US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Sep 21) once again claimed that he was responsible for brokering peace between India and Pakistan, and other nations. Speaking at the American Cornerstone Institute Founder's Dinner, he said he should be honoured with seven Nobel Prizes, one each for "ending seven wars". Trump claimed that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan using trade.<h2>Trade solved the India-Pakistan war?</h2>Trump claimed that he respected the leaders of the two nations and that to solve their differences he used trade. "We are forging peace agreements, and we are stopping wars. So we stopped wars between India and Pakistan, Thailand and Cambodia," he said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-to-recognise-palestine-today-despite-israel-slamming-move-as-rewarding-terrorism-was-the-move-delayed-by-trump-visit-1758428851590">UK to recognise Palestine today despite Israel slamming move as 'rewarding terrorism'. Was the move delayed by Trump visit?</a>"Think of India and Pakistan. Think of that. And you know how I stopped that -- with trade. They want to trade. And I have great respect for both leaders. But when you take a look at all of these wars that we've stopped," added Trump. He then proceeded to list other wars he has influenced using trade, naming those in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kosovo and Serbia, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Rwanda and the Congo."Just look at that. India, Pakistan, Thailand, Cambodia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kosovo and Serbia, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Rwanda and the Congo. We stopped all of them. And 60 per cent of them were stopped because of trade," he said.The US president claimed that he told India "look, we're not going to do any trade if you're going to fight and they have nuclear weapons," and that in response New Delhi stopped."I said, 'Well, what about the seven others? I should get a Nobel Prize for each one'. So they said, 'but if you stop Russia and Ukraine, sir, you should be able to get the Nobel'. I said I stopped seven wars. That's one war, and that's a big one," he said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-warns-afghanistan-rulers-taliban-hand-back-bagram-airbase-or-bad-things-are-going-to-happen-1758418119901">Trump warns Taliban: Hand back Bagram airbase or 'BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN'</a><h2>Trump thought Ukraine-Russia war would be easy to solve</h2>He then claimed that he initially thought that solving the Russia-Ukraine conflict would be easy to solve given his personal equation with Russian president Vladimir Putin. He then proceeded to slam Putin and said he was "disappointed in him"."Because I have a good relationship with President Putin, disappointed in him, but I do. I thought that would be the easiest one, but we'll get it done one way or the other," he said.&nbsp;

In a speech on Saturday, US President Donald Trump once again claimed he was responsible for brokering peace between India and Pakistan and several other nations. He stated that he should receive seven Nobel Prizes for "ending seven wars" and that he used trade to solve these conflicts.

US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Sep 21) once again claimed that he was responsible for brokering peace between India and Pakistan, and other nations. Speaking at the American Cornerstone Institute Founder's Dinner, he said he should be honoured with seven Nobel Prizes, one each for "ending seven wars". Trump claimed that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan using trade. Trade solved the India-Pakistan war? Trump claimed that he respected the leaders of the two nations and that to solve their differences he used trade. "We are forging peace agreements, and we are stopping wars. So we stopped wars between India and Pakistan, Thailand and Cambodia," he said. Also read | UK to recognise Palestine today despite Israel slamming move as 'rewarding terrorism'. Was the move delayed by Trump visit? "Think of India and Pakistan. Think of that. And you know how I stopped that -- with trade. They want to trade. And I have great respect for both leaders. But when you take a look at all of these wars that we've stopped," added Trump. He then proceeded to list other wars he has influenced using trade, naming those in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kosovo and Serbia, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Rwanda and the Congo. "Just look at that. India, Pakistan, Thailand, Cambodia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kosovo and Serbia, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, Rwanda and the Congo. We stopped all of them. And 60 per cent of them were stopped because of trade," he said. The US president claimed that he told India "look, we're not going to do any trade if you're going to fight and they have nuclear weapons," and that in response New Delhi stopped. "I said, 'Well, what about the seven others? I should get a Nobel Prize for each one'. So they said, 'but if you stop Russia and Ukraine, sir, you should be able to get the Nobel'. I said I stopped seven wars. That's one war, and that's a big one," he said. Also read | Trump warns Taliban: Hand back Bagram airbase or 'BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN' Trump thought Ukraine-Russia war would be easy to solve He then claimed that he initially thought that solving the Russia-Ukraine conflict would be easy to solve given his personal equation with Russian president Vladimir Putin. He then proceeded to slam Putin and said he was "disappointed in him". "Because I have a good relationship with President Putin, disappointed in him, but I do. I thought that would be the easiest one, but we'll get it done one way or the other," he said.

In a speech on Saturday, US President Donald Trump once again claimed he was responsible for brokering peace between India and Pakistan and several other nations. He stated that he should receive seven Nobel Prizes for "ending seven wars" and that he used trade to solve these conflicts.

'I should get a Nobel Prize for each one': Trump demands seven Nobels for 'solving' 7 wars, once again takes credit for India-Pak ceasefire

From Epstein's list to sexual misconduct, from the Russia investigation to funding Israel in its mass massacre, US President Donald Trump is one of the most polarising figures in the world as of now. But he is being endorsed for the Nobel Peace Prize by leaders from several countries, such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Israel, and Cambodia. Ironically, he might not be the most scandalous nomination. Here is the list of three well-known dictators who were also nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize at different points in history.<h2>Benito Mussolini</h2>Mussolini was nominated in 1935 by a German law professor and a French professor. It had been 13 years since Mussolini had been the ruler of the totalitarian regime in Italy. His regime jailed and tortured political opponents. The Italian fascist dictator was then preparing for the invasion of Ethiopia. However, the proper reason behind the nominations is unknown, as the letter of recommendation is missing from the archive. Many suggest that he was praised for signing the Lateran Treaty of 1929, which resolved long-standing tensions between the Italian state and the Vatican. However, the Norwegian Nobel Committee decided not to shortlist him.&nbsp;<h2>Joseph Stalin</h2>The Communist dictator was nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize, once in 1945 and next time in 1948. There were different nominators, including a Norwegian Parliamentarian. The reason provided was his role as a leader of the Allied forces to end World War II. Even though the role of the USSR in ending the war was massive, he was overlooked because his domestic purges were well-known. His rule saw mass detention, labour camps, also known as Gulags, and suppression of dissent. Thus, there was a real detachment from the nomination and the actual actions of the candidate.<h2>Adolf Hitler&nbsp;</h2>This is perhaps the most absurd of all. In 1939, Adolf Hitler was sarcastically nominated by Erik Brandt, a Swedish Parliamentarian. He meant it as a protest against the appeasement policies. Brandt was mocking the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's agreement with Hitler. He was also mocking his fellow parliamentarians who were seriously considering Neville for the prize. He called Hitler a "hope for peace' as a joke. But this caused a huge public and media uproar; the joke fell flat in the tense pre-war period, and Brandt quickly withdrew his nominations.&nbsp;&nbsp;These nominations, however, do not represent the spirit of the prize, nor do they diminish the efforts of others who made serious contributions. For example, in 1935, when Benito Mussolini was nominated for the prize, it was won by Carl von Ossietzky, a German pacifist who was imprisoned by Nazi Germany, because of his warning about the German rearmament, which had been severely restricted by the Treaty of Versailles, following World War I. It is also to be noted that nomination for the Nobel Prize does not account for endorsement from the Nobel Committee. These lists can be longer than 300 people, which are then narrowed down to 20-30 people, from which, after deliberation by the Nobel Committee, a laureate is chosen and awarded the prize on December 10, on the death anniversary of Alfred Nobel.&nbsp;

Armenia and Azerbaijan have joined Pakistan, Israel, and Cambodia to endorse Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. However controversial he may be, there are three shocking nominations in the history of the Nobel Peace Prize that are absurd to comprehend now.

