US President Donald Trump has reiterated his pledge several times during his presidency as well as campaign trail, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.His obsession with this statement is quite evident as the White House released a statement on when Trump said it in the past years.Notably, the US president said this no less than a dozen times while being in office this year.<h2>Here's the timeline of when he said it while being in office</h2>(6/17/25): “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple — you don’t have to go to too deep into it. They just can’t have a nuclear weapon.”6/16/25): “I want to see no nuclear weapon in Iran and we’re well on our way to making sure that happens.”(6/14/25): “You can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon.”(6/11/25): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. We’re not going to allow that.”(5/16/25): “You have to view them as people and I don’t want it to be a violent thing, but they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon.”(5/15/25): “I want them to succeed. I want them to end up being a great country, frankly, but they can’t have a nuclear weapon.”(5/14/25): “I want to make a deal with Iran, I want to do something if it’s possible, but for that to happen, it must stop sponsoring terror, halt its bloody proxy wars, and permanently and verifiably cease its pursuit of nuclear weapons.”(5/13/25): “Iran can have a much brighter future — but we’ll never allow America and its allies to be threatened with terrorism or a nuclear attack. The choice is theirs to make. We really want them to be a successful country … but they cannot have a nuclear weapon.”(5/6/25): “We want it to be a great country. Let it be a tremendously successful, rich country … but they can’t have a nuclear weapon.”(5/4/25): “I want Iran to be really successful, really great, really fantastic — the only thing they can’t have is a nuclear weapon. If they want to be successful, that’s OK. I want them to be so successful and, you know, the Iranian people are incredible — I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon because the world will be destroyed.”(4/17/25): “Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon.”(4/14/25): “Iran has to get rid of the concept of a nuclear weapon. They cannot have a nuclear weapon.”(4/11/25): “I want Iran to be a wonderful, great, happy country — but they can’t have a nuclear weapon.”(2/10/25): “You cannot allow [Iran] to have a nuclear weapon.”(2/4/25): “It’s very simple: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.”&nbsp;Meanwhile, during campaign trails, Trump said this no less than 40 times, showing his great obsession or we can call a pledge to restrain Iran from having a nuclear weapon.&nbsp;(11/3/24): “Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon. Nuclear weapons are the greatest single threat to our country, but to the entire world.” (10/29/24): “I would have been very good to Iran. They — I had to have one thing, no nuclear weapons. You can’t have nuclear weapon. Nuclear weapons are the greatest danger to our country going forward, to the world going forward.”(10/28/24): “And all I wanted was Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon … That’s all I wanted. Very simple. You can’t have a nuclear weapon.”(10/23/24): “We don’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.”(10/16/24): “I didn’t want much. I wanted Iran to be very successful. I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon.”(10/14/24): “You can’t let them have a nuclear weapon.”(10/10/24): “I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple.”(10/7/24): “I only wanted one thing. You can’t have a nuclear weapon. You cannot let them have a nuclear weapon.”(10/7/24): “No, they can’t have nukes. No, they can’t have nukes.”(10/1/24): "They can’t have a nuclear weapon — and now they’re very close to having one and it’s very dangerous for the world, very dangerous for the world … The biggest problem today, in my opinion, the biggest risk is the nuclear weapons.”(9/30/24): “All I want them to do is not have a nuclear weapon. They can’t have a nuclear weapon.”(9/26/24): “The only thing is [Iran] cannot have nuclear weapons.”(9/19/24): “I wanted one thing from Iran — no nuclear weapon. I didn’t want much — no nuclear weapon. And now they’re very close to getting it, and you can’t let that happen.”(9/17/24): “All we want is we don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. That’s all we want. We don’t want you to have a nuclear weapon.”(8/27/24): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. We just can’t let them have a nuclear weapon. I’ll say this. If they do have a nuclear weapon, Israel is gone. It’ll be gone.”(8/23/24): “I don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon.”(8/23/24): “I just wanted to have a deal with Iran, very simple deal — can’t have a nuclear weapon. That’s it.”(8/15/24): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. And we were all set to make sure that they don’t have a nuclear weapon. Because once they do, it’s a whole different world, it’s a whole different negotiation.”(8/8/24): “Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon — it’s very simple.”(8/5/24): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. You cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon.”(7/10/24): “Iran should not have a nuclear weapon … Iran should never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.”(6/20/24): “The main thing is Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon. That was my main thing. The deal was a simple deal. Iran can’t have a nuclear. You know, it can’t have a missile, it can’t have a nuclear missile. It cannot have that nuclear capability.”(5/15/24): “We have a very hostile country that wants nuclear weapons. You can’t let that happen.” (6/15/24) “Iran should not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. They would never have had even close to a nuclear weapon. They are very close to getting a nuclear weapon. You cannot let that happen.”(5/1/24): “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon — very simple. They cannot have a nuclear weapon.”(4/30/24): “You can’t let Iran have nuclear weapons.”(3/25/24): “Iran wanted to make a deal, and what the deal — 90% of the deal that I want to make is no nuclear weapon. That’s 90% — almost 100%. It might be 100%. That’s all I want. No nuclear weapon for Iran”(2/23/24): “I want everybody to be happy. They just can’t have a nuclear weapon.”(1/20/24): “I just didn’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon. I said, ‘You know, we’re going to make a great deal. Everybody’s going to be happy. You’re going to be rich as hell again. Everything’s going to be great, but you cannot have a nuclear weapon.’”(1/5/24): “They cannot have a nuclear weapon. That was the only thing — the one thing I said, ‘You cannot have.’”(1/5/24): “I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon.”(12/30/23): “They will have, within a short period of time, nuclear weapons — and that is never something that can be allowed to happen.”“No nuclear weapons. You can’t have nuclear weapons. (11/9/23): Nuclear weapons are the single greatest threat to this world.”(10/29/23): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. That’s all. They can’t have nuclear weapons. It’s too destructive, too powerful. They can’t have it.”(10/16/23): “Don’t let Iran have nuclear weapons. That’s my only thing I have to tell you today. Don’t let them have it.”(7/15/23): “No nuclear weapons. You can’t give [Iran] nuclear weapons.”(6/24/23): “You cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. You cannot let it happen because bad things will happen if that happens.”(1/6/20): “IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!”(6/22/19): “Iran cannot have Nuclear Weapons!”(1/24/15): “We can’t let Iran get a nuclear weapon. We can’t do it. Can’t do it. We cannot let that happen.”(11/4/11): “We can’t allow Iran to go nuclear.”&nbsp;

His obsession with this statement is quite evident as the White House released a statement on when Trump said it in the past years.

US President Donald Trump has reiterated his pledge several times during his presidency as well as campaign trail, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. His obsession with this statement is quite evident as the White House released a statement on when Trump said it in the past years. Notably, the US president said this no less than a dozen times while being in office this year. Here's the timeline of when he said it while being in office (6/17/25): “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple — you don’t have to go to too deep into it. They just can’t have a nuclear weapon.” 6/16/25): “I want to see no nuclear weapon in Iran and we’re well on our way to making sure that happens.” (6/14/25): “You can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon.” (6/11/25): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. We’re not going to allow that.” (5/16/25): “You have to view them as people and I don’t want it to be a violent thing, but they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon.” (5/15/25): “I want them to succeed. I want them to end up being a great country, frankly, but they can’t have a nuclear weapon.” (5/14/25): “I want to make a deal with Iran, I want to do something if it’s possible, but for that to happen, it must stop sponsoring terror, halt its bloody proxy wars, and permanently and verifiably cease its pursuit of nuclear weapons.” (5/13/25): “Iran can have a much brighter future — but we’ll never allow America and its allies to be threatened with terrorism or a nuclear attack. The choice is theirs to make. We really want them to be a successful country … but they cannot have a nuclear weapon.” (5/6/25): “We want it to be a great country. Let it be a tremendously successful, rich country … but they can’t have a nuclear weapon.” (5/4/25): “I want Iran to be really successful, really great, really fantastic — the only thing they can’t have is a nuclear weapon. If they want to be successful, that’s OK. I want them to be so successful and, you know, the Iranian people are incredible — I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon because the world will be destroyed.” (4/17/25): “Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon.” (4/14/25): “Iran has to get rid of the concept of a nuclear weapon. They cannot have a nuclear weapon.” (4/11/25): “I want Iran to be a wonderful, great, happy country — but they can’t have a nuclear weapon.” (2/10/25): “You cannot allow [Iran] to have a nuclear weapon.” (2/4/25): “It’s very simple: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.” Meanwhile, during campaign trails, Trump said this no less than 40 times, showing his great obsession or we can call a pledge to restrain Iran from having a nuclear weapon. (11/3/24): “Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon. Nuclear weapons are the greatest single threat to our country, but to the entire world.” (10/29/24): “I would have been very good to Iran. They — I had to have one thing, no nuclear weapons. You can’t have nuclear weapon. Nuclear weapons are the greatest danger to our country going forward, to the world going forward.” (10/28/24): “And all I wanted was Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon … That’s all I wanted. Very simple. You can’t have a nuclear weapon.” (10/23/24): “We don’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon.” (10/16/24): “I didn’t want much. I wanted Iran to be very successful. I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon.” (10/14/24): “You can’t let them have a nuclear weapon.” (10/10/24): “I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple.” (10/7/24): “I only wanted one thing. You can’t have a nuclear weapon. You cannot let them have a nuclear weapon.” (10/7/24): “No, they can’t have nukes. No, they can’t have nukes.” (10/1/24): "They can’t have a nuclear weapon — and now they’re very close to having one and it’s very dangerous for the world, very dangerous for the world … The biggest problem today, in my opinion, the biggest risk is the nuclear weapons.” (9/30/24): “All I want them to do is not have a nuclear weapon. They can’t have a nuclear weapon.” (9/26/24): “The only thing is [Iran] cannot have nuclear weapons.” (9/19/24): “I wanted one thing from Iran — no nuclear weapon. I didn’t want much — no nuclear weapon. And now they’re very close to getting it, and you can’t let that happen.” (9/17/24): “All we want is we don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. That’s all we want. We don’t want you to have a nuclear weapon.” (8/27/24): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. We just can’t let them have a nuclear weapon. I’ll say this. If they do have a nuclear weapon, Israel is gone. It’ll be gone.” (8/23/24): “I don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon.” (8/23/24): “I just wanted to have a deal with Iran, very simple deal — can’t have a nuclear weapon. That’s it.” (8/15/24): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. And we were all set to make sure that they don’t have a nuclear weapon. Because once they do, it’s a whole different world, it’s a whole different negotiation.” (8/8/24): “Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon — it’s very simple.” (8/5/24): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. You cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon.” (7/10/24): “Iran should not have a nuclear weapon … Iran should never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.” (6/20/24): “The main thing is Iran can’t have a nuclear weapon. That was my main thing. The deal was a simple deal. Iran can’t have a nuclear. You know, it can’t have a missile, it can’t have a nuclear missile. It cannot have that nuclear capability.” (5/15/24): “We have a very hostile country that wants nuclear weapons. You can’t let that happen.” (6/15/24) “Iran should not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. They would never have had even close to a nuclear weapon. They are very close to getting a nuclear weapon. You cannot let that happen.” (5/1/24): “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon — very simple. They cannot have a nuclear weapon.” (4/30/24): “You can’t let Iran have nuclear weapons.” (3/25/24): “Iran wanted to make a deal, and what the deal — 90% of the deal that I want to make is no nuclear weapon. That’s 90% — almost 100%. It might be 100%. That’s all I want. No nuclear weapon for Iran” (2/23/24): “I want everybody to be happy. They just can’t have a nuclear weapon.” (1/20/24): “I just didn’t want Iran to have a nuclear weapon. I said, ‘You know, we’re going to make a great deal. Everybody’s going to be happy. You’re going to be rich as hell again. Everything’s going to be great, but you cannot have a nuclear weapon.’” (1/5/24): “They cannot have a nuclear weapon. That was the only thing — the one thing I said, ‘You cannot have.’” (1/5/24): “I just don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon.” (12/30/23): “They will have, within a short period of time, nuclear weapons — and that is never something that can be allowed to happen.” “No nuclear weapons. You can’t have nuclear weapons. (11/9/23): Nuclear weapons are the single greatest threat to this world.” (10/29/23): “They can’t have a nuclear weapon. That’s all. They can’t have nuclear weapons. It’s too destructive, too powerful. They can’t have it.” (10/16/23): “Don’t let Iran have nuclear weapons. That’s my only thing I have to tell you today. Don’t let them have it.” (7/15/23): “No nuclear weapons. You can’t give [Iran] nuclear weapons.” (6/24/23): “You cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon. You cannot let it happen because bad things will happen if that happens.” (1/6/20): “IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!” (6/22/19): “Iran cannot have Nuclear Weapons!” (1/24/15): “We can’t let Iran get a nuclear weapon. We can’t do it. Can’t do it. We cannot let that happen.” (11/4/11): “We can’t allow Iran to go nuclear.”

His obsession with this statement is quite evident as the White House released a statement on when Trump said it in the past years.

'15 times this year, over 40...': How many times Trump said 'Iran cannot have nuclear weapons'? A TIMELINE

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (17 June) claimed that the United States knows the exact location of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei but will not target him, at least for now.“We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social.He warned, however, that US patience is wearing thin. “But we don’t want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”<h2>Comments follow warning of US air control over Iran</h2>Trump’s comments came shortly after he declared that the US had achieved “complete and total control” of Iranian airspace, hinting that the US might become more directly involved in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran.Trump’s post follows media reports that he had recently turned down an Israeli proposal to assassinate Ayatollah Khamenei.When asked about the report, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declined to confirm it. Speaking to Fox News, he said, “There’s so many false reports of conversations that never happened, and I’m not going to get into that.”However, he added, “I think that we do what we need to do, we’ll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States.”<h2>Netanyahu says targeting Khamenei would end conflict</h2>A day later, Netanyahu told ABC News that taking out Khamenei would not make the situation worse, but would end the conflict.“It’s not going to escalate the conflict, it’s going to end the conflict,” he said, dismissing fears that such a move could provoke a wider war in the region.

Trump’s comments came shortly after he declared that the US had achieved “complete and total control” of Iranian airspace, hinting that the US might become more directly involved in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (17 June) claimed that the United States knows the exact location of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei but will not target him, at least for now. “We know exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social. He warned, however, that US patience is wearing thin. “But we don’t want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Comments follow warning of US air control over Iran Trump’s comments came shortly after he declared that the US had achieved “complete and total control” of Iranian airspace, hinting that the US might become more directly involved in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran. Trump’s post follows media reports that he had recently turned down an Israeli proposal to assassinate Ayatollah Khamenei. When asked about the report, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declined to confirm it. Speaking to Fox News, he said, “There’s so many false reports of conversations that never happened, and I’m not going to get into that.” However, he added, “I think that we do what we need to do, we’ll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States.” Netanyahu says targeting Khamenei would end conflict A day later, Netanyahu told ABC News that taking out Khamenei would not make the situation worse, but would end the conflict. “It’s not going to escalate the conflict, it’s going to end the conflict,” he said, dismissing fears that such a move could provoke a wider war in the region.

Trump’s comments came shortly after he declared that the US had achieved “complete and total control” of Iranian airspace, hinting that the US might become more directly involved in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran.

'Not going to kill Khamenei, for now': Trump warns US knows where Iran’s Supreme Leader is hiding

The Kremlin said on Tuesday that the G7 was no longer significant for Russia and looked “rather useless” now, while latching onto the assertion of US President Donald Trump that it had been a big mistake to expel Russia from the Group of Eight in 2014.Trump said at a Group of Seven summit in Canada on Monday that the G8 had been wrong to kick out Russia in 2014 after it annexed Crimea from Ukraine.&nbsp;Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Tuesday, “We agree with President Trump: it was a big mistake then to exclude Russia from the G8 format.”He further said the G7 had “lost practical significance” for Russia, given the state of world affairs.“Given the declining share of the G7 countries in the global economy, given all the trends that are observed in the G7 countries and, of course, against the background of, for example, such formats as the G20, the G7 looks dull and rather useless,” Peskov said.&nbsp;“This was a big mistake,” Trump had said on Monday, adding that he believed Russia would not have invaded Ukraine in 2022 had Putin not been ejected from the high-profile group of nations.&nbsp;“Putin speaks to me. He doesn’t speak to anybody else ... he’s not a happy person about it,” Trump said.&nbsp;Russia was part of the “group of eight” (G8), an intergovernmental political forum, up until 2014, when it was expelled for annexing the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea.G7 used to be the G8, before Russia was ousted from the group by former US President Barack Obama and other world leaders in 2014.Trump said Vladimir Putin “was very insulted” by the move.&nbsp;By terming the G7 useless, the Kremlin has already undermined any resolutions, criticism, or sanctions the leaders decide to impose on Russia due to its ongoing war with Ukraine.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Tuesday, “We agree with President Trump: it was a big mistake then to exclude Russia from the G8 format.” He further said the G7 had “lost practical significance” for Russia, given the state of world affairs.

The Kremlin said on Tuesday that the G7 was no longer significant for Russia and looked “rather useless” now, while latching onto the assertion of US President Donald Trump that it had been a big mistake to expel Russia from the Group of Eight in 2014. Trump said at a Group of Seven summit in Canada on Monday that the G8 had been wrong to kick out Russia in 2014 after it annexed Crimea from Ukraine. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Tuesday, “We agree with President Trump: it was a big mistake then to exclude Russia from the G8 format.” He further said the G7 had “lost practical significance” for Russia, given the state of world affairs. “Given the declining share of the G7 countries in the global economy, given all the trends that are observed in the G7 countries and, of course, against the background of, for example, such formats as the G20, the G7 looks dull and rather useless,” Peskov said. “This was a big mistake,” Trump had said on Monday, adding that he believed Russia would not have invaded Ukraine in 2022 had Putin not been ejected from the high-profile group of nations. “Putin speaks to me. He doesn’t speak to anybody else ... he’s not a happy person about it,” Trump said. Russia was part of the “group of eight” (G8), an intergovernmental political forum, up until 2014, when it was expelled for annexing the Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea. G7 used to be the G8, before Russia was ousted from the group by former US President Barack Obama and other world leaders in 2014. Trump said Vladimir Putin “was very insulted” by the move. By terming the G7 useless, the Kremlin has already undermined any resolutions, criticism, or sanctions the leaders decide to impose on Russia due to its ongoing war with Ukraine.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Tuesday, “We agree with President Trump: it was a big mistake then to exclude Russia from the G8 format.” He further said the G7 had “lost practical significance” for Russia, given the state of world affairs.

