National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

In an effort to navigate the erratic behaviour of the US President Donald Trump, Iran incorporated senior psychologists to assess the mental situation so that they could develop an effective message that they could pass on to the mediators. According to Iranian officials who spoke to Drop Site News on the condition of anonymity, two senior psychologists were added to the advisory circle of the Iranian negotiator following the Islamabad talks in April, as the two sides began exchanging proposed terms for a potential MoU.“We added two senior psychologists to the negotiations’ advisory circle so that we can shape messages intended for President Trump from the perspective of managing what we regard as a psychopathic behaviour pattern,” said the Iranian official to Dropsite News. According to the officials, following the inclusion of psychologists in the negotiations, Trump's behaviour has reportedly improved.&nbsp;“Because the exchanged texts will ultimately become part of the historical record, we conduct our negotiations in a manner that ensures the relative weight and sophistication of each party’s negotiating techniques will be evident should these communications be made public in the years ahead,” the official added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jd-vance-says-some-in-israel-like-us-iran-deal-quite-a-bit-1781532065689">JD Vance says some in Israel like US-Iran deal 'quite a bit' despite backlash</a>According to Investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill, said that Iranian officials believed that Trump was operating from a position of “mental deficiency”. He asserted that the Iranian officials were not attributing the mental illness to Trump to downplay his credibility, but as a matter of fact, they almost “clinically began to see results”.Trump, for his part, has threatened on numerous occasions to bomb Iranian civilisation to the “Stone Age” as the two sides tried to negotiate peace. Now, most recently, Trump had a newfound respect for Iran's new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, and claimed to have met him. Last week The Washington Post reported that Trump was treated by 22 specialists for his routine checkup, which was the largest by any President in history, even for US President Donald Trump, compared to his first term in office.&nbsp;

Iran reportedly brought senior psychologists into US-Iran negotiations to assess Donald Trump's behaviour and tailor messages during the MoU talks.

In an effort to navigate the erratic behaviour of the US President Donald Trump, Iran incorporated senior psychologists to assess the mental situation so that they could develop an effective message that they could pass on to the mediators. According to Iranian officials who spoke to Drop Site News on the condition of anonymity, two senior psychologists were added to the advisory circle of the Iranian negotiator following the Islamabad talks in April, as the two sides began exchanging proposed terms for a potential MoU. “We added two senior psychologists to the negotiations’ advisory circle so that we can shape messages intended for President Trump from the perspective of managing what we regard as a psychopathic behaviour pattern,” said the Iranian official to Dropsite News. According to the officials, following the inclusion of psychologists in the negotiations, Trump's behaviour has reportedly improved. “Because the exchanged texts will ultimately become part of the historical record, we conduct our negotiations in a manner that ensures the relative weight and sophistication of each party’s negotiating techniques will be evident should these communications be made public in the years ahead,” the official added. Also Read: JD Vance says some in Israel like US-Iran deal 'quite a bit' despite backlash According to Investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill, said that Iranian officials believed that Trump was operating from a position of “mental deficiency”. He asserted that the Iranian officials were not attributing the mental illness to Trump to downplay his credibility, but as a matter of fact, they almost “clinically began to see results”. Trump, for his part, has threatened on numerous occasions to bomb Iranian civilisation to the “Stone Age” as the two sides tried to negotiate peace. Now, most recently, Trump had a newfound respect for Iran's new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, and claimed to have met him. Last week The Washington Post reported that Trump was treated by 22 specialists for his routine checkup, which was the largest by any President in history, even for US President Donald Trump, compared to his first term in office.

Iran reportedly brought senior psychologists into US-Iran negotiations to assess Donald Trump's behaviour and tailor messages during the MoU talks.

Trump seen as ‘mentally deficient’? Iran reportedly added psychologists for negotiations

A strong 6.7-magnitude earthquake struck central Indonesia's Sulawesi province on Tuesday (June 16) at 10:27 am local time, according to the US Geological Survey. The shallow tremor was centred east-southeast of the city of Palu. The initial assessments indicate that the seismic event caused no immediate casualties or structural damage to the region.&nbsp;The quake has strongly shaken the Indonesian regions of Palu and Sigi, though authorities have confirmed it does not pose a tsunami threat. According to Indonesia’s Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency, the tremor caused widespread alarm but spared the coastal areas from secondary wave dangers. The panic was deeply felt by local residents, many of whom still carry the trauma of past disasters. Nurhaidar, a 42-year-old resident of Palu, described the terrifying moment the quake struck while she was cooking. While speaking to news agency AFP, she recalled a sudden, violent jolt followed by intense shaking that made her entire roof rattle loudly, sounding as if it were on the verge of collapse. Disoriented and confused, she acted quickly to evacuate her home safely alongside her children.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tsunami-warnings-in-multiple-countries-as-massive-earthquake-aftershocks-batter-philippines-check-full-list-1780883134766">Tsunami warnings in multiple countries as massive earthquake, aftershocks strike Philippines - Check full list</a>&nbsp;This latest seismic event serves as another stark reminder of Indonesia’s vulnerable geography. As a vast archipelago in Southeast Asia, the nation sits directly atop the Pacific "Ring of Fire." This expansive arc of intense seismic activity is characterised by colliding tectonic plates, stretching all the way from Japan through Southeast Asia and across the Pacific basin.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/philippines-earthquake-race-to-find-survivor-continues-more-than-32-000-dispaced-1781034149038">Philippines Earthquake: Race To Find Survivor Continues | More Than 32,000 Dispaced</a>&nbsp;It is because of this positioning that the country experiences frequent volcanic and seismic disruptions. The memory of these dangers remains especially vivid in Palu, where a devastating magnitude-7.5 earthquake and a subsequent catastrophic tsunami killed more than 2,200 people in 2018. Despite the intense shaking and anxiety caused by this recent event, no similar disaster materialised.

A powerful 6.7-magnitude shallow earthquake struck central Indonesia's Sulawesi province near Palu. 

A strong 6.7-magnitude earthquake struck central Indonesia's Sulawesi province on Tuesday (June 16) at 10:27 am local time, according to the US Geological Survey. The shallow tremor was centred east-southeast of the city of Palu. The initial assessments indicate that the seismic event caused no immediate casualties or structural damage to the region. The quake has strongly shaken the Indonesian regions of Palu and Sigi, though authorities have confirmed it does not pose a tsunami threat. According to Indonesia’s Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency, the tremor caused widespread alarm but spared the coastal areas from secondary wave dangers. The panic was deeply felt by local residents, many of whom still carry the trauma of past disasters. Nurhaidar, a 42-year-old resident of Palu, described the terrifying moment the quake struck while she was cooking. While speaking to news agency AFP, she recalled a sudden, violent jolt followed by intense shaking that made her entire roof rattle loudly, sounding as if it were on the verge of collapse. Disoriented and confused, she acted quickly to evacuate her home safely alongside her children. Also read: Tsunami warnings in multiple countries as massive earthquake, aftershocks strike Philippines - Check full list This latest seismic event serves as another stark reminder of Indonesia’s vulnerable geography. As a vast archipelago in Southeast Asia, the nation sits directly atop the Pacific "Ring of Fire." This expansive arc of intense seismic activity is characterised by colliding tectonic plates, stretching all the way from Japan through Southeast Asia and across the Pacific basin. Also read: Philippines Earthquake: Race To Find Survivor Continues | More Than 32,000 Dispaced It is because of this positioning that the country experiences frequent volcanic and seismic disruptions. The memory of these dangers remains especially vivid in Palu, where a devastating magnitude-7.5 earthquake and a subsequent catastrophic tsunami killed more than 2,200 people in 2018. Despite the intense shaking and anxiety caused by this recent event, no similar disaster materialised.

A powerful 6.7-magnitude shallow earthquake struck central Indonesia's Sulawesi province near Palu.&nbsp;

Strong 6.7-magnitude earthquake strikes central Indonesia

A Russian Tu-22M3 strategic bomber crashed during a training flight in Siberia’s Irkutsk region, Russian media reported on Monday (Jun 15). The aircraft nosedived into the ground in a forest area, sending thick plumes of smoke into the sky. A video of the incident emerged on social media showing the exact moment the bomber plane crashed.According to Interfax news agency, the crash happened during the landing. The report added that the crew members managed to eject safely, and there was no damage on the ground. The aircraft did not have any ammunition.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Very closeup video of the highly expensive Russian Tu-22M3 strategic bomber crashing today. <a href="https://t.co/ds1Oa1ehAD">https://t.co/ds1Oa1ehAD</a> <a href="https://t.co/RrVg7eO6H2">pic.twitter.com/RrVg7eO6H2</a>&mdash; WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧 (@WarMonitor3) <a href="https://x.com/WarMonitor3/status/2066536936483831856?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

“The crew ejected. There is no threat to the pilots' lives or health. There was no damage on the ground. The aircraft was flying without ammunition,” the report cited the Russian Ministry of Defence as saying.“A commission from the Aerospace Forces’ main command is working at the crash site,” the military said.Irkutsk Region Governor Igor Kobzev said that the Tu-22M3 crashed while landing in the Bokhansky District, near the village of Kamenka. He added that the crew was found by locals and taken to the hospital.“According to preliminary information, the crew managed to eject. They were found alive by locals. There were no casualties or damage. Medics are already working with the crew, and they are ready to evacuate them to the regional centre if necessary,” he said.Kobzev said that preliminary information suggested that an engine failure likely led to the crash.Code-named "Backfire" by NATO, the Tu-22M3 is part of the Russian Aerospace Forces’ long-range aviation fleet. The Soviet-era supersonic bomber has been used in combat missions in Syria and Ukraine. It can carry Kh-22 cruise missiles as well as air-launched hypersonic Kinzhal missiles.

A Russian Tu-22M3 strategic bomber crashed during a training flight while landing in Siberia's Irkutsk region. The crew ejected safely and survived, with officials citing a likely engine failure as the cause.

A Russian Tu-22M3 strategic bomber crashed during a training flight in Siberia’s Irkutsk region, Russian media reported on Monday (Jun 15). The aircraft nosedived into the ground in a forest area, sending thick plumes of smoke into the sky. A video of the incident emerged on social media showing the exact moment the bomber plane crashed. According to Interfax news agency, the crash happened during the landing. The report added that the crew members managed to eject safely, and there was no damage on the ground. The aircraft did not have any ammunition.

A Russian Tu-22M3 strategic bomber crashed during a training flight while landing in Siberia's Irkutsk region. The crew ejected safely and survived, with officials citing a likely engine failure as the cause.

Dramatic footage captures moment Russian Tu-22M3 bomber crashes in Siberia | WATCH

California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday accused US President Donald Trump of using the Justice Department to pursue what he described as a politically motivated investigation against him and his family.&nbsp;Newsom, a Democrat widely seen as a potential contender for the White House in 2028, claimed federal investigators had been examining his personal and financial affairs despite finding no evidence of wrongdoing.&nbsp;According to Newsom, federal agents have questioned friends and associates linked to him and his wife and reviewed years of documents as part of the inquiry.&nbsp;In a post on X, Newsom said, "Today, my wife &amp; I joined Donald Trump's hit list. He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. They have not found a crime they are simply trying to find one".

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Today, my wife &amp; I joined Donald Trump’s hit list. He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. They have not found a crime - they are simply trying to find one. He isn&#39;t coming after me because of mean tweets, but because I am considering running for President.… <a href="https://t.co/tVYk3WUvO8">pic.twitter.com/tVYk3WUvO8</a>&mdash; Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) <a href="https://x.com/GavinNewsom/status/2066585778982166808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The California governor alleged that the investigation was driven by political considerations rather than any criminal conduct.&nbsp;"He isn't coming after me because of mean tweets, but because I am considering running for President," Newsom said.&nbsp;The accusations came after reports that multiple investigations involving Newsom are underway, including one focused on the finances of his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom.<h2>Newsom links probe to possible presidential bid</h2>Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-claims-strait-of-hormuz-will-be-toll-free-iran-says-ships-will-pay-maritime-service-fees-what-s-really-in-the-peace-deal-1781573888112">US claims Strait of Hormuz will be toll-free. Iran says ships will pay maritime service fees. What's really in the peace deal?</a>&nbsp;Newsom has emerged as one of Trump's most vocal critics and has frequently targeted the president through social media posts and public statements.&nbsp;In a video message, he repeated his allegation that the investigation was connected to speculation about a possible presidential campaign.&nbsp;"Donald Trump isn't just coming after me because of my mean tweets," Newsom said in the video. "He's coming after me because I am considering running for president."&nbsp;He further claimed that individuals who publicly challenge Trump often become targets of political retaliation.&nbsp;"One by one, anyone who has challenged Donald Trump has ended up on his hit list, the governor said. Without providing further details, Newsom accused Trump of misusing government institutions against political opponents.&nbsp;He also launched a sharp attack on the president, calling him "the most corrupt President in American history."&nbsp;According to Newsom, Trump resents being publicly challenged and criticised.&nbsp;

Newsom alleged that Trump targeted him and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, with a probe because he is considering running for president.

California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday accused US President Donald Trump of using the Justice Department to pursue what he described as a politically motivated investigation against him and his family. Newsom, a Democrat widely seen as a potential contender for the White House in 2028, claimed federal investigators had been examining his personal and financial affairs despite finding no evidence of wrongdoing. According to Newsom, federal agents have questioned friends and associates linked to him and his wife and reviewed years of documents as part of the inquiry. In a post on X, Newsom said, "Today, my wife & I joined Donald Trump's hit list. He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. They have not found a crime they are simply trying to find one".

Newsom alleged that Trump targeted him and his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, with a probe because he is considering running for president.