From Epstein's list to sexual misconduct, from the Russia investigation to funding Israel in its mass massacre, US President Donald Trump is one of the most polarising figures in the world as of now. But he is being endorsed for the Nobel Peace Prize by leaders from several countries, such as Armenia, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, Israel, and Cambodia. Ironically, he might not be the most scandalous nomination. Here is the list of three well-known dictators who were also nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize at different points in history. Benito Mussolini Mussolini was nominated in 1935 by a German law professor and a French professor. It had been 13 years since Mussolini had been the ruler of the totalitarian regime in Italy. His regime jailed and tortured political opponents. The Italian fascist dictator was then preparing for the invasion of Ethiopia. However, the proper reason behind the nominations is unknown, as the letter of recommendation is missing from the archive. Many suggest that he was praised for signing the Lateran Treaty of 1929, which resolved long-standing tensions between the Italian state and the Vatican. However, the Norwegian Nobel Committee decided not to shortlist him. Joseph Stalin The Communist dictator was nominated twice for the Nobel Peace Prize, once in 1945 and next time in 1948. There were different nominators, including a Norwegian Parliamentarian. The reason provided was his role as a leader of the Allied forces to end World War II. Even though the role of the USSR in ending the war was massive, he was overlooked because his domestic purges were well-known. His rule saw mass detention, labour camps, also known as Gulags, and suppression of dissent. Thus, there was a real detachment from the nomination and the actual actions of the candidate. Adolf Hitler This is perhaps the most absurd of all. In 1939, Adolf Hitler was sarcastically nominated by Erik Brandt, a Swedish Parliamentarian. He meant it as a protest against the appeasement policies. Brandt was mocking the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's agreement with Hitler. He was also mocking his fellow parliamentarians who were seriously considering Neville for the prize. He called Hitler a "hope for peace' as a joke. But this caused a huge public and media uproar; the joke fell flat in the tense pre-war period, and Brandt quickly withdrew his nominations. These nominations, however, do not represent the spirit of the prize, nor do they diminish the efforts of others who made serious contributions. For example, in 1935, when Benito Mussolini was nominated for the prize, it was won by Carl von Ossietzky, a German pacifist who was imprisoned by Nazi Germany, because of his warning about the German rearmament, which had been severely restricted by the Treaty of Versailles, following World War I. It is also to be noted that nomination for the Nobel Prize does not account for endorsement from the Nobel Committee. These lists can be longer than 300 people, which are then narrowed down to 20-30 people, from which, after deliberation by the Nobel Committee, a laureate is chosen and awarded the prize on December 10, on the death anniversary of Alfred Nobel.

Armenia and Azerbaijan have joined Pakistan, Israel, and Cambodia to endorse Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. However controversial he may be, there are three shocking nominations in the history of the Nobel Peace Prize that are absurd to comprehend now.

History’s most shocking Nobel Peace Prize nominations: #3 will blow your mind

Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is a story that's not new. Before him, four US presidents also received it

Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is a story that's not new. Before him, four US presidents also received it

Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize AGAIN! Here are four US presidents and a VP who already received it

After Pakistan and Israel, another country has backed US President Donald Trump in his bid to receive a Nobel Peace Prize. On Thursday (Aug 8), Cambodia became the third nation to officially nominate Trump for his commitment to resolving conflicts and avoiding “catastrophic” wars through his “visionary and innovative diplomacy.” This comes after the US president brokered a ceasefire between the Southeast Asian nation and its neighbour Thailand, after five days of military escalation. &nbsp;In a letter dated August 7 sent to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet wrote, “President Trump’s extraordinary statesmanship – marked by his commitment to resolving conflicts and preventing catastrophic wars through visionary and innovative diplomacy – was most recently demonstrated by his decisive role in brokering an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand.”&nbsp;“This timely intervention, which averted a potentially devastating conflict, was vital in preventing great loss of lives and paved the pay towards the restoration of peace,” it added.&nbsp;This comes after Deputy Prime Minister of Cambodia Sun Chanthol said last week that the country would nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for helping in reaching a truce with Thailand. “He should get the Nobel, not only for his work on Cambodia, but also elsewhere,” he said.&nbsp;Earlier on July 31, the White House backed the US president for his Nobel Peace Prize demand, saying he has resolved several conflicts around the world. Trump has claimed the credit for brokering a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia.&nbsp;Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “This means President Trump has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It is well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.”&nbsp;Pakistan was the first nation to nominate Trump for the top peace prize, citing his involvement in the ceasefire deal with India. Meanwhile, India has consistently rejected any foreign intervention in reaching a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan.&nbsp;“No leader in the world told India to stop its operation,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said last month. He added that he spoke with US Vice President JD Vance, “The Vice President of America told me on the phone that Pakistan is going to launch a big attack. My answer was that if Pakistan has this intention, it will cost them a lot. If Pakistan attacks, we will respond by launching a big attack.”&nbsp;Watch | India-Pakistan ceasefire and Trump's claims create a storm in Indian parliament&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-pakistan-ceasefire-and-trump-s-claims-create-a-storm-in-indian-parliament-1753890244949/embed

Another nation has joined Pakistan and Israel to officially back US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize nomination.

After Pakistan and Israel, another country has backed US President Donald Trump in his bid to receive a Nobel Peace Prize. On Thursday (Aug 8), Cambodia became the third nation to officially nominate Trump for his commitment to resolving conflicts and avoiding “catastrophic” wars through his “visionary and innovative diplomacy.” This comes after the US president brokered a ceasefire between the Southeast Asian nation and its neighbour Thailand, after five days of military escalation. In a letter dated August 7 sent to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet wrote, “President Trump’s extraordinary statesmanship – marked by his commitment to resolving conflicts and preventing catastrophic wars through visionary and innovative diplomacy – was most recently demonstrated by his decisive role in brokering an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand.” “This timely intervention, which averted a potentially devastating conflict, was vital in preventing great loss of lives and paved the pay towards the restoration of peace,” it added. This comes after Deputy Prime Minister of Cambodia Sun Chanthol said last week that the country would nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for helping in reaching a truce with Thailand. “He should get the Nobel, not only for his work on Cambodia, but also elsewhere,” he said. Earlier on July 31, the White House backed the US president for his Nobel Peace Prize demand, saying he has resolved several conflicts around the world. Trump has claimed the credit for brokering a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “This means President Trump has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It is well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.” Pakistan was the first nation to nominate Trump for the top peace prize, citing his involvement in the ceasefire deal with India. Meanwhile, India has consistently rejected any foreign intervention in reaching a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan. “No leader in the world told India to stop its operation,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said last month. He added that he spoke with US Vice President JD Vance, “The Vice President of America told me on the phone that Pakistan is going to launch a big attack. My answer was that if Pakistan has this intention, it will cost them a lot. If Pakistan attacks, we will respond by launching a big attack.” Watch | India-Pakistan ceasefire and Trump's claims create a storm in Indian parliament https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-pakistan-ceasefire-and-trump-s-claims-create-a-storm-in-indian-parliament-1753890244949/embed

Another nation has joined Pakistan and Israel to officially back US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize nomination.

Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter – What we know

During their dinner on July 7 (Monday) in the White House, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in "forging peace." Handing over an official letter to Trump, Netanyahu said that Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize and praised his efforts to pursue peace and security. Last month, Trump was nominated for the prize by Pakistan and a Republican lawmaker. "The President has already realised great opportunities. He forged the Abraham Accords. He's forging peace as we speak in one country, in one region after the other. So, I want to present to you, Mr. President, the letter I sent to the Nobel Prize Committee. It's nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well deserved, and you should get it," Netanyahu told the US President."I want to express the appreciation and admiration not only of all Israelis, but of the Jewish people and many, many admirers around the world, for your leadership, your leadership of the free world, your leadership of a just cause, and the pursuit of peace and security which you are leading in many lands, but now especially in the Middle East. President has an extraordinary team, and I think our teams together make an extraordinary combination to meet challenges and seize opportunities," the Israeli leader added.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presents President Trump with a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize <a href="https://t.co/JUzpU2ZPYz">pic.twitter.com/JUzpU2ZPYz</a>&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1942366276329914397?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 7, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is well known. Time and again, he has compared himself with former US President Barack Obama and said that he should get the prize too. He also lamented that the Nobel committee would not give him the prize because they only give it to liberals. From 2018 to the present, he has been nominated for the prize seven times by several individuals/countries, yet he has not yet received one.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. (Source: Office of the Prime Minister of Israel) <a href="https://t.co/t2jHAK7xCH">pic.twitter.com/t2jHAK7xCH</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1942443815782040055?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Thanking Netanyahu, he said, "This I did not know. Wow, thank you very much. Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful." Trump and Netanyahu met for the third time time year while the US is trying to broker a peace deal between Hamas and Israel to end the Gaza war. Trump also voiced confidence that Hamas was willing to end the conflict in Gaza. "I don't think there is a holdup. I think things are going along very well. They want to meet and they want to have that ceasefire," he said.<h3>Trump nominated by Pakistan and Republican lawmaker</h3>Last month, Republican leader Buddy Carter nominated the POTUS for Nobel Peace Prize for brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. He credited Trump for ‘preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.’ Prior to that, Pakistan nominated him, stating that the US president deserved a Nobel Peace Prize because of “his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis”. Despite multiple nominations, Donald Trump has not been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize due to several key factors considered by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. While he played a role in diplomatic efforts such as the Abraham Accords and initial talks with North Korea, these initiatives were often viewed as incomplete or lacking long-term impact. Critics argue that many of his foreign policy actions were transactional rather than transformative and did not resolve underlying conflicts.&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump has received multiple Nobel Peace Prize nominations  this year for what he calls his role as a “peacemaker.” His latest nomination comes from Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.


During their dinner on July 7 (Monday) in the White House, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in "forging peace." Handing over an official letter to Trump, Netanyahu said that Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize and praised his efforts to pursue peace and security. Last month, Trump was nominated for the prize by Pakistan and a Republican lawmaker. "The President has already realised great opportunities. He forged the Abraham Accords. He's forging peace as we speak in one country, in one region after the other. So, I want to present to you, Mr. President, the letter I sent to the Nobel Prize Committee. It's nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well deserved, and you should get it," Netanyahu told the US President. "I want to express the appreciation and admiration not only of all Israelis, but of the Jewish people and many, many admirers around the world, for your leadership, your leadership of the free world, your leadership of a just cause, and the pursuit of peace and security which you are leading in many lands, but now especially in the Middle East. President has an extraordinary team, and I think our teams together make an extraordinary combination to meet challenges and seize opportunities," the Israeli leader added.

