X, formerly known as Twitter, says it has uncovered a massive suspected Chinese bot farm that was allegedly conducting influence operations in the United States, including efforts to amplify criticism of artificial intelligence and data centers. The disclosure comes amid an increasingly heated national debate over the costs and benefits of rapidly expanding AI infrastructure. The issue has significant political implications, with Republicans increasingly divided over AI development and the construction of the massive data centers needed to support the technology.&nbsp;X’s Global Government Affairs account said the platform’s safety team identified a bot farm consisting of approximately 200,000 inauthentic Chinese accounts that were ‘involved in influence operations’. According to X, about 200 accounts within the network were identified as posting “in a manner that could manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI and energy policy.” The platform said posts from the accounts promoted claims that AI data centers are increasing household electricity bills and putting additional pressure on the US power grid.&nbsp;Other accounts allegedly shared AI-generated cartoons portraying data center developers as benefiting financially while ordinary Americans bear the costs. One image showed concerned citizens facing data center developers carrying bags of cash, accompanied by the caption, “Data centers get subsidized while we foot the bill!” Another image stated that “the AI industry is booming, but the costs are being borne by ordinary people.” The findings come after OpenAI announced earlier this summer that it had banned a "cluster of ChatGPT accounts that likely originated in China" that were allegedly being used to conduct a "covert influence operation" primarily aimed at US audiences.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/judge-throws-out-9-11-attack-mastermind-khalid-sheikh-mohammed-s-fbi-confession-over-torture-concerns-1787985338771">Judge throws out 9/11 attack mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's FBI confession over torture concerns</a>&nbsp;OpenAI said those accounts generated short comments and images that similarly promoted claims that AI development and data centers were increasing electricity demand and contributing to higher costs. The alleged influence campaigns emerged as the United States continues to debate the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure. Critics argue that the data centers needed to power AI systems can place additional pressure on electricity supplies, raise energy costs, create environmental concerns and potentially affect nearby property values.&nbsp;Supporters, however, argue that expanding AI data center capacity is important for U.S. national security and technological competitiveness. They also point to job creation, investment and increased tax revenue for communities hosting the facilities.The political debate intensified this week when President Donald Trump suggested at the White House that the AI industry needs “a little public relations help.” Trump pointed to a May Gallup poll showing that a majority of Americans oppose data centers being constructed in their communities.&nbsp;He argued that states and local communities should welcome data center projects because “the jobs are enormous, and the money paid, the taxes paid are just enormous.” "And if you don't take it, you're going to be left behind because there are plenty of places that want it," he added. At the same time, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., has argued that China could benefit from excessive US concerns about AI development.&nbsp;Fetterman warned that China benefits from "overreaction" to "AI doomsdaying" as Washington and Beijing compete for leadership in artificial intelligence. Fetterman wrote that “AI supremacy and energy dominance underpins our national security.” Following the discovery of the suspected Chinese influence campaign, X’s Global Government Affairs team said the platform would continue taking action against accounts that violate its policies.&nbsp;“We take seriously any attempts to undermine the integrity of the global town square and suspend accounts that violate our Authenticity policy.” &nbsp;The platform added that it remains “committed to maintaining an open and authentic platform where people debate topics of public interest.” The allegations add another layer to the growing US debate over AI, energy consumption and data center expansion, while also highlighting concerns about foreign influence operations shaping online political discussions.

X says it uncovered a suspected Chinese bot farm pushing anti-AI and anti-data center narratives as the US debates energy costs and AI growth

X, formerly known as Twitter, says it has uncovered a massive suspected Chinese bot farm that was allegedly conducting influence operations in the United States, including efforts to amplify criticism of artificial intelligence and data centers. The disclosure comes amid an increasingly heated national debate over the costs and benefits of rapidly expanding AI infrastructure. The issue has significant political implications, with Republicans increasingly divided over AI development and the construction of the massive data centers needed to support the technology. X’s Global Government Affairs account said the platform’s safety team identified a bot farm consisting of approximately 200,000 inauthentic Chinese accounts that were ‘involved in influence operations’. According to X, about 200 accounts within the network were identified as posting “in a manner that could manipulate a legitimate debate about American AI and energy policy.” The platform said posts from the accounts promoted claims that AI data centers are increasing household electricity bills and putting additional pressure on the US power grid. Other accounts allegedly shared AI-generated cartoons portraying data center developers as benefiting financially while ordinary Americans bear the costs. One image showed concerned citizens facing data center developers carrying bags of cash, accompanied by the caption, “Data centers get subsidized while we foot the bill!” Another image stated that “the AI industry is booming, but the costs are being borne by ordinary people.” The findings come after OpenAI announced earlier this summer that it had banned a "cluster of ChatGPT accounts that likely originated in China" that were allegedly being used to conduct a "covert influence operation" primarily aimed at US audiences. Also Read: Judge throws out 9/11 attack mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's FBI confession over torture concerns OpenAI said those accounts generated short comments and images that similarly promoted claims that AI development and data centers were increasing electricity demand and contributing to higher costs. The alleged influence campaigns emerged as the United States continues to debate the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure. Critics argue that the data centers needed to power AI systems can place additional pressure on electricity supplies, raise energy costs, create environmental concerns and potentially affect nearby property values. Supporters, however, argue that expanding AI data center capacity is important for U.S. national security and technological competitiveness. They also point to job creation, investment and increased tax revenue for communities hosting the facilities. The political debate intensified this week when President Donald Trump suggested at the White House that the AI industry needs “a little public relations help.” Trump pointed to a May Gallup poll showing that a majority of Americans oppose data centers being constructed in their communities. He argued that states and local communities should welcome data center projects because “the jobs are enormous, and the money paid, the taxes paid are just enormous.” "And if you don't take it, you're going to be left behind because there are plenty of places that want it," he added. At the same time, Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., has argued that China could benefit from excessive US concerns about AI development. Fetterman warned that China benefits from "overreaction" to "AI doomsdaying" as Washington and Beijing compete for leadership in artificial intelligence. Fetterman wrote that “AI supremacy and energy dominance underpins our national security.” Following the discovery of the suspected Chinese influence campaign, X’s Global Government Affairs team said the platform would continue taking action against accounts that violate its policies. “We take seriously any attempts to undermine the integrity of the global town square and suspend accounts that violate our Authenticity policy.” The platform added that it remains “committed to maintaining an open and authentic platform where people debate topics of public interest.” The allegations add another layer to the growing US debate over AI, energy consumption and data center expansion, while also highlighting concerns about foreign influence operations shaping online political discussions.

X says it uncovered a suspected Chinese bot farm targeting US debate over artificial intelligence, data centers, electricity costs and energy policy

X exposes suspected Chinese influence campaign over AI, energy and data centers

The upcoming midterm elections in the US are turning out to be a high-stakes race, not only for diplomatic ramifications, but also for domestic issues and influence.&nbsp;According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, major US firms are already preparing for a possible turnaround in congressional control this November.&nbsp;Companies with close ties to US President Donald Trump in particular are reportedly taking measures to gain favour with the opposing camp, the Democrats.&nbsp;The steps come amid a possible chance that the blue camp may flip the House of Representatives and claim the majority, which the Republicans currently control.&nbsp;Several companies that donated vast sums of money to Trump's projects are now preparing for possible congressional and even potential criminal investigations. So, how are these companies trying to wade through this uncertain political landscape?&nbsp;Well, the report says that major corporate organisations are trying to balance out the money given to the red camp by now donating millions to Democratic lawmakers ahead of the midterms.&nbsp;Executives and board members from some large public companies across sectors are reportedly discussing how to stay out of Democratic crosshairs and how to stay as neutral as possible to evade formal subpoenas and investigations if the House flips in the next three months.&nbsp;The change in strategy also comes amid statements from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who said that the Democratic Party is focused on affordability, as well as holding companies accountable.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/xi-consolidates-power-china-s-top-military-body-left-with-just-two-after-generals-purged-1787923218445">Xi consolidates power: China’s top military body left with just two after generals purged</a>&nbsp;Jeffries is likely to become the House Speaker in the scenario that the Democrats do cross the simple majority mark.&nbsp;This is what the existing makeup of the House of Representatives looks like. Out of a total of 435 seats, Republicans currently have 219, while Democrats represent 212 of the seats.&nbsp;The halfway mark is at 218, and this is where it gets interesting. There are currently four vacant seats in the House. These seats are only filled by a special election or the next approaching election cycle.The four vacancies are from the following parts of America: the 14th District of California, the 23rd District of Texas, the 20th District of Florida and the 13th District of Georgia.&nbsp;The midterms are turning out to be a high-stakes battle for all stakeholders, but more so for the incumbent president and his Republican Party, especially if popularity polls are anything to go by.&nbsp;The past few polls have shown a steady decline in Trump's popularity overall, but the biggest trigger has been voters' unhappiness with the long-drawn Iran war and Trump's handling of the economy.It appears that companies that contributed millions to the president's legacy projects are also looking at how the numbers stack up in popularity polls.&nbsp;Hence, the decision to regroup and strategise on a potential change in the power structure at Capitol Hill.&nbsp;The question is: Will their early outreach to the Democrats help them evade scrutiny?

Major US companies with close ties to Donald Trump are reportedly reaching out to Democrats and hedging their political bets as they prepare for a possible Democratic takeover of the House in the 2026 midterm elections.

The upcoming midterm elections in the US are turning out to be a high-stakes race, not only for diplomatic ramifications, but also for domestic issues and influence. According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, major US firms are already preparing for a possible turnaround in congressional control this November. Companies with close ties to US President Donald Trump in particular are reportedly taking measures to gain favour with the opposing camp, the Democrats. The steps come amid a possible chance that the blue camp may flip the House of Representatives and claim the majority, which the Republicans currently control. Several companies that donated vast sums of money to Trump's projects are now preparing for possible congressional and even potential criminal investigations. So, how are these companies trying to wade through this uncertain political landscape? Well, the report says that major corporate organisations are trying to balance out the money given to the red camp by now donating millions to Democratic lawmakers ahead of the midterms. Executives and board members from some large public companies across sectors are reportedly discussing how to stay out of Democratic crosshairs and how to stay as neutral as possible to evade formal subpoenas and investigations if the House flips in the next three months. The change in strategy also comes amid statements from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who said that the Democratic Party is focused on affordability, as well as holding companies accountable. Also Read: Xi consolidates power: China’s top military body left with just two after generals purged Jeffries is likely to become the House Speaker in the scenario that the Democrats do cross the simple majority mark. This is what the existing makeup of the House of Representatives looks like. Out of a total of 435 seats, Republicans currently have 219, while Democrats represent 212 of the seats. The halfway mark is at 218, and this is where it gets interesting. There are currently four vacant seats in the House. These seats are only filled by a special election or the next approaching election cycle. The four vacancies are from the following parts of America: the 14th District of California, the 23rd District of Texas, the 20th District of Florida and the 13th District of Georgia. The midterms are turning out to be a high-stakes battle for all stakeholders, but more so for the incumbent president and his Republican Party, especially if popularity polls are anything to go by. The past few polls have shown a steady decline in Trump's popularity overall, but the biggest trigger has been voters' unhappiness with the long-drawn Iran war and Trump's handling of the economy. It appears that companies that contributed millions to the president's legacy projects are also looking at how the numbers stack up in popularity polls. Hence, the decision to regroup and strategise on a potential change in the power structure at Capitol Hill. The question is: Will their early outreach to the Democrats help them evade scrutiny?

Major US companies with close ties to Donald Trump are reportedly reaching out to Democrats and hedging their political bets as they prepare for a possible Democratic takeover of the House in the 2026 midterm elections.

US midterms: Companies close to Trump prepare for possible Democratic takeover of House | Race to Power

US President Donald Trump was reportedly warned against launching attack on Iran in February by US intelligence chiefs, who cautioned him that the American military operation could backfire, strengthen hard-line forces in Tehran and trigger a wider regional crisis. According to a report, then-US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard told Trump in February that killing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could lead to an even more authoritarian government, one potentially more determined to pursue weapons of mass destruction.<h2>What did Gabbard say?</h2>The Wall Street Journal reported that Gabbard was summoned to the Oval Office before the US-Israel strikes began on February 28. Trump was reportedly seeking her assessment after being encouraged by the previous summer’s Operation Midnight Hammer, which targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, and strikes on Venezuela’s Caracas that led to capture of Nicolas Maduro.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had pushed for military action, arguing that Iran was at its weakest and that its nuclear ambitions could finally be extinguished, the report added.However, according to WSJ, Gabbard warned Trump that Tehran would likely retaliate. She warned that Iran could shut the Strait of Hormuz, sending oil prices higher, while striking US allies across the Middle East – which is exactly what happened.<h2>What did US military leaders say?</h2>US military leaders also cautioned that the conflict would cost American lives, consume dwindling stocks of munitions and stretch US forces already deployed across the region.Vice President JD Vance was also reportedly against entering the war but assured Trump he would support him if the president chose to proceed.Trump ultimately followed the recommendations of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine and Adm. Brad Cooper, the head of US Central Command. They presented detailed plans for disabling Iran with Israeli assistance.Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, and Khamenei was killed on the first day. Trump initially celebrated the result, but the situation soon became more complicated as the consequences predicted by Gabbard began unfolding.<h2>Trump’s Iran war drags on</h2>The war has now entered its sixth month, despite Trump initially saying it would take six weeks. Gulf allies including Saudi Arabia and Qatar have pressed Washington to end the fighting, while Republicans have grown concerned about its impact ahead of the midterm elections.The 60-day negotiating period under the June 17 peace framework has also expired. Trump has since turned to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to intensify economic pressure on Tehran through Operation Economic Outcast.The conflict has killed 3,000 Iranians and 18 US service members, while another 756 American troops have been injured.White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales defended Trump’s approach, saying: “He will never allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. It would be wise for Iran to reach a deal. Otherwise, they know what could happen.”

US President Donald Trump was warned by Tulsi Gabbard and US intelligence against striking Iran. Despite warnings that the consequences could backfire, Trump launched Operation Epic Fury in February—and many of those risks materialised.

US President Donald Trump was reportedly warned against launching attack on Iran in February by US intelligence chiefs, who cautioned him that the American military operation could backfire, strengthen hard-line forces in Tehran and trigger a wider regional crisis. According to a report, then-US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard told Trump in February that killing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could lead to an even more authoritarian government, one potentially more determined to pursue weapons of mass destruction. What did Gabbard say? The Wall Street Journal reported that Gabbard was summoned to the Oval Office before the US-Israel strikes began on February 28. Trump was reportedly seeking her assessment after being encouraged by the previous summer’s Operation Midnight Hammer, which targeted Iranian nuclear facilities, and strikes on Venezuela’s Caracas that led to capture of Nicolas Maduro. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had pushed for military action, arguing that Iran was at its weakest and that its nuclear ambitions could finally be extinguished, the report added. However, according to WSJ, Gabbard warned Trump that Tehran would likely retaliate. She warned that Iran could shut the Strait of Hormuz, sending oil prices higher, while striking US allies across the Middle East – which is exactly what happened. What did US military leaders say? US military leaders also cautioned that the conflict would cost American lives, consume dwindling stocks of munitions and stretch US forces already deployed across the region. Vice President JD Vance was also reportedly against entering the war but assured Trump he would support him if the president chose to proceed. Trump ultimately followed the recommendations of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine and Adm. Brad Cooper, the head of US Central Command. They presented detailed plans for disabling Iran with Israeli assistance. Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, and Khamenei was killed on the first day. Trump initially celebrated the result, but the situation soon became more complicated as the consequences predicted by Gabbard began unfolding. Trump’s Iran war drags on The war has now entered its sixth month, despite Trump initially saying it would take six weeks. Gulf allies including Saudi Arabia and Qatar have pressed Washington to end the fighting, while Republicans have grown concerned about its impact ahead of the midterm elections. The 60-day negotiating period under the June 17 peace framework has also expired. Trump has since turned to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to intensify economic pressure on Tehran through Operation Economic Outcast. The conflict has killed 3,000 Iranians and 18 US service members, while another 756 American troops have been injured. White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales defended Trump’s approach, saying: “He will never allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon. It would be wise for Iran to reach a deal. Otherwise, they know what could happen.”

US President Donald Trump was warned by Tulsi Gabbard and US intel against launching strikes on Iran. Despite the likely consequences being pointed out, all of which came true, the US military launched Operation Epic Fury in February.

Did Tulsi Gabbard warn Trump Iran war could backfire? What US intel got right

Donald Trump is considering a provocative new name for Lake Ontario, suggesting it could be renamed ‘Lake America’ as trade tensions between the United States and Canada continue to escalate. The US president made the remark on Tuesday as Canada prepared to announce retaliatory measures after Washington imposed 50 per cent tariffs on USD 20 billion worth of Canadian goods over the weekend. The move followed the collapse of trade negotiations between the two countries.&nbsp;In a social media post, Trump said, “The United States is giving serious consideration to changing the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America in that we don't expect to doing much business with Ontario any longer.” The proposal would mirror Trump's decision last year to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America through an executive order. Ontario, Canada's most populous province, is also a major centre of the country's automotive industry.<h2>US-Canada trade tensions intensify</h2>The latest comments come as rhetoric between Washington and Ottawa becomes increasingly confrontational. Trump told Canadian leaders on Monday to "fall in line" or face consequences "far WORSE" than the tariffs already imposed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, meanwhile, accused the United States of seeking to subordinate Canada.&nbsp;Trump has also threatened an additional 50 per cent tariff on Canadian vehicles, auto parts and steel. Carney responded that US trade demands demonstrated an effort to undermine Canada's major industries. Canada and the United States maintain one of the world's largest trading relationships, with deeply integrated supply chains spanning automobiles, energy, agriculture and manufacturing. A prolonged tariff battle could therefore create significant costs for companies and workers in both countries while increasing uncertainty for consumers over potential price increases.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-diplomats-set-to-return-to-middle-east-embassies-despite-stalled-iran-talks-report-1787660811871">US diplomats set to return to Middle East embassies despite stalled Iran talks: Report</a><h2>Businesses warn of impact</h2>Michael Howard II, who owns a furniture business in Warren, Michigan, outside Detroit, said the tariffs could have a direct impact on his family's finances and the wider community. "The ability for us to put food on the table for our family, but also impacts the ability for us to give back to our community," Howard said.&nbsp;Howard and his wife launched the business about a decade ago, producing and selling items including dining tables and bookcases. He argued that the close economic relationship between the two countries makes cutting ties unrealistic. "To say that we don't need Canada is just disingenuous. It's dishonest. And it's just absolutely not truthful. We need our neighbor, but also they need us."<h2>Canada prepares response</h2>Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne and three other Cabinet ministers were expected to outline measures on Tuesday to support workers affected by the tariffs. Carney had previously indicated that Canada could shift away from responding to US tariffs dollar for dollar. Instead, Ottawa may pursue more targeted measures designed to shield Canadian workers and businesses from the impact of the trade dispute.&nbsp;"An attitude at the negotiation table that Canada is a subsidiary of the United States" is "not something we're going to accept," Carney said. Speaking in French, Carney delivered an even stronger criticism of the US position. "We learned during the negotiations that the Americans want to destroy our major industries, including autos, steel and aluminum. That was one of the main reasons we said no. It was a bad deal."&nbsp;The latest developments highlight the widening rift between two economies whose industries and supply chains are closely interconnected. New tariffs, threats of additional measures and Canadian retaliation are increasing pressure on businesses, workers and consumers on both sides of the border.

