National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

The mayor of a northern Mexico border city said Thursday that US authorities had revoked his visa, the latest Mexican official to lose the privilege. Juan Francisco Gim, the mayor of Nogales, which borders the US state of Arizona, said in a video posted on X that "the United States government has taken a measure regarding my immigration status, which I respect."&nbsp;In May last year, Marina del Pilar Avila, the governor of the northwestern Mexican state of Baja California, which also borders the United States, said US authorities had canceled her visa.&nbsp;Both politicians are members of the ruling Morena party.&nbsp;Under US law, foreign visa records are confidential, and immigration authorities declined to provide details.&nbsp;Gim did not specify the reason behind the visa revocation, but stated it was part of "an administrative process" and that US authorities had not accused him of "anything improper at all."&nbsp;"I continue to work normally... I even participate in binational meetings on security issues," the Nogales mayor said in the video.&nbsp;Last month, the Nogales mayor praised the Donald Trump administration's immigration crackdown as "cleaning house" in an interview on Fox News.&nbsp;In recent months, popular Mexican musicians including Grupo Firme, Julion Alvarez and Lorenzo de Monteclaro had to cancel or postpone performances in the United States due to visa issues.&nbsp;The visas of Mexican band Los Alegres del Barranco were revoked last April for displaying images of drug lord Nemesio Oseguera, alias "El Mencho", leader of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, during a concert.&nbsp;Washington has designated the group as a terrorist organization.&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits for grammar and punctuation. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Under US law, foreign visa records are confidential, and immigration authorities declined to provide details.

Under US law, foreign visa records are confidential, and immigration authorities declined to provide details.

US authorities revoke visa of Mexican mayor of bordering state

United States President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin have agreed to meet on Ukraine war next week. Putin's special envoy Kirill A Dmitriev confirmed the news about the meeting between both the leaders. So, has the Trump tariff on India got to do something with the meeting? Trump's social media post hints towards that.&nbsp;Taking to Truth Social Trump wrote, "We put a 50 per cent tariff on India".&nbsp;He then goes on to say, "I don't know if that had anything to do with it, but we've had very productive talks today (with Russia),"&nbsp;The news of Trump-Putin meet on Ukraine war came hours after additional 25% tariff was imposed on India by the US President as punishment for its purchases of Russian energy.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-vs-modi-tariff-war-those-touting-india-russia-china-alliance-hold-your-horses-and-read-this-it-s-not-a-good-idea-ric-alliance-tariff-war-1754631308849">Those touting India, Russia, China alliance, HOLD YOUR HORSES and read this. It's not...</a>&nbsp;In an earlier post on Truth Social Trump accused India of selling products made form Russian oil to other countries at a higher price.&nbsp;"India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump wrote.&nbsp;Replying to a question whether the tariff imposed on India would end if Russia and Ukraine agreed to halt the war, Trump said, "We'll determine that later, but right now, they're paying a 50 per cent tariff."&nbsp;Trump-Putin Meet on Ukraine War&nbsp;Putin's three-hour-long meeting with US special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow also helped both the countries agree on having talks. However, there is still no clarity on Volodymyr Zelenskyy being part of the meet as the Russian president refused to meet Ukraine’s leader, a potential condition for the US-Russia talks.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/netanyahu-s-proposal-to-take-over-gaza-city-gets-final-cabinet-approval-what-s-next-for-israel-hamas-war-1754622829132">Netanyahu’s proposal to take over Gaza City gets final cabinet approval: What’s next in Israel-Hamas war?</a>&nbsp;On Thursday, conflicting statements from Washington and Moscow suggested deep confusion over the planned summit. While the Kremlin claimed talks were progressing for a bilateral Trump-Putin meeting next week, Putin dismissed the idea of a meeting with Zelensky. “I have nothing against it in general,” Putin said, “but certain conditions must be created for this… we are still far from creating such conditions.”&nbsp;UAE Likely Venue For Meet?&nbsp;However, it has been confirmed that the two leaders (Trump and Putin) are meeting and the venue is being finalised. According to reports, Putin hinted that the United Arab Emirates, where he met Mohamed bin Zayed this week, could host the summit. “We have many friends… one of them is the president of the UAE,” he said.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

The news of Trump-Putin meet on Ukraine war came hours after addition 25% tariff was slapped on India by the US President as punitive measure for purchasing Russian oil.

