National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

Donald Trump recently used his Truth Social platform to publicly praise Palantir Technologies, calling its systems highly effective in warfare and suggesting adversaries are already aware of its capabilities. The endorsement reflects a broader shift: artificial intelligence is no longer just a productivity tool; it is becoming central to how wars are planned and executed.&nbsp;This transformation was on display during the recent Iran conflict, where AI-assisted systems played a key operational role. Before strikes were carried out, software processed vast volumes of satellite imagery, drone feeds, and intelligence data to generate more than a thousand potential strike options. What once required days of human analysis was reduced to minutes, dramatically accelerating the pace of decision-making.&nbsp;At the center of this capability is Palantir’s Maven Smart System (MSS), a sophisticated command-and-control platform. Maven integrates intelligence streams from across the military, Army, Navy, Air Force, and even space-based assets into a unified system. It can identify, track, and classify targets such as vehicles, infrastructure, and weapons with remarkable speed, often reducing identification time to under a minute.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/molotov-cocktail-thrown-at-open-ai-s-ceo-sam-altman-s-home-suspect-arrested-1775850306127">Molotov cocktail thrown at OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman’s home; suspect arrested</a>&nbsp;Beyond targeting, Maven also supports predictive logistics. Analyzing patterns and real-time data, it helps commanders anticipate where supplies, reinforcements, or firepower will be needed before shortages arise. This allows military leaders to act proactively rather than reactively, improving operational efficiency on the battlefield.A major enhancement to Maven came through its integration with AI technology developed by Anthropic. Its Claude model enabled the system to go beyond raw data processing, offering contextual analysis, identifying patterns, and presenting commanders with more nuanced assessments.&nbsp;&nbsp;Instead of simply flagging potential targets, the system could interpret their significance based on historical and situational context. However, the partnership has not been without challenges. Anthropic reportedly placed limits on how its AI could be used, particularly in autonomous weapons or surveillance roles, prompting the Pentagon to explore alternative solutions. Despite these tensions, the US Department of Defense has formally designated Maven as a long-term ‘programme of record’, signaling its deep and enduring integration into military operations.&nbsp;Maven’s use is not limited to a single conflict. Variants of the system have been deployed for nearly a decade, supporting missions in Somalia against extremist groups, aiding operations in Iraq and Syria, assisting evacuation and rescue efforts in Afghanistan, and contributing to monitoring efforts in the Ukraine conflict. Its adoption by NATO further underscores its growing global footprint. Yet the rise of AI in warfare has sparked serious ethical and operational concerns. Critics argue that compressing decision timelines leaves less room for human verification, increasing the risk of errors.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nasa-moon-mission-artemis-ii-crew-returns-after-10-days-of-travel-into-deep-space-1775839480480/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/nasa-moon-mission-artemis-ii-crew-returns-after-10-days-of-travel-into-deep-space-1775839480480/embed</a>&nbsp;In high-stakes environments, a misidentified target can lead to devastating consequences. Reports of civilian casualties during strikes in Iran have intensified scrutiny, with lawmakers calling for stricter oversight and transparency regarding the role of AI in targeting decisions. Palantir maintains that human operators remain firmly ‘in the loop’, making final decisions on the use of force. Still, as AI systems become more advanced and deeply embedded in military strategy, questions remain about accountability, reliability, and the future balance between human judgment and machine-driven insights.&nbsp;What is clear is that Palantir is no longer a niche defense contractor. With multi-billion-dollar government contracts and a rapidly growing market valuation, the company has positioned itself at the center of a new era, one where data, algorithms, and artificial intelligence are as critical to warfare as traditional weapons.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Inside Palantir’s AI Maven system and how it helped the US military rapidly plan strikes in Iran, raising concerns about AI-driven warfare

Donald Trump recently used his Truth Social platform to publicly praise Palantir Technologies, calling its systems highly effective in warfare and suggesting adversaries are already aware of its capabilities. The endorsement reflects a broader shift: artificial intelligence is no longer just a productivity tool; it is becoming central to how wars are planned and executed. This transformation was on display during the recent Iran conflict, where AI-assisted systems played a key operational role. Before strikes were carried out, software processed vast volumes of satellite imagery, drone feeds, and intelligence data to generate more than a thousand potential strike options. What once required days of human analysis was reduced to minutes, dramatically accelerating the pace of decision-making. At the center of this capability is Palantir’s Maven Smart System (MSS), a sophisticated command-and-control platform. Maven integrates intelligence streams from across the military, Army, Navy, Air Force, and even space-based assets into a unified system. It can identify, track, and classify targets such as vehicles, infrastructure, and weapons with remarkable speed, often reducing identification time to under a minute. Also Read: Molotov cocktail thrown at OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman’s home; suspect arrested Beyond targeting, Maven also supports predictive logistics. Analyzing patterns and real-time data, it helps commanders anticipate where supplies, reinforcements, or firepower will be needed before shortages arise. This allows military leaders to act proactively rather than reactively, improving operational efficiency on the battlefield. A major enhancement to Maven came through its integration with AI technology developed by Anthropic. Its Claude model enabled the system to go beyond raw data processing, offering contextual analysis, identifying patterns, and presenting commanders with more nuanced assessments. Instead of simply flagging potential targets, the system could interpret their significance based on historical and situational context. However, the partnership has not been without challenges. Anthropic reportedly placed limits on how its AI could be used, particularly in autonomous weapons or surveillance roles, prompting the Pentagon to explore alternative solutions. Despite these tensions, the US Department of Defense has formally designated Maven as a long-term ‘programme of record’, signaling its deep and enduring integration into military operations. Maven’s use is not limited to a single conflict. Variants of the system have been deployed for nearly a decade, supporting missions in Somalia against extremist groups, aiding operations in Iraq and Syria, assisting evacuation and rescue efforts in Afghanistan, and contributing to monitoring efforts in the Ukraine conflict. Its adoption by NATO further underscores its growing global footprint. Yet the rise of AI in warfare has sparked serious ethical and operational concerns. Critics argue that compressing decision timelines leaves less room for human verification, increasing the risk of errors. https://www.wionews.com/videos/nasa-moon-mission-artemis-ii-crew-returns-after-10-days-of-travel-into-deep-space-1775839480480/embed In high-stakes environments, a misidentified target can lead to devastating consequences. Reports of civilian casualties during strikes in Iran have intensified scrutiny, with lawmakers calling for stricter oversight and transparency regarding the role of AI in targeting decisions. Palantir maintains that human operators remain firmly ‘in the loop’, making final decisions on the use of force. Still, as AI systems become more advanced and deeply embedded in military strategy, questions remain about accountability, reliability, and the future balance between human judgment and machine-driven insights. What is clear is that Palantir is no longer a niche defense contractor. With multi-billion-dollar government contracts and a rapidly growing market valuation, the company has positioned itself at the center of a new era, one where data, algorithms, and artificial intelligence are as critical to warfare as traditional weapons. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

AI-powered Maven system helped US military plan rapid strikes in Iran, boosting Palantir’s role but raising concerns over speed, accuracy, and civilian risks

Inside Palantir’s AI Maven: How the system helped US military in Iran strikes. Know all about it

A suspect was arrested after allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, early Friday morning (April 10). The individual also reportedly issued threats near the company’s headquarters in San Francisco. According to the company, no injuries were reported in either incident.&nbsp;&nbsp;A Molotov cocktail is a crude incendiary device typically made using a bottle filled with flammable liquid and a wick that is ignited before being thrown. “Early this morning, someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s home and also made threats at our San Francisco headquarters. Thankfully, no one was hurt,” said Jamie Radice, an OpenAI spokesperson. “The individual is in custody, and we’re assisting law enforcement with their investigation," he added, without giving any further details. Altman has not publicly responded to the incident.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-us-loading-warships-trump-warns-of-renewed-strikes-if-iran-does-not-comply-in-peace-talks-1775840972736">‘US loading warships’: Trump warns of renewed strikes if Iran does not comply in peace talks</a><h2>What the police said</h2>A spokesperson for the San Francisco Police Department said that officers responded to a fire investigation at approximately 4:12 am. They discovered that “that an unknown male subject threw an incendiary destructive device at a home, causing a fire to an exterior gate.” The suspect fled the scene on foot. The device, a hand-thrown incendiary weapon usually made from a glass bottle filled with flammable liquid and a cloth fuse, ignited before being thrown, setting part of an exterior gate on fire before the suspect fled on foot.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-toils-to-avoid-becoming-casualty-of-iran-war-1775838580448/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-toils-to-avoid-becoming-casualty-of-iran-war-1775838580448/embed</a>&nbsp;About an hour later, at 5:07 am, police responded to a separate call near the OpenAI headquarters on the 1400 block of 3rd Street, where a 20-year-old man allegedly threatened to burn down a building. Officers identified the individual as the same suspect from the earlier incident and took him into custody. “When officers arrived on scene, they recognized the male to be the same suspect from the earlier incident and immediately detained him,” said the SFPD.

Man arrested after Molotov cocktail attack at Sam Altman’s home and threats near OpenAI HQ in San Francisco; no injuries reported

A suspect was arrested after allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail at the home of Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, early Friday morning (April 10). The individual also reportedly issued threats near the company’s headquarters in San Francisco. According to the company, no injuries were reported in either incident. A Molotov cocktail is a crude incendiary device typically made using a bottle filled with flammable liquid and a wick that is ignited before being thrown. “Early this morning, someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Sam Altman’s home and also made threats at our San Francisco headquarters. Thankfully, no one was hurt,” said Jamie Radice, an OpenAI spokesperson. “The individual is in custody, and we’re assisting law enforcement with their investigation," he added, without giving any further details. Altman has not publicly responded to the incident. Also Read: ‘US loading warships’: Trump warns of renewed strikes if Iran does not comply in peace talks What the police said A spokesperson for the San Francisco Police Department said that officers responded to a fire investigation at approximately 4:12 am. They discovered that “that an unknown male subject threw an incendiary destructive device at a home, causing a fire to an exterior gate.” The suspect fled the scene on foot. The device, a hand-thrown incendiary weapon usually made from a glass bottle filled with flammable liquid and a cloth fuse, ignited before being thrown, setting part of an exterior gate on fire before the suspect fled on foot. https://www.wionews.com/videos/nato-toils-to-avoid-becoming-casualty-of-iran-war-1775838580448/embed About an hour later, at 5:07 am, police responded to a separate call near the OpenAI headquarters on the 1400 block of 3rd Street, where a 20-year-old man allegedly threatened to burn down a building. Officers identified the individual as the same suspect from the earlier incident and took him into custody. “When officers arrived on scene, they recognized the male to be the same suspect from the earlier incident and immediately detained him,” said the SFPD.

Suspect arrested after Molotov cocktail attack at Sam Altman’s home and threats near OpenAI headquarters in San Francisco; no injuries reported

Molotov cocktail thrown at Open AI's CEO Sam Altman’s home; suspect arrested

YouTube users are reacting strongly to rising Premium subscription prices in the US, and longer unskippable TV ads, which make the experience similar to cable TV. The platform is pushing for higher revenue through subscriptions and advertising changes, far from its creator community origins.

YouTube Premium Subscription fee hike and nearly two minutes of unskippable ads for TV viewers make users FURIOUS

AI companies are now racing not only to build better models but also to secure the computing power needed to run them. According to reports, Anthropic is exploring the possibility of designing its own AI chips to power its Claude chatbot and AI systems.The move comes as demand for high-performance computing continues to rise across the global AI industry. Reports suggest the company is studying whether building its own chips could reduce reliance on hardware suppliers and ensure a steady supply of computing power.<h2>Why Anthropic is considering building its own chips</h2>AI models require massive computing resources. Training and running modern systems often needs thousands of specialised processors. At present, Anthropic relies on hardware from several partners, including chips from Nvidia, Google, and other infrastructure providers.These chips are used to train and run large language models such as Claude.However, the global AI boom has created strong demand for advanced processors. Access to these chips has become one of the main challenges for AI companies expanding their services. To address this, Anthropic is reportedly exploring whether designing its own chips could give it more control over cost, performance and availability. Industry analysts say the idea is still at an early stage. The company has not announced a final design or created a dedicated team for the project yet.<h2>Current infrastructure powering Claude AI</h2>Right now, Claude AI runs on a mix of specialised hardware across different platforms. Anthropic uses infrastructure such as:Amazon’s AI chips including Trainium and InferentiaGoogle’s Tensor Processing Units (TPUs)Nvidia’s GPUs used widely across the AI industryThese processors help train models, run inference tasks and support cloud-based AI services.But as models become larger and more complex, companies increasingly want greater control over their computing infrastructure.<h2>Why many AI firms are building custom chips</h2>Anthropic would not be the first AI company to explore custom hardware.Several large technology firms have already invested heavily in developing their own processors. For example:Google developed its Tensor Processing Units for AI workloadsAmazon designed Trainium and Inferentia chips for cloud computingMicrosoft has been building AI chips for its cloud platformsThese custom chips can improve performance for specific AI tasks and reduce dependence on external suppliers. Designing chips also allows companies to optimise hardware specifically for their AI models.<h2>Challenges of designing AI chips</h2>Despite the potential advantages, building AI chips is a complex and expensive process. Industry estimates suggest developing advanced semiconductors can cost more than $500 million. It also requires teams of highly specialised engineers with expertise in chip architecture, manufacturing and system design.Beyond design, companies must also handle fabrication, testing and scaling production, which can take several years.This means Anthropic’s project, if pursued, would likely be a long-term effort rather than an immediate product launch.<h2>What this could mean for the AI industry</h2>If Anthropic eventually builds its own chips, the move could reshape relationships across the AI hardware ecosystem. Companies such as Nvidia dominate the AI GPU market, while Google provides powerful TPUs through its cloud platform. A shift towards custom chips could reduce dependence on these providers over time.However, experts note that partnerships with chip companies and cloud providers will remain essential, especially during the early stages of AI hardware development.For now, Anthropic’s exploration signals a broader trend: AI companies want more control over the infrastructure powering their models. As demand for computing power grows, the next phase of the AI race may not only be about smarter models but also about who controls the hardware that runs them.&nbsp;

Anthropic is reportedly exploring the development of custom AI chips to power its Claude models. Currently, the company relies on processors from Nvidia, Amazon and Google.

AI companies are now racing not only to build better models but also to secure the computing power needed to run them. According to reports, Anthropic is exploring the possibility of designing its own AI chips to power its Claude chatbot and AI systems. The move comes as demand for high-performance computing continues to rise across the global AI industry. Reports suggest the company is studying whether building its own chips could reduce reliance on hardware suppliers and ensure a steady supply of computing power. Why Anthropic is considering building its own chips AI models require massive computing resources. Training and running modern systems often needs thousands of specialised processors. At present, Anthropic relies on hardware from several partners, including chips from Nvidia, Google, and other infrastructure providers. These chips are used to train and run large language models such as Claude. However, the global AI boom has created strong demand for advanced processors. Access to these chips has become one of the main challenges for AI companies expanding their services. To address this, Anthropic is reportedly exploring whether designing its own chips could give it more control over cost, performance and availability. Industry analysts say the idea is still at an early stage. The company has not announced a final design or created a dedicated team for the project yet. Current infrastructure powering Claude AI Right now, Claude AI runs on a mix of specialised hardware across different platforms. Anthropic uses infrastructure such as: Amazon’s AI chips including Trainium and Inferentia Google’s Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) Nvidia’s GPUs used widely across the AI industry These processors help train models, run inference tasks and support cloud-based AI services. But as models become larger and more complex, companies increasingly want greater control over their computing infrastructure. Why many AI firms are building custom chips Anthropic would not be the first AI company to explore custom hardware. Several large technology firms have already invested heavily in developing their own processors. For example: Google developed its Tensor Processing Units for AI workloads Amazon designed Trainium and Inferentia chips for cloud computing Microsoft has been building AI chips for its cloud platforms These custom chips can improve performance for specific AI tasks and reduce dependence on external suppliers. Designing chips also allows companies to optimise hardware specifically for their AI models. Challenges of designing AI chips Despite the potential advantages, building AI chips is a complex and expensive process. Industry estimates suggest developing advanced semiconductors can cost more than $500 million. It also requires teams of highly specialised engineers with expertise in chip architecture, manufacturing and system design. Beyond design, companies must also handle fabrication, testing and scaling production, which can take several years. This means Anthropic’s project, if pursued, would likely be a long-term effort rather than an immediate product launch. What this could mean for the AI industry If Anthropic eventually builds its own chips, the move could reshape relationships across the AI hardware ecosystem. Companies such as Nvidia dominate the AI GPU market, while Google provides powerful TPUs through its cloud platform. A shift towards custom chips could reduce dependence on these providers over time. However, experts note that partnerships with chip companies and cloud providers will remain essential, especially during the early stages of AI hardware development. For now, Anthropic’s exploration signals a broader trend: AI companies want more control over the infrastructure powering their models. As demand for computing power grows, the next phase of the AI race may not only be about smarter models but also about who controls the hardware that runs them.

