The US has postponed launching a military strike against Iran amid rising tensions in the Middle East. The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and its strike group are moving west from the Indo- Pacific sea. It will reach the Middle East within a week. The war with Iran seems inevitable, even though Russia offered mediation between Israel and Iran. According to a report by the NYT, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu urged a delay to allow Israel more time to prepare against possible Iranian retaliation.At an emergency UN Security Council meeting on January 15, 2026, the US envoy to the UN, Mike Waltz, insisted that “all options are on the table”. Trump’s envoy has termed the President a “man of his actions” willing to respond to ongoing violence. Iran’s delegations at the UNSC strongly rejected claims, calling accusations of wrongdoing false and intentions to intervene based on “lies and misinformation. Iranian state media and government officials have shared videos of what they claim is evidence of rioters using Israeli and US weapons to kill civilians and damage properties.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-mar-a-lago-dystopian-furry-gala-elite-decadence-1768555729893">'Dystopian' and furry-themed gala hosted in Trump's Mar-a-Lago, sparks ridicule</a>The US have previously warned Iranian leadership that further killings will result in “grave consequences”. Simultaneously, the US military is evacuating personnel from its bases in the Middle East. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed that the pressure from the US President led to the postponement of 800 planned executions of protestors. This follows Trump's recent warnings when he said help is on the way. Trump had previously warned on Tuesday that Washington would take very strong actions if Iran carried out any executions."There is no hanging, today or tomorrow ... I can tell you, I'm confident about that. There is no plan for hanging at all," &nbsp;said Iran's Foreign Minister AraghchiA possible escalation in the Middle East will see the US engage in conflict on all fronts. It has already made clear its ambition to acquire Greenland, which has led to disagreement within NATO. Germany, Norway and the UK have together deployed 16 troops to protect Greenland against any possible invasion from the US. &nbsp;Israel’s strategic interests heavily shape US-Iran policy, and at the same time, pro-Israel lobbying constrains Washington’s options. A war with Iran would primarily serve Israeli regional objectives, will long term exhaust US capability in the Middle East.&nbsp;

The US has delayed a military strike on Iran as tensions rise. Carrier strike groups move toward the Middle East while Washington warns “all options are on the table.”

The US has postponed launching a military strike against Iran amid rising tensions in the Middle East. The USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and its strike group are moving west from the Indo- Pacific sea. It will reach the Middle East within a week. The war with Iran seems inevitable, even though Russia offered mediation between Israel and Iran. According to a report by the NYT, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu urged a delay to allow Israel more time to prepare against possible Iranian retaliation. At an emergency UN Security Council meeting on January 15, 2026, the US envoy to the UN, Mike Waltz, insisted that “all options are on the table”. Trump’s envoy has termed the President a “man of his actions” willing to respond to ongoing violence. Iran’s delegations at the UNSC strongly rejected claims, calling accusations of wrongdoing false and intentions to intervene based on “lies and misinformation. Iranian state media and government officials have shared videos of what they claim is evidence of rioters using Israeli and US weapons to kill civilians and damage properties. Also Read: 'Dystopian' and furry-themed gala hosted in Trump's Mar-a-Lago, sparks ridicule The US have previously warned Iranian leadership that further killings will result in “grave consequences”. Simultaneously, the US military is evacuating personnel from its bases in the Middle East. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed that the pressure from the US President led to the postponement of 800 planned executions of protestors. This follows Trump's recent warnings when he said help is on the way. Trump had previously warned on Tuesday that Washington would take very strong actions if Iran carried out any executions. "There is no hanging, today or tomorrow ... I can tell you, I'm confident about that. There is no plan for hanging at all," said Iran's Foreign Minister Araghchi A possible escalation in the Middle East will see the US engage in conflict on all fronts. It has already made clear its ambition to acquire Greenland, which has led to disagreement within NATO. Germany, Norway and the UK have together deployed 16 troops to protect Greenland against any possible invasion from the US. Israel’s strategic interests heavily shape US-Iran policy, and at the same time, pro-Israel lobbying constrains Washington’s options. A war with Iran would primarily serve Israeli regional objectives, will long term exhaust US capability in the Middle East.

The US has delayed a military strike on Iran as tensions rise. Carrier strike groups move toward the Middle East while Washington warns “all options are on the table.”

Trump delays Iran strike as US tells UN ‘all options on the table’ amid rising tensions

Escalating US-Iran tensions in Jan 2026 risk a major conflict, threatening the Strait of Hormuz where 20% of global oil flows. With the Rial collapsing and US warnings sharpening, a war could spike energy prices and hit Asian economies hard.

Escalating US-Iran tensions in Jan 2026 risk a major conflict, threatening the Strait of Hormuz where 20% of global oil flows. With the Rial collapsing and US warnings sharpening, a war could spike energy prices and hit Asian economies hard.

US vs Iran: Why avoiding war is critical to global peace and preventing an oil crisis

In a modern hybrid war, the first strike is often silent. The US Cyber Command could launch an aggressive offensive designed to paralyse the regime’s command and control (C2) infrastructure while simultaneously piercing the state-imposed internet blackout. 

In a modern hybrid war, the first strike is often silent. The US Cyber Command could launch an aggressive offensive designed to paralyse the regime’s command and control (C2) infrastructure while simultaneously piercing the state-imposed internet blackout.&nbsp;