United States President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin have agreed to meet on Ukraine war next week. Putin's special envoy Kirill A Dmitriev confirmed the news about the meeting between both the leaders. So, has the Trump tariff on India got to do something with the meeting? Trump's social media post hints towards that. Taking to Truth Social Trump wrote, "We put a 50 per cent tariff on India". He then goes on to say, "I don't know if that had anything to do with it, but we've had very productive talks today (with Russia)," The news of Trump-Putin meet on Ukraine war came hours after additional 25% tariff was imposed on India by the US President as punishment for its purchases of Russian energy. Also Read: Those touting India, Russia, China alliance, HOLD YOUR HORSES and read this. It's not... In an earlier post on Truth Social Trump accused India of selling products made form Russian oil to other countries at a higher price. "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine," Trump wrote. Replying to a question whether the tariff imposed on India would end if Russia and Ukraine agreed to halt the war, Trump said, "We'll determine that later, but right now, they're paying a 50 per cent tariff." Trump-Putin Meet on Ukraine War Putin's three-hour-long meeting with US special envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow also helped both the countries agree on having talks. However, there is still no clarity on Volodymyr Zelenskyy being part of the meet as the Russian president refused to meet Ukraine’s leader, a potential condition for the US-Russia talks. Also Read: Netanyahu’s proposal to take over Gaza City gets final cabinet approval: What’s next in Israel-Hamas war? On Thursday, conflicting statements from Washington and Moscow suggested deep confusion over the planned summit. While the Kremlin claimed talks were progressing for a bilateral Trump-Putin meeting next week, Putin dismissed the idea of a meeting with Zelensky. “I have nothing against it in general,” Putin said, “but certain conditions must be created for this… we are still far from creating such conditions.” UAE Likely Venue For Meet? However, it has been confirmed that the two leaders (Trump and Putin) are meeting and the venue is being finalised. According to reports, Putin hinted that the United Arab Emirates, where he met Mohamed bin Zayed this week, could host the summit. “We have many friends… one of them is the president of the UAE,” he said.

The news of Trump-Putin meet on Ukraine war came hours after addition 25% tariff was slapped on India by the US President as punitive measure for purchasing Russian oil.

Did Trump tariff heat on India lead Putin to direct talks for ending Ukraine war?

Trump and his obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize is a story that's not new. Before him, four US presidents also received it

Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize AGAIN! Here are four US presidents and a VP who already received it

US President Donald Trump will host the leaders of sworn enemies Armenia and Azerbaijan on Friday, touting the prospect of sealing a long-sought peace deal between the two regional rivals after decades of conflict. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev will attend a "Peace Signing Ceremony" at the White House, Trump posted Thursday on his Truth Social platform.&nbsp;The latest US diplomatic push comes a day after Cambodia's prime minister announced he had nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize.Trump has repeatedly praised his own diplomatic efforts, saying he deserves the prize, while also voicing frustration about the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the hunger plaguing Gaza during Israel's offensive.&nbsp;Peace has also been elusive for Armenia and Azerbaijan. Sworn enemies for decades, the two former Soviet republics went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. The two countries have held talks aimed at securing a peaceful resolution, including last month in the United Arab Emirates, but a breakthrough has proved elusive.&nbsp;"These two Nations have been at War for many years, resulting in the deaths of thousands of people," Trump wrote. "Many Leaders have tried to end the War, with no success, until now, thanks to 'TRUMP.' My Administration has been engaged with both sides for quite some time," he added, saying he was “very proud of these courageous Leaders for doing the right thing.” Friday "will be a Historic Day for Armenia, Azerbaijan, the United States, and, THE WORLD," Trump said. Trump, a billionaire business tycoon,&nbsp;also said that Washington will sign bilateral deals with both countries "to pursue Economic opportunities together, so we can fully unlock the potential of the South Caucasus Region."

US President Donald Trump will host the leaders of sworn enemies Armenia and Azerbaijan on Friday, touting the prospect of sealing a long-sought peace deal between the two regional rivals after decades of conflict.

US President Donald Trump will host the leaders of sworn enemies Armenia and Azerbaijan on Friday, touting the prospect of sealing a long-sought peace deal between the two regional rivals after decades of conflict. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev will attend a "Peace Signing Ceremony" at the White House, Trump posted Thursday on his Truth Social platform. The latest US diplomatic push comes a day after Cambodia's prime minister announced he had nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. Trump has repeatedly praised his own diplomatic efforts, saying he deserves the prize, while also voicing frustration about the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and the hunger plaguing Gaza during Israel's offensive. Peace has also been elusive for Armenia and Azerbaijan. Sworn enemies for decades, the two former Soviet republics went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. The two countries have held talks aimed at securing a peaceful resolution, including last month in the United Arab Emirates, but a breakthrough has proved elusive. "These two Nations have been at War for many years, resulting in the deaths of thousands of people," Trump wrote. "Many Leaders have tried to end the War, with no success, until now, thanks to 'TRUMP.' My Administration has been engaged with both sides for quite some time," he added, saying he was “very proud of these courageous Leaders for doing the right thing.” Friday "will be a Historic Day for Armenia, Azerbaijan, the United States, and, THE WORLD," Trump said. Trump, a billionaire business tycoon, also said that Washington will sign bilateral deals with both countries "to pursue Economic opportunities together, so we can fully unlock the potential of the South Caucasus Region."

