Pakistan is sending a delegation to the United States next week for high-stakes trade talks, President Donald Trump confirmed on Friday, as the South Asian nation tries to avert a looming tariff crisis that could jeopardise billions in export earnings, according to Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;The development comes amid Washington’s broader tariff campaign against countries running significant trade surpluses with the US and follows a sharp warning from Trump over recent military clashes between Pakistan and its neighbour India.<h2>Why Pakistan is under pressure</h2>As per Reuters, the US government last month announced sweeping tariff hikes on multiple trading partners. Among them, Pakistan now faces potential tariffs of up to 29 per cent on its exports to the US, owing to a trade surplus of approximately $3 billion.&nbsp;This makes the upcoming trade negotiations critical for Islamabad, which heavily relies on US market access to sustain key sectors such as textiles and surgical instruments.&nbsp;Trump, speaking at Joint Base Andrews, said that “Representatives from Pakistan are coming to the United States next week as they seek to make a deal on tariffs,” as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;While he did not elaborate on the scope of discussions, his remarks signal that the talks will centre on tariff exemptions and possibly a broader bilateral trade reset.<h2>A fragile moment for regional diplomacy</h2>The talks also come against the backdrop of heightened military tensions in South Asia.&nbsp;Earlier in May, Pakistan and India engaged in four days of intense cross-border conflict involving missiles, drones, artillery, and fighter jets, worst confrontation in decades.&nbsp;Referring to this, Trump added, “I would have no interest in making a deal with Pakistan or India if they were to engage in war with each other,” as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;The White House is closely monitoring the situation, given the nuclear capabilities of both nations and their strategic importance in regional stability.<h2>US-Pakistan trade dependency</h2>According to 2024 trade data from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), total two-way goods trade between the US and Pakistan stood at $12.2 billion, with Pakistan exporting $7.6 billion worth of goods to the US and importing $4.6 billion in return.&nbsp;Pakistan’s largest exports to the US include:<ul><li>Textiles and apparel: over $4.4 billion</li><li>Surgical and medical instruments: around $500 million</li><li>Leather goods and footwear</li><li>Sporting equipment</li></ul>The US is Pakistan’s single largest export destination, accounting for over 21 per cent of its total exports, according to data from Pakistan’s Ministry of Commerce.&nbsp;By contrast, US exports to Pakistan remain limited, concentrated mainly in machinery, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts, and agricultural products.&nbsp;This asymmetry gives the US considerable leverage in trade negotiations but also highlights Pakistan’s economic vulnerability if tariff hikes are implemented.<h2>Will Pakistan offer concessions?</h2>As per Bloomberg, Pakistan may offer market access guarantees and investment incentives to US firms as part of the deal, particularly in sectors such as agriculture, green energy, and e-commerce.&nbsp;Pakistan’s Board of Investment is reportedly finalising a list of federal infrastructure contracts and public-private partnerships worth over $25 billion, which could be opened up to US bidders in exchange for tariff relief.&nbsp;The talks are expected to include Pakistan’s caretaker Commerce Minister and key officials from its Finance and Foreign Affairs Ministries, according to government sources quoted by The Express Tribune.<h2>US Parallel talks with India complicate the picture</h2>While Pakistan prepares for negotiations, India is also deepening trade engagement with Washington. Trump confirmed on Friday that the US is “very close [to] making a deal with India,” as quoted by Reuters.India’s Trade Minister Piyush Goyal was in Washington earlier this month to advance discussions, with an interim trade agreement expected by early July, as per Reuters.&nbsp;India currently faces 26 per cent tariffs on US-bound goods under the April tariff hike and is reportedly offering $50 billion in procurement opportunities to American firms in return for relief and improved access to the US tech and defence markets.&nbsp;This parallel track may influence how Washington negotiates with Islamabad, potentially demanding more structural reforms or commercial openness.<h2>What happens next?</h2>For Pakistan, the stakes are high. Without a deal, its key exports could become uncompetitive overnight, triggering factory closures and job losses in industries that employ millions of workers, particularly in cities like Karachi, Sialkot, and Faisalabad.&nbsp;The US also risks weakening a strategically important partner in South Asia, one it often relies on for counterterrorism, Afghan stability, and regional intelligence cooperation.&nbsp;Trade officials from both countries are expected to meet in Washington next week, with preparatory talks already underway, according to sources quoted by Dawn&nbsp; &nbsp;

Business & Economy: This comes amid Washington broader tariff campaign against countries with significant trade surpluses with the US and a warning from Trump over recent military clashes between Pakistan and its neighbor India. 

Pakistan is sending a delegation to the United States next week for high-stakes trade talks, President Donald Trump confirmed on Friday, as the South Asian nation tries to avert a looming tariff crisis that could jeopardise billions in export earnings, according to Reuters. The development comes amid Washington’s broader tariff campaign against countries running significant trade surpluses with the US and follows a sharp warning from Trump over recent military clashes between Pakistan and its neighbour India. Why Pakistan is under pressure As per Reuters, the US government last month announced sweeping tariff hikes on multiple trading partners. Among them, Pakistan now faces potential tariffs of up to 29 per cent on its exports to the US, owing to a trade surplus of approximately $3 billion. This makes the upcoming trade negotiations critical for Islamabad, which heavily relies on US market access to sustain key sectors such as textiles and surgical instruments. Trump, speaking at Joint Base Andrews, said that “Representatives from Pakistan are coming to the United States next week as they seek to make a deal on tariffs,” as quoted by Reuters. While he did not elaborate on the scope of discussions, his remarks signal that the talks will centre on tariff exemptions and possibly a broader bilateral trade reset. A fragile moment for regional diplomacy The talks also come against the backdrop of heightened military tensions in South Asia. Earlier in May, Pakistan and India engaged in four days of intense cross-border conflict involving missiles, drones, artillery, and fighter jets, worst confrontation in decades. Referring to this, Trump added, “I would have no interest in making a deal with Pakistan or India if they were to engage in war with each other,” as quoted by Reuters. The White House is closely monitoring the situation, given the nuclear capabilities of both nations and their strategic importance in regional stability. US-Pakistan trade dependency According to 2024 trade data from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), total two-way goods trade between the US and Pakistan stood at $12.2 billion, with Pakistan exporting $7.6 billion worth of goods to the US and importing $4.6 billion in return. Pakistan’s largest exports to the US include: Textiles and apparel: over $4.4 billion Surgical and medical instruments: around $500 million Leather goods and footwear Sporting equipment The US is Pakistan’s single largest export destination, accounting for over 21 per cent of its total exports, according to data from Pakistan’s Ministry of Commerce. By contrast, US exports to Pakistan remain limited, concentrated mainly in machinery, pharmaceuticals, aircraft parts, and agricultural products. This asymmetry gives the US considerable leverage in trade negotiations but also highlights Pakistan’s economic vulnerability if tariff hikes are implemented. Will Pakistan offer concessions? As per Bloomberg, Pakistan may offer market access guarantees and investment incentives to US firms as part of the deal, particularly in sectors such as agriculture, green energy, and e-commerce. Pakistan’s Board of Investment is reportedly finalising a list of federal infrastructure contracts and public-private partnerships worth over $25 billion, which could be opened up to US bidders in exchange for tariff relief. The talks are expected to include Pakistan’s caretaker Commerce Minister and key officials from its Finance and Foreign Affairs Ministries, according to government sources quoted by The Express Tribune. US Parallel talks with India complicate the picture While Pakistan prepares for negotiations, India is also deepening trade engagement with Washington. Trump confirmed on Friday that the US is “very close [to] making a deal with India,” as quoted by Reuters. India’s Trade Minister Piyush Goyal was in Washington earlier this month to advance discussions, with an interim trade agreement expected by early July, as per Reuters. India currently faces 26 per cent tariffs on US-bound goods under the April tariff hike and is reportedly offering $50 billion in procurement opportunities to American firms in return for relief and improved access to the US tech and defence markets. This parallel track may influence how Washington negotiates with Islamabad, potentially demanding more structural reforms or commercial openness. What happens next? For Pakistan, the stakes are high. Without a deal, its key exports could become uncompetitive overnight, triggering factory closures and job losses in industries that employ millions of workers, particularly in cities like Karachi, Sialkot, and Faisalabad. The US also risks weakening a strategically important partner in South Asia, one it often relies on for counterterrorism, Afghan stability, and regional intelligence cooperation. Trade officials from both countries are expected to meet in Washington next week, with preparatory talks already underway, according to sources quoted by Dawn

Pakistan is reportedly set to send a delegation to the US next week for high-stakes trade talks to avoid a potential tariff crisis that could threaten billions in export earnings.&nbsp;

Pakistan heads to Washington for trade talks: What’s at stake as US tariff threat looms?

The Donald Trump administration has launched a Pentagon investigation into the 2021 withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan.In a memo, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said that he has concluded that a "comprehensive review" was needed to ensure that a "complete picture is provided to the American people".Pentagon chief Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, in his memo, said that the review would ensure that accountability for the troop withdrawal was met.“On August 26, 2021, President Biden's administration led a chaotic withdrawal of U.S. military and embassy officials from Afghanistan that led to the deaths of 13 U.S. service members and 170 civilians in a suicide bombing at the Kabul International Airport's Abbey Gate.”"I have concluded that we need to conduct a comprehensive review to ensure that accountability for this event is met and that the complete picture is provided to the American people," stated the memo.What happened during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan? Here's the timeline.<h3>11 September 2001</h3>The US is devastated by a massive terrorist strike. Four commercial airliners were hijacked by Al-Qaeda operatives, who then crashed three of them into the World Trade Centre in New York. The fourth one crashed into a field in Pennsylvania thanks to brave passengers.Around three thousand people died in the terror attack.In the aftermath, US President George W. Bush vowed to "win the war against terrorism".Nineteen hijackers were involved in the attack, none of them Afghan citizens.The Bush government zeroed in on Al-Qaeda and its leader, Osama bin Laden, who was located in Afghanistan. The US called on the Taliban regime to "deliver to the United States authorities all the leaders of al-Qaeda who hide in your land" or share in their fate.<h3>18 September 2001</h3>President George Bush signed into law a joint resolution authorising the use of force against the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attack.<h3>7 October 2001</h3>With British support, the US launched "Operation Enduring Freedom" and began a bombing campaign against Taliban forces. In the early phase, the US mainly carried out air strikes on al-Qaeda and Taliban forces. 12 days later, the first wave of conventional ground forces arrives.<h3>November 2001</h3>In a series of losses, the Taliban regime starts to unravel rapidly, with their strongholds crumbling.<h3>14 November 2001</h3>The UN Security Council (UNSC) passes Resolution 1378, calling for a "central role" for the United Nations in establishing a transitional administration and inviting member states to send peacekeeping forces to promote stability and aid delivery.<h3>December 2001</h3>Following the fall of Kabul in November 2001, with UN backing, major Afghan factions signed the Bonn Agreement and installed Hamid Karzai as the interim administration head and created an international peacekeeping force to maintain security in Kabul. Following this, UNSC Resolution 1386 on December 20 establishes the International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF.<h3>December 2001</h3>Taliban collapse and the fall can be tied to the surrender of Kandahar.<h3>March 2002</h3>The US launches its first major ground assault, called Operation Anaconda, against 800 al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters in the Shah-i-Kot Valley south of the city of Gardez (Paktia Province).<h3>April 2002</h3>President Bush calls for the reconstruction of Afghanistan.Speaking at the Virginia Military Institute, he said, “By helping to build an Afghanistan that is free from this evil and is a better place in which to live, we are working in the best traditions of George Marshall.”Between 2001 and 2009, the US Congress granted $38 billion in humanitarian and reconstruction assistance.<h3>1 May 2011</h3>Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan by US forces. Following this, the then-President Barack Obama prepared to announce the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan but was met with arguments for sustained military engagement.<h3>22 June 2011</h3>President Obama outlines a plan to withdraw thirty-three thousand troops by the summer of 2012—the surge troops sent in December 2009—including ten thousand by the end of 2011.<h3>November 2011</h3>The US marks ten years of war in Afghanistan. The war toll includes casualties of 1,800 US troop members and $444 billion in spending.<h3>June 2013</h3>Following peace talks, Afghan forces take the lead in security responsibility nationwide. The US-led coalition, meanwhile, switches to military training and special operations-driven counterterrorism. Talks continued in Doha, Qatar, between the Taliban and the US.<h3>27 May 2014</h3>President Obama announces a timetable for US troop withdrawal – to be completed by the end of 2016. The first phase of the plan calls for 9,800 troops to remain in Afghanistan, conducting operations against al-Qaeda and training Afghan forces.<h3>September 2014</h3>Newly elected Afghan president Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, a top Taliban official, and his chief opponent Abdullah Abdullah signed a power-sharing agreement.<h3>21 August 2017</h3>US President Donald Trump, in an address to troops in Arlington, Virginia, signals a prolonged Afghan war. He said that though his "original instinct was to pull out", He will instead press on with an open-ended military commitment aimed at preventing the emergence of "a vacuum for terrorists".<h3>29 February 2020</h3>The US and the Taliban sign an agreement paving the way for peace in Afghanistan and the drawdown of US troops from Afghanistan. The agreement includes guarantees from the Taliban that the country would not be used for terrorist activities.<h3>17 November 2020</h3>Before the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, the then-acting US Defence Secretary Christopher C. Miller announced that the number of troops in Afghanistan would be halved to 2,500 by mid-January.<h3>14 April 2021</h3>Newly inaugurated President Joe Biden announces the US will withdraw all its troops by 11 September 2021. "It's time to end America’s longest war," he said.<h3>15 August 2021</h3>Taliban takeover of Kabul and the presidential palace. Leaders of the terror group say they will hold talks with Afghan officials to form an "open, inclusive Islamic government".<h3>26 August 2021</h3>12 members of the US military are killed and 18 are injured in an attack outside the Kabul airport amid "chaotic" troop withdrawal. At least 170 Afghans were also killed. The Islamic State in Khorasan claims responsibility, and several days later, the United States launches an air strike targeting a suspected plotter from the group.<h3>30 August 2021</h3>After twenty years of war, the last of the US military departs from Afghanistan, leaving the nation under its Taliban rulers.

Hegseth said that he has concluded that a "comprehensive review" was needed to ensure that a "complete picture is provided to the American people". What happened during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan? From the 9/11 attack to the end of US' 20-year war, here's a timeline 

The Donald Trump administration has launched a Pentagon investigation into the 2021 withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan. In a memo, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said that he has concluded that a "comprehensive review" was needed to ensure that a "complete picture is provided to the American people". Pentagon chief Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, in his memo, said that the review would ensure that accountability for the troop withdrawal was met. “On August 26, 2021, President Biden's administration led a chaotic withdrawal of U.S. military and embassy officials from Afghanistan that led to the deaths of 13 U.S. service members and 170 civilians in a suicide bombing at the Kabul International Airport's Abbey Gate.” "I have concluded that we need to conduct a comprehensive review to ensure that accountability for this event is met and that the complete picture is provided to the American people," stated the memo. What happened during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan? Here's the timeline. 11 September 2001 The US is devastated by a massive terrorist strike. Four commercial airliners were hijacked by Al-Qaeda operatives, who then crashed three of them into the World Trade Centre in New York. The fourth one crashed into a field in Pennsylvania thanks to brave passengers. Around three thousand people died in the terror attack. In the aftermath, US President George W. Bush vowed to "win the war against terrorism". Nineteen hijackers were involved in the attack, none of them Afghan citizens. The Bush government zeroed in on Al-Qaeda and its leader, Osama bin Laden, who was located in Afghanistan. The US called on the Taliban regime to "deliver to the United States authorities all the leaders of al-Qaeda who hide in your land" or share in their fate. 18 September 2001 President George Bush signed into law a joint resolution authorising the use of force against the terrorists involved in the 9/11 attack. 7 October 2001 With British support, the US launched "Operation Enduring Freedom" and began a bombing campaign against Taliban forces. In the early phase, the US mainly carried out air strikes on al-Qaeda and Taliban forces. 12 days later, the first wave of conventional ground forces arrives. November 2001 In a series of losses, the Taliban regime starts to unravel rapidly, with their strongholds crumbling. 14 November 2001 The UN Security Council (UNSC) passes Resolution 1378, calling for a "central role" for the United Nations in establishing a transitional administration and inviting member states to send peacekeeping forces to promote stability and aid delivery. December 2001 Following the fall of Kabul in November 2001, with UN backing, major Afghan factions signed the Bonn Agreement and installed Hamid Karzai as the interim administration head and created an international peacekeeping force to maintain security in Kabul. Following this, UNSC Resolution 1386 on December 20 establishes the International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF. December 2001 Taliban collapse and the fall can be tied to the surrender of Kandahar. March 2002 The US launches its first major ground assault, called Operation Anaconda, against 800 al-Qaeda and Taliban fighters in the Shah-i-Kot Valley south of the city of Gardez (Paktia Province). April 2002 President Bush calls for the reconstruction of Afghanistan. Speaking at the Virginia Military Institute, he said, “By helping to build an Afghanistan that is free from this evil and is a better place in which to live, we are working in the best traditions of George Marshall.” Between 2001 and 2009, the US Congress granted $38 billion in humanitarian and reconstruction assistance. 1 May 2011 Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan by US forces. Following this, the then-President Barack Obama prepared to announce the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan but was met with arguments for sustained military engagement. 22 June 2011 President Obama outlines a plan to withdraw thirty-three thousand troops by the summer of 2012—the surge troops sent in December 2009—including ten thousand by the end of 2011. November 2011 The US marks ten years of war in Afghanistan. The war toll includes casualties of 1,800 US troop members and $444 billion in spending. June 2013 Following peace talks, Afghan forces take the lead in security responsibility nationwide. The US-led coalition, meanwhile, switches to military training and special operations-driven counterterrorism. Talks continued in Doha, Qatar, between the Taliban and the US. 27 May 2014 President Obama announces a timetable for US troop withdrawal – to be completed by the end of 2016. The first phase of the plan calls for 9,800 troops to remain in Afghanistan, conducting operations against al-Qaeda and training Afghan forces. September 2014 Newly elected Afghan president Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, a top Taliban official, and his chief opponent Abdullah Abdullah signed a power-sharing agreement. 21 August 2017 US President Donald Trump, in an address to troops in Arlington, Virginia, signals a prolonged Afghan war. He said that though his "original instinct was to pull out", He will instead press on with an open-ended military commitment aimed at preventing the emergence of "a vacuum for terrorists". 29 February 2020 The US and the Taliban sign an agreement paving the way for peace in Afghanistan and the drawdown of US troops from Afghanistan. The agreement includes guarantees from the Taliban that the country would not be used for terrorist activities. 17 November 2020 Before the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, the then-acting US Defence Secretary Christopher C. Miller announced that the number of troops in Afghanistan would be halved to 2,500 by mid-January. 14 April 2021 Newly inaugurated President Joe Biden announces the US will withdraw all its troops by 11 September 2021. "It's time to end America’s longest war," he said. 15 August 2021 Taliban takeover of Kabul and the presidential palace. Leaders of the terror group say they will hold talks with Afghan officials to form an "open, inclusive Islamic government". 26 August 2021 12 members of the US military are killed and 18 are injured in an attack outside the Kabul airport amid "chaotic" troop withdrawal. At least 170 Afghans were also killed. The Islamic State in Khorasan claims responsibility, and several days later, the United States launches an air strike targeting a suspected plotter from the group. 30 August 2021 After twenty years of war, the last of the US military departs from Afghanistan, leaving the nation under its Taliban rulers.

