US President Donald Trump said that the recent American airstrikes on “ended the war” and left the sites “completely destroyed”. He even compared the strike’s impact to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II.<h2>Trump says the strike stopped war before it started</h2>Speaking at the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump argued that the military action had prevented further conflict with Iran. “They spent trillions of dollars trying to do this thing, and they didn’t come up with it, and we’re actually getting along with them very well right now,” he said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/what-it-takes-to-fly-b-2-bomber-for-40-hours-straight-1750785472440">Stamina and sunflower seeds: What it takes to fly B-2 bomber for 40 hours straight?</a>He said, “That hit ended the war. That hit ended the war.” Trump then added, “I don’t want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don’t want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing that ended that war. This ended that, this ended that war.”According to him, had the US not carried out the operation, “they would have been… they’d be fighting right now.”<h2>What happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?</h2>In August 1945, the US dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the only time nuclear weapons have been used in warfare. The bomb on Hiroshima killed an estimated 140,000 people, while the strike on Nagasaki claimed around 70,000 lives. Both bombings caused massive destruction and led to Japan’s surrender, ending&nbsp;World&nbsp;War&nbsp;II.<h2>White House claims questioned by media and intel reports</h2>Trump’s statements come as US intelligence agencies and major news outlets oppugn how successful the strikes truly were. Reports from CNN and The New York Times, based on unnamed officials, suggest Iran’s core nuclear infrastructure may have only been delayed by a few months.In response, Trump lashed out at the media on his social platform, Truth Social. “Fake news CNN, together with the failing New York Times, have teamed up in an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history,” he wrote.“The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed!” Trump said, rejecting any suggestion that the damage was limited.

In August 1945, the US dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the only time nuclear weapons have been used in warfare. 

US President Donald Trump said that the recent American airstrikes on “ended the war” and left the sites “completely destroyed”. He even compared the strike’s impact to the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Trump says the strike stopped war before it started Speaking at the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump argued that the military action had prevented further conflict with Iran. “They spent trillions of dollars trying to do this thing, and they didn’t come up with it, and we’re actually getting along with them very well right now,” he said. Also read: Stamina and sunflower seeds: What it takes to fly B-2 bomber for 40 hours straight? He said, “That hit ended the war. That hit ended the war.” Trump then added, “I don’t want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don’t want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing that ended that war. This ended that, this ended that war.” According to him, had the US not carried out the operation, “they would have been… they’d be fighting right now.” What happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? In August 1945, the US dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the only time nuclear weapons have been used in warfare. The bomb on Hiroshima killed an estimated 140,000 people, while the strike on Nagasaki claimed around 70,000 lives. Both bombings caused massive destruction and led to Japan’s surrender, ending World War II. White House claims questioned by media and intel reports Trump’s statements come as US intelligence agencies and major news outlets oppugn how successful the strikes truly were. Reports from CNN and The New York Times, based on unnamed officials, suggest Iran’s core nuclear infrastructure may have only been delayed by a few months. In response, Trump lashed out at the media on his social platform, Truth Social. “Fake news CNN, together with the failing New York Times, have teamed up in an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history,” he wrote. “The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed!” Trump said, rejecting any suggestion that the damage was limited.

In August 1945, the US dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the only time nuclear weapons have been used in warfare.&nbsp;

Did Trump compare US Iran airstrikes to Hiroshima, Nagasaki? US president says it's 'essentially the same thing'

US President Donald Trump, during a press conference on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday (Jun 25), hailed the ceasefire in the Israel-Iran war as a "tremendous victory for everyone, including Iran". Amid uncertainty around the ceasefire, Trump insisted that it was "going very well" and said that thanks to the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, Tehran "won't be building bombs for a long time". Ridiculing reports that suggest that the US strikes, contrary to what Trump says, did not "obliterate" the Iranian nuclear programme, the US president insisted that a "total obliteration" happened and said that the Iranian nuclear programme has been set back "decades".<h2>Trump takes credit for setting back Iran's nuclear programme</h2>Doubling down on his "total obliteration" claims, Trump claimed that Tehran's nuclear programme has been set back by "decades". "They're not going to be building bombs for a long time," he added. The SU President also stated that progress was being made on the war in Gaza. He said he believed that "great progress" was being made to bring an end to the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, thanks to the US strikes. Suggesting that the bombing could have a positive impact on the Middle East, he said, “I think great progress is being made on Gaza, I think because of this attack that we made.”<h2>Trump slams the media</h2>Slamming media publications that reported on the leaked US intel on the assessment of damage at the nuclear sites, Trump called out reporters from certain media houses, including CNN and The New York Times, insisting that their publications were "going down".

Trump at NATO summit hails Iran-Israel ceasefire as 'tremendous victory for everyone' 

US President Donald Trump, during a press conference on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in The Hague on Wednesday (Jun 25), hailed the ceasefire in the Israel-Iran war as a "tremendous victory for everyone, including Iran". Amid uncertainty around the ceasefire, Trump insisted that it was "going very well" and said that thanks to the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, Tehran "won't be building bombs for a long time". Ridiculing reports that suggest that the US strikes, contrary to what Trump says, did not "obliterate" the Iranian nuclear programme, the US president insisted that a "total obliteration" happened and said that the Iranian nuclear programme has been set back "decades". Trump takes credit for setting back Iran's nuclear programme Doubling down on his "total obliteration" claims, Trump claimed that Tehran's nuclear programme has been set back by "decades". "They're not going to be building bombs for a long time," he added. The SU President also stated that progress was being made on the war in Gaza. He said he believed that "great progress" was being made to bring an end to the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, thanks to the US strikes. Suggesting that the bombing could have a positive impact on the Middle East, he said, “I think great progress is being made on Gaza, I think because of this attack that we made.” Trump slams the media Slamming media publications that reported on the leaked US intel on the assessment of damage at the nuclear sites, Trump called out reporters from certain media houses, including CNN and The New York Times, insisting that their publications were "going down".

Trump hails Iran-Israel ceasefire as 'tremendous victory for everyone' at NATO summit

Trump at NATO summit hails Iran-Israel ceasefire as 'tremendous victory for everyone'

A leaked intel report on the early assessment of the damage wrought by US bombing on three Iranian nuclear strikes has concluded that the strike has only set Tehran's nuclear programme back by a few months. As per reports, the damage was further lessened by the fact that Iran moved enriched uranium out of the sites before the US strikes. Citing people in the know, reports suggest that Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles were moved before US President Donald Trump ordered strikes that could destroy them. Trump, on his part, has doubled down on his "obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites claim and has slammed news websites that published the US leaked intel.<h2>Iran moved nuclear stockpiles</h2>Citing two people familiar with the classified US assessment, CNN reported that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed and that its centrifuges were largely "intact." One of the people who chose to stay anonymous claimed that the "enriched uranium was moved out of the sites prior to the US strikes". Similarly, The New York Times reported that "much of Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was moved before the strikes, which destroyed little of the nuclear material. Some of that may have been moved to secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran."Watch | U.S. intelligence says main components of nuke programmme not destroyed<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-intelligence-says-main-components-of-nuke-programmme-not-destroyed-1750819190440/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-intelligence-says-main-components-of-nuke-programmme-not-destroyed-1750819190440/embed</a>The leaked preliminary, classified report comes from the United States Defence Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm. It suggests that the recent American bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities — touted by President Donald Trump as a mission that "obliterated" Tehran's capabilities — has, in fact, only set the programme back by a few months. While earlier, as per US estimation, Iran was just three months away from making a bomb, now, as per the leaked assessment, Tehran's nuclear timeline has been delayed by as little as three months. However, quickly slamming the reports, Trump on Truth Social doubled down on his claims that the Iranian nuclear sites were "obliterated" in US strikes. Insisting that the three nuclear facilities were "completely destroyed" he ridiculed media houses that published reports casting doubt on his claims of the destruction of three nuclear sites in Iran -Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.&nbsp;

Citing people in the know, reports suggest that Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles were moved before US President Donald Trump ordered strikes that could destroy them. 

A leaked intel report on the early assessment of the damage wrought by US bombing on three Iranian nuclear strikes has concluded that the strike has only set Tehran's nuclear programme back by a few months. As per reports, the damage was further lessened by the fact that Iran moved enriched uranium out of the sites before the US strikes. Citing people in the know, reports suggest that Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles were moved before US President Donald Trump ordered strikes that could destroy them. Trump, on his part, has doubled down on his "obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites claim and has slammed news websites that published the US leaked intel. Iran moved nuclear stockpiles Citing two people familiar with the classified US assessment, CNN reported that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed and that its centrifuges were largely "intact." One of the people who chose to stay anonymous claimed that the "enriched uranium was moved out of the sites prior to the US strikes". Similarly, The New York Times reported that "much of Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was moved before the strikes, which destroyed little of the nuclear material. Some of that may have been moved to secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran." Watch | U.S. intelligence says main components of nuke programmme not destroyed https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-intelligence-says-main-components-of-nuke-programmme-not-destroyed-1750819190440/embed The leaked preliminary, classified report comes from the United States Defence Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm. It suggests that the recent American bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities — touted by President Donald Trump as a mission that "obliterated" Tehran's capabilities — has, in fact, only set the programme back by a few months. While earlier, as per US estimation, Iran was just three months away from making a bomb, now, as per the leaked assessment, Tehran's nuclear timeline has been delayed by as little as three months. However, quickly slamming the reports, Trump on Truth Social doubled down on his claims that the Iranian nuclear sites were "obliterated" in US strikes. Insisting that the three nuclear facilities were "completely destroyed" he ridiculed media houses that published reports casting doubt on his claims of the destruction of three nuclear sites in Iran -Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.

Citing people in the know, reports suggest that Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles were moved before US President Donald Trump ordered strikes that could destroy them.&nbsp;

Did Iran move enriched uranium stockpile to 'secret nuclear sites' before US strike? Leaked intel report suggests so

US President Donald Trump's ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were bold, and the visuals were dramatic, but it turns out the early assessment is far less than explosive. A leaked preliminary, classified report from the United States Defense Intelligence Agency, Pentagon's intelligence arm, suggests that the recent American bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities — touted by President Donald Trump as a mission that "obliterated" Tehran's capabilities — has in fact only set the programme back by a few months.<h2>What damage did the US do?</h2>According to the New York Times report, entrances to two key sites were sealed, but the fortified underground complexes themselves — at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — remain structurally intact. Based on the battle damage assessment conducted by the US Central Command in the aftermath of the strikes, it concluded that while the mission disrupted operations, it didn't collapse the core infrastructure.Watch | Iran's unstoppable missiles: Iran's new missile a 'multi-headed monster'<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-s-unstoppable-missiles-iran-s-new-missile-a-multi-headed-monster-1750809280601/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-s-unstoppable-missiles-iran-s-new-missile-a-multi-headed-monster-1750809280601/embed</a><h2>Trump's version vs reality</h2>While President Trump was quick to declare a resounding victory, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been more careful in describing the attack’s effects. At a press conference on Sunday, a day after the strikes, he said that the "operation was designed to severely degrade Iran's nuclear weapons infrastructure".He said that while the final damage assessment was to come, initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites "sustained severe damage and destruction". However, he stopped short of saying that the mission "obliterated" nuclear facilities.Meanwhile soon after the strikes, at a late night address to the public, Trump called the strikes a 'spectacular military success,' and said that “Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”Labelling Tehran the world's number one state sponsor of terror, Trump said that the US's objective with these strikes was the "destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat" posed by the nation.“We took the bomb right out of their hands,” he said, referring to Iran’s enriched uranium program. “Total obliteration,” he claimed. However, intel reports paint a murkier picture. Earlier, as per US estimation, Iran was just three months away from making a bomb; now, as per the assessment, Tehran's nuclear timeline has been delayed by as little as three months.&nbsp;

A leaked preliminary, classified report from the US Defense Intelligence Agency suggests that the recent bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities — touted by President Donald Trump as a mission that "obliterated" Tehran's capabilities — has only set the programme back by a few months.

US President Donald Trump's ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were bold, and the visuals were dramatic, but it turns out the early assessment is far less than explosive. A leaked preliminary, classified report from the United States Defense Intelligence Agency, Pentagon's intelligence arm, suggests that the recent American bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities — touted by President Donald Trump as a mission that "obliterated" Tehran's capabilities — has in fact only set the programme back by a few months. What damage did the US do? According to the New York Times report, entrances to two key sites were sealed, but the fortified underground complexes themselves — at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — remain structurally intact. Based on the battle damage assessment conducted by the US Central Command in the aftermath of the strikes, it concluded that while the mission disrupted operations, it didn't collapse the core infrastructure. Watch | Iran's unstoppable missiles: Iran's new missile a 'multi-headed monster' https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-s-unstoppable-missiles-iran-s-new-missile-a-multi-headed-monster-1750809280601/embed Trump's version vs reality While President Trump was quick to declare a resounding victory, Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been more careful in describing the attack’s effects. At a press conference on Sunday, a day after the strikes, he said that the "operation was designed to severely degrade Iran's nuclear weapons infrastructure". He said that while the final damage assessment was to come, initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites "sustained severe damage and destruction". However, he stopped short of saying that the mission "obliterated" nuclear facilities. Meanwhile soon after the strikes, at a late night address to the public, Trump called the strikes a 'spectacular military success,' and said that “Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” Labelling Tehran the world's number one state sponsor of terror, Trump said that the US's objective with these strikes was the "destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat" posed by the nation. “We took the bomb right out of their hands,” he said, referring to Iran’s enriched uranium program. “Total obliteration,” he claimed. However, intel reports paint a murkier picture. Earlier, as per US estimation, Iran was just three months away from making a bomb; now, as per the assessment, Tehran's nuclear timeline has been delayed by as little as three months.

A leaked preliminary, classified report from the US Defense Intelligence Agency suggests that the recent bombing campaign on Iran's nuclear facilities — touted by President Donald Trump as a mission that "obliterated" Tehran's capabilities — has only set the programme back by a few months.