Donald Trump considers renaming Lake Ontario 'Lake America' as US-Canada trade tensions escalate over tariffs, retaliation and auto industry threats

Donald Trump is considering a provocative new name for Lake Ontario, suggesting it could be renamed ‘Lake America’ as trade tensions between the United States and Canada continue to escalate. The US president made the remark on Tuesday as Canada prepared to announce retaliatory measures after Washington imposed 50 per cent tariffs on USD 20 billion worth of Canadian goods over the weekend. The move followed the collapse of trade negotiations between the two countries. In a social media post, Trump said, “The United States is giving serious consideration to changing the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America in that we don't expect to doing much business with Ontario any longer.” The proposal would mirror Trump's decision last year to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America through an executive order. Ontario, Canada's most populous province, is also a major centre of the country's automotive industry. US-Canada trade tensions intensify The latest comments come as rhetoric between Washington and Ottawa becomes increasingly confrontational. Trump told Canadian leaders on Monday to "fall in line" or face consequences "far WORSE" than the tariffs already imposed. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, meanwhile, accused the United States of seeking to subordinate Canada. Trump has also threatened an additional 50 per cent tariff on Canadian vehicles, auto parts and steel. Carney responded that US trade demands demonstrated an effort to undermine Canada's major industries. Canada and the United States maintain one of the world's largest trading relationships, with deeply integrated supply chains spanning automobiles, energy, agriculture and manufacturing. A prolonged tariff battle could therefore create significant costs for companies and workers in both countries while increasing uncertainty for consumers over potential price increases. Also Read: US diplomats set to return to Middle East embassies despite stalled Iran talks: Report Businesses warn of impact Michael Howard II, who owns a furniture business in Warren, Michigan, outside Detroit, said the tariffs could have a direct impact on his family's finances and the wider community. "The ability for us to put food on the table for our family, but also impacts the ability for us to give back to our community," Howard said. Howard and his wife launched the business about a decade ago, producing and selling items including dining tables and bookcases. He argued that the close economic relationship between the two countries makes cutting ties unrealistic. "To say that we don't need Canada is just disingenuous. It's dishonest. And it's just absolutely not truthful. We need our neighbor, but also they need us." Canada prepares response Canadian Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne and three other Cabinet ministers were expected to outline measures on Tuesday to support workers affected by the tariffs. Carney had previously indicated that Canada could shift away from responding to US tariffs dollar for dollar. Instead, Ottawa may pursue more targeted measures designed to shield Canadian workers and businesses from the impact of the trade dispute. "An attitude at the negotiation table that Canada is a subsidiary of the United States" is "not something we're going to accept," Carney said. Speaking in French, Carney delivered an even stronger criticism of the US position. "We learned during the negotiations that the Americans want to destroy our major industries, including autos, steel and aluminum. That was one of the main reasons we said no. It was a bad deal." The latest developments highlight the widening rift between two economies whose industries and supply chains are closely interconnected. New tariffs, threats of additional measures and Canadian retaliation are increasing pressure on businesses, workers and consumers on both sides of the border.

Donald Trump considers renaming Lake Ontario ‘Lake America’ as US-Canada trade tensions rise over tariffs, retaliation and threats to key industries

Donald Trump floats ‘Lake America’ name for Lake Ontario amid US-Canada trade war

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Aug 11) confirmed that he switched from Air Force One to a different plane during a recent summit in Turkey due to a "threat", saying that he does whatever Secret Service and the military advise him to do. The confirmation from Trump came just a day after reports about how the US President switched from the Qatar-gifted Boeing 747-8 to an older Air Force One, and then again made a secret switch to a smaller C-32A aircraft.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-wants-new-pm-for-israel-us-president-calls-netanyahu-wartime-pm-but-does-not-endorse-him-1781056588263">Trump wants new PM for Israel? US president calls Netanyahu 'wartime PM', but does not endorse him</a><h2>What Trump said about plane swap?</h2>Despite the absence of an official statement from the White House or Trump about the switching of planes, the US President has now confirmed the move. Speaking to reporters after returning from Ohio, the US President said, “I go by Secret Service and the military. They wanted me to go on a different flight, a different plane... I do what they say... I guess there was a threat out there. I didn't really ask too much about it. I get a lot of threats.” Trump further said that he has several threats that the public does not know about, adding that any “consequential President has a lot of threats.” "Non-consequential Presidents don't get threatened, and I think I'm maybe the most consequential President." Regarding the threats, the US President said he doesn't worry about anything. "Whatever it is, you know my attitude? Whatever."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-gives-bizarre-explanation-on-if-he-would-wear-bulletproof-vest-following-whca-shooting-i-don-t-know-if-1777615772252">Trump gives bizarre explanation on if he would wear bulletproof vest following WHCA shooting: 'I don't know if...'</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">.<a href="https://x.com/POTUS?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@POTUS</a>: &quot;I have a lot of threats that you don&#39;t know about. Any consequential President has a lot of threats. Non-consequential Presidents don&#39;t get threatened — and I think that I&#39;m maybe the most consequential President.&quot; 🔥 <a href="https://t.co/UBAPgiR4P8">https://t.co/UBAPgiR4P8</a> <a href="https://t.co/YKFQjmxN3V">pic.twitter.com/YKFQjmxN3V</a>&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2087346298403832235?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Last month, it was reported that Trump had to swap the Qatar-gifted jet for an older Boeing due to an alleged threat. However, a recent Washington Post report said that the US President switched planes once again, having been discreetly moved out of the older Air Force One in a catering container, which then transferred him to a smaller C-32A aircraft. The latest plane swap happened after the US and Israeli intelligence agencies detected a credible, imminent threat from Iranian-linked military forces or proxies planning to target Trump's aircraft. Specifically, there were concerns about a missile strike or an attack on his newly customized aircraft, which lacked advanced defense systems. In full view of media cameras, Trump boarded the Air Force One jet. However, according to a report by The Washington Post, minutes later, he was secretly moved via an airport catering truck to a smaller, unmarked C-32A military aircraft to fly to the UK. Iran's leadership, including Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, has vowed to avenge the killing of former Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by killing Trump. &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump confirmed he switched planes during his recent Turkey summit after the Secret Service and military advised him to do so due to a suspected threat. Trump said he routinely follows security advice and receives numerous threats.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Aug 11) confirmed that he switched from Air Force One to a different plane during a recent summit in Turkey due to a "threat", saying that he does whatever Secret Service and the military advise him to do. The confirmation from Trump came just a day after reports about how the US President switched from the Qatar-gifted Boeing 747-8 to an older Air Force One, and then again made a secret switch to a smaller C-32A aircraft. Also Read: Trump wants new PM for Israel? US president calls Netanyahu 'wartime PM', but does not endorse him What Trump said about plane swap? Despite the absence of an official statement from the White House or Trump about the switching of planes, the US President has now confirmed the move. Speaking to reporters after returning from Ohio, the US President said, “I go by Secret Service and the military. They wanted me to go on a different flight, a different plane... I do what they say... I guess there was a threat out there. I didn't really ask too much about it. I get a lot of threats.” Trump further said that he has several threats that the public does not know about, adding that any “consequential President has a lot of threats.” "Non-consequential Presidents don't get threatened, and I think I'm maybe the most consequential President." Regarding the threats, the US President said he doesn't worry about anything. "Whatever it is, you know my attitude? Whatever." Also Read: Trump gives bizarre explanation on if he would wear bulletproof vest following WHCA shooting: 'I don't know if...'

US President Donald Trump confirmed he switched planes during his recent Turkey summit after the Secret Service and military advised him to do so due to a suspected threat. Trump said he routinely follows security advice and receives numerous threats.

'Whatever it is, you know my attitude...': Trump CONFIRMS switching to secret flight after leaving Turkey

In a latest development, the US officials on Sunday (Aug 9) intercepted at least three general aviation aircraft citing that they violated the temporary flight restrictions near Bedminster, New Jersey, as the country's President Donald Trump spent the weekend at his golf club. The North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) said its F-16 fighter jets intercepted two general aviation aircraft. It also said that a third plane triggered an alert while Trump was preparing to depart the area, where the four-day LIV Golf New York tournament was being held.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-low-keying-iran-war-hormuz-demands-1786295909319">Trump calls Iran standoff a 'chess game' claims US is 'low-keying' war</a>&nbsp;The situation turned into a chaos and US Secret Service agents rushed to action in order to keep the US President Trump safe. Emergency SUVs and law enforcement officers were also seen moving. Following the incident, officials noted that the first two general aviation aircraft were safely escorted out of the restricted area by NORAD aircraft. Meanwhile, the aircraft "reestablished communications and became compliant before Norad intervention was required." Videos now circulating online captured the interceptions of the first two aircraft. It shows the dramatic moment an F-16 fighter jet closed in on what appeared to be a small Cessna aircraft near Jefferson Township, outside Bedminster.<h2>WATCH THE DRAMATIC VIDEO HERE</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">WATCH: US F-16 jet intercepts aircraft over Bedminster, New Jersey, where President Trump is present <a href="https://t.co/gS4gTP9Lbo">pic.twitter.com/gS4gTP9Lbo</a>&mdash; Rapid Report (@RapidReport2025) <a href="https://x.com/RapidReport2025/status/2086524153348104470?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/100-fake-news-trump-confronted-hegseth-over-us-munitions-shortages-claims-report-here-s-why-wh-says-1785993835957">‘100% fake news’: WH denies report claiming Trump confronted Hegseth</a><h2>All restrictions were in place</h2>It is pertinent to note that, ahead of Trump's landing in New Jersey, NORAD said that it would enforce multiple FAA-established temporary flight restrictions over the region this weekend. Both pilots and the public were told that the US Army ground-based defence assets may be present in the area, operating under the Continental US Norad Region as part of the command’s routine, layered defence. "These systems are operating under Norad authorities, constitute a routine component of the command’s layered defence posture and work in tandem with the command’s airborne assets to monitor and protect the airspace," information published by the Defence Visual Information Distribution Service said. Therefore, according to rule F16s intercepted the civilian planes and no laws were voilated.&nbsp;

Three general aviation aircraft violated temporary flight restrictions near Donald Trump's Bedminster golf club, prompting NORAD to intercept two with F-16 fighter jets. A third aircraft triggered an alert as Trump prepared to leave, reportedly delaying his departure by about 13 minutes.

In a latest development, the US officials on Sunday (Aug 9) intercepted at least three general aviation aircraft citing that they violated the temporary flight restrictions near Bedminster, New Jersey, as the country's President Donald Trump spent the weekend at his golf club. The North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) said its F-16 fighter jets intercepted two general aviation aircraft. It also said that a third plane triggered an alert while Trump was preparing to depart the area, where the four-day LIV Golf New York tournament was being held. Also Read: Trump calls Iran standoff a 'chess game' claims US is 'low-keying' war The situation turned into a chaos and US Secret Service agents rushed to action in order to keep the US President Trump safe. Emergency SUVs and law enforcement officers were also seen moving. Following the incident, officials noted that the first two general aviation aircraft were safely escorted out of the restricted area by NORAD aircraft. Meanwhile, the aircraft "reestablished communications and became compliant before Norad intervention was required." Videos now circulating online captured the interceptions of the first two aircraft. It shows the dramatic moment an F-16 fighter jet closed in on what appeared to be a small Cessna aircraft near Jefferson Township, outside Bedminster. WATCH THE DRAMATIC VIDEO HERE

Three general aviation aircraft violated temporary flight restrictions near Donald Trump's Bedminster golf club, prompting NORAD to intercept two with F-16 fighter jets. A third aircraft triggered an alert as Trump prepared to leave, reportedly delaying his departure by about 13 minutes.

US F16s intercept civilian planes near Trump’s New Jersey golf club, dramatic video surfaces | WATCH

Todd Blanche was confirmed as US attorney general on Saturday (Aug 8) after a razor-thin Senate vote that put him in charge of the Justice Department despite unified Democratic opposition and unease among a handful of Republicans. Blanche, who previously served as Trump’s personal lawyer and had been acting attorney general in recent months, was confirmed by a 50-49 vote. Republicans hold a slim Senate majority, and the nomination passed despite opposition from Republican senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, who joined Democrats in voting against him.Following his confirmation, Blanche thanked Trump for the appointment and expressed gratitude to the Senate. In a post on X, he said, “I am deeply honoured by the trust and confidence President Trump has placed in me to lead the Department of Justice as our great nation’s 88th Attorney General. I am grateful to the Senate for staying late to complete this process.”“To the dedicated public servants of the Department of Justice, thank you for your work each day to uphold the law and keep our country safe,” he added.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/certain-munitions-are-unlimited-others-did-trump-admit-some-us-munitions-supplies-were-limited-1786072145799">‘Certain munitions are unlimited, others...’: Did Trump admit some US weapons supplies were limited?</a>The confirmation gives Trump a loyal ally at the helm of the Justice Department at a time when the administration has faced sustained criticism over the role of federal law enforcement. Democrats argued that Blanche’s close personal and professional relationship with the president raised serious concerns about the department’s independence.Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said earlier this week that the attorney general should serve the public rather than the president, accusing Blanche of continuing to act as Trump’s personal lawyer.Blanche’s nomination also drew scrutiny from within Republican ranks. Concerns had emerged over proposals linked to a fund for alleged victims of politicised prosecutions and a tax-related arrangement involving Trump and his business interests. Those concerns eased after Blanche withdrew the proposed fund and limited the tax agreement to past filings.Before joining the administration, Blanche represented Trump in several high-profile criminal cases, including the New York hush-money trial and two federal investigations led by special counsel Jack Smith. Those federal cases were dropped after Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election.

US President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer Todd Blanche was confirmed as US Attorney General on Saturday (Aug 8) by the US Senate.



Todd Blanche was confirmed as US attorney general on Saturday (Aug 8) after a razor-thin Senate vote that put him in charge of the Justice Department despite unified Democratic opposition and unease among a handful of Republicans. Blanche, who previously served as Trump’s personal lawyer and had been acting attorney general in recent months, was confirmed by a 50-49 vote. Republicans hold a slim Senate majority, and the nomination passed despite opposition from Republican senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, who joined Democrats in voting against him. Following his confirmation, Blanche thanked Trump for the appointment and expressed gratitude to the Senate. In a post on X, he said, “I am deeply honoured by the trust and confidence President Trump has placed in me to lead the Department of Justice as our great nation’s 88th Attorney General. I am grateful to the Senate for staying late to complete this process.” “To the dedicated public servants of the Department of Justice, thank you for your work each day to uphold the law and keep our country safe,” he added. Also read | ‘Certain munitions are unlimited, others...’: Did Trump admit some US weapons supplies were limited? The confirmation gives Trump a loyal ally at the helm of the Justice Department at a time when the administration has faced sustained criticism over the role of federal law enforcement. Democrats argued that Blanche’s close personal and professional relationship with the president raised serious concerns about the department’s independence. Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said earlier this week that the attorney general should serve the public rather than the president, accusing Blanche of continuing to act as Trump’s personal lawyer. Blanche’s nomination also drew scrutiny from within Republican ranks. Concerns had emerged over proposals linked to a fund for alleged victims of politicised prosecutions and a tax-related arrangement involving Trump and his business interests. Those concerns eased after Blanche withdrew the proposed fund and limited the tax agreement to past filings. Before joining the administration, Blanche represented Trump in several high-profile criminal cases, including the New York hush-money trial and two federal investigations led by special counsel Jack Smith. Those federal cases were dropped after Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election.

US President Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer Todd Blanche was confirmed as US Attorney General on Saturday (Aug 8) by the US Senate.

