. Damn. 🔥 <a href="https://t.co/9jpKKMIcyx">pic.twitter.com/9jpKKMIcyx</a>&mdash; CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) <a href="https://twitter.com/CalltoActivism/status/1968892158104015243?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"That is blatant censorship, and it always starts small," Colbert said, and he referred to the administration's effort to rename the Gulf of Mexico. "And if ABC thinks this is going to satisfy the regime, they are woefully naive."&nbsp;Colbert’s show was cancelled as the channel cited financial reasons. However, most felt Trump had a role to play as Colbert was well known for openly criticizing the President.<h2>Jimmy Fallon reacts</h2>On NBC, host Jimmy Fallon cracked a couple of jokes on Thursday's episode of The Tonight Show and then became serious for a moment.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Jimmy reacts to ABC’s decision to suspend <a href="https://twitter.com/jimmykimmel?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JimmyKimmel</a> after pressure from the FCC, leaving everyone thinking WTF? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FallonTonight?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#FallonTonight</a> <a href="https://t.co/v5wLrPEAOM">pic.twitter.com/v5wLrPEAOM</a>&mdash; The Tonight Show (@FallonTonight) <a href="https://twitter.com/FallonTonight/status/1968882413410414801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

“To be honest with you all, I don’t know what’s going on. And no one does,” he said. “But I do know Jimmy Kimmel, and he’s a decent, funny and loving guy, and I hope he comes back.”

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/has-jimmy-kimmel-been-asked-by-abc-to-apologise-and-donate-to-charlie-kirk-s-family-post-remarks-on-show-1758251384622">Has Jimmy Kimmel been asked to apologise and donate to Charlie Kirk's family?</a>&nbsp;Fallon then declared that the show would not be censored and later described Trump’s UK visit with a voice-over dubbing only positive messages.<h2>Disney suspends Jimmy Kimmel’s show</h2>Disney said Wednesday it was suspending “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” after Kimmel made comments about the person charged in conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s assassination.“We hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it,” Kimmel said during his monologue Monday night.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/jimmy-kimmel-late-show-suspension-marvel-star-tatiana-maslany-ben-stiller-and-other-celebs-react-to-the-cancellation-over-charlie-kirk-remarks-1758269711287">Jimmy Kimmel late-show suspension: Marvel star Tatiana Maslany, Ben Stiller and other celebs react to the cancellation over Charlie Kirk remarks</a>&nbsp;Kirk was fatally shot at a Utah university on Sept. 10 by a gunman who fired from a rooftop, officials said.&nbsp;The move has left social media divided. Kirk’s killing itself has sparked online debate with right blaming the left and calling for retribution.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Trump has suggested that action could be taken against other networks which host late-night shows.&nbsp;"If they’re 97% against, they give me only bad publicity, or press — I mean, they’re getting a license. I would think maybe their license should be taken away," Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Thursday.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-vs-kimmel-trump-hails-jimmy-kimmel-show-cancellation-as-great-news-for-america-1758271817200/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-vs-kimmel-trump-hails-jimmy-kimmel-show-cancellation-as-great-news-for-america-1758271817200/embed</a>&nbsp;Kimmel’s suspension has sparked online criticism. Former President Barack Obama and legendary late-night talk show host David Letterman, and other celebrities have criticized the decision as an attack on free speech.&nbsp;

As Jimmy Kimmel's show was pulled off air by ABC, several late-night hosts took sly dig at US President Donald Trump on their show on Thursday. Kimmel's suspension has led to widespread criticism on social media for Trump administration. 

Late-night comedy hosts took jabs at US President Donald Trump a day after Jimmy Kimmel’s show was suspended following his comments about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. ABC pulled the plug on Kimmel’s show on Wednesday following his remarks on Monday and Tuesday’s episodes about Kirk’s assassination. In a show of solidarity, several late-night comedy hosts like Jimmy Fallon, Stephen Colbert, and Jon Stewart took to their own shows to react to the move, mocking the US President, who had celebrated the suspension. ‘How dare you, sir!’ Jon Stewart returned to The Daily Show and claimed that the program was ‘government-approved’. He referred to Trump as ‘Our Great Father’ and ‘Dear Leader’ and even joked about Trump’s recent visit to the United Kingdom. Stewart played a clip of a reporter’s question about Kimmel and whether free speech was under attack in America. “How dare you, sir! How dare you, sir!” Stewart bellowed. “What outfit are you with, sir, the Antifa-Herald Tribune?”

