The United States is all set to impose a 7.5% tariff on Chinese goods over allegations of excess manufacturing capacity ahead of a summit between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping next month. The imposition would restore Trump’s second-term duties on China to around 20%, a level Beijing has previously said is consistent with its trade truce with Washington.&nbsp;The 7.5% tariff is besides the other levies imposed during Trump’s first term and extended during the Biden administration.&nbsp;The move will revive Trump’s protectionist trade agenda after the Supreme Court struck down his previous import taxes on products from China and dozens of other economies.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-admin-proposes-hiking-h-1b-visa-fee-to-over-100-000-indians-brace-for-impact-1787587379674">Trump admin proposes hiking H-1B visa fee to over $100,000, Indians brace for impact</a>&nbsp;Exact rates are yet to be finalized, said people in the know of things, while speaking on condition of anonymity.&nbsp;&nbsp;As Trump is known to make last-minute demands or changes to trade announcements, one option under contemplation is announcing a higher duty rate for China and later suspending part of it in order to reduce the effective rate to 7.5%.&nbsp;Moreover, Beijing and Washington are also looking to extend their pact, which established a one-year truce that’s set to expire on Nov. 10.&nbsp;In March, the Trump administration launched an investigation into more than a dozen major trading partners under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 over excess capacity concerns.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-sets-stage-for-new-sanctions-unveiling-says-iran-is-completely-collapsing-1787581553591">Trump sets stage for new sanctions unveiling, says Iran is ‘completely collapsing’</a><h2>Trump and Xi to meet in Washington on Sept. 24</h2>&nbsp;Officials are hoping to publish the results of the excess capacity inquiry before the meeting between Trump and Xi in Washington on Sept. 24.&nbsp;Trump is rebuilding a tariff wall that was struck down when the Supreme Court in February ruled his global levies, issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, violated the US Constitution. The president’s temporary 10% global tariffs expired in July, and were also deemed illegal by a trade court.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-enter-new-phase-in-iran-war-very-soon-says-house-speaker-mike-johnson-1787516303936">‘We took the head off the snake’: US to enter ‘new phase’ in Iran war very soon, says Speaker Mike Johnson</a>&nbsp;In July, the Trump administration imposed a 12.5% tariff on Chinese goods, citing inadequate efforts to address forced labour practices. Beijing criticised the move but stopped short of announcing retaliatory measures.&nbsp;Section 301 allows the US Trade Representative, under the direction of the president, to impose tariffs in response to other nations’ trade measures it deems discriminatory to American businesses or in violation of US rights under international trade agreements.

The 7.5% tariff is besides the other levies imposed during Trump’s first term and extended by the Biden administration. The move will revive Trump’s protectionist trade agenda after the Supreme Court struck down his previous import taxes on products from China and dozens of other economies.

The United States is all set to impose a 7.5% tariff on Chinese goods over allegations of excess manufacturing capacity ahead of a summit between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping next month. The imposition would restore Trump’s second-term duties on China to around 20%, a level Beijing has previously said is consistent with its trade truce with Washington. The 7.5% tariff is besides the other levies imposed during Trump’s first term and extended during the Biden administration. The move will revive Trump’s protectionist trade agenda after the Supreme Court struck down his previous import taxes on products from China and dozens of other economies. Also Read: Trump admin proposes hiking H-1B visa fee to over $100,000, Indians brace for impact Exact rates are yet to be finalized, said people in the know of things, while speaking on condition of anonymity. As Trump is known to make last-minute demands or changes to trade announcements, one option under contemplation is announcing a higher duty rate for China and later suspending part of it in order to reduce the effective rate to 7.5%. Moreover, Beijing and Washington are also looking to extend their pact, which established a one-year truce that’s set to expire on Nov. 10. In March, the Trump administration launched an investigation into more than a dozen major trading partners under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 over excess capacity concerns. Also Read: Trump sets stage for new sanctions unveiling, says Iran is ‘completely collapsing’ Trump and Xi to meet in Washington on Sept. 24 Officials are hoping to publish the results of the excess capacity inquiry before the meeting between Trump and Xi in Washington on Sept. 24. Trump is rebuilding a tariff wall that was struck down when the Supreme Court in February ruled his global levies, issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, violated the US Constitution. The president’s temporary 10% global tariffs expired in July, and were also deemed illegal by a trade court. Also Read: ‘We took the head off the snake’: US to enter ‘new phase’ in Iran war very soon, says Speaker Mike Johnson In July, the Trump administration imposed a 12.5% tariff on Chinese goods, citing inadequate efforts to address forced labour practices. Beijing criticised the move but stopped short of announcing retaliatory measures. Section 301 allows the US Trade Representative, under the direction of the president, to impose tariffs in response to other nations’ trade measures it deems discriminatory to American businesses or in violation of US rights under international trade agreements.

The 7.5% tariff is besides the other levies imposed during Trump’s first term and extended by the Biden administration. The move will revive Trump’s protectionist trade agenda after the Supreme Court struck down his previous import taxes on products from China and dozens of other economies.

US plans to impose 7.5% overcapacity tariff on China ahead of Xi-Trump summit in Sept

A 26-second clip of US President Donald Trump and the First Lady at the Freedom 250 Grand Prix has gone viral. The two were passionately discussing or arguing about something, which has drawn speculation from many, as White House aide Natalie Harp was also present with the President and the First Lady, along with other members of the Trump family at the Freedom 250 Grand Prix in Washington, DC, on Sunday, August 23, 2026. Melania seemed cold, and President Trump is seen leaning in to speak to her.&nbsp;This incident has sparked speculation online about the relationship between Trump and Melania, which had reportedly been facing turbulence. This was the first time Melania appeared in public in months. In a later clip, when Harp was seen bringing Trump his phone, Melania could be seen getting up and moving away.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ghalibaf-mocks-trump-make-america-hungry-again-1787588633211">Iran’s Ghalibaf mocks Trump's economic sanction campaign: ‘Make America Hungry Again’</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Melania Trump is fed up with Donald Trump. She is visibly angry with him in this clip. <a href="https://t.co/fHoE32hkw6">pic.twitter.com/fHoE32hkw6</a>&mdash; War Dog (@WarDogwtf) <a href="https://x.com/WarDogwtf/status/2091810516012290326?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">This <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/Melania?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Melania</a> clip just got a whole lot worse. You’ve seen the footage of her looking visibly pissed, standing up, and practically bolting out of the room. That alone was already telling. But right after that sitting footage was reported, the audio that follows is pure gold:… <a href="https://t.co/yrVxdlgdCh">pic.twitter.com/yrVxdlgdCh</a>&mdash; Mahalaxmi Ramanathan (@MahalaxmiRaman) <a href="https://x.com/MahalaxmiRaman/status/2091881458587803777?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

One user wrote: "She wanted EVERYONE to know how p****d she was lol." Another user wrote, "To me it looks like they are having a serious discussion about something," while a third commented: "I don't think I've ever seen them interact this much in public."Forensic lip reader Jeremy Freeman analysed the viral 26-second clip for The Daily Mirror and claimed that it appears to him deeply frustrated exchange between the presidential couple. Melania supposedly remarked to US President Donald Trump,"That's the problem, people react," to which Trump responded: "We'll knock it off."Melania responded in a "snappy" tone: “Are you?” She went on to say: "It happened two times," to which Donald replied: "I know." Then in one final remark, Melania reportedly said: "I can't take any more."This incident comes just after reports of a letter from Trump's aide, Natalie Harp, to Donald Trump were reported by the New York Times. Harp reportedly referred to Trump as &nbsp;"guardian and protector" and &nbsp;showed deep devotion: "you are all that matters to me"

A 26-second clip of Donald Trump and Melania Trump at the Freedom 250 Grand Prix has sparked online speculation about a possible confrontation between the Presidential couple.