California Governor accuses Trump of ordering 'politically motivated' DOJ probe against him and his wife

A day after the United States and Iran announced a peace agreement to end the hostilities that have already lasted over 100 days, fresh questions have emerged over the terms. On one hand, Washington insists that ships would pass through the Strait of Hormuz toll-free; on the other, Iranian media reported that Tehran had secured the right to charge maritime service fees. What's happening in Hormuz? Here's what we know.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-peace-deal-inside-the-14-point-mou-that-ended-over-108-days-of-war-wion-decodes-donald-trump-mojtaba-khamenei-benjamin-netanyahu-lebanon-1781513800001">US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes</a><h2>Terms of US-Iran peace agreement unclear</h2>The disagreement highlights the lack of clarity surrounding the memorandum of understanding signed electronically on Sunday by US President Donald Trump, US Vice President JD Vance and Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.The Monday (Jun 15) agreement brought an immediate halt to nearly four months of conflict and opened a 60-day window for negotiations aimed at reaching a broader peace settlement.<h2>US insists toll-free passage will happen</h2>Speaking to reporters, senior Trump administration officials said the deal guarantees toll-free passage through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world's oil supply passes.Vance also said that there was an understanding with Iran that the strait would remain open "in a toll-free way for the long term." However, he added that this was the "sort of thing that we're going to figure out in these technical negotiations."Meanwhile, according to an AFP report, US officials have expressed confidence that shipping traffic could return to pre-war levels within weeks. Iran, however, has offered a different interpretation.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/enemy-had-no-choice-but-surrender-iran-claims-victory-as-us-agrees-to-permanently-end-war-1781482980593">'Enemy had no choice but surrender': Iran claims victory as US agrees to 'permanently' end war</a><h2>Iran silently adds Hormuz maritime fees in final hours before deal</h2>According to Iran's Fars News Agency, negotiators amended the memorandum at the last moment to explicitly recognise Iranian and Omani sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. Citing an unnamed source, the agency reported that Tehran would be permitted to charge maritime service fees to vessels using the route."The use of the term 'maritime services' means that the United States has accepted that fees will be paid to Iran," the source told Fars.The apparent contradiction is only one of several unresolved questions surrounding the agreement. Details of the memorandum have not yet been released publicly, with both sides suggesting that the text could be published later this week.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Fresh uncertainty has emerged over the US-Iran peace agreement after Washington said passage through the Strait of Hormuz would remain toll-free, while Iranian media reported that Tehran secured the right to charge maritime service fees. All we know.

A day after the United States and Iran announced a peace agreement to end the hostilities that have already lasted over 100 days, fresh questions have emerged over the terms. On one hand, Washington insists that ships would pass through the Strait of Hormuz toll-free; on the other, Iranian media reported that Tehran had secured the right to charge maritime service fees. What's happening in Hormuz? Here's what we know. Also read | US-Iran peace deal: Inside the 14-point MoU that ended over 108 days of war | WION Decodes Terms of US-Iran peace agreement unclear The disagreement highlights the lack of clarity surrounding the memorandum of understanding signed electronically on Sunday by US President Donald Trump, US Vice President JD Vance and Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. The Monday (Jun 15) agreement brought an immediate halt to nearly four months of conflict and opened a 60-day window for negotiations aimed at reaching a broader peace settlement. US insists toll-free passage will happen Speaking to reporters, senior Trump administration officials said the deal guarantees toll-free passage through the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world's oil supply passes. Vance also said that there was an understanding with Iran that the strait would remain open "in a toll-free way for the long term." However, he added that this was the "sort of thing that we're going to figure out in these technical negotiations." Meanwhile, according to an AFP report, US officials have expressed confidence that shipping traffic could return to pre-war levels within weeks. Iran, however, has offered a different interpretation. Also read | 'Enemy had no choice but surrender': Iran claims victory as US agrees to 'permanently' end war Iran silently adds Hormuz maritime fees in final hours before deal According to Iran's Fars News Agency, negotiators amended the memorandum at the last moment to explicitly recognise Iranian and Omani sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz. Citing an unnamed source, the agency reported that Tehran would be permitted to charge maritime service fees to vessels using the route. "The use of the term 'maritime services' means that the United States has accepted that fees will be paid to Iran," the source told Fars. The apparent contradiction is only one of several unresolved questions surrounding the agreement. Details of the memorandum have not yet been released publicly, with both sides suggesting that the text could be published later this week. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Fresh uncertainty has emerged over the US-Iran peace agreement after Washington said passage through the Strait of Hormuz would remain toll-free, while Iranian media reported that Tehran secured the right to charge maritime service fees. All we know.

US claims Strait of Hormuz will be toll-free. Iran says ships will pay maritime service fees. What's really in the peace deal?

Violent clashes between protesters and police in Geneva ahead of the G7 Summit have revived memories of one of the most turbulent gatherings in the bloc's history, the 2003 G8 meeting held in the French resort town of Évian.&nbsp;Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Geneva on Sunday to protest against the arrival of world leaders for the three-day G7 Summit taking place across Lake Geneva in France. While the march began peacefully, tensions escalated later in the day as some protesters clashed with police.&nbsp;Authorities used tear gas and water cannons after demonstrators threw stones and firecrackers. Protesters also set fire to a Tesla vehicle and damaged property, including windows at a United Nations office and a bank. According to reports, many participants targeted institutions they viewed as symbols of capitalism and global power.&nbsp;The scenes unfolding in Geneva have drawn comparisons with the unrest that overshadowed the 2003 G8 gathering, widely regarded as one of the most contentious meetings in the bloc's history.&nbsp;Évian les Bains, located on the French side of Lake Geneva near the Swiss border, was the destination for the 2003 summit as well. Nearby Swiss cities, particularly Geneva and Lausanne, became the centre of large demonstrations and confrontations because of the extensive security arrangements around the venue.&nbsp;<h2>Why did the 2003 protests erupt?</h2>The 2003 gathering took place only months after the US-led invasion of Iraq, sparking strong opposition from anti-war groups across Europe. Public anger was directed at Western leaders, especially then US President George W Bush, leading to large demonstrations during the summit.&nbsp;Many activists also criticised the G8 nations for pursuing economic policies they believed increased global inequality. Protesters accused world leaders of failing to take meaningful action on climate change and debt relief for developing countries.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-air-force-b-52-bomber-goes-down-during-takeoff-at-edwards-base-in-california-1781552673695">Eight feared dead after US Air Force B-52 bomber crashes at California's Edwards Base</a><h2>Violence, injuries and crakedown&nbsp;</h2>More than 100,000 people reportedly joined peaceful demonstrations, while some groups turned to violence. Parts of Geneva witnessed rioting, vandalism, looting and attacks on commercial properties, causing extensive damage.&nbsp;One of the most serious incidents occurred near Lausanne, where activists suspended themselves from a highway bridge in an attempt to disrupt the movement of delegates. During a police operation, British activist Martin Shaw fell around 20 metres onto a rocky riverbed and suffered permanent injuries.&nbsp;Authorities responded with a massive security operation. Switzerland deployed thousands of troops to assist police, while France mobilised nearly 16,000 security personnel. Border crossings between the two countries were heavily restricted, disrupting transport and daily movement.&nbsp;The handling of the protests later came under criticism from human rights organisations, which raised concerns about the use of force, extensive deployment of tear gas and conditions in temporary detention facilities.&nbsp;More than two decades later, the clashes witnessed in Geneva ahead of the current G7 Summit have once again brought attention to the unrest that defined the 2003 gathering in Évian and left a lasting mark on the history of global summit protests.

Held just months after the US invasion of Iraq, the 2003 G8 summit triggered widespread protests across Europe, with demonstrators expressing anger at Western leaders, particularly then US President George W Bush.

Violent clashes between protesters and police in Geneva ahead of the G7 Summit have revived memories of one of the most turbulent gatherings in the bloc's history, the 2003 G8 meeting held in the French resort town of Évian. Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Geneva on Sunday to protest against the arrival of world leaders for the three-day G7 Summit taking place across Lake Geneva in France. While the march began peacefully, tensions escalated later in the day as some protesters clashed with police. Authorities used tear gas and water cannons after demonstrators threw stones and firecrackers. Protesters also set fire to a Tesla vehicle and damaged property, including windows at a United Nations office and a bank. According to reports, many participants targeted institutions they viewed as symbols of capitalism and global power. The scenes unfolding in Geneva have drawn comparisons with the unrest that overshadowed the 2003 G8 gathering, widely regarded as one of the most contentious meetings in the bloc's history. Évian les Bains, located on the French side of Lake Geneva near the Swiss border, was the destination for the 2003 summit as well. Nearby Swiss cities, particularly Geneva and Lausanne, became the centre of large demonstrations and confrontations because of the extensive security arrangements around the venue. Why did the 2003 protests erupt? The 2003 gathering took place only months after the US-led invasion of Iraq, sparking strong opposition from anti-war groups across Europe. Public anger was directed at Western leaders, especially then US President George W Bush, leading to large demonstrations during the summit. Many activists also criticised the G8 nations for pursuing economic policies they believed increased global inequality. Protesters accused world leaders of failing to take meaningful action on climate change and debt relief for developing countries. Also Read: Eight feared dead after US Air Force B-52 bomber crashes at California's Edwards Base Violence, injuries and crakedown More than 100,000 people reportedly joined peaceful demonstrations, while some groups turned to violence. Parts of Geneva witnessed rioting, vandalism, looting and attacks on commercial properties, causing extensive damage. One of the most serious incidents occurred near Lausanne, where activists suspended themselves from a highway bridge in an attempt to disrupt the movement of delegates. During a police operation, British activist Martin Shaw fell around 20 metres onto a rocky riverbed and suffered permanent injuries. Authorities responded with a massive security operation. Switzerland deployed thousands of troops to assist police, while France mobilised nearly 16,000 security personnel. Border crossings between the two countries were heavily restricted, disrupting transport and daily movement. The handling of the protests later came under criticism from human rights organisations, which raised concerns about the use of force, extensive deployment of tear gas and conditions in temporary detention facilities. More than two decades later, the clashes witnessed in Geneva ahead of the current G7 Summit have once again brought attention to the unrest that defined the 2003 gathering in Évian and left a lasting mark on the history of global summit protests.

Held just months after the US invasion of Iraq, the 2003 G8 summit triggered widespread protests across Europe, with demonstrators expressing anger at Western leaders, particularly then US President George W Bush.

Wion Decodes | G7 Summit: Protests in Geneva revive memories of 2003; here's what happened then

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday said he was prepared to hold direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the United States, arguing that such a proposal would make it more difficult for the Russian leader to refuse a face-to-face meeting aimed at ending the war.&nbsp;Zelensky revealed that he discussed the possibility during a recent conversation with US President Donald Trump and said he was now waiting to see whether the idea would move forward.&nbsp;The Ukrainian leader noted that Putin has repeatedly declined invitations for direct talks despite Kyiv's efforts to open negotiations to end more than four years of conflict.&nbsp;In a video message posted on X, Zelensky said, “Yesterday (Sunday), we discussed with President Trump that such a meeting could be organised in the US, in a format where Putin would find it much harder to refuse.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">We offered Putin to meet anywhere where real decisions to end the war could be made. He does not want it. We discussed with the U.S. and France the possibility of a meeting with Russia around the G7, with all democratic nations represented. Putin does not want it. Yesterday,… <a href="https://t.co/6NNQH8QLW8">pic.twitter.com/6NNQH8QLW8</a>&mdash; Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) <a href="https://x.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/2066591356630577493?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"We will see what comes of it. If Russia refuses this chance as well, additional pressure will be needed," he added.&nbsp;Earlier in the day, Zelensky said he had also invited Putin to meet during the G7 gathering in France, but claimed Moscow showed no interest in engaging.&nbsp;According to Zelensky, Russia had "once again demonstrated that it is not ready to speak about this".&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-air-force-b-52-bomber-goes-down-during-takeoff-at-edwards-base-in-california-1781552673695">Eight feared dead after US Air Force B-52 bomber crashes at California's Edwards Base</a>&nbsp;The Ukrainian president has continued to push for direct dialogue with Putin in recent months. On June 4, he publicly appealed to the Russian leader through an open letter, calling for a personal meeting to discuss ways to end the conflict.&nbsp;"Ukraine proposes ending this war through direct engagement between you and us. I am proposing a meeting," Zelensky said in an open letter. "I propose to set a clear date for such a meeting."&nbsp;Putin, however, dismissed the idea of an immediate meeting with Zelensky and said experts should first handle negotiations.&nbsp;"I see no point in meeting. It only makes sense for the Ukrainian side to stop the advance of our armed forces. That's it. And we need agreements," Putin said at Russia's main economic forum.&nbsp;"Let the experts work, develop some solutions, and then we can meet," he added.&nbsp;The war between Russia and Ukraine has continued since February 24, 2022, with no peace agreement in sight. Efforts led by Trump to encourage a settlement have so far failed to produce a breakthrough.&nbsp;

Earlier this month, Zelensky appealed directly to Putin through an open letter, proposing a face-to-face meeting and calling for a fixed date for talks aimed at ending the war between Russia and Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday said he was prepared to hold direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the United States, arguing that such a proposal would make it more difficult for the Russian leader to refuse a face-to-face meeting aimed at ending the war. Zelensky revealed that he discussed the possibility during a recent conversation with US President Donald Trump and said he was now waiting to see whether the idea would move forward. The Ukrainian leader noted that Putin has repeatedly declined invitations for direct talks despite Kyiv's efforts to open negotiations to end more than four years of conflict. In a video message posted on X, Zelensky said, “Yesterday (Sunday), we discussed with President Trump that such a meeting could be organised in the US, in a format where Putin would find it much harder to refuse.”

Earlier this month, Zelensky appealed directly to Putin through an open letter, proposing a face-to-face meeting and calling for a fixed date for talks aimed at ending the war between Russia and Ukraine.

'Putin does not want it': Zelensky renews offer for face-to-face talks to 'end the war'

An Indian national serving as the captain of a Russian shadow fleet vessel intercepted by British authorities has been charged with sanctions-related offences, the UK's National Crime Agency (NCA) confirmed on Monday.&nbsp;Ajay Pant, 38, has been accused of directly or indirectly supplying or delivering prohibited Russian oil or oil products to a third country by ship in June 2026. The alleged offence falls under Regulation 46Z9B of the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, according to the NCA.&nbsp;The charges come a day after British forces intercepted the sanctioned oil tanker Smyrtos in an operation off the southern coast of England. The vessel is alleged to be part of Russia's shadow fleet, a network of ships used to move oil while bypassing Western sanctions imposed after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.&nbsp;According to British authorities, the operation marked the first UK-led mission of its kind. Defence Ministry footage showed British commandos boarding the vessel during a nighttime operation by descending from a helicopter before taking control of the ship.Pant is scheduled to appear before Southampton Magistrates' Court on Tuesday.&nbsp;<h2>Tanker remains detained in UK waters</h2>The NCA said all 24 crew members aboard the vessel remain on board. The crew includes nationals from India and Georgia.&nbsp;Earlier, UK Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander ordered the detention of the tanker, preventing it from leaving British waters. The vessel remains anchored near Weymouth in Dorset while investigations continue.&nbsp;Although the ship was sailing under the flag of Cameroon, the British government has described it as "stateless".&nbsp;The UK government has intensified efforts against vessels believed to be part of Russia's shadow fleet. Officials say such ships are often used to circumvent restrictions imposed on Russian oil exports.&nbsp;Since the start of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, Britain has sanctioned hundreds of vessels suspected of helping Russia evade Western embargoes.&nbsp;Many of these ships are ageing oil tankers with complex ownership structures and questionable insurance arrangements. As a result, they are prohibited from accessing British ports and related maritime services.&nbsp;The interception of the Smyrtos is being viewed by British authorities as part of a broader campaign to disrupt networks that help Russia continue oil exports despite international restrictions.