G7 ‘useless’ now, says Kremlin, concurs with Trump’s claim that kicking out Russia was a mistake

Amid the escalating Israel-Iran war, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 17) warned Tehran that the "gloves are off" if it touches US troops in the Middle East.The US president said that America will come down so hard on them if they do anything to the US people."We'll come down so hard if they do anything to our people. The gloves are off. I think they know not to touch our troops," he told reporters as he flew back to Washington from the G7 summit.He further said that he's considering sending US Vice President JD Vance and envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with the Iranians but it "depends on what happens when I get back.”Trump further pointed out that he is "not too much in the mood to negotiate" with Iran.He also said that he wanted something "better than a ceasefire" when it comes to the Israel-Iran conflict.Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he's seeking a "real end" to the conflict with Israel and Iran, saying that it's better than a ceasefire.When asked what is better than a ceasefire, Trump said, "an end, a real end, not a ceasefire. An end. Or giving entirely. That’s OK, too.”Trump stressed he wanted a “complete give-up” by Iran.He further hinted that the next 48 hours will reveal more about whether Israel plans to slow down or accelerate its attacks on Iran.On the fifth day of the Israel-Iran war, explosions were heard in Tehran, according to Iranian state media.Reportedly, Israel was attacking western areas of Iran's capital.Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz also warned Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei that he could share the same fate as former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.Hussein was executed by hanging after he was convicted of crimes against humanity by the Iraqi High Tribunal.Katz said Khamenei should "remember what happened to [the] dictator in the neighbouring country of Iran who took this path against Israel".

The US president said that America will come down so hard on them if they do anything to the US people.

Amid the escalating Israel-Iran war, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 17) warned Tehran that the "gloves are off" if it touches US troops in the Middle East. The US president said that America will come down so hard on them if they do anything to the US people. "We'll come down so hard if they do anything to our people. The gloves are off. I think they know not to touch our troops," he told reporters as he flew back to Washington from the G7 summit. He further said that he's considering sending US Vice President JD Vance and envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with the Iranians but it "depends on what happens when I get back.” Trump further pointed out that he is "not too much in the mood to negotiate" with Iran. He also said that he wanted something "better than a ceasefire" when it comes to the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he's seeking a "real end" to the conflict with Israel and Iran, saying that it's better than a ceasefire. When asked what is better than a ceasefire, Trump said, "an end, a real end, not a ceasefire. An end. Or giving entirely. That’s OK, too.” Trump stressed he wanted a “complete give-up” by Iran. He further hinted that the next 48 hours will reveal more about whether Israel plans to slow down or accelerate its attacks on Iran. On the fifth day of the Israel-Iran war, explosions were heard in Tehran, according to Iranian state media. Reportedly, Israel was attacking western areas of Iran's capital. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz also warned Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei that he could share the same fate as former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Hussein was executed by hanging after he was convicted of crimes against humanity by the Iraqi High Tribunal. Katz said Khamenei should "remember what happened to [the] dictator in the neighbouring country of Iran who took this path against Israel".

The US president said that America will come down so hard on them if they do anything to the US people.

'Will come down so hard, it'd be gloves off': Trump's BIG WARNING to Iran if it hits US troops amid war with Israel

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 17) denied claims about reaching out to Iran for "peace talks", calling it "fabricated and fake news".The US president said that if they want to talk, they know how to reach me.Trump further said that Iran should have taken the deal that was on the table, adding that it would have saved a lot of lives."I have not reached out to Iran for “Peace Talks” in any way, shape, or form. This is just more HIGHLY FABRICATED, FAKE NEWS! If they want to talk, they know how to reach me. They should have taken the deal that was on the table - Would have saved a lot of lives!!!," he said in a Truth Social post on Tuesday.Earlier today, Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he's seeking a "real end" to the conflict with Israel and Iran, saying that it's better than a ceasefire.When asked what is better than a ceasefire, Trump said, "an end, a real end, not a ceasefire. An end. Or giving entirely. That’s OK, too.”He further hinted that the next 48 hours will reveal more about whether Israel plans to slow down or accelerate its attacks on Iran.“You’re going to find out. Nobody’s slowed up so far,” Trump said.Notably, Israel’s foreign intelligence service, Mossad headquarters has been hit following Iranian strikes, Iranian state media reported.This comes as the war between the two countries escalates, leading to the death of more than 200 people in Iran and over a dozen Israelis.According to Press TV, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said that they struck a centre of Mossad on Tuesday amid the ongoing war.Meanwhile, Israel claimed it had killed top Iranian commander Ali Shadmani in an overnight airstrike. &nbsp;IDF said on Tuesday (June 17) that the head of IRGC’s Khatam-al Anbiya Central Headquarters, Ali Shadmani, has been assassinated in an attack on Tehran.&nbsp;

Trump further said that Iran should have taken the deal that was on the table, adding that it would have saved a lot of lives.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 17) denied claims about reaching out to Iran for "peace talks", calling it "fabricated and fake news". The US president said that if they want to talk, they know how to reach me. Trump further said that Iran should have taken the deal that was on the table, adding that it would have saved a lot of lives. "I have not reached out to Iran for “Peace Talks” in any way, shape, or form. This is just more HIGHLY FABRICATED, FAKE NEWS! If they want to talk, they know how to reach me. They should have taken the deal that was on the table - Would have saved a lot of lives!!!," he said in a Truth Social post on Tuesday. Earlier today, Trump told reporters on Air Force One that he's seeking a "real end" to the conflict with Israel and Iran, saying that it's better than a ceasefire. When asked what is better than a ceasefire, Trump said, "an end, a real end, not a ceasefire. An end. Or giving entirely. That’s OK, too.” He further hinted that the next 48 hours will reveal more about whether Israel plans to slow down or accelerate its attacks on Iran. “You’re going to find out. Nobody’s slowed up so far,” Trump said. Notably, Israel’s foreign intelligence service, Mossad headquarters has been hit following Iranian strikes, Iranian state media reported. This comes as the war between the two countries escalates, leading to the death of more than 200 people in Iran and over a dozen Israelis. According to Press TV, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said that they struck a centre of Mossad on Tuesday amid the ongoing war. Meanwhile, Israel claimed it had killed top Iranian commander Ali Shadmani in an overnight airstrike. IDF said on Tuesday (June 17) that the head of IRGC’s Khatam-al Anbiya Central Headquarters, Ali Shadmani, has been assassinated in an attack on Tehran.

Trump further said that Iran should have taken the deal that was on the table, adding that it would have saved a lot of lives.

'HIGHLY FABRICATED AND FAKE': Trump denies claims about reaching out to Iran for 'peace talks' amid war with Israel

ChatGPT-maker OpenAI has landed a $200 million contract from the United States Department of Defense&nbsp;to develop cutting-edge artificial intelligence tools for military applications, the Pentagon confirmed on Monday.&nbsp;It is the company’s most high-profile defence contract to date, placing OpenAI, originally a consumer-facing tech firm, at the heart of America’s military–AI transformation.&nbsp;“Under this award, the performer will develop prototype frontier AI capabilities to address critical national security challenges in both warfighting and enterprise domains,” the Pentagon stated.&nbsp;The work will be carried out primarily in and around Washington, with an estimated completion date of July 2026.<h2>Why it matters</h2>The deal underscores Washington’s push to harness frontier AI systems for battlefield readiness, faster intelligence synthesis, and advanced decision-making, as strategic rivalries with China and Russia intensify.&nbsp;It also marks OpenAI’s formal entry into the defence establishment, a major evolution for a company better known for revolutionising education and corporate workflows with tools like ChatGPT and Codex.&nbsp;As of March 2025, OpenAI had 500 million weekly active users. The company said this month that its annualised revenue run rate had surged to $10 billion, on track to meet its 2025 targets amid soaring global AI adoption.<h2>Defence AI gets a Silicon Valley upgrade</h2>The contract follows guidance issued by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in April, encouraging federal agencies to foster a competitive American AI sector. National security and defence systems were explicitly exempted from the tighter AI oversight — allowing agencies like the Pentagon to move quickly.&nbsp;That exemption is now being leveraged to formalise OpenAI’s military partnership.&nbsp;Reuters has reported that OpenAI is in talks to raise as much as $40 billion in a new funding round led by Japan’s SoftBank, at a $300 billion valuation — underlining investor confidence in its long-term strategic relevance.<h2>The bigger picture</h2>The US military has long experimented with AI through its research arm, DARPA. But this new agreement represents a turning point — where private AI leaders are brought directly into core national security missions.&nbsp;While technical specifics remain classified, the AI tools are expected to support capabilities such as autonomous decision-making, threat detection, secure communications, and multilingual data analysis.&nbsp;The move is likely to be watched closely in Beijing and Moscow, both of whom have ramped up investments in military-grade AI.The Pentagon’s new AI contract is not just about innovation, it’s about preserving a strategic edge in what many now call the AI arms race. (With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

This contract aims to enhance national security capabilities amid rising competition with China and Russia. Work will focus on autonomous decision-making and threat detection, with completion expected by July 2026. 

ChatGPT-maker OpenAI has landed a $200 million contract from the United States Department of Defense to develop cutting-edge artificial intelligence tools for military applications, the Pentagon confirmed on Monday. It is the company’s most high-profile defence contract to date, placing OpenAI, originally a consumer-facing tech firm, at the heart of America’s military–AI transformation. “Under this award, the performer will develop prototype frontier AI capabilities to address critical national security challenges in both warfighting and enterprise domains,” the Pentagon stated. The work will be carried out primarily in and around Washington, with an estimated completion date of July 2026. Why it matters The deal underscores Washington’s push to harness frontier AI systems for battlefield readiness, faster intelligence synthesis, and advanced decision-making, as strategic rivalries with China and Russia intensify. It also marks OpenAI’s formal entry into the defence establishment, a major evolution for a company better known for revolutionising education and corporate workflows with tools like ChatGPT and Codex. As of March 2025, OpenAI had 500 million weekly active users. The company said this month that its annualised revenue run rate had surged to $10 billion, on track to meet its 2025 targets amid soaring global AI adoption. Defence AI gets a Silicon Valley upgrade The contract follows guidance issued by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in April, encouraging federal agencies to foster a competitive American AI sector. National security and defence systems were explicitly exempted from the tighter AI oversight — allowing agencies like the Pentagon to move quickly. That exemption is now being leveraged to formalise OpenAI’s military partnership. Reuters has reported that OpenAI is in talks to raise as much as $40 billion in a new funding round led by Japan’s SoftBank, at a $300 billion valuation — underlining investor confidence in its long-term strategic relevance. The bigger picture The US military has long experimented with AI through its research arm, DARPA. But this new agreement represents a turning point — where private AI leaders are brought directly into core national security missions. While technical specifics remain classified, the AI tools are expected to support capabilities such as autonomous decision-making, threat detection, secure communications, and multilingual data analysis. The move is likely to be watched closely in Beijing and Moscow, both of whom have ramped up investments in military-grade AI. The Pentagon’s new AI contract is not just about innovation, it’s about preserving a strategic edge in what many now call the AI arms race. (With inputs from the agencies)

OpenAI has secured a $200 million contract with the U.S. Department of Defense to develop advanced AI tools for military use, marking its entry into defence.

OpenAI bags $200 million Pentagon contract to build AI tools for US military

As global leaders gather for the G7 summit in Canada, one bilateral meeting is drawing outsized attention between US President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba.&nbsp;At stake is a potential trade deal that could reshape economic ties between the world’s largest and fourth-largest economies. But with pressure mounting on both sides, the road to an agreement remains fraught.<h2>A handshake, but no breakthrough</h2>On Monday, President Trump and Prime Minister Ishiba met for 30 minutes on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Charlevoix, Alberta, as per the Japanese government. Official images released showed the two leaders smiling, but Tokyo offered no details on the content of their talks.&nbsp;The lack of a public outcome underscores the high stakes and political caution surrounding Japan’s efforts to secure a reprieve from steep US tariffs, especially on automobiles.&nbsp;According to Japan’s Ministry of Finance, the 25 per cent tariffs imposed by Washington in April 2025 now affect nearly $40 billion worth of Japanese car exports to the US—nearly a fifth of Japan’s total exports to America.<h2>No ‘quick fix’, says Ishiba</h2>Ahead of the summit, Prime Minister Ishiba had set the tone for Japan’s position. Speaking in Tokyo on June 12, he declared that Japan would not be rushed into a “quick fix” trade deal.&nbsp;&nbsp;“If there’s progress before I meet the president, that’s in and of itself good,” he said, as quoted by Bloomberg. “But what’s important is to achieve an agreement that’s beneficial to both Japan and the US. We won’t compromise Japan’s interests by prioritising a quick deal.”&nbsp;The remarks reflect Tokyo’s deep concern over the potential economic fallout from the tariffs. Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) has warned that the levies could push the nation into a technical recession, particularly as industrial output and consumer spending remain subdued following a sluggish first quarter in 2025.<h2>Rising stakes for Ishiba at home</h2>For Prime Minister Ishiba, the stakes are not just economic—but political. He faces a crucial general election next month, and returning from the G7 without a trade resolution could fuel criticism from opposition parties and industry leaders alike.&nbsp;On June 12, Ishiba met with opposition chiefs in Tokyo, describing the trade standoff as a “national crisis” that required bipartisan unity, as reported by Bloomberg. His government is also dispatching top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa to North America this week in a last-ditch effort to seek exemptions or adjustments to the tariffs.&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, many G7 leaders are seeking last-minute deals with Trump to prevent additional tariffs scheduled to take effect in July, a tactic widely seen as part of Trump’s broader strategy to extract concessions ahead of his re-election bid.<h2>Tariffs rooted in Trump’s ‘national security’ clause</h2>The current standoff was triggered by Trump’s April executive order, which cited national security concerns to justify sweeping tariffs on automotive imports, particularly from Japan.&nbsp;The move revived fears of a trade war reminiscent of earlier US–China clashes. In 2024 alone, Japanese exports to the US totalled over $135 billion, making America Japan’s second-largest trading partner after China, according to Japan’s Ministry of Finance.&nbsp;“The auto sector is Japan’s backbone,” noted Noriko Hama, professor of economics at Doshisha University, speaking to Nikkei Asia. “A prolonged tariff regime could ripple through employment, production, and consumption. Japan cannot afford to be seen as conceding too much—but nor can it afford a breakdown in US relations.”<h2>G7 backdrop: Global trade on edge</h2>The G7 summit itself has become a crucible for global trade tensions, with EU and Canadian leaders also pressing Trump to roll back tariffs. The Charlevoix summit is officially focused on economic cooperation and supply chain resilience, but trade friction has dominated the closed-door talks.&nbsp;While no formal US–Japan bilateral was announced, both sides signalled openness to further engagement. “We are not going to negotiate under pressure or media spectacle,” a senior Japanese trade official said, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity. “We seek a rules-based outcome with mutual respect.”&nbsp;Trump, meanwhile, has remained characteristically bullish. Speaking at the summit, he reiterated his commitment to “fairer deals” and called on partners to “open their markets more fully to American goods,” as quoted by Reuters.<h2>Outlook: Calm, but cautiously tense</h2>Despite the smiles at the G7 photo-op, there is little clarity on when or whether a trade deal will emerge. Analysts suggest that Japan may seek to delay any final agreement until after the July tariff deadline, banking on continued diplomatic engagement or a softening of the US stance.&nbsp;However, the clock is ticking. With domestic industry leaders growing anxious and opposition parties sharpening their attacks, the Ishiba government faces a narrowing window to show results.&nbsp;As the G7 wraps up, one thing is clear that the US–Japan trade ties are entering a volatile new phase, one where economics, diplomacy, and political survival are tightly intertwined. &nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

The two leaders met for 30 minutes without achieving a breakthrough, highlighting the complexities of Japan effort to avoid steep US tariffs, especially on automobiles. 