Anthropic is reportedly exploring the development of custom AI chips to power its Claude models. Currently, the company relies on processors from Nvidia, Amazon and Google.

AI infrastructure race: Anthropic may build its own AI chips to power Claude

Anthropic’s Claude Mythos Preview showed advanced ability to find and exploit vulnerabilities across computer systems. This is raising fears of AI-driven cyberattacks and financial instability. The US government has issued warnings to banking and financial industry leaders. Here is why it matters

Why Anthropic’s Claude Mythos is scaring financial sector and US officials: This AI model can end cybersecurity, if in wrong hands

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how people search for information online. One of the biggest shifts came when Google introduced AI Overviews, a feature that places AI-generated answers at the top of search results.The system is designed to provide quick summaries instead of simply showing links. But as AI answers become more visible, questions about accuracy, transparency and trust are growing. According to a recent analysis, AI Overviews are correct most of the time but errors still occur at scale.<h2>What are Google’s AI Overviews?</h2>AI Overviews were introduced in 2024 as part of Google’s broader push to integrate artificial intelligence into search. The feature uses AI models from the Google Gemini system to generate direct answers to user queries. Instead of scrolling through multiple websites, users see a short AI summary at the top of the results page. The summary usually includes links to websites that support the information.This change has effectively turned Google from a search engine that directs users to websites into a platform that sometimes publishes its own AI-generated answers.<h2>What the accuracy study found</h2>An analysis by AI startup Oumi evaluated how accurate these AI-generated answers are.At the request of The New York Times, the company tested 4,326 Google search queries using a benchmark known as SimpleQA, which is commonly used in the AI industry to measure system accuracy.The results showed:AI Overviews were 85 per cent accurate when powered by Gemini 2After an upgrade to Gemini 3, accuracy increased to 91 per centMore than 5,000 sources were cited across the analysed responsesThese findings suggest the technology is improving, but it is still not perfect.Given that Google processes more than 5 trillion searches per year, even a small error rate could lead to millions of incorrect responses being generated regularly.<h2>The problem of “ungrounded” answers</h2>Another issue raised in the analysis concerns how AI Overviews cite sources.Researchers found that more than half of the accurate responses were “ungrounded.” This means the links cited by Google did not fully support the information presented in the AI summary.This creates challenges for users trying to verify the accuracy of the answer.The study also observed that social platforms such as Facebook and Reddit appeared frequently among cited sources.For example:Facebook was cited 5 per cent of the time in accurate answersIt appeared 7 per cent of the time in inaccurate answersGoogle disputes parts of the analysisGoogle has acknowledged that AI Overviews can sometimes contain mistakes. However, the company also criticised the methodology used in the analysis. A Google spokesperson said the research relied on a benchmark created by OpenAI, which the company argues contains incorrect information.According to Google, relying on such benchmarks could affect the reliability of the findings.Another challenge with AI evaluation is that researchers often use AI systems themselves to verify answers. This means the checking process may also introduce errors.<h2>Why the debate over AI search matters</h2>AI-powered search tools promise faster answers and a simpler user experience. But experts warn that users may trust AI summaries without verifying them. Some technologists say the technology is already useful and improving quickly. Others argue that the average user may not realise that AI-generated results should still be checked.As AI systems become central to how people access information online, ensuring accuracy and transparency will become increasingly important.For now, the research suggests that while Google’s AI Overviews are often correct, users should still treat them as a starting point not the final word.&nbsp;

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how people search for information online. One of the biggest shifts came when Google introduced AI Overviews, a feature that places AI-generated answers at the top of search results.

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how people search for information online. One of the biggest shifts came when Google introduced AI Overviews, a feature that places AI-generated answers at the top of search results. The system is designed to provide quick summaries instead of simply showing links. But as AI answers become more visible, questions about accuracy, transparency and trust are growing. According to a recent analysis, AI Overviews are correct most of the time but errors still occur at scale. What are Google’s AI Overviews? AI Overviews were introduced in 2024 as part of Google’s broader push to integrate artificial intelligence into search. The feature uses AI models from the Google Gemini system to generate direct answers to user queries. Instead of scrolling through multiple websites, users see a short AI summary at the top of the results page. The summary usually includes links to websites that support the information. This change has effectively turned Google from a search engine that directs users to websites into a platform that sometimes publishes its own AI-generated answers. What the accuracy study found An analysis by AI startup Oumi evaluated how accurate these AI-generated answers are. At the request of The New York Times, the company tested 4,326 Google search queries using a benchmark known as SimpleQA, which is commonly used in the AI industry to measure system accuracy. The results showed: AI Overviews were 85 per cent accurate when powered by Gemini 2 After an upgrade to Gemini 3, accuracy increased to 91 per cent More than 5,000 sources were cited across the analysed responses These findings suggest the technology is improving, but it is still not perfect. Given that Google processes more than 5 trillion searches per year, even a small error rate could lead to millions of incorrect responses being generated regularly. The problem of “ungrounded” answers Another issue raised in the analysis concerns how AI Overviews cite sources. Researchers found that more than half of the accurate responses were “ungrounded.” This means the links cited by Google did not fully support the information presented in the AI summary. This creates challenges for users trying to verify the accuracy of the answer. The study also observed that social platforms such as Facebook and Reddit appeared frequently among cited sources. For example: Facebook was cited 5 per cent of the time in accurate answers It appeared 7 per cent of the time in inaccurate answers Google disputes parts of the analysis Google has acknowledged that AI Overviews can sometimes contain mistakes. However, the company also criticised the methodology used in the analysis. A Google spokesperson said the research relied on a benchmark created by OpenAI, which the company argues contains incorrect information. According to Google, relying on such benchmarks could affect the reliability of the findings. Another challenge with AI evaluation is that researchers often use AI systems themselves to verify answers. This means the checking process may also introduce errors. Why the debate over AI search matters AI-powered search tools promise faster answers and a simpler user experience. But experts warn that users may trust AI summaries without verifying them. Some technologists say the technology is already useful and improving quickly. Others argue that the average user may not realise that AI-generated results should still be checked. As AI systems become central to how people access information online, ensuring accuracy and transparency will become increasingly important. For now, the research suggests that while Google’s AI Overviews are often correct, users should still treat them as a starting point not the final word.

Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how people search for information online. One of the biggest shifts came when Google introduced AI Overviews, a feature that places AI-generated answers at the top of search results.

Can you trust the results: How accurate are Google’s AI overviews in search results?

AI companies are launching new models at a rapid pace. In the latest development, Meta has introduced a new AI model called Muse Spark, which the company says is its most advanced system so far. The model was developed by Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL), a new research division set up by Meta in 2025. The team is led by Alexandr Wang, who joined the company after Meta acquired his startup Scale AI in a multi-billion-dollar deal.According to company announcements and developer discussions, Muse Spark is designed to power Meta’s AI assistant across platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">1/ today we&#39;re releasing muse spark, the first model from MSL. nine months ago we rebuilt our ai stack from scratch. new infrastructure, new architecture, new data pipelines. muse spark is the result of that work, and now it powers meta ai. 🧵 <a href="https://t.co/fThDXdsxwB">pic.twitter.com/fThDXdsxwB</a>&mdash; Alexandr Wang (@alexandr_wang) <a href="https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/2041909376508985381?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 8, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What is Meta Muse Spark?</h2>Muse Spark is the first model from Meta’s new Muse family of AI systems, which is expected to replace the company’s earlier Llama models over time. Unlike some large flagship models, Muse Spark is described as a small but fast AI model. Meta says the model was built from scratch in about nine months.Despite its smaller size, the company claims the model can still handle complex reasoning tasks. In its technical description, Meta said the system can process questions related to science, mathematics and health.According to Alexandr Wang, the model also includes a “contemplating mode”, where multiple AI agents can work in parallel to solve complex problems.<h2>How Muse Spark compares with ChatGPT and Claude</h2>Muse Spark enters a highly competitive market where several companies are developing advanced AI assistants.Major competitors include:ChatGPT developed by OpenAIClaude developed by AnthropicMeta claims that Muse Spark performs competitively in certain benchmarks, including:Multimodal reasoningScientific problem solvingHealth-related analysisAgent-based workflowsThe company also said early testing showed the model could compete with other advanced reasoning systems such as Google’s Deep Think models and OpenAI’s professional reasoning models.However, these comparisons are based on internal tests and have not yet been widely verified by independent researchers.<h2>What can Muse Spark do?</h2>Meta says the new AI system is designed to understand real-world context and assist users across its ecosystem of apps.Some of its capabilities include:Solving science and mathematics problemsAnswering complex questionsManaging multiple AI agents for tasksProviding recommendations for shopping and creatorsUnderstanding conversations across Meta appsThe model will power an updated version of Meta AI, which the company plans to integrate across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger and Meta’s smart glasses.Meta says the system is being built for the three billion people who use its platforms globally.Muse Spark is not open source. One major difference from Meta’s earlier AI models is that Muse Spark is currently closed source.Meta’s previous Llama models were released publicly, allowing developers to access the code and build applications. Muse Spark, however, is currently available only through a private API preview for selected partners. The company said future versions of the Muse models may be open sourced, but no timeline has been confirmed.<h2>Safety testing and future development</h2>Meta said the new AI model has undergone safety evaluations, particularly in areas such as biological or chemical misuse.According to Alexandr Wang, Muse Spark showed strong refusal behaviour when asked about high-risk topics during internal testing.The company added that larger AI models in the Muse family are already under development, with new infrastructure being built to support them.This suggests Muse Spark may be only the first step in Meta’s long-term AI roadmap.<h2>Why Muse Spark matters in the AI race</h2>The launch of Muse Spark reflects the growing competition among technology companies to build powerful AI assistants. Companies including Meta, OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are investing billions of dollars into AI research and infrastructure. Meta’s strategy is different in one key way: the company plans to integrate AI deeply across its social platforms, where billions of users interact every day.If Muse Spark performs as expected, it could play a major role in shaping how people use AI inside messaging apps, social media and digital services.

Meta has introduced Muse Spark, the first model in its new Muse AI family developed by Meta Superintelligence Labs. Led by Alexandr Wang, the model is designed to power Meta AI assistants across Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.

AI companies are launching new models at a rapid pace. In the latest development, Meta has introduced a new AI model called Muse Spark, which the company says is its most advanced system so far. The model was developed by Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL), a new research division set up by Meta in 2025. The team is led by Alexandr Wang, who joined the company after Meta acquired his startup Scale AI in a multi-billion-dollar deal. According to company announcements and developer discussions, Muse Spark is designed to power Meta’s AI assistant across platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

Meta has introduced Muse Spark, the first model in its new Muse AI family developed by Meta Superintelligence Labs. Led by Alexandr Wang, the model is designed to power Meta AI assistants across Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.

What is Muse Spark? Meta’s newly launched AI model and how it compares to ChatGPT and Claude

Elon Musk recently shared an interview with Robin Farrow, who wrote a 'hit piece' on Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the artificial intelligence firm behind ChatGPT. In the interview, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist behind the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse exposé that sparked the MeToo movement, said that former associates of Altman described him as a sociopath and a pathological liar. Sharing the interview, the X chief, who was part of the founding team of OpenAI, said this man cannot be trusted with a superpowerful AI.&nbsp;<h2>Sam Altman accused of excessive lying</h2>Musk posted the Farrow interview, in which the journalist from The New Yorker highlighted allegations of repeated dishonesty, exaggeration, and misleading statements to board members and partners by Altman. Farrow claimed that Altman was fired from OpenAI in 2023 - before being reinstated - partly for excessive lying. He also spoke about untested AI models being released to India, and false assurances on AI safety provisions, under Altman. While sharing the interview, Musk wrote: "Not someone you want in charge of superpowerful AI."<h2>Farrow's allegations against Sam Altman</h2>Farrow made several allegations in a piece for the New Yorker, titled "Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?". Written by Farrow along with Andrew Marantz and published on 6 April, the article came after 18 months of reporting and investigation. It is based on interviews with more than 100 people, including former and current OpenAI board members, executives, employees, investors, and colleagues. The article also claims to have reviewed previously undisclosed internal documents. This includes the “Ilya memos”, which contain Ilya Sutskever’s Slack messages and HR documents. Also reviewed were the private notes kept by Dario Amodei, the co-founder of rival AI firm Anthropic. Amodei was previously associated with OpenAI.The article questioned whether Altman can be trusted with control over transformative AI technology, in the context that artificial general intelligence (AGI) could be humanity’s most dangerous invention and thus would require a leader of “uncommon integrity” to run a company like OpenAI.<h2>AI, leadership and integrity: Sam Altman is “unconstrained by the truth”</h2>The article seeks to establish a pattern of deception, manipulation, and prioritisation of power and profit over safety commitments in Altman’s conduct. It claims that this pattern has been repeated across his career, from Loopt to Y Combinator and now OpenAI.Altman allegedly drifted from the AI safety mission, pushing aggressively for deals with businesses and governments.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/openai-brings-chatgpt-to-apple-carplay-for-hands-free-voice-interaction-while-driving-1775153637555">OpenAI brings ChatGPT to Apple CarPlay for hands-free voice interaction while driving</a><h2>Sam Altman had a consistent pattern of lying and misrepresentation</h2>In late 2022, Altman told the board that certain controversial features in an upcoming AI model had been approved by OpenAI’s safety panel. After board member Helen Toner asked for documentation, it turned out that the most controversial features had not been approved.Altman told Mira Murati that ChatGPT's GPT-4 Turbo model didn’t need safety approval, citing general counsel Jason Kwon. However, Kwon later said he was “confused” and had no idea where Altman got that idea. In his private notes, running to more than 200 pages, Dario Amodei documented several incidents, including one involving the 2019 Microsoft deal with OpenAI. Amodei wrote that Altman’s words were “almost certainly bulls***t”.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed</a><h2>The betrayal of OpenAI’s nonprofit and safety mission</h2>Some OpenAI founders, including Altman, privately doubted its nonprofit structure early on, according to the report. Greg Brockman wrote in his diary: "If three months later, we’re doing B-corp, then it was a lie."One researcher reportedly told the board: “OpenAI has been going off the rails on its mission... We are prioritising product and revenue above all else.”<h2>Altman's deception and manipulation go back to his first startup</h2>According to the report, employees at his first start-up, Loopt, went to the board twice asking to fire Altman over a lack of transparency and a tendency for exaggeration. This included claiming he was a “Missouri high-school ping-pong champion” when he was not. He inspired loyalty in others but was accused of blurring the truth.During his time at Y Combinator, partners complained of divided loyalties, with Altman making personal investments while serving as president. Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, reportedly told colleagues Altman “had been lying to us all the time”.Altman was later pushed out as president but resisted and remained listed as chairman in SEC filings until 2021, which he said he was unaware of.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/hollywood/disney-exits-from-openai-deal-here-s-what-happened-1774549684205">Disney exits from OpenAI deal? Here's what happened</a><h2>Sam Altman's aggressive business dealings with questionable partners, and lobbying against regulation</h2>Altman reportedly sought funding and deals with Gulf autocracies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE for massive data-centre projects, despite security red flags. He internally discussed “playing world powers like China and Russia against each other in a bidding war for AI technology, according to the report. This plan was dropped after employee pushback.At one point, he claimed, without evidence, that China had an “AGI Manhattan Project”.Altman lobbied against AI regulation such as the European Union AI Act and bills in California, even as he publicly supported AI safety, said the report.&nbsp;<h2>Sister's abuse accusations and more: Sam Altman's personal character under scanner</h2>Sources cited in Farrow's reportage and interviews described Altman as having a “sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences”, and a desperate need to be liked.The article notes deeply personal allegations from Altman’s sister Annie, including of sexual abuse, which Altman fought in the courts. He denied the allegations. There were unsubstantiated Silicon Valley rumours involving minors, on which no evidence was found by the New Yorker reporters.<h2>Altman's board coup: He was ousted in 2023, but was reinstated, with limited probe</h2>Altman was fired as OpenAI CEO in 2023 by the board, citing a lack of candour. But he quickly returned to the position after organising a counter-campaign. He made Thrive Capital’s $86 billion investment in OpenAI conditional on his return, among other factors. He was reinstated within five days, with the board that ousted him practically disbanded. The subsequent “independent” WilmerHale review, overseen by new board members chosen in consultation with Altman, produced no written report. An 800-word announcement only cited a “breakdown in trust” without explicitly blaming Altman.<h2>‘Can't change my personality’: Altman’s response to allegations on his leadership, personal qualities</h2>Altman attributed the criticism of him to his avoidance of conflict. He said he “can’t change my personality”, and denied lying.He maintained that OpenAI would continue to run safety projects, “or at least safety-adjacent projects”.He also characterised OpenAI's shift to for-profit operations and aggressive deal-making as normal competitive business rather than a betrayal.The New Yorker article does not portray Altman as cartoonishly evil. It presents a complex, high-achieving figure whose traits led to breakdowns in trust. It suggests he exhibits a “reality-distortion field” and ruthless ambition.