<h2>US President Donald Trump has received multiple Nobel Peace Prize nominations &nbsp;this year for what he calls his role as a “peacemaker.” His latest nomination comes from Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu.</h2>

Israel PM Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, says 'you should get it' | Here's LIST of nominations POTUS received previously

United States President Donald Trump addressed a rally in Iowa on Friday IST (June 4 ) for the first time since winning the Iowa Caucuses en route to the White House. He kicked off the one-year countdown to the United States' 250th birthday celebration. From expressing his pride over the passage of the 'big beautiful bill' to revealing plans for an UFC match at the White House, Trump delivered an invigorating speech, filled with attacks on Democrats and thank you notes for his supporters, including US Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and others. He spoke about America's recent attack on Iran and explained how the big beautiful bill would help in securing borders.&nbsp;

<h2>'One of the greatest presidents ever'</h2>Trump said 165 days into his administration, the US is on a "winning streak like frankly nobody's seen before in the history of the presidency."“They said, 'You know, sir, you're going to go down as one of the greatest presidents ever. I said, 'really?' Trump told the crowd. “I said, 'Better than Washington?' They said, 'Yes, sir.' I said, 'Better than honest Abe Lincoln?' They said, 'Yes, sir.' I said, 'I like this guy that said that.' He closed his remarks with his ”We will make America great again” chants. He danced briefly, did a little victory lap, and walked off the stage. Earlier, speaking to reporters, before boarding Air Force One en route to Iowa, Trump said confidently, “I think I have more power now. I think I probably do because we've had a great record of success.”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Tfw you passed the largest working and middle class tax cut in American history — just in time for Independence Day 🕺🇺🇸 <a href="https://t.co/x8kTCSoPrn">pic.twitter.com/x8kTCSoPrn</a>&mdash; Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1940947980980269463?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 4, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;"There can be no better birthday present for America than the phenomenal victory we achieved just hours ago when Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill to make America great again…With this bill, every major promise I made to the people of Iowa in 2024 became a promise kept," Trump said about the tax bill.<h2>Trump says he'll hold a UFC fight at the White House</h2>The POTUS said the 250th anniversary celebration will include special events at the nation's parks, battlefields and historic sites. "And I even think we’re going to have a UFC fight," Trump said. "Does anybody watch UFC? We’re going to have a UFC fight. We’re going to have a UFC fight — think of this — on the grounds of the White House. We’re going to have a UFC fight, championship fight, full fight, like 20, 25,000 people and we’re going to do that as part of 250 also," Trump said. "We’re going to have some incredible events. Some professional events, some amateur events, but the UFC fight’s going to be a big deal, too."<h2>Trump on Democrats: 'I hate them'</h2>Trump criticized congressional Democrats, none of whom voted for his massive tax cut and spending bill. He suggested Republicans would use Democrats' "no" votes against them in the 2026 elections. "With all of the things we did, with the tax cuts and rebuilding our military, not one Democrat voted for us," he said. "And I think we’ll use it in the campaign that’s coming up — the midterms. Because we’ve got to beat them.""But all of the things that we’ve given and they wouldn’t vote, only because they hate Trump — but I hate them too," he added. “You know that? I really do. I hate them. I cannot stand them because I really believe they hate our country, you want to know the truth.”<h2>Trump talks about golden dome missile shield and Iran'</h2>Trump said that with the passing of the "great big, beautiful bill," his Golden Dome Missile Shield would protect the nation from retaliatory strikes from Iran. "We're going to have the best shield," the president said. “And you saw that just the other day where the missiles are being shot down one after another.” He said Iran had called him to tell him “they have to take a shot at us.” "That was Iran," he said. “Respectful. That means they respect us.” Trump also thanked the pilots who had dropped the bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities last month, and informed the crowd that they would be celebrated at the White House during the signing of the ‘big beautiful bill’. "You know, China, Russia, they were all watching, everybody was watching. We have the greatest equipment anywhere in the world. We have the greatest people anywhere in the world and we have the strongest military anywhere in the world," he added.<h2>&nbsp;</h2>

United States President Donald Trump addressed a rally in Iowa for the first time since winning the Iowa Caucuses en route to the White House. 

United States President Donald Trump addressed a rally in Iowa on Friday IST (June 4 ) for the first time since winning the Iowa Caucuses en route to the White House. He kicked off the one-year countdown to the United States' 250th birthday celebration. From expressing his pride over the passage of the 'big beautiful bill' to revealing plans for an UFC match at the White House, Trump delivered an invigorating speech, filled with attacks on Democrats and thank you notes for his supporters, including US Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and others. He spoke about America's recent attack on Iran and explained how the big beautiful bill would help in securing borders.

United States President Donald Trump addressed a rally in Iowa for the first time since winning the Iowa Caucuses en route to the White House.&nbsp;

Victory lap to UFC fight at White House: 'GREATEST president' Trump unveils plans for 250th American Independence day celebrations

President Donald Trump’s latest budget proposal, officially named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), runs to a staggering 940 pages, just shy of the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy. The bill passed the House of Representatives by a razor-thin margin of one vote.The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-big-beautiful-bill-full-list-of-republicans-opposing-us-president-s-tax-and-spending-measure-1751159077308">Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: FULL LIST of Republicans opposing US president's tax and spending measure</a><h2>Democrats stall with full reading to expose ‘monstrosity’</h2>In a rare procedural move, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has decided to force the entire bill to be read aloud in the Senate chamber. The move, designed to slow down the process and shine a light on the bill’s contents, could take at least 15 hours.“Schumer believes Americans deserve to hear exactly what’s in this monstrosity,” said a Democratic source, citing permanent tax breaks for billionaires, cuts to health care and food assistance, fossil fuel giveaways, and public land sales as just a few of the bill’s more contentious provisions.<h2>GOP senators face pressure amid razor-thin vote margin</h2>With only three Republican votes allowed to be lost in the Senate, Trump’s sweeping bill is on fragile ground. At least three GOP senators have already indicated they may vote against it. One of the loudest critics, Senator Rand Paul, was even spotted golfing with Trump over the weekend, leaving some to wonder if behind-the-scenes negotiations are underway.<h2>‘Green tax credits’ and confusion among Republicans</h2>The bill has not only caused opposition from Democrats but also confusion within Republican ranks. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted she voted for the bill without knowing what was in it, saying, “Full transparency, I did not know.” Even Trump appeared surprised by some of the details, taking to social media to vent his frustration. “I HATE the green tax credits,” he posted in all caps, referring to a policy tucked deep within the text.

The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.

President Donald Trump’s latest budget proposal, officially named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB), runs to a staggering 940 pages, just shy of the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy. The bill passed the House of Representatives by a razor-thin margin of one vote. The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Also read: Trump's Big Beautiful Bill: FULL LIST of Republicans opposing US president's tax and spending measure Democrats stall with full reading to expose ‘monstrosity’ In a rare procedural move, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has decided to force the entire bill to be read aloud in the Senate chamber. The move, designed to slow down the process and shine a light on the bill’s contents, could take at least 15 hours. “Schumer believes Americans deserve to hear exactly what’s in this monstrosity,” said a Democratic source, citing permanent tax breaks for billionaires, cuts to health care and food assistance, fossil fuel giveaways, and public land sales as just a few of the bill’s more contentious provisions. GOP senators face pressure amid razor-thin vote margin With only three Republican votes allowed to be lost in the Senate, Trump’s sweeping bill is on fragile ground. At least three GOP senators have already indicated they may vote against it. One of the loudest critics, Senator Rand Paul, was even spotted golfing with Trump over the weekend, leaving some to wonder if behind-the-scenes negotiations are underway. ‘Green tax credits’ and confusion among Republicans The bill has not only caused opposition from Democrats but also confusion within Republican ranks. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted she voted for the bill without knowing what was in it, saying, “Full transparency, I did not know.” Even Trump appeared surprised by some of the details, taking to social media to vent his frustration. “I HATE the green tax credits,” he posted in all caps, referring to a policy tucked deep within the text.

The legislation includes $3.8 trillion in tax cuts, but estimates suggest it could add as much as $4.5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.

