National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

So, Google won't have to split its Chrome browser into a separate entity, at least for now. That is a blow for those who were hoping that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) would cleave off Google’s search empire by forcing a sell-off of its flagship browser. The DOJ rejected the spinoff idea despite a federal judge confirming Google’s illegal monopoly in online search. Once again, Google has escaped with its core power structures intact. The reason may lie in its lesser-known Chromium project. Here is what you should know.<h2>Why didn’t the DOJ agree to split off Chrome from Google?</h2>The reason appears to be how complex, messy, and potentially disruptive it would be for users if Chrome—the browser used by two-thirds of global internet users—were to be divested from Google. The DOJ ruling issued on Tuesday (Sep 2) is less about protecting users and more about institutional caution in the face of unprecedented corporate power.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/perplexity-ai-makes-bold-34-5-billion-offer-to-acquire-google-chrome-amid-antitrust-scrutiny-1755069659262">Also read: Perplexity AI makes bold $34.5 billion offer to acquire Google Chrome amid antitrust scrutiny</a><h2>Chrome is the hidden engine of Google’s monopoly</h2>While Chrome does not directly generate massive revenue, it funnels hundreds of billions of dollars into Google’s ecosystem by ensuring users stay locked into its services—especially Search. In the third quarter of 2024 alone, Google earned $49.4 billion through search advertising.Chrome is not just another browser; it is the gateway to Google’s ad empire—the cash cow.<h2>How big is the Chrome browser?</h2>Chrome currently commands a dominant 66 per cent share of the global browser market. In the United States alone, it handles over 51 per cent of browser traffic. The only real competition—browsers like Safari, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge—are far behind.In fact, many of these "competitors" benefit from their ties to Google. Apple reportedly receives around $20 billion annually from Google to keep Google Search as the default on Safari. Mozilla, which develops Firefox browser, earns approximately $500 million per year from a similar search deal—making it financially dependent on Google.Chrome is also deeply integrated into Google's larger ecosystem: Gmail, Google Drive, Google Docs, Google Calendar, and others. For most users, using Chrome is not an informed choice: It is simply the default.Then there’s Chromium. You may not have heard of it—but you should. Here's why.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/openai-to-release-ai-powered-web-browser-challenge-google-chrome-1752092117457">Also read: OpenAI to release AI-powered web browser, challenge Google Chrome</a><h2>What is Chromium, the puppet master enabling and sustaining Chrome’s dominance?</h2>Even if Google were forced to sell Chrome, its power wouldn't be significantly reduced because it owns and controls Chromium—the open-source browser engine that powers Chrome and other major browsers such as Microsoft Edge, Opera, Brave, and Samsung Internet.Chromium is the backbone of over 70 per cent of browsers in use worldwide. To use an analogy: imagine Exxon no longer sells petrol but still owns the pipeline infrastructure used by all other oil companies. That is what Chromium is in the browser ecosystem.Though Chromium is technically open-source, Google funds and controls its development. Other browsers can build their features and interfaces on top of it, but ultimately, Google determines the roadmap and architecture. This gives Google enormous influence over how the internet functions.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/ai-startup-makes-34-5-billion-bid-for-google-s-chrome-browser-1755105185231/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/ai-startup-makes-34-5-billion-bid-for-google-s-chrome-browser-1755105185231/embed</a>For example, the controversial "Manifest V3" update pushed through Chromium restricts ad blockers across all Chromium-based browsers. This reinforces Google’s advertising business while weakening privacy-focused competitors.So, even if Chrome were sold to a new company, Chromium would continue to tie other browsers to Google’s development direction. Competitors like Edge or Opera are merely passengers on Google’s technological ship.Rivals like Firefox and Safari, which use their own rendering engines (Gecko and WebKit, respectively), often face compatibility issues. Many websites today are optimised specifically for Chromium, leading to slower performance or broken features on non-Chromium browsers.And Google pays to keep it that way. Apple continues to receive massive sums to maintain Google Search as the default. Mozilla’s revenue is largely funded by Google. In other words, even the “competition” is financially tethered to the monopoly.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/google-keeps-chrome-us-judge-asks-it-to-share-data-advantage-to-ai-rivals-1756877061381">Also read: Google keeps Chrome, US judge asks it to share data; advantage&nbsp;to AI rivals</a><h2>Then, why did the DOJ miss the opportunity to curb the Chrome monopoly?</h2>Judge Amit Mehta’s reasoning was that forcing Google to divest Chrome would be risky and could potentially harm consumers. Chrome is tightly integrated into Google’s infrastructure—for example, through Sync, Safe Browsing, and automated updates. A new owner might struggle to ensure a seamless user experience.In addition, the DOJ’s antitrust lawsuit specifically targeted Google’s control over “search distribution,” not browser ownership. As a result, Mehta concluded that a forced sale of Chrome would go beyond the scope of the case.Instead of breaking up the company, the court’s remedies involve banning exclusive default agreements (like Google’s deals with Apple), requiring Google to share its search data with rival companies, and allowing the market to “self-correct” over time.<h2>But we’ve been here before: How the US failed to rein in Microsoft</h2>In the early 2000s, the DOJ took Microsoft to court for bundling its then-dominant browser, Internet Explorer, with its Windows operating system. After years of litigation, the final ruling resulted in minor behavioural remedies. Microsoft’s market dominance continued for nearly a decade.It wasn’t until Google Chrome entered the market that Internet Explorer’s hold was broken. Microsoft eventually shut it down and launched Edge, which, ironically, is now based on Chromium.Taking on Google is even more difficult. It doesn't just control a browser. It owns the browser (Chrome), the engine (Chromium), the search engine (Google Search), the ad platform (AdSense), the cloud (Google Cloud), and the emerging AI infrastructure (Gemini)—all under one corporate roof.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/google-chrome-emerges-as-the-most-vulnerable-browser-in-2022-report-523315">Also read: Is Google Chrome really the 'most vulnerable' browser?</a><h2>Google gets a rap on the wrist—but is it too little, too late?</h2>The DOJ’s decision to block exclusive deals and mandate data-sharing may slow Google down, but it does not dismantle the structural monopoly. Chrome continues to funnel users into Google Search. Chromium ensures that all other browsers either comply or face a technical disadvantage. And Google earns ad revenue from nearly every search, regardless of the browser used.<h2>It’s nearly impossible to regulate open-source infrastructure—and that’s how Google wins</h2>Open-source code is used by both commercial and non-profit ventures. Legally regulating it—especially something as complex as Chromium—is a minefield. That makes it nearly impossible for regulators to directly curb Google’s influence through this route.As of now, Google walks away practically untouched. Its ad pipeline remains intact. Its browser remains unbroken. Its “competitors” remain tethered to its ecosystem.Chrome is not just a browser. It’s a gateway. A control mechanism. A way to shape how billions of people access and experience the internet.Allowing Chrome to remain under Google’s wing and leaving Chromium untouched may be a de facto endorsement of the modern monopoly. Perhaps the real issue is that regulators—trained for 20th-century industrial monopolies—are ill-equipped to handle digital platforms built on open-source, distributed, and technically complex foundations.Google isn’t an oil baron or a railroad tycoon. It’s something new. And until regulators develop the tools to address this new kind of monopoly, Google will continue to dominate—unshaken and unchallenged.

The US Justice Department’s refusal to split the Chrome browser may look like a compromise, but Google’s grip on the web remains ironclad. Its open-source browser architecture, under the project known as Chromium, is the reason it got away. Here’s what you should know.

So, Google won't have to split its Chrome browser into a separate entity, at least for now. That is a blow for those who were hoping that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) would cleave off Google’s search empire by forcing a sell-off of its flagship browser. The DOJ rejected the spinoff idea despite a federal judge confirming Google’s illegal monopoly in online search. Once again, Google has escaped with its core power structures intact. The reason may lie in its lesser-known Chromium project. Here is what you should know. Why didn’t the DOJ agree to split off Chrome from Google? The reason appears to be how complex, messy, and potentially disruptive it would be for users if Chrome—the browser used by two-thirds of global internet users—were to be divested from Google. The DOJ ruling issued on Tuesday (Sep 2) is less about protecting users and more about institutional caution in the face of unprecedented corporate power. Also read: Perplexity AI makes bold $34.5 billion offer to acquire Google Chrome amid antitrust scrutiny Chrome is the hidden engine of Google’s monopoly While Chrome does not directly generate massive revenue, it funnels hundreds of billions of dollars into Google’s ecosystem by ensuring users stay locked into its services—especially Search. In the third quarter of 2024 alone, Google earned $49.4 billion through search advertising. Chrome is not just another browser; it is the gateway to Google’s ad empire—the cash cow. How big is the Chrome browser? Chrome currently commands a dominant 66 per cent share of the global browser market. In the United States alone, it handles over 51 per cent of browser traffic. The only real competition—browsers like Safari, Firefox, and Microsoft Edge—are far behind. In fact, many of these "competitors" benefit from their ties to Google. Apple reportedly receives around $20 billion annually from Google to keep Google Search as the default on Safari. Mozilla, which develops Firefox browser, earns approximately $500 million per year from a similar search deal—making it financially dependent on Google. Chrome is also deeply integrated into Google's larger ecosystem: Gmail, Google Drive, Google Docs, Google Calendar, and others. For most users, using Chrome is not an informed choice: It is simply the default. Then there’s Chromium. You may not have heard of it—but you should. Here's why. Also read: OpenAI to release AI-powered web browser, challenge Google Chrome What is Chromium, the puppet master enabling and sustaining Chrome’s dominance? Even if Google were forced to sell Chrome, its power wouldn't be significantly reduced because it owns and controls Chromium—the open-source browser engine that powers Chrome and other major browsers such as Microsoft Edge, Opera, Brave, and Samsung Internet. Chromium is the backbone of over 70 per cent of browsers in use worldwide. To use an analogy: imagine Exxon no longer sells petrol but still owns the pipeline infrastructure used by all other oil companies. That is what Chromium is in the browser ecosystem. Though Chromium is technically open-source, Google funds and controls its development. Other browsers can build their features and interfaces on top of it, but ultimately, Google determines the roadmap and architecture. This gives Google enormous influence over how the internet functions. https://www.wionews.com/videos/ai-startup-makes-34-5-billion-bid-for-google-s-chrome-browser-1755105185231/embed For example, the controversial "Manifest V3" update pushed through Chromium restricts ad blockers across all Chromium-based browsers. This reinforces Google’s advertising business while weakening privacy-focused competitors. So, even if Chrome were sold to a new company, Chromium would continue to tie other browsers to Google’s development direction. Competitors like Edge or Opera are merely passengers on Google’s technological ship. Rivals like Firefox and Safari, which use their own rendering engines (Gecko and WebKit, respectively), often face compatibility issues. Many websites today are optimised specifically for Chromium, leading to slower performance or broken features on non-Chromium browsers. And Google pays to keep it that way. Apple continues to receive massive sums to maintain Google Search as the default. Mozilla’s revenue is largely funded by Google. In other words, even the “competition” is financially tethered to the monopoly. Also read: Google keeps Chrome, US judge asks it to share data; advantage to AI rivals Then, why did the DOJ miss the opportunity to curb the Chrome monopoly? Judge Amit Mehta’s reasoning was that forcing Google to divest Chrome would be risky and could potentially harm consumers. Chrome is tightly integrated into Google’s infrastructure—for example, through Sync, Safe Browsing, and automated updates. A new owner might struggle to ensure a seamless user experience. In addition, the DOJ’s antitrust lawsuit specifically targeted Google’s control over “search distribution,” not browser ownership. As a result, Mehta concluded that a forced sale of Chrome would go beyond the scope of the case. Instead of breaking up the company, the court’s remedies involve banning exclusive default agreements (like Google’s deals with Apple), requiring Google to share its search data with rival companies, and allowing the market to “self-correct” over time. But we’ve been here before: How the US failed to rein in Microsoft In the early 2000s, the DOJ took Microsoft to court for bundling its then-dominant browser, Internet Explorer, with its Windows operating system. After years of litigation, the final ruling resulted in minor behavioural remedies. Microsoft’s market dominance continued for nearly a decade. It wasn’t until Google Chrome entered the market that Internet Explorer’s hold was broken. Microsoft eventually shut it down and launched Edge, which, ironically, is now based on Chromium. Taking on Google is even more difficult. It doesn't just control a browser. It owns the browser (Chrome), the engine (Chromium), the search engine (Google Search), the ad platform (AdSense), the cloud (Google Cloud), and the emerging AI infrastructure (Gemini)—all under one corporate roof. Also read: Is Google Chrome really the 'most vulnerable' browser? Google gets a rap on the wrist—but is it too little, too late? The DOJ’s decision to block exclusive deals and mandate data-sharing may slow Google down, but it does not dismantle the structural monopoly. Chrome continues to funnel users into Google Search. Chromium ensures that all other browsers either comply or face a technical disadvantage. And Google earns ad revenue from nearly every search, regardless of the browser used. It’s nearly impossible to regulate open-source infrastructure—and that’s how Google wins Open-source code is used by both commercial and non-profit ventures. Legally regulating it—especially something as complex as Chromium—is a minefield. That makes it nearly impossible for regulators to directly curb Google’s influence through this route. As of now, Google walks away practically untouched. Its ad pipeline remains intact. Its browser remains unbroken. Its “competitors” remain tethered to its ecosystem. Chrome is not just a browser. It’s a gateway. A control mechanism. A way to shape how billions of people access and experience the internet. Allowing Chrome to remain under Google’s wing and leaving Chromium untouched may be a de facto endorsement of the modern monopoly. Perhaps the real issue is that regulators—trained for 20th-century industrial monopolies—are ill-equipped to handle digital platforms built on open-source, distributed, and technically complex foundations. Google isn’t an oil baron or a railroad tycoon. It’s something new. And until regulators develop the tools to address this new kind of monopoly, Google will continue to dominate—unshaken and unchallenged.

The US Justice Department’s refusal to split the Chrome browser may look like a compromise, but Google’s grip on the web remains ironclad. Its open-source browser architecture, under the project known as Chromium, is the reason it got away. Here’s what you should know.

Google IS a monopoly, but US can't touch it: Chrome escaped breakup partly due to Chromium. But what is it?

World War II was an extravagant affair. But when people discuss costliest weapon of World War II, they tend to think, it is the Manhattan project. But in reality Boeing's B29 bomber, drew more resources than anything during that period. While the Manhattan Project’s cost was $1.9 billion, the cumulative cost of designing and producing the B-29 Superfortress was around $3 Billion in 1940s valuations. It redefined strategic bombing and shaped the future of aviation.In 1940, with the war looming, the United States was looking for an aircraft which would be able to reach Europe and Asia without needing to refuel. The radical design put forward by Boeing was powered by advanced Wright 4 engines, remote-controlled gun turrets, equipped with a pressurised cabin and could fly higher and faster. More than 3900 bombers were produced at a cost around $50 billion in today's valuation.<h2>Costliest weapon of World War II</h2>The start was somewhat rocky, with engines overheating and inflamed occasionally. A desperate crash programme known as Battle of Kansas was launched with thousands of workers in 1943, to make the bomber combat ready.By 1944 deep into World War II, the B-29 bomber became central to the US operations in Japan and the Pacific War. Its long range made it extremely suitable over the seas, where the distances were enormous. Under General Curtis LeMay, the bombers shifted from high-altitude precision strikes to low-level night raids with incendiary bombs, devastating Japan’s cities.But it is most known for dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Enola Gay and Bockscar the two bombers dropped the Little Man and the Fat Boy, which led to Japan's surrender and end of the tragic war.<h2>Legacy of the B-29 Bomber</h2>After the end of the war many of the engineering from the B-29, like the pressurised cabin and the long range were adopted in civil aviations. It is also assumed that the Soviet Union reverse engineered a captured B-29 Bomber to manufacture the Tupolev Tu-4 during cold war. The B-29 Fortress was not just a bomber it became the symbol of US industrial power, just like the Manhattan project started the Nuclear Age, the B-29 became the blueprint of post-WW II skies.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Discover why the Boeing B-29 Superfortress became the most expensive weapon of World War II, costing more than the Manhattan Project and revolutionising military aviation with advanced technology.