As Jimmy Kimmel's show was pulled off air by ABC, several late-night hosts took sly dig at US President Donald Trump on their show on Thursday. Kimmel's suspension has led to widespread criticism on social media for Trump administration.&nbsp;

‘How Dare You Sir!’ Late-night hosts Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Fallon take jabs at Trump as Jimmy Kimmel is suspended by ABC

The Danish Armed Forces led NATO's Arctic Light 2025 without the US from September 9 to September 19. The drill combined 550 military personnel from Denmark and NATO allies. Russia has condemned the operations. Russian ambassador to Denmark, Vladimir Barbin, said that the Danes are persistently strengthening their military presence and are being pushed to strengthen their role in the security of Europe. Russia has called the Arctic light a direct security threat and a direct counter to Russia's Zapad. &nbsp;The drill is NATO's attempt to gain independent control of the security of the Arctic, as the United States continue to threaten the sovereignty of Greenland. The move to not invite the US military coincides with the months of tension with the US on the island.&nbsp;<h2>Arctic Light 2025</h2>Arctic Light 2025 was a 10-day military drill that was led by Denmark, along with participation from Norway, Sweden, France, and Germany. It had a mixture of naval, land, air and special forces drills. There were Danish frigates HDMS Niels Juel and fighter jets like F-16, a French naval vessel, Multi Role Tanker Transport and Mountain Infantry equipped with drones. Germany, Sweden and Norway contributed with army personnel. There were live firing drills, special operations and sea rescue operations to increase the interoperability of the forces.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🇩🇰 F-16s fly from Greenland, refuelled by a 🇫🇷 MRTT, proving Allied airpower reaches across the High North. Exercise Arctic Light 25 trains 🇩🇰🇫🇷🇸🇪🇳🇴🇩🇪 forces together - boosting readiness, air interoperability &amp; Arctic security. 🔗 Read more: <a href="https://t.co/VkxEdufqPC">https://t.co/VkxEdufqPC</a> <a href="https://t.co/2Vn98PCtf5">pic.twitter.com/2Vn98PCtf5</a>&mdash; NATO Air Command (@NATO_AIRCOM) <a href="https://twitter.com/NATO_AIRCOM/status/1968685057494692272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 18, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Denmark's growing wariness of Russia</h2>The Arctic Light 2025 had signs of the NATO-Russia military fortification along the Baltic to Arctic frontier.&nbsp;“I think it’s fair to say that Russia has built up in the Arctic for the last 20 years, and Russia is a regional superpower in the Arctic," said Maj. Gen. Søren Andersen to Associated Press.&nbsp;Denmark perceives Russia as a threat, and when the war in Ukraine ends, "I think most of us working in this business ... think that Russia will start building up again in other places and use their resources not in Ukraine, but other places in the world,” said Andersen.&nbsp;The present war between Russia and Ukraine is limited to Eastern Europe, but it could escalate to the Arctic at any moment. Russia has repeatedly accused Europe of pressuring the US President to take military action in Ukraine. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that any deployment of NATO forces would be considered an occupation and would sabotage the peace process.&nbsp;<h2>Why was the US not invited?</h2>US President Donald Trump has repeatedly asserted that he wants to take control of Greenland and will not rule out taking control of the island by military force. The semiautonomous mineral-rich region of Greenland is a territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. Both Denmark and Greenland have said that the island is not for sale. In August, Denmark summoned US diplomats in Copenhagen for a dressing down after reports of covert operations by the US to influence Greenland.&nbsp;The Arctic Light 2025 did not have any US military personnel in it. Denmark maintains US is a friendly nation, and it has asked Pete Hegseth to be present for the drill. But no invitation for the US military hints at the growing dissatisfaction within Denmark with the US authority over Greenland.“We have worked together with the U.S. for decades, both in exercises and also operations in Afghanistan, Iraq and so on,” said Andersen. So it will be the same this week. US and Denmark pilots will have a joint operation later in the week United States’ Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland.&nbsp;

Denmark led NATO’s Arctic Light 2025 drill without US forces. Russia calls it a direct threat, as tensions grow over Greenland’s sovereignty.

The Danish Armed Forces led NATO's Arctic Light 2025 without the US from September 9 to September 19. The drill combined 550 military personnel from Denmark and NATO allies. Russia has condemned the operations. Russian ambassador to Denmark, Vladimir Barbin, said that the Danes are persistently strengthening their military presence and are being pushed to strengthen their role in the security of Europe. Russia has called the Arctic light a direct security threat and a direct counter to Russia's Zapad. The drill is NATO's attempt to gain independent control of the security of the Arctic, as the United States continue to threaten the sovereignty of Greenland. The move to not invite the US military coincides with the months of tension with the US on the island. Arctic Light 2025 Arctic Light 2025 was a 10-day military drill that was led by Denmark, along with participation from Norway, Sweden, France, and Germany. It had a mixture of naval, land, air and special forces drills. There were Danish frigates HDMS Niels Juel and fighter jets like F-16, a French naval vessel, Multi Role Tanker Transport and Mountain Infantry equipped with drones. Germany, Sweden and Norway contributed with army personnel. There were live firing drills, special operations and sea rescue operations to increase the interoperability of the forces.

Denmark led NATO’s Arctic Light 2025 drill without US forces. Russia calls it a direct threat, as tensions grow over Greenland’s sovereignty.

