Just days after US President Donald Trump said that he is considering sending additional Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, the White House halted the delivery of some air defence interceptors and precision-guided bombs and missiles to Ukraine, as the Pentagon cited that US weapons stocks were going too low.This comes at a time when Ukraine is facing some of the largest missile and drone attacks from Russia since the beginning of the war.<h2>Why this halt now?</h2>The White House explained that the decision was taken to put "America's interest first" following a Department of Defense review of US "military support and assistance to other countries".“The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned, just ask Iran," White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement.The Ukrainian defence ministry on Wednesday said that it had not received advanced notice of reductions to US arms shipments, adding that ending Russia's invasion required "consistent" support."Ukraine has not received any official notifications about the suspension or revision of the delivery schedules for the agreed defense assistance," the ministry said in a statement."We emphasise that the path to ending the war lies through consistent and joint pressure on the aggressor, as well as through continued support for Ukraine," it added.Earlier, Ukraine's foreign ministry stressed that any delay or procrastination in supporting Ukraine's defence capabilities would only "encourage the aggressor to continue war and terror, rather than seek peace."Notably, last weekend, Ukraine faced its biggest aerial attack since 2022, with more than 500 drones and ballistic and cruise missiles launched at its cities.<h2>What all does it include?</h2>According to a New York Times report, the weapons that have been put on hold, include interceptors for Patriot air defense systems, precision artillery rounds and missiles that the Ukrainian air force fires from American-made F-16 jets, according to the Pentagon officials.These weapons have been critical as Ukraine makes an effort to fight against Russia's aggression. However, it is still unclear how many weapons are included in the list, and when the pause is going to take place.While, some US officials said that the munitions were not scheduled to be shipped to Ukraine for several months, according to the report.The US has been sending Ukraine a mix of weapons, equipment and munitions over the past two years, with some initiated during the Biden administration.&nbsp;

The Ukrainian defence ministry on Wednesday said that it had not received advanced notice of reductions to US arms shipments, adding that ending Russia's invasion required "consistent" support.

Just days after US President Donald Trump said that he is considering sending additional Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, the White House halted the delivery of some air defence interceptors and precision-guided bombs and missiles to Ukraine, as the Pentagon cited that US weapons stocks were going too low. This comes at a time when Ukraine is facing some of the largest missile and drone attacks from Russia since the beginning of the war. Why this halt now? The White House explained that the decision was taken to put "America's interest first" following a Department of Defense review of US "military support and assistance to other countries". “The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned, just ask Iran," White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly said in a statement. The Ukrainian defence ministry on Wednesday said that it had not received advanced notice of reductions to US arms shipments, adding that ending Russia's invasion required "consistent" support. "Ukraine has not received any official notifications about the suspension or revision of the delivery schedules for the agreed defense assistance," the ministry said in a statement. "We emphasise that the path to ending the war lies through consistent and joint pressure on the aggressor, as well as through continued support for Ukraine," it added. Earlier, Ukraine's foreign ministry stressed that any delay or procrastination in supporting Ukraine's defence capabilities would only "encourage the aggressor to continue war and terror, rather than seek peace." Notably, last weekend, Ukraine faced its biggest aerial attack since 2022, with more than 500 drones and ballistic and cruise missiles launched at its cities. What all does it include? According to a New York Times report, the weapons that have been put on hold, include interceptors for Patriot air defense systems, precision artillery rounds and missiles that the Ukrainian air force fires from American-made F-16 jets, according to the Pentagon officials. These weapons have been critical as Ukraine makes an effort to fight against Russia's aggression. However, it is still unclear how many weapons are included in the list, and when the pause is going to take place. While, some US officials said that the munitions were not scheduled to be shipped to Ukraine for several months, according to the report. The US has been sending Ukraine a mix of weapons, equipment and munitions over the past two years, with some initiated during the Biden administration.

The Ukrainian defence ministry on Wednesday said that it had not received advanced notice of reductions to US arms shipments, adding that ending Russia's invasion required "consistent" support.

'Precision-guided bombs, missiles': Trump halts some weapons transfers to Ukraine amid raging Russia war. But why?

Amid the ongoing feud between US President Donald Trump and his ex-closest ally Elon Musk, Chinese people have stormed social media with posts supporting the American billionaire as most of them were on Team Musk.All this ignited when Musk pledged to found a new political party, the American Party, if Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill passed the Senate. However, the US president's "big and beautiful bill" did pass the Senate on Tuesday.The bill is expected to increase the US national debt by $3.3 trillion. Musk has described the bill as "insane" and has vowed to unseat lawmakers who supported Trump's tax and spending measure.Hours after the bill passed the US Senate, the hashtag #MuskWantsToBuildAnAmericaParty went viral on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, similar to Musk's X, which received more than 37 million views.“If Elon Musk were to found a political party, his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics. The potential for change is significant – and worth watching,” one of the Weibo users wrote.Another user in support of Musk wrote, “When you’ve had enough, there’s no need to keep putting up with it."One user even stressed that billions of people are supporting Musk against Trump. "Brother Musk, you’ve got over a billion people on our side backing you.”Musk is widely respected and honoured in China for his technological achievements as Tesla's electric vehicles are the only Western brand on the roads of China. Moreover, Tesla's biggest factory is located in Shanghai.Notably, Musk shares a good relationship with China's Premier Li Qiang. While, US President Trump is not that popular in China and people are not fond of him, with some claiming that he has launched the most aggressive trade war on China in recent history.'Trump, Musk grow up'Some of the users also wrote that Trump and Musk should grow up, stressing that they are arguing over the smallest things.“These two grown men argue nonstop over the smallest things – and the whole world ends up knowing about it,” wrote one user, while another joked: “Every day, Musk is basically live-streaming ‘How Billionaires Argue’”.&nbsp;

Hours after the bill passed the US Senate, the hashtag #MuskWantsToBuildAnAmericaParty went viral on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, similar to Musk's X, which received more than 37 million views.

Amid the ongoing feud between US President Donald Trump and his ex-closest ally Elon Musk, Chinese people have stormed social media with posts supporting the American billionaire as most of them were on Team Musk. All this ignited when Musk pledged to found a new political party, the American Party, if Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill passed the Senate. However, the US president's "big and beautiful bill" did pass the Senate on Tuesday. The bill is expected to increase the US national debt by $3.3 trillion. Musk has described the bill as "insane" and has vowed to unseat lawmakers who supported Trump's tax and spending measure. Hours after the bill passed the US Senate, the hashtag #MuskWantsToBuildAnAmericaParty went viral on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, similar to Musk's X, which received more than 37 million views. “If Elon Musk were to found a political party, his tech-driven mindset could inject fresh energy into politics. The potential for change is significant – and worth watching,” one of the Weibo users wrote. Another user in support of Musk wrote, “When you’ve had enough, there’s no need to keep putting up with it." One user even stressed that billions of people are supporting Musk against Trump. "Brother Musk, you’ve got over a billion people on our side backing you.” Musk is widely respected and honoured in China for his technological achievements as Tesla's electric vehicles are the only Western brand on the roads of China. Moreover, Tesla's biggest factory is located in Shanghai. Notably, Musk shares a good relationship with China's Premier Li Qiang. While, US President Trump is not that popular in China and people are not fond of him, with some claiming that he has launched the most aggressive trade war on China in recent history. 'Trump, Musk grow up' Some of the users also wrote that Trump and Musk should grow up, stressing that they are arguing over the smallest things. “These two grown men argue nonstop over the smallest things – and the whole world ends up knowing about it,” wrote one user, while another joked: “Every day, Musk is basically live-streaming ‘How Billionaires Argue’”.

Hours after the bill passed the US Senate, the hashtag #MuskWantsToBuildAnAmericaParty went viral on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, similar to Musk's X, which received more than 37 million views.

'Brother Musk, billion people backing you': Here's how Chinese people are siding with Musk amid feud with Trump

The temporary protected status (TPS) for Haitians in the United States is in the limelight once again. A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s bid to end temporary deportation protections and work permits for Haitian immigrants before the program’s scheduled expiration date. The judge added that the Department of Homeland Security, in the rush to strip deportation protections and work permits, violated the law. Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem is attempting to end legal status for approximately 521,000 Haitian immigrants. The department had earlier revoked Joe Biden’s 18-month extension of temporary protected status (TPS) for Haitians through 3 February. The program was to end on 3 August, but it was extended till 2 September last week.&nbsp;Meanwhile, the US district judge Brian Cogan in Brooklyn said that Noem did not follow procedures and a timeline mandated by Congress to reconsider the TPS designation for Haitians. “Secretary Noem does not have statutory or inherent authority to partially vacate a country’s TPS designation”, and this makes her actions "unlawful," Cogan wrote. "Her partial vacatur must be set aside as unlawful under the (Administrative Procedure Act.)...Plaintiffs are likely to (and, indeed, do) succeed on the merits."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/over-14-million-people-could-die-trump-s-us-aid-cuts-could-affect-millions-after-musk-puts-usaid-through-the-woodchipper-1751383066410">Over 14 million people could die? Trump's US aid cuts could affect millions after Musk puts USAID 'through the woodchipper'</a>&nbsp;<h2>Lawsuit by nine Haitian TPS holders</h2>&nbsp;A lawsuit was filed in March by nine Haitian TPS holders and advocacy groups, including the Haitian Evangelical Clergy Association and Service Employees International Union 32BJ, against the rollback. It argued that the sudden revocation of the rule jolted the lives of Haitians who were forced to prepare for deportation far earlier than expected.&nbsp;Cogan added that Haitians' interests in being able to live and work in the United States "far outweigh" potential harm to the US government. He said that the Trump administration remains free to enforce immigration laws and terminate TPS status as prescribed by Congress. Notably, Republican President Donald Trump has cracked the whip on legal and illegal immigration during his second White House term.&nbsp;<h2>Reactions to the ruling on Haitians TPS</h2>&nbsp;In a statement, Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said Haiti's TPS designation was granted following the 2010 earthquake in that country, and was never intended as a "de facto" asylum program. "This ruling delays justice and seeks to kneecap the President's constitutionally vested powers," she said. "We expect a higher court to vindicate us."Manny Pastreich, president of SEIU Local 32BJ, whose members include Haitian TPS holders, said in a statement. "While the fight is far from over, this is an important step." &nbsp;

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has been blocked from ending temporary deportation protections and work permits for 521,000 Haitian immigrants in the US. Nine Haitian TPS holders and advocacy groups had filed a lawsuit against the rollback by the Trump administration in March.

The temporary protected status (TPS) for Haitians in the United States is in the limelight once again. A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s bid to end temporary deportation protections and work permits for Haitian immigrants before the program’s scheduled expiration date. The judge added that the Department of Homeland Security, in the rush to strip deportation protections and work permits, violated the law. Homeland Security Secretary, Kristi Noem is attempting to end legal status for approximately 521,000 Haitian immigrants. The department had earlier revoked Joe Biden’s 18-month extension of temporary protected status (TPS) for Haitians through 3 February. The program was to end on 3 August, but it was extended till 2 September last week. Meanwhile, the US district judge Brian Cogan in Brooklyn said that Noem did not follow procedures and a timeline mandated by Congress to reconsider the TPS designation for Haitians. “Secretary Noem does not have statutory or inherent authority to partially vacate a country’s TPS designation”, and this makes her actions "unlawful," Cogan wrote. "Her partial vacatur must be set aside as unlawful under the (Administrative Procedure Act.)...Plaintiffs are likely to (and, indeed, do) succeed on the merits." Also Read: Over 14 million people could die? Trump's US aid cuts could affect millions after Musk puts USAID 'through the woodchipper' Lawsuit by nine Haitian TPS holders A lawsuit was filed in March by nine Haitian TPS holders and advocacy groups, including the Haitian Evangelical Clergy Association and Service Employees International Union 32BJ, against the rollback. It argued that the sudden revocation of the rule jolted the lives of Haitians who were forced to prepare for deportation far earlier than expected. Cogan added that Haitians' interests in being able to live and work in the United States "far outweigh" potential harm to the US government. He said that the Trump administration remains free to enforce immigration laws and terminate TPS status as prescribed by Congress. Notably, Republican President Donald Trump has cracked the whip on legal and illegal immigration during his second White House term. Reactions to the ruling on Haitians TPS In a statement, Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said Haiti's TPS designation was granted following the 2010 earthquake in that country, and was never intended as a "de facto" asylum program. "This ruling delays justice and seeks to kneecap the President's constitutionally vested powers," she said. "We expect a higher court to vindicate us." Manny Pastreich, president of SEIU Local 32BJ, whose members include Haitian TPS holders, said in a statement. "While the fight is far from over, this is an important step."

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has been blocked from ending temporary deportation protections and work permits for 521,000 Haitian immigrants in the US. Nine Haitian TPS holders and advocacy groups had filed a lawsuit against the rollback by the Trump administration in March.

Kristi Noem blocked from ending temporary protected status for Haitians

The Trump administration is considering whether Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic frontrunner for New York City mayor, could be stripped of his American citizenship, following calls from Republican congressman Andy Ogles.Ogles claims Mamdani may have gained US citizenship through “concealment of material support for terrorism”. In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, he cited a rap song Mamdani released years ago, which referred to members of a foundation convicted of aiding Hamas as “my guys”. He also pointed to Mamdani’s recent refusal to disavow the controversial slogan “globalise the intifada”.“Zohran ‘little muhammad’ Mamdani is an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York. He needs to be deported,” Ogles wrote on X, formerly Twitter."Zohran Mamdani was a card-carrying member of the Democratic Socialists of America before he became a citizen. If he checked “NO” on his N-400 form when asked about associations with a Communist party, then he LIED. Get the plane ready—he might be going back!" Ogles wrote in a follow-up post.<h2>White House says denaturalisation could be investigated</h2>When asked about Ogles’ call for action, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded, “I have not seen those claims, but surely if they are true, it’s something that should be investigated.”The Justice Department confirmed receipt of Ogles’ letter but did not comment further. This comes after the Trump administration had already prioritised legal action against naturalised citizens who allegedly obtained their citizenship unlawfully. A Justice Department memo advised attorneys to pursue denaturalisation in cases involving fraud or misrepresentation during the immigration process.<h2>Mamdani faces Islamophobic attacks</h2>Mamdani, 33, was born in Uganda to Indian parents and became a US citizen in 2018. A practising Muslim and self-declared democratic socialist, he stunned the political establishment last week by defeating former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary.His win has been met with intense right-wing backlash, including Islamophobic slurs, scrutiny of his past activism, and criticism of his pro-Palestinian views.In an earlier comment, Donald Trump labelled him “a pure communist” and warned that New York could lose federal funding if Mamdani becomes mayor and “doesn’t behave himself”.Chris Murphy, Democratic senator from Connecticut, condemned the denaturalisation push, calling it, “racist bullshit”.He added, “Zohran won because he ran a campaign laser-focused on putting power back in the hands of working people. And that’s a threat to the Mar-a-Lago&nbsp;crowd.”

When asked about Ogles’ call for action, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded, “I have not seen those claims, but surely if they are true, it’s something that should be investigated.”

The Trump administration is considering whether Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic frontrunner for New York City mayor, could be stripped of his American citizenship, following calls from Republican congressman Andy Ogles. Ogles claims Mamdani may have gained US citizenship through “concealment of material support for terrorism”. In a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, he cited a rap song Mamdani released years ago, which referred to members of a foundation convicted of aiding Hamas as “my guys”. He also pointed to Mamdani’s recent refusal to disavow the controversial slogan “globalise the intifada”. “Zohran ‘little muhammad’ Mamdani is an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York. He needs to be deported,” Ogles wrote on X, formerly Twitter. "Zohran Mamdani was a card-carrying member of the Democratic Socialists of America before he became a citizen. If he checked “NO” on his N-400 form when asked about associations with a Communist party, then he LIED. Get the plane ready—he might be going back!" Ogles wrote in a follow-up post. White House says denaturalisation could be investigated When asked about Ogles’ call for action, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded, “I have not seen those claims, but surely if they are true, it’s something that should be investigated.” The Justice Department confirmed receipt of Ogles’ letter but did not comment further. This comes after the Trump administration had already prioritised legal action against naturalised citizens who allegedly obtained their citizenship unlawfully. A Justice Department memo advised attorneys to pursue denaturalisation in cases involving fraud or misrepresentation during the immigration process. Mamdani faces Islamophobic attacks Mamdani, 33, was born in Uganda to Indian parents and became a US citizen in 2018. A practising Muslim and self-declared democratic socialist, he stunned the political establishment last week by defeating former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary. His win has been met with intense right-wing backlash, including Islamophobic slurs, scrutiny of his past activism, and criticism of his pro-Palestinian views. In an earlier comment, Donald Trump labelled him “a pure communist” and warned that New York could lose federal funding if Mamdani becomes mayor and “doesn’t behave himself”. Chris Murphy, Democratic senator from Connecticut, condemned the denaturalisation push, calling it, “racist bullshit”. He added, “Zohran won because he ran a campaign laser-focused on putting power back in the hands of working people. And that’s a threat to the Mar-a-Lago crowd.”

When asked about Ogles’ call for action, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded, “I have not seen those claims, but surely if they are true, it’s something that should be investigated.”

'Get the plane ready': Trump team to deport Zohran Mamdani? Republican says ‘little muhammad’ will destroy NYC

The Senate has just passed US President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful" tax and spending bill after holding more than 24 hours of negotiations. Notably, the vote was 50-50 and Vice President JD Vance were there in the chamber to cast the tie-breaking vote, making it 51-50.Three Republicans voted against the bill, including Thom Tillis, Rand Paul, and Susan Collins, along with all Democrats.The bill will now head back to the House for final approval. Earlier, Trump had hinted at some flexibility on his July 4 deadline for the bill to be put on his desk.However, while speaking to reporters, Trump acknowledged that passing the bill before Friday’s Independence Day holiday may be unrealistic. “I’d love to do July 4, but I think it’s very hard to do July 4. I would say maybe July 4, or somewhere around there,” he said. He also attempted to reassure lawmakers worried about deep cuts, adding, “We won’t go too crazy” with spending reductions.Meanwhile, House GOP leaders reaffirmed their commitment to pass Trump's bill by July 4, saying they will "immediately" consider the Senate’s reconciliation bill, adding they will send it to the president by the self-imposed 4 July deadline.“The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump’s full America First agenda by the Fourth of July,” said the statement from Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Majority Whip Tom Emmer and Conference Chair Lisa McClain. “The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay.”<h2>Know about 'Big Beautiful Bill'</h2>The legislation spans 940 pages and carries a price tag of $3.3 trillion, nearly $800 billion more than the House’s earlier version. Moreover, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis, the bill includes:• Permanent extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts• Increased funding for the military and border security• Major Medicaid reductions• A ban on federal funding for nearly 30 gender-transition medical proceduresThe bill is set to slash social welfare programs and add an eye-watering $3 trillion to the national debt.&nbsp; &nbsp;

The bill will now head back to the House for final approval. Earlier, Trump has hinted at some flexibility on his July 4 deadline for the bill to be put on his desk. 