US President Donald Trump will host the leaders of sworn enemies Armenia and Azerbaijan on Friday, touting the prospect of sealing a long-sought peace deal between the two regional rivals after decades of conflict.

Trump strikes another peace deal, announces Armenia, Azerbaijan to sign treaty at White House

Wildfires are increasing around the globe in frequency, severity and duration, heightening the need to understand the health effects of wildfire exposure and pay attention to climate change in the country

Black smoke, charred remains, water bomber planes: Scary images show devastating wildfires across the world

In a bizarre turn of events, a talking parrot played an unlikely role in busting a major drugs operation in England when the pet repeated drug-related phrases taught by the dealers, authorities revealed this week. The narcotics network was operating from inside a prison and allegedly trafficked drugs across Blackpool between February 2023 and July 2024. The Lancashire Constabulary have announced charges against 15 people in connection with the gang. The group was led by Adam Garnett, 35, who was already serving a prison sentence when the police discovered their operation.&nbsp;The gang’s illegal activities came to light after a number of mobile phones and Wi-Fi routers were discovered in Garnett’s cell during a search. Following this, police identified his associates, including Dalbir Sandhu, Shannon Hilton and Jason Gerrand. After searching their homes, police found large quantities of drugs, cash, and phones, which linked the gang members to each other.&nbsp;As part of the search, the phone of Garnett’s girlfriend, Shannon Hilton, was discovered. The device contained videos of her pet parrot Mango repeating the phrase “two for 25”, which is a drug deal reference. Another video showed the bird playing with drugs linked to money.&nbsp;Posting the video of the parrot, Lancashire Police wrote on Facebook, “What’s the most talented thing your pet can do? Sit? Give paw? How about speak? One drug dealer's parrot learned to say ‘two for 25’ - a phrase picked up as part of common language used by the organised crime gang run by her boyfriend. Not a phrase you want your parrot squawking when the police come knocking!”&nbsp;The investigators also found video calls and other clips flaunting drugs on her phone. Despite being jailed, Garnett continued to run his criminal network. He was sentenced to an additional 19 years and six months in prison, which he will serve consecutively with his existing 15-year term. Hilton, 29, was awarded a 12-year prison sentence, while Sandhu, 41, will be spending 10 years behind bars.&nbsp;Police and Crime Commissioner Clive Grunshaw applauded the busting of gang operations as part of Operation Warrior. “This sends a clear message: we will not tolerate organised crime in our communities. I remain committed to giving law enforcement the resources they need to take down these gangs and protect the public,” he said.&nbsp;Watch | Organized Drug Gangs Fuel Surge in Youth Violence Across ‘Fragile’ French Cities&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/organized-drug-gangs-fuel-surge-in-youth-violence-across-fragile-french-cities-1753705742879/embed

In an unusual incident, a drug dealer’s pet parrot helped reveal their illegal activities to police after it recited drug-related phrases taught by its owner.

In a bizarre turn of events, a talking parrot played an unlikely role in busting a major drugs operation in England when the pet repeated drug-related phrases taught by the dealers, authorities revealed this week. The narcotics network was operating from inside a prison and allegedly trafficked drugs across Blackpool between February 2023 and July 2024. The Lancashire Constabulary have announced charges against 15 people in connection with the gang. The group was led by Adam Garnett, 35, who was already serving a prison sentence when the police discovered their operation. The gang’s illegal activities came to light after a number of mobile phones and Wi-Fi routers were discovered in Garnett’s cell during a search. Following this, police identified his associates, including Dalbir Sandhu, Shannon Hilton and Jason Gerrand. After searching their homes, police found large quantities of drugs, cash, and phones, which linked the gang members to each other. As part of the search, the phone of Garnett’s girlfriend, Shannon Hilton, was discovered. The device contained videos of her pet parrot Mango repeating the phrase “two for 25”, which is a drug deal reference. Another video showed the bird playing with drugs linked to money. Posting the video of the parrot, Lancashire Police wrote on Facebook, “What’s the most talented thing your pet can do? Sit? Give paw? How about speak? One drug dealer's parrot learned to say ‘two for 25’ - a phrase picked up as part of common language used by the organised crime gang run by her boyfriend. Not a phrase you want your parrot squawking when the police come knocking!” The investigators also found video calls and other clips flaunting drugs on her phone. Despite being jailed, Garnett continued to run his criminal network. He was sentenced to an additional 19 years and six months in prison, which he will serve consecutively with his existing 15-year term. Hilton, 29, was awarded a 12-year prison sentence, while Sandhu, 41, will be spending 10 years behind bars. Police and Crime Commissioner Clive Grunshaw applauded the busting of gang operations as part of Operation Warrior. “This sends a clear message: we will not tolerate organised crime in our communities. I remain committed to giving law enforcement the resources they need to take down these gangs and protect the public,” he said. Watch | Organized Drug Gangs Fuel Surge in Youth Violence Across ‘Fragile’ French Cities https://www.wionews.com/videos/organized-drug-gangs-fuel-surge-in-youth-violence-across-fragile-french-cities-1753705742879/embed

In an unusual incident, a drug dealer’s pet parrot helped reveal their illegal activities to police after it recited drug-related phrases taught by its owner.