Ajay Pant, 38, has been charged over allegations that he directly or indirectly facilitated the shipment of prohibited Russian oil or oil products to a third country by sea in June 2026.

An Indian national serving as the captain of a Russian shadow fleet vessel intercepted by British authorities has been charged with sanctions-related offences, the UK's National Crime Agency (NCA) confirmed on Monday. Ajay Pant, 38, has been accused of directly or indirectly supplying or delivering prohibited Russian oil or oil products to a third country by ship in June 2026. The alleged offence falls under Regulation 46Z9B of the Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, according to the NCA. The charges come a day after British forces intercepted the sanctioned oil tanker Smyrtos in an operation off the southern coast of England. The vessel is alleged to be part of Russia's shadow fleet, a network of ships used to move oil while bypassing Western sanctions imposed after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. According to British authorities, the operation marked the first UK-led mission of its kind. Defence Ministry footage showed British commandos boarding the vessel during a nighttime operation by descending from a helicopter before taking control of the ship. Pant is scheduled to appear before Southampton Magistrates' Court on Tuesday. Tanker remains detained in UK waters The NCA said all 24 crew members aboard the vessel remain on board. The crew includes nationals from India and Georgia. Earlier, UK Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander ordered the detention of the tanker, preventing it from leaving British waters. The vessel remains anchored near Weymouth in Dorset while investigations continue. Although the ship was sailing under the flag of Cameroon, the British government has described it as "stateless". The UK government has intensified efforts against vessels believed to be part of Russia's shadow fleet. Officials say such ships are often used to circumvent restrictions imposed on Russian oil exports. Since the start of the Ukraine conflict in 2022, Britain has sanctioned hundreds of vessels suspected of helping Russia evade Western embargoes. Many of these ships are ageing oil tankers with complex ownership structures and questionable insurance arrangements. As a result, they are prohibited from accessing British ports and related maritime services. The interception of the Smyrtos is being viewed by British authorities as part of a broader campaign to disrupt networks that help Russia continue oil exports despite international restrictions.

Ajay Pant, 38, has been charged over allegations that he directly or indirectly facilitated the shipment of prohibited Russian oil or oil products to a third country by sea in June 2026.

UK charges Indian captain of Russian shadow fleet tanker with sanctions offences

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday said the joint military campaign carried out by Israel and the United States against Iran had protected Israel from what he described as the threat of “nuclear annihilation”.&nbsp;Speaking at a televised press conference, his first public appearance since Washington and Tehran announced an agreement to end the Middle East war, Netanyahu claimed the military operation had achieved key objectives and significantly weakened Iran’s capabilities.&nbsp;“The most important thing is that we saved the State of Israel from the threat of nuclear annihilation,” Netanyahu said.&nbsp;He asserted that the military campaign had targeted critical infrastructure across Iran and created a strong deterrent against future threats. According to him, the operation had established a “credible military threat” that would support any future understanding reached with Tehran.&nbsp;Netanyahu also made it clear that Israel would not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons under any circumstances.&nbsp;“With an agreement or without one, Iran will not have nuclear weapons,” he said.&nbsp;“Not today and not tomorrow,” he added, saying that the joint US and Israeli operation had struck “every possible infrastructure target” in Iran.<h2>Israeli troops to remain in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria</h2>Netanyahu said Israeli forces would continue to stay in security zones in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria for as long as the government considered it necessary.&nbsp;“We established deep security zones around the State of Israel. We did this in Gaza, in Lebanon, and in Syria,” Netanyahu said.&nbsp;“And I want to make it clear: we will remain in these security zones for as long as necessary to protect our country.”&nbsp;The remarks came after the United States and Iran reached an agreement aimed at ending the broader regional conflict, including fighting in Lebanon involving Iran-backed Hezbollah militants and Israeli forces.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sikh-clergy-declares-punjab-cm-bhagwant-mann-khalsa-panth-virodhi-asks-community-to-shun-ties-1781555782624">Sikh clergy declares Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann ‘Khalsa Panth Virodhi’, asks community to shun ties</a><h2>Netanyahu confirms election plans</h2>Addressing domestic political questions, Netanyahu also announced that he would contest the Israeli elections scheduled later this year.&nbsp;The veteran leader, who has led Israel through years of conflict across multiple fronts and is currently facing a corruption trial, has come under increasing criticism from opposition parties over his handling of the war.&nbsp;Opposition leaders have accused him of failing to achieve several objectives set after Hamas launched its October 2023 attack on Israel.&nbsp;Despite the criticism, Netanyahu said he remained determined to seek another term in office.&nbsp;“I am going to run in the elections and intend to win,” he said.&nbsp;The comments marked Netanyahu’s first detailed public response after the announcement of the US-Iran agreement that seeks to bring an end to the conflict that intensified following US and Israeli strikes on Iran earlier this year.

Netanyahu said Israeli forces would remain in security zones in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria for as long as necessary to protect Israel and ensure its security.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday said the joint military campaign carried out by Israel and the United States against Iran had protected Israel from what he described as the threat of “nuclear annihilation”. Speaking at a televised press conference, his first public appearance since Washington and Tehran announced an agreement to end the Middle East war, Netanyahu claimed the military operation had achieved key objectives and significantly weakened Iran’s capabilities. “The most important thing is that we saved the State of Israel from the threat of nuclear annihilation,” Netanyahu said. He asserted that the military campaign had targeted critical infrastructure across Iran and created a strong deterrent against future threats. According to him, the operation had established a “credible military threat” that would support any future understanding reached with Tehran. Netanyahu also made it clear that Israel would not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons under any circumstances. “With an agreement or without one, Iran will not have nuclear weapons,” he said. “Not today and not tomorrow,” he added, saying that the joint US and Israeli operation had struck “every possible infrastructure target” in Iran. Israeli troops to remain in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria Netanyahu said Israeli forces would continue to stay in security zones in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria for as long as the government considered it necessary. “We established deep security zones around the State of Israel. We did this in Gaza, in Lebanon, and in Syria,” Netanyahu said. “And I want to make it clear: we will remain in these security zones for as long as necessary to protect our country.” The remarks came after the United States and Iran reached an agreement aimed at ending the broader regional conflict, including fighting in Lebanon involving Iran-backed Hezbollah militants and Israeli forces. Also Read: Sikh clergy declares Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann ‘Khalsa Panth Virodhi’, asks community to shun ties Netanyahu confirms election plans Addressing domestic political questions, Netanyahu also announced that he would contest the Israeli elections scheduled later this year. The veteran leader, who has led Israel through years of conflict across multiple fronts and is currently facing a corruption trial, has come under increasing criticism from opposition parties over his handling of the war. Opposition leaders have accused him of failing to achieve several objectives set after Hamas launched its October 2023 attack on Israel. Despite the criticism, Netanyahu said he remained determined to seek another term in office. “I am going to run in the elections and intend to win,” he said. The comments marked Netanyahu’s first detailed public response after the announcement of the US-Iran agreement that seeks to bring an end to the conflict that intensified following US and Israeli strikes on Iran earlier this year.

Netanyahu said Israeli forces would remain in security zones in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria for as long as necessary to protect Israel and ensure its security.

‘War saved Israel from nuclear annihilation’: Netanyahu says Israeli forces to stay in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza

Eight people are feared dead after a B-52 bomber crashed shortly after taking off in California on Monday, according to officials at the US Air Force base where the incident occurred.&nbsp;“An Air Force B-52 Stratofortress carrying eight people on a routine test mission crashed today shortly after take-off at 11.20 am (PDT). Initial indications are that the crash was not survivable,” Edwards Air Force Base said in a statement.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">‼️ Official release regarding today&#39;s B-52 crash at Edwards. Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and unit members at this time. More information will be released as it becomes available. <a href="https://t.co/410V2gqCFv">pic.twitter.com/410V2gqCFv</a>&mdash; Edwards Air Force Base (@EdwardsAFB) <a href="https://x.com/EdwardsAFB/status/2066647300974518345?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The development comes after an Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber crashed shortly after taking off from Edwards Air Force Base in California on Monday, according to officials at the base.&nbsp;The aircraft went down at around 11:20 a.m. PT after departing from the airfield at Edwards Air Force Base in Kern County.&nbsp;In a statement posted on X, the base said, "Emergency crews immediately responded to the scene, and the situation is ongoing."&nbsp;"The airfield has been closed, and all inbound aircraft are being diverted. Additionally, all non-commercial visitor passes have been suspended until further notice to allow the installation to focus entirely on emergency response operations," it added. The B-52 strategic bomber entered service after its first flight in 1954 and was initially developed for potential conflict with the Soviet Union. Despite its Cold War origins, the aircraft has undergone repeated modernisation programmes that have allowed it to remain operational for decades.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/war-saved-israel-from-nuclear-annihilation-netanyahu-says-israeli-forces-to-stay-in-lebanon-syria-and-gaza-1781557694223">‘War saved Israel from nuclear annihilation’: Netanyahu says Israeli forces to stay in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza</a>&nbsp;One of the largest aircraft in the US Air Force fleet, the B-52 measures about 159 feet in length and has a wingspan of approximately 185 feet. It can carry a wide variety of weapons, including conventional bombs and cruise missiles.&nbsp;The bomber is typically operated by a five-member crew consisting of an aircraft commander, pilot, radar navigator, navigator and electronic warfare officer.&nbsp;Capable of flying combat missions over distances of up to 8,800 miles, the aircraft can also be equipped to carry nuclear weapons. Over the years, the United States has deployed the B-52 in major military operations, including those in Vietnam, the Gulf region, Iraq, Afghanistan and, most recently, Iran.

Authorities did not immediately provide details about the cause of the crash. Emergency teams were sent to the site soon after the incident and response efforts were continuing.

Eight people are feared dead after a B-52 bomber crashed shortly after taking off in California on Monday, according to officials at the US Air Force base where the incident occurred. “An Air Force B-52 Stratofortress carrying eight people on a routine test mission crashed today shortly after take-off at 11.20 am (PDT). Initial indications are that the crash was not survivable,” Edwards Air Force Base said in a statement.

Authorities did not immediately provide details about the cause of the crash. Emergency teams were sent to the site soon after the incident and response efforts were underway.

Eight feared dead after US Air Force B-52 bomber crashes at California's Edwards Base

After it was revealed that the US-Iran agreement had been signed digitally Sunday, President Donald Trump said that ships were “starting to move” out of the Strait of Hormuz under the agreement reached with Iran, but international shipping associations have warned that it is still too risky, and only one ship had transited the strait on Monday, according to tracking data.&nbsp;“Ships are starting to move, many loaded up with Oil, out of the Strait of Hormuz,” Trump said in a Truth Social post on Monday.&nbsp;&nbsp;“They are going along the Southern ‘Highway,’ which is totally safe, secure, and pristine. There are other areas of travel, also!!!” Trump added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-has-committed-to-destroy-and-dispose-of-highly-enriched-material-says-vance-1781535582499">‘Iran has committed to destroy and dispose of highly enriched material,’ says Vance</a>&nbsp;

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump had said Sunday that the vital shipping lane would only reopen after the signing of the memorandum of understanding with Iran. The formal signing of the agreement is likely to take place in Switzerland on Friday.&nbsp;Traffic through the vital waterway, which carried around a quarter of the world’s oil flows before the war, came practically to a halt when the US and Israel started bombing Iran in February.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/g7-summit-2026-what-would-success-look-like-in-vian-amid-turbulent-times-1781524196880">G7 Summit 2026: What would success look like in Évian amid turbulent times?</a><h2>Strait of Hormuz remains closed, say Iranian state media reports</h2>&nbsp;However, in contrast to Trump’s claim, Iran’s state broadcaster IRIB said on Monday that there is “zero passage through the Strait of Hormuz”.&nbsp;In a video published on Telegram, an IRIB reporter said the vital waterway was “closed until further notice,” and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy had not permitted any vessels to transit the strait for more than 96 hours.&nbsp;<h2>MoU with Iran will be released after Friday: Trump</h2>&nbsp;The memorandum of understanding with Iran will likely be released sometime after Friday, Trump said during a bilateral press address with French President Emanuel Macron after reaching France for the G7 Summit.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/drdo-successfully-tests-indigenous-long-range-land-attack-cruise-missile-1781543212448">DRDO successfully tests indigenous Long Range Land Attack Cruise Missile</a>&nbsp;“I think pretty soon ... I want it to be released because it’s a very powerful document. It’s not like the Obama document, which was just a terrible document. This is a very powerful document and I want it to be released, so probably pretty soon,” Trump told reporters.&nbsp;“I would say, sometime after Friday, because the strait, it’s open now, but it opens completely,” he said.&nbsp;Meanwhile, a senior US administration official told reporters on Monday that details of the deal with Iran will be released in the next 24 to 48 hours.

US President Donald Trump had said on Sunday that the vital Strait of Hormuz would only reopen for maritime traffic after the signing of the memorandum of understanding with Iran. The formal signing of the agreement is likely to take place in Switzerland on Friday.

After it was revealed that the US-Iran agreement had been signed digitally Sunday, President Donald Trump said that ships were “starting to move” out of the Strait of Hormuz under the agreement reached with Iran, but international shipping associations have warned that it is still too risky, and only one ship had transited the strait on Monday, according to tracking data. “Ships are starting to move, many loaded up with Oil, out of the Strait of Hormuz,” Trump said in a Truth Social post on Monday. “They are going along the Southern ‘Highway,’ which is totally safe, secure, and pristine. There are other areas of travel, also!!!” Trump added. Also Read: ‘Iran has committed to destroy and dispose of highly enriched material,’ says Vance

US President Donald Trump had said on Sunday that the vital Strait of Hormuz would only reopen for maritime traffic after the signing of the memorandum of understanding with Iran. The formal signing of the agreement is likely to take place in Switzerland on Friday.