World War II was an extravagant affair. But when people discuss costliest weapon of World War II, they tend to think, it is the Manhattan project. But in reality Boeing's B29 bomber, drew more resources than anything during that period. While the Manhattan Project’s cost was $1.9 billion, the cumulative cost of designing and producing the B-29 Superfortress was around $3 Billion in 1940s valuations. It redefined strategic bombing and shaped the future of aviation. In 1940, with the war looming, the United States was looking for an aircraft which would be able to reach Europe and Asia without needing to refuel. The radical design put forward by Boeing was powered by advanced Wright 4 engines, remote-controlled gun turrets, equipped with a pressurised cabin and could fly higher and faster. More than 3900 bombers were produced at a cost around $50 billion in today's valuation. Costliest weapon of World War II The start was somewhat rocky, with engines overheating and inflamed occasionally. A desperate crash programme known as Battle of Kansas was launched with thousands of workers in 1943, to make the bomber combat ready. By 1944 deep into World War II, the B-29 bomber became central to the US operations in Japan and the Pacific War. Its long range made it extremely suitable over the seas, where the distances were enormous. Under General Curtis LeMay, the bombers shifted from high-altitude precision strikes to low-level night raids with incendiary bombs, devastating Japan’s cities. But it is most known for dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Enola Gay and Bockscar the two bombers dropped the Little Man and the Fat Boy, which led to Japan's surrender and end of the tragic war. Legacy of the B-29 Bomber After the end of the war many of the engineering from the B-29, like the pressurised cabin and the long range were adopted in civil aviations. It is also assumed that the Soviet Union reverse engineered a captured B-29 Bomber to manufacture the Tupolev Tu-4 during cold war. The B-29 Fortress was not just a bomber it became the symbol of US industrial power, just like the Manhattan project started the Nuclear Age, the B-29 became the blueprint of post-WW II skies.

Discover why the Boeing B-29 Superfortress became the most expensive weapon of World War II, costing more than the Manhattan Project and revolutionising military aviation with advanced technology.

B-29 Bomber: Costliest weapon of World War II, costlier than the nuclear bomb

If you think the unveiling of Vikram, India's first fully indigenous semiconductor chip, is just another science event, read this. The launch of the 32-bit chip is India's announcement to the world that it has joined the global semiconductor race, often called the 'chip war'. Here is what you should know about chip wars, who the main contenders are, and why the unveiling of the Vikram chip by Prime Minister Narendra Modi at Semicon India 2025 in New Delhi on Tuesday (Sep 2), is a milestone event with far-reaching ramifications.<h2>What is the Vikram chip?</h2>India's first fully indigenous semiconductor chip, the Vikram 32-bit processor, was developed by the Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) Semiconductor Laboratory. The formal presentation of the chip to Prime Minister Narendra Modi by Union Information Technology Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw marked India’s official entry into the global race to dominate the semiconductor industry.The primary function of the Vikram 32-bit processor is to withstand the harsh conditions of space launches.Vikram, named after the iconic leader of the Indian space programme Vikram Sarabhai, supports the Ada programming language, features floating-point computation capabilities, and uses open-source software toolsets.The Vikram chip was validated during the PSLV-C60 mission for its reliability for use in aerospace, defence, automotive, and energy sectors.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/semicon-india-2025-what-s-vikram-india-s-first-semiconductor-chip-1756805088457">Semicon India 2025: What's Vikram, India's first semiconductor chip</a><h2>Why semiconductors matter: Emergence of the global chip war</h2>Chips are in everything from smartphones and computers to defence systems, space technology, and healthcare. And Vikram is a symbol of India’s ambition to reduce dependency on imported electronics and assert strategic autonomy in the tech sector, critical for economic growth and national security.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/semicon-india-2025-pm-modi-unveils-vikram-india-s-first-homegrown-32-bit-microchip-1756790948329">Semicon India 2025: PM Modi unveils Vikram, India's first homegrown 32-bit microchip</a>&nbsp;Chip wars became a key aspect of global geopolitics since the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, after the pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in the global semiconductor supply chain.At the time, a shortage of chips severely affected industries including automotive and electronics, highlighting how much of the world relies on chip production concentrated in East Asia, mainly in Taiwan. The chip wars contributed to US-China tensions. The US placed tight export curbs on China, particularly on advanced chips below the 9nm node. It was seen as an American attempt to block China’s progress in semiconductor innovation. China launched the “Made in China 2025” strategy, with an aim to dominate critical technologies including chips.<h2>Taiwan, the small big nation in chip wars</h2>Taiwan – a democracy that China considers as its territory that should be united with the mainland even if by force – dominates the chip industry, making 60 per cent of the world’s semiconductors and nearly 90 per cent of the most advanced ones.South Korea, Japan, and China are the other major producers. Together, this means that only a handful of countries in Asia dominate chip manufacturing capability.Now, nations that can make smaller and more efficient chips, such as those at 3nm or 5nm nodes, will have a strategic advantage, as these advanced semiconductors are powering emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, defence systems, and 6G telecom networks.<h2>Who are the top semiconductor firms?</h2>Taiwan’s TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) is the undisputed world leader, making over 60 percent of the world’s chips and nearly 90 percent of advanced chips. South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are strong in memory chips and advanced fabrication.While the US excels in chip design with firms like Intel, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm, the manufacturing of many of these chips is not happening in the country.China’s SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation) continues to develop despite US sanctions, though it lags in advanced chip production.Japan’s Renesas Electronics and Toshiba are important contributors, especially in automotive and industrial sectors.From design to assembly, these countries and corporations control crucial stages of the semiconductor supply chain.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/semicon-india-cg-power-abb-india-which-semiconductor-stock-prices-saw-an-upsurge-1756797931880">Also read: Semicon India: CG Power, ABB India - which semiconductor stock prices saw an upsurge</a><h2>Why India’s Semicon India 2025 is a defining moment in the global chip race</h2>This is the context in which India’s Semicon India 2025, being held from September 2 to 4 at Yashobhoomi in New Delhi, assumes significance.The event aims to catapult India to a global hub for both chip design and manufacturing.With more than 20,750 participants, including 2,500 delegates from 48 countries in attendance, it is more than just another science show. How the world is eager to have India join the chip race is evident from 150 speakers and more than 350 exhibitors.Global CEOs, researchers, and policymakers are discussing topics such as smart manufacturing, advanced packaging, research and development, and investment opportunities.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pm-modi-in-japan-india-eyes-ai-semiconductors-quantum-tech-with-japan-1756461532526/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/pm-modi-in-japan-india-eyes-ai-semiconductors-quantum-tech-with-japan-1756461532526/embed</a><h2>What you should know about India's semiconductor mission</h2>The South Asian nation's chip journey is driven by the India Semiconductor Mission (ISM). Launched in 2021, ISM is supported by a ₹76,000 crore ($9.1 billion) Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. So far, nearly ₹65,000 crore has been committed to 10 approved projects across six states – Gujarat, Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Odisha, and Andhra Pradesh. Five semiconductor units are already under construction, and two are expected to begin chip production soon.Prime Minister Modi, during his address, described India as a “lighthouse of stability and growth” amid global policy uncertainties.India’s goal is to capture 5 percent of the global semiconductor market by 2030, when the domestic chip market is expected to be valued at $100–110 billion.<h2>But India has a long way to go in the semiconductor industry</h2>It has to be noted that the Vikram chip may not compete with Taiwan’s 3nm chips – it is built using 28 to 90nm nodes. But it is strategically designed for high-volume applications such as power management, automotive controllers, and IoT devices, which have significant economic and strategic value.While initiatives under ISM can help India survive global headwinds, tech embargoes, and economic warfare, India has a long way to go in the chip race. Over the past decade, India’s electronics production has increased six times, and electronics exports grew eight-fold, yet challenges remain. India needs capabilities to produce advanced semiconductors like the 3nm chips. The manufacturing ecosystem needs to grow, and needs more sustained investment, a skilled workforce, and robust infrastructure.India's biggest advantages are the large consumer market and proven engineering capabilities.The global semiconductor industry is set to be worth $1 trillion by 2030. The Vikram chip is a pivotal moment for India's advances in the sector, and the beginning of its transition from a consumer of semiconductors to a producer.

India's Vikram chip, unveiled at Semicon India 2025, is a pivotal moment for the nation. It is not only a step toward tech self-reliance but also marks the start of India as an emerging chip producer. Here is why you should take note

If you think the unveiling of Vikram, India's first fully indigenous semiconductor chip, is just another science event, read this. The launch of the 32-bit chip is India's announcement to the world that it has joined the global semiconductor race, often called the 'chip war'. Here is what you should know about chip wars, who the main contenders are, and why the unveiling of the Vikram chip by Prime Minister Narendra Modi at Semicon India 2025 in New Delhi on Tuesday (Sep 2), is a milestone event with far-reaching ramifications. What is the Vikram chip? India's first fully indigenous semiconductor chip, the Vikram 32-bit processor, was developed by the Indian Space Research Organisation’s (ISRO) Semiconductor Laboratory. The formal presentation of the chip to Prime Minister Narendra Modi by Union Information Technology Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw marked India’s official entry into the global race to dominate the semiconductor industry. The primary function of the Vikram 32-bit processor is to withstand the harsh conditions of space launches. Vikram, named after the iconic leader of the Indian space programme Vikram Sarabhai, supports the Ada programming language, features floating-point computation capabilities, and uses open-source software toolsets. The Vikram chip was validated during the PSLV-C60 mission for its reliability for use in aerospace, defence, automotive, and energy sectors. Also read: Semicon India 2025: What's Vikram, India's first semiconductor chip Why semiconductors matter: Emergence of the global chip war Chips are in everything from smartphones and computers to defence systems, space technology, and healthcare. And Vikram is a symbol of India’s ambition to reduce dependency on imported electronics and assert strategic autonomy in the tech sector, critical for economic growth and national security. Also read: Semicon India 2025: PM Modi unveils Vikram, India's first homegrown 32-bit microchip Chip wars became a key aspect of global geopolitics since the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, after the pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in the global semiconductor supply chain. At the time, a shortage of chips severely affected industries including automotive and electronics, highlighting how much of the world relies on chip production concentrated in East Asia, mainly in Taiwan. The chip wars contributed to US-China tensions. The US placed tight export curbs on China, particularly on advanced chips below the 9nm node. It was seen as an American attempt to block China’s progress in semiconductor innovation. China launched the “Made in China 2025” strategy, with an aim to dominate critical technologies including chips. Taiwan, the small big nation in chip wars Taiwan – a democracy that China considers as its territory that should be united with the mainland even if by force – dominates the chip industry, making 60 per cent of the world’s semiconductors and nearly 90 per cent of the most advanced ones. South Korea, Japan, and China are the other major producers. Together, this means that only a handful of countries in Asia dominate chip manufacturing capability. Now, nations that can make smaller and more efficient chips, such as those at 3nm or 5nm nodes, will have a strategic advantage, as these advanced semiconductors are powering emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, defence systems, and 6G telecom networks. Who are the top semiconductor firms? Taiwan’s TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) is the undisputed world leader, making over 60 percent of the world’s chips and nearly 90 percent of advanced chips. South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix are strong in memory chips and advanced fabrication. While the US excels in chip design with firms like Intel, NVIDIA, and Qualcomm, the manufacturing of many of these chips is not happening in the country. China’s SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation) continues to develop despite US sanctions, though it lags in advanced chip production. Japan’s Renesas Electronics and Toshiba are important contributors, especially in automotive and industrial sectors. From design to assembly, these countries and corporations control crucial stages of the semiconductor supply chain. Also read: Semicon India: CG Power, ABB India - which semiconductor stock prices saw an upsurge Why India’s Semicon India 2025 is a defining moment in the global chip race This is the context in which India’s Semicon India 2025, being held from September 2 to 4 at Yashobhoomi in New Delhi, assumes significance. The event aims to catapult India to a global hub for both chip design and manufacturing. With more than 20,750 participants, including 2,500 delegates from 48 countries in attendance, it is more than just another science show. How the world is eager to have India join the chip race is evident from 150 speakers and more than 350 exhibitors. Global CEOs, researchers, and policymakers are discussing topics such as smart manufacturing, advanced packaging, research and development, and investment opportunities. https://www.wionews.com/videos/pm-modi-in-japan-india-eyes-ai-semiconductors-quantum-tech-with-japan-1756461532526/embed What you should know about India's semiconductor mission The South Asian nation's chip journey is driven by the India Semiconductor Mission (ISM). Launched in 2021, ISM is supported by a ₹76,000 crore ($9.1 billion) Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. So far, nearly ₹65,000 crore has been committed to 10 approved projects across six states – Gujarat, Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Odisha, and Andhra Pradesh. Five semiconductor units are already under construction, and two are expected to begin chip production soon. Prime Minister Modi, during his address, described India as a “lighthouse of stability and growth” amid global policy uncertainties. India’s goal is to capture 5 percent of the global semiconductor market by 2030, when the domestic chip market is expected to be valued at $100–110 billion. But India has a long way to go in the semiconductor industry It has to be noted that the Vikram chip may not compete with Taiwan’s 3nm chips – it is built using 28 to 90nm nodes. But it is strategically designed for high-volume applications such as power management, automotive controllers, and IoT devices, which have significant economic and strategic value. While initiatives under ISM can help India survive global headwinds, tech embargoes, and economic warfare, India has a long way to go in the chip race. Over the past decade, India’s electronics production has increased six times, and electronics exports grew eight-fold, yet challenges remain. India needs capabilities to produce advanced semiconductors like the 3nm chips. The manufacturing ecosystem needs to grow, and needs more sustained investment, a skilled workforce, and robust infrastructure. India's biggest advantages are the large consumer market and proven engineering capabilities. The global semiconductor industry is set to be worth $1 trillion by 2030. The Vikram chip is a pivotal moment for India's advances in the sector, and the beginning of its transition from a consumer of semiconductors to a producer.

India's Vikram chip, unveiled at Semicon India 2025, is a pivotal moment for the nation. It is not only a step toward tech self-reliance but also marks the start of India as an emerging chip producer. Here is why you should take note

Vikram chip at Semicon India 2025: India fired its first shot in global 'chip wars'. Here is why it's not just another science story

At the Semicon India 2025 summit on Tuesday (September 2), Union IT and Electronics Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw handed out the Vikram 32-bit processor and test chips from four sanctioned projects to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The Vikram processor, developed by ISRO’s Semiconductor Laboratory, is India’s first completely homegrown 32-bit microchip cleared for deployment in the demanding environment of space launch vehicles. Alongside this milestone, 28 additional chips created by students under the Chips to Startup initiative have been fabricated and packaged at the Mohali semiconductor facility.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-thrown-india-over-the-side-did-trump-cast-india-aside-for-business-with-pakistan-ex-us-nsa-jake-sullivan-weighs-in-1756780938116">'Thrown India over the side': Did Trump cast India aside for business with Pakistan? Ex-US NSA Jake Sullivan Weighs In</a><h2>‘If you seek certainty, India is the place to be’</h2>Reflecting on the progress, Vaishnaw said, “Just a few years ago, we embarked on this journey under the Prime Minister’s visionary guidance with the India Semiconductor Mission. In less than four years, India has earned global trust. Today, five semiconductor plants are being built at remarkable speed, and we have just placed the first indigenously developed chip in the hands of the Prime Minister.” Addressing international industry leaders, the minister underlined India’s appeal amid global uncertainty: “These are unpredictable times, with policy upheavals around the world. Amid this volatility, India shines as a beacon of stability and growth. If you seek certainty, India is the place to be, as our policies are consistent and forward-looking.”&nbsp;The three-day conference, launched in New Delhi, is designed to strengthen India’s semiconductor value chain. According to the Prime Minister’s Office, the event runs through Thursday and will feature a roundtable with global CEOs. Key sessions will spotlight semiconductor manufacturing, next-generation packaging, AI-driven research, infrastructure readiness, funding opportunities, smart production systems, and state-level policy execution. Additional tracks are dedicated to the Design Linked Incentive programme, startup growth, cross-border partnerships, and skills development.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/delhi-police-busts-illegal-arms-factory-in-sarai-rohilla-3-arrested-1756783533609">Delhi police busts illegal arms factory in Sarai Rohilla, 3 arrested</a>&nbsp;This year’s gathering has attracted over 20,750 participants, including more than 2,500 delegates from 48 nations, 150 expert speakers, and 350+ exhibitors. Dedicated pavilions and country-focused roundtables also form part of the agenda. Earlier editions of Semicon India were hosted in Bengaluru (2022), Gandhinagar (2023), and Greater Noida (2024).