Hegseth said that he has concluded that a "comprehensive review" was needed to ensure that a "complete picture is provided to the American people". What happened during the US withdrawal from Afghanistan? From the 9/11 attack to the end of US' 20-year war, here's a timeline&nbsp;

Trump admin launches review of US troops' withdrawal from Afghanistan: Timeline from 9/11 attack to end of '20-year-war' | WION Explains

After US President Donald Trump launched a crackdown on Harvard University, various claims emerged on social media saying his crackdown was a frustration after the Ivy League university did not admit his youngest son Barron Trump. But now, the biographer of the US president, Michael Wolff, has claimed that it was Trump who was not admitted to Harvard, not Barron.&nbsp;The author of the books like 'Fire and Fury', 'Siege: Trump under fire', and this year's 'All or nothing', claimed this on a podcast with the The Daily Beast.&nbsp;His claim came after the host of podcast, Joanna Coles, said that many people who were linked to Trump studied in Harvard. Wolf said, "It's important not to lend too much calculation and planning to anything he does."&nbsp;"But the other thing is that, by the way, he didn't get into Harvard. So one of the Trump things is always holding a grudge against the Ivy League," the biographer added.&nbsp;<h2>Trump’s educational history</h2>&nbsp;Donald Trump studied at Fordham University in 1964 after attending the New York Military Academy for four years. He got his bachelor's degree in economics from University of Pennsylvania.&nbsp;After Wolf’s claim, a &nbsp;White House spokesperson hit out at the president’s biographer for "peddling fake news", adding that Trump did not need to apply to an "overrated and corrupt" university like Harvard.&nbsp;"They both peddle fake news for clickbait in a hopeless attempt to amount to something more than lying losers. The President didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard to become a successful businessman and the most transformative President in history," Taylor Rogers said.&nbsp;<h2>Trump 'loves the drama'</h2>&nbsp;Wolf also said that apart from "holding the grudge", Trump's "TV star instincts as a producer" play a key role in his legal battle against Ivy League Universities - especially Harvard. He said that Trump need an enemy.&nbsp;"That's what makes the show great, the Trump show. He picks fantastic enemies. And Harvard, for all it represents, fits right into the Trump show. The president loves the drama. He's done what he set out to do - dominate the headline. What do you do? You go after Harvard in a way that is draconian, dramatic, and existential. It's threatening Harvard on that level," Wolf said.&nbsp; &nbsp;

'He loves drama': Reason for Trump's 'grudge' against Harvard REVEALED. Here's what US president's biographer claims

After US President Donald Trump launched a crackdown on Harvard University, various claims emerged on social media saying his crackdown was a frustration after the Ivy League university did not admit his youngest son Barron Trump. But now, the biographer of the US president, Michael Wolff, has claimed that it was Trump who was not admitted to Harvard, not Barron. The author of the books like 'Fire and Fury', 'Siege: Trump under fire', and this year's 'All or nothing', claimed this on a podcast with the The Daily Beast. His claim came after the host of podcast, Joanna Coles, said that many people who were linked to Trump studied in Harvard. Wolf said, "It's important not to lend too much calculation and planning to anything he does." "But the other thing is that, by the way, he didn't get into Harvard. So one of the Trump things is always holding a grudge against the Ivy League," the biographer added. Trump’s educational history Donald Trump studied at Fordham University in 1964 after attending the New York Military Academy for four years. He got his bachelor's degree in economics from University of Pennsylvania. After Wolf’s claim, a White House spokesperson hit out at the president’s biographer for "peddling fake news", adding that Trump did not need to apply to an "overrated and corrupt" university like Harvard. "They both peddle fake news for clickbait in a hopeless attempt to amount to something more than lying losers. The President didn't need to apply to an overrated, corrupt institution like Harvard to become a successful businessman and the most transformative President in history," Taylor Rogers said. Trump 'loves the drama' Wolf also said that apart from "holding the grudge", Trump's "TV star instincts as a producer" play a key role in his legal battle against Ivy League Universities - especially Harvard. He said that Trump need an enemy. "That's what makes the show great, the Trump show. He picks fantastic enemies. And Harvard, for all it represents, fits right into the Trump show. The president loves the drama. He's done what he set out to do - dominate the headline. What do you do? You go after Harvard in a way that is draconian, dramatic, and existential. It's threatening Harvard on that level," Wolf said.

After US President Donald Trump launched a crackdown on Harvard University, various claims emerged on social media saying his crackdown was a frustration after the Ivy League university did not admit his youngest son Barron Trump.

US President Donald Trump has some marital advice for French President Emmanuel Macron, who recently got embroiled in controversy after a video of his wife supposedly slapping him went viral.The video captures French President Emmanuel Macron being "slapped", or rather pushed, in the face by his wife, Brigitte Macron, upon their arrival in Hanoi, Vietnam. The video has garnered significant media attention. It shows Brigitte extending her arms towards Macron's face as they disembarked from their aircraft. Initially, the Élysée Palace dismissed the incident as a light-hearted moment between the couple. President Macron later addressed the media frenzy, describing the interaction as harmless play fighting between spouses.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/french-president-s-hanoi-visit-overshadowed-by-viral-moment-1748319012870">French president's Hanoi visit overshadowed by viral moment</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Macron bitchslapped by 72-year-old wife Brigitte...his people claim it was a playful not angry slap <a href="https://t.co/3d15JVZFst">pic.twitter.com/3d15JVZFst</a>&mdash; Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) <a href="https://twitter.com/RitaPanahi/status/1926952721652793459?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 26, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What advice did Trump give Macron?</h2>In response to the viral video, US President Donald Trump offered a humorous take. During the send-off press conference for Elon Musk, a Fox News correspondent asked Trump if he had any "world leader-to-world leader marital advice" for Macron. Trump, who has plenty of marital experience under his belt — he has been married three times — quipped: "Make sure the door remains closed"."That was not good," Trump said to laughter in the Oval Office.Trump then revealed that he had talked to Macron after the plane incident."I spoke to him," he said, adding, "He's fine. They're fine"."They're two really good people. I know him very well, and I don't know what that was all about," added Trump as he chose his words carefully."But I know him very well, and they're fine," he added.<h2>Elon Musk's black eye</h2>Musk, who was supporting a black eye himself, interjected into the conversation, saying, "I know a little shiner here". He later revealed that the injury happened when he was "horsing around with Little X" his son.

During the send-off press conference for Elon Musk, Trump was asked if he had any "world leader-to-world leader marital advice" for Macron. Trump, who has plenty of marital experience under his belt — he has been married three times — quipped: "Make sure the door remains closed".

US President Donald Trump has some marital advice for French President Emmanuel Macron, who recently got embroiled in controversy after a video of his wife supposedly slapping him went viral. The video captures French President Emmanuel Macron being "slapped", or rather pushed, in the face by his wife, Brigitte Macron, upon their arrival in Hanoi, Vietnam. The video has garnered significant media attention. It shows Brigitte extending her arms towards Macron's face as they disembarked from their aircraft. Initially, the Élysée Palace dismissed the incident as a light-hearted moment between the couple. President Macron later addressed the media frenzy, describing the interaction as harmless play fighting between spouses. Also read | French president's Hanoi visit overshadowed by viral moment

During the send-off press conference for Elon Musk, Trump was asked if he had any "world leader-to-world leader marital advice" for Macron. Trump, who has plenty of marital experience under his belt — he has been married three times — quipped: "Make sure the door remains closed".

Donald Trump gives French President Emmanuel Macron marital advice after viral slap video: 'Make sure...'

US President Donald Trump held a press conference on Friday (May 30) in the Oval Office for Elon Musk as a farewell for his departure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This after Musk spent 130 days in Trump administration firing &nbsp;tens of thousands of civil servants and sparking dozens of lawsuits over potential misuse of Americans’ personal data.&nbsp;Addressing the press, the US president called the Tesla CEO “one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced”. The US president hailed Musk for leading “the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations.”&nbsp;“Elon gave an incredible service. There’s nobody like him, and he had to go through the slings and the arrows, which is a shame, because he's an incredible patriot. The good news is that 90% of the country knows that, and they appreciate it, and they really appreciate what he did,” Trump said.&nbsp;Apart from tons of praising words, the US president gifted the Tesla CEO a golden key. The large key was in a wooden box and the key dated back to Trump’s previous term as the 45th President of the United States: A “Key to the White House.”But was the only person who received the “special” key from Trump? Nope.&nbsp;'First key I’m giving to anyone'&nbsp;In a 2022 book named Breaking History, Trump’s son-in-law and ex-senior adviser Jared Kushner recounted how he’d “whipped out” the same key for the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2020. While giving the key to him, Trump told Netanyahu that the key was “a special token of affection, given by myself and the First Lady to the Prime Minister and the First Lady of Israel.”“And it’s a key, we call it a key to the White House. And it’s a key to our country and to our hearts,” Trump said &nbsp;while handing the special gift to Netanyahu.&nbsp;The book claimed that Trump told the Israeli PM that it was “the first key I’m giving to anyone.” He said that the key would let Netanyahu enter the White House even Trump is not the president.&nbsp;Trump told Musk that the key was “a little special something” that he gives to “very special people” as “a presentation from our country.”&nbsp;

'Key to White House': Trump gifts 'special' golden key to Musk. What is it and how many people have it? WION Explains 

US President Donald Trump held a press conference on Friday (May 30) in the Oval Office for Elon Musk as a farewell for his departure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This after Musk spent 130 days in Trump administration firing tens of thousands of civil servants and sparking dozens of lawsuits over potential misuse of Americans’ personal data. Addressing the press, the US president called the Tesla CEO “one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced”. The US president hailed Musk for leading “the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations.” “Elon gave an incredible service. There’s nobody like him, and he had to go through the slings and the arrows, which is a shame, because he's an incredible patriot. The good news is that 90% of the country knows that, and they appreciate it, and they really appreciate what he did,” Trump said. Apart from tons of praising words, the US president gifted the Tesla CEO a golden key. The large key was in a wooden box and the key dated back to Trump’s previous term as the 45th President of the United States: A “Key to the White House.” But was the only person who received the “special” key from Trump? Nope. 'First key I’m giving to anyone' In a 2022 book named Breaking History, Trump’s son-in-law and ex-senior adviser Jared Kushner recounted how he’d “whipped out” the same key for the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2020. While giving the key to him, Trump told Netanyahu that the key was “a special token of affection, given by myself and the First Lady to the Prime Minister and the First Lady of Israel.” “And it’s a key, we call it a key to the White House. And it’s a key to our country and to our hearts,” Trump said while handing the special gift to Netanyahu. The book claimed that Trump told the Israeli PM that it was “the first key I’m giving to anyone.” He said that the key would let Netanyahu enter the White House even Trump is not the president. Trump told Musk that the key was “a little special something” that he gives to “very special people” as “a presentation from our country.”

US President Donald Trump held a press conference on Friday (May 30) in the Oval Office for Elon Musk as a farewell for his departure from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

'Key to White House': Trump gifts 'special' golden key to Musk. What is it and how many people have it? WION Explains

US consumer spending barely rose in April as households tightened their wallets and diverted funds into savings. This reportedly reflects growing unease over the country’s economic trajectory amid erratic tariff policies and legal roadblocks to US President Donald Trump’s sweeping trade duties. According to Reuters, citing data from the US Commerce Department, consumer spending, the backbone of the US economy climbed just 0.2 per cent in April, a steep slowdown from March’s 0.7 per cent gain.&nbsp;&nbsp;The deceleration suggests that Americans, rattled by recent tariff shocks and broader uncertainty, are preparing for leaner times.<h2>Spending weakens as tariff anxiety rises</h2>While services spending held firm—buoyed by housing, utilities, healthcare, and hospitality—goods spending softened considerably.&nbsp; Shoppers cut back on vehicles, apparel, and recreational goods, which had seen a pre-emptive boost in March due to stockpiling before new tariffs, Reuters reported. President Trump’s new import duties, largely targeting Chinese goods, had been slashed to 30 per cent from 145 per cent through mid-August, following a ruling by a US trade court, as per Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;The court found that the president had overstepped his authority. However, a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated most of the duties the next day, plunging the economic outlook into further ambiguity.&nbsp;“The Liberation Day tariff shock clearly spooked consumers,” said Scott Anderson, Chief US Economist at BMO Capital Markets, in a statement to Reuters. “They’re now saving for a rainy day.”<h2>Savings jump to one-year high</h2>That caution was reflected in the personal saving rate, which jumped to 4.9 per cent in April, the highest since March 2024, from 4.3 per cent in March, according to the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), as cited by Reuters.&nbsp;Adding to the economic unease, the US economy shrank at an annualised rate of 0.2 per cent in Q1 2025, the first contraction in three years. This decline was mainly attributed to a surge in imports before tariffs kicked in, according to Reuters, referencing official government data.&nbsp;In a separate report, the US Census Bureau stated that the goods trade deficit shrank by 46 per cent to $87.6 billion in April. This was due to a sharp decline in imports, which fell by $68.4 billion to $276.1 billion, while goods exports rose by $6.3 billion to $188.5 billion.<h2>Inflation eases, but Fed remains on edge</h2>Inflation remained subdued in April. The PCE Price Index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, rose 0.1 per cent in April after remaining flat in March, as per the BEA data cited by Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;On a yearly basis, overall PCE inflation increased 2.1 per cent, while core PCE, which excludes food and energy, climbed 2.5 per cent, marking the smallest increase since March 2021, as per Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;Despite these modest gains, the Federal Reserve remains cautious. According to minutes from its May 6–7 meeting, reviewed by Reuters, Fed officials highlighted concerns about rising short-term inflation expectations.&nbsp;&nbsp;Some policymakers had reportedly warned that these expectations could influence businesses to raise prices and push long-term inflation even higher.<h2>Trade deficit shrinks but sentiment deteriorates</h2>According to the US Census Bureau, the collapse in imports and slight export gains contributed to the shrinking trade deficit.&nbsp; However, economists interviewed by Reuters cautioned that the downturn in imports may be temporary and tied to the unpredictable implementation of trade tariffs.&nbsp;Markets reacted nervously. As per Reuters, US stocks opened lower, Treasury yields rose slightly, and the dollar strengthened against major global currencies on Thursday.<h2>Outlook clouded by policy unpredictability</h2>With Trump’s tariffs caught in a legal tug-of-war and inflation trending downward but unstable, the economic recovery remains fragile.&nbsp;&nbsp;Economists quoted by Reuters suggested that while softer inflation offers some relief, uncertainty surrounding tariff rulings is expected to weigh heavily on both consumer confidence and business investment in the months ahead.

Business & Economy: The Liberation Day tariff shock spooked consumers, who are now saving for a rainy day. 

US consumer spending barely rose in April as households tightened their wallets and diverted funds into savings. This reportedly reflects growing unease over the country’s economic trajectory amid erratic tariff policies and legal roadblocks to US President Donald Trump’s sweeping trade duties. According to Reuters, citing data from the US Commerce Department, consumer spending, the backbone of the US economy climbed just 0.2 per cent in April, a steep slowdown from March’s 0.7 per cent gain. The deceleration suggests that Americans, rattled by recent tariff shocks and broader uncertainty, are preparing for leaner times. Spending weakens as tariff anxiety rises While services spending held firm—buoyed by housing, utilities, healthcare, and hospitality—goods spending softened considerably. Shoppers cut back on vehicles, apparel, and recreational goods, which had seen a pre-emptive boost in March due to stockpiling before new tariffs, Reuters reported. President Trump’s new import duties, largely targeting Chinese goods, had been slashed to 30 per cent from 145 per cent through mid-August, following a ruling by a US trade court, as per Reuters. The court found that the president had overstepped his authority. However, a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated most of the duties the next day, plunging the economic outlook into further ambiguity. “The Liberation Day tariff shock clearly spooked consumers,” said Scott Anderson, Chief US Economist at BMO Capital Markets, in a statement to Reuters. “They’re now saving for a rainy day.” Savings jump to one-year high That caution was reflected in the personal saving rate, which jumped to 4.9 per cent in April, the highest since March 2024, from 4.3 per cent in March, according to the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), as cited by Reuters. Adding to the economic unease, the US economy shrank at an annualised rate of 0.2 per cent in Q1 2025, the first contraction in three years. This decline was mainly attributed to a surge in imports before tariffs kicked in, according to Reuters, referencing official government data. In a separate report, the US Census Bureau stated that the goods trade deficit shrank by 46 per cent to $87.6 billion in April. This was due to a sharp decline in imports, which fell by $68.4 billion to $276.1 billion, while goods exports rose by $6.3 billion to $188.5 billion. Inflation eases, but Fed remains on edge Inflation remained subdued in April. The PCE Price Index, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation measure, rose 0.1 per cent in April after remaining flat in March, as per the BEA data cited by Reuters. On a yearly basis, overall PCE inflation increased 2.1 per cent, while core PCE, which excludes food and energy, climbed 2.5 per cent, marking the smallest increase since March 2021, as per Reuters. Despite these modest gains, the Federal Reserve remains cautious. According to minutes from its May 6–7 meeting, reviewed by Reuters, Fed officials highlighted concerns about rising short-term inflation expectations. Some policymakers had reportedly warned that these expectations could influence businesses to raise prices and push long-term inflation even higher. Trade deficit shrinks but sentiment deteriorates According to the US Census Bureau, the collapse in imports and slight export gains contributed to the shrinking trade deficit. However, economists interviewed by Reuters cautioned that the downturn in imports may be temporary and tied to the unpredictable implementation of trade tariffs. Markets reacted nervously. As per Reuters, US stocks opened lower, Treasury yields rose slightly, and the dollar strengthened against major global currencies on Thursday. Outlook clouded by policy unpredictability With Trump’s tariffs caught in a legal tug-of-war and inflation trending downward but unstable, the economic recovery remains fragile. Economists quoted by Reuters suggested that while softer inflation offers some relief, uncertainty surrounding tariff rulings is expected to weigh heavily on both consumer confidence and business investment in the months ahead.

US consumer spending barely increased in April, as households strained their finances and shifted funds into savings.&nbsp;

US consumer spending falters in April as inflation cools and savings rise

US President Donald Trump said on Friday (May 30) that he would consider a presidential pardon for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, who has serious charges of sex trafficking. Talking at a press conference in the Oval Office, the US president, who has not followed the case around Diddy, said he would "certainly look at the facts." He did not &nbsp;confirm any action plan but added, “If I think somebody was mistreated.”&nbsp;“It’s not a popularity contest. Whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact on me,” Trump added.When a Fox News reporter asked Trump about his ties with Diddy and whether it would affect the potential pardon in his case, Trump said, “I know people are thinking about it. I know that they're thinking about it. I think people have been very close to asking.”&nbsp;“First of all, I'd look at what's happening, and I haven't been watching it too closely, although it's certainly getting a lot of coverage,” the US president added.&nbsp;“I haven't seen him. I haven't spoken to him in years” Trump said.&nbsp;He then recalled when Diddy “used to really like me a lot,” but when “I think when I ran for politics … that relationship busted up.”The US president also said that he read “some little bit nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden.”&nbsp;“You become a much different person when you run for politics, and you do what's right,” Trump claimed.&nbsp;“I could do other things, and I'm sure he'd like me, and I'm sure other people would like me, but it wouldn't be as good for our country,” he added.&nbsp;What’s the case against Diddy?&nbsp;The singer is facing allegations of racketeering conspiracy under the RICO statute, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and transporting individuals for prostitution. &nbsp;If Diddy gets convicted, he could face a &nbsp;jail term for at least 15 years or even imprisonment for life.&nbsp;

'Used to really like me a lot': Trump may pardon Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs BUT... 