'Hear what’s in this monstrosity': Democrats stall Trump’s 940-page ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ by forcing it to be read aloud in Senate

India has repeatedly rejected the establishment of foreign military bases on its soil, including those of the United States of America, despite their growing defence partnership. This position stems from India’s longstanding commitment to strategic autonomy, a doctrine rooted in its post-colonial experience and non-aligned foreign policy. From Nehru to Modi, Indian leaders have maintained a clear stance that sovereignty must not be diluted by the permanent presence of foreign troops, regardless of diplomatic ties or logistical agreements. Unlike other smaller nations that accept US bases for added security, India views such arrangements as incompatible with its military self-sufficiency.<h2>India's military capability</h2>India’s military capabilities, ranging from nuclear deterrence to a large standing army and expanding naval and cyber assets, provide sufficient strategic depth. Instead of hosting foreign bases, India has opted for defence cooperation through limited-access agreements. Deals like LEMOA allow the US to refuel and restock at Indian facilities during joint operations or emergencies, but they do not permit basing rights. This arrangement further enables operational collaboration without compromising sovereignty.&nbsp;Hosting a US base in the country would also carry regional consequences, including potential friction with China and Russia. Moreover, several historical incidents, from the US Navy’s 7th Fleet sailing toward India in the 1971 liberation war to American opposition to India’s nuclear programme, might have fostered a cautious attitude in New Delhi toward US military intentions.<h2>Risks, Ramifications, and Alternative Pathways</h2>The absence of US bases in India is not merely a reflection of India’s position, but it also suits our current US strategic requirements. With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. From India’s perspective, allowing a base would invite geopolitical liabilities without tangible strategic gains. The recent missile strike on Al Udeid base in Qatar, during the Israel-Iran conflict, highlights the risks of becoming a target by hosting foreign forces. India seeks to avoid being drawn into conflicts unrelated to its national interest.Despite having closer ties through QUAD and joint military exercises like Malabar, New Delhi remains cautious. The concerns over potential disruption to long-standing partnerships, especially with Russia and past US policy decisions further strengthen India’s reluctance. In short, India’s refusal to host US military bases is a deliberate, calculated policy choice, and not an oversight or gap in the bilateral relationship.&nbsp;

With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. 

India has repeatedly rejected the establishment of foreign military bases on its soil, including those of the United States of America, despite their growing defence partnership. This position stems from India’s longstanding commitment to strategic autonomy, a doctrine rooted in its post-colonial experience and non-aligned foreign policy. From Nehru to Modi, Indian leaders have maintained a clear stance that sovereignty must not be diluted by the permanent presence of foreign troops, regardless of diplomatic ties or logistical agreements. Unlike other smaller nations that accept US bases for added security, India views such arrangements as incompatible with its military self-sufficiency. India's military capability India’s military capabilities, ranging from nuclear deterrence to a large standing army and expanding naval and cyber assets, provide sufficient strategic depth. Instead of hosting foreign bases, India has opted for defence cooperation through limited-access agreements. Deals like LEMOA allow the US to refuel and restock at Indian facilities during joint operations or emergencies, but they do not permit basing rights. This arrangement further enables operational collaboration without compromising sovereignty. Hosting a US base in the country would also carry regional consequences, including potential friction with China and Russia. Moreover, several historical incidents, from the US Navy’s 7th Fleet sailing toward India in the 1971 liberation war to American opposition to India’s nuclear programme, might have fostered a cautious attitude in New Delhi toward US military intentions. Risks, Ramifications, and Alternative Pathways The absence of US bases in India is not merely a reflection of India’s position, but it also suits our current US strategic requirements. With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions. From India’s perspective, allowing a base would invite geopolitical liabilities without tangible strategic gains. The recent missile strike on Al Udeid base in Qatar, during the Israel-Iran conflict, highlights the risks of becoming a target by hosting foreign forces. India seeks to avoid being drawn into conflicts unrelated to its national interest. Despite having closer ties through QUAD and joint military exercises like Malabar, New Delhi remains cautious. The concerns over potential disruption to long-standing partnerships, especially with Russia and past US policy decisions further strengthen India’s reluctance. In short, India’s refusal to host US military bases is a deliberate, calculated policy choice, and not an oversight or gap in the bilateral relationship.

With extensive facilities in Diego Garcia, Qatar, Japan, and Singapore, the Pentagon has ample reach across the Indo-Pacific and Indian Ocean regions.&nbsp;

No boots allowed: Why India refuses US military bases on its soil despite strategic ties

Each B-2 can carry up to 16 B61-12 variable yield nuclear bombs or B83 bombs with a yield of up to 1.2 megatons. In total, a single B-2 squadron could deliver 192 nuclear bombs across targets worldwide.

The B-2 Spirit stealth bomber is often called the most deadly aircraft ever built. But what if a full squadron of B-2s was launched in a nuclear strike? Could they really end human civilisation?

How a squadron of B-2 Bombers can wipe out entire human civilisation?

US President Donald Trump has been nominated by Republican leader Buddy Carter for Nobel Peace Prize for brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. He credited Trump for ‘preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.’ Earlier, Pakistan said that the US president deserved a Nobel Peace Prize because of “his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis”. Trump has repeatedly expressed his disappointment, saying he won't receive the prize, ‘no matter what he does.’ Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is a story that's not new. From 2018 to the present, he has been nominated for the prize six times by several individuals, yet he has not yet received one.&nbsp;“They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda, Congo, Serbia…the big one is India-Pakistan. I should have gotten it 4-5 times. Abraham Accords would have been a good one. They won’t give me. They only give it to liberals,” Trump bemoaned.<h2>Who is the decision maker for the peace prize?</h2>The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by Alfred Nobel’s will in 1895. It is awarded annually by the Norwegian Nobel Committee to individuals or organizations that have made significant contributions to peace. National politicians, university professors in history, social sciences, law, philosophy, theology, previous Nobel laureates, members of international courts, directors of peace research institutes, etc can nominate people or organisations for the peace prize. Nominations must be submitted by January 31 each year. So in this case, Pakistan's nomination of Trump is for next year i.e 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. &nbsp;The Norwegian Nobel Committee, a 5-member body appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, reviews all valid nominations. A shortlist is created—only a handful of candidates are seriously considered. Committee members and advisers analyze the shortlisted nominees’ actual impact on peace.The Nobel Committee meets to deliberate and a majority vote is required. If no candidate meets the standard, no prize is awarded.&nbsp;&nbsp;The Nobel Peace Prize winner is officially announced in early October. The announcement is made in Oslo, Norway, unlike other Nobel Prizes, which are announced in Sweden.<h2>Why has Trump not received the Nobel Prize yet?</h2>Despite multiple nominations, Donald Trump has not been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize due to several key factors considered by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. While he played a role in diplomatic efforts such as the Abraham Accords and initial talks with North Korea, these initiatives were often viewed as incomplete or lacking long-term impact. Critics argue that many of his foreign policy actions were transactional rather than transformative and did not resolve underlying conflicts. Additionally, Trump’s domestic and international human rights record—marked by policies like family separations at the US border and travel bans—ran counter to the Nobel Peace Prize's emphasis on humanitarian values and dignity. His presidency also saw continued military actions, including drone strikes and targeted killings, which conflicted with the Nobel’s focus on disarmament and peaceful conflict resolution. &nbsp;Furthermore, Trump’s highly polarising political style contrasted with the unifying image typical of past laureates. While some supporters claim ideological bias within the committee—given its ties to Norway’s parliament and perceived liberal leanings—the Nobel Committee has never confirmed such influence.&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump’s public and frequent promotion of his candidacy for the prize is unusual. Furthermore, Trump has criticized the Nobel committee for awarding the prize to former President Barack Obama. Just a few months into his presidency in 2009, Obama was honoured for his push to curb nuclear weapons and improve relations with the Muslim world. Stating that he shoudl definately get one, Trump in 2019 criticised Obama saying, "They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it. &nbsp;... That was the only thing I agreed with him on." &nbsp;"I deserve it, but they would never give me", remains Trump's bottom line on Nobel Peace Prize. Whether or not this would change in future, only time can tell.

Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is a story that's not new. From 2018 to the present, he has been nominated for the prize six times by several individuals, yet he has not yet received one.