Russia condemns Denmark led NATO’s Arctic Light 2025 without US amid tensions over Greenland

US President Donald Trump said on Friday after his phone call that Chinese President Xi Jinping approved a deal that would allow TikTok to continue its operations in the US. He also said that he will travel to China in early 2026, and that his phone call with XI was “very productive". Trump said they made progress on a wide range of issues during the call, including trade, fentanyl trafficking, the ongoing war in Ukraine, and approval of a deal to keep TikTok operating in the United States. “I just completed a very productive call with President Xi of China. We made progress on many very important issues including Trade, Fentanyl, the need to bring the War between Russia and Ukraine to an end, and the approval of the TikTok Deal," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. However, Trump did not share any details of the TikTok deal. The Chinese-owned short-video app TikTok faced a ban in the US unless its parent company ByteDance sells its American assets.&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;The call between Trump and Xi began at 8 am, a White House official said.&nbsp;Trump added that he and Xi agreed to meet in person at the APEC summit in South Korea later this year and discussed plans for state visits. Trump shared that he will travel to China in early 2026 and Xi Jinping will visit the United States at a later date.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<h2>China, US were allies in WWII, Xi reminds Trump in ‘pragmatic, positive and constructive’ call</h2>&nbsp;China and the United States can achieve mutual success and shared prosperity, benefiting both countries and the world, Chinese President Xi Jinping told President Trump, while calling their phone conversation ‘pragmatic, positive and constructive’. In the call, Xi said the two countries should make joint efforts to achieve mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation.&nbsp;&nbsp;Xi said that China and the United States were allies who fought side by side during World War II. He added that the Chinese people will never forget the valuable support provided by the United States and other anti-fascist allies to China’s War of Resistance against Japanese aggression.&nbsp;Xi called on the two sides to honour the fallen heroes, remember history, cherish peace and open up the future.&nbsp;He also said that the US should avoid taking unilateral trade restrictions to prevent undermining the achievements made by both sides through multiple rounds of consultations.&nbsp;He called on the US side to provide an open, fair and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese enterprises to invest in the country.&nbsp;The last known call between the two leaders took place in early June and also focused on trade relations. It was the first call since Trump returned to the White House in January. Trump later claimed that the more than hour-long discussion resulted in a “very positive conclusion” for both the countries.&nbsp;Days later, top US and Chinese officials followed up with a meeting in London, where they agreed on a “framework” to de-escalate trade tensions, including lower tariff rates between the two states and resumption of the flow of rare earth minerals from China to US firms.

Trump's call with Chinese leader Xi Jinping is likely to try to finalize a deal to keep TikTok operating in the United States and discuss the trade war between the two countries. The call could also set the stage for an in-person meeting between the two leaders.

US President Donald Trump said on Friday after his phone call that Chinese President Xi Jinping approved a deal that would allow TikTok to continue its operations in the US. He also said that he will travel to China in early 2026, and that his phone call with XI was “very productive". Trump said they made progress on a wide range of issues during the call, including trade, fentanyl trafficking, the ongoing war in Ukraine, and approval of a deal to keep TikTok operating in the United States. “I just completed a very productive call with President Xi of China. We made progress on many very important issues including Trade, Fentanyl, the need to bring the War between Russia and Ukraine to an end, and the approval of the TikTok Deal," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. However, Trump did not share any details of the TikTok deal. The Chinese-owned short-video app TikTok faced a ban in the US unless its parent company ByteDance sells its American assets.

Trump's call with Chinese leader Xi Jinping is likely to try to finalize a deal to keep TikTok operating in the United States and discuss the trade war between the two countries. The call could also set the stage for an in-person meeting between the two leaders.

Trump to visit China early next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in ‘very productive’ phone call

The Taliban government in Afghanistan has banned 680 books, 140 books written by women from the universities, claiming that they are "anti-Sharia" and "anti-Taliban". The ban is also applicable to books on human rights and sexual harassment. It was first reported by the BBC, which cited officials on Friday (September 19). One of the banned books has the title, "Safety in the Chemical Laboratory".&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-asim-munir-trying-to-make-us-break-down-imran-khan-alleges-mental-torture-on-self-wife-by-pak-army-chief-1758297971366">‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief</a>&nbsp;The universities were further told they were no longer allowed to teach 18 subjects, with a Taliban official saying they were "in conflict with the principles of Sharia and the system's policy", the British outlet reported.&nbsp;“All books authored by women are not allowed to be taught," a Taliban official told BBC Afghan.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call</a>&nbsp;Among the banned books, six are specifically about women, including Gender and Development, The Role of Women in Communication, and Women's Sociology. The Taliban government has said it respects women's rights in accordance with their interpretation of Afghan culture and Islamic law.&nbsp;Zakia Adeli, the former deputy minister of justice before the Taliban’s return in August 2021 and author of Political Terminology and International Relations, one of the banned books, told BBC Afghan that she was unsurprised by the move.&nbsp;“Considering what the Taliban have done over the past four years, it was not far-fetched to expect them to impose changes on the curriculum,” she told the BBC. “Given the Taliban’s misogynistic mindset and policies, it is only natural that when women themselves are not allowed to study, their views, ideas and writings are also suppressed," she added.

Among the banned books, six are specifically about women, including Gender and Development, The Role of Women in Communication, and Women Sociology. The Taliban government has said it respects women rights in accordance with their interpretation of Afghan culture and Islamic law.