The Senate has just passed US President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful" tax and spending bill after holding more than 24 hours of negotiations. Notably, the vote was 50-50 and Vice President JD Vance were there in the chamber to cast the tie-breaking vote, making it 51-50. Three Republicans voted against the bill, including Thom Tillis, Rand Paul, and Susan Collins, along with all Democrats. The bill will now head back to the House for final approval. Earlier, Trump had hinted at some flexibility on his July 4 deadline for the bill to be put on his desk. However, while speaking to reporters, Trump acknowledged that passing the bill before Friday’s Independence Day holiday may be unrealistic. “I’d love to do July 4, but I think it’s very hard to do July 4. I would say maybe July 4, or somewhere around there,” he said. He also attempted to reassure lawmakers worried about deep cuts, adding, “We won’t go too crazy” with spending reductions. Meanwhile, House GOP leaders reaffirmed their commitment to pass Trump's bill by July 4, saying they will "immediately" consider the Senate’s reconciliation bill, adding they will send it to the president by the self-imposed 4 July deadline. “The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump’s full America First agenda by the Fourth of July,” said the statement from Speaker Mike Johnson, Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Majority Whip Tom Emmer and Conference Chair Lisa McClain. “The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay.” Know about 'Big Beautiful Bill' The legislation spans 940 pages and carries a price tag of $3.3 trillion, nearly $800 billion more than the House’s earlier version. Moreover, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis, the bill includes: • Permanent extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts • Increased funding for the military and border security • Major Medicaid reductions • A ban on federal funding for nearly 30 gender-transition medical procedures The bill is set to slash social welfare programs and add an eye-watering $3 trillion to the national debt.

The bill will now head back to the House for final approval. Earlier, Trump has hinted at some flexibility on his July 4 deadline for the bill to be put on his desk.&nbsp;

US Senate narrowly passes Trump's sweeping 'Big Beautiful' tax and spending bill - Vance breaks 50-50 tie

As US President Donald Trump's US Agency for International Development (USAID) funding cuts, former presidents Barack Obama and George W Bush have criticised the closure of USAID, in a video farewell for USAID staffers on its last day as an independent organisation.In a recorded message played in a video conference for USAID staffers on Monday, Obama said that dismantling the agency was “a colossal mistake”.“Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it’s a tragedy. Because it’s some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world,” Obama said. He further predicted that "sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realise how much you are needed."While, Bush while talking about the cuts to the &nbsp;President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar), which helps in saving over 25 million lives, said, "Is it in our national interests that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is, and so do you.”&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>'Over 14 million people could die'</h2>&nbsp;This comes after a study highlighted that more than 14 million of the world's most vulnerable people could die by 2030 because of Trump's cuts.A new study published in 'The Lancet' alongside a United Nations conference in Spain warned that the rollback of humanitarian funding initiated under the US president could erase two decades of health gains.Study co-author Davide Rasella, a researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) warned that the funding cuts "risk abruptly halting -- and even reversing -- two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations"He further stressed that the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict for many low and middle-income countries."Now is the time to scale up, not scale back," Rasella said.Notably, the international team of researchers collected data from over 133 nations and assessed that between 2001 and 2021 USAID funding had prevented 91.8 million deaths in developing countries.The figure even exceeds the projected death toll of World War II.The USAID has provided over 40 per cent of global humanitarian funding until Trump returned to the White House, for his second term.But, just two weeks later, Trump's closest ally and advisor Elon Musk boasted to put the agency "through the woodchipper".<h2>Trump’s USAID closure a ‘travesty’</h2>&nbsp;

In a recorded message played in a video conference for USAID staffers on Monday, Obama said that dismantling the agency was “a colossal mistake”.

As US President Donald Trump's US Agency for International Development (USAID) funding cuts, former presidents Barack Obama and George W Bush have criticised the closure of USAID, in a video farewell for USAID staffers on its last day as an independent organisation. In a recorded message played in a video conference for USAID staffers on Monday, Obama said that dismantling the agency was “a colossal mistake”. “Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it’s a tragedy. Because it’s some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world,” Obama said. He further predicted that "sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realise how much you are needed." While, Bush while talking about the cuts to the President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar), which helps in saving over 25 million lives, said, "Is it in our national interests that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is, and so do you.” 'Over 14 million people could die' This comes after a study highlighted that more than 14 million of the world's most vulnerable people could die by 2030 because of Trump's cuts. A new study published in 'The Lancet' alongside a United Nations conference in Spain warned that the rollback of humanitarian funding initiated under the US president could erase two decades of health gains. Study co-author Davide Rasella, a researcher at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) warned that the funding cuts "risk abruptly halting -- and even reversing -- two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations" He further stressed that the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict for many low and middle-income countries. "Now is the time to scale up, not scale back," Rasella said. Notably, the international team of researchers collected data from over 133 nations and assessed that between 2001 and 2021 USAID funding had prevented 91.8 million deaths in developing countries. The figure even exceeds the projected death toll of World War II. The USAID has provided over 40 per cent of global humanitarian funding until Trump returned to the White House, for his second term. But, just two weeks later, Trump's closest ally and advisor Elon Musk boasted to put the agency "through the woodchipper". Trump’s USAID closure a ‘travesty’

In a recorded message played in a video conference for USAID staffers on Monday, Obama said that dismantling the agency was “a colossal mistake”.

'A travesty and tragedy': Obama, Bush come together to slam Trump's foreign aid cut after study warns over 14 million people could die

The United States Senate has entered the longest vote-a-rama in its history as lawmakers debate President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending package, officially titled the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill.’ By Tuesday, Senators had voted on 45 separate amendments and procedural motions, breaking the previous record of 44 votes during a budget resolution debate back in 2008. The rapid-fire session, which started on Monday afternoon, ran into the early hours of Tuesday.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/doge-to-investigate-dogefather-trump-says-doge-monster-should-eat-musk-amid-row-over-one-big-beautiful-bill-1751373603423">DOGE to investigate 'Dogefather'? Trump says 'DOGE monster should eat Musk' amid row over 'One Big Beautiful Bill'</a><h2>Trump open to deadline shift</h2>Speaking to reporters, Trump acknowledged that passing the bill before Friday’s Independence Day holiday may be unrealistic. “I’d love to do July 4, but I think it’s very hard to do July 4. I would say maybe July 4, or somewhere around there,” he said. He also attempted to reassure lawmakers worried about deep cuts, adding, “We won’t go too crazy” with spending reductions.<h2>What is a vote-a-rama?</h2>The vote-a-rama process allows senators to introduce and vote on an unlimited number of amendments to budget or reconciliation bills in rapid succession. It’s a rare and chaotic tradition made possible under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and often used to bypass the usual 60-vote threshold needed to pass most legislation.This year’s vote-a-rama began on Monday and was still going strong past midnight. “Hopefully, on the home stretch and then we’ll see where the votes are,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters.<h2>What’s inside Trump’s ‘big, beautiful’ bill?</h2>The legislation spans 940 pages and carries a price tag of $3.3 trillion, nearly $800 billion more than the House’s earlier version. According to a Congressional Budget Office analysis, it includes:• Permanent extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts• Increased funding for the military and border security• Major Medicaid reductions• A ban on federal funding for nearly 30 gender-transition medical proceduresThe bill is facing opposition from Democrats and even some conservatives concerned about its impact on the national debt, which currently stands at over&nbsp;$36&nbsp;trillion.

By Tuesday, Senators had voted on 45 separate amendments and procedural motions, breaking the previous record of 44 votes during a budget resolution debate back in 2008. The rapid-fire session, which started on Monday afternoon, ran into the early hours of Tuesday.

The United States Senate has entered the longest vote-a-rama in its history as lawmakers debate President Donald Trump’s sweeping tax and spending package, officially titled the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill.’ By Tuesday, Senators had voted on 45 separate amendments and procedural motions, breaking the previous record of 44 votes during a budget resolution debate back in 2008. The rapid-fire session, which started on Monday afternoon, ran into the early hours of Tuesday. Also read: DOGE to investigate 'Dogefather'? Trump says 'DOGE monster should eat Musk' amid row over 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Trump open to deadline shift Speaking to reporters, Trump acknowledged that passing the bill before Friday’s Independence Day holiday may be unrealistic. “I’d love to do July 4, but I think it’s very hard to do July 4. I would say maybe July 4, or somewhere around there,” he said. He also attempted to reassure lawmakers worried about deep cuts, adding, “We won’t go too crazy” with spending reductions. What is a vote-a-rama? The vote-a-rama process allows senators to introduce and vote on an unlimited number of amendments to budget or reconciliation bills in rapid succession. It’s a rare and chaotic tradition made possible under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and often used to bypass the usual 60-vote threshold needed to pass most legislation. This year’s vote-a-rama began on Monday and was still going strong past midnight. “Hopefully, on the home stretch and then we’ll see where the votes are,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters. What’s inside Trump’s ‘big, beautiful’ bill? The legislation spans 940 pages and carries a price tag of $3.3 trillion, nearly $800 billion more than the House’s earlier version. According to a Congressional Budget Office analysis, it includes: • Permanent extension of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts • Increased funding for the military and border security • Major Medicaid reductions • A ban on federal funding for nearly 30 gender-transition medical procedures The bill is facing opposition from Democrats and even some conservatives concerned about its impact on the national debt, which currently stands at over $36 trillion.

By Tuesday, Senators had voted on 45 separate amendments and procedural motions, breaking the previous record of 44 votes during a budget resolution debate back in 2008. The rapid-fire session, which started on Monday afternoon, ran into the early hours of Tuesday.

Vote on Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ underway: ‘Vote-a-rama’ becomes longest in Senate history - What is Vote-a-rama? | Explained

Billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk once again slammed the "Big Beautiful Bill" of the US President Donald Trump. Taking to his social media platform X, Musk reshared a poll on the bill and wrote, “Polls show that this bill is political suicide for the Republican Party." In a consecutive post, Musk called the bill “utterly insane and destructive.” “The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!” he wrote, adding that the bill was “utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.”&nbsp;A screenshot of the poll, shared by Trump, said, "Elon Musk claims that this legislation is an outrageous pork-filled spending bill that will massively increase the budget deficit and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." The poll, conducted by The Tarrance Group, showed that 58 per cent of the total voters in the November presidential election voted in agreement with Trump's bill. Meanwhile, 37 per cent disagree with it, and the first 5 per cent of the voters were unsure about it.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Polls show that this bill is political suicide for the Republican Party <a href="https://t.co/HJwKZ9g4tu">pic.twitter.com/HJwKZ9g4tu</a>&mdash; Elon Musk (@elonmusk) <a href="https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1939069416756650401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

'Split government is better for the people'&nbsp;Musk was also featured in a podcast with Mario Nawfal on X, where he said he was "not a huge Republican." “I’m not a huge Republican. I’m a huge moderate, actually," Musk said. &nbsp;"You want laws that serve the people, not just a small segment. When power is split, the laws passed are more likely to be in the public’s interest," Trump's former "buddy" added.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨ELON: “SPLIT GOVERNMENT IS BETTER FOR THE PEOPLE” “I’m not a huge Republican. I’m a huge moderate, actually. You want laws that serve the people, not just a small segment. When power is split, the laws passed are more likely to be in the public’s interest.” Source:… <a href="https://t.co/Z75PfcjB6u">https://t.co/Z75PfcjB6u</a> <a href="https://t.co/Y2i49eJfK8">pic.twitter.com/Y2i49eJfK8</a>&mdash; Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/1939371284166492284?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 29, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Previous fallout&nbsp;This all came after Musk left the Trump administration's DOGE and called the bill a “disgusting abomination."“I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,” Musk posted in early June on X.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The poll, conducted by The Tarrance Group, showed that 58 per cent of the total voters in the November presidential election voted in agreement with Trump bill.

Billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk once again slammed the "Big Beautiful Bill" of the US President Donald Trump. Taking to his social media platform X, Musk reshared a poll on the bill and wrote, “Polls show that this bill is political suicide for the Republican Party." In a consecutive post, Musk called the bill “utterly insane and destructive.” “The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!” he wrote, adding that the bill was “utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.” A screenshot of the poll, shared by Trump, said, "Elon Musk claims that this legislation is an outrageous pork-filled spending bill that will massively increase the budget deficit and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt." The poll, conducted by The Tarrance Group, showed that 58 per cent of the total voters in the November presidential election voted in agreement with Trump's bill. Meanwhile, 37 per cent disagree with it, and the first 5 per cent of the voters were unsure about it.

The poll, conducted by The Tarrance Group, showed that 58 per cent of the total voters in the November presidential election voted in agreement with Trump's bill.

'Political suicide, split govt better': Musk continues tirade against Trump's Big Beautiful Bill. Here's what he says now

A debate on President Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” of tax breaks and sweeping cuts to healthcare and food programmes was initiated by the United States Senate on Sunday ahead of Monday's session. The bill was narrowly passed by the House last month, and since then, Senate Republicans have been working to put their mark on the legislation in order to avoid the delicate balance in the lower chamber.According to a report in CBS News, the House will be required to approve the changes to the bill by the Senate before it reaches the desk of the president for signature. Meanwhile, lawmakers are going ahead quickly to get the measure signed by July 4.The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the legislation would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the coming years. The bill will increase spending for border security, energy production, and defence, which are offset in part by cuts to healthcare and nutrition programs.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-senate-rejects-bid-to-curb-trump-s-war-powers-on-iran-potus-can-strike-tehran-again-whenever-he-wants-without-congress-authorisation-1751069697657">US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump’s war powers on Iran; POTUS can strike Tehran again, whenever he wants, without Congress authorisation</a>Senate Republicans pushed the legislation forward late Saturday, with all but two GOP senators backing the move after hours of delay spent resolving last-minute concerns and negotiating changes to win over sceptics. The procedural vote remained open for more than three hours as Republican leaders offered reassurances and adjusted parts of the bill to gain the necessary support.Meanwhile, Senate Democrats slowed the process by forcing a full reading of the bill, which began late Saturday and lasted nearly 16 hours. Once the reading ended, formal debate began, with each side allotted 10 hours. Democrats are expected to use all their time to strongly oppose the bill.<h3>When will the Senate begin a "vote-a-rama"?</h3>The GOP is advancing the measure using the budget reconciliation process, which enables the majority party to pass legislation without needing bipartisan support. This approach only requires a simple majority rather than the usual 60-vote threshold, leaving Democrats with limited tools to stop the bill.In addition, the Senate will begin a "vote-a-rama," after the debate, in which it could offer an unlimited number of amendments and force the chamber to cast vote after vote. The process was likely to begin in the early morning on Monday, but the Senate added on late Sunday that once the debate ended, it would not reconvene until 9 a.m.With a 53-seat majority, Senate Republican leaders can afford to lose the backing of only three members—any more would require Vice President JD Vance to cast a tie-breaking vote. While several GOP senators who had earlier opposed the measure ultimately voted to advance it on Saturday, their stance on the final vote remains uncertain.Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated on Saturday that “it’s time to get this legislation across the finish line,” noting that full agreement among all 53 members is unrealistic. However, he emphasised that Republicans remain “united in our commitment to the goals of this bill.” &nbsp;

Senate Republicans pushed the legislation forward late Saturday, with all but two GOP senators backing the move after hours of delay spent resolving last-minute concerns and negotiating changes to win over sceptics.

A debate on President Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” of tax breaks and sweeping cuts to healthcare and food programmes was initiated by the United States Senate on Sunday ahead of Monday's session. The bill was narrowly passed by the House last month, and since then, Senate Republicans have been working to put their mark on the legislation in order to avoid the delicate balance in the lower chamber. According to a report in CBS News, the House will be required to approve the changes to the bill by the Senate before it reaches the desk of the president for signature. Meanwhile, lawmakers are going ahead quickly to get the measure signed by July 4. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the legislation would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the coming years. The bill will increase spending for border security, energy production, and defence, which are offset in part by cuts to healthcare and nutrition programs. Also read: US Senate rejects bid to curb Trump’s war powers on Iran; POTUS can strike Tehran again, whenever he wants, without Congress authorisation Senate Republicans pushed the legislation forward late Saturday, with all but two GOP senators backing the move after hours of delay spent resolving last-minute concerns and negotiating changes to win over sceptics. The procedural vote remained open for more than three hours as Republican leaders offered reassurances and adjusted parts of the bill to gain the necessary support. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats slowed the process by forcing a full reading of the bill, which began late Saturday and lasted nearly 16 hours. Once the reading ended, formal debate began, with each side allotted 10 hours. Democrats are expected to use all their time to strongly oppose the bill. When will the Senate begin a "vote-a-rama"? The GOP is advancing the measure using the budget reconciliation process, which enables the majority party to pass legislation without needing bipartisan support. This approach only requires a simple majority rather than the usual 60-vote threshold, leaving Democrats with limited tools to stop the bill. In addition, the Senate will begin a "vote-a-rama," after the debate, in which it could offer an unlimited number of amendments and force the chamber to cast vote after vote. The process was likely to begin in the early morning on Monday, but the Senate added on late Sunday that once the debate ended, it would not reconvene until 9 a.m. With a 53-seat majority, Senate Republican leaders can afford to lose the backing of only three members—any more would require Vice President JD Vance to cast a tie-breaking vote. While several GOP senators who had earlier opposed the measure ultimately voted to advance it on Saturday, their stance on the final vote remains uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated on Saturday that “it’s time to get this legislation across the finish line,” noting that full agreement among all 53 members is unrealistic. However, he emphasised that Republicans remain “united in our commitment to the goals of this bill.”

Senate Republicans pushed the legislation forward late Saturday, with all but two GOP senators backing the move after hours of delay spent resolving last-minute concerns and negotiating changes to win over sceptics.

US Senate begins debate on Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ ahead of final vote

With less than ten days remaining before the United States imposes sweeping tariff hikes on several trading partners, President Donald Trump has called trade with Japan “unfair” and signalled that the 25 per cent tariffs on automobiles may remain in place unless a new deal is reached. Trump’s remarks, made during a Fox News interview aired June 29, raise fresh concerns about a potential breakdown in trade negotiations that could significantly harm Japan’s already fragile economic recovery.“They won’t take our cars, and yet we take millions and millions of their cars into the United States. It’s not fair,” Trump said, referencing Japan’s limited import of US vehicles while dominating the American market. “I could send one [letter] to Japan. ‘Dear Mr Japan, here’s the story. You’re going to pay a 25 per cent tariff on your cars,’” he added. Trump also suggested Japan could help reduce the bilateral trade deficit by purchasing more American oil and goods. “Now we have oil. They could take a lot of oil. They could take a lot of other things,” he said.The Trump administration’s temporary suspension of country-based reciprocal tariffs expires on July 9. Without a deal, Japan faces not only the continuation of existing 25 per cent automobile tariffs but also a jump in broader duties from the current 10 per cent to as high as 24 per cent. These proposed levies would hit key export sectors, especially autos, which account for about 28 per cent of Japan’s $145 billion in annual exports to the US.<h2>Japan’s trade envoy pushes for breakthrough</h2>In response to the pressure, Japan’s chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, flew to Washington last week for a seventh round of talks with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. While the initial meeting was held in person, two subsequent conversations took place over the phone, indicating urgency but also unresolved sticking points. Japanese government statements over the weekend described the discussions as “fruitful” but offered no concrete signs of progress.Akazawa has pushed for a comprehensive agreement that includes sector-specific tariff relief, especially for autos. He emphasised that Japan’s automakers have invested more than $60 billion in the US, creating 2.3 million American jobs, and warned that the 25 per cent tariff is “unacceptable”.<h2>Falling exports underscore growing risks</h2>Trade data for May reinforces Tokyo’s concerns. Japanese exports fell for the first time in eight months, dropping 1.7 per cent year-on-year, while exports to the US plunged 11.1 per cent. The downturn reflects the chilling effect of looming tariffs, which had already prompted companies to front-load shipments earlier this year. Imports also fell 7.7 per cent, leading to a trade deficit of 637.6 billion yen ($4.39 billion) in May.Economists warn that if the full range of US tariffs goes into effect, Japan’s exports to the US could fall by 20-30 per cent, shaving up to 1 percentage point from GDP and risking a technical recession after the economy already contracted in the first quarter. While Trump maintains that the US can unilaterally set its trade terms, failure to reach a deal with Japan could deal a major blow to both countries’ economic outlooks.