Trump’s ex lawyer Todd Blanche confirmed as US Attorney General

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) said that he believes that the war with Iran, which has been going on for over 5 months, will be over “pretty soon”. Trump also admitted that some munitions were experiencing a “little bit tighter” supply. His remarks come amid reports suggesting that the American forces were running out of supplies of some weapons.“I think it’s going to end pretty soon. I don’t think they can go much longer,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office in a reference to Iran.<h2>Is US running out of munitions?</h2>Earlier on Tuesday (Aug 4), Reuters reported that the US Army had used up “virtually all” of its global stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during the conflict in the Middle East. It added that much of the US Army’s surface-to-surface weapons, Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), had been used up.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iranian-hackers-behind-cyberattack-on-minnesota-water-systems-what-we-know-1785484942363">Iranian hackers behind cyberattack on Minnesota water systems? What we know</a>When asked about the supply of munitions stockpiles, Trump said that the United States had an “unlimited supply” of certain weapons. However, the US president admitted that other inventories were limited.“We have certain types of munitions that are very powerful, that we have unlimited, virtual unlimited supply. We have others where it’s a little bit tighter,” Trump said.He added that US defence firms were setting up more production plants, including facilities for Patriot and Tomahawk missiles.ATACMS and PrSM are long-range munitions that cost more than $1 million each and are an integral part of the US military’s arsenal. The US-supplied ATACMS have also been used by Ukraine to strike targets inside Russia during the war.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Trump said the Iran war could end soon and admitted some US munitions supplies were “a little bit tighter.” His remarks followed reports that stocks of key long-range missiles had been heavily depleted.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (Aug 6) said that he believes that the war with Iran, which has been going on for over 5 months, will be over “pretty soon”. Trump also admitted that some munitions were experiencing a “little bit tighter” supply. His remarks come amid reports suggesting that the American forces were running out of supplies of some weapons. “I think it’s going to end pretty soon. I don’t think they can go much longer,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office in a reference to Iran. Is US running out of munitions? Earlier on Tuesday (Aug 4), Reuters reported that the US Army had used up “virtually all” of its global stockpile of highly accurate long-range missiles during the conflict in the Middle East. It added that much of the US Army’s surface-to-surface weapons, Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), had been used up. Also read | Iranian hackers behind cyberattack on Minnesota water systems? What we know When asked about the supply of munitions stockpiles, Trump said that the United States had an “unlimited supply” of certain weapons. However, the US president admitted that other inventories were limited. “We have certain types of munitions that are very powerful, that we have unlimited, virtual unlimited supply. We have others where it’s a little bit tighter,” Trump said. He added that US defence firms were setting up more production plants, including facilities for Patriot and Tomahawk missiles. ATACMS and PrSM are long-range munitions that cost more than $1 million each and are an integral part of the US military’s arsenal. The US-supplied ATACMS have also been used by Ukraine to strike targets inside Russia during the war. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Trump said the Iran war could end soon and admitted some US munitions supplies were “a little bit tighter.” His remarks followed reports that stocks of key long-range missiles had been heavily depleted.

‘Certain munitions are unlimited, others...’: Did Trump admit some US weapons supplies were limited?

India is likely to seek a sunset clause in its proposed interim trade agreement with the United States, mirroring a provision included in the recent trade arrangement between the European Union and the US. The move comes as countries negotiating trade deals with Washington increasingly seek safeguards against future policy changes.&nbsp;The discussion follows a recent decision by the European Parliament to include a sunset clause in legislation implementing the tariff provisions of the EU-US trade arrangement. Under the provision, the agreement will automatically expire on December 31, 2029, unless both sides agree to extend it.&nbsp;A sunset clause is a provision in an international trade agreement that sets an automatic expiry date unless all participating countries explicitly agree to renew it. While free trade agreements have traditionally remained in force indefinitely, countries negotiating with the administration of US President Donald Trump are increasingly insisting on such clauses as a protective mechanism.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-us-trade-deal-in-final-stages-us-envoy-says-talks-are-down-to-the-last-1-or-2-1782777789367">India-US trade deal in final stages: US envoy says talks are down to the last 1 or 2%</a><h2>Why are countries seeking sunset clauses?</h2>Countries negotiating trade agreements with the United States say they face uncertainty because of Washington's frequent use of unilateral tariffs, including Section 301 and Section 232 measures, as well as changing trade policies. Instead of committing to a permanent arrangement, governments are seeking a sunset clause that provides an automatic exit if the agreement is no longer beneficial.&nbsp;The provision is intended to prevent a situation where trading partners reduce their own trade barriers while continuing to face new tariffs imposed by the United States. It also creates an opportunity to reassess the agreement after a fixed period instead of requiring a politically difficult termination process.&nbsp;Supporters of the approach describe it as a defensive safeguard that allows governments to protect their domestic industries while maintaining flexibility in future trade negotiations.<h2>EU and USMCA offer recent examples</h2>The European Parliament recently incorporated the Turnberry trade framework with the United States into law and attached a sunset clause covering tariff concessions on industrial and agricultural goods. The provision requires those concessions to expire on December 31, 2029, unless both sides decide to renew the arrangement.&nbsp;The European Union said that because Trump's trade policies are fluid, it "makes no sense to have legislation based on an unfair deal forever." The legislation also requires a comprehensive review by the middle of 2029 before any extension can be approved.&nbsp;A similar mechanism was introduced by the Trump administration during the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement. The resulting United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement included a 16-year sunset clause along with a mandatory joint review every six years.&nbsp;Supporters say sunset clauses offer three main advantages. They give countries leverage by preventing the United States from securing long-term market access while imposing separate tariffs, provide a safety mechanism if domestic industries are hurt by American imports, and allow a review of the agreement in 2029 at the end of the current political cycle in Washington.

The European Parliament approved the Turnberry trade framework with the United States, including a sunset clause that expires tariff concessions on December 31, 2029, unless renewed by both sides.

India is likely to seek a sunset clause in its proposed interim trade agreement with the United States, mirroring a provision included in the recent trade arrangement between the European Union and the US. The move comes as countries negotiating trade deals with Washington increasingly seek safeguards against future policy changes. The discussion follows a recent decision by the European Parliament to include a sunset clause in legislation implementing the tariff provisions of the EU-US trade arrangement. Under the provision, the agreement will automatically expire on December 31, 2029, unless both sides agree to extend it. A sunset clause is a provision in an international trade agreement that sets an automatic expiry date unless all participating countries explicitly agree to renew it. While free trade agreements have traditionally remained in force indefinitely, countries negotiating with the administration of US President Donald Trump are increasingly insisting on such clauses as a protective mechanism. Also Read: India-US trade deal in final stages: US envoy says talks are down to the last 1 or 2% Why are countries seeking sunset clauses? Countries negotiating trade agreements with the United States say they face uncertainty because of Washington's frequent use of unilateral tariffs, including Section 301 and Section 232 measures, as well as changing trade policies. Instead of committing to a permanent arrangement, governments are seeking a sunset clause that provides an automatic exit if the agreement is no longer beneficial. The provision is intended to prevent a situation where trading partners reduce their own trade barriers while continuing to face new tariffs imposed by the United States. It also creates an opportunity to reassess the agreement after a fixed period instead of requiring a politically difficult termination process. Supporters of the approach describe it as a defensive safeguard that allows governments to protect their domestic industries while maintaining flexibility in future trade negotiations. EU and USMCA offer recent examples The European Parliament recently incorporated the Turnberry trade framework with the United States into law and attached a sunset clause covering tariff concessions on industrial and agricultural goods. The provision requires those concessions to expire on December 31, 2029, unless both sides decide to renew the arrangement. The European Union said that because Trump's trade policies are fluid, it "makes no sense to have legislation based on an unfair deal forever." The legislation also requires a comprehensive review by the middle of 2029 before any extension can be approved. A similar mechanism was introduced by the Trump administration during the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement. The resulting United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement included a 16-year sunset clause along with a mandatory joint review every six years. Supporters say sunset clauses offer three main advantages. They give countries leverage by preventing the United States from securing long-term market access while imposing separate tariffs, provide a safety mechanism if domestic industries are hurt by American imports, and allow a review of the agreement in 2029 at the end of the current political cycle in Washington.

The European Parliament approved the Turnberry trade framework with the United States, including a sunset clause that expires tariff concessions on December 31, 2029, unless renewed by both sides.

What is the sunset clause in international trade that countries seek in deals with Trump's America?

Iran on Monday said an expert delegation will travel to Doha later this week to discuss the implementation of the memorandum of understanding signed with the United States earlier this month. However, Tehran firmly denied that any meeting with US officials was scheduled.&nbsp;Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the delegation would focus only on implementing the clauses of the memorandum signed on June 17 between Tehran and Washington.&nbsp;"An expert delegation from the Islamic Republic of Iran will travel to Doha later this week" to discuss the implementation of clauses of the memorandum, foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said.&nbsp;He stressed that negotiations on a final agreement had not yet begun.&nbsp;"We have not yet entered the stage of negotiating a final agreement," he said, noting that "over the coming days, we will not have any negotiation meetings with the US side at any level".&nbsp;The statement came hours after US President Donald Trump claimed Iran had sought a meeting in Doha on Tuesday.&nbsp;"IRAN HAS REQUESTED A MEETING. IT WILL TAKE PLACE TOMORROW IN DOHA!" Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday, without specifying the participants.&nbsp;Later, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told Fox News that US envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner "will be flying to Doha for high-level meetings this week".&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/desperate-acts-of-violence-india-strongly-condemns-pakistan-air-strikes-on-afghanistan-killing-civilians-1782764622490">'Desperate acts of violence': India strongly condemns Pakistan air strikes on Afghanistan killing civilians</a><h2>Iran and Oman discuss the Strait of Hormuz</h2>Meanwhile, Iran's foreign ministry said it held its first meeting with Oman on Monday to discuss the management of the Strait of Hormuz after Tehran and Washington signed their preliminary agreement aimed at ending the Middle East war.&nbsp;Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said the Joint Hormuz Committee met during his visit to Muscat.&nbsp;"During a trip to Muscat, the first meeting of the Joint Hormuz Committee was held," said Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi on X.&nbsp;"While reviewing the current issues related to the strait, we exchanged views on the future management," he added.&nbsp;The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway separating Iran and Oman, has remained a major issue in discussions between Tehran and Washington. Iran is considering introducing service fees that did not exist before the war, while the United States opposes such charges, arguing the strait is an international waterway.&nbsp;Separately, France and Oman said in a joint statement issued after a meeting between French President Emmanuel Macron and Omani Sultan Haitham bin Tariq that they would conduct joint demining operations.&nbsp;Responding to the announcement, Gharibabadi insisted that only Iran would carry out demining activities under the agreement.&nbsp;"The situation is sensitive and complex. We strongly advise France not to complicate it further with its provocations," Gharibabadi wrote.

Iranian Foreign Ministry said the expert delegation would travel to Doha this week to discuss the implementation of the memorandum signed on June 17, while stressing that no negotiations on a final agreement or meetings with US officials were scheduled.

Iran on Monday said an expert delegation will travel to Doha later this week to discuss the implementation of the memorandum of understanding signed with the United States earlier this month. However, Tehran firmly denied that any meeting with US officials was scheduled. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the delegation would focus only on implementing the clauses of the memorandum signed on June 17 between Tehran and Washington. "An expert delegation from the Islamic Republic of Iran will travel to Doha later this week" to discuss the implementation of clauses of the memorandum, foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said. He stressed that negotiations on a final agreement had not yet begun. "We have not yet entered the stage of negotiating a final agreement," he said, noting that "over the coming days, we will not have any negotiation meetings with the US side at any level". The statement came hours after US President Donald Trump claimed Iran had sought a meeting in Doha on Tuesday. "IRAN HAS REQUESTED A MEETING. IT WILL TAKE PLACE TOMORROW IN DOHA!" Trump posted on his Truth Social platform on Monday, without specifying the participants. Later, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told Fox News that US envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner "will be flying to Doha for high-level meetings this week". Also Read: 'Desperate acts of violence': India strongly condemns Pakistan air strikes on Afghanistan killing civilians Iran and Oman discuss the Strait of Hormuz Meanwhile, Iran's foreign ministry said it held its first meeting with Oman on Monday to discuss the management of the Strait of Hormuz after Tehran and Washington signed their preliminary agreement aimed at ending the Middle East war. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said the Joint Hormuz Committee met during his visit to Muscat. "During a trip to Muscat, the first meeting of the Joint Hormuz Committee was held," said Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi on X. "While reviewing the current issues related to the strait, we exchanged views on the future management," he added. The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway separating Iran and Oman, has remained a major issue in discussions between Tehran and Washington. Iran is considering introducing service fees that did not exist before the war, while the United States opposes such charges, arguing the strait is an international waterway. Separately, France and Oman said in a joint statement issued after a meeting between French President Emmanuel Macron and Omani Sultan Haitham bin Tariq that they would conduct joint demining operations. Responding to the announcement, Gharibabadi insisted that only Iran would carry out demining activities under the agreement. "The situation is sensitive and complex. We strongly advise France not to complicate it further with its provocations," Gharibabadi wrote.

Iranian Foreign Ministry said the expert delegation would travel to Doha this week to discuss the implementation of the memorandum signed on June 17, while stressing that no negotiations on a final agreement or meetings with US officials were scheduled.

Iran says 'expert delegation' heads to Qatar this week, rejects Trump's claim of US talks

The US Supreme Court on Monday (June 29) refused to hear President Donald Trump's appeal against a jury verdict that found him liable for sexually assaulting and defaming E. Jean Carroll, leaving the $5 million judgment against him in place.&nbsp;The court declined to take up Trump's challenge as part of a series of rulings and did not provide any reason for its decision.<h2>What is the case?</h2>The case began with a federal lawsuit filed by Carroll in Manhattan, where she alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her inside the dressing room of a New York department store in 1996. Her defamation claims were linked to statements Trump made after completing his first term in office, when he dismissed her allegations as a "con job" and "hoax."&nbsp;On May 9, 2023, a federal civil court in Manhattan found Trump liable for sexually assaulting the former newspaper columnist and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages.&nbsp;Carroll, now 82, first made the allegation public in a book published in 2019. In it, she described what she considered to be a rape that took place 23 years earlier in a fitting room. Trump rejected the accusation at the time and called her a "nut job."&nbsp;Trump responded sharply after the Supreme Court declined to reconsider the jury's verdict.&nbsp;"Surprisingly, the Supreme Court declined to 'review' a Fake Case brought against me by a woman I never met (Decades-old celebrity photo line, standing with her husband, does not count!)," Trump wrote on social media.&nbsp;Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, welcomed the Supreme Court's decision.&nbsp;"Today's Supreme Court decision affirms once and for all the jury's unanimous verdict that President Donald J. Trump sexually assaulted and defamed E. Jean Carroll," said Kaplan.&nbsp;"His multiple efforts to appeal that verdict have all failed, and today's ruling ends his quest to avoid accountability for his actions."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-has-requested-a-meeting-trump-claims-meeting-in-doha-on-june-30-despite-denial-from-tehran-1782747856814">‘Iran has requested a meeting’: Trump claims meeting in Doha on June 30, despite denial from Tehran</a>&nbsp; The jury ordered Trump to pay $2 million in damages for sexual assault and another $3 million for defamatory remarks he made in 2022. An appeals court upheld that ruling in December 2024.&nbsp;In a separate defamation case before the federal civil court in New York, another jury ordered Trump to pay Carroll $83.3 million. That decision was also upheld on appeal.Several US media outlets reported at the end of May that the US Department of Justice had opened a criminal investigation targeting Carroll.

A federal jury in Manhattan found Trump liable for sexually assaulting former newspaper columnist E. Jean Carroll on May 9, 2023, and awarded her $5 million in damages.

The US Supreme Court on Monday (June 29) refused to hear President Donald Trump's appeal against a jury verdict that found him liable for sexually assaulting and defaming E. Jean Carroll, leaving the $5 million judgment against him in place. The court declined to take up Trump's challenge as part of a series of rulings and did not provide any reason for its decision. What is the case? The case began with a federal lawsuit filed by Carroll in Manhattan, where she alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her inside the dressing room of a New York department store in 1996. Her defamation claims were linked to statements Trump made after completing his first term in office, when he dismissed her allegations as a "con job" and "hoax." On May 9, 2023, a federal civil court in Manhattan found Trump liable for sexually assaulting the former newspaper columnist and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. Carroll, now 82, first made the allegation public in a book published in 2019. In it, she described what she considered to be a rape that took place 23 years earlier in a fitting room. Trump rejected the accusation at the time and called her a "nut job." Trump responded sharply after the Supreme Court declined to reconsider the jury's verdict. "Surprisingly, the Supreme Court declined to 'review' a Fake Case brought against me by a woman I never met (Decades-old celebrity photo line, standing with her husband, does not count!)," Trump wrote on social media. Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, welcomed the Supreme Court's decision. "Today's Supreme Court decision affirms once and for all the jury's unanimous verdict that President Donald J. Trump sexually assaulted and defamed E. Jean Carroll," said Kaplan. "His multiple efforts to appeal that verdict have all failed, and today's ruling ends his quest to avoid accountability for his actions." Also Read: ‘Iran has requested a meeting’: Trump claims meeting in Doha on June 30, despite denial from Tehran The jury ordered Trump to pay $2 million in damages for sexual assault and another $3 million for defamatory remarks he made in 2022. An appeals court upheld that ruling in December 2024. In a separate defamation case before the federal civil court in New York, another jury ordered Trump to pay Carroll $83.3 million. That decision was also upheld on appeal. Several US media outlets reported at the end of May that the US Department of Justice had opened a criminal investigation targeting Carroll.

A federal jury in Manhattan found Trump liable for sexually assaulting former newspaper columnist E. Jean Carroll on May 9, 2023, and awarded her $5 million in damages.

Trump loses top Court bid to overturn $5 million sexual assault verdict: What is the E. Jean Carroll case?

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he would be prepared to "cancel meetings" related to technical talks with Iran if Tehran refuses to allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), maintaining that the United States has already secured commitments on inspection access.&nbsp;Speaking to reporters after arriving in Pennsylvania for a visit to the Mack Trucks facility in Lehigh County, Trump brushed aside concerns about Iran's position on nuclear inspections.&nbsp;Responding to questions about whether inspectors from the UN nuclear watchdog would be allowed under a future agreement, Trump insisted that Tehran had already accepted the principle.&nbsp;"They're wrong. They're wrong. They're wrong. They know they're wrong. They told us inside, and we have it down 100 per cent for inspections. And if they were right, I'd cancel the meetings right now," Trump said.&nbsp;Asked when inspections could begin, he replied: "At the appropriate time. There's no rush, but they'll be on the ground at the appropriate time."&nbsp;Earlier in the day, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told reporters in Tehran that UN inspectors were not expected to visit nuclear facilities targeted by US strikes last year, rejecting remarks made a day earlier by US Vice President JD Vance.&nbsp;Trump's remarks came as differences between Washington and Tehran emerged over several issues, including access for inspectors, Iran's missile programme and the future management of the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/train-services-halted-across-germany-after-communication-system-failure-1782253198112">Train services resume across Germany after system failure brought network to standstill</a><h2>Rubio rejects Iranian tolls on the Strait of Hormuz</h2>Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington would oppose any attempt by Iran to impose tolls or fees on vessels using the strategic waterway.&nbsp;The United States and Iran recently signed a preliminary agreement aimed at ending the conflict and completed an initial round of negotiations in Switzerland. The two sides are now engaged in a 60-day period of talks focused on sanctions relief, Tehran's nuclear activities and the future of the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Shipping through the waterway was severely disrupted after Iran imposed a blockade during the early stages of the war, pushing global oil prices higher. Traffic has since started recovering following the signing of the agreement.&nbsp;Iran has repeatedly maintained that it will retain authority over the strait.&nbsp;&nbsp;On Tuesday, Iran and Oman said in a joint statement that they would examine the management of the trade route and consider service charges, while reaffirming their sovereignty over the waterway.&nbsp;Speaking during a visit to the United Arab Emirates, Rubio rejected the idea of any fees on vessels using the route.&nbsp;"It's an international waterway. No country is allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway," he said, adding that he believed "all the countries in this region would agree".&nbsp;Earlier, Iran's chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the Strait of Hormuz "will never return" to the pre-war status quo, despite both sides agreeing to establish communication channels to keep the route open.