US President Donald Trump has been nominated by Republican leader Buddy Carter for Nobel Peace Prize for brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. He credited Trump for ‘preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.’ Earlier, Pakistan said that the US president deserved a Nobel Peace Prize because of “his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis”. Trump has repeatedly expressed his disappointment, saying he won't receive the prize, ‘no matter what he does.’ Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is a story that's not new. From 2018 to the present, he has been nominated for the prize six times by several individuals, yet he has not yet received one. “They should give me the Nobel Prize for Rwanda, Congo, Serbia…the big one is India-Pakistan. I should have gotten it 4-5 times. Abraham Accords would have been a good one. They won’t give me. They only give it to liberals,” Trump bemoaned. Who is the decision maker for the peace prize? The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the five Nobel Prizes established by Alfred Nobel’s will in 1895. It is awarded annually by the Norwegian Nobel Committee to individuals or organizations that have made significant contributions to peace. National politicians, university professors in history, social sciences, law, philosophy, theology, previous Nobel laureates, members of international courts, directors of peace research institutes, etc can nominate people or organisations for the peace prize. Nominations must be submitted by January 31 each year. So in this case, Pakistan's nomination of Trump is for next year i.e 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The Norwegian Nobel Committee, a 5-member body appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, reviews all valid nominations. A shortlist is created—only a handful of candidates are seriously considered. Committee members and advisers analyze the shortlisted nominees’ actual impact on peace. The Nobel Committee meets to deliberate and a majority vote is required. If no candidate meets the standard, no prize is awarded. The Nobel Peace Prize winner is officially announced in early October. The announcement is made in Oslo, Norway, unlike other Nobel Prizes, which are announced in Sweden. Why has Trump not received the Nobel Prize yet? Despite multiple nominations, Donald Trump has not been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize due to several key factors considered by the Norwegian Nobel Committee. While he played a role in diplomatic efforts such as the Abraham Accords and initial talks with North Korea, these initiatives were often viewed as incomplete or lacking long-term impact. Critics argue that many of his foreign policy actions were transactional rather than transformative and did not resolve underlying conflicts. Additionally, Trump’s domestic and international human rights record—marked by policies like family separations at the US border and travel bans—ran counter to the Nobel Peace Prize's emphasis on humanitarian values and dignity. His presidency also saw continued military actions, including drone strikes and targeted killings, which conflicted with the Nobel’s focus on disarmament and peaceful conflict resolution. Furthermore, Trump’s highly polarising political style contrasted with the unifying image typical of past laureates. While some supporters claim ideological bias within the committee—given its ties to Norway’s parliament and perceived liberal leanings—the Nobel Committee has never confirmed such influence. Trump’s public and frequent promotion of his candidacy for the prize is unusual. Furthermore, Trump has criticized the Nobel committee for awarding the prize to former President Barack Obama. Just a few months into his presidency in 2009, Obama was honoured for his push to curb nuclear weapons and improve relations with the Muslim world. Stating that he shoudl definately get one, Trump in 2019 criticised Obama saying, "They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it. ... That was the only thing I agreed with him on." "I deserve it, but they would never give me", remains Trump's bottom line on Nobel Peace Prize. Whether or not this would change in future, only time can tell.

Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is a story that's not new. From 2018 to the present, he has been nominated for the prize six times by several individuals, yet he has not yet received one.

Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize again: Who selects the winners? Why has US president not been able to win it so far

Republican leader Buddy Carter nominates US President Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. He credited Trump for ‘preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.’ A couple of days ago, Pakistan also nominated Trump for establishing peace between New Delhi and Islamabad when the two nuclear-armed countries were embroiled in cross-border fighting following the dastardly Pahalgam attack on April 22. An attack that claimed 26 innocent lives in the Baisaran Valley.&nbsp;Carter in his letter to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, wrote, “In recent weeks, the world stood on the precipice of a dangerous and potentially region- destabilising war. Yet in the face of this crisis, President Trump took bold action to ultimately champion peace through strength and facilitate a ceasefire framework that brought hostilities to a halt. In a statement that has since reverberated around the globe, President Trump announced the terms of a complete and total ceasefire agreement, commending both Israel and Iran for their courage to end the war.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/day-after-nominating-trump-for-nobel-peace-prize-pakistan-condemns-strikes-on-iran-nuclear-sites-1750643817253">Day after nominating Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, Pakistan condemns US strikes on Iran nuclear sites</a>&nbsp;He added, “His message of mutual respect and peace will now result in a full cessation of military activity, no further escalation, and the preservation of thousands, if not millions, of lives throughout the Middle East and around the globe.”&nbsp;Further elaborating on the reason for nominating Trump, he wrote, “President Trump's influence was instrumental in forging a swift agreement that many believed to be impossible. President Trump also took bold, decisive actions to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions and ensure that the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism remains incapable of acquiring a nuclear weapon. His leadership at this moment exemplifies the very ideals that the Nobel Peace Prize seeks to recognize: the pursuit of peace, the prevention of war, and the advancement of international harmony.”This comes at a time when Trump announced ceasefire, but first he struck Iranian nuclear sites of &nbsp;Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Both Israel and Iran are now practicing restraint after initial ceasefire violations.

Republican leader Buddy Carter nominates US President Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. 

Republican leader Buddy Carter nominates US President Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. He credited Trump for ‘preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.’ A couple of days ago, Pakistan also nominated Trump for establishing peace between New Delhi and Islamabad when the two nuclear-armed countries were embroiled in cross-border fighting following the dastardly Pahalgam attack on April 22. An attack that claimed 26 innocent lives in the Baisaran Valley. Carter in his letter to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, wrote, “In recent weeks, the world stood on the precipice of a dangerous and potentially region- destabilising war. Yet in the face of this crisis, President Trump took bold action to ultimately champion peace through strength and facilitate a ceasefire framework that brought hostilities to a halt. In a statement that has since reverberated around the globe, President Trump announced the terms of a complete and total ceasefire agreement, commending both Israel and Iran for their courage to end the war.” Also read: Day after nominating Trump for Nobel Peace Prize, Pakistan condemns US strikes on Iran nuclear sites He added, “His message of mutual respect and peace will now result in a full cessation of military activity, no further escalation, and the preservation of thousands, if not millions, of lives throughout the Middle East and around the globe.” Further elaborating on the reason for nominating Trump, he wrote, “President Trump's influence was instrumental in forging a swift agreement that many believed to be impossible. President Trump also took bold, decisive actions to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions and ensure that the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism remains incapable of acquiring a nuclear weapon. His leadership at this moment exemplifies the very ideals that the Nobel Peace Prize seeks to recognize: the pursuit of peace, the prevention of war, and the advancement of international harmony.” This comes at a time when Trump announced ceasefire, but first he struck Iranian nuclear sites of Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Both Israel and Iran are now practicing restraint after initial ceasefire violations.

Republican leader Buddy Carter nominates US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for brokering the ceasefire between Israel and Iran.&nbsp;

Donald Trump gets second nomination for Nobel Peace Prize. Who did, and why?

En route to the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Donald Trump spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One. In just two days after suggesting a regime change in Iran, the US President now says, ‘I don't want it’; in addition, he emphasised ‘regime change takes chaos’. These comments could be viewed as a U-turn as he had proposed an ambitious plan to ‘Make Iran Great Again’ a campaign mirroring his own back home in America.&nbsp;Speaking to reporters, who asked, ‘Do you want a regime change in Iran?’, in his prompt response, he said, "No. If there was, there was, but no I don't want it," the US President said. "I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible. Regime change takes chaos, and ideally we don't want to see so much chaos "&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/day-after-attacking-iran-nuclear-sites-trump-talks-peace-announces-ceasefire-here-s-a-timeline-1750734084159">Day after US attacks Iran nuclear sites, Trump talks peace, announces ceasefire: Here's a timeline</a>&nbsp;“Iranians are very good traders and business people, they got a lot of oil, they should be fine and be able to rebuild and do a good job. They are never going to have nuclear but other than that they should do a good job,” he added.&nbsp;And on June 23, he had posted on Truth Social, “It’s not politically correct to use the term, “Regime Change,” but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!”&nbsp;His thoughts on regime change come only a couple of hours after his address, announcing the success of the attack on Iran nuclear sites, which he called a horribly destructive enterprise. “Our objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity, a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror.”&nbsp;This change in stance comes after both Israel and Iran have now abided by the ceasefire after initial violations from both sides.&nbsp;&nbsp;

En route to the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Donald Trump spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One. In just two days after suggesting a regime change in Iran, the US President now says, ‘I don't want it’; in addition, he emphasised ‘regime change takes chaos’.

En route to the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Donald Trump spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One. In just two days after suggesting a regime change in Iran, the US President now says, ‘I don't want it’; in addition, he emphasised ‘regime change takes chaos’. These comments could be viewed as a U-turn as he had proposed an ambitious plan to ‘Make Iran Great Again’ a campaign mirroring his own back home in America. Speaking to reporters, who asked, ‘Do you want a regime change in Iran?’, in his prompt response, he said, "No. If there was, there was, but no I don't want it," the US President said. "I'd like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible. Regime change takes chaos, and ideally we don't want to see so much chaos " Also read: Day after US attacks Iran nuclear sites, Trump talks peace, announces ceasefire: Here's a timeline “Iranians are very good traders and business people, they got a lot of oil, they should be fine and be able to rebuild and do a good job. They are never going to have nuclear but other than that they should do a good job,” he added. And on June 23, he had posted on Truth Social, “It’s not politically correct to use the term, “Regime Change,” but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!” His thoughts on regime change come only a couple of hours after his address, announcing the success of the attack on Iran nuclear sites, which he called a horribly destructive enterprise. “Our objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity, a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror.” This change in stance comes after both Israel and Iran have now abided by the ceasefire after initial violations from both sides.

En route to the NATO summit in the Netherlands, Donald Trump spoke to reporters aboard Air Force One. In just two days after suggesting a regime change in Iran, the US President now says, ‘I don't want it’; in addition, he emphasised ‘regime change takes chaos’.

