Trump claims scarves offer better protection than masks, but is that true?

Edited By: Bharat Sharma WION Web Team
New Delhi, India Published: Apr 03, 2020, 03:42 PM(IST)

File photo. Photograph:( AFP )

Story highlights

Surgical masks, which are mostly produced in China, have run out of stock globally

At Thursday’s coronavirus briefing, US President Donald Trump endorsed scarves as a better option than masks.

While referring to the question of advising citizens to wear masks, Trump claimed that scarves with more thickness than masks are more effective against the coronavirus.

Surgical masks, which are mostly produced in China, have run out of stock globally. US is currently faces shortages of medical supplies, ventilators, and masks, as is rest of the infected world.

Also read: Vacation gone awry? Over 40 American students return home with COVID-19

Exports of such items from China and South Korea have begun rapidly.

"In many cases the scarf is better; it's thicker. I mean you can -- depending on the material, it's thicker," the President said.

Additionally, Trump announced that his administration would soon release fresh recommendations regarding the usage of masks.

However, as CNN reported in a fact-check report, Trump’s claim of scarves providing better protection than masks is not endorsed by any global medical organisation or by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Also read: As domestic violence against women soars due to lockdown, Europe tries something new!

Even though scarves are capable of providing protection, the CDC has clearly advised against using alternative masks, unless there are no alternatives available at all!

As per the CDC guidelines, people “might use homemade masks” along the lines of scarves, bandannas etc “for care of patients with COVID-19 as a last resort”.

Furthermore, the advisory claims that "caution should be exercised when considering this option". If possible, further protective gear like face shields should be used over these homemade alternatives.

Also read: New York has enough ventilators for only six more days

Read in App