The Taliban government in Afghanistan has banned 680 books, 140 books written by women from the universities, claiming that they are "anti-Sharia" and "anti-Taliban". The ban is also applicable to books on human rights and sexual harassment. It was first reported by the BBC, which cited officials on Friday (September 19). One of the banned books has the title, "Safety in the Chemical Laboratory". Also read: ‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief The universities were further told they were no longer allowed to teach 18 subjects, with a Taliban official saying they were "in conflict with the principles of Sharia and the system's policy", the British outlet reported. “All books authored by women are not allowed to be taught," a Taliban official told BBC Afghan. Also read: Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call Among the banned books, six are specifically about women, including Gender and Development, The Role of Women in Communication, and Women's Sociology. The Taliban government has said it respects women's rights in accordance with their interpretation of Afghan culture and Islamic law. Zakia Adeli, the former deputy minister of justice before the Taliban’s return in August 2021 and author of Political Terminology and International Relations, one of the banned books, told BBC Afghan that she was unsurprised by the move. “Considering what the Taliban have done over the past four years, it was not far-fetched to expect them to impose changes on the curriculum,” she told the BBC. “Given the Taliban’s misogynistic mindset and policies, it is only natural that when women themselves are not allowed to study, their views, ideas and writings are also suppressed," she added.

Among the banned books, six are specifically about women, including Gender and Development, The Role of Women in Communication, and Women's Sociology. The Taliban government has said it respects women's rights in accordance with their interpretation of Afghan culture and Islamic law.

‘Anti-Sharia’: ‘Misogynist’ Taliban bans women authors from university syllabi

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India reacted to Saudi Arabia's recent defence agreement with Pakistan on Friday (September 19), saying India and Riyadh will keep in mind the mutual interests and sensitivities.&nbsp;MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, while addressing the weekly press briefing, said, "India and Saudi Arabia have a wide-ranging strategic partnership which has deepened considerably in the last several years. We expect that this strategic partnership will keep in mind mutual interests and sensitivities."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">President Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping hold phone call</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | On the Saudi Arabia-Pakistan Agreement, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal says, &quot;India and Saudi Arabia have a wide-ranging strategic partnership which has deepened considerably in the last several years. We expect that this strategic partnership will keep in mind mutual… <a href="https://t.co/qxoTg3XzN2">pic.twitter.com/qxoTg3XzN2</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1968989337858498638?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 19, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

A day earlier, Jaiswal said, "We have seen reports of the signing of a strategic mutual defence pact between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. The government was aware that this development, which formalizes a long-standing arrangement between the two countries, had been under consideration."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-infiltration-took-place-kp-oli-alleges-conspiracy-behind-nepal-protests-questions-automatic-weapons-used-1758279122146">‘Infiltration took place’: KP Oli alleges conspiracy behind Nepal protests, questions automatic weapons used</a>&nbsp;He further said that India will "study the implications of this development for our national security as well as for regional and global stability."&nbsp;The defence deal between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia stated that any attack on either country will be considered “an aggression against both”. The pact came just days after Israel attacked Hamas leadership in Qatar.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-anti-sharia-misogynist-taliban-bans-women-authors-from-university-syllabi-1758283600899"> ‘Anti-Sharia’: ‘Misogynist’ Taliban bans women authors from university syllabi</a>&nbsp;According to the joint statement, the agreement builds on the historic partnership extending for nearly eight decades between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, and is based on the bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity.

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India reacted to Saudi Arabia recent defence agreement with Pakistan on Friday (September 19), saying India and Riyadh will keep in mind the mutual interests and sensitivities.



The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India reacted to Saudi Arabia's recent defence agreement with Pakistan on Friday (September 19), saying India and Riyadh will keep in mind the mutual interests and sensitivities. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal, while addressing the weekly press briefing, said, "India and Saudi Arabia have a wide-ranging strategic partnership which has deepened considerably in the last several years. We expect that this strategic partnership will keep in mind mutual interests and sensitivities." Also read: President Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping hold phone call

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India reacted to Saudi Arabia's recent defence agreement with Pakistan on Friday (September 19), saying India and Riyadh will keep in mind the mutual interests and sensitivities.&nbsp;

‘We expect that...’: India reacts to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia’s defence pact