US President Donald Trump said on Friday (May 30) that he would consider a presidential pardon for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, who has serious charges of sex trafficking. Talking at a press conference in the Oval Office, the US president, who has not followed the case around Diddy, said he would "certainly look at the facts." He did not confirm any action plan but added, “If I think somebody was mistreated.” “It’s not a popularity contest. Whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact on me,” Trump added. When a Fox News reporter asked Trump about his ties with Diddy and whether it would affect the potential pardon in his case, Trump said, “I know people are thinking about it. I know that they're thinking about it. I think people have been very close to asking.” “First of all, I'd look at what's happening, and I haven't been watching it too closely, although it's certainly getting a lot of coverage,” the US president added. “I haven't seen him. I haven't spoken to him in years” Trump said. He then recalled when Diddy “used to really like me a lot,” but when “I think when I ran for politics … that relationship busted up.” The US president also said that he read “some little bit nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden.” “You become a much different person when you run for politics, and you do what's right,” Trump claimed. “I could do other things, and I'm sure he'd like me, and I'm sure other people would like me, but it wouldn't be as good for our country,” he added. What’s the case against Diddy? The singer is facing allegations of racketeering conspiracy under the RICO statute, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and transporting individuals for prostitution. If Diddy gets convicted, he could face a jail term for at least 15 years or even imprisonment for life.

US President Donald Trump said on Friday (May 30) that he would consider a presidential pardon for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, who has serious charges of sex trafficking.&nbsp;

'Used to really like me a lot': Trump may pardon Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs BUT...

US President Donald Trump addressed a press conference on Friday (May 30) along with Tesla boss Elon Musk after his exit from White House. Musk, who had been serving as the chief of the Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE) since the beginning of Trump's second term in January, is quitting the Washington stint. Trump and Musk's presser puts to an end the talks of rift between the duo after Musk's criticism of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill.’&nbsp;&nbsp;The US president, in the press conference, said that Elon Musk has worked tirelessly, and he is not leaving the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) because it is “his baby.” Musk agreed with Trump and said he will continue to play the role of his advisor and will keep visiting DOGE. He reiterated that 'DOGE will become the way of life."&nbsp;&nbsp;1. Trump opened the press conference by praising Elon Musk, calling him “a fantastic friend” who “didn’t need this,” referring to Musk’s government stint. “Government's a little nasty on occasion,” Trump added, before joking with another attendee about their “charmed life.” He credited Musk with leading “the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations.”&nbsp;&nbsp;2. Trump showered praises on Musk, calling his role in government reform “without comparison in modern history.” He thanked the Tesla boss for enduring “outrageous abuse and lies” out of patriotism and formally honored him as a “special government employee.”&nbsp;3. Trump said Musk’s team uncovered government practices that were “unbelievably stupid and unbelievably bad." The DOGE department, according to Trump, “installed geniuses” and brought in “an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people.” He recounted asking Musk what defined their team — to which Musk supposedly replied: “Being smart.”&nbsp;4. Praising his tariff decision, Trump claimed that ‘trade deficit has been cut to half.’ He then turned to Musk, calling him “one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced,” and said Musk “stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation.”&nbsp;5. Meanwhile, during the press conference as the Tesla CEO stood beside him at Oval Office, Trump once again claimed that he used tariff to stop the military action between India and Pakistan. "We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. It could have turned into a nuclear disaster.”&nbsp;6. The US president also said that the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal and Iran nuclear deal will be finalised soon. The US president lashed out at China claiming that it violated the trade truce of 90 days.<h2>What Elon Musk said in the press conference?</h2>Elon Musk addressed the audience after receiving a special award from Donald Trump, clarifying that his official role in the government’s “Doge” initiative is ending — but the movement itself is just getting started. Musk noted, "It’s like a version of Buddhism." Musk confirmed his official 134-day role as “special government employee” is ending soon, but added, "I’ll continue to be here and be a friend and advisor to the President."<h2>Elon Musk's eye and controversy around it</h2>Elon Musk had an apparent black bruise near his eye during his final press conference before White House exit. The ‘black eye’ sparked concerns as it was seenhours after the New York Times made explosive claims about the Tesla CEO's alleged drug addiction. &nbsp;A reporter asked Musk if his eye was ok. The Tesla CEO responded: “I wasn’t anywhere near France. I was just horsing around with little X, and I said punch me in the face and he did.” Tesla CEO's France reference was after French President Emmanuel Macron got shoved in the face while on an airplane by his wife - video of which went viral.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump is addressing a press conference along with Tesla boss Elon Musk 

US President Donald Trump addressed a press conference on Friday (May 30) along with Tesla boss Elon Musk after his exit from White House. Musk, who had been serving as the chief of the Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE) since the beginning of Trump's second term in January, is quitting the Washington stint. Trump and Musk's presser puts to an end the talks of rift between the duo after Musk's criticism of Trump's ‘big beautiful bill.’ The US president, in the press conference, said that Elon Musk has worked tirelessly, and he is not leaving the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) because it is “his baby.” Musk agreed with Trump and said he will continue to play the role of his advisor and will keep visiting DOGE. He reiterated that 'DOGE will become the way of life." 1. Trump opened the press conference by praising Elon Musk, calling him “a fantastic friend” who “didn’t need this,” referring to Musk’s government stint. “Government's a little nasty on occasion,” Trump added, before joking with another attendee about their “charmed life.” He credited Musk with leading “the most sweeping and consequential government reform program in generations.” 2. Trump showered praises on Musk, calling his role in government reform “without comparison in modern history.” He thanked the Tesla boss for enduring “outrageous abuse and lies” out of patriotism and formally honored him as a “special government employee.” 3. Trump said Musk’s team uncovered government practices that were “unbelievably stupid and unbelievably bad." The DOGE department, according to Trump, “installed geniuses” and brought in “an engineering mindset and unbelievably talented people.” He recounted asking Musk what defined their team — to which Musk supposedly replied: “Being smart.” 4. Praising his tariff decision, Trump claimed that ‘trade deficit has been cut to half.’ He then turned to Musk, calling him “one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced,” and said Musk “stepped forward to put his very great talents into the service of our nation.” 5. Meanwhile, during the press conference as the Tesla CEO stood beside him at Oval Office, Trump once again claimed that he used tariff to stop the military action between India and Pakistan. "We stopped India and Pakistan from fighting. It could have turned into a nuclear disaster.” 6. The US president also said that the Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal and Iran nuclear deal will be finalised soon. The US president lashed out at China claiming that it violated the trade truce of 90 days. What Elon Musk said in the press conference? Elon Musk addressed the audience after receiving a special award from Donald Trump, clarifying that his official role in the government’s “Doge” initiative is ending — but the movement itself is just getting started. Musk noted, "It’s like a version of Buddhism." Musk confirmed his official 134-day role as “special government employee” is ending soon, but added, "I’ll continue to be here and be a friend and advisor to the President." Elon Musk's eye and controversy around it Elon Musk had an apparent black bruise near his eye during his final press conference before White House exit. The ‘black eye’ sparked concerns as it was seenhours after the New York Times made explosive claims about the Tesla CEO's alleged drug addiction. A reporter asked Musk if his eye was ok. The Tesla CEO responded: “I wasn’t anywhere near France. I was just horsing around with little X, and I said punch me in the face and he did.” Tesla CEO's France reference was after French President Emmanuel Macron got shoved in the face while on an airplane by his wife - video of which went viral.

US President Donald Trump is addressing a press conference along with Tesla boss Elon Musk&nbsp;

'Elon's not really leaving' to 'stopped India-Pak from fighting': What Trump said in press conference after Musk's exit

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, reportedly used a mix of ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms while acting as one of Donald Trump’s top advisers. According to an investigation by the New York Times, Musk’s drug use was not just occasional, it became frequent enough to affect his health and daily life.Sources close to Musk told the Times that he often carried a daily stash of around 20 pills. His consumption of ketamine reportedly led to bladder problems, a known side effect of long-term use.<h2>Drug use intensified during political rise</h2>The report claims Musk’s drug use became more intense as he gained political influence. He had donated $275 million to Trump’s campaign and was appointed head of the so-called “department of government efficiency”, known informally as Doge. While in this role, he held sway over key decisions in government spending.Despite publicly claiming he only took “a small amount” of ketamine “about once every two weeks”, sources told the Times he was using it far more regularly. “If you’ve used too much ketamine, you can’t really get work done, and I have a lot of work,” Musk said in a March 2024 interview with journalist Don Lemon.<h2>Behaviour raised questions before resignation</h2>Musk officially stepped down from his government role on Wednesday. His resignation came after months of strange behaviour, including reportedly insulting cabinet members and even making a Nazi-like gesture at a political event.Although ketamine can be prescribed legally as a Schedule III drug, its recreational use or combining it with other substances could still break federal workplace rules. Ecstasy, on the other hand, is a Schedule I drug, making it completely illegal for most government employees.However, Musk was classified as a “special government employee”, which means he didn’t have to follow the same strict drug policies as regular federal workers.<h2>Drug box contained Adderall, sources say</h2>Photos seen by Times sources show Musk’s regular pill box included substances marked as Adderall, a drug used to treat ADHD but often misused for its stimulant effects.It remains unclear whether Musk ever attended White House meetings under the influence. Still, he was involved in confidential discussions with foreign leaders and helped shape federal budget decisions.The White House did not comment on whether Musk was ever tested for drug use, despite having access to sensitive information.While Musk’s company SpaceX enforces a drug-free policy due to its work with the US government, insiders told the Times that Musk was often tipped off before random drug tests, potentially weakening the process.Podcaster and public thinker Sam Harris, who once counted Musk as a friend, wrote in January, “There is something seriously wrong with his moral compass, if not his perception of reality.”

Musk officially stepped down from his government role on Wednesday. His resignation came after months of strange behaviour, including reportedly insulting cabinet members and even making a Nazi-like gesture at a political event.

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, reportedly used a mix of ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms while acting as one of Donald Trump’s top advisers. According to an investigation by the New York Times, Musk’s drug use was not just occasional, it became frequent enough to affect his health and daily life. Sources close to Musk told the Times that he often carried a daily stash of around 20 pills. His consumption of ketamine reportedly led to bladder problems, a known side effect of long-term use. Drug use intensified during political rise The report claims Musk’s drug use became more intense as he gained political influence. He had donated $275 million to Trump’s campaign and was appointed head of the so-called “department of government efficiency”, known informally as Doge. While in this role, he held sway over key decisions in government spending. Despite publicly claiming he only took “a small amount” of ketamine “about once every two weeks”, sources told the Times he was using it far more regularly. “If you’ve used too much ketamine, you can’t really get work done, and I have a lot of work,” Musk said in a March 2024 interview with journalist Don Lemon. Behaviour raised questions before resignation Musk officially stepped down from his government role on Wednesday. His resignation came after months of strange behaviour, including reportedly insulting cabinet members and even making a Nazi-like gesture at a political event. Although ketamine can be prescribed legally as a Schedule III drug, its recreational use or combining it with other substances could still break federal workplace rules. Ecstasy, on the other hand, is a Schedule I drug, making it completely illegal for most government employees. However, Musk was classified as a “special government employee”, which means he didn’t have to follow the same strict drug policies as regular federal workers. Drug box contained Adderall, sources say Photos seen by Times sources show Musk’s regular pill box included substances marked as Adderall, a drug used to treat ADHD but often misused for its stimulant effects. It remains unclear whether Musk ever attended White House meetings under the influence. Still, he was involved in confidential discussions with foreign leaders and helped shape federal budget decisions. The White House did not comment on whether Musk was ever tested for drug use, despite having access to sensitive information. While Musk’s company SpaceX enforces a drug-free policy due to its work with the US government, insiders told the Times that Musk was often tipped off before random drug tests, potentially weakening the process. Podcaster and public thinker Sam Harris, who once counted Musk as a friend, wrote in January, “There is something seriously wrong with his moral compass, if not his perception of reality.”

Musk officially stepped down from his government role on Wednesday. His resignation came after months of strange behaviour, including reportedly insulting cabinet members and even making a Nazi-like gesture at a political event.

'Something wrong with his moral compass': Elon Musk allegedly used drugs including ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms while working for Trump

President Donald Trump on Friday (May 30) accused China of breaking a recent trade agreement that he claimed was made to save Beijing from serious economic collapse.Writing on his platform, Truth Social, Trump said, “Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World.”He went on to say that the US had effectively gone “COLD TURKEY with China” and the impact on Beijing was dramatic. According to Trump, “Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, ‘civil unrest.’ I saw what was happening and didn’t like it, for them, not for us.”<h2>Trump claims he rushed to cut a deal to prevent collapse</h2>Trump said he decided to make a quick agreement with China to avoid what he described as a worsening situation. “I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn’t want to see that happen,” he said.“Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilised and China got back to business as usual. Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!!” Trump added.<h2>'Mr Nice Guy' no more: Trump says China broke the deal</h2>Trump accused China of failing to honour the terms of the agreement, saying, “The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!”Earlier this month, both countries agreed to lower their tariffs, the US dropped its rate on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China lowered its tariffs on American products from 125% to 10%.<h2>US officials admit trade talks have stalled</h2>Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent admitted on Thursday that discussions with China had hit a wall. Speaking to Fox News’s Bret Baier, Bessent said trade negotiations were “a bit stalled.” He also mentioned that there could be a call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in the near future.Trump had previously said that without the quick trade deal, China would have suffered more as the trade war escalated.<h2>Courts rule against Trump tariffs, but some still on hold</h2>A court ruling on Wednesday found that Trump did not have unilateral power under emergency laws to impose tariffs on countries like China, Mexico, and Canada, particularly when aimed at stopping fentanyl. That decision was temporarily overturned by an appeal court, allowing the tariffs to continue for now.However, many of the tariffs remain on hold due to a separate federal court ruling issued in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

According to Trump, “Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, ‘civil unrest.’ I saw what was happening and didn’t like it, for them, not for us.”

President Donald Trump on Friday (May 30) accused China of breaking a recent trade agreement that he claimed was made to save Beijing from serious economic collapse. Writing on his platform, Truth Social, Trump said, “Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World.” He went on to say that the US had effectively gone “COLD TURKEY with China” and the impact on Beijing was dramatic. According to Trump, “Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, ‘civil unrest.’ I saw what was happening and didn’t like it, for them, not for us.” Trump claims he rushed to cut a deal to prevent collapse Trump said he decided to make a quick agreement with China to avoid what he described as a worsening situation. “I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn’t want to see that happen,” he said. “Because of this deal, everything quickly stabilised and China got back to business as usual. Everybody was happy! That is the good news!!!” Trump added. 'Mr Nice Guy' no more: Trump says China broke the deal Trump accused China of failing to honour the terms of the agreement, saying, “The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!” Earlier this month, both countries agreed to lower their tariffs, the US dropped its rate on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China lowered its tariffs on American products from 125% to 10%. US officials admit trade talks have stalled Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent admitted on Thursday that discussions with China had hit a wall. Speaking to Fox News’s Bret Baier, Bessent said trade negotiations were “a bit stalled.” He also mentioned that there could be a call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in the near future. Trump had previously said that without the quick trade deal, China would have suffered more as the trade war escalated. Courts rule against Trump tariffs, but some still on hold A court ruling on Wednesday found that Trump did not have unilateral power under emergency laws to impose tariffs on countries like China, Mexico, and Canada, particularly when aimed at stopping fentanyl. That decision was temporarily overturned by an appeal court, allowing the tariffs to continue for now. However, many of the tariffs remain on hold due to a separate federal court ruling issued in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

According to Trump, “Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, ‘civil unrest.’ I saw what was happening and didn’t like it, for them, not for us.”

‘So much for Mr Nice Guy’: Trump blasts China for 'violating' trade deal he says saved Beijing 'grave economic danger'

Elon Musk is stepping down from his post in the Trump administration after 129 controversial days leading the Department of Government Efficiency, better known as DOGE.The billionaire, confirmed his departure earlier this week in a post on X, his own social media platform, where he thanked President Trump for the opportunity.Trump, in turn, announced a news conference at the Oval Office on Friday (May 30) with Musk by his side. “This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way,” he wrote.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-first-red-line-must-not-be-crossed-china-fumes-over-reports-of-us-arms-sales-to-taiwan-1748606326662">'First red line must not be crossed': China fumes over reports of US arms sales to Taiwan</a>Despite being in government for just over four months, Musk’s impact was significant, shaking up departments across Washington and leaving a ripple effect around the world.<h2>Deep cuts to federal budget marked Musk's tenure</h2>Musk joined the Trump administration to cut as much government spending as possible. At first, he aimed to cut $2 trillion from the budget, though that figure later dropped to $1 trillion, and then settled at $150 billion.According to DOGE, the department ultimately achieved $175 billion in savings. These came from asset sales, cancelled leases and grants, deleted “fraud and improper payments,” reduced regulation and by cutting 260,000 workers from the 2.3 million-strong federal workforce.However, the scale of the cuts also brought chaos. In several cases, judges blocked mass layoffs and ordered the reinstatement of sacked employees.Musk admitted early on that mistakes were likely. In February, after DOGE cut an aid programme confusing Mozambique for Gaza, he said: “We will make mistakes. But we'll act quickly to correct any mistakes.”One of the most dramatic effects of Musk’s policies was felt abroad. After a six-week review, DOGE eliminated more than 80% of programmes run by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), with the rest absorbed by the State Department.These cuts aligned with Trump’s “America First” agenda but hit hard. Projects ranging from famine response and vaccinations to support for transgender clinics in India and scholarships for Afghan women were either cut back or shut down.<h2>Ethical concerns over Musk's dual role</h2>Musk’s presence in the White House raised eyebrows. He was not elected, but held considerable power, all while his companies continued doing business with the US government.Some Democrats claimed he used his post to promote Starlink, his satellite internet firm, overseas. The White House was also accused of giving special treatment to Tesla, Musk’s electric car company, after showcasing its vehicles on the South Lawn in March.<h2>Musk clashed with officials over scale of cuts</h2>Despite public unity, tensions simmered within the administration over Musk’s sweeping budget cuts. While Trump gave DOGE his full support, some cabinet members reportedly grew uneasy.In one cabinet meeting in February, Trump addressed the discomfort. “They have a lot of respect for Elon and that he's doing this, and some disagree a little bit,” he said. “If they aren't, I want them to speak up.” No one did.On the same day Musk’s departure was announced, CBS aired part of an interview in which Musk voiced frustration over Trump’s latest budget bill.Calling it a “big, beautiful” spending plan packed with tax breaks and boosted defence funding, Musk said it “undermines” DOGE's work.

The billionaire, confirmed his departure earlier this week in a post on X, his own social media platform, where he thanked President Trump for the opportunity.

Elon Musk is stepping down from his post in the Trump administration after 129 controversial days leading the Department of Government Efficiency, better known as DOGE. The billionaire, confirmed his departure earlier this week in a post on X, his own social media platform, where he thanked President Trump for the opportunity. Trump, in turn, announced a news conference at the Oval Office on Friday (May 30) with Musk by his side. “This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way,” he wrote. Also read: 'First red line must not be crossed': China fumes over reports of US arms sales to Taiwan Despite being in government for just over four months, Musk’s impact was significant, shaking up departments across Washington and leaving a ripple effect around the world. Deep cuts to federal budget marked Musk's tenure Musk joined the Trump administration to cut as much government spending as possible. At first, he aimed to cut $2 trillion from the budget, though that figure later dropped to $1 trillion, and then settled at $150 billion. According to DOGE, the department ultimately achieved $175 billion in savings. These came from asset sales, cancelled leases and grants, deleted “fraud and improper payments,” reduced regulation and by cutting 260,000 workers from the 2.3 million-strong federal workforce. However, the scale of the cuts also brought chaos. In several cases, judges blocked mass layoffs and ordered the reinstatement of sacked employees. Musk admitted early on that mistakes were likely. In February, after DOGE cut an aid programme confusing Mozambique for Gaza, he said: “We will make mistakes. But we'll act quickly to correct any mistakes.” One of the most dramatic effects of Musk’s policies was felt abroad. After a six-week review, DOGE eliminated more than 80% of programmes run by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), with the rest absorbed by the State Department. These cuts aligned with Trump’s “America First” agenda but hit hard. Projects ranging from famine response and vaccinations to support for transgender clinics in India and scholarships for Afghan women were either cut back or shut down. Ethical concerns over Musk's dual role Musk’s presence in the White House raised eyebrows. He was not elected, but held considerable power, all while his companies continued doing business with the US government. Some Democrats claimed he used his post to promote Starlink, his satellite internet firm, overseas. The White House was also accused of giving special treatment to Tesla, Musk’s electric car company, after showcasing its vehicles on the South Lawn in March. Musk clashed with officials over scale of cuts Despite public unity, tensions simmered within the administration over Musk’s sweeping budget cuts. While Trump gave DOGE his full support, some cabinet members reportedly grew uneasy. In one cabinet meeting in February, Trump addressed the discomfort. “They have a lot of respect for Elon and that he's doing this, and some disagree a little bit,” he said. “If they aren't, I want them to speak up.” No one did. On the same day Musk’s departure was announced, CBS aired part of an interview in which Musk voiced frustration over Trump’s latest budget bill. Calling it a “big, beautiful” spending plan packed with tax breaks and boosted defence funding, Musk said it “undermines” DOGE's work.