A 26-second clip of US President Donald Trump and the First Lady at the Freedom 250 Grand Prix has gone viral. The two were passionately discussing or arguing about something, which has drawn speculation from many, as White House aide Natalie Harp was also present with the President and the First Lady, along with other members of the Trump family at the Freedom 250 Grand Prix in Washington, DC, on Sunday, August 23, 2026. Melania seemed cold, and President Trump is seen leaning in to speak to her. This incident has sparked speculation online about the relationship between Trump and Melania, which had reportedly been facing turbulence. This was the first time Melania appeared in public in months. In a later clip, when Harp was seen bringing Trump his phone, Melania could be seen getting up and moving away. Also Read: Iran’s Ghalibaf mocks Trump's economic sanction campaign: ‘Make America Hungry Again’

A 26-second clip of Donald Trump and Melania Trump at the Freedom 250 Grand Prix has sparked online speculation about a possible confrontation between the Presidential couple.

'I can't take any more':Trump and Melania arguing over Natalie Harp at 250 Grand Prix?

In a few minutes from now, the so-called economic D-Day for Iran will kick in, with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent set to unveil major economic sanctions on Iran. Trump claims that Iran is “completely collapsing”. But Tehran has asserted that this tactic will fail and threatened to shut down all oil exports from West Asia.Without detailing specific measures, Bessent has signalled that the US would also target nations that practise appeasement by engaging with Iran’s economy and financial system.China, though, drew the red line. Opposing the imposition of fresh sanctions against Iran, Beijing argued that they would escalate tensions and called upon all parties to exercise restraint and return to talks.Now, why is China’s stance so crucial?According to reports, Beijing helped push Tehran to the negotiating table for a ceasefire in April. Being Iran’s largest trading partner, which purchases roughly 90 per cent of its crude oil, China has high stakes in reopening the Strait of Hormuz.Another key question arises: Can Trump bypass China’s opposition and go ahead with the economic sanctions? Since his visit to Beijing in May, the US President has been keen on China buying American soybeans, oil as well as Boeing jets. For America, China’s supply of critical minerals is also vital, as they are essential components in the production of weapons, which have been depleted by the war.Going against Beijing at this juncture might put all this at risk. It is also worth noting that Xi is set to meet Trump at the White House in September.Ahead of America’s announcement, mediation efforts continue.Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir arrived in Tehran, where he met Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni. According to Reuters, Trump spoke to Munir last week, with the US seeking Pakistan’s influence to bring Iran back to talks.Tensions persisted in West Asia, though. For instance, Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis claimed responsibility for firing a ballistic missile at a Saudi Arabia-flagged tanker in the Red Sea. This led to a fire breaking out on the vessel. The Houthis declared a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia last month.On its part, Iran blacklisted 45 tankers for breaking its rules while crossing the Strait of Hormuz and warned other vessels not to transit this strategic waterway without its permission. It stressed that these vessels could be fined and have their cargo confiscated as well. Additionally, Iran threatened other countries against joining new US efforts to squeeze Tehran’s economy.Meanwhile, Iran clarified that it was yet to receive a formal invitation to join the Makkah Defence Pact signed by Pakistan, Türkiye and Saudi Arabia. However, Tehran did not rule out negotiations with these countries for the overall security of the region.America’s fresh threat of economic sanctions also comes at a time when the Iranian rial has fallen to a historic low, crossing two million rials against the US dollar. This has raised fresh concerns about inflation, purchasing power and the Iranian government’s ability to stabilise the economy.Food has become very expensive, with the price of rice up by 60 per cent since the war began.Now, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian also acknowledged the issues arising from the current impasse. He linked the MOU with the US to Iran’s economic prospects, saying that his country was not able to attract investment at present.People on the streets of Iran also expressed their anguish over the current state of affairs.With both the US and Iran unwilling to budge from their positions, West Asia continues to remain on edge.

Iran faces fresh US sanctions as Washington threatens economic pressure and China urges restraint, while Tehran warns of retaliation and tensions persist over the Strait of Hormuz.

In a few minutes from now, the so-called economic D-Day for Iran will kick in, with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent set to unveil major economic sanctions on Iran. Trump claims that Iran is “completely collapsing”. But Tehran has asserted that this tactic will fail and threatened to shut down all oil exports from West Asia. Without detailing specific measures, Bessent has signalled that the US would also target nations that practise appeasement by engaging with Iran’s economy and financial system. China, though, drew the red line. Opposing the imposition of fresh sanctions against Iran, Beijing argued that they would escalate tensions and called upon all parties to exercise restraint and return to talks. Now, why is China’s stance so crucial? According to reports, Beijing helped push Tehran to the negotiating table for a ceasefire in April. Being Iran’s largest trading partner, which purchases roughly 90 per cent of its crude oil, China has high stakes in reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Another key question arises: Can Trump bypass China’s opposition and go ahead with the economic sanctions? Since his visit to Beijing in May, the US President has been keen on China buying American soybeans, oil as well as Boeing jets. For America, China’s supply of critical minerals is also vital, as they are essential components in the production of weapons, which have been depleted by the war. Going against Beijing at this juncture might put all this at risk. It is also worth noting that Xi is set to meet Trump at the White House in September. Ahead of America’s announcement, mediation efforts continue. Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir arrived in Tehran, where he met Iranian Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni. According to Reuters, Trump spoke to Munir last week, with the US seeking Pakistan’s influence to bring Iran back to talks. Tensions persisted in West Asia, though. For instance, Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis claimed responsibility for firing a ballistic missile at a Saudi Arabia-flagged tanker in the Red Sea. This led to a fire breaking out on the vessel. The Houthis declared a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia last month. On its part, Iran blacklisted 45 tankers for breaking its rules while crossing the Strait of Hormuz and warned other vessels not to transit this strategic waterway without its permission. It stressed that these vessels could be fined and have their cargo confiscated as well. Additionally, Iran threatened other countries against joining new US efforts to squeeze Tehran’s economy. Meanwhile, Iran clarified that it was yet to receive a formal invitation to join the Makkah Defence Pact signed by Pakistan, Türkiye and Saudi Arabia. However, Tehran did not rule out negotiations with these countries for the overall security of the region. America’s fresh threat of economic sanctions also comes at a time when the Iranian rial has fallen to a historic low, crossing two million rials against the US dollar. This has raised fresh concerns about inflation, purchasing power and the Iranian government’s ability to stabilise the economy. Food has become very expensive, with the price of rice up by 60 per cent since the war began. Now, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian also acknowledged the issues arising from the current impasse. He linked the MOU with the US to Iran’s economic prospects, saying that his country was not able to attract investment at present. People on the streets of Iran also expressed their anguish over the current state of affairs. With both the US and Iran unwilling to budge from their positions, West Asia continues to remain on edge.

Iran faces fresh US sanctions as Washington threatens economic pressure and China urges restraint, while Tehran warns of retaliation and tensions persist over the Strait of Hormuz.