Pentagon’s Playbook: 5 ways US could strike Iran amidst the 2026 uprising

Tension between the United States and Iran has increased to the highest point after decades following the order of President Donald Trump to strike the key nuclear facilities across the Middle Eastern country. Conflictss between these nations are not new. Iran has always remained one of the greatest adversaries of the US since the 1979 Islamic revolution, after Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini threw pro-Western Mohammad Reza Pahlavi out of power in Tehran.Since then, the region has always remained heated, beginning with the conflicts on the issue of oil production to nuclear ambitions, Iran’s backing of proxies in the region, and US political interference. Trump was dragged into the recent war after Israel, considering Iran a nuclear threat, launched unprecedented strikes across the country, accusing Tehran of developing nuclear weapons.So, how has Iran always remained a target of the US? What is the real history behind this war? Was Iran a threat to the US or other nations else US begin war and always target Iran with the influence of colonial rulers (England) for its own selfish purpose?Let's delve into the timeline of the history of both nations' conflicts and know the facts:<h3>(1953) CIA-Backed Coup and Return of the Shah:</h3>Tensions between Iran and Western powers escalated when Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, elected in 1951, initiated steps to nationalise the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, an enterprise largely under British control since the early 20th century. This move to take control of Iran’s oil resources infuriated Britain, prompting it to seek American support. In response, the US Central Intelligence Agency collaborated with British intelligence to orchestrate a coup that ousted Mosaddegh and reinstated Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the previously exiled monarch, as shah.<h3>(1957) Civilian nuclear agreement – Atoms for Peace:</h3>Iran’s interest in developing nuclear energy began to take shape under the Shah’s leadership, with significant backing from the United States and its allies. In 1957, the two nations entered into a nuclear cooperation agreement under US President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s "Atoms for Peace" initiative. This agreement was aimed at promoting the peaceful use of nuclear technology. By the late 1960s, the US had supplied Iran with a nuclear research reactor and uranium fuel, laying the groundwork for Iran’s current nuclear programme and the global debates that followed.<h3>(1979) Islamic revolution:</h3>While relations between Tehran and Washington were increasing, people of Iran were agitating under the dictatorship of the shah, demanding the removal of Western influence in the nation. Revolutionary protests also began rocking the country in late 1978, which forced the shah to flee in January 1979. As a result, the exiled Islamic scholar Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned to power in Iran as the new Islamic Republic.<h3>(1980) Diplomatic break with the US:</h3>After the United States permitted the exiled Shah of Iran to receive cancer treatment, Iranian students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, taking 52 hostages and holding them for 444 days. In response, the US severed diplomatic relations and implemented economic sanctions. The former shah eventually died in exile.<h3>(1980–1988) US support for Iraq in war:</h3>When Saddam Hussein launched a military assault on Iran, aiming to weaken Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolutionary influence, the US aligned itself with Iraq. This decision escalated hostilities between Washington and Tehran. The brutal conflict continued until 1988, causing massive casualties on both sides, with Iraq even deploying chemical weapons against Iranian forces.<h3>(1984) Iran labelled terror sponsor:</h3>Amid increasing regional unrest, President Ronald Reagan designated Iran as a "state sponsor of terrorism" following deadly attacks in Lebanon, where US troops were stationed after Israel’s incursion. One of the deadliest assaults, on a US Marine barracks in Beirut, killed 241 American personnel. Washington attributed the attack to Hezbollah, a militant group with Iranian support. Despite this, Reagan’s administration later covertly negotiated with Iran for the release of hostages held by Hezbollah — a revelation that sparked the infamous Iran-Contra scandal.<h3>(1988) Civilian plane downed by US Navy:</h3>Amid escalating military tensions in the Persian Gulf, a US Navy warship mistakenly shot down Iran Air Flight 655 en route to Dubai on July 8, killing all 290 people aboard. Although the US called the incident an error, it neither issued a formal apology nor accepted full responsibility. However, it eventually compensated victims' families with a payment totalling $61.8 million.<h3>(1995) Sanction against Iran:</h3>US's sanctions against Iran escalated between 1995 and 1996 as then President Bill Clinton’s executive orders banned US companies from making any deal with Iran. Meanwhile, the Congress also passed a law penalising foreign entities from making any kind of investment in the country's energy sector or selling Iran advanced weapons. Meanwhile, the US also went for nuclear advancement and support of groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.<h3>(2002) Post-9/11 tensions:</h3>In the wake of the September 11 attacks, US President George W. Bush labelled Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as an “Axis of Evil” during his State of the Union speech. This declaration came despite Iran and the US having cooperated covertly at the time to combat mutual enemies, including the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. However, the relationship quickly deteriorated, and by late 2022, Iran was found to possess highly enriched uranium, prompting renewed international sanctions.<h3>(2013–2015) Iran’s Nuclear Agreement:</h3>Beginning in 2013, President Barack Obama initiated direct negotiations with Iran, which culminated in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The deal, also signed by China, Russia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, required Iran to restrict its nuclear enrichment to 3.67 per cent in return for sanction relief.<h3>(2018) US Exit from JCPOA:</h3>In 2018, President Donald Trump pulled the US out of the JCPOA, reinstating sanctions on Iran. The move was supported by Israel and criticised the agreement’s effectiveness. In response, Iran abandoned its nuclear restrictions under the deal and resumed uranium enrichment beyond agreed limits.<h3>(2019) The US designates Iran’s military institution as a terrorist org:</h3>The US designated the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the most powerful military institution of Iran, as a terrorist organisation. Following this, it has become the first time that the Americans assigned such a classification to a part of a foreign government.<h3>(2020) Assassination of Qassem Soleimani:</h3>In one of the most escalatory moves of Trump’s presidency, Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, head of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), was killed in a US drone strike in Baghdad. The assassination followed the US decision in 2019 to designate the Quds Force as a terrorist organisation. Iran retaliated with missile attacks targeting American bases in Iraq.<h3>(2025) Letter to Tehran and US attack:</h3>Trump sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in March demanding new negotiations on a nuclear deal, giving deadlines of 60 days. During the negotiations, Khamenei rejected the proposal, viewing it as the US trying to dictate terms. The discussions had quietly begun in countries like Oman and Italy, with Muscat playing a mediating role. Former US President Donald Trump stated that his administration had come “very close” to reaching an agreement after several dialogue rounds, even cautioning Israel against military actions.Iran remained cautiously hopeful but firmly maintained its right to continue uranium enrichment, which remained a major point of contention. A day before the sixth round of US-Iran negotiations, Israel carried out airstrikes across Iranian territory.Shortly after, the US joined the Israeli assault, targeting three of Iran’s major nuclear sites, including Fordow and Natanz. This offensive included the first combat use of America’s most powerful "bunker-buster" bomb. In retaliation, Iran launched missile strikes on the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which hosts US forces. Qatari officials later confirmed the missiles were intercepted and that the base had been evacuated ahead of the attack. &nbsp;

Conflicts between these nations are not new. Iran has always remained one of the greatest adversaries of the US since the 1979 Islamic revolution, after Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini threw pro-Western Mohammad Reza Pahlavi out of power in Tehran.

Tension between the United States and Iran has increased to the highest point after decades following the order of President Donald Trump to strike the key nuclear facilities across the Middle Eastern country. Conflictss between these nations are not new. Iran has always remained one of the greatest adversaries of the US since the 1979 Islamic revolution, after Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini threw pro-Western Mohammad Reza Pahlavi out of power in Tehran. Since then, the region has always remained heated, beginning with the conflicts on the issue of oil production to nuclear ambitions, Iran’s backing of proxies in the region, and US political interference. Trump was dragged into the recent war after Israel, considering Iran a nuclear threat, launched unprecedented strikes across the country, accusing Tehran of developing nuclear weapons. So, how has Iran always remained a target of the US? What is the real history behind this war? Was Iran a threat to the US or other nations else US begin war and always target Iran with the influence of colonial rulers (England) for its own selfish purpose? Let's delve into the timeline of the history of both nations' conflicts and know the facts: (1953) CIA-Backed Coup and Return of the Shah: Tensions between Iran and Western powers escalated when Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, elected in 1951, initiated steps to nationalise the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, an enterprise largely under British control since the early 20th century. This move to take control of Iran’s oil resources infuriated Britain, prompting it to seek American support. In response, the US Central Intelligence Agency collaborated with British intelligence to orchestrate a coup that ousted Mosaddegh and reinstated Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the previously exiled monarch, as shah. (1957) Civilian nuclear agreement – Atoms for Peace: Iran’s interest in developing nuclear energy began to take shape under the Shah’s leadership, with significant backing from the United States and its allies. In 1957, the two nations entered into a nuclear cooperation agreement under US President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s "Atoms for Peace" initiative. This agreement was aimed at promoting the peaceful use of nuclear technology. By the late 1960s, the US had supplied Iran with a nuclear research reactor and uranium fuel, laying the groundwork for Iran’s current nuclear programme and the global debates that followed. (1979) Islamic revolution: While relations between Tehran and Washington were increasing, people of Iran were agitating under the dictatorship of the shah, demanding the removal of Western influence in the nation. Revolutionary protests also began rocking the country in late 1978, which forced the shah to flee in January 1979. As a result, the exiled Islamic scholar Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned to power in Iran as the new Islamic Republic. (1980) Diplomatic break with the US: After the United States permitted the exiled Shah of Iran to receive cancer treatment, Iranian students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, taking 52 hostages and holding them for 444 days. In response, the US severed diplomatic relations and implemented economic sanctions. The former shah eventually died in exile. (1980–1988) US support for Iraq in war: When Saddam Hussein launched a military assault on Iran, aiming to weaken Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolutionary influence, the US aligned itself with Iraq. This decision escalated hostilities between Washington and Tehran. The brutal conflict continued until 1988, causing massive casualties on both sides, with Iraq even deploying chemical weapons against Iranian forces. (1984) Iran labelled terror sponsor: Amid increasing regional unrest, President Ronald Reagan designated Iran as a "state sponsor of terrorism" following deadly attacks in Lebanon, where US troops were stationed after Israel’s incursion. One of the deadliest assaults, on a US Marine barracks in Beirut, killed 241 American personnel. Washington attributed the attack to Hezbollah, a militant group with Iranian support. Despite this, Reagan’s administration later covertly negotiated with Iran for the release of hostages held by Hezbollah — a revelation that sparked the infamous Iran-Contra scandal. (1988) Civilian plane downed by US Navy: Amid escalating military tensions in the Persian Gulf, a US Navy warship mistakenly shot down Iran Air Flight 655 en route to Dubai on July 8, killing all 290 people aboard. Although the US called the incident an error, it neither issued a formal apology nor accepted full responsibility. However, it eventually compensated victims' families with a payment totalling $61.8 million. (1995) Sanction against Iran: US's sanctions against Iran escalated between 1995 and 1996 as then President Bill Clinton’s executive orders banned US companies from making any deal with Iran. Meanwhile, the Congress also passed a law penalising foreign entities from making any kind of investment in the country's energy sector or selling Iran advanced weapons. Meanwhile, the US also went for nuclear advancement and support of groups like Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. (2002) Post-9/11 tensions: In the wake of the September 11 attacks, US President George W. Bush labelled Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as an “Axis of Evil” during his State of the Union speech. This declaration came despite Iran and the US having cooperated covertly at the time to combat mutual enemies, including the Taliban and al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. However, the relationship quickly deteriorated, and by late 2022, Iran was found to possess highly enriched uranium, prompting renewed international sanctions. (2013–2015) Iran’s Nuclear Agreement: Beginning in 2013, President Barack Obama initiated direct negotiations with Iran, which culminated in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The deal, also signed by China, Russia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the European Union, required Iran to restrict its nuclear enrichment to 3.67 per cent in return for sanction relief. (2018) US Exit from JCPOA: In 2018, President Donald Trump pulled the US out of the JCPOA, reinstating sanctions on Iran. The move was supported by Israel and criticised the agreement’s effectiveness. In response, Iran abandoned its nuclear restrictions under the deal and resumed uranium enrichment beyond agreed limits. (2019) The US designates Iran’s military institution as a terrorist org: The US designated the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the most powerful military institution of Iran, as a terrorist organisation. Following this, it has become the first time that the Americans assigned such a classification to a part of a foreign government. (2020) Assassination of Qassem Soleimani: In one of the most escalatory moves of Trump’s presidency, Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, head of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), was killed in a US drone strike in Baghdad. The assassination followed the US decision in 2019 to designate the Quds Force as a terrorist organisation. Iran retaliated with missile attacks targeting American bases in Iraq. (2025) Letter to Tehran and US attack: Trump sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in March demanding new negotiations on a nuclear deal, giving deadlines of 60 days. During the negotiations, Khamenei rejected the proposal, viewing it as the US trying to dictate terms. The discussions had quietly begun in countries like Oman and Italy, with Muscat playing a mediating role. Former US President Donald Trump stated that his administration had come “very close” to reaching an agreement after several dialogue rounds, even cautioning Israel against military actions. Iran remained cautiously hopeful but firmly maintained its right to continue uranium enrichment, which remained a major point of contention. A day before the sixth round of US-Iran negotiations, Israel carried out airstrikes across Iranian territory. Shortly after, the US joined the Israeli assault, targeting three of Iran’s major nuclear sites, including Fordow and Natanz. This offensive included the first combat use of America’s most powerful "bunker-buster" bomb. In retaliation, Iran launched missile strikes on the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which hosts US forces. Qatari officials later confirmed the missiles were intercepted and that the base had been evacuated ahead of the attack.