Trump says ships ‘loaded with oil’ starting to move out of Strait of Hormuz

It was US President Donald Trump’s birthday on June 14, and comedian and late-night show host Jimmy Kimmel obviously had to wish his favourite subject of jokes. Fans of Kimmel would know that the comedian and Trump have had a long-running public feud with both being critical of each other.&nbsp;&nbsp;<h2>Jimmy Kimmel's birthday card for Donald Trump</h2>&nbsp;On Sunday, as Trump turned 80, Kimmel shared a satirical birthday card on Instagram that appeared to mimic a controversial card which Trump had allegedly sent to financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on his 50th birthday in 2003.&nbsp;“Happy 80th, Donald! A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret,” the parody card read. Kimmel captioned the post, “Happy #80,” and tagged Trump's official Instagram account.The alleged birthday card closely resembled the alleged Epstein birthday card, but with some changes.&nbsp;In his card, Kimmel replaced Epstein's name with Trump's and swapped the original illustration of a slender female silhouette with a caricature seemingly mocking the president's physique.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/p/DZkopWtMtQS/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:16px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DZkopWtMtQS/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank"> <div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div></div></div><div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><svg width="50px" height="50px" viewBox="0 0 60 60" version="1.1" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g stroke="none" stroke-width="1" fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd"><g transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)" fill="#000000"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></div><div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;">View this post on Instagram</div></div><div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"><div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div></div><div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)"></div></div><div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div></div></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div></div></a><p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DZkopWtMtQS/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank">A post shared by Jimmy Kimmel (@jimmykimmel)</a></div></blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>

<h2>What’s the controversy around the card?</h2>Donald Trump allegedly sent a card to Epstein in 2003 when the latter turned 50. The card came under scrutiny after it was first reported by the Wall Street Journal in July 2025. Instead of a direct message, the original card was structured as a fictional dialogue between ‘Donald’ and ‘Jeffery’.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/jimmy-kimmel-mocks-donald-trump-as-he-skips-son-s-wedding-he-loves-don-jr-he-just-loves-the-united-states-more-1779935771620">Jimmy Kimmel mocks Donald Trump as he skips son’s wedding: ‘He loves Don Jr. He just loves the United States more’</a>&nbsp;The card begins with a line credited to “Voice Over” that reads, “There must be more to life than having everything.”&nbsp;Donald then states, “Yes, there is, but I won't tell you what it is,” noting that “we have certain things in common, Jeffrey,” and that “enigmas never age, have you noticed that?”&nbsp;To that, Jeffrey replies, “As a matter of fact, it was clear to me the last time I saw you."&nbsp;The message ended with the line: “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.”&nbsp;The White House has repeatedly denied the involvement of the President in sending the card. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took to X (formerly Twitter) in September and stated, “As I have said all along, it's very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it. President Trump's legal team will continue to aggressively pursue litigation.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/george-clooney-speaks-in-support-of-jimmy-kimmel-amid-melania-trump-joke-outcry-1777371461900">George Clooney speaks in support of Jimmy Kimmel amid Melania Trump joke outcry</a>&nbsp;Trump first filed a $10 billion lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and two reporters in July. Then when the case was dismissed in April, Trump refiled the lawsuit the following month, adding the newspaper's parent company Dow Jones, media mogul Rupert Murdoch and News Corp CEO Robert Thomson to the complaint.&nbsp;Jeffery Epstein was found dead in his jail cell on August 10, 2019, at New York City's Metropolitan Correctional Center, back in 2003. He was charged with sex trafficking minors in federal court the year he died.&nbsp;

Jimmy Kimmel has once again taken a jab at US President Donald Trump on his 80th birthday. The comedian shared a satirical birthday card that had similarities to the card that Trump had allegedly sent to Epstein on his 50th birthday. 

It was US President Donald Trump’s birthday on June 14, and comedian and late-night show host Jimmy Kimmel obviously had to wish his favourite subject of jokes. Fans of Kimmel would know that the comedian and Trump have had a long-running public feud with both being critical of each other. Jimmy Kimmel's birthday card for Donald Trump On Sunday, as Trump turned 80, Kimmel shared a satirical birthday card on Instagram that appeared to mimic a controversial card which Trump had allegedly sent to financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on his 50th birthday in 2003. “Happy 80th, Donald! A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday, and may every day be another wonderful secret,” the parody card read. Kimmel captioned the post, “Happy #80,” and tagged Trump's official Instagram account. The alleged birthday card closely resembled the alleged Epstein birthday card, but with some changes. In his card, Kimmel replaced Epstein's name with Trump's and swapped the original illustration of a slender female silhouette with a caricature seemingly mocking the president's physique.

Jimmy Kimmel has once again taken a jab at US President Donald Trump on his 80th birthday. The comedian shared a satirical birthday card that had similarities to the card that Trump had allegedly sent to Epstein on his 50th birthday.&nbsp;

Jimmy Kimmel trolls Donald Trump’s 80th birthday with parody of alleged Jeffrey Epstein card

US Vice President JD Vance has said Iran could gain access to a proposed $300 billion reconstruction fund backed by Gulf nations, but only if Tehran fulfils its commitments under a prospective agreement with Washington.&nbsp;Speaking to CBS on Monday (June 15), Vance said the funds would be available only if Iran honoured its obligations under the deal. "That's the sort of thing they could have access to, funded by the Gulf Coast coalition, so long as they honour their end of the obligation," Vance said. He cautioned that hardliners within Iran could misrepresent the terms of any agreement by overstating the benefits and downplaying the concessions required from Tehran.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/bangladesh-pm-s-adviser-returns-to-dhaka-after-being-stopped-at-igi-airport-this-is-what-we-know-1781524687587">Bangladesh PM’s adviser returns to Dhaka after being stopped at IGI airport. This is what we know</a>&nbsp;"The hardliners in the Iranian system will overemphasise the benefits that Iran gets, while underemphasising all the things that they have to concede" to qualify for those benefits, Vance told CBS. The vice president said the United States remained open to various options being discussed as negotiations continue. However, he rejected suggestions that a reported $24 billion in frozen Iranian funds would be released as part of the agreement, noting that the text of the deal has not yet been made public.&nbsp;The issue of granting Iran access to additional funds has drawn scrutiny from critics of engagement with Tehran. Opponents of previous agreements have argued that the release of frozen assets could indirectly support Iran-backed militant groups. Similar concerns were raised after the administration of former US President Barack Obama unfroze Iranian assets under the 2015 nuclear deal.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tehran-not-yet-taken-its-final-decision-iranian-media-reports-on-peace-deal-with-us-this-is-what-we-know-1781434562907">‘Tehran not yet taken its final decision’: Iranian media reports on peace deal with US. This is what we know</a>&nbsp;In a series of television interviews on Monday, Vance said many technical and detailed aspects of the arrangement would be addressed during follow-up negotiations after any agreement is signed. He repeatedly stressed that financial benefits would be contingent on Iran complying with commitments to refrain from developing or acquiring a nuclear weapon.&nbsp;

US Vice President JD Vance stated Iran could access a $300 billion Gulf-backed reconstruction fund if it meets nuclear obligations, while denying the release of $24 billion in frozen assets.

US Vice President JD Vance has said Iran could gain access to a proposed $300 billion reconstruction fund backed by Gulf nations, but only if Tehran fulfils its commitments under a prospective agreement with Washington. Speaking to CBS on Monday (June 15), Vance said the funds would be available only if Iran honoured its obligations under the deal. "That's the sort of thing they could have access to, funded by the Gulf Coast coalition, so long as they honour their end of the obligation," Vance said. He cautioned that hardliners within Iran could misrepresent the terms of any agreement by overstating the benefits and downplaying the concessions required from Tehran. Also read: Bangladesh PM’s adviser returns to Dhaka after being stopped at IGI airport. This is what we know "The hardliners in the Iranian system will overemphasise the benefits that Iran gets, while underemphasising all the things that they have to concede" to qualify for those benefits, Vance told CBS. The vice president said the United States remained open to various options being discussed as negotiations continue. However, he rejected suggestions that a reported $24 billion in frozen Iranian funds would be released as part of the agreement, noting that the text of the deal has not yet been made public. The issue of granting Iran access to additional funds has drawn scrutiny from critics of engagement with Tehran. Opponents of previous agreements have argued that the release of frozen assets could indirectly support Iran-backed militant groups. Similar concerns were raised after the administration of former US President Barack Obama unfroze Iranian assets under the 2015 nuclear deal. Also read: ‘Tehran not yet taken its final decision’: Iranian media reports on peace deal with US. This is what we know In a series of television interviews on Monday, Vance said many technical and detailed aspects of the arrangement would be addressed during follow-up negotiations after any agreement is signed. He repeatedly stressed that financial benefits would be contingent on Iran complying with commitments to refrain from developing or acquiring a nuclear weapon.

US Vice President JD Vance stated Iran could access a $300 billion Gulf-backed reconstruction fund if it meets nuclear obligations, while denying the release of $24 billion in frozen assets.

Vance says Iran could access $300bn reconstruction fund if it meets its obligations. This is what we know

US Vice President JD Vance said the memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the US and Iran was signed digitally on Sunday (June 14), ahead of an expected in-person signing ceremony in Switzerland later this week. "We already signed the deal digitally yesterday," Vance said during an interview with ABC's Good Morning America on Monday (June 15). A senior US official later confirmed during a phone briefing that both US President Donald Trump and Vance digitally signed the agreement on Sunday.&nbsp;According to the official, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf signed the MoU on behalf of Tehran. The digital signing comes ahead of an apparent formal ceremony scheduled for Friday in Switzerland, where representatives of both countries are expected to participate. The agreement marks a significant step in ongoing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran, although details of the memorandum have not yet been publicly disclosed.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-has-committed-to-destroy-and-dispose-of-highly-enriched-material-says-vance-1781535582499">‘Iran has committed to destroy and dispose of highly enriched material,’ says Vance</a>&nbsp;According to US President Donald Trump, the agreement with Iran will help ensure that the Strait of Hormuz remains open to international shipping without tolls. Speaking in Geneva, Trump said he did not expect significant assistance from other countries to maintain access through the strategic waterway because of the deal reached with Iran. "I don't think we're going to need much help, because we have an agreement where it's going to be open and it's toll-free," Trump said.&nbsp;He added that a limited presence from allied nations could still be beneficial, suggesting that "it's not a bad idea to have a ship or two" from several countries operating in the area. Trump also expressed confidence that maritime traffic through the strait would continue without disruption. "You'd be a great country to do it in, because you never know what happens," he said, without specifying which country he was referring to. "But I think it's going to be open, and I think it's going to be free sailing."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-responsible-for-implementing-draft-deal-with-iran-claims-israeli-fm-1781533931722">US responsible for implementing draft deal with Iran, claims Israeli FM</a>

The US and Iran digitally signed a memorandum of understanding on June 14, ahead of an upcoming Switzerland meeting, aimed at ensuring toll-free, open shipping through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

US Vice President JD Vance said the memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the US and Iran was signed digitally on Sunday (June 14), ahead of an expected in-person signing ceremony in Switzerland later this week. "We already signed the deal digitally yesterday," Vance said during an interview with ABC's Good Morning America on Monday (June 15). A senior US official later confirmed during a phone briefing that both US President Donald Trump and Vance digitally signed the agreement on Sunday. According to the official, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf signed the MoU on behalf of Tehran. The digital signing comes ahead of an apparent formal ceremony scheduled for Friday in Switzerland, where representatives of both countries are expected to participate. The agreement marks a significant step in ongoing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran, although details of the memorandum have not yet been publicly disclosed. Also read: ‘Iran has committed to destroy and dispose of highly enriched material,’ says Vance According to US President Donald Trump, the agreement with Iran will help ensure that the Strait of Hormuz remains open to international shipping without tolls. Speaking in Geneva, Trump said he did not expect significant assistance from other countries to maintain access through the strategic waterway because of the deal reached with Iran. "I don't think we're going to need much help, because we have an agreement where it's going to be open and it's toll-free," Trump said. He added that a limited presence from allied nations could still be beneficial, suggesting that "it's not a bad idea to have a ship or two" from several countries operating in the area. Trump also expressed confidence that maritime traffic through the strait would continue without disruption. "You'd be a great country to do it in, because you never know what happens," he said, without specifying which country he was referring to. "But I think it's going to be open, and I think it's going to be free sailing." Also read: US responsible for implementing draft deal with Iran, claims Israeli FM

The US and Iran digitally signed a memorandum of understanding on June 14, ahead of an upcoming Switzerland meeting, aimed at ensuring toll-free, open shipping through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.

Vance says US-Iran MoU was signed digitally before planned Switzerland meeting

US Vice-President JD Vance said on Monday that Iran has “committed to destroy and dispose of their stockpile of highly enriched material” and to “never develop or procure a nuclear weapon.” Vance further said in an interview to CNBC that Iran would have to undergo a verification process to ensure it holds up its side of the deal, and only then will the US lift sanctions.&nbsp;Vance said if Iran honours its obligations and allows real inspections of its nuclear programme, then the US will welcome it back into the world economy.&nbsp;“We say to the Iranians, you are welcome to have access to an unsanctioned economy, you’re welcome to be re-invited into the world economy, but only if you honour the commitments that you make in this agreement,” he said.&nbsp;“So that’s the leverage point and simultaneously the enforcement mechanism we have over their nuclear programme.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/g7-summit-2026-what-would-success-look-like-in-vian-amid-turbulent-times-1781524196880">G7 Summit 2026: What would success look like in Évian amid turbulent times?</a>&nbsp;“Iran will have a much better and much more prosperous future if they meet the obligations they make in this agreement,” Vance said, adding that the unfreezing of Iran’s financial assets is “one of the things we’re going to work out in the technical talks that will follow the official signing on Friday.”&nbsp;<h2>Refutes claims of Iranian regime receiving $24 billion in frozen funds</h2>&nbsp;The US vice president refuted claims that the Iranian regime would receive $24 billion in frozen funds if it hits certain benchmarks, saying the figure “doesn’t appear anywhere in any of the texts.”&nbsp;“What we have said is that we are willing to talk about unfreezing assets, but a much, much bigger deal is unsanctioning their economy - so long as they make the long-term commitments on the nuclear programme,” Vance said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/g7-summit-2026-what-is-pm-modi-s-g7-agenda-priorities-for-india-at-vian-1781520152545">G7 Summit 2026: What is PM Modi’s G7 agenda, priorities for India at Évian</a>&nbsp;In another interview with CBS News, Vance did not rule out the possibility of US military forces being used to help ensure Iran’s compliance with an agreement on its nuclear materials, though he said he didn’t “think the US forces are going to be necessary.”&nbsp;“We certainly talked with the Iranians about how we’re going to destroy that enriched stockpile. The technical details are one of the things that we’re going to work on when we start those technical talks on Friday,” Vance said.&nbsp;“We’re talking about working with the IAEA and working with the Iranians to go in and destroy that enriched stockpile of material,” Vance told CBS News.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-restricts-access-of-anthropic-s-mythos-and-fable-to-americans-only-is-globalisation-dead-in-the-age-of-ai-1781372168111">US restricts access of Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable to Americans only. Is globalisation dead in the age of AI?</a>&nbsp;“But what the president has made very clear is the United States will be there to confirm that that enriched stockpile of material is destroyed,” he said.&nbsp;&nbsp;Asked whether he believed the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened beyond the 60-day period laid out in the agreement, Vance said that “our expectation is that the strait is going to be opened in a toll-free way for the long term.”&nbsp;<h2>‘Trump admin plans to release full text of agreement this week’</h2>&nbsp;Vance further said that the Trump administration plans to release the full text of the US-Iran agreement this week, saying, “We want the American people to see it.”“Sometimes with these agreements, there are some diplomatic protocols, some technical things to work out, but we plan to release the full text this week,” he said.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-govt-funded-foreign-biolabs-many-of-them-worked-on-dangerous-pathogens-reveals-tulsi-gabbard-1781283223008">US govt funded foreign biolabs, many of them worked on dangerous pathogens, reveals Tulsi Gabbard</a>&nbsp;Vance said there is some misreporting about the terms in the agreement and clarified that the deal broadly “ensures that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, while simultaneously opening the Strait of Hormuz.”