As global leaders gather for the G7 summit in Canada, one bilateral meeting is drawing outsized attention between US President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. At stake is a potential trade deal that could reshape economic ties between the world’s largest and fourth-largest economies. But with pressure mounting on both sides, the road to an agreement remains fraught. A handshake, but no breakthrough On Monday, President Trump and Prime Minister Ishiba met for 30 minutes on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Charlevoix, Alberta, as per the Japanese government. Official images released showed the two leaders smiling, but Tokyo offered no details on the content of their talks. The lack of a public outcome underscores the high stakes and political caution surrounding Japan’s efforts to secure a reprieve from steep US tariffs, especially on automobiles. According to Japan’s Ministry of Finance, the 25 per cent tariffs imposed by Washington in April 2025 now affect nearly $40 billion worth of Japanese car exports to the US—nearly a fifth of Japan’s total exports to America. No ‘quick fix’, says Ishiba Ahead of the summit, Prime Minister Ishiba had set the tone for Japan’s position. Speaking in Tokyo on June 12, he declared that Japan would not be rushed into a “quick fix” trade deal. “If there’s progress before I meet the president, that’s in and of itself good,” he said, as quoted by Bloomberg. “But what’s important is to achieve an agreement that’s beneficial to both Japan and the US. We won’t compromise Japan’s interests by prioritising a quick deal.” The remarks reflect Tokyo’s deep concern over the potential economic fallout from the tariffs. Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) has warned that the levies could push the nation into a technical recession, particularly as industrial output and consumer spending remain subdued following a sluggish first quarter in 2025. Rising stakes for Ishiba at home For Prime Minister Ishiba, the stakes are not just economic—but political. He faces a crucial general election next month, and returning from the G7 without a trade resolution could fuel criticism from opposition parties and industry leaders alike. On June 12, Ishiba met with opposition chiefs in Tokyo, describing the trade standoff as a “national crisis” that required bipartisan unity, as reported by Bloomberg. His government is also dispatching top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa to North America this week in a last-ditch effort to seek exemptions or adjustments to the tariffs. According to Bloomberg, many G7 leaders are seeking last-minute deals with Trump to prevent additional tariffs scheduled to take effect in July, a tactic widely seen as part of Trump’s broader strategy to extract concessions ahead of his re-election bid. Tariffs rooted in Trump’s ‘national security’ clause The current standoff was triggered by Trump’s April executive order, which cited national security concerns to justify sweeping tariffs on automotive imports, particularly from Japan. The move revived fears of a trade war reminiscent of earlier US–China clashes. In 2024 alone, Japanese exports to the US totalled over $135 billion, making America Japan’s second-largest trading partner after China, according to Japan’s Ministry of Finance. “The auto sector is Japan’s backbone,” noted Noriko Hama, professor of economics at Doshisha University, speaking to Nikkei Asia. “A prolonged tariff regime could ripple through employment, production, and consumption. Japan cannot afford to be seen as conceding too much—but nor can it afford a breakdown in US relations.” G7 backdrop: Global trade on edge The G7 summit itself has become a crucible for global trade tensions, with EU and Canadian leaders also pressing Trump to roll back tariffs. The Charlevoix summit is officially focused on economic cooperation and supply chain resilience, but trade friction has dominated the closed-door talks. While no formal US–Japan bilateral was announced, both sides signalled openness to further engagement. “We are not going to negotiate under pressure or media spectacle,” a senior Japanese trade official said, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity. “We seek a rules-based outcome with mutual respect.” Trump, meanwhile, has remained characteristically bullish. Speaking at the summit, he reiterated his commitment to “fairer deals” and called on partners to “open their markets more fully to American goods,” as quoted by Reuters. Outlook: Calm, but cautiously tense Despite the smiles at the G7 photo-op, there is little clarity on when or whether a trade deal will emerge. Analysts suggest that Japan may seek to delay any final agreement until after the July tariff deadline, banking on continued diplomatic engagement or a softening of the US stance. However, the clock is ticking. With domestic industry leaders growing anxious and opposition parties sharpening their attacks, the Ishiba government faces a narrowing window to show results. As the G7 wraps up, one thing is clear that the US–Japan trade ties are entering a volatile new phase, one where economics, diplomacy, and political survival are tightly intertwined. (With inputs from the agencies)

World leaders at the G7 summit in Canada are focusing on a critical bilateral meeting between US President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba regarding a potential trade deal impacting their economies.

Japan-US trade tensions escalate at G7: Ishiba holds line as Trump pushes tariff deal

US President Donald Trump on Monday (June 16) warned Iran to return to negotiations urgently, saying Tehran is not succeeding in its war against Israel.<h2>‘They should talk before it’s too late’</h2>Speaking to reporters at the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said, “They have to make a deal, and it’s painful for both parties, but I’d say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it’s too late.”He reiterated Washington’s support for Israel, adding, “We’ve always supported Israel and Israel is doing very well here.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/behind-the-doors-iran-wants-talks-not-war-how-tehran-is-quietly-signalling-us-israel-that-it-wants-to-end-the-conflict-1750088006086">Behind the doors, Iran wants talks, not war: How Tehran is quietly signalling US, Israel that it wants to end the conflict?</a><h2>Explosions rock Tehran as Israel targets key sites</h2>On the same day, multiple blasts were reported in both the western and eastern parts of Tehran. According to Iranian state media, a military base was among the locations hit by Israeli airstrikes, as reported by Reuters citing Fars news agency.As the situation escalated, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued an evacuation order for residents in Block 3 of northeast Tehran. The area reportedly includes the headquarters of Iran’s state broadcaster, IRIB.<h2>Netanyahu claims air control over Tehran</h2>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel is “on the path to victory” and asserted that the Israeli Air Force now “controls the skies over Tehran.”Separately, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz declared that “the Iranian propaganda and incitement megaphone is about to disappear,” referring to the IRIB facility within the evacuation zone.<h2>Tensions rise after Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites</h2>The escalation follows a major Israeli operation that targeted 100 sites across Iran, including nuclear facilities. The strikes killed several nuclear scientists and top Iranian military officials, prompting a series of retaliatory attacks between the two nations.

Speaking to reporters at the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said, “They have to make a deal, and it’s painful for both parties, but I’d say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it’s too late.”

US President Donald Trump on Monday (June 16) warned Iran to return to negotiations urgently, saying Tehran is not succeeding in its war against Israel. ‘They should talk before it’s too late’ Speaking to reporters at the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said, “They have to make a deal, and it’s painful for both parties, but I’d say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it’s too late.” He reiterated Washington’s support for Israel, adding, “We’ve always supported Israel and Israel is doing very well here.” Also read: Behind the doors, Iran wants talks, not war: How Tehran is quietly signalling US, Israel that it wants to end the conflict? Explosions rock Tehran as Israel targets key sites On the same day, multiple blasts were reported in both the western and eastern parts of Tehran. According to Iranian state media, a military base was among the locations hit by Israeli airstrikes, as reported by Reuters citing Fars news agency. As the situation escalated, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued an evacuation order for residents in Block 3 of northeast Tehran. The area reportedly includes the headquarters of Iran’s state broadcaster, IRIB. Netanyahu claims air control over Tehran Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel is “on the path to victory” and asserted that the Israeli Air Force now “controls the skies over Tehran.” Separately, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz declared that “the Iranian propaganda and incitement megaphone is about to disappear,” referring to the IRIB facility within the evacuation zone. Tensions rise after Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites The escalation follows a major Israeli operation that targeted 100 sites across Iran, including nuclear facilities. The strikes killed several nuclear scientists and top Iranian military officials, prompting a series of retaliatory attacks between the two nations.

Speaking to reporters at the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said, “They have to make a deal, and it’s painful for both parties, but I’d say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it’s too late.”

'Iran is not winning this war': Trump tells Iran to make a deal before 'it’s too late’ as Israel pounds Tehran

Israel-Iran war: US President Donald Trump said on Sunday (June 15) that it is "possible" that America could get "involved" in the ongoing Israel-Iran war. Trump said while denying that at present, the US has no involvement in Israeli strikes against Iran.&nbsp;In an interview with ABC News, the US president said, "We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved."&nbsp;Although the US president denied commenting on the reports that &nbsp;Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had urged the US to join the war.&nbsp;During the interview, Trump said he had a lengthy call with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, a day earlier to discuss, in large part, the conflict in the Middle East.&nbsp;Trump said that he is ready to be "open" to Putin's idea to act as a mediator between Iran and Israel for a ceasefire.&nbsp;"I would be open to it. [Putin] is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation. This is something I believe is going to get resolved," the US president told the news agency.&nbsp;Trump was asked about the "deadline" he gave to the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The US president said that after the "60-day ultimatum" to "make a deal," he would not give any new deadline to Iran."No, there's no deadline. But they are talking. They'd like to make a deal. They're talking. They continue to talk," Trump said.&nbsp;"Something like this had to happen because I think even from both sides, but something like this had to happen. They want to talk, and they will be talking," he added.&nbsp;244 killed in Iran, 17 in Israel&nbsp;In just three days into the war with Israel, Iran said 224 of its citizens lost their lives and over 1,200 people were injured. Meanwhile, in Israel, 17 people have been killed and 390 wounded since the conflict escalated on Friday (June 13).

US to be involved in Israel-Iran war? Trump says there is a possibility 

Israel-Iran war: US President Donald Trump said on Sunday (June 15) that it is "possible" that America could get "involved" in the ongoing Israel-Iran war. Trump said while denying that at present, the US has no involvement in Israeli strikes against Iran. In an interview with ABC News, the US president said, "We're not involved in it. It's possible we could get involved. But we are not at this moment involved." Although the US president denied commenting on the reports that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had urged the US to join the war. During the interview, Trump said he had a lengthy call with the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, a day earlier to discuss, in large part, the conflict in the Middle East. Trump said that he is ready to be "open" to Putin's idea to act as a mediator between Iran and Israel for a ceasefire. "I would be open to it. [Putin] is ready. He called me about it. We had a long talk about it. We talked about this more than his situation. This is something I believe is going to get resolved," the US president told the news agency. Trump was asked about the "deadline" he gave to the Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. The US president said that after the "60-day ultimatum" to "make a deal," he would not give any new deadline to Iran. "No, there's no deadline. But they are talking. They'd like to make a deal. They're talking. They continue to talk," Trump said. "Something like this had to happen because I think even from both sides, but something like this had to happen. They want to talk, and they will be talking," he added. 244 killed in Iran, 17 in Israel In just three days into the war with Israel, Iran said 224 of its citizens lost their lives and over 1,200 people were injured. Meanwhile, in Israel, 17 people have been killed and 390 wounded since the conflict escalated on Friday (June 13).

US President Donald Trump said on Sunday (June 15) that it is "possible" that American could get "involved" in the ongoing Israel-Iran war. Trump said while denying tat at present, the US has no involvement in Israeli strikes against Iran.&nbsp;

US to be involved in Israel-Iran war? Trump says there's a possibility

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 15) called on Israel and Iran to "make a deal"—but also suggested that the warring nations may “have to fight it out” first.His statement comes as Israel and Iran continue trading direct missile strikes in a dramatic escalation of hostilities.<h2>What did Trump say?</h2>Speaking to reporters at the White House before departing for the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said: "I think it's time for a deal," adding, "But sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens."When asked whether he had urged Israel to pause its ongoing air campaign, Trump refused to answer.Earlier, in a cryptic message on his platform Truth Social, Trump claimed that "many calls and meetings now taking place" and expressed optimism that a peace deal could be achieved "soon".They "should make a deal, and will make a deal," he wrote, without providing further details.<h2>Did Trump veto Israel's assassination plot on Khamenei?</h2>Citing a senior US official, AFP reported that Trump has reportedly also vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.Speaking to Axios, a US official said, "We communicated to the Israelis that President Trump is opposed to that. The Iranians haven’t killed an American and discussion of killing political leaders should not be on the table".As per the Times of Israel, Israeli officials have labelled the reports "fake news". Denying the report, National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi said it was "fake news," while Netanyahu's spokesperson Omer Dostri also called it "fake."<h2>Escalating Iran-Israel tensions</h2>This is the first time Israel and Iran have engaged in open, intense, direct conflict, breaking from decades of shadow war, proxy battles, and cyber operations. The situation has triggered alarm across global capitals, with fears that a broader Middle East war may now be underway.The conflict erupted Friday (Jun 13), when Israel launched widespread strikes across Iran, reportedly killing several top military commanders and nuclear scientists and damaging key military and nuclear installations.&nbsp;

Speaking to reporters at the White House before departing for the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said:

"I think it's time for a deal," adding, "But sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens."

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 15) called on Israel and Iran to "make a deal"—but also suggested that the warring nations may “have to fight it out” first. His statement comes as Israel and Iran continue trading direct missile strikes in a dramatic escalation of hostilities. What did Trump say? Speaking to reporters at the White House before departing for the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said: "I think it's time for a deal," adding, "But sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens." When asked whether he had urged Israel to pause its ongoing air campaign, Trump refused to answer. Earlier, in a cryptic message on his platform Truth Social, Trump claimed that "many calls and meetings now taking place" and expressed optimism that a peace deal could be achieved "soon". They "should make a deal, and will make a deal," he wrote, without providing further details. Did Trump veto Israel's assassination plot on Khamenei? Citing a senior US official, AFP reported that Trump has reportedly also vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Speaking to Axios, a US official said, "We communicated to the Israelis that President Trump is opposed to that. The Iranians haven’t killed an American and discussion of killing political leaders should not be on the table". As per the Times of Israel, Israeli officials have labelled the reports "fake news". Denying the report, National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi said it was "fake news," while Netanyahu's spokesperson Omer Dostri also called it "fake." Escalating Iran-Israel tensions This is the first time Israel and Iran have engaged in open, intense, direct conflict, breaking from decades of shadow war, proxy battles, and cyber operations. The situation has triggered alarm across global capitals, with fears that a broader Middle East war may now be underway. The conflict erupted Friday (Jun 13), when Israel launched widespread strikes across Iran, reportedly killing several top military commanders and nuclear scientists and damaging key military and nuclear installations.

Speaking to reporters at the White House before departing for the G7 summit in Canada, Trump said: "I think it's time for a deal," adding, "But sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens."

Trump urges Israel and Iran to 'make a deal,' but says they may need to 'fight it out'

US President Donald Trump blocked an Israeli plan to kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the last two days, Reuters reported citing two US officials.&nbsp;&nbsp;The officials, on the condition of anonymity, said that the Israeli forces were planning to kill the Iranian leader, but Trump vetoed it.&nbsp;&nbsp;“Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do we’re not even talking about going after the political leadership," a senior US administration official said.&nbsp;&nbsp;Since the war began between Israel and Iran, Trump has been in constant contact with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.&nbsp;&nbsp;On Sunday, during an interview, Fox News host asked Israeli PM Netanyahu about the report, to which, he responded that he’s not going to get into that.&nbsp;&nbsp;He also said that Israel does what it needs to do, adding that the US knows what is good for them.&nbsp;&nbsp;There are so many false reports of conversations that never happened, and I'm not going to get into that. But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States,” the Israeli PM said.&nbsp;&nbsp;Netanyahu also said that the change of regime in Iran could be a result of Israel’s military strikes on Tehran.&nbsp;&nbsp;He also suggested that Israel has killed Iran's intelligence chief Mohammad Kazemi in an aerial attack, as the arch-foes ramp up their conflict.&nbsp;"Moments ago, we also got the chief intelligence officer and his deputy in Tehran," Netanyahu told Fox News, adding, "Our brave pilots are over the skies of Tehran, and we're targeting military sites, nuclear sites."&nbsp;During the interview, Netanyahu also claimed that Iran tried to assassinate US President Donald Trump twice, adding that he is their “number one enemy”.&nbsp;"Do you want these people to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to your cities?" the Israeli PM said. "Of course not. "So we're defending ourselves, but we're also defending the world."&nbsp;Further, he also said that Iran tried to kill him too, calling himself Trump’s junior partner.

The officials, on the condition of anonymity, said that the Israeli forces were planning to kill the Iranian leader, but Trump vetoed it.

US President Donald Trump blocked an Israeli plan to kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the last two days, Reuters reported citing two US officials. The officials, on the condition of anonymity, said that the Israeli forces were planning to kill the Iranian leader, but Trump vetoed it. “Have the Iranians killed an American yet? No. Until they do we’re not even talking about going after the political leadership," a senior US administration official said. Since the war began between Israel and Iran, Trump has been in constant contact with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. On Sunday, during an interview, Fox News host asked Israeli PM Netanyahu about the report, to which, he responded that he’s not going to get into that. He also said that Israel does what it needs to do, adding that the US knows what is good for them. There are so many false reports of conversations that never happened, and I'm not going to get into that. But I can tell you, I think that we do what we need to do, we'll do what we need to do. And I think the United States knows what is good for the United States,” the Israeli PM said. Netanyahu also said that the change of regime in Iran could be a result of Israel’s military strikes on Tehran. He also suggested that Israel has killed Iran's intelligence chief Mohammad Kazemi in an aerial attack, as the arch-foes ramp up their conflict. "Moments ago, we also got the chief intelligence officer and his deputy in Tehran," Netanyahu told Fox News, adding, "Our brave pilots are over the skies of Tehran, and we're targeting military sites, nuclear sites." During the interview, Netanyahu also claimed that Iran tried to assassinate US President Donald Trump twice, adding that he is their “number one enemy”. "Do you want these people to have nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to your cities?" the Israeli PM said. "Of course not. "So we're defending ourselves, but we're also defending the world." Further, he also said that Iran tried to kill him too, calling himself Trump’s junior partner.

The officials, on the condition of anonymity, said that the Israeli forces were planning to kill the Iranian leader, but Trump vetoed it.

Israel tried to kill Iranian leader, but Trump intervened - Here's what Netanyahu said about it

US President Donald Trump is considering expanding the travel restrictions, as he mulls to impose travel ban on 36 more countries, according to a classified State Department cable.&nbsp;&nbsp;If it gets implemented, this would more than double the number of countries whose citizens will face full or partial travel ban to the US.&nbsp;&nbsp;Some of the countries also include close US partners, like Egypt and Djibouti.&nbsp;&nbsp;The memo was signed by State Secretary Marco Rubio and was sent to US diplomats on Saturday. The internal memo was reviewed by the Washington Post.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to that, the listed countries have 60 days to follow new rules set by the State Department.&nbsp;&nbsp;The concerns raised by the US include the government’s failure to issue reliable identity documents, lack of cooperation in accepting deported nationals, visa overstays and past involvement of some citizens in terrorist or anti-American activities.&nbsp;<h2>Here’s the full list of additional countries &nbsp;</h2><ul><li>Angola&nbsp;</li><li>Antigua and Barbuda&nbsp;</li><li>Benin</li><li>Bhutan&nbsp;</li><li>Burkina Faso&nbsp;</li><li>Cabo Verde&nbsp;</li><li>Cambodia&nbsp;</li><li>Cameroon</li><li>Cote D'Ivoire</li><li>Democratic Republic of Congo</li><li>Djibouti</li><li>Dominica&nbsp;</li><li>Ethiopia&nbsp;</li><li>Egypt</li><li>Gabon</li><li>The Gambia&nbsp;</li><li>Ghana&nbsp;</li><li>Kyrgyzstan&nbsp;</li><li>Liberia&nbsp;</li><li>Malawi&nbsp;</li><li>Mauritania</li><li>Niger</li><li>Nigeria&nbsp;</li><li>Saint Kitts and Nevis&nbsp;</li><li>Saint Lucia</li><li>Sao Tome and Principe&nbsp;</li><li>Senegal</li><li>South Sudan</li><li>Syria&nbsp;</li><li>Tanzania</li><li>Tonga</li><li>Tuvalu&nbsp;</li><li>Uganda</li><li>Vanuatu</li><li>Zambia&nbsp;</li><li>Zimbabwe</li></ul>&nbsp;Moreover, earlier this month, Trump’s travel ban came into effect post-midnight on June 9, majorly affecting citizens of 12 countries, including, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-travel-ban-to-go-into-effect-monday-19-countries-face-the-brunt-1749374293340">Also read: Trump travel ban to go into effect Monday, 19 countries face the brunt</a>&nbsp;The citizens of these 12 countries will be completely banned from entering the US.&nbsp;Meanwhile, the Trump travel ban will affect seven more countries, whose citizens will face further scrutiny before entering.&nbsp;These countries are Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.