China 'trumps' Trump on Iran sanctions, calls for return to talks | Gravitas

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has mocked US President Donald Trump’s economic sanction campaign. In response to Trump's reposting an edited excerpt from Ghalibaf’s remarks about Iran’s economic situation. In a social media post, he restyled Trump's famous Make America Great Again catchphrase to “Make America Hungry Again”.Ghalibaf shared a picture claiming that 47 million people in the United States face hunger and 16 million US children are among those affected by poverty and the cost-of-living crisis. Ghalibaf stressed that Trump can not cover up “defeats” using false claims.This reaction came in response to Trump sharing an edited excerpt from Ghalibaf's remark during a meeting with Iranian and Iraqi businesspeople, with Ghalibaf saying: “We are hungry and we do not have the ability to resist.”According to Iranian media, Ghalibaf was not describing hunger as the current condition of the Iranian people. Rather, he was emphasising the need to strengthen the economy. Both security and economic strength must be maintained simultaneously. He said that the US has failed militarily and is now engaging in psychological and economic warfare.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/revanth-reddy-returns-hyderabad-mea-denies-us-visit-clearance-1787578195030">'Insult' to 4 crore people of Telangana: Why CM Revanth Reddy's US visit clearance was denied</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">MAKE AMERICA HUNGRY AGAIN! You can’t cover up defeats with false claims. <a href="https://t.co/LBclafRt3B">pic.twitter.com/LBclafRt3B</a>&mdash; محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) <a href="https://x.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2091846882876145880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 24, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Iran will strike on US energy chokepoints and vital interests: IRGC</h2>Hossein Mohebbi, spokesperson for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, said that the country's missile capability remains intact and any attack at Iran's infrastructure will result in “heavy strikes” on US energy chokepoints and vital interests. He further added that Iran's missile production continues and the US plan for new economic sanctions against Tehran amounts to "an implicit admission" of Washington's failure on the military front.&nbsp;"We can easily establish economic relations with countries. There is no concern regarding the economic situation," said Mohebbi, according to Iranian state broadcaster IRIB.“Today, the US understands very well that if it carries out its threats against Iran’s infrastructure, it will face heavy strategic strikes on energy chokepoints and its vital interests.” He continued, “The most important achievement of this war was transferring vulnerability to the enemy’s vital infrastructure and affiliated centres."

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf mocked Donald Trump with a “Make America Hungry Again” remark after the US president shared an edited clip of his comments indicating that Iran was hungry.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has mocked US President Donald Trump’s economic sanction campaign. In response to Trump's reposting an edited excerpt from Ghalibaf’s remarks about Iran’s economic situation. In a social media post, he restyled Trump's famous Make America Great Again catchphrase to “Make America Hungry Again”. Ghalibaf shared a picture claiming that 47 million people in the United States face hunger and 16 million US children are among those affected by poverty and the cost-of-living crisis. Ghalibaf stressed that Trump can not cover up “defeats” using false claims. This reaction came in response to Trump sharing an edited excerpt from Ghalibaf's remark during a meeting with Iranian and Iraqi businesspeople, with Ghalibaf saying: “We are hungry and we do not have the ability to resist.” According to Iranian media, Ghalibaf was not describing hunger as the current condition of the Iranian people. Rather, he was emphasising the need to strengthen the economy. Both security and economic strength must be maintained simultaneously. He said that the US has failed militarily and is now engaging in psychological and economic warfare. Also Read: 'Insult' to 4 crore people of Telangana: Why CM Revanth Reddy's US visit clearance was denied

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf mocked Donald Trump with a “Make America Hungry Again” remark after the US president shared an edited clip of his comments indicating that Iran was hungry.

Iran’s Ghalibaf mocks Trump's economic sanction campaign: ‘Make America Hungry Again’

President Donald Trump set the stage for the unveiling of a range of new sanctions on Monday aimed at squeezing Iran’s economy by declaring that the theocratic state is “completely collapsing.”Just hours before the US Treasury was to unveil a tranche of new sanctions to force the Islamic Republic to capitulate in the war, President Trump wrote in a brief post on Truth Social, “IRAN IS COMPLETELY COLLAPSING!!!”&nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump had previously vowed that the new US tactic in the war, which represents a shift from military strikes and threats to sanctions-based financial warfare, would impose an “economic D-Day” on Iran. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-enter-new-phase-in-iran-war-very-soon-says-house-speaker-mike-johnson-1787516303936">‘We took the head off the snake’: US to enter ‘new phase’ in Iran war very soon, says Speaker Mike Johnson</a> Iran has been ostensibly dismissive of the US threat to ratchet up sanctions and claimed that the Islamic Republic has already withstood decades of economic punishment. US Treasury chief Scott Bessent also said that the new sanctions would amount to “the single greatest financial offensive ever marshalled against an adversary.” <h2>Iran will respond to US sanctions, says foreign ministry</h2> Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman warned on Monday that Tehran would respond harshly to new US sanctions, including with measures against countries it sees as cooperating with Washington. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-orchestrating-sabotage-attacks-at-european-arms-plants-to-sow-discord-report-1787511138908">Russia orchestrating sabotage attacks at European arms plants to sow discord: Report</a> “Any escalation of this situation will undoubtedly bring about consequences,” Esmaeil Baghaei said. “Our hands are not tied.” <h2>Baghaei downplays likely impact of new sanctions</h2> Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman further downplayed the potential impact of new economic sanctions the US will announce on Monday.When a reporter asked about the impact of the sanctions, spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said previous similar attempts by the US to pressure Iran had failed. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-switch-to-economic-war-against-iran-is-admission-of-its-military-defeat-irgc-1787504157742">US switch to economic war against Iran is admission of its ‘military defeat’: IRGC</a> “The Iranian people will show that they are determined and steadfast in safeguarding their rights,” he added.Baghaei said the new measures were being imposed because the Trump administration had “miscalculated” its attacks and believed “military aggression could bring the Iranians to their knees.”

President Trump had vowed that the new US tactic in the war, which represents a shift from military strikes to sanctions-based financial warfare, would impose an “economic D-Day” on Iran. Tehran has been claiming that it has already withstood decades of economic punishment.

President Donald Trump set the stage for the unveiling of a range of new sanctions on Monday aimed at squeezing Iran’s economy by declaring that the theocratic state is “completely collapsing.” Just hours before the US Treasury was to unveil a tranche of new sanctions to force the Islamic Republic to capitulate in the war, President Trump wrote in a brief post on Truth Social, “IRAN IS COMPLETELY COLLAPSING!!!”

President Trump had vowed that the new US tactic in the war, which represents a shift from military strikes to sanctions-based financial warfare, would impose an “economic D-Day” on Iran. Tehran has been claiming that it has already withstood decades of economic punishment.

Trump sets stage for new sanctions unveiling, says Iran is ‘completely collapsing’

The Union Government on Monday clarified that the discussion between two nations about the arrangement of a public appearance by their leader is a “normal practice”, PTI reported, citing government sources. This follows the government's clarification of US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks about the bilateral meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Evian, France.&nbsp;"Discussions regarding arrangements for public appearances of leaders are normal practice ahead of any VVIP visit," a government source told PTI."In this regard, the Indian side communicated its standard practice for such visits," the source added.The June 17 bilateral meeting between the US and India came after three Indian sailors were killed by a US Navy attack on the commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-strikes-alleged-drug-trafficking-boat-eastern-pacific-1787567752917">US strikes alleged drug trafficking boat in Eastern Pacific, killing 2</a><h2>What did US envoy Sergio Gor say?</h2>During the Economic Times World Leaders Forum, Gor said that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs specifically requested that there should be no press interaction following the bilateral meet. But Trump supposedly forgot about that and, following the opening remarks, asked reporters if they had any questions, which followed a 45-minute press conference with reporters. Gor claimed, adding that the remark “opened everything up”.“I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does, he looks up at the camera and say, any questions?” said Gor.US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The Indian government said discussions over public appearances by leaders are normal practice after US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks on the Modi-Trump G7 meeting.