US Vice President JD Vance refuted claims that the Iranian regime would receive $24 billion in frozen funds if it hits certain benchmarks, saying the figure doesn’t appear anywhere in the texts. He added that the Trump administration plans to release the full text of the agreement.

US Vice-President JD Vance said on Monday that Iran has “committed to destroy and dispose of their stockpile of highly enriched material” and to “never develop or procure a nuclear weapon.” Vance further said in an interview to CNBC that Iran would have to undergo a verification process to ensure it holds up its side of the deal, and only then will the US lift sanctions. Vance said if Iran honours its obligations and allows real inspections of its nuclear programme, then the US will welcome it back into the world economy. “We say to the Iranians, you are welcome to have access to an unsanctioned economy, you’re welcome to be re-invited into the world economy, but only if you honour the commitments that you make in this agreement,” he said. “So that’s the leverage point and simultaneously the enforcement mechanism we have over their nuclear programme.” Also Read: G7 Summit 2026: What would success look like in Évian amid turbulent times? “Iran will have a much better and much more prosperous future if they meet the obligations they make in this agreement,” Vance said, adding that the unfreezing of Iran’s financial assets is “one of the things we’re going to work out in the technical talks that will follow the official signing on Friday.” Refutes claims of Iranian regime receiving $24 billion in frozen funds The US vice president refuted claims that the Iranian regime would receive $24 billion in frozen funds if it hits certain benchmarks, saying the figure “doesn’t appear anywhere in any of the texts.” “What we have said is that we are willing to talk about unfreezing assets, but a much, much bigger deal is unsanctioning their economy - so long as they make the long-term commitments on the nuclear programme,” Vance said. Also Read: G7 Summit 2026: What is PM Modi’s G7 agenda, priorities for India at Évian In another interview with CBS News, Vance did not rule out the possibility of US military forces being used to help ensure Iran’s compliance with an agreement on its nuclear materials, though he said he didn’t “think the US forces are going to be necessary.” “We certainly talked with the Iranians about how we’re going to destroy that enriched stockpile. The technical details are one of the things that we’re going to work on when we start those technical talks on Friday,” Vance said. “We’re talking about working with the IAEA and working with the Iranians to go in and destroy that enriched stockpile of material,” Vance told CBS News. Also Read: US restricts access of Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable to Americans only. Is globalisation dead in the age of AI? “But what the president has made very clear is the United States will be there to confirm that that enriched stockpile of material is destroyed,” he said. Asked whether he believed the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened beyond the 60-day period laid out in the agreement, Vance said that “our expectation is that the strait is going to be opened in a toll-free way for the long term.” ‘Trump admin plans to release full text of agreement this week’ Vance further said that the Trump administration plans to release the full text of the US-Iran agreement this week, saying, “We want the American people to see it.” “Sometimes with these agreements, there are some diplomatic protocols, some technical things to work out, but we plan to release the full text this week,” he said. Also Read: US govt funded foreign biolabs, many of them worked on dangerous pathogens, reveals Tulsi Gabbard Vance said there is some misreporting about the terms in the agreement and clarified that the deal broadly “ensures that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon, while simultaneously opening the Strait of Hormuz.”

US Vice President JD Vance refuted claims that the Iranian regime would receive $24 billion in frozen funds if it hits certain benchmarks, saying the figure doesn’t appear anywhere in the texts. He added that the Trump administration plans to release the full text of the agreement.&nbsp;

‘Iran has committed to destroy and dispose of highly enriched material,’ says Vance

Iran was preparing to launch an attack on Israel and suspend the signing of a landmark agreement with the US after an Israeli strike near Beirut threatened to derail delicate last-minute diplomacy. Iran's lead negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, informed Qatari mediators that Tehran intended to retaliate against Israel and put the agreement with Washington on hold following the strike, which Iran reportedly viewed as crossing a red line because it targeted Lebanon.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/modi-response-indian-sailors-deaths-khobragade-comparison-1781510283032">From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to US changed?</a>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump intervened directly, urging Iran not to proceed with any military action and assuring Tehran that Israel would cease attacks on Lebanon once the agreement was signed, according to The New York Times. Qatar played a key role in mediating messages between Tehran and Washington during the final hours of negotiations, the report said. The diplomatic exchanges intensified after the Beirut strike raised fears that the emerging accord could collapse.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/modi-criticised-after-us-strike-kills-indian-sailors-marco-rubio-1781520851702">Opposition targets Modi's silence after Rubio's response on Indian sailors death</a>&nbsp;The report added that Ghalibaf and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi are expected to travel to Geneva to formally sign the agreement alongside US Vice President JD Vance. Separately, ABC News reported that Vance said the US-Iran agreement had already been digitally signed by the parties on Sunday, although a formal signing ceremony is still scheduled to take place on Friday.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-pm-keir-starmer-to-bar-all-under-16s-from-major-social-media-platforms-1781508860388">UK government to bar all under-16s from major social media platforms</a>&nbsp;Speaking in an interview with ABC News' Good Morning America, Vance said no funds had been released to Iran since the agreement was digitally signed. He did not provide further details on the implementation timeline of the accord, according to the broadcaster.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/no-birthday-gift-for-trump-us-iran-deal-friday-israel-jeopardises-agreement-1781510773241">How Washington plans to embed Israel into America's defence and intelligence ecosystem</a>

Iran threatened to freeze its US peace deal and retaliate against Israel following a Beirut strike. Direct intervention by Donald Trump and Qatari mediation saved the accord, which is digitally signed.

Iran was preparing to launch an attack on Israel and suspend the signing of a landmark agreement with the US after an Israeli strike near Beirut threatened to derail delicate last-minute diplomacy. Iran's lead negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, informed Qatari mediators that Tehran intended to retaliate against Israel and put the agreement with Washington on hold following the strike, which Iran reportedly viewed as crossing a red line because it targeted Lebanon. Also read: From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to US changed? US President Donald Trump intervened directly, urging Iran not to proceed with any military action and assuring Tehran that Israel would cease attacks on Lebanon once the agreement was signed, according to The New York Times. Qatar played a key role in mediating messages between Tehran and Washington during the final hours of negotiations, the report said. The diplomatic exchanges intensified after the Beirut strike raised fears that the emerging accord could collapse. Also read: Opposition targets Modi's silence after Rubio's response on Indian sailors death The report added that Ghalibaf and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi are expected to travel to Geneva to formally sign the agreement alongside US Vice President JD Vance. Separately, ABC News reported that Vance said the US-Iran agreement had already been digitally signed by the parties on Sunday, although a formal signing ceremony is still scheduled to take place on Friday. Also read: UK government to bar all under-16s from major social media platforms Speaking in an interview with ABC News' Good Morning America, Vance said no funds had been released to Iran since the agreement was digitally signed. He did not provide further details on the implementation timeline of the accord, according to the broadcaster. Also read: How Washington plans to embed Israel into America's defence and intelligence ecosystem

Iran threatened to freeze its US peace deal and retaliate against Israel following a Beirut strike. Direct intervention by Donald Trump and Qatari mediation saved the accord, which is digitally signed.

Iran was preparing to attack Israel, suspended US deal after Beirut strike, says report

The United Nations Security Council unanimously approved on Monday a one-year extension of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), despite concerns raised over the goals of the mission and effectiveness by the United States. The UN mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), which plays a significant role in coordinating the country, has been extended for a full year until June 17, 2027. Earlier in March, the mission received only a three-month extension after the United States called for a comprehensive assessment before endorsing a longer renewal. The resolution passed on Monday also requires "a strategic review of UNAMA and submit a written report outlining its findings to the Security Council by March 31, 2027. "A streamlined, fit-for-purpose UNAMA mandate is essential. We look forward to the strategic review of the mission requested in this resolution," said the US representative to the meeting.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jd-vance-says-some-in-israel-like-us-iran-deal-quite-a-bit-1781532065689">JD Vance says some in Israel like US-Iran deal 'quite a bit' despite backlash</a><h3>What is UNAMA?</h3>The UNAMA mission is a political mission tasked with supporting the people of Afghanistan by coordinating international humanitarian aid, promoting inclusive governance and human rights, and facilitating development. It was officially started on March 28, 2002, by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) under Resolution 1401. The mission has been a key UN presence in Afghanistan. Since the Taliban regained control in 2021 after the collapse of the US-backed government, the mission has helped coordinate humanitarian assistance, facilitate political engagement, and monitor human rights conditions. The resolution passed on Monday voiced deep concern over the growing and widespread deterioration of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Afghanistan, particularly affecting women and girls. "The resolution demonstrates firm support for the work of UNAMA, the resolution maintains and strengthens UNAMA's core mandate, including coordinating international assistance," said Fu Cong, UN ambassador of China, which submitted the resolution.

The mission has been a key UN presence in Afghanistan. Since the Taliban regained control in 2021 after the collapse of the US-backed government, the mission has helped coordinate humanitarian assistance, facilitate political engagement, and monitor human rights conditions.

The United Nations Security Council unanimously approved on Monday a one-year extension of the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), despite concerns raised over the goals of the mission and effectiveness by the United States. The UN mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), which plays a significant role in coordinating the country, has been extended for a full year until June 17, 2027. Earlier in March, the mission received only a three-month extension after the United States called for a comprehensive assessment before endorsing a longer renewal. The resolution passed on Monday also requires "a strategic review of UNAMA and submit a written report outlining its findings to the Security Council by March 31, 2027. "A streamlined, fit-for-purpose UNAMA mandate is essential. We look forward to the strategic review of the mission requested in this resolution," said the US representative to the meeting. Also read: JD Vance says some in Israel like US-Iran deal 'quite a bit' despite backlash What is UNAMA? The UNAMA mission is a political mission tasked with supporting the people of Afghanistan by coordinating international humanitarian aid, promoting inclusive governance and human rights, and facilitating development. It was officially started on March 28, 2002, by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) under Resolution 1401. The mission has been a key UN presence in Afghanistan. Since the Taliban regained control in 2021 after the collapse of the US-backed government, the mission has helped coordinate humanitarian assistance, facilitate political engagement, and monitor human rights conditions. The resolution passed on Monday voiced deep concern over the growing and widespread deterioration of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Afghanistan, particularly affecting women and girls. "The resolution demonstrates firm support for the work of UNAMA, the resolution maintains and strengthens UNAMA's core mandate, including coordinating international assistance," said Fu Cong, UN ambassador of China, which submitted the resolution.

The mission has been a key UN presence in Afghanistan. Since the Taliban regained control in 2021 after the collapse of the US-backed government, the mission has helped coordinate humanitarian assistance, facilitate political engagement, and monitor human rights conditions.

What is UNAMA? UN Security Council extends Afghanistan mission until 2027

US Vice President JD Vance claimed that “some element within Israel” like the US-Iran deal “quite a bit". During a CNBC interview, Vance responded to widespread condemnation from Israeli politicians across the political spectrum. Vance claims that the criticism has to do with “misreporting” from the Iranian media in an attempt to sell it to the domestic audience. He further added that a full copy of the MoU will be released later in the week. According to Vance, the deal will create “a new Middle East” in which “Israel is going to have a seat at the table.”Earlier in an interview with CBS News, Vance said that Netanyahu "aggressively asserts the interests of his country" but that they were not always aligned with those of the US. “But, even when we've been close partners, sometimes we have interests that are perfectly aligned, and sometimes we have interests that are misaligned,” said Vance. "And what I've seen with the prime minister is that he aggressively asserts the interests of his country- sometimes that means we're on the same page, sometimes it means we're not."Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/modi-response-indian-sailors-deaths-khobragade-comparison-1781510283032">From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to Washington changed?</a>He said that in those times the US had to focus on its own interests, "and where that diverges, we - unfortunately for the Israelis - have to choose the side of the American people".Israel has vehemently denied the US-Iran agreement, saying that it is not bound by the same. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich slammed the agreement on X, calling it "bad for Israel and for the entire free world. Period." Smotrich insisted Israel must continue its own campaign to topple the Iranian regime. Israel has claimed that it will maintain a military presence in Lebanon. Prior to the signing, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the defence ministry instructed the Israeli military to prepare for independent action against Iran's nuclear program. Iran maintains that the United States bears the direct "responsibility" for implementing the newly announced peace deal and controlling Israel's military actions.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">JD Vance: I think there are elements within Israel that, like, the deal quite a bit. One of the interesting things about the Iranian state media is that sometimes you&#39;ll have hardline elements really aiming at a domestic audience trying to sell the deal and in some ways… <a href="https://t.co/5A0PBXrHVy">pic.twitter.com/5A0PBXrHVy</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://x.com/clashreport/status/2066504556373012675?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US Vice President JD Vance said that some elements within Israel like the US-Iran agreement "quite a bit," despite criticism from Israeli politicians. Vance said the deal could create a "new Middle East" while ensuring Israel retains a seat at the table.