If it gets implemented, this would more than double the number of countries whose citizens will face full or partial travel ban to the US..

US President Donald Trump is considering expanding the travel restrictions, as he mulls to impose travel ban on 36 more countries, according to a classified State Department cable. If it gets implemented, this would more than double the number of countries whose citizens will face full or partial travel ban to the US. Some of the countries also include close US partners, like Egypt and Djibouti. The memo was signed by State Secretary Marco Rubio and was sent to US diplomats on Saturday. The internal memo was reviewed by the Washington Post. According to that, the listed countries have 60 days to follow new rules set by the State Department. The concerns raised by the US include the government’s failure to issue reliable identity documents, lack of cooperation in accepting deported nationals, visa overstays and past involvement of some citizens in terrorist or anti-American activities. Here’s the full list of additional countries Angola Antigua and Barbuda Benin Bhutan Burkina Faso Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Cote D'Ivoire Democratic Republic of Congo Djibouti Dominica Ethiopia Egypt Gabon The Gambia Ghana Kyrgyzstan Liberia Malawi Mauritania Niger Nigeria Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Sao Tome and Principe Senegal South Sudan Syria Tanzania Tonga Tuvalu Uganda Vanuatu Zambia Zimbabwe Moreover, earlier this month, Trump’s travel ban came into effect post-midnight on June 9, majorly affecting citizens of 12 countries, including, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Also read: Trump travel ban to go into effect Monday, 19 countries face the brunt The citizens of these 12 countries will be completely banned from entering the US. Meanwhile, the Trump travel ban will affect seven more countries, whose citizens will face further scrutiny before entering. These countries are Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.

If it gets implemented, this would more than double the number of countries whose citizens will face full or partial travel ban to the US..

US travel ban on 36 more countries? Trump considering new travel restrictions - Here's the FULL LIST of nations

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 15) stressed that Iran and Israel should make a deal, while also expressing confidence that they will make a deal and there will be peace soon.&nbsp;The US president further said that many calls and meetings are now taking place, without clearly mentioning which parties he’s referring to.&nbsp;Once again lamenting for not getting the credit, Trump in his Truth Social post, mentioned several conflicts which took place recently as well as in the past, crediting himself for intervening and bringing peace to those regions.He did not forget to claim credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, which the two nations have repeatedly denied, saying that the ceasefire was announced based on bilateral talks only and no third party was involved.&nbsp;“Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal, just like I got India and Pakistan to make, in that case by using TRADE with the United States to bring reason, cohesion, and sanity into the talks with two excellent leaders who were able to quickly make a decision and STOP!,” he wrote in the post. &nbsp;He then noted that during his first term, Serbia and Kosovo were going at it “hot and heavy”, and the long-time conflict was ready to break out into a war.&nbsp;“I stopped it (Biden has hurt the longer-term prospects with some very stupid decisions, but I will fix it, again!). Another case is Egypt and Ethiopia, and their fight over a massive dam that is having an effect on the magnificent Nile River. There is peace, at least for now, because of my intervention, and it will stay that way!,” Trump said.&nbsp;Trump then stressed that there will be peace soon between Israel and Iran, adding, “Many calls and meetings now taking place.”“I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that’s OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!,” the US president lamented.&nbsp;Iran on Sunday stressed that Iran had evidence to show that the US forces supported Israel in its operation against Tehran."We have solid proof of the support of the American forces and American bases in the region for the attacks of the Zionist regime military forces,"Araghchi told foreign diplomats, AFP reported.This comes after Trump said that the US had nothing to do with Israel’s attack on Iran.

The US president further said that many calls and meetings are now taking place, without clearly mentioning which parties he’s referring to. 

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (June 15) stressed that Iran and Israel should make a deal, while also expressing confidence that they will make a deal and there will be peace soon. The US president further said that many calls and meetings are now taking place, without clearly mentioning which parties he’s referring to. Once again lamenting for not getting the credit, Trump in his Truth Social post, mentioned several conflicts which took place recently as well as in the past, crediting himself for intervening and bringing peace to those regions. He did not forget to claim credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, which the two nations have repeatedly denied, saying that the ceasefire was announced based on bilateral talks only and no third party was involved. “Iran and Israel should make a deal, and will make a deal, just like I got India and Pakistan to make, in that case by using TRADE with the United States to bring reason, cohesion, and sanity into the talks with two excellent leaders who were able to quickly make a decision and STOP!,” he wrote in the post. He then noted that during his first term, Serbia and Kosovo were going at it “hot and heavy”, and the long-time conflict was ready to break out into a war. “I stopped it (Biden has hurt the longer-term prospects with some very stupid decisions, but I will fix it, again!). Another case is Egypt and Ethiopia, and their fight over a massive dam that is having an effect on the magnificent Nile River. There is peace, at least for now, because of my intervention, and it will stay that way!,” Trump said. Trump then stressed that there will be peace soon between Israel and Iran, adding, “Many calls and meetings now taking place.” “I do a lot, and never get credit for anything, but that’s OK, the PEOPLE understand. MAKE THE MIDDLE EAST GREAT AGAIN!,” the US president lamented. Iran on Sunday stressed that Iran had evidence to show that the US forces supported Israel in its operation against Tehran. "We have solid proof of the support of the American forces and American bases in the region for the attacks of the Zionist regime military forces,"Araghchi told foreign diplomats, AFP reported. This comes after Trump said that the US had nothing to do with Israel’s attack on Iran.

The US president further said that many calls and meetings are now taking place, without clearly mentioning which parties he’s referring to.&nbsp;

'Israel and Iran will MAKE A DEAL': Trump shows confidence in bringing peace in Middle East amid ongoing war

The grand military day parade in Washington DC was attended by President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, as well as US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth.

Tanks, troops and Trump: US celebrates 250 years of Army in magnificent military parade |  See pics inside

A deadly shooting in Minnesota on Saturday (June 14) has left one Democratic state representative and her husband dead, and another lawmaker and his wife injured. Governor Tim Walz described the incident as “politically motivated”.State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were killed in their home. Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also shot separately in their homes but are expected to survive.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/minnesota-shooting-democratic-lawmakers-shot-in-politically-motivated-attack-at-their-homes-trump-reacts-1749920912034">Democratic lawmakers shot in 'politically motivated' attack in Minnesota</a><h2>Public urged to stay away from rallies</h2>In the wake of the shootings, the Minnesota State Patrol issued a public warning, asking people not to attend any protests scheduled for the day. “Given the targeted shootings of state lawmakers overnight, we are asking the public to not attend today’s planned demonstrations across Minnesota out of an abundance of caution,” they said in a post on X (formerly Twitter).Police also posted a photo showing “No Kings” protest flyers found inside the suspect’s vehicle. The “No Kings” coalition, which had planned anti-Trump protests in the state capital, cancelled all scheduled rallies in response.<h2>Trump reacts to the Minnesota shootings</h2>US President Donald Trump issued a statement after being briefed on the incident. “Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place!” he said.The shootings took place just hours before thousands were expected to protest Trump’s policies, raising concerns over safety at political events.“When we did a search of the vehicle, we did find a manifesto that identified many lawmakers and other officials. We immediately made alerts to the state to provide security wherever necessary,” Brooklyn Park police chief Mark Bruley said in a press conference. Brooklyn Park police said that a manifesto containing a list of names was found inside the vehicle of the shooting suspect. The suspect was allegedly dressed as a police officer and driving a fake police cruiser. Brooklyn Park Police described the suspect as “a white male, brown hair, wearing black body armor over blue shirt and blue pants.”&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump issued a statement after being briefed on the incident. “Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place!” he said.

A deadly shooting in Minnesota on Saturday (June 14) has left one Democratic state representative and her husband dead, and another lawmaker and his wife injured. Governor Tim Walz described the incident as “politically motivated”. State Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were killed in their home. Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also shot separately in their homes but are expected to survive. Also read: Democratic lawmakers shot in 'politically motivated' attack in Minnesota Public urged to stay away from rallies In the wake of the shootings, the Minnesota State Patrol issued a public warning, asking people not to attend any protests scheduled for the day. “Given the targeted shootings of state lawmakers overnight, we are asking the public to not attend today’s planned demonstrations across Minnesota out of an abundance of caution,” they said in a post on X (formerly Twitter). Police also posted a photo showing “No Kings” protest flyers found inside the suspect’s vehicle. The “No Kings” coalition, which had planned anti-Trump protests in the state capital, cancelled all scheduled rallies in response. Trump reacts to the Minnesota shootings US President Donald Trump issued a statement after being briefed on the incident. “Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place!” he said. The shootings took place just hours before thousands were expected to protest Trump’s policies, raising concerns over safety at political events. “When we did a search of the vehicle, we did find a manifesto that identified many lawmakers and other officials. We immediately made alerts to the state to provide security wherever necessary,” Brooklyn Park police chief Mark Bruley said in a press conference. Brooklyn Park police said that a manifesto containing a list of names was found inside the vehicle of the shooting suspect. The suspect was allegedly dressed as a police officer and driving a fake police cruiser. Brooklyn Park Police described the suspect as “a white male, brown hair, wearing black body armor over blue shirt and blue pants.”

US President Donald Trump issued a statement after being briefed on the incident. “Such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America. God Bless the great people of Minnesota, a truly great place!” he said.

Does Minnesota lawmakers shooting have a Trump connection? Flyers linked to Anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ rally found in suspect’s car

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that the recent airstrikes on Iran were carried out with the full backing of US President Donald Trump.In a video message addressed to Trump on his birthday, Netanyahu said, “Our enemy is your enemy… We’re dealing with something that will threaten all of us sooner or later. Our victory will be your victory.”He added, “This is what Israel is doing with the support, the clear support of the president of the United States, Donald Trump, and the American people and many others in the world.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-very-soon-iaf-jets-over-tehran-netanyahu-issues-fresh-warning-for-iran-says-will-hit-every-target-of-ayatollahs-regime-1749914693145">‘Very soon, IAF jets over Tehran’: Netanyahu issues fresh WARNING for Iran, says will hit every target of 'Ayatollahs’ regime'</a><h2>Israeli PM says Iranian leadership is in retreat</h2>Netanyahu also claimed that Iran’s leadership is under pressure as Israel intensifies its military operations. “Iranian leaders are packing their bags,” he said, referring to the air raids on Tehran.Explaining the reason behind the strikes, Netanyahu warned that Iran was planning to develop nuclear weapons for use by militant groups. “We had information that this unscrupulous regime was planning to give the nuclear weapons that they would develop to their terrorist proxies. That’s nuclear terrorism on steroids. That would threaten the entire world,” he stated.<h2>Israel hits Iran’s missile defence systems</h2>The Israeli military confirmed on Saturday that its air force had attacked dozens of locations in and around Tehran. The targets included surface-to-air missile systems, which are part of Iran’s air defence network.“Overnight, the IAF struck dozens of targets… as part of the effort to damage the Iranian regime’s aerial defence capabilities in the area of Tehran,” the military said in a statement.<h2>Iran responds with more missile attacks</h2>In retaliation, Iran launched another round of missile attacks early on Saturday under the name “True Promise 3,” according to Iranian state media.Israel reported incoming missiles and activated its air defence systems. Emergency services said 34 people were injured in the Tel Aviv region, mostly with minor wounds. Police later confirmed that one person had died. By Saturday evening, reports said another casualty had occurred and 19 more people had been injured in a separate Iranian strike in central Israel.The latest round of hostilities began after an Israeli airstrike on 13 June targeted Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure. That attack killed four senior Iranian commanders, including Major General Mohammad Bagheri and Major General Hossein Salami.Iranian media reported that 78 civilians also died, including women, children, and six nuclear scientists. Dozens more were injured during the raids.

The Israeli military confirmed on Saturday that its air force had attacked dozens of locations in and around Tehran. The targets included surface-to-air missile systems, which are part of Iran’s air defence network.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said that the recent airstrikes on Iran were carried out with the full backing of US President Donald Trump. In a video message addressed to Trump on his birthday, Netanyahu said, “Our enemy is your enemy… We’re dealing with something that will threaten all of us sooner or later. Our victory will be your victory.” He added, “This is what Israel is doing with the support, the clear support of the president of the United States, Donald Trump, and the American people and many others in the world.” Also read: ‘Very soon, IAF jets over Tehran’: Netanyahu issues fresh WARNING for Iran, says will hit every target of 'Ayatollahs’ regime' Israeli PM says Iranian leadership is in retreat Netanyahu also claimed that Iran’s leadership is under pressure as Israel intensifies its military operations. “Iranian leaders are packing their bags,” he said, referring to the air raids on Tehran. Explaining the reason behind the strikes, Netanyahu warned that Iran was planning to develop nuclear weapons for use by militant groups. “We had information that this unscrupulous regime was planning to give the nuclear weapons that they would develop to their terrorist proxies. That’s nuclear terrorism on steroids. That would threaten the entire world,” he stated. Israel hits Iran’s missile defence systems The Israeli military confirmed on Saturday that its air force had attacked dozens of locations in and around Tehran. The targets included surface-to-air missile systems, which are part of Iran’s air defence network. “Overnight, the IAF struck dozens of targets… as part of the effort to damage the Iranian regime’s aerial defence capabilities in the area of Tehran,” the military said in a statement. Iran responds with more missile attacks In retaliation, Iran launched another round of missile attacks early on Saturday under the name “True Promise 3,” according to Iranian state media. Israel reported incoming missiles and activated its air defence systems. Emergency services said 34 people were injured in the Tel Aviv region, mostly with minor wounds. Police later confirmed that one person had died. By Saturday evening, reports said another casualty had occurred and 19 more people had been injured in a separate Iranian strike in central Israel. The latest round of hostilities began after an Israeli airstrike on 13 June targeted Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure. That attack killed four senior Iranian commanders, including Major General Mohammad Bagheri and Major General Hossein Salami. Iranian media reported that 78 civilians also died, including women, children, and six nuclear scientists. Dozens more were injured during the raids.

The Israeli military confirmed on Saturday that its air force had attacked dozens of locations in and around Tehran. The targets included surface-to-air missile systems, which are part of Iran’s air defence network.

'Our enemy is your enemy': Netanyahu says Israel attacked Iran with 'clear support' from Trump - Here's what he said

In a move that rewrites the future of American steelmaking, US President Donald Trump has formally approved Nippon Steel’s $14.9 billion acquisition of US Steel, ending months of political drama, union backlash, and national security reviews.&nbsp;Trump signed an executive order on Friday, giving the green light to the controversial merger on the condition that both companies sign an agreement with the US Treasury to address national security concerns, as reported by Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;Within hours, Nippon Steel and US Steel confirmed they had signed the agreement, satisfying the final regulatory hurdle.&nbsp;“We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again,” the companies said in a joint statement, thanking President Trump, as quoted by Reuters.<h2>$11 billion investment promise and a golden share mystery</h2>As per Reuters, the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments by 2028 into US operations. Nippon Steel is also expected to invest an additional $3 billion in a new mill after 2028, a move designed to strengthen its footprint in American infrastructure.&nbsp;The merger agreement reportedly outlines commitments on governance, production, and trade, but left investors puzzled by the lack of detail on the promised “golden share”, which would supposedly grant veto power to the US government over major decisions.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Reuters, US Senator David McCormick stated last month that the golden share would give Washington direct oversight, particularly critical given US Steel’s deep roots in Pennsylvania, a key swing state.<h2>From Biden’s rejection to Trump’s reversal</h2>The deal’s approval caps a volatile 18-month saga. Nippon Steel first announced the takeover bid in December 2023, but the United Steelworkers union quickly opposed it, warning of job losses and foreign control, as reported by Reuters.&nbsp;In January 2024, then-President Joe Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds. The companies responded with legal challenges, claiming the review process under Biden was flawed and biased again, as per Reuters.&nbsp;With Trump returning to the White House in January 2025, the companies gained a new opportunity. In April, his administration launched a 45-day national security review of the merger — as reported by Reuters, which culminated in Friday’s conditional approval.<h2>A global move in a high-stakes steel war</h2>According to Reuters, for Nippon Steel, the world’s fourth-largest steelmaker, gaining access to the US market is critical, particularly as global steel trade tensions escalate.&nbsp;&nbsp;By acquiring US Steel, the Japanese firm avoids 50 per cent tariffs currently imposed on foreign competitors and positions itself to benefit from America’s expanding infrastructure projects.&nbsp;The deal also helps Nippon Steel escape $565 million in breakup fees, which it would have owed if the deal failed, as per Reuters.&nbsp;Welcoming the development, Japan’s Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Yoji Muto issued a statement on Saturday: “The government of Japan welcomes the US government’s decision… this investment will enhance innovation capabilities in the US and Japanese steel industries," as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;The timing also aligns with Tokyo’s effort to finalise a US-Japan trade deal ahead of the G7 summit, where Trump is expected to meet Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, as per Reuters.<h2>Investors still uneasy</h2>Despite the approval, investor sentiment remains mixed.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Reuters, US Steel shares dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told Nikkei that the takeover would require “a degree of management freedom," a statement seen by many as conflicting with Trump’s previous assertion that the US would maintain control through the golden share.&nbsp;Trump had earlier referred to Nippon as a “great partner” during a rally on May 30, where he gave vague approval to an “investment," as reported by Reuters.&nbsp;The Friday order finally clarified that Nippon Steel will acquire a 100 per cent stake in US Steel, as per a spokesperson quoted by Reuters, effectively handing control of a century-old American industrial icon to Japanese ownership.<h2>Steel, politics, and symbolism</h2>For Trump, the approval of this deal is both economic and symbolic. While union disapproval and political risks were apparent, especially in swing states like Pennsylvania, the multi-billion-dollar investment commitment offers political cover. Trump is expected to highlight the merger as evidence of foreign investment flowing into the US under his watch.&nbsp;For Nippon Steel, the deal represents a bold step in its global strategy, but with long-term financial and political implications.&nbsp;&nbsp;As the Reuters report suggests, the company may face short-term pressure from investors worried about the scale of its commitments.&nbsp;Whether the mysterious golden share grants real control to the US or simply satisfies political optics remains an open question. &nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Trump greenlights Nippon Steel’s acquisition of US Steel with an $11 billion investment pledge and national security safeguards, ending a politically charged 18-month saga.