Tehran has rejected claims that discussions on its nuclear programme are underway and said it has not agreed to readmit International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors.

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he would be prepared to "cancel meetings" related to technical talks with Iran if Tehran refuses to allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), maintaining that the United States has already secured commitments on inspection access. Speaking to reporters after arriving in Pennsylvania for a visit to the Mack Trucks facility in Lehigh County, Trump brushed aside concerns about Iran's position on nuclear inspections. Responding to questions about whether inspectors from the UN nuclear watchdog would be allowed under a future agreement, Trump insisted that Tehran had already accepted the principle. "They're wrong. They're wrong. They're wrong. They know they're wrong. They told us inside, and we have it down 100 per cent for inspections. And if they were right, I'd cancel the meetings right now," Trump said. Asked when inspections could begin, he replied: "At the appropriate time. There's no rush, but they'll be on the ground at the appropriate time." Earlier in the day, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told reporters in Tehran that UN inspectors were not expected to visit nuclear facilities targeted by US strikes last year, rejecting remarks made a day earlier by US Vice President JD Vance. Trump's remarks came as differences between Washington and Tehran emerged over several issues, including access for inspectors, Iran's missile programme and the future management of the Strait of Hormuz. Also Read: Train services resume across Germany after system failure brought network to standstill Rubio rejects Iranian tolls on the Strait of Hormuz Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington would oppose any attempt by Iran to impose tolls or fees on vessels using the strategic waterway. The United States and Iran recently signed a preliminary agreement aimed at ending the conflict and completed an initial round of negotiations in Switzerland. The two sides are now engaged in a 60-day period of talks focused on sanctions relief, Tehran's nuclear activities and the future of the Strait of Hormuz. Shipping through the waterway was severely disrupted after Iran imposed a blockade during the early stages of the war, pushing global oil prices higher. Traffic has since started recovering following the signing of the agreement. Iran has repeatedly maintained that it will retain authority over the strait. On Tuesday, Iran and Oman said in a joint statement that they would examine the management of the trade route and consider service charges, while reaffirming their sovereignty over the waterway. Speaking during a visit to the United Arab Emirates, Rubio rejected the idea of any fees on vessels using the route. "It's an international waterway. No country is allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway," he said, adding that he believed "all the countries in this region would agree". Earlier, Iran's chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the Strait of Hormuz "will never return" to the pre-war status quo, despite both sides agreeing to establish communication channels to keep the route open.

Tehran has rejected claims that discussions on its nuclear programme are underway and said it has not agreed to readmit International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors.

Despite Iran's denial, Trump says Tehran agreed to nuclear inspections; Rubio rejects Hormuz tolls

A new book examining US President Donald Trump's second term claims that Vice President JD Vance once suggested India could take part in a peacekeeping mission in Ukraine, an idea that reportedly received a dismissive response from Trump.&nbsp;The claim appears in Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump, written by New York Times journalists Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan. The book describes a January 30 meeting in the Oval Office, held just 10 days after Trump's inauguration, where senior officials discussed options for ending the Russia-Ukraine war.&nbsp;According to the authors, retired Army Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg, Trump's special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, presented a proposal titled “An America First Plan: Trump's Historic Peace Deal for Russia-Ukraine War.”&nbsp;Those attending the meeting included Trump, Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller.&nbsp;The proposal reportedly stated that while Washington would not formally recognise Russia's claims over occupied Ukrainian territory, Kyiv would also avoid trying to reclaim those areas through military action. It further suggested deploying peacekeeping personnel from France, Britain and the Netherlands to oversee a ceasefire.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/train-services-halted-across-germany-after-communication-system-failure-1782253198112">Train services halted across Germany after communication system failure</a>&nbsp;Vance reportedly questioned the wisdom of sending troops from NATO countries, arguing that such a move could provoke Russia and increase the risk of deeper US involvement in the conflict.&nbsp;When he asked whether countries outside Europe could take on that role, Waltz reportedly responded that support from non-European nations would be preferable.&nbsp;According to the book, “Vance suggested Saudi Arabia or India. Trump chuckled.”Trump reportedly dismissed the idea, saying, “The Indians won’t do that. They won’t pay for something like that.”&nbsp;The authors further claim that Trump mentioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's positive relationship with him and his desire to visit, before adding that “the Indians do not ever pay for anything.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">So VP JD Vance Suggested Indian troops could be deployed in Ukraine as peace keeping mission &amp; President Trump then quipped that PM MODI really liked him, but Indians dont ever pay for anything. (This snippet is from a White House meeting in early 2025 - From Latest Book… <a href="https://t.co/UsW7lCfjOh">pic.twitter.com/UsW7lCfjOh</a>&mdash; Navroop Singh (@TheNavroopSingh) <a href="https://x.com/TheNavroopSingh/status/2069316718036713512?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The discussion also touched on concerns about Moscow's response to foreign troops in Ukraine. The book says that a month later, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told Rubio that Russia would regard troops from NATO countries in Ukraine as “unacceptable,” even if they operated under another banner.&nbsp;The authors also write that Trump repeatedly criticised Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during the meeting.&nbsp;“He’s a bad negotiator,” Trump reportedly said. “And he’s destroyed his country. But he was really good at getting stuff from the Biden administration.”

The book claims Trump spoke about his cordial ties with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the latter's desire to visit, then remarked that “the Indians do not ever pay for anything,” referring to troop deployment.

A new book examining US President Donald Trump's second term claims that Vice President JD Vance once suggested India could take part in a peacekeeping mission in Ukraine, an idea that reportedly received a dismissive response from Trump. The claim appears in Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump, written by New York Times journalists Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan. The book describes a January 30 meeting in the Oval Office, held just 10 days after Trump's inauguration, where senior officials discussed options for ending the Russia-Ukraine war. According to the authors, retired Army Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg, Trump's special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, presented a proposal titled “An America First Plan: Trump's Historic Peace Deal for Russia-Ukraine War.” Those attending the meeting included Trump, Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. The proposal reportedly stated that while Washington would not formally recognise Russia's claims over occupied Ukrainian territory, Kyiv would also avoid trying to reclaim those areas through military action. It further suggested deploying peacekeeping personnel from France, Britain and the Netherlands to oversee a ceasefire. Also Read: Train services halted across Germany after communication system failure Vance reportedly questioned the wisdom of sending troops from NATO countries, arguing that such a move could provoke Russia and increase the risk of deeper US involvement in the conflict. When he asked whether countries outside Europe could take on that role, Waltz reportedly responded that support from non-European nations would be preferable. According to the book, “Vance suggested Saudi Arabia or India. Trump chuckled.” Trump reportedly dismissed the idea, saying, “The Indians won’t do that. They won’t pay for something like that.” The authors further claim that Trump mentioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi's positive relationship with him and his desire to visit, before adding that “the Indians do not ever pay for anything.”

The book claims Trump spoke about his cordial ties with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the latter's desire to visit, then remarked that “the Indians do not ever pay for anything,” referring to troop deployment.

Vance proposed Indian troops for Ukraine, Trump replied ‘Indians won’t do that’: New book claims

US President Donald Trump on Monday congratulated Colombia's president-elect, Abelardo de la Espriella, following his narrow election victory, saying he looked forward to strengthening ties between the two countries.&nbsp;In a post on Truth Social, Trump highlighted his support for the conservative politician and expressed optimism about future cooperation.&nbsp;"It was my Great Honor to endorse him, and I look forward to working together to build a powerful relationship between Colombia and the United States of America, which will bring new levels of Greatness for both of our Countries!" Trump wrote.&nbsp;De la Espriella secured a tight victory in Sunday's runoff election, defeating leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda. He won 49.66 per cent of the vote against Cepeda's 48.70 per cent, bringing an end to Colombia's first left-wing government.<h2>De la Espriella promises tougher security policies</h2>The millionaire lawyer turned politician is set to take office in August and has pledged to move Colombia sharply to the right. His agenda includes building "mega-prisons," strengthening cooperation with the United States and adopting a tougher approach against drug trafficking and armed groups.&nbsp;"We are beginning a new era!" he said in his victory speech on Sunday night.De la Espriella has also proposed reducing the size of the state, reviewing Colombia's participation in international organisations, including the United Nations, and launching a bombing campaign against armed groups operating across the country.&nbsp;The president-elect, who holds dual US-Colombian citizenship and describes himself as a "Republican," has vowed to deepen security cooperation with Washington. He has pledged to bomb drug trafficking organisations, use herbicides to eradicate coca crops and allow US military bases on Colombian territory.&nbsp;His proposed "Plan Colombia II" takes its name from the multimillion-dollar agreement between Colombia and the United States in the 2000s that focused on combating drug cartels and leftist groups.&nbsp;"There will be no off-limits areas for the State, no criminals enjoying impunity," De la Espriella said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-senate-passes-housing-affordability-bill-with-bipartisan-support-what-s-in-it-1782171803211">US Senate passes housing affordability bill with bipartisan support; what's in it?</a><h2>Relations are strained under Gustavo Petro</h2>Relations between Bogota and Washington became increasingly strained during the presidency of leftist leader Gustavo Petro. Petro engaged in public disputes with Trump and chose not to participate in the US president's "Shield of the Americas" anti-crime coalition.&nbsp;According to the report, the Trump administration applied both public and legal pressure on Petro's government. Measures included personal sanctions against Petro, the revocation of his US visa and scrutiny of the growing territorial influence of organised crime groups during his presidency.&nbsp;Tensions reached a new level during Colombia's 2026 presidential election when Trump publicly backed De la Espriella, issuing what was described as a "Complete and Total Endorsement" of the conservative candidate.

President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella, a dual US-Colombian citizen who identifies as a "Republican," has pledged closer security cooperation with Washington, including tougher measures against drug trafficking, coca cultivation and greater US military involvement.

US President Donald Trump on Monday congratulated Colombia's president-elect, Abelardo de la Espriella, following his narrow election victory, saying he looked forward to strengthening ties between the two countries. In a post on Truth Social, Trump highlighted his support for the conservative politician and expressed optimism about future cooperation. "It was my Great Honor to endorse him, and I look forward to working together to build a powerful relationship between Colombia and the United States of America, which will bring new levels of Greatness for both of our Countries!" Trump wrote. De la Espriella secured a tight victory in Sunday's runoff election, defeating leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda. He won 49.66 per cent of the vote against Cepeda's 48.70 per cent, bringing an end to Colombia's first left-wing government. De la Espriella promises tougher security policies The millionaire lawyer turned politician is set to take office in August and has pledged to move Colombia sharply to the right. His agenda includes building "mega-prisons," strengthening cooperation with the United States and adopting a tougher approach against drug trafficking and armed groups. "We are beginning a new era!" he said in his victory speech on Sunday night. De la Espriella has also proposed reducing the size of the state, reviewing Colombia's participation in international organisations, including the United Nations, and launching a bombing campaign against armed groups operating across the country. The president-elect, who holds dual US-Colombian citizenship and describes himself as a "Republican," has vowed to deepen security cooperation with Washington. He has pledged to bomb drug trafficking organisations, use herbicides to eradicate coca crops and allow US military bases on Colombian territory. His proposed "Plan Colombia II" takes its name from the multimillion-dollar agreement between Colombia and the United States in the 2000s that focused on combating drug cartels and leftist groups. "There will be no off-limits areas for the State, no criminals enjoying impunity," De la Espriella said. Also Read: US Senate passes housing affordability bill with bipartisan support; what's in it? Relations are strained under Gustavo Petro Relations between Bogota and Washington became increasingly strained during the presidency of leftist leader Gustavo Petro. Petro engaged in public disputes with Trump and chose not to participate in the US president's "Shield of the Americas" anti-crime coalition. According to the report, the Trump administration applied both public and legal pressure on Petro's government. Measures included personal sanctions against Petro, the revocation of his US visa and scrutiny of the growing territorial influence of organised crime groups during his presidency. Tensions reached a new level during Colombia's 2026 presidential election when Trump publicly backed De la Espriella, issuing what was described as a "Complete and Total Endorsement" of the conservative candidate.

President-elect Abelardo de la Espriella, a dual US-Colombian citizen who identifies as a "Republican," has pledged closer security cooperation with Washington, including tougher measures against drug trafficking, coca cultivation and greater US military involvement.

After months of tensions with Colombia, Trump welcomes his endorsed candidate as new president

The US Senate on Monday (June 22) approved a bipartisan housing bill aimed at reducing housing costs by encouraging new construction, easing permitting requirements and limiting the role of large investors in the housing market.&nbsp;The measure, known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, passed by an overwhelming 85 to 5 vote and now moves to the House of Representatives. If approved there, it will be sent to President Donald Trump for his signature.&nbsp;The legislation arrives as Democrats and Republicans prepare for the November midterm elections, with housing affordability expected to remain a major concern for voters. Several senators missed the vote because severe thunderstorms in the Washington area disrupted flights and led to a ground stop at Ronald Reagan National Airport.<h3>Limiting institutional investors</h3>One of the bill's most prominent provisions seeks to curb purchases of single-family homes by large institutional investors. Under the proposal, corporate investors that already own 350 or more properties would be barred from buying additional single-family houses.&nbsp;A key section of the legislation titled “Homes Are For People, Not Corporations” is designed to prevent families from being outbid by large investment firms in the housing market.&nbsp;The final agreement emerged after months of negotiations. The Senate had passed one version in March, while the House approved a different version in May. Lawmakers eventually reached a compromise after the Senate accepted several House-backed provisions and dropped a proposal requiring major investors owning or building at least 350 single-family homes to sell them after seven years.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/five-arrested-after-trump-threatens-10-year-jail-term-over-alleged-reflecting-pool-vandalism-1782170152541">Five arrested after Trump threatens 10-year jail term over alleged Reflecting Pool vandalism</a><h3>Incentives to build more homes</h3>The legislation also focuses on increasing housing supply through grants and funding programmes. It creates a competitive grant programme worth $200 million annually to reward cities and local governments that expand housing construction or reform restrictive zoning policies.&nbsp;The bill allows Community Development Block Grant funding to be used directly for building affordable housing and requires recipients to maintain a database of undeveloped publicly owned land.&nbsp;It also establishes a pilot grant programme to help local governments convert vacant commercial and industrial buildings into affordable homes.&nbsp;Another provision removes the federal "chassis rule" for manufactured housing. The requirement previously mandated that manufactured homes remain permanently attached to a steel frame with wheels and an axle. Supporters believe eliminating the rule could reduce construction costs for a new manufactured housing unit by as much as $10,000.&nbsp;The legislation also streamlines environmental reviews to accelerate construction projects and raises the Public Welfare Investment cap for banks from 15 per cent to 20 per cent, allowing greater investment in affordable housing and community development initiatives. In addition, it increases private financing limits under Section 8 to support the rehabilitation of older public housing properties.

One of the bill's most prominent provisions seeks to curb purchases of single-family homes by large institutional investors. Under the proposal, corporate investors that already own 350 or more properties would be barred from buying additional single-family houses.



The US Senate on Monday (June 22) approved a bipartisan housing bill aimed at reducing housing costs by encouraging new construction, easing permitting requirements and limiting the role of large investors in the housing market. The measure, known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, passed by an overwhelming 85 to 5 vote and now moves to the House of Representatives. If approved there, it will be sent to President Donald Trump for his signature. The legislation arrives as Democrats and Republicans prepare for the November midterm elections, with housing affordability expected to remain a major concern for voters. Several senators missed the vote because severe thunderstorms in the Washington area disrupted flights and led to a ground stop at Ronald Reagan National Airport. Limiting institutional investors One of the bill's most prominent provisions seeks to curb purchases of single-family homes by large institutional investors. Under the proposal, corporate investors that already own 350 or more properties would be barred from buying additional single-family houses. A key section of the legislation titled “Homes Are For People, Not Corporations” is designed to prevent families from being outbid by large investment firms in the housing market. The final agreement emerged after months of negotiations. The Senate had passed one version in March, while the House approved a different version in May. Lawmakers eventually reached a compromise after the Senate accepted several House-backed provisions and dropped a proposal requiring major investors owning or building at least 350 single-family homes to sell them after seven years. Also Read: Five arrested after Trump threatens 10-year jail term over alleged Reflecting Pool vandalism Incentives to build more homes The legislation also focuses on increasing housing supply through grants and funding programmes. It creates a competitive grant programme worth $200 million annually to reward cities and local governments that expand housing construction or reform restrictive zoning policies. The bill allows Community Development Block Grant funding to be used directly for building affordable housing and requires recipients to maintain a database of undeveloped publicly owned land. It also establishes a pilot grant programme to help local governments convert vacant commercial and industrial buildings into affordable homes. Another provision removes the federal "chassis rule" for manufactured housing. The requirement previously mandated that manufactured homes remain permanently attached to a steel frame with wheels and an axle. Supporters believe eliminating the rule could reduce construction costs for a new manufactured housing unit by as much as $10,000. The legislation also streamlines environmental reviews to accelerate construction projects and raises the Public Welfare Investment cap for banks from 15 per cent to 20 per cent, allowing greater investment in affordable housing and community development initiatives. In addition, it increases private financing limits under Section 8 to support the rehabilitation of older public housing properties.