Tokyo is trying to strike a trade deal with the United States as July 9 tariff deadline looms; falling exports are adding pressure to the fragile Japanese economy.

With less than ten days remaining before the United States imposes sweeping tariff hikes on several trading partners, President Donald Trump has called trade with Japan “unfair” and signalled that the 25 per cent tariffs on automobiles may remain in place unless a new deal is reached. Trump’s remarks, made during a Fox News interview aired June 29, raise fresh concerns about a potential breakdown in trade negotiations that could significantly harm Japan’s already fragile economic recovery. “They won’t take our cars, and yet we take millions and millions of their cars into the United States. It’s not fair,” Trump said, referencing Japan’s limited import of US vehicles while dominating the American market. “I could send one [letter] to Japan. ‘Dear Mr Japan, here’s the story. You’re going to pay a 25 per cent tariff on your cars,’” he added. Trump also suggested Japan could help reduce the bilateral trade deficit by purchasing more American oil and goods. “Now we have oil. They could take a lot of oil. They could take a lot of other things,” he said. The Trump administration’s temporary suspension of country-based reciprocal tariffs expires on July 9. Without a deal, Japan faces not only the continuation of existing 25 per cent automobile tariffs but also a jump in broader duties from the current 10 per cent to as high as 24 per cent. These proposed levies would hit key export sectors, especially autos, which account for about 28 per cent of Japan’s $145 billion in annual exports to the US. Japan’s trade envoy pushes for breakthrough In response to the pressure, Japan’s chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, flew to Washington last week for a seventh round of talks with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. While the initial meeting was held in person, two subsequent conversations took place over the phone, indicating urgency but also unresolved sticking points. Japanese government statements over the weekend described the discussions as “fruitful” but offered no concrete signs of progress. Akazawa has pushed for a comprehensive agreement that includes sector-specific tariff relief, especially for autos. He emphasised that Japan’s automakers have invested more than $60 billion in the US, creating 2.3 million American jobs, and warned that the 25 per cent tariff is “unacceptable”. Falling exports underscore growing risks Trade data for May reinforces Tokyo’s concerns. Japanese exports fell for the first time in eight months, dropping 1.7 per cent year-on-year, while exports to the US plunged 11.1 per cent. The downturn reflects the chilling effect of looming tariffs, which had already prompted companies to front-load shipments earlier this year. Imports also fell 7.7 per cent, leading to a trade deficit of 637.6 billion yen ($4.39 billion) in May. Economists warn that if the full range of US tariffs goes into effect, Japan’s exports to the US could fall by 20-30 per cent, shaving up to 1 percentage point from GDP and risking a technical recession after the economy already contracted in the first quarter. While Trump maintains that the US can unilaterally set its trade terms, failure to reach a deal with Japan could deal a major blow to both countries’ economic outlooks.

Tokyo is trying to strike a trade deal with the United States as July 9 tariff deadline looms; falling exports are adding pressure to the fragile Japanese economy.

Trump threatens Japan with 25% auto tariffs ahead of deadline, citing ‘unfair’ trade

US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his intention not to extend the self-imposed July 9 deadline for countries to reach new trade agreements with the United States, signalling that tariffs of up to 25 per cent or more could soon take effect on nations with which the US has not finalised deals by then. Speaking in a taped interview on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures, aired June 29, Trump said, “I don’t think I’ll need to” extend the cutoff, though he added, “I could, no big deal.”The president emphasised his preference for sticking to the deadline, even joking on June 27 that he would rather shorten it and simply notify nations, “Congratulations, you’re paying 25 per cent.” He noted that formal letters notifying countries of impending tariffs would begin going out “pretty soon”.The July 9 cutoff marks the end of a 90-day negotiating window, initially set when the administration suspended sweeping country-based tariffs announced on ‘Liberation Day’ in April. Trump and his trade advisers have used the period to push for agreements aimed at reducing trade deficits and dismantling barriers that disadvantage US goods and services.<h2>Internal doubts persist</h2>However, internal differences over the feasibility of the timeline have surfaced. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, in an interview on Fox Business, cast doubt on the administration’s ability to finalise deals with all major trading partners by July 9. “If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18—there are another 20 important relationships—then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day,” Bessent said. His remarks highlight a more pragmatic approach within the administration, contrasting with Trump’s public hardline posture.Negotiations are ongoing with several nations, including India, which Trump suggested could be close to reaching an agreement. Indian trade officials recently held meetings in Washington. However, even the high-profile UK trade pact, once touted by the administration as a major breakthrough, still contains unresolved issues. Similarly, the recently concluded China agreement leaves significant gaps, especially around enforcement of fentanyl trafficking rules and US market access.Trump’s insistence on a hard deadline underscores his administration’s effort to maintain negotiating leverage. But critics warn that pushing nations too aggressively could result in shallow, hastily made deals or, worse, the imposition of disruptive tariffs that may harm US businesses and consumers.The president also touched on other major topics during his interview, including a pending deal involving TikTok, suggesting a group of “very wealthy people” were close to acquiring the platform. He hinted that Chinese approval might be required and promised more details “in about two weeks”, a familiar refrain in his policy announcements.

The Trump administration faces internal doubts about the tariff timeline; US trade pacts remain incomplete with most of its trading partners.

US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his intention not to extend the self-imposed July 9 deadline for countries to reach new trade agreements with the United States, signalling that tariffs of up to 25 per cent or more could soon take effect on nations with which the US has not finalised deals by then. Speaking in a taped interview on Fox News’s Sunday Morning Futures, aired June 29, Trump said, “I don’t think I’ll need to” extend the cutoff, though he added, “I could, no big deal.” The president emphasised his preference for sticking to the deadline, even joking on June 27 that he would rather shorten it and simply notify nations, “Congratulations, you’re paying 25 per cent.” He noted that formal letters notifying countries of impending tariffs would begin going out “pretty soon”. The July 9 cutoff marks the end of a 90-day negotiating window, initially set when the administration suspended sweeping country-based tariffs announced on ‘Liberation Day’ in April. Trump and his trade advisers have used the period to push for agreements aimed at reducing trade deficits and dismantling barriers that disadvantage US goods and services. Internal doubts persist However, internal differences over the feasibility of the timeline have surfaced. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, in an interview on Fox Business, cast doubt on the administration’s ability to finalise deals with all major trading partners by July 9. “If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18—there are another 20 important relationships—then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day,” Bessent said. His remarks highlight a more pragmatic approach within the administration, contrasting with Trump’s public hardline posture. Negotiations are ongoing with several nations, including India, which Trump suggested could be close to reaching an agreement. Indian trade officials recently held meetings in Washington. However, even the high-profile UK trade pact, once touted by the administration as a major breakthrough, still contains unresolved issues. Similarly, the recently concluded China agreement leaves significant gaps, especially around enforcement of fentanyl trafficking rules and US market access. Trump’s insistence on a hard deadline underscores his administration’s effort to maintain negotiating leverage. But critics warn that pushing nations too aggressively could result in shallow, hastily made deals or, worse, the imposition of disruptive tariffs that may harm US businesses and consumers. The president also touched on other major topics during his interview, including a pending deal involving TikTok, suggesting a group of “very wealthy people” were close to acquiring the platform. He hinted that Chinese approval might be required and promised more details “in about two weeks”, a familiar refrain in his policy announcements.

The Trump administration faces internal doubts about the tariff timeline; US trade pacts remain incomplete with most of its trading partners.

Trump says he’ll stick to July 9 tariff deadline, warns countries to finalise trade deals

US President Donald Trump called the pinpoint precision bombing of three nuclear facilities in Iran on June 21 “a spectacular military success” and there is no doubt that it was a stunning display of American military might. Hard power without equal.But Operation Midnight Hammer, as the Pentagon termed it, also served as a reminder that under Trump, the United States pays little attention to soft power, the ability to influence other countries through attraction and persuasion. In the international information war waged around the world, Trump’s America tends to fare badly.That was highlighted again in the aftermath of the strike on the Iranian facilities with 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs never before used in war. No other country has a bomb that can penetrate 250 feet of solid rock. &nbsp;Four days after the strikes on nuclear enrichment facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, one of the oldest and best-known instruments of US soft power, the Voice of America, was the subject of heated discussion in the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives.Kari Lake, the top advisor of the US Agency for Global Media, which includes the Voice of America, was called to defend her decision to abolish the broadcaster. Founded in 1942 to combat Nazi propaganda, it grew into a multi-media operation broadcasting in almost 50 languages and claiming a weekly global audience of more than 350 million people.Trump ordered VOA dismantled when he began his second term. By the time of the strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, around 85 per cent of the workforce had been fired. They included almost all journalists running the Persian-language service.&nbsp;If ever independent news were important for Iranians, it was when Israel and Iran began exchanging missile strikes, one of which hit the Iranian State TV and Radio Station at the moment a chador-clad anchor began her programme and had to run out of the studio seconds before the lights went out. &nbsp;In Washington, even ardent critics of VOA realised the importance of news unfiltered by Iranian propaganda. The government hastily ordered the Farsi-speaking staff to return to work from “administrative leave.” &nbsp;The Persian service had been shut down by an executive order Trump issued on March 15. The abrupt dismissal of the staff prompted various lawsuits.Though the need to recall the fired staff spoke volumes of the administration’s inept handling of the global information war, Kari Lake, on behalf of her boss, kept insisting that VOA must go.“Some say it’s the Voice of anti-America,” she told the hearing, a reference to oft-repeated charges that the broadcaster’s staffers were “left-wing radicals.” Lake added: “Hopefully, we can root out the Russian, Chinese, Iranian propaganda that has been prevalent on our airwaves at VOA and we are going to work to do that.”Lake suggested that the purpose of the broadcaster is “to promote President Trump’s message to people around the world. She sharply criticised VOA coverage of Trump in the run-up to the 2024 elections and accused the organisation of pro-Chinese Communist Party propaganda.Democrats on the committee interpreted her remarks as evidence she was on a mission to turn VOA into an international mouthpiece for President Trump.America’s adversaries around the world have had fulsome praise for the administration’s apparent mission to dismantle its global influence and information structure, chief of all the media that, in the words of the New York Times media analyst Tiffany Hsu “helped market the United States as the world’s moral and cultural authority.”America’s competitors in the influence market were overjoyed by VOA’s demise. Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of RT, the Kremlin-backed news network, &nbsp;said “this is a holiday for me and my colleagues.” Praise also came from China. Hu Xijin, former editor-in-chief of Global Times, &nbsp;a Chinese government outlet, commented that dismantling VOA was “really gratifying.” &nbsp;Both China and Russia are now spending more money and effort on the information war that runs parallel to hard power moves. In Trump’s first term, attempts to deeply cut budgets for international development and diplomacy failed to pass Congress. &nbsp;The main reason: opposition from the then leaders of the Armed Forces, who argued that military might alone could not solve America’s conflicts and should be complemented by soft power. The present top leaders of the Pentagon are inclined to bow to the president’s wishes. &nbsp;Across the Atlantic, the British government is going into the opposite direction from the Americans. The British Broadcasting Service (BBC) is held in high esteem and members of the parliament recently clamoured for more funding for a network with a sterling reputation and followers around the world.“The BBC plays an indispensable role in the fight against misinformation,’ the meeting was told, with speakers noting that “where services have been cut, we have seen other countries rush in to fill the space.” &nbsp;Perhaps the most devastating criticism of the Trump administration’s failure to appreciate the importance of its international media assets has come from Jamie Sheah, a British former NATO official.“The soft power suicide of the U.S. will be incomprehensible for future historians who will be dumbfounded in their attempts to explain why the global leader voluntarily wrecked one of its greatest national assets.”&nbsp;

Operation Midnight Hammer, as the Pentagon termed it, also served as a reminder that under Trump, the United States pays little attention to soft power, the ability to influence other countries through attraction and persuasion. 

US President Donald Trump called the pinpoint precision bombing of three nuclear facilities in Iran on June 21 “a spectacular military success” and there is no doubt that it was a stunning display of American military might. Hard power without equal. But Operation Midnight Hammer, as the Pentagon termed it, also served as a reminder that under Trump, the United States pays little attention to soft power, the ability to influence other countries through attraction and persuasion. In the international information war waged around the world, Trump’s America tends to fare badly. That was highlighted again in the aftermath of the strike on the Iranian facilities with 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs never before used in war. No other country has a bomb that can penetrate 250 feet of solid rock. Four days after the strikes on nuclear enrichment facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, one of the oldest and best-known instruments of US soft power, the Voice of America, was the subject of heated discussion in the Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Representatives. Kari Lake, the top advisor of the US Agency for Global Media, which includes the Voice of America, was called to defend her decision to abolish the broadcaster. Founded in 1942 to combat Nazi propaganda, it grew into a multi-media operation broadcasting in almost 50 languages and claiming a weekly global audience of more than 350 million people. Trump ordered VOA dismantled when he began his second term. By the time of the strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, around 85 per cent of the workforce had been fired. They included almost all journalists running the Persian-language service. If ever independent news were important for Iranians, it was when Israel and Iran began exchanging missile strikes, one of which hit the Iranian State TV and Radio Station at the moment a chador-clad anchor began her programme and had to run out of the studio seconds before the lights went out. In Washington, even ardent critics of VOA realised the importance of news unfiltered by Iranian propaganda. The government hastily ordered the Farsi-speaking staff to return to work from “administrative leave.” The Persian service had been shut down by an executive order Trump issued on March 15. The abrupt dismissal of the staff prompted various lawsuits. Though the need to recall the fired staff spoke volumes of the administration’s inept handling of the global information war, Kari Lake, on behalf of her boss, kept insisting that VOA must go. “Some say it’s the Voice of anti-America,” she told the hearing, a reference to oft-repeated charges that the broadcaster’s staffers were “left-wing radicals.” Lake added: “Hopefully, we can root out the Russian, Chinese, Iranian propaganda that has been prevalent on our airwaves at VOA and we are going to work to do that.” Lake suggested that the purpose of the broadcaster is “to promote President Trump’s message to people around the world. She sharply criticised VOA coverage of Trump in the run-up to the 2024 elections and accused the organisation of pro-Chinese Communist Party propaganda. Democrats on the committee interpreted her remarks as evidence she was on a mission to turn VOA into an international mouthpiece for President Trump. America’s adversaries around the world have had fulsome praise for the administration’s apparent mission to dismantle its global influence and information structure, chief of all the media that, in the words of the New York Times media analyst Tiffany Hsu “helped market the United States as the world’s moral and cultural authority.” America’s competitors in the influence market were overjoyed by VOA’s demise. Margarita Simonyan, the editor-in-chief of RT, the Kremlin-backed news network, said “this is a holiday for me and my colleagues.” Praise also came from China. Hu Xijin, former editor-in-chief of Global Times, a Chinese government outlet, commented that dismantling VOA was “really gratifying.” Both China and Russia are now spending more money and effort on the information war that runs parallel to hard power moves. In Trump’s first term, attempts to deeply cut budgets for international development and diplomacy failed to pass Congress. The main reason: opposition from the then leaders of the Armed Forces, who argued that military might alone could not solve America’s conflicts and should be complemented by soft power. The present top leaders of the Pentagon are inclined to bow to the president’s wishes. Across the Atlantic, the British government is going into the opposite direction from the Americans. The British Broadcasting Service (BBC) is held in high esteem and members of the parliament recently clamoured for more funding for a network with a sterling reputation and followers around the world. “The BBC plays an indispensable role in the fight against misinformation,’ the meeting was told, with speakers noting that “where services have been cut, we have seen other countries rush in to fill the space.” Perhaps the most devastating criticism of the Trump administration’s failure to appreciate the importance of its international media assets has come from Jamie Sheah, a British former NATO official. “The soft power suicide of the U.S. will be incomprehensible for future historians who will be dumbfounded in their attempts to explain why the global leader voluntarily wrecked one of its greatest national assets.”

Operation Midnight Hammer, as the Pentagon termed it, also served as a reminder that under Trump, the United States pays little attention to soft power, the ability to influence other countries through attraction and persuasion.&nbsp;

US-Iran conflict: A spectacular military win, another information war loss

US President Donald Trump has shared an article on Truth Social about the postponement of the trial against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, just hours after he demanded that the proceedings should end. Earlier on Sunday, the Jerusalem District Court agreed to cancel Netanyahu’s scheduled days of testimony in his criminal trial for this week, after Netanyahu appeared before the judges in a closed-door hearing to lay out the reasons the hearings must be put off, and not due to Trump’s demand. The Jerusalem District Court agreed to postpone Israeli PM’s corruption trial—just hours after Trump called for the case to be dropped while suggesting that American aid could hang in the balance over the decision.The court revealed Sunday that Netanyahu will not have to testify for the next two weeks due to diplomatic and national security issues, two days after the judge initially rejected the premier’s repeated requests to postpone the trial, and Trump promptly jumped in to claim credit.&nbsp;Trump had slammed the corruption trial against Netanyahu as a “political witch hunt” and called on Israel to drop the corruption charges.&nbsp;“It is terrible what they are doing in Israel to Bibi Netanyahu,” Trump wrote. “He is a War Hero, and a Prime Minister who did a fabulous job working with the United States to bring Great Success in getting rid of the dangerous Nuclear threat in Iran.”“The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,” he warned.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Trump also said that keeping Netanyahu occupied with the trial would hinder the efforts for a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release.“Thank you again, @realDonaldTrump. Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again!” Netanyahu replied.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Thank you again, <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a>. Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again! <a href="https://t.co/hfkct0Sqw7">https://t.co/hfkct0Sqw7</a>&mdash; Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) <a href="https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/1939225607658704916?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 29, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

A White House official said Trump made the personal decision to back the embattled prime minister during the ride back from the NATO summit last week, Axios reported.The leader of the opposition Democrats party, Yair Golan, said prolonging the war in Gaza personally benefits Netanyahu, who has set a goal of fighting until the terror group is completely eliminated without any timeline.“Trump’s proposal proves: The hostages are held by Hamas, but they are captive to Netanyahu’s interests,” Golan wrote on X.&nbsp;Netanyahu stands accused of accepting more than $200,000 from wealthy businessmen and granting regulatory benefits worth hundreds of millions of dollars to a telecom owner in exchange for favourable news coverage.Netanyahu claims that the charges are fabricated and part of a political coup, with his allies slamming the case as “judicial overreach.”

The Jerusalem District Court agreed to postpone Israeli PM’s corruption trial—just hours after Trump called for the case to be dropped while suggesting that American aid could hang in the balance over the decision.