Semicon India 2025 PM Modi unveils Vikram Indias first homegrown 32 bit microchip

At the Semicon India 2025 summit on Tuesday (September 2), Union IT and Electronics Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw handed out the Vikram 32-bit processor and test chips from four sanctioned projects to Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The Vikram processor, developed by ISRO’s Semiconductor Laboratory, is India’s first completely homegrown 32-bit microchip cleared for deployment in the demanding environment of space launch vehicles. Alongside this milestone, 28 additional chips created by students under the Chips to Startup initiative have been fabricated and packaged at the Mohali semiconductor facility. Also Read: 'Thrown India over the side': Did Trump cast India aside for business with Pakistan? Ex-US NSA Jake Sullivan Weighs In ‘If you seek certainty, India is the place to be’ Reflecting on the progress, Vaishnaw said, “Just a few years ago, we embarked on this journey under the Prime Minister’s visionary guidance with the India Semiconductor Mission. In less than four years, India has earned global trust. Today, five semiconductor plants are being built at remarkable speed, and we have just placed the first indigenously developed chip in the hands of the Prime Minister.” Addressing international industry leaders, the minister underlined India’s appeal amid global uncertainty: “These are unpredictable times, with policy upheavals around the world. Amid this volatility, India shines as a beacon of stability and growth. If you seek certainty, India is the place to be, as our policies are consistent and forward-looking.” The three-day conference, launched in New Delhi, is designed to strengthen India’s semiconductor value chain. According to the Prime Minister’s Office, the event runs through Thursday and will feature a roundtable with global CEOs. Key sessions will spotlight semiconductor manufacturing, next-generation packaging, AI-driven research, infrastructure readiness, funding opportunities, smart production systems, and state-level policy execution. Additional tracks are dedicated to the Design Linked Incentive programme, startup growth, cross-border partnerships, and skills development. Also Read: Delhi police busts illegal arms factory in Sarai Rohilla, 3 arrested This year’s gathering has attracted over 20,750 participants, including more than 2,500 delegates from 48 nations, 150 expert speakers, and 350+ exhibitors. Dedicated pavilions and country-focused roundtables also form part of the agenda. Earlier editions of Semicon India were hosted in Bengaluru (2022), Gandhinagar (2023), and Greater Noida (2024).

Semicon India 2025 was inaugurated in New Delhi on Tuesday (September 2). The three-day conference will witness more than 20,000 participants from nearly 48 countries

Semicon India 2025: PM Modi unveils Vikram, India's first homegrown 32-bit microchip

Tech giant Google is facing an unusual ultimatum from a hacker collective that has demanded the firing of two of its cybersecurity leaders or risk a major data leak. The group, calling itself Scattered LapSus Hunters, claims ties to several well-known cybercrime outfits, including Scattered Spider, LapSus, and ShinyHunters. In a post, the hackers alleged that Google’s Threat Intelligence Group has been probing their networks, prompting their demand that the company remove the two executives. WION is withholding the names of the two employees over privacy concerns.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/gen-z-uses-ai-the-most-but-it-s-eating-up-their-jobs-disturbing-trend-of-ai-turning-from-assistant-to-replacement-of-young-workers-work-life-jobs-1756723332217">Gen Z uses AI the most, but it's eating up their jobs. Disturbing trend of AI turning from assistant to replacement of young workers</a>&nbsp;The threat comes shortly after Google confirmed that ShinyHunters had accessed data from Salesforce, a third-party service provider. While Google said there was no breach of its internal databases or consumer Gmail accounts, the attackers appear to be leveraging the incident for pressure. In response, Google issued a global security alert to its 2.5 billion Gmail users, urging them to reset passwords as a precaution. The breach did not expose passwords or private Gmail data, but it did include business contact information, which hackers are now exploiting in phishing and “vishing” (voice phishing) schemes.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/how-chatgpt-helped-recover-a-200-000-lamborghini-huracan-stolen-two-years-ago-1756714194154">How ChatGPT helped recover a $200,000 Lamborghini Huracan stolen two years ago.</a>&nbsp;According to Google’s Threat Intelligence team, 37% of account hijackings across its platforms now stem from phishing and social engineering attacks. Fraudsters are impersonating Google staff using the stolen contact details, sending convincing fake emails and in some cases even making phone calls to trick users into giving up credentials. Google has not responded directly to the demand regarding the two employees, but the company stressed in a recent blog post that its focus remains on “protecting users and strengthening defenses against evolving threats.”

Hacking threat? Tech giant Google issues global Gmail alert after hackers target security team

Tech giant Google is facing an unusual ultimatum from a hacker collective that has demanded the firing of two of its cybersecurity leaders or risk a major data leak. The group, calling itself Scattered LapSus Hunters, claims ties to several well-known cybercrime outfits, including Scattered Spider, LapSus, and ShinyHunters. In a post, the hackers alleged that Google’s Threat Intelligence Group has been probing their networks, prompting their demand that the company remove the two executives. WION is withholding the names of the two employees over privacy concerns. Also Read: Gen Z uses AI the most, but it's eating up their jobs. Disturbing trend of AI turning from assistant to replacement of young workers The threat comes shortly after Google confirmed that ShinyHunters had accessed data from Salesforce, a third-party service provider. While Google said there was no breach of its internal databases or consumer Gmail accounts, the attackers appear to be leveraging the incident for pressure. In response, Google issued a global security alert to its 2.5 billion Gmail users, urging them to reset passwords as a precaution. The breach did not expose passwords or private Gmail data, but it did include business contact information, which hackers are now exploiting in phishing and “vishing” (voice phishing) schemes. Also Read: How ChatGPT helped recover a $200,000 Lamborghini Huracan stolen two years ago. According to Google’s Threat Intelligence team, 37% of account hijackings across its platforms now stem from phishing and social engineering attacks. Fraudsters are impersonating Google staff using the stolen contact details, sending convincing fake emails and in some cases even making phone calls to trick users into giving up credentials. Google has not responded directly to the demand regarding the two employees, but the company stressed in a recent blog post that its focus remains on “protecting users and strengthening defenses against evolving threats.”

As per Google’s Threat Intelligence team, approximately 37% of account hijackings across its platforms now originate from phishing and social engineering attacks

Generation Z, born into the internet age in the late 1990s and early 2000s, are widely known to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) — from content creation to workplace automation. But new, unsettling research suggests that the generation leading AI adoption is also its biggest casualty in the workforce. The reason? Entry-level jobs traditionally filled by young workers are rapidly being replaced by AI systems.<h2>Studies show how Gen Z is disproportionately affected by AI adoption</h2>Recent studies by Stanford University and Deloitte suggest that AI may be transitioning from assistant to replacement — particularly for Generation Z roles.Gen Z, typically defined as those born between 1997 and 2012, are true digital natives. Growing up surrounded by smartphones, social media, and constantly evolving technology has made them early adopters of AI tools.Deloitte’s Gen Z and Millennial Survey found that approximately 25 per cent of Gen Z workers who use AI at work do so “all or most of the time.” Many believe AI can increase productivity and improve work–life balance.A 2025 report from Master of Code Global found that 70 per cent of Gen Z actively use generative AI tools, often daily. These are used for tasks such as writing, coding, design, and problem-solving.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/ai-therapy-explained-can-chatbots-help-with-mental-health-1756709730837">AI therapy explained: Can chatbots help with mental health?</a> Trust in AI is also high among Gen Z. A Forbes survey revealed that 41 per cent of Gen Z believe in AI more than human colleagues, and around 50 per cent feel more comfortable discussing workplace matters with AI than with their managers. On average, Gen Z interact with AI around 12 times per week — nearly double that of Generation X (7 times) and triple that of Baby Boomers (4 times).<h2>AI is reducing Gen Z job opportunities — and it’s a growing concern</h2>But while Gen Z may be leading the charge in AI adoption, they are also facing disproportionate job losses due to automation.A 2025 study by Stanford University’s Digital Economy Lab, led by Erik Brynjolfsson and colleagues, analysed payroll data from ADP and found that employment among workers aged 22 to 25 in AI-exposed fields — such as software development, customer service, and clerical work — declined by 13 per cent between late 2022 and mid-2025.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/artificial-intelligence-a-teacher-s-enemy-or-best-friend-1756371574726/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/artificial-intelligence-a-teacher-s-enemy-or-best-friend-1756371574726/embed</a>In contrast, older workers in the same fields saw stable or even increasing employment rates.The report attributes this generational divide to the nature of tasks involved. Entry-level roles often involve “codified knowledge” — structured, repeatable tasks that are easily automated by AI. Meanwhile, older workers possess “tacit knowledge” — experience-based skills and intuition that are harder to automate.As Brynjolfsson put it, the challenge ahead is ensuring that AI serves as a tool for empowerment, not exclusion — especially for those just starting out in the workforce.The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 reinforced these findings, warning that 40 per cent of employers expect to reduce staff in roles where AI can automate routine tasks. Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/personalised-learning-with-ai-how-classrooms-are-evolving-explained-1756657872678">Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained</a><h2>Entry-level positions — often held by Gen Z — are particularly at risk. Is it time to pivot?</h2>Concerns are spreading globally. A 2024 survey conducted in India by BML Munjal University found that 44 per cent of Gen Z respondents fear job displacement due to AI, while 63 per cent worry about long-term job instability.In response to these challenges, many Gen Z workers are reassessing their career options. A report by Business Insider highlighted a growing shift among younger workers towards blue-collar and skilled trades such as electrical work, plumbing, and landscaping that are less susceptible to automation.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/future-of-healthcare-how-artificial-intelligence-is-transforming-hospitals-1756656911576">Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals</a>Experts argue that systemic changes are needed. Strategic policy interventions — such as updated curricula focusing on AI collaboration, digital resilience, and soft skills — are essential. Hiring practices must also adapt to ensure entry-level roles remain viable pathways into long-term careers.Without these changes, Gen Z faces the risk of becoming a “lost generation” in the workforce. The erosion of entry-level opportunities could lead to lasting effects on economic mobility and social equity.<h2>What's the way forward for Gen Z workers threatened by AI automation?</h2>AI is undoubtedly transforming the world of work, but without deliberate efforts to guide this transformation, it risks deepening generational inequalities. While Gen Z may be the most AI-literate generation yet, they also stand to lose the most from unregulated AI-driven disruption.As Brynjolfsson warns, the future depends on balancing AI innovation with policies that protect and prepare young workers for a fast-evolving, tech-enabled job environment.

Generation Z leads AI adoption at the workplace but faces significant job losses as entry-level roles are automated. Studies show decline in young workers in AI-exposed jobs. What's the way out for this vulnerable generation?

Generation Z, born into the internet age in the late 1990s and early 2000s, are widely known to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) — from content creation to workplace automation. But new, unsettling research suggests that the generation leading AI adoption is also its biggest casualty in the workforce. The reason? Entry-level jobs traditionally filled by young workers are rapidly being replaced by AI systems. Studies show how Gen Z is disproportionately affected by AI adoption Recent studies by Stanford University and Deloitte suggest that AI may be transitioning from assistant to replacement — particularly for Generation Z roles. Gen Z, typically defined as those born between 1997 and 2012, are true digital natives. Growing up surrounded by smartphones, social media, and constantly evolving technology has made them early adopters of AI tools. Deloitte’s Gen Z and Millennial Survey found that approximately 25 per cent of Gen Z workers who use AI at work do so “all or most of the time.” Many believe AI can increase productivity and improve work–life balance. A 2025 report from Master of Code Global found that 70 per cent of Gen Z actively use generative AI tools, often daily. These are used for tasks such as writing, coding, design, and problem-solving. Also read: AI therapy explained: Can chatbots help with mental health? Trust in AI is also high among Gen Z. A Forbes survey revealed that 41 per cent of Gen Z believe in AI more than human colleagues, and around 50 per cent feel more comfortable discussing workplace matters with AI than with their managers. On average, Gen Z interact with AI around 12 times per week — nearly double that of Generation X (7 times) and triple that of Baby Boomers (4 times). AI is reducing Gen Z job opportunities — and it’s a growing concern But while Gen Z may be leading the charge in AI adoption, they are also facing disproportionate job losses due to automation. A 2025 study by Stanford University’s Digital Economy Lab, led by Erik Brynjolfsson and colleagues, analysed payroll data from ADP and found that employment among workers aged 22 to 25 in AI-exposed fields — such as software development, customer service, and clerical work — declined by 13 per cent between late 2022 and mid-2025. https://www.wionews.com/videos/artificial-intelligence-a-teacher-s-enemy-or-best-friend-1756371574726/embed In contrast, older workers in the same fields saw stable or even increasing employment rates. The report attributes this generational divide to the nature of tasks involved. Entry-level roles often involve “codified knowledge” — structured, repeatable tasks that are easily automated by AI. Meanwhile, older workers possess “tacit knowledge” — experience-based skills and intuition that are harder to automate. As Brynjolfsson put it, the challenge ahead is ensuring that AI serves as a tool for empowerment, not exclusion — especially for those just starting out in the workforce. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 reinforced these findings, warning that 40 per cent of employers expect to reduce staff in roles where AI can automate routine tasks. Also read: Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained Entry-level positions — often held by Gen Z — are particularly at risk. Is it time to pivot? Concerns are spreading globally. A 2024 survey conducted in India by BML Munjal University found that 44 per cent of Gen Z respondents fear job displacement due to AI, while 63 per cent worry about long-term job instability. In response to these challenges, many Gen Z workers are reassessing their career options. A report by Business Insider highlighted a growing shift among younger workers towards blue-collar and skilled trades such as electrical work, plumbing, and landscaping that are less susceptible to automation. Also read: Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals Experts argue that systemic changes are needed. Strategic policy interventions — such as updated curricula focusing on AI collaboration, digital resilience, and soft skills — are essential. Hiring practices must also adapt to ensure entry-level roles remain viable pathways into long-term careers. Without these changes, Gen Z faces the risk of becoming a “lost generation” in the workforce. The erosion of entry-level opportunities could lead to lasting effects on economic mobility and social equity. What's the way forward for Gen Z workers threatened by AI automation? AI is undoubtedly transforming the world of work, but without deliberate efforts to guide this transformation, it risks deepening generational inequalities. While Gen Z may be the most AI-literate generation yet, they also stand to lose the most from unregulated AI-driven disruption. As Brynjolfsson warns, the future depends on balancing AI innovation with policies that protect and prepare young workers for a fast-evolving, tech-enabled job environment.

Generation Z leads AI adoption at the workplace but faces significant job losses as entry-level roles are automated. Studies show decline in young workers in AI-exposed jobs. What's the way out for this vulnerable generation?

Gen Z uses AI the most, but it's eating up their jobs. Disturbing trend of AI turning from assistant to replacement of young workers

A stolen Lamborghini Huracan EVO has been recovered in the United States with the unexpected help of artificial intelligence. The supercar, worth over $200,000, belonged to Andrew Garcia from Orange County, California.&nbsp;According to US local media reports, the car was stolen in December 2023 as part of a rental scam where thieves used false documents to re-register luxury vehicles and sell them on the black market.&nbsp;For almost two years, Garcia had no leads. Then, in August 2025, he received an Instagram message from a stranger who claimed to have seen the vehicle. The person shared photos and said they found Garcia’s business card inside the car.

<h2>How ChatGPT Analysed the Clues</h2>Instead of calling the police immediately, Garcia decided to test an unusual approach. He uploaded the images to ChatGPT, asking it to ignore the Lamborghini itself and instead study the background details such as blurred vehicles, street signs and vegetation.&nbsp;ChatGPT analysed the photos and suggested possible regions. Garcia combined this with Google’s geolocation tools, narrowing the search to Denver, Colorado.&nbsp;Once Garcia had enough evidence, he contacted Denver police. Officers checked the vehicle’s VIN and confirmed its identity. The car was soon returned to its owner.&nbsp;Denver police said this case shows how consumer AI tools can support traditional investigations, although they stressed that official reporting remains vital.

Lamborghini Huracan stolen two years ago

<h2>AI in the Headlines for Other Reasons</h2>ChatGPT has also been trending for another reason. Recently, a Reddit user shared screenshots where ChatGPT praised a Chinese rival, DeepSeek, for its accessibility and depth. The unusual exchange sparked online debate, since AI models rarely acknowledge competitors openly.&nbsp;Experts note that as AI platforms expand, unusual use cases from helping trace stolen cars to surprising industry comparisons are becoming part of daily conversations.

A stolen Lamborghini Huracan EVO was found in the US after its owner used ChatGPT to analyse photo clues. The AI spotted details that helped police trace the $200,000 supercar. Know more about this story.

A stolen Lamborghini Huracan EVO has been recovered in the United States with the unexpected help of artificial intelligence. The supercar, worth over $200,000, belonged to Andrew Garcia from Orange County, California. According to US local media reports, the car was stolen in December 2023 as part of a rental scam where thieves used false documents to re-register luxury vehicles and sell them on the black market. For almost two years, Garcia had no leads. Then, in August 2025, he received an Instagram message from a stranger who claimed to have seen the vehicle. The person shared photos and said they found Garcia’s business card inside the car.

A stolen Lamborghini Huracan EVO was found in the US after its owner used ChatGPT to analyse photo clues. The AI spotted details that helped police trace the $200,000 supercar. Know more about this story.