One of the bill's most prominent provisions seeks to curb purchases of single-family homes by large institutional investors. Under the proposal, corporate investors that already own 350 or more properties would be barred from buying additional single-family houses.

US Senate passes housing affordability bill with bipartisan support; what's in it?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday (Jun 21) addressed his relationship with US President Donald Trump. Rejecting the claims suggesting that US President Donald Trump influences his decisions or that he controls the Republican, he insisted that both leaders independently make decisions in the interest of their nations. This comes amid speculations about whether they influence each other’s decisions over the Iran war.Speaking at the JNS Summit in Jerusalem, Netanyahu said, “In the United States, they say that President Trump does everything that I ask him to do. And in Israel, they say that I do everything he wants me to do. Well, neither is true.”“We’re leaders of independent and proud countries. We stand for our interests. I stand for the interests of Israel and for its security,” he added.The Israeli leader acknowledged that while Trump and he have the same view on most issues, they sometimes have disagreements. Despite this, they respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership, he stressed.“Often we see eye to eye. Sometimes we don’t. But we respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership and commitment to our people,” he said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/lebanon-will-be-main-topic-of-discussion-tehran-says-ahead-of-us-iran-talks-in-switzerland-1782034242381">‘Lebanon will be main topic of discussion’: Tehran says ahead of US-Iran talks in Switzerland</a><h2>Troops in Lebanon to remain ‘as long as necessary’</h2>Speaking about the conflict in Lebanon, Netanyahu said that Israeli troops will stay in southern Lebanon as long as needed, despite the ceasefire reached under the US-Iran deal. He also vowed that he would not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.“We will remain in the security zone in southern Lebanon for as long as necessary to protect the cherished residents of the north and all the citizens of Israel... Nothing will alter that commitment,” he said.He continued, “And with regard to Iran: whatever political developments may unfold, I will not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. As long as I serve as prime minister of Israel, that will not happen.”Watch | US-Iran Peace Talks: US Vice President On His Connection With India &amp; Pakistan<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-peace-talks-us-vice-president-on-his-connection-with-india-pakistan-1782096108504/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-peace-talks-us-vice-president-on-his-connection-with-india-pakistan-1782096108504/embed</a>Netanyahu also reiterated that the war in the Middle East had achieved Israel’s key goal of preventing Iran from possessing a nuclear weapon.“We prevented Iran from carrying out a plan to annihilate us and today they would have had an atomic bomb to do so,” the Israeli leader said. “We prevented that from happening. We removed the existential danger. Had we not acted... Iran would have had atomic bombs and let me tell you something, they would have used them.”“That’s what we prevented,” he said.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Israeli PM Netanyahu rejected claims that US President Donald Trump influences his decisions, saying both leaders act independently. He also vowed to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and keep troops in Lebanon.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday (Jun 21) addressed his relationship with US President Donald Trump. Rejecting the claims suggesting that US President Donald Trump influences his decisions or that he controls the Republican, he insisted that both leaders independently make decisions in the interest of their nations. This comes amid speculations about whether they influence each other’s decisions over the Iran war. Speaking at the JNS Summit in Jerusalem, Netanyahu said, “In the United States, they say that President Trump does everything that I ask him to do. And in Israel, they say that I do everything he wants me to do. Well, neither is true.” “We’re leaders of independent and proud countries. We stand for our interests. I stand for the interests of Israel and for its security,” he added. The Israeli leader acknowledged that while Trump and he have the same view on most issues, they sometimes have disagreements. Despite this, they respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership, he stressed. “Often we see eye to eye. Sometimes we don’t. But we respect each other’s sovereignty and leadership and commitment to our people,” he said. Also read | ‘Lebanon will be main topic of discussion’: Tehran says ahead of US-Iran talks in Switzerland Troops in Lebanon to remain ‘as long as necessary’ Speaking about the conflict in Lebanon, Netanyahu said that Israeli troops will stay in southern Lebanon as long as needed, despite the ceasefire reached under the US-Iran deal. He also vowed that he would not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. “We will remain in the security zone in southern Lebanon for as long as necessary to protect the cherished residents of the north and all the citizens of Israel... Nothing will alter that commitment,” he said. He continued, “And with regard to Iran: whatever political developments may unfold, I will not allow Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. As long as I serve as prime minister of Israel, that will not happen.” Watch | US-Iran Peace Talks: US Vice President On His Connection With India & Pakistan https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-peace-talks-us-vice-president-on-his-connection-with-india-pakistan-1782096108504/embed Netanyahu also reiterated that the war in the Middle East had achieved Israel’s key goal of preventing Iran from possessing a nuclear weapon. “We prevented Iran from carrying out a plan to annihilate us and today they would have had an atomic bomb to do so,” the Israeli leader said. “We prevented that from happening. We removed the existential danger. Had we not acted... Iran would have had atomic bombs and let me tell you something, they would have used them.” “That’s what we prevented,” he said. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Israeli PM Netanyahu rejected claims that US President Donald Trump influences his decisions, saying both leaders act independently. He also vowed to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and keep troops in Lebanon.

‘I stand for interests of Israel’: Netanyahu rejects claims Trump influences his decisions amid Iran war

California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday accused US President Donald Trump of using the Justice Department to pursue what he described as a politically motivated investigation against him and his family.&nbsp;Newsom, a Democrat widely seen as a potential contender for the White House in 2028, claimed federal investigators had been examining his personal and financial affairs despite finding no evidence of wrongdoing.&nbsp;According to Newsom, federal agents have questioned friends and associates linked to him and his wife and reviewed years of documents as part of the inquiry.&nbsp;In a post on X, Newsom said, "Today, my wife &amp; I joined Donald Trump's hit list. He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. They have not found a crime they are simply trying to find one".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today, my wife &amp; I joined Donald Trump’s hit list. He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. They have not found a crime - they are simply trying to find one. He isn&#39;t coming after me because of mean tweets, but because I am considering running for President.… <a href="https://t.co/tVYk3WUvO8">pic.twitter.com/tVYk3WUvO8</a>&mdash; Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) <a href="https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/2066585778982166808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The California governor alleged that the investigation was driven by political considerations rather than any criminal conduct.&nbsp;"He isn't coming after me because of mean tweets, but because I am considering running for President," Newsom said.&nbsp;The accusations came after reports that multiple investigations involving Newsom are underway, including one focused on the finances of his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom.<h2>Newsom links probe to possible presidential bid</h2>Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-claims-strait-of-hormuz-will-be-toll-free-iran-says-ships-will-pay-maritime-service-fees-what-s-really-in-the-peace-deal-1781573888112">US claims Strait of Hormuz will be toll-free. Iran says ships will pay maritime service fees. What's really in the peace deal?</a>&nbsp;Newsom has emerged as one of Trump's most vocal critics and has frequently targeted the president through social media posts and public statements.&nbsp;In a video message, he repeated his allegation that the investigation was connected to speculation about a possible presidential campaign.&nbsp;"Donald Trump isn't just coming after me because of my mean tweets," Newsom said in the video. "He's coming after me because I am considering running for president."&nbsp;He further claimed that individuals who publicly challenge Trump often become targets of political retaliation.&nbsp;"One by one, anyone who has challenged Donald Trump has ended up on his hit list, the governor said. Without providing further details, Newsom accused Trump of misusing government institutions against political opponents.&nbsp;He also launched a sharp attack on the president, calling him "the most corrupt President in American history."&nbsp;According to Newsom, Trump resents being publicly challenged and criticised.&nbsp;

Newsom alleged that Trump targeted him and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, with a probe because he is considering running for president.

California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday accused US President Donald Trump of using the Justice Department to pursue what he described as a politically motivated investigation against him and his family. Newsom, a Democrat widely seen as a potential contender for the White House in 2028, claimed federal investigators had been examining his personal and financial affairs despite finding no evidence of wrongdoing. According to Newsom, federal agents have questioned friends and associates linked to him and his wife and reviewed years of documents as part of the inquiry. In a post on X, Newsom said, "Today, my wife & I joined Donald Trump's hit list. He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. They have not found a crime they are simply trying to find one".

Newsom alleged that Trump targeted him and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, with a probe because he is considering running for president.

California Governor accuses Trump of ordering 'politically motivated' DOJ probe against him and his wife

US President Donald Trump is celebrating his 80th birthday on Sunday (June 14) and he has made sure that he makes it a spectacle. A UFC-style cage fighting event has been organised on the South Lawn of the White House. Thousands of spectators will take part in the celebration as it comes as America's oldest president faces political pressure over several major issues, including the Iran war, inflation concerns and questions around his age and health. Stating that he would sign the peace agreement with Iran on Sunday, Trump has already hinted that he would give the world a birthday gift by ending the war he himself started in February 2026. Earlier, he also said that Gulf nations would have to be a part of the Abraham Accords if he signs a peace deal with Iran. As Trump turns 80, and turns the pages of his presidency, he appears determined to cement his place in West Asia's history.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/modi-trump-meet-will-g7-pave-the-way-for-an-india-us-trade-breakthrough-1781420074420">Modi-Trump meet: Will G7 pave the way for an India-US trade breakthrough?</a><h2>The Iran war</h2>After coming to power, Trump made it clear that Iran was his enemy and within six months, he launched an attack on the country, claiming to have “obliterated” the nuclear sites within the country. He has maintained that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. As he completed a year in office, he launched a war against Iran alongside Israel, killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The war has continued for more than 100 days, leading to global energy crisis. As the world stares at the uncertainty of the war, Trump has now said that he has ended the war and peace deal will be signed on Sunday. Whether or not he has achieved his war goals remains to be seen, but for now, he has put the world in mess and is attempting hard to portray it as a victory - right on his birthday.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-ended-the-war-today-trump-s-big-declaration-after-halting-iran-strikes-what-s-really-happening-1781229576328">'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes</a><h2>The Israel bonhomie&nbsp;</h2>The US and Israel bonhomie dates back to the very founding of Israel in 1948. With Trump, the relationship has just gotten better. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been touted as a team, united by a shared hardline stance on Iran, strong support for Israel's security priorities, and a willingness to challenge longstanding diplomatic conventions in the region. At an individual level, both leaders, for their own political goals in their countries, have attempted to show that it is they who call the shots. They have been successful in pressuring each other in several matters, including the war in Iran. More recently, Trump has even made an expletive-filled call to Netanyahu, while the Israeli PM has vowed not to stop his war on Hezbollah even if the US signs a peace deal with Iran. Recent differences aside, Trump and Netanyahu have largely been on the same page, with Trump using the Iran war in favour of Israel to pressure Muslim nations to normalise ties with Israel and officially recognise the nation. Muslim nations have been at loggerheads with Israel due to the Palestine issue.<h2>The Syrian truce&nbsp;</h2>In what can be easily termed as the most unprecedented diplomatic alliance, Trump has forged a bond with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa after the Syrian civil war ended, leading to the flight of Bashar al-Assad. The United States not only removed al-Sharaa from its terrorism blacklist and but the country also extended waivers on punitive enforcement of the 2019 Caesar Act and lifted heavy economic sanctions against Syria. Sharaa became first Syrian leader to visit the White House as Trump hosted him and called him a ‘tough attractive guy.’<h2>The Qatari connection&nbsp;</h2>Trump's Qatar links have been under scrutiny as the leader undertook a trip throughout West Asia few months into his second term. During that trip, the Qatari royal family gifted the Trump administration an ultra-luxurious Boeing 747-8 jetliner valued at $400 million. Trump accepted the aircraft as an interim or temporary replacement for the aging 40-year-old Air Force One. The gift ignited a political furor. Democrats and some Republicans flagged it as a potential violation of the US Constitution's Emoluments Clause, calling it a massive foreign “bribe.” Trump defended the transaction on Truth Social, calling it a "great gesture" that saves American taxpayers money. Qatar continues to serve as the key diplomatic bridge between Washington and regional actors and hosts the vital Al Udeid Air Base— the forward command center for U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). Additionally, Trump secured a massive $96 billion defense and commercial deal with Qatar for over 200 Boeing aircraft. Several media reports also point at links between Qatar and Trump's family business deals.<h2>Trump's bond with Bahrain and Kuwait&nbsp;</h2>For Trump, Kuwait and Bahrain represented both steadfast security partners and increasingly independent Gulf states. Following Iranian retaliatory attacks that struck targets in both countries, Trump publicly thanked Kuwait and Bahrain—along with Saudi Arabia and the UAE—and pledged that the United States "will not let them get hurt." Yet the limits of Washington's influence were also on display when Kuwait and Bahrain joined Qatar and Saudi Arabia in refusing to grant US forces access to their airspace and military bases for a regional military initiative known as "Project Freedom." The move underscored a growing willingness among Gulf nations to assert their sovereignty and avoid being drawn into broader regional conflicts without a clear regional consensus.

US President Donald Trump is celebrating his 80th birthday with a UFC-style cage fighting event on the White House South Lawn. The unusual spectacle comes as he faces scrutiny over Iran tensions, inflation concerns, and questions about his age and health.

US President Donald Trump is celebrating his 80th birthday on Sunday (June 14) and he has made sure that he makes it a spectacle. A UFC-style cage fighting event has been organised on the South Lawn of the White House. Thousands of spectators will take part in the celebration as it comes as America's oldest president faces political pressure over several major issues, including the Iran war, inflation concerns and questions around his age and health. Stating that he would sign the peace agreement with Iran on Sunday, Trump has already hinted that he would give the world a birthday gift by ending the war he himself started in February 2026. Earlier, he also said that Gulf nations would have to be a part of the Abraham Accords if he signs a peace deal with Iran. As Trump turns 80, and turns the pages of his presidency, he appears determined to cement his place in West Asia's history. Also Read: Modi-Trump meet: Will G7 pave the way for an India-US trade breakthrough? The Iran war After coming to power, Trump made it clear that Iran was his enemy and within six months, he launched an attack on the country, claiming to have “obliterated” the nuclear sites within the country. He has maintained that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. As he completed a year in office, he launched a war against Iran alongside Israel, killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The war has continued for more than 100 days, leading to global energy crisis. As the world stares at the uncertainty of the war, Trump has now said that he has ended the war and peace deal will be signed on Sunday. Whether or not he has achieved his war goals remains to be seen, but for now, he has put the world in mess and is attempting hard to portray it as a victory - right on his birthday. Also Read: 'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes The Israel bonhomie The US and Israel bonhomie dates back to the very founding of Israel in 1948. With Trump, the relationship has just gotten better. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been touted as a team, united by a shared hardline stance on Iran, strong support for Israel's security priorities, and a willingness to challenge longstanding diplomatic conventions in the region. At an individual level, both leaders, for their own political goals in their countries, have attempted to show that it is they who call the shots. They have been successful in pressuring each other in several matters, including the war in Iran. More recently, Trump has even made an expletive-filled call to Netanyahu, while the Israeli PM has vowed not to stop his war on Hezbollah even if the US signs a peace deal with Iran. Recent differences aside, Trump and Netanyahu have largely been on the same page, with Trump using the Iran war in favour of Israel to pressure Muslim nations to normalise ties with Israel and officially recognise the nation. Muslim nations have been at loggerheads with Israel due to the Palestine issue. The Syrian truce In what can be easily termed as the most unprecedented diplomatic alliance, Trump has forged a bond with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa after the Syrian civil war ended, leading to the flight of Bashar al-Assad. The United States not only removed al-Sharaa from its terrorism blacklist and but the country also extended waivers on punitive enforcement of the 2019 Caesar Act and lifted heavy economic sanctions against Syria. Sharaa became first Syrian leader to visit the White House as Trump hosted him and called him a ‘tough attractive guy.’ The Qatari connection Trump's Qatar links have been under scrutiny as the leader undertook a trip throughout West Asia few months into his second term. During that trip, the Qatari royal family gifted the Trump administration an ultra-luxurious Boeing 747-8 jetliner valued at $400 million. Trump accepted the aircraft as an interim or temporary replacement for the aging 40-year-old Air Force One. The gift ignited a political furor. Democrats and some Republicans flagged it as a potential violation of the US Constitution's Emoluments Clause, calling it a massive foreign “bribe.” Trump defended the transaction on Truth Social, calling it a "great gesture" that saves American taxpayers money. Qatar continues to serve as the key diplomatic bridge between Washington and regional actors and hosts the vital Al Udeid Air Base— the forward command center for U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM). Additionally, Trump secured a massive $96 billion defense and commercial deal with Qatar for over 200 Boeing aircraft. Several media reports also point at links between Qatar and Trump's family business deals. Trump's bond with Bahrain and Kuwait For Trump, Kuwait and Bahrain represented both steadfast security partners and increasingly independent Gulf states. Following Iranian retaliatory attacks that struck targets in both countries, Trump publicly thanked Kuwait and Bahrain—along with Saudi Arabia and the UAE—and pledged that the United States "will not let them get hurt." Yet the limits of Washington's influence were also on display when Kuwait and Bahrain joined Qatar and Saudi Arabia in refusing to grant US forces access to their airspace and military bases for a regional military initiative known as "Project Freedom." The move underscored a growing willingness among Gulf nations to assert their sovereignty and avoid being drawn into broader regional conflicts without a clear regional consensus.

US President Donald Trump is celebrating his 80th birthday with a UFC-style cage fighting event on the White House South Lawn. The unusual spectacle comes as he faces scrutiny over Iran tensions, inflation concerns, and questions about his age and health.