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) remains the cornerstone of global efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Adopted in 1970, the NPT’s objectives are threefold: prevent proliferation, promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and advance nuclear disarmament. With 191 parties, it is one of the most widely supported arms control agreements in history. Despite its reach, a small number of countries have never signed it citing regional threats and security concerns.&nbsp;<h2>The NPT's Core Objectives</h2>The NPT is built upon three main pillars:&nbsp;Non-Proliferation: Preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology.Disarmament: Pursuing nuclear disarmament by nuclear-armed states.Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy: Promoting the peaceful use of nuclear energy under strict safeguards.The treaty categorizes countries into nuclear-weapon states and non-nuclear-weapon states, with the former agreeing to pursue disarmament and the latter committing not to develop or acquire nuclear weapons.&nbsp;<h2>Countries That Have Not Signed the NPT</h2>&nbsp;Despite the treaty's widespread adoption, four UN member states have never signed the NPT:<ol><li>India: India conducted its first nuclear test, Operation Smiling Buddha, in 1974 and has since developed a robust nuclear arsenal. It maintains a policy of 'credible minimum deterrence',which includes a 'no first use' pledge. It has not signed the NPT, citing concerns over its security environment and the treaty's discriminatory nature.</li></ol>2. Israel: Israel follows a policy of nuclear ambiguity, neither confirming nor denying the possession of nuclear weapons. It has not signed the NPT, emphasising its security needs in a volatile region.3. Pakistan: Pakistan developed nuclear weapons in response to India's nuclear program and conducted its first nuclear tests in 1998. Like India, it has not signed the NPT, arguing that the treaty is biased and does not address the security concerns of non-signatory states. it has 170 total warheads.4. North Korea: North Korea joined the NPT in 1985 but withdrew in 2003. It has since conducted multiple nuclear tests, leading to widespread international condemnation and sanctions. North Korea is estimated to have assembled 50 nuclear warheads.&nbsp;Meanwhile Iran has multiple times threatened to leave the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT). It has also, repeatedly raised regional tensions with its nuclear programme. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran’s uranium enrichment activities have, at times, approached weapons-grade levels, prompting warnings from the United States and other countries. During the 1980s, Iraq under Saddam Hussein pursued a covert nuclear weapons program, aiming to rival regional powers. The programme was largely dismantled after the Gulf War under UN supervision, but it demonstrated the historical nuclear ambitions in the Middle East.&nbsp;&nbsp;Beyond Iran and Iraq, several countries are suspected of pursuing nuclear weapons covertly. Syria operated a clandestine reactor at Al Kibar, destroyed by Israel in 2007, which the IAEA concluded was likely a nuclear reactor. Libya ran a covert nuclear weapons program during the 1970s and 1980s but voluntarily dismantled it in 2003 under international supervision.&nbsp;In conclusion, while the NPT has played a pivotal role in curbing the spread of nuclear weapons, the non-signature of certain countries highlights ongoing challenges in achieving global nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation. Understanding the reasons behind their stance is crucial for addressing the complexities of nuclear diplomacy in the 21st century.

With 191 parties, it is one of the most widely supported arms control agreements in history. Despite its reach, a small number of countries have never signed it citing reginal thrats and security concerns.

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) remains the cornerstone of global efforts to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. Adopted in 1970, the NPT’s objectives are threefold: prevent proliferation, promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and advance nuclear disarmament. With 191 parties, it is one of the most widely supported arms control agreements in history. Despite its reach, a small number of countries have never signed it citing regional threats and security concerns. The NPT's Core Objectives The NPT is built upon three main pillars: Non-Proliferation: Preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology. Disarmament: Pursuing nuclear disarmament by nuclear-armed states. Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy: Promoting the peaceful use of nuclear energy under strict safeguards. The treaty categorizes countries into nuclear-weapon states and non-nuclear-weapon states, with the former agreeing to pursue disarmament and the latter committing not to develop or acquire nuclear weapons. Countries That Have Not Signed the NPT Despite the treaty's widespread adoption, four UN member states have never signed the NPT: India: India conducted its first nuclear test, Operation Smiling Buddha, in 1974 and has since developed a robust nuclear arsenal. It maintains a policy of 'credible minimum deterrence',which includes a 'no first use' pledge. It has not signed the NPT, citing concerns over its security environment and the treaty's discriminatory nature. 2. Israel: Israel follows a policy of nuclear ambiguity, neither confirming nor denying the possession of nuclear weapons. It has not signed the NPT, emphasising its security needs in a volatile region. 3. Pakistan: Pakistan developed nuclear weapons in response to India's nuclear program and conducted its first nuclear tests in 1998. Like India, it has not signed the NPT, arguing that the treaty is biased and does not address the security concerns of non-signatory states. it has 170 total warheads. 4. North Korea: North Korea joined the NPT in 1985 but withdrew in 2003. It has since conducted multiple nuclear tests, leading to widespread international condemnation and sanctions. North Korea is estimated to have assembled 50 nuclear warheads. Meanwhile Iran has multiple times threatened to leave the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT). It has also, repeatedly raised regional tensions with its nuclear programme. According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran’s uranium enrichment activities have, at times, approached weapons-grade levels, prompting warnings from the United States and other countries. During the 1980s, Iraq under Saddam Hussein pursued a covert nuclear weapons program, aiming to rival regional powers. The programme was largely dismantled after the Gulf War under UN supervision, but it demonstrated the historical nuclear ambitions in the Middle East. Beyond Iran and Iraq, several countries are suspected of pursuing nuclear weapons covertly. Syria operated a clandestine reactor at Al Kibar, destroyed by Israel in 2007, which the IAEA concluded was likely a nuclear reactor. Libya ran a covert nuclear weapons program during the 1970s and 1980s but voluntarily dismantled it in 2003 under international supervision. In conclusion, while the NPT has played a pivotal role in curbing the spread of nuclear weapons, the non-signature of certain countries highlights ongoing challenges in achieving global nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation. Understanding the reasons behind their stance is crucial for addressing the complexities of nuclear diplomacy in the 21st century.

With 191 parties, it is one of the most widely supported arms control agreements in history. Despite its reach, a small number of countries have never signed it citing reginal thrats and security concerns.