US President Donald Trump has shared an article on Truth Social about the postponement of the trial against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, just hours after he demanded that the proceedings should end. Earlier on Sunday, the Jerusalem District Court agreed to cancel Netanyahu’s scheduled days of testimony in his criminal trial for this week, after Netanyahu appeared before the judges in a closed-door hearing to lay out the reasons the hearings must be put off, and not due to Trump’s demand. The Jerusalem District Court agreed to postpone Israeli PM’s corruption trial—just hours after Trump called for the case to be dropped while suggesting that American aid could hang in the balance over the decision. The court revealed Sunday that Netanyahu will not have to testify for the next two weeks due to diplomatic and national security issues, two days after the judge initially rejected the premier’s repeated requests to postpone the trial, and Trump promptly jumped in to claim credit. Trump had slammed the corruption trial against Netanyahu as a “political witch hunt” and called on Israel to drop the corruption charges. “It is terrible what they are doing in Israel to Bibi Netanyahu,” Trump wrote. “He is a War Hero, and a Prime Minister who did a fabulous job working with the United States to bring Great Success in getting rid of the dangerous Nuclear threat in Iran.” “The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,” he warned.

The Jerusalem District Court agreed to postpone Israeli PM’s corruption trial—just hours after Trump called for the case to be dropped while suggesting that American aid could hang in the balance over the decision.

Trump posts article on Israeli court deferring Netanyahu’s trial hours after his call for dropping case

Eric Trump has suggested that he, or another member of the Trump family, could run for president in the future, saying the road to the White House would be an “easy one” if he chose to take it.In a recent interview with the Financial Times, the 41-year-old, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/khamenei-left-out-of-iran-israel-ceasefire-report-claims-tehran-agreed-to-trump-s-offer-without-consulting-supreme-leader-1751113614134">Khamenei left out? Iran agreed to ceasefire without consulting Supreme Leader</a>“The real question is: ‘Do you want to drag other members of your family into it?’ … Would I want my kids to live the same experience over the last decade that I’ve lived?” he said.“You know, if the answer was yes, I think the political path would be an easy one, meaning, I think I could do it. And by the way, I think other members of our family could do it too.”<h2>Politics might run in the family</h2>Unlike his siblings, Donald Jr. and Ivanka Trump, Eric has largely stayed out of the political spotlight. He has focused instead on the family’s business empire since his father first entered the White House in 2017.However, he admitted he’s kept a close watch on politics and said he’s not impressed by many of the people in office. “I’ve found myself wholly unimpressed by half the politicians I’ve seen. I think I could do the job very effectively,” he said.When asked whether the 2024 election would be the last time a Trump name appeared on the ballot, he left the door open. “I don’t know … Time will tell. But there are more people than just me,” he added. Still, he acknowledged the toll public life has taken on his family.“The question is, do you want to do it? And do you want to subject the people that you love to the brutality of this system? And I’m not sure if I can answer that question yet,” Eric said.<h2>“We didn’t profit from politics,” says Eric Trump</h2>Eric Trump also addressed long-standing accusations that the Trump family has used politics for personal profit. “If there’s one family that hasn’t profited off politics, it’s the Trump family,” he said. He argued that the presidency had actually cost the family.“In fact, I would sit there and say that we [would have] had many more zeros behind our name had my father not run in the first place. The opportunity cost, the legal cost, the toll it’s taken on our family has been astronomical,” Trump said.According to Eric, the family has spent close to $500 million defending themselves from what he called “Russia shams, fake hoaxes, [and] dirty dossiers about the unthinkable”.

Eric Trump, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost.

Eric Trump has suggested that he, or another member of the Trump family, could run for president in the future, saying the road to the White House would be an “easy one” if he chose to take it. In a recent interview with the Financial Times, the 41-year-old, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost. Also read: Khamenei left out? Iran agreed to ceasefire without consulting Supreme Leader “The real question is: ‘Do you want to drag other members of your family into it?’ … Would I want my kids to live the same experience over the last decade that I’ve lived?” he said. “You know, if the answer was yes, I think the political path would be an easy one, meaning, I think I could do it. And by the way, I think other members of our family could do it too.” Politics might run in the family Unlike his siblings, Donald Jr. and Ivanka Trump, Eric has largely stayed out of the political spotlight. He has focused instead on the family’s business empire since his father first entered the White House in 2017. However, he admitted he’s kept a close watch on politics and said he’s not impressed by many of the people in office. “I’ve found myself wholly unimpressed by half the politicians I’ve seen. I think I could do the job very effectively,” he said. When asked whether the 2024 election would be the last time a Trump name appeared on the ballot, he left the door open. “I don’t know … Time will tell. But there are more people than just me,” he added. Still, he acknowledged the toll public life has taken on his family. “The question is, do you want to do it? And do you want to subject the people that you love to the brutality of this system? And I’m not sure if I can answer that question yet,” Eric said. “We didn’t profit from politics,” says Eric Trump Eric Trump also addressed long-standing accusations that the Trump family has used politics for personal profit. “If there’s one family that hasn’t profited off politics, it’s the Trump family,” he said. He argued that the presidency had actually cost the family. “In fact, I would sit there and say that we [would have] had many more zeros behind our name had my father not run in the first place. The opportunity cost, the legal cost, the toll it’s taken on our family has been astronomical,” Trump said. According to Eric, the family has spent close to $500 million defending themselves from what he called “Russia shams, fake hoaxes, [and] dirty dossiers about the unthinkable”.

Eric Trump, who currently serves as co-executive vice-president of the Trump Organisation, said the main issue wasn’t whether he could win, but whether he wanted to subject his family to the personal cost.

Trump’s son for president next? Eric Trump hints at White House run, says it would ‘be easy’

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 27) angrily rejected media reports suggesting his administration had considered offering Iran as much as $30 billion in economic incentives to build civilian nuclear facilities in exchange for halting uranium enrichment. Slamming reports by what Trump labelled as "fake news media", Trump questioned who was the "sleazebag" saying he wants to give Iran $30 billion to build non-nuclear facilities. "Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump posted late Friday on Truth Social. On Thursday, CNN, citing anonymous sources, reported that the Trump administration was exploring economic incentives for Tehran. The report was also carried by NBC News on Friday.<h2>Ridiculous 'hoax'</h2>"Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Friday, calling the reports a "HOAX.""It’s just another HOAX put out by the Fake News in order to demean. These people are SICK!!!" he said.His comments come in response to reports by the reputed news outlets like CNN and NBC News, which, citing multiple sources, claimed that preliminary proposals were floated by US officials in recent days as part of ongoing indirect talks between Washington and Tehran. Those discussions, which began in April, are aimed at finding a diplomatic path forward for Iran's nuclear programme, which Iran says is peaceful and the US says must be prevented from reaching weapons capability.<h2>What did the reports claim the US was offering?</h2>According to the reports, one proposal involved unfreezing Iranian assets — potentially totalling up to $30 billion — in exchange for a freeze on uranium enrichment, a central demand of Western negotiators.The controversy comes just days after Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel following a brief but dangerous 12-day war that erupted on June 13. That conflict began when Israel launched a surprise wave of airstrikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites, prompting Iran to retaliate with ballistic missile strikes on a US airbase in Qatar. No casualties were reported.The US then entered the conflict directly, striking Iran's nuclear infrastructure with bunker-buster bombs and cruise missiles. According to the Pentagon, six Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs were dropped on the fortified Fordow facility, while dozens of submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeted Natanz and Isfahan.

Slamming reports by what Trump labelled as "fake news media", Trump questioned who was the "sleazebag" saying he wants to give Iran $30 billion to build non-nuclear facilities.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 27) angrily rejected media reports suggesting his administration had considered offering Iran as much as $30 billion in economic incentives to build civilian nuclear facilities in exchange for halting uranium enrichment. Slamming reports by what Trump labelled as "fake news media", Trump questioned who was the "sleazebag" saying he wants to give Iran $30 billion to build non-nuclear facilities. "Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump posted late Friday on Truth Social. On Thursday, CNN, citing anonymous sources, reported that the Trump administration was exploring economic incentives for Tehran. The report was also carried by NBC News on Friday. Ridiculous 'hoax' "Who in the Fake News Media is the SleazeBag saying that 'President Trump wants to give Iran $30 Billion to build non-military Nuclear facilities.' Never heard of this ridiculous idea," Trump wrote on Truth Social late on Friday, calling the reports a "HOAX." "It’s just another HOAX put out by the Fake News in order to demean. These people are SICK!!!" he said. His comments come in response to reports by the reputed news outlets like CNN and NBC News, which, citing multiple sources, claimed that preliminary proposals were floated by US officials in recent days as part of ongoing indirect talks between Washington and Tehran. Those discussions, which began in April, are aimed at finding a diplomatic path forward for Iran's nuclear programme, which Iran says is peaceful and the US says must be prevented from reaching weapons capability. What did the reports claim the US was offering? According to the reports, one proposal involved unfreezing Iranian assets — potentially totalling up to $30 billion — in exchange for a freeze on uranium enrichment, a central demand of Western negotiators. The controversy comes just days after Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel following a brief but dangerous 12-day war that erupted on June 13. That conflict began when Israel launched a surprise wave of airstrikes on Iranian military and nuclear sites, prompting Iran to retaliate with ballistic missile strikes on a US airbase in Qatar. No casualties were reported. The US then entered the conflict directly, striking Iran's nuclear infrastructure with bunker-buster bombs and cruise missiles. According to the Pentagon, six Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs were dropped on the fortified Fordow facility, while dozens of submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeted Natanz and Isfahan.

Slamming reports by what Trump labelled as "fake news media", Trump questioned who was the "sleazebag" saying he wants to give Iran $30 billion to build non-nuclear facilities.

'Sleazebag hoax': Trump explodes over $30 billion nuclear incentive for Iran report

With his self-imposed July 9 deadline for "Liberation Day" tariffs looming, US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 27) said that his administration will soon notify India and other countries about "what they have to pay" to continue trading with the United States "over the next week and a half or so". Trump's suspenseful remarks come just hours after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that trade talks with various nations could continue to September.<h2>What did Trump say about tariffs?</h2>Talking to reporters, the President of the United States (POTUS) Trump, said that over the next 7-10 days, America would send out letters telling countries how much they have to pay to continue trade with the US. "At a certain point, over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before, we’re going to send out a letter. We talked to many other countries, and we are just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States. And it's going to go very quickly," he said.He also said that he sent the letter because there were "200 countries" US had to negotiate with and that his administration couldn't do that.Meanwhile, Trump was upbeat about trade prospects with other countries, especially India and China. "We made a deal with China. … We're going to be trading in China. That’s going to come a little bit down the road, but we're going to be trading in China," he said. On India, he said, "we're going to reach a deal where we have the right to go in and trade".Yet, a senior Indian official told Reuters Thursday that negotiations remain stuck on several points, and no final deal is imminent.So far, Washington has reached a finalised trade agreement only with the United Kingdom, while talks with other major partners — including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea — remain unresolved.<h2>Trump-Canada tensions rise</h2>However, Trump has simultaneously reopened another front in his trade war, abruptly halting discussions with Canada following Ottawa's announcement of a digital services tax aimed largely at American tech giants."We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with … has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country," Trump posted on Truth Social."Based on this egregious tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately."

Donald Trump said his administration will soon notify India and other countries about "what they have to pay" to continue trading with the United States "over the next week and a half or so". 

With his self-imposed July 9 deadline for "Liberation Day" tariffs looming, US President Donald Trump on Friday (Jun 27) said that his administration will soon notify India and other countries about "what they have to pay" to continue trading with the United States "over the next week and a half or so". Trump's suspenseful remarks come just hours after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that trade talks with various nations could continue to September. What did Trump say about tariffs? Talking to reporters, the President of the United States (POTUS) Trump, said that over the next 7-10 days, America would send out letters telling countries how much they have to pay to continue trade with the US. "At a certain point, over the next week and a half or so, or maybe before, we’re going to send out a letter. We talked to many other countries, and we are just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in the United States. And it's going to go very quickly," he said. He also said that he sent the letter because there were "200 countries" US had to negotiate with and that his administration couldn't do that. Meanwhile, Trump was upbeat about trade prospects with other countries, especially India and China. "We made a deal with China. … We're going to be trading in China. That’s going to come a little bit down the road, but we're going to be trading in China," he said. On India, he said, "we're going to reach a deal where we have the right to go in and trade". Yet, a senior Indian official told Reuters Thursday that negotiations remain stuck on several points, and no final deal is imminent. So far, Washington has reached a finalised trade agreement only with the United Kingdom, while talks with other major partners — including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea — remain unresolved. Trump-Canada tensions rise However, Trump has simultaneously reopened another front in his trade war, abruptly halting discussions with Canada following Ottawa's announcement of a digital services tax aimed largely at American tech giants. "We have just been informed that Canada, a very difficult Country to TRADE with … has just announced that they are putting a Digital Services Tax on our American Technology Companies, which is a direct and blatant attack on our Country," Trump posted on Truth Social. "Based on this egregious tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately."

Donald Trump said his administration will soon notify India and other countries about "what they have to pay" to continue trading with the United States "over the next week and a half or so".&nbsp;

Trump says India and other countries will soon learn what 'they have to pay' to trade with US

US President Donald Trump has renewed his attacks on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, demanding an aggressive cut in interest rates to 1 per cent while declaring he would “love” for Powell to step down. The latest salvo marks Trump’s most explicit threat yet to reshape the leadership of the world’s most powerful central bank to deliver the steep rate cuts he wants as he sets the stage for a high-stakes election year.&nbsp;As per Reuters, Trump called Powell “stupid” and accused him of suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome”, blaming the Fed chief for keeping borrowing costs too high and choking economic momentum.<h2>Trump’s explicit call for deep rate cuts</h2>Speaking at the White House on Friday, Trump criticised the Fed for holding its benchmark short-term rate in a range of 4.25 to 4.50 per cent, insisting that the central bank should immediately cut rates to just 1 per cent.&nbsp;“I think we should be paying 1 per cent right now, and we’re paying more because we have a guy who suffers from, I think, Trump Derangement Syndrome,” Trump said, as quoted by Reuters. He added: “I’d love him to resign if he wanted to, he’s done a lousy job.”<h2>A litmus test for the next Fed chief</h2>Trump also made clear that any successor he nominates for Powell will have to meet his demand for drastic rate cuts. “If I think somebody’s going to keep the rates where they are or whatever, I’m not going to put them in,” Trump said. “I’m going to put somebody that wants to cut rates. There are a lot of them out there," as quoted by Reuters.&nbsp;&nbsp;This unusually blunt litmus test signals Trump’s readiness to break with precedent. While past US presidents have privately complained about the Fed keeping rates too high, few have set such clear and public policy conditions for a nominee. As per Reuters, Trump’s strategy is to ensure any new Fed chief will align with his push for cheap borrowing costs to stimulate the economy heading into the 2026 presidential race.<h2>Fed’s caution over inflation</h2>The Federal Reserve, however, has signalled it will move cautiously on rates. After a series of aggressive rate hikes to counter the biggest inflation surge since the 1970s and 1980s, the Fed eased somewhat in late 2024 but has held rates steady so far in 2025. Policymakers remain wary that cutting too quickly could reignite inflation, particularly in light of Trump’s own tariff threats, which risk fuelling price increases.&nbsp;Fed officials have pencilled in a modest half-percentage-point reduction later this year, a fraction of the dramatic cuts Trump is demanding. According to Reuters, Trump has repeatedly attacked Powell for refusing to lower borrowing costs since Trump returned to the White House in January.<h2>Powell’s tenure and Trump’s succession plan</h2>Powell’s term as chair of the Federal Reserve runs until May 2026, making his removal unlikely barring malfeasance or misconduct. Presidents are generally seen as unable to dismiss Fed chairs over policy disagreements, a legal protection designed to safeguard central bank independence. Trump had previously threatened to fire Powell outright, but in recent weeks he has largely abandoned that approach. A Supreme Court opinion is seen to have reinforced the view that presidents cannot dismiss Fed leaders over policy differences.&nbsp;Instead, Trump has shifted focus to naming Powell’s successor well in advance. He told reporters he has three or four potential candidates in mind and plans to announce his choice soon, potentially months ahead of the usual schedule. According to Reuters, such an early nomination is widely viewed as an effort to create a “shadow chair” who could undermine Powell’s authority and signal Trump’s preferred policy direction.<h2>Who could replace Powell?</h2>Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is seen as one of the leading candidates to replace Powell. But Bessent has downplayed suggestions of serving as a “shadow chair” before the term is up. “I don’t think anyone’s necessarily talking about that,” Bessent told CNBC. He noted that while Powell’s term as chair ends in May 2026, he can remain on the Fed Board of Governors until 2028. The first likely opportunity for a Trump appointment may come when Governor Adriana Kugler’s term expires in early 2026.&nbsp;“So there is a chance that the person who is going to become the chair could be appointed in January, which would probably mean an October, November nomination,” Bessent said, as quoted by Reuters. When asked about speculation he might be in the running, Bessent said: “I’ll do what the president wants, but I think I have the best job in Washington.”&nbsp;Other potential names in circulation include White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, and current Governor Christopher Waller. Waller, who was appointed during Trump’s first term, recently said he is open to cutting interest rates as soon as the Fed’s next meeting at the end of July.<h2>Political pressure meets Fed independence</h2>Trump’s aggressive rhetoric lays bare the growing tension between the White House and the Federal Reserve over monetary policy. While presidents have always eyed the Fed’s decisions closely, Trump’s approach marks a dramatic escalation in politicising central bank policy.&nbsp;The independence of the Federal Reserve has long been viewed as a cornerstone of its credibility in ensuring price stability and maintaining global confidence in the US economy. Trump’s demands for loyalty on rate policy could test the limits of that independence in the months to come.&nbsp;As per Reuters, with Powell’s term entering its final year, the battle over interest rates is poised to become a central economic and political fault line in the lead-up to the 2026 election.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Amid election-year economic manoeuvring, US President Trump slams Fed Chair Jerome Powell, calls for his resignation, and vows to nominate a rate-cut-friendly successor, deepening concerns over political interference in central bank independence.

