National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

A Utah court has prohibited Tyler James Robinson, accused of murdering the conservative activist Charlie Kirk, from contacting Kirk's widow, Erika, under a preliminary protection order. This order was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice.<h3>What is the protective order?</h3>According to a report in Newsweek, the order prevents Robinson from harassing, threatening, stalking, or engaging in any conduct that would cause fear or threat to a protected person or designated family or household members. In the document that Judge Tony F. Graf signed claims that the court determined Robinson to be a credible threat to the physical safety of the protected person.&nbsp;The restrictions also stop Robinson from developing any contacts with Erika Kirk in any manner, including via mail, phone, email, text, or social media.&nbsp;Along with his imprisonment, Robinson is barred from going near Erika Kirk’s residence, workplace, or school, and must steer clear of any place where they could potentially meet. The court document also warns that breaching the order could lead to further arrests and fresh criminal charges.&nbsp;The 22-year-old Robinson was taken into custody 33 hours after he killed Kirk. He faces charges of aggravated homicide, felony firearm discharge, and committing violent acts in the presence of a child. Prosecutors have also added two counts of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, according to Utah County Attorney Jeff Grey.&nbsp;The incident unfolded when 30-year-old Kirk was addressing a Turning Point USA event on September 10 at Utah Valley University. The killing was reportedly carried out by Robinson with a lethal bolt-action rifle, according to the prosecution. After the assassination, Robinson was first appeared in court for the first time on September 16 for the hearing.

The 'protective order' was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice.

A Utah court has prohibited Tyler James Robinson, accused of murdering the conservative activist Charlie Kirk, from contacting Kirk's widow, Erika, under a preliminary protection order. This order was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice. What is the protective order? According to a report in Newsweek, the order prevents Robinson from harassing, threatening, stalking, or engaging in any conduct that would cause fear or threat to a protected person or designated family or household members. In the document that Judge Tony F. Graf signed claims that the court determined Robinson to be a credible threat to the physical safety of the protected person. The restrictions also stop Robinson from developing any contacts with Erika Kirk in any manner, including via mail, phone, email, text, or social media. Along with his imprisonment, Robinson is barred from going near Erika Kirk’s residence, workplace, or school, and must steer clear of any place where they could potentially meet. The court document also warns that breaching the order could lead to further arrests and fresh criminal charges. The 22-year-old Robinson was taken into custody 33 hours after he killed Kirk. He faces charges of aggravated homicide, felony firearm discharge, and committing violent acts in the presence of a child. Prosecutors have also added two counts of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, according to Utah County Attorney Jeff Grey. The incident unfolded when 30-year-old Kirk was addressing a Turning Point USA event on September 10 at Utah Valley University. The killing was reportedly carried out by Robinson with a lethal bolt-action rifle, according to the prosecution. After the assassination, Robinson was first appeared in court for the first time on September 16 for the hearing.

The 'protective order' was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice.

What’s behind the court’s 'protective order' against Tyler Robinson and Erika Kirk?

During US President Donald Trump’s state visit to the UK on Wednesday (September 17), the presence of two influential women is expected to capture major attention: Melania Trump, the First Lady, and the Princess of Wales, Catherine. Their public appearances reflect both a strategic effort to strengthen diplomatic relations and spotlight their global roles. Melania’s first state visit in her husband’s second term has been meticulously planned for months.&nbsp;&nbsp;She’s known for her careful attention to the details of such high-profile events, particularly when it comes to the clothing she wears and the image she projects. Ahead of the trip, she receives extensive briefings on her counterparts, their interests, and even the specifics of their wardrobe choices to ensure no clashing colors or tones.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/uk-rolls-out-royal-carpet-for-us-president-donald-trump-and-first-lady-melania-arrives-at-windsor-castle-1758109153150">UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania</a><h2>Melania-Kate meeting</h2>In parallel, Kate’s role as Princess of Wales has grown ever more visible. Recently returning to a full schedule after recovering from health treatments, she is now positioned as one of the most influential figures within the royal family. As the princess attends engagements related to youth causes and outdoor activities, this appearance alongside Melania is not just a diplomatic moment but a visual one, highlighting both the regal and relatable sides of the royal family. The state visit involves formal ceremonies such as a royal procession, air force flyover, and a state banquet, but one of the most anticipated moments will be when Kate and Melania tour the Royal Estate's Frogmore Gardens with young scouts. Here, the princess’s focus on children’s mental health aligns with Melania’s own advocacy for children, making the joint appearance a natural and meaningful one.<h2>‘Impactful appearances by Melania and Kate’</h2>The event is not just symbolic of the royal family’s enduring influence in modern diplomacy but marks a new chapter in Kate’s recovery and her role as a global figure. As royal expert Elizabeth Holmes notes, this will be one of the most impactful appearances by the two women, underscoring their ability to “humanise” their respective roles on the world stage. Both women’s participation highlights their shared interest in children’s welfare, with Melania recently addressing issues like deepfake pornography and advocating for foster children. Likewise, Kate’s post-health recovery marks a return to public engagements with causes close to her heart.&nbsp;This marks another key moment in the ongoing evolution of the royal family, which has become adept at leveraging its influence for diplomacy, with Kate leading the charge as a modern, compassionate figure on the global stage.

A diplomatic first: Melania Trump, Princess Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor

During US President Donald Trump’s state visit to the UK on Wednesday (September 17), the presence of two influential women is expected to capture major attention: Melania Trump, the First Lady, and the Princess of Wales, Catherine. Their public appearances reflect both a strategic effort to strengthen diplomatic relations and spotlight their global roles. Melania’s first state visit in her husband’s second term has been meticulously planned for months. She’s known for her careful attention to the details of such high-profile events, particularly when it comes to the clothing she wears and the image she projects. Ahead of the trip, she receives extensive briefings on her counterparts, their interests, and even the specifics of their wardrobe choices to ensure no clashing colors or tones. Also Read: UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Melania-Kate meeting In parallel, Kate’s role as Princess of Wales has grown ever more visible. Recently returning to a full schedule after recovering from health treatments, she is now positioned as one of the most influential figures within the royal family. As the princess attends engagements related to youth causes and outdoor activities, this appearance alongside Melania is not just a diplomatic moment but a visual one, highlighting both the regal and relatable sides of the royal family. The state visit involves formal ceremonies such as a royal procession, air force flyover, and a state banquet, but one of the most anticipated moments will be when Kate and Melania tour the Royal Estate's Frogmore Gardens with young scouts. Here, the princess’s focus on children’s mental health aligns with Melania’s own advocacy for children, making the joint appearance a natural and meaningful one. ‘Impactful appearances by Melania and Kate’ The event is not just symbolic of the royal family’s enduring influence in modern diplomacy but marks a new chapter in Kate’s recovery and her role as a global figure. As royal expert Elizabeth Holmes notes, this will be one of the most impactful appearances by the two women, underscoring their ability to “humanise” their respective roles on the world stage. Both women’s participation highlights their shared interest in children’s welfare, with Melania recently addressing issues like deepfake pornography and advocating for foster children. Likewise, Kate’s post-health recovery marks a return to public engagements with causes close to her heart. This marks another key moment in the ongoing evolution of the royal family, which has become adept at leveraging its influence for diplomacy, with Kate leading the charge as a modern, compassionate figure on the global stage.

Melania Trump and Princess Kate make a high-profile debut together at the UK state visit, showcasing their influence on global diplomacy while aligning with key causes related to children’s well-being

Melania Trump, Princess Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor

US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania were welcomed in a royal ceremony after their arrival at the UK’s Windsor Castle on Wednesday (Sep 17) to mark their second state visit.

In pics | 41-gun salute, 120 horses, 1,300 troops: Trump and Melania’s royal welcome ceremony in UK

Ukrainian MP Artem Dmitruk made a shocking claims days after the murder of right-wing American activist Charlie Kirk. Dmitruk said that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's government was involved in the assassination attempt on US President Donald Trump last year and in the killing of Kirk.&nbsp;In an opinion piece for TASS, Dmitruk said that &nbsp;Zelensky's government is responsible to kill Kirk both ideologically and practically. "Kyiv's authorities are capable of killing anyone, from an ordinary citizen in Ukraine to the president of the United States," Dmitruk wrote in the Russian state media outlet. Dmitruk also said Kyiv's silence after Kirk's killing showed tacit approval. "They do not condemn such murders. Sometimes, they even rejoice in them, as was the case with Charlie Kirk," he wrote, as per TASS. This comes after Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray charged CHarlie Kirk's alleged killer Robinson with his murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and other offences. Gray said he will seek the death penalty for Robinson.<h2>Charlie Kirk's murder</h2>Right-wing activist and United States President Donald Trump ally Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday (Sep 10). He later succumbed to injuries. His death has caused a stir in the political landscape of America, with thousands demanding justice. Both sides of the spectrum are pointing fingers at the increasing gun violence in the United States. However, some also criticised Kirk and his views on gun violence. Meanwhile, the US administration under President Donald Trump declared him a martyr and announced that US flags will be flown at half mast in his honour. A suspect named Tyler Robinson has been arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the murder case. Investigations have revealed several controversial things, including his alleged transgender partner, Lance Twiggs.

Ukrainian MP Artem Dmitruk accused Zelensky’s government of links to Charlie Kirk’s murder and a Trump assassination attempt. Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University on Sept 10 and later died. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces charges, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty

Ukrainian MP Artem Dmitruk made a shocking claims days after the murder of right-wing American activist Charlie Kirk. Dmitruk said that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's government was involved in the assassination attempt on US President Donald Trump last year and in the killing of Kirk. In an opinion piece for TASS, Dmitruk said that Zelensky's government is responsible to kill Kirk both ideologically and practically. "Kyiv's authorities are capable of killing anyone, from an ordinary citizen in Ukraine to the president of the United States," Dmitruk wrote in the Russian state media outlet. Dmitruk also said Kyiv's silence after Kirk's killing showed tacit approval. "They do not condemn such murders. Sometimes, they even rejoice in them, as was the case with Charlie Kirk," he wrote, as per TASS. This comes after Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray charged CHarlie Kirk's alleged killer Robinson with his murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and other offences. Gray said he will seek the death penalty for Robinson. Charlie Kirk's murder Right-wing activist and United States President Donald Trump ally Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday (Sep 10). He later succumbed to injuries. His death has caused a stir in the political landscape of America, with thousands demanding justice. Both sides of the spectrum are pointing fingers at the increasing gun violence in the United States. However, some also criticised Kirk and his views on gun violence. Meanwhile, the US administration under President Donald Trump declared him a martyr and announced that US flags will be flown at half mast in his honour. A suspect named Tyler Robinson has been arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the murder case. Investigations have revealed several controversial things, including his alleged transgender partner, Lance Twiggs.

Ukrainian MP Artem Dmitruk accused Zelensky’s government of links to Charlie Kirk’s murder and a Trump assassination attempt. Kirk was shot at Utah Valley University on Sept 10 and later died. Suspect Tyler Robinson faces charges, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty

'Capable of killing anyone': Ukraine MP makes shocking claims against Zelensky over Charlie Kirk's murder - Here's what he said

Britain is rolling out its grandest traditions in an attempt to influence Donald Trump’s stance on the Ukraine war. The US president, joined by First Lady Melania Trump, will become the first American leader to be formally welcomed to Windsor Castle.The visit will feature all the pomp he admires, a carriage procession, a white-tie banquet and even a ceremonial flypast. Officials hope the royal charm offensive will create space for Prime Minister Keir Starmer to push Trump to take a tougher line against Russian President Vladimir Putin.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-qatar-funds-hamas-netanyahu-says-strikes-on-hamas-officials-in-qatar-entirely-justified-1758094498665">'Qatar funds Hamas': Netanyahu says strikes on Hamas officials in Qatar are 'entirely justified'</a><h2>What role does the king play?</h2>A senior defence official told Politico that the king is “very close” to the details of ceasefire negotiations and has developed a personal rapport with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Charles has quietly shown support for Kyiv, welcoming Zelenskyy for tea at Sandringham and lunch at Windsor Castle earlier this year.At last month’s Ukrainian independence day, he called for a “just and lasting peace”. Royal aides say such gestures underline his sympathy for Ukraine, even though the monarch avoids public political statements.<h2>Why target Trump through the royals?</h2>Trump has often clashed with European leaders, but he has consistently spoken with warmth about the royal family. Before departing for Britain, he hailed King Charles as “such an elegant gentleman” and described the trip as a “great honour.”Analysts believe that, unlike politicians, the monarchy can exert a unique influence. Charles’ biographer Robert Hardman said that “in soft power terms, other world leaders, other countries are far more interested in the monarchy than they are in Downing Street.<h2>Will the royal push work?</h2>The question is whether the royal reception will actually shift Trump’s stance. Some officials point to his past encounters with European monarchs as helping NATO unity. Others remain sceptical.Trump himself has insisted that NATO allies should stop buying Russian oil and impose heavy tariffs on China before the US considers fresh penalties against Moscow. For now, Britain’s task is less about securing breakthroughs and more about keeping Trump engaged in talks, and King Charles may be the strongest card it has left to play.&nbsp;

Britain plans a lavish Windsor Castle welcome for Donald Trump, using royal pageantry to influence his Ukraine stance. Officials hope King Charles’ soft power and rapport with Zelensky may sway US policy.

Britain is rolling out its grandest traditions in an attempt to influence Donald Trump’s stance on the Ukraine war. The US president, joined by First Lady Melania Trump, will become the first American leader to be formally welcomed to Windsor Castle. The visit will feature all the pomp he admires, a carriage procession, a white-tie banquet and even a ceremonial flypast. Officials hope the royal charm offensive will create space for Prime Minister Keir Starmer to push Trump to take a tougher line against Russian President Vladimir Putin. Also read: 'Qatar funds Hamas': Netanyahu says strikes on Hamas officials in Qatar are 'entirely justified' What role does the king play? A senior defence official told Politico that the king is “very close” to the details of ceasefire negotiations and has developed a personal rapport with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Charles has quietly shown support for Kyiv, welcoming Zelenskyy for tea at Sandringham and lunch at Windsor Castle earlier this year. At last month’s Ukrainian independence day, he called for a “just and lasting peace”. Royal aides say such gestures underline his sympathy for Ukraine, even though the monarch avoids public political statements. Why target Trump through the royals? Trump has often clashed with European leaders, but he has consistently spoken with warmth about the royal family. Before departing for Britain, he hailed King Charles as “such an elegant gentleman” and described the trip as a “great honour.” Analysts believe that, unlike politicians, the monarchy can exert a unique influence. Charles’ biographer Robert Hardman said that “in soft power terms, other world leaders, other countries are far more interested in the monarchy than they are in Downing Street. Will the royal push work? The question is whether the royal reception will actually shift Trump’s stance. Some officials point to his past encounters with European monarchs as helping NATO unity. Others remain sceptical. Trump himself has insisted that NATO allies should stop buying Russian oil and impose heavy tariffs on China before the US considers fresh penalties against Moscow. For now, Britain’s task is less about securing breakthroughs and more about keeping Trump engaged in talks, and King Charles may be the strongest card it has left to play.