Spoke too soon? Preliminary US intel report ridicules Trump's 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear programme claims

Israel was reportedly planning to strike 15 “important regime targets” in retaliation to Iran’s violation of the fresh ceasefire through missile launches on Tuesday morning, when US President Donald Trump told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to carry out the attack. Trump told Netanyahu to halt the attack when they spoke by phone, following which the Israeli PM ordered the IAF pilots to return. The Israeli leadership then looked for a site that could be targeted without any collateral damage, and so a radar installation was struck, said a Channel 12 report.Trump made it clear to Netanyahu in the call that he had to follow what he was saying, the report adds.&nbsp;As per a Jerusalem Post report, Trump viewed the ceasefire as a personal achievement and made it clear that no one—absolutely no one—would undermine it.&nbsp;<h2>Israel will respect the ceasefire, Katz tells Hegseth</h2>&nbsp;Later in the day, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz spoke with US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and told him that “Israel will respect the ceasefire—as long as the other side does.”Katz said in a post on X that he thanked his American counterpart for Trump’s “bold decision to act with Israel against the Iranian nuclear threat.”Katz also said that Hegseth “praised Israel and the IDF for the historic achievements made.”&nbsp;<h2>‘No nonsense, no further attacks,’ US conveyed to Iran</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, media reports said that the US also sent a message to Iran via Qatar, urging them to cease firing. A senior US official relayed through Qatari intermediaries: “No nonsense, no further attacks.”&nbsp;Qatar is working to revive nuclear talks between the US and Iran, and Qatari officials, along with Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff have been holding extensive discussions on the matter.&nbsp;<h2>‘Iran has no intention of confrontation with brothers’</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, President Masoud Pezeshkian said that Iran’s missile attack on an American airbase in Qatar was just a “response to the US military aggression”, and highlighted that Tehran has no intention whatsoever of confronting its brothers in neighbouring, regional and Muslim countries.In a telephone conversation with Sultan of Oman Haitham bin Tariq Al Said on Tuesday, Pezeshkian described the division of Islamic countries as a sinister plot hatched by the Zionist regime and the United States.

President Donald Trump viewed the ceasefire as a personal achievement and made it clear that no one—absolutely no one—would undermine it. Trump made it clear to Netanyahu in the call that he had to follow what he was saying.

Israel was reportedly planning to strike 15 “important regime targets” in retaliation to Iran’s violation of the fresh ceasefire through missile launches on Tuesday morning, when US President Donald Trump told Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to carry out the attack. Trump told Netanyahu to halt the attack when they spoke by phone, following which the Israeli PM ordered the IAF pilots to return. The Israeli leadership then looked for a site that could be targeted without any collateral damage, and so a radar installation was struck, said a Channel 12 report. Trump made it clear to Netanyahu in the call that he had to follow what he was saying, the report adds. As per a Jerusalem Post report, Trump viewed the ceasefire as a personal achievement and made it clear that no one—absolutely no one—would undermine it. Israel will respect the ceasefire, Katz tells Hegseth Later in the day, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz spoke with US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and told him that “Israel will respect the ceasefire—as long as the other side does.” Katz said in a post on X that he thanked his American counterpart for Trump’s “bold decision to act with Israel against the Iranian nuclear threat.” Katz also said that Hegseth “praised Israel and the IDF for the historic achievements made.” ‘No nonsense, no further attacks,’ US conveyed to Iran Meanwhile, media reports said that the US also sent a message to Iran via Qatar, urging them to cease firing. A senior US official relayed through Qatari intermediaries: “No nonsense, no further attacks.” Qatar is working to revive nuclear talks between the US and Iran, and Qatari officials, along with Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff have been holding extensive discussions on the matter. ‘Iran has no intention of confrontation with brothers’ Meanwhile, President Masoud Pezeshkian said that Iran’s missile attack on an American airbase in Qatar was just a “response to the US military aggression”, and highlighted that Tehran has no intention whatsoever of confronting its brothers in neighbouring, regional and Muslim countries. In a telephone conversation with Sultan of Oman Haitham bin Tariq Al Said on Tuesday, Pezeshkian described the division of Islamic countries as a sinister plot hatched by the Zionist regime and the United States.

President Donald Trump viewed the ceasefire as a personal achievement and made it clear that no one—absolutely no one—would undermine it. Trump made it clear to Netanyahu in the call that he had to follow what he was saying.

Israel was going to strike 15 targets in Iran when Trump stopped Netanyahu: Report

US President Donald Trump will be meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday (June 24) on the sidelines of the upcoming NATO Summit in The Hague. He said that he'll meet him and ask him "How you doing?"Meanwhile, Iran and Israel attacked each other within hours of a ceasefire, however, later Iran said that it would follow the ceasefire only if it is not attacked further. While Israeli PM Netanyahu said that it "refrained" from launching further attacks after Trump spoke to him.Click on the headlines to read more&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-zelensky-meeting-i-ll-say-how-you-doing-trump-says-zelensky-is-in-tough-situation-ahead-of-meet-at-nato-summit-1750779583357">'I’ll say ‘how you doing?': Trump says Zelensky is in 'tough situation' ahead of meet at NATO summit</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750779781813.png?rect=(0,168,1440,1080)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'I’ll say ‘how you doing?': Trump says Zelensky is in 'tough situation' ahead of meet at NATO summit"></figure>

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-says-will-respect-truce-if-israel-refrained-from-further-strikes-after-trump-call-1750777563676">Iran says will respect truce if…; Israel ‘refrained from further strikes’ after Trump call</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750778565987.jpg?rect=(2,0,1210,907)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Iran says will respect truce if…; Israel ‘refrained from further strikes’ after Trump call"></figure>Iran and Israel attacked each other within hours of US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a ceasefire, but later Tehran came up with the proposition that it would follow the truce only if it is not attacked further. On the other hand, Israel said that it “refrained” from launching further attacks after Trump spoke to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that it will respect a ceasefire announced by President Trump provided that Israel also upholds its terms. &nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-turned-your-leaders-into-dust-israeli-agents-threatened-iranian-general-to-flee-or-get-killed-here-s-what-leaked-audio-reveal-1750777258793">'Turned your leaders into dust': Israeli agents THREATENED Iranian general to flee or get killed - Here's what leaked audio reveal</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750777570377.jpg?rect=(0,232,3655,2742)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Turned your leaders into dust': Israeli agents THREATENED Iranian general to flee or get killed - Here's what leaked audio reveal"></figure>As Israel-Iran engulfed in a full-blown war earlier this month, Israeli intelligence agents launched a covert intimidation campaign against Iranian generals, giving them a deadline to flee with their families, according to an audio recording obtained by The Washington Post. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-europe-going-to-pay-in-big-way-nato-chief-rutte-lauds-trump-for-israel-iran-ceasefire-after-12-days-of-war-1750775540413">'Europe going to pay in BIG way': NATO Chief Rutte lauds Trump for Israel-Iran ceasefire after 12-days of war</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750775845918.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Europe going to pay in BIG way': NATO Chief Rutte lauds Trump for Israel-Iran ceasefire after 12-days of war"></figure>As US President Donald Trump announced the Israel-Iran ceasefire on Tuesday morning (June 24), NATO Chief Mark Rutte lauded Trump for the decisive and extraordinary action and for ending the Israel-Iran war in 12 days. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/b-2-bomber-or-a-flying-hotel-stealth-bombers-us-used-to-attack-iran-has-bunk-beds-noodles-candies-and-more-1750768557548">B-2 Bomber or a flying hotel? Stealth bombers US used to attack Iran has bunk beds, noodles, candies and more</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750769143312.jpg?rect=(0,80,640,480)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="B-2 Bomber or a flying hotel? Stealth bombers US used to attack Iran has bunk beds, noodles, candies and more"></figure>The night when the US hit Iranian nuclear facilities with the B-2 Spirit, no one could imagine that the two American pilots who were executing the operation might be eating noodles made in the microwave, having candy bars and energy drinks and catching short naps on fold-out beds, all while steering the $2 billion stealth bomber. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-iran-ceasefire-donald-trump-unhappy-with-israel-for-attacking-iran-says-both-nations-violated-ceasefire-1750763243428">'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS': Trump 'unhappy' with Israel for attacking Iran; says both nations 'violated ceasefire'</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750763528661.png?rect=(0,192,1440,1080)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS': Trump 'unhappy' with Israel for attacking Iran; says both nations 'violated ceasefire'"></figure>US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised both Israel and Iran for breaching a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered, singling out Israel for striking targets after the truce deadline had passed. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trump-after-making-peace-abroad-trump-turns-focus-to-next-big-agenda-what-is-one-big-beautiful-bill-1750777288546">'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION': After making 'peace abroad,' Trump turns focus to NEXT BIG agenda: What is One Big Beautiful Bill?</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750777645195.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION': After making 'peace abroad,' Trump turns focus to NEXT BIG agenda: What is One Big Beautiful Bill?"></figure>Fresh from announcing a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, US President Donald Trump is now calling on Congress to act swiftly on what he’s dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, a massive legislative package that forms the centrepiece of his second-term agenda. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-don-t-want-to-see-chaos-trump-says-no-to-regime-change-in-iran-despite-calling-for-it-days-earlier-1750775567192">'Don’t want to see chaos': Trump says ‘no’ to regime change in Iran, despite calling for it days earlier</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750775720735.jpg?rect=(16,84,379,284)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Don’t want to see chaos': Trump says ‘no’ to regime change in Iran, despite calling for it days earlier"></figure>US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he is not seeking regime change in Iran, days after appearing to suggest otherwise on social media. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/cricket-ind-vs-eng-duckett-becomes-first-england-opener-to-score-4th-innings-ton-vs-india-in-england-1750772789424">IND vs ENG: Duckett achieves RARE feat with fourth innings ton vs India at Headingley</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250611/image-1749639987028.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="IND vs ENG: Duckett achieves RARE feat with fourth innings ton vs India at Headingley"></figure>England batter Ben Duckett has become the first English opener to score a Test hundred in the fourth innings against India in England. Duckett achieved the feat during on day 5 (Jun 24) of the first Test at Headingley in Leeds. By the time rain stopped play on the final day, Duckett was batting at 105 not out with his partner Zak Crawley at 59. Duckett is also only the fifth England batter overall to score a fourth innings Test ton against India in England. He was eventually dismissed for 149. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/thug-life-ott-release-date-netflix-kamal-haasan-mani-ratnam-1750774282182">Kamal Haasan’s Thug Life to break the 8 weeks rule and release on OTT sooner?</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250624/image-1750774802465.jfif?rect=(0,149,902,675)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Kamal Haasan’s Thug Life to break the 8 weeks rule and release on OTT sooner?"></figure>Kamal Haasan-Mani Ratnam’s Thug Life might break the eight-week window and release sooner on the OTT platform Netflix. Ratnam and Haasan’s collaboration-a first in nearly four decades- was marred with controversy before the theatrical release. The film opened to mostly negative reviews, and reports state that the makers have decided to take the film to a digital platform before the scheduled date. Thug Life was released in theatres on June 5.&nbsp;

Here are the top 10 stories from across the world.

US President Donald Trump will be meeting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday (June 24) on the sidelines of the upcoming NATO Summit in The Hague. He said that he'll meet him and ask him "How you doing?" Meanwhile, Iran and Israel attacked each other within hours of a ceasefire, however, later Iran said that it would follow the ceasefire only if it is not attacked further. While Israeli PM Netanyahu said that it "refrained" from launching further attacks after Trump spoke to him. Click on the headlines to read more 'I’ll say ‘how you doing?': Trump says Zelensky is in 'tough situation' ahead of meet at NATO summit

Here are the top 10 stories from across the world.

Top 10 world news: Trump to meet Zelensky at NATO Summit; Israel-Iran ceasefire updates, and more

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (June 24) that he would “probably” meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump confirmed the possibility when asked about a meeting. “Yeah probably I’ll see him,” he said. When asked what he intended to say to the Ukrainian leader, Trump replied, “I’ll say ‘how you doing?’ He’s in a tough situation, should never have been there.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/donald-trump-after-making-peace-abroad-trump-turns-focus-to-next-big-agenda-what-is-one-big-beautiful-bill-1750777288546">'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION': After making 'peace abroad,' Trump turns focus to NEXT BIG agenda: What is One Big Beautiful Bill?</a><h2>Zelensky team confirms meeting preparations</h2>Volodymyr Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, also confirmed that talks were under way to prepare for the meeting. He said he had spoken with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday about the upcoming discussion.“The United States reaffirmed its unwavering support for a ceasefire,” Yermak wrote on social media platform X. A source close to the Ukrainian delegation told AFP that the meeting was scheduled for the “early afternoon” in the Netherlands and that both sides were finalising details.According to the AFP report, the focus of the meeting would be Ukraine’s plans to purchase a new defence package, particularly air defence systems, as Russian missile and drone strikes continue to threaten cities across Ukraine. The leaders are also expected to discuss stronger sanctions against Russia and a proposed reduction in the oil price cap.Ukraine and its allies are pushing for the current $60-per-barrel price cap on Russian oil to be lowered to $45 in a bid to further limit Moscow’s war funding.<h2>Trump reluctant to impose fresh sanctions</h2>So far, President Trump has resisted calls to introduce additional sanctions on Russia. This has caused frustration among Western allies, particularly after Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rejection of a US-backed ceasefire plan in Ukraine.

When asked what he intended to say to the Ukrainian leader, Trump replied, “I’ll say ‘how you doing?’ He’s in a tough situation, should have never been there.”