In a move that rewrites the future of American steelmaking, US President Donald Trump has formally approved Nippon Steel’s $14.9 billion acquisition of US Steel, ending months of political drama, union backlash, and national security reviews. Trump signed an executive order on Friday, giving the green light to the controversial merger on the condition that both companies sign an agreement with the US Treasury to address national security concerns, as reported by Reuters. Within hours, Nippon Steel and US Steel confirmed they had signed the agreement, satisfying the final regulatory hurdle. “We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again,” the companies said in a joint statement, thanking President Trump, as quoted by Reuters. $11 billion investment promise and a golden share mystery As per Reuters, the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments by 2028 into US operations. Nippon Steel is also expected to invest an additional $3 billion in a new mill after 2028, a move designed to strengthen its footprint in American infrastructure. The merger agreement reportedly outlines commitments on governance, production, and trade, but left investors puzzled by the lack of detail on the promised “golden share”, which would supposedly grant veto power to the US government over major decisions. As per Reuters, US Senator David McCormick stated last month that the golden share would give Washington direct oversight, particularly critical given US Steel’s deep roots in Pennsylvania, a key swing state. From Biden’s rejection to Trump’s reversal The deal’s approval caps a volatile 18-month saga. Nippon Steel first announced the takeover bid in December 2023, but the United Steelworkers union quickly opposed it, warning of job losses and foreign control, as reported by Reuters. In January 2024, then-President Joe Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds. The companies responded with legal challenges, claiming the review process under Biden was flawed and biased again, as per Reuters. With Trump returning to the White House in January 2025, the companies gained a new opportunity. In April, his administration launched a 45-day national security review of the merger — as reported by Reuters, which culminated in Friday’s conditional approval. A global move in a high-stakes steel war According to Reuters, for Nippon Steel, the world’s fourth-largest steelmaker, gaining access to the US market is critical, particularly as global steel trade tensions escalate. By acquiring US Steel, the Japanese firm avoids 50 per cent tariffs currently imposed on foreign competitors and positions itself to benefit from America’s expanding infrastructure projects. The deal also helps Nippon Steel escape $565 million in breakup fees, which it would have owed if the deal failed, as per Reuters. Welcoming the development, Japan’s Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Yoji Muto issued a statement on Saturday: “The government of Japan welcomes the US government’s decision… this investment will enhance innovation capabilities in the US and Japanese steel industries," as quoted by Reuters. The timing also aligns with Tokyo’s effort to finalise a US-Japan trade deal ahead of the G7 summit, where Trump is expected to meet Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, as per Reuters. Investors still uneasy Despite the approval, investor sentiment remains mixed. According to Reuters, US Steel shares dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told Nikkei that the takeover would require “a degree of management freedom," a statement seen by many as conflicting with Trump’s previous assertion that the US would maintain control through the golden share. Trump had earlier referred to Nippon as a “great partner” during a rally on May 30, where he gave vague approval to an “investment," as reported by Reuters. The Friday order finally clarified that Nippon Steel will acquire a 100 per cent stake in US Steel, as per a spokesperson quoted by Reuters, effectively handing control of a century-old American industrial icon to Japanese ownership. Steel, politics, and symbolism For Trump, the approval of this deal is both economic and symbolic. While union disapproval and political risks were apparent, especially in swing states like Pennsylvania, the multi-billion-dollar investment commitment offers political cover. Trump is expected to highlight the merger as evidence of foreign investment flowing into the US under his watch. For Nippon Steel, the deal represents a bold step in its global strategy, but with long-term financial and political implications. As the Reuters report suggests, the company may face short-term pressure from investors worried about the scale of its commitments. Whether the mysterious golden share grants real control to the US or simply satisfies political optics remains an open question. (With inputs from the agencies)

President Trump has approved Nippon Steel’s $14.9 billion takeover of US Steel, sealing a landmark deal with conditions to address national security concerns.

Trump clears Nippon Steel’s $14.9 billion takeover of US Steel after 18-month battle

After Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, attacking Tehran's nuclear facilities and top military officials, Iran on Saturday (June 14) said that the dialogue with the US over the nuclear programme is "meaningless".Iran further accused the US of supporting the attack, Reuters reported.“The other side [the US] acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime [Israel] to target Iran’s territory,” &nbsp;Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said, semi-official Tasnim news agency reported.He further said that Israel "succeeded in influencing" the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without the US's permission.Earlier also, Iran accused the US of being complicit in Israel's "Operation Rising Lion", however, Washington denied the allegations made by Iran.At the United Nation Security Council, the US told Iran that it would be "wise" to negotiate over its nuclear program.US President Donald Trump on Saturday said Iran might still have a “second chance” to reach a nuclear agreement, just hours after Israeli airstrikes hit key military and nuclear sites in Iran. The statement comes ahead of a planned sixth round of nuclear talks in Oman.“Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to ‘make a deal.’ They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn’t get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.Later, he held a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, discussing the ongoing attacks.In the initial post by Trump following Israel's attack, the US president repeated his call for Iran to negotiate, warning that the consequences could be far worse if diplomacy fails.He also underscored the military strength of both the United States and Israel, saying that the US makes the "best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it.”

Israel "succeeded in influencing" the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without the US's permission, Iran accused. 

After Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, attacking Tehran's nuclear facilities and top military officials, Iran on Saturday (June 14) said that the dialogue with the US over the nuclear programme is "meaningless". Iran further accused the US of supporting the attack, Reuters reported. “The other side [the US] acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime [Israel] to target Iran’s territory,” Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said, semi-official Tasnim news agency reported. He further said that Israel "succeeded in influencing" the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without the US's permission. Earlier also, Iran accused the US of being complicit in Israel's "Operation Rising Lion", however, Washington denied the allegations made by Iran. At the United Nation Security Council, the US told Iran that it would be "wise" to negotiate over its nuclear program. US President Donald Trump on Saturday said Iran might still have a “second chance” to reach a nuclear agreement, just hours after Israeli airstrikes hit key military and nuclear sites in Iran. The statement comes ahead of a planned sixth round of nuclear talks in Oman. “Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to ‘make a deal.’ They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn’t get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. Later, he held a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, discussing the ongoing attacks. In the initial post by Trump following Israel's attack, the US president repeated his call for Iran to negotiate, warning that the consequences could be far worse if diplomacy fails. He also underscored the military strength of both the United States and Israel, saying that the US makes the "best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it.”

Israel "succeeded in influencing" the diplomatic process and the Israeli attack would not have happened without the US's permission, Iran accused.&nbsp;

'Not have happened without US permission': Iran AGAIN accuses America of supporting Israeli attacks, says talks with US 'meaningless'

Donald&nbsp;Trump has disclosed tens of millions of dollars in income from cryptocurrencies, branded merchandise and luxury real estate, as per his latest financial filing since returning to the White House in January 2025.&nbsp;The report, submitted to the US Office of Government Ethics on June 13 and accessed by Reuters, offers the most detailed snapshot yet of the president’s personal business interests. And the earnings are staggering.&nbsp;At the top of the list: $57.35 million from World Liberty Financial, a Trump family crypto firm launched in 2024. The filing shows Trump owns over 15.75 billion governance tokens in the company. His three sons — Donald Jr., Eric, and Barron — are listed as co-founders on the firm’s website.&nbsp;The filing, though dated in June 2025, appears to reflect earnings through December 2024 — meaning Trump’s newer meme coin, the $TRUMP token (launched in January), isn’t even part of the declared income yet.<h2>From golf resorts to guitars: The Trump empire expands</h2>While the crypto headline drew most attention, Trump’s traditional business pillars remain robust. His Florida real estate holdings, including the Doral, Jupiter and West Palm Beach golf resorts, along with the Mar-a-Lago club generated a combined income of at least $217.7 million, as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;Trump also reportedly earned $5 million in licensing fees from a property development venture in Vietnam.&nbsp;&nbsp;But it’s the former president’s name-brand merchandise empire that stood out for its eclecticism and profitability.&nbsp;The financial disclosure revealed Trump received royalties from a range of goods branded with his name and image, including:<ul><li>$3 million from his “Save America” coffee table book</li><li>$2.8 million from Trump-branded watches</li><li>$2.5 million from a line of Trump fragrances and sneakers</li><li>$1.3 million from the Greenwood Bible, a special edition bearing Trump’s branding</li><li>$1.05 million from a “45” signature guitar</li><li>$1.15 million from NFT licensing and digital collectibles</li></ul>These earnings were listed in the 234-page disclosure, which includes over 140 pages of stock, bond, and investment listings, as confirmed by the New York Post.<h2>Crypto, lawsuits and a media stake</h2>Apart from assets, Trump also declared liabilities, including outstanding payments in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case, currently under appeal, and a balance of at least $15,000 on an American Express credit card.&nbsp;The filing reaffirms that Trump continues to hold a major stake in Trump Media &amp; Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social. His 53 per cent share is held in a revocable trust overseen by Donald Trump Jr., and is estimated to be worth billions on paper.&nbsp;Notably, as reported by The Wall Street Journal, Trump’s earnings from $TRUMP meme coin and other new crypto ventures were excluded from this filing, since the disclosure only covered 2024.<h2>A contrast with past presidents</h2>For comparison, President Joe Biden’s 2024 financial disclosure ran just 11 pages and listed mostly conventional retirement and banking income. Vice President Kamala Harris’ disclosure was similarly brief.&nbsp;Trump’s vast portfolio, spanning digital tokens, luxury clubs, NFTs, guitars, and religious books, places him in a financial category far removed from his predecessors.&nbsp;While critics continue to raise ethical concerns about potential conflicts between policy and profit, Trump has long rejected such criticism, claiming that business success only affirms his leadership credentials.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

Trump 2025 ethics filing reveals over $57 million from crypto, $217 million from golf resorts, and earnings from NFTs, books, and branded goods—highlighting his vast business empire while in office.

Donald Trump has disclosed tens of millions of dollars in income from cryptocurrencies, branded merchandise and luxury real estate, as per his latest financial filing since returning to the White House in January 2025. The report, submitted to the US Office of Government Ethics on June 13 and accessed by Reuters, offers the most detailed snapshot yet of the president’s personal business interests. And the earnings are staggering. At the top of the list: $57.35 million from World Liberty Financial, a Trump family crypto firm launched in 2024. The filing shows Trump owns over 15.75 billion governance tokens in the company. His three sons — Donald Jr., Eric, and Barron — are listed as co-founders on the firm’s website. The filing, though dated in June 2025, appears to reflect earnings through December 2024 — meaning Trump’s newer meme coin, the $TRUMP token (launched in January), isn’t even part of the declared income yet. From golf resorts to guitars: The Trump empire expands While the crypto headline drew most attention, Trump’s traditional business pillars remain robust. His Florida real estate holdings, including the Doral, Jupiter and West Palm Beach golf resorts, along with the Mar-a-Lago club generated a combined income of at least $217.7 million, as quoted by Reuters. Trump also reportedly earned $5 million in licensing fees from a property development venture in Vietnam. But it’s the former president’s name-brand merchandise empire that stood out for its eclecticism and profitability. The financial disclosure revealed Trump received royalties from a range of goods branded with his name and image, including: $3 million from his “Save America” coffee table book $2.8 million from Trump-branded watches $2.5 million from a line of Trump fragrances and sneakers $1.3 million from the Greenwood Bible, a special edition bearing Trump’s branding $1.05 million from a “45” signature guitar $1.15 million from NFT licensing and digital collectibles These earnings were listed in the 234-page disclosure, which includes over 140 pages of stock, bond, and investment listings, as confirmed by the New York Post. Crypto, lawsuits and a media stake Apart from assets, Trump also declared liabilities, including outstanding payments in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case, currently under appeal, and a balance of at least $15,000 on an American Express credit card. The filing reaffirms that Trump continues to hold a major stake in Trump Media & Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social. His 53 per cent share is held in a revocable trust overseen by Donald Trump Jr., and is estimated to be worth billions on paper. Notably, as reported by The Wall Street Journal, Trump’s earnings from $TRUMP meme coin and other new crypto ventures were excluded from this filing, since the disclosure only covered 2024. A contrast with past presidents For comparison, President Joe Biden’s 2024 financial disclosure ran just 11 pages and listed mostly conventional retirement and banking income. Vice President Kamala Harris’ disclosure was similarly brief. Trump’s vast portfolio, spanning digital tokens, luxury clubs, NFTs, guitars, and religious books, places him in a financial category far removed from his predecessors. While critics continue to raise ethical concerns about potential conflicts between policy and profit, Trump has long rejected such criticism, claiming that business success only affirms his leadership credentials. (With inputs from the agencies)

Donald Trump reported tens of millions in 2024 income from crypto, real estate, and branded merchandise in a sprawling financial disclosure.

Trump files first financial disclosure after returning to office, details here

US President Donald Trump on Saturday said Iran might still have a “second chance” to reach a nuclear agreement, just hours after Israeli airstrikes hit key military and nuclear sites in Iran. The statement comes ahead of a planned sixth round of nuclear talks in Oman.“Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to ‘make a deal.’ They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn’t get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-are-dead-now-and-it-will-get-worse-trump-warns-iran-to-make-a-deal-before-nothing-s-left-after-israeli-strikes-1749810106093">Trump warns Iran to 'make a deal' before nothing's left after Israeli strikes</a><h2>US denies supporting Israeli strikes</h2>Earlier, Iran accused the United States of backing the Israeli assault. Washington has denied any involvement but said that they were aware of Israel's plan. Explosions were reported in Tehran on Friday as Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion, targeting Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure.Israel has declared a state of emergency, bracing for retaliation in the form of missile or drone attacks from Tehran.<h2>Trump: ‘Great death and destruction’</h2>In an earlier Truth Social post, Trump repeated his call for Iran to negotiate, warning that the consequences could be far worse if diplomacy fails.“I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it’, but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done,” he said.He also underscored the military strength of both the United States and Israel. “The United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it.”Trump said Iranian hardliners had underestimated the response they would face, stating: “Certain Iranian hardliners spoke bravely, but they didn’t know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!”<h2>Iran calls Israeli attack a ‘declaration of war’</h2>Following the Israeli strikes, Iran said the assault was a “declaration of war” and urged the United Nations Security Council to take immediate action. According to Iranian officials, three top military figures were killed, Iran’s armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri, Revolutionary Guards commander Hossein Salami, and Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader and former IRGC commander.

Earlier, Iran accused the United States of backing the Israeli assault. Washington has denied any involvement but said that they were aware of Israel's plan.

US President Donald Trump on Saturday said Iran might still have a “second chance” to reach a nuclear agreement, just hours after Israeli airstrikes hit key military and nuclear sites in Iran. The statement comes ahead of a planned sixth round of nuclear talks in Oman. “Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to ‘make a deal.’ They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn’t get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. Also read: Trump warns Iran to 'make a deal' before nothing's left after Israeli strikes US denies supporting Israeli strikes Earlier, Iran accused the United States of backing the Israeli assault. Washington has denied any involvement but said that they were aware of Israel's plan. Explosions were reported in Tehran on Friday as Israel launched what it called Operation Rising Lion, targeting Iran’s military and nuclear infrastructure. Israel has declared a state of emergency, bracing for retaliation in the form of missile or drone attacks from Tehran. Trump: ‘Great death and destruction’ In an earlier Truth Social post, Trump repeated his call for Iran to negotiate, warning that the consequences could be far worse if diplomacy fails. “I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it’, but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done,” he said. He also underscored the military strength of both the United States and Israel. “The United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come – And they know how to use it.” Trump said Iranian hardliners had underestimated the response they would face, stating: “Certain Iranian hardliners spoke bravely, but they didn’t know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!” Iran calls Israeli attack a ‘declaration of war’ Following the Israeli strikes, Iran said the assault was a “declaration of war” and urged the United Nations Security Council to take immediate action. According to Iranian officials, three top military figures were killed, Iran’s armed forces chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri, Revolutionary Guards commander Hossein Salami, and Ali Shamkhani, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader and former IRGC commander.

Earlier, Iran accused the United States of backing the Israeli assault. Washington has denied any involvement but said that they were aware of Israel's plan.

‘Gave Iran a 60 days, today is day 61’: Trump hints Israeli strikes came because Iran didn't 'make a deal', offers Tehran second chance

US President Donald Trump has called on Iran to come to the negotiating table over its nuclear programme, warning of “much worse” consequences if it fails to act.In a post on Truth Social on Friday (June 13), Trump said, “I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it’, but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done.”He also issued a clear threat about the strength of US and Israeli military power, saying, “The United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come, And they know how to use it.”Trump claimed that Iranian hardliners underestimated the response they would face.US president said, “Certain Iranian hardliner’s spoke bravely, but they didn’t know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!”He said there had already been “great death and destruction”, but stressed there was still time for diplomacy.He said, “Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!”<h2>Iran accuses Israel of declaring war</h2>Iran, meanwhile, accused Israel of launching strikes on its military and nuclear facilities on Friday and called the attack a “declaration of war”.Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the United Nations Security Council, urging the international body to act quickly.The Iranian foreign ministry said Araghchi “called on the Security Council to immediately address this issue”, according to AFP.

In a post on Truth Social on Friday (June 13), Trump said, “I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it’, but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done.”

US President Donald Trump has called on Iran to come to the negotiating table over its nuclear programme, warning of “much worse” consequences if it fails to act. In a post on Truth Social on Friday (June 13), Trump said, “I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it’, but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done.” He also issued a clear threat about the strength of US and Israeli military power, saying, “The United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come, And they know how to use it.” Trump claimed that Iranian hardliners underestimated the response they would face. US president said, “Certain Iranian hardliner’s spoke bravely, but they didn’t know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!” He said there had already been “great death and destruction”, but stressed there was still time for diplomacy. He said, “Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!” Iran accuses Israel of declaring war Iran, meanwhile, accused Israel of launching strikes on its military and nuclear facilities on Friday and called the attack a “declaration of war”. Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the United Nations Security Council, urging the international body to act quickly. The Iranian foreign ministry said Araghchi “called on the Security Council to immediately address this issue”, according to AFP.