US President Donald Trump has renewed his attacks on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, demanding an aggressive cut in interest rates to 1 per cent while declaring he would “love” for Powell to step down. The latest salvo marks Trump’s most explicit threat yet to reshape the leadership of the world’s most powerful central bank to deliver the steep rate cuts he wants as he sets the stage for a high-stakes election year. As per Reuters, Trump called Powell “stupid” and accused him of suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome”, blaming the Fed chief for keeping borrowing costs too high and choking economic momentum. Trump’s explicit call for deep rate cuts Speaking at the White House on Friday, Trump criticised the Fed for holding its benchmark short-term rate in a range of 4.25 to 4.50 per cent, insisting that the central bank should immediately cut rates to just 1 per cent. “I think we should be paying 1 per cent right now, and we’re paying more because we have a guy who suffers from, I think, Trump Derangement Syndrome,” Trump said, as quoted by Reuters. He added: “I’d love him to resign if he wanted to, he’s done a lousy job.” A litmus test for the next Fed chief Trump also made clear that any successor he nominates for Powell will have to meet his demand for drastic rate cuts. “If I think somebody’s going to keep the rates where they are or whatever, I’m not going to put them in,” Trump said. “I’m going to put somebody that wants to cut rates. There are a lot of them out there," as quoted by Reuters. This unusually blunt litmus test signals Trump’s readiness to break with precedent. While past US presidents have privately complained about the Fed keeping rates too high, few have set such clear and public policy conditions for a nominee. As per Reuters, Trump’s strategy is to ensure any new Fed chief will align with his push for cheap borrowing costs to stimulate the economy heading into the 2026 presidential race. Fed’s caution over inflation The Federal Reserve, however, has signalled it will move cautiously on rates. After a series of aggressive rate hikes to counter the biggest inflation surge since the 1970s and 1980s, the Fed eased somewhat in late 2024 but has held rates steady so far in 2025. Policymakers remain wary that cutting too quickly could reignite inflation, particularly in light of Trump’s own tariff threats, which risk fuelling price increases. Fed officials have pencilled in a modest half-percentage-point reduction later this year, a fraction of the dramatic cuts Trump is demanding. According to Reuters, Trump has repeatedly attacked Powell for refusing to lower borrowing costs since Trump returned to the White House in January. Powell’s tenure and Trump’s succession plan Powell’s term as chair of the Federal Reserve runs until May 2026, making his removal unlikely barring malfeasance or misconduct. Presidents are generally seen as unable to dismiss Fed chairs over policy disagreements, a legal protection designed to safeguard central bank independence. Trump had previously threatened to fire Powell outright, but in recent weeks he has largely abandoned that approach. A Supreme Court opinion is seen to have reinforced the view that presidents cannot dismiss Fed leaders over policy differences. Instead, Trump has shifted focus to naming Powell’s successor well in advance. He told reporters he has three or four potential candidates in mind and plans to announce his choice soon, potentially months ahead of the usual schedule. According to Reuters, such an early nomination is widely viewed as an effort to create a “shadow chair” who could undermine Powell’s authority and signal Trump’s preferred policy direction. Who could replace Powell? Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is seen as one of the leading candidates to replace Powell. But Bessent has downplayed suggestions of serving as a “shadow chair” before the term is up. “I don’t think anyone’s necessarily talking about that,” Bessent told CNBC. He noted that while Powell’s term as chair ends in May 2026, he can remain on the Fed Board of Governors until 2028. The first likely opportunity for a Trump appointment may come when Governor Adriana Kugler’s term expires in early 2026. “So there is a chance that the person who is going to become the chair could be appointed in January, which would probably mean an October, November nomination,” Bessent said, as quoted by Reuters. When asked about speculation he might be in the running, Bessent said: “I’ll do what the president wants, but I think I have the best job in Washington.” Other potential names in circulation include White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, and current Governor Christopher Waller. Waller, who was appointed during Trump’s first term, recently said he is open to cutting interest rates as soon as the Fed’s next meeting at the end of July. Political pressure meets Fed independence Trump’s aggressive rhetoric lays bare the growing tension between the White House and the Federal Reserve over monetary policy. While presidents have always eyed the Fed’s decisions closely, Trump’s approach marks a dramatic escalation in politicising central bank policy. The independence of the Federal Reserve has long been viewed as a cornerstone of its credibility in ensuring price stability and maintaining global confidence in the US economy. Trump’s demands for loyalty on rate policy could test the limits of that independence in the months to come. As per Reuters, with Powell’s term entering its final year, the battle over interest rates is poised to become a central economic and political fault line in the lead-up to the 2026 election. (With inputs from the agencies)

Donald Trump escalates pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell, demanding a drastic rate cut to 1% and signalling he’ll install a successor who aligns with his economic agenda ahead of the 2026 election.

Trump demands 1% interest rate, says he’d ‘love’ for Powell to resign

The latest satellite images from the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) appear to show Iran moving quickly to repair damage at the nuclear facility, just days after the United States heavily bombed the site. The photos, captured Friday (Jun 27) by Maxar Technologies, show construction equipment and signs of activity near the tunnel entrances and impact points where US bunker-buster bombs struck during last weekend's coordinated strikes. This comes just a week after the US, in a major escalation of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, carried out bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.<h2>What do the latest satellite images show?</h2>In the latest satellite images, excavators and bulldozers can be seen clearing debris and shifting earth around the northern ridge of the mountain that houses the Fordow enrichment complex. As per Business Insider, in particular, crews appear focused on areas where GBU-57 "bunker buster" bombs reportedly struck the site's exhaust shafts—critical access points into the underground facility.Other images reveal what looks like the start of new access roads being carved into the mountainside, as well as attempts to restore damaged existing infrastructure. This suggests that Tehran may be trying to re-enter the site to assess internal damage and begin recovery work, although Iranian officials are yet to confirm or deny this.<h2>Iran's actions were predicted earlier</h2>A March report by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) had predicted such a response. The report said that a long-term strike campaign would be needed to prevent Iran from rebuilding and that in the absence of such an effort, Tehran would relaunch "efforts to dig down to the facilities to re-establish access and supplies would likely begin almost immediately".&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing developments in the Israel-Iran conflict. In this context, claims and counterclaims are being made online and offline. However, we cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, photos, and videos. &nbsp;

The photos, captured Friday (Jun 27) by Maxar Technologies, show construction equipment and signs of activity near the tunnel entrances and impact points where US bunker-buster bombs struck during last weekend's coordinated strikes. 

The latest satellite images from the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) appear to show Iran moving quickly to repair damage at the nuclear facility, just days after the United States heavily bombed the site. The photos, captured Friday (Jun 27) by Maxar Technologies, show construction equipment and signs of activity near the tunnel entrances and impact points where US bunker-buster bombs struck during last weekend's coordinated strikes. This comes just a week after the US, in a major escalation of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, carried out bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. What do the latest satellite images show? In the latest satellite images, excavators and bulldozers can be seen clearing debris and shifting earth around the northern ridge of the mountain that houses the Fordow enrichment complex. As per Business Insider, in particular, crews appear focused on areas where GBU-57 "bunker buster" bombs reportedly struck the site's exhaust shafts—critical access points into the underground facility. Other images reveal what looks like the start of new access roads being carved into the mountainside, as well as attempts to restore damaged existing infrastructure. This suggests that Tehran may be trying to re-enter the site to assess internal damage and begin recovery work, although Iranian officials are yet to confirm or deny this. Iran's actions were predicted earlier A March report by the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) had predicted such a response. The report said that a long-term strike campaign would be needed to prevent Iran from rebuilding and that in the absence of such an effort, Tehran would relaunch "efforts to dig down to the facilities to re-establish access and supplies would likely begin almost immediately". Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing developments in the Israel-Iran conflict. In this context, claims and counterclaims are being made online and offline. However, we cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, photos, and videos.

The photos, captured Friday (Jun 27) by Maxar Technologies, show construction equipment and signs of activity near the tunnel entrances and impact points where US bunker-buster bombs struck during last weekend's coordinated strikes.&nbsp;

Iran back at it again? Begins repairs at Fordow nuclear site just days after US bombing, satellite photos show

President Donald Trump said Friday he is calling off trade negotiations with Canada in retaliation for taxes impacting US tech firms, adding that Ottawa will learn of their new tariff rate within a week.Trump was referring to Canada's digital services tax, which was enacted last year and forecast to bring in Can$5.9 billion (US$4.2 billion) over five years.While the measure is not new, US service providers will be "on the hook for a multi-billion dollar payment in Canada" come June 30, noted the Computer &amp; Communications Industry Association recently.The three per cent tax applies to large or multinational companies such as Alphabet, Amazon and Meta that provide digital services to Canadians, and Washington has previously requested dispute settlement talks over the matter."Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform Friday.Canada may have been spared some of Trump's sweeping duties, but it faces a separate tariff regime.Trump has also imposed steep levies on imports of steel, aluminum and autos.Last week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Ottawa will adjust its 25 percent counter tariffs on US steel and aluminum -- in response to a doubling of US levies on the metals to 50 percent -- if a bilateral trade deal was not reached in 30 days."We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians," Carney said Friday, adding that he had not spoken to Trump on the day.US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC that Washington had hoped Carney's government would halt the tax "as a sign of goodwill."He now expects US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to start a probe to determine the harm stemming from Canada's digital tax.<h2>China progress&nbsp;</h2>Trump's salvo targeting Canada came shortly after Washington and Beijing confirmed finalizing a framework to move forward on trade.A priority for Washington in talks with Beijing had been ensuring the supply of the rare earths essential for products including electric vehicles, hard drives and national defense equipment.China, which dominates global production of the elements, began requiring export licences in early April, a move widely viewed as a response to Trump's blistering tariffs.Both sides agreed after talks in Geneva in May to temporarily lower steep tit-for-tat duties on each other's products.China also committed to easing some non-tariff countermeasures but US officials later accused Beijing of violating the pact and slow-walking export license approvals for rare earths.They eventually agreed on a framework to move forward with their Geneva consensus, following talks in London this month.A White House official told AFP on Thursday that the Trump administration and China had "agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement."This clarification came after the US president told an event that Washington had inked a deal relating to trade with China, without providing details.Under the deal, China "will review and approve applications for the export control items that meet the requirements in accordance with the law," China's commerce ministry said."The US side will correspondingly cancel a series of restrictive measures against China," it added.<h2>Upcoming deals?</h2>Dozens of economies, although not China, face a July 9 deadline for steeper duties to kick in -- rising from a current 10 percent.It remains to be seen if countries will successfully reach agreements to avoid them before the deadline.On talks with the European Union, for example, Trump told an event at the White House on Friday: "We have the cards. We have the cards far more than they do."But Bessent said Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by September, indicating more agreements could be concluded, although talks were likely to extend past July.Bessent told Fox Business there are 18 key partners Washington is focused on pacts with."If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18, there are another important 20 relationships, then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day," Bessent said, referring to the US holiday on September 1.Wall Street's major indexes finished at fresh records as markets cheered progress in US-China trade while shrugging off concerns about Canada.&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

"Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform Friday.

President Donald Trump said Friday he is calling off trade negotiations with Canada in retaliation for taxes impacting US tech firms, adding that Ottawa will learn of their new tariff rate within a week. Trump was referring to Canada's digital services tax, which was enacted last year and forecast to bring in Can$5.9 billion (US$4.2 billion) over five years. While the measure is not new, US service providers will be "on the hook for a multi-billion dollar payment in Canada" come June 30, noted the Computer & Communications Industry Association recently. The three per cent tax applies to large or multinational companies such as Alphabet, Amazon and Meta that provide digital services to Canadians, and Washington has previously requested dispute settlement talks over the matter. "Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform Friday. Canada may have been spared some of Trump's sweeping duties, but it faces a separate tariff regime. Trump has also imposed steep levies on imports of steel, aluminum and autos. Last week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Ottawa will adjust its 25 percent counter tariffs on US steel and aluminum -- in response to a doubling of US levies on the metals to 50 percent -- if a bilateral trade deal was not reached in 30 days. "We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians," Carney said Friday, adding that he had not spoken to Trump on the day. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC that Washington had hoped Carney's government would halt the tax "as a sign of goodwill." He now expects US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to start a probe to determine the harm stemming from Canada's digital tax. China progress Trump's salvo targeting Canada came shortly after Washington and Beijing confirmed finalizing a framework to move forward on trade. A priority for Washington in talks with Beijing had been ensuring the supply of the rare earths essential for products including electric vehicles, hard drives and national defense equipment. China, which dominates global production of the elements, began requiring export licences in early April, a move widely viewed as a response to Trump's blistering tariffs. Both sides agreed after talks in Geneva in May to temporarily lower steep tit-for-tat duties on each other's products. China also committed to easing some non-tariff countermeasures but US officials later accused Beijing of violating the pact and slow-walking export license approvals for rare earths. They eventually agreed on a framework to move forward with their Geneva consensus, following talks in London this month. A White House official told AFP on Thursday that the Trump administration and China had "agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement." This clarification came after the US president told an event that Washington had inked a deal relating to trade with China, without providing details. Under the deal, China "will review and approve applications for the export control items that meet the requirements in accordance with the law," China's commerce ministry said. "The US side will correspondingly cancel a series of restrictive measures against China," it added. Upcoming deals? Dozens of economies, although not China, face a July 9 deadline for steeper duties to kick in -- rising from a current 10 percent. It remains to be seen if countries will successfully reach agreements to avoid them before the deadline. On talks with the European Union, for example, Trump told an event at the White House on Friday: "We have the cards. We have the cards far more than they do." But Bessent said Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by September, indicating more agreements could be concluded, although talks were likely to extend past July. Bessent told Fox Business there are 18 key partners Washington is focused on pacts with. "If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18, there are another important 20 relationships, then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day," Bessent said, referring to the US holiday on September 1. Wall Street's major indexes finished at fresh records as markets cheered progress in US-China trade while shrugging off concerns about Canada. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

"Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform Friday.

Trump ends trade negotiations with Canada in retaliation for tech tax

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) warned Iran after Iranian Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's bold remarks against Trump as he claimed victory over US regime in Israel-Iran war. Trump lambasted Khamenei, warning that it will only get worse for them.The US president said that Iran is always so "angry, hostile, and unhappy". Further, describing what they have done to themselves, Trump said "look at what it has gotten them - burned out, blown up Country, with no future, a decimated Military, a horrible Economy, and DEATH all around them."In a post on Truth Social, Trump slammed Iran and Supreme Leader Khamenei for his statements made on Thursday, warning the US president.He further warned that it will "only get worse!", hoping that the leadership of Iran would realize that "you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR."Saved from 'ugly death'Trump stressed that he saved Khamenei form a very "ugly and ignominious death", adding that he knew exactly where Iranian leader was sheltered amid the continuous assassination threats from Israel during the 12-day Israel-Iran war.Calling him the "so-called Supreme Leader", Trump lambasted on Truth Social, saying that why would the Iranian leader so "blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel" when he knows that it is a lie."As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie. His Country was decimated, his three evil Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life. I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, "THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!"," the US president said.He continued that in the "final act of the war", Trump demanded Israel to bring back a very large group of planes, which were heading directly to Tehran for "perhaps the final knockout"."Tremendous damage would have ensued, and many Iranians would have been killed. It was going to be the biggest attack of the War, by far. During the last few days, I was working on the possible removal of sanctions, and other things, which would have given a much better chance to Iran at a full, fast, and complete recovery - The sanctions are BITING!," he added.With even more frustration, the US president said, that, "Instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more."He pressed that Iran has to get back into the World Order flow, warning that things will only get worse for them.&nbsp;

Trump further warned that it will "only get worse!", hoping that the leadership of Iran would realize that "you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR."

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) warned Iran after Iranian Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's bold remarks against Trump as he claimed victory over US regime in Israel-Iran war. Trump lambasted Khamenei, warning that it will only get worse for them. The US president said that Iran is always so "angry, hostile, and unhappy". Further, describing what they have done to themselves, Trump said "look at what it has gotten them - burned out, blown up Country, with no future, a decimated Military, a horrible Economy, and DEATH all around them." In a post on Truth Social, Trump slammed Iran and Supreme Leader Khamenei for his statements made on Thursday, warning the US president. He further warned that it will "only get worse!", hoping that the leadership of Iran would realize that "you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR." Saved from 'ugly death' Trump stressed that he saved Khamenei form a very "ugly and ignominious death", adding that he knew exactly where Iranian leader was sheltered amid the continuous assassination threats from Israel during the 12-day Israel-Iran war. Calling him the "so-called Supreme Leader", Trump lambasted on Truth Social, saying that why would the Iranian leader so "blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel" when he knows that it is a lie. "As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie. His Country was decimated, his three evil Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life. I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, "THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!"," the US president said. He continued that in the "final act of the war", Trump demanded Israel to bring back a very large group of planes, which were heading directly to Tehran for "perhaps the final knockout". "Tremendous damage would have ensued, and many Iranians would have been killed. It was going to be the biggest attack of the War, by far. During the last few days, I was working on the possible removal of sanctions, and other things, which would have given a much better chance to Iran at a full, fast, and complete recovery - The sanctions are BITING!," he added. With even more frustration, the US president said, that, "Instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more." He pressed that Iran has to get back into the World Order flow, warning that things will only get worse for them.

Trump further warned that it will "only get worse!", hoping that the leadership of Iran would realize that "you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR."

'WILL ONLY GET WORSE': Trump's BIG WARNING to 'burned out' Iran after Khamenei claims victory over US regime

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) stressed that he saved Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei from a very "ugly and ignominious death", adding that he knew exactly where the Iranian leader was sheltered amid the continuous assassination threats from Israel during the 12-day Israel-Iran war.Calling him the "so-called Supreme Leader", Trump lambasted on Truth Social, saying that why would the Iranian leader so "blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel" when he knows that it is a lie."As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie. His Country was decimated, his three evil Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life. I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, "THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!"," the US president said.He continued that in the "final act of the war", Trump demanded Israel to bring back a very large group of planes, which were heading directly to Tehran for "perhaps the final knockout"."Tremendous damage would have ensued, and many Iranians would have been killed. It was going to be the biggest attack of the War, by far. During the last few days, I was working on the possible removal of sanctions, and other things, which would have given a much better chance to Iran at a full, fast, and complete recovery - The sanctions are BITING!," he added.With even more frustration, the US president said, that, "Instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more."He pressed that Iran has to get back into the World Order flow, warning that things will only get worse for them.Further, explaining what Iran has become, Trump said that they are always "so angry, hostile, and unhappy, and look at what it has gotten them - A burned out, blown up Country, with no future, a decimated Military, a horrible Economy, and DEATH all around them."He further warned that it will "only get worse!", hoping that the leadership of Iran would realize that "you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR."

Calling him the "so-called Supreme Leader", Trump lambasted on Truth Social, saying that why would the Iranian leader so "blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel" when he knows that it is a lie.

US President Donald Trump on Friday (June 27) stressed that he saved Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei from a very "ugly and ignominious death", adding that he knew exactly where the Iranian leader was sheltered amid the continuous assassination threats from Israel during the 12-day Israel-Iran war. Calling him the "so-called Supreme Leader", Trump lambasted on Truth Social, saying that why would the Iranian leader so "blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel" when he knows that it is a lie. "As a man of great faith, he is not supposed to lie. His Country was decimated, his three evil Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life. I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, "THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!"," the US president said. He continued that in the "final act of the war", Trump demanded Israel to bring back a very large group of planes, which were heading directly to Tehran for "perhaps the final knockout". "Tremendous damage would have ensued, and many Iranians would have been killed. It was going to be the biggest attack of the War, by far. During the last few days, I was working on the possible removal of sanctions, and other things, which would have given a much better chance to Iran at a full, fast, and complete recovery - The sanctions are BITING!," he added. With even more frustration, the US president said, that, "Instead I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more." He pressed that Iran has to get back into the World Order flow, warning that things will only get worse for them. Further, explaining what Iran has become, Trump said that they are always "so angry, hostile, and unhappy, and look at what it has gotten them - A burned out, blown up Country, with no future, a decimated Military, a horrible Economy, and DEATH all around them." He further warned that it will "only get worse!", hoping that the leadership of Iran would realize that "you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR."

Calling him the "so-called Supreme Leader", Trump lambasted on Truth Social, saying that why would the Iranian leader so "blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Israel" when he knows that it is a lie.