The billionaire, confirmed his departure earlier this week in a post on X, his own social media platform, where he thanked President Trump for the opportunity.

Elon Musk's White House crusade comes to an end: What he really did in 129 chaotic days as Trump’s DOGE chief

As the global economy reels from President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade manoeuvres, Wall Street has coined a nickname that’s quickly gone viral, and it’s getting under Trump’s skin.&nbsp;TACO Trade, short for ‘Trump Always Chickens Out’, is a term first introduced by Robert Armstrong, a columnist for the Financial Times. It describes what many economists and investors say has become a hallmark of Trump’s approach to trade policy, threatening steep tariffs to gain leverage and then backtracking when markets react adversely.<h2>What is the ‘TACO Trade’?</h2>According to the Financial Times, TACO Trade refers to a recurring cycle: Trump threatens sky-high tariffs; global markets tumble; the president delays or waters down the measures; and markets bounce back as investors anticipate the pattern.&nbsp;For instance, as reported by Bloomberg, Trump announced sweeping new tariffs on nearly all trading partners on April 2, including a 26 per cent duty on Indian imports. But following a sharp sell-off in equities, including an 8 per cent drop in Hong Kong’s Hang Seng and a 9 per cent plunge in Tokyo’s Nikkei 225, Trump paused the tariffs seven days later for a 90-day window to renegotiate trade deals.<h2>Trump reacts&nbsp;</h2>Asked about the viral acronym during a White House media interaction, Trump bristled at the suggestion that he was retreating under pressure. “You call that chickening out? It’s called negotiation,” he told reporters, adding, “That’s a nasty question.” He went on to clarify that he often starts with a ‘ridiculously high number’ and then negotiates down, according to The New York Times.&nbsp;He also defended his decision to ease tariffs on China, saying, “We helped them… they were having difficulty because we were basically going cold turkey with them.”&nbsp;As per The Guardian, analysts argue that these recurring pullbacks have become so consistent that traders now price them into market forecasts, leading to sharp rebounds after Trump softens his stance.<h2>Trump tariff faces legal heat&nbsp;</h2>In a major blow to Trump’s economic agenda, a US federal court recently ruled that the president exceeded his authority when imposing wide-ranging tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), according to Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;The court held that a trade deficit does not constitute an “unusual and extraordinary threat,” invalidating the tariffs announced in April as part of Trump’s so-called ‘Liberation Day’ package.&nbsp;As per Associated Press, the ruling was cheered by investors and trade partners. Stock indices such as India’s Sensex, Japan’s Nikkei, and South Korea’s KOSPI posted gains immediately after the verdict.&nbsp;However, the Trump administration appealed the ruling, and a federal appeals court has temporarily reinstated the tariffs, citing national security concerns. This means the 145 per cent duties on Chinese goods and baseline 10–26 per cent tariffs on others remain in place pending a final judgment.<h2>Why TACO Trade matters?</h2>According to Reuters, many global firms are now reconsidering their supply chain strategies amid trade uncertainty. For economists and investors, the “TACO Trade” phenomenon is more than a meme, it reflects an underlying instability in trade governance and a lack of policy clarity from the White House.&nbsp;“It’s not about ‘chickening out,’” Trump said defiantly this week, “it’s called smart negotiating.”Still, as Wall Street embraces the TACO metaphor, and markets continue to react in predictable waves,&nbsp;the label may prove stickier than Trump expects.&nbsp;

Business & Economy: The term, coined by Robert Armstrong for the Financial Times, refers to a recurring cycle where Trump threatens high tariffs to gain leverage and then backtracking when markets react adversely. 

As the global economy reels from President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade manoeuvres, Wall Street has coined a nickname that’s quickly gone viral, and it’s getting under Trump’s skin. TACO Trade, short for ‘Trump Always Chickens Out’, is a term first introduced by Robert Armstrong, a columnist for the Financial Times. It describes what many economists and investors say has become a hallmark of Trump’s approach to trade policy, threatening steep tariffs to gain leverage and then backtracking when markets react adversely. What is the ‘TACO Trade’? According to the Financial Times, TACO Trade refers to a recurring cycle: Trump threatens sky-high tariffs; global markets tumble; the president delays or waters down the measures; and markets bounce back as investors anticipate the pattern. For instance, as reported by Bloomberg, Trump announced sweeping new tariffs on nearly all trading partners on April 2, including a 26 per cent duty on Indian imports. But following a sharp sell-off in equities, including an 8 per cent drop in Hong Kong’s Hang Seng and a 9 per cent plunge in Tokyo’s Nikkei 225, Trump paused the tariffs seven days later for a 90-day window to renegotiate trade deals. Trump reacts Asked about the viral acronym during a White House media interaction, Trump bristled at the suggestion that he was retreating under pressure. “You call that chickening out? It’s called negotiation,” he told reporters, adding, “That’s a nasty question.” He went on to clarify that he often starts with a ‘ridiculously high number’ and then negotiates down, according to The New York Times. He also defended his decision to ease tariffs on China, saying, “We helped them… they were having difficulty because we were basically going cold turkey with them.” As per The Guardian, analysts argue that these recurring pullbacks have become so consistent that traders now price them into market forecasts, leading to sharp rebounds after Trump softens his stance. Trump tariff faces legal heat In a major blow to Trump’s economic agenda, a US federal court recently ruled that the president exceeded his authority when imposing wide-ranging tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), according to Reuters. The court held that a trade deficit does not constitute an “unusual and extraordinary threat,” invalidating the tariffs announced in April as part of Trump’s so-called ‘Liberation Day’ package. As per Associated Press, the ruling was cheered by investors and trade partners. Stock indices such as India’s Sensex, Japan’s Nikkei, and South Korea’s KOSPI posted gains immediately after the verdict. However, the Trump administration appealed the ruling, and a federal appeals court has temporarily reinstated the tariffs, citing national security concerns. This means the 145 per cent duties on Chinese goods and baseline 10–26 per cent tariffs on others remain in place pending a final judgment. Why TACO Trade matters? According to Reuters, many global firms are now reconsidering their supply chain strategies amid trade uncertainty. For economists and investors, the “TACO Trade” phenomenon is more than a meme, it reflects an underlying instability in trade governance and a lack of policy clarity from the White House. “It’s not about ‘chickening out,’” Trump said defiantly this week, “it’s called smart negotiating.” Still, as Wall Street embraces the TACO metaphor, and markets continue to react in predictable waves, the label may prove stickier than Trump expects.

The term "TACO Trade" has gained popularity as Wall Street criticises President Donald Trump's aggressive trade policies.&nbsp;

What is ‘TACO Trade’? Trump's new nickname that fumes him amid the tariff legal saga

President Donald Trump get a temporary legal lifeline for his sweeping April 2025 tariff agenda, but it’s only a pause, not a win.&nbsp; &nbsp;According to Bloomberg, on May 29, a US federal appeals court has stayed a lower court ruling that would have forced his administration to unwind the majority of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).&nbsp;On May 28, the US Court of International Trade dealt a major blow, ruling that Trump had overreached by using emergency powers to impose blanket tariffs on dozens of nations, citing issues like fentanyl trafficking and trade deficits as national threats.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Bloomberg Economics, the ruling would have slashed the average US tariff rate from nearly 27 per cent to below 6 per cent, a dramatic rollback of Trump’s hardline trade stance.&nbsp;Trump responded on social media, labelling the court’s decision “so wrong and so political” and urging the Supreme Court to act “quickly and decisively.” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed his stance, warning that if courts could derail a president’s trade policy, it would weaken “Presidential Power” and disrupt diplomacy, as per Bloomberg.&nbsp;&nbsp;While the stay allows the tariffs to remain in place at least until 9 June, when further legal arguments will be heard, the administration knows this is only a temporary shield as per Bloomberg.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, a second federal judge has also struck down a set of tariffs, though that ruling is limited to a specific plaintiff and delayed for 14 days to allow for appeal.<h2>Team Trump eyes for a backup plan</h2> Facing legal headwinds, the Trump administration is already exploring alternative pathways to keep its protectionist trade agenda intact.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Bloomberg, officials are weighing options under other laws , most notably Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act and Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, both of which have been used before to target imports on national security or unfair trade grounds.&nbsp;Section 232, in particular, has formed the backbone of Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminium, and vehicles since 2017. According to Bloomberg, these tools are considered more legally durable than IEEPA, but they’re slower. Investigations can take up to 270 days, although White House insiders suggest processes may be fast-tracked.&nbsp;Peter Navarro, Trump’s former trade adviser, told Bloomberg that “the Trump tariff agenda is alive, well, healthy, and will be implemented to protect you, to save your jobs and your factories.” He hinted that US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would announce new strategies shortly. However, some Trump allies remain sceptical of the timeline.&nbsp;“The idea that Trump is going to turn to plan B and do tariffs by other means has problems,” said James Lucier of Capital Alpha Partners, speaking to Bloomberg. “Yes, he will do it. But he is running out of time to get results before the midterm elections.”&nbsp;Section 122, which allows temporary tariffs of up to 15 per cent for 150 days, was also discussed.&nbsp; &nbsp;But Navarro downplayed it, citing its limited duration. Meanwhile, Section 301 remains a wildcard as it has been used before, particularly against China, and could provide broader trade tools if IEEPA is struck down for good, as per Bloomberg.&nbsp;<h2>Global implications and the road ahead</h2> The court battles come at a time when global trade remains fragile, with Trump’s April tariffs already straining relations with major economies. The initial ruling would have voided levies on imports from key partners like China, Canada, and Mexico and, as Bloomberg noted, blocked nearly two-thirds of the administration’s tariffs. With this legal uncertainty in play, trading partners are watching closely. If Trump is forced to unwind tariffs, the US may lose bargaining power in ongoing negotiations over market access and manufacturing policy. For now, Trump’s legal team remains defiant, promising to escalate the fight all the way to the Supreme Court if needed. But as analysts warn, hastily reintroducing tariffs through other channels could open the door to more lawsuits — unless the process is rock-solid. “If Trump jumps through the hoops and does all the paperwork for Section 232 tariffs, then he may have tariffs that are legally sustainable,” Lucier told Bloomberg. “But if he rushes it, the same anti-tariff forces will take him to court again.” The court’s decision has bought Trump time, but not clarity. As legal battles escalate and the 2026 midterm clock ticks louder, the future of America’s aggressive trade policy hangs in the balance.&nbsp;

Business & Economy: The stay allows the tariffs to remain in place until 9 June, when further legal arguments will be heard. 

President Donald Trump get a temporary legal lifeline for his sweeping April 2025 tariff agenda, but it’s only a pause, not a win. According to Bloomberg, on May 29, a US federal appeals court has stayed a lower court ruling that would have forced his administration to unwind the majority of tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). On May 28, the US Court of International Trade dealt a major blow, ruling that Trump had overreached by using emergency powers to impose blanket tariffs on dozens of nations, citing issues like fentanyl trafficking and trade deficits as national threats. According to Bloomberg Economics, the ruling would have slashed the average US tariff rate from nearly 27 per cent to below 6 per cent, a dramatic rollback of Trump’s hardline trade stance. Trump responded on social media, labelling the court’s decision “so wrong and so political” and urging the Supreme Court to act “quickly and decisively.” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed his stance, warning that if courts could derail a president’s trade policy, it would weaken “Presidential Power” and disrupt diplomacy, as per Bloomberg. While the stay allows the tariffs to remain in place at least until 9 June, when further legal arguments will be heard, the administration knows this is only a temporary shield as per Bloomberg. According to Bloomberg, a second federal judge has also struck down a set of tariffs, though that ruling is limited to a specific plaintiff and delayed for 14 days to allow for appeal. Team Trump eyes for a backup plan Facing legal headwinds, the Trump administration is already exploring alternative pathways to keep its protectionist trade agenda intact. As per Bloomberg, officials are weighing options under other laws , most notably Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act and Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, both of which have been used before to target imports on national security or unfair trade grounds. Section 232, in particular, has formed the backbone of Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminium, and vehicles since 2017. According to Bloomberg, these tools are considered more legally durable than IEEPA, but they’re slower. Investigations can take up to 270 days, although White House insiders suggest processes may be fast-tracked. Peter Navarro, Trump’s former trade adviser, told Bloomberg that “the Trump tariff agenda is alive, well, healthy, and will be implemented to protect you, to save your jobs and your factories.” He hinted that US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would announce new strategies shortly. However, some Trump allies remain sceptical of the timeline. “The idea that Trump is going to turn to plan B and do tariffs by other means has problems,” said James Lucier of Capital Alpha Partners, speaking to Bloomberg. “Yes, he will do it. But he is running out of time to get results before the midterm elections.” Section 122, which allows temporary tariffs of up to 15 per cent for 150 days, was also discussed. But Navarro downplayed it, citing its limited duration. Meanwhile, Section 301 remains a wildcard as it has been used before, particularly against China, and could provide broader trade tools if IEEPA is struck down for good, as per Bloomberg. Global implications and the road ahead The court battles come at a time when global trade remains fragile, with Trump’s April tariffs already straining relations with major economies. The initial ruling would have voided levies on imports from key partners like China, Canada, and Mexico and, as Bloomberg noted, blocked nearly two-thirds of the administration’s tariffs. With this legal uncertainty in play, trading partners are watching closely. If Trump is forced to unwind tariffs, the US may lose bargaining power in ongoing negotiations over market access and manufacturing policy. For now, Trump’s legal team remains defiant, promising to escalate the fight all the way to the Supreme Court if needed. But as analysts warn, hastily reintroducing tariffs through other channels could open the door to more lawsuits — unless the process is rock-solid. “If Trump jumps through the hoops and does all the paperwork for Section 232 tariffs, then he may have tariffs that are legally sustainable,” Lucier told Bloomberg. “But if he rushes it, the same anti-tariff forces will take him to court again.” The court’s decision has bought Trump time, but not clarity. As legal battles escalate and the 2026 midterm clock ticks louder, the future of America’s aggressive trade policy hangs in the balance.

A US federal appeals court has stayed a lower court ruling that would have forced President Donald Trump to unwind most of the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).&nbsp;

Trump gets slight relief as tariffs temporarily reinstated amid ongoing legal battle

The Trump administration has directed federal agencies to cease using statistics on race, sex, ethnicity, or national origin in hiring decisions, marking a decisive step toward dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in the federal workforce.The new directive, issued by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on May 29, aligns with an executive order signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year to overhaul federal hiring practices and focus purely on “merit, qualifications, and job-related criteria”.Under the new guidelines, federal agencies are prohibited from collecting or distributing demographic data related to race, sex, ethnicity, or national origin when making hiring or promotion decisions. The move aims to remove any consideration of under-representation of certain groups during the hiring process, a concept that has been a cornerstone of DEI initiatives in both government and private sectors for decades.Trump’s administration has long criticised DEI programs, arguing that they are inherently discriminatory against white people and men. The directive follows the president's broader agenda to roll back what he describes as “woke” policies, which he claims prioritise diversity over merit. Proponents of DEI, however, argue that demographic data is a crucial tool for identifying and rectifying systemic inequities and discrimination in the workforce.In addition to halting the use of demographic data, the memo also addresses recruitment practices, advocating for a broader approach that extends beyond elite academic institutions.Agencies are encouraged to focus recruitment efforts on state universities, religious colleges, trade schools, and faith-based organisations, aiming to attract a more diverse array of candidates. The memo stresses that the federal workforce should prioritise “patriotic Americans” who are committed to upholding the Constitution and the rule of law.&nbsp;Broader changes and their impact&nbsp;While the administration's focus on merit-based hiring is framed as a move to streamline and improve government efficiency, critics see it as an ideological shift with deep implications for the composition of the federal workforce.The Trump administration has also introduced new essay questions for civil service job applicants, asking candidates about their commitment to the Constitution, the president’s executive orders, and government efficiency. Critics view these questions as a veiled attempt to instill political loyalty, which could hinder the nonpartisan nature of federal hiring.This latest move is part of Trump’s ongoing efforts to reshape the federal workforce, including proposals to eliminate job protections for many federal employees and directly hire and fire personnel.The memo on hiring changes signals a continued transformation in how the federal government approaches staffing, with a sharp focus on ideological alignment and adherence to the president’s vision.Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, expressed concerns about the potential for this new approach to discourage a diverse range of applicants, arguing that it could be perceived as a loyalty test rather than a fair evaluation of skills, according to a Bloomberg article.“This is a move to ensure loyalty to the president of the day,” Stier said, warning that it risks turning the hiring process into a tool for political allegiance rather than merit. He also pointed out that adding a political litmus test, such as the new essay questions (to be implemented in civil service job applications), would make it more difficult for the government to hire qualified, nonpartisan employees.

The new directive, issued by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), aligns with an executive order signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year to overhaul federal hiring practices and focus purely on merit, qualifications, and job-related criteria.

The Trump administration has directed federal agencies to cease using statistics on race, sex, ethnicity, or national origin in hiring decisions, marking a decisive step toward dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in the federal workforce. The new directive, issued by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) on May 29, aligns with an executive order signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year to overhaul federal hiring practices and focus purely on “merit, qualifications, and job-related criteria”. Under the new guidelines, federal agencies are prohibited from collecting or distributing demographic data related to race, sex, ethnicity, or national origin when making hiring or promotion decisions. The move aims to remove any consideration of under-representation of certain groups during the hiring process, a concept that has been a cornerstone of DEI initiatives in both government and private sectors for decades. Trump’s administration has long criticised DEI programs, arguing that they are inherently discriminatory against white people and men. The directive follows the president's broader agenda to roll back what he describes as “woke” policies, which he claims prioritise diversity over merit. Proponents of DEI, however, argue that demographic data is a crucial tool for identifying and rectifying systemic inequities and discrimination in the workforce. In addition to halting the use of demographic data, the memo also addresses recruitment practices, advocating for a broader approach that extends beyond elite academic institutions. Agencies are encouraged to focus recruitment efforts on state universities, religious colleges, trade schools, and faith-based organisations, aiming to attract a more diverse array of candidates. The memo stresses that the federal workforce should prioritise “patriotic Americans” who are committed to upholding the Constitution and the rule of law. Broader changes and their impact While the administration's focus on merit-based hiring is framed as a move to streamline and improve government efficiency, critics see it as an ideological shift with deep implications for the composition of the federal workforce. The Trump administration has also introduced new essay questions for civil service job applicants, asking candidates about their commitment to the Constitution, the president’s executive orders, and government efficiency. Critics view these questions as a veiled attempt to instill political loyalty, which could hinder the nonpartisan nature of federal hiring. This latest move is part of Trump’s ongoing efforts to reshape the federal workforce, including proposals to eliminate job protections for many federal employees and directly hire and fire personnel. The memo on hiring changes signals a continued transformation in how the federal government approaches staffing, with a sharp focus on ideological alignment and adherence to the president’s vision. Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, expressed concerns about the potential for this new approach to discourage a diverse range of applicants, arguing that it could be perceived as a loyalty test rather than a fair evaluation of skills, according to a Bloomberg article. “This is a move to ensure loyalty to the president of the day,” Stier said, warning that it risks turning the hiring process into a tool for political allegiance rather than merit. He also pointed out that adding a political litmus test, such as the new essay questions (to be implemented in civil service job applications), would make it more difficult for the government to hire qualified, nonpartisan employees.