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday (June 24) that he would “probably” meet Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump confirmed the possibility when asked about a meeting. “Yeah probably I’ll see him,” he said. When asked what he intended to say to the Ukrainian leader, Trump replied, “I’ll say ‘how you doing?’ He’s in a tough situation, should never have been there.” Also read: 'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION': After making 'peace abroad,' Trump turns focus to NEXT BIG agenda: What is One Big Beautiful Bill? Zelensky team confirms meeting preparations Volodymyr Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, also confirmed that talks were under way to prepare for the meeting. He said he had spoken with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday about the upcoming discussion. “The United States reaffirmed its unwavering support for a ceasefire,” Yermak wrote on social media platform X. A source close to the Ukrainian delegation told AFP that the meeting was scheduled for the “early afternoon” in the Netherlands and that both sides were finalising details. According to the AFP report, the focus of the meeting would be Ukraine’s plans to purchase a new defence package, particularly air defence systems, as Russian missile and drone strikes continue to threaten cities across Ukraine. The leaders are also expected to discuss stronger sanctions against Russia and a proposed reduction in the oil price cap. Ukraine and its allies are pushing for the current $60-per-barrel price cap on Russian oil to be lowered to $45 in a bid to further limit Moscow’s war funding. Trump reluctant to impose fresh sanctions So far, President Trump has resisted calls to introduce additional sanctions on Russia. This has caused frustration among Western allies, particularly after Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rejection of a US-backed ceasefire plan in Ukraine.

When asked what he intended to say to the Ukrainian leader, Trump replied, “I’ll say ‘how you doing?’ He’s in a tough situation, should have never been there.”

'I’ll say ‘how you doing?': Trump says Zelensky is in 'tough situation' ahead of meet at NATO summit

Iran and Israel attacked each other within hours of US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a ceasefire, but later Tehran came up with the proposition that it would follow the truce only if it is not attacked further. On the other hand, Israel said that it “refrained” from launching further attacks after Trump spoke to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that it will respect a ceasefire announced by President Trump provided that Israel also upholds its terms. “If the Zionist regime does not violate the ceasefire, Iran will not violate it either,” Pezeshkian said during a phone conversation with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim.&nbsp;“The Iranian people have once again shown that despite some problems and grievances, they will stand united against the enemy’s invasion until the end,” he added.&nbsp;Earlier, in a first official remark to Trump’s claimed ceasefire, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran would stop its attacks if Israel stopped its airstrikes by 4 am local time.&nbsp;&nbsp;Israel struck a radar installation near Tehran hours after the start of ceasefire in retaliation for Iranian missile launches, but said it had refrained from further attacks after President Donald Trump spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.&nbsp;The prime minister’s office acknowledged the strike in a statement after Trump expressed frustration that Israel had launched strikes on Iran after the ceasefire agreement was reached but before it took effect.Trump also criticised Israel’s plans to respond militarily to an alleged Iranian violation of the ceasefire.&nbsp;<h2>Iran rejects accusations of breaching truce</h2>&nbsp;Tehran rejected accusations that it breached the truce, which was meant to start at 7 am Israeli time (0400 GMT), and instead said Israel had continued its attacks on Iran for an hour and a half after the ceasefire came into effect.&nbsp;Netanyahu’s office claimed that Israel had carried out a strike in Tehran targeting Iranian security forces at 3 am (midnight GMT), four hours before the ceasefire was due to start.&nbsp;<h2>‘Iran launched missile after ceasefire came into effect’</h2>&nbsp;An Iranian missile strike on Beersheba in Israel’s south killed four Israelis on Tuesday morning. Netanyahu’s office said that attack had been launched before the truce started.It also accused Iran of launching a single missile six minutes after the ceasefire came into effect and firing another two missiles around three and a half hours later, at about 10.25 a.m. (0725 GMT). In retaliation, the Israeli air force destroyed the radar installation near Tehran, Netanyahu’s office said.The prime minister’s office said Israel refrained from carrying out further strikes on Iran after a Trump spoke to Netanyahu, without specifying if the conversation took place before or after the attack on radar.

Israel struck a radar installation near Tehran hours after the start of ceasefire in retaliation for Iranian missile launches, but said it had refrained from further attacks after President Donald Trump spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Iran and Israel attacked each other within hours of US President Donald Trump’s announcement of a ceasefire, but later Tehran came up with the proposition that it would follow the truce only if it is not attacked further. On the other hand, Israel said that it “refrained” from launching further attacks after Trump spoke to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that it will respect a ceasefire announced by President Trump provided that Israel also upholds its terms. “If the Zionist regime does not violate the ceasefire, Iran will not violate it either,” Pezeshkian said during a phone conversation with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. “The Iranian people have once again shown that despite some problems and grievances, they will stand united against the enemy’s invasion until the end,” he added. Earlier, in a first official remark to Trump’s claimed ceasefire, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Iran would stop its attacks if Israel stopped its airstrikes by 4 am local time. Israel struck a radar installation near Tehran hours after the start of ceasefire in retaliation for Iranian missile launches, but said it had refrained from further attacks after President Donald Trump spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The prime minister’s office acknowledged the strike in a statement after Trump expressed frustration that Israel had launched strikes on Iran after the ceasefire agreement was reached but before it took effect. Trump also criticised Israel’s plans to respond militarily to an alleged Iranian violation of the ceasefire. Iran rejects accusations of breaching truce Tehran rejected accusations that it breached the truce, which was meant to start at 7 am Israeli time (0400 GMT), and instead said Israel had continued its attacks on Iran for an hour and a half after the ceasefire came into effect. Netanyahu’s office claimed that Israel had carried out a strike in Tehran targeting Iranian security forces at 3 am (midnight GMT), four hours before the ceasefire was due to start. ‘Iran launched missile after ceasefire came into effect’ An Iranian missile strike on Beersheba in Israel’s south killed four Israelis on Tuesday morning. Netanyahu’s office said that attack had been launched before the truce started. It also accused Iran of launching a single missile six minutes after the ceasefire came into effect and firing another two missiles around three and a half hours later, at about 10.25 a.m. (0725 GMT). In retaliation, the Israeli air force destroyed the radar installation near Tehran, Netanyahu’s office said. The prime minister’s office said Israel refrained from carrying out further strikes on Iran after a Trump spoke to Netanyahu, without specifying if the conversation took place before or after the attack on radar.

Israel struck a radar installation near Tehran hours after the start of ceasefire in retaliation for Iranian missile launches, but said it had refrained from further attacks after President Donald Trump spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Iran says will respect truce if…; Israel ‘refrained from further strikes’ after Trump call

Fresh from announcing a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, US President Donald Trump is now calling on Congress to act swiftly on what he’s dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, a massive legislative package that forms the centrepiece of his second-term agenda.<h2>‘Get the deal done this week,' says Trump</h2>Posting on Truth Social, Trump said the country was now ready to turn inward after achieving peace abroad. “Now that we have made PEACE abroad, we must finish the job here at home by passing ‘THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,’ and getting the Bill to my desk, ASAP,” he said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-don-t-want-to-see-chaos-trump-says-no-to-regime-change-in-iran-despite-calling-for-it-days-earlier-1750775567192">'Don’t want to see chaos': Trump says ‘no’ to regime change in Iran, despite calling for it days earlier</a>“It will be a Historic Present for THE GREAT PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, as we begin the Celebration of our Country’s 250th Birthday,” he said, promising “unprecedented Safety, Security, and Prosperity.”“To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don’t go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK… NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT’S DONE,” Trump said. Congress is due to go into recess for the July 4 holiday, making this week the final opportunity to pass the bill on schedule.<h2>What is the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’?</h2>The bill, officially named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA), is over 1,000 pages long and bundles together several of Trump’s core campaign pledges.While some of Trump’s policies could be rolled out via executive action, major changes such as tax reforms and budget adjustments require full congressional approval. The OBBB aims to fast-track those changes in a single package.<h2>What’s in the bill?</h2>The legislation has five major parts:• Tax cuts made permanent: The bill extends and locks in the income and estate tax cuts introduced in Trump’s 2017 reforms.• New tax relief: Further cuts are proposed for overtime pay, tips, and Social Security income. According to the White House, individuals earning between $30,000 and $80,000 would see a 15% tax reduction next year.• Increased defence and border spending: A substantial rise in funding for border security and upgrades to US military capabilities.• Crackdown on wasteful spending: A pledge to eliminate “waste, fraud and abuse” in government expenditures.• Raising the debt ceiling: The bill seeks to raise the federal borrowing limit to ensure the government can meet its financial obligations.White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X last week, “It’s imperative the Senate returns this historic piece of legislation on July 4th!”

Posting on Truth Social, Trump said the country was now ready to turn inward after achieving peace abroad. “Now that we have made PEACE abroad, we must finish the job here at home by passing ‘THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,’ and getting the Bill to my desk, ASAP,” he said.

Fresh from announcing a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, US President Donald Trump is now calling on Congress to act swiftly on what he’s dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, a massive legislative package that forms the centrepiece of his second-term agenda. ‘Get the deal done this week,' says Trump Posting on Truth Social, Trump said the country was now ready to turn inward after achieving peace abroad. “Now that we have made PEACE abroad, we must finish the job here at home by passing ‘THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,’ and getting the Bill to my desk, ASAP,” he said. Also read: 'Don’t want to see chaos': Trump says ‘no’ to regime change in Iran, despite calling for it days earlier “It will be a Historic Present for THE GREAT PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, as we begin the Celebration of our Country’s 250th Birthday,” he said, promising “unprecedented Safety, Security, and Prosperity.” “To my friends in the Senate, lock yourself in a room if you must, don’t go home, and GET THE DEAL DONE THIS WEEK… NO ONE GOES ON VACATION UNTIL IT’S DONE,” Trump said. Congress is due to go into recess for the July 4 holiday, making this week the final opportunity to pass the bill on schedule. What is the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’? The bill, officially named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA), is over 1,000 pages long and bundles together several of Trump’s core campaign pledges. While some of Trump’s policies could be rolled out via executive action, major changes such as tax reforms and budget adjustments require full congressional approval. The OBBB aims to fast-track those changes in a single package. What’s in the bill? The legislation has five major parts: • Tax cuts made permanent: The bill extends and locks in the income and estate tax cuts introduced in Trump’s 2017 reforms. • New tax relief: Further cuts are proposed for overtime pay, tips, and Social Security income. According to the White House, individuals earning between $30,000 and $80,000 would see a 15% tax reduction next year. • Increased defence and border spending: A substantial rise in funding for border security and upgrades to US military capabilities. • Crackdown on wasteful spending: A pledge to eliminate “waste, fraud and abuse” in government expenditures. • Raising the debt ceiling: The bill seeks to raise the federal borrowing limit to ensure the government can meet its financial obligations. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X last week, “It’s imperative the Senate returns this historic piece of legislation on July 4th!”

Posting on Truth Social, Trump said the country was now ready to turn inward after achieving peace abroad. “Now that we have made PEACE abroad, we must finish the job here at home by passing ‘THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,’ and getting the Bill to my desk, ASAP,” he said.

'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION': After making 'peace abroad,' Trump turns focus to NEXT BIG agenda: What is One Big Beautiful Bill?

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 24) stressed that Iran will never rebuild their nuclear program, adding that their nuclear capacities are gone after the US attacked its nuke facilities two days ago.While speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato Summit in The Hague, Trump said Iran would never rebuild its nuclear programme."The country’s nuclear capacities are gone and it would never rebuild its nuclear programme," the US president said when asked about Iran's nuke program.Meanwhile, in a post on Truth Social, Trump said, "IRAN WILL NEVER REBUILD THEIR NUCLEAR FACILITIES!" He posted this right after he posted that the ceasefire was in effect, even after both countries violated it.On Saturday (Jun 21) the United States entered the Israel-Iran war, striking three nuclear sites in Iran -Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. This comes just a day after US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 20) warned that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes.Moreover, as Trump expressed that he is "unhappy" with Israel for breaking the ceasefire, he asked Israel to turn around all planes, stressing that Israel is not going to attack Iran further."ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home while doing a friendly “Plane Wave” to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect! Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES," he wrote.Right before these posts, Trump warned Israel to not drop the bombs. " IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!," he wrote.Speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato summit in The Hague, Trump said Israel “unloaded” right after agreeing to the deal. He said that both Israel and Iran violated a ceasefire, hours after he made the announcement.The US president said that he is "unhappy" with both countries but especially Israel. "I don't think they did it intentionally, but I don't like it what Israel did today."Trump repeatedly said that he is not happy with Israel, while also saying that he is not happy with Iran too.

While speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato Summit in The Hague, Trump said Iran would never rebuild its nuclear programme.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 24) stressed that Iran will never rebuild their nuclear program, adding that their nuclear capacities are gone after the US attacked its nuke facilities two days ago. While speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato Summit in The Hague, Trump said Iran would never rebuild its nuclear programme. "The country’s nuclear capacities are gone and it would never rebuild its nuclear programme," the US president said when asked about Iran's nuke program. Meanwhile, in a post on Truth Social, Trump said, "IRAN WILL NEVER REBUILD THEIR NUCLEAR FACILITIES!" He posted this right after he posted that the ceasefire was in effect, even after both countries violated it. On Saturday (Jun 21) the United States entered the Israel-Iran war, striking three nuclear sites in Iran -Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. This comes just a day after US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 20) warned that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes. Moreover, as Trump expressed that he is "unhappy" with Israel for breaking the ceasefire, he asked Israel to turn around all planes, stressing that Israel is not going to attack Iran further. "ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home while doing a friendly “Plane Wave” to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect! Thank you for your attention to this matter! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES," he wrote. Right before these posts, Trump warned Israel to not drop the bombs. " IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!," he wrote. Speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato summit in The Hague, Trump said Israel “unloaded” right after agreeing to the deal. He said that both Israel and Iran violated a ceasefire, hours after he made the announcement. The US president said that he is "unhappy" with both countries but especially Israel. "I don't think they did it intentionally, but I don't like it what Israel did today." Trump repeatedly said that he is not happy with Israel, while also saying that he is not happy with Iran too.

While speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato Summit in The Hague, Trump said Iran would never rebuild its nuclear programme.