The Union Government on Monday clarified that the discussion between two nations about the arrangement of a public appearance by their leader is a “normal practice”, PTI reported, citing government sources. This follows the government's clarification of US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks about the bilateral meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Evian, France. "Discussions regarding arrangements for public appearances of leaders are normal practice ahead of any VVIP visit," a government source told PTI. "In this regard, the Indian side communicated its standard practice for such visits," the source added. The June 17 bilateral meeting between the US and India came after three Indian sailors were killed by a US Navy attack on the commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz. Also Read: US strikes alleged drug trafficking boat in Eastern Pacific, killing 2 What did US envoy Sergio Gor say? During the Economic Times World Leaders Forum, Gor said that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs specifically requested that there should be no press interaction following the bilateral meet. But Trump supposedly forgot about that and, following the opening remarks, asked reporters if they had any questions, which followed a 45-minute press conference with reporters. Gor claimed, adding that the remark “opened everything up”. “I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does, he looks up at the camera and say, any questions?” said Gor. US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The Indian government said discussions over public appearances by leaders are normal practice after US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks on the Modi-Trump G7 meeting.

India calls leader media arrangements ‘normal practice’ after Sergio Gor remarks

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs had made a request ahead of the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump during the G7 summit. He claimed that the Ministry of External Affairs had asked for “no questions” after the leaders finished their opening remarks.“We were behind the scenes, behind the stage, and at one point it was just the president and I, and he asked me, he goes, what are the Indians going to raise? We went over some topics. And he said, " Do they have any asks? And the MEA had one ask. He said, and it was, let's bring in the media, but let's not do a full press conference," said Gor at the Economic Times World Leaders Forum.“I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does he looks up at the camera and says, any questions?” said Sergio Gor.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-airstrikes-gaza-kill-two-amid-ceasefire-1787498033928">Israel airstrikes kill 2 in Gaza, including 4-year-old boy, amid ceasefire</a>Gor added that a 45-minute press conference with reporters raised a wide range of issues and “everything was on the table”.&nbsp;US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.&nbsp;"The numbers don't lie. If you look at the trajectory of our relationship, just go by the numbers," he said."15 years ago, our bilateral trade was 20 billion dollars. Today, it's 240 billion dollars. That's not an accident, and it's continuing to grow," said Gor. The forum took place right after Gor's historic trip to Srinagar, where he publicly called Jammu &amp; Kashmir "an important part of India," sparking a diplomatic protest from Pakistan.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">“India specifically requested that there should be no press conference and no press questions during the Trump Modi meet at G7.” ~ US ambassador Sergio Gor. Rahul Gandhi was so right about him, when he said he will be destroyed within seconds if he faces the Press. <a href="https://t.co/TwDdIkAYQ0">pic.twitter.com/TwDdIkAYQ0</a>&mdash; Jitesh (@Chaotic_mind99) <a href="https://x.com/Chaotic_mind99/status/2091548020169134563?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed India’s MEA requested no questions from the media after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Donald Trump delivered opening remarks at their G7 meeting.

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs had made a request ahead of the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump during the G7 summit. He claimed that the Ministry of External Affairs had asked for “no questions” after the leaders finished their opening remarks. “We were behind the scenes, behind the stage, and at one point it was just the president and I, and he asked me, he goes, what are the Indians going to raise? We went over some topics. And he said, " Do they have any asks? And the MEA had one ask. He said, and it was, let's bring in the media, but let's not do a full press conference," said Gor at the Economic Times World Leaders Forum. “I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does he looks up at the camera and says, any questions?” said Sergio Gor. Also Read: Israel airstrikes kill 2 in Gaza, including 4-year-old boy, amid ceasefire Gor added that a 45-minute press conference with reporters raised a wide range of issues and “everything was on the table”. US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "The numbers don't lie. If you look at the trajectory of our relationship, just go by the numbers," he said. "15 years ago, our bilateral trade was 20 billion dollars. Today, it's 240 billion dollars. That's not an accident, and it's continuing to grow," said Gor. The forum took place right after Gor's historic trip to Srinagar, where he publicly called Jammu & Kashmir "an important part of India," sparking a diplomatic protest from Pakistan.

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed India’s MEA requested no questions from the media after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Donald Trump delivered opening remarks at their G7 meeting.

US envoy Sergio Gor claims India sought ‘no questions’ after Modi-Trump G7 meeting

The South Carolina crowd erupted in cheers as President Donald Trump recognized White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt for her work and service to the country.

Trump praised Leavitt during the rally, highlighting the “great job” she has done as White House Press Secretary. The moment drew a strong reaction from supporters in the crowd.

Watch the full moment as Trump recognizes Karoline Leavitt, praises her White House service and the South Carolina crowd responds with loud cheers.

Trump Praises Karoline Leavitt At South Carolina Rally | Crowd Erupts In Cheers  

President Donald Trump made a notable claim about his support among gay voters, saying he received the highest gay vote in political history for a Republican.

During his remarks, Trump also referred to the Village People's “YMCA” as the “Gay National Anthem”, highlighting the song's popularity and his use of it at political events.

Trump Claims Record Gay Vote For Republican | “I Played The Gay National Anthem!”

President Donald Trump launched a fierce verbal attack on Democrats, accusing them of hating the United States and describing them as “communists” and “Radical Left Lunatics.”

Trump also called some Democrats “horrible, horrible people” during his remarks, escalating his criticism of the opposition party.

The comments come amid heightened political divisions in the United States, with Trump's remarks likely to fuel further debate over the increasingly confrontational political climate.

Trump Attacks Democrats As “Communists” And “Radical Left Lunatics” | Fierce Political Remarks

President Donald Trump delighted supporters at a campaign rally in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, when he broke into his signature dance moves as the Village People’s “YMCA” played.

The unexpected moment came as Trump campaigned for Republican Senate candidate Darline Graham ahead of Tuesday’s primary runoff. Trump’s familiar dance routine drew attention from the crowd and added a lively moment to the South Carolina campaign event.

Trump Performs Signature ‘YMCA’ Dance At South Carolina Rally |Crowd Cheers As Trump Dances On Stage

US President Donald Trump has delivered a stark assessment of Iran’s current economic and military situation, claiming that Tehran is facing severe financial pressure.

Trump said Iran has “no money,” “no navy” and “no air force,” while also claiming that the country is struggling to pay its soldiers and police. He further cited a 350% inflation figure while discussing Iran’s economic condition.

The remarks come amid heightened tensions surrounding Iran and growing international attention on the country’s economy, military capabilities and ability to maintain its security apparatus.

Trump On Iran: “They Have No Money, No Navy, No Air Force” | 350% Inflation Claim

Welcome to WION. Here are the top global and India headlines making news.