The new directive, issued by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), aligns with an executive order signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year to overhaul federal hiring practices and focus purely on “merit, qualifications, and job-related criteria”.

Trump administration rejigs federal hiring process, bans use of race, ethnicity data

An illegal immigrant has been detained in the United States for threatening to kill "precious president" Donald Trump. The undocumented migrant, in a letter to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, said he would kill the President of the United States for deporting his family to Mexico.&nbsp;The first time Donald Trump assured the world that he could end Russia’s devastating all-out war on Ukraine in a day was on March 5, 2023, when he was campaigning for re-election to a second term.&nbsp;After Elon Musk announced his departure from the department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), US president Donald Trump called the Tesla CEO "horrific" and said he will attend a press conference at the Oval Office with him on Friday (May 30).&nbsp;Click on the headlines to read more&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-illegal-alien-who-threatened-to-shoot-precious-president-donald-trump-in-the-head-arrested-trump-assassination-who-isramon-morales-reyes-1748573275869">'Illegal alien' threatens to shoot 'precious president' Donald Trump in the head, arrested</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250530/image-1748573645122.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Illegal alien' threatens to shoot 'precious president' Donald Trump in the head, arrested"></figure>An illegal immigrant has been detained in the United States for threatening to kill "precious president" Donald Trump. The undocumented migrant, in a letter to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, said he would kill the President of the United States for deporting his family to Mexico.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/us-russia-relations-trump-in-fantasyland-opinion-1748575568737">US-Russia relations – Trump in fantasyland</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250530/image-1748576111338.webp?rect=(0,135,2130,1598)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="US-Russia relations – Trump in fantasyland"></figure>The first time Donald Trump assured the world that he could end Russia’s devastating all-out war on Ukraine in a day was on March 5, 2023, when he was campaigning for re-election to a second term.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-elon-is-terrific-trump-to-hold-press-conference-with-tesla-ceo-on-his-last-day-1748578531554">'Elon is terrific!': Trump to hold press conference with Tesla CEO on his 'last day'</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250530/image-1748578953364.jpg?rect=(0,160,960,720)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Elon is terrific!': Trump to hold press conference with Tesla CEO on his 'last day'"></figure>After Elon Musk announced his departure from the department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), US president Donald Trump called the Tesla CEO "horrific" and said he will attend a press conference at the Oval Office with him on Friday (May 30).&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/bollywood/-she-is-not-interested-ajay-devgn-on-daughter-nysa-s-bollywood-aspirations-1748575252751">'She is not interested': Ajay Devgn on daughter Nysa's Bollywood aspirations</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250530/image-1748575754598.png?rect=(0,276,1440,1080)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'She is not interested': Ajay Devgn on daughter Nysa's Bollywood aspirations"></figure>Bollywood star Ajay Devgn revealed during the trailer launch in Mumbai for Kajol's upcoming horror film, Maa, that his daughter, Nysa, is not interested in making her acting debut just yet. During the event, Ajay Devgn, who also produced the movie, was asked why he did not cast Nysa, to which he replied, "At the moment, she is not interested in this kind of work."&nbsp;WATCH | Raids concerning terror link case conducted across Jammu and Kashmir&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKING</a> | Raids concerning terror link case conducted across <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/JammuKashmir?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#JammuKashmir</a>. Evidence related to terror networks seized.<a href="https://twitter.com/SaroyaHem?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SaroyaHem</a> joined by <a href="https://twitter.com/idrees_lone?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@idrees_lone</a> for updates. <a href="https://t.co/PKYj6Z2XHF">pic.twitter.com/PKYj6Z2XHF</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1928303822079938783?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Morning news brief: Trump assassination threat; Musk-Trump to do press conference, and more

An illegal immigrant has been detained in the United States for threatening to kill "precious president" Donald Trump. The undocumented migrant, in a letter to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, said he would kill the President of the United States for deporting his family to Mexico. The first time Donald Trump assured the world that he could end Russia’s devastating all-out war on Ukraine in a day was on March 5, 2023, when he was campaigning for re-election to a second term. After Elon Musk announced his departure from the department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), US president Donald Trump called the Tesla CEO "horrific" and said he will attend a press conference at the Oval Office with him on Friday (May 30). Click on the headlines to read more 'Illegal alien' threatens to shoot 'precious president' Donald Trump in the head, arrested An illegal immigrant has been detained in the United States for threatening to kill "precious president" Donald Trump. The undocumented migrant, in a letter to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, said he would kill the President of the United States for deporting his family to Mexico. US-Russia relations – Trump in fantasyland The first time Donald Trump assured the world that he could end Russia’s devastating all-out war on Ukraine in a day was on March 5, 2023, when he was campaigning for re-election to a second term. 'Elon is terrific!': Trump to hold press conference with Tesla CEO on his 'last day' After Elon Musk announced his departure from the department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), US president Donald Trump called the Tesla CEO "horrific" and said he will attend a press conference at the Oval Office with him on Friday (May 30). 'She is not interested': Ajay Devgn on daughter Nysa's Bollywood aspirations Bollywood star Ajay Devgn revealed during the trailer launch in Mumbai for Kajol's upcoming horror film, Maa, that his daughter, Nysa, is not interested in making her acting debut just yet. During the event, Ajay Devgn, who also produced the movie, was asked why he did not cast Nysa, to which he replied, "At the moment, she is not interested in this kind of work." WATCH | Raids concerning terror link case conducted across Jammu and Kashmir

After Elon Musk announced his departure from the department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), US president Donald Trump called the Tesla CEO "horrific" and said he will attend a press conference at the Oval Office with him on Friday (May 30). Takin to his social media platform Truth Social on Thursday (May 29), Trump wrote, "This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way."“Elon is terrific!” the US president added.Trump further added, "I am having a Press Conference tomorrow at 1:30 P.M. EST, with Elon Musk, at the Oval Office."Trump's announcement came after Musk disclosed on Wednesday (May 28) that he would step down from his role under Trump administration.“As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,” Musk wrote on his social media platform X."The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government,” the Tesla CEO added. &nbsp;Musk was leading the cost-cutting efforts within the Trump administration through DOGE.His departure follows sharp criticism of Trump’s proposed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which Musk described as a “massive spending bill” that will undo all his efforts under DOGE role.The Tesla chief also planned that the will stay away from politics as he said, “I think I’ve done enough."White House also expressed appreciation for Musk, "We thank him for his service. We thank him for getting DOGE off of the ground, and the efforts to cut waste, fraud and abuse will continue."&nbsp;

'Elon is terrific!': Trump to hold press conference with Tesla CEO on his 'last day'

After Elon Musk announced his departure from the department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), US president Donald Trump called the Tesla CEO "horrific" and said he will attend a press conference at the Oval Office with him on Friday (May 30). Takin to his social media platform Truth Social on Thursday (May 29), Trump wrote, "This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way." “Elon is terrific!” the US president added. Trump further added, "I am having a Press Conference tomorrow at 1:30 P.M. EST, with Elon Musk, at the Oval Office." Trump's announcement came after Musk disclosed on Wednesday (May 28) that he would step down from his role under Trump administration. “As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending,” Musk wrote on his social media platform X. "The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government,” the Tesla CEO added. Musk was leading the cost-cutting efforts within the Trump administration through DOGE. His departure follows sharp criticism of Trump’s proposed “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which Musk described as a “massive spending bill” that will undo all his efforts under DOGE role. The Tesla chief also planned that the will stay away from politics as he said, “I think I’ve done enough." White House also expressed appreciation for Musk, "We thank him for his service. We thank him for getting DOGE off of the ground, and the efforts to cut waste, fraud and abuse will continue."

After Elon Musk announced his departure from the department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), US president Donald Trump called the Tesla CEO "horrific" and said he will attend a press conference at the Oval Office with him on Friday (May 30).&nbsp;

The first time Donald Trump assured the world that he could end Russia’s devastating all-out war on Ukraine in a day was on March 5, 2023, when he was campaigning for re-election to a second term. “Before I even arrive at the Oval Office, I will have the war settled. It will take no longer than one day,” he told a cheering crowd.The one-day solution promise to end a war, which at the time had just entered its second year, became a routine part of speeches in a campaign he won in 2024. Trump stressed that he based his prediction on good relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. US military experts and diplomats familiar with Russia scoffed at the claim. America’s European allies shrugged it off as campaign hyperbole.The biggest military conflict in Europe since the end of World War II continued without a halt. Ceasefire negotiations failed. &nbsp;It took Trump 812 days from his first one-day promise to admit that he had misjudged his influence on Putin. After voicing frustration in a series of social media statements, he wrote on May 25: “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY, needlessly killing a lot of people as missiles and drones are being shot into cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever.” &nbsp;That followed what the Ukrainian government described as the biggest Russian drone attack since the start of the war in 2022. Overnight, Russia launched 355 drones, following up on 298 the previous night. &nbsp;Just a week before, Trump had a two-hour telephone conversation with Putin to bring about a ceasefire. Putin did not agree, but both he and Trump said Russia and Ukraine would soon start talks towards a future peace.After the conversation with Putin, Trump arranged a conference call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the leaders of Germany, France, Italy, Finland and the European Union. If they expected that Trump would announce concrete steps to tame the Russian leader, they were disappointed. &nbsp;While the European Union, a solid backer of Ukraine, has slapped new sanctions on Russia in response to Putin refusing a ceasefire, Trump threatened to step up existing sanctions and impose tariffs on Russia but has not acted so far.A bipartisan bill in the 100-seat Senate to impose additional sanctions on Russia has won 81 co-sponsors – a rare feat in deeply divided America – but Republican leaders are waiting for endorsement from the White House.&nbsp;It took a prominent Democratic senator to spell out what most experts in the US and Europe have been thinking for years. “Putin is playing Trump like a fiddle,” Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters. “He keeps extending the time because he sees time as being on the side of Russia.” &nbsp;The way Trump is handling Russia looks like the geopolitical equivalent of the way he has been handling the global tariffs he imposed on April 2, “liberation day” as he put it. His on-again, off-again tactics earned him a nickname from Wall Street he deeply resents: TACO.It stands for Trump Always Chickens Out. A reporter who mentioned the term in a press conference earned a stern rebuke: “nasty question.”One possibility Trump has mentioned in the first 100 days of his second term is for the US to walk away from negotiations and let Zelenskyy and Putin sort it out between them. It is open to conjecture whether that would mean a halt to the supply of weapons and intelligence support. The US has been the main supplier of both.Europe has been stepping up military support. Germany, the second biggest supplier of military aid to Ukraine after the US, changed its long-standing policy on how its weapons can be used. &nbsp;Chancellor Friedrich Merz, in a decision that highlighted hardened resolve to back Ukraine, lifted long-standing restrictions on the range of German-delivered missiles. The new policy means that Ukraine can reach targets deep inside Russia. Merz did not mention a weapon high on the Ukrainian wish list – the Taurus missile, which has a range of 500 kilometres.But the German defence ministry said it would finance the production of long-range weapons systems in Ukraine, and “the first of these systems could be deployed by the Ukrainian armed forces in just a few weeks.”Ukrainian and Russian officials met in Turkey earlier in May for the first direct peace talks since the Russian invasion. No decisions came out of the meeting, but another one is scheduled for Istanbul early in June. Expectations for a breakthrough are low, and Trump himself has asserted that “nothing is going to happen until Putin and I get together.” &nbsp;Both in his first term and the first three months of his second, Trump has spoken of his good relationship with the Russian leader, which appears to be the reason he was so confident he could solve the conflict in one day.It’s worth noting that Trump is not the first American president who saw Putin through rose-tinted glasses. At a summit meeting in Slovenia in 2001, George W. Bush said of the ex-Soviet spymaster, “I looked the man in the eye. I found him very straightforward and trustworthy. We had a good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul.”Almost a quarter century later, Putin retains the ability to impress senior American officials. In March, Trump sent a special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to gauge the mood in the Kremlin at a time when Washington appeared receptive to Moscow’s version of the reason for its war. &nbsp;Witkoff, a real estate investor and friend of Trump, met Putin and told a US television anchor later he had “liked” the Kremlin leader. “I thought he was straight up with me. I don’t regard Putin as a bad guy.”

Trump's on-again, off-again tactics earned him a nickname from Wall Street he deeply resents: TACO. It stands for Trump Always Chickens Out.

The first time Donald Trump assured the world that he could end Russia’s devastating all-out war on Ukraine in a day was on March 5, 2023, when he was campaigning for re-election to a second term. “Before I even arrive at the Oval Office, I will have the war settled. It will take no longer than one day,” he told a cheering crowd. The one-day solution promise to end a war, which at the time had just entered its second year, became a routine part of speeches in a campaign he won in 2024. Trump stressed that he based his prediction on good relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin. US military experts and diplomats familiar with Russia scoffed at the claim. America’s European allies shrugged it off as campaign hyperbole. The biggest military conflict in Europe since the end of World War II continued without a halt. Ceasefire negotiations failed. It took Trump 812 days from his first one-day promise to admit that he had misjudged his influence on Putin. After voicing frustration in a series of social media statements, he wrote on May 25: “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY, needlessly killing a lot of people as missiles and drones are being shot into cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever.” That followed what the Ukrainian government described as the biggest Russian drone attack since the start of the war in 2022. Overnight, Russia launched 355 drones, following up on 298 the previous night. Just a week before, Trump had a two-hour telephone conversation with Putin to bring about a ceasefire. Putin did not agree, but both he and Trump said Russia and Ukraine would soon start talks towards a future peace. After the conversation with Putin, Trump arranged a conference call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and the leaders of Germany, France, Italy, Finland and the European Union. If they expected that Trump would announce concrete steps to tame the Russian leader, they were disappointed. While the European Union, a solid backer of Ukraine, has slapped new sanctions on Russia in response to Putin refusing a ceasefire, Trump threatened to step up existing sanctions and impose tariffs on Russia but has not acted so far. A bipartisan bill in the 100-seat Senate to impose additional sanctions on Russia has won 81 co-sponsors – a rare feat in deeply divided America – but Republican leaders are waiting for endorsement from the White House. It took a prominent Democratic senator to spell out what most experts in the US and Europe have been thinking for years. “Putin is playing Trump like a fiddle,” Jeanne Shaheen, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters. “He keeps extending the time because he sees time as being on the side of Russia.” The way Trump is handling Russia looks like the geopolitical equivalent of the way he has been handling the global tariffs he imposed on April 2, “liberation day” as he put it. His on-again, off-again tactics earned him a nickname from Wall Street he deeply resents: TACO. It stands for Trump Always Chickens Out. A reporter who mentioned the term in a press conference earned a stern rebuke: “nasty question.” One possibility Trump has mentioned in the first 100 days of his second term is for the US to walk away from negotiations and let Zelenskyy and Putin sort it out between them. It is open to conjecture whether that would mean a halt to the supply of weapons and intelligence support. The US has been the main supplier of both. Europe has been stepping up military support. Germany, the second biggest supplier of military aid to Ukraine after the US, changed its long-standing policy on how its weapons can be used. Chancellor Friedrich Merz, in a decision that highlighted hardened resolve to back Ukraine, lifted long-standing restrictions on the range of German-delivered missiles. The new policy means that Ukraine can reach targets deep inside Russia. Merz did not mention a weapon high on the Ukrainian wish list – the Taurus missile, which has a range of 500 kilometres. But the German defence ministry said it would finance the production of long-range weapons systems in Ukraine, and “the first of these systems could be deployed by the Ukrainian armed forces in just a few weeks.” Ukrainian and Russian officials met in Turkey earlier in May for the first direct peace talks since the Russian invasion. No decisions came out of the meeting, but another one is scheduled for Istanbul early in June. Expectations for a breakthrough are low, and Trump himself has asserted that “nothing is going to happen until Putin and I get together.” Both in his first term and the first three months of his second, Trump has spoken of his good relationship with the Russian leader, which appears to be the reason he was so confident he could solve the conflict in one day. It’s worth noting that Trump is not the first American president who saw Putin through rose-tinted glasses. At a summit meeting in Slovenia in 2001, George W. Bush said of the ex-Soviet spymaster, “I looked the man in the eye. I found him very straightforward and trustworthy. We had a good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul.” Almost a quarter century later, Putin retains the ability to impress senior American officials. In March, Trump sent a special envoy, Steve Witkoff, to gauge the mood in the Kremlin at a time when Washington appeared receptive to Moscow’s version of the reason for its war. Witkoff, a real estate investor and friend of Trump, met Putin and told a US television anchor later he had “liked” the Kremlin leader. “I thought he was straight up with me. I don’t regard Putin as a bad guy.”

Trump's on-again, off-again tactics earned him a nickname from Wall Street he deeply resents: TACO. It stands for Trump Always Chickens Out.

US-Russia relations – Trump in fantasyland

An illegal immigrant has been detained in the United States for threatening to kill "precious president" Donald Trump. The undocumented migrant, in a letter to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, said he would kill the President of the United States for deporting his family to Mexico.The "illegal alien" has been identified as Ramon Morales Reyes.<h2>Shoot your 'precious president'</h2>In a letter sent to an unidentified ICE officer on May 21, Ramon Morales Reyes threatened to shoot Trump, whom he referred to as "your precious president", in the head, menacingly warning, "I will see him at one of his big ralleys (rallies)."The undocumented migrant in his letter claimed that Trump was "messing with us Mexicans" and that they've "done more for this country than you white people"."You have been deporting my family, and I think it is time Donald J. Trump get(s) what he has coming to him".He said he would self-deport himself back to Mexico, "but not before I use my 30 yard 6 to shoot your precious president in his head".Here, the "self-deport" part appears to be a reference to an option given by the Trump administration to "illegal aliens", offering them $1,000 bonuses and paid travel for voluntarily leaving the US.<h2>Who is Ramon Morales Reyes?</h2>Ramon Morales Reyes is a 54-year-old man from Mexico who, as per reports, was residing in the US illegally.Amid US President Donald Trump's increasingly aggressive push for expelling illegal immigrants, members of Reyes's family were also deported.Reyes, who has a criminal record including multiple arrests, as per reports, tried to enter the US illegally nine times between 1998 and 2005. He had also been arrested for a felony hit-and-run.He is now in ICE detention in Wisconsin, pending deportation proceedings, said the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).Sharing a picture of Reyes and his letter on X, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said, "Thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars"."This threat comes not even a year after President Trump was shot in Butler, Pennsylvania, and less than two weeks after former FBI Director Comey called for the President's assassination," she noted.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars. This threat comes not even a year after President Trump was shot in Butler, Pennsylvania and less than two weeks after former FBI Director Comey called for the… <a href="https://t.co/Sr2pI08NuQ">pic.twitter.com/Sr2pI08NuQ</a>&mdash; Secretary Kristi Noem (@Sec_Noem) <a href="https://twitter.com/Sec_Noem/status/1927803898611290540?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In a letter sent to an unidentified ICE officer on May 21, Ramon Morales Reyes threatened to shoot Trump, whom he referred to as "your precious president", in the head, menacingly warning, "I will see him at one of his big ralleys (rallies)."