What is Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and why these three countries never signed? EXPLAINED

Nepal's ousted prime minister KP Oli marked the &nbsp;Constitution Day of the country with a Facebook post on Friday (September 19). Oli, who resigned and fled the country after a massive Gen Z protest over corruption, questioned the use of automatic weapons in the protest, saying that the Nepalese Police do not have those.&nbsp;Oli wrote in his post, “Today is Constitution Day. The day the constitution was made, by the constitution that was elected by the Nepalese people after struggling for 70 years. The day when the democratic republic, a federal inclusive system and the rights of the people were established." Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">Trump to visit China early next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in ‘very productive’ phone call</a>&nbsp;“The Constitution was issued overcoming the blockade and the challenges arising over the country’s sovereignty. Therefore, the Constitution of Nepal is a future line written by the Nepalese people for themselves," the ousted PM added. Moreover, Oli also alleged that the protestors were infiltrated and were not the people of Nepal. “Infiltration took place during the Gen Z demonstration that was supposed to be peaceful last week. Conspirators who infiltrated it created violence, killing our youth. The incident of shooting with automatic weapons that are not with the police should be investigated," he wrote.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-asim-munir-trying-to-make-us-break-down-imran-khan-alleges-mental-torture-on-self-wife-by-pak-army-chief-1758297971366">‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief</a> “I won’t say much about the conspiracy behind this today, a lot of things will make a statement by itself. Was our country being built or spoiled, or was it just expanded outrage by standing up a spoiled fictional statement? All these things our new generation will realize itself," Oli said.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-ilhan-omar-marry-her-brother-to-get-us-citizenship-here-s-the-truth-behind-trump-s-bold-claim-1758288186766">Did Ilhan Omar marry her brother to get US citizenship? Here's the truth behind Trump's bold claim</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

Oli, who resigned and fled the country after a massive Gen Z protest over corruption, questioned the use of automatic weapons in the protest, saying that the Nepalese Police do not have those.

Nepal's ousted prime minister KP Oli marked the Constitution Day of the country with a Facebook post on Friday (September 19). Oli, who resigned and fled the country after a massive Gen Z protest over corruption, questioned the use of automatic weapons in the protest, saying that the Nepalese Police do not have those. Oli wrote in his post, “Today is Constitution Day. The day the constitution was made, by the constitution that was elected by the Nepalese people after struggling for 70 years. The day when the democratic republic, a federal inclusive system and the rights of the people were established." Also read: Trump to visit China early next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in ‘very productive’ phone call “The Constitution was issued overcoming the blockade and the challenges arising over the country’s sovereignty. Therefore, the Constitution of Nepal is a future line written by the Nepalese people for themselves," the ousted PM added. Moreover, Oli also alleged that the protestors were infiltrated and were not the people of Nepal. “Infiltration took place during the Gen Z demonstration that was supposed to be peaceful last week. Conspirators who infiltrated it created violence, killing our youth. The incident of shooting with automatic weapons that are not with the police should be investigated," he wrote. Also read: ‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief “I won’t say much about the conspiracy behind this today, a lot of things will make a statement by itself. Was our country being built or spoiled, or was it just expanded outrage by standing up a spoiled fictional statement? All these things our new generation will realize itself," Oli said. Also read: Did Ilhan Omar marry her brother to get US citizenship? Here's the truth behind Trump's bold claim

Oli, who resigned and fled the country after a massive Gen Z protest over corruption, questioned the use of automatic weapons in the protest, saying that the Nepalese Police do not have those.

‘Infiltration took place’: KP Oli alleges conspiracy behind Nepal protests, questions automatic weapons used

At least 11 people were killed in two separate bomb blasts in the Balochistan province of Pakistan on Friday (September 19), AFP reported, citing officials. The first incident took place on September 18 when an explosion-laden car drove into a convoy of paramilitary soldiers in the province’s Dasht town near the border with Iran.&nbsp;&nbsp;Five people were killed in that blast, three of them were soldiers. This particular attack was claimed by the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), the leading Baloch group waging the armed movement against the Pakistani rule over Balochistan.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-asim-munir-trying-to-make-us-break-down-imran-khan-alleges-mental-torture-on-self-wife-by-pak-army-chief-1758297971366"> ‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief</a>&nbsp;The second blast occurred on the same day but near the border with Afghanistan.&nbsp;“The scene of the incident has been surrounded by forces. Levies and other law enforcement agencies are present at the scene. The process of collecting evidence and investigation is underway,” a statement by the Balochistan Home Department said, Dawn reported.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/president-trump-and-china-s-president-xi-jinping-hold-phone-call-1758284142971">Trump to visit China early next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in ‘very productive’ phone call</a>&nbsp;Balochistan has been witnessing violence for a long time now, due to the constant efforts of separatist groups of insurgency against the present Pakistani government. They allege that the Pakistani government discriminates against the Baloch people.&nbsp;Earlier this month, 15 people were killed in a suicide bombing claimed by the Islamic State group at a political rally in the provincial capital, Quetta.

At least 11 people were killed in two separate bomb blasts in the Balochistan province of Pakistan on Friday (September 19), AFP reported, citing officials.