U.S. President Donald Trump shares images of the proposed White House ballroom following a Supreme Court-related development. Germany’s foreign minister sharply criticizes Vladimir Putin over the war in Ukraine and pledges further support for Kyiv.

Meanwhile, Israel pushes back against U.S. criticism of its strikes on Syrian military sites, while Iran announces further upgrades to its ballistic and cruise missile programs.

In India, Rahul Gandhi’s youth event gets underway in Pune, with the Congress leader engaging with students and discussing issues facing young Indians.

Elsewhere, the IMF stalls Bangladesh funding amid concerns over delayed reforms, firefighters continue battling wildfires in Spain’s Valencia region, and a Chinese humanoid robot reportedly posts an impressive 100-metre trial time.

Watch the full bulletin for the latest world news, India news, geopolitics, Ukraine war, Iran, Israel, Bangladesh, Trump and technology updates.


Trump’s White House Ballroom | Rahul Gandhi’s Pune Youth Event |  Germany Slams Putin 

President Donald Trump has unveiled a major new push to accelerate America’s commercial space ambitions, with the United States targeting more than 1,000 rocket launches and spacecraft re-entries from American soil every year by 2030.

The new policy directs US government agencies to examine federal land for additional launch and re-entry sites while encouraging greater private-sector participation in space transportation.

Trump’s plans extend beyond Earth orbit. NASA has been directed to support commercial transportation to and from the Moon, robotic missions to Mars and eventually commercial human transportation to the Red Planet.

The announcement comes as the US-China space race intensifies, with both countries pursuing ambitious lunar programs. The United States is aiming to return astronauts to the lunar surface before 2030 and establish a more sustained presence on the Moon.

Trump Unveils Major US Space Push | 1,000+ Rocket Launches by 2030 | Moon & Mars Missions Accelerate

Karoline Leavitt is set to leave her position as White House press secretary at the end of August, and President Donald Trump has begun teasing possible contenders to replace her.

At a rally in South Carolina, Trump praised Leavitt’s performance while joking about her decision to leave the demanding White House role after the birth of her second child. Leavitt became the youngest White House press secretary in U.S. history when she took the position at the age of 28.

Trump said there is no shortage of interest in the position and suggested that the role has become more attractive under Leavitt. Among the names he mentioned are Scott Jennings, a CNN commentator and Trump supporter, and Margo Martin, a longtime Trump communications aide.

Karoline Leavitt Set to Leave White House Press Secretary Post | Trump Reveals Possible Replacements

Iran-US tensions are intensifying as Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian calls for an end to the month-long war while insisting that Tehran is negotiating from a position of strength. US President Donald Trump, however, says Iran is interested in a deal but is not yet ready to make what he considers the “right deal.”

Trump has also claimed that the United States has total control of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most strategically important waterways. The comments come as Washington increases economic and maritime pressure on Tehran.

Iran has rejected the latest US pressure campaign and warned that further threats could trigger a strong military response. Iranian officials say Tehran remains prepared to defend its strategic waterways and interests across the region.

Meanwhile, the United States is expected to announce new sanctions targeting Iran, while discussions involving Iran and Oman continue over possible conditions for resuming talks, including security and freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran-US War: Tehran Calls For End To Month-Long Conflict |Trump Says Iran Not Ready For “Right Deal”

A federal judge in Manhattan has struck down the Trump administration’s policy suspending immigrant visa issuance for citizens of 75 countries, ruling that the measure was ‘contrary to law’ and exceeded the statutory authority of Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The State Department introduced the policy in January, pausing immigrant visa processing for people from nearly 40% of the world’s countries. The administration said the move was intended to prevent the admission of immigrants who could potentially 'take welfare and public benefits'.&nbsp;Judge Jeannette Vargas of the Federal District Court in Manhattan rejected that reasoning, ruling that visa denials based solely on the policy must be reversed. Her decision represents another legal setback for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. Under US immigration law, applicants can be denied entry as a potential ‘public charge’ only after a consular officer evaluates the individual’s circumstances. That assessment must consider factors including the applicant’s finances, age, health, skills and family situation.&nbsp;Vargas found that the State Department’s policy effectively instructed US consular officers to deny immigrant visas based solely on an applicant’s country of nationality, even when the applicant could demonstrate an ability to support themselves. A cable sent by Rubio to US diplomatic and consular posts, which was included in the court record, instructed officers to refuse applicants even when someone “provides additional evidence that demonstrates he or she overcomes the public charge refusal.”“The outcome is predetermined,” Vargas wrote. “The visa will be refused.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nigerian-navy-disrupts-crude-oil-theft-operation-recovers-93-000-litres-in-bonny-1787399410204">Nigerian Navy disrupts crude oil theft operation, recovers 93,000 litres in Bonny</a>&nbsp;The judge concluded that the policy conflicted with a 1965 law prohibiting nationality-based discrimination in the issuance of immigrant visas. She also found that another federal provision prevents the secretary of state from controlling how consular officers make individual visa determinations. The ruling applies to denials based on the disputed policy. Visa refusals based on separate legal grounds remain valid, even if officers also referenced the 75-country policy. As a result, the precise number of visa denials that could be reversed remains uncertain.&nbsp;The suspension affected immigrant visas used by people seeking permanent residence in the United States, including those joining family members or moving to the country for employment. It did not apply to nonimmigrant visas, including tourist and student visas. The administration’s list covered countries across the Caribbean, sub-Saharan Africa, the Balkans, the Middle East, Central Asia and Southeast Asia. It included several US partners, including Jordan, Egypt and Georgia.&nbsp;According to the administration, the State Department developed the list using data from the Council of Economic Advisers. Countries were targeted where more than 30% of immigrant households were reported to receive some form of public assistance. The plaintiffs included six US citizens who had filed family-based immigration petitions and argued that the policy prevented relatives in Ghana, Jamaica, Guatemala and Ethiopia from receiving immigrant visas. Five Colombian applicants seeking employment-based visas also joined the case. One of them received a visa denial notice that specifically cited the policy.&nbsp;The Trump administration did prevail on one narrower issue. Vargas agreed that the policy did not constitute a formal rule requiring the government to open the measure to public comment before putting it into effect. In defending the policy, government lawyers relied in part on a 2018 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the third version of Trump’s first-term travel ban. That policy restricted entry by nationals of several countries, most of which had majority-Muslim populations.&nbsp;Vargas, however, distinguished that precedent from the current case. She said the 2018 ruling concerned the president’s authority to determine who could enter the United States, while the current dispute involved the separate question of whether a visa could be issued in the first place. Vargas, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, gave both sides until September 11 to submit proposals for resolving the remaining issues in the case. The Trump administration can appeal the ruling, potentially setting up another legal battle over the scope of executive authority in US immigration policy.