Drug dealer’s talking parrot helps British cops uncover gang’s illegal activities - Here’s how

The United States again claimed to have brokered to end the war between India and Pakistan after the Pahalgam terrorist attack claimed 16 lives at the popular tourist destination in Jammu and Kashmir. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday (Aug 7) said that the Trump administration was “involved directly” in brokering peace between both the countries following Operation Sindoor launched by India against Pakistan to avenge the killings.&nbsp;“On the broader issue of peace, the President is committed to peace and committed to being the President of peace. And so, we saw when India and Pakistan went to war, we got involved directly, and the President was able to deliver on that peace,” said Rubio while speaking at the EWTN’s The World Over show.&nbsp;Indian has, however, rejected claims by the US of brokering a peace between both the countries. It has maintained that the agreement to stop hostilities with Pakistan came through direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries and not with intervention of US President Donald Trump.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-trump-tariff-heat-on-india-lead-putin-to-direct-talks-for-ending-ukraine-war-1754631927304">Did Trump tariff heat on India lead Putin to direct talks for ending Ukraine war?</a>&nbsp;Rubio also mentioned other conflicts that the trump administration has been 'successful' in resolving.&nbsp;“Cambodia and Thailand more recently; Azerbaijan and Armenia, hopefully – we’re taping this here today, but on Friday of this week, we’ll be here to sign an agreement and the beginning of a peace deal there. DRC-Rwanda – a 30-year war, 7 million people killed – we were able to bring them here to sign it. Obviously, work needs to – peace is not permanent. It always has to be worked and maintained,” he said.&nbsp;“We dedicate a significant amount of time to stopping and ending wars,” Rubio added.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio again reiterated US roles in helping end the India-Pakistan war after the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmirs Pahalgam.

The United States again claimed to have brokered to end the war between India and Pakistan after the Pahalgam terrorist attack claimed 16 lives at the popular tourist destination in Jammu and Kashmir. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday (Aug 7) said that the Trump administration was “involved directly” in brokering peace between both the countries following Operation Sindoor launched by India against Pakistan to avenge the killings. “On the broader issue of peace, the President is committed to peace and committed to being the President of peace. And so, we saw when India and Pakistan went to war, we got involved directly, and the President was able to deliver on that peace,” said Rubio while speaking at the EWTN’s The World Over show. Indian has, however, rejected claims by the US of brokering a peace between both the countries. It has maintained that the agreement to stop hostilities with Pakistan came through direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries and not with intervention of US President Donald Trump. Also Read: Did Trump tariff heat on India lead Putin to direct talks for ending Ukraine war? Rubio also mentioned other conflicts that the trump administration has been 'successful' in resolving. “Cambodia and Thailand more recently; Azerbaijan and Armenia, hopefully – we’re taping this here today, but on Friday of this week, we’ll be here to sign an agreement and the beginning of a peace deal there. DRC-Rwanda – a 30-year war, 7 million people killed – we were able to bring them here to sign it. Obviously, work needs to – peace is not permanent. It always has to be worked and maintained,” he said. “We dedicate a significant amount of time to stopping and ending wars,” Rubio added.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio again reiterated US roles in helping end the India-Pakistan war after the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam.

Pahalgam terror attack: 'Involved directly' in ending war between India, Pakistan, reiterates Rubio

On Friday (August 8), a Delhi court rejected the plea filed by Christian Michel James, the alleged middleman in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper deal. It was on the grounds that he had undergone the maximum period of sentence of seven years for the corruption case. In an order dated August 7, Special Judge Sanjay Jindal said and as quoted by news agency PTI, "Considering the allegations under Section 467 of the IPC which entails life imprisonment, it cannot be said that the accused has already undergone the period of maximum punishment prescribed for the alleged offences."&nbsp;As per the court, apart from offences of cheating, criminal conspiracy and bribery, the CBI has also accused James of violating Section 467 i.e. forgery. The court mentioned that the punishment for the same is life imprisonment.&nbsp;&nbsp;In the hearing the court said, “Considering the allegations u/sec. 467 IPC which entails life imprisonment, it cannot be said that the accused has already undergone the period of maximum punishment prescribed for the alleged offences.”&nbsp;On Wednesday, James had informed the court that it isn't safe for him to leave the national capital. "If I put one step out in Delhi, new charges will be placed on me. It is not safe. I do not want to come back to this court with new charges," said James.

On Friday (August 8), a Delhi court rejected the plea filed by Christian Michel James, the alleged middleman in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper deal.