'COMPLETELY DEMOLISHED': Iran will never rebuild their nuclear facilities - Trump's BIG claim after striking Tehran's nuke sites

Hours after the US announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, both countries violated it. US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 24) stressed that he is "unhappy" with Israel as it fired a missile after the agreement. Now, not just Iran, the US president is also not happy with Israel after it violated the ceasefire announced by Trump earlier this morning."I am not happy with Israel," Trump repeatedly said, while talking to reporters before leaving for the Nato Summit in The Hague. "I am not happy with Iran as well, he said when asked about Iran violating the deal, "but I am not happy with Israel because they fired one missile after the deal."Trump added, "I don't think they did it intentionally, but I don't like it what Israel did it today."Trump repeatedly said that he is not happy with Israel, while also saying that he is not happy with Iran too.Speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato summit, Trump said Israel “unloaded” right after agreeing to the deal.In a post on Truth Social, the US president warned Israel, asking them to not drop bombs and bring pilots home. "ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES."When asked about Iran's nuclear capacities, Trump said that it is gone and it would never rebuild its nuclear programme.On Saturday (Jun 21) the United States entered the Israel-Iran war, striking three nuclear sites in Iran -Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. This comes just a day after US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 20) warned that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes.Later, today morning, Trump announced the Israel-Iran ceasefire, saying, "THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform.The US leader had earlier said the truce would be a phased 24-hour process beginning at around 0400 GMT Tuesday, with Iran unilaterally halting all operations first. He said Israel would follow suit 12 hours later.&nbsp;

Speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato summit, Trump said Israel “unloaded” right after agreeing to the deal.

Hours after the US announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, both countries violated it. US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 24) stressed that he is "unhappy" with Israel as it fired a missile after the agreement. Now, not just Iran, the US president is also not happy with Israel after it violated the ceasefire announced by Trump earlier this morning. "I am not happy with Israel," Trump repeatedly said, while talking to reporters before leaving for the Nato Summit in The Hague. "I am not happy with Iran as well, he said when asked about Iran violating the deal, "but I am not happy with Israel because they fired one missile after the deal." Trump added, "I don't think they did it intentionally, but I don't like it what Israel did it today." Trump repeatedly said that he is not happy with Israel, while also saying that he is not happy with Iran too. Speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato summit, Trump said Israel “unloaded” right after agreeing to the deal. In a post on Truth Social, the US president warned Israel, asking them to not drop bombs and bring pilots home. "ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES." When asked about Iran's nuclear capacities, Trump said that it is gone and it would never rebuild its nuclear programme. On Saturday (Jun 21) the United States entered the Israel-Iran war, striking three nuclear sites in Iran -Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. This comes just a day after US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 20) warned that Iran had a "maximum" of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes. Later, today morning, Trump announced the Israel-Iran ceasefire, saying, "THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform. The US leader had earlier said the truce would be a phased 24-hour process beginning at around 0400 GMT Tuesday, with Iran unilaterally halting all operations first. He said Israel would follow suit 12 hours later.

Speaking to reporters before leaving for the Nato summit, Trump said Israel “unloaded” right after agreeing to the deal.

Not just Iran, Trump 'UNHAPPY' with Israel too now? Here's how US president reacted after ceasefire violation

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised both Israel and Iran for breaching a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered, singling out Israel for striking targets after the truce deadline had passed.<h2>Trump: ‘I’m not happy’ with Israel’s actions</h2>Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.”“I gotta get Israel to calm down now,” Trump said as he left the White House, Reuters reports.“Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen," he added.“We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing,” Trump told reporters/Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-thanks-iran-for-early-notice-was-tehran-s-missile-attack-on-us-bases-in-qatar-just-for-show-1750710034107">Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? A face-saving move meant for de-escalation</a>He said that he was not happy with either country, but especially Israel.Trump also posted a warning to Israel on his Truth Social platform, writing in capital letters, “ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES”This message came just hours after both Israel and Iran reportedly accepted a US-proposed ceasefire to halt their 12-day conflict.<h2>Ceasefire brokered after ‘simultaneous’ calls for peace</h2>Announcing the agreement on Truth Social, Trump claimed both nations had reached out to him at the same time to ask for peace.“Israel &amp; Iran came to me, almost simultaneously, and said, ‘PEACE!’” he wrote. “The World, and the Middle East, are the real WINNERS! Both Nations will see tremendous LOVE, PEACE, AND PROSPERITY in their futures.”He also said that Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been “destroyed” and would “never rebuild”.The Israeli government confirmed it had agreed to Trump’s ceasefire proposal, stating it had successfully neutralised the “dual existential threat” posed by Iran’s nuclear programme and ballistic missiles.However, Tel Aviv warned that it remained ready to act if Tehran violated the terms of the truce. “The military has been instructed to maintain a high level of alertness,” an Israeli spokesperson&nbsp;said.

Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.”

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised both Israel and Iran for breaching a ceasefire he claimed to have brokered, singling out Israel for striking targets after the truce deadline had passed. Trump: ‘I’m not happy’ with Israel’s actions Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.” “I gotta get Israel to calm down now,” Trump said as he left the White House, Reuters reports. “Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen," he added. “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing,” Trump told reporters/ Also read: Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? A face-saving move meant for de-escalation He said that he was not happy with either country, but especially Israel. Trump also posted a warning to Israel on his Truth Social platform, writing in capital letters, “ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES” This message came just hours after both Israel and Iran reportedly accepted a US-proposed ceasefire to halt their 12-day conflict. Ceasefire brokered after ‘simultaneous’ calls for peace Announcing the agreement on Truth Social, Trump claimed both nations had reached out to him at the same time to ask for peace. “Israel & Iran came to me, almost simultaneously, and said, ‘PEACE!’” he wrote. “The World, and the Middle East, are the real WINNERS! Both Nations will see tremendous LOVE, PEACE, AND PROSPERITY in their futures.” He also said that Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been “destroyed” and would “never rebuild”. The Israeli government confirmed it had agreed to Trump’s ceasefire proposal, stating it had successfully neutralised the “dual existential threat” posed by Iran’s nuclear programme and ballistic missiles. However, Tel Aviv warned that it remained ready to act if Tehran violated the terms of the truce. “The military has been instructed to maintain a high level of alertness,” an Israeli spokesperson said.

Speaking before departing for the NATO summit in The Hague on Tuesday (24 June), Trump told reporters he was “not happy that Israel is going now” and accused the country of firing “one missile… after the time limit.”

'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS': Trump 'unhappy' with Israel for attacking Iran; says both nations 'violated ceasefire'

“THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT,” US President Donald Trump wrote on Tuesday (June 24), adding, “PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!” This comes after the US president announced a US-brokered ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel hours after Iran struck a US air base in Qatar. While Iran's attack seemed a big move, it turned out to be a calculated and choreographed move, ultimately meant for the de-escalation of the conflict.The missile launch targeting US forces in Qatar may have made headlines, but US officials suggest it was more symbolic than strategic. President Donald Trump on Monday (June 23), thanked Iran for giving early notice before firing missiles at Al Udeid Air Base.“I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “No Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-qatar-attack-iran-doha-reserves-right-to-respond-after-iranian-missile-strike-on-us-base-1750702766051">Will Qatar attack Iran? Doha 'reserves right to respond' after Iranian missile strike on US base</a><h2>Missiles were fired, but no casualties</h2>The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched a barrage of missiles on Monday (23 June), aimed at the US military’s Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The attack came in response to Washington’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend.Qatar’s air defences successfully intercepted the missiles. There were no reported injuries or damage, and the US had already moved its aircraft out of harm’s way ahead of the strike.A defence official told US media that the missiles were of “short-range and medium-range ballistic” variety, and the attack came after a warning from Tehran passed to Qatari and American officials.<h2>Trump says Iran ‘got it out of their system’</h2>President Trump wrote on Truth Social, “They’ve gotten it all out of their ‘system’… Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region.” US defence officials described the Iranian strike as “retaliatory but largely symbolic.”<h2>Iran tried to keep Qatar out of the line of fire</h2>Iran was quick to say that Qatar wasn’t the intended target. The country’s Supreme National Security Council released a statement saying that the strike was far from urban areas and posed no threat to civilians.“We remain committed to maintaining warm relations with Qatar,” the statement said, as Iran maintained that its true grievance was with the US presence in the region, not its allies.<h2>US had braced for a response</h2>The missile launch did not take Washington by surprise. A senior White House official told CNN, “We knew they’d retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani.” The US military had moved unsheltered aircraft from the Al Udeid base days before the attack, according to satellite imagery taken on 19 June.<h2>A face-saving move?</h2>With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than a fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

“THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT,” US President Donald Trump wrote on Tuesday (June 24), adding, “PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!” This comes after the US president announced a US-brokered ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel hours after Iran struck a US air base in Qatar. While Iran's attack seemed a big move, it turned out to be a calculated and choreographed move, ultimately meant for the de-escalation of the conflict. The missile launch targeting US forces in Qatar may have made headlines, but US officials suggest it was more symbolic than strategic. President Donald Trump on Monday (June 23), thanked Iran for giving early notice before firing missiles at Al Udeid Air Base. “I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “No Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.” Also read: Will Qatar attack Iran? Doha 'reserves right to respond' after Iranian missile strike on US base Missiles were fired, but no casualties The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched a barrage of missiles on Monday (23 June), aimed at the US military’s Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The attack came in response to Washington’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. Qatar’s air defences successfully intercepted the missiles. There were no reported injuries or damage, and the US had already moved its aircraft out of harm’s way ahead of the strike. A defence official told US media that the missiles were of “short-range and medium-range ballistic” variety, and the attack came after a warning from Tehran passed to Qatari and American officials. Trump says Iran ‘got it out of their system’ President Trump wrote on Truth Social, “They’ve gotten it all out of their ‘system’… Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region.” US defence officials described the Iranian strike as “retaliatory but largely symbolic.” Iran tried to keep Qatar out of the line of fire Iran was quick to say that Qatar wasn’t the intended target. The country’s Supreme National Security Council released a statement saying that the strike was far from urban areas and posed no threat to civilians. “We remain committed to maintaining warm relations with Qatar,” the statement said, as Iran maintained that its true grievance was with the US presence in the region, not its allies. US had braced for a response The missile launch did not take Washington by surprise. A senior White House official told CNN, “We knew they’d retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani.” The US military had moved unsheltered aircraft from the Al Udeid base days before the attack, according to satellite imagery taken on 19 June. A face-saving move? With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than a fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? A face-saving move meant for de-escalation

American military engineers have fortified key Middle Eastern bases over the years. Hardened aircraft shelters, reinforced barracks, and layered defences are in place, especially at large hubs like Al Udeid and Al Dhafra in the UAE.

American military engineers have fortified key Middle Eastern bases over the years. Hardened aircraft shelters, reinforced barracks, and layered defences are in place, especially at large hubs like Al Udeid and Al Dhafra in the UAE.

Operation Basharat al-Fath: Are US troops safe in the Middle East and how prepared are they for Iranian missile strikes?

The US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest American military facility in the Middle East, housing thousands of US troops, fighter jets, bombers, and surveillance assets. Targeting this base sends a direct warning to Washington.

The US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest American military facility in the Middle East, housing thousands of US troops, fighter jets, bombers, and surveillance assets. Targeting this base sends a direct warning to Washington.

Why Iran chose to target Qatar? Strategic reasons behind Tehran’s retaliation against B-2 Bomber strikes

Qatar has temporarily closed its airspace as a security precaution, its foreign ministry announced on Monday (June 23). "The competent Qatari authorities announce the temporary suspension of air traffic in the country's airspace, to ensure the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors," the Qatari ministry posted on X. The move comes amid rising concerns that Iran may soon target US military sites in the region in response to recent airstrikes on its nuclear facilities.The decision to suspend air traffic was described by Qatari officials as part of “a set of precautionary measures based on regional developments.” The government stressed that the country’s security remains stable.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-threatens-us-after-trump-s-bullseye-strike-on-nuclear-sites-says-we-will-end-this-war-1750694777361">'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after Trump’s ‘bullseye’ strike on nuclear sites; says 'we will end' this war</a><h2>US base at Al Udeid placed on high alert</h2>Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation.According to reports, the base is now on high alert. The BBC cited sources who said there is “a credible threat” to the US-run Coalition Air Operations Centre located at the base. The threat is believed to be a potential missile strike from Iran.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-18-hour-flight-mid-air-refuellings-how-us-fooled-iran-with-decoy-b-2-bombers-and-hit-three-nuclear-facilities-1750682313639">'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities</a><h2>UK and US embassies issue safety warning</h2>The US embassy in Qatar issued a message urging American citizens to “shelter in place until further notice.” The UK government has also advised British nationals in Qatar to do the same, citing concerns about possible regional retaliation from Iran. Both advisories noted that the warning was made “out of an abundance of caution” and did not offer specific details about the nature of the threat.Following the embassy advisories, local institutions in Doha reportedly sent alerts to employees and students. However, Qatari foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari said there was no direct threat identified and said that the country is “prepared to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of its citizens and residents.”<h2>Iran vows to strike back after US hits nuclear sites</h2>The heightened alert comes just days after US President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on several Iranian nuclear facilities using bunker-buster bombs. Trump called the operation a “Bullseye!!!” and claimed “monumental damage” had been inflicted on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, particularly “far below ground level.”In response, Iran warned that the US had expanded its list of legitimate military targets by getting involved in the conflict. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaqari said in a&nbsp;video&nbsp;message.

Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation.