Britain plans a lavish Windsor Castle welcome for Donald Trump, using royal pageantry to influence his Ukraine stance. Officials hope King Charles’ soft power and rapport with Zelensky may sway US policy.

Trump's UK visit could be Ukraine's best hope: Will King Charles succeed where Europe failed in influencing Trump?

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (September 17) received an extravagant welcome during his second state visit to the UK, with a gun salute and a display of mounted cavalry marking the start of his arrival, all amidst tight security. Prince William and his wife Catherine greeted Trump and First Lady Melania as the Marine One helicopter landed at Windsor Castle.&nbsp;Shielded from the protests outside by layers of security, the couple escorted the Trumps to meet King Charles III and Queen Camilla. The formal proceedings kicked off with Trump shaking hands with the monarch just as a 41-gun salute was fired from six historic World War One artillery pieces positioned on the castle’s eastern lawn, with another similar salute taking place at the Tower of London in central London.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russian-opposition-leader-alexei-navalny-s-death-in-custody-linked-to-poisoning-labs-confirm-says-wife-yulia-navalnaya-1758106068761">Russian Opposition leader Alexei Navalny's death in custody linked to poisoning, labs confirm, claims wife Yulia Navalnaya</a><h2>A royal welcome for Donald Trump and Melania</h2>A massive spectacle unfolded, with around 120 horses and 1,300 British military personnel participating in what officials described as the grandest military ceremonial welcome for a state visitor in recent history. Following the formalities, the royal couple and the Trumps made their way in a carriage procession across the Windsor estate toward the ancient castle.&nbsp;Britain is pulling out all the stops to impress and charm the unpredictable Donald Trump during his latest visit, aiming to keep him engaged amid a series of global crises. The 79-year-old president, however, is being kept at a distance from the British public, as polls show that he is highly unpopular among them. The entire trip is being carried out behind closed doors, out of view from regular Britons.&nbsp;Knowing Trump's affinity for British royalty and his love for extravagant displays, the UK has outdone itself with a ceremonial welcome even grander than the one offered during his 2019 state visit, when Queen Elizabeth II hosted him. Trump and his wife Melania will pay their respects by laying a wreath at the tomb of Queen Elizabeth II, who passed away in 2022. The trip will conclude with a formal white-tie banquet, where both Trump and King Charles III are scheduled to make speeches.<h2>Political Tensions and the Epstein Shadow</h2>The question for Britain is whether this lavish reception will win over Trump, whose unpredictable policies on issues like tariffs, Ukraine, and Gaza have created global chaos. Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be hoping that Trump leaves the UK feeling positively towards the country, though the outcome remains uncertain.&nbsp;Trump appeared to appreciate the gesture as he arrived at the US ambassador’s residence in London by helicopter with Melania on Tuesday. "A lot of things here warm my heart," he said, noting that his mother was from Scotland and that he owns two golf resorts there. He also referred to King Charles as "my friend," despite the monarch’s ongoing cancer treatment. However, Trump's association with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein continues to hover over the visit. Images of Trump and Epstein were projected onto Windsor Castle on Tuesday (September 16), and protests were expected to take place across London on Wednesday (September 17).

UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania; arrives at Windsor Castle

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (September 17) received an extravagant welcome during his second state visit to the UK, with a gun salute and a display of mounted cavalry marking the start of his arrival, all amidst tight security. Prince William and his wife Catherine greeted Trump and First Lady Melania as the Marine One helicopter landed at Windsor Castle. Shielded from the protests outside by layers of security, the couple escorted the Trumps to meet King Charles III and Queen Camilla. The formal proceedings kicked off with Trump shaking hands with the monarch just as a 41-gun salute was fired from six historic World War One artillery pieces positioned on the castle’s eastern lawn, with another similar salute taking place at the Tower of London in central London. Also Read: Russian Opposition leader Alexei Navalny's death in custody linked to poisoning, labs confirm, claims wife Yulia Navalnaya A royal welcome for Donald Trump and Melania A massive spectacle unfolded, with around 120 horses and 1,300 British military personnel participating in what officials described as the grandest military ceremonial welcome for a state visitor in recent history. Following the formalities, the royal couple and the Trumps made their way in a carriage procession across the Windsor estate toward the ancient castle. Britain is pulling out all the stops to impress and charm the unpredictable Donald Trump during his latest visit, aiming to keep him engaged amid a series of global crises. The 79-year-old president, however, is being kept at a distance from the British public, as polls show that he is highly unpopular among them. The entire trip is being carried out behind closed doors, out of view from regular Britons. Knowing Trump's affinity for British royalty and his love for extravagant displays, the UK has outdone itself with a ceremonial welcome even grander than the one offered during his 2019 state visit, when Queen Elizabeth II hosted him. Trump and his wife Melania will pay their respects by laying a wreath at the tomb of Queen Elizabeth II, who passed away in 2022. The trip will conclude with a formal white-tie banquet, where both Trump and King Charles III are scheduled to make speeches. Political Tensions and the Epstein Shadow The question for Britain is whether this lavish reception will win over Trump, whose unpredictable policies on issues like tariffs, Ukraine, and Gaza have created global chaos. Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be hoping that Trump leaves the UK feeling positively towards the country, though the outcome remains uncertain. Trump appeared to appreciate the gesture as he arrived at the US ambassador’s residence in London by helicopter with Melania on Tuesday. "A lot of things here warm my heart," he said, noting that his mother was from Scotland and that he owns two golf resorts there. He also referred to King Charles as "my friend," despite the monarch’s ongoing cancer treatment. However, Trump's association with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein continues to hover over the visit. Images of Trump and Epstein were projected onto Windsor Castle on Tuesday (September 16), and protests were expected to take place across London on Wednesday (September 17).

Donald Trump’s second UK state visit featured a grand welcome with a gun salute, military display, and a royal procession at Windsor Castle

UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania

The wife of Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny on Wednesday (September 17) said that lab tests conducted on biological samples secretly taken from him reveal he was poisoned while imprisoned in a remote Arctic facility in February 2024. Navalny, a leading critic of President Vladimir Putin, died under suspicious circumstances during a 19-year prison term, which many view as political retaliation. Known for exposing corruption in Putin’s circle and mobilising mass protests, Navalny’s demise has remained unexplained by Russian authorities, who claim he suddenly fell ill during a prison yard walk on February 16.&nbsp;Before the burial, Yulia Navalnaya revealed that Navalny’s supporters managed to discreetly send biological samples abroad for testing. “The labs in two countries concluded that Alexei was deliberately poisoned,” she said in a social media video. Though she did not disclose the specifics of the samples or the poison identified, she called on the laboratories to publicly confirm their findings and name the toxin.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/christian-brueckner-suspected-in-madeline-mccann-s-disappearance-freed-after-serving-seven-year-jail-term-for-rape-1758104777095">Christian Brueckner, suspected in Madeline McCann's disappearance, freed after serving seven-year jail term for rape</a>&nbsp;Navalnaya also shared unverified images purportedly showing Navalny’s prison cell after his body was taken away, highlighting a visible pool of vomit and citing prison staff accounts describing seizures. Navalny had previously survived a Novichok nerve agent poisoning in 2020 during a Siberian campaign tour, after which he was flown to Germany for recovery. He was imprisoned upon his return to Russia in 2021 on charges widely regarded as politically motivated.&nbsp;While incarcerated, Navalny continued his anti-Putin activism and condemned Russia’s war in Ukraine. Officials say he died suddenly after falling ill during an outdoor walk. Delays in releasing his body to his family raised further doubts among supporters. Navalnaya maintains Putin ordered her husband’s assassination, an allegation the Kremlin denies.&nbsp;Since Navalny’s death, the government intensified repression of his associates, branding his wife a "terrorist and extremist," and imprisoning his lawyers and journalists covering his cases. Many of Navalny’s relatives and key supporters have fled Russia. The opposition, weakened by internal divisions, struggles to maintain influence in exile.

Navalny’s wife says lab tests on smuggled samples confirm he was poisoned in a Russian Arctic prison in 2024, alleging Kremlin-ordered murder amid ongoing repression of his allies

The wife of Russian opposition figure Alexei Navalny on Wednesday (September 17) said that lab tests conducted on biological samples secretly taken from him reveal he was poisoned while imprisoned in a remote Arctic facility in February 2024. Navalny, a leading critic of President Vladimir Putin, died under suspicious circumstances during a 19-year prison term, which many view as political retaliation. Known for exposing corruption in Putin’s circle and mobilising mass protests, Navalny’s demise has remained unexplained by Russian authorities, who claim he suddenly fell ill during a prison yard walk on February 16. Before the burial, Yulia Navalnaya revealed that Navalny’s supporters managed to discreetly send biological samples abroad for testing. “The labs in two countries concluded that Alexei was deliberately poisoned,” she said in a social media video. Though she did not disclose the specifics of the samples or the poison identified, she called on the laboratories to publicly confirm their findings and name the toxin. Also Read: Christian Brueckner, suspected in Madeline McCann's disappearance, freed after serving seven-year jail term for rape Navalnaya also shared unverified images purportedly showing Navalny’s prison cell after his body was taken away, highlighting a visible pool of vomit and citing prison staff accounts describing seizures. Navalny had previously survived a Novichok nerve agent poisoning in 2020 during a Siberian campaign tour, after which he was flown to Germany for recovery. He was imprisoned upon his return to Russia in 2021 on charges widely regarded as politically motivated. While incarcerated, Navalny continued his anti-Putin activism and condemned Russia’s war in Ukraine. Officials say he died suddenly after falling ill during an outdoor walk. Delays in releasing his body to his family raised further doubts among supporters. Navalnaya maintains Putin ordered her husband’s assassination, an allegation the Kremlin denies. Since Navalny’s death, the government intensified repression of his associates, branding his wife a "terrorist and extremist," and imprisoning his lawyers and journalists covering his cases. Many of Navalny’s relatives and key supporters have fled Russia. The opposition, weakened by internal divisions, struggles to maintain influence in exile.

Navalny’s wife says lab tests on smuggled samples confirm he was poisoned in a Russian Arctic prison in 2024, alleging Kremlin-ordered murder amid ongoing repression of his allies

Russian Opposition leader Alexei Navalny's death in custody linked to poisoning, labs confirm, claims wife Yulia Navalnaya

Christian Brueckner, the primary suspect in the 2007 disappearance of British toddler Madeleine McCann, was released from prison in Germany on Wednesday (September 17). The 48-year-old had just completed a seven-year sentence for the rape of a 72-year-old American woman in Portugal’s Algarve region, the area where McCann was disappeared. Brueckner, who has long been under suspicion in the McCann case, has never been formally charged due to insufficient evidence. Despite German prosecutors naming him their main suspect in 2020, the evidence they have gathered has not been enough to bring formal charges. In addition, authorities have not uncovered definitive proof linking him to Madeleine's disappearance.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ai-war-china-trials-local-chip-making-tech-even-as-it-asks-chinese-firms-to-reject-us-made-nvidia-chips-why-this-matters-1758101991019">AI War: China trials local chip making tech even as it asks Chinese firms to reject US-made Nvidia chips. Why this matters</a>&nbsp;Following his release from Sehnde prison in northern Germany, Brueckner was escorted by his lawyer, accompanied by police vans. Reports suggest that he will be required to wear an electronic ankle bracelet and regularly check in with probation officers. His passport has been confiscated, and his identification is now restricted for use within Germany.&nbsp;Despite his release, prosecutors in Braunschweig have indicated that Brueckner remains a dangerous individual and a flight risk. They warned he may attempt to leave the country due to the ongoing media attention surrounding the case. Brueckner's defense lawyer, however, expressed concern that the public perception of his client as a child murderer will make reintegration into society extremely difficult.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-qatar-funds-hamas-netanyahu-says-strikes-on-hamas-officials-in-qatar-entirely-justified-1758094498665">'Qatar funds Hamas': Netanyahu says strikes on Hamas officials in Qatar are 'entirely justified'</a>&nbsp;Brueckner has a history of criminal activity, including a conviction for sexually abusing children as a teenager, and a record of 17 criminal offenses, which include theft, bodily harm, and drug trafficking. He was also acquitted in 2022 of charges related to other sexual offenses committed in Portugal. As investigations into McCann's case continue, German prosecutors have mentioned that they are still evaluating new evidence from a June search near Praia da Luz, the area where Madeleine disappeared. Though no conclusive discoveries have been made, they insist that the investigation remains active, with multiple lines of inquiry still being pursued.

Christian Brueckner, suspected in the 2007 disappearance of Madeleine McCann, was released from German prison after serving a sentence for rape. Despite being a key suspect, he hasn't been charged due to lack of evidence

Christian Brueckner, the primary suspect in the 2007 disappearance of British toddler Madeleine McCann, was released from prison in Germany on Wednesday (September 17). The 48-year-old had just completed a seven-year sentence for the rape of a 72-year-old American woman in Portugal’s Algarve region, the area where McCann was disappeared. Brueckner, who has long been under suspicion in the McCann case, has never been formally charged due to insufficient evidence. Despite German prosecutors naming him their main suspect in 2020, the evidence they have gathered has not been enough to bring formal charges. In addition, authorities have not uncovered definitive proof linking him to Madeleine's disappearance. Also Read: AI War: China trials local chip making tech even as it asks Chinese firms to reject US-made Nvidia chips. Why this matters Following his release from Sehnde prison in northern Germany, Brueckner was escorted by his lawyer, accompanied by police vans. Reports suggest that he will be required to wear an electronic ankle bracelet and regularly check in with probation officers. His passport has been confiscated, and his identification is now restricted for use within Germany. Despite his release, prosecutors in Braunschweig have indicated that Brueckner remains a dangerous individual and a flight risk. They warned he may attempt to leave the country due to the ongoing media attention surrounding the case. Brueckner's defense lawyer, however, expressed concern that the public perception of his client as a child murderer will make reintegration into society extremely difficult. Also Read: 'Qatar funds Hamas': Netanyahu says strikes on Hamas officials in Qatar are 'entirely justified' Brueckner has a history of criminal activity, including a conviction for sexually abusing children as a teenager, and a record of 17 criminal offenses, which include theft, bodily harm, and drug trafficking. He was also acquitted in 2022 of charges related to other sexual offenses committed in Portugal. As investigations into McCann's case continue, German prosecutors have mentioned that they are still evaluating new evidence from a June search near Praia da Luz, the area where Madeleine disappeared. Though no conclusive discoveries have been made, they insist that the investigation remains active, with multiple lines of inquiry still being pursued.