Conflicts between these nations are not new. Iran has always remained one of the greatest adversaries of the US since the 1979 Islamic revolution, after Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini threw pro-Western Mohammad Reza Pahlavi out of power in Tehran.

EXPLAINED: Is Iran really a threat or a victim of US? Know history of 70 years of betrayals, coups and bombs

Ali Shamkhani, senior advisor to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has spoken publicly for the first time since surviving an Israeli airstrike on his Tehran residence during the June 13 offensive. In a televised interview aired by Iranian state TV on Saturday, Shamkhani described being buried under the debris for over three hours, believing at first that the explosion was an earthquake. “My family was sleeping in the next room. I was asleep because it was prayer time and I was waking up when my entire room collapsed and a lot of debris fell on me,” he said. “I was under the rubble for 3 hours. I did my morning prayer under the rubble.”&nbsp;Shamkhani, who now uses a steam-assisted breathing device for lung recovery, suffered internal injuries and broken ribs. “At first, I thought an earthquake had occurred, and I remained under the rubble for three hours until I heard the sound of a car. At that point, I realised that Israel had targeted me because, in an earthquake, cars cannot move through the streets of Tehran,” he told in the interview. Reports of his death had earlier circulated widely, including confirmations by both Israeli and Iranian sources. However, Iranian state media later carried a letter from Shamkhani addressed to Khamenei, affirming that he had survived.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei’s advisor also BACK from the ‘DEAD’ Israel claimed it killed Ali Shamkhani in June 13 strike He says he was buried ‘under rubble for 3 HOURS’ — IRIB <a href="https://t.co/vXGnPEsQGT">https://t.co/vXGnPEsQGT</a> <a href="https://t.co/FdXCVnVeKi">pic.twitter.com/FdXCVnVeKi</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1939033317590102150?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 28, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>&nbsp;</h2><h2>Advisor suggests he was specifically targeted</h2> In the same interview, Shamkhani stated: “The Zionists know why they targeted me, and so do I. I can’t reveal the reason, but I made their lives miserable.” He dismissed rumours of a leg amputation, saying, “They were falsely claiming they amputated my leg. Let them take it away. What do I need a leg for?” Shamkhani, a former navy commander and head of the Supreme National Security Council, appeared later that day at the funeral for Iranian officials and scientists killed in the Israeli strikes — an event Supreme Leader Khamenei notably did not attend.&nbsp;A resident living opposite Shamkhani’s residence told Middle East Eye that the blast was so powerful she and her husband were thrown from their bed. “It was a miracle we survived,” she said.&nbsp;Ali Shamkhani also took part in Saturday’s state funeral held for military commanders, nuclear scientists, and civilians killed in Israeli strikes earlier this month. He was seen standing alongside President Masoud Pezeshkian and Mojtaba Khamenei, son of the Supreme Leader. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei remained conspicuously absent, reportedly due to ongoing security concerns. State media reported that the funeral honoured 60 individuals in total, including 16 scientists, 10 senior commanders, as well as four women and four children. &nbsp;

"I was waking up when my entire room collapsed and a lot of debris fell on me,” he said. “I was under the rubble for 3 hours. I did my morning prayer under the rubble.”

Ali Shamkhani, senior advisor to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has spoken publicly for the first time since surviving an Israeli airstrike on his Tehran residence during the June 13 offensive. In a televised interview aired by Iranian state TV on Saturday, Shamkhani described being buried under the debris for over three hours, believing at first that the explosion was an earthquake. “My family was sleeping in the next room. I was asleep because it was prayer time and I was waking up when my entire room collapsed and a lot of debris fell on me,” he said. “I was under the rubble for 3 hours. I did my morning prayer under the rubble.” Shamkhani, who now uses a steam-assisted breathing device for lung recovery, suffered internal injuries and broken ribs. “At first, I thought an earthquake had occurred, and I remained under the rubble for three hours until I heard the sound of a car. At that point, I realised that Israel had targeted me because, in an earthquake, cars cannot move through the streets of Tehran,” he told in the interview. Reports of his death had earlier circulated widely, including confirmations by both Israeli and Iranian sources. However, Iranian state media later carried a letter from Shamkhani addressed to Khamenei, affirming that he had survived.

"I was waking up when my entire room collapsed and a lot of debris fell on me,” he said. “I was under the rubble for 3 hours. I did my morning prayer under the rubble.”

'Under rubble for 3 hours': Khamenei's top advisor, once presumed dead, recounts surviving Israeli airstrike

“THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT,” US President Donald Trump wrote on Tuesday (June 24), adding, “PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!” This comes after the US president announced a US-brokered ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel hours after Iran struck a US air base in Qatar. While Iran's attack seemed a big move, it turned out to be a calculated and choreographed move, ultimately meant for the de-escalation of the conflict.The missile launch targeting US forces in Qatar may have made headlines, but US officials suggest it was more symbolic than strategic. President Donald Trump on Monday (June 23), thanked Iran for giving early notice before firing missiles at Al Udeid Air Base.“I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “No Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-qatar-attack-iran-doha-reserves-right-to-respond-after-iranian-missile-strike-on-us-base-1750702766051">Will Qatar attack Iran? Doha 'reserves right to respond' after Iranian missile strike on US base</a><h2>Missiles were fired, but no casualties</h2>The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched a barrage of missiles on Monday (23 June), aimed at the US military’s Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The attack came in response to Washington’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend.Qatar’s air defences successfully intercepted the missiles. There were no reported injuries or damage, and the US had already moved its aircraft out of harm’s way ahead of the strike.A defence official told US media that the missiles were of “short-range and medium-range ballistic” variety, and the attack came after a warning from Tehran passed to Qatari and American officials.<h2>Trump says Iran ‘got it out of their system’</h2>President Trump wrote on Truth Social, “They’ve gotten it all out of their ‘system’… Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region.” US defence officials described the Iranian strike as “retaliatory but largely symbolic.”<h2>Iran tried to keep Qatar out of the line of fire</h2>Iran was quick to say that Qatar wasn’t the intended target. The country’s Supreme National Security Council released a statement saying that the strike was far from urban areas and posed no threat to civilians.“We remain committed to maintaining warm relations with Qatar,” the statement said, as Iran maintained that its true grievance was with the US presence in the region, not its allies.<h2>US had braced for a response</h2>The missile launch did not take Washington by surprise. A senior White House official told CNN, “We knew they’d retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani.” The US military had moved unsheltered aircraft from the Al Udeid base days before the attack, according to satellite imagery taken on 19 June.<h2>A face-saving move?</h2>With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than a fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

“THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT,” US President Donald Trump wrote on Tuesday (June 24), adding, “PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!” This comes after the US president announced a US-brokered ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel hours after Iran struck a US air base in Qatar. While Iran's attack seemed a big move, it turned out to be a calculated and choreographed move, ultimately meant for the de-escalation of the conflict. The missile launch targeting US forces in Qatar may have made headlines, but US officials suggest it was more symbolic than strategic. President Donald Trump on Monday (June 23), thanked Iran for giving early notice before firing missiles at Al Udeid Air Base. “I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “No Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.” Also read: Will Qatar attack Iran? Doha 'reserves right to respond' after Iranian missile strike on US base Missiles were fired, but no casualties The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps launched a barrage of missiles on Monday (23 June), aimed at the US military’s Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. The attack came in response to Washington’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend. Qatar’s air defences successfully intercepted the missiles. There were no reported injuries or damage, and the US had already moved its aircraft out of harm’s way ahead of the strike. A defence official told US media that the missiles were of “short-range and medium-range ballistic” variety, and the attack came after a warning from Tehran passed to Qatari and American officials. Trump says Iran ‘got it out of their system’ President Trump wrote on Truth Social, “They’ve gotten it all out of their ‘system’… Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region.” US defence officials described the Iranian strike as “retaliatory but largely symbolic.” Iran tried to keep Qatar out of the line of fire Iran was quick to say that Qatar wasn’t the intended target. The country’s Supreme National Security Council released a statement saying that the strike was far from urban areas and posed no threat to civilians. “We remain committed to maintaining warm relations with Qatar,” the statement said, as Iran maintained that its true grievance was with the US presence in the region, not its allies. US had braced for a response The missile launch did not take Washington by surprise. A senior White House official told CNN, “We knew they’d retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani.” The US military had moved unsheltered aircraft from the Al Udeid base days before the attack, according to satellite imagery taken on 19 June. A face-saving move? With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than a fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

With no casualties, intercepted missiles, and prior coordination, Iran’s strike seemed more of a “face-saving” move than fierce retaliation. It allowed Tehran to respond publicly to the US airstrikes while keeping the door open for de-escalation.

Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show? A face-saving move meant for de-escalation

Hours before US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said that Iran is not a nation that surrenders. Khamenei's statement came after Iran launched missile strikes on a US military base in Qatar in retaliation for America's strike on three of its nuclear sites. Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, stating that it is an end to the 12-day war. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that ‘there is no agreement on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations’.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Those who know the Iranian people and their history know that the Iranian nation isn’t a nation that surrenders.&mdash; Khamenei.ir (@khamenei_ir) <a href="https://twitter.com/khamenei_ir/status/1937255046372295137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 23, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Trump announces ceasefire between Iran and Israel</h2>US President Donald Trump late on June 23 announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, stating that it is an end to 12-day war. This came on a day when Iran struck an American base in Qatar in retaliation for US strikes on its nuclear sites using B-2 bombers. Trump wrote on Truth Social, "It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a complete and total ceasefire (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ended!"&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/explosions-heard-in-iraq-s-baghdad-minutes-after-trump-s-israel-iran-ceasefire-announcement-1750730771217">Explosions heard in Iraq's Baghdad minutes after Trump's Israel-Iran ceasefire announcement</a><h2>US enters Iran-Israel war</h2>In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” In response, Iranian missiles targeted the largest US military base in West Asia, Al-Udeid. Al-Udeid is home to the US military's headquarters for all air operations in the region.&nbsp; &nbsp;As America entered the war, Donald Trump said that ‘there will either be peace or tragedy.’ "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” Trump said in a press briefing at the Oval Office. US Vice President JD Vance said that America's war is against Iran's nuclear facilities and not Iran. Vance reiterated Trump’s claims of destroying nuclear facilities, but also added that Iran would be unable to ‘rebuild the nuclear capability in the future.’ The US carried out a strike in Iran using B-2 bombers, including the first-ever use of a 30,000-pound (14,000 kilograms) GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, also known as bunker busters, in combat.&nbsp; &nbsp;

US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran; however, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said this ahead of the ceasefire announcement

Hours before US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said that Iran is not a nation that surrenders. Khamenei's statement came after Iran launched missile strikes on a US military base in Qatar in retaliation for America's strike on three of its nuclear sites. Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, stating that it is an end to the 12-day war. However, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that ‘there is no agreement on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations’.

US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran; however, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said this ahead of the ceasefire announcement

'Those who know Iranian people...': Khamenei's BIG statement on 'surrender' before Trump's ceasefire announcement

Iran’s limited response — just six missiles, with no major damage — points to a desire to show they did respond, without inviting massive US escalation. In military terms, it was a gesture, not a game-changer.

With domestic outrage brewing over the US strike, Tehran likely needed a headline-grabbing move for internal audiences, showing defiance without crossing the point of no return.

Attack on Qatar: Why Iran's retaliation against B-2 Bomber strike feels like firecrackers in a storm?

Ordinary people across the Middle East, Iranians, Iraqis, Lebanese, Yemenis, Palestinians, face economic misery, instability, and human suffering as tensions escalate.

Ordinary people across the Middle East, Iranians, Iraqis, Lebanese, Yemenis, Palestinians, face economic misery, instability, and human suffering as tensions escalate.

Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Israel vs Iran, Iraq, Syria: How a Middle East war could unfold after B-2 Bomber, Al Udeid Air Base attack

American military engineers have fortified key Middle Eastern bases over the years. Hardened aircraft shelters, reinforced barracks, and layered defences are in place, especially at large hubs like Al Udeid and Al Dhafra in the UAE.

American military engineers have fortified key Middle Eastern bases over the years. Hardened aircraft shelters, reinforced barracks, and layered defences are in place, especially at large hubs like Al Udeid and Al Dhafra in the UAE.

Operation Basharat al-Fath: Are US troops safe in the Middle East and how prepared are they for Iranian missile strikes?

The US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest American military facility in the Middle East, housing thousands of US troops, fighter jets, bombers, and surveillance assets. Targeting this base sends a direct warning to Washington.

The US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is the largest American military facility in the Middle East, housing thousands of US troops, fighter jets, bombers, and surveillance assets. Targeting this base sends a direct warning to Washington.

Why Iran chose to target Qatar? Strategic reasons behind Tehran’s retaliation against B-2 Bomber strikes

Iran has launched a retaliatory strike against the United States, firing missiles at US military bases in both Iraq and Qatar, Iranian state media confirmed on Monday night. The operation, named “Bashar al Fateh”, is Tehran’s response to the recent US airstrikes on its nuclear sites.Military sources told Reuters that air defences were activated at Ain al-Asad Air Base in Iraq. The base, located in Iraq’s western Anbar province, is one of the largest US military installations in the Middle East and plays a key role in supporting Iraqi forces and NATO missions.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-launches-ops-glad-tidings-of-victory-against-us-tehran-fires-missiles-at-us-base-in-qatar-explosions-heard-in-doha-1750697514731">Iran launches Ops 'Glad Tidings of Victory' against US: Tehran fires missiles at US base in Qatar, explosions heard in Doha</a>The US is reportedly tracking multiple missile launches from Iran, some of which are believed to be directed towards Ain al-Asad. This is the same base that was struck by Iranian missiles in January 2020 following the killing of General Qasem Soleimani.Iran had previously warned of retaliation following what President Donald Trump authorised strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump claimed “monumental damage” had been done, particularly deep underground.<h2>Iran also strikes Qatar’s Al Udeid base</h2>Iran’s missiles also targeted the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. State-run media in Iran announced the start of “Operation Glad Tidings of Victory” against US forces in the region.Loud explosions were reported in central Doha and Lusail on Monday night, with projectiles visible in the night sky, according to Reuters and AFP. Al Udeid houses nearly 10,000 American troops and serves as the forward headquarters of US Central Command.Qatar had already taken precautions earlier in the day, suspending all air traffic and citing “regional developments” as the reason. The move came shortly after the US and UK embassies in Doha advised their citizens to shelter in place.In a televised message, Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaqari accused the US of inflaming the conflict by backing Israel’s military actions and striking Iran directly.“Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end&nbsp;it,”&nbsp;he&nbsp;said.

The US is reportedly tracking multiple missile launches from Iran, some of which are believed to be directed towards Ain al-Asad. This is the same base that was struck by Iranian missiles in January 2020 following the killing of General Qasem Soleimani.