A federal judge strikes down Trump’s 75-country immigrant visa ban, ruling the policy was 'contrary to law' and exceeded Secretary of State Rubio’s authority

A federal judge in Manhattan has struck down the Trump administration’s policy suspending immigrant visa issuance for citizens of 75 countries, ruling that the measure was ‘contrary to law’ and exceeded the statutory authority of Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The State Department introduced the policy in January, pausing immigrant visa processing for people from nearly 40% of the world’s countries. The administration said the move was intended to prevent the admission of immigrants who could potentially 'take welfare and public benefits'. Judge Jeannette Vargas of the Federal District Court in Manhattan rejected that reasoning, ruling that visa denials based solely on the policy must be reversed. Her decision represents another legal setback for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda. Under US immigration law, applicants can be denied entry as a potential ‘public charge’ only after a consular officer evaluates the individual’s circumstances. That assessment must consider factors including the applicant’s finances, age, health, skills and family situation. Vargas found that the State Department’s policy effectively instructed US consular officers to deny immigrant visas based solely on an applicant’s country of nationality, even when the applicant could demonstrate an ability to support themselves. A cable sent by Rubio to US diplomatic and consular posts, which was included in the court record, instructed officers to refuse applicants even when someone “provides additional evidence that demonstrates he or she overcomes the public charge refusal.” “The outcome is predetermined,” Vargas wrote. “The visa will be refused.” Also Read: Nigerian Navy disrupts crude oil theft operation, recovers 93,000 litres in Bonny The judge concluded that the policy conflicted with a 1965 law prohibiting nationality-based discrimination in the issuance of immigrant visas. She also found that another federal provision prevents the secretary of state from controlling how consular officers make individual visa determinations. The ruling applies to denials based on the disputed policy. Visa refusals based on separate legal grounds remain valid, even if officers also referenced the 75-country policy. As a result, the precise number of visa denials that could be reversed remains uncertain. The suspension affected immigrant visas used by people seeking permanent residence in the United States, including those joining family members or moving to the country for employment. It did not apply to nonimmigrant visas, including tourist and student visas. The administration’s list covered countries across the Caribbean, sub-Saharan Africa, the Balkans, the Middle East, Central Asia and Southeast Asia. It included several US partners, including Jordan, Egypt and Georgia. According to the administration, the State Department developed the list using data from the Council of Economic Advisers. Countries were targeted where more than 30% of immigrant households were reported to receive some form of public assistance. The plaintiffs included six US citizens who had filed family-based immigration petitions and argued that the policy prevented relatives in Ghana, Jamaica, Guatemala and Ethiopia from receiving immigrant visas. Five Colombian applicants seeking employment-based visas also joined the case. One of them received a visa denial notice that specifically cited the policy. The Trump administration did prevail on one narrower issue. Vargas agreed that the policy did not constitute a formal rule requiring the government to open the measure to public comment before putting it into effect. In defending the policy, government lawyers relied in part on a 2018 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the third version of Trump’s first-term travel ban. That policy restricted entry by nationals of several countries, most of which had majority-Muslim populations. Vargas, however, distinguished that precedent from the current case. She said the 2018 ruling concerned the president’s authority to determine who could enter the United States, while the current dispute involved the separate question of whether a visa could be issued in the first place. Vargas, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, gave both sides until September 11 to submit proposals for resolving the remaining issues in the case. The Trump administration can appeal the ruling, potentially setting up another legal battle over the scope of executive authority in US immigration policy.

Trump’s 75-country immigrant visa ban was struck down by a federal judge, who ruled it exceeded legal authority and unlawfully targeted nationalities

'Contrary to law': US Federal judge strikes down Trump administration’s 75-country visa ban

Donald Trump returned to the White House promising to cut government waste, reduce federal spending and bring down America’s deficit. But more than a year into his second term, the US fiscal picture is facing growing pressure, with total national debt surpassing $40 trillion.

The administration launched the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with an ambitious goal of identifying waste and generating major savings. However, reported savings fell far short of the initial targets, while overall government spending remained high.

Trump’s major tax-and-spending package also created a difficult fiscal trade-off. While the administration argued that lower taxes would boost investment and economic growth, reduced tax revenue can add pressure to the deficit unless spending falls sufficiently.

Tariffs were another key part of Trump’s strategy, with the administration presenting them as both a trade tool and a potential source of revenue. However, tariff revenues have faced volatility while also raising concerns about inflation and higher costs for businesses and consumers.

Trump’s Fiscal Promise Under Pressure: US Debt Surpasses $40 Trillion | Deficit And Borrowing Rise

After organising a UFC fight on the White House lawn, President Donald Trump is set to take a lap of honour at an IndyCar race through the streets of Washington this weekend, as he seeks to put his mark on celebrations for the 250th anniversary of the United States.&nbsp;Racing cars will speed past historic landmarks, including the US Capitol and Smithsonian museums, as 25 drivers complete 147 laps at speeds of up to 185 mph (298 kmh).&nbsp;Workers have welded down more than 200 manhole covers along the 250-mile (400-kilometre) circuit to prevent the force of the speeding cars from tearing them off.&nbsp;Practice and qualifying sessions will take place on Saturday, while the "Freedom 250 Grand Prix" will be held on Sunday.&nbsp;Trump, 80, is expected to take a ceremonial lap of honour in his armoured limousine, "The Beast", before waving the green flag to start the race.&nbsp;The event is being managed by IndyCar championship organisers. The US motorsport series features cars similar to Formula One vehicles but often holds races on oval tracks, including the Indianapolis 500.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/amit-shah-meets-gorkha-leaders-in-darjeeling-mha-panel-to-draft-permanent-political-solution-1787397945546">Amit Shah meets Gorkha leaders in Darjeeling, MHA panel to draft ‘permanent political solution’</a><h2>IndyCar race adds to 250th anniversary events</h2>The race marks another attempt by Trump to put his stamp on Washington's celebrations for the 250th anniversary. The events began with a UFC bout held inside a huge cage on the White House lawn in June.&nbsp;As with the UFC event, IndyCar organisers are covering the cost of the major logistical operation. The race has also forced the closure of some of Washington's busiest roads for several days.&nbsp;Thousands of spectators are expected to line the route for the unprecedented race, which resembles Formula One events held on city streets in Las Vegas, Monaco and Singapore.<h2>Trump takes centre stage in celebrations</h2>Trump has placed himself at the centre of celebrations marking the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, which marked the separation of the original 13 American colonies from Britain.&nbsp;He has also sought to leave his mark on Washington by starting construction of a large ballroom at the White House, renaming institutions after himself and launching a troubled repainting project at the Reflecting Pool on the National Mall.&nbsp;Instead of bringing Americans together, however, the 250th anniversary celebrations have largely become a source of political discord.&nbsp;In a July 3 speech at Mount Rushmore, Trump launched a strong attack on Democrats and said the country faced a "communist menace".&nbsp;He later became the main attraction at a major Fourth of July concert in Washington after several musical artists withdrew, saying the event had become too political.&nbsp;The former reality TV star ended the evening with military jet flyovers followed by a world record fireworks display featuring 850,000 rockets over 40 minutes.&nbsp;Polls have meanwhile shown Trump remains deeply unpopular about a year and a half after returning to the White House, with the Iran war and cost of living pushing his approval ratings down.

After hosting a UFC event at the White House, Donald Trump is set to take a ceremonial lap at an IndyCar race in Washington as part of the US 250th anniversary celebrations.