Elon Musk has shared a Robin Farrow interview citing allegations against Sam Altman, appearing to agree with the contents of Farrow's New Yorker ‘hit piece’ on the OpenAI CEO. Altman is accused of dishonesty, with the article questioning his leadership amid AI integrity and safety issues.

Elon Musk recently shared an interview with Robin Farrow, who wrote a 'hit piece' on Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, the artificial intelligence firm behind ChatGPT. In the interview, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist behind the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse exposé that sparked the MeToo movement, said that former associates of Altman described him as a sociopath and a pathological liar. Sharing the interview, the X chief, who was part of the founding team of OpenAI, said this man cannot be trusted with a superpowerful AI. Sam Altman accused of excessive lying Musk posted the Farrow interview, in which the journalist from The New Yorker highlighted allegations of repeated dishonesty, exaggeration, and misleading statements to board members and partners by Altman. Farrow claimed that Altman was fired from OpenAI in 2023 - before being reinstated - partly for excessive lying. He also spoke about untested AI models being released to India, and false assurances on AI safety provisions, under Altman. While sharing the interview, Musk wrote: "Not someone you want in charge of superpowerful AI." Farrow's allegations against Sam Altman Farrow made several allegations in a piece for the New Yorker, titled "Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?". Written by Farrow along with Andrew Marantz and published on 6 April, the article came after 18 months of reporting and investigation. It is based on interviews with more than 100 people, including former and current OpenAI board members, executives, employees, investors, and colleagues. The article also claims to have reviewed previously undisclosed internal documents. This includes the “Ilya memos”, which contain Ilya Sutskever’s Slack messages and HR documents. Also reviewed were the private notes kept by Dario Amodei, the co-founder of rival AI firm Anthropic. Amodei was previously associated with OpenAI. The article questioned whether Altman can be trusted with control over transformative AI technology, in the context that artificial general intelligence (AGI) could be humanity’s most dangerous invention and thus would require a leader of “uncommon integrity” to run a company like OpenAI. AI, leadership and integrity: Sam Altman is “unconstrained by the truth” The article seeks to establish a pattern of deception, manipulation, and prioritisation of power and profit over safety commitments in Altman’s conduct. It claims that this pattern has been repeated across his career, from Loopt to Y Combinator and now OpenAI. Altman allegedly drifted from the AI safety mission, pushing aggressively for deals with businesses and governments. Also read: OpenAI brings ChatGPT to Apple CarPlay for hands-free voice interaction while driving Sam Altman had a consistent pattern of lying and misrepresentation In late 2022, Altman told the board that certain controversial features in an upcoming AI model had been approved by OpenAI’s safety panel. After board member Helen Toner asked for documentation, it turned out that the most controversial features had not been approved. Altman told Mira Murati that ChatGPT's GPT-4 Turbo model didn’t need safety approval, citing general counsel Jason Kwon. However, Kwon later said he was “confused” and had no idea where Altman got that idea. In his private notes, running to more than 200 pages, Dario Amodei documented several incidents, including one involving the 2019 Microsoft deal with OpenAI. Amodei wrote that Altman’s words were “almost certainly bulls***t”. https://www.wionews.com/videos/openai-to-introduce-ads-on-chatgpt-as-new-revenue-stream-1774169954470/embed The betrayal of OpenAI’s nonprofit and safety mission Some OpenAI founders, including Altman, privately doubted its nonprofit structure early on, according to the report. Greg Brockman wrote in his diary: "If three months later, we’re doing B-corp, then it was a lie." One researcher reportedly told the board: “OpenAI has been going off the rails on its mission... We are prioritising product and revenue above all else.” Altman's deception and manipulation go back to his first startup According to the report, employees at his first start-up, Loopt, went to the board twice asking to fire Altman over a lack of transparency and a tendency for exaggeration. This included claiming he was a “Missouri high-school ping-pong champion” when he was not. He inspired loyalty in others but was accused of blurring the truth. During his time at Y Combinator, partners complained of divided loyalties, with Altman making personal investments while serving as president. Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, reportedly told colleagues Altman “had been lying to us all the time”. Altman was later pushed out as president but resisted and remained listed as chairman in SEC filings until 2021, which he said he was unaware of. Also read: Disney exits from OpenAI deal? Here's what happened Sam Altman's aggressive business dealings with questionable partners, and lobbying against regulation Altman reportedly sought funding and deals with Gulf autocracies in Saudi Arabia and the UAE for massive data-centre projects, despite security red flags. He internally discussed “playing world powers like China and Russia against each other in a bidding war for AI technology, according to the report. This plan was dropped after employee pushback. At one point, he claimed, without evidence, that China had an “AGI Manhattan Project”. Altman lobbied against AI regulation such as the European Union AI Act and bills in California, even as he publicly supported AI safety, said the report. Sister's abuse accusations and more: Sam Altman's personal character under scanner Sources cited in Farrow's reportage and interviews described Altman as having a “sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences”, and a desperate need to be liked. The article notes deeply personal allegations from Altman’s sister Annie, including of sexual abuse, which Altman fought in the courts. He denied the allegations. There were unsubstantiated Silicon Valley rumours involving minors, on which no evidence was found by the New Yorker reporters. Altman's board coup: He was ousted in 2023, but was reinstated, with limited probe Altman was fired as OpenAI CEO in 2023 by the board, citing a lack of candour. But he quickly returned to the position after organising a counter-campaign. He made Thrive Capital’s $86 billion investment in OpenAI conditional on his return, among other factors. He was reinstated within five days, with the board that ousted him practically disbanded. The subsequent “independent” WilmerHale review, overseen by new board members chosen in consultation with Altman, produced no written report. An 800-word announcement only cited a “breakdown in trust” without explicitly blaming Altman. ‘Can't change my personality’: Altman’s response to allegations on his leadership, personal qualities Altman attributed the criticism of him to his avoidance of conflict. He said he “can’t change my personality”, and denied lying. He maintained that OpenAI would continue to run safety projects, “or at least safety-adjacent projects”. He also characterised OpenAI's shift to for-profit operations and aggressive deal-making as normal competitive business rather than a betrayal. The New Yorker article does not portray Altman as cartoonishly evil. It presents a complex, high-achieving figure whose traits led to breakdowns in trust. It suggests he exhibits a “reality-distortion field” and ruthless ambition.

Elon Musk has shared a Robin Farrow interview citing allegations against Sam Altman, appearing to agree with the contents of Farrow's New Yorker ‘hit piece’ on the OpenAI CEO. Altman is accused of dishonesty, with the article questioning his leadership amid AI integrity and safety issues.

Sam Altman a sociopath, pathological liar and abuser? Musk agrees to claims on OpenAI chief's past and leadership

Anthropic has revealed details about a new experimental AI model called Claude Mythos, which the company says is its most advanced system so far. According to Anthropic, the model has demonstrated a strong ability to detect serious cybersecurity flaws in widely used software systems. Because of its capabilities, the company is not releasing the model publicly yet and is instead working with technology partners to fix the vulnerabilities it discovered.The announcement reflects how AI tools are increasingly being used in cybersecurity research to identify weaknesses in complex software systems.<h2>Claude Mythos identified thousands of software vulnerabilities</h2>In a blog post, Anthropic said Claude Mythos Preview was able to identify thousands of previously unknown vulnerabilities in widely used software.These include “zero-day vulnerabilities”, which are security flaws that software developers have not yet discovered. Zero-day vulnerabilities are particularly concerning because attackers can exploit them before developers have time to fix them.<h2>Anthropic said the AI model identified vulnerabilities across:</h2>Web browsersOperating systemsCore system softwareThe company added that some of the vulnerabilities could potentially allow attackers to escalate access from a normal user account to full control of a system.Vulnerabilities discovered in OpenBSD and Linux systemsAmong the findings was a 27-year-old vulnerability in OpenBSD, an operating system widely used in security-focused infrastructure such as firewalls and servers. The model also identified several vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel, which powers the majority of servers worldwide and forms the backbone of many internet services.Security researchers say the Linux kernel is one of the most widely analysed pieces of software in the world, which makes the discovery of new vulnerabilities particularly notable.According to Anthropic, these flaws could potentially allow attackers to gain elevated access to systems if exploited.<h2>Anthropic working with 40 technology companies</h2>Because of the security implications, Anthropic said it is collaborating with more than 40 technology companies to address the vulnerabilities identified by Claude Mythos.The goal is to fix the security issues before the model is released more broadly. This approach reflects a growing concern in the AI industry: extremely capable AI systems could potentially identify security weaknesses faster than humans, which creates both benefits and risks.Anthropic said controlled testing with industry partners will help ensure that vulnerabilities are addressed responsibly.<h2>Why the model is not yet publicly released</h2>Although Claude Mythos reportedly outperforms earlier models such as Claude Opus 4.6 and other competing AI systems on several benchmarks, Anthropic is taking a cautious approach.The company said the model’s cybersecurity capabilities mean it needs additional testing and safeguards before public deployment.Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has previously warned that highly capable AI models may present new risks if released without careful evaluation. Earlier reports also suggested that the model’s existence first became known after references appeared in a data leak related to Anthropic’s internal systems.<h2>AI and the future of cybersecurity</h2>Cybersecurity experts increasingly see artificial intelligence as a powerful tool for analysing large codebases and identifying weaknesses that human researchers may overlook.Traditional vulnerability discovery often requires months of manual review by security teams. AI systems can scan code at scale and highlight suspicious patterns within minutes.However, experts say this capability must be handled carefully. The same technology that identifies vulnerabilities could potentially be misused if released without safeguards. Anthropic’s decision to work with industry partners before releasing Claude Mythos suggests that AI companies are becoming more cautious about how powerful models are deployed. As AI research continues to advance, tools like Claude Mythos may play an important role in strengthening digital security across software systems used worldwide.&nbsp;

Anthropic has revealed an experimental AI system called Claude Mythos, which reportedly discovered thousands of previously unknown cybersecurity vulnerabilities, including zero-day flaws in systems such as OpenBSD and the Linux kernel. 

Anthropic has revealed details about a new experimental AI model called Claude Mythos, which the company says is its most advanced system so far. According to Anthropic, the model has demonstrated a strong ability to detect serious cybersecurity flaws in widely used software systems. Because of its capabilities, the company is not releasing the model publicly yet and is instead working with technology partners to fix the vulnerabilities it discovered. The announcement reflects how AI tools are increasingly being used in cybersecurity research to identify weaknesses in complex software systems. Claude Mythos identified thousands of software vulnerabilities In a blog post, Anthropic said Claude Mythos Preview was able to identify thousands of previously unknown vulnerabilities in widely used software. These include “zero-day vulnerabilities”, which are security flaws that software developers have not yet discovered. Zero-day vulnerabilities are particularly concerning because attackers can exploit them before developers have time to fix them. Anthropic said the AI model identified vulnerabilities across: Web browsers Operating systems Core system software The company added that some of the vulnerabilities could potentially allow attackers to escalate access from a normal user account to full control of a system. Vulnerabilities discovered in OpenBSD and Linux systems Among the findings was a 27-year-old vulnerability in OpenBSD, an operating system widely used in security-focused infrastructure such as firewalls and servers. The model also identified several vulnerabilities in the Linux kernel, which powers the majority of servers worldwide and forms the backbone of many internet services. Security researchers say the Linux kernel is one of the most widely analysed pieces of software in the world, which makes the discovery of new vulnerabilities particularly notable. According to Anthropic, these flaws could potentially allow attackers to gain elevated access to systems if exploited. Anthropic working with 40 technology companies Because of the security implications, Anthropic said it is collaborating with more than 40 technology companies to address the vulnerabilities identified by Claude Mythos. The goal is to fix the security issues before the model is released more broadly. This approach reflects a growing concern in the AI industry: extremely capable AI systems could potentially identify security weaknesses faster than humans, which creates both benefits and risks. Anthropic said controlled testing with industry partners will help ensure that vulnerabilities are addressed responsibly. Why the model is not yet publicly released Although Claude Mythos reportedly outperforms earlier models such as Claude Opus 4.6 and other competing AI systems on several benchmarks, Anthropic is taking a cautious approach. The company said the model’s cybersecurity capabilities mean it needs additional testing and safeguards before public deployment. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has previously warned that highly capable AI models may present new risks if released without careful evaluation. Earlier reports also suggested that the model’s existence first became known after references appeared in a data leak related to Anthropic’s internal systems. AI and the future of cybersecurity Cybersecurity experts increasingly see artificial intelligence as a powerful tool for analysing large codebases and identifying weaknesses that human researchers may overlook. Traditional vulnerability discovery often requires months of manual review by security teams. AI systems can scan code at scale and highlight suspicious patterns within minutes. However, experts say this capability must be handled carefully. The same technology that identifies vulnerabilities could potentially be misused if released without safeguards. Anthropic’s decision to work with industry partners before releasing Claude Mythos suggests that AI companies are becoming more cautious about how powerful models are deployed. As AI research continues to advance, tools like Claude Mythos may play an important role in strengthening digital security across software systems used worldwide.

Anthropic has revealed an experimental AI system called Claude Mythos, which reportedly discovered thousands of previously unknown cybersecurity vulnerabilities, including zero-day flaws in systems such as OpenBSD and the Linux kernel.&nbsp;

‘Claude Mythos in cybersecurity’: How Anthropic’s new AI model can find hidden software vulnerabilities

A hacker group has reportedly carried out what could be the largest data breach in China’s history, allegedly stealing an enormous cache of highly sensitive information, including classified defense documents and missile schematics, from a state-run supercomputer. The breach is believed to involve over 10 petabytes of data, reportedly extracted from the National Supercomputing Center (NSCC) in Tianjin. The facility serves as a major infrastructure hub supporting more than 6,000 clients, including leading scientific institutions and defense-related organizations across China.&nbsp;Cybersecurity analysts who examined portions of the leaked data and communicated with the alleged attacker suggest that access to the system may have been gained with surprising ease. According to their findings, data extraction occurred over several months without detection. An account identifying itself as “FlamingChina” published a sample of the purported dataset on Telegram on February 6. The group claimed the data includes “research across various fields including aerospace engineering, military research, bioinformatics, fusion simulation, and more.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-ghost-murmur-how-the-cia-used-secret-futuristic-tech-to-rescue-downed-us-f-15e-pilot-dude-44-bravo-amid-iran-war-1775647718461">'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war</a>&nbsp;The hackers allege the information is tied to major Chinese entities such as the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, and the National University of Defense Technology. Experts who reviewed the sample say the group is offering limited previews for thousands of dollars, while full access is priced at hundreds of thousands, with payments requested in cryptocurrency. The sample reportedly includes documents labeled “secret” in Chinese, as well as technical files, simulations, and visual renderings of military hardware such as bombs and missiles.<h2>Intelligence implications</h2>The Tianjin facility, established in 2009, was China’s first national supercomputing center and is part of a broader network of similar hubs in cities like Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Chengdu. Marc Hofer, a cybersecurity researcher and author of the blog NetAskari, emphasized the potential intelligence value of such a massive dataset. He said, “Only they probably have the capacity to work through all this data and come back with something useful." To illustrate the scale, one petabyte equals 1,000 terabytes, while a typical high-end laptop holds about one terabyte of storage.<h2>How did the breach allegedly happen?</h2>According to Hofer, the individual claiming responsibility said they infiltrated the system through a compromised VPN domain. Once inside, they allegedly deployed a botnet, an automated network of programs, to systematically extract data from the NSCC. The attacker claimed the operation took approximately six months to complete. These claims cannot be independently verified. Cybersecurity expert Cary explained that the breach may have relied more on system design weaknesses than advanced hacking techniques: “You can think of it as having a bunch of different servers that you have access to and you’re pulling data through this hole in the security of the NSCC, pulling some down to one server, some down to the next.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-donald-trump-agrees-to-suspend-attack-on-iran-by-two-weeks-1775609056416/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-donald-trump-agrees-to-suspend-attack-on-iran-by-two-weeks-1775609056416/embed</a><h2>Broader concerns</h2>If confirmed, the incident could highlight deeper vulnerabilities within China’s technological infrastructure, especially as the country competes globally in artificial intelligence and advanced computing. Cybersecurity has long been considered a weak point in both China’s public and private sectors. In 2021, a massive database containing personal data of up to one billion Chinese citizens was reportedly left unsecured for over a year before being exposed in 2022.&nbsp;China has acknowledged these risks. In its 2025 National Security White Paper, the government identified the need to strengthen protections across network, data, and AI systems, stating that it aims to build more resilient cybersecurity frameworks for critical infrastructure.