'SAVED HIM FROM VERY UGLY, IGNOMINIOUS DEATH': Trump says he knew where Khamenei was hidden, warns 'it'll only get worse'

The Trump Organisation’s much-touted “Made in the USA” promise for its new smartphone is facing fresh scrutiny after references to American production quietly vanished from its website. The shift in marketing language has prompted questions over whether Donald Trump’s brand can truly deliver a fully US-built phone—something experts warn is far from realistic with today’s global supply chains.<h2>Website wording quietly changes</h2>According to the BBC, the Trump T1 phone launched on 16 June with a clear “Made in the USA” tagline on its website. But by mid-week, that phrase was gone. Instead, the site now promotes an “American-Proud Design” and says the phone is “brought to life right here in the USA” with “American hands behind every device.”A banner that once read “our MADE IN THE USA T1 Phone” was changed to simply “the new T1 phone,” as first reported by The Verge.&nbsp;Despite these edits, Trump Mobile insists nothing has changed about its plans. A spokesperson told the BBC: “Speculation to the contrary is simply inaccurate,” maintaining that the phones would still be produced in America. The company also encouraged customers to sign up immediately for its service using their existing devices while waiting for the T1’s release later this year.<h2>Experts doubt feasibility of US-only smartphone</h2>Industry experts remain sceptical about the promise of a fully American-made smartphone. As per the BBC, Professor Tinglong Dai of Johns Hopkins University said the Trump team didn’t even appear to have a working prototype, calling the idea of fully domestic production “extremely unlikely” and requiring “a miracle.” Leo Gebbie, a technology analyst at CCS Insight, told the BBC that the United States “simply does not have the high-tech supply chain” to make smartphones entirely domestically, especially on an accelerated timeline. He suggested the most realistic scenario would involve assembling imported parts in the US to justify a “Made in USA” label.&nbsp;As reported by CNBC, even Apple—under years of political pressure—has struggled to move significant iPhone production to the US. Much of Apple’s assembly remains in China, Vietnam and India, despite Donald Trump’s past calls to shift manufacturing home.<h2>Trump’s record on manufacturing pressure</h2>The controversy also reflects Trump’s long history of pushing for “America First” manufacturing. In May, he wrote on Truth Social that he had “long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple” that iPhones sold in the US should be built domestically and not in India or elsewhere.&nbsp;During his presidency, Trump threatened to impose 25 per cent tariffs on Apple if it did not relocate production to the United States, as per Reuters. However, such threats had limited effect. Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, described the expectation as a “fairy tale that is not feasible” given Apple’s massive, globalised supply chain.<h2>Trump Mobile says vision remains</h2>Despite dropping the explicit “Made in the USA” tagline, the Trump Mobile team says its long-term goal remains the same. Eric Trump, who joined Donald Trump Jr in launching the mobile plan earlier this month, told a podcast that “eventually, all the phones can be built in the United States of America.” As per the BBC, the Trump Mobile website now focuses on promoting its service plans and encouraging Americans to switch immediately, while promising to launch the T1 phone later this year.&nbsp;For now, the subtle shift in wording has drawn new attention to the gap between the marketing promise of an all-American smartphone and the complicated, global reality of how such devices are actually made.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

Initially launched with a clear American production tagline, the site now highlights American-Proud Design. Experts question the feasibility of fully US made smartphones due to global supply chain complexities. 

The Trump Organisation’s much-touted “Made in the USA” promise for its new smartphone is facing fresh scrutiny after references to American production quietly vanished from its website. The shift in marketing language has prompted questions over whether Donald Trump’s brand can truly deliver a fully US-built phone—something experts warn is far from realistic with today’s global supply chains. Website wording quietly changes According to the BBC, the Trump T1 phone launched on 16 June with a clear “Made in the USA” tagline on its website. But by mid-week, that phrase was gone. Instead, the site now promotes an “American-Proud Design” and says the phone is “brought to life right here in the USA” with “American hands behind every device.” A banner that once read “our MADE IN THE USA T1 Phone” was changed to simply “the new T1 phone,” as first reported by The Verge. Despite these edits, Trump Mobile insists nothing has changed about its plans. A spokesperson told the BBC: “Speculation to the contrary is simply inaccurate,” maintaining that the phones would still be produced in America. The company also encouraged customers to sign up immediately for its service using their existing devices while waiting for the T1’s release later this year. Experts doubt feasibility of US-only smartphone Industry experts remain sceptical about the promise of a fully American-made smartphone. As per the BBC, Professor Tinglong Dai of Johns Hopkins University said the Trump team didn’t even appear to have a working prototype, calling the idea of fully domestic production “extremely unlikely” and requiring “a miracle.” Leo Gebbie, a technology analyst at CCS Insight, told the BBC that the United States “simply does not have the high-tech supply chain” to make smartphones entirely domestically, especially on an accelerated timeline. He suggested the most realistic scenario would involve assembling imported parts in the US to justify a “Made in USA” label. As reported by CNBC, even Apple—under years of political pressure—has struggled to move significant iPhone production to the US. Much of Apple’s assembly remains in China, Vietnam and India, despite Donald Trump’s past calls to shift manufacturing home. Trump’s record on manufacturing pressure The controversy also reflects Trump’s long history of pushing for “America First” manufacturing. In May, he wrote on Truth Social that he had “long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple” that iPhones sold in the US should be built domestically and not in India or elsewhere. During his presidency, Trump threatened to impose 25 per cent tariffs on Apple if it did not relocate production to the United States, as per Reuters. However, such threats had limited effect. Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, described the expectation as a “fairy tale that is not feasible” given Apple’s massive, globalised supply chain. Trump Mobile says vision remains Despite dropping the explicit “Made in the USA” tagline, the Trump Mobile team says its long-term goal remains the same. Eric Trump, who joined Donald Trump Jr in launching the mobile plan earlier this month, told a podcast that “eventually, all the phones can be built in the United States of America.” As per the BBC, the Trump Mobile website now focuses on promoting its service plans and encouraging Americans to switch immediately, while promising to launch the T1 phone later this year. For now, the subtle shift in wording has drawn new attention to the gap between the marketing promise of an all-American smartphone and the complicated, global reality of how such devices are actually made. (With inputs from the agencies)

The Trump Organisation's "Made in the USA" promise for its T1 smartphone has come under scrutiny after related references were removed from its website.

‘Made in USA’ missing from Trump phone website: What happened?

After the 12-day war between Israel and Iran over Iran's building nuclear weapons, the US is now exploring a range of proposals to get Tehran back on table for further negotiations, according to four sources familiar with the matter, CNN reported. The proposals include easing sanctions, releasing billions of dollars in restricted Iranian funds, and much more.This further includes a $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program, according to the sources.Despite the 12-day war and Israeli attacks on Iran, people mediating from the US and the Middle East were in talks with the Iranians over the past two weeks.The officials from US President Donald Trump administration stressed that several proposals have been floated to the Iranians. However, there is just one consistent non-negotiable thing, zero Iranian enrichment of uranium, which Iran has consistently said it requires.<h2>What all does the proposal include?</h2>Among all the terms discussed between the US and Iran, some include an estimated $20-30 billion investment in a new Iranian non-enrichment nuclear program that would be used for civilian energy purposes.The money would not directly come from the US, one official insisted, saying that he prefers its Arab partners foot the bill.Meanwhile, in earlier rounds of talks, investment in Iran's nuclear energy facilities was discussed.“The US is willing to lead these talks” with Iran, the Trump administration official told CNN. “And someone is going to need to pay for the nuclear program to be built, but we will not make that commitment.”While, some other incentives include removing sanctions on Iran and allowing them the $6 billion, which has been froze in foreign bank accounts.Another key proposal they gave is for US-backed allies in the Gulf to pay to replace the Fordow nuclear facility, which was hit by the US bunker-buster bombs last weekend during Israel-Iran war.“There are a lot of ideas being thrown around by different people and a lot of them are trying to be creative,” one of the sources told CNN.

The officials from US President Donald Trump administration stressed that several proposals have been floated to the Iranians. However, there is just one consistent non-negotiable thing, zero Iranian enrichment of uranium, which Iran has consistently said it requires.

After the 12-day war between Israel and Iran over Iran's building nuclear weapons, the US is now exploring a range of proposals to get Tehran back on table for further negotiations, according to four sources familiar with the matter, CNN reported. The proposals include easing sanctions, releasing billions of dollars in restricted Iranian funds, and much more. This further includes a $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program, according to the sources. Despite the 12-day war and Israeli attacks on Iran, people mediating from the US and the Middle East were in talks with the Iranians over the past two weeks. The officials from US President Donald Trump administration stressed that several proposals have been floated to the Iranians. However, there is just one consistent non-negotiable thing, zero Iranian enrichment of uranium, which Iran has consistently said it requires. What all does the proposal include? Among all the terms discussed between the US and Iran, some include an estimated $20-30 billion investment in a new Iranian non-enrichment nuclear program that would be used for civilian energy purposes. The money would not directly come from the US, one official insisted, saying that he prefers its Arab partners foot the bill. Meanwhile, in earlier rounds of talks, investment in Iran's nuclear energy facilities was discussed. “The US is willing to lead these talks” with Iran, the Trump administration official told CNN. “And someone is going to need to pay for the nuclear program to be built, but we will not make that commitment.” While, some other incentives include removing sanctions on Iran and allowing them the $6 billion, which has been froze in foreign bank accounts. Another key proposal they gave is for US-backed allies in the Gulf to pay to replace the Fordow nuclear facility, which was hit by the US bunker-buster bombs last weekend during Israel-Iran war. “There are a lot of ideas being thrown around by different people and a lot of them are trying to be creative,” one of the sources told CNN.

The officials from US President Donald Trump administration stressed that several proposals have been floated to the Iranians. However, there is just one consistent non-negotiable thing, zero Iranian enrichment of uranium, which Iran has consistently said it requires.

'$30bn civil nuclear deal, unfreeze funds': Trump admin offers Iran to resume nuclear talks | Proposal details INSIDE

US President Donald Trump has fuelled fresh speculation about an imminent “very big” trade deal with India, weeks after top negotiators from both countries wrapped up closed-door talks aimed at slashing tariffs and expanding market access.&nbsp;Speaking at the ‘Big Beautiful Event’ at the White House on Thursday, Trump told supporters: “We just signed with China yesterday. We are having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one,” as quoted by Reuters. Trump said the United States would not sign trade deals with every nation indiscriminately. “We’re not going to make deals with everybody. Some we are just going to send them a letter, say thank you very much. You are to pay 25, 35, 45 per cent. That’s the easy way to do it,” he said, emphasising that his team preferred forging substantial bilateral pacts over blanket tariff threats, as reported by Reuters.&nbsp;<h2>High-stakes negotiations target $500 billion trade milestone</h2>The comments follow intensive four-day negotiations held earlier this month between US and Indian trade teams in New Delhi. Talks focused on expanding market access for industrial and agricultural products, tariff reductions, and tackling non-tariff barriers.According to people familiar with the negotiations, the goal is to transform annual bilateral trade from its current level of around $190 billion to $500 billion by 2030, a figure Indian and US officials have cited repeatedly as a shared ambition.&nbsp;Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said after the latest round of talks: “PM Modi and US President Trump met in February 2025… Both our leaders have decided to enter into a bilateral trade agreement which will be mutually beneficial for both the economies, businesses on both sides and the people of both countries. We are negotiating to make a nice, fair, equitable, and balanced agreement to promote business,” as quoted by Reuters.Earlier this month, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also signalled optimism that a deal could soon be finalised, saying both sides had found “common ground” to meet their strategic and economic interests, as per Reuters.&nbsp;<h2>India–US trade: A crucial and growing partnership</h2>The United States is India’s single largest trading partner. According to India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry, bilateral goods and services trade between the two countries reached $191 billion in 2023–24, with Indian exports to the US valued at over $118 billion and imports from the US at around $73 billion.The US accounted for roughly 18 per cent of India’s total exports in 2023–24, making it India’s top export destination. Key Indian exports include pharmaceuticals, textiles, engineering goods, gems and jewellery, and software services.&nbsp;Conversely, the US is a major supplier of crude oil, LNG, advanced machinery, aircraft, defence equipment and agricultural products to India. US energy exports to India alone exceeded $10 billion in 2023, as per the US Energy Information Administration.Trade in services also forms a vital component of the economic relationship, with India’s IT sector providing services worth over $40 billion annually to US clients, according to Nasscom data.&nbsp;Investment ties are similarly robust. US foreign direct investment in India stood at $67 billion as of end-2023, while Indian companies have invested over $40 billion in the US, generating thousands of American jobs.<h2>Talks come amid tariff threats</h2>Trump’s comments also underline the high-stakes backdrop for the negotiations. The US President has threatened to impose tariffs of up to 45 per cent on countries unwilling to strike new trade deals with Washington.&nbsp;While the Biden-era Phase One agreement with India had kept tariff escalation largely at bay, Trump’s second-term approach has seen renewed threats of sweeping duties unless partners sign what he calls “fair and reciprocal” deals.Indian officials see a deal with the US as critical to securing market stability and boosting exports amid a challenging global environment marked by trade fragmentation and geopolitical tensions.&nbsp;For the United States, expanding trade ties with India is seen as a key element of its Indo-Pacific strategy, offering a counterweight to China’s economic influence in the region.<h2>A path forward?</h2>Negotiators from both sides remain tight-lipped about precise timelines or the final shape of any agreement. But Trump’s remarks suggest both governments want to signal progress ahead of their next planned high-level meeting.&nbsp;With India–US trade already on a record-setting trajectory, any new pact will have to address thorny issues ranging from tariff harmonisation to digital trade rules and standards. But if achieved, officials on both sides believe it could cement one of the 21st century’s most consequential economic partnerships.&nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies)&nbsp;

At a White House event, he hinted at a very big agreement on the horizon while emphasizing selective trade partnerships.

US President Donald Trump has fuelled fresh speculation about an imminent “very big” trade deal with India, weeks after top negotiators from both countries wrapped up closed-door talks aimed at slashing tariffs and expanding market access. Speaking at the ‘Big Beautiful Event’ at the White House on Thursday, Trump told supporters: “We just signed with China yesterday. We are having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India. Very big one,” as quoted by Reuters. Trump said the United States would not sign trade deals with every nation indiscriminately. “We’re not going to make deals with everybody. Some we are just going to send them a letter, say thank you very much. You are to pay 25, 35, 45 per cent. That’s the easy way to do it,” he said, emphasising that his team preferred forging substantial bilateral pacts over blanket tariff threats, as reported by Reuters. High-stakes negotiations target $500 billion trade milestone The comments follow intensive four-day negotiations held earlier this month between US and Indian trade teams in New Delhi. Talks focused on expanding market access for industrial and agricultural products, tariff reductions, and tackling non-tariff barriers. According to people familiar with the negotiations, the goal is to transform annual bilateral trade from its current level of around $190 billion to $500 billion by 2030, a figure Indian and US officials have cited repeatedly as a shared ambition. Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said after the latest round of talks: “PM Modi and US President Trump met in February 2025… Both our leaders have decided to enter into a bilateral trade agreement which will be mutually beneficial for both the economies, businesses on both sides and the people of both countries. We are negotiating to make a nice, fair, equitable, and balanced agreement to promote business,” as quoted by Reuters. Earlier this month, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also signalled optimism that a deal could soon be finalised, saying both sides had found “common ground” to meet their strategic and economic interests, as per Reuters. India–US trade: A crucial and growing partnership The United States is India’s single largest trading partner. According to India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry, bilateral goods and services trade between the two countries reached $191 billion in 2023–24, with Indian exports to the US valued at over $118 billion and imports from the US at around $73 billion. The US accounted for roughly 18 per cent of India’s total exports in 2023–24, making it India’s top export destination. Key Indian exports include pharmaceuticals, textiles, engineering goods, gems and jewellery, and software services. Conversely, the US is a major supplier of crude oil, LNG, advanced machinery, aircraft, defence equipment and agricultural products to India. US energy exports to India alone exceeded $10 billion in 2023, as per the US Energy Information Administration. Trade in services also forms a vital component of the economic relationship, with India’s IT sector providing services worth over $40 billion annually to US clients, according to Nasscom data. Investment ties are similarly robust. US foreign direct investment in India stood at $67 billion as of end-2023, while Indian companies have invested over $40 billion in the US, generating thousands of American jobs. Talks come amid tariff threats Trump’s comments also underline the high-stakes backdrop for the negotiations. The US President has threatened to impose tariffs of up to 45 per cent on countries unwilling to strike new trade deals with Washington. While the Biden-era Phase One agreement with India had kept tariff escalation largely at bay, Trump’s second-term approach has seen renewed threats of sweeping duties unless partners sign what he calls “fair and reciprocal” deals. Indian officials see a deal with the US as critical to securing market stability and boosting exports amid a challenging global environment marked by trade fragmentation and geopolitical tensions. For the United States, expanding trade ties with India is seen as a key element of its Indo-Pacific strategy, offering a counterweight to China’s economic influence in the region. A path forward? Negotiators from both sides remain tight-lipped about precise timelines or the final shape of any agreement. But Trump’s remarks suggest both governments want to signal progress ahead of their next planned high-level meeting. With India–US trade already on a record-setting trajectory, any new pact will have to address thorny issues ranging from tariff harmonisation to digital trade rules and standards. But if achieved, officials on both sides believe it could cement one of the 21st century’s most consequential economic partnerships. (With inputs from the agencies)

US President Donald Trump has raised expectations for a significant trade deal with India following recent negotiations aimed at reducing tariffs and improving market access.

US–India trade deal: What’s inside Trump’s “very big” hint?

On Thursday (June 26), White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, while addressing the media, highlighted the effectiveness of Operation Midnight Hammer, which was launched on June 22 to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Emphasising on what could have been a looming threat to West Asia, Leavitt took a dig at previous administrations' 'failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance’. She said Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent ‘pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars' to Tehran.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent pallets of cash – American taxpayer dollars – in a failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime’s compliance with a weak and ineffective deal. President Trump sent American war planes to destroy Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear weapon. <a href="https://t.co/LT1fk1P8gX">pic.twitter.com/LT1fk1P8gX</a>&mdash; Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) <a href="https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/1938309280374960261?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 26, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Leavitt continued, "President Trump finally ended the immediate threat of a nuclear Iranian regime. Following President Trump's command, the most powerful military in the history of the world executed massive precision strikes on three of the Iranian regime's key nuclear facilities."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-press-secretary-reveals-when-iran-israel-us-agreed-on-same-thing-definitely-not-on-nuclear-program-1750961331404">Trump press secretary reveals when Iran, Israel, US agreed on same thing - Definitely not on nuclear program</a>&nbsp;"The objective of Operation Midnight Hammer was to destroy the regime's nuclear enrichment capacity and stop the grave nuclear threat posed to the United States, Israel, and the rest of the free world. The mission, which will go down in the history books, was an overwhelming success," she added.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-damage-is-excessive-and-serious-iran-foreign-minister-abbas-araghchi-days-after-strikes-on-nuclear-facilities-1750978779062">'Damage is excessive and serious,' says Iran Foreign Minister Araghchi days after strikes on nuclear facilities</a>&nbsp;"Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars, in a failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance with a weak and ineffective deal. President Trump sent a fleet of American warplanes to destroy Iran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon. The United States and the entire world are safer because of this president's decisiveness," she said.&nbsp;In her address, she mentioned how Iran was only weeks away from producing a nuclear weapon, which was thwarted by Trump’s decisive call to ‘obliterate’ the facilities.&nbsp;

Emphasising on what could have been a looming threat to West Asia, Leavitt took a dig at previous administrations' 'failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance’. She said Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent ‘pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars' to Tehran.

On Thursday (June 26), White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, while addressing the media, highlighted the effectiveness of Operation Midnight Hammer, which was launched on June 22 to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Emphasising on what could have been a looming threat to West Asia, Leavitt took a dig at previous administrations' 'failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance’. She said Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent ‘pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars' to Tehran.