Qatar has temporarily closed its airspace as a security precaution, its foreign ministry announced on Monday (June 23). "The competent Qatari authorities announce the temporary suspension of air traffic in the country's airspace, to ensure the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors," the Qatari ministry posted on X. The move comes amid rising concerns that Iran may soon target US military sites in the region in response to recent airstrikes on its nuclear facilities. The decision to suspend air traffic was described by Qatari officials as part of “a set of precautionary measures based on regional developments.” The government stressed that the country’s security remains stable. Also read: 'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after Trump’s ‘bullseye’ strike on nuclear sites; says 'we will end' this war US base at Al Udeid placed on high alert Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation. According to reports, the base is now on high alert. The BBC cited sources who said there is “a credible threat” to the US-run Coalition Air Operations Centre located at the base. The threat is believed to be a potential missile strike from Iran. Also read: '18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities UK and US embassies issue safety warning The US embassy in Qatar issued a message urging American citizens to “shelter in place until further notice.” The UK government has also advised British nationals in Qatar to do the same, citing concerns about possible regional retaliation from Iran. Both advisories noted that the warning was made “out of an abundance of caution” and did not offer specific details about the nature of the threat. Following the embassy advisories, local institutions in Doha reportedly sent alerts to employees and students. However, Qatari foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari said there was no direct threat identified and said that the country is “prepared to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of its citizens and residents.” Iran vows to strike back after US hits nuclear sites The heightened alert comes just days after US President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on several Iranian nuclear facilities using bunker-buster bombs. Trump called the operation a “Bullseye!!!” and claimed “monumental damage” had been inflicted on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, particularly “far below ground level.” In response, Iran warned that the US had expanded its list of legitimate military targets by getting involved in the conflict. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaqari said in a video message.

Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation.

Iran to target Qatar next? Doha halts air traffic amid fears of Iranian missile strike on LARGEST US airbase in Middle East

Iran has warned that the United States has expanded the list of legitimate targets by striking Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend and accused US President Donald Trump of inflaming tensions by backing Israel’s military campaign. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” said Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya military command, in a video statement delivered in English on Monday.Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-18-hour-flight-mid-air-refuellings-how-us-fooled-iran-with-decoy-b-2-bombers-and-hit-three-nuclear-facilities-1750682313639">'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities</a><h2>Trump calls airstrike a ‘Bullseye’, hints at regime change</h2>President Trump praised the strikes on social media, calling them a “Bullseye!!!” and claiming that “monumental damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran,” especially “far below ground level.”Although the White House has stated the goal is only to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Trump appeared to go further on Sunday, suggesting that regime change might be a natural consequence.“It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!” he posted.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-iran-s-secret-cyber-war-how-tehran-tel-aviv-are-waging-war-online-and-why-us-is-in-the-crossfire-1750610574082">Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?</a><h2>Nuclear facility may be destroyed, says satellite analysis</h2>Commercial satellite images analysed by experts suggest that the US strikes caused serious damage to Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility, which is built deep within a mountain. The site may have been destroyed along with the centrifuges used to enrich uranium, although this has yet to be independently confirmed.Fordow was one of three key targets struck by US bunker-busting bombs in what has become the largest coordinated strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure to date.Iran claims that over 400 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Israeli attacks. In response, Iran launched missile strikes that killed 24 Israeli civilians and injured hundreds more, marking the first time Iranian missiles have pierced Israeli defences in such large numbers.<h2>Strait of Hormuz under threat as oil prices fluctuate</h2>Iran’s parliament has approved a proposal to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital channel through which 20% of the world’s oil flows, although final approval lies with the Supreme National Security Council. Any attempt to close the strait could trigger a global oil crisis and a direct military clash with the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which is based in nearby Bahrain.Oil prices spiked briefly on Monday, hitting their highest point since January, before settling. Brent crude futures fell 0.5% to $76.64 a barrel by 8:30 am GMT, after climbing above $80 at market open.US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned, “It’s economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that.”

Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats.

Iran has warned that the United States has expanded the list of legitimate targets by striking Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend and accused US President Donald Trump of inflaming tensions by backing Israel’s military campaign. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” said Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya military command, in a video statement delivered in English on Monday. Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats. Also read: '18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities Trump calls airstrike a ‘Bullseye’, hints at regime change President Trump praised the strikes on social media, calling them a “Bullseye!!!” and claiming that “monumental damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran,” especially “far below ground level.” Although the White House has stated the goal is only to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Trump appeared to go further on Sunday, suggesting that regime change might be a natural consequence. “It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!” he posted. Also read: Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire? Nuclear facility may be destroyed, says satellite analysis Commercial satellite images analysed by experts suggest that the US strikes caused serious damage to Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility, which is built deep within a mountain. The site may have been destroyed along with the centrifuges used to enrich uranium, although this has yet to be independently confirmed. Fordow was one of three key targets struck by US bunker-busting bombs in what has become the largest coordinated strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure to date. Iran claims that over 400 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Israeli attacks. In response, Iran launched missile strikes that killed 24 Israeli civilians and injured hundreds more, marking the first time Iranian missiles have pierced Israeli defences in such large numbers. Strait of Hormuz under threat as oil prices fluctuate Iran’s parliament has approved a proposal to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital channel through which 20% of the world’s oil flows, although final approval lies with the Supreme National Security Council. Any attempt to close the strait could trigger a global oil crisis and a direct military clash with the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet, which is based in nearby Bahrain. Oil prices spiked briefly on Monday, hitting their highest point since January, before settling. Brent crude futures fell 0.5% to $76.64 a barrel by 8:30 am GMT, after climbing above $80 at market open. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned, “It’s economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that.”

Since the US airstrikes on Sunday, Iran has continued to fire missiles at Israel, but has so far avoided direct confrontation with the United States, despite repeated threats.

'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after Trump’s ‘bullseye’ strike on nuclear sites; says 'we will end' this war

Amid fears of Iran closing down the Strait of Hormuz and severely impacting oil supplies, US President Donald Trump issued a warning to global oil producers and urged them to resist any move that could increase costs. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important oil routes in the world, and about one-fifth of the global oil supply passes through it daily. “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING! YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday morning in all caps and using exclamation marks, as he mostly does.&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;Trump also issued an appeal to increase America’s domestic oil and gas supply, “To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!”&nbsp;&nbsp;

&nbsp;The Iranian lawmakers had threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a key commercial shipping channel for the world’s oil supply, in retaliation for the US strikes.&nbsp;&nbsp;Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers that may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.It would also negatively impact his efforts to boost the US economy by increasing business costs that would in turn deter investment and job growth.&nbsp;&nbsp;So far, oil prices have been subdued after jumping 4 per cent after trading began on Sunday night but pared back soon.On Monday morning, the price of a barrel of US oil was marginally up by 0.4 per cent at $74.16 after briefly dipping, while Brent crude, the international standard, edged up by 0.2 per cent to $77.17 per barrel. Both are still higher than before strikes began on Iran over a week ago.&nbsp;The subdued market reaction shows investors believe Iran is unlikely to block the Strait of Hormuz, as it is itself a major oil producer and would suffer from a closure. Analysts also suspect if Iran would close the waterway, since it itself uses it to move its own crude, mostly to China, and needs the revenue.&nbsp;US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Sunday that any attempt by Iran to block the strait would be “economic suicide” and would draw a response from Washington.

Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers, which may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.

Amid fears of Iran closing down the Strait of Hormuz and severely impacting oil supplies, US President Donald Trump issued a warning to global oil producers and urged them to resist any move that could increase costs. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most important oil routes in the world, and about one-fifth of the global oil supply passes through it daily. “EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I’M WATCHING! YOU’RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON’T DO IT!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday morning in all caps and using exclamation marks, as he mostly does.

Any rise in oil prices would lead to higher inflation for American consumers, which may become a big political problem for Trump, who won his second stint in the White House on promises to bring down prices.

‘Keep oil prices down. I’m watching’: Trump issues warning after Iran strikes

US President Donald Trump has said he is still open to diplomacy with Iran but questioned why the Iranian people shouldn’t remove their government if it refuses to negotiate. His comments came after American B-2 bombers struck three of Iran’s key nuclear sites over the weekend.Speaking on Fox News, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn’t the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-18-hour-flight-mid-air-refuellings-how-us-fooled-iran-with-decoy-b-2-bombers-and-hit-three-nuclear-facilities-1750682313639">'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities</a><h2>Trump contradicts officials with ‘regime change’ post</h2>Although senior US officials have consistently said that regime change is not the aim of American policy, Trump posted on social media Sunday, “Why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???”The strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities marked a major escalation in US involvement in the conflict, with Washington now backing Israel’s campaign to shut down Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-iran-s-secret-cyber-war-how-tehran-tel-aviv-are-waging-war-online-and-why-us-is-in-the-crossfire-1750610574082">Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?</a><h2>White House confident Iran’s nuclear sites are destroyed</h2>Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night.”She added, “We have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran’s enriched uranium was stored.” Leavitt insisted the president would not have approved the strikes unless he believed they would be effective.<h2>IAEA chief says Iran’s uranium stockpile unaccounted for</h2>Rafael Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the agency cannot confirm where Iran’s near-weapons-grade nuclear material is currently located. He has called for inspectors to be allowed back into Iran to examine the impact of the strikes and assess the situation on the ground. Speaking to CNN, Grossi noted that Iran has roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, close to the 90% required to make a nuclear bomb.General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Monday it was still “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been entirely eliminated. He said assessments were ongoing and that further analysis would be needed in the&nbsp;coming&nbsp;days.

Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated.”

US President Donald Trump has said he is still open to diplomacy with Iran but questioned why the Iranian people shouldn’t remove their government if it refuses to negotiate. His comments came after American B-2 bombers struck three of Iran’s key nuclear sites over the weekend. Speaking on Fox News, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “If the Iranian regime refuses to come to a peaceful diplomatic solution, which the president is still interested and engaging in, by the way, why shouldn’t the Iranian people take away the power of this incredibly violent regime that has been suppressing them for decades?” Also read: '18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities Trump contradicts officials with ‘regime change’ post Although senior US officials have consistently said that regime change is not the aim of American policy, Trump posted on social media Sunday, “Why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???” The strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities marked a major escalation in US involvement in the conflict, with Washington now backing Israel’s campaign to shut down Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. Also read: Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire? White House confident Iran’s nuclear sites are destroyed Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated, as the president said in his address to the nation on Saturday night.” She added, “We have a high degree of confidence that where those strikes took place is where Iran’s enriched uranium was stored.” Leavitt insisted the president would not have approved the strikes unless he believed they would be effective. IAEA chief says Iran’s uranium stockpile unaccounted for Rafael Grossi, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the agency cannot confirm where Iran’s near-weapons-grade nuclear material is currently located. He has called for inspectors to be allowed back into Iran to examine the impact of the strikes and assess the situation on the ground. Speaking to CNN, Grossi noted that Iran has roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, close to the 90% required to make a nuclear bomb. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Monday it was still “way too early” to determine whether Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been entirely eliminated. He said assessments were ongoing and that further analysis would be needed in the coming days.

Leavitt also backed Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear sites had been “completely and totally obliterated.” She told Good Morning America, “We are confident, yes, that Iran’s nuclear sites were completely and totally obliterated.”

'Take away power of this regime': Trump 'still interested' in Iran diplomacy but asks why Iranians don’t overthrow 'violent' regime

As the United States deploys its most advanced B-2 Spirit stealth bombers in support of Israel amid growing tensions with Iran, few realise that this cutting-edge aircraft owes part of its existence to the Third Reich’s secret war files. The sleek flying wing design of the B-2, capable of evading radar and penetrating deep into enemy airspace, was inspired by a top-secret Nazi project known as the Horten Ho 229, a revolutionary jet developed in the final years of Adolf Hitler’s Germany. This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers. Their expertise, once devoted to Hitler’s war machine, soon powered America’s own military ambitions from space travel to stealth technology.&nbsp;During the Second World War, the Horten brothers, Reimar and Walter, were pioneers of aviation design, working under the Luftwaffe’s command. Their masterpiece was the Ho 229, the world’s first jet-powered flying wing, a radical aircraft without tail or fuselage. Its shape, designed for aerodynamic efficiency, had the added effect of reducing its visibility to radar, a principle we now call “stealth”.&nbsp;The Ho 229 never flew in combat, as the war ended before the aircraft could be fully developed. However, in April 1945, American forces overran the German base where the prototype was stored. Recognising its potential, the Allies seized not only the airframe but also an entire trove of scientific documents — blueprints, notes, and aerodynamic data.&nbsp;These materials became part of the haul brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip. The controversial programme secretly transported more than 1,600 German scientists, many of whom had worked for the Nazi regime, to help the US counter Soviet advances in military and space technology. Among the recruits were experts in rocketry, aerodynamics, and aircraft design.In the decades that followed, American engineers continued exploring the flying wing concept, heavily informed by the Horten brothers’ work. This research culminated in the creation of the B-2 Spirit, first flown in 1989 and now the most advanced stealth bomber in the world.&nbsp;With its elegant curved wings, composite materials and radar-absorbing skin, the B-2 can evade even the most sophisticated air defences. Its ability to deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads at intercontinental range has made it one of the most formidable aircraft ever built.Ironically, as the B-2 now flies missions over the Middle East to assist Israel, a nation founded in the shadow of the Holocaust, its design is rooted in Nazi aviation experiments once meant to serve Hitler’s ambitions. The historical twist is stark, technology born in a bid to win a fascist war is now employed to defend a democratic state threatened by modern adversaries.&nbsp;Operation Paperclip remains one of the more controversial chapters of post-war history. While it undeniably advanced US scientific leadership and Northrop Gunnman's innovation but it also involved moral compromises, as Nazi officials and collaborators were quietly granted asylum and employment in exchange for their technical expertise.&nbsp;Today, the B-2’s legacy is inseparable from this complex history. As these stealth bombers continue to patrol skies in support of Israel, they carry with them a hidden lineage — one that began in the dark heart of Nazi Germany, was reshaped by American ingenuity, and now plays a key role in global power projection.

This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers.