An illegal immigrant has been detained in the United States for threatening to kill "precious president" Donald Trump. The undocumented migrant, in a letter to a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, said he would kill the President of the United States for deporting his family to Mexico. The "illegal alien" has been identified as Ramon Morales Reyes. Shoot your 'precious president' In a letter sent to an unidentified ICE officer on May 21, Ramon Morales Reyes threatened to shoot Trump, whom he referred to as "your precious president", in the head, menacingly warning, "I will see him at one of his big ralleys (rallies)." The undocumented migrant in his letter claimed that Trump was "messing with us Mexicans" and that they've "done more for this country than you white people". "You have been deporting my family, and I think it is time Donald J. Trump get(s) what he has coming to him". He said he would self-deport himself back to Mexico, "but not before I use my 30 yard 6 to shoot your precious president in his head". Here, the "self-deport" part appears to be a reference to an option given by the Trump administration to "illegal aliens", offering them $1,000 bonuses and paid travel for voluntarily leaving the US. Who is Ramon Morales Reyes? Ramon Morales Reyes is a 54-year-old man from Mexico who, as per reports, was residing in the US illegally. Amid US President Donald Trump's increasingly aggressive push for expelling illegal immigrants, members of Reyes's family were also deported. Reyes, who has a criminal record including multiple arrests, as per reports, tried to enter the US illegally nine times between 1998 and 2005. He had also been arrested for a felony hit-and-run. He is now in ICE detention in Wisconsin, pending deportation proceedings, said the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Sharing a picture of Reyes and his letter on X, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said, "Thanks to our ICE officers, this illegal alien who threatened to assassinate President Trump is behind bars". "This threat comes not even a year after President Trump was shot in Butler, Pennsylvania, and less than two weeks after former FBI Director Comey called for the President's assassination," she noted.

In a letter sent to an unidentified ICE officer on May 21, Ramon Morales Reyes threatened to shoot Trump, whom he referred to as "your precious president", in the head, menacingly warning, "I will see him at one of his big ralleys (rallies)."

'Illegal alien' threatens to shoot 'precious president' Donald Trump in the head, arrested

Tech giant Elon Musk announced that his term as the chief of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has come to an end. He thanked US President Donald Trump for the "opportunity to reduce wasteful spending". However, the end of his White House stint is being seen as a possible end to Trump-Musk camaraderie, especially considering the timing of Musk's announcement. Just a day ago, Musk&nbsp; criticized Trump's "big, beautiful" bill - his first-ever criticism of President Trump.<h2>From Trump's greatest supporter to exit; Here's a recap of key moments of Elon Musk at White House:</h2>The 'Nazi' salute After Trump came to power in US in January, Elon Musk made headlines and his Tesla cars were dubbed as 'swasticars' after Musk did - what Democrats believed was a Nazi salute Musk's kids at White HouseDuring Musk's first appearance before reporters after his arrival in the White House, he was seen with his the child. Trump said: "This is X and he's a great guy." The child was filmed picking his nose while his father boasted about his cost-cutting at DOGE.&nbsp;Elon Musk vs Scott Bessent&nbsp;A nasty brawl between Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk took place in White House West Wing. Bessent repeatedly shouted "F*** you!" during the West Wing brawl. Musk in response called Bessent a 'Soros agent' and accused him of having run "a failed hedge fund." The dispute began because Musk had attempted to select Gary Shapley to lead the IRS – without first getting Bessent’s approval. White House did not deny the reports about the brawl with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt saying, "Disagreements are a normal part of any healthy policy process, and ultimately everyone knows they serve at the pleasure of President Trump."&nbsp;Rift in MAGAMusk, an immigrant himself, was among the most outspoken H-1B defenders. This was the first rift in MAGA after Trump assumed power. While Trump wanted to go big on immigration and his supporters favoured a ban on H1B, Musk stood against it. Musk clashed with the likes of Steve Bannon, a former top White House aide in Trump’s first term, and Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and staunch Trump supporter, who argued the program takes jobs away from Americans&nbsp;Musk was the dominant figure at the gathering of Trump’s Cabinet officials, offering a number of sharp comments toward the federal workforce. The West Wing clash was followed by his heated disputes with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins, and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy. However, he enjoyed unparalleled support from trump who once said, “Is anyone unhappy with Elon? If you are, we’ll throw them out of here,” Trump quipped at one point.” Tariff dissenter&nbsp;After Trump announced Liberation Day tariffs, Musk made the case for a free-trade zone between the United States and Europe. He also called Trump's economic advisor Peter Navarro "dumber than a sack of bricks." White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt tried to play down the public feud, saying that "boys will be boys." 'Omnipresent' Musk&nbsp;From Trump's Middle East tour to Lincoln bedroom, it almost seemed that Trump and Musk were inseparable. In an interview, Musk had said that he played video games in his West Wing office and enjoyed overnight stays in the Lincoln Bedroom on trump's invitation. “We’ll be on Air Force One or Marine One and he’s like, ‘Hey do you want to stay over?’ I’m like, ‘Sure,’ and he sends me to the Lincoln Bedroom,” Musk recalled. “I haven’t requested it — to be clear.” Musk said he’s also gotten ice cream from the White House kitchen — eating “a tub” of rich caramel Haagen-Dazs “Don’t tell RFK.” Big, Beautiful Bill&nbsp;Musk said he was "disappointed" by Trump's divisive mega-bill, which offers sprawling tax relief and spending cuts, in a rare split with the Republican president. The tech tycoon said the "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" -- which passed the US House last week and now moves to the Senate -- would increase the deficit and undermine the work of DOGE&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

From Trump's greatest supporter to exit Here's a recap of key moments of Elon Musk at White House

Tech giant Elon Musk announced that his term as the chief of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has come to an end. He thanked US President Donald Trump for the "opportunity to reduce wasteful spending". However, the end of his White House stint is being seen as a possible end to Trump-Musk camaraderie, especially considering the timing of Musk's announcement. Just a day ago, Musk criticized Trump's "big, beautiful" bill - his first-ever criticism of President Trump. From Trump's greatest supporter to exit; Here's a recap of key moments of Elon Musk at White House: The 'Nazi' salute After Trump came to power in US in January, Elon Musk made headlines and his Tesla cars were dubbed as 'swasticars' after Musk did - what Democrats believed was a Nazi salute Musk's kids at White House During Musk's first appearance before reporters after his arrival in the White House, he was seen with his the child. Trump said: "This is X and he's a great guy." The child was filmed picking his nose while his father boasted about his cost-cutting at DOGE. Elon Musk vs Scott Bessent A nasty brawl between Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Elon Musk took place in White House West Wing. Bessent repeatedly shouted "F*** you!" during the West Wing brawl. Musk in response called Bessent a 'Soros agent' and accused him of having run "a failed hedge fund." The dispute began because Musk had attempted to select Gary Shapley to lead the IRS – without first getting Bessent’s approval. White House did not deny the reports about the brawl with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt saying, "Disagreements are a normal part of any healthy policy process, and ultimately everyone knows they serve at the pleasure of President Trump." Rift in MAGA Musk, an immigrant himself, was among the most outspoken H-1B defenders. This was the first rift in MAGA after Trump assumed power. While Trump wanted to go big on immigration and his supporters favoured a ban on H1B, Musk stood against it. Musk clashed with the likes of Steve Bannon, a former top White House aide in Trump’s first term, and Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and staunch Trump supporter, who argued the program takes jobs away from Americans Musk was the dominant figure at the gathering of Trump’s Cabinet officials, offering a number of sharp comments toward the federal workforce. The West Wing clash was followed by his heated disputes with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins, and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy. However, he enjoyed unparalleled support from trump who once said, “Is anyone unhappy with Elon? If you are, we’ll throw them out of here,” Trump quipped at one point.” Tariff dissenter After Trump announced Liberation Day tariffs, Musk made the case for a free-trade zone between the United States and Europe. He also called Trump's economic advisor Peter Navarro "dumber than a sack of bricks." White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt tried to play down the public feud, saying that "boys will be boys." 'Omnipresent' Musk From Trump's Middle East tour to Lincoln bedroom, it almost seemed that Trump and Musk were inseparable. In an interview, Musk had said that he played video games in his West Wing office and enjoyed overnight stays in the Lincoln Bedroom on trump's invitation. “We’ll be on Air Force One or Marine One and he’s like, ‘Hey do you want to stay over?’ I’m like, ‘Sure,’ and he sends me to the Lincoln Bedroom,” Musk recalled. “I haven’t requested it — to be clear.” Musk said he’s also gotten ice cream from the White House kitchen — eating “a tub” of rich caramel Haagen-Dazs “Don’t tell RFK.” Big, Beautiful Bill Musk said he was "disappointed" by Trump's divisive mega-bill, which offers sprawling tax relief and spending cuts, in a rare split with the Republican president. The tech tycoon said the "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" -- which passed the US House last week and now moves to the Senate -- would increase the deficit and undermine the work of DOGE

<h2>From Trump's greatest supporter to exit; Here's a recap of key moments of Elon Musk at White House</h2>

From 'Nazi' salute to criticism of ‘big beautiful’ bill: Elon Musk and his key moments at Donald Trump's White House

In a landmark judgement that could reshape the global trade dynamics, a US trade court blocked Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs from going into effect, stating that the US president overstepped authorities. Rejecting all arguments, the Manhattan-based three-judge Court of International Trade ruled that Congress did not delegate "unbounded" powers to the President under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). It only authorises the president to impose necessary economic sanctions during an emergency "to combat an unusual and extraordinary threat," the bench said.&nbsp;The White House, as per AFP, has been given 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process and halt the tariffs. However, the White House said that the "unelected judges" have no right to weigh in on Trump's handling of the issue. As the judgement changed the track of Trump's tariff game, what drew eyeballs was his administration's bizarre explanations to the court justifying his tariffs.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Washington, DC: On US court blocking Donald Trump&#39;s tariffs White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says, &quot; ...Other countries around the world has belief in Donald Trump...they also probably see how ridiculous this ruling is...we intend to win, we have filed an… <a href="https://t.co/tvflLPj8ii">pic.twitter.com/tvflLPj8ii</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1928147355888668959?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 29, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

1. The Trump administration, in their plea, stated that the US was able to stop military actions between India and Pakistan using his trade and tariff - a claim that India's MEA has denied&nbsp;2. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told the court that the “tenuous ceasefire” between India and Paksitan was achieved after "Donald Trump offered to expand trade with the countries in exchange for it."&nbsp;3. Lutnick went on to claim, “If the court pauses President Trump’s tariffs move, then it will lead to both countries resuming their military actions since there will be no condition left to compel them to maintain peace.”&nbsp;4. &nbsp;Trump administration said the court ruling could hamper the security of entire region - “An adverse ruling that constrains presidential power in this case could lead India and Pakistan to question the validity of President Trump’s offer, threatening the security of an entire region and the lives of millions," Lutnick said.&nbsp;5. The Trump administration said that the ruling could have "an adverse ruling would destroy the carefully crafted China trade agreement." Lutnick claimed that it was President Trump’s spiraling tariffs that brought China to "negotiating table."&nbsp;6. Trump administration also said in the court that the ruling could "allow Chinese aggression" and "leave the American people exposed to predatory economic practices"&nbsp;7. Trump's secretary of state Marco Rubio claimed that the ruling could be a threat to national security. "A legal setback would lead to embarrassment of the United States on a global stage” and “would embolden allies and adversaries alike, leading to a dangerous situation globally," he said.&nbsp;

US trade court blocked Donald Trumps Liberation Day tariffs a look at his administration bizarre justification in the court

In a landmark judgement that could reshape the global trade dynamics, a US trade court blocked Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs from going into effect, stating that the US president overstepped authorities. Rejecting all arguments, the Manhattan-based three-judge Court of International Trade ruled that Congress did not delegate "unbounded" powers to the President under International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). It only authorises the president to impose necessary economic sanctions during an emergency "to combat an unusual and extraordinary threat," the bench said. The White House, as per AFP, has been given 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process and halt the tariffs. However, the White House said that the "unelected judges" have no right to weigh in on Trump's handling of the issue. As the judgement changed the track of Trump's tariff game, what drew eyeballs was his administration's bizarre explanations to the court justifying his tariffs.

US trade court blocked Donald Trump's ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs: Here's a look at his administration's bizarre justification in the court

From India-Pak tensions to national security threat: BIZARRE reasons Trump admin gave to defend tariffs in US court

President Donald Trump reacted to his embarrassing nickname, TACO, an acronym for ‘Trump Always Chickens Out’ that has been popular among investors on Wall Street. When confronted by a reporter about the nickname on Wednesday at the White House, he said he never chickened out, instead, he feels he is too tough."I kick out?" At first, he misheard the acronym.The reporter repeated, "chickened out""Oh, isn’t that nice. ‘Chicken out,’ I’ve never heard that," and then followed his explanation why he is too tough even though he did not follow through with tariffs on China and the European Union.&nbsp;“You call that chickening out? Because we have $14 trillion now invested, committed to investing—when Biden didn’t have practically anything; Biden, this country was dying,” said Trump.He said the US is a hot property now, since he took over. Earlier, it was ‘stone-cold dead’, the Saudis told that to Trump.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump becomes even more unhinged when he hears “TACO” (Trump Always Chickens Out). Share the hell out of this clip. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TACOTrump?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TACOTrump</a> <a href="https://t.co/cfKwmmmNsa">pic.twitter.com/cfKwmmmNsa</a>&mdash; 💥Arbiter of Cool💥😎✌🏻👊🏻 (@ArbiterofCool) <a href="https://twitter.com/ArbiterofCool/status/1927780355660001792?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

“We had a country of people that didn’t think it was going to survive, and you ask a nasty question like that,” Trump said while accusing the media of victimising him. He continued his preaching on how his method of negotiation has set the bar higher, which landed them a better deal than Biden ever could have acquired.Trump went on to rebuke the reporter, “Don’t ever say what you said. That’s a nasty question. To me, that’s the nastiest question.”The acronym was first coined by Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong. He used it to describe the trading practice of loading up stocks when Trump announces the Tariff and then selling when he backtracks on implementing them.&nbsp;Observers on Wall Street believe that Trump's threat of implementing higher tariffs has not provided them any high ground in negotiations. The Trump administration is running out on its “90 deals in 90 days” promise. The wishful thinking that corporations will cave in under the threat of high tariffs has not produced any significant result.

Trump rebukes reporters for mentioning his embarrassing nickname, TACO, in the White House, saying he feels he is too tough.

President Donald Trump reacted to his embarrassing nickname, TACO, an acronym for ‘Trump Always Chickens Out’ that has been popular among investors on Wall Street. When confronted by a reporter about the nickname on Wednesday at the White House, he said he never chickened out, instead, he feels he is too tough. "I kick out?" At first, he misheard the acronym. The reporter repeated, "chickened out" "Oh, isn’t that nice. ‘Chicken out,’ I’ve never heard that," and then followed his explanation why he is too tough even though he did not follow through with tariffs on China and the European Union. “You call that chickening out? Because we have $14 trillion now invested, committed to investing—when Biden didn’t have practically anything; Biden, this country was dying,” said Trump. He said the US is a hot property now, since he took over. Earlier, it was ‘stone-cold dead’, the Saudis told that to Trump.

Trump rebukes reporters for mentioning his embarrassing nickname, TACO, in the White House, saying he feels he is too tough.

Watch: Trump upset over new nickname 'TACO', slams reporter who tells him the meaning

In a landmark ruling that could reshape global trade dynamics, the United States Court of International Trade has declared President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariff regime as illegal, according to a report by Bloomberg.&nbsp;&nbsp;The decision comes at a crucial moment in India-US trade negotiations, with Indian officials seeing it as an opportunity to reassess concessions made under pressure during the Trump era.&nbsp;India and the US are now reportedly working to conclude an interim trade deal before June 25, as reciprocal tariffs imposed under Trump’s 2025 executive order remain paused until July 9. This gives negotiators a narrow window to finalise a mutually agreeable framework.<h2>What did the US court say?</h2>On May 28 (May 29 IST), the US Court of International Trade ruled that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, including the 10% baseline and additional 26% duty on Indian goods,&nbsp;lacked legal justification under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), according to Bloomberg.&nbsp;The court concluded that trade deficits did not constitute the “unusual and extraordinary threat” required to invoke emergency powers. In its judgement, the court said, “IEEPA does not authorise any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs", as quoted by Bloomberg.&nbsp;&nbsp;The ruling is currently under appeal, but it temporarily undermines Washington’s leverage,&nbsp;especially in trade talks with strategic partners like India.<h2>How will it affect India-US trade talks?</h2>The ruling has reportedly shifted the momentum in India’s favour, at least temporarily. With the July 9 deadline fast approaching, Indian negotiators find themselves with more room to demand balanced terms.&nbsp;Ajay Srivastava, co-founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), said the judgment&nbsp;effectively dismantles the legal foundation of Trump-era tariff threats. “India must not enter into a one-sided deal based on illegal pressure tactics. With the Trump tariffs standing on shaky legal ground, India must pause and reassess its negotiation strategy before committing to an FTA that could disproportionately favour US interests,” Srivastava told ANI.&nbsp;During earlier negotiations, Washington reportedly pushed for expansive market access in Indian sectors such as agriculture, automobiles, and government procurement, while offering limited trade concessions in return. This imbalance, experts argue, should now be revisited.<h2>India-US interim trade deal likely before June 25</h2>According to reports, both countries are pushing to finalise a limited trade package ahead of the July 9 tariff expiry. This interim deal is expected to be the first step toward a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) and will cover trade in goods, non-tariff barriers, and select services, including digital trade.&nbsp;India is reportedly specifically seeking a full exemption from the 26% reciprocal tariff imposed by Trump’s executive order. While the US Congress must approve any Most Favoured Nation (MFN) tariff reduction, Trump’s reciprocal tariffs were imposed under emergency provisions and can be lifted via a new executive order.&nbsp;Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, during his recent US visit, held talks with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to provide political direction to the negotiations. A high-level US delegation is reportedly expected to visit India in early June to continue discussions.<h2>What are both countries asking for?</h2>India is reportedly seeking duty concessions for its labour-intensive export sectors, including textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, bananas, and grapes. The goal is to improve India’s competitiveness in the US market and to reach an ambitious bilateral trade target of $500 billion by 2030, up from the current level of $190 billion.&nbsp;In return, the US is reportedly demanding market access and tariff reductions in sectors such as electric vehicles, wine and dairy, apples and tree nuts, and petrochemical and industrial goods.&nbsp;According to data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, bilateral trade rose from $119.72 billion in FY24 to $131.84 billion in FY25, an increase of 10.1 per cent. Indian exports surged 11.6 per cent to $86.51 billion, while imports from the US rose 7.42 per cent to $45.33 billion.&nbsp;This resulted in India’s trade surplus with the US widening to $41.18 billion, up from $35.32 billion a year earlier.<h2>What pressure points remain?</h2>Despite this trade surplus in goods, Trump has repeatedly criticised India’s export-driven approach, ignoring significant American revenues generated from services and intellectual property in India.&nbsp;As reported by Bloomberg, US companies operating in India, from tech giants like Apple and Google to pharma and defence contractors reportedly benefit significantly from Indian market access, data, and human capital.&nbsp;However, the ruling does not impact tariffs imposed through other laws, such as the 25 per cent duty on steel, aluminium and auto parts, still affecting Indian exporters. US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, in court arguments reported by Reuters, said that without IEEPA, the President lacks fast-acting tools to address trade imbalances and national security threats. He added that alternatives such as Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 are lengthy and procedurally complex.&nbsp;India’s concessions have not been limited to tariffs. As per the US Trade Representative’s (USTR) 2025 Special 301 Report, the US continues to push India for reforms in data localisation, pharmaceutical patent law (specifically Section 3(d) of India’s Patents Act), and easing regulatory norms for genetically modified crops. The report accuses India of maintaining “high customs duties on IP-intensive products” and inadequate IP enforcement.&nbsp;Yet, New Delhi has so far reportedly resisted attempts at so-called “evergreening”, a practice used by pharmaceutical companies to extend patents by making minor modifications to existing drugs. India remains a critical supplier of affordable generic medicines to the US and developing nations.<h2>What lies ahead?</h2>The US court ruling offers India a rare window to renegotiate terms on more equitable grounds. However, this window may close quickly, especially if the Trump administration’s appeal finds favour in a higher court, possibly the US Supreme Court.&nbsp;For now, India’s Commerce Ministry has not issued an official statement on the judgement. But according to the report, the ruling is being seen as a strategic pause, a critical chance to reassess India’s trade priorities with its largest economic partner. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;

Business & Economy: This decision is crucial for India-US trade negotiations, as tariffs imposed under Trump 2025 executive order remain paused until July 9.