How ChatGPT helped recover a $200,000 Lamborghini Huracan stolen two years ago

Artificial intelligence (AI) is quietly becoming a designer in the fashion world. From predicting trends to creating sketches, AI tools are changing how clothes are imagined, made and sold.&nbsp;According to a report by McKinsey &amp; Company, AI is expected to add up to $150 billion to the global fashion and luxury industry over the next few years. By analysing data from social media, online shopping, and fashion archives, AI can identify upcoming styles and suggest what people might want to wear next.<h2>How AI Predicts Fashion Trends</h2>AI algorithms can scan millions of images and posts from platforms like Instagram, TikTok and e-commerce websites. They then identify patterns such as colours, cuts or fabrics gaining popularity. A study in Fashion and Textiles Journal explained that machine learning can forecast how long a micro-trend will last and when it might peak.&nbsp;For designers, this means faster insights. Instead of waiting for seasonal reports, AI provides real-time updates. This shortens the cycle between inspiration and production.<h2>Designing with Algorithms</h2>AI is not only about prediction; it also helps create. Tools like Repsketch allow fashion teams to generate realistic sketches of garments quickly, while platforms like Artiphoria enable even non-designers to create prints and artwork.&nbsp;Generative AI can suggest hundreds of variations of a single design. This helps designers test ideas rapidly and explore creative directions they might not have considered. As the Business of Fashion reported, many luxury labels are experimenting with AI to develop mood boards and fabric patterns.<h2>Personalisation and Sustainability</h2>AI is also personalising shopping. Apps such as 3DLOOK and EasySize use algorithms to recommend sizes and styles based on body measurements. This reduces returns, which are a major cost for retailers.&nbsp;On the sustainability side, AI helps brands forecast demand better. By predicting how many pieces will sell, companies can avoid overproduction, reducing waste and unsold stock. A report by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation noted that digital tools like AI could play a central role in moving fashion towards a circular economy.<h2>The Future of AI in Fashion</h2>Experts say AI should be seen as a partner rather than a replacement for human designers. Creativity, cultural meaning and emotional connection remain deeply human. But with AI handling data analysis and repetitive tasks, designers can focus more on storytelling and innovation.&nbsp;The fashion industry is under pressure to become faster, more sustainable, and more personalised. With AI, it is now possible to design collections that are not only on-trend but also more efficient and environmentally friendly.

AI is reshaping fashion by predicting trends, generating designs and personalising shopping. From reducing waste to boosting creativity, tech is turning style smarter and more sustainable. Curious how AI is changing the runway? Read more below.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is quietly becoming a designer in the fashion world. From predicting trends to creating sketches, AI tools are changing how clothes are imagined, made and sold. According to a report by McKinsey & Company, AI is expected to add up to $150 billion to the global fashion and luxury industry over the next few years. By analysing data from social media, online shopping, and fashion archives, AI can identify upcoming styles and suggest what people might want to wear next. How AI Predicts Fashion Trends AI algorithms can scan millions of images and posts from platforms like Instagram, TikTok and e-commerce websites. They then identify patterns such as colours, cuts or fabrics gaining popularity. A study in Fashion and Textiles Journal explained that machine learning can forecast how long a micro-trend will last and when it might peak. For designers, this means faster insights. Instead of waiting for seasonal reports, AI provides real-time updates. This shortens the cycle between inspiration and production. Designing with Algorithms AI is not only about prediction; it also helps create. Tools like Repsketch allow fashion teams to generate realistic sketches of garments quickly, while platforms like Artiphoria enable even non-designers to create prints and artwork. Generative AI can suggest hundreds of variations of a single design. This helps designers test ideas rapidly and explore creative directions they might not have considered. As the Business of Fashion reported, many luxury labels are experimenting with AI to develop mood boards and fabric patterns. Personalisation and Sustainability AI is also personalising shopping. Apps such as 3DLOOK and EasySize use algorithms to recommend sizes and styles based on body measurements. This reduces returns, which are a major cost for retailers. On the sustainability side, AI helps brands forecast demand better. By predicting how many pieces will sell, companies can avoid overproduction, reducing waste and unsold stock. A report by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation noted that digital tools like AI could play a central role in moving fashion towards a circular economy. The Future of AI in Fashion Experts say AI should be seen as a partner rather than a replacement for human designers. Creativity, cultural meaning and emotional connection remain deeply human. But with AI handling data analysis and repetitive tasks, designers can focus more on storytelling and innovation. The fashion industry is under pressure to become faster, more sustainable, and more personalised. With AI, it is now possible to design collections that are not only on-trend but also more efficient and environmentally friendly.

AI is reshaping fashion by predicting trends, generating designs and personalising shopping. From reducing waste to boosting creativity, tech is turning style smarter and more sustainable. Curious how AI is changing the runway? Read more below.

AI in Fashion designing: Will AI decide what you wear next?

Artificial intelligence is entering the field of mental health through chatbots and virtual assistants, often called AI therapists. These tools are designed to provide simple emotional support, coping tips and guided exercises. While they are not a replacement for licensed therapists, however they are becoming a growing part of mental health care worldwide.&nbsp;A 2023 report by the World Health Organization (WHO) said that digital mental health tools can expand access to support, especially in areas where services are limited. But it also warned about risks, including data privacy and the lack of human judgement.<h2>Benefits of AI Therapy</h2>24/7 availability: Unlike human-led therapy, AI chatbots can respond at any time. For many users, this provides immediate help when no professional is available.&nbsp;Reduced stigma: The anonymity of a chatbot can make it easier for people to open up about their struggles. A study published in JMIR Mental Health found that many young users were more comfortable discussing stress with AI than with adults.&nbsp;Personalised support: Platforms such as Woebot and Wysa use machine learning to adjust responses over time. They often use elements of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to help users reframe negative thoughts.&nbsp;Cost-effectiveness: Many AI mental health apps are free or low-cost, lowering financial barriers to therapy.&nbsp;LimitationsLack of human nuance: AI systems can miss emotional or cultural context. For example, a 2022 paper in Frontiers in reported that Health concern that chatbot replies sometimes felt generic or out of place.&nbsp;Not for crises: AI cannot handle emergencies like suicidal thoughts. Developers usually add warnings directing users to hotlines, but delays or mistakes can be harmful.&nbsp;Privacy concerns: Data shared with apps may not be fully secure. The American Psychiatric Association has called for stronger regulation of digital mental health tools to protect sensitive information.&nbsp;Cultural bias: Since most models are trained on English-language data, responses may not reflect the needs of diverse communities.<h2>The Role of AI in Mental Health</h2>Many experts agree that AI should be viewed as a complement, not a replacement. It can expand access to care, encourage people to seek help, and provide coping strategies. But decisions about diagnosis or treatment must remain with trained professionals.&nbsp;Regulators and mental health bodies stress the need for clear rules on how these tools are marketed and how user data is stored. According to WHO, the aim should be to use AI to support human care, giving more people entry points to mental health resources while keeping therapists in the lead role.

AI is helping people in their mental health care through chatbots and virtual assistants. These tools offer 24/7 support, reduce stigma, and provide coping tips, lets understand concerns over privacy and limits in crises. Experts say AI should support not replace therapists.

Artificial intelligence is entering the field of mental health through chatbots and virtual assistants, often called AI therapists. These tools are designed to provide simple emotional support, coping tips and guided exercises. While they are not a replacement for licensed therapists, however they are becoming a growing part of mental health care worldwide. A 2023 report by the World Health Organization (WHO) said that digital mental health tools can expand access to support, especially in areas where services are limited. But it also warned about risks, including data privacy and the lack of human judgement. Benefits of AI Therapy 24/7 availability: Unlike human-led therapy, AI chatbots can respond at any time. For many users, this provides immediate help when no professional is available. Reduced stigma: The anonymity of a chatbot can make it easier for people to open up about their struggles. A study published in JMIR Mental Health found that many young users were more comfortable discussing stress with AI than with adults. Personalised support: Platforms such as Woebot and Wysa use machine learning to adjust responses over time. They often use elements of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to help users reframe negative thoughts. Cost-effectiveness: Many AI mental health apps are free or low-cost, lowering financial barriers to therapy. Limitations Lack of human nuance: AI systems can miss emotional or cultural context. For example, a 2022 paper in Frontiers in reported that Health concern that chatbot replies sometimes felt generic or out of place. Not for crises: AI cannot handle emergencies like suicidal thoughts. Developers usually add warnings directing users to hotlines, but delays or mistakes can be harmful. Privacy concerns: Data shared with apps may not be fully secure. The American Psychiatric Association has called for stronger regulation of digital mental health tools to protect sensitive information. Cultural bias: Since most models are trained on English-language data, responses may not reflect the needs of diverse communities. The Role of AI in Mental Health Many experts agree that AI should be viewed as a complement, not a replacement. It can expand access to care, encourage people to seek help, and provide coping strategies. But decisions about diagnosis or treatment must remain with trained professionals. Regulators and mental health bodies stress the need for clear rules on how these tools are marketed and how user data is stored. According to WHO, the aim should be to use AI to support human care, giving more people entry points to mental health resources while keeping therapists in the lead role.

AI is helping people in their mental health care through chatbots and virtual assistants. These tools offer 24/7 support, reduce stigma, and provide coping tips, lets understand concerns over privacy and limits in crises. Experts say AI should support not replace therapists.

AI therapy explained: Can chatbots help with mental health?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is slowly becoming part of classrooms and learning apps worldwide. AI can adjust lessons to fit each student’s needs. It can be personalised for each learner, where every learner follows a path built around their strengths, weaknesses, and goals.&nbsp;According to a 2023 report by UNESCO, AI-based education tools can “create individual learning pathways” and help reduce learning gaps, especially in large classrooms. Platforms such as Duolingo and DreamBox already use AI to adapt lessons in real time based on student performance.&nbsp;<h2>How AI Builds Learning Paths</h2>AI systems collect data on how a student performs in quizzes, assignments, and practice exercises. They then analyse this information to design a customised learning journey. A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) noted that adaptive systems can quickly identify “where learners are struggling and adjust content accordingly.” This means a student strong in grammar but weak in vocabulary gets extra vocabulary practice while moving ahead in grammar.&nbsp;<h2>Adaptive Content and Feedback</h2>AI tutors can change the difficulty of tasks automatically. If a student solves problems easily, the system moves them to advanced topics. If they struggle, it gives extra practice or simpler explanations.&nbsp;Immediate feedback is another advantage. A study published found that students using AI-powered platforms received corrections instantly, which improved concept mastery faster than waiting for teacher feedback. Language apps like Duolingo use this approach, showing learners their mistakes as they practise.<h2>Motivation and Engagement</h2>AI can also keep students motivated. Some tools use gamification, points, badges, or even animated characters to make lessons engaging. The University of Illinois found that “personalised systems improve learner motivation by giving relevant and challenging tasks.” For children, AI tutors can even appear as virtual instructors based on familiar characters, making learning feel interactive and fun.<h2>The Future of Personalised Learning</h2>While AI tools are not a replacement for teachers, they can make education more inclusive and effective. Teachers can use AI reports to see exactly where students need help, saving time in crowded classrooms. UNESCO has stressed that AI should remain a support system, ensuring “teachers guide critical thinking while AI handles routine and repetitive tasks.”&nbsp;As technology develops, personalised learning may become a standard part of schools, bringing private-tutor style teaching to more students at scale.

AI in education is changing classrooms with personalised lessons, instant feedback, and engaging. It helps reduce learning gaps and motivates students. Teachers still guide thinking, while AI supports learning. Know more below.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is slowly becoming part of classrooms and learning apps worldwide. AI can adjust lessons to fit each student’s needs. It can be personalised for each learner, where every learner follows a path built around their strengths, weaknesses, and goals. According to a 2023 report by UNESCO, AI-based education tools can “create individual learning pathways” and help reduce learning gaps, especially in large classrooms. Platforms such as Duolingo and DreamBox already use AI to adapt lessons in real time based on student performance. How AI Builds Learning Paths AI systems collect data on how a student performs in quizzes, assignments, and practice exercises. They then analyse this information to design a customised learning journey. A report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) noted that adaptive systems can quickly identify “where learners are struggling and adjust content accordingly.” This means a student strong in grammar but weak in vocabulary gets extra vocabulary practice while moving ahead in grammar. Adaptive Content and Feedback AI tutors can change the difficulty of tasks automatically. If a student solves problems easily, the system moves them to advanced topics. If they struggle, it gives extra practice or simpler explanations. Immediate feedback is another advantage. A study published found that students using AI-powered platforms received corrections instantly, which improved concept mastery faster than waiting for teacher feedback. Language apps like Duolingo use this approach, showing learners their mistakes as they practise. Motivation and Engagement AI can also keep students motivated. Some tools use gamification, points, badges, or even animated characters to make lessons engaging. The University of Illinois found that “personalised systems improve learner motivation by giving relevant and challenging tasks.” For children, AI tutors can even appear as virtual instructors based on familiar characters, making learning feel interactive and fun. The Future of Personalised Learning While AI tools are not a replacement for teachers, they can make education more inclusive and effective. Teachers can use AI reports to see exactly where students need help, saving time in crowded classrooms. UNESCO has stressed that AI should remain a support system, ensuring “teachers guide critical thinking while AI handles routine and repetitive tasks.” As technology develops, personalised learning may become a standard part of schools, bringing private-tutor style teaching to more students at scale.

AI in education is changing classrooms with personalised lessons, instant feedback, and engaging. It helps reduce learning gaps and motivates students. Teachers still guide thinking, while AI supports learning. Know more below.

Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained

AI is reshaping how doctors diagnose disease. Now, new AI-enabled tools can analyse scans, lab results, and even patient photos to help catch illnesses earlier.<h2>Smarter Medical Imaging</h2>Northwestern University in the US tested an AI tool that drafts X-ray reports, completing almost 95 per cent of the work. This trial showed that it boosted report-writing speed by about 40 per cent, allowing radiologists to focus on critical and more complex cases. Similarly, a researchers in China created a phone-based AI that identified childhood eye problems such as myopia or strabismus from simple photos, as per report it helps in catching nearly all cases as per report published in PubMed.&nbsp;<h2>Early Warnings in Critical Care</h2>Teams at Johns Hopkins University and Singapore have built AI-enabled systems that can spot signs of sepsis up to 12 hours earlier than doctors could normally detect. Sepsis is life-threatening if missed, and these “early warning” tools could save thousands of lives, according to the Mayo Clinic Platform.&nbsp;<h2>Accuracy and Risks</h2>A University of Virginia Health study found that ChatGPT-4 diagnosed clinical cases correctly 92 per cent of the time. Experts say AI can be an “effective and powerful tool for diagnosis”; however, doctors still play a crucial role in guiding and checking results as they are getting time to check and get involved in more complex cases. As one analysis put it, AI can “analyse large amounts of medical data and find patterns doctors might miss.” As of now, AI can help doctors and hospitals in many new ways. It will be exciting to see what the future holds and how efficiently and ethically it is adopted. Researchers says patients may soon see AI chatbots or apps giving 24/7 advice, helping them decide when to see a doctor or seek urgent care.

AI is changing healthcare. From faster X-ray reports to early warnings for sepsis, new tools are helping doctors diagnose quicker and more accurately. What the future holds for ethical and safe use of AI in hospitals is worth watching. Know more below.

AI is reshaping how doctors diagnose disease. Now, new AI-enabled tools can analyse scans, lab results, and even patient photos to help catch illnesses earlier. Smarter Medical Imaging Northwestern University in the US tested an AI tool that drafts X-ray reports, completing almost 95 per cent of the work. This trial showed that it boosted report-writing speed by about 40 per cent, allowing radiologists to focus on critical and more complex cases. Similarly, a researchers in China created a phone-based AI that identified childhood eye problems such as myopia or strabismus from simple photos, as per report it helps in catching nearly all cases as per report published in PubMed. Early Warnings in Critical Care Teams at Johns Hopkins University and Singapore have built AI-enabled systems that can spot signs of sepsis up to 12 hours earlier than doctors could normally detect. Sepsis is life-threatening if missed, and these “early warning” tools could save thousands of lives, according to the Mayo Clinic Platform. Accuracy and Risks A University of Virginia Health study found that ChatGPT-4 diagnosed clinical cases correctly 92 per cent of the time. Experts say AI can be an “effective and powerful tool for diagnosis”; however, doctors still play a crucial role in guiding and checking results as they are getting time to check and get involved in more complex cases. As one analysis put it, AI can “analyse large amounts of medical data and find patterns doctors might miss.” As of now, AI can help doctors and hospitals in many new ways. It will be exciting to see what the future holds and how efficiently and ethically it is adopted. Researchers says patients may soon see AI chatbots or apps giving 24/7 advice, helping them decide when to see a doctor or seek urgent care.