Iran has launched a retaliatory strike against the United States, firing missiles at US military bases in both Iraq and Qatar, Iranian state media confirmed on Monday night. The operation, named “Bashar al Fateh”, is Tehran’s response to the recent US airstrikes on its nuclear sites. Military sources told Reuters that air defences were activated at Ain al-Asad Air Base in Iraq. The base, located in Iraq’s western Anbar province, is one of the largest US military installations in the Middle East and plays a key role in supporting Iraqi forces and NATO missions. Also read: Iran launches Ops 'Glad Tidings of Victory' against US: Tehran fires missiles at US base in Qatar, explosions heard in Doha The US is reportedly tracking multiple missile launches from Iran, some of which are believed to be directed towards Ain al-Asad. This is the same base that was struck by Iranian missiles in January 2020 following the killing of General Qasem Soleimani. Iran had previously warned of retaliation following what President Donald Trump authorised strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump claimed “monumental damage” had been done, particularly deep underground. Iran also strikes Qatar’s Al Udeid base Iran’s missiles also targeted the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. State-run media in Iran announced the start of “Operation Glad Tidings of Victory” against US forces in the region. Loud explosions were reported in central Doha and Lusail on Monday night, with projectiles visible in the night sky, according to Reuters and AFP. Al Udeid houses nearly 10,000 American troops and serves as the forward headquarters of US Central Command. Qatar had already taken precautions earlier in the day, suspending all air traffic and citing “regional developments” as the reason. The move came shortly after the US and UK embassies in Doha advised their citizens to shelter in place. In a televised message, Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaqari accused the US of inflaming the conflict by backing Israel’s military actions and striking Iran directly. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” he said.

The US is tracking multiple missile launches from Iran, some of which are believed to be directed towards Ain al-Asad. This is the same base that was struck by Iranian missiles in January 2020 following the killing of General Qasem Soleimani.

After Qatar, Iran fires missiles at US base in Iraq: Ain al-Asad on high alert

Qatar has temporarily closed its airspace as a security precaution, its foreign ministry announced on Monday (June 23). "The competent Qatari authorities announce the temporary suspension of air traffic in the country's airspace, to ensure the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors," the Qatari ministry posted on X. The move comes amid rising concerns that Iran may soon target US military sites in the region in response to recent airstrikes on its nuclear facilities.The decision to suspend air traffic was described by Qatari officials as part of “a set of precautionary measures based on regional developments.” The government stressed that the country’s security remains stable.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-threatens-us-after-trump-s-bullseye-strike-on-nuclear-sites-says-we-will-end-this-war-1750694777361">'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after Trump’s ‘bullseye’ strike on nuclear sites; says 'we will end' this war</a><h2>US base at Al Udeid placed on high alert</h2>Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation.According to reports, the base is now on high alert. The BBC cited sources who said there is “a credible threat” to the US-run Coalition Air Operations Centre located at the base. The threat is believed to be a potential missile strike from Iran.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-18-hour-flight-mid-air-refuellings-how-us-fooled-iran-with-decoy-b-2-bombers-and-hit-three-nuclear-facilities-1750682313639">'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities</a><h2>UK and US embassies issue safety warning</h2>The US embassy in Qatar issued a message urging American citizens to “shelter in place until further notice.” The UK government has also advised British nationals in Qatar to do the same, citing concerns about possible regional retaliation from Iran. Both advisories noted that the warning was made “out of an abundance of caution” and did not offer specific details about the nature of the threat.Following the embassy advisories, local institutions in Doha reportedly sent alerts to employees and students. However, Qatari foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari said there was no direct threat identified and said that the country is “prepared to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of its citizens and residents.”<h2>Iran vows to strike back after US hits nuclear sites</h2>The heightened alert comes just days after US President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on several Iranian nuclear facilities using bunker-buster bombs. Trump called the operation a “Bullseye!!!” and claimed “monumental damage” had been inflicted on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, particularly “far below ground level.”In response, Iran warned that the US had expanded its list of legitimate military targets by getting involved in the conflict. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaqari said in a&nbsp;video&nbsp;message.

Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation.

Qatar has temporarily closed its airspace as a security precaution, its foreign ministry announced on Monday (June 23). "The competent Qatari authorities announce the temporary suspension of air traffic in the country's airspace, to ensure the safety of citizens, residents, and visitors," the Qatari ministry posted on X. The move comes amid rising concerns that Iran may soon target US military sites in the region in response to recent airstrikes on its nuclear facilities. The decision to suspend air traffic was described by Qatari officials as part of “a set of precautionary measures based on regional developments.” The government stressed that the country’s security remains stable. Also read: 'Trump, the gambler…': Iran threatens US after Trump’s ‘bullseye’ strike on nuclear sites; says 'we will end' this war US base at Al Udeid placed on high alert Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation. According to reports, the base is now on high alert. The BBC cited sources who said there is “a credible threat” to the US-run Coalition Air Operations Centre located at the base. The threat is believed to be a potential missile strike from Iran. Also read: '18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities UK and US embassies issue safety warning The US embassy in Qatar issued a message urging American citizens to “shelter in place until further notice.” The UK government has also advised British nationals in Qatar to do the same, citing concerns about possible regional retaliation from Iran. Both advisories noted that the warning was made “out of an abundance of caution” and did not offer specific details about the nature of the threat. Following the embassy advisories, local institutions in Doha reportedly sent alerts to employees and students. However, Qatari foreign ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari said there was no direct threat identified and said that the country is “prepared to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of its citizens and residents.” Iran vows to strike back after US hits nuclear sites The heightened alert comes just days after US President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on several Iranian nuclear facilities using bunker-buster bombs. Trump called the operation a “Bullseye!!!” and claimed “monumental damage” had been inflicted on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, particularly “far below ground level.” In response, Iran warned that the US had expanded its list of legitimate military targets by getting involved in the conflict. “Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it,” Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaqari said in a video message.

Al Udeid Air Base, located near Doha, is the largest US military installation in the Middle East and home to US Central Command’s forward headquarters. It hosts around 10,000 US troops and also includes UK military personnel on rotation.

Iran to target Qatar next? Doha halts air traffic amid fears of Iranian missile strike on LARGEST US airbase in Middle East

By embedding the engines deep within the wing and using S-shaped inlets, the B-2 avoids radar and infrared detection, a key reason it's still unmatched.

By embedding the engines deep within the wing and using S-shaped inlets, the B-2 avoids radar and infrared detection, a key reason it's still unmatched.

What engines does the B-2 bomber use, and how much mileage does it give?

One of the darkest, most controversial chapters in this saga was the Iran–Contra affair, a secret, illegal web of arms deals, hostage diplomacy, and foreign insurgencies that nearly collapsed the Reagan presidency.

One of the darkest, most controversial chapters in this saga was the Iran–Contra affair, a secret, illegal web of arms deals, hostage diplomacy, and foreign insurgencies that nearly collapsed the Reagan presidency.

What was Iran-Contra affair, a political scandal that nearly brought down a US President?

An 18-hour flight each way, multiple mid-air refuellings, and clever diversions, this is what the US did to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. The mission, known as Operation Midnight Hammer, relied on misdirection and stealth to ensure maximum impact with minimum detection.<h2>A false trail: B-2s seen heading towards the Pacific</h2>On Saturday, a formation of B-2 stealth bombers took off from their base in Missouri. Observers spotted them flying toward Guam, a US territory in the Pacific. It appeared the US was signalling a strike was coming, just not immediately. But this flight was a decoy, meant to draw attention away from the real mission.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-iran-s-secret-cyber-war-how-tehran-tel-aviv-are-waging-war-online-and-why-us-is-in-the-crossfire-1750610574082">Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire?</a>While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected. US fighter jets also played a role in the deception, flying ahead of the stealth bombers to draw out enemy defences.As the bombers approached Iranian airspace, a US submarine fired over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles to disable critical air defences. Within minutes, the B-2s dropped 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 30,000 pounds, on Iran’s key nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-s-fordow-still-not-completely-obliterated-after-being-hit-by-us-bunker-busters-here-s-what-israeli-and-us-intelligence-reveal-1750613456192">Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal</a><h2>Largest-ever B-2 mission went undetected</h2>The operation marked the largest-ever coordinated B-2 strike and the second-longest B-2 flight in history, second only to post-9/11 missions. The Pentagon confirmed that more than 125 aircraft supported the effort. General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Iran did not detect the bombers. “Iran’s fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran’s surface-to-air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission. We retained the element of surprise,” he said.<h2>Trump posted about mission before officials were briefed</h2>The operation’s secrecy was so tight that even top officials in Washington weren’t informed in advance. “Very few people knew the timing or nature of the plan,” Caine told reporters, adding that many only learnt of the mission after President Donald Trump announced it on social media late Saturday night. The US airstrikes followed an earlier barrage of missiles fired by Israel under Operation Rising Lion.Commercial satellite images shared by Reuters showed signs of major destruction at Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear facility. Experts said the deeply buried site and the equipment used for uranium enrichment may have been seriously damaged, though the extent is still unclear.Initial assessments suggested that all three nuclear sites targeted by the US had sustained significant damage. However, General Caine declined to say whether Iran’s nuclear programme had been fully dismantled.Following the US attack, Iran launched a missile assault on Israel. The strikes injured dozens and caused widespread destruction in Tel Aviv, leaving several buildings in ruins. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.

While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected.