Trump turns 80: From Iran war to Syrian truce - how the US president wants West Asia to remember him | WION Decodes

US President Donald Trump on Monday nominated his former personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, to serve as attorney general on a permanent basis, setting the stage for what could be a contentious confirmation process in the Senate.&nbsp;Blanche, 51, has been serving as acting attorney general since Pam Bondi left the position in April. During his tenure, he has overseen several indictments targeting individuals viewed as political opponents of Trump.&nbsp;The White House confirmed on Monday that Blanche's nomination had been formally sent to the Senate. The move follows Trump's remarks at a White House Rose Garden dinner last week, where he informed guests of his intention to nominate Blanche for the role.<h2>Senate approval remains uncertain</h2>Despite the nomination, it remains unclear whether Blanche can secure enough support in the Senate, which must approve senior administration appointments, including the attorney general.&nbsp;His nomination comes at a politically sensitive time for the Trump administration. Republicans have recently faced a series of setbacks as Trump's approval ratings have come under pressure over economic concerns and the Iran war, with midterm elections approaching in five months.&nbsp;Lawmakers have also raised concerns over Blanche's support for a proposed $1.8 billion fund that was intended to compensate Trump allies who faced prosecution during former President Joe Biden's administration. The administration later abandoned the proposal.&nbsp;The initiative drew criticism from both Republicans and Democrats. Among the most vocal critics was Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bibi-you-will-be-on-your-own-trump-s-stern-warning-to-netanyahu-against-renewed-iran-conflict-1780954671256">'Bibi, you will be on your own': Trump's stern warning to Netanyahu against renewed Iran conflict</a>&nbsp;"Donald Trump has been engaged in the most corrupt enterprise in the history of the Presidency. Todd Blanche apparently has not noticed," Durbin said.&nbsp;Before joining the administration, Blanche was a member of Trump's legal team during the New York criminal trial involving allegations of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.&nbsp;He also represented Trump in two federal cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith involving allegations related to classified documents and efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.&nbsp;Blanche's nomination comes months after Trump removed former attorney general Pam Bondi following tensions over her handling of Justice Department files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Blanche's nomination follows the departure of former attorney general Pam Bondi, whom Trump removed after disagreements over her handling of Justice Department records linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

US President Donald Trump on Monday nominated his former personal lawyer, Todd Blanche, to serve as attorney general on a permanent basis, setting the stage for what could be a contentious confirmation process in the Senate. Blanche, 51, has been serving as acting attorney general since Pam Bondi left the position in April. During his tenure, he has overseen several indictments targeting individuals viewed as political opponents of Trump. The White House confirmed on Monday that Blanche's nomination had been formally sent to the Senate. The move follows Trump's remarks at a White House Rose Garden dinner last week, where he informed guests of his intention to nominate Blanche for the role. Senate approval remains uncertain Despite the nomination, it remains unclear whether Blanche can secure enough support in the Senate, which must approve senior administration appointments, including the attorney general. His nomination comes at a politically sensitive time for the Trump administration. Republicans have recently faced a series of setbacks as Trump's approval ratings have come under pressure over economic concerns and the Iran war, with midterm elections approaching in five months. Lawmakers have also raised concerns over Blanche's support for a proposed $1.8 billion fund that was intended to compensate Trump allies who faced prosecution during former President Joe Biden's administration. The administration later abandoned the proposal. The initiative drew criticism from both Republicans and Democrats. Among the most vocal critics was Senator Dick Durbin, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Also Read: 'Bibi, you will be on your own': Trump's stern warning to Netanyahu against renewed Iran conflict "Donald Trump has been engaged in the most corrupt enterprise in the history of the Presidency. Todd Blanche apparently has not noticed," Durbin said. Before joining the administration, Blanche was a member of Trump's legal team during the New York criminal trial involving allegations of hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. He also represented Trump in two federal cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith involving allegations related to classified documents and efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Blanche's nomination comes months after Trump removed former attorney general Pam Bondi following tensions over her handling of Justice Department files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Blanche's nomination follows the departure of former attorney general Pam Bondi, whom Trump removed after disagreements over her handling of Justice Department records linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump nominates his former lawyer Todd Blanche as US attorney general, Senate fight looms

US President Donald Trump warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against reigniting conflict with Iran, cautioning that Israel could find itself isolated if it returned to war.&nbsp;"I said, 'Bibi, you better be careful, or you will be on your own very soon,'" Axios quoted Trump as saying in an interview.&nbsp;Trump said several countries in the region had urged Washington to prevent further escalation and push Israel towards restraint.&nbsp;"These countries were very concerned. They love the deal that we have been negotiating," Trump said, adding that five regional nations had contacted him on the issue.&nbsp;&nbsp;He also claimed that Iran had conveyed through messages on Monday morning that it was prepared to halt attacks if Israel did the same.&nbsp;"They called us and said that they are not doing any more attacks and asked us to tell Israel not to do any more attacks," Trump told Axios.&nbsp;The US President said his conversation with Netanyahu played a key role in stopping a planned Israeli strike against Iran. Referring to Sunday's developments, he claimed Israel had informed Washington only at the last moment.&nbsp;"They were already on their way. But eventually I had [the Israeli strike] limited," Trump said.&nbsp;He further reiterated that Tehran remains interested in reaching an agreement with Washington and suggested a deal could be concluded soon.&nbsp;"It is going to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon and stop enrichment. It is a phenomenal deal. We are getting everything we wanted," Trump claimed.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-threatens-to-turn-naval-blockade-into-another-defeat-for-us-1780950778198">Iran threatens to turn naval blockade into ‘another defeat’ for US</a>&nbsp;Iran's parliamentary speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, pushed back against Trump's remarks, saying the US President's recent comments regarding the draft memorandum of understanding did not reflect what had been agreed upon.&nbsp;"We have no trust in the other side," Ghalibaf said.<h2>Events leading up to the ceasefire</h2>The statements come after a two-day military escalation disrupted a fragile regional truce. The crisis began with an Israeli airstrike in Beirut that killed Hezbollah operatives and was followed by large-scale ballistic missile attacks launched by Iran against Israel.&nbsp;Despite Trump's public calls for restraint, Israel carried out retaliatory strikes inside Iran early on Monday, targeting air defence systems, missile production facilities and the Karun petrochemical plant.&nbsp;The confrontation ended later on Monday after intensive US efforts helped secure a conditional ceasefire. Iran halted what it described as warning strikes, while Netanyahu agreed to suspend further operations, while warning that any future Iranian aggression would be met with overwhelming force.&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Trump said five countries in the region urged Washington to prevent further escalation, as they supported the deal being negotiated.

US President Donald Trump warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against reigniting conflict with Iran, cautioning that Israel could find itself isolated if it returned to war. "I said, 'Bibi, you better be careful, or you will be on your own very soon,'" Axios quoted Trump as saying in an interview. Trump said several countries in the region had urged Washington to prevent further escalation and push Israel towards restraint. "These countries were very concerned. They love the deal that we have been negotiating," Trump said, adding that five regional nations had contacted him on the issue. He also claimed that Iran had conveyed through messages on Monday morning that it was prepared to halt attacks if Israel did the same. "They called us and said that they are not doing any more attacks and asked us to tell Israel not to do any more attacks," Trump told Axios. The US President said his conversation with Netanyahu played a key role in stopping a planned Israeli strike against Iran. Referring to Sunday's developments, he claimed Israel had informed Washington only at the last moment. "They were already on their way. But eventually I had [the Israeli strike] limited," Trump said. He further reiterated that Tehran remains interested in reaching an agreement with Washington and suggested a deal could be concluded soon. "It is going to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon and stop enrichment. It is a phenomenal deal. We are getting everything we wanted," Trump claimed. Also Read: Iran threatens to turn naval blockade into ‘another defeat’ for US Iran's parliamentary speaker and chief negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, pushed back against Trump's remarks, saying the US President's recent comments regarding the draft memorandum of understanding did not reflect what had been agreed upon. "We have no trust in the other side," Ghalibaf said. Events leading up to the ceasefire The statements come after a two-day military escalation disrupted a fragile regional truce. The crisis began with an Israeli airstrike in Beirut that killed Hezbollah operatives and was followed by large-scale ballistic missile attacks launched by Iran against Israel. Despite Trump's public calls for restraint, Israel carried out retaliatory strikes inside Iran early on Monday, targeting air defence systems, missile production facilities and the Karun petrochemical plant. The confrontation ended later on Monday after intensive US efforts helped secure a conditional ceasefire. Iran halted what it described as warning strikes, while Netanyahu agreed to suspend further operations, while warning that any future Iranian aggression would be met with overwhelming force. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Trump said five countries in the region urged Washington to prevent further escalation, as they supported the deal being negotiated.

'Bibi, you will be on your own': Trump's stern warning to Netanyahu against renewed Iran conflict

A federal judge on Monday struck down the $100,000 fee that US President Donald Trump had imposed last year on new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers, concluding that it constituted an unlawful tax that Congress never authorised.&nbsp;US District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general challenging a fee Trump announced in September that dramatically raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas.&nbsp;The ⁠H-1B programme offers 65,000 visas annually, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees, approved for three to six years. Earlier, employers seeking a visa for a foreign worker typically paid about $2,000 to $5,000 in fees depending on various factors.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israeli-strikes-made-iran-stop-attacks-fight-against-tehran-hezbollah-not-over-netanyahu-1780939147844">Israeli strikes made Iran stop attacks, fight against Tehran, Hezbollah ‘not over’: Netanyahu</a>&nbsp;The fees hike has discouraged H-1B visa requests, according to court filings. As of February 15, US Citizenship and Immigration Services had received just 85 payments ⁠of the $100,000 fee, the administration said in a March filing.&nbsp;However, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary, Markwayne Mullin, told a Senate panel recently that more than 200,000 applicants seeking H-1B visas to work in the US paid $100,000 for expedited processing during fiscal year 2026.&nbsp;The administration argued that the fee constituted a monetary penalty that the president had lawful authority to impose under federal immigration law to restrict the entry of ⁠certain foreign nationals. Trump administration officials projected it as an initiative to encourage companies to hire Americans instead.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/eu-sanctions-irgc-navy-unit-2-iranians-over-crippling-strait-of-hormuz-blockade-1780933198425">EU sanctions IRGC Navy unit, 2 Iranians over crippling Strait of Hormuz blockade</a>&nbsp;The Trump administration contended that the judge had no authority to get involved in the visa fee dispute. The Justice Department claimed Trump’s action was unreviewable for multiple reasons and the judge should toss the states’ case.&nbsp;But Sorokin, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, concluded that the fee was not a penalty but a tax that ⁠the Republican president lacked any authorisation from Congress to issue.“Here, the substance and application of the $100,000 payment reveal that it is ⁠a tax, regardless of what the payment is called,” he wrote.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-announces-end-of-military-operations-against-israel-warns-harsher-action-if-lebanon-attacked-again-1780925146328">Iran announces end of military operations against Israel, warns ‘harsher’ action if Lebanon attacked again</a>&nbsp;The president had dramatically raised the cost of visas for highly skilled workers in an executive order last year.&nbsp;On June 3, Mullin said the DHS has the authority to waive a new $100,000 H-1B visa fee in certain cases, offering potential relief to employers facing high recruitment costs.&nbsp;&nbsp;Speaking at his first Senate budget hearing as DHS secretary, Mullin also said the department can consider fee waivers on a case-by-case basis after Senator Susan Collins of Maine pointed out that a rural hospital had to pay the fee to hire a surgeon from abroad after failing to find a qualified US candidate. “We do have some authority and flexibility to be able to waive some of this on a case by case,” Mullin said.

US District Judge Leo Sorokin, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, concluded that the $100,000 fee for H1-B visa was not a penalty but a tax that ⁠the Republican president lacked any authorisation from Congress to issue.

A federal judge on Monday struck down the $100,000 fee that US President Donald Trump had imposed last year on new H-1B visas for highly skilled foreign workers, concluding that it constituted an unlawful tax that Congress never authorised. US District Judge Leo Sorokin in Boston issued the ruling in a lawsuit filed by 20 Democratic state attorneys general challenging a fee Trump announced in September that dramatically raised the cost of obtaining H-1B visas. The ⁠H-1B programme offers 65,000 visas annually, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees, approved for three to six years. Earlier, employers seeking a visa for a foreign worker typically paid about $2,000 to $5,000 in fees depending on various factors. Also Read: Israeli strikes made Iran stop attacks, fight against Tehran, Hezbollah ‘not over’: Netanyahu The fees hike has discouraged H-1B visa requests, according to court filings. As of February 15, US Citizenship and Immigration Services had received just 85 payments ⁠of the $100,000 fee, the administration said in a March filing. However, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary, Markwayne Mullin, told a Senate panel recently that more than 200,000 applicants seeking H-1B visas to work in the US paid $100,000 for expedited processing during fiscal year 2026. The administration argued that the fee constituted a monetary penalty that the president had lawful authority to impose under federal immigration law to restrict the entry of ⁠certain foreign nationals. Trump administration officials projected it as an initiative to encourage companies to hire Americans instead. Also Read: EU sanctions IRGC Navy unit, 2 Iranians over crippling Strait of Hormuz blockade The Trump administration contended that the judge had no authority to get involved in the visa fee dispute. The Justice Department claimed Trump’s action was unreviewable for multiple reasons and the judge should toss the states’ case. But Sorokin, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, concluded that the fee was not a penalty but a tax that ⁠the Republican president lacked any authorisation from Congress to issue. “Here, the substance and application of the $100,000 payment reveal that it is ⁠a tax, regardless of what the payment is called,” he wrote. Also Read: Iran announces end of military operations against Israel, warns ‘harsher’ action if Lebanon attacked again The president had dramatically raised the cost of visas for highly skilled workers in an executive order last year. On June 3, Mullin said the DHS has the authority to waive a new $100,000 H-1B visa fee in certain cases, offering potential relief to employers facing high recruitment costs. Speaking at his first Senate budget hearing as DHS secretary, Mullin also said the department can consider fee waivers on a case-by-case basis after Senator Susan Collins of Maine pointed out that a rural hospital had to pay the fee to hire a surgeon from abroad after failing to find a qualified US candidate. “We do have some authority and flexibility to be able to waive some of this on a case by case,” Mullin said.

US District Judge Leo Sorokin, who was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama, concluded that the $100,000 fee for H1-B visa was not a penalty but a tax that ⁠the Republican president lacked any authorisation from Congress to issue.

Federal judge rules Trump’s $100,000 fee for H-1B visas unlawful, strikes it down

US President Donald Trump has blamed the weather for his viral meltdown during an interview. This comes after the Republican lashed out at NBC’s Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker before storming out of the television interview and accusing American media of being “crooked” over claims that the US elections are rigged.<h2>What happened during interview?</h2>During the interview, Welker questioned Trump about his proposed “anti-weaponisation fund,” which was designed to provide compensation to individuals who believe they were unfairly targeted by government investigations during the Biden administration. However, the proposal has reportedly failed to advance after receiving little support from federal authorities.Defending the proposal, Trump argued that political opponents and sections of the media had caused serious harm to people’s lives through what he described as unjust legal actions.“I love the idea because people like you, the fake dirty press, the crooked press, people like stupid Biden, he’s not smart enough to know what’s going on, but people that surrounded him ... what they did to the lives of people, they destroyed people. They sent people to jail who did nothing wrong,” Trump said.The discussion became more heated when Welker asked Trump to substantiate his long-standing claims that the 2020 presidential election was manipulated. The president maintained that evidence exists to support his allegations.“Listen to me: There’s tremendous evidence. There’s nothing but evidence. The election was rigged. It was a dirty election, and it’s happening again right now in California,” Trump said without providing any substantial evidence to suggest his claims.As Welker continued to press him for proof on his claims, Trump slammed her and the US media, saying, “No, they’re crooked. They’re crooked, just like you’re crooked. Your press is crooked, and Meet the Press is crooked.”When Welker rejected the accusations, Trump responded, “Really? Well, you play right into their hands then. You’re either crooked, or you’re stupid.”Trump went on to slam US media and said, “Your elections are crooked, and you’re crooked and Meet the Press is crooked, and so is ABC and CBS and CNN. You’re one-sided crooked networks.”Moments later, he stood up and walked off. “Let’s call it quits because I’ve had enough. Thank you, darling,” he said. When the moderator urged him to continue, he said, “I’ve given you enough time. You ought to straighten out your press because you know what, a country can never be great with a dishonest press,” before leaving.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Trump shortly after this meltdown: I just did an interview…but it was raining. It was with NBC fake news. And because it was raining, I got a little bit angry at them. I was not happy with them. But we had a good time. <a href="https://t.co/XjkNG9ps8C">https://t.co/XjkNG9ps8C</a> <a href="https://t.co/5LicNnvJUt">pic.twitter.com/5LicNnvJUt</a>&mdash; Acyn (@Acyn) <a href="https://x.com/Acyn/status/2063642051909218812?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 7, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Trump blames it on rain</h2>Following the meltdown, which has gone viral on social media, Trump told reporters at an agricultural roundtable: “I just did an interview in the most beautiful barn I’ve ever seen.”He added, “But it was raining. And it was with NBC fake news. And because it was raining, I got a little bit angry at them. I was not happy with them. But we had a good time.”Several social media users pointed out his bizarre reasoning for storming out of the television interview. “Was it raining in the room? Does he think NBC controls the weather? Make this make sense. (You can’t.),” One person wrote. Another question, “The interview was indoors! What does rain have to do with it?” A third wrote, “What does the rain have to do with anything? Does he melt?”

US President Donald Trump blamed rainy weather for his viral walkout from an NBC interview after clashing with Kristen Welker over election fraud claims, a justification that drew widespread ridicule on social media.

US President Donald Trump has blamed the weather for his viral meltdown during an interview. This comes after the Republican lashed out at NBC’s Meet the Press moderator Kristen Welker before storming out of the television interview and accusing American media of being “crooked” over claims that the US elections are rigged. What happened during interview? During the interview, Welker questioned Trump about his proposed “anti-weaponisation fund,” which was designed to provide compensation to individuals who believe they were unfairly targeted by government investigations during the Biden administration. However, the proposal has reportedly failed to advance after receiving little support from federal authorities. Defending the proposal, Trump argued that political opponents and sections of the media had caused serious harm to people’s lives through what he described as unjust legal actions. “I love the idea because people like you, the fake dirty press, the crooked press, people like stupid Biden, he’s not smart enough to know what’s going on, but people that surrounded him ... what they did to the lives of people, they destroyed people. They sent people to jail who did nothing wrong,” Trump said. The discussion became more heated when Welker asked Trump to substantiate his long-standing claims that the 2020 presidential election was manipulated. The president maintained that evidence exists to support his allegations. “Listen to me: There’s tremendous evidence. There’s nothing but evidence. The election was rigged. It was a dirty election, and it’s happening again right now in California,” Trump said without providing any substantial evidence to suggest his claims. As Welker continued to press him for proof on his claims, Trump slammed her and the US media, saying, “No, they’re crooked. They’re crooked, just like you’re crooked. Your press is crooked, and Meet the Press is crooked.” When Welker rejected the accusations, Trump responded, “Really? Well, you play right into their hands then. You’re either crooked, or you’re stupid.” Trump went on to slam US media and said, “Your elections are crooked, and you’re crooked and Meet the Press is crooked, and so is ABC and CBS and CNN. You’re one-sided crooked networks.” Moments later, he stood up and walked off. “Let’s call it quits because I’ve had enough. Thank you, darling,” he said. When the moderator urged him to continue, he said, “I’ve given you enough time. You ought to straighten out your press because you know what, a country can never be great with a dishonest press,” before leaving.