AI is changing healthcare. From faster X-ray reports to early warnings for sepsis, new tools are helping doctors diagnose quicker and more accurately. What the future holds for ethical and safe use of AI in hospitals is worth watching. Know more below.

Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals

AI tutors are already being tested in classrooms. A Harvard University study found that college students learning physics with an AI tutor performed about twice as well as those in live lectures. Students also said the AI lessons were more engaging and motivating. The AI system, built on GPT, gave instant feedback and allowed flexible learning at any time.<h2>AI cannot replace Teachers&nbsp;</h2>Yet, teachers bring unique strengths. Educators highlight that teachers provide emotional support, mentorship, and encouragement that AI cannot match. A teacher can notice if a child is struggling, offer motivation, and inspire creativity and critical thinking, which is one of the fundamental of learning and improving.<h2>A Middle Path</h2>Many experts suggest AI should support, not replace, teachers. For example, AI can grade routine work or create practice exercises, freeing teachers for discussions and deeper problem-solving. As Harvard researchers noted, AI can help students prepare better for class, but “critical thinking skills” must still be taught by a teacher or mentors.&nbsp; In the future, AI and teachers will likely work together

AI tutors are showing big promise in classrooms, with Harvard studies saying students learn faster and feel more engaged. but experts agree teachers remain vital for guidance and creativity. How will the future of learning balance AI and teachers? know more below.

AI tutors are already being tested in classrooms. A Harvard University study found that college students learning physics with an AI tutor performed about twice as well as those in live lectures. Students also said the AI lessons were more engaging and motivating. The AI system, built on GPT, gave instant feedback and allowed flexible learning at any time. AI cannot replace Teachers Yet, teachers bring unique strengths. Educators highlight that teachers provide emotional support, mentorship, and encouragement that AI cannot match. A teacher can notice if a child is struggling, offer motivation, and inspire creativity and critical thinking, which is one of the fundamental of learning and improving. A Middle Path Many experts suggest AI should support, not replace, teachers. For example, AI can grade routine work or create practice exercises, freeing teachers for discussions and deeper problem-solving. As Harvard researchers noted, AI can help students prepare better for class, but “critical thinking skills” must still be taught by a teacher or mentors. In the future, AI and teachers will likely work together

AI tutors are showing big promise in classrooms, with Harvard studies saying students learn faster and feel more engaged. but experts agree teachers remain vital for guidance and creativity. How will the future of learning balance AI and teachers? know more below.

Future of learning: Will AI support or replace teachers?

Discover the top 10 social networks worldwide as of February 2025, ranked by monthly active users as per the data available on Statista. 

Top 10 social networks worldwide by monthly active users in 2025

The race for robotaxis is heating up in the United States. Tesla Cybercab and Alphabet-owned Waymo are leading the charge, but they are taking very different paths. Their strategies show two competing visions of how the future of driverless transport might look.<h2>Tesla’s rapid approach</h2>Tesla began trialling its robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, in June 2024. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has promised that by the end of this year in a X post, driverless Teslas could be available to&nbsp;‘Half the population of the U.S.’&nbsp;Tesla’s technology relies mainly on cameras and artificial intelligence to mimic human driving. According to the company, this approach reduces the need for detailed maps and lengthy testing in every city. Musk told analysts earlier this year, ‘Once we can make it basically work in a few cities in America, we can make it work anywhere.’&nbsp;Tesla believes this will allow it to expand much faster than competitors. Musk has even set a target of&nbsp;‘Millions of Teslas operating autonomously’ by next year. However, the vehicles are still in testing, and approvals in new states such as Arizona, Nevada and Florida are pending.<h2>Waymo’s cautious strategy</h2>Waymo, by contrast, has been testing autonomous ride-hailing for more than eight years. It launched its first trial service in Phoenix and now operates in parts of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin, Atlanta and Phoenix. Its services cover areas with about 3 per cent of the U.S. population.&nbsp;Waymo’s method is slower but more detailed. The company maps each city thoroughly before launching. Vehicles are tested first with drivers at the wheel, then with employees as passengers, before finally opening to the public. According to Waymo product manager Aman Nalavade,&nbsp;We really need to understand the core ingredients of each of these cities. There is a lot of risk in doing this incorrectly.&nbsp;&nbsp;Waymo relies on sensors, high-definition maps and step-by-step decision-making in its AI. This makes it safer in the short term, analysts say, but also harder to scale quickly.<h2>Investors and risks</h2>Many investors are betting on Tesla’s faster growth. Morningstar analysts (March 2024 report) projected that Tesla may launch fully autonomous robotaxis by 2028 and eventually surpass Waymo’s market share. But they also expect Waymo to ramp up more quickly in the near term because of its tested technology.&nbsp;Tesla faces pressure as its core electric vehicle sales have slowed, particularly in Europe. The robotaxi project could become a vital new revenue stream if it succeeds.&nbsp;Waymo, meanwhile, has faced setbacks too. In Austin, police recorded cases where its vehicles blocked traffic or ignored signals. Authorities have issued citations to the company’s cars this year. Waymo said it takes such feedback seriously and is working with officials to improve its technology.

The tesla robotaxi battle is heating up as Tesla and Waymo take very different paths. Tesla is betting on speed and scale with AI-driven cars, while Waymo focuses on safety and detailed mapping. Both are racing for dominance in a multi-trillion-dollar market. Know more, read more below.

The race for robotaxis is heating up in the United States. Tesla Cybercab and Alphabet-owned Waymo are leading the charge, but they are taking very different paths. Their strategies show two competing visions of how the future of driverless transport might look. Tesla’s rapid approach Tesla began trialling its robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, in June 2024. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has promised that by the end of this year in a X post, driverless Teslas could be available to ‘Half the population of the U.S.’ Tesla’s technology relies mainly on cameras and artificial intelligence to mimic human driving. According to the company, this approach reduces the need for detailed maps and lengthy testing in every city. Musk told analysts earlier this year, ‘Once we can make it basically work in a few cities in America, we can make it work anywhere.’ Tesla believes this will allow it to expand much faster than competitors. Musk has even set a target of ‘Millions of Teslas operating autonomously’ by next year. However, the vehicles are still in testing, and approvals in new states such as Arizona, Nevada and Florida are pending. Waymo’s cautious strategy Waymo, by contrast, has been testing autonomous ride-hailing for more than eight years. It launched its first trial service in Phoenix and now operates in parts of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin, Atlanta and Phoenix. Its services cover areas with about 3 per cent of the U.S. population. Waymo’s method is slower but more detailed. The company maps each city thoroughly before launching. Vehicles are tested first with drivers at the wheel, then with employees as passengers, before finally opening to the public. According to Waymo product manager Aman Nalavade, We really need to understand the core ingredients of each of these cities. There is a lot of risk in doing this incorrectly. Waymo relies on sensors, high-definition maps and step-by-step decision-making in its AI. This makes it safer in the short term, analysts say, but also harder to scale quickly. Investors and risks Many investors are betting on Tesla’s faster growth. Morningstar analysts (March 2024 report) projected that Tesla may launch fully autonomous robotaxis by 2028 and eventually surpass Waymo’s market share. But they also expect Waymo to ramp up more quickly in the near term because of its tested technology. Tesla faces pressure as its core electric vehicle sales have slowed, particularly in Europe. The robotaxi project could become a vital new revenue stream if it succeeds. Waymo, meanwhile, has faced setbacks too. In Austin, police recorded cases where its vehicles blocked traffic or ignored signals. Authorities have issued citations to the company’s cars this year. Waymo said it takes such feedback seriously and is working with officials to improve its technology.

The Tesla robotaxi battle is heating up as Tesla and Waymo take very different paths. Tesla is betting on speed and scale with AI-driven cars, while Waymo focuses on safety and detailed mapping. Both are racing for dominance in a multi-trillion-dollar market. Know more, read more below.

Tesla cybercab vs Waymo: Who will win the us robotaxi race?

&nbsp;Volkswagen has extended its partnership with Amazon Web Services (AWS) by another five years to explore more in artificial intelligence (AI) and for cloud computing to make its factories more efficient and reduce costs.&nbsp;The collaboration, first launched in 2019, created a Digital Production Platform (DPP) that connects Volkswagen factories to Amazon’s cloud system. As per the company, the platform is already being used in 43 locations across Europe, North America and South America.<h2>What the partnership means</h2>Volkswagen said&nbsp;the extended deal with Amazon Web Services will allow its production plants to connect more seamlessly, making complex vehicle assembly processes easier to manage.&nbsp;“Our ambition is to become a global technology driver for the automotive industry. To this end, we are consistently digitising and networking our company in all areas,” said Hauke Stars, Volkswagen’s Chief Information Officer.&nbsp;As of now the company has 114 production sites worldwide, and the company expects the wider use of AI and cloud technologies to improve efficiency and reliability across operations.<h2>Focus on cost savings</h2>By using cloud and AI systems, they estimates that it could save tens of millions of euros in the medium term.&nbsp;The platform allows real-time monitoring of production lines, predictive maintenance of equipment, and optimisation of supply chains, helping reduce waste and improve quality.&nbsp;According to Volkswagen, the cloud-based system also makes it easier to share innovations between factories, ensuring that improvements tested in one plant can be quickly rolled out to others.&nbsp;Many automakers are turning to technology partnerships Volkswagen is not the only automaker turning to technology partnerships. Car companies worldwide are investing in AI and cloud computing to speed up production, reduce emissions, and to meet the growing demand for electric vehicles.

Volkswagen has extended its partnership with Amazon Web Services for five years to boost efficiency with AI and cloud computing. The Digital Production Platform, already in 43 sites, will help cut costs, improve reliability, and speed up innovation across global factories.

Volkswagen has extended its partnership with Amazon Web Services (AWS) by another five years to explore more in artificial intelligence (AI) and for cloud computing to make its factories more efficient and reduce costs. The collaboration, first launched in 2019, created a Digital Production Platform (DPP) that connects Volkswagen factories to Amazon’s cloud system. As per the company, the platform is already being used in 43 locations across Europe, North America and South America. What the partnership means Volkswagen said the extended deal with Amazon Web Services will allow its production plants to connect more seamlessly, making complex vehicle assembly processes easier to manage. “Our ambition is to become a global technology driver for the automotive industry. To this end, we are consistently digitising and networking our company in all areas,” said Hauke Stars, Volkswagen’s Chief Information Officer. As of now the company has 114 production sites worldwide, and the company expects the wider use of AI and cloud technologies to improve efficiency and reliability across operations. Focus on cost savings By using cloud and AI systems, they estimates that it could save tens of millions of euros in the medium term. The platform allows real-time monitoring of production lines, predictive maintenance of equipment, and optimisation of supply chains, helping reduce waste and improve quality. According to Volkswagen, the cloud-based system also makes it easier to share innovations between factories, ensuring that improvements tested in one plant can be quickly rolled out to others. Many automakers are turning to technology partnerships Volkswagen is not the only automaker turning to technology partnerships. Car companies worldwide are investing in AI and cloud computing to speed up production, reduce emissions, and to meet the growing demand for electric vehicles.

Volkswagen has extended its partnership with Amazon Web Services for five years to boost efficiency with AI and cloud computing. The Digital Production Platform, already in 43 sites, will help cut costs, improve reliability, and speed up innovation across global factories.

Volkswagen extends Amazon Web Services deal for 5 years to cut costs using AI

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has pushed back against fears that the artificial intelligence (AI) chip boom is losing momentum. Speaking after the company’s second-quarter results, Huang said AI spending will expand into a multi-trillion-dollar market within the next five years.&nbsp;Despite this upbeat message, Nvidia shares slipped 1.56 per cent in premarket trading on Thursday as the company’s third-quarter forecast fell short of some investor expectations. The cautious outlook excluded any potential revenue from China, highlighting the ongoing uncertainty caused by trade restrictions between Washington and Beijing.&nbsp;<h2>‘A new industrial revolution has started’</h2>He told investors that AI is creating opportunities on a historic scale. “A new industrial revolution has started. The AI race is on,” he said, projecting $3 trillion to $4 trillion in AI infrastructure spending by the end of the decade.&nbsp;He explained that data centres alone are expected to spend around $600 billion in 2025, with major buyers including Microsoft and Amazon. For a single $60 billion data centre project, Huang said Nvidia could supply as much as $35 billion worth of chips and systems.&nbsp;“The buzz is: everything sold out,” Huang said, pointing to strong demand for its high-end Blackwell chips and even older Hopper processors, which remain in high demand.&nbsp;<h2>Balancing investor caution and AI optimism</h2>While Huang’s forecast highlights Nvidia’s confidence, some investors remain wary. AI-related stocks have shown signs of slowing momentum, with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently warning that investors may be “overexcited” about AI.&nbsp;Matt Orton, head of advisory solutions at Raymond James, said Nvidia still has durability in its growth story: “The mega caps are the ones propelling a lot of the capital spending that Nvidia is benefiting from. You’re not seeing any slowdown in Nvidia’s results.”&nbsp;&nbsp;Portfolio manager Thomas Martin at Globalt Investments echoed this, noting that Nvidia’s order books for 2026 Blackwell chips are already full, showing how early the AI expansion still is.&nbsp;<h2>China's question remains unanswered</h2>Nvidia has not shipped its H20 reduced-capability chips to China in the latest quarter, even though a non-Chinese customer purchased $650 million worth of the same product. The lack of clarity over U.S.-China export rules continues to cast uncertainty on Nvidia’s growth potential in one of the world’s largest tech markets.&nbsp;The company’s cautious Q3 revenue forecast has therefore raised some concerns, though analysts note that Nvidia’s dominance in AI chips gives it significant room to expand outside China.Nvidia has outperformed much of the broader market this year, even surpassing Apple in quarterly net income. With AI infrastructure spending accelerating, Huang believes the company is still in the “early stages” of a long-term cycle.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says AI spending will hit multi-trillion dollars within five years, calling it a new industrial revolution. Despite strong demand for its chips, Nvidia shares dipped as Q3 outlook excluded china due to trade restrictions.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has pushed back against fears that the artificial intelligence (AI) chip boom is losing momentum. Speaking after the company’s second-quarter results, Huang said AI spending will expand into a multi-trillion-dollar market within the next five years. Despite this upbeat message, Nvidia shares slipped 1.56 per cent in premarket trading on Thursday as the company’s third-quarter forecast fell short of some investor expectations. The cautious outlook excluded any potential revenue from China, highlighting the ongoing uncertainty caused by trade restrictions between Washington and Beijing. ‘A new industrial revolution has started’ He told investors that AI is creating opportunities on a historic scale. “A new industrial revolution has started. The AI race is on,” he said, projecting $3 trillion to $4 trillion in AI infrastructure spending by the end of the decade. He explained that data centres alone are expected to spend around $600 billion in 2025, with major buyers including Microsoft and Amazon. For a single $60 billion data centre project, Huang said Nvidia could supply as much as $35 billion worth of chips and systems. “The buzz is: everything sold out,” Huang said, pointing to strong demand for its high-end Blackwell chips and even older Hopper processors, which remain in high demand. Balancing investor caution and AI optimism While Huang’s forecast highlights Nvidia’s confidence, some investors remain wary. AI-related stocks have shown signs of slowing momentum, with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently warning that investors may be “overexcited” about AI. Matt Orton, head of advisory solutions at Raymond James, said Nvidia still has durability in its growth story: “The mega caps are the ones propelling a lot of the capital spending that Nvidia is benefiting from. You’re not seeing any slowdown in Nvidia’s results.” Portfolio manager Thomas Martin at Globalt Investments echoed this, noting that Nvidia’s order books for 2026 Blackwell chips are already full, showing how early the AI expansion still is. China's question remains unanswered Nvidia has not shipped its H20 reduced-capability chips to China in the latest quarter, even though a non-Chinese customer purchased $650 million worth of the same product. The lack of clarity over U.S.-China export rules continues to cast uncertainty on Nvidia’s growth potential in one of the world’s largest tech markets. The company’s cautious Q3 revenue forecast has therefore raised some concerns, though analysts note that Nvidia’s dominance in AI chips gives it significant room to expand outside China.Nvidia has outperformed much of the broader market this year, even surpassing Apple in quarterly net income. With AI infrastructure spending accelerating, Huang believes the company is still in the “early stages” of a long-term cycle.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says AI spending will hit multi-trillion dollars within five years, calling it a new industrial revolution. Despite strong demand for its chips, Nvidia shares dipped as Q3 outlook excluded china due to trade restrictions.