At least 11 people were killed in two separate bomb blasts in the Balochistan province of Pakistan on Friday (September 19), AFP reported, citing officials. The first incident took place on September 18 when an explosion-laden car drove into a convoy of paramilitary soldiers in the province’s Dasht town near the border with Iran. Five people were killed in that blast, three of them were soldiers. This particular attack was claimed by the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), the leading Baloch group waging the armed movement against the Pakistani rule over Balochistan. Also read: ‘Asim Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran Khan alleges ‘mental torture’ on self, wife by Pak army chief The second blast occurred on the same day but near the border with Afghanistan. “The scene of the incident has been surrounded by forces. Levies and other law enforcement agencies are present at the scene. The process of collecting evidence and investigation is underway,” a statement by the Balochistan Home Department said, Dawn reported. Also read: Trump to visit China early next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in ‘very productive’ phone call Balochistan has been witnessing violence for a long time now, due to the constant efforts of separatist groups of insurgency against the present Pakistani government. They allege that the Pakistani government discriminates against the Baloch people. Earlier this month, 15 people were killed in a suicide bombing claimed by the Islamic State group at a political rally in the provincial capital, Quetta.

At least 11 people were killed in two separate bomb blasts in the Balochistan province of Pakistan on Friday (September 19), AFP reported, citing officials.

Pakistan: 11 killed in 2 bomb blasts in Balochistan

&nbsp;In a world where nuclear capabilities are often seen as symbols of power and deterrence, the Muslim-majority nations present a unique case. This fact stands in stark contrast to the global proliferation of nuclear arms and raises questions about the dynamics of power, security, and international relations within the Muslim world. On Wednesday, Saudi Arabia and nuclear-armed Pakistan signed a mutual defence pact, reinforcing a decades-old security partnership just a week after Israel’s strikes on Qatar reshaped regional diplomacy. Under the agreement, Pakistan is now committed to providing Saudi Arabia with a nuclear umbrella. “This is a comprehensive defensive agreement that encompasses all military means,” a Saudi official told Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;The nuclear dimension has long been a central element of this relationship. In the 1970s, as Pakistan’s scientist AQ Khan developed the country’s secret nuclear programme, Project-706, Saudi funding supported much of it, covering up to 60 per cent of the main Kahuta facility. The arrangement allows Saudi Arabia to enjoy protection without possessing the weapons itself. Pakistan’s missiles, including the Shaheen-III with a range of 2,750 kilometres, provide the Kingdom with a credible deterrent capable of reaching virtually anywhere in its territory.&nbsp;<h2>Pakistan: The Sole Nuclear-Armed Muslim Nation</h2>Pakistan's journey to nuclear capability began in the early 1970s, driven by regional security concerns and the desire to establish a strategic deterrent. On May 28, 1998, Pakistan conducted its first nuclear tests, Chagai-I and Chagai-II, becoming the seventh nation globally to possess nuclear weapons and the first in the Muslim-majority world. As of 2025, estimates suggest Pakistan maintains a stockpile of approximately 170 nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists.&nbsp;Pakistan's nuclear doctrine, known as ‘Full Spectrum Deterrence,’ emphasises the use of its nuclear arsenal to deter any aggression, including conventional threats. Unlike some nuclear-armed nations, Pakistan does not adhere to a ‘no first use’ policy, maintaining the stance that it will use ‘any weapon in its arsenal’ to protect its interests in case of an aggressive attack. This policy underscores Pakistan's commitment to maintaining a credible deterrent against regional threats.<h2>The Absence of Nuclear Weapons in Other Muslim-Majority Countries</h2>Despite the presence of numerous conflicts and security challenges across the Muslim-majority world, no other nation in this group has developed or acquired nuclear weapons. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey have pursued nuclear technology for energy and research purposes but have refrained from weaponization. Iran, for instance, maintains a nuclear program under the scrutiny of international agreements, while Saudi Arabia and Turkey have expressed interest in nuclear energy without clear intentions to develop nuclear arms.&nbsp;This absence can be attributed to various factors, including international non-proliferation norms, economic considerations, and the strategic alliances these countries maintain with nuclear-armed states. Additionally, the ethical and religious perspectives within Islam regarding the use of weapons of mass destruction play a role in shaping national policies. Some scholars argue that Islamic teachings prohibit the development and use of such destructive weapons, influencing the stance of Muslim-majority nations on nuclear armament.<h2>Implications for Regional and Global Security</h2>Pakistan's status as the only Muslim-majority nuclear-armed nation has significant implications for regional security dynamics. It influences the security policies of neighboring countries and affects the broader strategic calculations of global powers engaged in the region. The concentration of nuclear capabilities in a single Muslim-majority country also impacts non-proliferation efforts and arms control initiatives within the Islamic world.&nbsp;The unique position of Pakistan presents both opportunities and challenges. While it highlights the nation's strategic importance, it also places a responsibility on Pakistan to engage in regional stability efforts and contribute to global non-proliferation objectives.&nbsp;&nbsp;Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.&nbsp;

The arrangement allows Saudi Arabia to enjoy protection without possessing the weapons itself. Pakistan’s missiles, including the Shaheen-III with a range of 2,750 kilometres, provide the Kingdom with a credible deterrent capable of reaching virtually anywhere in its territory.