US President Donald Trump blamed rainy weather for his viral walkout from an NBC interview after clashing with Kristen Welker over election fraud claims, a justification that drew widespread ridicule on social media.

WATCH | Trump blames weather for viral meltdown during TV interview

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised his former National Security Advisor John Bolton, calling him "a bad guy" and saying he is now facing the consequences of his actions as Bolton prepares to plead guilty in a classified documents case.&nbsp;Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while travelling to Chippewa Falls on Saturday, Trump accused Bolton of being dishonest and overly eager to support military action.&nbsp;"He's a bad guy, John Bolton. He's a dirty guy, and we caught him. You know, we caught him. And, you know, he wrote a book; he took all the information he took. I looked at John Bolton as somebody who was a very dishonest guy and not a smart guy. And I guess he's paying the price for certainly being dishonest," Trump said.&nbsp;The US President also claimed that Bolton consistently pushed for military conflicts during his time in government.&nbsp;"Well, I was never much of a fan of John Bolton. I never thought he was a smart person. And he was a radical right in terms of war, not in terms of other things. He wanted to go to war with anybody who opened their mouth, anybody who talked," Trump said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-s-fertility-rate-is-falling-what-does-it-mean-for-the-economy-and-society-1780797075611">WION Decodes | India's fertility rate is falling: What does it mean for the economy and society?</a><h2>Bolton to plead guilty</h2>Bolton, who served as Trump's national security adviser before becoming one of his most vocal critics, is expected to plead guilty to one count related to retaining classified documents, according to US media reports.&nbsp;He was indicted by the Trump administration in October on 18 counts involving the transmission and retention of top secret national defence information.&nbsp;&nbsp;Prosecutors accused Bolton of sharing classified files by email with two "unauthorised individuals" who have not been publicly identified but are believed to be his wife and daughter.&nbsp;Authorities allege that some of the classified material was later used in Bolton's book, The Room Where It Happened, which was highly critical of the Trump administration.&nbsp;The case has drawn attention because Trump himself previously faced federal charges over his handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, which he described as political targeting by the Democratic Party, although that case was later dismissed by a federal judge.

John Bolton, US National Security Advisor during Trump's first term, was indicted by White House in October on 18 counts involving the transmission and retention of top secret national defence information.

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised his former National Security Advisor John Bolton, calling him "a bad guy" and saying he is now facing the consequences of his actions as Bolton prepares to plead guilty in a classified documents case. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One while travelling to Chippewa Falls on Saturday, Trump accused Bolton of being dishonest and overly eager to support military action. "He's a bad guy, John Bolton. He's a dirty guy, and we caught him. You know, we caught him. And, you know, he wrote a book; he took all the information he took. I looked at John Bolton as somebody who was a very dishonest guy and not a smart guy. And I guess he's paying the price for certainly being dishonest," Trump said. The US President also claimed that Bolton consistently pushed for military conflicts during his time in government. "Well, I was never much of a fan of John Bolton. I never thought he was a smart person. And he was a radical right in terms of war, not in terms of other things. He wanted to go to war with anybody who opened their mouth, anybody who talked," Trump said. Also Read: WION Decodes | India's fertility rate is falling: What does it mean for the economy and society? Bolton to plead guilty Bolton, who served as Trump's national security adviser before becoming one of his most vocal critics, is expected to plead guilty to one count related to retaining classified documents, according to US media reports. He was indicted by the Trump administration in October on 18 counts involving the transmission and retention of top secret national defence information. Prosecutors accused Bolton of sharing classified files by email with two "unauthorised individuals" who have not been publicly identified but are believed to be his wife and daughter. Authorities allege that some of the classified material was later used in Bolton's book, The Room Where It Happened, which was highly critical of the Trump administration. The case has drawn attention because Trump himself previously faced federal charges over his handling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, which he described as political targeting by the Democratic Party, although that case was later dismissed by a federal judge.

John Bolton, US National Security Advisor during Trump's first term, was indicted by White House in October on 18 counts involving the transmission and retention of top secret national defence information.

Trump turns on former adviser Bolton amid legal turmoil, labels him ‘dishonest’ and ‘bad guy’

US President Donald Trump, during a press conference at the White House Oval Office interrupted an Indian journalist as he began to speak. The reporter was asking about Trump's relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Trump looked disinterested for very long time and then he asked if he was from India. Amid controversy on racism remarks, Trump quickly added that he was “only kidding.”&nbsp;“Are you from India, by any chance? Huh? I thought you were from Germany?” he stated with an unpleasant smile. "I was only kidding," Trump quickly added after the journalist verified his origin from India. Trump commented, "You’re Central Casting. That’s a good thing.”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump yesterday, a reporter asked him about a trade deal with India. Trump responded: &quot;Are you from India by any chance? I thought you were from Germany... I&#39;m only kidding.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/kGoaY6VvEi">pic.twitter.com/kGoaY6VvEi</a>&mdash; Open Source Intel (@Osint613) <a href="https://x.com/Osint613/status/2062875935825702965?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>'You’re Central Casting'</h2>Not fully addressing the journalist's inquiry, Trump commented, "You’re Central Casting. That’s a good thing.” Trump often uses the phrase “Central Casting” to mean someone looks like a typical example of a certain job or role, like an actor chosen for a movie. Several users criticised Donald Trump’s remarks, accusing him of racism and insensitivity. Some described his comments as “racism at best” and “racist talk,” while others dismissed them as “meaningless statements.” One user went further, calling him “elitist” and making harsh comparisons, while another said the US had “elected a joker as president,” reflecting strong backlash and divided reactions online.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-state-dept-deletes-x-post-featuring-wion-question-to-rubio-on-racism-against-indians-1779646649248">US State Dept deletes X post featuring WION question&nbsp;</a><h2>Rubio on racism</h2>During his New Delhi visit, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was caught off guard as WION's Sidhant Sibal asked him about racism against Asians in America. Responding to the question, Rubio said that such remarks were made by “stupid people” and did not represent the broader American society. “I’m sure that there are people that have made comments online and other places, because every country in the world has stupid people,” Rubio said. “I’m sure there’s stupid people here. There are stupid people in the United States that make dumb comments all the time,” he added. <a href="https://x.com/WIONews/status/2058477359523917919">WATCH here</a>&nbsp;A day later, when he realised that the question was asked over Trump's 'hellhole' remark, he walked back on his statement. in April 2026 shared a four-page transcript of remarks made by podcaster Michael Savage on America's birthright citizenship where he accused people from India and China of abusing the privilege. "A baby here becomes an instant citizen, and then they bring the entire family in from China or India or some other hellhole on the planet," the transcript documents Savage as saying.&nbsp;

Trump sparked controversy after telling an Indian journalist he thought he was from Germany before calling him “Central Casting” during an Oval Office briefing. The remarks triggered accusations of racism online. .

US President Donald Trump, during a press conference at the White House Oval Office interrupted an Indian journalist as he began to speak. The reporter was asking about Trump's relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Trump looked disinterested for very long time and then he asked if he was from India. Amid controversy on racism remarks, Trump quickly added that he was “only kidding.” “Are you from India, by any chance? Huh? I thought you were from Germany?” he stated with an unpleasant smile. "I was only kidding," Trump quickly added after the journalist verified his origin from India. Trump commented, "You’re Central Casting. That’s a good thing.”

Trump sparked controversy after telling an Indian journalist he thought he was from Germany before calling him ‘Central Casting’ during an Oval Office briefing. The remarks triggered accusations of racism online.&nbsp;

'Are you from India?': Trump's dig at Indian journalist triggers racism debate - VIDEO

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (May 31) touted his cognitive health as “extreme intelligence” after the White House released his medical check-up results days before. The medical examination, which happened on Tuesday (May 31) at the Walter Reed Military Hospital near Washington, comes weeks before his 80th birthday on June 14. The second-term president, whose frequent snoozing at public events and bruised hands slathered in makeup have constantly been making headlines, is in “excellent health”, claims the White House physician in a memo released on Friday (May 29).“The results of my Physical Examination, taken at Walter Reed Military Medical Center, and just released, were extremely good,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. “Unlike other U.S. Presidents, none of whom have ever taken an approved, high difficulty, Cognitive Test, I scored a perfect 30 out of 30, considered ‘extreme intelligence.’”He further added, targeting Democrats, “Are the Dumocrats really surprised? In fact, this is my fourth such test, all PERFECT or, 120 correct answers out of 120 questions asked! It is very rare that anyone gets a Perfect Score, especially when achieved four times in a row.”“All people running for President and Vice President should be forced to take high difficulty Cognitive Tests. Congress, and the Democrats, should demand it!” he said.<h2>What did Trump’s medical report reveal?</h2>Trump’s physician said that the 79-year-old president was in “excellent health” but advised him to lose weight. According to the memo published by the White House, US Navy Captain Sean Barbabella said, “President Trump remains in excellent health, demonstrating strong cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and overall physical function.” In the three-page report, Barbabella concluded that Trump is “fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State.”“Preventative counseling was provided, including guidance on diet, recommendation to take a low-dose aspirin, increased physical activity, and continued weight loss,” the memo read. It added that Trump’s cardiac age is estimated to be “approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age.”Regarding the repeated questions over frequent bruising seen on the president’s back of hand and swollen ankles, the memo said, “Examination of the dorsal hands revealed ecchymosis (bruising), consistent with minor soft tissue irritation related to frequent handshaking in the setting of aspirin use for cardiovascular prevention.”The US president has often been seen dozing at several White House events. Despite several of him seen apparently closing his eyes having gone viral on social media, Trump has repeatedly denied that he fell asleep.Last year, the White House revealed that Trump has been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency – a common condition in which faulty vein valves allow blood to pool, causing swelling, cramping and skin changes. The disclosure came after Trump was seen with swollen ankles on several occasions.

US President Donald Trump said his recent cognitive test score reflected “extreme intelligence” after a White House medical report declared him in excellent health.

US President Donald Trump on Sunday (May 31) touted his cognitive health as “extreme intelligence” after the White House released his medical check-up results days before. The medical examination, which happened on Tuesday (May 31) at the Walter Reed Military Hospital near Washington, comes weeks before his 80th birthday on June 14. The second-term president, whose frequent snoozing at public events and bruised hands slathered in makeup have constantly been making headlines, is in “excellent health”, claims the White House physician in a memo released on Friday (May 29). “The results of my Physical Examination, taken at Walter Reed Military Medical Center, and just released, were extremely good,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. “Unlike other U.S. Presidents, none of whom have ever taken an approved, high difficulty, Cognitive Test, I scored a perfect 30 out of 30, considered ‘extreme intelligence.’” He further added, targeting Democrats, “Are the Dumocrats really surprised? In fact, this is my fourth such test, all PERFECT or, 120 correct answers out of 120 questions asked! It is very rare that anyone gets a Perfect Score, especially when achieved four times in a row.” “All people running for President and Vice President should be forced to take high difficulty Cognitive Tests. Congress, and the Democrats, should demand it!” he said. What did Trump’s medical report reveal? Trump’s physician said that the 79-year-old president was in “excellent health” but advised him to lose weight. According to the memo published by the White House, US Navy Captain Sean Barbabella said, “President Trump remains in excellent health, demonstrating strong cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and overall physical function.” In the three-page report, Barbabella concluded that Trump is “fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State.” “Preventative counseling was provided, including guidance on diet, recommendation to take a low-dose aspirin, increased physical activity, and continued weight loss,” the memo read. It added that Trump’s cardiac age is estimated to be “approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age.” Regarding the repeated questions over frequent bruising seen on the president’s back of hand and swollen ankles, the memo said, “Examination of the dorsal hands revealed ecchymosis (bruising), consistent with minor soft tissue irritation related to frequent handshaking in the setting of aspirin use for cardiovascular prevention.” The US president has often been seen dozing at several White House events. Despite several of him seen apparently closing his eyes having gone viral on social media, Trump has repeatedly denied that he fell asleep. Last year, the White House revealed that Trump has been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency – a common condition in which faulty vein valves allow blood to pool, causing swelling, cramping and skin changes. The disclosure came after Trump was seen with swollen ankles on several occasions.

US President Donald Trump said his recent cognitive test score reflected “extreme intelligence” after a White House medical report declared him in excellent health.

‘Extreme intelligence’: Trump boasts ‘perfect 30 out of 30’ cognitive score after medical report released

US President Donald Trump’s absence from his son’s wedding did not go unnoticed for late night host Jimmy Kimmel who turned it into a comedy segment during a recent episode of his show. Donald Trump Jr recently married Bettina Anderson during a private ceremony held on an island in the Bahamas. His siblings Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump and Tiffany Trump but their father was not present.&nbsp;The president later took to Truth Social to explain the reason of his absence and stated that government related responsibilities and his dedication to the country prevented him from travelling to the wedding.&nbsp;Soon after, Kimmel sarcastically suggested “Daddy Donald” loved the United States more than attending his son's wedding and poked fun at the official explanation.&nbsp;&nbsp;Jimmy Kimmel said, “It was a small ceremony with about 40 guests, none of whom were his father. Daddy Donald sent his RSVP via Truth Social. He wrote, ‘While I very much wanted to be with my son, Don Jr., and the newest member of the Trump Family, his soon to be wife, Bettina, circumstances pertaining to Government, and my love for the United States of America, do not allow me to do so. I feel it is important for me to remain in Washington, D.C., at the White House during this important period of time'.”&nbsp;“See, he can be warm when he wants to. He loves Don Jr. He just loves the United States more. He had circumstances pertaining to the government to get to and also flying to a private island makes him miss his friend Jeffrey who he lost.”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Jimmy Kimmel 🤣😭 &quot;Trump sent his RSVP to Don Junior&#39;s wedding via Truth Social... he had circumstances pertaining to government to attend to. And also flying to a private island makes him miss his friend Jeffrey&quot; <a href="https://t.co/a4GFTNtBqA">pic.twitter.com/a4GFTNtBqA</a>&mdash; Elizabeth (@alluringmedia) <a href="https://x.com/alluringmedia/status/2059813110907560420?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 28, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Kimmel then continued joking about Trump by pointing out that the president still found time to attend other public events, including “UFC fights with Vanilla Ice,” but not his son's wedding. Kimmel then joked that without his father at the wedding, Donald Trump Jr must have missed Trump's long speeches about political topics. Kimmel also mentioned that reports suggested that that Trump Jr. and Bettina Anderson are still planning another celebration at the White House, where Trump and Melania Trump are expected to attend. Kimmel hilariously pointed out that that how awkward it would look if they skipped that event as well! Before marrying Bettina Anderson, Donald Trump Jr. was married to Vanessa Trump from 2005 until their divorce in 2018. He was then engaged to former Fox News personality Kimberly Guilfoyle.

Jimmy Kimmel made fun of US President Donald Trump after he skipped his son Donald Trump Jr's wedding in the Bahamas. Kimmel joked that ‘Daddy Donald’ loved the United States more than his son.

US President Donald Trump’s absence from his son’s wedding did not go unnoticed for late night host Jimmy Kimmel who turned it into a comedy segment during a recent episode of his show. Donald Trump Jr recently married Bettina Anderson during a private ceremony held on an island in the Bahamas. His siblings Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump and Tiffany Trump but their father was not present. The president later took to Truth Social to explain the reason of his absence and stated that government related responsibilities and his dedication to the country prevented him from travelling to the wedding. Soon after, Kimmel sarcastically suggested “Daddy Donald” loved the United States more than attending his son's wedding and poked fun at the official explanation. Jimmy Kimmel said, “It was a small ceremony with about 40 guests, none of whom were his father. Daddy Donald sent his RSVP via Truth Social. He wrote, ‘While I very much wanted to be with my son, Don Jr., and the newest member of the Trump Family, his soon to be wife, Bettina, circumstances pertaining to Government, and my love for the United States of America, do not allow me to do so. I feel it is important for me to remain in Washington, D.C., at the White House during this important period of time'.” “See, he can be warm when he wants to. He loves Don Jr. He just loves the United States more. He had circumstances pertaining to the government to get to and also flying to a private island makes him miss his friend Jeffrey who he lost.”

Jimmy Kimmel made fun of US President Donald Trump after he skipped his son Donald Trump Jr's wedding in the Bahamas. Kimmel joked that ‘Daddy Donald’ loved the United States more than his son.