In a post on Truth Social on Friday (June 13), Trump said, “I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to ‘just do it’, but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn’t get it done.”

'They are DEAD now, and it will get worse': Trump warns Iran to 'make a deal' before nothing's left after Israeli strikes

Hours after Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities under "Operation Rising Lion", the US senator stressed that the attack was intended to scuttle the Trump Administration negotiations with Iran.US Senator Chris Murphy said that the attacks risk a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America."Israel's attack on Iran, clearly intended to scuttle the Trump Administration's negotiations with Iran, risks a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America and is further evidence of how little respect world powers - including our own allies - have for President Trump," Murphy said in a post on X.He then said that Iran would not be this close to possessing a nuclear weapon if Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu had not forced America out of the nuclear agreement with Iran, stressing that it had brought Europe, Russia, and China together behind the US to successfully contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions."This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict," the US senator said. &nbsp;He stressed that the war would likely be disastrous for the security of Israel and the US."A war between Israel and Iran may be good for Netanyahu’s domestic politics, but it will likely be disastrous for both the security of Israel, the United States, and the rest of the region," he added.Noting what US State Secretary Marco Rubio said on the attack, Murphy said that the US has no obligation to follow Israel into a war, which America did not even ask for.After decades of warnings against the nuclear program, Israel attacked Iran on Friday morning, launching Operation Rising Lion as it struck Tehran's nuclear sites, military facilities, missile bases, as well as senior leadership.As it launched strikes, Israel announced a domestic state of emergency as the country braces for possible retaliation from Iran.&nbsp;

US Senator Chris Murphy said that the attacks risk a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America.

Hours after Israel launched strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities under "Operation Rising Lion", the US senator stressed that the attack was intended to scuttle the Trump Administration negotiations with Iran. US Senator Chris Murphy said that the attacks risk a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America. "Israel's attack on Iran, clearly intended to scuttle the Trump Administration's negotiations with Iran, risks a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America and is further evidence of how little respect world powers - including our own allies - have for President Trump," Murphy said in a post on X. He then said that Iran would not be this close to possessing a nuclear weapon if Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu had not forced America out of the nuclear agreement with Iran, stressing that it had brought Europe, Russia, and China together behind the US to successfully contain Iran’s nuclear ambitions. "This is a disaster of Trump and Netanyahu's own making, and now the region risks spiraling toward a new, deadly conflict," the US senator said. He stressed that the war would likely be disastrous for the security of Israel and the US. "A war between Israel and Iran may be good for Netanyahu’s domestic politics, but it will likely be disastrous for both the security of Israel, the United States, and the rest of the region," he added. Noting what US State Secretary Marco Rubio said on the attack, Murphy said that the US has no obligation to follow Israel into a war, which America did not even ask for. After decades of warnings against the nuclear program, Israel attacked Iran on Friday morning, launching Operation Rising Lion as it struck Tehran's nuclear sites, military facilities, missile bases, as well as senior leadership. As it launched strikes, Israel announced a domestic state of emergency as the country braces for possible retaliation from Iran.

US Senator Chris Murphy said that the attacks risk a regional war that will likely be catastrophic for America.

A CATASTROPHE for America? US senator claims Israel's attack on Iran intended to scuttle Trump admin's talks with Tehran

In a move that could dramatically reshape the landscape of high-net-worth immigration, US President Donald Trump has officially launched a new fast-track residency programme dubbed the “Trump Gold Card.”&nbsp;&nbsp;The initiative requiring a $5 million payment in exchange for permanent residency, is now accepting preliminary applications via a newly launched government portal.&nbsp;The Trump administration unveiled the site, <a href="https://trumpcard.gov/">trumpcard.gov</a>, on Wednesday, where foreign nationals and businesses can express interest in the premium immigration pathway. While the cards are not being issued yet, the site allows potential applicants to join a waiting list, submit basic personal information and receive updates on the rollout.<h2>Trump unveils ‘Trump Card’ portal on Truth Social</h2>Trump made the announcement through his social media platform Truth Social, stating, “For five million dollars, individuals can obtain access to what is called The Trump Card.”&nbsp;He added that “thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World.”

The linked webpage, titled “The Trump Card is coming,” requests details like name, country of origin, whether the applicant is an individual or business, and an email address.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to USA Today, the website is functioning only as a notification list, and no actual cards are being issued at this stage.<h2>What is the Trump's ‘Gold Card’?</h2>The Trump's ‘Gold Card’ is a new immigration programme that promises permanent US residency for foreign nationals who invest $5 million.&nbsp;&nbsp;While the details are still being finalised, Trump has described the card as offering “green card privileges plus,” suggesting an expedited route to citizenship for wealthy individuals and high-skill contributors.&nbsp;In an interview cited by Reuters, Trump clarified that the Gold Card “does not offer citizenship directly,” but is “a sophisticated alternative to the green card” with “an elevated pathway toward eventual citizenship.”<h2>How is it different from the US Green Card and EB-5 visa?</h2>The Trump Gold Card appears to be a more exclusive alternative to the EB-5 investor visa, a long-standing programme that grants green cards to foreign nationals who invest between $800,000 and $1.05 million in a US enterprise and create at least 10 full-time American jobs.&nbsp;Unlike the EB-5, the Gold Card does not require job creation, potentially making it far more accessible to passive investors.&nbsp;&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, this new policy could reduce bureaucratic delays and attract ultra-high-net-worth individuals who view the US not only as a destination for relocation but also as a secure market for financial and real estate investments.&nbsp;Legal experts have raised questions about how the Trump administration plans to differentiate this card from existing residency statuses under immigration law. “It could face significant challenges in the courts unless it is written into legislation,” said immigration attorney Rachel Woldenberg, as quoted by The New York Times.<h2>What does this mean for the US economy?</h2>The launch of the Trump Gold Card comes amid heightened global interest in “citizenship by investment” schemes, many of which are operated by countries like Portugal, the UAE and St. Kitts and Nevis.&nbsp;&nbsp;The US, historically more restrictive in this space, could now become a serious player in the market for wealth-driven migration.&nbsp;According to the Migration Policy Institute, over 14,000 people have received EB-5 visas since 2020, contributing more than $37 billion in direct investment to the US economy.&nbsp;&nbsp;Economists suggest that a streamlined $5 million route could increase foreign capital inflow significantly, especially from Asia and the Middle East.&nbsp;However, critics argue that such programmes may widen inequalities. “It creates a two-tier immigration system, where money buys privilege,” said Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at MPI, speaking to Bloomberg.&nbsp;Still, supporters believe the Gold Card could unlock new avenues for foreign investment, especially amid concerns over budget deficits and rising national debt.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently projected a federal deficit of $1.6 trillion in 2025. If even 1,000 Gold Cards are sold, the scheme could inject $5 billion directly into the US economy.<h2>What happens next?</h2>While the website is live and collecting interest, the Trump administration has yet to announce a start date for processing applications or issuing residency permits.&nbsp;&nbsp;Legislative hurdles may also stand in the way. As per Reuters, no formal bill has yet been introduced in Congress to legitimise or fund the programme.&nbsp;Still, for those with deep pockets and dreams of an American zip code, the Trump Gold Card may soon be the most direct and expensive ticket in.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)

Trump unveils the Trump Gold Card—an exclusive $5 million US residency scheme for high-net-worth individuals, raising hopes and legal questions.

In a move that could dramatically reshape the landscape of high-net-worth immigration, US President Donald Trump has officially launched a new fast-track residency programme dubbed the “Trump Gold Card.” The initiative requiring a $5 million payment in exchange for permanent residency, is now accepting preliminary applications via a newly launched government portal. The Trump administration unveiled the site, trumpcard.gov, on Wednesday, where foreign nationals and businesses can express interest in the premium immigration pathway. While the cards are not being issued yet, the site allows potential applicants to join a waiting list, submit basic personal information and receive updates on the rollout. Trump unveils ‘Trump Card’ portal on Truth Social Trump made the announcement through his social media platform Truth Social, stating, “For five million dollars, individuals can obtain access to what is called The Trump Card.” He added that “thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World.”

Trump launches $5 million "Trump Gold Card" residency programme, offering fast-track US green card privileges to wealthy foreign investors.&nbsp;

Trump’s $5 million ‘Gold Card’ for US residency opens for applicants: Here’s what it means

Several parts of the United States are gearing up for the "No Kings" protest on Saturday (June 14). The White House is hosting a military parade in Washington DC, supposedly to celebrate the 250-year anniversary of the US Army. However, it is the same day President Donald Trump celebrates his birthday. So, it is being perceived as a dictator-style parade that Trump is throwing for himself.&nbsp;This comes as protests against the raids carried out by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continue in Los Angeles. Trump deployed National Guard and active-duty Marines to protect the ICE agents, drawing flak for his actions. California Governor Gavin Newsom took legal action against the Trump Administration. The protests have spread to cities like New York, Atlanta and Chicago.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-trump-won-t-allow-mob-rule-in-america-white-house-says-as-protests-spread-across-us-1749671196870">‘Trump won’t allow mob rule in America’: White House says as protests spread across US</a>&nbsp;Saturday protests had been in the pipeline even before troops were moved into LA and tensions escalated over immigration efforts.&nbsp;<h2>DC military parade “wasteful”, akin to authoritarian regimes</h2>&nbsp;Critics have slammed the military parade, calling it "wasteful" and driven by "ego", with such exhibitions only being seen among authoritarian regimes. The parade is estimated to cost $45 million. This includes $16 million for damage that would be caused to roads by tanks and other heavy vehicles. An estimated 6,500 US troops, 150 vehicles, and 50 aircraft will be part of the military parade in DC.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/unrest-provoked-by-white-house-la-mayor-bass-slams-trump-s-double-standard-1749680392504">Unrest ‘provoked by White House’: LA Mayor Bass slams Trump’s ‘double standard’</a>&nbsp;US Senator Adam Schiff (D-California), called it a "dictator-style military parade", saying that Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, and Xi Jinping are known for throwing such parades.&nbsp;US Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinios), an Army veteran, wrote on social media, “Trump is throwing himself a $30 million birthday parade just to stroke his own ego," and called it "an egotistical, nonsensical birthday parade."&nbsp;<h2>Trump warns protesters</h2>&nbsp;Saturday protests are being held under the banner of &nbsp;"No Kings". Meanwhile, Trump has warned people who planned to protest at the upcoming parade, saying, "For those who want to protest, they’re going to be met with very big force."&nbsp;This is not the first time a military parade is happening in the US. In 1991, President George HW Bush hosted a military parade to mark the end of the First Gulf War. On the day, tanks and thousands of troops marched in DC.&nbsp;President Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) and President John F. Kennedy (D) had also hosted similar events in the past. &nbsp;

Washington DC military parade: Donald Trump is celebrating his birthday on the same day as the military parade, with critics calling it something that only dictators do.

Several parts of the United States are gearing up for the "No Kings" protest on Saturday (June 14). The White House is hosting a military parade in Washington DC, supposedly to celebrate the 250-year anniversary of the US Army. However, it is the same day President Donald Trump celebrates his birthday. So, it is being perceived as a dictator-style parade that Trump is throwing for himself. This comes as protests against the raids carried out by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continue in Los Angeles. Trump deployed National Guard and active-duty Marines to protect the ICE agents, drawing flak for his actions. California Governor Gavin Newsom took legal action against the Trump Administration. The protests have spread to cities like New York, Atlanta and Chicago. Also Read: ‘Trump won’t allow mob rule in America’: White House says as protests spread across US Saturday protests had been in the pipeline even before troops were moved into LA and tensions escalated over immigration efforts. DC military parade “wasteful”, akin to authoritarian regimes Critics have slammed the military parade, calling it "wasteful" and driven by "ego", with such exhibitions only being seen among authoritarian regimes. The parade is estimated to cost $45 million. This includes $16 million for damage that would be caused to roads by tanks and other heavy vehicles. An estimated 6,500 US troops, 150 vehicles, and 50 aircraft will be part of the military parade in DC. Also Read: Unrest ‘provoked by White House’: LA Mayor Bass slams Trump’s ‘double standard’ US Senator Adam Schiff (D-California), called it a "dictator-style military parade", saying that Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un, and Xi Jinping are known for throwing such parades. US Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinios), an Army veteran, wrote on social media, “Trump is throwing himself a $30 million birthday parade just to stroke his own ego," and called it "an egotistical, nonsensical birthday parade." Trump warns protesters Saturday protests are being held under the banner of "No Kings". Meanwhile, Trump has warned people who planned to protest at the upcoming parade, saying, "For those who want to protest, they’re going to be met with very big force." This is not the first time a military parade is happening in the US. In 1991, President George HW Bush hosted a military parade to mark the end of the First Gulf War. On the day, tanks and thousands of troops marched in DC. President Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) and President John F. Kennedy (D) had also hosted similar events in the past.

Washington DC military parade: Donald Trump is celebrating his birthday on the same day as the military parade, with critics calling it something that only dictators do.

Ode to Army or birthday hoopla? 'No Kings' protests to greet $45 million 'dictator-style' parade in Washington DC

US President Donald Trump has reiterated his threat to impose unilateral tariffs on dozens of countries, giving them a two-week ultimatum to accept new trade terms or face higher duties.&nbsp;&nbsp;Speaking at an event at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, Trump said his administration would be sending letters to US trading partners outlining “the deal”, stating, “You can take it or leave it,” as quoted by Bloomberg.&nbsp;This comes ahead of a self-imposed July 9 deadline to reimpose duties that were initially delayed earlier this year amid financial market jitters and diplomatic pushback.<h2>Trump’s latest warning: Unilateral tariffs in ‘one to two weeks’</h2>According to Bloomberg, Trump said on Wednesday, “We’re going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is.” He added, “At a certain point, we’re just going to send letters out,” indicating a unilateral approach that may bypass negotiations.&nbsp;While Trump has frequently used two-week deadlines as political pressure tactics with many either delayed or abandoned, this warning marks a potential inflection point in his 2025 economic agenda.&nbsp;&nbsp;He has also signalled a reduced appetite for full-scale negotiations, telling reporters that the administration lacked the capacity to strike individual deals with “dozens” of economies.&nbsp;&nbsp;Talks would now be prioritised with a few major partners, including India, Japan, South Korea, and the European&nbsp;Union.<h2>Trump tariff saga&nbsp;</h2>On 2 April 2025, Trump unveiled sweeping global tariffs in what he heralded as his administration’s “Liberation Day” trade offensive. Under Executive Order 14257, a baseline 10 per cent reciprocal duty was imposed on nearly all US imports, with significantly higher levies aimed at key trading partners&nbsp;.&nbsp;In China’s case, the tariff assault was especially dramatic. The US first raised duties from 20 per cent to 34 per cent, then to 84 per cent, and finally to a stratospheric 145 per cent by 11 April. China, in turn, retaliated, escalating its tariffs to roughly 125 per cent on US exports, including agricultural and industrial goods .&nbsp;&nbsp;Beijing also issued export restrictions on rare-earth minerals and magnets, key inputs for tech industries, intensifying tensions further&nbsp;.&nbsp;Similar reciprocal tariffs were applied to other major economies. Mexico and Vietnam faced a 15 per cent duty on low-cost electronics and solar equipment, while Germany and South Korea saw 20 per cent levies on automobiles and industrial machinery.&nbsp;&nbsp;India was slapped with a stiff 26 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals and processed metals, far higher than earlier reported estimates . Meanwhile, Indonesia and Thailand confronted new duties targeting textiles and battery components.&nbsp;In the midst of the chaos, Trump reversed course on 9 April, pausing most tariffs for 90 days while keeping Chinese tariffs intact prompting a dramatic rebound in stocks. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the reprieve as a deliberate tactic to buy time for negotiations.&nbsp;&nbsp;However, the pause did little to resolve the core dispute. A US trade court ruled the tariff plan overstepped legal authority on 28 May, temporarily halting implementation. Trump swiftly appealed, keeping the threat alive .<h2>Trade tensions with China simmer despite truce</h2>Among the most fragile trade relationships remains that with China. Although Trump has touted a partial deal with Beijing, declaring earlier this week that “the framework is done,” tensions continue to simmer.&nbsp;&nbsp;As per Bloomberg, the agreement includes Beijing’s commitment to supply rare earths and industrial magnets, while the US would ease restrictions on Chinese students pursuing higher education in American institutions.&nbsp;Yet, this truce has already been tested. Both Washington and Beijing have accused each other of backtracking on key terms, leading to an emergency round of talks in London. According to Reuters, US negotiators fear that China’s state subsidies and export controls on critical minerals remain unresolved issues.&nbsp;<h2>No EU deal in sight, bilateral talks prioritised</h2>While some limited progress has been made such as a tariff truce with China and a skeletal trade understanding with the UK, the Trump administration has failed to reach comprehensive agreements with most other partners.&nbsp;Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, speaking on Wednesday, expressed frustration at the pace of negotiations with the European Union, calling the 27-member bloc “an impossible consensus machine.” As quoted by Reuters, Lutnick said, “The EU is likely to be among the last deals we close, not the first.”&nbsp;In contrast, efforts to finalise bilateral agreements with India, Japan and South Korea are ongoing. But details remain scarce, and many analysts see Trump’s unilateral approach as risking renewed trade wars with traditional allies and emerging economies alike.&nbsp;With the July 9 deadline fast approaching, Trump’s two-week ultimatum puts pressure on US trading partners to accept revised trade terms or brace for higher tariffs.&nbsp;&nbsp;While some nations may seek to negotiate exemptions or fast-track bilateral agreements, others could retaliate, plunging global trade into another uncertain chapter.&nbsp;Whether Trump follows through with his tariff threats remains to be seen. But one thing is clear, his trade doctrine is back on the global agenda, and the consequences could be far-reaching. &nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)

With a July 9 deadline looming, Trump revives his hardline trade agenda, risking fresh global tensions as tariff threats return.