As the United States deploys its most advanced B-2 Spirit stealth bombers in support of Israel amid growing tensions with Iran, few realise that this cutting-edge aircraft owes part of its existence to the Third Reich’s secret war files. The sleek flying wing design of the B-2, capable of evading radar and penetrating deep into enemy airspace, was inspired by a top-secret Nazi project known as the Horten Ho 229, a revolutionary jet developed in the final years of Adolf Hitler’s Germany. This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers. Their expertise, once devoted to Hitler’s war machine, soon powered America’s own military ambitions from space travel to stealth technology. During the Second World War, the Horten brothers, Reimar and Walter, were pioneers of aviation design, working under the Luftwaffe’s command. Their masterpiece was the Ho 229, the world’s first jet-powered flying wing, a radical aircraft without tail or fuselage. Its shape, designed for aerodynamic efficiency, had the added effect of reducing its visibility to radar, a principle we now call “stealth”. The Ho 229 never flew in combat, as the war ended before the aircraft could be fully developed. However, in April 1945, American forces overran the German base where the prototype was stored. Recognising its potential, the Allies seized not only the airframe but also an entire trove of scientific documents — blueprints, notes, and aerodynamic data. These materials became part of the haul brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip. The controversial programme secretly transported more than 1,600 German scientists, many of whom had worked for the Nazi regime, to help the US counter Soviet advances in military and space technology. Among the recruits were experts in rocketry, aerodynamics, and aircraft design. In the decades that followed, American engineers continued exploring the flying wing concept, heavily informed by the Horten brothers’ work. This research culminated in the creation of the B-2 Spirit, first flown in 1989 and now the most advanced stealth bomber in the world. With its elegant curved wings, composite materials and radar-absorbing skin, the B-2 can evade even the most sophisticated air defences. Its ability to deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads at intercontinental range has made it one of the most formidable aircraft ever built. Ironically, as the B-2 now flies missions over the Middle East to assist Israel, a nation founded in the shadow of the Holocaust, its design is rooted in Nazi aviation experiments once meant to serve Hitler’s ambitions. The historical twist is stark, technology born in a bid to win a fascist war is now employed to defend a democratic state threatened by modern adversaries. Operation Paperclip remains one of the more controversial chapters of post-war history. While it undeniably advanced US scientific leadership and Northrop Gunnman's innovation but it also involved moral compromises, as Nazi officials and collaborators were quietly granted asylum and employment in exchange for their technical expertise. Today, the B-2’s legacy is inseparable from this complex history. As these stealth bombers continue to patrol skies in support of Israel, they carry with them a hidden lineage — one that began in the dark heart of Nazi Germany, was reshaped by American ingenuity, and now plays a key role in global power projection.

This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers.

B-2 Bomber helped Israel, but its origins lie in Hitler’s secret Nazi war files

When President Donald Trump abruptly left the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, a full day ahead of schedule, the official explanation was swift and stern: the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran required his immediate presence in Washington. But among diplomats and intelligence officials, a more unsettling theory quickly began to spread— one that linked Trump’s exit not just to the Middle East, but to threats much closer to home. Specifically, there were reports that Iran had activated or threatened to activate sleeper cells within the United States. Could this be the real reason behind the sudden leaving of the American president from the G7 stage?&nbsp;According to senior intelligence sources, chatter picked up in the days leading up to the summit suggested that Tehran, reeling from the devastation inflicted was preparing asymmetric retaliation. One threat loomed particularly large: attacks on American targets through covert operatives embedded in the West. The CIA reportedly flagged multiple signals indicating potential “active positioning” of these sleeper units.&nbsp;Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron, in a pointed remark to the press, claimed Trump was leaving “to play a role in de-escalation” between Israel and Iran, hinting at US backchannel talks. But Trump fired back while still in the air, using Truth Social to accuse Macron of being “publicity-seeking” and “getting it wrong.” He added ominously: “Much bigger than that. Stay tuned.” Those five words — “much bigger than that” — have since become the focus of intense speculation. Was Trump referring to the evolving war in the Middle East? Or was he alluding to a more imminent threat — a plot that could potentially unfold within US borders? While the White House has continued to cite the Iran war as the central reason for his return, officials have notably avoided denying reports of heightened domestic threat alerts issued to major cities.&nbsp;What are sleeper cells?Sleeper cells are the term used to refer to covert operatives that are embedded in a target country with no immediate mission until activated or called to action by their operatives.These operatives often live quiet, unassuming lives, fully assimilated—working regular jobs, holding down routine roles—until they suddenly "wake up" to execute a mission. Sleeper cells are arguably the most insidious and unpredictable threat, because these operatives hide in plain sight, often invisible until it's too late.&nbsp;The US Department of Homeland Security has once again sounded the alarm on Iran's global threat posture, warning that the Islamic Republic is expected to continue sponsoring terrorism and plotting attacks against individuals, including current and former American officials. The latest assessment echoes a similar report issued by DHS under the Biden administration in 2024.&nbsp;Mike Nelson, a retired Special Forces lieutenant colonel with CENTCOM experience, told News Nation that Hezbollah has had sleeper cells in the western hemisphere for some time, including coming through Venezuela. He said that Iranians and Hezbollah have used these cells in the past, including during the Jewish Community Centre bombing in Buenos Aires in 1994.&nbsp;"It seems likely (Hezbollah and Iran) would try to activate sleeper cells in the United States as retaliation if the U.S. joins in the strikes, so it would be prudent for the FBI to be monitoring," said Nelson. According to Nelson, Iran’s regime views its survival as the endgame. "The Iranian regime wants this to end with them in power, and their primary concern is survival," he said.

Was Trump’s sudden G7 exit linked to Iranian sleeper cell threat? Report claims

When President Donald Trump abruptly left the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada, a full day ahead of schedule, the official explanation was swift and stern: the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran required his immediate presence in Washington. But among diplomats and intelligence officials, a more unsettling theory quickly began to spread— one that linked Trump’s exit not just to the Middle East, but to threats much closer to home. Specifically, there were reports that Iran had activated or threatened to activate sleeper cells within the United States. Could this be the real reason behind the sudden leaving of the American president from the G7 stage? According to senior intelligence sources, chatter picked up in the days leading up to the summit suggested that Tehran, reeling from the devastation inflicted was preparing asymmetric retaliation. One threat loomed particularly large: attacks on American targets through covert operatives embedded in the West. The CIA reportedly flagged multiple signals indicating potential “active positioning” of these sleeper units. Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron, in a pointed remark to the press, claimed Trump was leaving “to play a role in de-escalation” between Israel and Iran, hinting at US backchannel talks. But Trump fired back while still in the air, using Truth Social to accuse Macron of being “publicity-seeking” and “getting it wrong.” He added ominously: “Much bigger than that. Stay tuned.” Those five words — “much bigger than that” — have since become the focus of intense speculation. Was Trump referring to the evolving war in the Middle East? Or was he alluding to a more imminent threat — a plot that could potentially unfold within US borders? While the White House has continued to cite the Iran war as the central reason for his return, officials have notably avoided denying reports of heightened domestic threat alerts issued to major cities. What are sleeper cells? Sleeper cells are the term used to refer to covert operatives that are embedded in a target country with no immediate mission until activated or called to action by their operatives. These operatives often live quiet, unassuming lives, fully assimilated—working regular jobs, holding down routine roles—until they suddenly "wake up" to execute a mission. Sleeper cells are arguably the most insidious and unpredictable threat, because these operatives hide in plain sight, often invisible until it's too late. The US Department of Homeland Security has once again sounded the alarm on Iran's global threat posture, warning that the Islamic Republic is expected to continue sponsoring terrorism and plotting attacks against individuals, including current and former American officials. The latest assessment echoes a similar report issued by DHS under the Biden administration in 2024. Mike Nelson, a retired Special Forces lieutenant colonel with CENTCOM experience, told News Nation that Hezbollah has had sleeper cells in the western hemisphere for some time, including coming through Venezuela. He said that Iranians and Hezbollah have used these cells in the past, including during the Jewish Community Centre bombing in Buenos Aires in 1994. "It seems likely (Hezbollah and Iran) would try to activate sleeper cells in the United States as retaliation if the U.S. joins in the strikes, so it would be prudent for the FBI to be monitoring," said Nelson. According to Nelson, Iran’s regime views its survival as the endgame. "The Iranian regime wants this to end with them in power, and their primary concern is survival," he said.

Sleeper cells are the term used to refer to covert operatives that are embedded in a target country with no immediate mission until activated

President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 22) claimed that US air raids had “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s enrichment facilities. Yet, experts and officials remain cautious about the actual ground impact and the long-term damage to Iran’s nuclear programme.<h2>Does Iran still have its enriched uranium?</h2>An adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Shamkhani, insisted that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is intact, despite the strikes. In a post on X, he said, “Even if nuclear sites are destroyed, the game isn’t over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, and politics will remain. … Surprises will continue!”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-s-fordow-still-not-completely-obliterated-after-being-hit-by-us-bunker-busters-here-s-what-israeli-and-us-intelligence-reveal-1750613456192">Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal</a>Similarly, Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation, said, “They should know that this industry has roots in our country and the roots of this national industry cannot be destroyed. Of course, we have suffered damage, but this is not the first time that the industry has suffered damage.”<h2>Is there evidence they moved uranium before the strike?</h2>Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment. The Open Source Centre in London also analyses such unusual activity as preparation for an imminent attack. Hassan Abedini, deputy political head of Iran’s state media, said all enriched uranium had been cleared from Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, meaning there were no radioactive materials left to be struck.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/in-pics-how-much-damage-did-us-strikes-cause-to-iran-s-fordow-nuclear-site-here-s-what-satellite-images-reveal-1750610564427">In Pics: How much damage did US strikes cause to Iran’s Fordow nuclear site? Here's what satellite images reveal</a><h2>Does Iran have other hidden enrichment sites?</h2>Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation a few days ago said that they have another “secure and invulnerable location” housing centrifuges.

Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment.

President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 22) claimed that US air raids had “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s enrichment facilities. Yet, experts and officials remain cautious about the actual ground impact and the long-term damage to Iran’s nuclear programme. Does Iran still have its enriched uranium? An adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Shamkhani, insisted that Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is intact, despite the strikes. In a post on X, he said, “Even if nuclear sites are destroyed, the game isn’t over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, and politics will remain. … Surprises will continue!” Also read: Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal Similarly, Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation, said, “They should know that this industry has roots in our country and the roots of this national industry cannot be destroyed. Of course, we have suffered damage, but this is not the first time that the industry has suffered damage.” Is there evidence they moved uranium before the strike? Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment. The Open Source Centre in London also analyses such unusual activity as preparation for an imminent attack. Hassan Abedini, deputy political head of Iran’s state media, said all enriched uranium had been cleared from Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, meaning there were no radioactive materials left to be struck. Also read: In Pics: How much damage did US strikes cause to Iran’s Fordow nuclear site? Here's what satellite images reveal Does Iran have other hidden enrichment sites? Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation a few days ago said that they have another “secure and invulnerable location” housing centrifuges.

Iran claims it evacuated key facilities days before the US bombardment. Satellite images reportedly show 16 cargo trucks near the main tunnel at Fordow, suggesting they may have hauled out uranium or other equipment.

Did Iran anticipate US strike? Satellite images hint Tehran secretly shifted enriched uranium before US bombs hit Fordow

Unlike many other bombers, the B-2 offers limited outward visibility. Its cockpit is designed for long-haul stealth missions, where external observation is minimal. Pilots rely heavily on their sensors and avionics, rather than visual cues.

Unlike many other bombers, the B-2 offers limited outward visibility. Its cockpit is designed for long-haul stealth missions, where external observation is minimal. Pilots rely heavily on their sensors and avionics, rather than visual cues.

Inside B-2 Bomber: What it’s like to fly the world’s most secretive aircraft

The B-21 incorporates next-generation stealth materials and design improvements. It is built to evade the latest radar systems, including those used by emerging military powers. The Air Force expects it to survive in heavily contested airspace where older bombers might be detected.

The B-21 incorporates next-generation stealth materials and design improvements. It is built to evade the latest radar systems, including those used by emerging military powers. The Air Force expects it to survive in heavily contested airspace where older bombers might be detected.

Why B-2 Bomber could be replaced with B-21 Raider?

Iran on Sunday (June 23) threatened US military bases for launching attacks against the nation's nuclear facilities, saying such bases would be legitimate targets. US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The US has thousands of troops stationed on bases throughout the Middle East. Let's take a look at nations with significant deployments of US troops in the Middle East, which come under the US military's Central Command (CENTCOM).<h2>Bahrain</h2>The small Gulf state is home to a facility called Naval Support Activity Bahrain, where the US Navy's Fifth Fleet and headquarters of US Naval Forces Central Command are stationed. The country's deepwater port is capable of hosting the largest US warships, including aircraft carriers, and the base has been used by the US Navy since 1948, when the facility was run by Britain's Royal Navy.&nbsp;There are various US vessels that use Bahrain as their home port, such as four mine countermeasures and two logistics support ships. The US Coast Guard also has some vessels present in the country, consisting of six fast response cutters.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-bases-on-alert-as-iran-backed-militias-prepare-for-potential-retaliation-report-1750654417149">US bases in Iraq on alert as intel hints at potential retaliation by Iran-backed militias: Report</a><h2>Iraq</h2>The United States has troops stationed at several installations in Iraq, such as the Al-Asad and Arbil air bases. Baghdad is an ally of Iran, but also a strategic ally of Tehran's bitter rival the United States. As per reports, there are approximately 2,500 American soldiers in Iraq as part of the global coalition fighting the Islamic State jihadist organisation. Baghdad and Washington have agreed to schedule the phasing out of the forces of the coalition from Iraq.&nbsp;US troops in Syria and Iraq were targeted repeatedly by pro-Iran extremists after the Gaza war broke out in October 2023, but retaliated with punishing attacks on Tehran-aligned targets, and the attacks mostly ceased.<h2>Kuwait</h2>Kuwait has multiple US bases, such as Camp Arifjan, where the forward headquarters for the US Army element of CENTCOM is located. The US Army also prepositions materiel in the country. Ali al-Salem Air Base is home to the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military terms as the "primary airlift hub and gateway for delivering combat power to joint and coalition forces" in the theater. Furthermore, the United States operates drones such as MQ-9 Reapers in Kuwait.<h2>Qatar</h2>Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar features the forward elements of CENTCOM, as well as of its airmen and special ops men in the area. It also accommodates rotating combat aircraft, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military claims consists of "airlift, aerial refueling intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and aeromedical evacuation assets."<h2>Syria</h2>The United States has had troop presences for years at a chain of bases in Syria as part of the international campaign against the Islamic State group, which emerged from Syria's civil war to capture vast swaths of Syria and neighboring Iraq. The Pentagon revealed in April that it would cut approximately in half its troops in the nation to under 1,000 in the next few months as part of a "consolidation" of US forces in the nation.<h2>United Arab Emirates</h2>The US 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, a force that consists of 10 aircraft squadrons and also has UAVs like MQ-9 Reapers, is headquartered at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE. Fighting aircraft have cycled through Al Dhafra, which also has the Gulf Air Warfare Center for air and missile defense training.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Arab governments sounded alarm on Sunday following the US attacks on three Iranian nuclear facilities overnight, and they called for immediate de-escalation amid concerns of being battlegrounds in an rising confrontation.&nbsp;Persian Gulf nations like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, who may have previously hailed the destruction of Iran's nuclear program by military means, instead condemned the American interference. Saudi Arabia condemned the infringement of Iran's sovereignty, and the UAE voiced “deep concern.” Governments from the area requested increased efforts at brokering an end to the fighting before the region becomes lost in "the horrors and dangers of war," Bahrain warned. And Oman, a seasoned diplomatic middleman between Iran and the United States, said, "The measures taken by the United States risk broadening the conflict's scope and involve a grave breach of international law."