Jimmy Kimmel mocks Donald Trump as he skips son’s wedding: ‘He loves Don Jr. He just loves the United States more’

US President Donald Trump's Justice Department is going after E. Jean Carroll, a former columnist whom the POTUS was found to have sexually assaulted in the 1990s. The DoJ has launched a criminal probe into Carroll, US media reported late Wednesday (May 27). Trump, who is currently serving as the US president for the second time, has repeatedly urged his Justice Department to take action against his enemies. The latest investigation is set to focus on whether the former columnist committed perjury in her two civil lawsuits against the businessman turned politician. &nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/snake-oil-salesman-removing-snakes-rfk-jr-shares-video-grabbing-live-snakes-with-bare-hands-sparks-backlash-1779861574927">‘Snake oil salesman removing snakes’: RFK Jr shares video grabbing live snakes with bare hands, sparks backlash</a><h2>Who is E. Jean Carroll?</h2>E. Jean Carroll is an American Journalist and former advice columnist who won two high-profile civil lawsuits against Donald Trump for sexual abuse and defamation.In November 2019, she sued Trump under New York's Adult Survivors Act, accusing him of raping her in a department store dressing room in Manhattan in the 1990s. Subsequently, a federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse. In the second case, she accused Trump of defamation over his malicious public comments denying the assault and defaming her. Trump had publicly sought to describe Carroll as "not his type" and had claimed that she was concocting the abuse to boost her book sales. Carroll won this case as well.Across both civil cases, Carroll was awarded a combined $88.3 million in damages.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/self-proclaimed-simpson-s-prophet-who-predicted-trump-s-presidency-now-wants-to-become-president-himself-1779875535562">Self-proclaimed Simpson's 'prophet' who predicted Trump's presidency makes prediction about 2028 US elections</a><h2>Trump's DoJ to probe his victim</h2>According to reports by CNN and The New York Times, federal investigators are now examining whether Carroll committed perjury during testimony connected to her two civil lawsuits against Trump.The investigation reportedly centres around a 2022 deposition in which Carroll stated that she had not received outside funding for her legal battle against Trump. It was later revealed that some legal expenses were reportedly backed by billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman.CNN reported that the criminal inquiry is being handled through the US Attorney’s Office in Chicago. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has reportedly recused himself because he previously worked on one of Trump’s appeals linked to the Carroll cases. &nbsp;

Donald Trump’s Justice Department has reportedly launched a criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll, the columnist who successfully sued him for sexual abuse and defamation. The investigation is now focusing on whether she lied under oath. Why is Trump’s DoJ targeting Carroll now? 

US President Donald Trump's Justice Department is going after E. Jean Carroll, a former columnist whom the POTUS was found to have sexually assaulted in the 1990s. The DoJ has launched a criminal probe into Carroll, US media reported late Wednesday (May 27). Trump, who is currently serving as the US president for the second time, has repeatedly urged his Justice Department to take action against his enemies. The latest investigation is set to focus on whether the former columnist committed perjury in her two civil lawsuits against the businessman turned politician. Also read | ‘Snake oil salesman removing snakes’: RFK Jr shares video grabbing live snakes with bare hands, sparks backlash Who is E. Jean Carroll? E. Jean Carroll is an American Journalist and former advice columnist who won two high-profile civil lawsuits against Donald Trump for sexual abuse and defamation. In November 2019, she sued Trump under New York's Adult Survivors Act, accusing him of raping her in a department store dressing room in Manhattan in the 1990s. Subsequently, a federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse. In the second case, she accused Trump of defamation over his malicious public comments denying the assault and defaming her. Trump had publicly sought to describe Carroll as "not his type" and had claimed that she was concocting the abuse to boost her book sales. Carroll won this case as well. Across both civil cases, Carroll was awarded a combined $88.3 million in damages. Also read | Self-proclaimed Simpson's 'prophet' who predicted Trump's presidency makes prediction about 2028 US elections Trump's DoJ to probe his victim According to reports by CNN and The New York Times, federal investigators are now examining whether Carroll committed perjury during testimony connected to her two civil lawsuits against Trump. The investigation reportedly centres around a 2022 deposition in which Carroll stated that she had not received outside funding for her legal battle against Trump. It was later revealed that some legal expenses were reportedly backed by billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman. CNN reported that the criminal inquiry is being handled through the US Attorney’s Office in Chicago. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has reportedly recused himself because he previously worked on one of Trump’s appeals linked to the Carroll cases.

Donald Trump’s Justice Department has reportedly launched a criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll, the columnist who successfully sued him for sexual abuse and defamation. The investigation is now focusing on whether she lied under oath. Why is Trump’s DoJ targeting Carroll now?&nbsp;

Trump’s Justice Department launches criminal probe against his sex assault victim E. Jean Carroll

US President Donald Trump underwent his annual medical examination on Tuesday at Walter Reed Military Hospital near Washington, days before turning 80 and amid growing public scrutiny over his health. According to AFP, Trump arrived at around 8:50 am (1250 GMT), with the check-up including both medical and dental evaluations. The visit comes as questions circulate about his visible fatigue during meetings and recurring bruising on his hand, which has drawn attention in recent weeks.&nbsp;<h2>White House monitoring and past medical disclosures</h2>&nbsp;The White House is expected to release a summary of the examination within days, although officials retain discretion over the level of detail provided. Trump, who is the oldest president ever inaugurated, has previously faced criticism over transparency regarding his health. Last year, the administration disclosed that he had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a condition in which faulty vein valves cause blood to pool, resulting in swelling and discomfort. The disclosure followed repeated public appearances showing swelling in his ankles. Officials have also said that bruising on his right hand is linked to aspirin use as part of a ‘standard’ cardiovascular regimen.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/700gb-data-stolen-israeli-researchers-blame-iranian-hackers-for-los-angeles-transit-system-breach-1779796247002">700GB data stolen! Israeli Researchers blame Iranian hackers for Los Angeles transit system breach</a>&nbsp;<h2>Previous evaluations and medical claims</h2>&nbsp;Trump has undergone multiple medical assessments over the past year, including a scheduled check-up in April and an unannounced hospital visit in October, both of which triggered renewed public speculation about his condition. In October, Trump said he had undergone a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan as part of a second physical examination, later describing the results as reassuring. He stated that the MRI showed his cardiovascular health was “excellent”. White House physician Sean Barbabella confirmed the assessment in a memo following the examination, saying the president’s cardiac age, a clinical measure of cardiovascular fitness based on ECG data, was found to be approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age.&nbsp;Trump later defended the use of advanced imaging, saying, “Getting an MRI is very standard. What, you think I shouldn’t have it? Other people get it… the doctor said it was the best result he has ever seen as a doctor.” However, medical experts, as quoted by Reuters, have noted that MRIs are not typically part of routine physical examinations and are generally used when more detailed diagnostic imaging is required.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-are-the-abraham-accords-the-countries-that-joined-those-that-refused-and-why-they-matter-today-1779792559008">What are Abraham Accords? The countries that joined, those that refused and why they matter today</a>&nbsp;<h2>Age, public scrutiny and political context</h2>&nbsp;Trump has frequently contrasted his own physical and mental fitness with that of his Democratic rival Joe Biden, insisting on his continued ‘vigor’ in public appearances and interviews. However, AFP reports that concerns have persisted over his apparent sleepiness during meetings and visible health markers.&nbsp;He is due to hold a policy meeting later in the day at the White House, with the ongoing Iran conflict expected to feature on the agenda. Trump also turns 80 on June 14, an occasion that will coincide with a planned UFC event on the White House lawn.&nbsp;

 The visit comes as questions circulate about his visible fatigue during meetings and recurring bruising on his hand, which has drawn attention in recent weeks.

US President Donald Trump underwent his annual medical examination on Tuesday at Walter Reed Military Hospital near Washington, days before turning 80 and amid growing public scrutiny over his health. According to AFP, Trump arrived at around 8:50 am (1250 GMT), with the check-up including both medical and dental evaluations. The visit comes as questions circulate about his visible fatigue during meetings and recurring bruising on his hand, which has drawn attention in recent weeks. White House monitoring and past medical disclosures The White House is expected to release a summary of the examination within days, although officials retain discretion over the level of detail provided. Trump, who is the oldest president ever inaugurated, has previously faced criticism over transparency regarding his health. Last year, the administration disclosed that he had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, a condition in which faulty vein valves cause blood to pool, resulting in swelling and discomfort. The disclosure followed repeated public appearances showing swelling in his ankles. Officials have also said that bruising on his right hand is linked to aspirin use as part of a ‘standard’ cardiovascular regimen. ALSO READ: 700GB data stolen! Israeli Researchers blame Iranian hackers for Los Angeles transit system breach Previous evaluations and medical claims Trump has undergone multiple medical assessments over the past year, including a scheduled check-up in April and an unannounced hospital visit in October, both of which triggered renewed public speculation about his condition. In October, Trump said he had undergone a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan as part of a second physical examination, later describing the results as reassuring. He stated that the MRI showed his cardiovascular health was “excellent”. White House physician Sean Barbabella confirmed the assessment in a memo following the examination, saying the president’s cardiac age, a clinical measure of cardiovascular fitness based on ECG data, was found to be approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age. Trump later defended the use of advanced imaging, saying, “Getting an MRI is very standard. What, you think I shouldn’t have it? Other people get it… the doctor said it was the best result he has ever seen as a doctor.” However, medical experts, as quoted by Reuters, have noted that MRIs are not typically part of routine physical examinations and are generally used when more detailed diagnostic imaging is required. ALSO READ: What are Abraham Accords? The countries that joined, those that refused and why they matter today Age, public scrutiny and political context Trump has frequently contrasted his own physical and mental fitness with that of his Democratic rival Joe Biden, insisting on his continued ‘vigor’ in public appearances and interviews. However, AFP reports that concerns have persisted over his apparent sleepiness during meetings and visible health markers. He is due to hold a policy meeting later in the day at the White House, with the ongoing Iran conflict expected to feature on the agenda. Trump also turns 80 on June 14, an occasion that will coincide with a planned UFC event on the White House lawn.

&nbsp;The visit comes as questions circulate about his visible fatigue during meetings and recurring bruising on his hand, which has drawn attention in recent weeks.

Trump takes annual physical just days before 80th birthday as health questions mount

As negotiations over a possible US-Iran agreement continue, Donald Trump has once again pushed for the expansion of the Abraham Accords, the diplomatic agreements that reshaped relations between Israel and parts of the Arab world in 2020. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he had urged Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt and Jordan to join the accords, adding that if Iran reached an agreement with Washington, “it would be an Honor to have them also be part of this unparalleled World Coalition”, adding that, “The Abraham Accords have been great for them, and will be even better for everybody, and bring true Power, Strength, and Peace to the Middle East.” His remarks have renewed attention on an initiative that remains one of the most consequential diplomatic shifts in the modern Middle East. Trump has repeatedly said he ⁠wants to ​expand the accords that he brokered during his first term in the White House.<h2>What exactly are the Abraham Accords?</h2>The Abraham Accords were a series of agreements brokered by the United States during Trump’s first term to normalise diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab nations. The United Arab Emirates and Bahrain signed first in September 2020, becoming the first Arab states in a quarter century to formally recognise Israel. Morocco and Sudan later followed in 2020 and 2021 respectively. The accords were heavily shaped by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and focused not only on diplomacy, but also on trade, investment, tourism and security cooperation.&nbsp;

&nbsp;&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/taj-mahal-s-iranian-secret-why-iran-took-a-swipe-at-marco-rubio-s-visit-truth-about-mumtaz-mahal-s-persian-roots-1779786217852">Taj Mahal’s Iranian secret! Why Iran took swipe at Marco Rubio’s visit &amp; truth about Mumtaz Mahal’s Persian roots| WION Decodes</a>&nbsp;According to the US State Department, the accords were built on “mutual understanding and coexistence” and sought to advance “peace, security, and prosperity in the Middle East and around the world”.<h2>Why some countries joined the accords</h2>Kazakhstan joined the accords last year, becoming the first post-Soviet state to join the pact with Israel.&nbsp;For countries such as the UAE and Bahrain, the accords opened opportunities for economic partnerships, technology cooperation and closer security ties with both Israel and the United States. Trade between Israel and Gulf states expanded rapidly after the agreements were signed, particularly in sectors such as defence, tourism, energy and artificial intelligence. Washington also viewed the accords as a strategic regional realignment aimed at countering Iranian influence while integrating Israel more deeply into the Middle East.&nbsp;

&nbsp;<h2>Why others still refuse to join</h2>Despite US pressure, several major Muslim-majority nations have refused to join. Saudi Arabia has repeatedly insisted that there can be no normalisation with Israel without a ‘clear path’ towards the creation of a Palestinian state, a demand strongly opposed by Israel’s current government. Pakistan, which has never formally recognised Israel since 1948, swiftly rejected Trump’s latest proposal. On Tuesday, Pak Defence Minister Khawaja Asif said joining the accords would contradict Pakistan’s ‘fundamental ideals’.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/will-iran-war-finally-end-what-we-know-and-don-t-know-about-fragile-us-iran-deal-still-facing-key-disputes-1779788417971">Will Iran war finally end? What we know and don’t know about fragile US-Iran deal still facing key disputes</a>&nbsp;Palestinian leaders have also criticised the agreements, arguing that Arab nations normalised ties with Israel without securing meaningful progress on Palestinian statehood.<h2>Why the accords matter today</h2>Five years after they were signed, the Abraham Accords remain central to Middle Eastern diplomacy. Supporters view them as a rare framework for regional cooperation in a deeply fractured region. Critics argue they bypassed the Palestinian issue without resolving it.&nbsp;Trump’s latest attempt to revive and expand the accords amid negotiations with Iran reflects a broader US strategy: reducing conflict through regional alliances while reshaping the balance of power in the Middle East. Whether more countries eventually join may depend less on Washington’s pressure and more on whether the region’s unresolved political conflicts can be addressed.

The Abraham Accords were a series of agreements brokered by the United States during Trump’s first term to normalise diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab nations.

As negotiations over a possible US-Iran agreement continue, Donald Trump has once again pushed for the expansion of the Abraham Accords, the diplomatic agreements that reshaped relations between Israel and parts of the Arab world in 2020. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he had urged Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt and Jordan to join the accords, adding that if Iran reached an agreement with Washington, “it would be an Honor to have them also be part of this unparalleled World Coalition”, adding that, “The Abraham Accords have been great for them, and will be even better for everybody, and bring true Power, Strength, and Peace to the Middle East.” His remarks have renewed attention on an initiative that remains one of the most consequential diplomatic shifts in the modern Middle East. Trump has repeatedly said he ⁠wants to expand the accords that he brokered during his first term in the White House. What exactly are the Abraham Accords? The Abraham Accords were a series of agreements brokered by the United States during Trump’s first term to normalise diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab nations. The United Arab Emirates and Bahrain signed first in September 2020, becoming the first Arab states in a quarter century to formally recognise Israel. Morocco and Sudan later followed in 2020 and 2021 respectively. The accords were heavily shaped by Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and focused not only on diplomacy, but also on trade, investment, tourism and security cooperation.

The Abraham Accords were a series of agreements brokered by the United States during Trump’s first term to normalise diplomatic relations between Israel and several Arab nations.

What are Abraham Accords? The countries that joined, those that refused and why they matter today

Even as negotiations continue, military activity has not entirely stopped. On Tuesday, the US Central Command confirmed fresh strikes aimed “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces”.

Even as negotiations continue, military activity has not entirely stopped. On Tuesday, the US Central Command confirmed fresh strikes aimed “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces”.

Will Iran war finally end? What we know and don’t know about fragile US-Iran deal still facing key disputes

Donald Trump isn't letting Stephen Colbert ride off into the sunset quietly. Just hours after The Late Show with Stephen Colbert aired its final episode on CBS, the US President took to Truth Social to ‘celebrate’ the show’s end and issue a sharp warning to the rest of late-night television.<h2>‘Beginning of the End’</h2>In a Friday morning post, Trump didn't hold back, framing Colbert’s departure not as a routine television finale, but as a forced exit. He called it the “Beginning of the End” for what he described as "untalented, nasty, highly overpaid, not funny, and very poorly rated Late Night Television Hosts." He even predicted that Colbert's peers would soon suffer the same fate. "Others, of even less talent, to soon follow," Trump wrote, capping the message off with a biting, "May they all Rest in Peace!"

Trump's post on Truth Social

&nbsp;It was the second time in 24 hours that the President used his platform to celebrate the end of Colbert's show. In an earlier post, Trump called the popular host a "jerk" and compared his onscreen presence to a "dead person." Claiming that poor ratings drove CBS to cancel the program, Trump added, "You could take any person off of the street and they would be better than this total jerk. Thank goodness he's finally gone!"

<h2>What was the actual reason behind ending Colbert’s show?</h2>Trump may have been celebrating the end of the show and citing arbitrary reasons behind the move, the entertainment world, however, points to a different narrative behind the curtain. While CBS officially cited rising costs and shifting ratings for pulling the plug, industry insiders have long tied the cancellation to the massive Skydance-Paramount merger. The network announced the end of The Late Show in July of last year, right before the merger secured necessary government approval in August.<h2>Trump’s long feud with comedy show hosts</h2>Trump’s public feud with late-night comedy is nothing new. Comedians like Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers, Jon Stewart, and John Oliver have spent years making him a focal point of their monologues, and Trump has frequently hit back. Lately, his rants have been aimed at Jimmy Kimmel. Last September, Trump publicly demanded ABC fire Kimmel over jokes made in the wake of the Charlie Kirk shooting. The tension escalated last month following a security incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, when First Lady Melania Trump urged the network to discipline Kimmel for a previous joke. The President quickly backed her up, echoing the call for Kimmel to be taken off the air. Meanwhile, Colbert has already moved on to a new career path. Rather than retirement, the comedian is pivoting to a major new passion project: he is set to write the screenplay for an upcoming Lord of the Rings film, collaborating directly with director Peter Jackson.

As Stephen Colbert's popular show The Late Show came to an end, US President Donald Trump took to TruthSocial to ‘celebrate’ the moment and even warned other late-night show hosts of a similar fate.  

Donald Trump isn't letting Stephen Colbert ride off into the sunset quietly. Just hours after The Late Show with Stephen Colbert aired its final episode on CBS, the US President took to Truth Social to ‘celebrate’ the show’s end and issue a sharp warning to the rest of late-night television. ‘Beginning of the End’ In a Friday morning post, Trump didn't hold back, framing Colbert’s departure not as a routine television finale, but as a forced exit. He called it the “Beginning of the End” for what he described as "untalented, nasty, highly overpaid, not funny, and very poorly rated Late Night Television Hosts." He even predicted that Colbert's peers would soon suffer the same fate. "Others, of even less talent, to soon follow," Trump wrote, capping the message off with a biting, "May they all Rest in Peace!"

As Stephen Colbert's popular show The Late Show came to an end, US President Donald Trump took to TruthSocial to ‘celebrate’ the moment and even warned other late-night show hosts of a similar fate. &nbsp;

Donald Trump predicts the 'Beginning of the End' for late-night TV as Stephen Colbert’s show ends