Christian Brueckner, suspected in the 2007 disappearance of Madeleine McCann, was released from German prison after serving a sentence for rape. Despite being a key suspect, he hasn't been charged due to lack of evidence

Christian Brueckner, suspected in Madeline McCann's disappearance, freed after serving seven-year jail term for rape

Amid the intensifying ‘AI war’, China has restricted the use of US-made AI chips, even as it moved a step close to self-reliance by trialling its own semiconductor manufacturing technology. According to mutiple reports, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) recently ordered major tech firms—including Alibaba, ByteDance, and Tencent—to halt purchases and suspend testing of Nvidia’s AI chips, particularly the RTX Pro 6000D. The move aims at reducing dependence on foreign hardware and bolstering domestic alternatives.<h2>China rejects US-made Nvidia chips: Why it matters</h2>China’s rejection of Nvidia chips came close on the heels of earlier curbs on the American company's H20 AI chip, citing “information risks” and cybersecurity concerns. Beijing has alerady gone beyond usage bans: antitrust probes against Nvidia is looking into its 2019 acquisition of Mellanox Technologies, as a violation of merger conditions.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-nvidia-violate-anti-monopoly-law-in-china-here-s-what-beijing-s-market-regulator-revealed-amid-trade-tensions-with-us-1757933085751">Did Nvidia violate anti-monopoly law in China? Here’s what Beijing’s market regulator revealed amid trade tensions with US</a><h2>China trials domestic chip-making technology. What did it do?</h2>Financial Times reported that China is conducting trials of its own semiconductor manufacturing technology. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), the largest Chinese chipmaker, is testing a domestically developed deep-ultraviolet (DUV) lithography machine created by Shanghai startup Yuliangsheng.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/how-nvidia-s-46-7-billion-boost-helped-palantir-stock-1756376930342">How Nvidia’s $46.7 billion boost helped Palantir stock</a> This is a crucial step toward lessening reliance on foreign equipment, especially given that China remains barred from acquiring extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography tools, the key technology for producing the most advanced chips.This domestic DUV tool still incorporates some imported parts and requires further development to achieve mass production yields. Yet, it is a reflection of China’s concerted efforts to catch up in chip fabrication technology. SMIC currently uses multi-patterning with 28nm tools to produce chips roughly equivalent to 7nm nodes. it has aspirations to reach 5nm.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-secretly-hiding-trackers-in-ai-chip-shipments-to-catch-illegal-diversions-to-china-report-1755206968127/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-secretly-hiding-trackers-in-ai-chip-shipments-to-catch-illegal-diversions-to-china-report-1755206968127/embed</a><h2>China now has a data centre powered by domestic AI chips</h2>Amid intense competition in artificial intelligence with the US, China Unicom recently unveiled a major data centre powered almost entirely by domestic AI chips, made by Alibaba’s T-Head and Biren Tech, among others. Alibaba and Baidu have also begun deploying their own AI chips for AI model training, a broader industry shift away from Nvidia’s technology.<h2>China is seeking technological autonomy to end dependency on the US</h2>China’s domestic chip industry continues to face challenges like achieving advanced node yields, developing EUV lithography. But it is on a march towards long-term technological sovereignty over short-term performance advantages. Chinese quest for automomy in AI technology could fragment global AI standards and supply chains.US &nbsp;export controls have restricted China’s access to key technologies. It has also given urgency to China’s drive for self-sufficiency.&nbsp;

Amid intense competition with the US, China has trialled domestic AI chipmaking tools, even as it  banned Nvidia AI chips. Beijing is accelerating self-reliance amid US export controls in the ongoing AI chip war. Here is why it matters



Amid the intensifying ‘AI war’, China has restricted the use of US-made AI chips, even as it moved a step close to self-reliance by trialling its own semiconductor manufacturing technology. According to mutiple reports, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) recently ordered major tech firms—including Alibaba, ByteDance, and Tencent—to halt purchases and suspend testing of Nvidia’s AI chips, particularly the RTX Pro 6000D. The move aims at reducing dependence on foreign hardware and bolstering domestic alternatives. China rejects US-made Nvidia chips: Why it matters China’s rejection of Nvidia chips came close on the heels of earlier curbs on the American company's H20 AI chip, citing “information risks” and cybersecurity concerns. Beijing has alerady gone beyond usage bans: antitrust probes against Nvidia is looking into its 2019 acquisition of Mellanox Technologies, as a violation of merger conditions. Also read: Did Nvidia violate anti-monopoly law in China? Here’s what Beijing’s market regulator revealed amid trade tensions with US China trials domestic chip-making technology. What did it do? Financial Times reported that China is conducting trials of its own semiconductor manufacturing technology. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), the largest Chinese chipmaker, is testing a domestically developed deep-ultraviolet (DUV) lithography machine created by Shanghai startup Yuliangsheng. Also read: How Nvidia’s $46.7 billion boost helped Palantir stock This is a crucial step toward lessening reliance on foreign equipment, especially given that China remains barred from acquiring extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography tools, the key technology for producing the most advanced chips. This domestic DUV tool still incorporates some imported parts and requires further development to achieve mass production yields. Yet, it is a reflection of China’s concerted efforts to catch up in chip fabrication technology. SMIC currently uses multi-patterning with 28nm tools to produce chips roughly equivalent to 7nm nodes. it has aspirations to reach 5nm. https://www.wionews.com/videos/u-s-secretly-hiding-trackers-in-ai-chip-shipments-to-catch-illegal-diversions-to-china-report-1755206968127/embed China now has a data centre powered by domestic AI chips Amid intense competition in artificial intelligence with the US, China Unicom recently unveiled a major data centre powered almost entirely by domestic AI chips, made by Alibaba’s T-Head and Biren Tech, among others. Alibaba and Baidu have also begun deploying their own AI chips for AI model training, a broader industry shift away from Nvidia’s technology. China is seeking technological autonomy to end dependency on the US China’s domestic chip industry continues to face challenges like achieving advanced node yields, developing EUV lithography. But it is on a march towards long-term technological sovereignty over short-term performance advantages. Chinese quest for automomy in AI technology could fragment global AI standards and supply chains. US export controls have restricted China’s access to key technologies. It has also given urgency to China’s drive for self-sufficiency.

Amid intense competition with the US, China has trialled domestic AI chipmaking tools, even as it &nbsp;banned Nvidia AI chips. Beijing is accelerating self-reliance amid US export controls in the ongoing AI chip war. Here is why it matters&nbsp;

AI War: China trials local chip making tech even as it asks Chinese firms to reject US-made Nvidia chips. Why this matters

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended last week’s strike on Hamas officials in Qatar, describing it as justified because of the Gulf state’s close ties with the militant group. “Qatar is connected to Hamas, it bolsters Hamas, it harbours Hamas, it funds Hamas… It has strong levers (that it could pull), but it chose not to,” Netanyahu told reporters at a press conference. “Therefore our action was entirely justified,” he added. The airstrike in Doha was the first time Israel had launched such an operation on Qatari soil, a country that is also a US ally.<h2>What was the outcome of the strike?</h2>The bombing killed six people, though none of them were the senior Hamas leaders that Israel said it was targeting, according to both Israeli sources and the militant group. The unprecedented move has heightened tensions in the region and added new pressure to already fragile ceasefire negotiations.<h2>How did Qatar react?</h2>Qatar responded by calling an emergency meeting of the Arab League and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Nearly 60 nations attended, condemning Israel and urging collective action. Qatar has no diplomatic relations with Israel but has long hosted Hamas leaders. It has also acted as a mediator in ceasefire talks and in negotiations for the release of Israeli hostages captured during Hamas' 7 October 2023 attack.<h2>What is Qatar’s role in the conflict?</h2>Between 2018 and 2023, Qatar provided millions of dollars each month in cash and aid to Gaza, funding that was approved at the time by Netanyahu’s cabinet. Despite this, Israeli media earlier this year reported that two of Netanyahu’s aides were investigated by Shin Bet for allegedly receiving payments from Qatar, a scandal dubbed “Qatargate”.Netanyahu, who testified in the inquiry in March, dismissed it as a “political witch hunt”. Reports also linked the dismissals of Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar and efforts to remove Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara to their involvement in the probe.

Netanyahu defended Israel’s first strike in Qatar, claiming Doha funds Hamas. The attack killed six, intensified regional tensions, and drew condemnation from nearly 60 nations as fragile ceasefire talks faced fresh obstacles.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended last week’s strike on Hamas officials in Qatar, describing it as justified because of the Gulf state’s close ties with the militant group. “Qatar is connected to Hamas, it bolsters Hamas, it harbours Hamas, it funds Hamas… It has strong levers (that it could pull), but it chose not to,” Netanyahu told reporters at a press conference. “Therefore our action was entirely justified,” he added. The airstrike in Doha was the first time Israel had launched such an operation on Qatari soil, a country that is also a US ally. What was the outcome of the strike? The bombing killed six people, though none of them were the senior Hamas leaders that Israel said it was targeting, according to both Israeli sources and the militant group. The unprecedented move has heightened tensions in the region and added new pressure to already fragile ceasefire negotiations. How did Qatar react? Qatar responded by calling an emergency meeting of the Arab League and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. Nearly 60 nations attended, condemning Israel and urging collective action. Qatar has no diplomatic relations with Israel but has long hosted Hamas leaders. It has also acted as a mediator in ceasefire talks and in negotiations for the release of Israeli hostages captured during Hamas' 7 October 2023 attack. What is Qatar’s role in the conflict? Between 2018 and 2023, Qatar provided millions of dollars each month in cash and aid to Gaza, funding that was approved at the time by Netanyahu’s cabinet. Despite this, Israeli media earlier this year reported that two of Netanyahu’s aides were investigated by Shin Bet for allegedly receiving payments from Qatar, a scandal dubbed “Qatargate”. Netanyahu, who testified in the inquiry in March, dismissed it as a “political witch hunt”. Reports also linked the dismissals of Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar and efforts to remove Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara to their involvement in the probe.

Netanyahu defended Israel’s first strike in Qatar, claiming Doha funds Hamas. The attack killed six, intensified regional tensions, and drew condemnation from nearly 60 nations as fragile ceasefire talks faced fresh obstacles.

'Qatar funds Hamas': Netanyahu says strikes on Hamas officials in Qatar are 'entirely justified'

An unusual trend is being observed in Kabul, Afghanistan. According to reports, cosmetic surgery facilities are becoming increasingly popular in an orthodox Taliban-ruled state. Approximately 20 clinics have popped up in Kabul offering procedures like Botox, facelifts, and hair transplants. These clinics feature luxurious design elements like velvet sofas and crystal chandeliers, which create an environment unlikely to be appreciated under the Taliban authorities.&nbsp;In July 2023, the Taliban imposed a nationwide ban on beauty parlours, giving owners one month to close their businesses. When the bans were being imposed, there were approximately 12,000–13,000 beauty parlours available in Kabul. According to reports by the UN and Afghan women’s groups, these salons were one of the few remaining sources of income and social space for Afghan women.&nbsp;&nbsp;Read Also: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/complete-list-prime-minister-modi-s-international-travel-1758020879275">Prime Minister Modi’s international travel: Complete list of Prime Ministerial visits abroad</a>&nbsp;However, despite the Taliban conservatism, something around 20 clinics have flourished. Doctors from foreign countries like Turkey have travelled to Kabul to train Afghans. Professionals have claimed that these procedures are permitted under medical treatment without any intervention from the Taliban authorities.&nbsp;The clientele is diverse, encompassing both men and women. Men are often there to address their thinning hairline. However, the majority are women who are mostly covered in traditional burqas.&nbsp;&nbsp;25-year-old Silsila Hamidi is getting another facelift, as she is stressed from being a woman in Afghanistan, and her face had started to sag. "Even if others can't see us, we see ourselves: looking beautiful in the mirror gives us energy," said Hamidi.&nbsp;In a country where the majority live in poverty, such procedures are being conducted under the medical treatment and cost between $43 and $87 for Botox treatments, and hair implants costing $260 to $509.&nbsp;&nbsp;Read Also: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/diamonds-daria-i-noor-bangladesh-vault-1757651980488">Kohinoor's long-lost sister Daria-i-noor diamond to reappear in Bangladesh in a 117-year-old vault</a><h2>Salons banned, but not Botox&nbsp;</h2>Even though women can't travel long distances without a male guardian, can't speak loudly, can't visit universities, parks and gyms, surgical cosmetic procedures are booming. The hair salons, which provided a much-needed social space for working-class women, have withered away under the guise of immorality. A new breed of wealthy, influential Afghan women and men use these services.&nbsp;Since the Taliban has ordered men to grow beards at least fist length, transplants have become fashionable, said Bilal Khan, co-director of the EuroAsia clinic. He is about to open his second clinic.&nbsp;These are private, regulated, and behind closed-door clinics which do not attract ideological contradiction. The rise of social media influencers has also played a role in popularising cosmetic procedures. Many patients being swayed by social media seek surgeries even though they do not have any medical requirements. Showing a stark shift in societal values for a country, half of which is in abject poverty.&nbsp;&nbsp;Read Also: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/weirdest-guinness-world-records-top-10-1757167165334">Top 10 weirdest Guinness World Records that will leave you speechless</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

In Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, beauty salons are banned, but Botox and cosmetic surgery clinics are thriving. Discover how private clinics in Kabul are booming despite strict restrictions on women

An unusual trend is being observed in Kabul, Afghanistan. According to reports, cosmetic surgery facilities are becoming increasingly popular in an orthodox Taliban-ruled state. Approximately 20 clinics have popped up in Kabul offering procedures like Botox, facelifts, and hair transplants. These clinics feature luxurious design elements like velvet sofas and crystal chandeliers, which create an environment unlikely to be appreciated under the Taliban authorities. In July 2023, the Taliban imposed a nationwide ban on beauty parlours, giving owners one month to close their businesses. When the bans were being imposed, there were approximately 12,000–13,000 beauty parlours available in Kabul. According to reports by the UN and Afghan women’s groups, these salons were one of the few remaining sources of income and social space for Afghan women. Read Also: Prime Minister Modi’s international travel: Complete list of Prime Ministerial visits abroad However, despite the Taliban conservatism, something around 20 clinics have flourished. Doctors from foreign countries like Turkey have travelled to Kabul to train Afghans. Professionals have claimed that these procedures are permitted under medical treatment without any intervention from the Taliban authorities. The clientele is diverse, encompassing both men and women. Men are often there to address their thinning hairline. However, the majority are women who are mostly covered in traditional burqas. 25-year-old Silsila Hamidi is getting another facelift, as she is stressed from being a woman in Afghanistan, and her face had started to sag. "Even if others can't see us, we see ourselves: looking beautiful in the mirror gives us energy," said Hamidi. In a country where the majority live in poverty, such procedures are being conducted under the medical treatment and cost between $43 and $87 for Botox treatments, and hair implants costing $260 to $509. Read Also: Kohinoor's long-lost sister Daria-i-noor diamond to reappear in Bangladesh in a 117-year-old vault Salons banned, but not Botox Even though women can't travel long distances without a male guardian, can't speak loudly, can't visit universities, parks and gyms, surgical cosmetic procedures are booming. The hair salons, which provided a much-needed social space for working-class women, have withered away under the guise of immorality. A new breed of wealthy, influential Afghan women and men use these services. Since the Taliban has ordered men to grow beards at least fist length, transplants have become fashionable, said Bilal Khan, co-director of the EuroAsia clinic. He is about to open his second clinic. These are private, regulated, and behind closed-door clinics which do not attract ideological contradiction. The rise of social media influencers has also played a role in popularising cosmetic procedures. Many patients being swayed by social media seek surgeries even though they do not have any medical requirements. Showing a stark shift in societal values for a country, half of which is in abject poverty. Read Also: Top 10 weirdest Guinness World Records that will leave you speechless

In Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, beauty salons are banned, but Botox and cosmetic surgery clinics are thriving. Discover how private clinics in Kabul are booming despite strict restrictions on women

Botox under burqas, unlikely boom of cosmetic surgery in Taliban conservatism

Podcasting, once a niche medium for storytelling, education, and light-hearted banter, has evolved into a potent vehicle for ideological warfare—sometimes with deadly consequences. What began in the early 2000s as an accessible, soothing pastime has, by 2025, become a channel for weaponised words, amplifying conspiracy theories, radicalising audiences trapped in echo chambers, and deepening political divides. Charlie Kirk, both a martyr for the US right-wing and a hate figure for the extreme left, was an active podcaster before he was murdered this month.<h2>Words can kill: The far-right vs far-left podcast ecosystem</h2>While several longstanding hosts like Joe Rogan and Glenn Beck found refuge in podcasting—often because they were shunned or limited by mainstream media—podcasts have become algorithm-driven battlegrounds. Hosts like Charlie Kirk and the Chapo Trap House crew stand on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum, reaching vast audiences. Beyond mere commentary, these podcasts serve as recruitment tools, propaganda mills, and community-building hubs. Their evolution mirrors broader digital media trends: voices colliding with unregulated extremism, fuelled by monetisation and social media virality.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/after-trump-blames-left-for-radicalising-charlie-kirk-killer-damning-study-on-how-domestic-terrorists-are-mostly-right-wing-vanishes-from-doj-website-1758086933683/amp">DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death</a><h2>The origin of innocence: Evolution of podcasting</h2>Podcasting’s boom began around 2004, rooted in RSS feeds and MP3 downloads. Early shows focused on entertainment, learning, or storytelling—especially true crime (Serial), science (Radiolab), or comedy. Podcasts were perfect for passive listening during commutes or chores, resembling public radio without ads. As digital tech advanced and big tech platforms like Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts emerged, anyone with a microphone could create content, bypassing traditional gatekeepers.The transformation of pocasts into a cultural war zone began in the 2010s, especially after Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. Ideology-driven and divisive rhetoric became central to many shows.<h2>How Kirk went from campus provocateur to icon</h2>The Charlie Kirk Show helped mobilise MAGA youth, inspiring over 37,000 chapters of Kirk’s NGO Turning Point USA. After his death, the show’s influence surged. Kirk’s early podcasts focused on campus debates and “free speech” battles but gradually hardened in tone. His content began blending Christian nationalism, Trumpist narratives, and youth outreach.&nbsp;<h2>How podcasts became the far-right’s arsenal to weaponise words</h2>Algorithmic bias and underserved market demand led to dominance of rightwing podcasts online. Left-wing podcasts, while praised for originality, often lack comparable real-world influence.Far-right podcasts aggressively weaponised the medium, creating a networked system of radicalisation. The Charlie Kirk Show exemplifies this: a slickly produced mix of anti-woke rants, conspiratorial framing, and culture war commentary turned Kirk into a Gen Z conservative icon. His assassination in September only intensified the show’s influence, propelling it to number 1 on Apple Podcasts and immortalising Kirk as a martyr among conservatives.The refrain of conservative and far-right podcasts is consistent: frame progressives as existential threats, delegitimise mainstream media, and encourage both online and on-street activism. Phrases like “fight back” or “defend your country” are common, paired with disdain for “globalists,” “woke elites,” or “leftist propaganda,” creating a coordinated content ecosystem preaching mostly to the converted.Shows like The Daily Shoah and Fash the Nation are known for promoting white nationalist ideologies, often masked as humour or coded language.&nbsp;Their rhetoric imagines violent futures for the US and normalises real-life confrontation.&nbsp;Hosts frequently cross-promote on apps like Telegram, swap guest spots, and build digital communities primed for activism.&nbsp;Even deplatforming by YouTube or Facebook does not stop them; RSS feeds, Rumble, and peer-to-peer hosting keep content alive.The Daily Shoah, hosted by Mike Enoch and others, uses white nationalist comedy. Fash the Nation popularised the “Great Replacement” theory, which posits that white populations are being systematically replaced through immigration and demographic change, a racist conspiracy. Killstream uses shock-jock tactics and live-stream debates to promote street-level confrontations.These podcasts have strong reach among disillusioned youth and are amplified by social media and recommendation algorithms.&nbsp;They create “rabbit holes” where ironic or casual listening can shift into genuine belief and recruitment for far-right causes.&nbsp;Their popularity became evident when right-wing shows outnumbered and topped listenership on platforms like Spotify and Apple, catering to an underserved anti-woke demographic.<h2>The far-left is far behind in the podcast war</h2>The far-left uses intellectualism, satire, and irony to reach audiences. Chapo Trap House pioneered the “dirtbag left” style—a mix of socialist critique, comedic takedowns of liberal centrists, and profanity-laden disdain for both Democratic and Republican parties.The show was a Patreon success, once earning over $160,000 per month, funding live tours and shaping millennial socialist discourse.Other shows include The Antifada, which combines Marxist theory with event commentary, and Revolutionary Left Radio, which offers dense philosophical monologues critiquing capitalism and imperialism through radical, often academic frameworks.But when compared to right-wing podcasts, these leftist shows lack mainstream platform support and have a more limited reach.They, however, influence activist networks and political consciousness among younger listeners.<h2>Podcasts are trusted—and that’s where the danger lies</h2>A 2023 Pew Research Center study showed that over 30 per cent of listeners trust podcasts more than traditional news. This trust makes podcasts fertile ground for alternate reality construction, ideological grooming, and weaponising words that can have violent outcomes.Far-right podcasts normalise political violence, white racial grievance, and conspiratorial thinking. Their hosts have been linked to real-world incidents—from the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville in August 2017 to the January 6, 2021 US Capitol riot.&nbsp;Their messaging often frames violence as defensive and necessary.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fbi-s-arctic-fox-case-targeted-gop-and-charlie-kirk-trump-lashes-out-at-biden-1758094242635">FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden</a><h2>Parasocial bonds: When host becomes indoctrinator</h2>Both far-right and far-left podcasts exploit parasocial bonds—the illusion of friendship between host and listener—to create loyalty and identity.&nbsp;The line between opinion and indoctrination dissolves, when your “friend” tells you who to fear, mock, or ignore.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-some-hate-can-t-be-negotiated-charlie-kirk-s-shooter-tyler-robinson-s-text-to-partner-exposes-motive-here-s-what-he-said-1758083338852">'Some hate can’t be negotiated': Charlie Kirk's 'shooter' Tyler Robinson's text to partner exposes motive - Here's what he said</a><h2>Podcasts spew venom: Is censorship required?</h2>Podcasting began as an open, humanising format for casual listening but has become a digital battlefield at the hands of some hosts and listeners. &nbsp;Each episode can be a weapon; each listener a potential recruit.Currently, podcasts operate largely in a legal vacuum, with no formal censorship beyond some deplatforming of controversial hosts.&nbsp;It is time to balance free speech with responsibility—curbing algorithmic extremism without blanket bans.Listeners need better media literacy—to understand framing, bias, and rhetorical manipulation.Creators must acknowledge their influence and avoid exploiting parasocial relationships.The genie is out of the bottle. Podcasts are no longer mere audio backdrops to our days; they are frontlines in a culture war.

Charlie Kirk assassination has brought attention to podcast as a medium. Podcasting evolved from a casual pastime to a tool for ideological warfare, amplifying extremism via both far-right and far-left shows, with real-world consequences like radicalisation and violence



Podcasting, once a niche medium for storytelling, education, and light-hearted banter, has evolved into a potent vehicle for ideological warfare—sometimes with deadly consequences. What began in the early 2000s as an accessible, soothing pastime has, by 2025, become a channel for weaponised words, amplifying conspiracy theories, radicalising audiences trapped in echo chambers, and deepening political divides. Charlie Kirk, both a martyr for the US right-wing and a hate figure for the extreme left, was an active podcaster before he was murdered this month. Words can kill: The far-right vs far-left podcast ecosystem While several longstanding hosts like Joe Rogan and Glenn Beck found refuge in podcasting—often because they were shunned or limited by mainstream media—podcasts have become algorithm-driven battlegrounds. Hosts like Charlie Kirk and the Chapo Trap House crew stand on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum, reaching vast audiences. Beyond mere commentary, these podcasts serve as recruitment tools, propaganda mills, and community-building hubs. Their evolution mirrors broader digital media trends: voices colliding with unregulated extremism, fuelled by monetisation and social media virality. Also read: DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death The origin of innocence: Evolution of podcasting Podcasting’s boom began around 2004, rooted in RSS feeds and MP3 downloads. Early shows focused on entertainment, learning, or storytelling—especially true crime (Serial), science (Radiolab), or comedy. Podcasts were perfect for passive listening during commutes or chores, resembling public radio without ads. As digital tech advanced and big tech platforms like Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts emerged, anyone with a microphone could create content, bypassing traditional gatekeepers. The transformation of pocasts into a cultural war zone began in the 2010s, especially after Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. Ideology-driven and divisive rhetoric became central to many shows. How Kirk went from campus provocateur to icon The Charlie Kirk Show helped mobilise MAGA youth, inspiring over 37,000 chapters of Kirk’s NGO Turning Point USA. After his death, the show’s influence surged. Kirk’s early podcasts focused on campus debates and “free speech” battles but gradually hardened in tone. His content began blending Christian nationalism, Trumpist narratives, and youth outreach. How podcasts became the far-right’s arsenal to weaponise words Algorithmic bias and underserved market demand led to dominance of rightwing podcasts online. Left-wing podcasts, while praised for originality, often lack comparable real-world influence. Far-right podcasts aggressively weaponised the medium, creating a networked system of radicalisation. The Charlie Kirk Show exemplifies this: a slickly produced mix of anti-woke rants, conspiratorial framing, and culture war commentary turned Kirk into a Gen Z conservative icon. His assassination in September only intensified the show’s influence, propelling it to number 1 on Apple Podcasts and immortalising Kirk as a martyr among conservatives. The refrain of conservative and far-right podcasts is consistent: frame progressives as existential threats, delegitimise mainstream media, and encourage both online and on-street activism. Phrases like “fight back” or “defend your country” are common, paired with disdain for “globalists,” “woke elites,” or “leftist propaganda,” creating a coordinated content ecosystem preaching mostly to the converted. Shows like The Daily Shoah and Fash the Nation are known for promoting white nationalist ideologies, often masked as humour or coded language. Their rhetoric imagines violent futures for the US and normalises real-life confrontation. Hosts frequently cross-promote on apps like Telegram, swap guest spots, and build digital communities primed for activism. Even deplatforming by YouTube or Facebook does not stop them; RSS feeds, Rumble, and peer-to-peer hosting keep content alive. The Daily Shoah, hosted by Mike Enoch and others, uses white nationalist comedy. Fash the Nation popularised the “Great Replacement” theory, which posits that white populations are being systematically replaced through immigration and demographic change, a racist conspiracy. Killstream uses shock-jock tactics and live-stream debates to promote street-level confrontations. These podcasts have strong reach among disillusioned youth and are amplified by social media and recommendation algorithms. They create “rabbit holes” where ironic or casual listening can shift into genuine belief and recruitment for far-right causes. Their popularity became evident when right-wing shows outnumbered and topped listenership on platforms like Spotify and Apple, catering to an underserved anti-woke demographic. The far-left is far behind in the podcast war The far-left uses intellectualism, satire, and irony to reach audiences. Chapo Trap House pioneered the “dirtbag left” style—a mix of socialist critique, comedic takedowns of liberal centrists, and profanity-laden disdain for both Democratic and Republican parties. The show was a Patreon success, once earning over $160,000 per month, funding live tours and shaping millennial socialist discourse. Other shows include The Antifada, which combines Marxist theory with event commentary, and Revolutionary Left Radio, which offers dense philosophical monologues critiquing capitalism and imperialism through radical, often academic frameworks. But when compared to right-wing podcasts, these leftist shows lack mainstream platform support and have a more limited reach. They, however, influence activist networks and political consciousness among younger listeners. Podcasts are trusted—and that’s where the danger lies A 2023 Pew Research Center study showed that over 30 per cent of listeners trust podcasts more than traditional news. This trust makes podcasts fertile ground for alternate reality construction, ideological grooming, and weaponising words that can have violent outcomes. Far-right podcasts normalise political violence, white racial grievance, and conspiratorial thinking. Their hosts have been linked to real-world incidents—from the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville in August 2017 to the January 6, 2021 US Capitol riot. Their messaging often frames violence as defensive and necessary. Also read: FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden Parasocial bonds: When host becomes indoctrinator Both far-right and far-left podcasts exploit parasocial bonds—the illusion of friendship between host and listener—to create loyalty and identity. The line between opinion and indoctrination dissolves, when your “friend” tells you who to fear, mock, or ignore. Also read: 'Some hate can’t be negotiated': Charlie Kirk's 'shooter' Tyler Robinson's text to partner exposes motive - Here's what he said Podcasts spew venom: Is censorship required? Podcasting began as an open, humanising format for casual listening but has become a digital battlefield at the hands of some hosts and listeners. Each episode can be a weapon; each listener a potential recruit. Currently, podcasts operate largely in a legal vacuum, with no formal censorship beyond some deplatforming of controversial hosts. It is time to balance free speech with responsibility—curbing algorithmic extremism without blanket bans. Listeners need better media literacy—to understand framing, bias, and rhetorical manipulation. Creators must acknowledge their influence and avoid exploiting parasocial relationships. The genie is out of the bottle. Podcasts are no longer mere audio backdrops to our days; they are frontlines in a culture war.