No 'Make Iran Great Again': Trump's U-turn in less than 48 hours, says doesn't want regime change in Iran

Ordinary people across the Middle East, Iranians, Iraqis, Lebanese, Yemenis, Palestinians, face economic misery, instability, and human suffering as tensions escalate.

Ordinary people across the Middle East, Iranians, Iraqis, Lebanese, Yemenis, Palestinians, face economic misery, instability, and human suffering as tensions escalate.

Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Israel vs Iran, Iraq, Syria: How a Middle East war could unfold after B-2 Bomber, Al Udeid Air Base attack

What if it had not gone according to plan.. Here is what would have happened if the B 2 bomber had been detected mid mission. 

What if it hadn’t gone according to plan? Here's what would have happened if the B-2 bomber had been detected mid-mission.

What if B-2 Bomber gets caught in enemy airspace? This is how it can defend itself...

President Donald Trump had been strongly considering taking US military action in Iran for days before he gave his top aides a directive: Tell the media that he would decide within two weeks whether to act, as a means of hiding his true thinking. The president had been angered by reports that indicated he had come to a last-minute decision on attacking Iranian nuclear facilities and believed that a two-week timeframe might mislead the Iranians and cover up his intentions, according to sources close to the development.&nbsp;Trump had made the decision to make the statement on Thursday (19) when he was having lunch with his former advisor Steve Bannon, who had been openly doubting US involvement. Moments later, his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, entered the White House briefing room and complied with the president's directive, indicating to the world that Trump was not yet set in his mind.&nbsp;Although the last word came on Saturday (June 21) as bombers were already airborne, Trump's inner circle thought his mind had been made up for several days about taking action in Iran. Trump was briefed on plans of attack already and was holding his senior national security aides in person on a daily basis, in addition to having multiple phone calls throughout the day.&nbsp;Meanwhile, President Donald Trump reiterated on Sunday (June 22) that US strikes on Iran had destroyed their nuclear sites, after other officials cautioned that the extent of damage was still not confirmed. In his post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!”

‘Two-week peace window’ was a smokescreen for Iran strike, claims report

President Donald Trump had been strongly considering taking US military action in Iran for days before he gave his top aides a directive: Tell the media that he would decide within two weeks whether to act, as a means of hiding his true thinking. The president had been angered by reports that indicated he had come to a last-minute decision on attacking Iranian nuclear facilities and believed that a two-week timeframe might mislead the Iranians and cover up his intentions, according to sources close to the development. Trump had made the decision to make the statement on Thursday (19) when he was having lunch with his former advisor Steve Bannon, who had been openly doubting US involvement. Moments later, his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, entered the White House briefing room and complied with the president's directive, indicating to the world that Trump was not yet set in his mind. Although the last word came on Saturday (June 21) as bombers were already airborne, Trump's inner circle thought his mind had been made up for several days about taking action in Iran. Trump was briefed on plans of attack already and was holding his senior national security aides in person on a daily basis, in addition to having multiple phone calls throughout the day. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump reiterated on Sunday (June 22) that US strikes on Iran had destroyed their nuclear sites, after other officials cautioned that the extent of damage was still not confirmed. In his post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!”

US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan

President Donald Trump reiterated on Sunday (June 22) that US strikes on Iran had destroyed their nuclear sites, after other officials cautioned that the extent of damage was still not confirmed. In his post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!”

Earlier on Saturday (June 21), US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jun 21) announced a “very successful attack” on Iran's three nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Iranian officials confirmed that the bombing took place at 2:30 am local time. “We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space. A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow,” he wrote on his Truth Social platform.&nbsp;"All planes are safely on their way home. Congratulations to our great American Warriors. There is not another military in the World that could have done this. NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE! Thank you for your attention to this matter.” the US president added.&nbsp;In another post, Trump posted, “Fordow is gone.” In an X post, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant wrote, “President Trump took a bold decision for the United States, for Israel, for all of humanity. The world is now a safer place.” Trump said that he will give an address to the nation at 10 pm at the White House “regarding our very successful military operation in Iran.”&nbsp;He added, “This is an HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD. IRAN MUST NOW AGREE TO END THIS WAR. THANK YOU!”Iranian state media outlet FARS News reported that residents of Qom, a city about 87 miles south of Tehran, heard several explosions outside of their city. The Fordow nuclear plant is located close to Qom, built into a mountainside.&nbsp;The US strikes come after speculations whether the US would enter the conflict in the Middle East. Trump earlier said, “I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.”

Monumental damage done to all nuclear sites in Iran says Trump after US strikes Iran

President Donald Trump reiterated on Sunday (June 22) that US strikes on Iran had destroyed their nuclear sites, after other officials cautioned that the extent of damage was still not confirmed. In his post on Truth Social, Trump wrote, “Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images. Obliteration is an accurate term! The white structure shown is deeply imbedded into the rock, with even its roof well below ground level, and completely shielded from flame. The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!”

'Monumental damage done to all nuclear sites in Iran', says Trump after US strikes Iran

US President Donald Trump gave the go-ahead to attack on Iranian nuclear facilities ‘minutes before the bombs dropped’, Vice President JD Vance was quoted saying to NBC's "Meet the Press" on Saturday, CNN reported. Vance added that Trump "had the power to call off this attack until the very last minute" and chose to go ahead.&nbsp;Large ‘bunker buster’ bombs were dropped on two of the nuclear facilities around 6:40 pm ET on Saturday in the US, timing the attack approximately 2:10 a.m. local time Sunday in Iran, per a timeline released by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, CNN said.&nbsp;Trump has been weighing US involvement for days and has instructed his press secretary to provide a two-week deadline from the briefing room in recent days. But he had already been inclined to participate in Israel's military campaign in private meetings with senior aides as his representative Steve Witkoff was still pursuing diplomatic attempts, CNN reported. "President Donald Trump made the final order for the US to strike Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday," CNN reported, quoting a senior White House official. Trump made the final call on Saturday and directed Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to go ahead, this official said. &nbsp;The US is also closely observing whether Iran will attack American forces or resume its nuclear weapons program, Vance added, describing the situation as ‘a very delicate moment’, according to CNN. Iran's next move would be apparent within the next 24 hours, he said. Until now, the US has ‘gotten some indirect messages from the Iranians’, Vance stated. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier on Sunday said that "both public and private messages are being directly communicated to the Iranians through several channels."&nbsp;Reiterating the administration's position, Vance said that the US has "no interest in boots on the ground" and rejected suggestions that the US intervention would escalate. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged direct negotiations between the United States and Iran after Saturday's military attacks and said that America is "prepared to talk to them tomorrow." The US top diplomat repeated that Iran would be able to have a civilian nuclear program but no enrichment of uranium, CNN reported.&nbsp;"The Iranian regime should wake up and say, 'Okay, if we really want nuclear energy in our country, there's a way to do it.' That offer is still there. We're prepared to talk to them tomorrow and start working on that," Rubio said. "Steve Witkoff has traveled extensively around the world trying to reach that deal with them, but they play too many games. They play way too many games. And now they found out."&nbsp;He added that Iran "tried to play" in negotiations, so "the president had to take action as a response." Iran rejected the US proposal, "wouldn't respond" to American offers and "disappeared for 10 days" ahead of the military operation, he said.<h2>US enters Iran-Israel war</h2>In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” As America entered the war, Donald Trump said that ‘there will either be peace or tragedy.’ "This cannot continue. There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump told a press briefing at the Oval Office. He also conveyed the goal of the US' strikes, saying, "Our Objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”