US Vice President JD Vance claimed that “some element within Israel” like the US-Iran deal “quite a bit". During a CNBC interview, Vance responded to widespread condemnation from Israeli politicians across the political spectrum. Vance claims that the criticism has to do with “misreporting” from the Iranian media in an attempt to sell it to the domestic audience. He further added that a full copy of the MoU will be released later in the week. According to Vance, the deal will create “a new Middle East” in which “Israel is going to have a seat at the table.” Earlier in an interview with CBS News, Vance said that Netanyahu "aggressively asserts the interests of his country" but that they were not always aligned with those of the US. “But, even when we've been close partners, sometimes we have interests that are perfectly aligned, and sometimes we have interests that are misaligned,” said Vance. "And what I've seen with the prime minister is that he aggressively asserts the interests of his country- sometimes that means we're on the same page, sometimes it means we're not." Also Read: From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to Washington changed? He said that in those times the US had to focus on its own interests, "and where that diverges, we - unfortunately for the Israelis - have to choose the side of the American people". Israel has vehemently denied the US-Iran agreement, saying that it is not bound by the same. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich slammed the agreement on X, calling it "bad for Israel and for the entire free world. Period." Smotrich insisted Israel must continue its own campaign to topple the Iranian regime. Israel has claimed that it will maintain a military presence in Lebanon. Prior to the signing, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the defence ministry instructed the Israeli military to prepare for independent action against Iran's nuclear program. Iran maintains that the United States bears the direct "responsibility" for implementing the newly announced peace deal and controlling Israel's military actions.

US Vice President JD Vance said that some elements within Israel like the US-Iran agreement "quite a bit," despite criticism from Israeli politicians. Vance said the deal could create a "new Middle East" while ensuring Israel retains a seat at the table.

JD Vance says some in Israel like US-Iran deal 'quite a bit' despite backlash

A female doctor in Poland was taken into custody after 34 human fetuses were found buried in her garden at the former home, the officials said on Monday. The doctor, identified as Magdalena H., a 57-year-old medical pathologist having no previous criminal record, is suspected of using the foetuses to perform experiments, resulting in her now facing up to 12 years in prison. The case has sparked widespread controversy in predominantly Catholic Poland, with many people questioning how the doctor was able to obtain the remains of unborn babies in a country known for having some of Europe's toughest abortion regulations. However, a spokesperson for the prosecutor's office said investigators have found so far no evidence that the foetuses were linked through illegal abortions. The charges against the doctor include desecrating human remains, improper disposal of medical waste, and leaving hazardous materials in an unauthorised location. Last week, officials launched an investigation after medical waste was reportedly uncovered during construction work at her former residence in the southeastern village of Lutoryz.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-pm-keir-starmer-to-bar-all-under-16s-from-major-social-media-platforms-1781508860388">UK government to bar all under-16s from major social media platforms, Keir Starmer announces</a><h3>Foetuses used for research purposes</h3>A large-scale search operation involving dozens of police officers, sniffer dogs, and ground-penetrating radar led to the discovery of at least 34 foetuses buried in the property's garden. According to Krzysztof Ciechanowski, spokesperson for the District Prosecutor's Office in Rzeszów, the biological material was likely used by the detained woman for research purposes.&nbsp;According to AFP, Poland's Radio Eska, Magdalena H. had omitted the foetuses amid the Covid-19 pandemic from a hospital in Rzeszow where she worked in order to conduct experiments at home. Along with the bodies, tens of thousands of microscope slides, "fragments of documentation", and paraffin blocks were discovered during the search. The doctor was arrested on Friday and placed in pre-trial detention for three months. During a court hearing, she denied the charges but acknowledged that she had transported and buried the human foetuses discovered on her property, along with other medical waste, according to the prosecutor's spokesperson. Investigators have not yet established the identities of the foetuses, and authorities are still examining whether Magdalena H., whose surname has not been disclosed in line with Polish privacy regulations, acted independently or with the involvement of others.

The charges against Poland female doctor include desecrating human remains, improper disposal of medical waste, and leaving hazardous materials in an unauthorised location.

A female doctor in Poland was taken into custody after 34 human fetuses were found buried in her garden at the former home, the officials said on Monday. The doctor, identified as Magdalena H., a 57-year-old medical pathologist having no previous criminal record, is suspected of using the foetuses to perform experiments, resulting in her now facing up to 12 years in prison. The case has sparked widespread controversy in predominantly Catholic Poland, with many people questioning how the doctor was able to obtain the remains of unborn babies in a country known for having some of Europe's toughest abortion regulations. However, a spokesperson for the prosecutor's office said investigators have found so far no evidence that the foetuses were linked through illegal abortions. The charges against the doctor include desecrating human remains, improper disposal of medical waste, and leaving hazardous materials in an unauthorised location. Last week, officials launched an investigation after medical waste was reportedly uncovered during construction work at her former residence in the southeastern village of Lutoryz. Also read: UK government to bar all under-16s from major social media platforms, Keir Starmer announces Foetuses used for research purposes A large-scale search operation involving dozens of police officers, sniffer dogs, and ground-penetrating radar led to the discovery of at least 34 foetuses buried in the property's garden. According to Krzysztof Ciechanowski, spokesperson for the District Prosecutor's Office in Rzeszów, the biological material was likely used by the detained woman for research purposes. According to AFP, Poland's Radio Eska, Magdalena H. had omitted the foetuses amid the Covid-19 pandemic from a hospital in Rzeszow where she worked in order to conduct experiments at home. Along with the bodies, tens of thousands of microscope slides, "fragments of documentation", and paraffin blocks were discovered during the search. The doctor was arrested on Friday and placed in pre-trial detention for three months. During a court hearing, she denied the charges but acknowledged that she had transported and buried the human foetuses discovered on her property, along with other medical waste, according to the prosecutor's spokesperson. Investigators have not yet established the identities of the foetuses, and authorities are still examining whether Magdalena H., whose surname has not been disclosed in line with Polish privacy regulations, acted independently or with the involvement of others.

The charges against Poland female doctor include desecrating human remains, improper disposal of medical waste, and leaving hazardous materials in an unauthorised location.

Thirty-four human foetuses found in garden of Polish female doctor's, probe underway

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday (June 15) said the United States bears responsibility for implementing the Pakistan-mediated memorandum of understanding (MoU) reached with Tehran and called for Israeli attacks on Lebanon to cease. According to Iran's state news agency IRNA, Araghchi made the remarks during separate telephone conversations with Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/hormuz-services-must-be-paid-for-iran-calls-blocked-funds-part-of-peace-deal-as-trump-warns-of-ultimate-alternative-1781371786544">'Hormuz services MUST be paid for': Iran calls blocked funds part of peace deal as Trump warns of ‘ultimate alternative’</a>&nbsp;During the discussions, Araghchi and his counterparts also stressed the importance of continuing diplomatic efforts to strengthen regional stability and security, IRNA reported. The comments came a day after US President Donald Trump announced that a peace agreement with Iran had been completed. Trump said the understanding would bring an end to hostilities across all fronts, including Lebanon, facilitate the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and lead to the lifting of the US naval blockade on Iran. Meanwhile, Pakistan and Japan welcomed the understanding reached between Washington and Tehran.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/tehran-not-yet-taken-its-final-decision-iranian-media-reports-on-peace-deal-with-us-this-is-what-we-know-1781434562907">‘Tehran not yet taken its final decision’: Iranian media reports on peace deal with US. This is what we know</a>&nbsp;Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and his Japanese counterpart Toshimitsu Motegi discussed the development during a telephone conversation on Monday and highlighted the agreement's significance for regional stability and the wider international community, according to a statement issued by Pakistan's Foreign Ministry.&nbsp;The statement said Motegi expressed Japan's "deep appreciation and commendation" for Pakistan's sustained mediation efforts and constructive role throughout the process. According to the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, the Japanese foreign minister said Islamabad's engagement had helped facilitate and advance the outcome achieved between Washington and Tehran.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/that-s-why-you-came-here-to-finland-jaishankar-s-back-to-back-one-liners-go-viral-1781355962575">‘That’s why you came here to Finland’: Jaishankar’s back-to-back one-liners go viral</a>

Iran's Foreign Minister stated that the US must implement the Pakistan-mediated draft deal, following President Trump's announcement of a peace agreement aimed at ending regional conflicts, lifting blockades, and opening the Strait of Hormuz.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday (June 15) said the United States bears responsibility for implementing the Pakistan-mediated memorandum of understanding (MoU) reached with Tehran and called for Israeli attacks on Lebanon to cease. According to Iran's state news agency IRNA, Araghchi made the remarks during separate telephone conversations with Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan. Also read: 'Hormuz services MUST be paid for': Iran calls blocked funds part of peace deal as Trump warns of ‘ultimate alternative’ During the discussions, Araghchi and his counterparts also stressed the importance of continuing diplomatic efforts to strengthen regional stability and security, IRNA reported. The comments came a day after US President Donald Trump announced that a peace agreement with Iran had been completed. Trump said the understanding would bring an end to hostilities across all fronts, including Lebanon, facilitate the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and lead to the lifting of the US naval blockade on Iran. Meanwhile, Pakistan and Japan welcomed the understanding reached between Washington and Tehran. Also read: ‘Tehran not yet taken its final decision’: Iranian media reports on peace deal with US. This is what we know Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and his Japanese counterpart Toshimitsu Motegi discussed the development during a telephone conversation on Monday and highlighted the agreement's significance for regional stability and the wider international community, according to a statement issued by Pakistan's Foreign Ministry. The statement said Motegi expressed Japan's "deep appreciation and commendation" for Pakistan's sustained mediation efforts and constructive role throughout the process. According to the Pakistani Foreign Ministry, the Japanese foreign minister said Islamabad's engagement had helped facilitate and advance the outcome achieved between Washington and Tehran. Also read: ‘That’s why you came here to Finland’: Jaishankar’s back-to-back one-liners go viral

Iran's Foreign Minister stated that the US must implement the Pakistan-mediated draft deal, following President Trump's announcement of a peace agreement aimed at ending regional conflicts, lifting blockades, and opening the Strait of Hormuz.

US responsible for implementing draft deal with Iran, claims Israeli FM

Fox Corporation has agreed to acquire streaming platform Roku in a USD22 billion deal, a move that is expected to strengthen the American media giant as a force to reckon with in the live news and sports as well as streaming industry. Under the agreement, Fox will purchase Roku for USD160 a share through a mix of cash and FOX Class A common stock, according to a company statement. "This is a defining moment for FOX, and a natural extension of the deliberate and focused strategy we have been executing for nearly a decade," Lachlan Murdoch, executive chair and CEO, Fox Corporation, said. As part of the transaction, Roku shareholders will receive $96 in cash and 0.9693 shares of Fox Class A common stock for each Class A and Class B Roku share they own. "In 2020, we acquired Tubi, and under our stewardship, it has become one of the most successful businesses in streaming. Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it," Lachlan added.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/uk-pm-keir-starmer-to-bar-all-under-16s-from-major-social-media-platforms-1781508860388">UK government to bar all under-16s from major social media platforms, Keir Starmer announces</a><h3>What will the acquisition cover?</h3>The companies said Roku will continue to operate as an open, partner-friendly platform while also carrying Fox content. Fox stated that the acquisition will bring together its portfolio of sports, news, entertainment programming, and the Tubi streaming service with Roku’s connected TV platform, The Roku Channel, extensive first-party data, and direct access to more than 100 million streaming households worldwide. The merger is expected to create a major player in the rapidly growing streaming and connected TV industry, combining Fox's vast content library with Roku's technology capabilities and consumer-facing platform. "I'm incredibly proud of what our team has built, and the combination with FOX is an extraordinary opportunity to accelerate our vision, scale faster and innovate more aggressively for viewers, partners and advertisers," Anthony Wood, founder and CEO of Roku, said. The transaction is subject to a nod from both Fox and Roku shareholders and US and some non-US regulatory approvals.

Fox said the Roku acquisition will combine its sports, news, entertainment content and Tubi streaming service with Roku’s connected TV platform, The Roku Channel, valuable user data, and access to over 100 million streaming households globally.

Fox Corporation has agreed to acquire streaming platform Roku in a USD22 billion deal, a move that is expected to strengthen the American media giant as a force to reckon with in the live news and sports as well as streaming industry. Under the agreement, Fox will purchase Roku for USD160 a share through a mix of cash and FOX Class A common stock, according to a company statement. "This is a defining moment for FOX, and a natural extension of the deliberate and focused strategy we have been executing for nearly a decade," Lachlan Murdoch, executive chair and CEO, Fox Corporation, said. As part of the transaction, Roku shareholders will receive $96 in cash and 0.9693 shares of Fox Class A common stock for each Class A and Class B Roku share they own. "In 2020, we acquired Tubi, and under our stewardship, it has become one of the most successful businesses in streaming. Today, we take the next step: bringing together the most valuable live content portfolio in video consumption with the preeminent streaming platform through which America watches it," Lachlan added. Also read: UK government to bar all under-16s from major social media platforms, Keir Starmer announces What will the acquisition cover? The companies said Roku will continue to operate as an open, partner-friendly platform while also carrying Fox content. Fox stated that the acquisition will bring together its portfolio of sports, news, entertainment programming, and the Tubi streaming service with Roku’s connected TV platform, The Roku Channel, extensive first-party data, and direct access to more than 100 million streaming households worldwide. The merger is expected to create a major player in the rapidly growing streaming and connected TV industry, combining Fox's vast content library with Roku's technology capabilities and consumer-facing platform. "I'm incredibly proud of what our team has built, and the combination with FOX is an extraordinary opportunity to accelerate our vision, scale faster and innovate more aggressively for viewers, partners and advertisers," Anthony Wood, founder and CEO of Roku, said. The transaction is subject to a nod from both Fox and Roku shareholders and US and some non-US regulatory approvals.

Fox said the Roku acquisition will combine its sports, news, entertainment content and Tubi streaming service with Roku’s connected TV platform, The Roku Channel, valuable user data, and access to over 100 million streaming households globally.