A hacker claims to have stolen 10 petabytes of sensitive data from China’s Tianjin supercomputer, raising major cybersecurity and intelligence concerns

A hacker group has reportedly carried out what could be the largest data breach in China’s history, allegedly stealing an enormous cache of highly sensitive information, including classified defense documents and missile schematics, from a state-run supercomputer. The breach is believed to involve over 10 petabytes of data, reportedly extracted from the National Supercomputing Center (NSCC) in Tianjin. The facility serves as a major infrastructure hub supporting more than 6,000 clients, including leading scientific institutions and defense-related organizations across China. Cybersecurity analysts who examined portions of the leaked data and communicated with the alleged attacker suggest that access to the system may have been gained with surprising ease. According to their findings, data extraction occurred over several months without detection. An account identifying itself as “FlamingChina” published a sample of the purported dataset on Telegram on February 6. The group claimed the data includes “research across various fields including aerospace engineering, military research, bioinformatics, fusion simulation, and more.” Also Read: 'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war The hackers allege the information is tied to major Chinese entities such as the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, and the National University of Defense Technology. Experts who reviewed the sample say the group is offering limited previews for thousands of dollars, while full access is priced at hundreds of thousands, with payments requested in cryptocurrency. The sample reportedly includes documents labeled “secret” in Chinese, as well as technical files, simulations, and visual renderings of military hardware such as bombs and missiles. Intelligence implications The Tianjin facility, established in 2009, was China’s first national supercomputing center and is part of a broader network of similar hubs in cities like Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Chengdu. Marc Hofer, a cybersecurity researcher and author of the blog NetAskari, emphasized the potential intelligence value of such a massive dataset. He said, “Only they probably have the capacity to work through all this data and come back with something useful." To illustrate the scale, one petabyte equals 1,000 terabytes, while a typical high-end laptop holds about one terabyte of storage. How did the breach allegedly happen? According to Hofer, the individual claiming responsibility said they infiltrated the system through a compromised VPN domain. Once inside, they allegedly deployed a botnet, an automated network of programs, to systematically extract data from the NSCC. The attacker claimed the operation took approximately six months to complete. These claims cannot be independently verified. Cybersecurity expert Cary explained that the breach may have relied more on system design weaknesses than advanced hacking techniques: “You can think of it as having a bunch of different servers that you have access to and you’re pulling data through this hole in the security of the NSCC, pulling some down to one server, some down to the next.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-donald-trump-agrees-to-suspend-attack-on-iran-by-two-weeks-1775609056416/embed Broader concerns If confirmed, the incident could highlight deeper vulnerabilities within China’s technological infrastructure, especially as the country competes globally in artificial intelligence and advanced computing. Cybersecurity has long been considered a weak point in both China’s public and private sectors. In 2021, a massive database containing personal data of up to one billion Chinese citizens was reportedly left unsecured for over a year before being exposed in 2022. China has acknowledged these risks. In its 2025 National Security White Paper, the government identified the need to strengthen protections across network, data, and AI systems, stating that it aims to build more resilient cybersecurity frameworks for critical infrastructure.

Hackers claim to have stolen 10PB of sensitive data from China’s Tianjin supercomputer, raising major cybersecurity and intelligence concerns

China data breach: Hacker claims 10 Petabytes stolen from Tianjin supercomputer

‘Ghost Murmur’: Here's how a classified futuristic tool no one knew existed brought an American pilot home from the Iranian desert. All you need to know.

'Ghost Murmur': How the CIA used secret futuristic tech to rescue downed US F-15E pilot 'Dude 44 Bravo' amid Iran war

A new cyberattack hits every 39 seconds globally, pushing the cost of cybercrime to a projected $15.63 trillion by 2029. While global cybersecurity spending is set to approach $240 billion, breaches continue, raising concerns about whether current strategies are keeping pace with evolving risks. Now, a Bengaluru firm is introducing an all-in one solution that includes continuous compliance and deep data discovery.Experts say the challenge of addressing cybersecurity lies in how cybersecurity is structured. Many organisations still depend on fragmented tools and compliance-based models that provide only a snapshot of security readiness, rather than continuous, real-time insights. This gap often leaves systems exposed despite heavy investments.“Security and risk leaders face an uncertain road ahead… the question is no longer how much you are spending on security but whether you can clearly demonstrate measurable return on that investment,” said Dharshan Shanthamurthy, Founder and CEO of SISA, the Bengaluru-headquartered cybersecurity firm.SISA has introduced SISA One, a dashboard that combines continuous compliance with real-time control visibility, deep data discovery and classification to identify vulnerabilities in data security, and advanced security operations for real-time threat detection and response.SISA One was launched at the world's biggest cybersecurity conference RSA 2026 Conference in San Francisco, California, last month. SISA says it's the first such unified platform globally for compliance, security and privacy.Operating in 40+ countries, the cybersecurity firm works with over 1,000 organisations to anticipate threats and secure critical payment infrastructure, using insights from past breaches to enable a shift towards proactive risk management."While single-function tools solve specific problems, over-reliance on them creates inefficiencies and fragmented visibility," said Mahendran Chandramohan, &nbsp;Senior Vice President and Head of Engineering and DFIR at SISA.He noted that organisations in the payments sector must simultaneously secure infrastructure, applications and transaction flows while meeting strict regulatory and customer requirements, adding that integrated systems could help simplify this process.Industry observers note that cybersecurity is increasingly becoming a boardroom issue rather than just a technical one, especially as geopolitical tensions and digital dependencies deepen global risks. &nbsp;

SISA has introduced SISA One, a dashboard that combines continuous compliance with real-time control visibility, deep data discovery and classification to identify vulnerabilities in data security, and advanced security operations for real-time threat detection and response.

A new cyberattack hits every 39 seconds globally, pushing the cost of cybercrime to a projected $15.63 trillion by 2029. While global cybersecurity spending is set to approach $240 billion, breaches continue, raising concerns about whether current strategies are keeping pace with evolving risks. Now, a Bengaluru firm is introducing an all-in one solution that includes continuous compliance and deep data discovery. Experts say the challenge of addressing cybersecurity lies in how cybersecurity is structured. Many organisations still depend on fragmented tools and compliance-based models that provide only a snapshot of security readiness, rather than continuous, real-time insights. This gap often leaves systems exposed despite heavy investments. “Security and risk leaders face an uncertain road ahead… the question is no longer how much you are spending on security but whether you can clearly demonstrate measurable return on that investment,” said Dharshan Shanthamurthy, Founder and CEO of SISA, the Bengaluru-headquartered cybersecurity firm. SISA has introduced SISA One, a dashboard that combines continuous compliance with real-time control visibility, deep data discovery and classification to identify vulnerabilities in data security, and advanced security operations for real-time threat detection and response. SISA One was launched at the world's biggest cybersecurity conference RSA 2026 Conference in San Francisco, California, last month. SISA says it's the first such unified platform globally for compliance, security and privacy. Operating in 40+ countries, the cybersecurity firm works with over 1,000 organisations to anticipate threats and secure critical payment infrastructure, using insights from past breaches to enable a shift towards proactive risk management. "While single-function tools solve specific problems, over-reliance on them creates inefficiencies and fragmented visibility," said Mahendran Chandramohan, Senior Vice President and Head of Engineering and DFIR at SISA. He noted that organisations in the payments sector must simultaneously secure infrastructure, applications and transaction flows while meeting strict regulatory and customer requirements, adding that integrated systems could help simplify this process. Industry observers note that cybersecurity is increasingly becoming a boardroom issue rather than just a technical one, especially as geopolitical tensions and digital dependencies deepen global risks.

SISA has introduced SISA One, a dashboard that combines continuous compliance with real-time control visibility, deep data discovery and classification to identify vulnerabilities in data security, and advanced security operations for real-time threat detection and response.

New cyberattack hits every 39 seconds: Now, Bengaluru-based firm aims to address cybersecurity gaps

SpaceX has confidentially filed for an initial public offering (IPO) that could value the space exploration, satellite internet and AI company led by world's richest person Elon Musk at around $2 trillion. The IPO could raise as much as $75 billion, potentially making it the largest listing in history.&nbsp;<h2>Listing imminent: SpaceX confidential SEC filing</h2>The filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was made on April 1, according to Bloomberg and other reports. The company could go public as early as June, subject to regulatory review and market conditions, said the reports.Reports indicate SpaceX is targeting a valuation above $1.75 trillion, with some estimates approaching $2 trillion. At this level, it would rank among the world’s largest companies, alongside Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and Amazon. It could also surpass Meta and Tesla, the electric vehicle company also led by Musk.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/spacex-crew-12-docks-at-international-space-station-four-new-astronauts-arrive-via-spacex-rocket-1771128001120/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/spacex-crew-12-docks-at-international-space-station-four-new-astronauts-arrive-via-spacex-rocket-1771128001120/embed</a><h2>SpaceX expecting the biggest IPO ever</h2>The IPO could raise between $50 billion and $75 billion, surpassing the previous record set by Saudi Aramco. The Saudi Aramco IPO in 2019 raised about $29.4 billion and valued the company at roughly $1.7 trillion at listing.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/technology/-google-will-win-the-ai-race-in-the-west-china-on-earth-and-spacex-in-space-says-elon-musk-1773990362750">‘Google will win the AI race in the West, China on Earth, and SpaceX in space,’ says Elon Musk</a><h2>Starlink, the real star of SpaceX</h2>SpaceX develops rockets, space exploration systems but Starlink, its satellite internet service, is the primary revenue driver. It generates more than two-thirds of the company’s total revenue by providing internet connectivity via low-Earth orbit satellites. SpaceX is estimated to have generated around $15–16 billion in revenue in 2025, with EBITDA of approximately $7.5 billion. The company recently entered into a $19.6 billion spectrum deal with EchoStar to expand its direct-to-cell capabilities.Reusable rockets such as Falcon 9 underpin SpaceX’s dominance in commercial and government launches. Future growth is expected to depend heavily on the success of Starship, the company’s next-generation rocket designed for Mars missions and large-scale satellite deployment.<h2>xAI deal adds AI angle to SpaceX products and services</h2>SpaceX’s integration with xAI, the artificial intelligence venture behind the popular Grok chatbot, values the combined entity at approximately $1.25 trillion and adds an AI dimension to its broader space and communications strategy.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-is-autonomous-drone-swarming-tech-musk-s-spacex-xai-place-bids-in-secret-pentagon-competition-wion-explains-1771301948635">What is autonomous drone swarming tech? Musk's SpaceX, xAI bid in secret Pentagon competition | WION Explains</a><h2>Analysts think the stock could perform well long term, but risks remain</h2>SpaceX is expected to list at a high valuation, with analysts such as PitchBook and Morningstar suggesting it could trade at more than 90 times revenue. However, they argue that over a five to seven year period, the valuation could be justified if Starship development succeeds and Starlink continues its rapid expansion.Risks include delays in Starship development, regulatory challenges, limited public financial disclosure. The broader market volatility and selling pressure from early investors after the IPO could also hit the stock.SpaceX’s IPO could mark a historic moment, bringing its combined strengths in space launch, satellite internet, and AI-linked infrastructure into public markets, provided it delivers on its ambitious growth expectations.

SpaceX has confidentially filed for IPO that could value the company near $2 trillion and raise up to $75 billion, reports said. The valuation is being driven by Starlink internet growth and long-term space and AI ambitions that includes Mars exploration

SpaceX has confidentially filed for an initial public offering (IPO) that could value the space exploration, satellite internet and AI company led by world's richest person Elon Musk at around $2 trillion. The IPO could raise as much as $75 billion, potentially making it the largest listing in history. Listing imminent: SpaceX confidential SEC filing The filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was made on April 1, according to Bloomberg and other reports. The company could go public as early as June, subject to regulatory review and market conditions, said the reports. Reports indicate SpaceX is targeting a valuation above $1.75 trillion, with some estimates approaching $2 trillion. At this level, it would rank among the world’s largest companies, alongside Nvidia, Apple, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and Amazon. It could also surpass Meta and Tesla, the electric vehicle company also led by Musk. https://www.wionews.com/videos/spacex-crew-12-docks-at-international-space-station-four-new-astronauts-arrive-via-spacex-rocket-1771128001120/embed SpaceX expecting the biggest IPO ever The IPO could raise between $50 billion and $75 billion, surpassing the previous record set by Saudi Aramco. The Saudi Aramco IPO in 2019 raised about $29.4 billion and valued the company at roughly $1.7 trillion at listing. Also read: ‘Google will win the AI race in the West, China on Earth, and SpaceX in space,’ says Elon Musk Starlink, the real star of SpaceX SpaceX develops rockets, space exploration systems but Starlink, its satellite internet service, is the primary revenue driver. It generates more than two-thirds of the company’s total revenue by providing internet connectivity via low-Earth orbit satellites. SpaceX is estimated to have generated around $15–16 billion in revenue in 2025, with EBITDA of approximately $7.5 billion. The company recently entered into a $19.6 billion spectrum deal with EchoStar to expand its direct-to-cell capabilities. Reusable rockets such as Falcon 9 underpin SpaceX’s dominance in commercial and government launches. Future growth is expected to depend heavily on the success of Starship, the company’s next-generation rocket designed for Mars missions and large-scale satellite deployment. xAI deal adds AI angle to SpaceX products and services SpaceX’s integration with xAI, the artificial intelligence venture behind the popular Grok chatbot, values the combined entity at approximately $1.25 trillion and adds an AI dimension to its broader space and communications strategy. Also read: What is autonomous drone swarming tech? Musk's SpaceX, xAI bid in secret Pentagon competition | WION Explains Analysts think the stock could perform well long term, but risks remain SpaceX is expected to list at a high valuation, with analysts such as PitchBook and Morningstar suggesting it could trade at more than 90 times revenue. However, they argue that over a five to seven year period, the valuation could be justified if Starship development succeeds and Starlink continues its rapid expansion. Risks include delays in Starship development, regulatory challenges, limited public financial disclosure. The broader market volatility and selling pressure from early investors after the IPO could also hit the stock. SpaceX’s IPO could mark a historic moment, bringing its combined strengths in space launch, satellite internet, and AI-linked infrastructure into public markets, provided it delivers on its ambitious growth expectations.

SpaceX has confidentially filed for IPO that could value the company near $2 trillion and raise up to $75 billion, reports said. The valuation is being driven by Starlink internet growth and long-term space and AI ambitions that includes Mars exploration

'$2 trillion valuation': SpaceX blockbuster IPO could raise $75 billion, say reports

Google DeepMind has introduced Gemma 4, a new generation of open AI models designed for advanced reasoning and autonomous AI workflows. The release represents Google’s latest push in the open-model ecosystem, offering developers more powerful AI tools while allowing broad use under the Apache 2.0 open-source licence.According to Google DeepMind’s official blog, Gemma 4 is designed to deliver higher intelligence with fewer parameters, making it more efficient for real-world applications.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today, we’re launching Gemma 4, our most intelligent open models to date. Built with the same breakthrough technology as Gemini 3, Gemma 4 brings advanced reasoning to your personal hardware and devices. Here’s what Gemma 4 unlocks for developers: — Intelligence-per-parameter:… <a href="https://t.co/JgwRZvQHgF">pic.twitter.com/JgwRZvQHgF</a>&mdash; Google AI (@GoogleAI) <a href="https://twitter.com/GoogleAI/status/2039735543068504476?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Four model sizes designed for different workloads</h2>Google released Gemma 4 in four model configurations, each designed for specific computing needs.The models include:E2B (effective 2 billion parameters) - lightweight model for edge devicesE4B (effective 4 billion parameters) - improved performance for mobile environments26B Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) - optimised for complex reasoning tasks31B Dense model - the most powerful version in the Gemma 4 seriesAccording to benchmark rankings, the 31B model currently holds the third position among open AI models on the Arena AI leaderboard, while the 26B model ranks sixth, outperforming models estimated to be 20 times larger.A Google DeepMind research leader wrote in the official announcement that “Gemma 4 delivers an unprecedented level of intelligence-per-parameter.”<h2>Built for agentic AI systems</h2>One of the key goals of Gemma 4 is to support agentic AI systems, which can perform tasks autonomously rather than simply generating text responses.The models include several capabilities designed for AI agents, such as:Native function calling Structured JSON output Support for system commands Integration with external tools and APIsThese features allow developers to build AI systems that can analyse data, trigger workflows and interact with digital tools.<h2>Multimodal AI with support for 140 languages</h2>Gemma 4 is also designed as a multimodal AI system, meaning it can process different types of data.The models support:Text Images VideoAdditionally, the smaller E2B and E4B versions include native audio input for speech recognition.Google said the models support more than 140 languages, allowing developers to build AI applications for global users.Another notable upgrade is the 256,000-token context window for larger models. This enables developers to process long documents, full research papers or even entire code repositories in a single prompt.<h2>AI models designed for mobile and edge devices</h2>Unlike many large AI systems that require powerful servers, some Gemma 4 models are designed to run directly on devices. The E2B and E4B models are optimised for mobile phones, Internet-of-Things devices and edge computing systems.Google said these models can run offline on devices such as smartphones, Raspberry Pi computers and NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano, offering near-zero latency.The company also collaborated with Qualcomm and MediaTek to improve mobile performance.<h2>A growing ecosystem around Gemma models</h2>Since the first Gemma models were introduced, adoption has grown rapidly. Google reports that Gemma models have been downloaded more than 400 million times, leading to the creation of over 100,000 community-built variants, often referred to as the “Gemmaverse”.Developers can access Gemma 4 through platforms such as:Hugging FaceKaggleOllamaGoogle AI Studio<h2>What this means for developers and the AI industry</h2>Gemma 4 reflects a broader shift in the AI industry toward open models that developers can customise and deploy across different environments.By offering multiple model sizes and device compatibility, Google DeepMind aims to support both large-scale enterprise systems and smaller applications running on personal devices. As AI development moves toward autonomous systems capable of executing tasks, models like Gemma 4 may become an important foundation for building next-generation AI agents.&nbsp;

Google DeepMind has launched Gemma 4, a new generation of open AI models designed for advanced reasoning and agentic AI workflows. Released under the Apache 2.0 open-source licence, the models aim to deliver higher intelligence with fewer parameters, improving efficiency. 