Charlie Kirk assassination has brought attention to podcast as a medium. Podcasting evolved from a casual pastime to a tool for ideological warfare, amplifying extremism via both far-right and far-left shows, with real-world consequences like radicalisation and violence&nbsp;

Death by Podcast: Charlie Kirk murder is also about how a new medium went from soothing pastime to weaponised words

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Sep 16) lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden and former Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice for investigating slain MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk and his organisation Turning Point USA (TPUSA). In his usual fashion, Trump called Smith "deranged" while labelling Biden "incompetent," as he questioned why the "wonderful" Turning Point was under investigation.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-elect-a-rapist-expect-to-get-fu-ed-britons-troll-trump-as-windsor-castle-lights-up-with-epstein-images-1758075915188">'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images</a><h2>Arctic Fox</h2>Trump's statement comes as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, on Tuesday (Sep 16) revealed that the FBI's election-related investigation into President Donald Trump, launched in 2022, also roped in dozens of Republican entities, including Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA.Grassley said that the investigation code-named "Arctic Fox" by the bureau was partisan in nature and claimed that there was plenty of proof towards that."In other words, Arctic Frost wasn't just a case to politically investigate Trump," he said. “It was a vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors could achieve their partisan ends and improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kash-patel-denies-politicising-fbi-as-hearing-turns-into-war-of-words-liar-buffoon-false-rant-1758071374525">Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns into war of words: 'Liar,' 'buffoon,' 'false rant'</a><h3>Trump reiterates DOJ was weaponised by Biden claims</h3>Using his nickname for Biden, he once again repeated his claim that the previous administration "Weaponised the Justice Department against Sleepy Joe Biden’s Political Opponents, including ME!".Without taking their names, Trump then set his sights on Loren Merchan and her father, Judge Juan Merchan, alleging, "They allowed the daughter of a Judge, on one of the corrupt trials against me, to become the biggest fund raiser for Biden and Kamala, making many Millions of Dollars for herself and her family". Loren Merchan presided over the Manhattan hush-money case against Trump.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/after-trump-blames-left-for-radicalising-charlie-kirk-killer-damning-study-on-how-domestic-terrorists-are-mostly-right-wing-vanishes-from-doj-website-1758086933683">DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death</a>Trump added that not only did her father refuse to recuse himself but also put a "gag order on me, not allowing ANY talk about their family corruption and unprecedented conflict of interest." However, this statement has little truth. Reports suggest that Judge Merchan issued a gag order against Trump to prevent him from making statements that could threaten witnesses, jurors, court staff, prosecutors, and their families. The order was also supposed to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings and ensure a fair trial.

"Every leading legal analyst and pundit said this trial was wrong and should not have been allowed to go forward," claimed Trump, adding, "But it did because of a Corrupt Judge who will hopefully pay a very big price for his illegal actions, someday!"

Donald Trump lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden, and former Special Counsel Jack Smith for investigating slain Charlie Kirk and reiterated claims that the previous administration "weaponised" the Justice Department.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Sep 16) lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden and former Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice for investigating slain MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk and his organisation Turning Point USA (TPUSA). In his usual fashion, Trump called Smith "deranged" while labelling Biden "incompetent," as he questioned why the "wonderful" Turning Point was under investigation. Also read | 'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images Arctic Fox Trump's statement comes as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, on Tuesday (Sep 16) revealed that the FBI's election-related investigation into President Donald Trump, launched in 2022, also roped in dozens of Republican entities, including Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA. Grassley said that the investigation code-named "Arctic Fox" by the bureau was partisan in nature and claimed that there was plenty of proof towards that. "In other words, Arctic Frost wasn't just a case to politically investigate Trump," he said. “It was a vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors could achieve their partisan ends and improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus.” Also read | Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns into war of words: 'Liar,' 'buffoon,' 'false rant' Trump reiterates DOJ was weaponised by Biden claims Using his nickname for Biden, he once again repeated his claim that the previous administration "Weaponised the Justice Department against Sleepy Joe Biden’s Political Opponents, including ME!". Without taking their names, Trump then set his sights on Loren Merchan and her father, Judge Juan Merchan, alleging, "They allowed the daughter of a Judge, on one of the corrupt trials against me, to become the biggest fund raiser for Biden and Kamala, making many Millions of Dollars for herself and her family". Loren Merchan presided over the Manhattan hush-money case against Trump. Also read | DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death Trump added that not only did her father refuse to recuse himself but also put a "gag order on me, not allowing ANY talk about their family corruption and unprecedented conflict of interest." However, this statement has little truth. Reports suggest that Judge Merchan issued a gag order against Trump to prevent him from making statements that could threaten witnesses, jurors, court staff, prosecutors, and their families. The order was also supposed to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings and ensure a fair trial.

Donald Trump lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden, and former Special Counsel Jack Smith for investigating slain Charlie Kirk and reiterated claims that the previous administration "weaponised" the Justice Department.

FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden

Israel said on Wednesday (September 17) it would allow civilians to leave Gaza City through a “temporary” corridor as its ground offensive in the territory’s main urban hub gathered pace. The army’s Arabic-language spokesman, Avichay Adraee, announced that “a temporary transportation route via Salah al-Din Street” would be open for 48 hours only.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-we-don-t-want-to-be-sparta-israeli-business-leaders-slam-netanyahu-for-isolation-remarks-say-we-want-peace-1758082517127">'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Netanyahu angers Israeli business leaders</a><h2>How is the offensive unfolding?</h2>The Israeli military intensified its bombardment of Gaza City overnight, pushing troops deeper into the centre of the city. Army chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir told AFP that the operation had “significantly expanded,” combining ground forces, precision airstrikes and intelligence. “Our objective is to enhance the strikes on Hamas until its decisive defeat,” Zamir said.Officials estimate 2,000–3,000 Hamas fighters remain in central Gaza City. Around 40% of the civilian population has already fled south, though many remain trapped amid the destruction.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-they-re-in-big-trouble-trump-says-doesn-t-know-too-much-about-israel-s-gaza-offensive-but-1758044868411">‘They’re in big trouble’: Trump says doesn't ‘know too much about’ Israel's Gaza offensive but…</a><h2>What has been the global reaction?</h2>The UN accused Israel of committing “genocide” and condemned the assault as “carnage”. UN chief António Guterres said Israel appeared “determined to go up to the end” and was not serious about negotiating a ceasefire. France urged Israel to halt its “destructive campaign”, saying it had lost any military rationale and should return to talks.Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump accused Hamas of using civilians as cover: “I hear Hamas is trying to use the old human shield deal, and if they do that they’re going to be in big trouble.”Hamas described the offensive as “systematic ethnic cleansing targeting our people in Gaza.” Gaza’s civil defence, which operates under Hamas authority, said at least 44 people were killed by Israeli fire on Tuesday alone.

Israel opened a temporary corridor for Gaza civilians as its ground offensive in Gaza City escalated. UN condemned “genocide,” France urged restraint, while Trump blamed Hamas for using civilians as shields.

Israel said on Wednesday (September 17) it would allow civilians to leave Gaza City through a “temporary” corridor as its ground offensive in the territory’s main urban hub gathered pace. The army’s Arabic-language spokesman, Avichay Adraee, announced that “a temporary transportation route via Salah al-Din Street” would be open for 48 hours only. Also read: 'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Netanyahu angers Israeli business leaders How is the offensive unfolding? The Israeli military intensified its bombardment of Gaza City overnight, pushing troops deeper into the centre of the city. Army chief Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir told AFP that the operation had “significantly expanded,” combining ground forces, precision airstrikes and intelligence. “Our objective is to enhance the strikes on Hamas until its decisive defeat,” Zamir said. Officials estimate 2,000–3,000 Hamas fighters remain in central Gaza City. Around 40% of the civilian population has already fled south, though many remain trapped amid the destruction. Also read: ‘They’re in big trouble’: Trump says doesn't ‘know too much about’ Israel's Gaza offensive but… What has been the global reaction? The UN accused Israel of committing “genocide” and condemned the assault as “carnage”. UN chief António Guterres said Israel appeared “determined to go up to the end” and was not serious about negotiating a ceasefire. France urged Israel to halt its “destructive campaign”, saying it had lost any military rationale and should return to talks. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump accused Hamas of using civilians as cover: “I hear Hamas is trying to use the old human shield deal, and if they do that they’re going to be in big trouble.” Hamas described the offensive as “systematic ethnic cleansing targeting our people in Gaza.” Gaza’s civil defence, which operates under Hamas authority, said at least 44 people were killed by Israeli fire on Tuesday alone.

Israel opened a temporary corridor for Gaza civilians as its ground offensive in Gaza City escalated. UN condemned “genocide,” France urged restraint, while Trump blamed Hamas for using civilians as shields.

'Systematic ethnic cleansing'? Israel opens 48-hour 'escape route' as Gaza City offensive escalates

Nepal observes a national day of mourning to honour 72 victims of the Gen Z-led anti-government protests. The government declares a public holiday, compensates families, and calls for unity ahead of the March 2026 elections.

Nepal mourns remembering the victims of the Gen Z protest

Every year, thousands of highly skilled Indian professionals travel to the US on temporary work visas like the H‑1B and L‑1, contributing significantly to America's tech sector and economy. But while these workers help build multibillion-dollar businesses, billions of their own dollars quietly disappear into the US system and are never repatriated. The reason? India and the US do not have a 'totalisation agreement', a bilateral social security pact that could have protected these workers from losing their hard-earned money.<h2>What is a totalisation agreement?</h2>A totalisation agreement is a formal arrangement made by two countries to coordinate their respective social security systems. These agreements ensure that citizens from these countries can either claim US Social Security benefits or avoid paying into the system entirely if they are already contributing to their home country’s system.The aim is to avoid double taxation, so that workers do not pay into the social security systems of both countries for the same work. It also preserves eligibility for benefits by allowing workers to combine work credits from both countries to qualify for retirement or disability benefits.The US has signed totalisation pacts with more than 30 countries including Canada, the UK, Germany, South Korea, and Japan, but not India.The Indian government has failed to reach such a pact despite repeated diplomatic efforts and negotiations that have dragged on for years without resolution.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-us-trade-talks-conclude-1758027481473">‘Intensifying efforts to achieve early conclusion’: India-US trade talks conclude after 7 hours amid Trump’s tariff war</a><h2>How much are Indian techies losing each year in the US?</h2>Indian professionals on temporary work visas are required to pay US payroll taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). This includes 6.2 per cent toward Social Security and 1.45 per cent toward Medicare, totalling 7.65 per cent of their gross wages, withheld automatically by employers.But here’s the catch: to qualify for US Social Security benefits, a worker must contribute for at least 40 quarters, or 10 years. However, most H‑1B and L‑1 workers return to India within six years—unless their visas are extended—well before they become eligible to claim any benefits. As a result, their contributions are ‘forfeited’.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-us-wrap-up-trade-talks-india-says-talks-were-very-positive-1758041424039/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-us-wrap-up-trade-talks-india-says-talks-were-very-positive-1758041424039/embed</a><h2>What is the financial loss to Indians whose social security payments are not repatriated?</h2>The Harvard Journal on Legislation reported that Indians on H‑1B and L‑1 visas contribute approximately $3 billion annually to US Social Security. More than $25 billion have been lost to them over the years, even by conservative estimates.Between 2002 and 2012 alone, Indian workers contributed over $27.6 billion, according to Harvard research. That places the total lost contributions well into the tens of billions of dollars over the last two decades.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rajesh-agrawal-india-us-trade-negotiator-profile-1758012761187">Rajesh Agrawal: Meet India's chief trade negotiator leading talks with US</a><h2>Into the black hole: Where does money not given to Indian techies in the US go?</h2>These funds are not held in a personal account for each worker. They are not returned to them after they leave the US. Instead, the money flows into the US Social Security Trust Funds, which operate on a 'pay-as-you-go' basis. This means today’s workers fund the benefits of current retirees.For Indian workers who do not stay long enough to qualify, the contributions effectively become a sunk cost—a financial black hole with no return.As there is no totalisation pact in place, there is also no legal or policy mechanism for India to recover or redirect these contributions for its returning citizens.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-my-friend-indian-pm-modi-thanks-trump-for-special-birthday-wish-amid-trade-tensions-1758043756592">'Narendra, doing a tremendous job...: Trump calls Indian PM Modi on his birthday, shares special wish amid trade tensions</a>&nbsp;<h2>How totalisation agreements of other countries help workers</h2>Nations with totalisation agreements have far more favourable outcomes. Social security benefits of their workers are either transferred or paid out abroad. Work years in one country are counted or added toward benefit eligibility in another. Exemptions are made from dual payroll taxation when covered by the home country's system.In the case of German workers, they can combine years worked in Germany and the US to qualify for benefits in either country. Canadian citizens can avoid paying into US Social Security if they are already contributing to the Canadian Pension Plan.Even Brazil, which signed a totalisation agreement with the US in 2015, has begun implementation steps.But India—home to the largest number of H‑1B workers—still has no such arrangement in force.<h2>Indian techies' money stashed in the US: What’s the US government’s position?</h2>India has consistently expressed interest in a totalisation agreement with the US, citing the vast financial losses to its citizens. But the US has dragged its feet. The core issue appears to be that India’s social security system (mainly managed by the EPFO, or Employee Provident Fund Organisation) is not considered equivalent to the US social security model in terms of structure and guarantees, making negotiations complex.Indian workers remain the largest group affected by the absence of such a pact.<h2>Do Indian workers in the US get their social security benefits paid to them?</h2>Yes, but it happens only to those who stay long enough. Non-Green Card holders can receive US Social Security payouts abroad only if they have worked in the US for at least 10 years and meet other eligibility criteria.But since most Indian tech professionals leave well before that threshold, this exception helps very few.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/from-kremlin-laundromat-to-friend-trump-s-u-turn-brings-india-us-back-to-negotiating-table-trade-talks-in-delhi-today-1757990317044">From 'Kremlin laundromat' to 'friend': Trump's U-turn brings India, US back to negotiating table; trade talks in Delhi today</a><h2>Beyond individual financial loss: Why the totalisation pact matters</h2>The forfeited billions from Indian professionals are, in fact, helping subsidise America's aging population. This, in essence, makes Indian tech workers involuntary contributors to the US retirement system, with no reciprocal benefits.For a country like India, where social security structures are still evolving and returnee professionals often face reintegration challenges, this represents a serious policy blind spot.<h2>The bottom line: India and the US must enter into a totalisation agreement</h2>This has been a long-standing demand. A totalisation pact can prevent double payroll taxation, allow contribution credits to be totalised (combined across countries), and create pathways for payouts or refunds for returning Indian citizens.Until then, billions of dollars from Indian techies will continue to disappear into a system that gives them nothing in return.

Indian tech workers in the US never get paid billions in Social Security contributions. This is  due to the absence of a totalisation agreement between India and the US. There is no refunds or benefits when these workers return. Where's the money gone?