Emphasising on what could have been a looming threat to West Asia, Leavitt took a dig at previous administrations' 'failed attempt to buy the Iranian regime's compliance’. She said Barack Obama and Joe Biden sent ‘pallets of cash, American taxpayer dollars' to Tehran.

Obama and Biden sent American taxpayers' money to Iran...: White House reveals

Since the start of the Israel-Iran war, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been making bold remarks against the US and President Donald Trump as America joined Israel in attacking Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, with an aim to destroy Iran's capability of building nuclear weapons.In the first week of the war, Iranian Leader Khamenei issued a grave warning to the US on June 18, telling them that the country would suffer "irreparable damage" if it engaged in any military actions against Iran.<h2>'Irreparable damage'</h2>“The Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,” Khamenei said in a televised address.He added that the damage it will face will be "far greater" than any harm that Iran may encounter. He further said that the Iranian nation is not frightened by Trump's threats."The US President threatens us. With his absurd rhetoric, he demands that the Iranian people surrender to him. They should make threats against those who are afraid of being threatened," he said.<h2>Four-word reply to Trump's warning</h2>On the same day, Khamenei issued a strong response to the threats from the US. Trump demanded "unconditional surrender" from Iran, but Khamenei responded with four words - "Iran will not surrender".“Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation, and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender,” Khamenei said in a message read aloud on national TV.After the US attacked Iran's nuclear sites, Khamenei vowed punishment for Israel, saying that the punishment would continue. "The Zionist enemy has made a big mistake, committed a big crime; it must be punished and it is being punished; it is being punished right now.”On Tuesday, Khamenei issued another remark against the US after its attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. He said, "We didn't harm anyone. And we will not accept any harassment from anyone under any circumstances.” Sharing an image of a burning US flag amid a war-like situation, “…we will not submit to anyone's harassment; This is the logic of the Iranian nation,” he added.<h2>'US will pay a heavy price'</h2>Today (Thursday), after the two countries agreed to a ceasefire after Trump's announcement, Khamenei again warned the US that an attack similar to what happened to Al-Udeid Air Base can be repeated in the future too.He said that Iran attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region. Such an action "can be repeated in the future too, and America will definitely pay a heavy price, he said."The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to key US centers in the region and can take action whenever it deems necessary is a significant matter. Such an action can be repeated in the future too. Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price," Khamenei said.<h2>'Heavy slap to US's face'</h2>The Iranian leader said that Iran delivered a "heavy slap to the US's face", adding that America gained no achievement from this war."The Islamic Republic delivered a heavy slap to the US’s face. It attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region," Khamenei wrote on X after his televised message was released in minutes.Not just the US, Khamenei issued three threatening messages to Israel after it attacked Iran's nuclear facilities, and killed military officials as well as nuclear scientists.Moreover, before the Israel-Iran war started, Khamenei had been warning US President Trump as the two nations engaged in a conflict regarding the nuclear programme. When Trump threatened to bomb Iran, the Iranian leader warned that the US would face a "strong blow" if it followed through on its military threat.&nbsp;&nbsp;

In the first week of the war, Iranian Leader Khamenei issued a grave warning to the US on June 18, telling them that the country would suffer "irreparable damage" if it engaged in any military actions against Iran.

Since the start of the Israel-Iran war, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been making bold remarks against the US and President Donald Trump as America joined Israel in attacking Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, with an aim to destroy Iran's capability of building nuclear weapons. In the first week of the war, Iranian Leader Khamenei issued a grave warning to the US on June 18, telling them that the country would suffer "irreparable damage" if it engaged in any military actions against Iran. 'Irreparable damage' “The Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage,” Khamenei said in a televised address. He added that the damage it will face will be "far greater" than any harm that Iran may encounter. He further said that the Iranian nation is not frightened by Trump's threats. "The US President threatens us. With his absurd rhetoric, he demands that the Iranian people surrender to him. They should make threats against those who are afraid of being threatened," he said. Four-word reply to Trump's warning On the same day, Khamenei issued a strong response to the threats from the US. Trump demanded "unconditional surrender" from Iran, but Khamenei responded with four words - "Iran will not surrender". “Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation, and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender,” Khamenei said in a message read aloud on national TV. After the US attacked Iran's nuclear sites, Khamenei vowed punishment for Israel, saying that the punishment would continue. "The Zionist enemy has made a big mistake, committed a big crime; it must be punished and it is being punished; it is being punished right now.” On Tuesday, Khamenei issued another remark against the US after its attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. He said, "We didn't harm anyone. And we will not accept any harassment from anyone under any circumstances.” Sharing an image of a burning US flag amid a war-like situation, “…we will not submit to anyone's harassment; This is the logic of the Iranian nation,” he added. 'US will pay a heavy price' Today (Thursday), after the two countries agreed to a ceasefire after Trump's announcement, Khamenei again warned the US that an attack similar to what happened to Al-Udeid Air Base can be repeated in the future too. He said that Iran attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region. Such an action "can be repeated in the future too, and America will definitely pay a heavy price, he said. "The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to key US centers in the region and can take action whenever it deems necessary is a significant matter. Such an action can be repeated in the future too. Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price," Khamenei said. 'Heavy slap to US's face' The Iranian leader said that Iran delivered a "heavy slap to the US's face", adding that America gained no achievement from this war. "The Islamic Republic delivered a heavy slap to the US’s face. It attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region," Khamenei wrote on X after his televised message was released in minutes. Not just the US, Khamenei issued three threatening messages to Israel after it attacked Iran's nuclear facilities, and killed military officials as well as nuclear scientists. Moreover, before the Israel-Iran war started, Khamenei had been warning US President Trump as the two nations engaged in a conflict regarding the nuclear programme. When Trump threatened to bomb Iran, the Iranian leader warned that the US would face a "strong blow" if it followed through on its military threat.

In the first week of the war, Iranian Leader Khamenei issued a grave warning to the US on June 18, telling them that the country would suffer "irreparable damage" if it engaged in any military actions against Iran.

'Irreparable damage, slap on face...': Times when Khamenei issued BOLD warnings to Trump after US entered Israel-Iran war

The United States is redrawing its military priorities. President Donald Trump has unveiled a nearly $893 billion defence and national security budget request for 2026, one that reflects a clear pivot towards next-generation warfare. The budget, flat in dollar terms from last year, offers a glimpse into Trump’s evolving vision: a leaner, tech-driven military force, heavy on drones and long-range missiles, but lighter on traditional fighter jets and warships.&nbsp;But the announcement does not exist in isolation. It comes at a time when the world is witnessing not one, but two active war zones, Russia’s grinding invasion of Ukraine and a dangerous escalation between Israel and Iran. And across the Atlantic, NATO is preparing for a historic increase in defence spending. So, what’s really driving Trump’s latest move?<h2>More missiles, fewer F-35s: Inside the 2026 budget shift</h2>According to documents reviewed by Reuters, Trump has proposed purchasing only 47 F-35 stealth jets, down from 68 approved in President Biden’s final defence budget. The cut has already sparked pushback on Capitol Hill, with the House Appropriations Committee recommending 69 fighter jets as part of its draft legislation. Instead of expanding airpower through fighter jets, the budget prioritises long-range strike capabilities. As per Reuters, the US Air Force plans to increase investment in the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile - Extended Range (JASSM-ER) and Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), systems designed to strike targets at a distance, particularly relevant to rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific.&nbsp;Meanwhile, orders for the Precision Strike Missile, a successor to the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) used in Ukraine, are being scaled back, signalling a focus on fewer, more advanced platforms.In another major shift, the budget boosts funding for small tactical drones, a response to battlefield innovations seen in Ukraine, where cheap, unmanned aircraft have proven to be highly effective tools of modern warfare.<h2>Cuts and controversy: What’s being sacrificed?</h2>To offset these investments, the 2026 plan trims other corners of the Pentagon’s arsenal. As per Reuters, the US Navy will reduce its civilian workforce by more than 7,200 jobs, while only three new warships are scheduled for procurement under this budget. Large naval projects like the Virginia-class submarine, jointly built by General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries, will instead be funded through a separate appropriation.&nbsp;One of Trump’s most ambitious defence projects, the “Golden Dome” missile defence shield is mostly absent from this request. Instead, funding for the programme has been routed through a separate $25 billion allocation within a larger $150 billion Republican-led defence package dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”, which has already passed the House.<h2>How US defence spending in 2024–25</h2>Before Trump’s 2026 pitch, the US already led global military spending. As per Reuters, US defence outlays reached $997 billion in fiscal 2024, rising 5.7 per cent from 2023 and comprising 37 per cent of worldwide military expenditure. For fiscal 2025, Congress approved about $895 billion under the National Defense Authorization Act. This total included a $849.8 billion base budget and additional war-related, emergency funding, in line with the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, which capped growth at just 0.9 per cent over the previous year .&nbsp;The $849.8 billion base defence budget for fiscal 2025 was divided into several major areas. According to the Department of Defense’s FY 2025 budget overview, around 39 per cent (approximately $330 billion) was dedicated to military personnel and benefits, including pay, housing and healthcare. A similar proportion was allocated to operations and maintenance, covering day-to-day military activities, logistics, training, facility upkeep and ongoing overseas commitments . The combined $300 billion allocated to procurement and research, development, test &amp; evaluation (RDT&amp;E) funded new weapons, advanced technologies, and the next generation of platforms which are vital for modernising the force. This structure reflects a strong focus on sustaining readiness while investing heavily in future capabilities.Altogether, defence spending comprised just over 50 per cent of the US discretionary budget, which totals around $1.8 trillion, making it the single largest area of government expenditure, as noted by Reuters.<h2>NATO’s 5 per cent pledge: A new arms race?</h2>Across the Atlantic, NATO allies are preparing for a dramatic increase in defence spending. At a summit in The Hague earlier this week, member states agreed to a new goal: defence spending equivalent to 5 per cent of national GDP by 2035, up from the current 2 per cent target set in 2014.The new benchmark includes 3.5 per cent for core military capability and 1.5 per cent for infrastructure, cyber defence, and supply chain resilience.&nbsp;But not all NATO members are willing to commit. Spain’s refusal to accept the 5 per cent goal drew a sharp rebuke from Trump, who called Madrid’s decision “terrible” and hinted at trade retaliation. As quoted by Politico, Trump stated that European nations should meet the 5 per cent target but insisted that the US should not be held to the same requirement, given it already spends around 3.4 per cent of GDP on defence. According to Washington Post, only a handful of countries, including Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Norway, are on track to meet the 5 per cent goal.<h2>Two wars, one nervous West</h2>The timing of Trump’s budget is deliberate. It arrives amid two major global crises.In Ukraine, Russia’s full-scale invasion has entered its third year. The US has been a key supplier of munitions and intelligence, but Trump has repeatedly called for Europe to “step up” and share more of the financial burden. As per Reuters, he remains critical of “blank cheque” approaches to Kyiv.In the West Asia, tensions between Israel and Iran have escalated rapidly. Israel has carried out targeted strikes on suspected Iranian nuclear infrastructure. In response, Tehran launched waves of drones and missiles, triggering fears of a broader regional war.&nbsp;These crises appear to have informed the Pentagon’s strategy. The focus on drones, missiles and unmanned platforms reflects an evolving battlefield where precision and distance are more valuable than conventional firepower.<h2>The bigger picture: From conventional to asymmetric warfare</h2>Trump’s 2026 defence budget reflects more than just financial priorities, it signals a shift in American military doctrine. The US is reportedly recalibrating away from high-maintenance legacy systems like the F-35 and large naval platforms, and moving towards rapid, asymmetric capabilities designed for unpredictable and tech-driven theatres of war.&nbsp;Meanwhile, NATO’s 5 per cent pledge suggests that Europe, too, is bracing for a long-term security challenge. But questions remain over implementation and whether political appetite will keep pace with rising military costs. As the US Congress prepares for heated debates over the budget, and as NATO allies scramble to realign spending, one thing is clear: the global defence landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation. In a world shaped by drones, missile shields and cyber weapons, Trump’s budget may be setting the tone for the wars of tomorrow. &nbsp;(With inputs from the agencies) &nbsp;

As wars rage in Ukraine and West Asia, and NATO eyes a 5% defence GDP goal, the US pivots toward asymmetric warfare and tech-driven military dominance.

The United States is redrawing its military priorities. President Donald Trump has unveiled a nearly $893 billion defence and national security budget request for 2026, one that reflects a clear pivot towards next-generation warfare. The budget, flat in dollar terms from last year, offers a glimpse into Trump’s evolving vision: a leaner, tech-driven military force, heavy on drones and long-range missiles, but lighter on traditional fighter jets and warships. But the announcement does not exist in isolation. It comes at a time when the world is witnessing not one, but two active war zones, Russia’s grinding invasion of Ukraine and a dangerous escalation between Israel and Iran. And across the Atlantic, NATO is preparing for a historic increase in defence spending. So, what’s really driving Trump’s latest move? More missiles, fewer F-35s: Inside the 2026 budget shift According to documents reviewed by Reuters, Trump has proposed purchasing only 47 F-35 stealth jets, down from 68 approved in President Biden’s final defence budget. The cut has already sparked pushback on Capitol Hill, with the House Appropriations Committee recommending 69 fighter jets as part of its draft legislation. Instead of expanding airpower through fighter jets, the budget prioritises long-range strike capabilities. As per Reuters, the US Air Force plans to increase investment in the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile - Extended Range (JASSM-ER) and Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM), systems designed to strike targets at a distance, particularly relevant to rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific. Meanwhile, orders for the Precision Strike Missile, a successor to the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) used in Ukraine, are being scaled back, signalling a focus on fewer, more advanced platforms. In another major shift, the budget boosts funding for small tactical drones, a response to battlefield innovations seen in Ukraine, where cheap, unmanned aircraft have proven to be highly effective tools of modern warfare. Cuts and controversy: What’s being sacrificed? To offset these investments, the 2026 plan trims other corners of the Pentagon’s arsenal. As per Reuters, the US Navy will reduce its civilian workforce by more than 7,200 jobs, while only three new warships are scheduled for procurement under this budget. Large naval projects like the Virginia-class submarine, jointly built by General Dynamics and Huntington Ingalls Industries, will instead be funded through a separate appropriation. One of Trump’s most ambitious defence projects, the “Golden Dome” missile defence shield is mostly absent from this request. Instead, funding for the programme has been routed through a separate $25 billion allocation within a larger $150 billion Republican-led defence package dubbed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”, which has already passed the House. How US defence spending in 2024–25 Before Trump’s 2026 pitch, the US already led global military spending. As per Reuters, US defence outlays reached $997 billion in fiscal 2024, rising 5.7 per cent from 2023 and comprising 37 per cent of worldwide military expenditure. For fiscal 2025, Congress approved about $895 billion under the National Defense Authorization Act. This total included a $849.8 billion base budget and additional war-related, emergency funding, in line with the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, which capped growth at just 0.9 per cent over the previous year . The $849.8 billion base defence budget for fiscal 2025 was divided into several major areas. According to the Department of Defense’s FY 2025 budget overview, around 39 per cent (approximately $330 billion) was dedicated to military personnel and benefits, including pay, housing and healthcare. A similar proportion was allocated to operations and maintenance, covering day-to-day military activities, logistics, training, facility upkeep and ongoing overseas commitments . The combined $300 billion allocated to procurement and research, development, test & evaluation (RDT&E) funded new weapons, advanced technologies, and the next generation of platforms which are vital for modernising the force. This structure reflects a strong focus on sustaining readiness while investing heavily in future capabilities. Altogether, defence spending comprised just over 50 per cent of the US discretionary budget, which totals around $1.8 trillion, making it the single largest area of government expenditure, as noted by Reuters. NATO’s 5 per cent pledge: A new arms race? Across the Atlantic, NATO allies are preparing for a dramatic increase in defence spending. At a summit in The Hague earlier this week, member states agreed to a new goal: defence spending equivalent to 5 per cent of national GDP by 2035, up from the current 2 per cent target set in 2014. The new benchmark includes 3.5 per cent for core military capability and 1.5 per cent for infrastructure, cyber defence, and supply chain resilience. But not all NATO members are willing to commit. Spain’s refusal to accept the 5 per cent goal drew a sharp rebuke from Trump, who called Madrid’s decision “terrible” and hinted at trade retaliation. As quoted by Politico, Trump stated that European nations should meet the 5 per cent target but insisted that the US should not be held to the same requirement, given it already spends around 3.4 per cent of GDP on defence. According to Washington Post, only a handful of countries, including Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Norway, are on track to meet the 5 per cent goal. Two wars, one nervous West The timing of Trump’s budget is deliberate. It arrives amid two major global crises. In Ukraine, Russia’s full-scale invasion has entered its third year. The US has been a key supplier of munitions and intelligence, but Trump has repeatedly called for Europe to “step up” and share more of the financial burden. As per Reuters, he remains critical of “blank cheque” approaches to Kyiv. In the West Asia, tensions between Israel and Iran have escalated rapidly. Israel has carried out targeted strikes on suspected Iranian nuclear infrastructure. In response, Tehran launched waves of drones and missiles, triggering fears of a broader regional war. These crises appear to have informed the Pentagon’s strategy. The focus on drones, missiles and unmanned platforms reflects an evolving battlefield where precision and distance are more valuable than conventional firepower. The bigger picture: From conventional to asymmetric warfare Trump’s 2026 defence budget reflects more than just financial priorities, it signals a shift in American military doctrine. The US is reportedly recalibrating away from high-maintenance legacy systems like the F-35 and large naval platforms, and moving towards rapid, asymmetric capabilities designed for unpredictable and tech-driven theatres of war. Meanwhile, NATO’s 5 per cent pledge suggests that Europe, too, is bracing for a long-term security challenge. But questions remain over implementation and whether political appetite will keep pace with rising military costs. As the US Congress prepares for heated debates over the budget, and as NATO allies scramble to realign spending, one thing is clear: the global defence landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation. In a world shaped by drones, missile shields and cyber weapons, Trump’s budget may be setting the tone for the wars of tomorrow. (With inputs from the agencies)

Trump’s $893B defence budget slashes F-35 orders to fund drones, missiles and next-gen warfare tools.

Why Trump’s $893 Billion Military Budget Cuts F-35s and Boosts Drones, Missiles?

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday (June 26) claimed victory over Israel, days after US President Donald Trump announced the Israel-Iran ceasefire. He congratulated the country for 'crushing Israel'.In his first public message after the ceasefire, Khamenei said that the "Zionist regime" had almost collapsed and been crushed under the blows of Iran.“With all that clamor, with all those claims, the Zionist regime, under the blows of the Islamic Republic, has almost collapsed and been crushed,” Khamenei said in a televised message to Iranian people posted on his official X account."My congratulations on our dear Iran’s victory over the US regime," the Iranian supreme leader posted on X.He further slammed the US for entering the war, saying that America intervened because it felt that Israel would be completely destroyed."The US regime entered the war directly because it felt that if it didn’t, the Zionist regime would be completely destroyed. It entered the war in an effort to save that regime but achieved nothing," he said.<h2>Warning to US</h2>Khamenei claimed that Iran attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region, adding that Iran delivered a "heavy slap to the US's face".Khamenei further warned the US, saying that such an action "can be repeated in the future too, and America will definitely pay a heavy price."The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to key US centers in the region and can take action whenever it deems necessary is a significant matter. Such an action can be repeated in the future too. Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price," the Iranian leader said.Extending congratulations to Iran, he posted, "I offer my congratulations on the victory over the fallacious Zionist regime."