On Friday (August 8), a Delhi court rejected the plea filed by Christian Michel James, the alleged middleman in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper deal. It was on the grounds that he had undergone the maximum period of sentence of seven years for the corruption case. In an order dated August 7, Special Judge Sanjay Jindal said and as quoted by news agency PTI, "Considering the allegations under Section 467 of the IPC which entails life imprisonment, it cannot be said that the accused has already undergone the period of maximum punishment prescribed for the alleged offences." As per the court, apart from offences of cheating, criminal conspiracy and bribery, the CBI has also accused James of violating Section 467 i.e. forgery. The court mentioned that the punishment for the same is life imprisonment. In the hearing the court said, “Considering the allegations u/sec. 467 IPC which entails life imprisonment, it cannot be said that the accused has already undergone the period of maximum punishment prescribed for the alleged offences.” On Wednesday, James had informed the court that it isn't safe for him to leave the national capital. "If I put one step out in Delhi, new charges will be placed on me. It is not safe. I do not want to come back to this court with new charges," said James.

On Friday (August 8), a Delhi court rejected the plea filed by Christian Michel James, the alleged middleman in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper deal.

AgustaWestland case: Court rejects alleged middleman Christian Michel's plea for release

United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to take over Gaza City and called it ‘wrong’. He further highlighted that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is worsening, and hostages taken by Hamas are living in inhumane conditions. Urging the Israeli government to reconsider the decision, Starmer called for a ‘ceasefire.’ He also said that the step will not bring an end to the ongoing conflict but only bring 'bloodshed.' He renewed his call for disarmament of Hamas and said that it can not play any role in the future of Gaza. Israeli cabinet had earlier approved Netanyahu's plan to 'defeat Hamas' and said that the takeover of Gaza City was primarily to provide humanitarian aid to starving civilians in the area. However, Netanyahu has clarified that he does not intend to annexe Gaza and would want it to be taken over by a "governing body.'

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The Israeli Government’s decision to further escalate its offensive in Gaza is wrong, and we urge it to reconsider immediately. Every day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens and hostages taken by Hamas are being held in appalling and inhuman conditions. We need a ceasefire… <a href="https://t.co/UoJhjss81e">pic.twitter.com/UoJhjss81e</a>&mdash; Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) <a href="https://twitter.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1953713663996576068?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In a statement, he also said, “Together with our allies, we are working on a long-term plan to secure peace in the region as part of a two-state solution, and ultimately achieve a brighter future for Palestinians and Israelis. But without both sides engaging in good faith in negotiations, that prospect is vanishing before our eyes. Our message is clear: a diplomatic solution is possible, but both parties must step away from the path of destruction.” The British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had earlier announced that the UK would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the war and humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip, and meets several other conditions, including recommitting to a viable peace process.&nbsp;&nbsp;Moreover, Saudi Arabia rejected Netanyahu's plan by lambasting it for the "starvation" and "ethnic cleansing" of Palestinians in the blockaded territory. Riyadh said it "condemns in the strongest and most forceful terms the decision of the Israeli occupation authorities to occupy the Gaza Strip", in a foreign ministry statement on X. It added that it "categorically condemns its persistence in committing crimes of starvation, brutal practices, and ethnic cleansing against the brotherly Palestinian people". Meanwhile, Belgium also summoned Israeli ambassador over the plan, AFP reported.<h2>Turkey and UN also oppose the Gaza plan</h2>In a statement, Turkey also urged the international community to prevent Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City, saying it was a "heavy blow" to peace and security. "We call on the international community to fulfil its responsibilities to prevent the implementation of this decision, which aims to forcibly displace Palestinians from their own land," the foreign ministry said in a statement. Additionally, UN human rights chief Volker Turk said that Netanyahu's plan must be halted because it is contrary to the ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Israel must bring its occupation to an end as soon as possible. It also said that the plan is in opposition to the realisation of the “agreed two-State solution and to the right of Palestinians to self-determination.”&nbsp;Meanwhile, China also expressed "serious concerns" over Israel's Gaza City take-over plan, urging it to "immediately cease its dangerous actions"."Gaza belongs to the Palestinian people and is an inseparable part of Palestinian territory," a foreign ministry spokesperson told AFP in a message. "The correct way to ease the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and to secure the release of hostages is an immediate ceasefire," they added.<h2>What is Netanyahu's Gaza plan?</h2>In a statement released by Isareli government, Netanyahu's Gaza plan is covered in five points. It is a plan to defeat the Hamas and "concluding the war". It was approved by a majority vote. Netanyahu had earlier said Israel intended to take over all of the Gaza Strip, but the plan only mentions Gaza City. The plan's objectives include disarmament of Hamas, returning of hostages, demilitarising the Gaza Strip, taking security control of the territory, and establishing "an alternative civil administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority." Notably, the Israel Defense Forces have warned against the plan and said that the operation risks the lives of the remaining hostages in addition to potentially sparking a humanitarian disaster.<h2>&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;