Google DeepMind has introduced Gemma 4, a new generation of open AI models designed for advanced reasoning and autonomous AI workflows. The release represents Google’s latest push in the open-model ecosystem, offering developers more powerful AI tools while allowing broad use under the Apache 2.0 open-source licence. According to Google DeepMind’s official blog, Gemma 4 is designed to deliver higher intelligence with fewer parameters, making it more efficient for real-world applications.

Google DeepMind has launched Gemma 4, a new generation of open AI models designed for advanced reasoning and agentic AI workflows. Released under the Apache 2.0 open-source licence, the models aim to deliver higher intelligence with fewer parameters, improving efficiency.&nbsp;

Google DeepMind launches Gemma 4: AI models for advanced reasoning and AI agents

A large portion of the internal interface code used by the Claude chatbot was accidentally exposed online after a technical error by Anthropic, the company behind the AI system.The incident happened early Tuesday morning when the company pushed what was expected to be a routine update to Claude. However, the update mistakenly included a debugging “source map” file that linked directly to the platform’s internal code.The file reportedly contained around 512,000 lines of TypeScript code, revealing parts of the interface used to run Claude’s features.The issue was first spotted by users on social media platform X, after which the code was quickly downloaded and shared across developer forums and repositories.<h2>How the Claude source code leak happened</h2>According to reports from technology publication VentureBeat, the leak occurred around 4 a.m. when Anthropic released a software update.The update mistakenly included a source map file a debugging tool that developers use to trace errors in code. In this case, the file provided a pathway to Claude’s underlying interface code. Once the link was discovered, the code package was downloaded and circulated widely online. Within hours, developers began examining the files and recreating some parts of the interface.Anthropic later confirmed that the issue was the result of human error during the update process. The company said there was no external hacking or malicious activity involved.<h2>What information was exposed</h2>The leaked files mainly contain the interface code used to run Claude’s user experience. According to the company, the incident did not expose model weights or AI training data, which are the most sensitive parts of the system.Anthropic also stated that no customer data was compromised.However, the interface code itself still has significant value because it reveals how the company structures its tools and features. Developers reviewing the files have already highlighted several internal components that had not previously been made public.<h2>Developers already analysing the leaked code</h2>Because the files spread quickly online, parts of the code are already being analysed by developers.Some users have reportedly begun recreating elements of Claude’s internal interface for experimental purposes. One interesting detail discovered in the code is a feature resembling a Tamagotchi-style interface, where users interact with stat-based digital companions.It is not yet clear whether this feature was planned for public release or was still under development.<h2>Anthropic moves to contain the spread</h2>After the leak began circulating, Anthropic issued DMCA takedown requests to remove repositories hosting the files.However, because the code spread quickly across the internet, experts say it may be difficult to remove it completely. The company said the leaked files represent only a snapshot of Claude’s development at a specific time.Anthropic continues to update its AI models and software regularly, which means future versions of the system may already differ significantly from the leaked code.<h2>Why the leak matters in the AI industry</h2>The incident comes at a time when competition between AI companies is increasing.Major firms including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic are rapidly releasing new AI features and products.Even though the leak does not expose the core AI model, analysts say interface code can still provide insights into design approaches, system architecture and product strategy. For Anthropic, the immediate concern will be protecting intellectual property and preventing competitors from replicating elements of its user interface.The company has not indicated whether the leak will delay future updates to Claude.

A technical error by Anthropic accidentally exposed around 512,000 lines of interface code used by the Claude platform. The leak occurred when a routine update mistakenly included a debugging source map file, allowing developers to access internal TypeScript code. 

A large portion of the internal interface code used by the Claude chatbot was accidentally exposed online after a technical error by Anthropic, the company behind the AI system. The incident happened early Tuesday morning when the company pushed what was expected to be a routine update to Claude. However, the update mistakenly included a debugging “source map” file that linked directly to the platform’s internal code. The file reportedly contained around 512,000 lines of TypeScript code, revealing parts of the interface used to run Claude’s features. The issue was first spotted by users on social media platform X, after which the code was quickly downloaded and shared across developer forums and repositories. How the Claude source code leak happened According to reports from technology publication VentureBeat, the leak occurred around 4 a.m. when Anthropic released a software update. The update mistakenly included a source map file a debugging tool that developers use to trace errors in code. In this case, the file provided a pathway to Claude’s underlying interface code. Once the link was discovered, the code package was downloaded and circulated widely online. Within hours, developers began examining the files and recreating some parts of the interface. Anthropic later confirmed that the issue was the result of human error during the update process. The company said there was no external hacking or malicious activity involved. What information was exposed The leaked files mainly contain the interface code used to run Claude’s user experience. According to the company, the incident did not expose model weights or AI training data, which are the most sensitive parts of the system. Anthropic also stated that no customer data was compromised. However, the interface code itself still has significant value because it reveals how the company structures its tools and features. Developers reviewing the files have already highlighted several internal components that had not previously been made public. Developers already analysing the leaked code Because the files spread quickly online, parts of the code are already being analysed by developers. Some users have reportedly begun recreating elements of Claude’s internal interface for experimental purposes. One interesting detail discovered in the code is a feature resembling a Tamagotchi-style interface, where users interact with stat-based digital companions. It is not yet clear whether this feature was planned for public release or was still under development. Anthropic moves to contain the spread After the leak began circulating, Anthropic issued DMCA takedown requests to remove repositories hosting the files. However, because the code spread quickly across the internet, experts say it may be difficult to remove it completely. The company said the leaked files represent only a snapshot of Claude’s development at a specific time. Anthropic continues to update its AI models and software regularly, which means future versions of the system may already differ significantly from the leaked code. Why the leak matters in the AI industry The incident comes at a time when competition between AI companies is increasing. Major firms including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic are rapidly releasing new AI features and products. Even though the leak does not expose the core AI model, analysts say interface code can still provide insights into design approaches, system architecture and product strategy. For Anthropic, the immediate concern will be protecting intellectual property and preventing competitors from replicating elements of its user interface. The company has not indicated whether the leak will delay future updates to Claude.

A technical error by Anthropic accidentally exposed around 512,000 lines of interface code used by the Claude platform. The leak occurred when a routine update mistakenly included a debugging source map file, allowing developers to access internal TypeScript code.&nbsp;

'512,000 lines of Claude source code leaked': Anthropic confirms accidental leak of its Claude chatbot source code

Artificial intelligence is gradually becoming part of everyday driving experiences. OpenAI has introduced ChatGPT support for Apple CarPlay, allowing drivers to interact with the chatbot directly from their car dashboard using voice.The update follows changes introduced by Apple in iOS 26.4, which expanded Apple CarPlay capabilities for third-party conversational applications. With the new integration, users can ask questions or request information through voice commands while driving, without needing to touch their phones.<h2>How ChatGPT works on Apple CarPlay</h2>The feature works through a compatible iPhone connected to Apple CarPlay.Drivers can open the ChatGPT app on the CarPlay dashboard and start speaking queries. The chatbot processes spoken questions and delivers responses through the car’s audio system.This design allows hands-free interaction, which aligns with Apple’s broader goal of reducing distractions while driving.However, there is currently no wake-word support. This means users must first open the ChatGPT app manually before giving voice commands.Once activated, drivers can ask questions about general knowledge, travel information, weather updates or other topics while keeping their hands on the wheel.<h2>What ChatGPT can and cannot do in cars</h2>While the integration expands AI use inside vehicles, the feature comes with clear limitations.ChatGPT on CarPlay cannot control car functions or phone settings. It does not operate vehicle systems such as navigation, music playback or climate control. The chatbot’s role is limited to answering questions or generating information through conversation.According to OpenAI, this design choice ensures the system focuses on information support rather than controlling critical vehicle functions.<h2>Why Apple opened CarPlay to conversational apps</h2>The integration became possible after Apple updated CarPlay policies in iOS 26.4, allowing conversational AI apps to operate through the dashboard interface.Industry analysts say the move reflects a wider shift toward AI-assisted driving experiences. Technology companies are exploring ways to embed conversational AI into cars, smartphones and other everyday devices.Hands-free systems are considered particularly important in vehicles, where driver safety remains a priority.<h2>AI assistants are moving into vehicles</h2>ChatGPT’s arrival on CarPlay highlights how AI assistants are expanding beyond smartphones and computers.Car manufacturers and technology companies are increasingly experimenting with AI tools that can answer questions, provide recommendations and assist drivers during journeys.For now, the CarPlay version of ChatGPT focuses on voice-based conversation rather than deeper vehicle integration. But the development signals how AI assistants may become a common feature in digital dashboards. As automotive technology evolves, AI systems may gradually play a larger role in helping drivers access information without taking their attention away from the road.

OpenAI has introduced ChatGPT support for Apple CarPlay, allowing drivers to interact with the chatbot directly from their vehicle dashboard using voice. Enabled by Apple’s iOS 26.4 update, the feature lets users ask questions hands-free while driving. 

Artificial intelligence is gradually becoming part of everyday driving experiences. OpenAI has introduced ChatGPT support for Apple CarPlay, allowing drivers to interact with the chatbot directly from their car dashboard using voice. The update follows changes introduced by Apple in iOS 26.4, which expanded Apple CarPlay capabilities for third-party conversational applications. With the new integration, users can ask questions or request information through voice commands while driving, without needing to touch their phones. How ChatGPT works on Apple CarPlay The feature works through a compatible iPhone connected to Apple CarPlay. Drivers can open the ChatGPT app on the CarPlay dashboard and start speaking queries. The chatbot processes spoken questions and delivers responses through the car’s audio system. This design allows hands-free interaction, which aligns with Apple’s broader goal of reducing distractions while driving. However, there is currently no wake-word support. This means users must first open the ChatGPT app manually before giving voice commands. Once activated, drivers can ask questions about general knowledge, travel information, weather updates or other topics while keeping their hands on the wheel. What ChatGPT can and cannot do in cars While the integration expands AI use inside vehicles, the feature comes with clear limitations. ChatGPT on CarPlay cannot control car functions or phone settings. It does not operate vehicle systems such as navigation, music playback or climate control. The chatbot’s role is limited to answering questions or generating information through conversation. According to OpenAI, this design choice ensures the system focuses on information support rather than controlling critical vehicle functions. Why Apple opened CarPlay to conversational apps The integration became possible after Apple updated CarPlay policies in iOS 26.4, allowing conversational AI apps to operate through the dashboard interface. Industry analysts say the move reflects a wider shift toward AI-assisted driving experiences. Technology companies are exploring ways to embed conversational AI into cars, smartphones and other everyday devices. Hands-free systems are considered particularly important in vehicles, where driver safety remains a priority. AI assistants are moving into vehicles ChatGPT’s arrival on CarPlay highlights how AI assistants are expanding beyond smartphones and computers. Car manufacturers and technology companies are increasingly experimenting with AI tools that can answer questions, provide recommendations and assist drivers during journeys. For now, the CarPlay version of ChatGPT focuses on voice-based conversation rather than deeper vehicle integration. But the development signals how AI assistants may become a common feature in digital dashboards. As automotive technology evolves, AI systems may gradually play a larger role in helping drivers access information without taking their attention away from the road.

OpenAI has introduced ChatGPT support for Apple CarPlay, allowing drivers to interact with the chatbot directly from their vehicle dashboard using voice. Enabled by Apple’s iOS 26.4 update, the feature lets users ask questions hands-free while driving.&nbsp;

OpenAI brings ChatGPT to Apple CarPlay for hands-free voice interaction while driving

Iran has indicated that Indians and Indian shipping interests are secure amid war-linked tensions on the Strait of Hormuz, while reports claimed that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is charging vessels around $1 per barrel of oil for safe passage using non-dollar payment methods. The message to Indians followed remarks by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi that only Iran and Oman would determine the future of the strait through which about 20 per cent of global oil and LNG trade flows.&nbsp;<h2>‘Our Indian friends are in safe hands’: Iran</h2>“Our Indian friends are in safe hands, no worries,” Iran’s embassy in New Delhi said in a post on X, along with a wink emoji. This is a possible signal of preferential treatment for India as the Strait of Hormuz faces disruption due to the US-Israel war on Iran. Despite the global tensions, India has not reported major supply concerns for oil and gas. This is significant, as India is one of the world’s largest oil importers. Indian officials have reassured the public that fuel stocks remain adequate, and the government has intervened in cases of black marketing of LPG and increases in aviation turbine fuel prices.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/indian-lpg-tanker-escaped-strait-of-hormuz-mines-via-new-route-did-not-pay-fee-for-transit-1775028249692">Indian LPG tanker escaped Strait of Hormuz mines via new route; did not pay fee for transit</a><h2>Iran claims full control of Strait of Hormuz</h2>The reassurance comes as Iran claims “full and decisive control” over the critical chokepoint, describing its actions as self-defence following US and Israeli strikes from February 28. It has repeatedly said that friendly nations like India, China, Russia, Pakistan, and Iraq are being granted safe transit through the waterway. Several Indian-flagged vessels have already passed through after coordination with Iran.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-will-consider-when-hormuz-is-open-trump-says-iran-asked-for-ceasefire-1775042630435">'Will consider when Hormuz is open..': Trump says Iran asked for ceasefire as West Asia war escalates</a><h2>Iran de-dollarising oil trade? Payments reportedly made in yuan and stablecoins</h2>A report by Bloomberg claimed that the IRGC has effectively established a toll system for commercial shipping along the strait. It said oil tankers are being charged $1 per barrel. This means large vessels carrying about 2 million barrels could pay up to $2 million per transit. Payments are required in Chinese yuan or stablecoins such as USDT, bypassing US-dominated financial systems, the report said.<h2>How vessels are being allowed to pass via Strait of Hormuz</h2>According to reports, vessels seeking passage must contact IRGC-linked intermediaries and submit detailed documentation. This includes details of ownership, cargo and crew. A vetting process follows, based on the perceived geopolitical alignment of the nations linked to the vessels with Iran. Friendly nations receive more favourable terms, while others risk denial or even attack, the reports claimed.Once approved, the ships are issued permits, assigned routes, and in some cases escorted by Iranian patrol boats.Some tankers have paid in Chinese currency, yuan, and others in crypto. The reports state that this toll system has been formalised by Iran’s parliamentary National Security Committee.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-china-call-for-restoring-navigation-in-strait-of-hormuz-1775051996141/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-china-call-for-restoring-navigation-in-strait-of-hormuz-1775051996141/embed</a><h2>Shipping traffic along Strait of Hormuz is still low</h2>Despite the assurances from Iran, overall shipping traffic via the Strait of Hormuz remains below pre-conflict levels. Several major carriers are staying away from the route, as insurance costs have surged, particularly following incidents such as the recent drone strike on a Kuwaiti tanker.The legal basis for Iranian tolls under international maritime law is not yet clear. International law typically limits territorial control to 12 nautical miles.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran has reassured India on safe passage of its vessels via Strait of Hormuz. Reports meanwhile claim that the IRGC is charging $1 per barrel toll in yuan and cryptocurrency like stablecoins. But the situation is far from normal

