Uber, Lyft, DoorDash can continue to classify drivers as contractors in California

On Thursday, the California Supreme Court delivered a landmark ruling that allows app-based ride-hailing and delivery services such as Uber and Lyft to continue classifying their drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. This unanimous decision marks the end of a protracted legal battle between labour unions and technology companies over the employment status of app-based service workers in California.

The court's ruling upholds Proposition 22, a voter-approved measure passed in 2020 that exempts these companies from treating their drivers as employees. Under this law, drivers are not entitled to traditional employee benefits such as overtime pay, paid sick leave, and unemployment insurance. The decision overturns a lower court's 2021 ruling that had declared the measure illegal, supporting instead an appeals court decision from last year that favoured the tech companies.

This verdict represents a significant victory for companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash, which invested USD 200 million in a campaign to support the passage of Proposition 22 in 2020. Uber hailed the ruling as a "victory" for drivers, emphasising that it secures drivers' freedom to work on their terms.

Add WION as a Preferred Source

However, the decision is a setback for labour unions and their allies in the California Legislature who have been fighting to secure more rights and benefits for drivers. Labour activists, including Nicole Moore, president of Rideshare Drivers United, expressed disappointment with the outcome, describing it as unjust and contrary to California's values.

Despite this setback, labour unions have vowed to continue their fight for drivers' job protections and benefits. They point to an earlier ruling in the appeal process that potentially opens the door for the Legislature to pass laws allowing drivers to unionise.

The ruling effectively nullifies a 2019 law passed by California lawmakers that would have required these companies to provide drivers with protections such as minimum wage, overtime, health insurance, and expense reimbursement. This law sought to redefine the criteria for classifying workers as employees or independent contractors, with significant implications for app-based ride-hailing and delivery companies.

Proposition 22, which was approved by voters in November 2020, exempted these companies from the 2019 law while providing some "alternative benefits" for drivers. These include a guaranteed minimum wage and health insurance subsidies for those averaging at least 25 hours of work per week.

The California Supreme Court's decision comes amid a broader national debate over gig workers' rights. In other parts of the country, such as Massachusetts, drivers are rallying behind initiatives to secure union rights and improved working conditions.

This ruling sets a significant precedent in California and may influence similar debates in other states regarding the classification and rights of gig economy workers. It underscores the ongoing tension between the flexibility offered by gig work and the need for worker protection in the evolving landscape of the modern economy.