After organising a UFC fight on the White House lawn, President Donald Trump is set to take a lap of honour at an IndyCar race through the streets of Washington this weekend, as he seeks to put his mark on celebrations for the 250th anniversary of the United States. Racing cars will speed past historic landmarks, including the US Capitol and Smithsonian museums, as 25 drivers complete 147 laps at speeds of up to 185 mph (298 kmh). Workers have welded down more than 200 manhole covers along the 250-mile (400-kilometre) circuit to prevent the force of the speeding cars from tearing them off. Practice and qualifying sessions will take place on Saturday, while the "Freedom 250 Grand Prix" will be held on Sunday. Trump, 80, is expected to take a ceremonial lap of honour in his armoured limousine, "The Beast", before waving the green flag to start the race. The event is being managed by IndyCar championship organisers. The US motorsport series features cars similar to Formula One vehicles but often holds races on oval tracks, including the Indianapolis 500. Also Read: Amit Shah meets Gorkha leaders in Darjeeling, MHA panel to draft ‘permanent political solution’ IndyCar race adds to 250th anniversary events The race marks another attempt by Trump to put his stamp on Washington's celebrations for the 250th anniversary. The events began with a UFC bout held inside a huge cage on the White House lawn in June. As with the UFC event, IndyCar organisers are covering the cost of the major logistical operation. The race has also forced the closure of some of Washington's busiest roads for several days. Thousands of spectators are expected to line the route for the unprecedented race, which resembles Formula One events held on city streets in Las Vegas, Monaco and Singapore. Trump takes centre stage in celebrations Trump has placed himself at the centre of celebrations marking the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, which marked the separation of the original 13 American colonies from Britain. He has also sought to leave his mark on Washington by starting construction of a large ballroom at the White House, renaming institutions after himself and launching a troubled repainting project at the Reflecting Pool on the National Mall. Instead of bringing Americans together, however, the 250th anniversary celebrations have largely become a source of political discord. In a July 3 speech at Mount Rushmore, Trump launched a strong attack on Democrats and said the country faced a "communist menace". He later became the main attraction at a major Fourth of July concert in Washington after several musical artists withdrew, saying the event had become too political. The former reality TV star ended the evening with military jet flyovers followed by a world record fireworks display featuring 850,000 rockets over 40 minutes. Polls have meanwhile shown Trump remains deeply unpopular about a year and a half after returning to the White House, with the Iran war and cost of living pushing his approval ratings down.

After hosting a UFC event at the White House, Donald Trump is set to take a ceremonial lap at an IndyCar race in Washington as part of the US 250th anniversary celebrations.

After UFC at White House, Trump gears up for motor race in US capital

Questions are growing over Natalie Harp’s role inside the White House, her close access to President Donald Trump and the extent of her reported influence around the president.

The scrutiny follows reports about private letters Harp allegedly wrote to Trump after accompanying him during a 2023 trip to Scotland and Ireland. The reported letters described her deep personal devotion to Trump and her desire to maintain his approval.

Harp, who serves as a special assistant and executive assistant to President Trump, has reportedly been described as an important gatekeeper around the president. Reports have also raised questions about her access to Trump and her role in facilitating contact with him.

Former officials and political commentators have raised concerns about whether her level of access and influence is appropriate, including potential national-security implications. The White House, however, has defended Harp as one of Trump's most loyal and hardworking aides and has rejected criticism of her role.

Natalie Harp’s White House Role Under Scrutiny | Trump Ally’s Access And Influence Questioned

As the ongoing conflict approaches the six-month mark, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has publicly called for an immediate end to the hostilities, asserting that Tehran is currently operating from a "position of power and dignity". The remarks come in direct response to escalating economic pressures from Washington, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent vowing an aggressive campaign of fresh sanctions aimed at crippling the Iranian economy.  


US-Iran war: Iran president urges end to war from position of strength

As the war with Iran approaches the six-month mark and US stockpiles of key weapons come under increasing pressure, the Trump administration is shifting its focus toward an aggressive economic campaign against Tehran. President Donald Trump this week announced what he described as an ‘unprecedented’ level of economic warfare and isolation against Iran. The administration says the campaign is designed to pressure Iran’s leadership into abandoning its nuclear program and fully reopening the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz to oil and natural gas tankers.&nbsp;The economic push comes as Trump confronts an increasingly unpopular war that has so far failed to produce a clear path toward an end. With crucial midterm elections approaching and control of Congress at stake, the administration is putting greater emphasis on sanctions and financial pressure in an effort to force Tehran into submission. Iran, however, has experienced decades of U.S. sanctions and has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to adapt to economic restrictions. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded to the latest threat Friday by posting the history of US sanctions against Iran on X. “We have seen this movie before. Same bull. Different bullies.”&nbsp;The administration’s strategy has received support from Iran hawks, who argue that intensified economic pressure could eventually force Tehran to make major concessions. Other analysts, however, warn that Washington may be repeating mistakes made by previous administrations.<h2>Threat of secondary sanctions</h2>Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent offered a glimpse into the next phase of the campaign during a CNBC interview on Thursday. He warned that the United States could impose secondary sanctions on countries and companies that continue doing business with Iran. Bessent did not identify potential targets. The earlier phase of Operation Economic Fury focused largely on individuals and entities involved in buying Iranian oil or accessing the country’s financial system.&nbsp;China and India are among the major purchasers of Iranian oil, meaning any broader secondary-sanctions campaign could have significant consequences for Washington’s relations with two major Asian powers. “If you insist on doing business with them, then the U.S. Treasury and U.S. government will put its full might and force against you,” Bessent said. “It’s time for our allies and the rest of the world to make a decision.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-dr-congo-s-bundibugyo-ebola-outbreak-became-its-deadliest-explained-1787312611253">Why DR Congo's Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak became its deadliest? EXPLAINED</a><h2>Secondary sanctions could hurt US interests</h2>Most major parts of Iran’s energy, financial and transportation sectors are already subject to US sanctions. The administration’s next step therefore appears likely to involve targeting countries and companies that continue maintaining economic ties with Tehran. The strategy resembles the “maximum pressure” campaign Trump pursued during his first term, but this time it is being combined with military action.&nbsp;The experience of the first administration demonstrated the difficulties involved in enforcing secondary sanctions. Washington frequently faced pressure to grant waivers to countries dependent on Iranian oil, while aggressive enforcement risked damaging US economic and diplomatic interests. “Trump’s strategy now rests on targeting Tehran directly by impeding its touch points and access to the formal financial system and international economy,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the FDD’s Iran program. “This will require making the Iran issue more important in U.S. bilateral relations with countries in Europe and Asia.”The challenge for Washington will be persuading allies and trading partners to accept the economic costs of cutting ties with Iran.<h2>Tehran says sanctions will not force surrender</h2>Iranian officials have rejected the idea that escalating economic pressure will force the government to accept Washington’s demands. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei accused the United States of returning to sanctions whenever diplomatic efforts become difficult. “Iran has demonstrated over decades that it will not be strangled by these exhausted refrains,” he said. “The real risk is that American politicians, clinging to this bad habit, will instead strangle their own remaining chances of a less humiliating exit from a crisis of their own making.”