Minutes before the bombs dropped Vance on Trumps Iran strike decision

US President Donald Trump gave the go-ahead to attack on Iranian nuclear facilities ‘minutes before the bombs dropped’, Vice President JD Vance was quoted saying to NBC's "Meet the Press" on Saturday, CNN reported. Vance added that Trump "had the power to call off this attack until the very last minute" and chose to go ahead. Large ‘bunker buster’ bombs were dropped on two of the nuclear facilities around 6:40 pm ET on Saturday in the US, timing the attack approximately 2:10 a.m. local time Sunday in Iran, per a timeline released by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, CNN said. Trump has been weighing US involvement for days and has instructed his press secretary to provide a two-week deadline from the briefing room in recent days. But he had already been inclined to participate in Israel's military campaign in private meetings with senior aides as his representative Steve Witkoff was still pursuing diplomatic attempts, CNN reported. "President Donald Trump made the final order for the US to strike Iranian nuclear sites on Saturday," CNN reported, quoting a senior White House official. Trump made the final call on Saturday and directed Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to go ahead, this official said. The US is also closely observing whether Iran will attack American forces or resume its nuclear weapons program, Vance added, describing the situation as ‘a very delicate moment’, according to CNN. Iran's next move would be apparent within the next 24 hours, he said. Until now, the US has ‘gotten some indirect messages from the Iranians’, Vance stated. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier on Sunday said that "both public and private messages are being directly communicated to the Iranians through several channels." Reiterating the administration's position, Vance said that the US has "no interest in boots on the ground" and rejected suggestions that the US intervention would escalate. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged direct negotiations between the United States and Iran after Saturday's military attacks and said that America is "prepared to talk to them tomorrow." The US top diplomat repeated that Iran would be able to have a civilian nuclear program but no enrichment of uranium, CNN reported. "The Iranian regime should wake up and say, 'Okay, if we really want nuclear energy in our country, there's a way to do it.' That offer is still there. We're prepared to talk to them tomorrow and start working on that," Rubio said. "Steve Witkoff has traveled extensively around the world trying to reach that deal with them, but they play too many games. They play way too many games. And now they found out." He added that Iran "tried to play" in negotiations, so "the president had to take action as a response." Iran rejected the US proposal, "wouldn't respond" to American offers and "disappeared for 10 days" ahead of the military operation, he said. US enters Iran-Israel war In a major escalation of tensions in West Asia, the US bombed three nuclear sites - Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan - in Iran and warned the Islamic Republic of more "precision strikes" if it did not end its conflict with Israel. This came days after the US president said that he would decide within ‘two weeks’ if he needs to bomb Iran. The US strike came on the ninth day of Operation Rising Lion, under which Israel hit several nuclear facilities inside Iran, killing top military officials and nuclear scientists. The Israel Defence Forces said that US strikes “were in coordination with the IDF” and it was a “crucial step stopping the Iranian regime's aggression.” As America entered the war, Donald Trump said that ‘there will either be peace or tragedy.’ "This cannot continue. There will either be peace or tragedy for Iran, far greater than what we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump told a press briefing at the Oval Office. He also conveyed the goal of the US' strikes, saying, "Our Objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity, and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror. Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”

US Vice President JD Vance accused Iran of not negotiating in good faith, which he said served as a catalyst for US strikes

'Minutes before the bombs dropped': Vance on Trump’s Iran strike decision

After the United States struck three Iranian nuclear facilities under what it called ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi slammed Pakistan for nominating President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize and asked if they want him to win the prize for the strikes on nuclear sites in Iran. The AIMIM chief's remarks come against the backdrop of the American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites as well as Pakistan’s move to nominate the US President for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan had nominated Trump for the Nobel Prize, citing his “diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership” during the recent India-Pakistan conflict.&nbsp;He further questioned Pakistan’s support for Trump and asked if they backed him only to see the strikes on Iran.“We should ask Pakistanis if they want Trump to get a Nobel Peace Prize for this...,” Owaisi said, referring to the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan.He also mocked Pakistan's top military leadership and asked whether Islamabad’s Army chief, Asim Munir, had lunch with the US president for this (US strikes on Iran). “They all have been exposed today,” Owaisi added.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Hyderabad | &quot;...Did Pakistan&#39;s General (Army chief Asim Munir) have lunch with the US president for this? They all have been exposed today.., &quot;says AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi on the US strikes on Iran&#39;s 3 nuclear facilities and the ongoing conflict between Israel and… <a href="https://t.co/rAwPK9YU1Z">pic.twitter.com/rAwPK9YU1Z</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1936685598196318688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Owaisi further raised concerns over the chances of serious consequences for India if a full-scale war breaks out in the Middle East region.He cited that over 16 million Indians reside in the Gulf and the Middle East, saying that “if that area erupts in a war, which unfortunately is very likely, then it will have a grave impact on the Indians living there”.&nbsp;Owaisi also targeted the United States and President Donald Trump for the strikes in Iran.&nbsp;“The US was never an honest broker. Whether it is Iraq, Libya or Palestine. The US is sitting completely silent on the ethnic cleansing taking place in Gaza,” Owaisi told news agency ANI.&nbsp;“You went into Iraq, saying they were creating these weapons of mass destruction, and nothing was found over there. You removed Gaddafi in Libya, and nothing happened. Saddam was killed, and Gaddafi was killed. The US policy is only to cover up the crimes of the Israeli government,” the MP said.&nbsp;Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar condemned the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and posted a statement on X.&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><a href="https://t.co/XWB82VovOL">pic.twitter.com/XWB82VovOL</a>&mdash; Ishaq Dar (@MIshaqDar50) <a href="https://twitter.com/MIshaqDar50/status/1936688895003078721?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 22, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US President Donald Trump, early on Sunday, announced that Washington carried out strikes on Iran's three nuclear facilities. Later, Trump warned Iran that any retaliation from Tehran against the US “will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed” on Sunday.

Owaisi further raised concerns over the chances of serious consequences for India if a full-scale war breaks out in the Middle East region. He cited that over 16 million Indians reside in the Gulf and the Middle East.

After the United States struck three Iranian nuclear facilities under what it called ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi slammed Pakistan for nominating President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize and asked if they want him to win the prize for the strikes on nuclear sites in Iran. The AIMIM chief's remarks come against the backdrop of the American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites as well as Pakistan’s move to nominate the US President for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan had nominated Trump for the Nobel Prize, citing his “diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership” during the recent India-Pakistan conflict. He further questioned Pakistan’s support for Trump and asked if they backed him only to see the strikes on Iran. “We should ask Pakistanis if they want Trump to get a Nobel Peace Prize for this...,” Owaisi said, referring to the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. He also mocked Pakistan's top military leadership and asked whether Islamabad’s Army chief, Asim Munir, had lunch with the US president for this (US strikes on Iran). “They all have been exposed today,” Owaisi added.

Owaisi further raised concerns over the chances of serious consequences for India if a full-scale war breaks out in the Middle East region. He cited that over 16 million Indians reside in the Gulf and the Middle East.

Owaisi mocks Pakistan over US strikes on Iran: ‘Should Donald Trump win Nobel Peace for this?’

Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, through which about 20 per cent of the world’s oil passes daily. It is one of the world’s most strategic chokepoints for global trade.

Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, through which about 20 per cent of the world’s oil passes daily. It is one of the world’s most strategic chokepoints for global trade.

Strait of Hormuz: 4 key commodities India relies on from this vital trade route

India maintains a Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), managed by Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL) under the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas. The SPR is meant to cushion India against supply disruptions.

India maintains a Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), managed by Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserves Limited (ISPRL) under the Ministry of Petroleum &amp; Natural Gas. The SPR is meant to cushion India against supply disruptions.

Strait of Hormuz: How many days can India survive with its strategic oil reserves?

The Strait handles 20 per cent of global oil flows. It is critical for energy security in India, China, Japan, and South Korea. Any blockage would hit India’s crude supply chain hard.

The Strait handles 20 per cent of global oil flows. It is critical for energy security in India, China, Japan, and South Korea. Any blockage would hit India’s crude supply chain hard.

Strait of Hormuz closure: Does India import 70% of its oil through this water corridor?

The paint is engineered to absorb radar energy instead of reflecting it. This reduces the B-2’s radar signature dramatically, making it nearly impossible to detect on conventional radar systems.Untitled Summary

The paint is engineered to absorb radar energy instead of reflecting it. This reduces the B-2’s radar signature dramatically, making it nearly impossible to detect on conventional radar systems.Untitled Summary

Why the B-2 Bomber's 'paint' is one of the most expensive materials on Earth

The B-2’s unique “flying wing” design with no tail, sharp edges, or vertical surfaces, helps scatter and deflect radar waves away from the transmitting source, making it extremely difficult for radar to detect and track.

The B-2’s unique “flying wing” design with no tail, sharp edges, or vertical surfaces, helps scatter and deflect radar waves away from the transmitting source, making it extremely difficult for radar to detect and track.

How B-2 Bomber avoids radar? Understanding the science of invisibility

The official estimate by the U.S. Department of Defence places the operating cost at nearly $150,000 per flight hour. This includes fuel, maintenance, crew salaries, and logistical support.

The official estimate by the US Department of Defence places the operating cost at nearly $150,000 per flight hour. This includes fuel, maintenance, crew salaries, and logistical support.

Over $1 million? How much does one US B-2 Bomber mission really cost?

The aircraft carries around 167,000 pounds of fuel in its internal tanks, spread across the wing area. Its flying-wing design maximises space for fuel and weapons.

The aircraft carries around 167,000 pounds of fuel in its internal tanks, spread across the wing area. Its flying-wing design maximises space for fuel and weapons.

How far can a US B-2 Bomber fly on one tank of fuel?