An 18-hour flight each way, multiple mid-air refuellings, and clever diversions, this is what the US did to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities. The mission, known as Operation Midnight Hammer, relied on misdirection and stealth to ensure maximum impact with minimum detection. A false trail: B-2s seen heading towards the Pacific On Saturday, a formation of B-2 stealth bombers took off from their base in Missouri. Observers spotted them flying toward Guam, a US territory in the Pacific. It appeared the US was signalling a strike was coming, just not immediately. But this flight was a decoy, meant to draw attention away from the real mission. Also read: Israel and Iran’s secret cyber war: How Tehran, Tel Aviv are waging war online and why US is in the crossfire? While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected. US fighter jets also played a role in the deception, flying ahead of the stealth bombers to draw out enemy defences. As the bombers approached Iranian airspace, a US submarine fired over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles to disable critical air defences. Within minutes, the B-2s dropped 14 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, each weighing 30,000 pounds, on Iran’s key nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Also read: Iran's Fordow still not 'completely obliterated' after being hit by US bunker-busters? Here's what Israeli and US intelligence reveal Largest-ever B-2 mission went undetected The operation marked the largest-ever coordinated B-2 strike and the second-longest B-2 flight in history, second only to post-9/11 missions. The Pentagon confirmed that more than 125 aircraft supported the effort. General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Iran did not detect the bombers. “Iran’s fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran’s surface-to-air missile systems did not see us throughout the mission. We retained the element of surprise,” he said. Trump posted about mission before officials were briefed The operation’s secrecy was so tight that even top officials in Washington weren’t informed in advance. “Very few people knew the timing or nature of the plan,” Caine told reporters, adding that many only learnt of the mission after President Donald Trump announced it on social media late Saturday night. The US airstrikes followed an earlier barrage of missiles fired by Israel under Operation Rising Lion. Commercial satellite images shared by Reuters showed signs of major destruction at Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear facility. Experts said the deeply buried site and the equipment used for uranium enrichment may have been seriously damaged, though the extent is still unclear. Initial assessments suggested that all three nuclear sites targeted by the US had sustained significant damage. However, General Caine declined to say whether Iran’s nuclear programme had been fully dismantled. Following the US attack, Iran launched a missile assault on Israel. The strikes injured dozens and caused widespread destruction in Tel Aviv, leaving several buildings in ruins. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.

While the world watched the Pacific, seven other B-2 bombers quietly flew east on an 18-hour mission toward Iran. Keeping radio silence, flying under radar, and refuelling mid-air, these aircraft remained undetected.

'18-hour flight, mid-air refuellings': How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities

The Strait of Hormuz—a narrow, 33-km-wide maritime chokepoint between Iran and Oman—is once again at the centre of global attention, this time more perilously than ever before. Amid intensifying military conflict in West Asia, Iran’s Parliament has reportedly approved a plan to block the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation of the US’ airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. While the final decision rests with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, even the suggestion of a closure has already roiled global oil markets and raised alarm across nations that depend on oil imports for their energy needs.The Strait is one of the world’s most critical energy arteries, through which nearly 20 per cent of the world’s oil and LNG (liquified natural gas) flows daily, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). In 2024 alone, about 17 million barrels of oil and 25 per cent of global LNG passed through this route. A blockade—even if temporary—could disrupt more than $2 trillion worth of trade, spike oil prices beyond $120 per barrel, and unleash inflationary shocks across continents.<h2>India faces the heat of the conflict</h2>India, which relies heavily on crude and gas imports to power its economy, is particularly vulnerable. According to ICRA, 45–50 per cent of India’s crude oil imports pass through the Strait, sourced primarily from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE. Additionally, India’s LNG imports, especially from Qatar, are routed through Hormuz, making the potential closure an energy security nightmare.Oil prices have already surged in anticipation. Brent crude rose 2 per cent to hover near $80 per barrel, while analysts warn that a prolonged disruption could push it well past $100–120 per barrel.The economic fallout for India would be immediate. ICRA estimates that every $10/barrel increase in oil prices would inflate India’s oil import bill by $13-14 billion annually, while widening the current account deficit (CAD) by 0.3 per cent of GDP. If crude averages $80–90/barrel in FY26, CAD may expand to 1.5–1.6 per cent of GDP, up from 1.2–1.3 per cent, triggering pressure on the Indian rupee and worsening inflation.A 10 per cent surge in oil prices would also raise WPI inflation by 80-100 bps and CPI inflation by 20-30 bps, straining household budgets and increasing the cost of living.Industries highly dependent on petroleum inputs, like tyres, paints, and fertilisers, would see margin pressures. Oil marketing companies (HPCL, BPCL, IOC) may struggle to pass on higher input costs, while upstream firms like ONGC and Oil India could benefit from elevated crude prices.<h2>China’s dilemma: Energy strategy under pressure</h2>China, the world’s largest crude importer, is also staring at major disruption. Roughly 14 per cent of China’s crude oil imports come from Iran, with additional volumes routed indirectly through Malaysia and the UAE to circumvent sanctions. China’s independent refiners rely heavily on discounted Iranian crude and fuel oil, while its vast plastics and petrochemical sectors depend on Iranian LPG, which makes up nearly 25 per cent of its LPG (liquified petroleum gas) imports.A closure of Hormuz or a partial halt in Iranian exports would leave China scrambling to secure alternative supplies. Demand has already surged for Indian Ocean-side crudes like Abu Dhabi’s Murban and Russian ESPO. Any further disruption could force China to compete more aggressively in the spot market, pushing global prices even higher.<h2>Asia’s energy axis: Japan, South Korea, and the rest</h2>Beyond India and China, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia also remain deeply exposed. Collectively, Asia consumes over 80 per cent of the oil and gas transiting Hormuz. Japan and South Korea, in particular, rely on Gulf oil for their refineries and LNG for their power plants. A closure could trigger energy shortages, increase power tariffs, and exacerbate inflation across the region.For smaller Asian economies still recovering from the pandemic and supply chain shocks, this could prove destabilising. LNG-based power producers and city gas distribution (CGD) firms, like Adani Total Gas, Mahanagar Gas, and Indraprastha Gas, could see margins shrink as imported fuel becomes prohibitively expensive.<h2>Global repercussions: From Europe to Wall Street</h2>The impact won’t stop in Asia. Europe, still reeling from the fallout of the Ukraine war, depends on Qatari LNG routed through Hormuz. A disruption could intensify energy shortages and derail recovery.The global shipping and insurance industries would also feel the pinch. Tankers, already paying higher war-risk premiums, may be rerouted through longer, more expensive paths like around South Africa, delaying deliveries and increasing freight rates.Market volatility is inevitable. Stock indices have already begun to reflect war jitters, and a sustained oil rally could force central banks to revise inflation outlooks, pause rate cuts, or even raise rates again.<h2>Iran’s strategic gamble: A double-edged sword</h2>While Iran's threat to close the Strait may be driven by strategic calculations, it risks severe self-inflicted damage. Over 90 per cent of Iran’s own crude and LNG exports pass through Hormuz. Any closure would undercut Tehran’s discounted oil sales to China, one of its few remaining financial lifelines amid sanctions.Moreover, closure would alienate allies like China and Russia, who rely on uninterrupted flows. It could also provoke a military response from the US, UK, or France, all of which maintain naval forces in the region. Historically, even during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, the Strait was never fully blocked, underlining the severity of such a move.<h2>Outlook remains fragile, volatile, and contingent on diplomacy</h2>As of now, Iran has not formally enacted a closure, but tensions remain sky-high. The international community, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has called on China to pressure Iran into restraint, warning of “economic suicide” if the Strait is blocked.Short-term oil volatility is almost certain, with prices reacting sharply to geopolitical signals. Strategic oil reserves may offer temporary cushioning, but a prolonged crisis would require diplomatic interventions, alternate logistics planning, and possibly new trade partnerships.

For India and much of Asia, the coming weeks will be crucial. As the world's energy lifeline teeters on the brink, every diplomatic move, military engagement, and shipping update will reverberate across economies, markets, and households.