Hours after the Israeli cabinet approved the Gaza plan, United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer called for a ceasefire and claimed that Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza takeover would only bring bloodshed

United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer has rejected Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to take over Gaza City and called it ‘wrong’. He further highlighted that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is worsening, and hostages taken by Hamas are living in inhumane conditions. Urging the Israeli government to reconsider the decision, Starmer called for a ‘ceasefire.’ He also said that the step will not bring an end to the ongoing conflict but only bring 'bloodshed.' He renewed his call for disarmament of Hamas and said that it can not play any role in the future of Gaza. Israeli cabinet had earlier approved Netanyahu's plan to 'defeat Hamas' and said that the takeover of Gaza City was primarily to provide humanitarian aid to starving civilians in the area. However, Netanyahu has clarified that he does not intend to annexe Gaza and would want it to be taken over by a "governing body.'

Hours after the Israeli cabinet approved the Gaza plan, United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer called for a ceasefire and claimed that Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza takeover would only bring bloodshed

'More bloodshed': UK, Turkey, China reject Netanyahu's Gaza take-over plan, says THIS about two-state solution

Donald Trump's tariff threat is not the first time India was punished by the US. The last time it happened, India came out bruised, but not defeated. Here is the story of India's Pokhran II nuclear tests, US punishment for it, and how New Delhi dealt with it

When India was punished, isolated by US and still survived the impact - The Pokhran nuclear test story - Foreign affairs tales

Malaysia has become a key international gateway or transit point for criminals involved in illegal wildlife trade. In one such incident, an Indian national was arrested at Kuala Lumpur International Airport for trying to smuggle live turtles. The Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency (AKPS) arrested the man with 2,500 live turtles valued at a whopping $82,000.&nbsp;The suspect was scheduled to board a flight to India's Bengaluru when the security nabbed the man at the departure gate at 10.05pm during a routine security operation.&nbsp;Based on intelligence information, enforcement officers from AKPS and Aviation Security (AVSEC) personnel conducted a scan of the suspect's luggage and came across thousands of Red-eared Slider turtles hidden inside the baggage. All the wildlife was seized by the authorities for further investigation.&nbsp;According to a local news media malaymail, the case is being investigated under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 and the International Trade in Endangered Species Act 2008.Native to North America, the red-eared slider is classified as an invasive species in many countries, including India, where it poses a major threat to native aquatic biodiversity.&nbsp;Earlier in March, an Indian national travelling from Malaysia to India was arrested at the Bengaluru International Airport for smuggling four baby siamang gibbons and two baby northern pig-tailed macaques in his cabin luggage.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Security personnel conducted a scan of the suspects luggage at the  Kuala Lumpur airport International airport and came across thousands of turtles hidden inside the baggage.

Malaysia has become a key international gateway or transit point for criminals involved in illegal wildlife trade. In one such incident, an Indian national was arrested at Kuala Lumpur International Airport for trying to smuggle live turtles. The Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency (AKPS) arrested the man with 2,500 live turtles valued at a whopping $82,000. The suspect was scheduled to board a flight to India's Bengaluru when the security nabbed the man at the departure gate at 10.05pm during a routine security operation. Based on intelligence information, enforcement officers from AKPS and Aviation Security (AVSEC) personnel conducted a scan of the suspect's luggage and came across thousands of Red-eared Slider turtles hidden inside the baggage. All the wildlife was seized by the authorities for further investigation. According to a local news media malaymail, the case is being investigated under the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 and the International Trade in Endangered Species Act 2008. Native to North America, the red-eared slider is classified as an invasive species in many countries, including India, where it poses a major threat to native aquatic biodiversity. Earlier in March, an Indian national travelling from Malaysia to India was arrested at the Bengaluru International Airport for smuggling four baby siamang gibbons and two baby northern pig-tailed macaques in his cabin luggage.

Security personnel conducted a scan of the suspect's luggage at the &nbsp;Kuala Lumpur airport International airport and came across thousands of turtles hidden inside the baggage.

Thousands of live turtles in suitcase: Indian national arrested at Kuala Lumpur airport