Every year, thousands of highly skilled Indian professionals travel to the US on temporary work visas like the H‑1B and L‑1, contributing significantly to America's tech sector and economy. But while these workers help build multibillion-dollar businesses, billions of their own dollars quietly disappear into the US system and are never repatriated. The reason? India and the US do not have a 'totalisation agreement', a bilateral social security pact that could have protected these workers from losing their hard-earned money. What is a totalisation agreement? A totalisation agreement is a formal arrangement made by two countries to coordinate their respective social security systems. These agreements ensure that citizens from these countries can either claim US Social Security benefits or avoid paying into the system entirely if they are already contributing to their home country’s system. The aim is to avoid double taxation, so that workers do not pay into the social security systems of both countries for the same work. It also preserves eligibility for benefits by allowing workers to combine work credits from both countries to qualify for retirement or disability benefits. The US has signed totalisation pacts with more than 30 countries including Canada, the UK, Germany, South Korea, and Japan, but not India. The Indian government has failed to reach such a pact despite repeated diplomatic efforts and negotiations that have dragged on for years without resolution. Also read: ‘Intensifying efforts to achieve early conclusion’: India-US trade talks conclude after 7 hours amid Trump’s tariff war How much are Indian techies losing each year in the US? Indian professionals on temporary work visas are required to pay US payroll taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). This includes 6.2 per cent toward Social Security and 1.45 per cent toward Medicare, totalling 7.65 per cent of their gross wages, withheld automatically by employers. But here’s the catch: to qualify for US Social Security benefits, a worker must contribute for at least 40 quarters, or 10 years. However, most H‑1B and L‑1 workers return to India within six years—unless their visas are extended—well before they become eligible to claim any benefits. As a result, their contributions are ‘forfeited’. https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-us-wrap-up-trade-talks-india-says-talks-were-very-positive-1758041424039/embed What is the financial loss to Indians whose social security payments are not repatriated? The Harvard Journal on Legislation reported that Indians on H‑1B and L‑1 visas contribute approximately $3 billion annually to US Social Security. More than $25 billion have been lost to them over the years, even by conservative estimates. Between 2002 and 2012 alone, Indian workers contributed over $27.6 billion, according to Harvard research. That places the total lost contributions well into the tens of billions of dollars over the last two decades. Also read: Rajesh Agrawal: Meet India's chief trade negotiator leading talks with US Into the black hole: Where does money not given to Indian techies in the US go? These funds are not held in a personal account for each worker. They are not returned to them after they leave the US. Instead, the money flows into the US Social Security Trust Funds, which operate on a 'pay-as-you-go' basis. This means today’s workers fund the benefits of current retirees. For Indian workers who do not stay long enough to qualify, the contributions effectively become a sunk cost—a financial black hole with no return. As there is no totalisation pact in place, there is also no legal or policy mechanism for India to recover or redirect these contributions for its returning citizens. Also read: 'Narendra, doing a tremendous job...: Trump calls Indian PM Modi on his birthday, shares special wish amid trade tensions How totalisation agreements of other countries help workers Nations with totalisation agreements have far more favourable outcomes. Social security benefits of their workers are either transferred or paid out abroad. Work years in one country are counted or added toward benefit eligibility in another. Exemptions are made from dual payroll taxation when covered by the home country's system. In the case of German workers, they can combine years worked in Germany and the US to qualify for benefits in either country. Canadian citizens can avoid paying into US Social Security if they are already contributing to the Canadian Pension Plan. Even Brazil, which signed a totalisation agreement with the US in 2015, has begun implementation steps. But India—home to the largest number of H‑1B workers—still has no such arrangement in force. Indian techies' money stashed in the US: What’s the US government’s position? India has consistently expressed interest in a totalisation agreement with the US, citing the vast financial losses to its citizens. But the US has dragged its feet. The core issue appears to be that India’s social security system (mainly managed by the EPFO, or Employee Provident Fund Organisation) is not considered equivalent to the US social security model in terms of structure and guarantees, making negotiations complex. Indian workers remain the largest group affected by the absence of such a pact. Do Indian workers in the US get their social security benefits paid to them? Yes, but it happens only to those who stay long enough. Non-Green Card holders can receive US Social Security payouts abroad only if they have worked in the US for at least 10 years and meet other eligibility criteria. But since most Indian tech professionals leave well before that threshold, this exception helps very few. Also read: From 'Kremlin laundromat' to 'friend': Trump's U-turn brings India, US back to negotiating table; trade talks in Delhi today Beyond individual financial loss: Why the totalisation pact matters The forfeited billions from Indian professionals are, in fact, helping subsidise America's aging population. This, in essence, makes Indian tech workers involuntary contributors to the US retirement system, with no reciprocal benefits. For a country like India, where social security structures are still evolving and returnee professionals often face reintegration challenges, this represents a serious policy blind spot. The bottom line: India and the US must enter into a totalisation agreement This has been a long-standing demand. A totalisation pact can prevent double payroll taxation, allow contribution credits to be totalised (combined across countries), and create pathways for payouts or refunds for returning Indian citizens. Until then, billions of dollars from Indian techies will continue to disappear into a system that gives them nothing in return.

Indian tech workers in the US never get paid billions in Social Security contributions. This is &nbsp;due to the absence of a totalisation agreement between India and the US. There is no refunds or benefits when these workers return. Where's the money gone?

US keeps BILLIONS OF DOLLARS of Indian techies and skilled workers because of this reason. What is totalisation pact?

A day after US President Donald Trump lashed out at the left, labelling Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a damning research paper of domestic terrorism detailing far-right extremist violence has vanished from the US Justice Department's website. According to an AFP report, the research from the National Institute of Justice, which has since been removed, concluded that since 1990, "far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/tyler-robinson-s-chilling-discord-confession-goes-viral-as-trump-lashes-out-at-left-says-charlie-kirk-s-killer-radicalised-over-the-internet-1758010151866">Tyler Robinson's chilling Discord confession goes viral as Trump lashes out at left, says Charlie Kirk's killer 'radicalised over the internet'</a><h2>Left to blame or merely a scapegoat?</h2>On Monday (Sep 15) Trump labelled suspected killer Tyler Robinson a leftist "radicalised over the internet." Speaking to reporters at the White House, the POTUS said that Robinson, who comes from a family of Republican Party supporters, had "wonderful parents," but over a "fairly short period of time," was "radicalised." Blaming the left for Kirk's assassination, the right-wing leader alleged, "He's (Robinson) a left," adding, "A lot of problems with the left, and they get protected, and they shouldn't be protected".However, the claim stands in stark contrast to the research paper titled "What NIJ research tells us about domestic terrorism".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-queer-resistance-fbi-eyes-transgender-far-left-groups-in-charlie-kirk-killing-after-these-alarming-online-posts-lance-twiggs-1757910295251">‘Queer resistance’? FBI eyes transgender, far-left groups in Charlie Kirk killing after THESE alarming online posts</a><h2>Why was the paper removed from the DoJ website?</h2>The Trump administration has yet to reveal the reason the paper was taken down from the Department of Justice website. However, it is known that the research was removed following the deadly assassination of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk on September 10.Archived versions of the Office of Justice Programs website captured by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine show that the document remained accessible the day after the killing (September 11). However, it disappeared the following day, reports the independent 404 Media.Meanwhile, the White House on Monday announced that it would pursue an alleged left-wing "domestic terror movement" in the wake of Kirk's killing. However, this has prompted alarm that the far-right Trump admin could use this as a method of silencing political descent.&nbsp;

A day after President Donald Trump labelled Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a research paper on right-wing domestic terrorism has been removed from the US Justice Department's website.

A day after US President Donald Trump lashed out at the left, labelling Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a damning research paper of domestic terrorism detailing far-right extremist violence has vanished from the US Justice Department's website. According to an AFP report, the research from the National Institute of Justice, which has since been removed, concluded that since 1990, "far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists". Also read | Tyler Robinson's chilling Discord confession goes viral as Trump lashes out at left, says Charlie Kirk's killer 'radicalised over the internet' Left to blame or merely a scapegoat? On Monday (Sep 15) Trump labelled suspected killer Tyler Robinson a leftist "radicalised over the internet." Speaking to reporters at the White House, the POTUS said that Robinson, who comes from a family of Republican Party supporters, had "wonderful parents," but over a "fairly short period of time," was "radicalised." Blaming the left for Kirk's assassination, the right-wing leader alleged, "He's (Robinson) a left," adding, "A lot of problems with the left, and they get protected, and they shouldn't be protected". However, the claim stands in stark contrast to the research paper titled "What NIJ research tells us about domestic terrorism". Also read | ‘Queer resistance’? FBI eyes transgender, far-left groups in Charlie Kirk killing after THESE alarming online posts Why was the paper removed from the DoJ website? The Trump administration has yet to reveal the reason the paper was taken down from the Department of Justice website. However, it is known that the research was removed following the deadly assassination of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk on September 10. Archived versions of the Office of Justice Programs website captured by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine show that the document remained accessible the day after the killing (September 11). However, it disappeared the following day, reports the independent 404 Media. Meanwhile, the White House on Monday announced that it would pursue an alleged left-wing "domestic terror movement" in the wake of Kirk's killing. However, this has prompted alarm that the far-right Trump admin could use this as a method of silencing political descent.

A day after President Donald Trump labelled Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a research paper on right-wing domestic terrorism has been removed from the US Justice Department's website.

DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi was born on September 17, 1950, in Vadnagar, Bombay State (present-day Gujarat), where he completed his secondary education. All the leaders and the International community are celebrating PM Modi's 75th birthday. Let's have a look at it.

'50 yrs of serving nation': International community celebrates Indian PM Modi's 75th birthday

China has described the framework deal reached in Madrid to transfer TikTok’s US operations to American ownership as a “win-win.” Chinese state media said that the agreement was built on “mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation.”<h2>Trump and Xi set for crucial call</h2>Investors are watching closely as US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to confirm the deal in a phone call on Friday. The outcome could set the tone for further economic talks between the two powers.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-we-don-t-want-to-be-sparta-israeli-business-leaders-slam-netanyahu-for-isolation-remarks-say-we-want-peace-1758082517127">'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Israeli business leaders slam Netanyahu for 'super-Sparta' remarks, say we want peace</a><h2>What does the deal mean for TikTok?</h2>The plan would transfer TikTok’s US assets from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to American owners. The app has more than 170 million users in the US, making the deal central to Washington’s demands for stronger local control.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-elect-a-rapist-expect-to-get-fu-ed-britons-troll-trump-as-windsor-castle-lights-up-with-epstein-images-1758075915188">'Dick-tator': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images</a><h2>A repeat of an earlier deal</h2>Reuters reported that the agreement is similar to one that was worked out earlier this year but abandoned after Trump imposed heavy tariffs on Chinese imports. The revived version is now seen as a key step to stabilise relations between the two nations.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kash-patel-not-up-to-the-job-us-senator-says-fbi-director-blew-it-with-his-handling-of-charlie-kirk-s-killing-case-1758046754195">Kash Patel ‘not up to the job’: US senator says FBI director ‘blew it’ with his handling of Charlie Kirk’s killing case</a><h2>China’s next steps</h2>The Communist Party’s People’s Daily, writing under the byline “Zhong Sheng” or “Voice of China”, said Beijing would review TikTok’s technology exports and intellectual property licensing “in accordance with the law.” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who met Chinese negotiators in Madrid this week, said that the 17 September deadline could be pushed back by 90 days to allow the deal to be finalised.

China hails a Madrid framework deal to shift TikTok’s US assets into American ownership as “win-win”, with Trump and Xi set for a key call shaping future US-China economic relations.

China has described the framework deal reached in Madrid to transfer TikTok’s US operations to American ownership as a “win-win.” Chinese state media said that the agreement was built on “mutual respect, peaceful coexistence and win-win cooperation.” Trump and Xi set for crucial call Investors are watching closely as US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping are expected to confirm the deal in a phone call on Friday. The outcome could set the tone for further economic talks between the two powers. Also read: 'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Israeli business leaders slam Netanyahu for 'super-Sparta' remarks, say we want peace What does the deal mean for TikTok? The plan would transfer TikTok’s US assets from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to American owners. The app has more than 170 million users in the US, making the deal central to Washington’s demands for stronger local control. Also read: 'Dick-tator': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images A repeat of an earlier deal Reuters reported that the agreement is similar to one that was worked out earlier this year but abandoned after Trump imposed heavy tariffs on Chinese imports. The revived version is now seen as a key step to stabilise relations between the two nations. Also read: Kash Patel ‘not up to the job’: US senator says FBI director ‘blew it’ with his handling of Charlie Kirk’s killing case China’s next steps The Communist Party’s People’s Daily, writing under the byline “Zhong Sheng” or “Voice of China”, said Beijing would review TikTok’s technology exports and intellectual property licensing “in accordance with the law.” US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who met Chinese negotiators in Madrid this week, said that the 17 September deadline could be pushed back by 90 days to allow the deal to be finalised.

China hails a Madrid framework deal to shift TikTok’s US assets into American ownership as “win-win”, with Trump and Xi set for a key call shaping future US-China economic relations.