In a landmark ruling that could reshape global trade dynamics, the United States Court of International Trade has declared President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariff regime as illegal, according to a report by Bloomberg. The decision comes at a crucial moment in India-US trade negotiations, with Indian officials seeing it as an opportunity to reassess concessions made under pressure during the Trump era. India and the US are now reportedly working to conclude an interim trade deal before June 25, as reciprocal tariffs imposed under Trump’s 2025 executive order remain paused until July 9. This gives negotiators a narrow window to finalise a mutually agreeable framework. What did the US court say? On May 28 (May 29 IST), the US Court of International Trade ruled that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, including the 10% baseline and additional 26% duty on Indian goods, lacked legal justification under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), according to Bloomberg. The court concluded that trade deficits did not constitute the “unusual and extraordinary threat” required to invoke emergency powers. In its judgement, the court said, “IEEPA does not authorise any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs", as quoted by Bloomberg. The ruling is currently under appeal, but it temporarily undermines Washington’s leverage, especially in trade talks with strategic partners like India. How will it affect India-US trade talks? The ruling has reportedly shifted the momentum in India’s favour, at least temporarily. With the July 9 deadline fast approaching, Indian negotiators find themselves with more room to demand balanced terms. Ajay Srivastava, co-founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), said the judgment effectively dismantles the legal foundation of Trump-era tariff threats. “India must not enter into a one-sided deal based on illegal pressure tactics. With the Trump tariffs standing on shaky legal ground, India must pause and reassess its negotiation strategy before committing to an FTA that could disproportionately favour US interests,” Srivastava told ANI. During earlier negotiations, Washington reportedly pushed for expansive market access in Indian sectors such as agriculture, automobiles, and government procurement, while offering limited trade concessions in return. This imbalance, experts argue, should now be revisited. India-US interim trade deal likely before June 25 According to reports, both countries are pushing to finalise a limited trade package ahead of the July 9 tariff expiry. This interim deal is expected to be the first step toward a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) and will cover trade in goods, non-tariff barriers, and select services, including digital trade. India is reportedly specifically seeking a full exemption from the 26% reciprocal tariff imposed by Trump’s executive order. While the US Congress must approve any Most Favoured Nation (MFN) tariff reduction, Trump’s reciprocal tariffs were imposed under emergency provisions and can be lifted via a new executive order. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, during his recent US visit, held talks with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to provide political direction to the negotiations. A high-level US delegation is reportedly expected to visit India in early June to continue discussions. What are both countries asking for? India is reportedly seeking duty concessions for its labour-intensive export sectors, including textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, bananas, and grapes. The goal is to improve India’s competitiveness in the US market and to reach an ambitious bilateral trade target of $500 billion by 2030, up from the current level of $190 billion. In return, the US is reportedly demanding market access and tariff reductions in sectors such as electric vehicles, wine and dairy, apples and tree nuts, and petrochemical and industrial goods. According to data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, bilateral trade rose from $119.72 billion in FY24 to $131.84 billion in FY25, an increase of 10.1 per cent. Indian exports surged 11.6 per cent to $86.51 billion, while imports from the US rose 7.42 per cent to $45.33 billion. This resulted in India’s trade surplus with the US widening to $41.18 billion, up from $35.32 billion a year earlier. What pressure points remain? Despite this trade surplus in goods, Trump has repeatedly criticised India’s export-driven approach, ignoring significant American revenues generated from services and intellectual property in India. As reported by Bloomberg, US companies operating in India, from tech giants like Apple and Google to pharma and defence contractors reportedly benefit significantly from Indian market access, data, and human capital. However, the ruling does not impact tariffs imposed through other laws, such as the 25 per cent duty on steel, aluminium and auto parts, still affecting Indian exporters. US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, in court arguments reported by Reuters, said that without IEEPA, the President lacks fast-acting tools to address trade imbalances and national security threats. He added that alternatives such as Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 are lengthy and procedurally complex. India’s concessions have not been limited to tariffs. As per the US Trade Representative’s (USTR) 2025 Special 301 Report, the US continues to push India for reforms in data localisation, pharmaceutical patent law (specifically Section 3(d) of India’s Patents Act), and easing regulatory norms for genetically modified crops. The report accuses India of maintaining “high customs duties on IP-intensive products” and inadequate IP enforcement. Yet, New Delhi has so far reportedly resisted attempts at so-called “evergreening”, a practice used by pharmaceutical companies to extend patents by making minor modifications to existing drugs. India remains a critical supplier of affordable generic medicines to the US and developing nations. What lies ahead? The US court ruling offers India a rare window to renegotiate terms on more equitable grounds. However, this window may close quickly, especially if the Trump administration’s appeal finds favour in a higher court, possibly the US Supreme Court. For now, India’s Commerce Ministry has not issued an official statement on the judgement. But according to the report, the ruling is being seen as a strategic pause, a critical chance to reassess India’s trade priorities with its largest economic partner.

The US Court of International Trade has declared Trump's reciprocal tariff regime illegal, potentially reshaping global trade dynamics.&nbsp;

US court rules Trump tariff illegal: How it will impact India-US trade talks?

Donald Trump may be lying about his health, believe a majority of United States citizens, according to a new poll.This comes as former US President Joe Biden, who had stirred quite a bit of debate over his health and mental faculties, was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer.<h2>Liar liar pants on fire?</h2>As per a YouGov/Economist poll, 45 per cent of Americans believe that the 78-year-old US president was "not at all" or "not very" transparent about his health.The survey, which had 1,660 participants, was conducted between May 23 and May 26. While 45 per cent of people thought Trump was lying about his health woes, a smaller number of people, albeit only by a narrow margin, believed he was totally transparent.62 per cent of the survey respondents believe that the ageing president – who happens to be the oldest president to be sworn in as the President of the United States – must release his medical records to the public. They say it was his duty to disclose any health conditions that may affect his ability to serve as the Commander-in-Chief. Meanwhile, 28 per cent said that the POTUS, like any other person, had the right to keep medical records private.The survey also asked people if they believe Biden was transparent about his health: 82 per cent answered in the negative.As per a Mirror report, the poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2 per cent.<h2>Trump's dementia risk</h2>As per the report, like with Biden, there have been concerns about Trump's physical and mental health, including the possibility of dementia. The neurological disease reportedly runs in the Trump family.However, in April, a report from the White House physician sought to lay such fears to rest and claimed that Trump was in "excellent cognitive and physical health".It must be noted that just months before, a disastrous presidential debate between Biden and Trump gave rise to concerns about Biden's mental health faculties; a doctor's report declared the Democrat "fit to serve". With that in mind, concerns about Trump's health seem all the more plausible. &nbsp;

As per a YouGov/Economist poll, 45 per cent of Americans believe that the 78-year-old US president was "not at all" or "not very" transparent about his health.

Donald Trump may be lying about his health, believe a majority of United States citizens, according to a new poll. This comes as former US President Joe Biden, who had stirred quite a bit of debate over his health and mental faculties, was recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Liar liar pants on fire? As per a YouGov/Economist poll, 45 per cent of Americans believe that the 78-year-old US president was "not at all" or "not very" transparent about his health. The survey, which had 1,660 participants, was conducted between May 23 and May 26. While 45 per cent of people thought Trump was lying about his health woes, a smaller number of people, albeit only by a narrow margin, believed he was totally transparent. 62 per cent of the survey respondents believe that the ageing president – who happens to be the oldest president to be sworn in as the President of the United States – must release his medical records to the public. They say it was his duty to disclose any health conditions that may affect his ability to serve as the Commander-in-Chief. Meanwhile, 28 per cent said that the POTUS, like any other person, had the right to keep medical records private. The survey also asked people if they believe Biden was transparent about his health: 82 per cent answered in the negative. As per a Mirror report, the poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2 per cent. Trump's dementia risk As per the report, like with Biden, there have been concerns about Trump's physical and mental health, including the possibility of dementia. The neurological disease reportedly runs in the Trump family. However, in April, a report from the White House physician sought to lay such fears to rest and claimed that Trump was in "excellent cognitive and physical health". It must be noted that just months before, a disastrous presidential debate between Biden and Trump gave rise to concerns about Biden's mental health faculties; a doctor's report declared the Democrat "fit to serve". With that in mind, concerns about Trump's health seem all the more plausible.

As per a YouGov/Economist poll, 45 per cent of Americans believe that the 78-year-old US president was "not at all" or "not very" transparent about his health.

Trump lying about his health, has dementia? 45% of Americans think so, reveals new poll

The growing fiscal deficit in the United States is raising concerns about the long-term stability of global equity markets. Experts warn that the increasing national debt, combined with ongoing trade tensions and tariff uncertainties, poses significant risks to global investor confidence.&nbsp;The recent downgrade of the US credit rating by Moody’s — the first in over a century — has intensified worries about the country's fiscal health and its ability to manage debt sustainably.&nbsp;Moody’s downgrade highlighted the impact of proposed tax policies, which are expected to add trillions to the federal deficit over the next decade.&nbsp;The US currently carries a debt exceeding $36 trillion, and experts suggest that such high levels of indebtedness could undermine economic growth and financial market stability.&nbsp;US debt sparks investor caution&nbsp;This downgrade has led investors to reconsider their exposure to U.S. assets, prompting a shift toward other markets seen as more stable or promising.&nbsp;While the US remains a major economic powerhouse, the uncertainties surrounding fiscal policies and trade negotiations have led to cautious market behaviour. Some investors are moving funds out of US equities and bonds, which has created volatility and affected global markets.&nbsp;Experts also note that India’s economy appears resilient amidst these global shifts, benefiting from stable inflation, a strengthening currency, and favourable oil prices.&nbsp;This has helped India maintain investor interest, even as attention temporarily shifts away due to global trade deal developments.&nbsp;Meanwhile, precious metals like gold are gaining appeal as safe-haven assets in the current climate of fiscal uncertainty. Analysts believe that if the trend of reduced US asset exposure continues, gold’s value may rise further.&nbsp;Overall, the US fiscal deficit and credit rating downgrade are key factors reshaping global investment patterns, pushing investors to diversify and seek safer opportunities beyond traditional US markets.

The recent downgrade of the US credit rating by Moodys has intensified worries about the country fiscal health and its ability to manage debt sustainably.

The growing fiscal deficit in the United States is raising concerns about the long-term stability of global equity markets. Experts warn that the increasing national debt, combined with ongoing trade tensions and tariff uncertainties, poses significant risks to global investor confidence. The recent downgrade of the US credit rating by Moody’s — the first in over a century — has intensified worries about the country's fiscal health and its ability to manage debt sustainably. Moody’s downgrade highlighted the impact of proposed tax policies, which are expected to add trillions to the federal deficit over the next decade. The US currently carries a debt exceeding $36 trillion, and experts suggest that such high levels of indebtedness could undermine economic growth and financial market stability. US debt sparks investor caution This downgrade has led investors to reconsider their exposure to U.S. assets, prompting a shift toward other markets seen as more stable or promising. While the US remains a major economic powerhouse, the uncertainties surrounding fiscal policies and trade negotiations have led to cautious market behaviour. Some investors are moving funds out of US equities and bonds, which has created volatility and affected global markets. Experts also note that India’s economy appears resilient amidst these global shifts, benefiting from stable inflation, a strengthening currency, and favourable oil prices. This has helped India maintain investor interest, even as attention temporarily shifts away due to global trade deal developments. Meanwhile, precious metals like gold are gaining appeal as safe-haven assets in the current climate of fiscal uncertainty. Analysts believe that if the trend of reduced US asset exposure continues, gold’s value may rise further. Overall, the US fiscal deficit and credit rating downgrade are key factors reshaping global investment patterns, pushing investors to diversify and seek safer opportunities beyond traditional US markets.

The recent downgrade of the US credit rating by Moody’s — the first in over a century — has intensified worries about the country's fiscal health and its ability to manage debt sustainably.

US fiscal strains trigger global market shifts and investor caution

In a major blow to Donald Trump, a US federal court on Wednesday (May 28) blocked the majority of the US president's sweeping tariffs, a decision the White House said "unelected judges" have no right to weigh in on.The US federal court, in its ruling, said that Trump, by igniting a global trade war, has overstepped his constitutional authority with across-the-board levies.<h2>Not a blank cheque</h2>The court's ruling comes in two separate cases, which argue that the POTUS violated Congress's power of the purse – brought forward by businesses and a coalition of state governmentsThe three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade also struck down Trump's use of emergency powers to impose across-the-board import duties on countries China, Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. The court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president a blank cheque to rewrite trade policy."The question in the two cases before the court is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 ("IEEPA") delegates these powers to the president in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world," wrote the three-judge panel in an unsigned opinion."The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder," it noted, adding that any interpretation that "delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional".<h2>White House reacts</h2>The White House, as per AFP, has been given 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process and halt the tariffs.Slamming the ruling, the White House argued that "unelected judges" have no right to weigh in on Trump's handling of the issue."President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American greatness," said Trump's spokesperson Kush Desai.While the statement did not mention if Trump was seeking legal recourse, multiple US outlets said that his administration has already filed an appeal.The Trump camp also reacted with fury. Stephen Miller, one of Trump's closest White House aides on social media, decried a "judicial coup", which he claimed was out of control.Trump has long justified the tariffs as a response to "national emergencies" like trade deficits and drug trafficking. Critics like Gregory W. Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, however, say this was a "bogus" pretext. He said that the court has confirmed that "these tariffs are an illegal abuse of executive power.""Trump's declaration of a bogus national emergency to justify his global trade war was an absurd and unlawful use of IEEPA," he added.

The US federal court, in its ruling, said that Trump, by igniting a global trade war, has overstepped his constitutional authority with across-the-board levies.

In a major blow to Donald Trump, a US federal court on Wednesday (May 28) blocked the majority of the US president's sweeping tariffs, a decision the White House said "unelected judges" have no right to weigh in on. The US federal court, in its ruling, said that Trump, by igniting a global trade war, has overstepped his constitutional authority with across-the-board levies. Not a blank cheque The court's ruling comes in two separate cases, which argue that the POTUS violated Congress's power of the purse – brought forward by businesses and a coalition of state governments The three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade also struck down Trump's use of emergency powers to impose across-the-board import duties on countries China, Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. The court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the president a blank cheque to rewrite trade policy. "The question in the two cases before the court is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 ("IEEPA") delegates these powers to the president in the form of authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world," wrote the three-judge panel in an unsigned opinion. "The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder," it noted, adding that any interpretation that "delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional". White House reacts The White House, as per AFP, has been given 10 days to complete the bureaucratic process and halt the tariffs. Slamming the ruling, the White House argued that "unelected judges" have no right to weigh in on Trump's handling of the issue. "President Trump pledged to put America first, and the administration is committed to using every lever of executive power to address this crisis and restore American greatness," said Trump's spokesperson Kush Desai. While the statement did not mention if Trump was seeking legal recourse, multiple US outlets said that his administration has already filed an appeal. The Trump camp also reacted with fury. Stephen Miller, one of Trump's closest White House aides on social media, decried a "judicial coup", which he claimed was out of control. Trump has long justified the tariffs as a response to "national emergencies" like trade deficits and drug trafficking. Critics like Gregory W. Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, however, say this was a "bogus" pretext. He said that the court has confirmed that "these tariffs are an illegal abuse of executive power." "Trump's declaration of a bogus national emergency to justify his global trade war was an absurd and unlawful use of IEEPA," he added.

The US federal court, in its ruling, said that Trump, by igniting a global trade war, has overstepped his constitutional authority with across-the-board levies.

US court blocks Trump's 'America First' global tariffs, says POTUS overstepped constitutional authority

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (May 28) reiterated that nuclear talks with Iran are going well and revealed that he had spoken to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu against striking Iran amid talks. He added that there are two outcomes possible in the ongoing negotiations — one that is “violent,” which the US would rather avoid, and the second, a deal.&nbsp;“We’ll find out if that means anything,” he said to reporters in the Oval Office. &nbsp;“I think we’re going to see something very sensible...People will be surprised by what’s happening there,” Trump added.&nbsp;&nbsp;President Trump also acknowledged that he warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against taking any actions that could threaten ongoing talks between the Trump administration and Iran over a new nuclear deal.&nbsp;“Well, I’d like to be honest. Yes, I did. Next question, please?” Trump said when asked if he had warned Netanyahu against strikes. Trump added, “I didn't warn him. I told him it wasn't appropriate. There are good talks. It's not appropriate now. If we can solve it through a document.... blowing up the labs without anyone being in them - that would be better. I told him it wasn't appropriate because we are very close to a solution. But that could change at any moment. It could change over a phone call... But right now I think they want to make a deal and it could save a lot of lives."

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">🚨WATCH: Trump in response to a journalist&#39;s question about Netanyahu and an attack on Iran: I warned Netanyahu not to attack Iran because it could sabotage the nuclear talks. I didn&#39;t warn him. I told him it wasn&#39;t appropriate. There are good talks. It&#39;s not appropriate now. If… <a href="https://t.co/2IdiiZfyQF">pic.twitter.com/2IdiiZfyQF</a>&mdash; Raylan Givens (@JewishWarrior13) <a href="https://twitter.com/JewishWarrior13/status/1927773146913866115?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Iran-US nuclear talks</h2>Meanwhile, Iran said it would be able to survive if negotiations with the US over its nuclear programme fail to secure a deal. "It's not like we will die of hunger if they refuse to negotiate with us or impose sanctions," Iran President Masoud Pezeshkian was quoted as saying by state media about the talks with Washington. “We will find a way to survive.”&nbsp;The negotiations aim to resolve a decades-long dispute over Iran's nuclear ambitions, and Trump has threatened Iran with crippling economic sanctions and bombing if no new nuclear agreement is reached. The fifth round of Oman-mediated talks between the US and Iran was held last week in Rome. While Iran has stated that it will not suspend its enrichment of uranium to secure a deal on its nuclear programme with the United States, America said it cannot accept any Iranian enrichment.

US President Donald Trump reiterated that nuclear talks with Iran are going well and revealed that he had spoken to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu against striking Iran amid talks

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (May 28) reiterated that nuclear talks with Iran are going well and revealed that he had spoken to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu against striking Iran amid talks. He added that there are two outcomes possible in the ongoing negotiations — one that is “violent,” which the US would rather avoid, and the second, a deal. “We’ll find out if that means anything,” he said to reporters in the Oval Office. “I think we’re going to see something very sensible...People will be surprised by what’s happening there,” Trump added. President Trump also acknowledged that he warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against taking any actions that could threaten ongoing talks between the Trump administration and Iran over a new nuclear deal. “Well, I’d like to be honest. Yes, I did. Next question, please?” Trump said when asked if he had warned Netanyahu against strikes. Trump added, “I didn't warn him. I told him it wasn't appropriate. There are good talks. It's not appropriate now. If we can solve it through a document.... blowing up the labs without anyone being in them - that would be better. I told him it wasn't appropriate because we are very close to a solution. But that could change at any moment. It could change over a phone call... But right now I think they want to make a deal and it could save a lot of lives."