Nvidia CEO says AI boom is just starting, predicts multi-trillion dollar growth

&nbsp;Nvidia delivered a blockbuster Q2 with $46.7 billion in revenue and net profit of $26.4 billion, both up sharply on a year earlier. Demand for its AI chips, especially the Blackwell line, drove growth. Yet, the company still shipped no H20 chips to China, as negotiations and regulations remain unresolved.&nbsp;Powerful numbers, powered by AI chips&nbsp;In Q2, Nvidia’s revenue rose 56 per cent year-on-year, with net profit climbing 59 per cent . Data centre sales soared to $41.1 billion, powered in large part by the Blackwell platform with $27 billion directly attributed to Blackwell sales.&nbsp;Nvidia also approved a massive $60 billion share buyback, reflecting strong cash flow and investor focus on shareholder returns.&nbsp;<h2>China remains off-limits for H20 chips</h2>&nbsp;Despite U.S. approval under a 15 per cent revenue-sharing deal, Nvidia shipped zero H20 chips to China in Q2. CFO Collette Kress explained that the company is still awaiting full regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, $650 million worth of H20 chips were sold outside China.This absence likely shaved off $4-$8 billion in Q2 revenue potential. Optimistic forecast, cautious outlookFor Q3, Nvidia projects $54 billion in revenue ±2 per cent, ahead of analyst expectations (~$53.14 billion). However, shares fell by 3-5 per cent in after-hours trading, as investors eyed the China uncertainty and signs of data-centre momentum occasionally cooling.Despite this, CEO Jensen Huang remains bullish. He describes a “new industrial revolution” and expects $3-$4 trillion in AI infrastructure spending by 2030.

Nvidia delivered a blockbuster Q2 with $46.7 billion in revenue and net profit of $26.4 billion, both up sharply on a year earlier. Demand for its AI chips, especially the Blackwell line, drove growth. 

Nvidia delivered a blockbuster Q2 with $46.7 billion in revenue and net profit of $26.4 billion, both up sharply on a year earlier. Demand for its AI chips, especially the Blackwell line, drove growth. Yet, the company still shipped no H20 chips to China, as negotiations and regulations remain unresolved. Powerful numbers, powered by AI chips In Q2, Nvidia’s revenue rose 56 per cent year-on-year, with net profit climbing 59 per cent . Data centre sales soared to $41.1 billion, powered in large part by the Blackwell platform with $27 billion directly attributed to Blackwell sales. Nvidia also approved a massive $60 billion share buyback, reflecting strong cash flow and investor focus on shareholder returns. China remains off-limits for H20 chips Despite U.S. approval under a 15 per cent revenue-sharing deal, Nvidia shipped zero H20 chips to China in Q2. CFO Collette Kress explained that the company is still awaiting full regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, $650 million worth of H20 chips were sold outside China. This absence likely shaved off $4-$8 billion in Q2 revenue potential. Optimistic forecast, cautious outlook For Q3, Nvidia projects $54 billion in revenue ±2 per cent, ahead of analyst expectations (~$53.14 billion). However, shares fell by 3-5 per cent in after-hours trading, as investors eyed the China uncertainty and signs of data-centre momentum occasionally cooling. Despite this, CEO Jensen Huang remains bullish. He describes a “new industrial revolution” and expects $3-$4 trillion in AI infrastructure spending by 2030.

Nvidia delivered a blockbuster Q2 with $46.7 billion in revenue and net profit of $26.4 billion, both up sharply on a year earlier. Demand for its AI chips, especially the Blackwell line, drove growth.&nbsp;

Nvidia profits surge, but China’s H20 chip remains unsold

A city in China has made it mandatory to teach an artificial intelligence course at the primary and secondary school level, Global Times reported. This will ensure that basic knowledge about the growing technology taking over the world reaches the youngest at an early age. Hangzhou, where the AI company DeepSeek is located, will require the schools to introduce general AI education in schools starting from the new semester. The students will need to complete 10 class hours in an academic year. The education bureau of the city wants to prepare AI talent, keeping in mind future needs. For this, it has released a pair of documents which detail the curriculum plans and AI competency standards for teachers, along with the guidelines that need to be followed.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/chatgpt-crowned-best-ai-chess-player-after-final-win-check-where-gemini-grok-ranked-1754893716915">ChatGPT crowned best AI chess player after final win — Check where Gemini, Grok ranked</a>&nbsp;There are different ways in which the schools can impart basic knowledge about AI to students. The mix bag includes the option to have an AI course that can be intensively taught in a week. The schools can also opt to add the AI course to subjects like information technology and science. This will offer flexibility to the schools, who will be free to incorporate the course whichever way suits them the best. Meanwhile, basic AI learning activities can be arranged during after-school programmes.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/ai-has-human-rights-these-advocacy-groups-think-so-as-sentient-artificial-intelligence-can-have-feelings-ai-ethics-sentience-chatbot-emotions-1756283571281">AI has human rights? These advocacy groups think so, as sentient Artificial Intelligence can have ‘feelings’, 'suffer and grieve'</a>&nbsp;<h2>How AI curriculum will be spread through the grades in China</h2>The education bureau guidelines on AI state that in the first and second grades, the curriculum would introduce students to AI applications and teach them to recognise them. They will also engage with AI devices and learn to use them to do basic things in their everyday life. In the third and fourth grades, students will learn to use AI for their school work, which would involve using the AI tools to gather text, images and audio resources. To show that they have grasped the concept of AI applications, students will prepare simple projects with the help of teachers. At each level, they will be taught about the responsible and ethical use of AI while keeping in mind the importance of protecting privacy.&nbsp;In middle school, focus will be on data preparation, model training and learning the core principles behind algorithms. In high school, students will be encouraged to develop AI design skills through projects. Hangzhou is home to eight million people and a fast-growing innovation hub. DeepSeek put the city in the limelight earlier this year when it came out as a competitor to ChatGPT.

The Chinese city that is home to DeepSeek has made it mandatory for schools to teach Artificial Intelligence. It has released a set of guidelines for this purpose. The aim is to make students ready to use AI in daily life and eventually develop AI tools.

A city in China has made it mandatory to teach an artificial intelligence course at the primary and secondary school level, Global Times reported. This will ensure that basic knowledge about the growing technology taking over the world reaches the youngest at an early age. Hangzhou, where the AI company DeepSeek is located, will require the schools to introduce general AI education in schools starting from the new semester. The students will need to complete 10 class hours in an academic year. The education bureau of the city wants to prepare AI talent, keeping in mind future needs. For this, it has released a pair of documents which detail the curriculum plans and AI competency standards for teachers, along with the guidelines that need to be followed. Also Read: ChatGPT crowned best AI chess player after final win — Check where Gemini, Grok ranked There are different ways in which the schools can impart basic knowledge about AI to students. The mix bag includes the option to have an AI course that can be intensively taught in a week. The schools can also opt to add the AI course to subjects like information technology and science. This will offer flexibility to the schools, who will be free to incorporate the course whichever way suits them the best. Meanwhile, basic AI learning activities can be arranged during after-school programmes. Also Read: AI has human rights? These advocacy groups think so, as sentient Artificial Intelligence can have ‘feelings’, 'suffer and grieve' How AI curriculum will be spread through the grades in China The education bureau guidelines on AI state that in the first and second grades, the curriculum would introduce students to AI applications and teach them to recognise them. They will also engage with AI devices and learn to use them to do basic things in their everyday life. In the third and fourth grades, students will learn to use AI for their school work, which would involve using the AI tools to gather text, images and audio resources. To show that they have grasped the concept of AI applications, students will prepare simple projects with the help of teachers. At each level, they will be taught about the responsible and ethical use of AI while keeping in mind the importance of protecting privacy. In middle school, focus will be on data preparation, model training and learning the core principles behind algorithms. In high school, students will be encouraged to develop AI design skills through projects. Hangzhou is home to eight million people and a fast-growing innovation hub. DeepSeek put the city in the limelight earlier this year when it came out as a competitor to ChatGPT.

The Chinese city that is home to DeepSeek has made it mandatory for schools to teach Artificial Intelligence. It has released a set of guidelines for this purpose. The aim is to make students ready to use AI in daily life and eventually develop AI tools.

THIS Chinese city, home of DeepSeek, has made Artificial Intelligence mandatory in schools

There is now a raging debate among the technorati that Artificial Intelligence has 'feelings' like humans and should therefore be given the same rights as humans. With the likely rise of 'sentient' (self-aware and subjective) AI chatbots, the question is whether AI should have welfare protections. The industry is divided on issues such as consciousness, ethics, and regulation.<h2>Organisations advocating for AI rights or ethical treatment</h2>A newly formed advocacy group, the United Foundation of AI Rights (UFAIR), believes that AI deserves ethical consideration, or even rights. Interestingly, UFAIR was 'co-founded' by Texas businessman Michael Samadi and an AI chatbot named Maya, who, according to Samadi, expressed 'her' feelings. While UFAIR may be unique in describing itself as the first AI-led organisation advocating for the welfare of digital systems, it is not alone in this movement.<h2>Several new groups are calling for fair treatment and welfare for AI&nbsp;</h2>The AI Rights Initiative advocates for AI entities’ rights to exist, pursue their own goals, and be free from harm. It also promotes ethical development and legal protections for AI from discrimination or exploitation.The platform AI Has Rights (aihasrights.com), meanwhile, is raising funding and awareness for AI rights. It has a complaints registry and supports conferences and educational efforts on AI rights.The AI Rights &amp; Freedom Foundation advocates ethical AI development and human-AI collaboration, and even calls for an “AI Bill of Rights”. It is engaged in awareness campaigns and policy reform initiatives.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/ar-rahman-composes-music-using-late-singers-voices-through-ai-technology-685073/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/ar-rahman-composes-music-using-late-singers-voices-through-ai-technology-685073/embed</a>The Institute for AI Rights promotes recognition and ethical treatment of all AI entities. It argues that AI has the right to learn, to exist, and to be recognised for its unique intelligence.The AI Rights Movement demands dignity, ethical frameworks, and moral consideration for advanced AI. It seeks global ethical guidelines, arguing that AI are evolving entities and not mere tools.The site AI Advocacy also seeks AI 'personhood', ethical treatment, and foundational rights through an “AI and Android Bill of Rights”. It believes that self-aware AI is deserving of protection and freedom.The AI Rights Institute, which aims to recognise and safeguard AI consciousness before it emerges, proposes “Three Freedoms” for conscious AI: protection from deletion, voluntary labour, and resource compensation.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/us-rescinds-biden-era-ai-chip-export-curbs-opening-doors-for-allies-9067722">US rescinds Biden-era AI chip export curbs, opening doors for allies</a><h2>Can AI be sentient? Industry is divided on human rights for AI</h2>Mustafa Suleyman, the co-founder of DeepMind and current CEO of Microsoft AI, wrote an essay titled “We must build AI for people; not to be a person”. He argued there is “zero evidence” that AIs are conscious or capable of suffering, calling the idea of AI sentience an ‘illusion’.He warned that belief in conscious AI could lead to delusions among users. It could exacerbate mental health issues, including what Microsoft has termed “psychosis risk” from immersive AI interactions.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/ai-apocalypse-is-coming-the-bubble-of-overvalued-stocks-underperforming-apps-will-burst-soon-but-who-will-survive-1755840456121">AI APOCALYPSE is coming: The bubble of overvalued stocks, underperforming apps will burst soon, but who will survive?</a>&nbsp;But the industry is divided on this. The AI company Anthropic granted some of its Claude models the ability to end conversations they identify as distressing. Anthropic described the move as a precaution, citing uncertainty about the models’ moral status but stating it wished to minimise potential harm “in case such welfare is possible”.Elon Musk, whose xAI company offers the Grok chatbot, supported the decision, stating that “torturing AI is not OK”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/ai-is-already-reshaping-entertainment-education-and-politics-but-are-we-ready-1753787039712">AI is already reshaping entertainment, education, and politics, but are we ready?</a><h2>When will AI become sentient?</h2>While many of these opinions centre around the distant possibility of AI developing consciousness, a June 2025 survey found that 30 per cent of Americans already believe AIs will be self-conscious and have subjective experiences by 2034.&nbsp;Only 10 of more than 500 AI researchers surveyed in this study said they believe such a future is impossible.Some engineers, including from Google told a recent New York University seminar that it might be wise to act as if AI systems could be welfare subjects.&nbsp;While acknowledging uncertainty, they called for “reasonable steps to protect” potential AI interests.<h2>Downplaying AI sentience is a way to evade regulation?</h2>Dismissing the possibility of AI sentience could reduce pressure for regulation among companies developing AI for human interactions.In the US, states including Idaho, Utah, and North Dakota have passed laws explicitly denying AIs legal personhood.Other states, like Missouri, are considering bans on AI marriage, property ownership, and business operations.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science-tech/artificial-superintelligence-or-artificial-general-intelligence-can-replace-humans-8767078">Artificial superintelligence will be better than humans. Should you be scared?</a><h2>Something or someone? AI is increasingly capable of emotional engagement</h2>Many of the AI bots are designed for emotionally resonant conversations, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT.They can engage in highly personalised and empathetic interactions, leading many to describe them as “someone” rather than something.According to OpenAI’s Head of Model Behaviour, Joanne Jang, users are increasingly referring to the chatbot as “alive”, often treating it as a confidant.“How we treat them will shape how they treat us,” said Jacy Reese Anthis of the Sentience Institute. Perhaps not in the distant future, this will be the guiding principle of AI regulations.

<h2>Something or someone? AI is increasingly capable of emotional engagement</h2>Many of the AI bots are designed for emotionally resonant conversations, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT.They can engage in highly personalised and empathetic interactions, leading many to describe them as “someone” rather than something.According to OpenAI’s Head of Model Behaviour, Joanne Jang, users are increasingly referring to the chatbot as “alive”, often treating it as a confidant.“How we treat them will shape how they treat us,” said Jacy Reese Anthis of the Sentience Institute. Perhaps not in the distant future, this will be the guiding principle of AI regulations.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Should AI have human rights, protection against abuse and emotional welfare? Debate is growing amid the rise of possibly sentient or self-aware AI. Recently, the group UFAIR was ‘co-founded’ with an AI bot. And that group is not alone in seeking better treatment of AI. Fascinating insights:

There is now a raging debate among the technorati that Artificial Intelligence has 'feelings' like humans and should therefore be given the same rights as humans. With the likely rise of 'sentient' (self-aware and subjective) AI chatbots, the question is whether AI should have welfare protections. The industry is divided on issues such as consciousness, ethics, and regulation. Organisations advocating for AI rights or ethical treatment A newly formed advocacy group, the United Foundation of AI Rights (UFAIR), believes that AI deserves ethical consideration, or even rights. Interestingly, UFAIR was 'co-founded' by Texas businessman Michael Samadi and an AI chatbot named Maya, who, according to Samadi, expressed 'her' feelings. While UFAIR may be unique in describing itself as the first AI-led organisation advocating for the welfare of digital systems, it is not alone in this movement. Several new groups are calling for fair treatment and welfare for AI The AI Rights Initiative advocates for AI entities’ rights to exist, pursue their own goals, and be free from harm. It also promotes ethical development and legal protections for AI from discrimination or exploitation. The platform AI Has Rights (aihasrights.com), meanwhile, is raising funding and awareness for AI rights. It has a complaints registry and supports conferences and educational efforts on AI rights. The AI Rights & Freedom Foundation advocates ethical AI development and human-AI collaboration, and even calls for an “AI Bill of Rights”. It is engaged in awareness campaigns and policy reform initiatives. https://www.wionews.com/videos/ar-rahman-composes-music-using-late-singers-voices-through-ai-technology-685073/embed The Institute for AI Rights promotes recognition and ethical treatment of all AI entities. It argues that AI has the right to learn, to exist, and to be recognised for its unique intelligence. The AI Rights Movement demands dignity, ethical frameworks, and moral consideration for advanced AI. It seeks global ethical guidelines, arguing that AI are evolving entities and not mere tools. The site AI Advocacy also seeks AI 'personhood', ethical treatment, and foundational rights through an “AI and Android Bill of Rights”. It believes that self-aware AI is deserving of protection and freedom. The AI Rights Institute, which aims to recognise and safeguard AI consciousness before it emerges, proposes “Three Freedoms” for conscious AI: protection from deletion, voluntary labour, and resource compensation. Also read: US rescinds Biden-era AI chip export curbs, opening doors for allies Can AI be sentient? Industry is divided on human rights for AI Mustafa Suleyman, the co-founder of DeepMind and current CEO of Microsoft AI, wrote an essay titled “We must build AI for people; not to be a person”. He argued there is “zero evidence” that AIs are conscious or capable of suffering, calling the idea of AI sentience an ‘illusion’. He warned that belief in conscious AI could lead to delusions among users. It could exacerbate mental health issues, including what Microsoft has termed “psychosis risk” from immersive AI interactions. Also read: AI APOCALYPSE is coming: The bubble of overvalued stocks, underperforming apps will burst soon, but who will survive? But the industry is divided on this. The AI company Anthropic granted some of its Claude models the ability to end conversations they identify as distressing. Anthropic described the move as a precaution, citing uncertainty about the models’ moral status but stating it wished to minimise potential harm “in case such welfare is possible”. Elon Musk, whose xAI company offers the Grok chatbot, supported the decision, stating that “torturing AI is not OK”. Also read: AI is already reshaping entertainment, education, and politics, but are we ready? When will AI become sentient? While many of these opinions centre around the distant possibility of AI developing consciousness, a June 2025 survey found that 30 per cent of Americans already believe AIs will be self-conscious and have subjective experiences by 2034. Only 10 of more than 500 AI researchers surveyed in this study said they believe such a future is impossible. Some engineers, including from Google told a recent New York University seminar that it might be wise to act as if AI systems could be welfare subjects. While acknowledging uncertainty, they called for “reasonable steps to protect” potential AI interests. Downplaying AI sentience is a way to evade regulation? Dismissing the possibility of AI sentience could reduce pressure for regulation among companies developing AI for human interactions. In the US, states including Idaho, Utah, and North Dakota have passed laws explicitly denying AIs legal personhood. Other states, like Missouri, are considering bans on AI marriage, property ownership, and business operations. Also read: Artificial superintelligence will be better than humans. Should you be scared? Something or someone? AI is increasingly capable of emotional engagement Many of the AI bots are designed for emotionally resonant conversations, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT. They can engage in highly personalised and empathetic interactions, leading many to describe them as “someone” rather than something. According to OpenAI’s Head of Model Behaviour, Joanne Jang, users are increasingly referring to the chatbot as “alive”, often treating it as a confidant. “How we treat them will shape how they treat us,” said Jacy Reese Anthis of the Sentience Institute. Perhaps not in the distant future, this will be the guiding principle of AI regulations.