China calls TikTok deal with US a 'win-win': Can Trump and Xi finally end the TikTok standoff?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing backlash from the Israel Business Forum (IBF), representing workers from 200 of Israel’s largest companies, for isolating the country from the rest of the world. On Monday, Netanyahu warned that amid criticism from the world for its actions in Gaza, it might have to be become a self-reliant economy with “autarkic characteristics” and a kind of “super-Sparta.” He was faced with an uphill task of defending his words and himself in front of the opposition and top business leaders of the country. The IBF hit back at Netanyahu's "super-Sparta" stance, and declared that “We are not Sparta”, Times of Israel reported. The leaders added that Netanyahu’s policies were pushing the country “towards a political, economic, and social abyss that will endanger our existence in Israel.” Notably, Netanyahu's Monday speech and the IDF’s Gaza City offensive led to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange seeing a massive dip.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-israel-is-committing-genocide-in-gaza-says-probe-launched-by-united-nations-rights-body-1758006485370">'Israel is committing genocide in Gaza', says probe launched by United Nations rights body</a>&nbsp;<h2>Netanyahu angers Israeli business community with “isolation” remarks</h2>The prime minister faced anger from the business community, who said they had had enough of the tensions and wanted peace. Arnon Bar-David, the head of the Histadrut trade union federation, said, "I don’t want to be Sparta… We deserve peace. Israeli society is exhausted, and our status in the world is very bad." Meanwhile, Netanyahu tried to appease the businessmen by stating that he had complete confidence in the Israeli economy. He added that the fall in the stock market was simply because of a “misunderstanding". Netanyahu said the dip "didn't shake us." Netanyahu also invited the ire of the opposition on his "isolation" comments. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid asked what he meant by saying that Israel was “becoming” isolated. "Did some higher power cause this?” Lapid asked in a speech at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. "You caused this. You are the main cause of the diplomatic isolation," he said.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-gaza-war-israel-continues-to-pound-gaza-strip-with-missiles-1758078334856/embed<h2>Israel might have to rely solely on its own weapons: Netanyahu&nbsp;</h2>Netanyahu clarified that his Monday speech was mostly "political at its core" and not about the larger economy. He stated that the area where there could be restrictions, "not economic ones, but political at their core", was in the "defence industries." The prime minister said that the country is aiming to be self-reliant in defence, and should be ready to "defend itself with its own forces and with its own weapons," warning that there could be more "political restrictions during the war", as encountered before.&nbsp;He made many more claims to push forward his case that Israel was not witnessing any downfall. Netanyahu told the leaders that the shekel (Israeli currency) was stronger than it was before the war. He added that the stock market was performing at record levels, and unemployment was at a historic low, and the country had seen huge foreign investment recently. "My remarks were on the attempt to restrict the import of parts, components, weapons, or raw materials," he told the gathered business leaders.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has angered business leaders in the country after saying that the country is being isolated. The premier said Israel might need to become "super-Sparta", but the Israel Business Forum said the Israeli society is exhausted and wants peace.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing backlash from the Israel Business Forum (IBF), representing workers from 200 of Israel’s largest companies, for isolating the country from the rest of the world. On Monday, Netanyahu warned that amid criticism from the world for its actions in Gaza, it might have to be become a self-reliant economy with “autarkic characteristics” and a kind of “super-Sparta.” He was faced with an uphill task of defending his words and himself in front of the opposition and top business leaders of the country. The IBF hit back at Netanyahu's "super-Sparta" stance, and declared that “We are not Sparta”, Times of Israel reported. The leaders added that Netanyahu’s policies were pushing the country “towards a political, economic, and social abyss that will endanger our existence in Israel.” Notably, Netanyahu's Monday speech and the IDF’s Gaza City offensive led to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange seeing a massive dip. Also Read: 'Israel is committing genocide in Gaza', says probe launched by United Nations rights body Netanyahu angers Israeli business community with “isolation” remarks The prime minister faced anger from the business community, who said they had had enough of the tensions and wanted peace. Arnon Bar-David, the head of the Histadrut trade union federation, said, "I don’t want to be Sparta… We deserve peace. Israeli society is exhausted, and our status in the world is very bad." Meanwhile, Netanyahu tried to appease the businessmen by stating that he had complete confidence in the Israeli economy. He added that the fall in the stock market was simply because of a “misunderstanding". Netanyahu said the dip "didn't shake us." Netanyahu also invited the ire of the opposition on his "isolation" comments. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid asked what he meant by saying that Israel was “becoming” isolated. "Did some higher power cause this?” Lapid asked in a speech at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. "You caused this. You are the main cause of the diplomatic isolation," he said. https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-gaza-war-israel-continues-to-pound-gaza-strip-with-missiles-1758078334856/embed Israel might have to rely solely on its own weapons: Netanyahu Netanyahu clarified that his Monday speech was mostly "political at its core" and not about the larger economy. He stated that the area where there could be restrictions, "not economic ones, but political at their core", was in the "defence industries." The prime minister said that the country is aiming to be self-reliant in defence, and should be ready to "defend itself with its own forces and with its own weapons," warning that there could be more "political restrictions during the war", as encountered before. He made many more claims to push forward his case that Israel was not witnessing any downfall. Netanyahu told the leaders that the shekel (Israeli currency) was stronger than it was before the war. He added that the stock market was performing at record levels, and unemployment was at a historic low, and the country had seen huge foreign investment recently. "My remarks were on the attempt to restrict the import of parts, components, weapons, or raw materials," he told the gathered business leaders.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has angered business leaders in the country after saying that the country is being isolated. The premier said Israel might need to become "super-Sparta", but the Israel Business Forum said the Israeli society is exhausted and wants peace.

'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Israeli business leaders slam Netanyahu for 'super-Sparta' remarks, say we want peace

When his partner asked in disbelief if he was the shooter behind Charlie Kirk's assassination, Robinson replied, “I am, I’m sorry.” 

'Some hate can’t be negotiated': Charlie Kirk's 'shooter' Tyler Robinson's text to partner exposes motive - Here's what he said

Banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) on Wednesday (Sep 19) issued a chilling warning against Indian diplomats in Canada. In a post on X, the Khalistani group announced a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18. The group, whose account is restricted in India, also released a poster that features India’s High Commissioner to Ottawa, Dinesh Patnaik, with a target on his face. The message also warned Indo-Canadians to avoid the consulate on September 18, the date of the planned protest.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-elect-a-rapist-expect-to-get-fu-ed-britons-troll-trump-as-windsor-castle-lights-up-with-epstein-images-1758075915188">'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images</a><h2>What did SFJ say?</h2>In a notice shared on social media, SFJ linked the action to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's statement in Parliament two years ago, alleging Indian involvement in the killing of Khalistani separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar.In its notice, the Khalistani group claimed that two years after Trudeau's announcement, "Indian Consulates continue to run spy networks and surveillance targeting Khalistan Referendum campaigners."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-blames-incompetent-biden-for-dallas-beheading-of-indian-origin-chandra-nagamallaiah-vows-crackdown-on-illegal-criminals-1757900557177">Trump blames 'incompetent' Biden for Dallas beheading of Indian-origin Chandra Nagamallaiah, vows crackdown on illegal criminals</a>"The threat is so grave that the RCMP has offered ‘Witness Protection’ to Inderjeet Singh Gosal, who assumed leadership of the Khalistan Referendum campaign after Shaheed Nijjar’s martyrdom," it adds, before announcing what it called a “Historic SIEGE” to “demand accountability for Indian state-directed espionage and intimidation on Canadian soil.”<h2>Canada says 'Khalistani extremists'&nbsp;a national security threat</h2>The call for the siege comes just weeks after a Canadian government report highlighted the presence and foreign funding of Khalistani groups on its soil.The "2025 Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in Canada" identified Babbar Khalsa International and the International Sikh Youth Federation among organisations that have received financial support within Canada. It also noted that Canadian law enforcement and intelligence agencies have tracked money flows to globally designated groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.According to the assessment, Khalistani extremists continue to pursue "violent means to establish an independent state within Punjab, India" and are believed to raise funds across multiple countries, including Canada. While the groups once ran extensive fundraising networks, authorities now believe they operate in smaller clusters, often tapping diaspora communities and exploiting non-profit organisations to move money.&nbsp;

The banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) has issued a "chilling warning" against Indian diplomats in Canada, announcing a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18.

Banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) on Wednesday (Sep 19) issued a chilling warning against Indian diplomats in Canada. In a post on X, the Khalistani group announced a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18. The group, whose account is restricted in India, also released a poster that features India’s High Commissioner to Ottawa, Dinesh Patnaik, with a target on his face. The message also warned Indo-Canadians to avoid the consulate on September 18, the date of the planned protest. Also read | 'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images What did SFJ say? In a notice shared on social media, SFJ linked the action to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's statement in Parliament two years ago, alleging Indian involvement in the killing of Khalistani separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar. In its notice, the Khalistani group claimed that two years after Trudeau's announcement, "Indian Consulates continue to run spy networks and surveillance targeting Khalistan Referendum campaigners." Also read | Trump blames 'incompetent' Biden for Dallas beheading of Indian-origin Chandra Nagamallaiah, vows crackdown on illegal criminals "The threat is so grave that the RCMP has offered ‘Witness Protection’ to Inderjeet Singh Gosal, who assumed leadership of the Khalistan Referendum campaign after Shaheed Nijjar’s martyrdom," it adds, before announcing what it called a “Historic SIEGE” to “demand accountability for Indian state-directed espionage and intimidation on Canadian soil.” Canada says 'Khalistani extremists' a national security threat The call for the siege comes just weeks after a Canadian government report highlighted the presence and foreign funding of Khalistani groups on its soil. The "2025 Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in Canada" identified Babbar Khalsa International and the International Sikh Youth Federation among organisations that have received financial support within Canada. It also noted that Canadian law enforcement and intelligence agencies have tracked money flows to globally designated groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. According to the assessment, Khalistani extremists continue to pursue "violent means to establish an independent state within Punjab, India" and are believed to raise funds across multiple countries, including Canada. While the groups once ran extensive fundraising networks, authorities now believe they operate in smaller clusters, often tapping diaspora communities and exploiting non-profit organisations to move money.

The banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) has issued a "chilling warning" against Indian diplomats in Canada, announcing a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18.

Khalistani group Sikhs for Justice issues chilling threat, announces ‘siege’ of Indian consulate in Vancouver

A 28-year-old Greek heiress tragically died after a mosquito bit her, and two hospitals turned her away, thinking that it wasn't anything serious. Marissa Laimou had previously battled cancer and was dead in her bed by her housekeeper at her London apartment on September 11. According to Greek media reports, Marissa has developed dizziness, itching, fever and other signs of infection. She called a doctor who checked her at her house and gave her paracetamol. However, when her condition didn't improve, she visited a hospital. Marissa also visited her oncologist, who sent her to another hospital. She was given a diagnosis that referred to an insect bite. She was prescribed antibiotics and sent back home. She was found dead the next day. Her family allege that at the hospital, instead of a doctor, only the nurses checked her and didn't find a need to admit her. The hospital has admitted that lapses occurred and is investigating the incident. Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/strip-club-didnt-want-to-pay-8mn-in-taxes-so-they-gave-the-auditor-lap-dances-1758078233518"> Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances</a>&nbsp;<h2>How did the Greek heiress die?</h2>Marissa's mother, Bessy, told Greek media that her daughter died of toxic shock caused by an insect bite. "My daughter had survived cancer and died from an insect," she said, that she was "a girl with so many gifts, all of England is crying, all her doctors too." It is not known which kind of insect bit her. An autopsy will be carried out in about a week, her relatives informed the media. The post-mortem will conclusively find what killed Marissa. Talking about the Greek heiress, her friends said that she was into theatre and had recently staged a production of Romeo and Juliet in London. She was working on another theatre project. Marissa had turned to theatre after battling breast cancer. Meanwhile, her family is a big name in the Greek shipping industry and has been in the business since the early 20th century.&nbsp;

A Greek heiress died in London after being bitten by a mosquito. Although it is not clear whether the bite was what killed her. Marissa Laimou was a cancer survivor and visited two hospitals, but neither deemed her condition serious enough to admit her.

A 28-year-old Greek heiress tragically died after a mosquito bit her, and two hospitals turned her away, thinking that it wasn't anything serious. Marissa Laimou had previously battled cancer and was dead in her bed by her housekeeper at her London apartment on September 11. According to Greek media reports, Marissa has developed dizziness, itching, fever and other signs of infection. She called a doctor who checked her at her house and gave her paracetamol. However, when her condition didn't improve, she visited a hospital. Marissa also visited her oncologist, who sent her to another hospital. She was given a diagnosis that referred to an insect bite. She was prescribed antibiotics and sent back home. She was found dead the next day. Her family allege that at the hospital, instead of a doctor, only the nurses checked her and didn't find a need to admit her. The hospital has admitted that lapses occurred and is investigating the incident. Also Read: Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances How did the Greek heiress die? Marissa's mother, Bessy, told Greek media that her daughter died of toxic shock caused by an insect bite. "My daughter had survived cancer and died from an insect," she said, that she was "a girl with so many gifts, all of England is crying, all her doctors too." It is not known which kind of insect bit her. An autopsy will be carried out in about a week, her relatives informed the media. The post-mortem will conclusively find what killed Marissa. Talking about the Greek heiress, her friends said that she was into theatre and had recently staged a production of Romeo and Juliet in London. She was working on another theatre project. Marissa had turned to theatre after battling breast cancer. Meanwhile, her family is a big name in the Greek shipping industry and has been in the business since the early 20th century.

A Greek heiress died in London after being bitten by a mosquito. Although it is not clear whether the bite was what killed her. Marissa Laimou was a cancer survivor and visited two hospitals, but neither deemed her condition serious enough to admit her.

Did toxic shock from a mosquito bite kill a Greek heiress? Two hospitals blamed of serious lapses

An American company that owns strip clubs across the country gave away free lap dances to an auditor in order to avoid paying $8 million in sales taxes to New York City and the state of New York. A prosecutor in the case alleged that the executives bribed a government official with free trips to some of the clubs and spent thousands of dollars on him. New York Attorney General Letitia James said the alleged scheme involved Houston-based RCI Hospitality Holdings. She said that company executives and the corporate leaders did so from 2010 to 2024 for at least six tax audits. RCI Hospitality owns and operates more than 60 clubs, sports bars and restaurants in the US. Their most popular establishment is Rick's Cabaret, which is located in more than a dozen cities, including New York City. Prosecutors alleged that the auditor was given at least 13 complimentary, multiday trips to Florida, besides up to $5,000 per day use for private dances at the company's strip clubs. A company executive also accompanied the unnamed auditor on these trips. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/luigi-mangione-terror-charges-dropped-but-he-could-still-face-death-penalty-all-about-the-case-1758035769727">Luigi Mangione's terror charges dropped, but he could still face death penalty: Here's how</a>&nbsp;<h2>RCI Hospitality rebuffs the accusations of bribery</h2> A grand jury indictment in the case was unsealed on Tuesday and charges RCI, five of its executives and the three clubs in Manhattan with conspiracy, bribery, tax fraud and other crimes. “RCI’s executives shamelessly used their strip clubs to bribe their way out of paying millions of dollars in taxes,” James said in a statement. “I will always take action to fight corruption and ensure everyone pays their fair share.” Meanwhile, the lawyer for RCI, Daniel Horwitz, termed the allegations false and “baseless” and said his clients were "innocent." “We are clearly disappointed with the New York Attorney General’s decision to move forward with an indictment and look forward to addressing the allegations," Horwitz said in a statement. He added that RCIs always paid “all legitimate and non-contested taxes".&nbsp;Those indicted at RCI in the bribery case include Eric Langan of Bellaire, Texas, chief executive officer, president and board chairman; and Timothy Winata of Houston, a controller and accountant. According to the prosecutor, Langan authorised the money for the bribes, while Winata directly handed the bribes and even went with the auditor on these trips to their strip clubs. Winata also travelled from Texas to Manhattan to give the bribe to the auditor when he was at Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar, in Manhattan, prosecutors said. A sixth person has also been arrested in the case, although James's office did not say whether it was the auditor. His name has been redacted in the indictment, but what is known is that he worked for the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. Amid the charges, the company continues to keep the shutters up of all three of its Manhattan clubs.&nbsp;

RCI Hospitality, which operates the Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar in Manhattan, and several more establishments in the US, has been accused of bribing a tax auditor with cash and lap dances at their strip clubs.

An American company that owns strip clubs across the country gave away free lap dances to an auditor in order to avoid paying $8 million in sales taxes to New York City and the state of New York. A prosecutor in the case alleged that the executives bribed a government official with free trips to some of the clubs and spent thousands of dollars on him. New York Attorney General Letitia James said the alleged scheme involved Houston-based RCI Hospitality Holdings. She said that company executives and the corporate leaders did so from 2010 to 2024 for at least six tax audits. RCI Hospitality owns and operates more than 60 clubs, sports bars and restaurants in the US. Their most popular establishment is Rick's Cabaret, which is located in more than a dozen cities, including New York City. Prosecutors alleged that the auditor was given at least 13 complimentary, multiday trips to Florida, besides up to $5,000 per day use for private dances at the company's strip clubs. A company executive also accompanied the unnamed auditor on these trips. Also Read: Luigi Mangione's terror charges dropped, but he could still face death penalty: Here's how RCI Hospitality rebuffs the accusations of bribery A grand jury indictment in the case was unsealed on Tuesday and charges RCI, five of its executives and the three clubs in Manhattan with conspiracy, bribery, tax fraud and other crimes. “RCI’s executives shamelessly used their strip clubs to bribe their way out of paying millions of dollars in taxes,” James said in a statement. “I will always take action to fight corruption and ensure everyone pays their fair share.” Meanwhile, the lawyer for RCI, Daniel Horwitz, termed the allegations false and “baseless” and said his clients were "innocent." “We are clearly disappointed with the New York Attorney General’s decision to move forward with an indictment and look forward to addressing the allegations," Horwitz said in a statement. He added that RCIs always paid “all legitimate and non-contested taxes". Those indicted at RCI in the bribery case include Eric Langan of Bellaire, Texas, chief executive officer, president and board chairman; and Timothy Winata of Houston, a controller and accountant. According to the prosecutor, Langan authorised the money for the bribes, while Winata directly handed the bribes and even went with the auditor on these trips to their strip clubs. Winata also travelled from Texas to Manhattan to give the bribe to the auditor when he was at Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar, in Manhattan, prosecutors said. A sixth person has also been arrested in the case, although James's office did not say whether it was the auditor. His name has been redacted in the indictment, but what is known is that he worked for the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. Amid the charges, the company continues to keep the shutters up of all three of its Manhattan clubs.

RCI Hospitality, which operates the Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar in Manhattan, and several more establishments in the US, has been accused of bribing a tax auditor with cash and lap dances at their strip clubs.

Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances

Smoke-choked air that fills their lungs, floods threatening their homes and debilitating heat: a group of young Americans testified Tuesday that President Donald Trump's fossil-fuel push is trampling their inalienable rights.Lighthiser v Trump is emblematic of a growing global trend of legal action as a tool to push action on planetary warming amid political inertia or outright hostility.At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy.They are also contesting the government's actions undermining federal climate science, from firing scientists to removing critical reports.A two-day hearing opened in a federal courtroom in Missoula, Montana where Julia Olson, lead attorney for the 22 plaintiffs, framed the dispute as a constitutional test."Does the United States Constitution guard against executive abuses of power by executive order that deprive children and youth of their fundamental rights to life and to their liberties?" she asked.Michael Sawyer, representing the Trump administration, countered that the case itself undermined democracy."This is, at its core, an anti-democratic lawsuit," he argued."We just had an election. One of the major issues in that election was a duelling perspective on emissions, energy policy, and they are now stepping in and asking the court to overrule the results."<h2>Witnesses grilled</h2>The spotlight then shifted to the young plaintiffs, represented by the nonprofit Our Children's Trust, who described how climate change is reshaping their lives.J.M., a teenager from Livingston, Montana, said that even in her short life she has seen snowfall decline, wildfire seasons lengthen, and flooding worsen.One blaze forced her family to evacuate, and she remembers packing her stuffed toys and worrying about the family's animals."Just experiencing that from a young age put the fear of wildfire in me," she said.Another plaintiff, Joseph Lee, 19, recalled wildfires in California last year that destroyed the home of a friend."I don't know if I'm going to be next -- are my parents going to be safe?"&nbsp;he told the court.Asked why he chose to participate in the lawsuit, Lee, who has been hospitalized for heat stroke that nearly caused organ failure, said: "A better future is possible."The young people faced tough questioning from government lawyers, who grilled J.M. over her family's decision to keep three horses -- arguing that raising them contributed to greenhouse emissions and implying she was being hypocritical.<h2>Long odds</h2>Expert witnesses also took the stand Tuesday, including renowned climate scientist Steven Running, who shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for being a co-author on a major UN climate report, and former senior White House official John Podesta."In your expert opinion would their injuries get worse if more fossil fuels were to be unleashed under these executive orders?" Olson asked Running."Unquestionably," he answered.The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary injunction that could open the door to a full trial.The federal government, joined by 19 conservative-leaning states and the territory of Guam, wants the case thrown out, but has not called their own witnesses.The plaintiffs hope to build on recent state-level wins: a 2023 Montana ruling that oil and gas permits violated the state's constitutional right to a clean environment, and a 2024 Hawaii settlement mandating faster decarbonization of its transport sector.On the federal level, however, the record is bleak. The landmark 2015 Juliana v. United States case was dismissed after the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal earlier this year.During cross-examination, government lawyer Sawyer pressed Podesta for previously arguing against Juliana when he served in the government.But Podesta countered that while Juliana was too broad, and would have required reversing five decades of policy, in the new case the "remedy is direct and narrow" -- "To pull back on specific actions that are heavily burdening these kids and will have direct impact on their lives."It remains to be seen whether this central argument, key to the plaintiff's case, plays.Judge Dana Christensen, an Obama appointee with a record of pro-environment rulings, is presiding -- but even if the plaintiffs notch a win, the case could eventually land before the conservative-dominated Supreme Court.Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy.

Smoke-choked air that fills their lungs, floods threatening their homes and debilitating heat: a group of young Americans testified Tuesday that President Donald Trump's fossil-fuel push is trampling their inalienable rights. Lighthiser v Trump is emblematic of a growing global trend of legal action as a tool to push action on planetary warming amid political inertia or outright hostility. At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy. They are also contesting the government's actions undermining federal climate science, from firing scientists to removing critical reports. A two-day hearing opened in a federal courtroom in Missoula, Montana where Julia Olson, lead attorney for the 22 plaintiffs, framed the dispute as a constitutional test. "Does the United States Constitution guard against executive abuses of power by executive order that deprive children and youth of their fundamental rights to life and to their liberties?" she asked. Michael Sawyer, representing the Trump administration, countered that the case itself undermined democracy. "This is, at its core, an anti-democratic lawsuit," he argued. "We just had an election. One of the major issues in that election was a duelling perspective on emissions, energy policy, and they are now stepping in and asking the court to overrule the results." Witnesses grilled The spotlight then shifted to the young plaintiffs, represented by the nonprofit Our Children's Trust, who described how climate change is reshaping their lives. J.M., a teenager from Livingston, Montana, said that even in her short life she has seen snowfall decline, wildfire seasons lengthen, and flooding worsen. One blaze forced her family to evacuate, and she remembers packing her stuffed toys and worrying about the family's animals. "Just experiencing that from a young age put the fear of wildfire in me," she said. Another plaintiff, Joseph Lee, 19, recalled wildfires in California last year that destroyed the home of a friend. "I don't know if I'm going to be next -- are my parents going to be safe?" he told the court. Asked why he chose to participate in the lawsuit, Lee, who has been hospitalized for heat stroke that nearly caused organ failure, said: "A better future is possible." The young people faced tough questioning from government lawyers, who grilled J.M. over her family's decision to keep three horses -- arguing that raising them contributed to greenhouse emissions and implying she was being hypocritical. Long odds Expert witnesses also took the stand Tuesday, including renowned climate scientist Steven Running, who shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for being a co-author on a major UN climate report, and former senior White House official John Podesta. "In your expert opinion would their injuries get worse if more fossil fuels were to be unleashed under these executive orders?" Olson asked Running. "Unquestionably," he answered. The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary injunction that could open the door to a full trial. The federal government, joined by 19 conservative-leaning states and the territory of Guam, wants the case thrown out, but has not called their own witnesses. The plaintiffs hope to build on recent state-level wins: a 2023 Montana ruling that oil and gas permits violated the state's constitutional right to a clean environment, and a 2024 Hawaii settlement mandating faster decarbonization of its transport sector. On the federal level, however, the record is bleak. The landmark 2015 Juliana v. United States case was dismissed after the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal earlier this year. During cross-examination, government lawyer Sawyer pressed Podesta for previously arguing against Juliana when he served in the government. But Podesta countered that while Juliana was too broad, and would have required reversing five decades of policy, in the new case the "remedy is direct and narrow" -- "To pull back on specific actions that are heavily burdening these kids and will have direct impact on their lives." It remains to be seen whether this central argument, key to the plaintiff's case, plays. Judge Dana Christensen, an Obama appointee with a record of pro-environment rulings, is presiding -- but even if the plaintiffs notch a win, the case could eventually land before the conservative-dominated Supreme Court. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy.

'Executive abuse of power’: Trump sued by youth over climate change in landmark case

FBI Director Kash Patel on Tuesday (Sep 16) pushed back hard against accusations from Senate Democrats that his removal of senior FBI agents was politically motivated, insisting he had no plans to step down despite reports of unease in the White House over his leadership. "I'm not going anywhere. If you want to criticise my 16 years of service, bring it on," Patel said in his opening remarks before the Senate judiciary committee, where he faced lawmakers for the first time since his February confirmation. What followed was a tense, four-hour hearing marked by angry exchanges.<h2>Kash Patel hearing turns into a war of words</h2>Patel accused Democrats of "weaponising intelligence," at one point calling California senator Adam Schiff "a liar" and "a political buffoon at best" after being pressed about the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to a lower-security prison. He insisted he had no role in that decision and that a court order prevented him from releasing more documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein.<h2>FBI agents who investigated Trump were fired?</h2>Other Democrats questioned Patel's fitness for the job, citing lawsuits by three fired senior FBI officials who allege the bureau has been politicised. According to the lawsuit, they also claim that at one point Kash Patel stated that he had been instructed to fire agents who investigated Trump. Patel refused to comment on the allegations, saying they were the subject of litigation, but said terminations were only made when agents violated their oath, broke the law, or failed to meet bureau standards."The only way, generally speaking, an individual is terminated at the FBI is if they have violated their oath of office, violated the law, or failed to uphold the standards that we need them to have at the FBI," he said."I don't think you're fit to head the bureau," Senator Cory Booker told him, predicting Patel was "not going to be around long. I think this might be your last oversight hearing". Patel shot back: "That rant of false information does not bring this country together".Patel also resisted providing figures on how many agents had been fired, resigned, or retired since Trump became POTUS, accusing Hawaii senator Mazie Hirono of seeking a "media hit" rather than answers.Patel is due to appear Wednesday (Sep 17) before the House Judiciary Committee, where Democrats have signalled plans to press him further on Epstein and the bureau's independence.

FBI Director Kash Patel testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday in a tense four-hour hearing, where he denied that he has politicised the bureau and conducted a "campaign of retribution" against those who investigated President Donald Trump.

FBI Director Kash Patel on Tuesday (Sep 16) pushed back hard against accusations from Senate Democrats that his removal of senior FBI agents was politically motivated, insisting he had no plans to step down despite reports of unease in the White House over his leadership. "I'm not going anywhere. If you want to criticise my 16 years of service, bring it on," Patel said in his opening remarks before the Senate judiciary committee, where he faced lawmakers for the first time since his February confirmation. What followed was a tense, four-hour hearing marked by angry exchanges. Kash Patel hearing turns into a war of words Patel accused Democrats of "weaponising intelligence," at one point calling California senator Adam Schiff "a liar" and "a political buffoon at best" after being pressed about the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to a lower-security prison. He insisted he had no role in that decision and that a court order prevented him from releasing more documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein. FBI agents who investigated Trump were fired? Other Democrats questioned Patel's fitness for the job, citing lawsuits by three fired senior FBI officials who allege the bureau has been politicised. According to the lawsuit, they also claim that at one point Kash Patel stated that he had been instructed to fire agents who investigated Trump. Patel refused to comment on the allegations, saying they were the subject of litigation, but said terminations were only made when agents violated their oath, broke the law, or failed to meet bureau standards. "The only way, generally speaking, an individual is terminated at the FBI is if they have violated their oath of office, violated the law, or failed to uphold the standards that we need them to have at the FBI," he said. "I don't think you're fit to head the bureau," Senator Cory Booker told him, predicting Patel was "not going to be around long. I think this might be your last oversight hearing". Patel shot back: "That rant of false information does not bring this country together". Patel also resisted providing figures on how many agents had been fired, resigned, or retired since Trump became POTUS, accusing Hawaii senator Mazie Hirono of seeking a "media hit" rather than answers. Patel is due to appear Wednesday (Sep 17) before the House Judiciary Committee, where Democrats have signalled plans to press him further on Epstein and the bureau's independence.

FBI Director Kash Patel testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday in a tense four-hour hearing, where he denied that he has politicised the bureau and conducted a "campaign of retribution" against those who investigated President Donald Trump.

Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns into war of words: 'Liar,' 'buffoon,' 'false rant'

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

What’s behind the court’s 'protective order' against Tyler Robinson and Erika Kirk?

Melania, Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor

In pics | 41-gun salute, 120 horses, 1,300 troops: Trump, Melania’s UK welcome

Ukraine MP makes shocking claims against Zelensky over Charlie Kirk's murder

Trump's UK visit could be Ukraine's best hope: Here's how

UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania

Alexei Navalny's death in custody linked to poisoning, labs confirm, claims wife

Main suspect in McCann's disappearance freed after serving seven-year jail term

AI War: China trials chip tech while asking Chinese firms to reject Nvidia chips

Netanyahu says strikes on Hamas officials in Qatar are 'entirely justified'

Botox under burqas, unlikely boom of cosmetic surgery in Taliban conservatism

Death by Podcast: Charlie Kirk murder and the rise of violence-inspiring content

FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden

'Systematic ethnic cleansing'? Israel opens 48-hour 'escape route' as Gaza City offensive escalates

Nepal mourns remembering the victims of the Gen Z protest

Decades of daylight robbery: How Indians in US lose billions of dollars

DOJ quietly deletes study on right-wing terror after Trump said this about Kirk

International community celebrates Indian PM Modi's 75th birthday

China calls TikTok deal with US a 'win-win' ahead of Trump, Xi call

'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Netanyahu angers Israeli business leaders

Charlie Kirk's 'shooter' Tyler Robinson's text to partner exposes motive

Khalistani group SFJ announces ‘siege’ of Indian consulate in Vancouver

Did toxic shock from a mosquito bite kill a Greek heiress?

Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances

'Executive abuse of power’: Trump sued by youth over climate change

Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns ugly: 'Liar,' 'buffoon'