Iran has indicated that Indians and Indian shipping interests are secure amid war-linked tensions on the Strait of Hormuz, while reports claimed that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is charging vessels around $1 per barrel of oil for safe passage using non-dollar payment methods. The message to Indians followed remarks by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi that only Iran and Oman would determine the future of the strait through which about 20 per cent of global oil and LNG trade flows. ‘Our Indian friends are in safe hands’: Iran “Our Indian friends are in safe hands, no worries,” Iran’s embassy in New Delhi said in a post on X, along with a wink emoji. This is a possible signal of preferential treatment for India as the Strait of Hormuz faces disruption due to the US-Israel war on Iran. Despite the global tensions, India has not reported major supply concerns for oil and gas. This is significant, as India is one of the world’s largest oil importers. Indian officials have reassured the public that fuel stocks remain adequate, and the government has intervened in cases of black marketing of LPG and increases in aviation turbine fuel prices. Also read: Indian LPG tanker escaped Strait of Hormuz mines via new route; did not pay fee for transit Iran claims full control of Strait of Hormuz The reassurance comes as Iran claims “full and decisive control” over the critical chokepoint, describing its actions as self-defence following US and Israeli strikes from February 28. It has repeatedly said that friendly nations like India, China, Russia, Pakistan, and Iraq are being granted safe transit through the waterway. Several Indian-flagged vessels have already passed through after coordination with Iran. Also read: 'Will consider when Hormuz is open..': Trump says Iran asked for ceasefire as West Asia war escalates Iran de-dollarising oil trade? Payments reportedly made in yuan and stablecoins A report by Bloomberg claimed that the IRGC has effectively established a toll system for commercial shipping along the strait. It said oil tankers are being charged $1 per barrel. This means large vessels carrying about 2 million barrels could pay up to $2 million per transit. Payments are required in Chinese yuan or stablecoins such as USDT, bypassing US-dominated financial systems, the report said. How vessels are being allowed to pass via Strait of Hormuz According to reports, vessels seeking passage must contact IRGC-linked intermediaries and submit detailed documentation. This includes details of ownership, cargo and crew. A vetting process follows, based on the perceived geopolitical alignment of the nations linked to the vessels with Iran. Friendly nations receive more favourable terms, while others risk denial or even attack, the reports claimed. Once approved, the ships are issued permits, assigned routes, and in some cases escorted by Iranian patrol boats. Some tankers have paid in Chinese currency, yuan, and others in crypto. The reports state that this toll system has been formalised by Iran’s parliamentary National Security Committee. https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-china-call-for-restoring-navigation-in-strait-of-hormuz-1775051996141/embed Shipping traffic along Strait of Hormuz is still low Despite the assurances from Iran, overall shipping traffic via the Strait of Hormuz remains below pre-conflict levels. Several major carriers are staying away from the route, as insurance costs have surged, particularly following incidents such as the recent drone strike on a Kuwaiti tanker. The legal basis for Iranian tolls under international maritime law is not yet clear. International law typically limits territorial control to 12 nautical miles. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran has reassured India on safe passage of its vessels via Strait of Hormuz. Reports meanwhile claim that the IRGC is charging $1 per barrel toll in yuan and cryptocurrency like stablecoins. But the situation is far from normal

‘Indian friends are safe’, says Iran on Strait of Hormuz transit as IRGC reportedly charges $1 per oil barrel in yuan and stablecoins

In a fascinating mix of everyday technology and deep space exploration, NASA has approved the use of iPhones for astronauts aboard the Artemis II mission, a move that signals a new era in how space journeys are documented. Ahead of launch, NASA teams were seen integrating the smartphones into astronaut suits as the four-member crew prepared for their 10-day mission around the Moon. The spacecraft lifted off on Wednesday (April 1) aboard the Space Launch System from the Kennedy Space Center, marking a major milestone in humanity’s return to lunar exploration.<h2>iPhones in space</h2>The decision stems from a new policy introduced in 2026 by NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman, allowing astronauts to carry modern smartphones during missions. While these devices won’t be connected to any network, they will play a unique role, capturing personal moments and high-quality images during the historic lunar flyby. To ensure complete safety, all iPhones will remain on airplane mode, preventing any interference with spacecraft systems. In this configuration, the phones essentially function as standalone cameras and recording devices.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/nasa-launches-historic-artemis-ii-moon-mission-1775082791850">We're going around the Moon: NASA launches historic Artemis II mission</a><h2>What is NASA's Artemis II mission?</h2>Artemis II is NASA’s first crewed mission to the Moon in over five decades. Although it will not involve a landing, the mission is critical for testing systems that will support future lunar landings. The inclusion of iPhones reflects NASA’s broader effort to make space exploration more relatable. By equipping astronauts with familiar consumer technology, the agency aims to create more personal, immersive visuals for audiences on Earth.&nbsp;Experts say that modern smartphones now offer camera capabilities comparable to professional equipment, making them practical tools even in extreme environments. Their compact design and ease of use provide astronauts with an efficient way to document their journey.

Here's why NASA astronauts are carrying iPhones to the Moon on Artemis II

In a fascinating mix of everyday technology and deep space exploration, NASA has approved the use of iPhones for astronauts aboard the Artemis II mission, a move that signals a new era in how space journeys are documented. Ahead of launch, NASA teams were seen integrating the smartphones into astronaut suits as the four-member crew prepared for their 10-day mission around the Moon. The spacecraft lifted off on Wednesday (April 1) aboard the Space Launch System from the Kennedy Space Center, marking a major milestone in humanity’s return to lunar exploration. iPhones in space The decision stems from a new policy introduced in 2026 by NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman, allowing astronauts to carry modern smartphones during missions. While these devices won’t be connected to any network, they will play a unique role, capturing personal moments and high-quality images during the historic lunar flyby. To ensure complete safety, all iPhones will remain on airplane mode, preventing any interference with spacecraft systems. In this configuration, the phones essentially function as standalone cameras and recording devices. Also Read: We're going around the Moon: NASA launches historic Artemis II mission What is NASA's Artemis II mission? Artemis II is NASA’s first crewed mission to the Moon in over five decades. Although it will not involve a landing, the mission is critical for testing systems that will support future lunar landings. The inclusion of iPhones reflects NASA’s broader effort to make space exploration more relatable. By equipping astronauts with familiar consumer technology, the agency aims to create more personal, immersive visuals for audiences on Earth. Experts say that modern smartphones now offer camera capabilities comparable to professional equipment, making them practical tools even in extreme environments. Their compact design and ease of use provide astronauts with an efficient way to document their journey.

NASA allows astronauts to carry iPhones on Artemis II to capture personal moments in space, making lunar missions more relatable to people on Earth

US-based tech giant Oracle has laid off thousands of employees to cut costs, reported suggested, with more layoffs expected within a month. About 12,000 people were fired by the company in India, while about 30,000 were laid off globally. According to the laid-off employees, the company sent an email stating they were being relieved from duty, without any prior communication.According to a PTI report citing people impacted by the retrenchment, “In India, around 12,000 employees have been laid off. The company is planning another mass layoff within a month.” LinkedIn posts from laid-off employees suggested that the cuts have affected staff across Oracle Cloud, Health, Sales, Customer Success, and NetSuite.In the email, the company cited organisational changes as the reason behind firing employees. It added that “because of these changes, a decision has been taken to streamline the operations, and as a result, unfortunately, the position you currently hold will become redundant.”In its severance package, Oracle has offered 15 days of salary to those employees who have completed a year of service in India. It will also add one month of unpaid wages till the termination date, leave encashment, gratuity based on eligibility and pay for a one-month notice period. The company has also offered a two-month salary as a top-up. The package is available for the employees who voluntarily and amicably resign.<h2>What did the email say?</h2>According to the email received by an employee and posted on social media, it read, “We are sharing some difficult news regarding your position. After careful consideration of Oracle's current business needs, we have made the decision to eliminate your role as part of a broader organizational change. As a result, today is your last working day.”“We are grateful for your dedication, hard work, and the impact you have made during your time with us,” it added. “After signing your termination paperwork, you will be eligible to receive a severance package subject to the terms and conditions of the severance plan. You will receive an email from DocuSign to your Oracle email address with details on your severance and termination date.”The email also included details of separation-related information and severance agreements and was signed by “Oracle Leadership”.

Oracle has laid off about 30,000 employees globally, including 12,000 in India, citing restructuring. More cuts may follow, with affected staff receiving severance packages after sudden notices.

US-based tech giant Oracle has laid off thousands of employees to cut costs, reported suggested, with more layoffs expected within a month. About 12,000 people were fired by the company in India, while about 30,000 were laid off globally. According to the laid-off employees, the company sent an email stating they were being relieved from duty, without any prior communication. According to a PTI report citing people impacted by the retrenchment, “In India, around 12,000 employees have been laid off. The company is planning another mass layoff within a month.” LinkedIn posts from laid-off employees suggested that the cuts have affected staff across Oracle Cloud, Health, Sales, Customer Success, and NetSuite. In the email, the company cited organisational changes as the reason behind firing employees. It added that “because of these changes, a decision has been taken to streamline the operations, and as a result, unfortunately, the position you currently hold will become redundant.” In its severance package, Oracle has offered 15 days of salary to those employees who have completed a year of service in India. It will also add one month of unpaid wages till the termination date, leave encashment, gratuity based on eligibility and pay for a one-month notice period. The company has also offered a two-month salary as a top-up. The package is available for the employees who voluntarily and amicably resign. What did the email say? According to the email received by an employee and posted on social media, it read, “We are sharing some difficult news regarding your position. After careful consideration of Oracle's current business needs, we have made the decision to eliminate your role as part of a broader organizational change. As a result, today is your last working day.” “We are grateful for your dedication, hard work, and the impact you have made during your time with us,” it added. “After signing your termination paperwork, you will be eligible to receive a severance package subject to the terms and conditions of the severance plan. You will receive an email from DocuSign to your Oracle email address with details on your severance and termination date.” The email also included details of separation-related information and severance agreements and was signed by “Oracle Leadership”.

Oracle has laid off about 30,000 employees globally, including 12,000 in India, citing restructuring. More cuts may follow, with affected staff receiving severance packages after sudden notices.

Oracle lays off 12,000 in India: Company sends email overnight – Here’s what it said

Nearly 70 per cent of Australian under-16s who had social media accounts before a landmark law banned it are still accessing them. The government is probing Meta, TikTok, Google, Snap and other tech firms over alleged failures to enforce the ban. The probe covers platforms like Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube.<h2>Australia's stringent law banning social media for teens</h2>The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act, in force since December, designates Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit and several other platforms as “age-restricted”, requiring them to prevent under-16s from holding accounts. Penalties of up to A$49.5 million, or US$33.9 million, could be imposed on companies for non-compliance.Under the law, the entire onus is on the platforms, as there is no penalty for children or parents if under-16s try to access social media using circumventions such as VPNs.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/in-a-global-first-australia-s-under-16-social-media-ban-takes-effect-1765286627973">In a global first, Australia’s under-16 social media ban takes effect</a><h2>Law enforcement is lax, reveals survey</h2>However, the new eSafety Compliance Report and Survey, based on compulsory information from platforms and interviews with nearly 900 parents, found that implementation is far from perfect.In the survey, 31 per cent of parents said their children still had at least one social media account after the ban. Among children who previously used Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok, about 70 per cent retained access. Platform-specific data showed similar trends, with 63.6 per cent of children keeping Facebook accounts, 69.1 per cent on Instagram, 69.4 per cent on Snapchat, 69.3 per cent on TikTok, and 48.5 per cent on YouTube.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-bans-under-16-social-media-accounts-millions-removed-within-days-1768537233396/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-bans-under-16-social-media-accounts-millions-removed-within-days-1768537233396/embed</a><h2>Tech firms doing bare minimum, says minister</h2>Australia’s communications minister, Anika Wells, said the companies were doing “the absolute bare minimum”, adding that “none of this is even difficult for big tech, who are innovative billion-dollar companies”.Calling the update unacceptable, she said firms must comply: “If these companies want to do business in Australia, they must obey Australian laws.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/australia-bans-under-16s-from-social-media-but-youtube-warns-it-could-make-them-less-safe-wion-explains-1764746581502">Australia bans under-16s from social media, but YouTube warns it could make them less safe. Here's how</a><h2>Australia's eSafety Commission blames weak enforcement</h2>The eSafety Commission of Australia said overall account ownership declined, but a substantial proportion of children under 16 retained social media accounts, attributing this partly to weak enforcement systems. “The most common reason children still had their social media accounts was that they had not yet been asked by the platform to verify their age,” it said.Some platforms allow repeated age-verification attempts and encourage underage users to try verification despite declaring an age below 16.<h2>‘Deliberate resistance’</h2>Technologies such as facial age estimation were deemed unreliable, especially near the age threshold, with concerns that some 14- and 15-year-olds could be classified as over 16.Wells argued such shortcomings reflected deliberate resistance, with companies attempting to “throw doubt on any regulation”.<h2>Meta says age verification is tough</h2>For its part, Meta said age verification is an industry-wide challenge, citing “natural error margins” at the 16-year limit. It instead advocated stronger controls at the level of app stores and operating systems, including parental approvals.According to the government, 4.7 million social media accounts were removed or restricted shortly after the ban. However, ongoing access by minors has raised doubts about the policy’s effectiveness.

Australia is probing Meta, TikTok, Google and others as most under-16s retain social media access despite a ban. Weak enforcement and ineffective age verification systems threaten to defeat implementation of the landmark law, in effect since December

Nearly 70 per cent of Australian under-16s who had social media accounts before a landmark law banned it are still accessing them. The government is probing Meta, TikTok, Google, Snap and other tech firms over alleged failures to enforce the ban. The probe covers platforms like Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube. Australia's stringent law banning social media for teens The Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act, in force since December, designates Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit and several other platforms as “age-restricted”, requiring them to prevent under-16s from holding accounts. Penalties of up to A$49.5 million, or US$33.9 million, could be imposed on companies for non-compliance. Under the law, the entire onus is on the platforms, as there is no penalty for children or parents if under-16s try to access social media using circumventions such as VPNs. Also read: In a global first, Australia’s under-16 social media ban takes effect Law enforcement is lax, reveals survey However, the new eSafety Compliance Report and Survey, based on compulsory information from platforms and interviews with nearly 900 parents, found that implementation is far from perfect. In the survey, 31 per cent of parents said their children still had at least one social media account after the ban. Among children who previously used Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok, about 70 per cent retained access. Platform-specific data showed similar trends, with 63.6 per cent of children keeping Facebook accounts, 69.1 per cent on Instagram, 69.4 per cent on Snapchat, 69.3 per cent on TikTok, and 48.5 per cent on YouTube. https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-bans-under-16-social-media-accounts-millions-removed-within-days-1768537233396/embed Tech firms doing bare minimum, says minister Australia’s communications minister, Anika Wells, said the companies were doing “the absolute bare minimum”, adding that “none of this is even difficult for big tech, who are innovative billion-dollar companies”. Calling the update unacceptable, she said firms must comply: “If these companies want to do business in Australia, they must obey Australian laws.” Also read: Australia bans under-16s from social media, but YouTube warns it could make them less safe. Here's how Australia's eSafety Commission blames weak enforcement The eSafety Commission of Australia said overall account ownership declined, but a substantial proportion of children under 16 retained social media accounts, attributing this partly to weak enforcement systems. “The most common reason children still had their social media accounts was that they had not yet been asked by the platform to verify their age,” it said. Some platforms allow repeated age-verification attempts and encourage underage users to try verification despite declaring an age below 16. ‘Deliberate resistance’ Technologies such as facial age estimation were deemed unreliable, especially near the age threshold, with concerns that some 14- and 15-year-olds could be classified as over 16. Wells argued such shortcomings reflected deliberate resistance, with companies attempting to “throw doubt on any regulation”. Meta says age verification is tough For its part, Meta said age verification is an industry-wide challenge, citing “natural error margins” at the 16-year limit. It instead advocated stronger controls at the level of app stores and operating systems, including parental approvals. According to the government, 4.7 million social media accounts were removed or restricted shortly after the ban. However, ongoing access by minors has raised doubts about the policy’s effectiveness.