As the investigation continues in the Australian mushroom murders, it has revealed that Erin Patterson, who killed her in-laws, also tried to poison her husband earlier with chicken korma curry. The 50-year-old mother of two poisoned her relatives by serving them home-cooked beef wellingtons laced with toxic mushrooms that killed three.&nbsp;In July 2023, Patterson served the poisonous dish to her estranged husband’s elderly parents, Gail and Donald Patterson, his aunt, Heather Wilkinson, and his uncle, Ian Wilkinson. The dish contained death cap mushrooms, the most lethal fungus in the world, which killed three of her guests.&nbsp;Now, the police have revealed new information that between 2021 and 2022, Patterson tried to kill her husband in three instances by serving him poisoned pasta bolognese, chicken korma curry and a vegetable wrap. These accusations, which were earlier withheld from the jury to give her a fair trial, came to light on Friday (Aug 8) after the Supreme Court rejected an application to keep the allegations suppressed.&nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-are-australia-mushroom-murders-woman-found-guilty-for-killing-in-laws-1751866797946">What are Australia mushroom murders? Woman found guilty of killing</a> <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-are-australia-mushroom-murders-woman-found-guilty-for-killing-in-laws-1751866797946">in-laws</a>&nbsp;In a pre-trial hearing last October, Patterson’s husband, Simon, revealed that he fell ill after eating a mild chicken korma served by her during a camping trip in 2022. “At first I felt hot, especially in my head, and that led to feeling nauseous and then that led to me quite suddenly needing to vomit,” he said.&nbsp;He later fell into a coma and underwent surgery to remove a section of his bowel. Simon later told doctor Christopher Ford that he suspected he was deliberately poisoned by Patterson.&nbsp;He also became worried after she offered him a batch of homemade cookies. “Simon was apprehensive about eating the cookies, as he felt they may be poisoned,” Ford said. “He reported to me that while they were away, Erin called several times and enquired about whether he had eaten any of the cookies.”&nbsp;The charges were dropped by the prosecutors at the beginning of Patterson’s trial, and the media were restricted from reporting on details.&nbsp;Last month, a 12-member jury reached the verdict after a 10-week trial, finding Patterson guilty of murder and attempted murder of her husband’s relatives. The 50-year-old mother of two is facing life in prison, and her sentencing is awaited. The shocking case had drawn global attention as the mysterious case unravelled.&nbsp;Patterson had claimed she had poisoned the dish served to her in-laws unintentionally. On the other hand, the evidence suggested otherwise. She is expected to be sentenced on August 25, when she will appear before the court. Following this, her legal team will have 28 days to challenge her conviction and sentencing. &nbsp;Watch | Australia’s reef in crisis, climate blamed&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-s-reef-in-crisis-climate-blamed-1754473443215/embed &nbsp;

New information into the infamous Australia murder case reveals Erin Patterson tried to kill her husband by serving him poisoned food on three instances.

As the investigation continues in the Australian mushroom murders, it has revealed that Erin Patterson, who killed her in-laws, also tried to poison her husband earlier with chicken korma curry. The 50-year-old mother of two poisoned her relatives by serving them home-cooked beef wellingtons laced with toxic mushrooms that killed three. In July 2023, Patterson served the poisonous dish to her estranged husband’s elderly parents, Gail and Donald Patterson, his aunt, Heather Wilkinson, and his uncle, Ian Wilkinson. The dish contained death cap mushrooms, the most lethal fungus in the world, which killed three of her guests. Now, the police have revealed new information that between 2021 and 2022, Patterson tried to kill her husband in three instances by serving him poisoned pasta bolognese, chicken korma curry and a vegetable wrap. These accusations, which were earlier withheld from the jury to give her a fair trial, came to light on Friday (Aug 8) after the Supreme Court rejected an application to keep the allegations suppressed. Also read | What are Australia mushroom murders? Woman found guilty of killing in-laws In a pre-trial hearing last October, Patterson’s husband, Simon, revealed that he fell ill after eating a mild chicken korma served by her during a camping trip in 2022. “At first I felt hot, especially in my head, and that led to feeling nauseous and then that led to me quite suddenly needing to vomit,” he said. He later fell into a coma and underwent surgery to remove a section of his bowel. Simon later told doctor Christopher Ford that he suspected he was deliberately poisoned by Patterson. He also became worried after she offered him a batch of homemade cookies. “Simon was apprehensive about eating the cookies, as he felt they may be poisoned,” Ford said. “He reported to me that while they were away, Erin called several times and enquired about whether he had eaten any of the cookies.” The charges were dropped by the prosecutors at the beginning of Patterson’s trial, and the media were restricted from reporting on details. Last month, a 12-member jury reached the verdict after a 10-week trial, finding Patterson guilty of murder and attempted murder of her husband’s relatives. The 50-year-old mother of two is facing life in prison, and her sentencing is awaited. The shocking case had drawn global attention as the mysterious case unravelled. Patterson had claimed she had poisoned the dish served to her in-laws unintentionally. On the other hand, the evidence suggested otherwise. She is expected to be sentenced on August 25, when she will appear before the court. Following this, her legal team will have 28 days to challenge her conviction and sentencing. Watch | Australia’s reef in crisis, climate blamed https://www.wionews.com/videos/australia-s-reef-in-crisis-climate-blamed-1754473443215/embed

New information into the infamous Australia murder case reveals Erin Patterson tried to kill her husband by serving him poisoned food on three instances.