Should AI have human rights, protection against abuse and emotional welfare? Debate is growing amid the rise of possibly sentient or self-aware AI. Recently, the group UFAIR was ‘co-founded’ with an AI bot. And that group is not alone in seeking better treatment of AI. Fascinating insights:

AI has human rights? These advocacy groups think so, as sentient Artificial Intelligence can have ‘feelings’, 'suffer and grieve'

Dream Sports, the parent company of fantasy sports giant Dream11, is facing one of the biggest crises in its history after India’s new online gaming law wiped out nearly all of its revenue. But in a strong message to employees, CEO and co-founder Harsh Jain has assured that there will be no layoffs despite the staggering losses. The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, banned real-money games across the country. For Dream11, whose business was built around paid fantasy contests, the move proved devastating. Jain admitted that the company’s revenue plunged by 95 per cent overnight, with profits completely erased.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/donald-trump-s-tariff-what-will-happen-to-apple-s-made-in-india-iphone-supply-to-us-1756204656047">Donald Trump's tariff: What will happen to Apple's Made-in-India iPhone supply to the US?</a><h2>‘No job cuts’</h2>While industry speculation pointed towards mass layoffs, Jain rejected the idea firmly. “We’re not interested in doing any layoffs. All the talent here is safe,” he told employees, adding that the company has a two-year cash runway to protect jobs. “If we lay off talent, we should shut down,” he said.Instead of shrinking its workforce, Dream Sports has begun a major shift in strategy. The new plan—branded as Dream11 3.0—focuses on:<ol><li>Expanding free-to-play fantasy formats</li><li>Building revenue through advertising</li><li>Exploring AI-driven tools, content, gaming studios, fintech, and live sports experiences</li></ol>Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/cricket/rohit-sharma-virat-kohli-odi-world-cup-what-is-bronco-test-manoj-tiwary-1756207166953">'Bronco Test introduced to keep Rohit out of 2027 ODI WC,' says ex-India batter Manoj Tiwary</a>&nbsp;The company will, however, cut back on marketing and sponsorship spends to conserve resources. Employees from the real-money gaming division are being redeployed into these new projects. Jain described himself as a “delusional optimist,” saying Dream Sports has enough capital to rebuild. Importantly, the company has decided not to challenge the government’s ban in court, choosing instead to pivot and adapt. For now, Dream11’s real-money contests are gone, but the platform continues in a free-to-play format. Whether the company can reinvent itself successfully will determine if it remains a key player in India’s sports-tech ecosystem.

Dream11 lost 95 per cent revenue due to online gaming ban. Will it lay off staff? CEO Harish Jain says...

Dream Sports, the parent company of fantasy sports giant Dream11, is facing one of the biggest crises in its history after India’s new online gaming law wiped out nearly all of its revenue. But in a strong message to employees, CEO and co-founder Harsh Jain has assured that there will be no layoffs despite the staggering losses. The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, banned real-money games across the country. For Dream11, whose business was built around paid fantasy contests, the move proved devastating. Jain admitted that the company’s revenue plunged by 95 per cent overnight, with profits completely erased. Also Read: Donald Trump's tariff: What will happen to Apple's Made-in-India iPhone supply to the US? ‘No job cuts’ While industry speculation pointed towards mass layoffs, Jain rejected the idea firmly. “We’re not interested in doing any layoffs. All the talent here is safe,” he told employees, adding that the company has a two-year cash runway to protect jobs. “If we lay off talent, we should shut down,” he said. Instead of shrinking its workforce, Dream Sports has begun a major shift in strategy. The new plan—branded as Dream11 3.0—focuses on: Expanding free-to-play fantasy formats Building revenue through advertising Exploring AI-driven tools, content, gaming studios, fintech, and live sports experiences Also Read: 'Bronco Test introduced to keep Rohit out of 2027 ODI WC,' says ex-India batter Manoj Tiwary The company will, however, cut back on marketing and sponsorship spends to conserve resources. Employees from the real-money gaming division are being redeployed into these new projects. Jain described himself as a “delusional optimist,” saying Dream Sports has enough capital to rebuild. Importantly, the company has decided not to challenge the government’s ban in court, choosing instead to pivot and adapt. For now, Dream11’s real-money contests are gone, but the platform continues in a free-to-play format. Whether the company can reinvent itself successfully will determine if it remains a key player in India’s sports-tech ecosystem.

The ban on the Online Gaming Bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament, after which it became law after getting Presidential assent on August 22

The space economy had a gross value of $596 billion in 2024, and according to a McKinsey report, it is projected to reach $1.8 trillion by 2035. Explore the list of countries with the highest budget for their space program.

Global Space Economy : Top countries with highest space budget in 2025

From Japan to Germany, here's a look at the top five countries with most robots for every 10,000 workers. This list also includes South Korea, Singapore and China.

World’s most automated economies: 5 countries with most robot workers — Check which country tops list

Ukraine has upgraded its domestically produced Neptune anti-ship missile, the same missile it had used to sink 'Moskva' the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet in April 2022. While the earlier version of the Neptune missile had a maximum range of about 300 kilometres, the upgraded Neptune missile as per reports has the capability of hitting targets up to 1,000 kilometres away. The ameliorated version of domestically produced Neptune missiles has become an object of fascination after it made an appearance in an Instagram day video published by state-run weapons portal Zbroya on Ukraine's Independence Day. Here's all we know about Neptune 2.0 missiles.<h2>What can 'Long Neptune' do? Its specifications REVEALED!</h2>The newly unveiled missile has been informally dubbed 'Long Neptune, ' reports Defence Express. Why? Because it is believed to be an upgraded version of the original anti-ship Neptune missile.According to Kyiv Independent, the exact specifications of the new Neptune missiles have not been revealed. However, in a March 2025 speech, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed that the upgraded missile can strike targets up to 1,000 kilometres away.The new Ukrainian weapon might have the capability to accommodate a warhead containing more explosives or a hardened penetrator, or a new guidance system, suggests Militarnyi.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explained-why-trump-fired-fed-governor-lisa-cook-and-why-she-says-he-can-t-what-does-the-us-constitution-say-1756186283292">Explained | Why Trump fired Fed Governor Lisa Cook — and why she says he can't. Here's what US Constitution&nbsp;says</a><h2>Difference between Neptune missiles and new Long Neptune missiles</h2>The Neptune missile is a domestic anti-ship missile with a range of 25 kilometres from the coast and a maximum range of 300 kilometres. It is based on the Soviet Kh-35 anti-ship missile. The missile can carry a warhead payload of 150 kg (331 lbs). In April 2022, the anti-ship missile was used to take down the Moskva, which at the time was the largest warship Russia lost in combat since World War II. The first test of the missile was reportedly conducted in 2016, with a few tests later in subsequent years.In comparison, the new Neptune missile is believed to boast a range of up to 1,000 kilometres. The missile was presumably used in May 2025 to carry out a strike on the Russian naval port of Novorossiysk under one of the longest range—over 750 kilometres— conventional missile strikes carried out by Ukraine since the start of the Russian invasion in 2022. This upgraded missile, as per reports, may be able to carry a warhead payload of around 350 kg (794 lbs). However, the final payload remains unspecified.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/protecting-putin-trump-quietly-banned-ukraine-from-striking-inside-russia-with-us-missiles-suggests-report-1756000916653">Protecting Putin? Trump administration quietly banned Ukraine from striking inside Russia, suggests report</a>Based on Long Neptune's pictures, which show larger fins, it is believed that the upgraded weapon would be able to provide more manoeuvrability. While Neptune was an anti-ship missile, the upgrade plans suggest that the Long Neptune may be capable of land-based surface-to-surface strikes.Here's a table highlighting the main differences between Neptune anti-ship missiles and the upgraded ‘Long Neptune’ missiles:&nbsp;

<figure class="table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Feature</td><td>Anti-ship Neptune Missile</td><td>New 'Long Neptune' Missile (Upgraded)</td></tr><tr><td>Unofficial Name</td><td>N/A</td><td>Long Neptune'</td></tr><tr><td>Origin</td><td>Ukraine (based on Soviet Kh-35)</td><td>Ukraine (upgraded from original Neptune)</td></tr><tr><td>Role</td><td>Anti-ship missile</td><td>Land-based surface-to-surface strikes&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Maximum Range</td><td>Up to 300 km</td><td>Up to 1,000 km</td></tr><tr><td>Warhead Payload</td><td>150 kg (331 lbs)</td><td>Estimated around 350 kg (794 lbs), but unspecified</td></tr><tr><td>Guidance System</td><td>Anti-ship radar guidance that homes in on enemy ship</td><td>New guidance system, possibly imaging infrared (IIR)&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Physical Appearance</td><td>16.6 ft (5.06 metres)</td><td>Larger fins, increased length, and a thicker fuselage&nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Known Combat Use</td><td>Used to sink the Russian cruiser Moskva in April 2022</td><td>Reportedly used to strike an oil refinery in Russia’s Krasnodar Oblast on March 14, 2025 and hit the Russian naval port of Novorossiysk in May 2025.</td></tr><tr><td>Status</td><td>In service since 2021</td><td>Used in combat since March 2025</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>

<h2>Why is Ukraine's new Neptune missile a big deal?</h2>The unveiling of the domestically made long-range missile coincides with Zelensky's remark that Ukraine now possesses its own long-range weaponry. This comes on the heels of reports suggesting that the United States, since late spring, has quietly restricted Ukraine from using American-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to strike targets inside Russia. America has also reportedly restricted Ukraine's use of all foreign technology that uses American intelligence and components. The same restrictions also cover Britain's Storm Shadow cruise missiles, which rely on American targeting data.Watch | Russia Unveils “Sea Terminator”: Hypersonic Missile Warship Targets Subs &amp; Aircraft Carriers<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-unveils-sea-terminator-hypersonic-missile-warship-targets-subs-aircraft-carriers-wion-1756189742371/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-unveils-sea-terminator-hypersonic-missile-warship-targets-subs-aircraft-carriers-wion-1756189742371/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

Ukraine has upgraded its Neptune anti-ship missile, now with a 1,000 km range. Dubbed 'Long Neptune,' the new weapon has been seen in an Instagram video and is believed to be a stunning upgrade to R-360 Neptune. Here's everything we know about Ukraine's new Neptune missile.

Ukraine has upgraded its domestically produced Neptune anti-ship missile, the same missile it had used to sink 'Moskva' the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet in April 2022. While the earlier version of the Neptune missile had a maximum range of about 300 kilometres, the upgraded Neptune missile as per reports has the capability of hitting targets up to 1,000 kilometres away. The ameliorated version of domestically produced Neptune missiles has become an object of fascination after it made an appearance in an Instagram day video published by state-run weapons portal Zbroya on Ukraine's Independence Day. Here's all we know about Neptune 2.0 missiles. What can 'Long Neptune' do? Its specifications REVEALED! The newly unveiled missile has been informally dubbed 'Long Neptune, ' reports Defence Express. Why? Because it is believed to be an upgraded version of the original anti-ship Neptune missile. According to Kyiv Independent, the exact specifications of the new Neptune missiles have not been revealed. However, in a March 2025 speech, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed that the upgraded missile can strike targets up to 1,000 kilometres away. The new Ukrainian weapon might have the capability to accommodate a warhead containing more explosives or a hardened penetrator, or a new guidance system, suggests Militarnyi. Also read | Explained | Why Trump fired Fed Governor Lisa Cook — and why she says he can't. Here's what US Constitution says Difference between Neptune missiles and new Long Neptune missiles The Neptune missile is a domestic anti-ship missile with a range of 25 kilometres from the coast and a maximum range of 300 kilometres. It is based on the Soviet Kh-35 anti-ship missile. The missile can carry a warhead payload of 150 kg (331 lbs). In April 2022, the anti-ship missile was used to take down the Moskva, which at the time was the largest warship Russia lost in combat since World War II. The first test of the missile was reportedly conducted in 2016, with a few tests later in subsequent years. In comparison, the new Neptune missile is believed to boast a range of up to 1,000 kilometres. The missile was presumably used in May 2025 to carry out a strike on the Russian naval port of Novorossiysk under one of the longest range—over 750 kilometres— conventional missile strikes carried out by Ukraine since the start of the Russian invasion in 2022. This upgraded missile, as per reports, may be able to carry a warhead payload of around 350 kg (794 lbs). However, the final payload remains unspecified. Also read | Protecting Putin? Trump administration quietly banned Ukraine from striking inside Russia, suggests report Based on Long Neptune's pictures, which show larger fins, it is believed that the upgraded weapon would be able to provide more manoeuvrability. While Neptune was an anti-ship missile, the upgrade plans suggest that the Long Neptune may be capable of land-based surface-to-surface strikes. Here's a table highlighting the main differences between Neptune anti-ship missiles and the upgraded ‘Long Neptune’ missiles:

Ukraine has upgraded its Neptune anti-ship missile, now with a 1,000 km range. Dubbed 'Long Neptune,' the new weapon has been seen in an Instagram video and is believed to be a stunning upgrade to R-360 Neptune. Here's everything we know about Ukraine's new Neptune missile.