Australia is probing Meta, TikTok, Google and others as most under-16s retain social media access despite a ban. Weak enforcement and ineffective age verification systems threaten to defeat implementation of the landmark law, in effect since December

Is Australia's teen social media ban failing? Meta, TikTok, Google, Snap, others face probe as access continues for most under-16s

As conflict in West Asia intensifies, concerns are growing over potential disruptions to global internet infrastructure, particularly undersea cables in the Red Sea. While Iran has not officially threatened such action, several accounts on X have raised alarms about possible cable damage amid rising tensions involving the US, Israel, and Iran.&nbsp;The last major disruption occurred in September 2025, when a commercial vessel reportedly dragged its anchor and damaged multiple submarine fibre optic cables. This incident caused noticeable internet slowdowns across parts of West and South Asia. Now, with the conflict escalating and Yemen’s Houthi group entering the fray, fears of a deliberate attack have increased. The Iran-backed Houthis have previously issued threats on social media about targeting these critical cables, making the risk difficult to ignore.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-bbc-dismissed-scott-mills-from-radio-2-shocking-email-reveals-details-1774874648753">Why BBC dismissed Scott Mills from Radio 2? Shocking email reveals details</a>&nbsp;According to the International Cable Protection Committee, four key cables were affected in the 2025 incident: SEA-ME-WE 4, India-Middle East-Western Europe (IMEWE), FALCON (GCX), and Europe India Gateway (EIG). Experts say that around 30% of cable faults each year are caused by ship anchors, but the current geopolitical climate raises the possibility of intentional disruption. These Red Sea cables are vital for global connectivity, supporting financial systems, cloud computing, video communication, email, and AI operations. Any damage could have widespread consequences.<h2>What does it mean for India?</h2>India, which was impacted during the 2025 outage, could again face disruptions. Although services did not completely fail, users experienced slow speeds and latency. With increasing dependence on digital payments, cloud infrastructure, and AI technologies, India remains vulnerable. Nearly 95% of international data is transmitted via undersea cables.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-us-forces-could-take-iran-s-kharg-island-very-soon-floats-seizing-iran-oil-exports-1774876465787/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-us-forces-could-take-iran-s-kharg-island-very-soon-floats-seizing-iran-oil-exports-1774876465787/embed</a>&nbsp;India currently connects through 17 cables across 14 landing stations, primarily in Mumbai and Chennai. However, this uneven distribution creates a risk; any disruption in these hubs could significantly impact connectivity across the country. As tensions persist in the region, the threat to critical internet infrastructure remains a growing concern for India and the world.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

As US-Iran war escalates, Red Sea cable threat raises fear of internet disruption in India

As conflict in West Asia intensifies, concerns are growing over potential disruptions to global internet infrastructure, particularly undersea cables in the Red Sea. While Iran has not officially threatened such action, several accounts on X have raised alarms about possible cable damage amid rising tensions involving the US, Israel, and Iran. The last major disruption occurred in September 2025, when a commercial vessel reportedly dragged its anchor and damaged multiple submarine fibre optic cables. This incident caused noticeable internet slowdowns across parts of West and South Asia. Now, with the conflict escalating and Yemen’s Houthi group entering the fray, fears of a deliberate attack have increased. The Iran-backed Houthis have previously issued threats on social media about targeting these critical cables, making the risk difficult to ignore. Also Read: Why BBC dismissed Scott Mills from Radio 2? Shocking email reveals details According to the International Cable Protection Committee, four key cables were affected in the 2025 incident: SEA-ME-WE 4, India-Middle East-Western Europe (IMEWE), FALCON (GCX), and Europe India Gateway (EIG). Experts say that around 30% of cable faults each year are caused by ship anchors, but the current geopolitical climate raises the possibility of intentional disruption. These Red Sea cables are vital for global connectivity, supporting financial systems, cloud computing, video communication, email, and AI operations. Any damage could have widespread consequences. What does it mean for India? India, which was impacted during the 2025 outage, could again face disruptions. Although services did not completely fail, users experienced slow speeds and latency. With increasing dependence on digital payments, cloud infrastructure, and AI technologies, India remains vulnerable. Nearly 95% of international data is transmitted via undersea cables. https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-us-forces-could-take-iran-s-kharg-island-very-soon-floats-seizing-iran-oil-exports-1774876465787/embed India currently connects through 17 cables across 14 landing stations, primarily in Mumbai and Chennai. However, this uneven distribution creates a risk; any disruption in these hubs could significantly impact connectivity across the country. As tensions persist in the region, the threat to critical internet infrastructure remains a growing concern for India and the world. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Rising West Asia tensions spark fears of Red Sea cable damage, risking internet disruptions in India and globally due to heavy reliance on undersea networks

Artificial intelligence agents are increasingly becoming part of workplace tools. Now, Google is experimenting with an internal AI system called Agent Smith, designed to automate tasks and allow employees to monitor work directly from their phones.&nbsp;The internal tool allows engineers and other employees to assign tasks that run automatically in the background. Workers can then check progress, review updates or send new instructions using their mobile devices. Reports indicate the system is already helping engineers complete routine tasks more quickly while reducing manual workload.&nbsp;<h2>What is Google’s ‘Agent Smith’?</h2>Agent Smith is an AI-powered system developed internally at Google. Unlike traditional coding assistants, the tool can plan and execute multiple steps of a workflow on its own. The AI system builds on Google’s existing agentic coding platform known as Antigravity. It can interact with various internal tools and services used inside the company.&nbsp;Employees can assign tasks to the system, which then works independently. The agent operates asynchronously, meaning it continues running even when the employee is offline or their laptop is closed.&nbsp;Workers can later check progress from their phones, review results or give further instructions.&nbsp;<h2>How the AI agent works inside Google</h2>According to people familiar with the system, Agent Smith can perform several functions that normally require manual work.&nbsp;These include:Automating parts of coding workflowsAccessing internal documents and toolsManaging multi-step tasks in the backgroundSending updates through internal chat platforms&nbsp;Because the system can access employee profiles and internal documentation, it can retrieve information that workers would otherwise need to search manually.&nbsp;Some engineers say the tool helps reduce time spent on repetitive tasks and allows them to focus on more complex work.&nbsp;<h2>Why Google is investing heavily in AI agents</h2>Agentic AI systems that perform actions autonomously is becoming a major focus across the technology industry.&nbsp;Google co-founder Sergey Brin reportedly told employees during a recent town hall meeting that AI agents will play an important role inside the company this year. At the same time, Google CEO Sundar Pichai has encouraged employees to adopt AI tools internally. According to reports, some teams have even been told that the use of AI may be considered in performance evaluations. The company sees AI automation as a way to improve productivity as competition among technology firms intensifies.&nbsp;<h2>Part of a broader industry trend</h2>Google is not the only company exploring autonomous AI agents. Several major technology firms are investing in systems that go beyond simple chatbots.&nbsp;Instead of just generating answers, agentic AI tools can:&nbsp;Run commandsanalyse documentscoordinate workflowsinteract with software systems&nbsp;This approach aims to turn AI into a digital worker that can handle routine tasks independently. For companies with large engineering teams, such tools could significantly change how software development and internal operations are managed.&nbsp;<h2>What the future of AI agents may look like</h2>Google has not officially confirmed detailed plans for Agent Smith. A company spokesperson told reporters that Google is constantly experimenting with new ways to build AI agents that solve real-world problems. If systems like Agent Smith continue to develop, they could change how employees interact with computers. Instead of working primarily from laptops, workers may increasingly assign tasks to AI systems and monitor progress remotely. The concept of “work from phone” may become more common as AI agents handle complex workflows in the background. For now, Agent Smith remains an internal experiment. However, it highlights how technology companies are exploring new ways to integrate AI into everyday work.

Google is testing an internal AI agent called Agent Smith, designed to automate workplace tasks. Built on Antigravity, the system can run workflows independently, access internal tools and documents, and allow employees to assign tasks and monitor progress from their phones. 

Artificial intelligence agents are increasingly becoming part of workplace tools. Now, Google is experimenting with an internal AI system called Agent Smith, designed to automate tasks and allow employees to monitor work directly from their phones. The internal tool allows engineers and other employees to assign tasks that run automatically in the background. Workers can then check progress, review updates or send new instructions using their mobile devices. Reports indicate the system is already helping engineers complete routine tasks more quickly while reducing manual workload. What is Google’s ‘Agent Smith’? Agent Smith is an AI-powered system developed internally at Google. Unlike traditional coding assistants, the tool can plan and execute multiple steps of a workflow on its own. The AI system builds on Google’s existing agentic coding platform known as Antigravity. It can interact with various internal tools and services used inside the company. Employees can assign tasks to the system, which then works independently. The agent operates asynchronously, meaning it continues running even when the employee is offline or their laptop is closed. Workers can later check progress from their phones, review results or give further instructions. How the AI agent works inside Google According to people familiar with the system, Agent Smith can perform several functions that normally require manual work. These include: Automating parts of coding workflows Accessing internal documents and tools Managing multi-step tasks in the background Sending updates through internal chat platforms Because the system can access employee profiles and internal documentation, it can retrieve information that workers would otherwise need to search manually. Some engineers say the tool helps reduce time spent on repetitive tasks and allows them to focus on more complex work. Why Google is investing heavily in AI agents Agentic AI systems that perform actions autonomously is becoming a major focus across the technology industry. Google co-founder Sergey Brin reportedly told employees during a recent town hall meeting that AI agents will play an important role inside the company this year. At the same time, Google CEO Sundar Pichai has encouraged employees to adopt AI tools internally. According to reports, some teams have even been told that the use of AI may be considered in performance evaluations. The company sees AI automation as a way to improve productivity as competition among technology firms intensifies. Part of a broader industry trend Google is not the only company exploring autonomous AI agents. Several major technology firms are investing in systems that go beyond simple chatbots. Instead of just generating answers, agentic AI tools can: Run commands analyse documents coordinate workflows interact with software systems This approach aims to turn AI into a digital worker that can handle routine tasks independently. For companies with large engineering teams, such tools could significantly change how software development and internal operations are managed. What the future of AI agents may look like Google has not officially confirmed detailed plans for Agent Smith. A company spokesperson told reporters that Google is constantly experimenting with new ways to build AI agents that solve real-world problems. If systems like Agent Smith continue to develop, they could change how employees interact with computers. Instead of working primarily from laptops, workers may increasingly assign tasks to AI systems and monitor progress remotely. The concept of “work from phone” may become more common as AI agents handle complex workflows in the background. For now, Agent Smith remains an internal experiment. However, it highlights how technology companies are exploring new ways to integrate AI into everyday work.

Google is testing an internal AI agent called Agent Smith, designed to automate workplace tasks. Built on Antigravity, the system can run workflows independently, access internal tools and documents, and allow employees to assign tasks and monitor progress from their phones.&nbsp;

Google’s ‘Agent Smith’: AI agent lets employees run tasks directly from their phones

Amid the rising trend and use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the industry, experts have consistently cautioned about the risk of entry-level jobs that could lose employment opportunities. Along with entry-level employees, it now appears that even top executives at multinational corporations are not immune to these changes. In an interview with CNBC, Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey and former Walmart CEO Doug McMillon shared that the fast pace of AI advancement played a key role in their decisions to step down. They emphasised the need for a new generation of leadership better equipped to navigate this technological shift. Quincey, who has led the beverage company since 2017, is set to be replaced by current COO Henrique Braun at the end of this month. “My job is also to think who's the best team to put on the field to get the next wave done,” Quincey said during the interview and added, “And I concluded that, actually, it was time to put someone else on the field for the next wave of growth.” Quincey further said that his company has made a lot of progress under him in a pre-AI and a pre-gen-AI mode, but currently, there is a 'new shift' potentially needing different leadership. He noted that Coca-Cola requires someone with the "energy to make a new transformation of the enterprise".<h3>AI revolution</h3>Meanwhile, McMillon, who retired in January this year has said in a previous interview that his decision to resign from the post was due to his being unable to see through the AI revolution. “With what's happening with AI, I could start this next big set of transformations with AI, but I couldn't finish,” said McMillon, and added, "About a year ago, I really started feeling like this next run, you could see what agentic commerce was going to look like, the vision for AI shopping." "I started thinking about everything that needs to happen over the next few years, and it really caused me to think that now was the right time to step down," McMillon further said. While top CEOs are preparing for the rise of AI, the outlook for entry-level workers appears increasingly uncertain. Last year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei cautioned that AI could eliminate up to half of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. He noted that roles involving repetitive yet adaptable tasks, such as those in law firms, consulting, administration, and finance, are especially vulnerable, as companies may turn to AI to reduce costs. "Specifically, if we look at jobs like entry-level white, you know, I think of people who work at law firms, like first-year associates, there's a lot of document review. It's very repetitive, but every example is different. That's something that AI is quite good at," Amodei said. "I think, to be honest, a large fraction of them would like to be able to use it to cut costs to employ fewer people," he added.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uss-george-hw-bush-to-join-iran-war-report-claims-us-aircraft-carrier-being-deployed-to-centcom-region-1774676307070">USS George HW Bush to join Iran war? Report claims US aircraft carrier being deployed to CENTCOM region</a>

Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey and former Walmart CEO Doug McMillon shared that the fast pace of AI advancement played a key role in their decisions to step down. They emphasised the need for a new generation of leadership better equipped to navigate this technological shift. 

Amid the rising trend and use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in the industry, experts have consistently cautioned about the risk of entry-level jobs that could lose employment opportunities. Along with entry-level employees, it now appears that even top executives at multinational corporations are not immune to these changes. In an interview with CNBC, Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey and former Walmart CEO Doug McMillon shared that the fast pace of AI advancement played a key role in their decisions to step down. They emphasised the need for a new generation of leadership better equipped to navigate this technological shift. Quincey, who has led the beverage company since 2017, is set to be replaced by current COO Henrique Braun at the end of this month. “My job is also to think who's the best team to put on the field to get the next wave done,” Quincey said during the interview and added, “And I concluded that, actually, it was time to put someone else on the field for the next wave of growth.” Quincey further said that his company has made a lot of progress under him in a pre-AI and a pre-gen-AI mode, but currently, there is a 'new shift' potentially needing different leadership. He noted that Coca-Cola requires someone with the "energy to make a new transformation of the enterprise". AI revolution Meanwhile, McMillon, who retired in January this year has said in a previous interview that his decision to resign from the post was due to his being unable to see through the AI revolution. “With what's happening with AI, I could start this next big set of transformations with AI, but I couldn't finish,” said McMillon, and added, "About a year ago, I really started feeling like this next run, you could see what agentic commerce was going to look like, the vision for AI shopping." "I started thinking about everything that needs to happen over the next few years, and it really caused me to think that now was the right time to step down," McMillon further said. While top CEOs are preparing for the rise of AI, the outlook for entry-level workers appears increasingly uncertain. Last year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei cautioned that AI could eliminate up to half of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years. He noted that roles involving repetitive yet adaptable tasks, such as those in law firms, consulting, administration, and finance, are especially vulnerable, as companies may turn to AI to reduce costs. "Specifically, if we look at jobs like entry-level white, you know, I think of people who work at law firms, like first-year associates, there's a lot of document review. It's very repetitive, but every example is different. That's something that AI is quite good at," Amodei said. "I think, to be honest, a large fraction of them would like to be able to use it to cut costs to employ fewer people," he added. Also read: USS George HW Bush to join Iran war? Report claims US aircraft carrier being deployed to CENTCOM region

Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey and former Walmart CEO Doug McMillon shared that the fast pace of AI advancement played a key role in their decisions to step down. They emphasised the need for a new generation of leadership better equipped to navigate this technological shift.&nbsp;

Is AI forcing CEOs to exit? Coca-Cola, Walmart chiefs cite reasons behind their decisions to quit

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, shared a post on X about a man who used ChatGPT, to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol to treat his dog. Altman described the meeting as one of the most interesting conversations he had that week. According to Altman, the man behind the effort, Paul Conyngham, used AI tools alongside human expertise to create a treatment protocol aimed at saving his dog named Rosie.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The coolest meeting I had this week with was Paul, who used ChatGPT and other LLMs to create an mRNA vaccine protocol to save his dog Rosie. It is amazing story. &quot;The chat bots empowered me as an individual to act with the power of a research institute - planning, education,… <a href="https://t.co/akgD2Wz7d0">https://t.co/akgD2Wz7d0</a>&mdash; Sam Altman (@sama) <a href="https://twitter.com/sama/status/2037396826060673188?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>How AI helped design the vaccine protocol</h2>In a post shared on X, Conyngham explained that AI tools played a major role in planning the process.He said chatbots helped him perform tasks that would normally require a large research team. These included analysing genomic information, exploring treatment options and designing a potential vaccine protocol.“The chatbots empowered me as an individual to act with the power of a research institute,” he wrote.According to his description, AI assisted with:Planning research stepsLearning scientific conceptsTroubleshooting problemsChecking regulatory considerationsConverting genomic data into a vaccine designHowever, he stressed that human experts were involved throughout the process.“The combination of AI and human collaboration is what made it possible,” he said.<h2>What is an mRNA vaccine?</h2>An mRNA vaccine works by using messenger RNA to instruct cells to produce a specific protein. The immune system then learns to recognise that protein and builds protection against the related disease.The technology became widely known during the COVID-19 pandemic, when pharmaceutical companies used it to develop vaccines rapidly. Researchers say mRNA platforms are flexible because they can be designed using genetic information. This makes them a potential tool for personalised medicine in the future.In this case, the vaccine protocol was reportedly designed based on genomic data related to the disease affecting the dog.<h2>Sam Altman reacts to the story</h2>Altman said the meeting made him think about the broader possibilities of AI-assisted scientific work.“The coolest meeting I had this week was with Paul,” he wrote in a post on X.He noted that AI tools allowed one individual to plan research steps that might normally require a larger institutional effort.Altman added that the story raised an interesting idea that similar approaches could eventually become the foundation for new companies focused on AI-assisted biomedical development.However, he also acknowledged that turning such projects into scalable systems would still be complex.<h2>AI and the future of scientific research</h2>The example highlights how artificial intelligence is gradually entering areas traditionally limited to specialised laboratories. AI models can analyse scientific papers, interpret genomic information and generate hypotheses for researchers to examine.Still, experts caution that AI-generated medical ideas must always be reviewed by trained professionals. Medical treatments require extensive testing, regulatory approval and safety verification. The case shared by Altman shows how AI tools may support individuals and researchers, but they do not replace human expertise.<h2>A glimpse into AI-assisted discovery</h2>The story of Rosie the dog reflects a broader shift in technology. Artificial intelligence is moving beyond conversation tools and becoming a research assistant. For individuals with technical knowledge, AI can help organise information, accelerate learning and explore complex scientific problems.While such projects remain rare, they suggest a possible future where AI supports scientific experimentation in new ways. As AI models continue improving, collaborations between machines and human experts may play a larger role in research, medicine and biotechnology.