Are these US bases sitting ducks for Iran? Military assets on high alert after Trump strike

Iran on Sunday (June 23) threatened US military bases for launching attacks against the nation's nuclear facilities, saying such bases would be legitimate targets. US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. The US has thousands of troops stationed on bases throughout the Middle East. Let's take a look at nations with significant deployments of US troops in the Middle East, which come under the US military's Central Command (CENTCOM). Bahrain The small Gulf state is home to a facility called Naval Support Activity Bahrain, where the US Navy's Fifth Fleet and headquarters of US Naval Forces Central Command are stationed. The country's deepwater port is capable of hosting the largest US warships, including aircraft carriers, and the base has been used by the US Navy since 1948, when the facility was run by Britain's Royal Navy. There are various US vessels that use Bahrain as their home port, such as four mine countermeasures and two logistics support ships. The US Coast Guard also has some vessels present in the country, consisting of six fast response cutters. Also Read: US bases in Iraq on alert as intel hints at potential retaliation by Iran-backed militias: Report Iraq The United States has troops stationed at several installations in Iraq, such as the Al-Asad and Arbil air bases. Baghdad is an ally of Iran, but also a strategic ally of Tehran's bitter rival the United States. As per reports, there are approximately 2,500 American soldiers in Iraq as part of the global coalition fighting the Islamic State jihadist organisation. Baghdad and Washington have agreed to schedule the phasing out of the forces of the coalition from Iraq. US troops in Syria and Iraq were targeted repeatedly by pro-Iran extremists after the Gaza war broke out in October 2023, but retaliated with punishing attacks on Tehran-aligned targets, and the attacks mostly ceased. Kuwait Kuwait has multiple US bases, such as Camp Arifjan, where the forward headquarters for the US Army element of CENTCOM is located. The US Army also prepositions materiel in the country. Ali al-Salem Air Base is home to the 386th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military terms as the "primary airlift hub and gateway for delivering combat power to joint and coalition forces" in the theater. Furthermore, the United States operates drones such as MQ-9 Reapers in Kuwait. Qatar Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar features the forward elements of CENTCOM, as well as of its airmen and special ops men in the area. It also accommodates rotating combat aircraft, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing, which the military claims consists of "airlift, aerial refueling intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and aeromedical evacuation assets." Syria The United States has had troop presences for years at a chain of bases in Syria as part of the international campaign against the Islamic State group, which emerged from Syria's civil war to capture vast swaths of Syria and neighboring Iraq. The Pentagon revealed in April that it would cut approximately in half its troops in the nation to under 1,000 in the next few months as part of a "consolidation" of US forces in the nation. United Arab Emirates The US 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, a force that consists of 10 aircraft squadrons and also has UAVs like MQ-9 Reapers, is headquartered at Al Dhafra Air Base in the UAE. Fighting aircraft have cycled through Al Dhafra, which also has the Gulf Air Warfare Center for air and missile defense training. Meanwhile, Arab governments sounded alarm on Sunday following the US attacks on three Iranian nuclear facilities overnight, and they called for immediate de-escalation amid concerns of being battlegrounds in an rising confrontation. Persian Gulf nations like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, who may have previously hailed the destruction of Iran's nuclear program by military means, instead condemned the American interference. Saudi Arabia condemned the infringement of Iran's sovereignty, and the UAE voiced “deep concern.” Governments from the area requested increased efforts at brokering an end to the fighting before the region becomes lost in "the horrors and dangers of war," Bahrain warned. And Oman, a seasoned diplomatic middleman between Iran and the United States, said, "The measures taken by the United States risk broadening the conflict's scope and involve a grave breach of international law."

After US B-2 stealth bombers hit Iran’s key nuclear sites, Tehran has vowed retaliation

The United States on Saturday (Jun 21) officially entered the war in the Middle East as it bombed three nuclear sites inside Iran. Taking to his Truth Social profile, US President Donald Trump announced the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. He said that a "full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow". As per reports, this dramatic escalation of the Israel-Iran war was done by Trump without authorisation from the US Congress and the Pentagon. But did he have the authority to do so? Or did Trump overreach his authority as the POTUS?&nbsp;The US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities—ordered by President Donald Trump—have ignited a constitutional firestorm in Washington. The operation, called as 'Midnight Hammer', was executed with surgical precision but has left behind a trail of political and legal fallout. While some Republicans lauded the move as a bold show of strength, many Democrats—and even a few conservatives—are sounding the alarm, calling the strikes “unconstitutional,” “unauthorised,” and potentially “impeachable.”&nbsp;As questions mount over the legality of Trump’s actions, so do concerns over their long-term consequences. Did Trump overstep his constitutional bounds? Was Congress bypassed? And what precedent does this set for future presidents?&nbsp;Here’s a deep dive into the legality, authority, and political reverberations of Trump’s latest move against Iran—and what it means for American democracy and global stability.<h2>Did Trump overstep his authority?</h2>At the heart of the controversy lies a foundational question: who in the US government has the power to declare war?&nbsp;The US Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war (Article I), while the President, as Commander-in-Chief (Article II), can direct military operations. This delicate balance has often been tested—and Trump’s recent Iran strike has pushed it to the brink.&nbsp;As per the US Constitution, the President of the United States, be it Trump or another, must go to Congress before declaring war on any nation. As per Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution, “[The Congress shall have Power …] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water…” However, it must be noted that the US Congress has not declared war in over 80 years – since World War II. Yet, the US has been part of many wars, including the Afghanistan War, officially known as Operation Enduring Freedom, which happens to be the longest war in US history (from 2001 to 2021).&nbsp;Progressive Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Ro Khanna, have accused Trump of violating both the War Powers Resolution and the Constitution by failing to obtain Congressional approval before launching the strikes. “We need to vote on a War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless war,” Khanna said. Ocasio-Cortez went further, calling the move “grounds for impeachment.”&nbsp;Even some Republicans expressed concern. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a known constitutional conservative, declared bluntly: “This is not Constitutional.” Trump’s defenders argue that the President acted within his authority to protect national security. The White House later said it had made “bipartisan courtesy calls” before the operation, but it’s clear no formal consultation or approval from Congress took place before the missiles launched.<h2>Presidential authority &amp; historical precedents</h2>Presidents have long taken military action without prior Congressional approval—often citing urgent threats or previous authorisations. From Clinton’s airstrikes in Kosovo to Obama’s intervention in Libya and Trump’s own 2020 strike on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, there is precedent for limited military actions conducted under executive authority.&nbsp;Trump’s supporters, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, argue that “the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.” Others point out that the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief does allow for defensive measures without a declaration of war.&nbsp;But critics counter that the latest strike was not reactive or time-sensitive in the way previous emergency actions have been. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), a long-time advocate for reining in presidential war powers, labeled the operation “horrible judgment” and vowed to push for a War Powers Resolution to curtail further hostilities.&nbsp;The broader concern is the erosion of Congressional oversight. If presidents continue acting unilaterally, critics warn, the legislative branch may become a mere spectator in matters of war and peace.<h2>Republicans rally, Democrats rebuke</h2>Among Republicans, the response has largely been supportive. Sen. Lindsey Graham called the strike “the right call,” while Rep. Mike Lawler praised it for neutralising the nuclear threat without declaring war. Former Trump officials and conservative think tanks framed the move as necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran.&nbsp;However, the party isn’t monolithic. Isolationist voices like Rep. Massie questioned not just the constitutionality but the strategic wisdom of escalating conflict in the Middle East—especially when Trump's base had long opposed “forever wars.”&nbsp;Meanwhile, Democrats, particularly progressives, have taken a sharply critical stance. Rep. Sean Casten (IL) and Sen. Bernie Sanders both labeled the action “grossly unconstitutional.” Casten even called it “an unambiguous impeachable offense.” DNC Chair Ken Martin added, “Americans overwhelmingly do not want to go to war. This is reckless.”&nbsp;Interestingly, not all Democrats toed the same line. Sen. John Fetterman, known for his centrist pragmatism, said he supported the strike because “Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear capabilities.” This shows how concerns over Iran’s ambitions cross party lines, even if agreement on Trump’s method is lacking.<h2>Global and domestic consequences</h2>The most immediate concern is regional escalation. Iran has vowed to retaliate, calling the strikes “criminal” and warning of “everlasting consequences.” The attack could reignite hostilities across the Middle East, where US forces remain vulnerable, and tensions with Iran-backed militias are already high.&nbsp;Observers fear that a tit-for-tat spiral could destabilise the entire region—from the Strait of Hormuz to the Golan Heights. With Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria already embroiled in conflict, the addition of a direct US-Iran confrontation could prove catastrophic.<h2>Diplomatic fallout</h2>The strikes all but obliterate hopes of a diplomatic thaw with Iran. Trust, already frayed since Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, is now likely beyond repair. Any backchannel or formal negotiations around nuclear containment are off the table for the foreseeable future.&nbsp;Domestically, the strikes could boomerang. Public opinion has shifted against military adventurism, and any US casualties or drawn-out confrontation could sour voters. Already, Congressional Democrats are preparing legal challenges and legislative remedies. Sen. Kaine and Rep. Khanna have introduced measures to curtail Trump’s war-making powers, setting the stage for a renewed debate on the War Powers Resolution.&nbsp;Most crucially, the strikes may set a precedent. If Congress fails to push back, future presidents—regardless of party—may feel emboldened to bypass legislative oversight in matters of war.<h2>A defining moment</h2>Trump’s decision to strike Iran has reawakened a fundamental constitutional question: where does presidential authority end, and Congressional oversight begin?&nbsp;This moment may prove pivotal—not just for Trump, but for American democracy itself. The legal and political battles playing out in Washington will shape how war powers are exercised, contested, and understood for years to come. Whether Trump’s actions are ultimately vindicated or condemned, they have already triggered a reckoning—one that will define the limits of presidential power in an era of high-stakes global conflict.

Trump ordered the shot on Iran but can he really declare war What the law says as Dems and even GOP oppose another stupid war