US President Donald Trump has spared no effort in demonstrating his desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize. In a latest development, Trump once again touted his claimed diplomatic achievements as a justification for receiving the world’s most prestigious peace honour. This time, Trump bragged his alleged role in easing tensions between India and Pakistan, a claim which has multiple times been firmly denied by New Delhi. On numerous occasions, from official speeches to campaign rallies and even interviews, Trump has never shied away from publicly referenced the Nobel Peace Prize. Despite not securing the award during his first term, his preoccupation with it appears undiminished.<h2> A Pattern of Nominations</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize on multiple occasions, since his first term but has never won the prize. From Norwegian MP Christian Tybring-Gjedde, Swedish MP Magnus Jacobsson, and U.S. Congresswoman Claudia Tenney, his nominations have come from a range of people, who have been &nbsp;typically citing his role in diplomatic agreements such as the Abraham Accords.&nbsp;Earlier on Saturday, Pakistan through a post on social media platform X recommended his name, stating that the President should get Nobel Peace Prize in 2026 “in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis”.&nbsp;In 2024, Trump was again nominated by Anat Alon-Beck, who is an &nbsp;Israeli-born law professor at Case Western Reserve University. He &nbsp;credited him with fostering the early efforts toward peace in the Middle East and even facilitating hostage releases. &nbsp;Before this, Ukrainian politician Oleksandr Merezhko also put Trump forward for consideration.Despite being nominated several times, the Nobel Committee has never considered awarding him. The committee, which was appointed by the Norwegian parliament, maintains a very strict confidentiality and independent evaluation, although, Trump has often cast serious doubts on these factors.&nbsp;<h2>Repeated Obsession with the Prize</h2>&nbsp;Trump's desire to win the Nobel Peace prize is not hidden. He has publicly expressed this desire many times over the years, in interviews, speeches, campaign rallies, and even social media posts. In the recent post on June 20, the President's desperation broke all bounds, he went on to mention the prize six times, lamenting he "won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what."&nbsp;He cited his administration’s efforts in preventing conflicts between India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia, as well as his important role in the Abraham Accords. Trump has consistently taken credit for de-escalating tensions and brokering peace, and this is regardless of whether the parties involved acknowledged his mediation. This is especially true in case of the India-Pakistan recent conflict, when India repeatedly denied any efforts of mediation made by US in the matter.&nbsp;His frustration over the snub has not only been public but also persistent. According to advisers, the desire for the Nobel is not symbolic, it is personal, and has actively influenced how his team positions his foreign policy moves.&nbsp;<h2>Obama and the Source of Frustration</h2>&nbsp;But the frustration is not without a reason. It is often said that at the core of Trump’s resentment appears to be the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the then President Barack Obama. Obama was honoured with the prestigious award just months into his presidency, for efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and promote nuclear disarmament.&nbsp;Trump has often called Obama’s win undeserved. In 2019, he commented, “They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it. That was the only thing I agreed with him on.”&nbsp;Former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who is now a Trump critic, said Trump’s view is that if Obama could recieve the prize so early in his presidency, then he should too, especially considering the number of peace-related efforts he &nbsp;alleges he has undertaken.&nbsp;<h2>Why Trump Wants It</h2>&nbsp;But the question remains, Why does Trump want the Prize? Trump’s longing for the Nobel Peace Prize seems to be rooted in legacy, recognition, and validation. If we go by the reports from The New York Times and Axios, Trump believes this prize would strengthen his status as a statesman and validate his often-criticised foreign policy.&nbsp;He has provided multiple reference to the Nobel every time he is &nbsp;touting peace deals and mediating ceasefire efforts, this includes his involvement in Ukraine, Gaza, and the Middle East, often arguing that his contributions have gone unrecognised due to 'political bias'. The prize has become both a point of pride and grievance for Trump.&nbsp;On Social media and during public appearances, Trump frames the Nobel Peace Prize as a symbol of unjust exclusion, even while asserting that he does not care about awards. “No, I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do... but the people know, and that’s all that matters to me,” he wrote. Many of Trump critics believe that this statement tells of deeper personal ambition.&nbsp;<h2>Past U.S. Presidents Who Won the Prize</h2>&nbsp;Trump is obviously not the first American president to seek the Nobel Peace Prize, but he is among a rare group who have expressed such great interest so vocally. Four US presidents have received the honour. Theodore Roosevelt was the first US President to receive the prize in 1906, for mediating the Treaty of Portsmouth to end the Russo-Japanese War. Later Woodrow Wilson was recognised for his role in establishing the League of Nations after World War I in 1919. Jimmy Carter was the third American President awarded in 2002. The fourth President to be awarded was Barack Obama in 2002. He was honoured early in his presidency for diplomatic outreach and nuclear disarmament efforts.&nbsp;For Trump, the Nobel is more than a prize: it represents vindication. Whether he will ever receive it remains uncertain, but his pursuit of it remains unabated.&nbsp;Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer. &nbsp;

Trump has often called Obama’s win undeserved. In 2019, he commented, “They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it. That was the only thing I agreed with him on."

US President Donald Trump has spared no effort in demonstrating his desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize. In a latest development, Trump once again touted his claimed diplomatic achievements as a justification for receiving the world’s most prestigious peace honour. This time, Trump bragged his alleged role in easing tensions between India and Pakistan, a claim which has multiple times been firmly denied by New Delhi. On numerous occasions, from official speeches to campaign rallies and even interviews, Trump has never shied away from publicly referenced the Nobel Peace Prize. Despite not securing the award during his first term, his preoccupation with it appears undiminished. A Pattern of Nominations Trump has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize on multiple occasions, since his first term but has never won the prize. From Norwegian MP Christian Tybring-Gjedde, Swedish MP Magnus Jacobsson, and U.S. Congresswoman Claudia Tenney, his nominations have come from a range of people, who have been typically citing his role in diplomatic agreements such as the Abraham Accords. Earlier on Saturday, Pakistan through a post on social media platform X recommended his name, stating that the President should get Nobel Peace Prize in 2026 “in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis”. In 2024, Trump was again nominated by Anat Alon-Beck, who is an Israeli-born law professor at Case Western Reserve University. He credited him with fostering the early efforts toward peace in the Middle East and even facilitating hostage releases. Before this, Ukrainian politician Oleksandr Merezhko also put Trump forward for consideration. Despite being nominated several times, the Nobel Committee has never considered awarding him. The committee, which was appointed by the Norwegian parliament, maintains a very strict confidentiality and independent evaluation, although, Trump has often cast serious doubts on these factors. Repeated Obsession with the Prize Trump's desire to win the Nobel Peace prize is not hidden. He has publicly expressed this desire many times over the years, in interviews, speeches, campaign rallies, and even social media posts. In the recent post on June 20, the President's desperation broke all bounds, he went on to mention the prize six times, lamenting he "won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what." He cited his administration’s efforts in preventing conflicts between India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia, as well as his important role in the Abraham Accords. Trump has consistently taken credit for de-escalating tensions and brokering peace, and this is regardless of whether the parties involved acknowledged his mediation. This is especially true in case of the India-Pakistan recent conflict, when India repeatedly denied any efforts of mediation made by US in the matter. His frustration over the snub has not only been public but also persistent. According to advisers, the desire for the Nobel is not symbolic, it is personal, and has actively influenced how his team positions his foreign policy moves. Obama and the Source of Frustration But the frustration is not without a reason. It is often said that at the core of Trump’s resentment appears to be the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize awarded to the then President Barack Obama. Obama was honoured with the prestigious award just months into his presidency, for efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and promote nuclear disarmament. Trump has often called Obama’s win undeserved. In 2019, he commented, “They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it. That was the only thing I agreed with him on.” Former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who is now a Trump critic, said Trump’s view is that if Obama could recieve the prize so early in his presidency, then he should too, especially considering the number of peace-related efforts he alleges he has undertaken. Why Trump Wants It But the question remains, Why does Trump want the Prize? Trump’s longing for the Nobel Peace Prize seems to be rooted in legacy, recognition, and validation. If we go by the reports from The New York Times and Axios, Trump believes this prize would strengthen his status as a statesman and validate his often-criticised foreign policy. He has provided multiple reference to the Nobel every time he is touting peace deals and mediating ceasefire efforts, this includes his involvement in Ukraine, Gaza, and the Middle East, often arguing that his contributions have gone unrecognised due to 'political bias'. The prize has become both a point of pride and grievance for Trump. On Social media and during public appearances, Trump frames the Nobel Peace Prize as a symbol of unjust exclusion, even while asserting that he does not care about awards. “No, I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do... but the people know, and that’s all that matters to me,” he wrote. Many of Trump critics believe that this statement tells of deeper personal ambition. Past U.S. Presidents Who Won the Prize Trump is obviously not the first American president to seek the Nobel Peace Prize, but he is among a rare group who have expressed such great interest so vocally. Four US presidents have received the honour. Theodore Roosevelt was the first US President to receive the prize in 1906, for mediating the Treaty of Portsmouth to end the Russo-Japanese War. Later Woodrow Wilson was recognised for his role in establishing the League of Nations after World War I in 1919. Jimmy Carter was the third American President awarded in 2002. The fourth President to be awarded was Barack Obama in 2002. He was honoured early in his presidency for diplomatic outreach and nuclear disarmament efforts. For Trump, the Nobel is more than a prize: it represents vindication. Whether he will ever receive it remains uncertain, but his pursuit of it remains unabated. Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

Trump has often called Obama’s win undeserved. In 2019, he commented, “They gave one to Obama immediately upon his ascent to the presidency, and he had no idea why he got it. That was the only thing I agreed with him on."

‘Nobel ambitions': Why Donald Trump won’t stop talking about the peace prize?