US President Donald Trump has reiterated his threat to impose unilateral tariffs on dozens of countries, giving them a two-week ultimatum to accept new trade terms or face higher duties. Speaking at an event at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, Trump said his administration would be sending letters to US trading partners outlining “the deal”, stating, “You can take it or leave it,” as quoted by Bloomberg. This comes ahead of a self-imposed July 9 deadline to reimpose duties that were initially delayed earlier this year amid financial market jitters and diplomatic pushback. Trump’s latest warning: Unilateral tariffs in ‘one to two weeks’ According to Bloomberg, Trump said on Wednesday, “We’re going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is.” He added, “At a certain point, we’re just going to send letters out,” indicating a unilateral approach that may bypass negotiations. While Trump has frequently used two-week deadlines as political pressure tactics with many either delayed or abandoned, this warning marks a potential inflection point in his 2025 economic agenda. He has also signalled a reduced appetite for full-scale negotiations, telling reporters that the administration lacked the capacity to strike individual deals with “dozens” of economies. Talks would now be prioritised with a few major partners, including India, Japan, South Korea, and the European Union. Trump tariff saga On 2 April 2025, Trump unveiled sweeping global tariffs in what he heralded as his administration’s “Liberation Day” trade offensive. Under Executive Order 14257, a baseline 10 per cent reciprocal duty was imposed on nearly all US imports, with significantly higher levies aimed at key trading partners . In China’s case, the tariff assault was especially dramatic. The US first raised duties from 20 per cent to 34 per cent, then to 84 per cent, and finally to a stratospheric 145 per cent by 11 April. China, in turn, retaliated, escalating its tariffs to roughly 125 per cent on US exports, including agricultural and industrial goods . Beijing also issued export restrictions on rare-earth minerals and magnets, key inputs for tech industries, intensifying tensions further . Similar reciprocal tariffs were applied to other major economies. Mexico and Vietnam faced a 15 per cent duty on low-cost electronics and solar equipment, while Germany and South Korea saw 20 per cent levies on automobiles and industrial machinery. India was slapped with a stiff 26 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals and processed metals, far higher than earlier reported estimates . Meanwhile, Indonesia and Thailand confronted new duties targeting textiles and battery components. In the midst of the chaos, Trump reversed course on 9 April, pausing most tariffs for 90 days while keeping Chinese tariffs intact prompting a dramatic rebound in stocks. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the reprieve as a deliberate tactic to buy time for negotiations. However, the pause did little to resolve the core dispute. A US trade court ruled the tariff plan overstepped legal authority on 28 May, temporarily halting implementation. Trump swiftly appealed, keeping the threat alive . Trade tensions with China simmer despite truce Among the most fragile trade relationships remains that with China. Although Trump has touted a partial deal with Beijing, declaring earlier this week that “the framework is done,” tensions continue to simmer. As per Bloomberg, the agreement includes Beijing’s commitment to supply rare earths and industrial magnets, while the US would ease restrictions on Chinese students pursuing higher education in American institutions. Yet, this truce has already been tested. Both Washington and Beijing have accused each other of backtracking on key terms, leading to an emergency round of talks in London. According to Reuters, US negotiators fear that China’s state subsidies and export controls on critical minerals remain unresolved issues. No EU deal in sight, bilateral talks prioritised While some limited progress has been made such as a tariff truce with China and a skeletal trade understanding with the UK, the Trump administration has failed to reach comprehensive agreements with most other partners. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, speaking on Wednesday, expressed frustration at the pace of negotiations with the European Union, calling the 27-member bloc “an impossible consensus machine.” As quoted by Reuters, Lutnick said, “The EU is likely to be among the last deals we close, not the first.” In contrast, efforts to finalise bilateral agreements with India, Japan and South Korea are ongoing. But details remain scarce, and many analysts see Trump’s unilateral approach as risking renewed trade wars with traditional allies and emerging economies alike. With the July 9 deadline fast approaching, Trump’s two-week ultimatum puts pressure on US trading partners to accept revised trade terms or brace for higher tariffs. While some nations may seek to negotiate exemptions or fast-track bilateral agreements, others could retaliate, plunging global trade into another uncertain chapter. Whether Trump follows through with his tariff threats remains to be seen. But one thing is clear, his trade doctrine is back on the global agenda, and the consequences could be far-reaching. (With inputs from the agencies)

President Trump has issued a two-week ultimatum for new trade deals, threatening sweeping unilateral tariffs if countries don’t comply.

‘Take it or leave it’: Trump threatens new wave of tariffs in two weeks

After a week of feuding between US President Donald Trump and his buddy Elon Musk, the billionaire on Wednesday (June 11) realised that he had "gone too far," saying that he regretted some of his posts about the US president.The online clash between the two has sparked controversies as well as netizens also started joking about it. Some called it "staged fight", while others believed it.However, on Wednesday, it seems like Musk had a change of heart or has probably flipped from slamming and targeting Trump.It all began when Musk began criticising the US president's "Big Beautiful Bill". Taking on X, the billionaire posted, "Keep the good, remove the bad." In another post, he wrote, "Slim beautiful bill for the win."<h2>Timeline: Defaming to regretting</h2><h3>'Outrageous Congressional spending bill'</h3>In a social media post, Musk called the "Big Beautiful Bill", "outrageous and a disgusting abomination".“I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he posted.The next day, Musk said that a new one should be drafted, adding, "No one who actually reads the bill should be able to stomach it."The White House responded to Musk, saying that the federal government “will not consult every policy decision with Elon Musk.”<h3>'Bankrupting America is NOT ok'</h3>Musk then wrote another post, slamming the bill, “Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL."<h3>'A big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill'</h3>The billionaire in another post wrote, "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil &amp; gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that is both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way."<h3>Trump responds</h3>The US president responded to Musk's posts, saying that he was disappointed with Musk, claiming that the billionaire knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody.<h3>Musk denies Trump's claims</h3>Musk responded and fact-checked it, saying, "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!"He then continued to repost several posts in which media organisations, as well as people, were slamming Trump's tax and spending bill.<h3>Trump warns Musk of govt contracts</h3>Later on Thursday, Trump warned that he may terminate US government contracts and subsidies given to Musk's companies.Musk did not hold back, and replied, “SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately” before taking a U-turn.He even responded “yes” to a post on X calling for Donald Trump's impeachment.<h3>'Big Bomb'</h3>Musk also dropped a "Big Bomb", as he claimed that Trump is in the "Epstein Files"."That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out," the billionaire posted.<h3>Trump tariffs will bring 'recession'</h3>The billionaire slammed Trump's tariff war, saying that it will result in recession in second half of the year.However, after a long week of war of words between Trump and Musk, it might seem like the friendship between the two might be saved as Musk has realised that he went too far, and regrets what he did.&nbsp;

It all began when Musk began criticising the US president's "Big Beautiful Bill". Taking on X, the billionaire posted, "Keep the good, remove the bad."

After a week of feuding between US President Donald Trump and his buddy Elon Musk, the billionaire on Wednesday (June 11) realised that he had "gone too far," saying that he regretted some of his posts about the US president. The online clash between the two has sparked controversies as well as netizens also started joking about it. Some called it "staged fight", while others believed it. However, on Wednesday, it seems like Musk had a change of heart or has probably flipped from slamming and targeting Trump. It all began when Musk began criticising the US president's "Big Beautiful Bill". Taking on X, the billionaire posted, "Keep the good, remove the bad." In another post, he wrote, "Slim beautiful bill for the win." Timeline: Defaming to regretting 'Outrageous Congressional spending bill' In a social media post, Musk called the "Big Beautiful Bill", "outrageous and a disgusting abomination". “I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he posted. The next day, Musk said that a new one should be drafted, adding, "No one who actually reads the bill should be able to stomach it." The White House responded to Musk, saying that the federal government “will not consult every policy decision with Elon Musk.” 'Bankrupting America is NOT ok' Musk then wrote another post, slamming the bill, “Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL." 'A big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill' The billionaire in another post wrote, "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that is both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way." Trump responds The US president responded to Musk's posts, saying that he was disappointed with Musk, claiming that the billionaire knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody. Musk denies Trump's claims Musk responded and fact-checked it, saying, "False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!" He then continued to repost several posts in which media organisations, as well as people, were slamming Trump's tax and spending bill. Trump warns Musk of govt contracts Later on Thursday, Trump warned that he may terminate US government contracts and subsidies given to Musk's companies. Musk did not hold back, and replied, “SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately” before taking a U-turn. He even responded “yes” to a post on X calling for Donald Trump's impeachment. 'Big Bomb' Musk also dropped a "Big Bomb", as he claimed that Trump is in the "Epstein Files". "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out," the billionaire posted. Trump tariffs will bring 'recession' The billionaire slammed Trump's tariff war, saying that it will result in recession in second half of the year. However, after a long week of war of words between Trump and Musk, it might seem like the friendship between the two might be saved as Musk has realised that he went too far, and regrets what he did.

It all began when Musk began criticising the US president's "Big Beautiful Bill". Taking on X, the billionaire posted, "Keep the good, remove the bad."

Change of heart or a U-turn? Elon Musk flips after a week of attacks against Trump - Timeline from defaming to 'regretting'

US President Donald Trump set the internet on speculation on Tuesday (June 10) that he was wearing a Foley catheter, a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine that is collected into a bag, as he was people noticed a strange bulge in his pants. The theory circulated on the social media platform X when a few photos of the US president at the UFC championship fight in New Jersey and at the White House.&nbsp;The photos sparked theories online that the 78-year-old might be wearing a catheter.&nbsp;"Trump appears to be wearing leg braces and possibly a catheter. The weakness on his right side has been pretty evident for a number of years. And the bruising on his right hand might be caused by his receiving infusion therapy of some sort. Common with a Parkinson’s type disease," a user on X, Dave, wrote.&nbsp;"Trump is absolutely wearing a Foley catheter. It’s a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag strapped to the leg. That line down his pants? Not a crease. It’s tubing," another internet user said.&nbsp;<img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GtBw_n6WUAEyj1o?format=jpg&amp;name=small" alt="Image"><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EU4W4BoWsAAM6Ah?format=jpg&amp;name=small" alt="Image">Meanwhile, some of the users on X tagged Elon Musk’s Grok as the AI to explain the photos.&nbsp;"There's no evidence Donald Trump has "Bungalow Legs," a humorous, non-medical term. Social media posts speculate about a bulge in his trouser leg, suggesting a catheter or brace, but his April 2025 medical report states he's in "excellent health" with no such issues," Grok responded to the prompt.&nbsp;“The bulge could be wrinkles or lighting. Without verified medical evidence, these claims remain unconfirmed. Treat online health rumors about public figures with skepticism, as they often lack credible backing,” the AI assistant added.&nbsp;Grok gave a similar response to all the X users who raised this question.&nbsp;

Bungalow Legs? Internet is curious about bulge in Donald Trump pants. Here is what Musk Grok says 

US President Donald Trump set the internet on speculation on Tuesday (June 10) that he was wearing a Foley catheter, a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine that is collected into a bag, as he was people noticed a strange bulge in his pants. The theory circulated on the social media platform X when a few photos of the US president at the UFC championship fight in New Jersey and at the White House. The photos sparked theories online that the 78-year-old might be wearing a catheter. "Trump appears to be wearing leg braces and possibly a catheter. The weakness on his right side has been pretty evident for a number of years. And the bruising on his right hand might be caused by his receiving infusion therapy of some sort. Common with a Parkinson’s type disease," a user on X, Dave, wrote. "Trump is absolutely wearing a Foley catheter. It’s a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a bag strapped to the leg. That line down his pants? Not a crease. It’s tubing," another internet user said. Meanwhile, some of the users on X tagged Elon Musk’s Grok as the AI to explain the photos. "There's no evidence Donald Trump has "Bungalow Legs," a humorous, non-medical term. Social media posts speculate about a bulge in his trouser leg, suggesting a catheter or brace, but his April 2025 medical report states he's in "excellent health" with no such issues," Grok responded to the prompt. “The bulge could be wrinkles or lighting. Without verified medical evidence, these claims remain unconfirmed. Treat online health rumors about public figures with skepticism, as they often lack credible backing,” the AI assistant added. Grok gave a similar response to all the X users who raised this question.

US President Donald Trump set the internet on speculation on Tuesday (June 10) that he was wearing a Foley catheter, a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine that is collected into a bag, as he was people noticed a strange bulge in his pants.

Foley catheter or Bungalow Legs? Internet is curious about 'bulge' in Donald Trump's pants. Here's what Musk's Grok says

US President Donald Trump has announced a federal program as he proposes a government-funded $1000 investment account for American babies, calling it "Trump savings accounts".Unofficially known as "Trump Accounts" or "MAGA Accounts", the program is part of a broader tax-cut package that recently passed the House.Trump made the announcement at a White House roundtable, in presence of over a dozen CEOs, including &nbsp;from Uber, Goldman Sachs and Dell Technologies.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-big-beautiful-bill-would-increase-deficit-by-2-4-trillion-says-cbo-1749058573412">Also read: Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ would increase deficit by $2.4 trillion, says CBO</a><h2>Trump’s Savings Accounts plan explained</h2>Every US citizen born after December 31, 2024 and before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market, US President Trump said.The accounts will be controlled and operated by the baby's guardian and will allow additional private contributions of up to $5000 annually.Calling it a "pro-family initiative", Trump said that it will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation.Mike Johnson, the House speaker, was also present at the roundtable. He called it a "bold, transformative policy" that gives every eligible American child a financial head start from day one.While Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" has cleared the House, it is still pending to go through the Senate.The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued a report last week warning that the “Big Beautiful Bill" is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.Trump has been optimistic about the returns, as he said that the beneficiaries would "really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economies into the future”.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/elon-musk-is-disappointed-with-the-big-beautiful-bill-1748407088947">Also read: &nbsp;Elon Musk is disappointed with the 'Big Beautiful Bill'</a>

Unofficially known as Trump Accounts or MAGA Accounts, the program is part of a broader tax-cut package that recently passed the House.

US President Donald Trump has announced a federal program as he proposes a government-funded $1000 investment account for American babies, calling it "Trump savings accounts". Unofficially known as "Trump Accounts" or "MAGA Accounts", the program is part of a broader tax-cut package that recently passed the House. Trump made the announcement at a White House roundtable, in presence of over a dozen CEOs, including from Uber, Goldman Sachs and Dell Technologies. Also read: Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ would increase deficit by $2.4 trillion, says CBO Trump’s Savings Accounts plan explained Every US citizen born after December 31, 2024 and before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market, US President Trump said. The accounts will be controlled and operated by the baby's guardian and will allow additional private contributions of up to $5000 annually. Calling it a "pro-family initiative", Trump said that it will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation. Mike Johnson, the House speaker, was also present at the roundtable. He called it a "bold, transformative policy" that gives every eligible American child a financial head start from day one. While Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" has cleared the House, it is still pending to go through the Senate. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued a report last week warning that the “Big Beautiful Bill" is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Trump has been optimistic about the returns, as he said that the beneficiaries would "really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economies into the future”. Also read: Elon Musk is disappointed with the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Unofficially known as "Trump Accounts" or "MAGA Accounts", the program is part of a broader tax-cut package that recently passed the House.

$1000 for every US baby? Here's what we know about ‘Trump’s Savings Accounts’ plan for American babies