Sam Altman shared a story about Paul Conyngham on X, who used ChatGPT and other AI tools to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol for his dog, Rosie. By analysing genomic data and planning research steps with AI, Conyngham created a treatment concept with support from human experts.

Sam Altman, chief executive of OpenAI, shared a post on X about a man who used ChatGPT, to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol to treat his dog. Altman described the meeting as one of the most interesting conversations he had that week. According to Altman, the man behind the effort, Paul Conyngham, used AI tools alongside human expertise to create a treatment protocol aimed at saving his dog named Rosie.

Sam Altman shared a story about Paul Conyngham on X, who used ChatGPT and other AI tools to help design a potential mRNA vaccine protocol for his dog, Rosie. By analysing genomic data and planning research steps with AI, Conyngham created a treatment concept with support from human experts.

Man uses ChatGPT to help design an mRNA vaccine to save his dog; OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reacts

“Wolf warriors” is a term usually associated with Chinese diplomats for their aggressive methods, both in real life and online. Perhaps the diplomatic missions of Iran could now be described as the new wolf warriors of the Islamic Republic, pushing ahead with different forms of information warfare even as much of their leadership is wiped out through decapitation strikes by Israel and the US since February 28.<h2>Iranian diplomatic missions deploy memes, photos and emotional text in information war</h2>Since the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in an Israeli air strike, the Iranian diplomatic corps transformed into a coordinated digital force. There is a clear escalation in messaging from Iranian embassies, consulates and UN missions. They are conducting elements of both war and diplomacy via X and other social media platforms in real time.<h2>Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The central command</h2>With Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi as its face, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs is acting as the primary narrative hub. English-language posts from its diplomatic missions consistently frame the war as “US-Israeli aggression”, highlighting civilian harm and infrastructure damage. The alleged US-Israel bombing of a school in Minab, in which 165 mostly girl children reportedly died, has been repeatedly presented as a potential war crime.Throgh its missions, Iran is highlighting diplomatic outreach to countries including India, Russia, Turkey, Japan, Egypt and Sri Lanka. In the absence of extensive offline diplomatic activity, this online messaging serves as Iran's de facto international engagement and a tool to reinforce the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic.&nbsp;At the same time, these posts are closely watched by global oil, gas and shipping industries, as Iran uses its control over the Strait of Hormuz as a key non-military lever.<h2>Iran missions to the UN: The only major global platform available to Islamic Republic</h2>Iran’s permanent mission to the UN has significantly amplified its online presence, disputing US and Israeli claims and rejecting assertions of maritime disruptions. Its posts included images showing the aftermath of the Minab school attack, with captions questioning how children at school desks could be considered an imminent threat.Iran’s UN mission in Geneva has relied on international law and humanitarian discourse to push for debates at the UN Human Rights Council. It frames incidents such as the Minab strike as violations of international humanitarian law.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-launched-far-more-missile-drone-strikes-on-gulf-states-than-israel-claims-report-1774597564760">Iran launched far more missile, drone strikes on Gulf states than Israel, claims report</a><h2>Iran’s Europe mission: Confrontation and critique</h2>Iran’s mission to the European Union uses a more confrontational style, publicly criticising European leaders and institutions for what it calls “selective outrage”. Social media posts from the mission often juxtapose European responses to other conflicts, particularly Ukraine, with perceived silence on Iranian casualties, aiming to highlight double standards.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-president-says-strikes-paused-for-10-days-at-iran-s-request-1774587573008/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-president-says-strikes-paused-for-10-days-at-iran-s-request-1774587573008/embed</a><h2>Iranian embassies and consulates: Localised messaging, global reach</h2>Among the most active are Iranian embassies and consulates in key countries. Iranian missions in India have been posting messages highlighting bilateral ties and diplomatic dialogue. Iran has often acknowledged India’s relatively neutral stance on the war, even as it reportedly exempted vessels bound for India from any Strait of Hormuz disruption.From the social media handles of Iranian missions in Pakistan, the tone is sharper. Posts frequently questioned Western positions and dismissed recent calls for negotiation as insincere.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-war-pentagon-to-send-10-000-more-ground-troops-as-iran-mobilises-1-million-say-reports-pressure-tactic-or-costly-mistake-of-us-1774588399102">Iran war: Pentagon to send 10,000 more ground troops as Iran mobilises 1 million, say reports. Pressure tactic or costly mistake of US?</a><h2>Iranian diplomatic missions act as force multipliers, using memes, humour&nbsp;</h2>Several posts blend humour and meme culture. It is relatively unusual for Iran to mix satire with official messaging, but the approach appears aimed at increasing engagement with younger, globally connected audiences. The embassies are acting as force multipliers of the regime in creating a narrative suitable for it.<h2>Analysis: A battle for minds in the age of short attention spans</h2>From an information warfare perspective, Iranian embassies now function as “always-on” communication nodes, sharing real-time updates and countering adversaries’ claims. This online activity also projects a sense of continuity and stability within the Iranian regime despite sustained bombardment by Israel and the US.This diplomatic effort forms part of a broader Iranian digital presence that incorporates visual storytelling, sharp-edged humour and, at times, AI-generated content. It is a battle for minds, aimed at countering narratives from the US, Israel and the West. With much of its military infrastructure under pressure, Iran is seeking to influence international opinion and reinforce its claim of lawful self-defence under international law.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran’s diplomatic missions, embassies and consulates have turned into a coordinated digital force, using social media memes, visuals, emotional language and legal arguments to shape global opinion, even as its actions are hitting trade and causing tensions in the entire Gulf region  

“Wolf warriors” is a term usually associated with Chinese diplomats for their aggressive methods, both in real life and online. Perhaps the diplomatic missions of Iran could now be described as the new wolf warriors of the Islamic Republic, pushing ahead with different forms of information warfare even as much of their leadership is wiped out through decapitation strikes by Israel and the US since February 28. Iranian diplomatic missions deploy memes, photos and emotional text in information war Since the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in an Israeli air strike, the Iranian diplomatic corps transformed into a coordinated digital force. There is a clear escalation in messaging from Iranian embassies, consulates and UN missions. They are conducting elements of both war and diplomacy via X and other social media platforms in real time. Ministry of Foreign Affairs: The central command With Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi as its face, Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs is acting as the primary narrative hub. English-language posts from its diplomatic missions consistently frame the war as “US-Israeli aggression”, highlighting civilian harm and infrastructure damage. The alleged US-Israel bombing of a school in Minab, in which 165 mostly girl children reportedly died, has been repeatedly presented as a potential war crime. Throgh its missions, Iran is highlighting diplomatic outreach to countries including India, Russia, Turkey, Japan, Egypt and Sri Lanka. In the absence of extensive offline diplomatic activity, this online messaging serves as Iran's de facto international engagement and a tool to reinforce the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic. At the same time, these posts are closely watched by global oil, gas and shipping industries, as Iran uses its control over the Strait of Hormuz as a key non-military lever. Iran missions to the UN: The only major global platform available to Islamic Republic Iran’s permanent mission to the UN has significantly amplified its online presence, disputing US and Israeli claims and rejecting assertions of maritime disruptions. Its posts included images showing the aftermath of the Minab school attack, with captions questioning how children at school desks could be considered an imminent threat. Iran’s UN mission in Geneva has relied on international law and humanitarian discourse to push for debates at the UN Human Rights Council. It frames incidents such as the Minab strike as violations of international humanitarian law. Also read: Iran launched far more missile, drone strikes on Gulf states than Israel, claims report Iran’s Europe mission: Confrontation and critique Iran’s mission to the European Union uses a more confrontational style, publicly criticising European leaders and institutions for what it calls “selective outrage”. Social media posts from the mission often juxtapose European responses to other conflicts, particularly Ukraine, with perceived silence on Iranian casualties, aiming to highlight double standards. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-president-says-strikes-paused-for-10-days-at-iran-s-request-1774587573008/embed Iranian embassies and consulates: Localised messaging, global reach Among the most active are Iranian embassies and consulates in key countries. Iranian missions in India have been posting messages highlighting bilateral ties and diplomatic dialogue. Iran has often acknowledged India’s relatively neutral stance on the war, even as it reportedly exempted vessels bound for India from any Strait of Hormuz disruption. From the social media handles of Iranian missions in Pakistan, the tone is sharper. Posts frequently questioned Western positions and dismissed recent calls for negotiation as insincere. Also read: Iran war: Pentagon to send 10,000 more ground troops as Iran mobilises 1 million, say reports. Pressure tactic or costly mistake of US? Iranian diplomatic missions act as force multipliers, using memes, humour Several posts blend humour and meme culture. It is relatively unusual for Iran to mix satire with official messaging, but the approach appears aimed at increasing engagement with younger, globally connected audiences. The embassies are acting as force multipliers of the regime in creating a narrative suitable for it. Analysis: A battle for minds in the age of short attention spans From an information warfare perspective, Iranian embassies now function as “always-on” communication nodes, sharing real-time updates and countering adversaries’ claims. This online activity also projects a sense of continuity and stability within the Iranian regime despite sustained bombardment by Israel and the US. This diplomatic effort forms part of a broader Iranian digital presence that incorporates visual storytelling, sharp-edged humour and, at times, AI-generated content. It is a battle for minds, aimed at countering narratives from the US, Israel and the West. With much of its military infrastructure under pressure, Iran is seeking to influence international opinion and reinforce its claim of lawful self-defence under international law. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran’s diplomatic missions, embassies and consulates have turned into a coordinated digital force, using social media memes, visuals, emotional language and legal arguments to shape global opinion, even as its actions are hitting trade and causing tensions in the entire Gulf region &nbsp;

Iran's online 'wolf warriors': How embassies and consulates are fighting the information warfare, using humour, emotions, and memes

Artificial intelligence research is increasingly moving closer to human neuroscience. Meta has introduced a new AI system designed to predict human brain activity, highlighting how machine learning and brain research are beginning to converge.The model, called TRIBE v2, analyses patterns in brain activity recorded through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). According to Meta’s research blog and demonstration page, the system was trained using brain scan data from more than 700 volunteers.Researchers say the model could help scientists better understand how the brain processes images, sound and language.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today we&#39;re introducing TRIBE v2 (Trimodal Brain Encoder), a foundation model trained to predict how the human brain responds to almost any sight or sound. Building on our Algonauts 2025 award-winning architecture, TRIBE v2 draws on 500+ hours of fMRI recordings from 700+ people… <a href="https://t.co/vRoVj8gP4j">pic.twitter.com/vRoVj8gP4j</a>&mdash; AI at Meta (@AIatMeta) <a href="https://twitter.com/AIatMeta/status/2037153756346016207?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What is Meta’s TRIBE v2 AI model?</h2>TRIBE v2 is an AI system designed to interpret patterns in neural activity. It uses machine learning techniques to analyse fMRI scans that record blood flow changes in the brain.These changes reveal which parts of the brain become active when people see images, listen to sounds or read text. According to Meta researchers, participants in the study were exposed to different forms of content such as:ImagesAudio clipsWritten languageThe AI model then analysed how the brain responded to each stimulus. Over time, it learned to predict neural activity patterns linked to different types of information.Meta said the goal is to develop AI systems that better understand how the human brain processes information.<h2>How the model was trained</h2> The system was trained using brain imaging data collected from over 700 volunteers. Functional MRI technology allows researchers to observe brain activity by measuring oxygen levels in different brain regions.By analysing these signals, the AI system identifies relationships between external stimuli and neural responses. According to Meta’s research explanation, the model can predict how certain sensory inputs such as pictures or language may activate specific brain areas.Scientists say this approach helps build computational models that simulate aspects of human cognition.<h2>Why companies are studying the brain</h2>Technology companies are increasingly investing in neuroscience research to improve artificial intelligence.While current AI systems are strong in pattern recognition and data processing, they still struggle with contextual reasoning and flexible understanding areas where the human brain performs far better. By studying neural activity patterns, researchers hope to improve how AI models:Interpret languageUnderstand contextPredict human behaviourLearn from limited informationMeta said the work is part of a broader effort to build AI systems that resemble aspects of human intelligence.<h2>Possible applications in healthcare and neurotechnology&nbsp;</h2> Although the model is still in the research stage, experts say such technology could eventually support several fields.Potential applications include:Brain–computer interfacesAssistive communication toolsResearch into neurological disordersPersonalised medical treatments based on brain responsesFor example, brain-computer interfaces could allow people with speech or motor impairments to communicate using neural signals.However, scientists note that the technology is still far from clinical use.Ethical questions around brain dataResearch combining AI and brain signals also raises important ethical questions.Brain activity data is considered highly sensitive information. Experts warn that strict privacy safeguards will be necessary as the technology develops.Concerns include:Data privacy and consentPotential misuse of neural informationSecurity of brain-signal datasetsAs research continues, policymakers and scientists may need to develop new guidelines governing how neural data can be used.<h2>What this means for AI research</h2>Meta’s TRIBE v2 project shows how AI research is expanding beyond traditional computing tasks. By analysing how the brain reacts to different inputs, scientists hope to create AI systems that process information in more human-like ways.Although the technology is still experimental, it highlights the growing intersection between neuroscience and artificial intelligence.As companies continue investing in this field, future AI systems may become better at understanding language, context and human behaviour areas where machines still lag behind people.

Meta has introduced TRIBE v2, an AI system designed to predict human brain activity using fMRI scans. Trained on brain data from over 700 volunteers, the model analyses how the brain responds to images, audio and text to better understand neural patterns. 

Artificial intelligence research is increasingly moving closer to human neuroscience. Meta has introduced a new AI system designed to predict human brain activity, highlighting how machine learning and brain research are beginning to converge. The model, called TRIBE v2, analyses patterns in brain activity recorded through functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). According to Meta’s research blog and demonstration page, the system was trained using brain scan data from more than 700 volunteers. Researchers say the model could help scientists better understand how the brain processes images, sound and language.

Meta has introduced TRIBE v2, an AI system designed to predict human brain activity using fMRI scans. Trained on brain data from over 700 volunteers, the model analyses how the brain responds to images, audio and text to better understand neural patterns.&nbsp;

TRIBE v2: Meta introduces AI model that can predict human brain activity

technology

Technology, News on Technology, stories on Technology, articles on Technology, Technology stories at Wion, Technology news, Technology latest news

technology

Inside Palantir’s AI Maven: How the system helped US military in Iran strikes. Know all about it

Molotov cocktail thrown at Open AI's CEO Sam Altman’s home; suspect arrested

YouTube Premium Subscription prices rise; unskippable ads get longer on TV

AI infrastructure race: Anthropic may build its own AI chips to power Claude

Claude Mythos AI model automates cyberattacks. Can be destructive in wrong hands

Google’s AI search accuracy: How accurate are Google’s AI overviews?

Alexandr Wang-led Meta lab introduces Muse Spark AI model

Is Sam Altman a sociopath, abuser, liar? Questions arise about his AI leadership

Claude Mythos: Anthropic’s AI model that can find critical software flaws

China data breach: Hacker claims 10 Petabytes stolen from Tianjin supercomputer

Ghost Murmur: All about secret tech CIA used to rescue US F-15E pilot from Iran

A new cyberattack every 39 seconds: Why firms remain vulnerable

'$2 trillion valuation': SpaceX blockbuster IPO could raise $75 billion

Google DeepMind launches Gemma 4: AI models for advanced reasoning and AI agents

Anthropic confirms accidental leak of Claude chatbot source code

ChatGPT comes to Apple CarPlay: Now drivers can talk to ChatGPT from their car

Indian friends safe, says Iran on Strait of Hormuz; IRGC charges in yuan, crypto

Here's why NASA astronauts are carrying iPhones to the Moon on Artemis II

Oracle lays off 12,000 in India: Company sends email – Here’s what it said

Australia probes Meta, TikTok, others for violating under-16 social media ban

Amid US-Iran war, Red Sea cable threat raises fear of net disruption in India

‘Agent Smith’: Google’s internal AI tool automates coding and workflows

Is AI forcing CEOs to exit? Coca-Cola, Walmart chiefs cite reasons why they quit

Sam Altman shares story of AI-assisted vaccine design to save a dog

Iran's online 'wolf warriors' fight information war, one post at a time

TRIBE v2: Meta introduces AI model that can predict human brain activity