The Strait of Hormuz—a narrow, 33-km-wide maritime chokepoint between Iran and Oman—is once again at the centre of global attention, this time more perilously than ever before. Amid intensifying military conflict in West Asia, Iran’s Parliament has reportedly approved a plan to block the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation of the US’ airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites. While the final decision rests with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, even the suggestion of a closure has already roiled global oil markets and raised alarm across nations that depend on oil imports for their energy needs. The Strait is one of the world’s most critical energy arteries, through which nearly 20 per cent of the world’s oil and LNG (liquified natural gas) flows daily, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). In 2024 alone, about 17 million barrels of oil and 25 per cent of global LNG passed through this route. A blockade—even if temporary—could disrupt more than $2 trillion worth of trade, spike oil prices beyond $120 per barrel, and unleash inflationary shocks across continents. India faces the heat of the conflict India, which relies heavily on crude and gas imports to power its economy, is particularly vulnerable. According to ICRA, 45–50 per cent of India’s crude oil imports pass through the Strait, sourced primarily from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE. Additionally, India’s LNG imports, especially from Qatar, are routed through Hormuz, making the potential closure an energy security nightmare. Oil prices have already surged in anticipation. Brent crude rose 2 per cent to hover near $80 per barrel, while analysts warn that a prolonged disruption could push it well past $100–120 per barrel. The economic fallout for India would be immediate. ICRA estimates that every $10/barrel increase in oil prices would inflate India’s oil import bill by $13-14 billion annually, while widening the current account deficit (CAD) by 0.3 per cent of GDP. If crude averages $80–90/barrel in FY26, CAD may expand to 1.5–1.6 per cent of GDP, up from 1.2–1.3 per cent, triggering pressure on the Indian rupee and worsening inflation. A 10 per cent surge in oil prices would also raise WPI inflation by 80-100 bps and CPI inflation by 20-30 bps, straining household budgets and increasing the cost of living. Industries highly dependent on petroleum inputs, like tyres, paints, and fertilisers, would see margin pressures. Oil marketing companies (HPCL, BPCL, IOC) may struggle to pass on higher input costs, while upstream firms like ONGC and Oil India could benefit from elevated crude prices. China’s dilemma: Energy strategy under pressure China, the world’s largest crude importer, is also staring at major disruption. Roughly 14 per cent of China’s crude oil imports come from Iran, with additional volumes routed indirectly through Malaysia and the UAE to circumvent sanctions. China’s independent refiners rely heavily on discounted Iranian crude and fuel oil, while its vast plastics and petrochemical sectors depend on Iranian LPG, which makes up nearly 25 per cent of its LPG (liquified petroleum gas) imports. A closure of Hormuz or a partial halt in Iranian exports would leave China scrambling to secure alternative supplies. Demand has already surged for Indian Ocean-side crudes like Abu Dhabi’s Murban and Russian ESPO. Any further disruption could force China to compete more aggressively in the spot market, pushing global prices even higher. Asia’s energy axis: Japan, South Korea, and the rest Beyond India and China, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia also remain deeply exposed. Collectively, Asia consumes over 80 per cent of the oil and gas transiting Hormuz. Japan and South Korea, in particular, rely on Gulf oil for their refineries and LNG for their power plants. A closure could trigger energy shortages, increase power tariffs, and exacerbate inflation across the region. For smaller Asian economies still recovering from the pandemic and supply chain shocks, this could prove destabilising. LNG-based power producers and city gas distribution (CGD) firms, like Adani Total Gas, Mahanagar Gas, and Indraprastha Gas, could see margins shrink as imported fuel becomes prohibitively expensive. Global repercussions: From Europe to Wall Street The impact won’t stop in Asia. Europe, still reeling from the fallout of the Ukraine war, depends on Qatari LNG routed through Hormuz. A disruption could intensify energy shortages and derail recovery. The global shipping and insurance industries would also feel the pinch. Tankers, already paying higher war-risk premiums, may be rerouted through longer, more expensive paths like around South Africa, delaying deliveries and increasing freight rates. Market volatility is inevitable. Stock indices have already begun to reflect war jitters, and a sustained oil rally could force central banks to revise inflation outlooks, pause rate cuts, or even raise rates again. Iran’s strategic gamble: A double-edged sword While Iran's threat to close the Strait may be driven by strategic calculations, it risks severe self-inflicted damage. Over 90 per cent of Iran’s own crude and LNG exports pass through Hormuz. Any closure would undercut Tehran’s discounted oil sales to China, one of its few remaining financial lifelines amid sanctions. Moreover, closure would alienate allies like China and Russia, who rely on uninterrupted flows. It could also provoke a military response from the US, UK, or France, all of which maintain naval forces in the region. Historically, even during the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, the Strait was never fully blocked, underlining the severity of such a move. Outlook remains fragile, volatile, and contingent on diplomacy As of now, Iran has not formally enacted a closure, but tensions remain sky-high. The international community, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has called on China to pressure Iran into restraint, warning of “economic suicide” if the Strait is blocked. Short-term oil volatility is almost certain, with prices reacting sharply to geopolitical signals. Strategic oil reserves may offer temporary cushioning, but a prolonged crisis would require diplomatic interventions, alternate logistics planning, and possibly new trade partnerships.

For India and much of Asia, the coming weeks will be crucial. As the world's energy lifeline teeters on the brink, every diplomatic move, military engagement, and shipping update will reverberate across economies, markets, and households.

Strait of Hormuz risks: Asia, including India and China, braces for economic jitters

As the United States deploys its most advanced B-2 Spirit stealth bombers in support of Israel amid growing tensions with Iran, few realise that this cutting-edge aircraft owes part of its existence to the Third Reich’s secret war files. The sleek flying wing design of the B-2, capable of evading radar and penetrating deep into enemy airspace, was inspired by a top-secret Nazi project known as the Horten Ho 229, a revolutionary jet developed in the final years of Adolf Hitler’s Germany. This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers. Their expertise, once devoted to Hitler’s war machine, soon powered America’s own military ambitions from space travel to stealth technology.&nbsp;During the Second World War, the Horten brothers, Reimar and Walter, were pioneers of aviation design, working under the Luftwaffe’s command. Their masterpiece was the Ho 229, the world’s first jet-powered flying wing, a radical aircraft without tail or fuselage. Its shape, designed for aerodynamic efficiency, had the added effect of reducing its visibility to radar, a principle we now call “stealth”.&nbsp;The Ho 229 never flew in combat, as the war ended before the aircraft could be fully developed. However, in April 1945, American forces overran the German base where the prototype was stored. Recognising its potential, the Allies seized not only the airframe but also an entire trove of scientific documents — blueprints, notes, and aerodynamic data.&nbsp;These materials became part of the haul brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip. The controversial programme secretly transported more than 1,600 German scientists, many of whom had worked for the Nazi regime, to help the US counter Soviet advances in military and space technology. Among the recruits were experts in rocketry, aerodynamics, and aircraft design.In the decades that followed, American engineers continued exploring the flying wing concept, heavily informed by the Horten brothers’ work. This research culminated in the creation of the B-2 Spirit, first flown in 1989 and now the most advanced stealth bomber in the world.&nbsp;With its elegant curved wings, composite materials and radar-absorbing skin, the B-2 can evade even the most sophisticated air defences. Its ability to deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads at intercontinental range has made it one of the most formidable aircraft ever built.Ironically, as the B-2 now flies missions over the Middle East to assist Israel, a nation founded in the shadow of the Holocaust, its design is rooted in Nazi aviation experiments once meant to serve Hitler’s ambitions. The historical twist is stark, technology born in a bid to win a fascist war is now employed to defend a democratic state threatened by modern adversaries.&nbsp;Operation Paperclip remains one of the more controversial chapters of post-war history. While it undeniably advanced US scientific leadership and Northrop Gunnman's innovation but it also involved moral compromises, as Nazi officials and collaborators were quietly granted asylum and employment in exchange for their technical expertise.&nbsp;Today, the B-2’s legacy is inseparable from this complex history. As these stealth bombers continue to patrol skies in support of Israel, they carry with them a hidden lineage — one that began in the dark heart of Nazi Germany, was reshaped by American ingenuity, and now plays a key role in global power projection.

This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers.