In his first public message after the ceasefire, Khamenei said that the "Zionist regime" had almost collapsed and been crushed under the blows of Iran.

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday (June 26) claimed victory over Israel, days after US President Donald Trump announced the Israel-Iran ceasefire. He congratulated the country for 'crushing Israel'. In his first public message after the ceasefire, Khamenei said that the "Zionist regime" had almost collapsed and been crushed under the blows of Iran. “With all that clamor, with all those claims, the Zionist regime, under the blows of the Islamic Republic, has almost collapsed and been crushed,” Khamenei said in a televised message to Iranian people posted on his official X account. "My congratulations on our dear Iran’s victory over the US regime," the Iranian supreme leader posted on X. He further slammed the US for entering the war, saying that America intervened because it felt that Israel would be completely destroyed. "The US regime entered the war directly because it felt that if it didn’t, the Zionist regime would be completely destroyed. It entered the war in an effort to save that regime but achieved nothing," he said. Warning to US Khamenei claimed that Iran attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region, adding that Iran delivered a "heavy slap to the US's face". Khamenei further warned the US, saying that such an action "can be repeated in the future too, and America will definitely pay a heavy price. "The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to key US centers in the region and can take action whenever it deems necessary is a significant matter. Such an action can be repeated in the future too. Should any aggression occur, the enemy will definitely pay a heavy price," the Iranian leader said. Extending congratulations to Iran, he posted, "I offer my congratulations on the victory over the fallacious Zionist regime."

In his first public message after the ceasefire, Khamenei said that the "Zionist regime" had almost collapsed and been crushed under the blows of Iran.

'Almost collapsed and crushed': Khamenei claims VICTORY over Israel in first message after Israel-Iran ceasefire

NATO chief Mark Rutte's "daddy" remark at the summit in The Hague went viral and raised eyebrows. Following the reaction, he has been forced to backtrack. Rutte apparently called US President Donald Trump "daddy" while commenting on the Iran-Israel war. He was backing Trump's use of the F word in reference to the ongoing crisis in the Middle East. "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing," Trump said. The two met later, and on Wednesday, Rutte said, "Daddy has to use strong language" on the matter of the Iran-Israel conflict so that things can be sorted out. Trump agreed to Rutte's comments."You have to use strong language. Every once in a while, you have to use a certain word," the president said.&nbsp;However, this did not go down well with anyone in the world, and Rutte started facing backlash for using the word "daddy" for Trump.Rutte was forced to defend his words, saying, "The daddy thing, I didn't call [Trump] daddy, what I said, is that sometimes... In Europe, I hear sometimes countries saying, "hey, Mark, will the US stay with us?"&nbsp;And I said, "that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'hey, are you still staying with the family'"? So in that sense, I use daddy, not that I was calling President Trump daddy," Rutte said, Daily Mail reported.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/donald-trump-nato-ukrainian-journalist-husband-soldier-heart-warming-exchange-1750907342186">VIDEO: Ukrainian journalist holds back tears as Trump asks her about her soldier husband fighting Russia</a>&nbsp;<h2>“Like two kids in the schoolyard”</h2>&nbsp;While meeting Rutte, Trump said that the Iran-Israel ceasefire will hold.&nbsp;'They're not going to be fighting each other, they've had it. Like two kids in the schoolyard, they fight like hell, you can't stop them. Let them fight for two or three minutes, then it's easy to stop them," Trump said. Rutte chimed in with the "daddy" comment.Meanwhile, Trump was asked at the concluding press conference about being called "daddy" by Rutte. He said, "No, he likes me, I think he likes me! If he doesn't, I'll let you know and I'll come back and I'll hit him hard, OK?" "He did it very&nbsp;affectionately, though. 'Daddy, you're my daddy,"' the president smiled and said.At the defence bloc's gathering in The Hague, Trump proposed a big increase in defence spending, which was backed by other leaders. The new &nbsp;language states that "allies commit to invest 5 per cent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035." Most of the member nations agreed, while Spain said it would only invest two per cent.&nbsp; &nbsp;

NATO chief Mark Rutte says he didn't really call Trump “daddy” at the summit. He presented his point of view and tried to clarify what he actually meant. Meanwhile, the US president apparently loved being called “daddy” in front of the world.

NATO chief Mark Rutte's "daddy" remark at the summit in The Hague went viral and raised eyebrows. Following the reaction, he has been forced to backtrack. Rutte apparently called US President Donald Trump "daddy" while commenting on the Iran-Israel war. He was backing Trump's use of the F word in reference to the ongoing crisis in the Middle East. "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing," Trump said. The two met later, and on Wednesday, Rutte said, "Daddy has to use strong language" on the matter of the Iran-Israel conflict so that things can be sorted out. Trump agreed to Rutte's comments. "You have to use strong language. Every once in a while, you have to use a certain word," the president said. However, this did not go down well with anyone in the world, and Rutte started facing backlash for using the word "daddy" for Trump. Rutte was forced to defend his words, saying, "The daddy thing, I didn't call [Trump] daddy, what I said, is that sometimes... In Europe, I hear sometimes countries saying, "hey, Mark, will the US stay with us?" And I said, "that sounds a little bit like a small child asking his daddy, 'hey, are you still staying with the family'"? So in that sense, I use daddy, not that I was calling President Trump daddy," Rutte said, Daily Mail reported. Also Read: VIDEO: Ukrainian journalist holds back tears as Trump asks her about her soldier husband fighting Russia “Like two kids in the schoolyard” While meeting Rutte, Trump said that the Iran-Israel ceasefire will hold. 'They're not going to be fighting each other, they've had it. Like two kids in the schoolyard, they fight like hell, you can't stop them. Let them fight for two or three minutes, then it's easy to stop them," Trump said. Rutte chimed in with the "daddy" comment. Meanwhile, Trump was asked at the concluding press conference about being called "daddy" by Rutte. He said, "No, he likes me, I think he likes me! If he doesn't, I'll let you know and I'll come back and I'll hit him hard, OK?" "He did it very affectionately, though. 'Daddy, you're my daddy,"' the president smiled and said. At the defence bloc's gathering in The Hague, Trump proposed a big increase in defence spending, which was backed by other leaders. The new language states that "allies commit to invest 5 per cent of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035." Most of the member nations agreed, while Spain said it would only invest two per cent.

NATO chief Mark Rutte says he didn't really call Trump “daddy” at the summit. He presented his point of view and tried to clarify what he actually meant. Meanwhile, the US president apparently loved being called “daddy” in front of the world.

'The daddy thing, I didn't...': Embarrassed NATO chief Rutte does an about-turn on Trump 'daddy' remark

Donald Trump's two top executives, on Wednesday (Jun 25) at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague, confirmed that a bombshell US intelligence report on Iran airstrikes was, in fact, leaked. They then quickly pivoted to denouncing the people behind the leak, calling the move politically motivated and demanding accountability. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio assumed an aggressive counteroffensive against the leaked preliminary Pentagon report that said that US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites only set the nation's nuclear programme back by a few months.<h2>What did Rubio and Hegseth say?</h2>Confirming the bombshell leak, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a NATO summit in the Netherlands alongside US President Donald Trump, sought to downplay the contents of the preliminary Pentagon assessment.While Trump continues to insist that the strikes caused a "total obliteration" of Iran’s nuclear capabilities, the leak, first reported by CNN and The New York Times, suggested that the underground facilities had survived the attack, with entrances sealed but no collapse of the critical subterranean infrastructure. Furthermore, the intel estimated that the damage had only caused a few months' setback to Iran's programme and not years, as Trump claimed.At the press conference, Hegseth accused unnamed insiders of leaking the report for political purposes and revealed that an FBI-led investigation was underway. "We are doing a leak investigation with the FBI now because this information is for internal purposes—battle damage investigation—and CNN and others are trying to spin it to try and make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success," he said.He defended the precision and power of the operation, saying that "When you talk to the people who built the bombs, understand what those bombs can do, and deliver those bombs, they landed precisely where they were supposed to." Hegseth claimed the Fordow facility, buried deep within a mountain, suffered "devastation," thanks to the "30,000 pounds of explosives", even as early assessments described the damage as "moderate to severe.""The amount of munitions—six per location—any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise, is speculating with other motives, and we know that, because when you actually look at the report—by the way, it was a top secret report—it was preliminary, it was low-confidence, so you make assessments based on what you know," Hegseth said adding that he believed that the damage was likely "severe and obliterated".Rubio, taking a sharper tone, dismissed the leakers as "professional stabbers" and suggested the media was manipulating the intelligence. "On this stuff about the intelligence—this is what a leaker is telling you the intelligence says. That's the game these people play. They read it and then they go out and characterise it the way they want," he said.Rubio added that a key "conversion facility" necessary for weaponising uranium had been "wiped out," although he acknowledged that "anything in the world can be rebuilt." Still, he argued that Iran would now be under closer watch: "We know where it is, and if they try to rebuild it, we will have options there as well".<h2>Trump lashes out at media</h2>Trump also conceded that the report was "correct" but lashed out at the press over the leaked report, singling out outlets by name. "CNN is scum, MSDNC is scum, the New York Times is scum," he told reporters. "They're bad people, they’re sick.""What they've done is they’ve tried to make this unbelievable victory into something less, “he said, insisting that the report's interpretation was off. Painting the reports as a way to get ratings, he added, ”The generals and all of the people who did a good job, they get demeaned by these idiots at CNN, who can't get ratings. The place is dying, nobody even wants to waste their time going on any of their shows, so they form what [sic] The New York Times, which is dying also. Without Trump, you wouldn't have a New York Times." &nbsp;

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio assumed an aggressive counteroffensive against the leaked preliminary Pentagon report that said that US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites only set the nation's nuclear programme back by a few months.

Donald Trump's two top executives, on Wednesday (Jun 25) at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) summit in The Hague, confirmed that a bombshell US intelligence report on Iran airstrikes was, in fact, leaked. They then quickly pivoted to denouncing the people behind the leak, calling the move politically motivated and demanding accountability. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio assumed an aggressive counteroffensive against the leaked preliminary Pentagon report that said that US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites only set the nation's nuclear programme back by a few months. What did Rubio and Hegseth say? Confirming the bombshell leak, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a NATO summit in the Netherlands alongside US President Donald Trump, sought to downplay the contents of the preliminary Pentagon assessment. While Trump continues to insist that the strikes caused a "total obliteration" of Iran’s nuclear capabilities, the leak, first reported by CNN and The New York Times, suggested that the underground facilities had survived the attack, with entrances sealed but no collapse of the critical subterranean infrastructure. Furthermore, the intel estimated that the damage had only caused a few months' setback to Iran's programme and not years, as Trump claimed. At the press conference, Hegseth accused unnamed insiders of leaking the report for political purposes and revealed that an FBI-led investigation was underway. "We are doing a leak investigation with the FBI now because this information is for internal purposes—battle damage investigation—and CNN and others are trying to spin it to try and make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success," he said. He defended the precision and power of the operation, saying that "When you talk to the people who built the bombs, understand what those bombs can do, and deliver those bombs, they landed precisely where they were supposed to." Hegseth claimed the Fordow facility, buried deep within a mountain, suffered "devastation," thanks to the "30,000 pounds of explosives", even as early assessments described the damage as "moderate to severe." "The amount of munitions—six per location—any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise, is speculating with other motives, and we know that, because when you actually look at the report—by the way, it was a top secret report—it was preliminary, it was low-confidence, so you make assessments based on what you know," Hegseth said adding that he believed that the damage was likely "severe and obliterated". Rubio, taking a sharper tone, dismissed the leakers as "professional stabbers" and suggested the media was manipulating the intelligence. "On this stuff about the intelligence—this is what a leaker is telling you the intelligence says. That's the game these people play. They read it and then they go out and characterise it the way they want," he said. Rubio added that a key "conversion facility" necessary for weaponising uranium had been "wiped out," although he acknowledged that "anything in the world can be rebuilt." Still, he argued that Iran would now be under closer watch: "We know where it is, and if they try to rebuild it, we will have options there as well". Trump lashes out at media Trump also conceded that the report was "correct" but lashed out at the press over the leaked report, singling out outlets by name. "CNN is scum, MSDNC is scum, the New York Times is scum," he told reporters. "They're bad people, they’re sick." "What they've done is they’ve tried to make this unbelievable victory into something less, “he said, insisting that the report's interpretation was off. Painting the reports as a way to get ratings, he added, ”The generals and all of the people who did a good job, they get demeaned by these idiots at CNN, who can't get ratings. The place is dying, nobody even wants to waste their time going on any of their shows, so they form what [sic] The New York Times, which is dying also. Without Trump, you wouldn't have a New York Times."

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio assumed an aggressive counteroffensive against the leaked preliminary Pentagon report that said that US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites only set the nation's nuclear programme back by a few months.

Rubio, Hegseth admit US intel on Iran strikes is real — but there's a catch. Here's what they said

Donald Trump shared an exchange he had with a Ukrainian journalist whose husband is a soldier and is fighting in the war against Russia. At the NATO Summit, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked the president whether the US would give Ukraine Patriot missiles. She informed him that ever since the war broke out, she has been staying in Warsaw, Poland, with her kids, while her husband is fighting the war against Moscow. This jolted Trump, who said, "That’s rough". At the end of the NATO Summit in The Hague, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked Trump at the press conference, "whether or not the US is ready to sell anti-air missile systems to Ukraine."After Trump pointed at her to ask a question, he asked, "Where are you from?" "I'm from Ukraine," the woman said, and asked about the Patriot missiles, saying that "Russia has been pounding Ukraine really heavily right now."Trump asked the reporter, "Are you living yourself now in Ukraine?" She said, "My husband is there," to which a visibly moved Trump interjected, "Wow. I can see you're … you know, it's amazing." The woman said, "Me with the kids, I'm in Warsaw, actually, because he wanted me to.""Is your husband a soldier?" Trump asked. The woman responded, "He is."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/is-that-a-suit-zelensky-finally-seen-in-formal-attire-at-dinner-with-the-dutch-royals-1750839272322">Is that a suit? Zelensky finally seen in formal attire at dinner with the Dutch royals</a> Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-tried-to-demean-great-work-our-b-2-pilots-did-trump-blasts-bad-and-sick-media-outlets-1750874874034">‘Tried to demean great work our B-2 pilots did’: Trump blasts ‘BAD AND SICK’ media outlets</a>&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump gets emotional as he is asked by a Ukrainian reporter whose husband serves in Ukraine about whether he will supply air defenses to Ukraine. Quite a moment in the press conference. <a href="https://t.co/MPW8dV3j3k">pic.twitter.com/MPW8dV3j3k</a>&mdash; Yaroslav Trofimov (@yarotrof) <a href="https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1937882754877718626?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"He is there now, wow. That's rough stuff. And you are living here?", "In Warsaw," the woman says."Let me just tell you, they do want to have the anti-missile missile, as we call it. You know, they're very hard to get. We need them too. We were supplying them to Israel, and they're very effective. 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective," Trump tells the reporter.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-zelensky-responds-to-putin-s-threat-to-conquer-all-of-ukraine-1750773057841/embed&nbsp;"That's a very good question. And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see that it's very upsetting to you. Say hello to your husband, OK," Trump says at the end of the conversation.Trump was quite aggressive towards the other journalists at the conference. His empathetic exchange with the Ukrainian journalist was definitely one of the highlights of the day.Earlier in the day, Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the summit and suggested that an increase in spending by the trans-Atlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its other neighbours. Trump has been upset with Putin for not ending the war. Last month, Moscow hit Ukraine with a barrage of 300 drone and missile attacks, which prompted Trump to lash out at him, calling him "crazy."

Donald Trump had a heart-warming exchange with a Ukrainian journalist at the NATO Summit. The US president was visibly moved after she told him that her husband was a soldier and fighting the war against Russia, while she stayed in Warsaw with the kids. 

Donald Trump shared an exchange he had with a Ukrainian journalist whose husband is a soldier and is fighting in the war against Russia. At the NATO Summit, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked the president whether the US would give Ukraine Patriot missiles. She informed him that ever since the war broke out, she has been staying in Warsaw, Poland, with her kids, while her husband is fighting the war against Moscow. This jolted Trump, who said, "That’s rough". At the end of the NATO Summit in The Hague, BBC Ukraine correspondent Myroslava Petsa asked Trump at the press conference, "whether or not the US is ready to sell anti-air missile systems to Ukraine." After Trump pointed at her to ask a question, he asked, "Where are you from?" "I'm from Ukraine," the woman said, and asked about the Patriot missiles, saying that "Russia has been pounding Ukraine really heavily right now." Trump asked the reporter, "Are you living yourself now in Ukraine?" She said, "My husband is there," to which a visibly moved Trump interjected, "Wow. I can see you're … you know, it's amazing." The woman said, "Me with the kids, I'm in Warsaw, actually, because he wanted me to." "Is your husband a soldier?" Trump asked. The woman responded, "He is." Also Read: Is that a suit? Zelensky finally seen in formal attire at dinner with the Dutch royals Also Read: ‘Tried to demean great work our B-2 pilots did’: Trump blasts ‘BAD AND SICK’ media outlets

Donald Trump had a heart-warming exchange with a Ukrainian journalist at the NATO Summit. The US president was visibly moved after she told him that her husband was a soldier and fighting the war against Russia, while she stayed in Warsaw with the kids.&nbsp;

VIDEO: Ukrainian journalist holds back tears as Trump asks her about her soldier husband fighting Russia

donald-trump

Donald Trump, News on Donald Trump, stories on Donald Trump, articles on Donald Trump, Donald Trump stories at Wion, Donald Trump news, Donald Trump latest news

donald trump

'Precision-guided bombs, missiles': Trump halts some weapons transfers to Ukraine amid raging Russia war. But why?

'Billion people backing you': Chinese people backs Musk amid feud with Trump

Kristi Noem blocked from ending temporary protected status for Haitians

'Get the plane ready': Trump team to deport Zohran Mamdani?

US Senate passes Trump's sweeping 'Big Beautiful' tax and spending bill

Obama and Bush come together to criticise Trump's foreign aid cut

Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces Senate’s longest vote in history

'Political suicide': Musk continues tirade against Trump's Big Beautiful Bill

US Senate begins debate on Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ ahead of final vote

Trump threatens Japan with 25% auto tariffs citing ‘unfair’ trade

Trump says he’ll stick to tariff deadline, warns countries to finalise deals

US-Iran conflict: A spectacular military win, another information war loss

Trump posts article on Israeli court deferring Bibi’s trial hours after his call

Trump’s son for president next? Eric Trump hints at White House run, says it would ‘be easy’

'Sleazebag hoax': Trump explodes over $30bn nuclear incentive for Iran report

Trump says India, others will soon learn what 'they've to pay' to trade with US

Trump demands 1% interest rate, says he’d ‘love’ for Powell to resign

Iran repairing bombed Fordow nuclear site, reveal new satellite images

Trump ends trade negotiations with Canada in retaliation for tech tax

Trump's BIG WARNING to 'burned out' Iran after Khamenei claims victory

'SAVED HIM FROM VERY UGLY DEATH': Trump says he knew where Khamenei was hidden

‘Made in USA’ missing from Trump phone website: What happened?

Trump admin offers Iran to resume nuclear talks | Proposal details INSIDE

US–India trade deal: What’s inside Trump’s “very big” hint?

Obama and Biden sent American taxpayers' money to Iran...: White House reveals

'Irreparable damage, slap on face': Times when Khamenei WARNED Trump