In a world where nuclear capabilities are often seen as symbols of power and deterrence, the Muslim-majority nations present a unique case. This fact stands in stark contrast to the global proliferation of nuclear arms and raises questions about the dynamics of power, security, and international relations within the Muslim world. On Wednesday, Saudi Arabia and nuclear-armed Pakistan signed a mutual defence pact, reinforcing a decades-old security partnership just a week after Israel’s strikes on Qatar reshaped regional diplomacy. Under the agreement, Pakistan is now committed to providing Saudi Arabia with a nuclear umbrella. “This is a comprehensive defensive agreement that encompasses all military means,” a Saudi official told Reuters. The nuclear dimension has long been a central element of this relationship. In the 1970s, as Pakistan’s scientist AQ Khan developed the country’s secret nuclear programme, Project-706, Saudi funding supported much of it, covering up to 60 per cent of the main Kahuta facility. The arrangement allows Saudi Arabia to enjoy protection without possessing the weapons itself. Pakistan’s missiles, including the Shaheen-III with a range of 2,750 kilometres, provide the Kingdom with a credible deterrent capable of reaching virtually anywhere in its territory. Pakistan: The Sole Nuclear-Armed Muslim Nation Pakistan's journey to nuclear capability began in the early 1970s, driven by regional security concerns and the desire to establish a strategic deterrent. On May 28, 1998, Pakistan conducted its first nuclear tests, Chagai-I and Chagai-II, becoming the seventh nation globally to possess nuclear weapons and the first in the Muslim-majority world. As of 2025, estimates suggest Pakistan maintains a stockpile of approximately 170 nuclear warheads, according to the Federation of American Scientists. Pakistan's nuclear doctrine, known as ‘Full Spectrum Deterrence,’ emphasises the use of its nuclear arsenal to deter any aggression, including conventional threats. Unlike some nuclear-armed nations, Pakistan does not adhere to a ‘no first use’ policy, maintaining the stance that it will use ‘any weapon in its arsenal’ to protect its interests in case of an aggressive attack. This policy underscores Pakistan's commitment to maintaining a credible deterrent against regional threats. The Absence of Nuclear Weapons in Other Muslim-Majority Countries Despite the presence of numerous conflicts and security challenges across the Muslim-majority world, no other nation in this group has developed or acquired nuclear weapons. Countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkey have pursued nuclear technology for energy and research purposes but have refrained from weaponization. Iran, for instance, maintains a nuclear program under the scrutiny of international agreements, while Saudi Arabia and Turkey have expressed interest in nuclear energy without clear intentions to develop nuclear arms. This absence can be attributed to various factors, including international non-proliferation norms, economic considerations, and the strategic alliances these countries maintain with nuclear-armed states. Additionally, the ethical and religious perspectives within Islam regarding the use of weapons of mass destruction play a role in shaping national policies. Some scholars argue that Islamic teachings prohibit the development and use of such destructive weapons, influencing the stance of Muslim-majority nations on nuclear armament. Implications for Regional and Global Security Pakistan's status as the only Muslim-majority nuclear-armed nation has significant implications for regional security dynamics. It influences the security policies of neighboring countries and affects the broader strategic calculations of global powers engaged in the region. The concentration of nuclear capabilities in a single Muslim-majority country also impacts non-proliferation efforts and arms control initiatives within the Islamic world. The unique position of Pakistan presents both opportunities and challenges. While it highlights the nation's strategic importance, it also places a responsibility on Pakistan to engage in regional stability efforts and contribute to global non-proliferation objectives. Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

The arrangement allows Saudi Arabia to enjoy protection without possessing the weapons itself. Pakistan’s missiles, including the Shaheen-III with a range of 2,750 kilometres, provide the Kingdom with a credible deterrent capable of reaching virtually anywhere in its territory.

Among Muslim nations, how many have nuclear weapons? Saudi–Pak defence pact explained

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Trump slaps $100,000 fee on H-1B visas, Indian tech workers to be hit hardest

'Dick-tator': Britons troll Trump, light up Windsor Castle with Epstein images

Trump says US blasted 3rd boat with drugs ‘en route to poison Americans’. Watch

NATO jets intercept Russian warplanes violating Estonian airspace

India, Canada agree to reactivate bilateral dialogues

Judge dismisses Trump’s $15 billion lawsuit against NYT over Epstein reporting

'Western recognition for Palestinian State late but important step'

JeM front plans rally to honor Masood Azhar’s family Killed in Operation Sindoor

‘Munir trying to make us break down’: Imran alleges mental torture on self, wife

‘Our virtual door is open’: UK launches dark web portal for foreign spies

UNSC rejects resolution to extend relief, ‘snapback’ sanctions reimposed on Iran

Estonia claims Russian jets violated its airspace, 5th time this year

Palestinian President Abbas to address UN assembly via video

UK deports Indian man, first under new immigration scheme. Details inside

How many NATO allies host America’s nuclear weapons today?

LeT commander confirms Indian strikes wrecked Muridke terror camp in Pakistan

Pak says its nuclear arsenal could be extended to Saudi Arabia under new pact

Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel react as Jimmy Kimmel is suspended

Russia condemns Denmark led NATO’s Arctic Light 2025 without US

Trump to visit China next year, says Xi approved TikTok deal in productive call

‘Anti-Sharia’: ‘Misogynist’ Taliban bans women authors from university syllabi

India reacts to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia’s defence pact

Why these three countries never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?

Oli alleges conspiracy behind Nepal protests, questions automatic weapons used

Pakistan: 11 killed in 2 bomb blasts in Balochistan

Among Muslim nations, who has nuclear weapons? Saudi–Pak defence pact explained