The United States on Saturday (Jun 21) officially entered the war in the Middle East as it bombed three nuclear sites inside Iran. Taking to his Truth Social profile, US President Donald Trump announced the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites. He said that a "full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow". As per reports, this dramatic escalation of the Israel-Iran war was done by Trump without authorisation from the US Congress and the Pentagon. But did he have the authority to do so? Or did Trump overreach his authority as the POTUS? The US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities—ordered by President Donald Trump—have ignited a constitutional firestorm in Washington. The operation, called as 'Midnight Hammer', was executed with surgical precision but has left behind a trail of political and legal fallout. While some Republicans lauded the move as a bold show of strength, many Democrats—and even a few conservatives—are sounding the alarm, calling the strikes “unconstitutional,” “unauthorised,” and potentially “impeachable.” As questions mount over the legality of Trump’s actions, so do concerns over their long-term consequences. Did Trump overstep his constitutional bounds? Was Congress bypassed? And what precedent does this set for future presidents? Here’s a deep dive into the legality, authority, and political reverberations of Trump’s latest move against Iran—and what it means for American democracy and global stability. Did Trump overstep his authority? At the heart of the controversy lies a foundational question: who in the US government has the power to declare war? The US Constitution grants Congress the sole authority to declare war (Article I), while the President, as Commander-in-Chief (Article II), can direct military operations. This delicate balance has often been tested—and Trump’s recent Iran strike has pushed it to the brink. As per the US Constitution, the President of the United States, be it Trump or another, must go to Congress before declaring war on any nation. As per Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 of the US Constitution, “[The Congress shall have Power …] To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water…” However, it must be noted that the US Congress has not declared war in over 80 years – since World War II. Yet, the US has been part of many wars, including the Afghanistan War, officially known as Operation Enduring Freedom, which happens to be the longest war in US history (from 2001 to 2021). Progressive Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Ro Khanna, have accused Trump of violating both the War Powers Resolution and the Constitution by failing to obtain Congressional approval before launching the strikes. “We need to vote on a War Powers Resolution to prevent America from being dragged into another endless war,” Khanna said. Ocasio-Cortez went further, calling the move “grounds for impeachment.” Even some Republicans expressed concern. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), a known constitutional conservative, declared bluntly: “This is not Constitutional.” Trump’s defenders argue that the President acted within his authority to protect national security. The White House later said it had made “bipartisan courtesy calls” before the operation, but it’s clear no formal consultation or approval from Congress took place before the missiles launched. Presidential authority & historical precedents Presidents have long taken military action without prior Congressional approval—often citing urgent threats or previous authorisations. From Clinton’s airstrikes in Kosovo to Obama’s intervention in Libya and Trump’s own 2020 strike on Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, there is precedent for limited military actions conducted under executive authority. Trump’s supporters, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, argue that “the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.” Others point out that the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief does allow for defensive measures without a declaration of war. But critics counter that the latest strike was not reactive or time-sensitive in the way previous emergency actions have been. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), a long-time advocate for reining in presidential war powers, labeled the operation “horrible judgment” and vowed to push for a War Powers Resolution to curtail further hostilities. The broader concern is the erosion of Congressional oversight. If presidents continue acting unilaterally, critics warn, the legislative branch may become a mere spectator in matters of war and peace. Republicans rally, Democrats rebuke Among Republicans, the response has largely been supportive. Sen. Lindsey Graham called the strike “the right call,” while Rep. Mike Lawler praised it for neutralising the nuclear threat without declaring war. Former Trump officials and conservative think tanks framed the move as necessary to prevent a nuclear Iran. However, the party isn’t monolithic. Isolationist voices like Rep. Massie questioned not just the constitutionality but the strategic wisdom of escalating conflict in the Middle East—especially when Trump's base had long opposed “forever wars.” Meanwhile, Democrats, particularly progressives, have taken a sharply critical stance. Rep. Sean Casten (IL) and Sen. Bernie Sanders both labeled the action “grossly unconstitutional.” Casten even called it “an unambiguous impeachable offense.” DNC Chair Ken Martin added, “Americans overwhelmingly do not want to go to war. This is reckless.” Interestingly, not all Democrats toed the same line. Sen. John Fetterman, known for his centrist pragmatism, said he supported the strike because “Iran cannot be allowed to have nuclear capabilities.” This shows how concerns over Iran’s ambitions cross party lines, even if agreement on Trump’s method is lacking. Global and domestic consequences The most immediate concern is regional escalation. Iran has vowed to retaliate, calling the strikes “criminal” and warning of “everlasting consequences.” The attack could reignite hostilities across the Middle East, where US forces remain vulnerable, and tensions with Iran-backed militias are already high. Observers fear that a tit-for-tat spiral could destabilise the entire region—from the Strait of Hormuz to the Golan Heights. With Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria already embroiled in conflict, the addition of a direct US-Iran confrontation could prove catastrophic. Diplomatic fallout The strikes all but obliterate hopes of a diplomatic thaw with Iran. Trust, already frayed since Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal, is now likely beyond repair. Any backchannel or formal negotiations around nuclear containment are off the table for the foreseeable future. Domestically, the strikes could boomerang. Public opinion has shifted against military adventurism, and any US casualties or drawn-out confrontation could sour voters. Already, Congressional Democrats are preparing legal challenges and legislative remedies. Sen. Kaine and Rep. Khanna have introduced measures to curtail Trump’s war-making powers, setting the stage for a renewed debate on the War Powers Resolution. Most crucially, the strikes may set a precedent. If Congress fails to push back, future presidents—regardless of party—may feel emboldened to bypass legislative oversight in matters of war. A defining moment Trump’s decision to strike Iran has reawakened a fundamental constitutional question: where does presidential authority end, and Congressional oversight begin? This moment may prove pivotal—not just for Trump, but for American democracy itself. The legal and political battles playing out in Washington will shape how war powers are exercised, contested, and understood for years to come. Whether Trump’s actions are ultimately vindicated or condemned, they have already triggered a reckoning—one that will define the limits of presidential power in an era of high-stakes global conflict.

US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan

Trump ordered the shot on Iran, but can he really declare war? What the law says as Dems and even GOP oppose another 'stupid war'

US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Sunday (June 22) to slam Republican Congressman Thomas Massie after the latter criticised recent American military strikes on Iran. The president posted a lengthy post, calling Massie “weak” and a “pathetic loser”. This comes after Massie took to X (formerly Twitter) to express concern about the constitutionality of the strikes. He wrote, “This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our constitution.”In a strong defence of the US action, Trump wrote, “Iran has killed and maimed thousands of Americans, and even took over the American Embassy in Tehran under the Carter Administration. We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the ‘bomb’ right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!) but, as usual… this ‘lightweight’ Congressman is against what was so brilliantly achieved last night in Iran.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-iran-anticipate-the-us-strike-satellite-images-hint-tehran-secretly-shifted-enriched-uranium-before-us-bombs-hit-fordow-1750614164833">Did Iran anticipate US strike? Satellite images hint Tehran secretly shifted enriched uranium before US bombs hit Fordow</a>He went on to criticise Massie’s voting history and his stance on military affairs. “Massie is weak, ineffective, and votes ‘NO’ on virtually everything put before him (Rand Paul, Jr.), no matter how good something may be. He is disrespectful to our great military, and all that they stand for, not even acknowledging their brilliance and bravery in yesterday’s attack, which was a total and complete WIN.”Trump added, “Massie should drop his fake act and start putting America First, but he doesn’t know how to get there, he doesn’t have a clue!”He said, “MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague! The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I’ll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.”<h2>US-Iran tensions spike</h2>The United States, working in coordination with Israel, recently launched airstrikes on three key nuclear sites in Iran, Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan.These strikes followed Israel’s Operation Rising Lion, now in its ninth day, during which Iran’s nuclear facilities and top military and scientific figures were targeted. Trump had earlier warned he was considering bombing Iran, and after the strikes, he declared, “There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days.”

The president posted a lengthy post, calling Massie “weak” and a “pathetic loser”. This comes after Massie took to X (formerly Twitter) to express concern about the constitutionality of the strikes.

US President Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Sunday (June 22) to slam Republican Congressman Thomas Massie after the latter criticised recent American military strikes on Iran. The president posted a lengthy post, calling Massie “weak” and a “pathetic loser”. This comes after Massie took to X (formerly Twitter) to express concern about the constitutionality of the strikes. He wrote, “This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our constitution.” In a strong defence of the US action, Trump wrote, “Iran has killed and maimed thousands of Americans, and even took over the American Embassy in Tehran under the Carter Administration. We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the ‘bomb’ right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!) but, as usual… this ‘lightweight’ Congressman is against what was so brilliantly achieved last night in Iran.” Also read: Did Iran anticipate US strike? Satellite images hint Tehran secretly shifted enriched uranium before US bombs hit Fordow He went on to criticise Massie’s voting history and his stance on military affairs. “Massie is weak, ineffective, and votes ‘NO’ on virtually everything put before him (Rand Paul, Jr.), no matter how good something may be. He is disrespectful to our great military, and all that they stand for, not even acknowledging their brilliance and bravery in yesterday’s attack, which was a total and complete WIN.” Trump added, “Massie should drop his fake act and start putting America First, but he doesn’t know how to get there, he doesn’t have a clue!” He said, “MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague! The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I’ll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.” US-Iran tensions spike The United States, working in coordination with Israel, recently launched airstrikes on three key nuclear sites in Iran, Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. These strikes followed Israel’s Operation Rising Lion, now in its ninth day, during which Iran’s nuclear facilities and top military and scientific figures were targeted. Trump had earlier warned he was considering bombing Iran, and after the strikes, he declared, “There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days.”

The president posted a lengthy post, calling Massie “weak” and a “pathetic loser”. This comes after Massie took to X (formerly Twitter) to express concern about the constitutionality of the strikes.

‘Iran has killed, maimed thousands of Americans’: Trump hails Iran strike as ‘total WIN’, blasts Republican who opposed US attack

As the United States under US President Donald Trump struck Iranian nuclear facilities, a decade-old tweet by Trump has gone viral on social media. Back in 2011, Donald Trump warned that then-President Barack Obama might start a war with Iran just to win re-election. Calling Obama “weak,” Trump accused him of not being able to negotiate with Iran. He said in several tweets that Obama would launch military strikes on Iran to boost his popularity. Between 2011 and 2013, Trump made similar claims on TV, in radio interviews, apart from Twitter (now X).&nbsp;“Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly, not skilled!” Trump wrote on X. Netizens have pointed out the stark contrast between Trump's claims a decade ago from what he is doing now. The US, on Trump's order, bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel.&nbsp;<h2>'Obama will attack Iran'</h2>In a post on X, Trump in 2011 said, “Obama will start a war with Iran.”In a post on X,&nbsp;Trump in January 2012 said, “Obama will attack Iran in order to get reelected.”In a post on X, Trump in September 2012, said, I predict that Obama at some point will attack Iran in order to save face!In Oct 2012: “Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin, watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.” In Jan 2012: On Sean Hannity’s radio show, Trump said: “I say that he starts a war in Iran before the election… lives will be wasted for no reason.”In Nov 2012, Trump wrote on X, “Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly, not skilled!”&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GuEFW6DW8AAz7kf?format=png&amp;name=small" alt="Image"></figure><h2>US, under Trump, attacks Iran</h2>In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” &nbsp;As America entered the war, Donald Trump also said, "This cannot continue. There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump told a press briefing at the Oval Office. He also conveyed the goal of the US' strikes, saying, "Our Objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” &nbsp;

Back in 2011, Donald Trump warned that then-President Barack Obama might start a war with Iran just to win re-election. Netizens have pointed out the stark contrast between Trump claims a decade ago from what he is doing now

As the United States under US President Donald Trump struck Iranian nuclear facilities, a decade-old tweet by Trump has gone viral on social media. Back in 2011, Donald Trump warned that then-President Barack Obama might start a war with Iran just to win re-election. Calling Obama “weak,” Trump accused him of not being able to negotiate with Iran. He said in several tweets that Obama would launch military strikes on Iran to boost his popularity. Between 2011 and 2013, Trump made similar claims on TV, in radio interviews, apart from Twitter (now X). “Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly, not skilled!” Trump wrote on X. Netizens have pointed out the stark contrast between Trump's claims a decade ago from what he is doing now. The US, on Trump's order, bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. 'Obama will attack Iran' In a post on X, Trump in 2011 said, “Obama will start a war with Iran.” In a post on X, Trump in January 2012 said, “Obama will attack Iran in order to get reelected.” In a post on X, Trump in September 2012, said, I predict that Obama at some point will attack Iran in order to save face! In Oct 2012: “Now that Obama’s poll numbers are in tailspin, watch for him to launch a strike in Libya or Iran. He is desperate.” In Jan 2012: On Sean Hannity’s radio show, Trump said: “I say that he starts a war in Iran before the election… lives will be wasted for no reason.” In Nov 2012, Trump wrote on X, “Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly, not skilled!” US, under Trump, attacks Iran In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” As America entered the war, Donald Trump also said, "This cannot continue. There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump told a press briefing at the Oval Office. He also conveyed the goal of the US' strikes, saying, "Our Objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”

Back in 2011, Donald Trump warned that then-President Barack Obama might start a war with Iran just to win re-election. Netizens have pointed out the stark contrast between Trump's claims a decade ago from what he is doing now

'I predicted a long time ago...': Trump's old posts about Obama attacking Iran goes viral after US hits Iranian nuclear facilities

In the 1940s, Nazi engineers Walter and Reimar Horten designed a revolutionary flying wing aircraft, the Horten Ho 229. It was meant to be fast, long-range, and hard to detect by radar, decades ahead of its time.

In the 1940s, Nazi engineers Walter and Reimar Horten designed a revolutionary flying wing aircraft, the Horten Ho 229. It was meant to be fast, long-range, and hard to detect by radar, decades ahead of its time.

Hitler’s obsession? B-2 Bomber’s design was inspired by a lost Nazi blueprint from 1940s

The B-2 can carry up to 18,000 kg (40,000 lbs) of munitions inside its two large internal bomb bays, maintaining stealth while delivering devastating firepower.

The B-2 can carry up to 18,000 kg (40,000 lbs) of munitions inside its two large internal bomb bays, maintaining stealth while delivering devastating firepower.

What weapons can US B-2 Bomber carry and how many?

To handle nature’s calls during these extended missions, B-2 pilots wear absorbent undergarments — the same type used by astronauts on space missions. They are officially called “Pilot Relief Bags” but are commonly referred to as “astronaut diapers.”

To handle nature’s calls during these extended missions, B-2 pilots wear absorbent undergarments — the same type used by astronauts on space missions. They are officially called “Pilot Relief Bags” but are commonly referred to as “astronaut diapers.”

Why do B-2 Bomber pilots sometimes wear astronaut diapers?

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

Did Trump compare US Iran airstrikes to Hiroshima, Nagasaki? US president says it's 'essentially the same thing'

Trump at NATO summit hails Iran-Israel ceasefire as 'tremendous victory'

Iran moved enriched uranium stockpile to 'secret nuclear sites' before US strike

US intel report ridicules Trump's 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program claims

Israel was going to strike 15 targets in Iran when Trump call stopped Netanyahu

Top 10 world news: Trump to meet Zelensky at NATO Summit, and more

'I’ll say ‘how you doing?': Trump says Zelensky is in 'tough situation'

Iran says will respect truce if…; Israel claims ‘refrained from further strikes’

'NO ONE GOES ON VACATION': After 'peace abroad,' Trump turns focus back home

'COMPLETELY DEMOLISHED': Iran will never rebuild their nuclear facilities

Israel-Iran war: Here's how US president reacted after ceasefire violation

'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS': Trump 'unhappy' with Israel for attacking Iran

Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show?

Operation Basharat al-Fath: Are US troops safe in the Middle East and how prepared are they for Iranian missile strikes?

Why Iran chose to target Qatar? Strategic reasons behind Tehran’s retaliation

Qatar halts air traffic amid fears of Iran's strike on US airbase in Doha

'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after strike on nuclear sites

‘Keep oil prices down. I’m watching’: Trump issues warning after Iran strikes

'Take away power of this regime': Trump 'still interested' in Iran diplomacy

B-2 Bomber helped Israel, but its origins lie in Hitler’s secret Nazi war files

Was Trump’s sudden G7 exit linked to Iranian sleeper cell threat? Report claims

Did Iran anticipate US strike and shift uranium before bombs hit Fordow?

Inside B-2 Bomber: What it’s like to fly the world’s most secretive aircraft

Why B-2 Bomber could be replaced with B-21 Raider?

Are these US bases sitting ducks for Iran? Military assets on high alert

Trump ordered the shot on Iran, but can he really declare war? What the law says