Fox agrees to buy Roku for $22 billion deal to expand streaming and Live TV reach

The US attack on Indian commercial vessels in the Gulf of Oman and the resulting death of three Indian sailors have sparked a strong reaction from the Indian political and diplomatic community. While the Indian Ministry of External Affairs summoned the US chargé d’affaires twice within three days to protest the deaths and demand accountability, the response was considered by many as muted. &nbsp;Subrahmanyam Jaishankar raised the issue directly with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a phone call on June 14, 2026, following which Rubio issued a statement on the movement of the vessel, saying blockade violations “will not be tolerated”, it lacked “remorse” and accountability for the Indian deaths.&nbsp;<h2>The Khobragade Incident 2013</h2>In 2013, when Indian Diplomat Devyani Khobragade was arrested and strip-searched in New York, the Manmohan Singh Government responded assertively. India blocked perks such as cheap alcohol and food imports at the US embassy. Deputy Counsel General Devyani Khobragade was accused of submitting false documents to obtain a work visa for her Manhattan housekeeper, an Indian national whom she allegedly paid less than $3 an hour. The arrest of the 39-year-old sparked a diplomatic storm. Lawmakers called her treatment “despicable” and "barbaric", despite having diplomatic immunity.&nbsp;Indian police in New Delhi removed security barriers around the US embassy in New Delhi, which were put in place to prevent vehicles from approaching the barrier at high speed and to prevent threats from suicide bombers. Indian Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid told Parliament it was not about one individual, but about the sense of the self as a nation. US diplomats were stripped of ID passes allowing VIP treatment at airports. India asked the US Embassy to "withdraw" an unnamed senior diplomat who was believed to be closely involved in facilitating the evacuation of the maid's family to the US. It was only the second time India had expelled a US diplomat, the first being George Griffin in 1981.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/spacex-ipo-retail-investors-exit-liquidity-risks-analysis-1781349887293">Trillion-dollar trap: Hidden risks behind SpaceX's blockbuster IPO that nobody wants to discuss</a><h2>Modi himself snubbed US diplomats&nbsp;</h2>The whole Indian political class united on the aggression, even the BJP's Narendra Modi, then Chief Minister of Gujarat and the prime ministerial candidate at the time, and Congress's Rahul Gandhi refused to meet a visiting US congressional delegation in protest. It was a deliberate and symbolic move, but then Narendra Modi had nothing to lose politically. The contrast is stark and widely noted. India has somewhat lost its strategic autonomy under Modi's leadership. On one hand, it portrays itself as a guarantor of security in the Indian Ocean region; on the other hand, it failed to condemn the attack on an unarmed Iranian frigate, IRIS Dena, by the US. Now, as a PM, Narendra Modi maintains silence over the deaths of its own citizens. He is yet to offer any condemnation or comment, leaving the response to a routine diplomatic protest. Modi's social media timeline in the week was dominated by world leaders congratulating him on becoming the longest-serving Prime Minister of India. He is off to Slovakia and then France for the G7 Summit, where he will have a bilateral meeting with Trump.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">In December 2013, Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade was arrested in U S on visa fraud charges, the government of India has shown a quick hit back to the United States. And then there&#39;s Narendra Modi who didn&#39;t even flinch to criticize the U S when it killed our 3 soliders. <a href="https://t.co/boXQwdVFEE">pic.twitter.com/boXQwdVFEE</a>&mdash; POL (@CptoneP) <a href="https://x.com/CptoneP/status/2065488529220915353?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The deaths of three Indian sailors in a US strike have revived comparisons with India's strong response during the 2013 Devyani Khobragade diplomatic row, putting Prime Minister Narendra Modi's handling of the crisis under scrutiny.

The US attack on Indian commercial vessels in the Gulf of Oman and the resulting death of three Indian sailors have sparked a strong reaction from the Indian political and diplomatic community. While the Indian Ministry of External Affairs summoned the US chargé d’affaires twice within three days to protest the deaths and demand accountability, the response was considered by many as muted. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar raised the issue directly with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a phone call on June 14, 2026, following which Rubio issued a statement on the movement of the vessel, saying blockade violations “will not be tolerated”, it lacked “remorse” and accountability for the Indian deaths. The Khobragade Incident 2013 In 2013, when Indian Diplomat Devyani Khobragade was arrested and strip-searched in New York, the Manmohan Singh Government responded assertively. India blocked perks such as cheap alcohol and food imports at the US embassy. Deputy Counsel General Devyani Khobragade was accused of submitting false documents to obtain a work visa for her Manhattan housekeeper, an Indian national whom she allegedly paid less than $3 an hour. The arrest of the 39-year-old sparked a diplomatic storm. Lawmakers called her treatment “despicable” and "barbaric", despite having diplomatic immunity. Indian police in New Delhi removed security barriers around the US embassy in New Delhi, which were put in place to prevent vehicles from approaching the barrier at high speed and to prevent threats from suicide bombers. Indian Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid told Parliament it was not about one individual, but about the sense of the self as a nation. US diplomats were stripped of ID passes allowing VIP treatment at airports. India asked the US Embassy to "withdraw" an unnamed senior diplomat who was believed to be closely involved in facilitating the evacuation of the maid's family to the US. It was only the second time India had expelled a US diplomat, the first being George Griffin in 1981. Also Read: Trillion-dollar trap: Hidden risks behind SpaceX's blockbuster IPO that nobody wants to discuss Modi himself snubbed US diplomats The whole Indian political class united on the aggression, even the BJP's Narendra Modi, then Chief Minister of Gujarat and the prime ministerial candidate at the time, and Congress's Rahul Gandhi refused to meet a visiting US congressional delegation in protest. It was a deliberate and symbolic move, but then Narendra Modi had nothing to lose politically. The contrast is stark and widely noted. India has somewhat lost its strategic autonomy under Modi's leadership. On one hand, it portrays itself as a guarantor of security in the Indian Ocean region; on the other hand, it failed to condemn the attack on an unarmed Iranian frigate, IRIS Dena, by the US. Now, as a PM, Narendra Modi maintains silence over the deaths of its own citizens. He is yet to offer any condemnation or comment, leaving the response to a routine diplomatic protest. Modi's social media timeline in the week was dominated by world leaders congratulating him on becoming the longest-serving Prime Minister of India. He is off to Slovakia and then France for the G7 Summit, where he will have a bilateral meeting with Trump.

The deaths of three Indian sailors in a US strike have revived comparisons with India's strong response during the 2013 Devyani Khobragade diplomatic row, putting Prime Minister Narendra Modi's handling of the crisis under scrutiny.

From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to Washington changed?

The G7 Summit is going to take place at a time when the global political landscape is witnessing deep multipolar competition, rebalancing of historical alliances, supply disruptions amid Middle East conflict and the war still raging on in Ukraine after having started in 2022.Global security is severely strained, and defence expenditures are skyrocketing because of all that has been going on. Lack of mutual trust and ideological rifts are putting global security at severe risk.&nbsp;In a tumultuous period like this, global problems become intertwined, and their solutions can be found only when leaders sit together, as they will at the G7 Summit 2026 in France.The success of the G7 Summit 2026 will depend on what leaders of powerful nations say, agree on, decide and implement.A successful summit would mean that major economies agree to work together for solving pressing issues and resolving conflicts to ensure peace.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/g7-summit-2026-what-is-pm-modi-s-g7-agenda-priorities-for-india-at-vian-1781520152545">G7 Summit 2026: What is PM Modi’s G7 agenda, priorities for India at Évian</a><h2>Global security and peace</h2>The most vital issue at the time is global security. The ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions continue to threaten global stability and are hurting economies the world over, pushing populations to the brink. The disruption of fuel supply due to the closure of a key waterway resulted in soaring energy prices, which have pushed inflation up.&nbsp;One great success would be clear commitments to protect supply chains and an agreement on a united, decisive response by G7 nations to tackle any new security threats in future.&nbsp;Success would mean stronger defence partnerships and cooperation on cybersecurity and protection of critical infrastructure.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-restricts-access-of-anthropic-s-mythos-and-fable-to-americans-only-is-globalisation-dead-in-the-age-of-ai-1781372168111">US restricts access of Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable to Americans only. Is globalisation dead in the age of AI?</a><h2>Agreement on artificial intelligence&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Another major point of success would be arriving at meaningful agreements on artificial intelligence (AI). AI is changing the way people work, live, and do business, but it also brings along serious risks. It would be a big achievement if the G7 members and attending nations come up with shared rules for AI while focusing on transparency, ethics, data privacy, and safety. These decisions would help prevent misuse while encouraging innovation and cooperation between nations.&nbsp;<h2>Economy, inflation and rising debt</h2>&nbsp;The world economy is right now burdened by several problems, including inflation, rising debt, and supply chain disruptions. The leaders at the G7 summit will have to chart out plans to support sustainable growth, strengthen trade relationships, and reduce dependence on vulnerable supply networks.&nbsp;Stress on innovation and job creation would lead to long-term economic stability and peace.Decisions that ensure economic resilience will be an important measure of success.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/imd-warns-of-el-ni-o-onset-how-will-it-impact-india-s-weather-rainfall-economy-and-public-health-1781356547429">IMD warns of El Niño onset: How will it impact India’s weather, rainfall, economy and public health</a><h2>The Global South: Bridging the divide</h2>&nbsp;Another major sign of success would be stronger cooperation with emerging economies and countries in the Global South. Many global challenges cannot be solved by developed countries alone. Building stronger partnerships, increasing development investments, and making decision-making more inclusive would substantially enhance the G7’s credibility and effectiveness.&nbsp;Supporting solutions to key issues of developing countries, like food security, healthcare, infrastructure, and debt management, could prove to be a gamechanger.&nbsp;Climate action has been a major priority, but US President Donald Trump discounts it. The summit’s success would require practical steps rather than just promises on more funding for clean energy projects, faster adoption of renewable technologies, and stronger support for countries most affected by climate change.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-govt-funded-foreign-biolabs-many-of-them-worked-on-dangerous-pathogens-reveals-tulsi-gabbard-1781283223008">US govt funded foreign biolabs, many of them worked on dangerous pathogens, reveals Tulsi Gabbard</a>&nbsp;The success of the G7 Summit 2026 will be gauged not just by diplomatic declarations but by the capacity of member nations to produce meaningful and practical outcomes. It will be measured by real action rather than symbolic statements.&nbsp;&nbsp;In a world characterised by fast-paced technological change, geopolitical tensions, climate concerns, and economic uncertainty, a successful G7 summit will be a demonstration of collective leadership and a willingness to tackle issues impacting both developed and developing countries.

In a tumultuous period like this, global problems become intertwined, and their solutions can be found only when leaders sit together, as they will at the G7 Summit 2026 in France. The summit would be a success if major economies agree to work together for resolving pressing issues.

The G7 Summit is going to take place at a time when the global political landscape is witnessing deep multipolar competition, rebalancing of historical alliances, supply disruptions amid Middle East conflict and the war still raging on in Ukraine after having started in 2022. Global security is severely strained, and defence expenditures are skyrocketing because of all that has been going on. Lack of mutual trust and ideological rifts are putting global security at severe risk. In a tumultuous period like this, global problems become intertwined, and their solutions can be found only when leaders sit together, as they will at the G7 Summit 2026 in France. The success of the G7 Summit 2026 will depend on what leaders of powerful nations say, agree on, decide and implement. A successful summit would mean that major economies agree to work together for solving pressing issues and resolving conflicts to ensure peace. Also Read: G7 Summit 2026: What is PM Modi’s G7 agenda, priorities for India at Évian Global security and peace The most vital issue at the time is global security. The ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions continue to threaten global stability and are hurting economies the world over, pushing populations to the brink. The disruption of fuel supply due to the closure of a key waterway resulted in soaring energy prices, which have pushed inflation up. One great success would be clear commitments to protect supply chains and an agreement on a united, decisive response by G7 nations to tackle any new security threats in future. Success would mean stronger defence partnerships and cooperation on cybersecurity and protection of critical infrastructure. Also Read: US restricts access of Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable to Americans only. Is globalisation dead in the age of AI? Agreement on artificial intelligence Another major point of success would be arriving at meaningful agreements on artificial intelligence (AI). AI is changing the way people work, live, and do business, but it also brings along serious risks. It would be a big achievement if the G7 members and attending nations come up with shared rules for AI while focusing on transparency, ethics, data privacy, and safety. These decisions would help prevent misuse while encouraging innovation and cooperation between nations. Economy, inflation and rising debt The world economy is right now burdened by several problems, including inflation, rising debt, and supply chain disruptions. The leaders at the G7 summit will have to chart out plans to support sustainable growth, strengthen trade relationships, and reduce dependence on vulnerable supply networks. Stress on innovation and job creation would lead to long-term economic stability and peace. Decisions that ensure economic resilience will be an important measure of success. Also Read: IMD warns of El Niño onset: How will it impact India’s weather, rainfall, economy and public health The Global South: Bridging the divide Another major sign of success would be stronger cooperation with emerging economies and countries in the Global South. Many global challenges cannot be solved by developed countries alone. Building stronger partnerships, increasing development investments, and making decision-making more inclusive would substantially enhance the G7’s credibility and effectiveness. Supporting solutions to key issues of developing countries, like food security, healthcare, infrastructure, and debt management, could prove to be a gamechanger. Climate action has been a major priority, but US President Donald Trump discounts it. The summit’s success would require practical steps rather than just promises on more funding for clean energy projects, faster adoption of renewable technologies, and stronger support for countries most affected by climate change. Also Read: US govt funded foreign biolabs, many of them worked on dangerous pathogens, reveals Tulsi Gabbard The success of the G7 Summit 2026 will be gauged not just by diplomatic declarations but by the capacity of member nations to produce meaningful and practical outcomes. It will be measured by real action rather than symbolic statements. In a world characterised by fast-paced technological change, geopolitical tensions, climate concerns, and economic uncertainty, a successful G7 summit will be a demonstration of collective leadership and a willingness to tackle issues impacting both developed and developing countries.

In a tumultuous period like this, global problems become intertwined, and their solutions can be found only when leaders sit together, as they will at the G7 Summit 2026 in France. The summit would be a success if major economies agree to work together for resolving pressing issues.

G7 Summit 2026: What would success look like in Évian amid turbulent times?

When leaders gather for the G7 summit in Paris from June 15-17, the focus is expected to inevitably be on familiar flashpoints like the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, tensions with China, global trade, energy security and artificial intelligence. However, beyond the official agenda lies a larger shift that has been quietly reshaping international diplomacy.The world's most important conversations are no longer being driven solely by the traditional Western powers. Increasingly, countries such as India, Brazil, South Africa, Australia and Mexico are emerging as the key players whose support, cooperation and influence can determine whether global initiatives succeed or fail.For decades, the G7 functioned as the political and economic centre of gravity of the international system. Together, its members represented the world's richest economies and often set the direction for trade, finance and security policy.That landscape looks very different today.The rise of China, the expansion of BRICS, disruptions to global supply chains and growing dissatisfaction across the developing world have created space for a new group of influential states often described as "middle powers".The label can be misleading. These are not minor players.<h2>No more minor league play for India, Brazil and more</h2>India is now the world's fastest-growing major economy and a crucial voice on technology, manufacturing and supply chains. Brazil onthe other hand carries significant influence across Latin America and remains central to debates over climate change and food security. South Africa meanwhile has become an important bridge between Western capitals and the broader Global South. Australia plays an outsized role in Indo-Pacific security, while Mexico's growing manufacturing base has made it increasingly important to North American economic strategy.What sets these countries apart is their refusal to choose sides.<h2>What sets these countries apart&nbsp;</h2>Unlike during the Cold War, many of today's middle powers are pursuing policies of strategic autonomy. For example, despite US pressure, India continues to buy Russian oil, prioritising it's citizens energy needs, even as it continues to deepen ties with Washington. Brazil too, successfully carries out the balancing trick, maintains relations with both China and the United States. South Africa engages with Western economies even as it strengthens its role within BRICS. This flexibility gives them leverage that larger powers increasingly cannot ignore.That reality is expected to be visible at the G7 summit. Whether the issue is securing critical minerals, reforming global financial institutions, managing energy transitions or building resilient supply chains, Western leaders need partners beyond their traditional alliance network.The result is a diplomatic shift that would have been difficult to imagine two decades ago. Countries once invited to global summits largely as observers are now helping shape the agenda itself. An example of that is India's Prime Minister taking part in not one or two but six consecutive G7 meetings; the French summit is his seventh.&nbsp;As the G7 meets this year, one thing is becoming clear: the future of global governance will not be decided by the West alone. It will depend just as much on how effectively it works with a rising group of middle powers that increasingly sit at the centre of the world's biggest decisions. &nbsp;

The G7 may still represent the world's leading industrial economies, but countries such as India, Brazil, South Africa and Australia are increasingly shaping global outcomes. Their growing influence reflects a broader shift toward a more multipolar world order.