Trump escalates economic warfare against Iran as the war nears six months, targeting Tehran with expanded sanctions and threatening secondary sanctions

As the war with Iran approaches the six-month mark and US stockpiles of key weapons come under increasing pressure, the Trump administration is shifting its focus toward an aggressive economic campaign against Tehran. President Donald Trump this week announced what he described as an ‘unprecedented’ level of economic warfare and isolation against Iran. The administration says the campaign is designed to pressure Iran’s leadership into abandoning its nuclear program and fully reopening the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz to oil and natural gas tankers. The economic push comes as Trump confronts an increasingly unpopular war that has so far failed to produce a clear path toward an end. With crucial midterm elections approaching and control of Congress at stake, the administration is putting greater emphasis on sanctions and financial pressure in an effort to force Tehran into submission. Iran, however, has experienced decades of U.S. sanctions and has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to adapt to economic restrictions. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded to the latest threat Friday by posting the history of US sanctions against Iran on X. “We have seen this movie before. Same bull. Different bullies.” The administration’s strategy has received support from Iran hawks, who argue that intensified economic pressure could eventually force Tehran to make major concessions. Other analysts, however, warn that Washington may be repeating mistakes made by previous administrations. Threat of secondary sanctions Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent offered a glimpse into the next phase of the campaign during a CNBC interview on Thursday. He warned that the United States could impose secondary sanctions on countries and companies that continue doing business with Iran. Bessent did not identify potential targets. The earlier phase of Operation Economic Fury focused largely on individuals and entities involved in buying Iranian oil or accessing the country’s financial system. China and India are among the major purchasers of Iranian oil, meaning any broader secondary-sanctions campaign could have significant consequences for Washington’s relations with two major Asian powers. “If you insist on doing business with them, then the U.S. Treasury and U.S. government will put its full might and force against you,” Bessent said. “It’s time for our allies and the rest of the world to make a decision.” Also Read: Why DR Congo's Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak became its deadliest? EXPLAINED Secondary sanctions could hurt US interests Most major parts of Iran’s energy, financial and transportation sectors are already subject to US sanctions. The administration’s next step therefore appears likely to involve targeting countries and companies that continue maintaining economic ties with Tehran. The strategy resembles the “maximum pressure” campaign Trump pursued during his first term, but this time it is being combined with military action. The experience of the first administration demonstrated the difficulties involved in enforcing secondary sanctions. Washington frequently faced pressure to grant waivers to countries dependent on Iranian oil, while aggressive enforcement risked damaging US economic and diplomatic interests. “Trump’s strategy now rests on targeting Tehran directly by impeding its touch points and access to the formal financial system and international economy,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior director of the FDD’s Iran program. “This will require making the Iran issue more important in U.S. bilateral relations with countries in Europe and Asia.” The challenge for Washington will be persuading allies and trading partners to accept the economic costs of cutting ties with Iran. Tehran says sanctions will not force surrender Iranian officials have rejected the idea that escalating economic pressure will force the government to accept Washington’s demands. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei accused the United States of returning to sanctions whenever diplomatic efforts become difficult. “Iran has demonstrated over decades that it will not be strangled by these exhausted refrains,” he said. “The real risk is that American politicians, clinging to this bad habit, will instead strangle their own remaining chances of a less humiliating exit from a crisis of their own making.”

Trump is escalating economic pressure on Iran as the war nears six months, threatening secondary sanctions to force Tehran to surrender its nuclear ambitions

Trump warns of ‘economic D-Day’ against Iran, but Tehran knows sanctions well

U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified pressure on Iran, warning countries against providing Tehran with any economic lifeline. The threat has put allies and trading partners on edge as Washington seeks to tighten economic pressure on the Islamic Republic. At the center of the debate is Iran's trade network, with China remaining the largest buyer of Iranian oil despite years of U.S. sanctions and diplomatic pressure. The developments are reigniting questions over the effectiveness of sanctions, global energy security and the future of Iran's economic ties.

Trump warns nations giving any economic lifeline to Iran

The Trump administration is facing criticism after reports that a US Navy aircraft carrier originally named after Black war hero Doris Miller could be renamed to honour President Donald Trump.The Navy had earlier announced that the carrier under construction would be named USS Doris Miller, recognising Miller for his actions during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in the Second World War.&nbsp;However, CNN reported, citing three sources familiar with internal discussions, that the Navy is now considering a change to the name. Two sources told the network that discussions have taken place about naming the carrier after Trump.&nbsp;“This is a slap in the face to every war hero and every service member who has worn the uniform,” Derrick Johnson, president of the NAACP civil rights group quoted as saying by the Guardian. “Doris Miller earned his place in American history through courage, sacrifice, and service,” added Johnson. “Donald Trump only wants to serve himself.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/shameful-uk-australia-and-canada-condemn-israel-over-gaza-aid-convoy-killings-1787331804049">'Shameful': UK, Australia and Canada condemn Israel over Gaza aid convoy killings</a><h3>Doris Miller's Pearl Harbour heroics</h3>Miller served as a Navy cook and reportedly shot down four to six Japanese bombers during the Pearl Harbour attack in 1941, despite having no formal training with the weapon he used.&nbsp;He died in 1943 after a Japanese torpedo struck the USS Liscome Bay, killing about two-thirds of its crew. Actor Cuba Gooding Jr portrayed Miller in the 2001 film Pearl Harbour. &nbsp;Miller received the Navy Cross for his actions during the attack. The citation said: “While at the side of his Captain on the bridge of the battleship U.S.S. WEST VIRGINIA, Mess Attendant First Class Doris Miller, despite enemy strafing and bombing and in the face of a serious fire, assisted in moving his Captain, who had been mortally wounded, to a place of greater safety, and later manned and operated a machine gun directed at enemy Japanese attacking aircraft until ordered to leave the bridge.”&nbsp;Miller's family has continued to seek an upgrade of his award to the Medal of Honour.&nbsp;No US Navy aircraft carrier has previously been named after a sitting president. Reports that the vessel could instead carry Trump's name have therefore triggered strong criticism.

The Trump administration faces backlash over reports that a US Navy carrier named after Black war hero Doris Miller could be renamed to honour Donald Trump.

The Trump administration is facing criticism after reports that a US Navy aircraft carrier originally named after Black war hero Doris Miller could be renamed to honour President Donald Trump. The Navy had earlier announced that the carrier under construction would be named USS Doris Miller, recognising Miller for his actions during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour in the Second World War. However, CNN reported, citing three sources familiar with internal discussions, that the Navy is now considering a change to the name. Two sources told the network that discussions have taken place about naming the carrier after Trump. “This is a slap in the face to every war hero and every service member who has worn the uniform,” Derrick Johnson, president of the NAACP civil rights group quoted as saying by the Guardian. “Doris Miller earned his place in American history through courage, sacrifice, and service,” added Johnson. “Donald Trump only wants to serve himself.” Also Read: 'Shameful': UK, Australia and Canada condemn Israel over Gaza aid convoy killings Doris Miller's Pearl Harbour heroics Miller served as a Navy cook and reportedly shot down four to six Japanese bombers during the Pearl Harbour attack in 1941, despite having no formal training with the weapon he used. He died in 1943 after a Japanese torpedo struck the USS Liscome Bay, killing about two-thirds of its crew. Actor Cuba Gooding Jr portrayed Miller in the 2001 film Pearl Harbour. Miller received the Navy Cross for his actions during the attack. The citation said: “While at the side of his Captain on the bridge of the battleship U.S.S. WEST VIRGINIA, Mess Attendant First Class Doris Miller, despite enemy strafing and bombing and in the face of a serious fire, assisted in moving his Captain, who had been mortally wounded, to a place of greater safety, and later manned and operated a machine gun directed at enemy Japanese attacking aircraft until ordered to leave the bridge.” Miller's family has continued to seek an upgrade of his award to the Medal of Honour. No US Navy aircraft carrier has previously been named after a sitting president. Reports that the vessel could instead carry Trump's name have therefore triggered strong criticism.

The Trump administration faces backlash over reports that a US Navy carrier named after Black war hero Doris Miller could be renamed to honour Donald Trump.

Trump under fire as Navy weighs replacing Black war hero's name with his own

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump