Iran's Revolutionary Guards said on Wednesday (August 26) that Tehran and Oman had reached an agreement on sharing revenues from the Strait of Hormuz, a day after the two countries held high-level talks in Tehran.&nbsp;Revolutionary Guards spokesman Hossein Mohebi said the discussions covered the share of the waters and revenues between Iran and Oman.&nbsp;"During negotiations with Oman, some agreements were made regarding each country's share of the waters of the Strait and Iran's and Oman's shares of its revenues," Mohebi said.&nbsp;However, Mohebi accused the United States of "obstructing work" to complete the agreement.&nbsp;The announcement came a day after the foreign ministers of Iran and Oman met in Tehran. Their talks focused on a proposed temporary transit corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and a project to clear mines from the waterway.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/high-alert-in-neighbouring-states-of-up-and-bihar-after-devastating-flash-floods-in-nepal-1787747307583">High alert in neighbouring states of UP and Bihar after devastating flash floods in Nepal</a><h3>Pezeshkian rejects US sanctions pressure</h3>Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian also rejected Washington's economic pressure campaign on Wednesday, saying US sanctions would not achieve their intended goal.&nbsp;"America will not achieve anything with economic pressure at this stage, just as it was unable to achieve anything in the war," Pezeshkian said, according to Iran's ISNA news agency.&nbsp;The statement came as US President Donald Trump has shifted his focus towards economic measures amid pressure at home over the impact of the conflict. Washington has expanded sanctions and warned countries of consequences if they do not join the pressure campaign.&nbsp;Iranian leaders have remained defiant and said they have a two-year plan to deal with the pressure. Iran's army also said on Wednesday that it had rebuilt or replaced all weapons systems damaged during the fighting.&nbsp;The war began after US-Israeli strikes on the Islamic Republic on February 38 and has since spread across the Middle East. The conflict has disrupted global trade and energy security after Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation. The waterway handles nearly 20 per cent of global oil and gas shipments.&nbsp;Meanwhile, peace negotiations remain stalled. The breach of a Memorandum of Understanding between Washington and Tehran has failed to produce a diplomatic outcome to the conflict.

After weeks of negotiations, Iran and Oman reached a deal to share revenues from the Strait of Hormuz, but Tehran maintained that the waterway’s full reopening would depend on the US lifting its naval blockade and meeting other Iranian demands.

Iran's Revolutionary Guards said on Wednesday (August 26) that Tehran and Oman had reached an agreement on sharing revenues from the Strait of Hormuz, a day after the two countries held high-level talks in Tehran. Revolutionary Guards spokesman Hossein Mohebi said the discussions covered the share of the waters and revenues between Iran and Oman. "During negotiations with Oman, some agreements were made regarding each country's share of the waters of the Strait and Iran's and Oman's shares of its revenues," Mohebi said. However, Mohebi accused the United States of "obstructing work" to complete the agreement. The announcement came a day after the foreign ministers of Iran and Oman met in Tehran. Their talks focused on a proposed temporary transit corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and a project to clear mines from the waterway. Also Read: High alert in neighbouring states of UP and Bihar after devastating flash floods in Nepal Pezeshkian rejects US sanctions pressure Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian also rejected Washington's economic pressure campaign on Wednesday, saying US sanctions would not achieve their intended goal. "America will not achieve anything with economic pressure at this stage, just as it was unable to achieve anything in the war," Pezeshkian said, according to Iran's ISNA news agency. The statement came as US President Donald Trump has shifted his focus towards economic measures amid pressure at home over the impact of the conflict. Washington has expanded sanctions and warned countries of consequences if they do not join the pressure campaign. Iranian leaders have remained defiant and said they have a two-year plan to deal with the pressure. Iran's army also said on Wednesday that it had rebuilt or replaced all weapons systems damaged during the fighting. The war began after US-Israeli strikes on the Islamic Republic on February 38 and has since spread across the Middle East. The conflict has disrupted global trade and energy security after Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation. The waterway handles nearly 20 per cent of global oil and gas shipments. Meanwhile, peace negotiations remain stalled. The breach of a Memorandum of Understanding between Washington and Tehran has failed to produce a diplomatic outcome to the conflict.

After weeks of negotiations, Iran and Oman reached a deal to share revenues from the Strait of Hormuz, but Tehran maintained that the waterway’s full reopening would depend on the US lifting its naval blockade and meeting other Iranian demands.

Iran reaches Hormuz revenue sharing deal with Oman, Pezeshkian says US sanctions cannot force Tehran

Iran has rejected any suggestion that a temporary maritime arrangement reached with Oman amounts to a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, with Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi saying the waterway remains closed from a military standpoint."The understanding between Iran and Oman does not mean the opening of the Strait of Hormuz," Gharibabadi said in a television programme on Tuesday night, according to ISNA.Asked when the strait could reopen, he was equally direct: "The Strait of Hormuz will not open tomorrow."<h2>What is the temporary route?</h2>Under the arrangement discussed with Oman, ships entering the Persian Gulf would use a route through Iranian waters, while vessels leaving the Gulf would use Omani territorial waters.Gharibabadi said that, despite the two directions, ships would pass through Iranian waters under the temporary arrangement. "This route is like a round-trip highway with a total width of about 7 miles," he said.The arrangement is intended to be temporary. Iran and Oman are expected to negotiate a permanent maritime route within 30 to 60 days, replacing the previous traffic arrangement.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/if-iran-overplays-its-hand-us-won-t-rule-out-kinetic-strikes-on-tehran-war-secretary-hegseth-warns-as-economic-pressure-intensifies-1787629525309">'If Iran overplays its hand': US won't rule out 'kinetic strikes' on Tehran, War Secretary Hegseth warns</a><h2>Iran says the strait remains militarily closed</h2>Gharibabadi stressed that the new shipping arrangement should not be confused with a full reopening. "Militarily, the Strait of Hormuz is closed," he said.He added that military vessels would not be allowed to use the temporary arrangement and only commercial vessels would be permitted to pass.Gharibabadi said the issue of maritime routes had become a matter of Iranian national security, arguing that Tehran had suffered damage under the previous arrangement."For the past 58 years, ships have been passing through Omani waters, and Iran has suffered severe damage," he said, adding that "fundamental changes" were needed in the routes used for entry and exit.<h2>Military plays key role in route decisions</h2>Gharibabadi said discussions with Oman were being conducted through a joint working group involving Iran's Foreign Ministry, Ports and Maritime Organization, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including its Navy, and the General Staff of the Armed Forces.He said the armed forces had the leading role in determining the routes. "The main guidance regarding the routes actually lies with military friends and the armed forces complex," he said.According to Gharibabadi, the proposals presented to Oman originated with Iran's armed forces and had the backing of all relevant government and military bodies. He also stressed that deciding specific maritime routes was a technical matter and not something handled by the Foreign Ministry.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/wion-decodes-two-thirds-of-ships-crossing-hormuz-are-now-dark-what-does-that-mean-1787645012571">WION Decodes: Two-thirds of ships crossing Hormuz are now 'dark'. What does that mean?</a><h2>Trump warns Iran over mine-laying</h2>Gharibabadi's comments came hours after US President Donald Trump said the US Navy had informed him that mines had been removed or detonated in international waters in the Strait of Hormuz.Trump warned that any attempt by Iran to lay new mines in international waters would trigger an immediate US military response. In a post on Truth Social, he said any vessel involved in placing new mines would be “immediately and systematically destroyed.”<h2>US not planning new Iran strikes 'for the time being', Rubio tells allies</h2>US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has told several allied foreign ministers that Washington does not expect to launch new strikes against Iran "for the time being", Axios reported.&nbsp;According to the report, Rubio said the Trump administration would instead focus on increasing economic and maritime pressure on Tehran. The strategy includes a US naval blockade and a new sanctions initiative announced by the Treasury Department.

Iran says a temporary maritime route agreed with Oman does not mean the Strait of Hormuz has reopened. Tehran says commercial ships may use the route, but the waterway remains militarily closed.

Iran has rejected any suggestion that a temporary maritime arrangement reached with Oman amounts to a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, with Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi saying the waterway remains closed from a military standpoint. "The understanding between Iran and Oman does not mean the opening of the Strait of Hormuz," Gharibabadi said in a television programme on Tuesday night, according to ISNA. Asked when the strait could reopen, he was equally direct: "The Strait of Hormuz will not open tomorrow." What is the temporary route? Under the arrangement discussed with Oman, ships entering the Persian Gulf would use a route through Iranian waters, while vessels leaving the Gulf would use Omani territorial waters. Gharibabadi said that, despite the two directions, ships would pass through Iranian waters under the temporary arrangement. "This route is like a round-trip highway with a total width of about 7 miles," he said. The arrangement is intended to be temporary. Iran and Oman are expected to negotiate a permanent maritime route within 30 to 60 days, replacing the previous traffic arrangement. Also read | 'If Iran overplays its hand': US won't rule out 'kinetic strikes' on Tehran, War Secretary Hegseth warns Iran says the strait remains militarily closed Gharibabadi stressed that the new shipping arrangement should not be confused with a full reopening. "Militarily, the Strait of Hormuz is closed," he said. He added that military vessels would not be allowed to use the temporary arrangement and only commercial vessels would be permitted to pass. Gharibabadi said the issue of maritime routes had become a matter of Iranian national security, arguing that Tehran had suffered damage under the previous arrangement. "For the past 58 years, ships have been passing through Omani waters, and Iran has suffered severe damage," he said, adding that "fundamental changes" were needed in the routes used for entry and exit. Military plays key role in route decisions Gharibabadi said discussions with Oman were being conducted through a joint working group involving Iran's Foreign Ministry, Ports and Maritime Organization, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including its Navy, and the General Staff of the Armed Forces. He said the armed forces had the leading role in determining the routes. "The main guidance regarding the routes actually lies with military friends and the armed forces complex," he said. According to Gharibabadi, the proposals presented to Oman originated with Iran's armed forces and had the backing of all relevant government and military bodies. He also stressed that deciding specific maritime routes was a technical matter and not something handled by the Foreign Ministry. Also read | WION Decodes: Two-thirds of ships crossing Hormuz are now 'dark'. What does that mean? Trump warns Iran over mine-laying Gharibabadi's comments came hours after US President Donald Trump said the US Navy had informed him that mines had been removed or detonated in international waters in the Strait of Hormuz. Trump warned that any attempt by Iran to lay new mines in international waters would trigger an immediate US military response. In a post on Truth Social, he said any vessel involved in placing new mines would be “immediately and systematically destroyed.” US not planning new Iran strikes 'for the time being', Rubio tells allies US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has told several allied foreign ministers that Washington does not expect to launch new strikes against Iran "for the time being", Axios reported. According to the report, Rubio said the Trump administration would instead focus on increasing economic and maritime pressure on Tehran. The strategy includes a US naval blockade and a new sanctions initiative announced by the Treasury Department.

Iran says a temporary maritime route agreed with Oman does not mean the Strait of Hormuz has reopened. Tehran says commercial ships may use the route, but the waterway remains militarily closed.

'Militarily closed': Iran says Oman route does not mean Strait of Hormuz is reopening

Iran and Oman’s foreign ministers on Tuesday (August 25) said they discussed plans for a temporary shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and a joint project to clear mines from the waterway.&nbsp;The two countries have been working to regulate traffic through the Strait of Hormuz under the US-Iran memorandum of understanding. The waterway became a major flashpoint during the Middle East war.&nbsp;Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi and Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi "discussed a phased framework that could provide a practical and implementable basis for moving forward" during talks in Tehran, Oman said in a joint statement.&nbsp;The proposed framework "includes the establishment of a joint temporary navigational corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and an agreement to implement a joint project to clear the Strait of mines," the statement said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/canada-hits-back-at-trump-with-tariffs-of-up-to-50-percent-on-us-goods-as-trade-war-escalates-1787672086990">Canada hits back at Trump with tariffs of up to 50% on US goods as trade war escalates</a><h3>Talks planned for permanent corridor</h3>The two sides will continue technical talks on a "permanent navigational corridor and future administration of the Strait". They will also discuss information sharing, traffic management, and navigation and security services.&nbsp;Iran and Oman also said states bordering the Gulf should take part in joint discussions on the waterway.&nbsp;The announcement came as US President Donald Trump repeated his claim on Truth Social that "all mines have been removed and/or detonated from within the International Waters of the Strait of Hormuz," according to the US Navy.&nbsp;"Iran has been notified that any ship or boat placing new mines will be immediately and systematically destroyed... There is a Zero Tolerance policy on mine placement in full force and effect," he added.<h3>Strait remains largely blocked</h3>The war began after the United States and Israel attacked Iran on February 28. Tehran then quickly blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, while Washington imposed a naval counter-blockade on Iranian ports.&nbsp;Shipping through the strait remains largely paralysed. The disruption has affected global oil markets because the waterway normally carries around one fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas exports.&nbsp;Iran and Oman, which both border the strait, have discussed the future of navigation through the waterway for several weeks. Tehran has said the geographical coordinates of a route proposed by the two countries "have been agreed upon".&nbsp;However, Iranian officials have said the strait will not fully reopen until the United States meets Tehran’s demands. These include lifting the naval blockade, ending oil sanctions and unfreezing Iranian assets held abroad.

Iran and Oman discussed a phased framework for a temporary navigational corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and a joint mine-clearing project, with talks also continuing on a permanent shipping route.

Iran and Oman’s foreign ministers on Tuesday (August 25) said they discussed plans for a temporary shipping corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and a joint project to clear mines from the waterway. The two countries have been working to regulate traffic through the Strait of Hormuz under the US-Iran memorandum of understanding. The waterway became a major flashpoint during the Middle East war. Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi and Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi "discussed a phased framework that could provide a practical and implementable basis for moving forward" during talks in Tehran, Oman said in a joint statement. The proposed framework "includes the establishment of a joint temporary navigational corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and an agreement to implement a joint project to clear the Strait of mines," the statement said. Also Read: Canada hits back at Trump with tariffs of up to 50% on US goods as trade war escalates Talks planned for permanent corridor The two sides will continue technical talks on a "permanent navigational corridor and future administration of the Strait". They will also discuss information sharing, traffic management, and navigation and security services. Iran and Oman also said states bordering the Gulf should take part in joint discussions on the waterway. The announcement came as US President Donald Trump repeated his claim on Truth Social that "all mines have been removed and/or detonated from within the International Waters of the Strait of Hormuz," according to the US Navy. "Iran has been notified that any ship or boat placing new mines will be immediately and systematically destroyed... There is a Zero Tolerance policy on mine placement in full force and effect," he added. Strait remains largely blocked The war began after the United States and Israel attacked Iran on February 28. Tehran then quickly blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, while Washington imposed a naval counter-blockade on Iranian ports. Shipping through the strait remains largely paralysed. The disruption has affected global oil markets because the waterway normally carries around one fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas exports. Iran and Oman, which both border the strait, have discussed the future of navigation through the waterway for several weeks. Tehran has said the geographical coordinates of a route proposed by the two countries "have been agreed upon". However, Iranian officials have said the strait will not fully reopen until the United States meets Tehran’s demands. These include lifting the naval blockade, ending oil sanctions and unfreezing Iranian assets held abroad.

Iran and Oman discussed a phased framework for a temporary navigational corridor through the Strait of Hormuz and a joint mine-clearing project, with talks also continuing on a permanent shipping route.

Iran, Oman plan temporary Hormuz corridor, Trump claims all mines have been cleared

The Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important energy corridors, has become increasingly difficult to track as the war between Iran, the US, and Israel continues. Before the conflict, fewer than 1 per cent of vessels crossing the strait were classified as "dark". Since July 8, that figure has risen to around two-thirds of all transits, according to maritime intelligence firm Kpler.But what exactly does "dark" mean, and why does it matter?<h2>What is a 'dark' ship transit?</h2>In this context, "dark" does not necessarily mean that a vessel is operating illegally or secretly. It means that its exact route cannot be confirmed because of gaps in available tracking data.According to Kpler, these gaps can result from disabled transponders, jammed signals, or missing satellite imagery. When tracking systems cannot establish where a vessel crossed the waterway, that transit is recorded as unknown or "dark".Before the war, the vast majority of vessels followed the traditional corridor through the centre of the Strait of Hormuz, making their movements relatively easy to track.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-calls-strait-of-hormuz-american-territory-vows-iran-will-never-get-nuclear-weapon-1787385976123">Trump calls Strait of Hormuz 'American territory', vows Iran will never get nuclear weapon</a><h2>Why are so many transits now going dark?</h2>The pattern changed after Iran closed the strait following the outbreak of the war.The waterway now effectively has two competing routes. One runs along the Iranian side and is the only route approved by Tehran. The other lies farther south, near Oman's coast and potentially mined waters.During the relatively calmer period between June 17 and July 7, around nine ships a day used the Iranian route, and eight used the Omani route. Others travelled through unidentified routes or the former International Maritime Organization corridor. After hostilities resumed on July 8, however, the share of unidentified or "dark" crossings surged to two-thirds.<h2>How much has traffic through Hormuz fallen?</h2>The change in tracking visibility comes alongside a huge decline in overall shipping. Before the war, around one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas exports passed through the Strait of Hormuz.In February, an average of 95 commodity carriers crossed the strait each day. After Iran closed the waterway on March 1, it fell to around 10 per day.A June agreement briefly pushed the average up to 36 daily transits. But after fighting resumed on July 8, the number dropped again to around 15 transits a day through August 22.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uae-suspends-trade-with-iran-accuses-it-of-targeting-gulf-shipping-tehran-calls-claim-baseless-1787100695124">UAE suspends trade with Iran, accuses it of targeting Gulf shipping; Tehran calls claim baseless</a><h2>Are sailors still trapped in the Gulf?</h2>Yes. The disruption has left around 6,000 sailors and 500 vessels stranded in the Gulf, according to the International Maritime Organization. The IMO said discussions were continuing on securing a safe maritime route, but stressed that progress depended on de-escalation in the region.The maritime risks have also become deadly. The IMO has recorded 68 incidents in the Gulf and neighbouring waters during the war, including 47 incidents classified as attacks by the UK Maritime Trade Operations.At least 20 seafarers and port workers have been killed, 35 wounded, and one remains missing, according to the IMO.<h2>Why does the 'dark' trend matter?</h2>The rise in dark transits makes it harder to know exactly where vessels are travelling through one of the world's most important shipping chokepoints. That creates uncertainty for ship operators, insurers, governments and maritime authorities, especially in waters where Iran has warned of possible mines and where commercial vessels have already come under attack.

Two-thirds of vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz are now being classified as "dark". But does that mean they are operating secretly, illegally, or simply disappearing from tracking systems? WION Decodes what is really happening.

The Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important energy corridors, has become increasingly difficult to track as the war between Iran, the US, and Israel continues. Before the conflict, fewer than 1 per cent of vessels crossing the strait were classified as "dark". Since July 8, that figure has risen to around two-thirds of all transits, according to maritime intelligence firm Kpler. But what exactly does "dark" mean, and why does it matter? What is a 'dark' ship transit? In this context, "dark" does not necessarily mean that a vessel is operating illegally or secretly. It means that its exact route cannot be confirmed because of gaps in available tracking data. According to Kpler, these gaps can result from disabled transponders, jammed signals, or missing satellite imagery. When tracking systems cannot establish where a vessel crossed the waterway, that transit is recorded as unknown or "dark". Before the war, the vast majority of vessels followed the traditional corridor through the centre of the Strait of Hormuz, making their movements relatively easy to track. Also read | Trump calls Strait of Hormuz 'American territory', vows Iran will never get nuclear weapon Why are so many transits now going dark? The pattern changed after Iran closed the strait following the outbreak of the war. The waterway now effectively has two competing routes. One runs along the Iranian side and is the only route approved by Tehran. The other lies farther south, near Oman's coast and potentially mined waters. During the relatively calmer period between June 17 and July 7, around nine ships a day used the Iranian route, and eight used the Omani route. Others travelled through unidentified routes or the former International Maritime Organization corridor. After hostilities resumed on July 8, however, the share of unidentified or "dark" crossings surged to two-thirds. How much has traffic through Hormuz fallen? The change in tracking visibility comes alongside a huge decline in overall shipping. Before the war, around one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas exports passed through the Strait of Hormuz. In February, an average of 95 commodity carriers crossed the strait each day. After Iran closed the waterway on March 1, it fell to around 10 per day. A June agreement briefly pushed the average up to 36 daily transits. But after fighting resumed on July 8, the number dropped again to around 15 transits a day through August 22. Also read | UAE suspends trade with Iran, accuses it of targeting Gulf shipping; Tehran calls claim baseless Are sailors still trapped in the Gulf? Yes. The disruption has left around 6,000 sailors and 500 vessels stranded in the Gulf, according to the International Maritime Organization. The IMO said discussions were continuing on securing a safe maritime route, but stressed that progress depended on de-escalation in the region. The maritime risks have also become deadly. The IMO has recorded 68 incidents in the Gulf and neighbouring waters during the war, including 47 incidents classified as attacks by the UK Maritime Trade Operations. At least 20 seafarers and port workers have been killed, 35 wounded, and one remains missing, according to the IMO. Why does the 'dark' trend matter? The rise in dark transits makes it harder to know exactly where vessels are travelling through one of the world's most important shipping chokepoints. That creates uncertainty for ship operators, insurers, governments and maritime authorities, especially in waters where Iran has warned of possible mines and where commercial vessels have already come under attack.

Two-thirds of vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz are now being classified as "dark". But does that mean they are operating secretly, illegally, or simply disappearing from tracking systems? WION Decodes what is really happening.

WION Decodes: Two-thirds of ships crossing Hormuz are now 'dark'. What does that mean?

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Saturday (August 22) said Tehran had received many messages from neighbouring countries seeking new regional security arrangements and greater economic cooperation. He said the messages came as countries in the region reassessed their security concerns following the US actions.&nbsp;"We’ve received numerous messages from neighbouring countries about shaping new security arrangements and economic cooperation in the region," Ghalibaf wrote on X.&nbsp;"The United States put the security of every single one of its allies at such risk through bullying and pure disregard for their interests for the sake of Israel that they briefly saw their entire existence on the line," he said, adding, “A homegrown, independent order is what will actually deliver peace and security.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">1/2 We’ve received numerous messages from neighboring countries about shaping new security arrangements and economic cooperation in the region. The United States put the security of every single one of its allies at such risk…&mdash; محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) <a href="https://x.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2091108458430943245?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

However, Ghalibaf did not name the countries that had contacted Iran. He also did not provide details about the proposed arrangements or evidence of the reported outreach.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/contrary-to-law-us-federal-judge-strikes-down-trump-administration-s-75-country-visa-ban-1787401056447">'Contrary to law': US Federal judge strikes down Trump administration’s 75-country visa ban</a><h2>Iran pushes for new regional order</h2>The remarks echoed comments Ghalibaf made during his visit to Iraq this week. He had said Tehran wanted to speed up the creation of a "new regional order" without foreign involvement.&nbsp;His Iraq visit came as Baghdad faces US pressure to disarm Iran-backed armed groups. Iraq is also seeking Tehran's approval for its oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;This statement comes against the backdrop of Washington preparing to announce what US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called the "toughest sanctions in history" against Iran.&nbsp;The Iranian parliamentary speaker, who leads Tehran's mediated negotiations with Washington, acknowledged the growing economic pressure this week. He warned that Iran "won’t endure" if its people remain hungry and the economy stays strangled.&nbsp;In a related development, Tehran has allowed some Iraqi oil tankers to pass through the strategic Strait of Hormuz after repeated requests from Baghdad, Iranian state media reported on Saturday.&nbsp;"Despite being subjected to the most severe military measures and insecurity created in the strait due to the hostile actions of the United States, Tehran has granted permission to many Iraqi oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz over the past six months," the IRNA news agency said.&nbsp;Iraq had sought permission through several channels, including during Ghalibaf's visit to the country, according to the report.&nbsp;Tehran has asserted control over the Strait of Hormuz since the Middle East war began on February 28. Tehran requires vessels to obtain permission and pay transit fees before using the waterway.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said several neighbouring countries have sought new security and economic ties with Tehran amid the ongoing war with the US and rising pressure on Iran.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf on Saturday (August 22) said Tehran had received many messages from neighbouring countries seeking new regional security arrangements and greater economic cooperation. He said the messages came as countries in the region reassessed their security concerns following the US actions. "We’ve received numerous messages from neighbouring countries about shaping new security arrangements and economic cooperation in the region," Ghalibaf wrote on X. "The United States put the security of every single one of its allies at such risk through bullying and pure disregard for their interests for the sake of Israel that they briefly saw their entire existence on the line," he said, adding, “A homegrown, independent order is what will actually deliver peace and security.”

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said several neighbouring countries have sought new security and economic ties with Tehran amid the ongoing war with the US and rising pressure on Iran.

Iran says 'numerous' neighbours seek new security ties amid ongoing war with US

The West Asia conflict is approaching its sixth month with no clear diplomatic or military exit in sight as US President Donald Trump dramatically escalates pressure on Iran. Trump has announced what he described as an unprecedented economic warfare and isolation campaign against Iran, warning that countries continuing to do business with Tehran could face “tremendous punishment.”

The latest escalation comes amid a growing dispute over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy routes. Trump says the waterway remains open and that numerous vessels are passing through, while Iranian officials maintain that the strait remains closed until Washington meets Tehran’s conditions.

Iran has demanded an end to the blockade of its ports, the lifting of oil sanctions and the release of frozen Iranian assets. Meanwhile, US-Iran negotiations remain uncertain, with Trump saying talks could resume at some point but reiterating that Iran must not be allowed to possess nuclear weapons.


Trump Launches “Economic Warfare” Against Iran As Strait Of Hormuz Crisis Deepens

Tensions between Iran and the United States have taken another sharp turn after U.S. President Donald Trump made remarks about the Strait of Hormuz.

Senior Iranian parliament member Ibrahim Azizi mocked Trump over his comments, warning the U.S. president to focus on his own security and referring to Trump's reported secret plane switch in Ankara as he travelled after the NATO summit.

Trump had confirmed that he switched aircraft in Ankara in July after the U.S. Secret Service and military advised him to do so because of what officials described as an imminent threat from Iran.

The controversy intensified after Trump said he would soon declare the Strait of Hormuz part of the United States. Iran strongly rejected the claim, with its foreign ministry insisting that the strategic waterway is Iranian and will remain under Iranian control.

Iran also said that decisions over the opening or closure of the Strait of Hormuz would remain under Tehran's authority.

Trump's Strait of Hormuz Claim Sparks Iran Fury | Iranian Lawmaker Mocks Trump Over Secret Plane Switch

A senior Iranian official on Thursday (August 13) said the Strait of Hormuz remains under the control of Iran, rejecting US President Donald Trump's claim that Washington has taken control of the strategic waterway. Hossein Taeb, head of Iran's paramilitary Basij forces affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards, said the waterway remains under Tehran's management and control.&nbsp;"Today, you see that the Strait of Hormuz is under the management and control of the Islamic Republic, and our country continues on its path in complete security," Taeb said, according to Iranian state television.&nbsp;His remarks came a day after Trump claimed that the United States had "total control" over the Strait of Hormuz and said he intended to maintain that control as negotiations with Iran over reopening the waterway remained stalled.&nbsp;In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, "The U.S.A. has total control over the Strait of Hormuz. I THINK WE WILL KEEP IT! Our Naval Blockade is being called, by everyone, 'A WALL OF STEEL,' and there is nothing Iran can do about it."&nbsp;Trump also claimed that Iran's military infrastructure had suffered severe damage. He ended the message with the phrase, "Praise be to Allah!"&nbsp;"All they have is FAKE NEWS and 300% INFLATION, and getting worse! Iran is all talk and no action, the Bully of the Middle East No Longer. Praise be to Allah! President," he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-japan-tensions-flare-putin-visits-disputed-islands-tokyo-summons-envoy-1786617952382">Russia-Japan tensions flare: Putin visits disputed islands, Tokyo protests, summons Russian envoy</a><h3>Iran and US clash over Strait of Hormuz</h3>Trump has repeatedly claimed that Washington controls the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route for energy and other commodity shipments through the Middle East.&nbsp;Iran, however, has maintained that it effectively controls a large part of the waterway. Tehran also plans to impose a toll system in response to the US war launched by Trump on February 28.&nbsp;The dispute comes as Washington and Tehran continue behind-the-scenes diplomatic engagement. Representatives from both sides have held indirect discussions on measures to ease the Hormuz crisis and restore regular maritime traffic.&nbsp;Tehran has reportedly demanded compensation for war-related damage linked to the US-Israel. It has also sought compensation for economic losses caused by sanctions. Trump has publicly rejected the demand.<h3>Diplomatic efforts continue amid rising pressure</h3>At the same time, the Trump administration has increased economic pressure on Tehran by enforcing existing sanctions. Washington has also warned that further punitive measures could follow if Iran refuses to comply.&nbsp;The competing claims over control of the Strait of Hormuz come as both sides continue indirect discussions aimed at easing the crisis and restoring regular maritime traffic.

Iran has rejected Trump’s claim of having “total control” over the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that the strategic waterway remains under Tehran’s management amid stalled negotiations between Washington and Tehran.

A senior Iranian official on Thursday (August 13) said the Strait of Hormuz remains under the control of Iran, rejecting US President Donald Trump's claim that Washington has taken control of the strategic waterway. Hossein Taeb, head of Iran's paramilitary Basij forces affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards, said the waterway remains under Tehran's management and control. "Today, you see that the Strait of Hormuz is under the management and control of the Islamic Republic, and our country continues on its path in complete security," Taeb said, according to Iranian state television. His remarks came a day after Trump claimed that the United States had "total control" over the Strait of Hormuz and said he intended to maintain that control as negotiations with Iran over reopening the waterway remained stalled. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said, "The U.S.A. has total control over the Strait of Hormuz. I THINK WE WILL KEEP IT! Our Naval Blockade is being called, by everyone, 'A WALL OF STEEL,' and there is nothing Iran can do about it." Trump also claimed that Iran's military infrastructure had suffered severe damage. He ended the message with the phrase, "Praise be to Allah!" "All they have is FAKE NEWS and 300% INFLATION, and getting worse! Iran is all talk and no action, the Bully of the Middle East No Longer. Praise be to Allah! President," he added. Also Read: Russia-Japan tensions flare: Putin visits disputed islands, Tokyo protests, summons Russian envoy Iran and US clash over Strait of Hormuz Trump has repeatedly claimed that Washington controls the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route for energy and other commodity shipments through the Middle East. Iran, however, has maintained that it effectively controls a large part of the waterway. Tehran also plans to impose a toll system in response to the US war launched by Trump on February 28. The dispute comes as Washington and Tehran continue behind-the-scenes diplomatic engagement. Representatives from both sides have held indirect discussions on measures to ease the Hormuz crisis and restore regular maritime traffic. Tehran has reportedly demanded compensation for war-related damage linked to the US-Israel. It has also sought compensation for economic losses caused by sanctions. Trump has publicly rejected the demand. Diplomatic efforts continue amid rising pressure At the same time, the Trump administration has increased economic pressure on Tehran by enforcing existing sanctions. Washington has also warned that further punitive measures could follow if Iran refuses to comply. The competing claims over control of the Strait of Hormuz come as both sides continue indirect discussions aimed at easing the crisis and restoring regular maritime traffic.

Iran has rejected Trump’s claim of having “total control” over the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that the strategic waterway remains under Tehran’s management amid stalled negotiations between Washington and Tehran.

Iran challenges Trump’s Hormuz claim; says Tehran controls strait, not US

A new U.S. government energy report is putting renewed focus on the Strait of Hormuz, as shipping through one of the world’s most important energy corridors remains constrained and uncertainty continues over how quickly oil flows will return to normal. The U.S. Energy Information Administration, or EIA, said in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook that it expects severe constraints on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to persist through August, before traffic gradually increases beginning in September. The agency said reduced shipments through the waterway are expected to further draw down global oil inventories in the coming months.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/who-bears-responsibility-iran-wants-polluter-pays-rule-for-strait-of-hormuz-as-oil-slick-plagues-qeshm-1786582552036">'Who bears responsibility?': Iran wants 'polluter pays' rule for Strait of Hormuz as oil slick plagues Qeshm</a> The assessment comes as President Donald Trump has said the United States has “total control” of the Strait, while administration officials have pointed to improvements in the movement of oil from the region. The administration has also disputed some estimates of how limited current shipping traffic remains. The EIA report, however, focuses primarily on the economic consequences of the disruption and the expected pace of recovery rather than the question of who controls the waterway. The agency now forecasts Brent crude oil to average around $85 per barrel during the third quarter of 2026, $11 per barrel higher than it projected just one month ago. The EIA expects prices to ease to around $78 per barrel in the fourth quarter as shipping increases and more oil production comes back online.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-sanctions-iran-s-crypto-network-after-strait-of-hormuz-attacks-offers-15m-bounty-for-intel-on-irgc-finance-1786150050092">US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance</a> For the full year, the EIA forecasts Brent crude at an average of approximately $87 per barrel in 2026. It expects prices to decline further in 2027, averaging around $69 per barrel as inventories rebuild and supplies recover. The Strait of Hormuz is particularly important because it connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea, providing a crucial export route for major Middle Eastern energy producers. Disruptions there can therefore have consequences well beyond the region, affecting global oil supplies, shipping costs, and ultimately prices paid by consumers. The latest EIA outlook also suggests that some effects of the conflict could persist even after shipping conditions improve. Around 5.5 million barrels per day of Middle Eastern oil production was offline in July, equivalent to more than 5% of global oil consumption. Although much of that production is expected to return, the EIA forecasts that approximately 600,000 barrels per day could remain offline through the end of 2027 as some producers face difficulties restoring output to pre-conflict levels. The outlook represents another shift in expectations for an oil market that has changed rapidly as conditions around Hormuz have evolved. In July, the EIA had expected Brent to average about $74 per barrel during the third quarter. Its new forecast of roughly $85 illustrates how continued restrictions through the Strait have altered the supply picture. The central question now is how quickly normal commercial traffic can resume. The EIA expects conditions to begin improving in September, but its latest forecast makes clear that the economic consequences of the disruption could continue long after more ships begin moving through the Strait.&nbsp;

The agency now forecasts Brent crude oil to average around $85 per barrel during the third quarter of 2026, $11 per barrel higher than it projected just one month ago. The EIA expects prices to ease to around $78 per barrel in the fourth quarter as shipping increases.

A new U.S. government energy report is putting renewed focus on the Strait of Hormuz, as shipping through one of the world’s most important energy corridors remains constrained and uncertainty continues over how quickly oil flows will return to normal. The U.S. Energy Information Administration, or EIA, said in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook that it expects severe constraints on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to persist through August, before traffic gradually increases beginning in September. The agency said reduced shipments through the waterway are expected to further draw down global oil inventories in the coming months. Also read | 'Who bears responsibility?': Iran wants 'polluter pays' rule for Strait of Hormuz as oil slick plagues Qeshm The assessment comes as President Donald Trump has said the United States has “total control” of the Strait, while administration officials have pointed to improvements in the movement of oil from the region. The administration has also disputed some estimates of how limited current shipping traffic remains. The EIA report, however, focuses primarily on the economic consequences of the disruption and the expected pace of recovery rather than the question of who controls the waterway. The agency now forecasts Brent crude oil to average around $85 per barrel during the third quarter of 2026, $11 per barrel higher than it projected just one month ago. The EIA expects prices to ease to around $78 per barrel in the fourth quarter as shipping increases and more oil production comes back online. Also read | US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance For the full year, the EIA forecasts Brent crude at an average of approximately $87 per barrel in 2026. It expects prices to decline further in 2027, averaging around $69 per barrel as inventories rebuild and supplies recover. The Strait of Hormuz is particularly important because it connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea, providing a crucial export route for major Middle Eastern energy producers. Disruptions there can therefore have consequences well beyond the region, affecting global oil supplies, shipping costs, and ultimately prices paid by consumers. The latest EIA outlook also suggests that some effects of the conflict could persist even after shipping conditions improve. Around 5.5 million barrels per day of Middle Eastern oil production was offline in July, equivalent to more than 5% of global oil consumption. Although much of that production is expected to return, the EIA forecasts that approximately 600,000 barrels per day could remain offline through the end of 2027 as some producers face difficulties restoring output to pre-conflict levels. The outlook represents another shift in expectations for an oil market that has changed rapidly as conditions around Hormuz have evolved. In July, the EIA had expected Brent to average about $74 per barrel during the third quarter. Its new forecast of roughly $85 illustrates how continued restrictions through the Strait have altered the supply picture. The central question now is how quickly normal commercial traffic can resume. The EIA expects conditions to begin improving in September, but its latest forecast makes clear that the economic consequences of the disruption could continue long after more ships begin moving through the Strait.

The agency now forecasts Brent crude oil to average around $85 per barrel during the third quarter of 2026, $11 per barrel higher than it projected just one month ago. The EIA expects prices to ease to around $78 per barrel in the fourth quarter as shipping increases.

New EIA report warns Strait of Hormuz disruptions could keep pressure on global oil markets

The Union Cabinet on Thursday approved the GOBARdhan (Galvanising Organic Bio Agro Resources Dhan) scheme with a total outlay of ₹23,731 crore, aiming to significantly increase India's compressed biogas production over the next decade while supporting rural incomes and reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels.&nbsp;Briefing the media after the Cabinet meeting, Information and Broadcasting Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said the scheme will be implemented from FY2026-27 to FY2035-36. He said it aims to increase domestic compressed biogas production nearly tenfold through an integrated framework that provides assured offtake, stable pricing, capital assistance, pipeline connectivity, credit support and technology development.<h2>Integrated support for the CBG sector</h2>An official release described the scheme as "a defining moment in India's clean energy journey" and said it "will transform the country's abundant agricultural residue, cattle dung, press mud, municipal organic waste and other biomass resources into clean fuel, organic manure, rural income and national economic value."&nbsp;The government said the scheme builds on earlier initiatives, including SATAT, the Market Development Assistance (MDA) Scheme, the Biomass Aggregation Machinery (BAM) Scheme, the Development of Pipeline Infrastructure (DPI) Scheme and financial assistance provided under the National Bioenergy Programme.&nbsp;According to the release, these initiatives have already helped commission more than 200 compressed biogas plants across the country. It added that the new scheme will bring the entire compressed biogas value chain under a single platform to improve project viability and provide greater confidence to investors and lenders.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-opens-up-on-jharkhand-student-protest-for-first-time-says-every-govt-must-1786030596513">Watch: Rahul Gandhi opens up on Jharkhand student protest for first time, says 'every govt must...'</a><h2>Pricing, blending and financial support</h2>Under the scheme, City Gas Distribution entities will procure compressed biogas to meet the government's blending targets of 3 per cent in FY2026-27, 4 per cent in FY2027-28 and 5 per cent from FY2028-29 onwards for the CNG transport and PNG domestic segments.&nbsp;The government has also fixed an administered compressed biogas price of ₹2,110 per Metric Million British Thermal Unit (MMBTU) under a minimum 10-year pricing framework to provide long-term revenue certainty for producers.&nbsp;Eligible greenfield compressed biogas projects will receive capital assistance of up to ₹2 crore per tonne per day of installed capacity. The scheme also includes a dedicated credit guarantee mechanism for MSME-based projects, pipeline connectivity for compressed biogas plants and a CBG Ecosystem Challenge Fund to strengthen district-level implementation and feedstock supply chains.&nbsp;The government said the scheme aims to strengthen India's clean gas economy by increasing renewable gas production, reducing fossil fuel imports, creating new income opportunities for farmers and rural entrepreneurs, improving waste management and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

The Centre approved the ₹23,731 crore GOBARdhan scheme to boost compressed biogas production, improve waste management and reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels.

The Union Cabinet on Thursday approved the GOBARdhan (Galvanising Organic Bio Agro Resources Dhan) scheme with a total outlay of ₹23,731 crore, aiming to significantly increase India's compressed biogas production over the next decade while supporting rural incomes and reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels. Briefing the media after the Cabinet meeting, Information and Broadcasting Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said the scheme will be implemented from FY2026-27 to FY2035-36. He said it aims to increase domestic compressed biogas production nearly tenfold through an integrated framework that provides assured offtake, stable pricing, capital assistance, pipeline connectivity, credit support and technology development. Integrated support for the CBG sector An official release described the scheme as "a defining moment in India's clean energy journey" and said it "will transform the country's abundant agricultural residue, cattle dung, press mud, municipal organic waste and other biomass resources into clean fuel, organic manure, rural income and national economic value." The government said the scheme builds on earlier initiatives, including SATAT, the Market Development Assistance (MDA) Scheme, the Biomass Aggregation Machinery (BAM) Scheme, the Development of Pipeline Infrastructure (DPI) Scheme and financial assistance provided under the National Bioenergy Programme. According to the release, these initiatives have already helped commission more than 200 compressed biogas plants across the country. It added that the new scheme will bring the entire compressed biogas value chain under a single platform to improve project viability and provide greater confidence to investors and lenders. Also Read: Watch: Rahul Gandhi opens up on Jharkhand student protest for first time, says 'every govt must...' Pricing, blending and financial support Under the scheme, City Gas Distribution entities will procure compressed biogas to meet the government's blending targets of 3 per cent in FY2026-27, 4 per cent in FY2027-28 and 5 per cent from FY2028-29 onwards for the CNG transport and PNG domestic segments. The government has also fixed an administered compressed biogas price of ₹2,110 per Metric Million British Thermal Unit (MMBTU) under a minimum 10-year pricing framework to provide long-term revenue certainty for producers. Eligible greenfield compressed biogas projects will receive capital assistance of up to ₹2 crore per tonne per day of installed capacity. The scheme also includes a dedicated credit guarantee mechanism for MSME-based projects, pipeline connectivity for compressed biogas plants and a CBG Ecosystem Challenge Fund to strengthen district-level implementation and feedstock supply chains. The government said the scheme aims to strengthen India's clean gas economy by increasing renewable gas production, reducing fossil fuel imports, creating new income opportunities for farmers and rural entrepreneurs, improving waste management and cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

The Centre approved the ₹23,731 crore GOBARdhan scheme to boost compressed biogas production, improve waste management and reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels.

Cabinet approves ₹23,731 crore GOBARdhan scheme to boost compressed biogas production

Amid the worsening security situation in the Strait of Hormuz following the recent flare-up between the United States and Iran, India has directed shipowners, ship managers and recruitment agencies not to deploy Indian seafarers on vessels passing through the strategic waterway. The Directorate General of Maritime Administration (DGMA) issued the order on Wednesday.&nbsp;The move is significant for India's more than 300,000 seafarers working on ships across the world, making the country the third-largest supplier of sailors. The decision came after two Indian seafarers were killed in separate attacks on vessels in the region over the past three days. Their deaths have taken the number of Indian nationals killed in the Gulf region since the outbreak of the war to at least 13.&nbsp;In its order dated Wednesday (July 15, 2026), the DGMA instructed shipowners, ship managers and recruitment companies not to deploy Indian seafarers on vessels travelling through the Strait of Hormuz until further orders.&nbsp;“Companies are directed to avoid deploying Indian seafarers on vessels undertaking voyages involving passage through the Strait of Hormuz until further orders,” the notice read.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Advisory for Indian Maritime Stakeholders In view of the heightened security situation in the Gulf region, the Directorate General of Maritime Administration (DGMA), through DGMA Circular No. 36 of 2026, has directed Ship Owners, Ship Managers and RPSL Companies to avoid… <a href="https://t.co/s8XgKI1ifn">pic.twitter.com/s8XgKI1ifn</a>&mdash; Directorate General of Shipping, Govt. of India (@dgshipping_IN) <a href="https://x.com/dgshipping_IN/status/2077428583220560179?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The shipping regulator said recent attacks on commercial vessels had “significantly” increased the risks for seafarers operating in the conflict-hit region.&nbsp;"In view of the heightened security situation in the Persian Gulf region ... the Directorate considers it necessary to adopt enhanced precautionary measures to safeguard the interests of Indian seafarers serving on board ships operating in the region," the order said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/are-you-muslim-indian-man-stabbed-15-times-in-us-after-being-asked-about-religion-1784133567663">'Are you Muslim?': Indian man stabbed 15 times in US after being asked about religion</a>&nbsp;The regulator also directed masters of vessels to stay alert to the security situation in the Persian Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz and nearby waters while continuously monitoring navigational warnings.&nbsp;The notice added, “DGMA continues to closely monitor the evolving security situation and remains committed to safeguarding the safety, security and welfare of Indian seafarers.”&nbsp;The advisory comes as tensions in the Middle East remain high after US strikes on Iranian military installations raised fears of a wider regional conflict and possible disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Both sides are claiming control over the vital Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for nearly 20 per cent of the global oil supply. The tensions have also pushed up oil prices, which climbed above $100 during the previous phase of the conflict.

India has directed shipping firms not to deploy Indian seafarers on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz until further orders amid escalating US-Iran tensions and rising security risks in the region.

Amid the worsening security situation in the Strait of Hormuz following the recent flare-up between the United States and Iran, India has directed shipowners, ship managers and recruitment agencies not to deploy Indian seafarers on vessels passing through the strategic waterway. The Directorate General of Maritime Administration (DGMA) issued the order on Wednesday. The move is significant for India's more than 300,000 seafarers working on ships across the world, making the country the third-largest supplier of sailors. The decision came after two Indian seafarers were killed in separate attacks on vessels in the region over the past three days. Their deaths have taken the number of Indian nationals killed in the Gulf region since the outbreak of the war to at least 13. In its order dated Wednesday (July 15, 2026), the DGMA instructed shipowners, ship managers and recruitment companies not to deploy Indian seafarers on vessels travelling through the Strait of Hormuz until further orders. “Companies are directed to avoid deploying Indian seafarers on vessels undertaking voyages involving passage through the Strait of Hormuz until further orders,” the notice read.

India has directed shipping firms not to deploy Indian seafarers on vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz until further orders amid escalating US-Iran tensions and rising security risks in the region.

'Do not deploy Indian sailors': India warns shipping firms over Hormuz amid US-Iran tensions

The conflict between the United States and Iran has entered its fifth consecutive day of military escalation, with fresh U.S. strikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure linked to threats against shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian state media reported explosions across multiple cities, while Tehran retaliated by launching attacks on U.S. military positions in Bahrain and Kuwait, further raising fears of a wider regional conflict. President Donald Trump has vowed to continue military operations unless Iran returns to negotiations, while Vice President JD Vance has publicly argued that diplomacy—not prolonged military intervention or ground troops—offers the only sustainable path to ending the crisis. Meanwhile, Iranian officials have questioned the future of previous diplomatic understandings, signaling that the prospects for renewed negotiations remain uncertain.

U.S.-Iran war: Trump threatens more strikes while Iran targets U.S. bases across the Gulf region

The United States launched a fresh wave of strikes against Iran on Wednesday morning (3.30 PM IST), the US Central Command (CENTCOM) said, after Washington reinstated a naval blockade of the Islamic Republic, deepening the conflict between the two countries in what analysts fear could become a prolonged war.&nbsp;US forces "began launching a wave of strikes... designed to further degrade military capabilities Iranian forces have used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz," CENTCOM said on X.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">At 6 a.m. ET today, U.S. Central Command forces began launching a wave of strikes against Iran. The strikes are designed to further degrade military capabilities Iranian forces have used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2077338021733478617?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The strikes came as the United States restored a naval blockade on Iranian ports and carried out its fourth straight night of attacks on Iran. The US military said it completed its latest operation at 10 p.m. ET on Tuesday, targeting dozens of military sites near the Strait of Hormuz and coastal areas.&nbsp;The latest escalation between Tehran and Washington has effectively ended the 14-point memorandum of understanding signed on July 17 to restore peace. The renewed conflict was triggered by Iran's attacks on commercial vessels attempting to bypass the designated route in the Strait of Hormuz, prompting both countries to race for control of the strategic waterway that carries nearly 20 per cent of the world's oil supply.&nbsp;President Donald Trump also warned that the United States would strike bridges and power plants in Iran "next week" unless Tehran returns to the negotiating table.&nbsp;More than 30 civilians have been killed in recent US strikes, Iranian government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani said on Wednesday after four consecutive nights of attacks.&nbsp;The latest escalation also pushed oil prices higher on Wednesday. Brent crude, the global benchmark, rose 0.3 per cent to $85 a barrel in early ET trading, while West Texas Intermediate gained 0.5 per cent to nearly $80 a barrel.&nbsp;Meanwhile, India has strengthened measures to safeguard its citizens working in the maritime sector after a missile strike in the Strait of Hormuz killed an Indian sailor and injured 10 others.&nbsp;The Ministry of External Affairs has taken up the matter with Iran after two UAE-flagged commercial tankers carrying Indian crew members were hit in the strategic waterway. Indian authorities are also introducing a real-time monitoring system to track the movement and safety of Indian seafarers operating in the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

The United States launched a fresh wave of strikes on Iran after four consecutive nights of attacks and the reinstatement of a naval blockade, escalating the battle for control of the Strait of Hormuz.

The United States launched a fresh wave of strikes against Iran on Wednesday morning (3.30 PM IST), the US Central Command (CENTCOM) said, after Washington reinstated a naval blockade of the Islamic Republic, deepening the conflict between the two countries in what analysts fear could become a prolonged war. US forces "began launching a wave of strikes... designed to further degrade military capabilities Iranian forces have used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz," CENTCOM said on X.

The United States launched a fresh wave of strikes on Iran after four consecutive nights of attacks and the reinstatement of a naval blockade, escalating the battle for control of the Strait of Hormuz.

US launches fresh strikes after reinstating naval blockade of Iran as battle for Hormuz intensifies

The Strait of Hormuz is burning again, and behind the smoke, a very clear financial map is emerging. This isn't just a war story, but a market story. Since Iran shut the strait in late February, Brent crude jumped 15 per cent within days, gasoline prices spiked, and inflation fears returned to Washington. But not every producer is losing. Saudi Arabia and Oman are heading for a windfall, while the UAE watches its petrodollar income shrink. Why the split? Geography and infrastructure. Riyadh has rerouted nearly 7 million barrels a day through its east-west pipeline to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, completely bypassing Hormuz.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/new-delhi-to-track-every-indian-seafarer-in-hormuz-after-deadly-iran-tanker-attack-kills-sailor-injures-10-others-1784075142969">New Delhi to track every Indian seafarer in Hormuz after deadly Iran tanker attack kills sailor, injures 10 others</a> According to Goldman Sachs, higher prices have more than made up for the lost tanker shipments. That's the Saudi playbook: sidestep the chokepoint, and sell into a panicked market. Compare that to Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain; they are under loss with no pipeline escape route. Those unable to avoid the Strait saw straight revenue declines, even as prices climbed. Then there's refining. U.S. gasoline refining margins have surged more than 60 per cent since June, crossing $56 a barrel, nearing 2022 energy-crisis territory.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/can-india-withstand-another-west-asia-crisis-how-israel-hezbollah-iran-tensions-could-hit-its-energy-security-wion-decodes-1782374369218">Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes</a> Refiners are pocketing both a crude discount and a fuel-price premium. That's a rare double windfall, which analysts call unsustainable. And beyond the gulf, the biggest winners may sit outside West Asia entirely. The New York Times calculated the United States gained roughly 50 billion dollars in extra export revenue and Russia over $15 billion, while every Persian Gulf nation logged export declines. The takeaway: Hormuz tensions are reshaping petro-politics itself. Saudi Arabia is consolidating leverage over rivals like the UAE. Washington and Moscow are quietly cashing in. And refiners worldwide are riding margins that history says won't last. The war isn't just about the Gulf. It's about who controls the world's next barrel and its price.

The Strait of Hormuz is once again at the centre of a global energy crisis, but not every oil producer is losing. While Saudi Arabia, the US and Russia are reaping billions, others are seeing exports fall despite soaring crude prices. Scroll down to see who the biggest winners and losers are.

The Strait of Hormuz is burning again, and behind the smoke, a very clear financial map is emerging. This isn't just a war story, but a market story. Since Iran shut the strait in late February, Brent crude jumped 15 per cent within days, gasoline prices spiked, and inflation fears returned to Washington. But not every producer is losing. Saudi Arabia and Oman are heading for a windfall, while the UAE watches its petrodollar income shrink. Why the split? Geography and infrastructure. Riyadh has rerouted nearly 7 million barrels a day through its east-west pipeline to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, completely bypassing Hormuz. Also read | New Delhi to track every Indian seafarer in Hormuz after deadly Iran tanker attack kills sailor, injures 10 others According to Goldman Sachs, higher prices have more than made up for the lost tanker shipments. That's the Saudi playbook: sidestep the chokepoint, and sell into a panicked market. Compare that to Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain; they are under loss with no pipeline escape route. Those unable to avoid the Strait saw straight revenue declines, even as prices climbed. Then there's refining. U.S. gasoline refining margins have surged more than 60 per cent since June, crossing $56 a barrel, nearing 2022 energy-crisis territory. Also read | Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes Refiners are pocketing both a crude discount and a fuel-price premium. That's a rare double windfall, which analysts call unsustainable. And beyond the gulf, the biggest winners may sit outside West Asia entirely. The New York Times calculated the United States gained roughly 50 billion dollars in extra export revenue and Russia over $15 billion, while every Persian Gulf nation logged export declines. The takeaway: Hormuz tensions are reshaping petro-politics itself. Saudi Arabia is consolidating leverage over rivals like the UAE. Washington and Moscow are quietly cashing in. And refiners worldwide are riding margins that history says won't last. The war isn't just about the Gulf. It's about who controls the world's next barrel and its price.

The Strait of Hormuz is once again at the centre of a global energy crisis, but not every oil producer is losing. While Saudi Arabia, the US and Russia are reaping billions, others are seeing exports fall despite soaring crude prices. Scroll down to see who the biggest winners and losers are.

Hormuz crisis has clear winners and losers: Here's who's cashing in from the oil crisis

Ukraine has launched one of its deepest attacks yet, striking Russia's largest refinery in Siberia, nearly 2,500 km from the border, dealing a major blow to Moscow's fuel infrastructure. The attack comes as Russia intensifies missile and drone strikes against Ukraine, with President Vladimir Putin warning of even stronger retaliation.

At the same time, tensions in the Strait of Hormuz continue to escalate as the United States and Iran exchange strikes for a third consecutive night. Rising attacks on energy infrastructure and commercial shipping have pushed global oil prices sharply higher, raising fears of inflation, supply disruptions, and a possible global economic slowdown.

Ukraine destroys Russia’s largest refinery as Hormuz crisis explodes| Putin threatens bigger strikes

India on Tuesday (July 14) strongly condemned the recent attacks on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, calling them acts of violence against seafarers that threaten the safe and uninterrupted movement of ships along one of the world's most important maritime routes.&nbsp;The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued the statement hours after summoning the Iranian Embassy's Deputy Chief of Mission in New Delhi to South Block to register a "strong protest" over the strike on two commercial ships sailing through the Strait of Hormuz. The attack killed one Indian sailor and injured several crew members.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/vietnam-boat-tragedy-mortal-remains-of-kerala-couple-arrive-in-thiruvananthapuram-1784021564029">Vietnam boat tragedy: Mortal remains of Kerala couple arrive in Thiruvananthapuram</a>&nbsp;According to the ministry, India expressed its concern over the renewed attacks at sea and the growing tensions across West Asia. It urged an immediate end to the hostilities and called for the resumption of negotiations and diplomatic efforts to preserve regional peace, security and stability.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">&quot;The Deputy Chief of Mission of the Embassy of Iran in New Delhi was summoned this morning by the Ministry of External Affairs, and a strong protest against these attacks was lodged with him,&quot; says MEA on the attacks on two vessels, MT Al Bahiyah and MT Mombasa, with Indian… <a href="https://t.co/Sdi8uGASL0">pic.twitter.com/Sdi8uGASL0</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2076943491947728901?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 14, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The ministry also stressed that attacks targeting commercial vessels and civilian infrastructure across the region "must cease" so that unrestricted and unhindered maritime trade through global shipping routes can resume quickly in accordance with international law.&nbsp;The MEA said it was "deeply concerned" by the strikes on MT Al Bahiyah and MT Mombasa. Together, the two ships had 30 Indian sailors among a total crew of 46.&nbsp;The ministry said one of the 12 Indian crew members aboard MT Al Bahiyah was killed while another suffered injuries. Among the 18 Indian nationals serving on MT Mombasa, nine were injured, and two remain in critical condition.&nbsp;Expressing grief over the loss, the ministry conveyed its "deepest condolences" to the family of the deceased sailor and wished a speedy recovery to those injured in the attack.The MEA said the Indian Embassy and Consulate in the UAE are closely monitoring the situation and remain in constant contact with the Emirati authorities to ensure all necessary assistance is provided to the affected Indian sailors.&nbsp;The ministry also detailed the diplomatic steps taken by New Delhi, saying it summoned the Iranian Embassy's Deputy Chief of Mission on Tuesday to formally lodge a "strong protest" over the missile strike on the two ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz."The Deputy Chief of Mission of the Embassy of Iran in New Delhi was summoned this morning by the Ministry of External Affairs, and a strong protest against these attacks was lodged with him," the statement read.

India expressed deep concern over the targeted strikes on the commercial vessels MT Al Bahiyah and MT Mombasa in the Strait of Hormuz, which killed one Indian sailor and injured several others.

India on Tuesday (July 14) strongly condemned the recent attacks on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, calling them acts of violence against seafarers that threaten the safe and uninterrupted movement of ships along one of the world's most important maritime routes. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) issued the statement hours after summoning the Iranian Embassy's Deputy Chief of Mission in New Delhi to South Block to register a "strong protest" over the strike on two commercial ships sailing through the Strait of Hormuz. The attack killed one Indian sailor and injured several crew members. Also Read: Vietnam boat tragedy: Mortal remains of Kerala couple arrive in Thiruvananthapuram According to the ministry, India expressed its concern over the renewed attacks at sea and the growing tensions across West Asia. It urged an immediate end to the hostilities and called for the resumption of negotiations and diplomatic efforts to preserve regional peace, security and stability.

India expressed deep concern over the targeted strikes on the commercial vessels MT Al Bahiyah and MT Mombasa in the Strait of Hormuz, which killed one Indian sailor and injured several others.

'Acts of violence': India lodges strong protest over Hormuz strikes, calls for end to attacks on commercial vessels

Oil prices climbed sharply on Wednesday (Jul 8) after fresh US strikes on Iran reignited fears over the Strait of Hormuz, the vital, narrow waterway through which a huge share of global energy supplies moves. As markets opened, West Texas Intermediate, the US benchmark, rose 2.63 per cent to $72.29 a barrel. This followed a similar 2.76 per cent gain on Tuesday.The price rise came after the US military said its forces launched strikes on Iran following attacks on three commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. The renewed fighting has once again put the world’s most important oil chokepoint under pressure.<h2>Explosions reported near key Iranian ports</h2>Iranian state media reported multiple explosions in and around the strait. The reports said there were six blasts on Qeshm island, seven in the city of Sirik and more near Bandar Abbas, one of Iran’s biggest ports.US Central Command said the strikes were meant to punish what it called Iranian attacks on commercial shipping and warned that such actions would carry high costs.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-peace-deal-inside-the-14-point-mou-that-ended-over-108-days-of-war-wion-decodes-donald-trump-mojtaba-khamenei-benjamin-netanyahu-lebanon-1781513800001">US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes</a>Iran, however, pushed back hard. Tehran's foreign ministry accused Washington of violating the memorandum of understanding between the two sides and warned that Tehran would respond."Iran is issuing a serious warning about the consequences of America's breach of the treaty, and will take decisive measures to protect its interests and national security," the ministry said in a statement carried by official media.<h2>Shipping risk returns to the centre of the crisis</h2>The latest attacks have brought back an old fear, disruption in the Strait of Hormuz.That fear had eased in recent weeks after maritime traffic started moving again under a fragile US-Iran agreement. But the calm did not last long.British maritime security agency UKMTO said an unknown projectile hit a tanker overnight, sparking a fire. Two more vessels were then struck, with at least one hit by a drone.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/can-india-withstand-another-west-asia-crisis-how-israel-hezbollah-iran-tensions-could-hit-its-energy-security-wion-decodes-1782374369218">Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes</a>All three ships were attacked near Oman, where a temporary transit corridor along the coastline had been proposed. Iran has opposed that route, insisting on control over the narrow passage and the fees linked to it.Qatar said one of the vessels was its LNG tanker Al-Rekayyat and blamed Iran for the attack. Doha later summoned Iran’s deputy ambassador and demanded an explanation."We hold Iran fully legally responsible for this attack and for any resulting damages or repercussions," Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al Ansari wrote on X. Iran rejected the accusation and said it was dismayed by Qatar’s remarks.

Oil prices are climbing again after fresh US strikes on Iran reignited tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. With attacks on commercial ships and fears of supply disruptions returning, markets are once again on edge. Scroll down to find out why crude is rising, and what happened in the Gulf.

Oil prices climbed sharply on Wednesday (Jul 8) after fresh US strikes on Iran reignited fears over the Strait of Hormuz, the vital, narrow waterway through which a huge share of global energy supplies moves. As markets opened, West Texas Intermediate, the US benchmark, rose 2.63 per cent to $72.29 a barrel. This followed a similar 2.76 per cent gain on Tuesday. The price rise came after the US military said its forces launched strikes on Iran following attacks on three commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. The renewed fighting has once again put the world’s most important oil chokepoint under pressure. Explosions reported near key Iranian ports Iranian state media reported multiple explosions in and around the strait. The reports said there were six blasts on Qeshm island, seven in the city of Sirik and more near Bandar Abbas, one of Iran’s biggest ports. US Central Command said the strikes were meant to punish what it called Iranian attacks on commercial shipping and warned that such actions would carry high costs. Also read | US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes Iran, however, pushed back hard. Tehran's foreign ministry accused Washington of violating the memorandum of understanding between the two sides and warned that Tehran would respond. "Iran is issuing a serious warning about the consequences of America's breach of the treaty, and will take decisive measures to protect its interests and national security," the ministry said in a statement carried by official media. Shipping risk returns to the centre of the crisis The latest attacks have brought back an old fear, disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. That fear had eased in recent weeks after maritime traffic started moving again under a fragile US-Iran agreement. But the calm did not last long. British maritime security agency UKMTO said an unknown projectile hit a tanker overnight, sparking a fire. Two more vessels were then struck, with at least one hit by a drone. Also read | Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes All three ships were attacked near Oman, where a temporary transit corridor along the coastline had been proposed. Iran has opposed that route, insisting on control over the narrow passage and the fees linked to it. Qatar said one of the vessels was its LNG tanker Al-Rekayyat and blamed Iran for the attack. Doha later summoned Iran’s deputy ambassador and demanded an explanation. "We hold Iran fully legally responsible for this attack and for any resulting damages or repercussions," Qatari foreign ministry spokesman Majed Al Ansari wrote on X. Iran rejected the accusation and said it was dismayed by Qatar’s remarks.

Oil prices are climbing again after fresh US strikes on Iran reignited tensions around the Strait of Hormuz. With attacks on commercial ships and fears of supply disruptions returning, markets are once again on edge. Scroll down to find out why crude is rising, and what happened in the Gulf.

Oil prices jump by 2.63% as fresh US strikes on Iran shake up Strait of Hormuz again

A disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could trigger far more than an oil shock. In this Alpha Tab report, we examine how rising tensions in West Asia could disrupt LNG supplies, create helium shortages, and put global semiconductor manufacturing under severe pressure. From chipmakers to technology supply chains, the consequences of prolonged energy disruptions could ripple across the global economy and the future of the tech industry.

Hormuz Shock Threatens Semiconductor Supply Chains 

As US President Donald Trump departs for a highly anticipated visit to China on Tuesday (May 12), the ongoing geopolitical tensions in West Asia are expected to feature prominently during the discussions. A senior administration official told news outlets in an anonymous briefing on Sunday that Trump could “apply pressure” to China on Iran in areas such as oil sales and Tehran’s purchase of potential dual-role military-civilian goods.&nbsp;US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week accused China of “funding” Iran. “Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism, and China has been buying 90 per cent of their energy, so they are funding the largest state sponsor of terrorism,” Bessent told Fox News on May 7.&nbsp;Trump's visit to Beijing has already been impacted by the Iran war and the shipping crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. It was scheduled for earlier this year but was postponed in March due to the US-Israeli strikes on Iran, which began on February 28, and the eventual ceasefire to negotiate a peaceful exit from the war. Washington also staged a naval blockade of the Islamic Republic in hopes of forcing Tehran to accept a peace proposal.&nbsp;<h2>China’s stance on the Hormuz crisis</h2>China is one of the nations most severely impacted by the closure of the vital waterway, as it acquires nearly 20 per cent of its energy through the strait. Beijing has called for open and secure shipping multiple times; however, it has termed the US naval blockade "a dangerous escalation of unilateralism."&nbsp;On April 15, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated, "The blockade of international waterways is a violation of international law and a direct threat to global supply chain stability. We urge the US to cease these provocative actions and return to the path of diplomatic dialogue."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/cctv-footage-of-mechanic-carrying-hidden-sickle-sparks-security-fears-in-delhi-1778592726866">CCTV footage of ‘mechanic’ carrying hidden sickle sparks security fears in Delhi</a><h2>The US position: Pressure and peace terms</h2>Washington expects Chinese support to persuade the Islamic Republic to accept its peace terms, as Beijing remains one of the major importers of Iranian oil despite the ongoing crisis. Several reports have also suggested its military support. In an interview with Time Magazine on May 1, 2026, Trump himself commented on the situation, saying, "China is possibly helping Iran a lot more than they should be. They are giving them a financial lifeline and possibly more than just parts for their drones."&nbsp;The US is expected to use this week's summit to present evidence of "dual-use technology" transfers and demand that Beijing use its leverage as a mediator in the “Islamabad Talks” to secure a final deal. For the Trump administration, the goal is clear: to press China to withdraw its economic and tacit military support, forcing Tehran to accept the current peace proposal.

Trump set to arrive in Beijing on Wednesday for his first China visit since 2017 amid talks overshadowed by the Strait of Hormuz blockade and the global energy crisis.

As US President Donald Trump departs for a highly anticipated visit to China on Tuesday (May 12), the ongoing geopolitical tensions in West Asia are expected to feature prominently during the discussions. A senior administration official told news outlets in an anonymous briefing on Sunday that Trump could “apply pressure” to China on Iran in areas such as oil sales and Tehran’s purchase of potential dual-role military-civilian goods. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last week accused China of “funding” Iran. “Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism, and China has been buying 90 per cent of their energy, so they are funding the largest state sponsor of terrorism,” Bessent told Fox News on May 7. Trump's visit to Beijing has already been impacted by the Iran war and the shipping crisis in the Strait of Hormuz. It was scheduled for earlier this year but was postponed in March due to the US-Israeli strikes on Iran, which began on February 28, and the eventual ceasefire to negotiate a peaceful exit from the war. Washington also staged a naval blockade of the Islamic Republic in hopes of forcing Tehran to accept a peace proposal. China’s stance on the Hormuz crisis China is one of the nations most severely impacted by the closure of the vital waterway, as it acquires nearly 20 per cent of its energy through the strait. Beijing has called for open and secure shipping multiple times; however, it has termed the US naval blockade "a dangerous escalation of unilateralism." On April 15, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated, "The blockade of international waterways is a violation of international law and a direct threat to global supply chain stability. We urge the US to cease these provocative actions and return to the path of diplomatic dialogue." Also Read: CCTV footage of ‘mechanic’ carrying hidden sickle sparks security fears in Delhi The US position: Pressure and peace terms Washington expects Chinese support to persuade the Islamic Republic to accept its peace terms, as Beijing remains one of the major importers of Iranian oil despite the ongoing crisis. Several reports have also suggested its military support. In an interview with Time Magazine on May 1, 2026, Trump himself commented on the situation, saying, "China is possibly helping Iran a lot more than they should be. They are giving them a financial lifeline and possibly more than just parts for their drones." The US is expected to use this week's summit to present evidence of "dual-use technology" transfers and demand that Beijing use its leverage as a mediator in the “Islamabad Talks” to secure a final deal. For the Trump administration, the goal is clear: to press China to withdraw its economic and tacit military support, forcing Tehran to accept the current peace proposal.

Trump set to arrive in Beijing on Wednesday for his first China visit since 2017 amid talks overshadowed by the Strait of Hormuz blockade and the global energy crisis.

Iran to feature prominently during Xi-Trump summit: Where do US and China stand on Hormuz issue?

US President Donald Trump has reportedly instructed his officials to prepare for an extended blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, citing US officials, the move is aimed at weakening Tehran’s economy and forcing concessions on its nuclear programme. This decision follows a breakdown in peace talks and a determination by the administration that a sustained blockade carries less risk than either resuming a full-scale bombing campaign or withdrawing from the conflict entirely.&nbsp;According to the report by the Wall Street Journal, the decision was made following a high-level meeting in the situation room of the White House. According to the US officials, the central component of the extended blockade is a suspension of Iran's uranium enrichment for at least 20 years. The blockade is designed to hit the economic lifeline of Iran.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uae-exits-opec-impact-oil-petrodollar-global-markets-1777448292891">UAE exits OPEC: What it means for UAE, petrodollar system and global markets</a><h2>Why did the US choose a blockade?</h2>According to the report, which cites anonymous US officials, they considered two competing alternatives: resuming military strikes and withdrawing from the conflict. However, both options were viewed as carrying greater risks; continuing the blockade was considered a middle ground. Trump claimed that the US is in a “state of collapse” and urged them to get smart soon. Iran wants an end to the war and lifting of the blockade, but remains adamant on delaying the nuclear discussion, while Washington claims a nuclear concession was non-negotiable.“Prior to the U.S. blockade on Iran, 5 ships were moored or anchored in the Iranian port of Chah Bahar on an average day. Today, more than 20 vessels remain in Chah Bahar as U.S. forces cut off economic trade going into and coming out of Iran during the ongoing blockade,” said a post by the CENTCOM on the social media platform X.&nbsp;The Iranian Rial has hit a record low of 1.8 million to $1 as the country is facing a severe storage crunch for its oil. Meanwhile, the UAE has decided to quit OPEC and maintain a reflection of a major change and widening in the infighting among the Gulf nations.&nbsp;&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump signalled a prolonged blockade of the Strait of Hormuz to pressure Iran on its nuclear programme amid rising tensions. According to him, Iran is in a “state of collapse”. 

US President Donald Trump has reportedly instructed his officials to prepare for an extended blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, citing US officials, the move is aimed at weakening Tehran’s economy and forcing concessions on its nuclear programme. This decision follows a breakdown in peace talks and a determination by the administration that a sustained blockade carries less risk than either resuming a full-scale bombing campaign or withdrawing from the conflict entirely. According to the report by the Wall Street Journal, the decision was made following a high-level meeting in the situation room of the White House. According to the US officials, the central component of the extended blockade is a suspension of Iran's uranium enrichment for at least 20 years. The blockade is designed to hit the economic lifeline of Iran. Also Read: UAE exits OPEC: What it means for UAE, petrodollar system and global markets Why did the US choose a blockade? According to the report, which cites anonymous US officials, they considered two competing alternatives: resuming military strikes and withdrawing from the conflict. However, both options were viewed as carrying greater risks; continuing the blockade was considered a middle ground. Trump claimed that the US is in a “state of collapse” and urged them to get smart soon. Iran wants an end to the war and lifting of the blockade, but remains adamant on delaying the nuclear discussion, while Washington claims a nuclear concession was non-negotiable. “Prior to the U.S. blockade on Iran, 5 ships were moored or anchored in the Iranian port of Chah Bahar on an average day. Today, more than 20 vessels remain in Chah Bahar as U.S. forces cut off economic trade going into and coming out of Iran during the ongoing blockade,” said a post by the CENTCOM on the social media platform X. The Iranian Rial has hit a record low of 1.8 million to $1 as the country is facing a severe storage crunch for its oil. Meanwhile, the UAE has decided to quit OPEC and maintain a reflection of a major change and widening in the infighting among the Gulf nations.

US President Donald Trump signalled a prolonged blockade of the Strait of Hormuz to pressure Iran on its nuclear programme amid rising tensions. According to him, Iran is in a “state of collapse”.&nbsp;

Trump plans for extended Strait of Hormuz blockade to pressure Iran on nuclear deal

A day after a superyacht sailing to Russia passed through the Strait of Hormuz, all eyes has been shifted to its owner Alexey Mordashov. The superyacht passed the Hormuz strait despite dual blockade by the US and Iran amid ongoing tensions and a fragile ceasefire after the war that started on Feb 28. The 142m-long (465 ft) multi-deck luxury boat, named Nord, travelled from Dubai to Muscat, Oman, over the weekend and became one of few private vessels to transit through the strait in recent months. The owner, Alexey Mordashov, has become a major point of attention because he was also sanctioned by the European Union, United States, and United Kingdom in early 2022 following the invasion of Ukraine. Despite this, his vessel passed through one of the world’s most tense maritime chokepoints.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/from-hormuz-to-inflation-how-the-iran-war-is-hitting-the-world-economy-1777368568772/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/from-hormuz-to-inflation-how-the-iran-war-is-hitting-the-world-economy-1777368568772/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/panama-canal-auction-prices-hormuz-crisis-global-trade-routes-1777123731447">Panama Canal bids surge to $4mn as Hormuz crisis disrupts trade</a><h2>Who is Alexey Mordashov?</h2>Alexey Mordashov is reportedly one of Russian President Vladimir Putin's key allies. A steel magnate, he is Russia’s richest man, with an estimated net worth of $37 billion (Rs 3,50,000 crore). Though he is not formally listed as the yacht’s owner, shipping data and Russian corporate records from 2025 indicate that Nord is registered to a Russian firm owned by his wife. The firm is based in Cherepovets, where his company Severstal is also registered. According to Forbes, Mordashov is the largest shareholder in the steel company Severstal and was the top man of the company for nearly two decades before he resigned in 2015.&nbsp;Also Read:&nbsp; <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/irgc-subsea-cables-strait-of-hormuz-digital-chokepoint-1777373875901">Hormuz is a digital chokepoint: How can the US-Iran war threaten Internet connectivity?</a>&nbsp;According to Bloomberg, Alexey Mordashov holds stakes in several major companies, including mining firm Nordgold, power equipment manufacturer Power Machines, European tour operator TUI, hypermarket chain Lenta, and telecommunications operator Rostelecom. Forbes reported that Mordashov comes from a modest background, with parents who worked in a mill. He earned an MBA from Northumbria University and a Master of Science in Engineering from the Leningrad Institute of Economics. His rise began when he became finance director of a steel plant and was tasked by its aging director with buying shares to prevent an external takeover—shares that Mordashov ultimately retained for himself.

Sanctioned Russian businessman Alexey Mordashov is under scrutiny after his superyacht Nord passed through the tense Strait of Hormuz. Despite Western sanctions, the rare transit highlights ongoing geopolitical risks and Mordashov’s global business influence

A day after a superyacht sailing to Russia passed through the Strait of Hormuz, all eyes has been shifted to its owner Alexey Mordashov. The superyacht passed the Hormuz strait despite dual blockade by the US and Iran amid ongoing tensions and a fragile ceasefire after the war that started on Feb 28. The 142m-long (465 ft) multi-deck luxury boat, named Nord, travelled from Dubai to Muscat, Oman, over the weekend and became one of few private vessels to transit through the strait in recent months. The owner, Alexey Mordashov, has become a major point of attention because he was also sanctioned by the European Union, United States, and United Kingdom in early 2022 following the invasion of Ukraine. Despite this, his vessel passed through one of the world’s most tense maritime chokepoints. https://www.wionews.com/videos/from-hormuz-to-inflation-how-the-iran-war-is-hitting-the-world-economy-1777368568772/embed Also Read: Panama Canal bids surge to $4mn as Hormuz crisis disrupts trade Who is Alexey Mordashov? Alexey Mordashov is reportedly one of Russian President Vladimir Putin's key allies. A steel magnate, he is Russia’s richest man, with an estimated net worth of $37 billion (Rs 3,50,000 crore). Though he is not formally listed as the yacht’s owner, shipping data and Russian corporate records from 2025 indicate that Nord is registered to a Russian firm owned by his wife. The firm is based in Cherepovets, where his company Severstal is also registered. According to Forbes, Mordashov is the largest shareholder in the steel company Severstal and was the top man of the company for nearly two decades before he resigned in 2015. Also Read: Hormuz is a digital chokepoint: How can the US-Iran war threaten Internet connectivity? According to Bloomberg, Alexey Mordashov holds stakes in several major companies, including mining firm Nordgold, power equipment manufacturer Power Machines, European tour operator TUI, hypermarket chain Lenta, and telecommunications operator Rostelecom. Forbes reported that Mordashov comes from a modest background, with parents who worked in a mill. He earned an MBA from Northumbria University and a Master of Science in Engineering from the Leningrad Institute of Economics. His rise began when he became finance director of a steel plant and was tasked by its aging director with buying shares to prevent an external takeover—shares that Mordashov ultimately retained for himself.

Sanctioned Russian businessman Alexey Mordashov is under scrutiny after his superyacht Nord passed through the tense Strait of Hormuz. Despite Western sanctions, the rare transit highlights ongoing geopolitical risks and Mordashov’s global business influence

Meet Alexey Mordashov, Russian man linked to superyacht that sailed through Hormuz: What's his net-worth

One of the most prominent tactics involves disabling the Automatic Identification System (AIS), which typically broadcasts a vessel’s location and identity.

One of the most prominent tactics involves disabling the Automatic Identification System (AIS), which typically broadcasts a vessel’s location and identity.

Ships going ‘dark’, using ‘zombie’ IDs: What tactics are vessels using to cross Strait of Hormuz amid blockade?

Marine tracking data, on Monday, showed the tanker appearing off India’s west coast after weeks without signal, suggesting it had navigated the strategically critical waterway amid heightened tensions.

Marine tracking data, on Monday, showed the tanker appearing off India’s west coast after weeks without signal, suggesting it had navigated the strategically critical waterway amid heightened tensions.

'132,890 cubic metres of LNG’: ADNOC tanker crosses Strait of Hormuz for first time since Iran war, appears near India

The journey places the vessel among a limited number of ships currently navigating the route, which typically handles about one-fifth of global oil trade under normal conditions.

The journey places the vessel among a limited number of ships currently navigating the route, which typically handles about one-fifth of global oil trade under normal conditions.

465-foot superyacht with helipad, submarine: Sanctioned Russian billionaire-linked $500m Nord sails through blockaded Strait of Hormuz

Iran is planning to introduce a new navigation and passage law for ships using the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing tensions with the US and the ongoing blockage. The legislation is expected to be formally adopted once the Iranian parliament resumes sessions, according to Alaeddin Boroujerdi, a member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee. Officials describe the law as “Strait of Hormuz Security Plan,” and it has reportedly undergone multiple legal and international reviews. Boroujerdi said that once passed, it will become binding law and will be forwarded to the government for enforcement, setting new rules for maritime passage through the critical shipping route.&nbsp;<h2>What is the law?</h2>According to Boroujerdi, Iran is planning to introduce a new fee and payment system for vessels passing through the strait, with the Central Bank of Iran already opening accounts in multiple currencies including the rial, yuan, US dollar, and euro. He said that in the future, payments will be mandated in Iranian rials through a digital currency infrastructure. "Many meetings were held to consider the legal and international aspects of the Strait of Hormuz Security Plan. This plan will be adopted as a binding law immediately after the opening of parliament and sent to the government for implementation," TASS quoted him as saying.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-sends-new-proposal-to-end-war-with-us-trump-to-review-in-situation-room-meeting-what-are-the-conditions-1777262321532">Iran sends new proposal to end war with US; Trump to review it: What are the conditions?</a><h2>What we know about Iran-US deal?</h2>Hopes of reviving peace efforts receded as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited Islamabad, Pakistan, in what marked his third visit in 48 hours. Araghchi first arrived on April 24, for meetings with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, and Army Chief Asim Munir. He briefly left for Oman before returning on April 26, for a second round of talks before heading to Moscow. After meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin, he has again returned to Pakistan. During this phase, Iran has reportedly given a new proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war.&nbsp;&nbsp;It is reportedly a three stage proposal. The first stage demands a total end to the war, specifically hostilities on Hezbollah in Lebanon. The second stage focuses on lifting the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and restoring maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. The third stage is on contentious negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program are postponed. This will be initiated only after the ceasefire is established and the Strait is reopened.&nbsp;&nbsp;An Axios report stated that Trump is expected to hold a Situation Room meeting with his top national security and foreign policy team as the US received the proposal. Earlier on Apr 26, Trump scrapped the visit of envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to Islamabad and said that Iran could telephone if it wants to negotiate, while he stressed that it ​can never have a nuclear weapon. Tehran has pulled back from the second round of negotiations in Pakistan stating excessive demands by the US and demanded that talks are only possible if obstacles, including its blockade of Iranian ports are removed.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-only-three-days-left-trump-claims-iranian-pipelines-will-explode-from-within-if-deal-not-reached-1777269545547">'Only three days left': Trump claims Iranian pipelines will explode from within if deal not reached</a><h2>Trump's threat to Iran</h2>Meanwhile, Trump on Sunday (Apr 26) threatened Iran again claiming that the country has just three days to agree to a deal to end the war, or its oil pipelines will “explode from within." Similar claims were made by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He claimed that the crude oil industry in Iran is beginning to shut down its production due to the US blockade restricting exports. "Pumping will soon collapse. Gasoline shortages in Iran next!" Bessent said. "Surviving IRGC leaders are trapped like drowning rats in a sewage pipe," he added.

Strait of Hormuz may soon see new transit rules as Alaeddin Boroujerdi confirms a binding law is coming. Amid tensions, Donald Trump reviews Iran’s proposal to end conflict and reopen key shipping routes.

Iran is planning to introduce a new navigation and passage law for ships using the Strait of Hormuz amid ongoing tensions with the US and the ongoing blockage. The legislation is expected to be formally adopted once the Iranian parliament resumes sessions, according to Alaeddin Boroujerdi, a member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee. Officials describe the law as “Strait of Hormuz Security Plan,” and it has reportedly undergone multiple legal and international reviews. Boroujerdi said that once passed, it will become binding law and will be forwarded to the government for enforcement, setting new rules for maritime passage through the critical shipping route. What is the law? According to Boroujerdi, Iran is planning to introduce a new fee and payment system for vessels passing through the strait, with the Central Bank of Iran already opening accounts in multiple currencies including the rial, yuan, US dollar, and euro. He said that in the future, payments will be mandated in Iranian rials through a digital currency infrastructure. "Many meetings were held to consider the legal and international aspects of the Strait of Hormuz Security Plan. This plan will be adopted as a binding law immediately after the opening of parliament and sent to the government for implementation," TASS quoted him as saying. Also Read: Iran sends new proposal to end war with US; Trump to review it: What are the conditions? What we know about Iran-US deal? Hopes of reviving peace efforts receded as Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi visited Islamabad, Pakistan, in what marked his third visit in 48 hours. Araghchi first arrived on April 24, for meetings with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, and Army Chief Asim Munir. He briefly left for Oman before returning on April 26, for a second round of talks before heading to Moscow. After meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin, he has again returned to Pakistan. During this phase, Iran has reportedly given a new proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war. It is reportedly a three stage proposal. The first stage demands a total end to the war, specifically hostilities on Hezbollah in Lebanon. The second stage focuses on lifting the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and restoring maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. The third stage is on contentious negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program are postponed. This will be initiated only after the ceasefire is established and the Strait is reopened. An Axios report stated that Trump is expected to hold a Situation Room meeting with his top national security and foreign policy team as the US received the proposal. Earlier on Apr 26, Trump scrapped the visit of envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner to Islamabad and said that Iran could telephone if it wants to negotiate, while he stressed that it can never have a nuclear weapon. Tehran has pulled back from the second round of negotiations in Pakistan stating excessive demands by the US and demanded that talks are only possible if obstacles, including its blockade of Iranian ports are removed. Also Read: 'Only three days left': Trump claims Iranian pipelines will explode from within if deal not reached Trump's threat to Iran Meanwhile, Trump on Sunday (Apr 26) threatened Iran again claiming that the country has just three days to agree to a deal to end the war, or its oil pipelines will “explode from within." Similar claims were made by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. He claimed that the crude oil industry in Iran is beginning to shut down its production due to the US blockade restricting exports. "Pumping will soon collapse. Gasoline shortages in Iran next!" Bessent said. "Surviving IRGC leaders are trapped like drowning rats in a sewage pipe," he added.

Strait of Hormuz may soon see new transit rules as Alaeddin Boroujerdi confirms a binding law is coming. Amid tensions, Donald Trump reviews Iran’s proposal to end conflict and reopen key shipping routes.

Iran to introduce new navigation law amid Strait of Hormuz blockade: What is it?

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday (April 27) appealed to the Security Council to reopen Strait of Hormuz as the blockade has impacted global energy security, food supplies and trade, impacting the world economy hard. He stressed that the "passage is an economic and humanitarian imperative and everyone is paying the price..".&nbsp;Guterres while making the appeal said that navigational rights through the Strait of Hormuz must be respected under the Resolution 2817.&nbsp;"These principles must be upheld in full and without delay. I appeal to the parties, open the strait, let ships pass. No tolls, no discrimination. Let trade resume. Let the global economy breathe," said the UN Secretary-General.&nbsp;Iran has offered to end its control over the Strait of Hormuz if the US lifts naval blockade and ends the war. But the US President Donald Trump seems unlikely to accept Iran's offer.&nbsp;The naval blockade of Strait of Hormuz by US prevents Iran from selling oil, thus impacting global prices and economies.<h2>"US requested negotiations"</h2>&nbsp;On Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister during his visit to Russia said that US has requested negotiations and that they are looking into it.&nbsp;“It is clear that Iran is standing up to the world's greatest superpower and they have not achieved a single one of their goals. That is why they have requested negotiations and we are looking into it,” says Araghchi in Moscow.&nbsp;The second round of talks, after the ceasefire ended last week has failed to take shape. Iran has often blamed the US for not showing any seriousness in negotiation and has not committed to direct talks with the US.&nbsp;However, the United States till recently was saying that the talks will be held and it is sending Steve Witkoff, a U.S. special envoy, and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, to Islamabad, Pakistan on Saturday. But at the last moment Trump announced the cancellation of the trip.&nbsp;

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres while making the appeal to the Security Council said that navigational rights through the Strait of Hormuz must be respected under the Resolution 2817.

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday (April 27) appealed to the Security Council to reopen Strait of Hormuz as the blockade has impacted global energy security, food supplies and trade, impacting the world economy hard. He stressed that the "passage is an economic and humanitarian imperative and everyone is paying the price..". Guterres while making the appeal said that navigational rights through the Strait of Hormuz must be respected under the Resolution 2817. "These principles must be upheld in full and without delay. I appeal to the parties, open the strait, let ships pass. No tolls, no discrimination. Let trade resume. Let the global economy breathe," said the UN Secretary-General. Iran has offered to end its control over the Strait of Hormuz if the US lifts naval blockade and ends the war. But the US President Donald Trump seems unlikely to accept Iran's offer. The naval blockade of Strait of Hormuz by US prevents Iran from selling oil, thus impacting global prices and economies. "US requested negotiations" On Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister during his visit to Russia said that US has requested negotiations and that they are looking into it. “It is clear that Iran is standing up to the world's greatest superpower and they have not achieved a single one of their goals. That is why they have requested negotiations and we are looking into it,” says Araghchi in Moscow. The second round of talks, after the ceasefire ended last week has failed to take shape. Iran has often blamed the US for not showing any seriousness in negotiation and has not committed to direct talks with the US. However, the United States till recently was saying that the talks will be held and it is sending Steve Witkoff, a U.S. special envoy, and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, to Islamabad, Pakistan on Saturday. But at the last moment Trump announced the cancellation of the trip.

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres while making the appeal to the Security Council said that navigational rights through the Strait of Hormuz must be respected under the Resolution 2817.

'Everyone is paying the price': UN Secretary-General appeals to reopen Strait of Hormuz

Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday (April 27) raised strong concerns over the trajectory of the Iran war, questioning Washington’s strategy and warning that Tehran appears more resilient than earlier assessments, even as tensions intensify around the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Speaking in North Rhine-Westphalia, Merz said he was unable to identify a clear exit strategy being pursued by the United States, adding that the situation was becoming increasingly complex and difficult to manage.&nbsp;"The Iranians are obviously very skilled at negotiating, or rather, very skilful at not negotiating, letting the Americans travel to Islamabad and then leave again without any result," he said during an interaction with students.&nbsp;"An entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership, especially by these so-called Revolutionary Guards. And so I hope that this ends as quickly as possible," he added.&nbsp;Merz also pointed out that Germany and its European partners were not consulted before the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, noting that he had conveyed his scepticism directly to US President Donald Trump.&nbsp;"If I had known that it would continue like this for five or six weeks and get progressively worse, I would have told him even more emphatically," he said, drawing parallels with earlier US interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan.&nbsp;The German Chancellor said there were indications that the Strait of Hormuz had been partially mined, adding that Europe had offered assistance to secure the vital shipping route.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-new-zealand-sign-historic-fta-20-bn-investment-trade-and-mobility-to-expand-1777293232649">India–New Zealand sign ‘historic’ FTA: $20 bn investment, trade and mobility to expand</a>&nbsp;"We have offered, also as Europeans, to send German minesweepers to clear the strait, which has obviously been mined in part," he said.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Trump has criticised NATO allies for not deploying naval forces to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which remains largely shut, disrupting global energy supplies and triggering market volatility.&nbsp;The remarks come after Trump on Saturday announced that American negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner would no longer travel to Pakistan for talks with Iran, cancelling the visit shortly after Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi concluded his diplomatic trip to Islamabad.

Merz said Germany and Europe were not consulted before the US and Israel began strikes on Iran, and noted that he later raised his concerns directly with Trump.

Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday (April 27) raised strong concerns over the trajectory of the Iran war, questioning Washington’s strategy and warning that Tehran appears more resilient than earlier assessments, even as tensions intensify around the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz. Speaking in North Rhine-Westphalia, Merz said he was unable to identify a clear exit strategy being pursued by the United States, adding that the situation was becoming increasingly complex and difficult to manage. "The Iranians are obviously very skilled at negotiating, or rather, very skilful at not negotiating, letting the Americans travel to Islamabad and then leave again without any result," he said during an interaction with students. "An entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership, especially by these so-called Revolutionary Guards. And so I hope that this ends as quickly as possible," he added. Merz also pointed out that Germany and its European partners were not consulted before the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, noting that he had conveyed his scepticism directly to US President Donald Trump. "If I had known that it would continue like this for five or six weeks and get progressively worse, I would have told him even more emphatically," he said, drawing parallels with earlier US interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan. The German Chancellor said there were indications that the Strait of Hormuz had been partially mined, adding that Europe had offered assistance to secure the vital shipping route. Also Read: India–New Zealand sign ‘historic’ FTA: $20 bn investment, trade and mobility to expand "We have offered, also as Europeans, to send German minesweepers to clear the strait, which has obviously been mined in part," he said. Meanwhile, Trump has criticised NATO allies for not deploying naval forces to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which remains largely shut, disrupting global energy supplies and triggering market volatility. The remarks come after Trump on Saturday announced that American negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner would no longer travel to Pakistan for talks with Iran, cancelling the visit shortly after Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi concluded his diplomatic trip to Islamabad.

Merz said Germany and Europe were not consulted before the US and Israel began strikes on Iran, and noted that he later raised his concerns directly with Trump.

‘An entire nation is humiliated by....’: German Chancellor questions US exit strategy in Iran war

As the Strait of Hormuz crisis has mounted over the last 50 days, shipping companies have paid as much as $4 million in individual auctions to secure priority transit through the Panama Canal. The Panama Canal Authority highlight a massive shift in global trade routes as countries look to bypass the conflict zone in the West Asia.&nbsp;The Panama Canal normally uses a flat-rate reservation system, ships without booking must enter a bidding system to avoid waiting for long. The auction prices jumped from &nbsp;$135,000, to $4 million for Neopanamax slots. The vessels that failed to secure a passage take the Cape of Good Hope route, which can add 20+ days to the voyage. Asian buyers have to increasingly source, crude &nbsp;US Gulf Coast via the Panama Canal, the daily passage of ships have increased from highest 34 of 2024 to 40 in Macrh-April 2026.&nbsp;"With all the bombings, the missiles, the drones ... companies are saying it's safer and less expensive to cross through the Panama Canal," lawyer and analyst in Panama City. “All of this is affecting global supply chains.” Meanwhile, Panama's government is "maximizing what it can earn from the Panama Canal," Noriega said.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/isaac-accord-milei-israel-argentina-foreign-policy-shift-1777116352261">What is the Isaac Accord and why is Javier Milei aligning Argentina with Israel?</a>Normally approximately 6 per cent of the oil passes throgh Panama Canal and which connect the Atlantic and Pacific oceans in Central America. Most of the cargoes containv goods like car parts, grain and consumer electronics which are traded from China to Europe and US east coast and vice versa. “Crude cargoes do not typically flow from the Atlantic basin to Asia via the panamax locks. They do now,” read a report by Lloyd’s List Intelligence highlighting the dramatic reconfiguration of global energy logistics. The report also adds that these global maritime disruptions are causing roughly $14 billion in annual economic losses from rerouting and insurance spikes.&nbsp;

Shipping firms pay up to $4M to cross the Panama Canal as the Strait of Hormuz crisis forces global trade reroutes.

As the Strait of Hormuz crisis has mounted over the last 50 days, shipping companies have paid as much as $4 million in individual auctions to secure priority transit through the Panama Canal. The Panama Canal Authority highlight a massive shift in global trade routes as countries look to bypass the conflict zone in the West Asia. The Panama Canal normally uses a flat-rate reservation system, ships without booking must enter a bidding system to avoid waiting for long. The auction prices jumped from $135,000, to $4 million for Neopanamax slots. The vessels that failed to secure a passage take the Cape of Good Hope route, which can add 20+ days to the voyage. Asian buyers have to increasingly source, crude US Gulf Coast via the Panama Canal, the daily passage of ships have increased from highest 34 of 2024 to 40 in Macrh-April 2026. "With all the bombings, the missiles, the drones ... companies are saying it's safer and less expensive to cross through the Panama Canal," lawyer and analyst in Panama City. “All of this is affecting global supply chains.” Meanwhile, Panama's government is "maximizing what it can earn from the Panama Canal," Noriega said. Also Read: What is the Isaac Accord and why is Javier Milei aligning Argentina with Israel? Normally approximately 6 per cent of the oil passes throgh Panama Canal and which connect the Atlantic and Pacific oceans in Central America. Most of the cargoes containv goods like car parts, grain and consumer electronics which are traded from China to Europe and US east coast and vice versa. “Crude cargoes do not typically flow from the Atlantic basin to Asia via the panamax locks. They do now,” read a report by Lloyd’s List Intelligence highlighting the dramatic reconfiguration of global energy logistics. The report also adds that these global maritime disruptions are causing roughly $14 billion in annual economic losses from rerouting and insurance spikes.

Shipping firms pay up to $4M to cross the Panama Canal as the Strait of Hormuz crisis forces global trade reroutes.

Panama Canal bids surge to $4mn as Hormuz crisis disrupts trade

Tensions between Iran and the United States are escalating once again as Tehran issues a strong warning over the ongoing US naval blockade of its ports.

Iran’s military has declared that Washington will face a “powerful response” if the blockade continues, calling the move illegal and tantamount to piracy. The US, meanwhile, is enforcing strict restrictions on ships entering and leaving Iranian ports as part of its pressure campaign.

The standoff is raising fears of wider conflict, with Iran warning that security across Gulf shipping routes could be at risk if the blockade is not lifted.

Iran Warns US Over Naval Blockade: 'Powerful Response’ Threat Escalates 

US President Donald Trump, on Friday, April 17, 2026, after claiming victory and the complete opening of the Strait of Hormuz, &nbsp;acknowledged that “there could” still be differences to work out between the U.S. and Iran. While talking to the reporters in Phoenix on Friday, Trump slightly tempered his earlier claim that Tehran had “agreed to everything” to the two countries have had "some very good discussions.""We've done a good job, but we'll see,” Trump said. "Talks are going on and will go on over the weekend, and a lot of good things are happening," Trump continued, adding, "That includes Lebanon, too.".Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-rebukes-israel-lebanon-ceasefire-iran-reopens-strait-hormuz-1776496556104">Trump rebukes Israel over Lebanon ceasefire, a shift in power dynamics in West Asia</a>When the reporters said Iran claimed that the two countries have significant differences, "Let's see what happens. If there are, we'll have to straighten it out. But I don't think there are too many significant differences." But he insisted that the US blockade of Iran will end once Iran signs a deal.&nbsp;While Trump continues to frame the agreement as a potential “deal” that is near completion, key sticking points remain. Iran has categorically denied any deal involving the transfer of enriched uranium. Trump insists on the permanent end of Iran's nuclear programme, while Iran views continued enrichment as a "red line". President Donald Trump said in-person discussions would "probably" happen this weekend. Though reports from ABC News suggest that the US officials believe that a potential talk could be held on “Monday”. Further, there is no discussion about Iran's proxies and its missile program.&nbsp;Iran is further claiming release of its billions of dollars in frozen assets, and media reports have suggested a potential "cash-for-uranium" deal, but Trump explicitly denied these claims. The US has also denied these claims that Iran is also seeking $270 billion in war reparations. &nbsp;Official statement of Iranian negotiations leader, Mohammed Ghalibaf and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmael Baqaei suggest that Iran will not allow navigation in the Strait of Hormuz if the American blockade continues, and that navigation will be carried out based on a "designated route" and with "Iranian permission." Official statement further suggests that the open or closed status of the Hormuz will be determined in the field, not on social media.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump says US-Iran talks show progress but admits differences remain over nuclear deal and Strait of Hormuz access, as Tehran rejects uranium transfer claims.

US President Donald Trump, on Friday, April 17, 2026, after claiming victory and the complete opening of the Strait of Hormuz, acknowledged that “there could” still be differences to work out between the U.S. and Iran. While talking to the reporters in Phoenix on Friday, Trump slightly tempered his earlier claim that Tehran had “agreed to everything” to the two countries have had "some very good discussions." "We've done a good job, but we'll see,” Trump said. "Talks are going on and will go on over the weekend, and a lot of good things are happening," Trump continued, adding, "That includes Lebanon, too." . Also Read: Trump rebukes Israel over Lebanon ceasefire, a shift in power dynamics in West Asia When the reporters said Iran claimed that the two countries have significant differences, "Let's see what happens. If there are, we'll have to straighten it out. But I don't think there are too many significant differences." But he insisted that the US blockade of Iran will end once Iran signs a deal. While Trump continues to frame the agreement as a potential “deal” that is near completion, key sticking points remain. Iran has categorically denied any deal involving the transfer of enriched uranium. Trump insists on the permanent end of Iran's nuclear programme, while Iran views continued enrichment as a "red line". President Donald Trump said in-person discussions would "probably" happen this weekend. Though reports from ABC News suggest that the US officials believe that a potential talk could be held on “Monday”. Further, there is no discussion about Iran's proxies and its missile program. Iran is further claiming release of its billions of dollars in frozen assets, and media reports have suggested a potential "cash-for-uranium" deal, but Trump explicitly denied these claims. The US has also denied these claims that Iran is also seeking $270 billion in war reparations. Official statement of Iranian negotiations leader, Mohammed Ghalibaf and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmael Baqaei suggest that Iran will not allow navigation in the Strait of Hormuz if the American blockade continues, and that navigation will be carried out based on a "designated route" and with "Iranian permission." Official statement further suggests that the open or closed status of the Hormuz will be determined in the field, not on social media.

Trump says US-Iran talks show progress but admits differences remain over nuclear deal and Strait of Hormuz, as Tehran rejects uranium transfer claims.

Trump acknowledges possible remaining gaps after claiming Tehran 'agreed to everything'

United States President while speaking to reporters outside the Oval office on Monday (April 13) said that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has started and that other countries will help in the blockade. He however, did not give names of the country that will help US in blocking the strait.He also reiterated that "Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, we can't let a country blackmail the world". Speaking further he said that the talks in Islamabad failed as "Iran did not agree not to have a nuclear weapon."<h2>Trump declares naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz</h2>&nbsp;Earlier today, Trump threatened "blocking ships entering or exiting Iranian Ports on April 13". Taking to Truth Social he wrote, "The United States to Blockade Ships Entering or Exiting Iranian Ports on April 13 at 10:00 AM ET".&nbsp;This comes just a day after he declared a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The back-to-back announcements mark a dramatic hardening of Washington's posture in the now seven-week-old conflict.&nbsp;The military, however, asserted that it will not obstruct vessels transiting the Hormuz to and from non-Iranian ports. On humanitarian grounds, the military stated that humanitarian shipments, including food, medical supplies, and other essential goods, will be permitted, subject to inspection.&nbsp;Neutral vessels, however, may still be subject to the right of visit and search to determine the presence of contraband cargo. The military further warned that any vessel entering or departing the blockaded area without authorisation is subject to interception, diversion, and capture, and that the blockade applies to all vessel traffic, regardless of flag.&nbsp;

Earlier today, Trump threatened blocking ships entering or exiting Iranian Ports on April 13. Taking to Truth Social he wrote, The United States to Blockade Ships Entering or Exiting Iranian Ports on April 13 at 10:00 AM ET.

United States President while speaking to reporters outside the Oval office on Monday (April 13) said that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has started and that other countries will help in the blockade. He however, did not give names of the country that will help US in blocking the strait. He also reiterated that "Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, we can't let a country blackmail the world". Speaking further he said that the talks in Islamabad failed as "Iran did not agree not to have a nuclear weapon." Trump declares naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz Earlier today, Trump threatened "blocking ships entering or exiting Iranian Ports on April 13". Taking to Truth Social he wrote, "The United States to Blockade Ships Entering or Exiting Iranian Ports on April 13 at 10:00 AM ET". This comes just a day after he declared a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The back-to-back announcements mark a dramatic hardening of Washington's posture in the now seven-week-old conflict. The military, however, asserted that it will not obstruct vessels transiting the Hormuz to and from non-Iranian ports. On humanitarian grounds, the military stated that humanitarian shipments, including food, medical supplies, and other essential goods, will be permitted, subject to inspection. Neutral vessels, however, may still be subject to the right of visit and search to determine the presence of contraband cargo. The military further warned that any vessel entering or departing the blockaded area without authorisation is subject to interception, diversion, and capture, and that the blockade applies to all vessel traffic, regardless of flag.

Earlier today, Trump threatened "blocking ships entering or exiting Iranian Ports on April 13". Taking to Truth Social he wrote, "The United States to Blockade Ships Entering or Exiting Iranian Ports on April 13 at 10:00 AM ET".

'Blockade of Strait of Hormuz has started, other countries will help': Trump