As the United States deploys its most advanced B-2 Spirit stealth bombers in support of Israel amid growing tensions with Iran, few realise that this cutting-edge aircraft owes part of its existence to the Third Reich’s secret war files. The sleek flying wing design of the B-2, capable of evading radar and penetrating deep into enemy airspace, was inspired by a top-secret Nazi project known as the Horten Ho 229, a revolutionary jet developed in the final years of Adolf Hitler’s Germany. This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers. Their expertise, once devoted to Hitler’s war machine, soon powered America’s own military ambitions from space travel to stealth technology. During the Second World War, the Horten brothers, Reimar and Walter, were pioneers of aviation design, working under the Luftwaffe’s command. Their masterpiece was the Ho 229, the world’s first jet-powered flying wing, a radical aircraft without tail or fuselage. Its shape, designed for aerodynamic efficiency, had the added effect of reducing its visibility to radar, a principle we now call “stealth”. The Ho 229 never flew in combat, as the war ended before the aircraft could be fully developed. However, in April 1945, American forces overran the German base where the prototype was stored. Recognising its potential, the Allies seized not only the airframe but also an entire trove of scientific documents — blueprints, notes, and aerodynamic data. These materials became part of the haul brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip. The controversial programme secretly transported more than 1,600 German scientists, many of whom had worked for the Nazi regime, to help the US counter Soviet advances in military and space technology. Among the recruits were experts in rocketry, aerodynamics, and aircraft design. In the decades that followed, American engineers continued exploring the flying wing concept, heavily informed by the Horten brothers’ work. This research culminated in the creation of the B-2 Spirit, first flown in 1989 and now the most advanced stealth bomber in the world. With its elegant curved wings, composite materials and radar-absorbing skin, the B-2 can evade even the most sophisticated air defences. Its ability to deliver both nuclear and conventional payloads at intercontinental range has made it one of the most formidable aircraft ever built. Ironically, as the B-2 now flies missions over the Middle East to assist Israel, a nation founded in the shadow of the Holocaust, its design is rooted in Nazi aviation experiments once meant to serve Hitler’s ambitions. The historical twist is stark, technology born in a bid to win a fascist war is now employed to defend a democratic state threatened by modern adversaries. Operation Paperclip remains one of the more controversial chapters of post-war history. While it undeniably advanced US scientific leadership and Northrop Gunnman's innovation but it also involved moral compromises, as Nazi officials and collaborators were quietly granted asylum and employment in exchange for their technical expertise. Today, the B-2’s legacy is inseparable from this complex history. As these stealth bombers continue to patrol skies in support of Israel, they carry with them a hidden lineage — one that began in the dark heart of Nazi Germany, was reshaped by American ingenuity, and now plays a key role in global power projection.

This curious connection between Nazi science and modern American airpower was made possible through Operation Paperclip, a covert post-war US programme that recruited hundreds of German scientists and engineers.

B-2 Bomber helped Israel, but its origins lie in Hitler’s secret Nazi war files

When did the B-2 first make its presence felt in active warfare? The moment came in 1999, during NATO’s campaign in Kosovo. Here’s a breakdown of what happened, along with the long-standing question: did it deliver depleted uranium munitions?

When did the B-2 first make its presence felt in active warfare? The moment came in 1999, during NATO’s campaign in Kosovo. Here’s a breakdown of what happened, along with the long-standing question: did it deliver depleted uranium munitions?

Did US use B-2 bomber to drop depleted uranium in Kosovo War?

What if it had not gone according to plan.. Here is what would have happened if the B 2 bomber had been detected mid mission. 

What if it hadn’t gone according to plan? Here's what would have happened if the B-2 bomber had been detected mid-mission.

What if B-2 Bomber gets caught in enemy airspace? This is how it can defend itself...

Unlike many other bombers, the B-2 offers limited outward visibility. Its cockpit is designed for long-haul stealth missions, where external observation is minimal. Pilots rely heavily on their sensors and avionics, rather than visual cues.

Unlike many other bombers, the B-2 offers limited outward visibility. Its cockpit is designed for long-haul stealth missions, where external observation is minimal. Pilots rely heavily on their sensors and avionics, rather than visual cues.

Inside B-2 Bomber: What it’s like to fly the world’s most secretive aircraft

The B-21 incorporates next-generation stealth materials and design improvements. It is built to evade the latest radar systems, including those used by emerging military powers. The Air Force expects it to survive in heavily contested airspace where older bombers might be detected.

The B-21 incorporates next-generation stealth materials and design improvements. It is built to evade the latest radar systems, including those used by emerging military powers. The Air Force expects it to survive in heavily contested airspace where older bombers might be detected.

Why B-2 Bomber could be replaced with B-21 Raider?

The unique composite materials used in the B-2’s structure are prone to corrosion if exposed to uncontrolled environments. Air-conditioned hangars ensure a stable atmosphere that prevents the gradual degradation of these critical materials.

The unique composite materials used in the B-2’s structure are prone to corrosion if exposed to uncontrolled environments. Air-conditioned hangars ensure a stable atmosphere that prevents the gradual degradation of these critical materials.

Why B-2 Bomber requires a special hangar with air conditioning?

Tensions have spiked after the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities. In retaliation, Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could block oil shipments to several countries, including India and Europe.

Tensions have spiked after the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities. In retaliation, Iran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, a move that could block oil shipments to several countries, including India and Europe.

Can 'Strait of Hormuz' trigger a war between the US and Iran?

Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, through which about 20 per cent of the world’s oil passes daily. It is one of the world’s most strategic chokepoints for global trade.

Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, through which about 20 per cent of the world’s oil passes daily. It is one of the world’s most strategic chokepoints for global trade.

Strait of Hormuz: 4 key commodities India relies on from this vital trade route

India maintains a Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), managed by Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL) under the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. The SPR is meant to cushion India against supply disruptions.

India maintains a Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), managed by Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL) under the Ministry of Petroleum &amp; Natural Gas. The SPR is meant to cushion India against supply disruptions.

Strait of Hormuz: How many days can India survive with its strategic oil reserves?

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow passage through which about 20 per cent of the world’s oil is shipped. For India, nearly 60-65 per cent of crude oil imports transit this corridor from Gulf nations.

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow passage through which about 20 per cent of the world’s oil is shipped. For India, nearly 60-65 per cent of crude oil imports transit this corridor from Gulf nations.

Strait of Hormuz: Will oil prices rise in India if Iran closes the water corridor?

The Strait handles 20 per cent of global oil flows. It is critical for energy security in India, China, Japan, and South Korea. Any blockage would hit India’s crude supply chain hard.

The Strait handles 20 per cent of global oil flows. It is critical for energy security in India, China, Japan, and South Korea. Any blockage would hit India’s crude supply chain hard.

Strait of Hormuz closure: Does India import 70% of its oil through this water corridor?

In the 1940s, Nazi engineers Walter and Reimar Horten designed a revolutionary flying wing aircraft, the Horten Ho 229. It was meant to be fast, long-range, and hard to detect by radar, decades ahead of its time.

In the 1940s, Nazi engineers Walter and Reimar Horten designed a revolutionary flying wing aircraft, the Horten Ho 229. It was meant to be fast, long-range, and hard to detect by radar, decades ahead of its time.

Hitler’s obsession? B-2 Bomber’s design was inspired by a lost Nazi blueprint from 1940s

The B-2 can carry up to 18,000 kg (40,000 lbs) of munitions inside its two large internal bomb bays, maintaining stealth while delivering devastating firepower.

The B-2 can carry up to 18,000 kg (40,000 lbs) of munitions inside its two large internal bomb bays, maintaining stealth while delivering devastating firepower.

What weapons can US B-2 Bomber carry and how many?

The B-2’s unique “flying wing” design with no tail, sharp edges, or vertical surfaces, helps scatter and deflect radar waves away from the transmitting source, making it extremely difficult for radar to detect and track.

The B-2’s unique “flying wing” design with no tail, sharp edges, or vertical surfaces, helps scatter and deflect radar waves away from the transmitting source, making it extremely difficult for radar to detect and track.

How B-2 Bomber avoids radar? Understanding the science of invisibility

us-iran-war

Us Iran War, News on Us Iran War, stories on Us Iran War, articles on Us Iran War, Us Iran War stories at Wion, Us Iran War news, Us Iran War latest news

us iran-war

Trump delays Iran strike as US tells UN ‘all options on the table’ amid rising tensions

US vs Iran: Why avoiding war is vital for global peace and oil stability

Pentagon’s Playbook: 5 ways US could strike Iran amidst the 2026 uprising

Is Iran really a threat or a victim? Know 70 years of conflicts with US

'Under rubble for 3 hrs': Khamenei's top advisor recounts surviving airstrike

Was Iran's missile attack on US bases in Qatar just for show?

Khamenei's BIG statement on 'surrender' before Trump's ceasefire announcement

Why Iran's retaliation against B-2 Bomber feels like firecrackers in a storm?

How a Middle East war could unfold after B-2 Bomber, Al Udeid Air Base attack

Are US troops safe in the Middle East and how prepared are they for strikes?

Why Iran chose to target Qatar? Strategic reasons behind Tehran’s retaliation

After Qatar, Iran fires missiles at US base in Iraq: Ain al-Asad on high alert

Iran to target Qatar next? Doha halts air traffic amid fears of Iranian missile strike on LARGEST US airbase in Middle East

What engines does the B-2 bomber use, and how much mileage does it give?

What was Iran-Contra affair? A secret arms deal that rocked a US presidency

How US fooled Iran with 'decoy' B-2 bombers and hit three nuclear facilities

Strait of Hormuz risks: Asia, including India and China, braces for jitters