When leaders gather for the G7 summit in Paris from June 15-17, the focus is expected to inevitably be on familiar flashpoints like the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, tensions with China, global trade, energy security and artificial intelligence. However, beyond the official agenda lies a larger shift that has been quietly reshaping international diplomacy. The world's most important conversations are no longer being driven solely by the traditional Western powers. Increasingly, countries such as India, Brazil, South Africa, Australia and Mexico are emerging as the key players whose support, cooperation and influence can determine whether global initiatives succeed or fail. For decades, the G7 functioned as the political and economic centre of gravity of the international system. Together, its members represented the world's richest economies and often set the direction for trade, finance and security policy. That landscape looks very different today. The rise of China, the expansion of BRICS, disruptions to global supply chains and growing dissatisfaction across the developing world have created space for a new group of influential states often described as "middle powers". The label can be misleading. These are not minor players. No more minor league play for India, Brazil and more India is now the world's fastest-growing major economy and a crucial voice on technology, manufacturing and supply chains. Brazil onthe other hand carries significant influence across Latin America and remains central to debates over climate change and food security. South Africa meanwhile has become an important bridge between Western capitals and the broader Global South. Australia plays an outsized role in Indo-Pacific security, while Mexico's growing manufacturing base has made it increasingly important to North American economic strategy. What sets these countries apart is their refusal to choose sides. What sets these countries apart Unlike during the Cold War, many of today's middle powers are pursuing policies of strategic autonomy. For example, despite US pressure, India continues to buy Russian oil, prioritising it's citizens energy needs, even as it continues to deepen ties with Washington. Brazil too, successfully carries out the balancing trick, maintains relations with both China and the United States. South Africa engages with Western economies even as it strengthens its role within BRICS. This flexibility gives them leverage that larger powers increasingly cannot ignore. That reality is expected to be visible at the G7 summit. Whether the issue is securing critical minerals, reforming global financial institutions, managing energy transitions or building resilient supply chains, Western leaders need partners beyond their traditional alliance network. The result is a diplomatic shift that would have been difficult to imagine two decades ago. Countries once invited to global summits largely as observers are now helping shape the agenda itself. An example of that is India's Prime Minister taking part in not one or two but six consecutive G7 meetings; the French summit is his seventh. As the G7 meets this year, one thing is becoming clear: the future of global governance will not be decided by the West alone. It will depend just as much on how effectively it works with a rising group of middle powers that increasingly sit at the centre of the world's biggest decisions.

The G7 may still represent the world's leading industrial economies, but countries such as India, Brazil, South Africa and Australia are increasingly shaping global outcomes. Their growing influence reflects a broader shift toward a more multipolar world order.

G7's new reality: India, Brazil and other middle powers are becoming impossible to ignore

Bangladesh Prime Minister Tarique Rahman's adviser on policy and strategy, Zahed Ur Rahman, returned to Dhaka without entering India after he was briefly stopped by immigration authorities at New Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport.&nbsp;The incident, reported by Bangladesh newspapers Prothom Alo and The Daily Star, marks the first such episode involving an official linked to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)-led government since it assumed office earlier this year. Zahed Ur Rahman had arrived in New Delhi on Sunday evening to attend the 28th Meeting of the Committee of Senior Officials of the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA), scheduled to be hosted by India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on June 15 and 16.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/modi-criticised-after-us-strike-kills-indian-sailors-marco-rubio-1781520851702">Marco Rubio's response to deaths of Indian sailors sparks backlash, opposition targets Modi's silence</a>&nbsp;According to the report, citing diplomatic sources in both Dhaka and New Delhi, Indian immigration authorities held Zahed for about two and a half hours after his arrival. Although he was later cleared to enter the country following intervention from higher authorities, he chose not to proceed with his visit and instead returned to Dhaka via Colombo. The report said Bangladesh's High Commission in New Delhi had formally informed the MEA through a diplomatic note on Friday about Zahed's participation in the IORA meeting. Bangladesh High Commissioner M Riaz Hamidullah had also reportedly communicated with Indian officials ahead of the visit.&nbsp;Despite the advance notification, Zahed was stopped during immigration checks and kept waiting for more than two hours, with no immediate explanation reportedly provided, according to the Bangladeshi media reports. Meanwhile, The Daily Star cited an Indian television news channel as reporting that Zahed's name appeared on a security-related watchlist during verification procedures. The report further stated that he was travelling on a regular green passport carrying a SAARC sticker rather than a diplomatic passport.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/first-indigo-flight-lands-at-noida-international-airport-jewar-in-historic-milestone-watch-1781499854158">First flight lands at Noida International Airport in historic milestone | WATCH</a>

Bangladesh PM adviser Zahed Ur Rahman returned to Dhaka after being detained for over two hours at New Delhi’s airport due to a security watchlist match, despite advance diplomatic notifications.

Bangladesh Prime Minister Tarique Rahman's adviser on policy and strategy, Zahed Ur Rahman, returned to Dhaka without entering India after he was briefly stopped by immigration authorities at New Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport. The incident, reported by Bangladesh newspapers Prothom Alo and The Daily Star, marks the first such episode involving an official linked to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)-led government since it assumed office earlier this year. Zahed Ur Rahman had arrived in New Delhi on Sunday evening to attend the 28th Meeting of the Committee of Senior Officials of the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA), scheduled to be hosted by India's Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on June 15 and 16. Also read: Marco Rubio's response to deaths of Indian sailors sparks backlash, opposition targets Modi's silence According to the report, citing diplomatic sources in both Dhaka and New Delhi, Indian immigration authorities held Zahed for about two and a half hours after his arrival. Although he was later cleared to enter the country following intervention from higher authorities, he chose not to proceed with his visit and instead returned to Dhaka via Colombo. The report said Bangladesh's High Commission in New Delhi had formally informed the MEA through a diplomatic note on Friday about Zahed's participation in the IORA meeting. Bangladesh High Commissioner M Riaz Hamidullah had also reportedly communicated with Indian officials ahead of the visit. Despite the advance notification, Zahed was stopped during immigration checks and kept waiting for more than two hours, with no immediate explanation reportedly provided, according to the Bangladeshi media reports. Meanwhile, The Daily Star cited an Indian television news channel as reporting that Zahed's name appeared on a security-related watchlist during verification procedures. The report further stated that he was travelling on a regular green passport carrying a SAARC sticker rather than a diplomatic passport. Also read: First flight lands at Noida International Airport in historic milestone | WATCH

Bangladesh PM adviser Zahed Ur Rahman returned to Dhaka after being detained for over two hours at New Delhi’s airport due to a security watchlist match, despite advance diplomatic notifications.

Bangladesh PM’s adviser returns to Dhaka after being stopped at IGI airport. This is what we know

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement on US military strike on a commercial vessel in the Gulf of Oman that killed three Indian seafarers has triggered a backlash in India. Rubio defended the attack without showing any condolences or remorse for the Indian lives lost in the attack. In a statement, Rubio said that “all security should immediately comply with orders from the US forces as they seek to uphold peace and security in the strait”. India’s Ministry of External Affairs summoned the US chargé d’affaires twice within three days to protest the deaths and demand accountability. Though the statement from the US lacked any acknowledgement of Indian lives lost.&nbsp;Opposition MP Sashi Tharoor called it “ deeply insensitive”. He said he was deeply “shocked” and asked whether targeting the propulsion or steering system could have been a more proportional response instead of killing Indians. “Practically every merchant ship navigating these crucial waters has an Indian crew on board. Are they all considered fair game for US missiles now?” wrote Tharoor in a post on social media platform X.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/no-birthday-gift-for-trump-us-iran-deal-friday-israel-jeopardises-agreement-1781510773241">How Washington plans to embed Israel into America's defence and intelligence ecosystem</a>Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi went further. He called out Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence, labelling him a “compromised PM” and “an obedient servant” to Washington. Rahul Gandhi further raised the case of Indian sailor Nishanth Uirthanathan, who died due to medical complications aboard MT Celestial docked at Duqm Port in Oman, and urged the government to expedite the repatriation of his mortal remains.He criticised Modi's lack of public statement, asserting that "a free country would never tolerate such language". He accused Modi of failing to protect Indian citizens and the country's "national dignity".&nbsp;Senior leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra condemned the government's response as “shameful”, suggesting that India must assert itself against foreign high-handedness. Congress President Malikarjun Kharge said that “Indian lives cannot be treated as an afterthought in matters of foreign policy,” adding that “silence is not a substitute for accountability.”Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said that Modi not only signed away the future of Indian farmers in a deal which “saw the Modi Government unilaterally make enormous concessions” but also promised to purchase approximately $500 billion worth of American goods over the next five years. He claimed that countries like Malaysia had made their trade agreement with the US null and void following the US Supreme Court decision. He urged New Delhi to postpone the visit of the US Trade Representative, in light of the US Supreme Court decision, the recent US attacks on Indians commercial vessels and the lack of remorse from Marco Rubio's statement.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Rahul Gandhi, Shashi Tharoor and other opposition leaders have targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended a US strike that killed three Indian seafarers without expressing condolences.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement on US military strike on a commercial vessel in the Gulf of Oman that killed three Indian seafarers has triggered a backlash in India. Rubio defended the attack without showing any condolences or remorse for the Indian lives lost in the attack. In a statement, Rubio said that “all security should immediately comply with orders from the US forces as they seek to uphold peace and security in the strait”. India’s Ministry of External Affairs summoned the US chargé d’affaires twice within three days to protest the deaths and demand accountability. Though the statement from the US lacked any acknowledgement of Indian lives lost. Opposition MP Sashi Tharoor called it “ deeply insensitive”. He said he was deeply “shocked” and asked whether targeting the propulsion or steering system could have been a more proportional response instead of killing Indians. “Practically every merchant ship navigating these crucial waters has an Indian crew on board. Are they all considered fair game for US missiles now?” wrote Tharoor in a post on social media platform X. Also Read: How Washington plans to embed Israel into America's defence and intelligence ecosystem Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi went further. He called out Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence, labelling him a “compromised PM” and “an obedient servant” to Washington. Rahul Gandhi further raised the case of Indian sailor Nishanth Uirthanathan, who died due to medical complications aboard MT Celestial docked at Duqm Port in Oman, and urged the government to expedite the repatriation of his mortal remains. He criticised Modi's lack of public statement, asserting that "a free country would never tolerate such language". He accused Modi of failing to protect Indian citizens and the country's "national dignity". Senior leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra condemned the government's response as “shameful”, suggesting that India must assert itself against foreign high-handedness. Congress President Malikarjun Kharge said that “Indian lives cannot be treated as an afterthought in matters of foreign policy,” adding that “silence is not a substitute for accountability.” Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said that Modi not only signed away the future of Indian farmers in a deal which “saw the Modi Government unilaterally make enormous concessions” but also promised to purchase approximately $500 billion worth of American goods over the next five years. He claimed that countries like Malaysia had made their trade agreement with the US null and void following the US Supreme Court decision. He urged New Delhi to postpone the visit of the US Trade Representative, in light of the US Supreme Court decision, the recent US attacks on Indians commercial vessels and the lack of remorse from Marco Rubio's statement.

Rahul Gandhi, Shashi Tharoor and other opposition leaders have targeted Prime Minister Narendra Modi after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended a US strike that killed three Indian seafarers without expressing condolences.

Marco Rubio's response to deaths of Indian sailors sparks backlash, opposition targets Modi's silence

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Trump seen as ‘mentally deficient’? Iran reportedly added psychologists for negotiations

Strong 6.7-magnitude earthquake strikes central Indonesia

Dramatic footage captures moment Russian Tu-22M3 bomber crashes in Siberia

California Governor accuses Trump of ordering 'politically motivated' DOJ probe

US says Hormuz to be toll-free. Iran says ships will pay. What's the truth?

G7 Summit: Protests in Geneva revive memories of 2003; here's what happened then

'Putin does not want it': Zelensky renews offer for direct talks to end war

UK charges Indian captain of Russian shadow fleet tanker with sanctions offences

War prevented ‘nuclear annihilation’: Netanyahu vows troops will stay in Lebanon

Eight feared dead after B-52 bomber crashes at Edwards Base in California

Trump says ships ‘loaded with oil’ starting to move out of Strait of Hormuz

Jimmy Kimmel trolls Trump’s 80th birthday with parody of alleged Epstein card

Vance: Iran could access $300bn reconstruction fund if it meets its obligations

Vance says US-Iran MoU was signed digitally before planned Switzerland meeting

‘Iran has committed to destroy, dispose of highly enriched material,’ says Vance

Iran was preparing to attack Israel, suspended US deal after Beirut strike

What is UNAMA? UN Security Council extends Afghanistan mission until 2027

JD Vance says some in Israel like US-Iran deal 'quite a bit' despite backlash

Thirty-four human foetuses found in garden of Polish female doctor's

US responsible for implementing draft deal with Iran, claims Israeli FM

Fox agrees to buy Roku for $22 b deal to expand streaming and Live TV reach

From Devyani Khobragade to Gulf of Oman: Has India's response to US changed?

G7 Summit 2026: What would success look like in Évian amid turbulent times?

G7's new reality: India, and other middle powers becoming impossible to ignore

Bangladesh PM’s adviser returns to Dhaka after being stopped at IGI airport

Opposition targets Modi's silence after Rubio's response on Indian sailors death