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (May 28) reiterated that nuclear talks with Iran are going well and revealed that he had spoken to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu against striking Iran amid talks.&nbsp;

'Very inappropriate': Trump told Israeli PM Netanyahu not to strike Iran amid nuclear talks with US, stays hopeful for the deal

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (May 28) issued a big statement regarding the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, claiming that he will find out in about two weeks if Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the ongoing war. Speaking at the swearing-in ceremony of the US Attorney at the White House, Trump said that he isn't sure if Putin wants to end the war and if “he's tapping America along.” He warned that he would deal with Putin “differently” if he was tapping the US.&nbsp;"I'll let you know in about two weeks... we're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along — and if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently," Trump said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">President Trump: ◾️I will let you know within 2 weeks if Putin is tapping us along or not, if he is we will respond differently. ◾️I cannot tell if Putin wants to end the war. ◾️Putin is playing with fire. ◾️I am disappointed at what happened a couple of nights now where people… <a href="https://t.co/ZN5nIU8bbh">pic.twitter.com/ZN5nIU8bbh</a>&mdash; Anton Gerashchenko (@Gerashchenko_en) <a href="https://twitter.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1927767394216272233?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The US president also opined that Putin is playing with fire and expressed his disappointment over Russian strike in Ukraine amid ongoing peace talks. “Putin is playing with fire…I am disappointed at what happened a couple of nights ago - where people were killed - in the middle of what you would call a negotiation,” Trump said.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">REPORTER: Do you still believe that Putin actually wants to end the war?<a href="https://twitter.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a>: &quot;I can&#39;t tell you that, but I&#39;ll let you know in about two weeks... we&#39;re going to find out whether or not he&#39;s tapping us along — and if he is, we&#39;ll respond a little bit differently.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/PlQ1YooKqk">pic.twitter.com/PlQ1YooKqk</a>&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1927765075877646376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Trump’s latest comments came after he called the Kremlin leader “CRAZY” over the weekend following a mass Russian air attack on Kyiv. “What Vladimir Putin doesn’t realize is that if it weren’t for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD..“He’s playing with fire!” Trump said on his Truth Social.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky proposed a three-way summit with Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and himself to end the war. This was outrightly rejected by the Kremlin. Putin had also refused to meet Zelensky in Turkey earlier this month. At that time, Trump was on his Middle East tour and had said that both leaders would meet soon to end the war.&nbsp;“I don’t believe anything’s going to happen, whether you like it or not, until he and I get together,” Trump said. “But we’re going to have to get it solved because too many people are dying.”<h2>Russia proposes second round of direct talks with Ukraine in Istanbul</h2>Russia on Wednesday said it had drafted a peace "memorandum" outlining its terms for ending the Ukraine conflict and would present it to Kyiv at direct talks in Istanbul next Monday. "Our delegation... is ready to present this memorandum to the Ukrainian delegation and provide the necessary explanations during a second round of direct talks in Istanbul on Monday, June 2," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump said that he is not sure if Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin wants to end the Russia Ukraine war

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (May 28) issued a big statement regarding the Russia-Ukraine peace talks, claiming that he will find out in about two weeks if Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the ongoing war. Speaking at the swearing-in ceremony of the US Attorney at the White House, Trump said that he isn't sure if Putin wants to end the war and if “he's tapping America along.” He warned that he would deal with Putin “differently” if he was tapping the US. "I'll let you know in about two weeks... we're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along — and if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently," Trump said.

US President Donald Trump said that he is not sure if his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin wants to end the Russia-Ukraine war

Trump fed up with 'CRAZY' Putin? US president says 'will find out in 2 weeks if he wants to end Russia-Ukraine war'

Amid US President Donald Trump's standoff with Harvard University, there was a controversy making rounds on social media, with theories claiming that Trump's son Barron Trump was not accepted to the school.Nicholas Clemens, the first lady’s communications director dismissed the claims, calling it "completely false"."Barron did not apply to Harvard and any assertion that he, or that anyone on his behalf, applied is completely false," she said.19-year-old Barron's college admission status has been the subject of social media theories.This comes amid Trump is targeting Harvard with federal funding cuts and demanding to know more about its international student population.Moreover, the Trump administration is asking all federal agencies to find ways to terminate all federal contracts with Harvard.While Harvard has already sued in federal court seeking the restoration of about $3.2 billion in federal grant funding frozen by the administration since last month.Earlier on Monday, Trump accused Harvard of being "very antisemitic" and said he was considering giving the school’s federal funding to trade schools "all across our land.""What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!" he wrote.Trump went on to demand more transparency from the university. “Nobody told us that! We want to know who those foreign students are, a reasonable request since we give Harvard BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, but Harvard isn’t exactly forthcoming. We want those names and countries,” he said.Harvard currently has 6,793 international students for the 2024–2025 academic year, making up 27.2% of its student body, according to university figures.Neither Harvard nor the White House responded immediately to media requests for comment.The dispute between Harvard and the Trump administration began in March after the government’s antisemitism task force launched a review of the university’s federal funding. Since then, nearly $2.7 billion in grants have been withheld, including $450 million earlier this month.&nbsp;

This comes amid Trump is targeting Harvard with federal funding cuts and demanding to know more about its international student population.

Amid US President Donald Trump's standoff with Harvard University, there was a controversy making rounds on social media, with theories claiming that Trump's son Barron Trump was not accepted to the school. Nicholas Clemens, the first lady’s communications director dismissed the claims, calling it "completely false". "Barron did not apply to Harvard and any assertion that he, or that anyone on his behalf, applied is completely false," she said. 19-year-old Barron's college admission status has been the subject of social media theories. This comes amid Trump is targeting Harvard with federal funding cuts and demanding to know more about its international student population. Moreover, the Trump administration is asking all federal agencies to find ways to terminate all federal contracts with Harvard. While Harvard has already sued in federal court seeking the restoration of about $3.2 billion in federal grant funding frozen by the administration since last month. Earlier on Monday, Trump accused Harvard of being "very antisemitic" and said he was considering giving the school’s federal funding to trade schools "all across our land." "What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!" he wrote. Trump went on to demand more transparency from the university. “Nobody told us that! We want to know who those foreign students are, a reasonable request since we give Harvard BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, but Harvard isn’t exactly forthcoming. We want those names and countries,” he said. Harvard currently has 6,793 international students for the 2024–2025 academic year, making up 27.2% of its student body, according to university figures. Neither Harvard nor the White House responded immediately to media requests for comment. The dispute between Harvard and the Trump administration began in March after the government’s antisemitism task force launched a review of the university’s federal funding. Since then, nearly $2.7 billion in grants have been withheld, including $450 million earlier this month.

This comes amid Trump is targeting Harvard with federal funding cuts and demanding to know more about its international student population.

Did Harvard reject Barron Trump? Melania Trump reacts to conspiracy theory amid Trump-Harvard row

CBS has released a preview of an interview with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, which is scheduled to be aired on Sunday, June 1. In the preview of the interview, Musk says he is disappointed with the GOP's Big Beautiful Bill, which is significantly increasing the budget deficit and diminishing all the effort of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).Musk said, "So, you know, I was like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decrease it and undermines the work the DOGE team is doing."He further added, "I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don’t know if it can be both. My personal opinion.”The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is an extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. It introduces tax reforms and a MAGA savings account offering $1,000 per child; allocates an additional $150 billion for defence spending and $70 billion for border security enhancements; reduces the coverage and introduces stricter requirements for federal aids such as Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); eliminates subsidised federal education and eliminates the Deaprtment of Education's authority to enforce gainful employment.The billionaire's statement might have some influence on the content or course of events.The bill was passed in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 22, narrowly by a single vote, but it is still up for consideration in the Senate.&nbsp;This is uncharacteristic considering Musk is one of the biggest cheerleaders of the Trump Administration. When Musk took over DOGE, he promised to reduce government spending by $2 trillion. Till now, he has managed to close down 11 federal agencies and render 250,000 federal workers jobless, which is supposed to save $160 billion of taxpayers' money.&nbsp;The bill is called by many critics the Reverse Robin Hood Bill and decreases the government spending on social welfare schemes. Democrats call it a measure to transfer wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich. Even after this, the bill is touted to increase government spending and add several trillion to the national debt of the US.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Elon Musk criticises the GOP's sweeping "Big Beautiful Bill" for ballooning the national debt and undermining government efficiency. Here's what the controversial bill includes—and why it's facing backlash from both sides.

CBS has released a preview of an interview with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, which is scheduled to be aired on Sunday, June 1. In the preview of the interview, Musk says he is disappointed with the GOP's Big Beautiful Bill, which is significantly increasing the budget deficit and diminishing all the effort of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk said, "So, you know, I was like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not decrease it and undermines the work the DOGE team is doing." He further added, "I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful. But I don’t know if it can be both. My personal opinion.” The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is an extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. It introduces tax reforms and a MAGA savings account offering $1,000 per child; allocates an additional $150 billion for defence spending and $70 billion for border security enhancements; reduces the coverage and introduces stricter requirements for federal aids such as Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP); eliminates subsidised federal education and eliminates the Deaprtment of Education's authority to enforce gainful employment. The billionaire's statement might have some influence on the content or course of events. The bill was passed in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 22, narrowly by a single vote, but it is still up for consideration in the Senate. This is uncharacteristic considering Musk is one of the biggest cheerleaders of the Trump Administration. When Musk took over DOGE, he promised to reduce government spending by $2 trillion. Till now, he has managed to close down 11 federal agencies and render 250,000 federal workers jobless, which is supposed to save $160 billion of taxpayers' money. The bill is called by many critics the Reverse Robin Hood Bill and decreases the government spending on social welfare schemes. Democrats call it a measure to transfer wealth from the poor and middle class to the rich. Even after this, the bill is touted to increase government spending and add several trillion to the national debt of the US.

Elon Musk criticises the GOP's sweeping "Big Beautiful Bill" for ballooning the national debt and undermining government efficiency. Here's what the controversial bill includes—and why it's facing backlash from both sides.

Elon Musk is disappointed with the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Former Russian President and Russian Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, responded to Trump's Truth social post, saying that “I only know of one REALLY BAD thing- WWIII”.&nbsp;In a post on the social media platform X, Medvedev said, “Regarding Trump's words about Putin 'playing with fire' and 'really bad things' happening to Russia. I only know of one REALLY BAD thing — WWIII. I hope Trump understands this!”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Regarding Trump&#39;s words about Putin &quot;playing with fire&quot; and &quot;really bad things&quot; happening to Russia. I only know of one REALLY BAD thing — WWIII. I hope Trump understands this!&mdash; Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) <a href="https://twitter.com/MedvedevRussiaE/status/1927427723028238477?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 27, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This came as a response to President Trump's warning that Russia had avoided really bad consequences solely due to Trump.&nbsp;"What Vladimir Putin doesn’t realise is that if it weren’t for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD. He’s playing with fire!" said Trump in a Truth Social post.The speculation from the European Union was right, Trump finally admitted that he was trying his best to protect Vladimir Putin.Russian state media, Russia Today, mocked Trump and suggested that we should wait till tomorrow until he changes his mind.&nbsp;"President Trump warns Moscow, claiming Russia avoided ‘REALLY BAD’ consequences only thanks to him ‘Putin doesn’t realise… he’s playing with fire!’ — Trump’s message leaves little room for misinterpretation Until he posts the opposite tomorrow morning"

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">President Trump warns Moscow, claiming Russia avoided ‘REALLY BAD’ consequences only thanks to him ‘Putin doesn’t realize… he’s playing with fire!’ — Trump’s message leaves little room for misinterpretation Until he posts the opposite tomorrow morning <a href="https://t.co/AOTjt3uYLS">pic.twitter.com/AOTjt3uYLS</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1927392457710268523?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 27, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

These war of words on social media epitomises the intersection of the US global diplomacy and Trump's quirky self-contradiction, which is becoming usual for everyone around him. Even the Russian officials and media interpret them as the same. Trump wants to believe that his past relationship with Putin is deterring any global conflict. However, the statements of Russian officials are a mixture of mockery and menace. As Dmitry Medvedev hints at the spectre of WWIII, the international community is left wondering whether Trump's remarks are a mixture of warning or boasting or just another drama in his political theatrics.

President Donald Trump warned Vladimir Putin that Russia avoided “REALLY BAD” consequences only because of him. In response, Dmitry Medvedev invoked the threat of World War III, escalating tensions online.

Former Russian President and Russian Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, responded to Trump's Truth social post, saying that “I only know of one REALLY BAD thing- WWIII”. In a post on the social media platform X, Medvedev said, “Regarding Trump's words about Putin 'playing with fire' and 'really bad things' happening to Russia. I only know of one REALLY BAD thing — WWIII. I hope Trump understands this!”

President Donald Trump warned Vladimir Putin that Russia avoided “REALLY BAD” consequences only because of him. In response, Dmitry Medvedev invoked the threat of World War III, escalating tensions online.

Trump warns Putin he ‘Played With Fire’; former Russian President Medvedev fires back with WWIII threat

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, leading an all-party delegation to Panama, delivered a scathing rebuke of Pakistan’s continued support for cross-border terrorism.&nbsp;India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, during his 3-day visit to the US, met Under Secretary Jeffrey Kessler. The key focus of the meet is to advance cooperation in critical and emerging technologies.&nbsp;President Donald Trump’s administration has ordered US embassies to stop scheduling new appointments for student visas as it gears up to expand social media screenings for applicants.&nbsp;Russian Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, responded to Trump's Truth social post, saying that “I only know of one REALLY BAD thing- WWIII”.&nbsp;Click on the headlines to know more&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/operation-sindoor-outreach-our-desire-to-be-left-alone-not-reciprocated-by-other-side-shashi-tharoor-slams-pakistan-for-promoting-terrorism-1748398086484">Operation Sindoor outreach | 'Our desire to be left alone not reciprocated by other side': Shashi Tharoor slams Pakistan for promoting terrorism</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250528/image-1748398299383.jpg?rect=(0,72,1136,852)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Operation Sindoor outreach | 'Our desire to be left alone not reciprocated by other side': Shashi Tharoor slams Pakistan for promoting terrorism"></figure>Speaking to the Indian community in Panama, Tharoor said, "Unfortunately, our desire to just be left alone is not reciprocated by our friends on the other side of the border. They have chosen repeatedly to attack us because they believe that they want territory which they do not control, which we control. It is part of the sovereign borders of the United Indian, and we are not going to give it to them even if we have to pay the price that we have repeatedly been paid. " &nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/foreign-secretary-vikram-misri-in-washington-early-convening-of-india-us-strategic-trade-dialogue-in-focus-1748402909286">Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri in Washington: Early convening of India-US Strategic Trade Dialogue in focus</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250528/image-1748403181156.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri in Washington: Early convening of India-US Strategic Trade Dialogue in focus"></figure>India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, during his 3-day visit to the US, met Under Secretary Jeffrey Kessler. The key focus of the meet is to advance cooperation in critical and emerging technologies. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-administration-pauses-student-visa-appointments-for-expansion-of-social-media-screening-1748403287379">Trump administration pauses student visa appointments for ‘expansion of social media screening’</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250528/image-1748403480513.jpg?rect=(0,391,6258,4688)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Trump administration pauses student visa appointments for ‘expansion of social media screening’"></figure>President Donald Trump’s administration has ordered US embassies to stop scheduling new appointments for student visas as it gears up to expand social media screenings for applicants.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-warns-putin-he-played-with-fire-medvedev-fires-back-with-wwiii-threat-1748398287014">Trump warns Putin he ‘Played With Fire’; Medvedev fires back with WWIII threat</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250528/image-1748401827064.jpg?rect=(0,240,1440,1080)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Trump warns Putin he ‘Played With Fire’; Medvedev fires back with WWIII threat"></figure>Russian Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, responded to Trump's Truth social post, saying that “I only know of one REALLY BAD thing- WWIII”. Watch | Trump media to sell stock to buy Bitcoin

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump media to sell stock to buy Bitcoin. Critics say conflict, US President says I don&#39;t care. <a href="https://twitter.com/ShivanChanana?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ShivanChanana</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/SaroyaHem?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SaroyaHem</a> tell you more. <a href="https://t.co/otfTBaDvXF">pic.twitter.com/otfTBaDvXF</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1927573671205347634?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Morning news brief: Operation Sindoor outreach; Trump administration pauses student visa appointments, and more

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, leading an all-party delegation to Panama, delivered a scathing rebuke of Pakistan’s continued support for cross-border terrorism. India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, during his 3-day visit to the US, met Under Secretary Jeffrey Kessler. The key focus of the meet is to advance cooperation in critical and emerging technologies. President Donald Trump’s administration has ordered US embassies to stop scheduling new appointments for student visas as it gears up to expand social media screenings for applicants. Russian Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, responded to Trump's Truth social post, saying that “I only know of one REALLY BAD thing- WWIII”. Click on the headlines to know more Operation Sindoor outreach | 'Our desire to be left alone not reciprocated by other side': Shashi Tharoor slams Pakistan for promoting terrorism Speaking to the Indian community in Panama, Tharoor said, "Unfortunately, our desire to just be left alone is not reciprocated by our friends on the other side of the border. They have chosen repeatedly to attack us because they believe that they want territory which they do not control, which we control. It is part of the sovereign borders of the United Indian, and we are not going to give it to them even if we have to pay the price that we have repeatedly been paid. " Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri in Washington: Early convening of India-US Strategic Trade Dialogue in focus India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, during his 3-day visit to the US, met Under Secretary Jeffrey Kessler. The key focus of the meet is to advance cooperation in critical and emerging technologies. Trump administration pauses student visa appointments for ‘expansion of social media screening’ President Donald Trump’s administration has ordered US embassies to stop scheduling new appointments for student visas as it gears up to expand social media screenings for applicants. Trump warns Putin he ‘Played With Fire’; Medvedev fires back with WWIII threat Russian Deputy Chairman of the Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, responded to Trump's Truth social post, saying that “I only know of one REALLY BAD thing- WWIII”. Watch | Trump media to sell stock to buy Bitcoin

Good morning! Start your day with WION's morning news brief

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

Pakistan heads to Washington for trade talks: What’s at stake as US tariff threat looms?

Trump admin launches review of US troops' withdrawal from Afghanistan: Timeline from 9/11 attack to end of '20-year-war' | WION Explains

'He loves drama': Reason for Trump's 'grudge' against Harvard REVEALED. Here's what US president's biographer claims

Donald Trump gives French President Emmanuel Macron marital advice after viral slap video: 'Make sure...'

'Key to White House': Trump gifts 'special' golden key to Musk. What is it and how many people have it? WION Explains

US consumer spending falters in April as inflation cools and savings rise

'Used to really like me a lot': Trump may pardon Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs BUT...

'Elon's not really leaving' to 'stopped India-Pak from fighting': What Trump said in press conference after Musk's exit

'Something wrong with his moral compass': Elon Musk allegedly used drugs including ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms while working for Trump

‘So much for Mr Nice Guy’: Trump blasts China for 'violating' trade deal he says saved Beijing 'grave economic danger'

Elon Musk's White House crusade comes to an end: What he really did in 129 chaotic days as Trump’s DOGE chief

What is ‘TACO Trade’? Trump's new nickname that fumes him amid the tariff legal saga

Trump gets slight relief as tariffs temporarily reinstated amid ongoing legal battle

Trump administration rejigs federal hiring process, bans use of race, ethnicity data

Morning news brief: Trump assassination threat; Musk-Trump to do press conference, and more

'Elon is terrific!': Trump to hold press conference with Tesla CEO on his 'last day'

US-Russia relations – Trump in fantasyland

'Illegal alien' threatens to shoot 'precious president' Donald Trump in the head, arrested

From 'Nazi' salute to criticism of ‘big beautiful’ bill: Elon Musk and his key moments at Donald Trump's White House

From India-Pak tensions to national security threat: BIZARRE reasons Trump admin gave to defend tariffs in US court

Watch: Trump upset over new nickname 'TACO', slams reporter who tells him the meaning

US court rules Trump tariff illegal: How it will impact India-US trade talks?

Trump lying about his health, has dementia? 45% of Americans think so, reveals new poll

US fiscal strains trigger global market shifts and investor caution

US court blocks Trump's 'America First' global tariffs, says POTUS overstepped constitutional authority

'Very inappropriate': Trump told Israeli PM Netanyahu not to strike Iran amid nuclear talks with US, stays hopeful for the deal