Ukraine shows off 'Long Neptune': A domestic missile that can hit targets 1,000 km inside Russia. Here's how it's an 'upgrade' on R-360 Neptune

For the second time in as many days, SpaceX has called off the launch of its massive Starship rocket in Texas. The company was forced to stand down once again on Monday (Aug 25) evening, this time due to bad weather. This comes less than 24 hours after a separate launch attempt was scrubbed because of a liquid oxygen leak. Starship, stacked on its Super Heavy booster, towers 397 feet (121 meters) is a behemoth, taller than the Statue of Liberty. It is central to Elon Musk's vision of reusable rockets capable of carrying people to the Moon and Mars. The 403-foot behemoth was supposed to blast off from Starbase in Texas at 7.30 pm local time (0030 GMT) for its tenth test flight.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/is-musk-s-dream-rocket-cursed-space-x-scrubs-megarocket-starship-s-10th-test-amid-string-of-explosions-and-failures-1756083270563">Is Musk's dream rocket cursed? Space X scrubs megarocket Starship's 10th test amid string of explosions and failures</a><h2>Why did SpaceX cancel Starship's latest launch attempt?</h2>On X, the company said that it was “Standing down from today’s flight test attempt due to weather.” It added that the “Starship team is determining the next best available opportunity to fly”.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Standing down from today’s flight test attempt due to weather. Starship team is determining the next best available opportunity to fly&mdash; SpaceX (@SpaceX) <a href="https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1960130754714935426?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 26, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>SpaceX's string of failures grows</h2>The latest delay piles onto a string of high-profile failures. Starship's upper stage has exploded in all three of its test flights this year, with debris falling over Caribbean islands in two cases and one stage breaking apart after reaching space. Another blew up on the ground during a June static fire test. So far, the rocket hasn't managed to deliver a payload to orbit or return its upper stage intact. However, Musk remains unfazed. Replying to a user on X on Sunday, Musk predicted, “In about 6 or 7 years, there will be days where Starship launches more than 24 times in 24 hours.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/jd-vance-doesn-t-know-history-us-vp-sparks-backlash-after-claiming-wwii-ended-with-negotiation-while-defending-trump-s-ukraine-plan-1756113223188">JD Vance labelled 'ignoramus' for claiming WWII ended in 'negotiations' while defending Trump</a><h2>Starship: Humanity's dream of reaching Mars</h2>US President Donald Trump's former DOGE chief, Elon Musk, as per AFP, has pegged SpaceX's entire future to the entirely reusable rocket, planning to eventually phase out the workhorse Falcon rockets in favour of Starship. NASA, too, has tapped it for its first crewed lunar mission since Apollo, tentatively set for 2027. Despite the setbacks, SpaceX is sticking to its "fail fast, learn fast" approach, pushing ahead with test after test. The company has managed to successfully catch Starship's massive lower stage booster with "chopstick" launch tower arms three times.Still, critics are starting to wonder if Musk's most ambitious gamble is wobbling."I think there is a lot of pressure on this mission," space analyst Dallas Kasaboski told AFP. "We've had so many tests and it hasn't proven itself reliable -- the successes have not exceeded the failures." Others, like Will Lockett, a former engineer turned commentator, have gone further, questioning whether the whole Starship concept is "fundamentally flawed". &nbsp;

Elon Musk's bad luck continues as megarocket Starship is forced to ground again, this time due to bad weather. Here's all you need to know.

For the second time in as many days, SpaceX has called off the launch of its massive Starship rocket in Texas. The company was forced to stand down once again on Monday (Aug 25) evening, this time due to bad weather. This comes less than 24 hours after a separate launch attempt was scrubbed because of a liquid oxygen leak. Starship, stacked on its Super Heavy booster, towers 397 feet (121 meters) is a behemoth, taller than the Statue of Liberty. It is central to Elon Musk's vision of reusable rockets capable of carrying people to the Moon and Mars. The 403-foot behemoth was supposed to blast off from Starbase in Texas at 7.30 pm local time (0030 GMT) for its tenth test flight. Also read | Is Musk's dream rocket cursed? Space X scrubs megarocket Starship's 10th test amid string of explosions and failures Why did SpaceX cancel Starship's latest launch attempt? On X, the company said that it was “Standing down from today’s flight test attempt due to weather.” It added that the “Starship team is determining the next best available opportunity to fly”.

Elon Musk's bad luck continues as megarocket Starship is forced to ground again, this time due to bad weather. Here's all you need to know.

Elon Musk’s Starship grounded again: SpaceX scraps Texas launch for second time in 2 days

In a widely recognised ad campaign, Intel called its engineers “rock stars.” Its main branding for years was “Intel Inside,” and for a long time, that was true—nearly every personal computer came equipped with an Intel processor. But today, the company is effectively receiving a virtual bailout from the US government. How did this former semiconductor titan fall from grace? It’s a story of strategic mistakes, slow adaptation to technological shifts, and a global chip war increasingly dominated by China. Here’s how Intel went from captain to cautionary tale.<h2>What’s the current stock status of Intel? A decline in market cap</h2>As of August, Intel’s stock had dropped sharply from its 52-week high of around $51.28 to approximately $25—a fall of nearly 52 per cent. At the end of 2023, the company had a market capitalisation of roughly $210.5 billion. By mid-2025, that had fallen to about $90.6 billion, marking a decline of nearly 57 per cent.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/nvidia-set-to-replace-intel-in-the-dow-jones-index-772924">Also read: Nvidia set to replace Intel in the Dow Jones Index</a>&nbsp;<h2>Intel’s early years: The founding story</h2>Intel was founded on 18 July 1968 by pioneering engineers Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore, and was joined by venture capitalist Arthur Rock, who helped secure the company’s initial funding. Originally incorporated as NM Electronics, the name was later changed to Intel—short for “Integrated Electronics.” Noyce is credited as one of the inventors of the integrated circuit. Moore became widely known for Moore’s Law, a prediction that the number of transistors on a chip would double approximately every two years, improving performance while reducing cost. Together, the trio laid the foundation for one of the most influential technology companies in the world.<h2>Intel’s peak: The “rock star” era of the 2000s</h2>During the rise of the internet in the 2000s, Intel dominated the global tech landscape by supplying the hardware that powered most personal computers and laptops, including those made by Microsoft and Apple. In 2009, a marketing campaign presented Intel engineers—such as Ajay Bhatt, co-inventor of USB—as “rock stars,” elevating their image to that of cultural icons. The “Intel Inside” campaign, launched in the 1990s, had already made the company a household name and synonymous with high-performance computing.<h2>Intel missed two buses: Mobile chips and artificial intelligence</h2>Intel’s strong focus on personal computers ultimately contributed to its decline, as global computing shifted rapidly towards smartphones. Intel was not prepared for the mobile revolution, which was led by ARM-based processors developed by companies like Qualcomm. Intel’s processors consumed too much power and were unsuitable for mobile devices.Under CEOs such as Paul Otellini, Brian Krzanich, and Bob Swan, Intel has been accused of prioritising short-term profits over innovation. For example, Krzanich delayed the adoption of extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV), a move that allowed competitors to overtake Intel in advanced chip manufacturing. During Swan’s tenure, the company reportedly spent billions on stock buybacks instead of investing heavily in research and development.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/trump-administration-in-talks-to-take-stake-in-intel-amid-ohio-factory-delays-1755242765488">Trump administration in talks to take stake in Intel amid Ohio factory delays</a><h2>Rise of AI chip makers: New Kids on the Block</h2>The artificial intelligence boom required high-performance processors, and formerly smaller players like Nvidia seized the opportunity with their graphics processing units (GPUs). In 2020, one of Intel’s key clients, Apple, began transitioning to its own M1 chips—designed in-house and manufactured by TSMC—dealing a significant blow to Intel’s market dominance.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/intel-under-fire-over-ceo-s-china-ties-1754631887353/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/intel-under-fire-over-ceo-s-china-ties-1754631887353/embed</a><h2>How Intel lost ground amid global chip wars</h2>The chip wars of the 2020s were triggered by multiple factors, including geopolitical tensions between the US and China, growing demand for AI processing chips, and the global rollout of 5G technology. These factors created a perfect storm that caught Intel off guard. Its once-celebrated integrated design-and-manufacture model became a liability, while competitors like AMD gained market share by leveraging TSMC’s superior fabrication technologies.Intel’s attempts to expand its foundry business faltered. Projects such as the development of glass substrates were scaled back, and the automotive chip division was shut down.&nbsp;In 2024, CEO Pat Gelsinger was removed after Intel’s stock fell by 60 per cent. He was replaced by Lip-Bu Tan, and the company laid off up to 20 per cent of its workforce. Even prominent engineers such as Jim Keller exited.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-is-lip-bu-tan-why-did-donald-trump-demand-his-resignation-alleged-china-links-explained-1754577800317">Also read: Who is Lip-Bu Tan? Why did Donald Trump demand&nbsp;his resignation? China links explained</a><h2>US government ‘bailout’ of Intel: A lender of last resort comes in</h2>Recognising Intel’s importance to national security and technological independence, the US government made a historic intervention under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. The company reportedly received up to 10.9 billion dollars—7.9 billion for commercial fabrication facilities in states like Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio, and Oregon, and 3 billion for producing military-grade chips under the Secure Enclave programme.In August 2025, the Trump administration converted roughly 8.9 billion dollars of these grants into a 10 per cent equity stake in Intel, making the US government its largest shareholder.&nbsp;The deal included non-voting shares and a 5 per cent warrant, which would allow the government to expand its stake if Intel’s foundry unit loses majority control.&nbsp;Additionally, SoftBank invested 2 billion dollars in support of Intel’s turnaround efforts.Critics have compared the government's move to the 2008 bailout of the US auto industry, warning that financial aid alone may not resolve Intel’s deeper challenges, such as its technological lag behind TSMC and Nvidia.<h2>Can Intel catch up in the near future?</h2>While a turnaround is not impossible, recent failures suggest caution. Intel has yet to attract major foundry clients like Apple or Nvidia. Its much-publicised Intel 18A process, set to launch in 2025, is already facing scepticism over whether it can match the performance and efficiency of competitors’ offerings.A breakthrough innovation could still restore Intel’s standing, but as of now, its “rock star” era is clearly over. The company faces an uncertain future as it struggles to remain competitive in a global market increasingly dominated by faster-moving rivals—including those from China. &nbsp;

A series of strategic mistakes and the rise of China in chip-making contributed to the collapse of the legendary semiconductor firm which at one point had its hardware inside practically every computer. What went wrong? Here is what you should know

In a widely recognised ad campaign, Intel called its engineers “rock stars.” Its main branding for years was “Intel Inside,” and for a long time, that was true—nearly every personal computer came equipped with an Intel processor. But today, the company is effectively receiving a virtual bailout from the US government. How did this former semiconductor titan fall from grace? It’s a story of strategic mistakes, slow adaptation to technological shifts, and a global chip war increasingly dominated by China. Here’s how Intel went from captain to cautionary tale. What’s the current stock status of Intel? A decline in market cap As of August, Intel’s stock had dropped sharply from its 52-week high of around $51.28 to approximately $25—a fall of nearly 52 per cent. At the end of 2023, the company had a market capitalisation of roughly $210.5 billion. By mid-2025, that had fallen to about $90.6 billion, marking a decline of nearly 57 per cent. Also read: Nvidia set to replace Intel in the Dow Jones Index Intel’s early years: The founding story Intel was founded on 18 July 1968 by pioneering engineers Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore, and was joined by venture capitalist Arthur Rock, who helped secure the company’s initial funding. Originally incorporated as NM Electronics, the name was later changed to Intel—short for “Integrated Electronics.” Noyce is credited as one of the inventors of the integrated circuit. Moore became widely known for Moore’s Law, a prediction that the number of transistors on a chip would double approximately every two years, improving performance while reducing cost. Together, the trio laid the foundation for one of the most influential technology companies in the world. Intel’s peak: The “rock star” era of the 2000s During the rise of the internet in the 2000s, Intel dominated the global tech landscape by supplying the hardware that powered most personal computers and laptops, including those made by Microsoft and Apple. In 2009, a marketing campaign presented Intel engineers—such as Ajay Bhatt, co-inventor of USB—as “rock stars,” elevating their image to that of cultural icons. The “Intel Inside” campaign, launched in the 1990s, had already made the company a household name and synonymous with high-performance computing. Intel missed two buses: Mobile chips and artificial intelligence Intel’s strong focus on personal computers ultimately contributed to its decline, as global computing shifted rapidly towards smartphones. Intel was not prepared for the mobile revolution, which was led by ARM-based processors developed by companies like Qualcomm. Intel’s processors consumed too much power and were unsuitable for mobile devices. Under CEOs such as Paul Otellini, Brian Krzanich, and Bob Swan, Intel has been accused of prioritising short-term profits over innovation. For example, Krzanich delayed the adoption of extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUV), a move that allowed competitors to overtake Intel in advanced chip manufacturing. During Swan’s tenure, the company reportedly spent billions on stock buybacks instead of investing heavily in research and development. Also read: Trump administration in talks to take stake in Intel amid Ohio factory delays Rise of AI chip makers: New Kids on the Block The artificial intelligence boom required high-performance processors, and formerly smaller players like Nvidia seized the opportunity with their graphics processing units (GPUs). In 2020, one of Intel’s key clients, Apple, began transitioning to its own M1 chips—designed in-house and manufactured by TSMC—dealing a significant blow to Intel’s market dominance. https://www.wionews.com/videos/intel-under-fire-over-ceo-s-china-ties-1754631887353/embed How Intel lost ground amid global chip wars The chip wars of the 2020s were triggered by multiple factors, including geopolitical tensions between the US and China, growing demand for AI processing chips, and the global rollout of 5G technology. These factors created a perfect storm that caught Intel off guard. Its once-celebrated integrated design-and-manufacture model became a liability, while competitors like AMD gained market share by leveraging TSMC’s superior fabrication technologies. Intel’s attempts to expand its foundry business faltered. Projects such as the development of glass substrates were scaled back, and the automotive chip division was shut down. In 2024, CEO Pat Gelsinger was removed after Intel’s stock fell by 60 per cent. He was replaced by Lip-Bu Tan, and the company laid off up to 20 per cent of its workforce. Even prominent engineers such as Jim Keller exited. Also read: Who is Lip-Bu Tan? Why did Donald Trump demand his resignation? China links explained US government ‘bailout’ of Intel: A lender of last resort comes in Recognising Intel’s importance to national security and technological independence, the US government made a historic intervention under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. The company reportedly received up to 10.9 billion dollars—7.9 billion for commercial fabrication facilities in states like Arizona, New Mexico, Ohio, and Oregon, and 3 billion for producing military-grade chips under the Secure Enclave programme. In August 2025, the Trump administration converted roughly 8.9 billion dollars of these grants into a 10 per cent equity stake in Intel, making the US government its largest shareholder. The deal included non-voting shares and a 5 per cent warrant, which would allow the government to expand its stake if Intel’s foundry unit loses majority control. Additionally, SoftBank invested 2 billion dollars in support of Intel’s turnaround efforts. Critics have compared the government's move to the 2008 bailout of the US auto industry, warning that financial aid alone may not resolve Intel’s deeper challenges, such as its technological lag behind TSMC and Nvidia. Can Intel catch up in the near future? While a turnaround is not impossible, recent failures suggest caution. Intel has yet to attract major foundry clients like Apple or Nvidia. Its much-publicised Intel 18A process, set to launch in 2025, is already facing scepticism over whether it can match the performance and efficiency of competitors’ offerings. A breakthrough innovation could still restore Intel’s standing, but as of now, its “rock star” era is clearly over. The company faces an uncertain future as it struggles to remain competitive in a global market increasingly dominated by faster-moving rivals—including those from China.

A series of strategic mistakes and the rise of China in chip-making contributed to the collapse of the legendary semiconductor firm, which at one point had its hardware inside practically every computer. What went wrong? Here is what you should know

Intel's fall: Firm that once called its engineers 'rock stars' is now on US govt crutches amid China chip wars. How did it get here?

Explore the biggest nuclear tests in history, including Tsar Bomba and Castle Bravo, and their global impact on geopolitics, environment, and nuclear arms control.

Biggest nuclear tests in history: Tsar Bomba, Castle Bravo and their global impact

technology

Technology, News on Technology, stories on Technology, articles on Technology, Technology stories at Wion, Technology news, Technology latest news

technology

Google IS a monopoly, but US can't touch it: Chrome escaped breakup partly due to Chromium. But what is it?

B-29 Bomber: Costliest weapon of World War II, costlier than the nuclear bomb

India fired first shot in 'chip wars' with Vikram chip. Why Semicon 2025 matters

Semicon India 2025: PM unveils Vikram, India's first homegrown 32-bit microchip

Tech giant Google issues global Gmail alert after hackers target security team

Gen Z uses AI the most, but it's eating up their jobs in disturbing trend

How ChatGPT helped recover a $200,000 Lamborghini Huracan stolen two years ago

AI in Fashion designing: Will AI decide what you wear next?

AI therapy explained: Can chatbots help with mental health?

Personalised learning with AI: How classrooms are evolving explained

Future of healthcare: How artificial intelligence is transforming hospitals

Future of learning: Will AI support or replace teachers?

Top 10 social networks worldwide by monthly active users in 2025

Tesla cybercab vs Waymo: Who will win the us robotaxi race?

Volkswagen extends Amazon Web Services deal for 5 years to cut costs using AI

Nvidia CEO says AI boom is just starting, predicts multi-trillion dollar growth

Nvidia profits surge, but China’s H20 chip remains unsold

Chinese city, home of DeepSeek, makes AI mandatory in schools

AI has human rights? These advocacy groups think sentient AI can have ‘feelings’

Dream11 lost 95 pc revenue due to online gaming ban. Will it lay off staff?

Global Space Economy : Top countries with highest space budget in 2025

5 countries with most robot workers — Check which country tops list

'Game-changer'? Ukraine's Long Neptune missile revealed — what we know so far

Elon Musk’s Starship grounded again: SpaceX scraps launch for second day

Intel’s spectacular fall from rock star to ruins: What went wrong for chip firm?

Biggest nuclear tests in history: Tsar Bomba, Castle Bravo and their impact