A shooting in an Austria school on Tuesday (June 10) left 10 people dead, city's mayor confirmed the death toll. The shooting happened at the BORG Dreierschützengasse.US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 10) defended his decision to send thousands of troops to Los Angeles amid protests against immigration raids.&nbsp;Click on the headlines to read more&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/austria-school-shooting-leaves-5-dead-1749546460259">Austria school shooting leaves 10 dead, suspect reported to be a student who was 'bullied'</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749549222293.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Austria school shooting leaves 10 dead, suspect reported to be a student who was 'bullied'"></figure>A shooting at a school in Austria has left ten people dead. The city's mayor confirmed the death toll in the incident reported in the city of Graz. Austrian police held a press conference and that several people had lost their lives in the shooting. Earlier, they confirmed that a major operation was underway on Tuesday morning after shots were heard at around 10 am. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-claims-la-would-be-dust-without-national-guards-but-governor-newsom-says-it-s-a-dictator-fantasy-1749560019798">'Burning to ground': Trump claims LA would be dust without National Guards, but Governor Newsom says it’s a ‘dictator fantasy’</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749560153574.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Burning to ground': Trump claims LA would be dust without National Guards, but Governor Newsom says it’s a ‘dictator fantasy’"></figure>US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 10) defended his decision to send thousands of troops to Los Angeles amid protests against immigration raids, claiming the city would have been destroyed without federal intervention.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-s-digital-democracy-modi-government-s-survey-sees-over-5-lakh-responses-in-a-day-5-states-which-had-the-most-respondents-1749568976106">India's digital democracy: Modi government's survey sees over 5 lakh responses in a day - 5 states which had the most respondents</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749569173591.jpg?rect=(0,195,4544,3404)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="India's digital democracy: Modi government's survey sees over 5 lakh responses in a day - 5 states which had the most respondents"></figure>As Prime Minister Narendra Modi marked 11 years on Monday (June 9) and launched a survey on the NaMo app to take people's feedback on several issues. In just 26 hours, five lakh people responded, according to official sources. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/pakistan/pakistan-hikes-defence-budget-by-20-per-cent-despite-economic-challenges-cuts-overall-spending-1749570351835">Pakistan hikes defence budget by 20% despite economic challenges, cuts overall spending in 2025-26</a> <img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749571244072.jpg?rect=(0,196,1148,861)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Pakistan hikes defence budget by 20% despite economic challenges, cuts overall spending in 2025-26">Pakistan has hiked its defence spending by a steep 20% after suffering serious setbacks from Indian strikes during Operation Sindoor despite battling severe economic challenges and had to slash its overall federal expenditure for fiscal 2025-26 by a hefty 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion) in its budget. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/2020s-weakest-decade-since-60s-world-bank-s-prediction-about-worsening-global-economy-is-trump-tariffs-to-be-blamed-1749567462523">2020s weakest decade since 60s: World Bank's PREDICTION about worsening global economy | Is Trump tariffs to be blamed?</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749567803837.png?rect=(0,0,1200,900)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="2020s weakest decade since 60s: World Bank's PREDICTION about worsening global economy | Is Trump tariffs to be blamed?"></figure>The World Bank has cut its forecast for global growth this year, and on Tuesday (June 10) warned that the 2020s are on course for the weakest performance for any decade since the 1960s. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-sanctions-ben-gvir-and-smotrich-over-their-gaza-comments-who-are-they-1749566042482">UK sanctions Ben-Gvir and Smotrich over their Gaza comments. Who are they?</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749566914008.jpg?rect=(0,169,1034,776)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="UK sanctions Ben-Gvir and Smotrich over their Gaza comments. Who are they?"></figure>Britain on Tuesday sanctioned two far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, over the comments they made on Gaza. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich will be banned from entering the UK and will have any assets in the country frozen as part of the measures announced by the foreign secretary, David Lammy, on Tuesday. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-going-to-hit-em-back-harder-trump-s-homeland-secretary-kristi-noem-issues-chilling-warning-to-la-protesters-here-s-what-she-said-1749559821456">'Going to hit ‘em back harder': Trump's Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem issues chilling WARNING to LA protesters - Here's what she said</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749560030349.jpeg?rect=(0,69,411,309)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="'Going to hit ‘em back harder': Trump's Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem issues chilling WARNING to LA protesters - Here's what she said"></figure>US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem issued a chilling warning to protesters in Los Angeles as tensions intensify over immigration raids, which has entered its fourth day now.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/-what-is-brigade-313-question-unsettles-pakistan-senator-sherry-rehman-she-admits-islamabad-s-links-to-terror-1749552842826">‘What is Brigade 313’? Question unsettles Pakistan Senator Sherry Rehman, she admits Islamabad’s links to terror</a> <img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749553247555.jpg?rect=(0,374,1164,870)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="‘What is Brigade 313’? Question unsettles Pakistan Senator Sherry Rehman, she admits Islamabad’s links to terror">Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Vice President Sherry Rehman, who was earlier Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, was visibly flustered when questioned on al-Qaeda-linked Brigade 313 and acknowledged Islamabad’s links to terrorism in the past while she dodged pointed questions.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/sports/who-is-ipl-lucky-charm-and-only-player-to-win-a-title-with-dhoni-kohli-and-rohit-1749550178004">IPL's lucky charm? He's the only player to win a title with Dhoni, Kohli and Rohit</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749551232193.webp?rect=(0,56,1136,852)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="IPL's lucky charm? He's the only player to win a title with Dhoni, Kohli and Rohit"></figure>Indian Premier League (IPL) is a tough tournament to win - ask Virat Kohli - it took him 18 years to finally get the trophy in IPL 2025. With the win, Kohli joined Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni - arguably his biggest contemporary Indian players - to have at least one IPL trophy to their name. All three players, however, had one common player with them during the IPL title win - Josh Hazlewood. <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/kingdom-why-has-vijay-deverakonda-s-action-thriller-been-delayed-1749553010771">Kingdom: Why has Vijay Deverakonda's action thriller been delayed?</a><figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20250610/image-1749553427736.jpg?rect=(0,160,960,720)&amp;w=752&amp;h=564&amp;format=webp&amp;quality=medium" alt="Kingdom: Why has Vijay Deverakonda's action thriller been delayed?"></figure>Vijay Deverakonda's much-anticipated spy thriller Kingdom has been facing delays for quite some time. The film which is scheduled to release next month might be missing it as per reports. But, what is the main reason behind it? &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 10) defended his decision to send thousands of troops to Los Angeles amid protests

A shooting in an Austria school on Tuesday (June 10) left 10 people dead, city's mayor confirmed the death toll. The shooting happened at the BORG Dreierschützengasse. US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 10) defended his decision to send thousands of troops to Los Angeles amid protests against immigration raids. Click on the headlines to read more Austria school shooting leaves 10 dead, suspect reported to be a student who was 'bullied' A shooting at a school in Austria has left ten people dead. The city's mayor confirmed the death toll in the incident reported in the city of Graz. Austrian police held a press conference and that several people had lost their lives in the shooting. Earlier, they confirmed that a major operation was underway on Tuesday morning after shots were heard at around 10 am. 'Burning to ground': Trump claims LA would be dust without National Guards, but Governor Newsom says it’s a ‘dictator fantasy’ US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (June 10) defended his decision to send thousands of troops to Los Angeles amid protests against immigration raids, claiming the city would have been destroyed without federal intervention. India's digital democracy: Modi government's survey sees over 5 lakh responses in a day - 5 states which had the most respondents As Prime Minister Narendra Modi marked 11 years on Monday (June 9) and launched a survey on the NaMo app to take people's feedback on several issues. In just 26 hours, five lakh people responded, according to official sources. Pakistan hikes defence budget by 20% despite economic challenges, cuts overall spending in 2025-26 Pakistan has hiked its defence spending by a steep 20% after suffering serious setbacks from Indian strikes during Operation Sindoor despite battling severe economic challenges and had to slash its overall federal expenditure for fiscal 2025-26 by a hefty 7% to 17.57 trillion rupees ($62 billion) in its budget. 2020s weakest decade since 60s: World Bank's PREDICTION about worsening global economy | Is Trump tariffs to be blamed? The World Bank has cut its forecast for global growth this year, and on Tuesday (June 10) warned that the 2020s are on course for the weakest performance for any decade since the 1960s. UK sanctions Ben-Gvir and Smotrich over their Gaza comments. Who are they? Britain on Tuesday sanctioned two far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, over the comments they made on Gaza. Ben-Gvir and Smotrich will be banned from entering the UK and will have any assets in the country frozen as part of the measures announced by the foreign secretary, David Lammy, on Tuesday. 'Going to hit ‘em back harder': Trump's Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem issues chilling WARNING to LA protesters - Here's what she said US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem issued a chilling warning to protesters in Los Angeles as tensions intensify over immigration raids, which has entered its fourth day now. ‘What is Brigade 313’? Question unsettles Pakistan Senator Sherry Rehman, she admits Islamabad’s links to terror Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) Vice President Sherry Rehman, who was earlier Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, was visibly flustered when questioned on al-Qaeda-linked Brigade 313 and acknowledged Islamabad’s links to terrorism in the past while she dodged pointed questions. IPL's lucky charm? He's the only player to win a title with Dhoni, Kohli and Rohit Indian Premier League (IPL) is a tough tournament to win - ask Virat Kohli - it took him 18 years to finally get the trophy in IPL 2025. With the win, Kohli joined Rohit Sharma and MS Dhoni - arguably his biggest contemporary Indian players - to have at least one IPL trophy to their name. All three players, however, had one common player with them during the IPL title win - Josh Hazlewood. Kingdom: Why has Vijay Deverakonda's action thriller been delayed? Vijay Deverakonda's much-anticipated spy thriller Kingdom has been facing delays for quite some time. The film which is scheduled to release next month might be missing it as per reports. But, what is the main reason behind it?

Here are the top 10 stories from across the world.

Top 10 world news: Austria school shooting leaves 10 dead; Los Angeles protest updates, and more

The World Bank has cut its forecast for global growth this year, and on Tuesday (June 10) warned that the 2020s are on course for the weakest performance for any decade since the 1960s.The Washington-based global bank published its twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, and reduced its forecast for global GDP growth this year to 2.3 per cent, down from 2.7 per cent in January.This would mark to be the slowest growth rate outside full-blown recessions since 2008, according to the bank.It further warned that the global growth in the first seven years of this decade is on course to average 2.5 per cent, which will be the slowest for any decade since the 1960s.<h2>Is Trump tariffs to be blamed?</h2>The World Bank blamed US President Donald Trump's trade war for the 2020s to be the weakest performance for any decade.After returning to the Oval Office, Trump has made several announcements, marking a major shift in the US policies, slapping tariffs on leading economies.With only a “tepid” recovery in global growth, to 2.4%, expected in 2026, the bank said this decade was likely to be the weakest since the 1960s.World Bank’s Chief Economist Indermit Gill said that decades of economic progress in developing countries had all but ground to a halt in recent years, with growth in investment and trade slowing and debt piling up.“Outside of Asia, the developing world is becoming a development-free zone,” he said.“It has been advertising itself for more than a decade. Growth in developing economies has ratcheted down for three decades – from 6% annually in the 2000s to 5% in the 2010s – to less than 4% in the 2020s.”The World Bank prediction assumes that Trump's high "reciprocal" tariffs, announced in April will not be reimposed when the 90-day "pause" he announced last month comes to an end.The bank urged governments to negotiate an end to the ongoing trade conflict. It further called on emerging markets and developing countries to rebuild their public finances by broadening their tax base.The global bank stressed that the situation could worsen further, if tariffs end up being higher than expected and uncertainty continues.“Risks to the global outlook remain tilted decidedly to the downside,” it added. “Growth could turn out to be lower if trade restrictions escalate or if policy uncertainty persists, which could also result in a buildup of financial stress.”

This would mark to be the slowest growth rate outside full-blown recessions since 2008, according to the bank.

The World Bank has cut its forecast for global growth this year, and on Tuesday (June 10) warned that the 2020s are on course for the weakest performance for any decade since the 1960s. The Washington-based global bank published its twice-yearly Global Economic Prospects report, and reduced its forecast for global GDP growth this year to 2.3 per cent, down from 2.7 per cent in January. This would mark to be the slowest growth rate outside full-blown recessions since 2008, according to the bank. It further warned that the global growth in the first seven years of this decade is on course to average 2.5 per cent, which will be the slowest for any decade since the 1960s. Is Trump tariffs to be blamed? The World Bank blamed US President Donald Trump's trade war for the 2020s to be the weakest performance for any decade. After returning to the Oval Office, Trump has made several announcements, marking a major shift in the US policies, slapping tariffs on leading economies. With only a “tepid” recovery in global growth, to 2.4%, expected in 2026, the bank said this decade was likely to be the weakest since the 1960s. World Bank’s Chief Economist Indermit Gill said that decades of economic progress in developing countries had all but ground to a halt in recent years, with growth in investment and trade slowing and debt piling up. “Outside of Asia, the developing world is becoming a development-free zone,” he said. “It has been advertising itself for more than a decade. Growth in developing economies has ratcheted down for three decades – from 6% annually in the 2000s to 5% in the 2010s – to less than 4% in the 2020s.” The World Bank prediction assumes that Trump's high "reciprocal" tariffs, announced in April will not be reimposed when the 90-day "pause" he announced last month comes to an end. The bank urged governments to negotiate an end to the ongoing trade conflict. It further called on emerging markets and developing countries to rebuild their public finances by broadening their tax base. The global bank stressed that the situation could worsen further, if tariffs end up being higher than expected and uncertainty continues. “Risks to the global outlook remain tilted decidedly to the downside,” it added. “Growth could turn out to be lower if trade restrictions escalate or if policy uncertainty persists, which could also result in a buildup of financial stress.”

This would mark to be the slowest growth rate outside full-blown recessions since 2008, according to the bank.

2020s weakest decade since 60s: World Bank's PREDICTION about worsening global economy | Is Trump tariffs to be blamed?

The deployment of around 4,000 California National Guard soldiers to the streets of Los Angeles amid ongoing protests has stirred up a major political storm. President Donald Trump ordered the troops to intervene in demonstrations against his administration’s immigration raids, and did so without the approval of California Governor Gavin Newsom.This move marks a rare moment in American history, with Trump invoking a little-used authority to bypass the state’s leadership. Not since 1965 has a president summoned National Guard troops to a state without the governor’s consent.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-is-the-national-guard-why-are-they-in-los-angeles-and-why-trump-s-use-of-it-is-sparking-backlash-1749557683479">EXPLAINED: What is National Guard? Why are they in Los Angeles and why Trump’s use of it is sparking backlash?</a><h2>What triggered the latest deployment of National Guard?</h2>Protests in Los Angeles entered their fourth consecutive day after a wave of immigration enforcement raids led to hundreds of arrests. The demonstrations have sparked citywide unrest, prompting Trump to act unilaterally by sending in the National Guard.Governor Newsom fiercely opposed the move, calling it “a serious breach of state sovereignty” and vowed legal action to reverse the order. “We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved,” he posted on social media, calling the deployment “immoral” and “unconstitutional.”<h2>How does the National Guard work?</h2>The National Guard is a state-run military force made up of part-time soldiers who usually work civilian jobs or attend university. They are typically called in by governors during emergencies or civil unrest. However, the president has authority under certain federal laws to override state leaders in extreme situations.One such law allows federal intervention in the event of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,” the clause Trump appears to have used.<h2>When have such deployments happened before?</h2>• 1992 Los Angeles riots: After the acquittal of police officers who beat Rodney King, violent protests erupted. President George H.W. Bush responded to a request from California’s Republican governor and LA’s Democratic mayor by deploying thousands of National Guard troops. The riots resulted in over 50 deaths and widespread damage.• 1965 Selma to Montgomery march: President Lyndon B. Johnson sent in the Alabama National Guard against the state’s wishes to protect civil rights marchers led by Martin Luther King Jr. Governor George Wallace had refused to act. The move was pivotal in advancing civil rights.• Other deployments: During the civil rights era, Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson all federalised state troops to ensure the desegregation of schools and to uphold public order against opposition from segregationist state officials.<h2>How unusual is this move?</h2>It is highly uncommon for a president to override a governor’s authority on National Guard deployment. The 1992 LA riots remain the last time a president sent in troops domestically, but only after receiving a formal request.Historically, the use of the National Guard without state approval has been linked to moments of national crisis and civil rights milestones. In most cases, governors are reluctant to give up control of their state’s Guard, viewing it as essential to law enforcement.

This move marks a rare moment in American history, with Trump invoking a little-used authority to bypass the state’s leadership. Not since 1965 has a president summoned National Guard troops to a state without the governor’s consent.

The deployment of around 4,000 California National Guard soldiers to the streets of Los Angeles amid ongoing protests has stirred up a major political storm. President Donald Trump ordered the troops to intervene in demonstrations against his administration’s immigration raids, and did so without the approval of California Governor Gavin Newsom. This move marks a rare moment in American history, with Trump invoking a little-used authority to bypass the state’s leadership. Not since 1965 has a president summoned National Guard troops to a state without the governor’s consent. Also read: EXPLAINED: What is National Guard? Why are they in Los Angeles and why Trump’s use of it is sparking backlash? What triggered the latest deployment of National Guard? Protests in Los Angeles entered their fourth consecutive day after a wave of immigration enforcement raids led to hundreds of arrests. The demonstrations have sparked citywide unrest, prompting Trump to act unilaterally by sending in the National Guard. Governor Newsom fiercely opposed the move, calling it “a serious breach of state sovereignty” and vowed legal action to reverse the order. “We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved,” he posted on social media, calling the deployment “immoral” and “unconstitutional.” How does the National Guard work? The National Guard is a state-run military force made up of part-time soldiers who usually work civilian jobs or attend university. They are typically called in by governors during emergencies or civil unrest. However, the president has authority under certain federal laws to override state leaders in extreme situations. One such law allows federal intervention in the event of “a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,” the clause Trump appears to have used. When have such deployments happened before? • 1992 Los Angeles riots: After the acquittal of police officers who beat Rodney King, violent protests erupted. President George H.W. Bush responded to a request from California’s Republican governor and LA’s Democratic mayor by deploying thousands of National Guard troops. The riots resulted in over 50 deaths and widespread damage. • 1965 Selma to Montgomery march: President Lyndon B. Johnson sent in the Alabama National Guard against the state’s wishes to protect civil rights marchers led by Martin Luther King Jr. Governor George Wallace had refused to act. The move was pivotal in advancing civil rights. • Other deployments: During the civil rights era, Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy and Johnson all federalised state troops to ensure the desegregation of schools and to uphold public order against opposition from segregationist state officials. How unusual is this move? It is highly uncommon for a president to override a governor’s authority on National Guard deployment. The 1992 LA riots remain the last time a president sent in troops domestically, but only after receiving a formal request. Historically, the use of the National Guard without state approval has been linked to moments of national crisis and civil rights milestones. In most cases, governors are reluctant to give up control of their state’s Guard, viewing it as essential to law enforcement.

This move marks a rare moment in American history, with Trump invoking a little-used authority to bypass the state’s leadership. Not since 1965 has a president summoned National Guard troops to a state without the governor’s consent.

'First time since 1965': Why Trump’s deployment of National Guard to LA is so controversial - When have US presidents deployed them in past?

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

'15 times this year, over 40...': How many times Trump said 'Iran cannot have nuclear weapons'? A TIMELINE

'Not going to kill him, for now': Trump says US knows where Khamenei is hiding

G7 useless, says Kremlin, concurs with Trump on Russia’s ouster being a mistake

'It'd be gloves off': Trump WARNS Iran if it hits US troops amid Israel war

Israel-Iran war: Trump denies claims about reaching to Iran for 'peace talks'

OpenAI bags $200 million Pentagon contract to build AI tools for US military

Japan-US trade tensions escalate at G7

Trump tells Iran to make a deal before 'it’s too late’ as Israel pounds Tehran

US to be involved in Israel-Iran war? Trump says there's a possibility

Trump urges Israel and Iran to 'make a deal,' but says they may need to 'fight it out'

Israel tried to kill Iranian leader, but Trump intervened

Trump considering US travel ban on 36 more countries? Here's the FULL LIST

Israel, Iran will MAKE A DEAL: Trump shows confidence in bringing peace amid war

Tanks, troops and Trump: US celebrates 250 years of Army in magnificent military parade | See pics inside

Minnesota lawmakers shooting: Anti-Trump rally flyers found in suspect’s car

Netanyahu says Israel attacked Iran with 'clear support' from Trump

Trump clears Nippon Steel’s $14.9 billion takeover of US Steel

'Talks with US meaningless': Iran again accuses America for Israeli attacks

Trump files first financial disclosure after returning to office, details here

‘Gave Iran 60 days’: Trump hints Israeli followed delayed nuclear deal

Trump warns Iran to 'make a deal' before nothing's left after Israeli strikes

US senator claims Israel's attack intended to scuttle Trump's talks with Iran

Trump’s $5 million Gold Card for US residency opens for applicants, details here

Ode to Army or birthday hoopla? 'No Kings' protests to greet $45mn DC parade

‘Take it or leave it’: Trump threatens new wave of tariffs in two weeks

Change of heart or a U-turn? Elon Musk flips after a week of attacks against Trump - Timeline from defaming to 'regretting'