Served poisoned chicken korma to husband before killing in-laws: New claims emerge in Australian mushroom murder case

In response to the remarks by the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev over Trump's "dead economy" jibe, the United States has repositioned two nuclear submarines to strategic positions, in a Cold War-era tactic. The moves by Trump to counter Moscow's defiance after his threats of tariffs and sanctions fell flat.&nbsp;The president did not clearly mention what type of submarines were being repositioned, and the Pentagon usually disclosed little about any of its subs’ movements. Currently, the US Navy has three types of submarines, all of which are powered by nuclear, but only one of these carries nuclear weapons. Take a look at the differences between the US and Russian submarine fleets and which of them is more powerful.<h3>American Ballistic Missile Submarines (Ohio-class)</h3>The Ohio-class Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs) of the American Navy are popular for their stealth capability and precise striking ability of nuclear warheads. Out of which, around 14 of these boomers are currently in service.&nbsp;These submarines can run up to 15 years and can carry at least 20 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). The Trident is the primary weapon of these submarines.<h3>American Fast Attack Submarines</h3>America has three different classes of nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSN), which include the Seawolf-class, Virginia-class, and Los Angeles-class (also known as the 688 class). These attack submarines are designed to destroy enemy vessels easily, as they are equipped with Tomahawk missiles, Harpoon missiles, and MK-48 torpedoes.&nbsp;Along with different missiles, these submarines can also carry out intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations and engage in mine warfare. The US has Virginia-class SSNs, which include: USS Hawaii, USS North Carolina, USS Missouri, etc., with 24 in number. And there are also three Seawolf-class submarines in the US Navy.<h3>American Guided-missile submarines</h3>After the Pentagon determined that the US Navy didn’t need as many Ohio-class SSBNs in the nuclear deterrent role in 1990, it converted four of them into guided-missile submarines (SSGNs). These can carry Tomahawk cruise missiles instead of the Trident ballistic missiles, and each can carry 154 Tomahawks with a high-explosive warhead of up to 1,000 pounds and a range of about 1,000 miles.<h3>Russian Ballistic Missile Submarines</h3>Russia is also not behind the US in terms of submarines, as it has one of the largest fleets in the world, comprising nearly 64 vessels. Around 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) are central to its strategic mechanism, including the Delta IV-class and Borei-class.&nbsp;Additionally, the Russian Navy operates eight Borei-class SSBNs, equipped with six 533 mm torpedo launchers and 16 Bulava SLBMs. These submarines also comprise a crew of over a hundred seamen and can fire anti-submarine rockets and bottom mines.&nbsp;Another class, the Delta IV-class submarines, which Boreis will replace, were built alongside the Typhoon-class. However, at least six of the Deltas are currently deployed.<h3>Russian Fast Attack Submarines</h3>The other class of the Russian Navy is ‘Fast Attack Submarines,’ which has four Yasen-class nuclear attack submarines. This class can carry either up to four P-800 32-40 Oniks missiles or five 3M54-1 Kalibr missiles, which have long-range land attack and anti-ship capabilities.&nbsp;The Akula-class is the Russian Navy's silent killing machine. Five of them are currently in service, which is also known as the Shark (akula in Russian translates to shark). These submarines can operate Kalibr, Oniks, or Granit missiles and torpedoes, countering the US Los Angeles-class.&nbsp;

Both nation has different classes of submarines with different levels and multiple specifications that can target the enemy with precision, destroying heavily. Currently, the US has 71 nuclear-powered submarines, and Russia has around 64 submarines.

In response to the remarks by the former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev over Trump's "dead economy" jibe, the United States has repositioned two nuclear submarines to strategic positions, in a Cold War-era tactic. The moves by Trump to counter Moscow's defiance after his threats of tariffs and sanctions fell flat. The president did not clearly mention what type of submarines were being repositioned, and the Pentagon usually disclosed little about any of its subs’ movements. Currently, the US Navy has three types of submarines, all of which are powered by nuclear, but only one of these carries nuclear weapons. Take a look at the differences between the US and Russian submarine fleets and which of them is more powerful. American Ballistic Missile Submarines (Ohio-class) The Ohio-class Ballistic Missile Submarines (SSBNs) of the American Navy are popular for their stealth capability and precise striking ability of nuclear warheads. Out of which, around 14 of these boomers are currently in service. These submarines can run up to 15 years and can carry at least 20 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). The Trident is the primary weapon of these submarines. American Fast Attack Submarines America has three different classes of nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSN), which include the Seawolf-class, Virginia-class, and Los Angeles-class (also known as the 688 class). These attack submarines are designed to destroy enemy vessels easily, as they are equipped with Tomahawk missiles, Harpoon missiles, and MK-48 torpedoes. Along with different missiles, these submarines can also carry out intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations and engage in mine warfare. The US has Virginia-class SSNs, which include: USS Hawaii, USS North Carolina, USS Missouri, etc., with 24 in number. And there are also three Seawolf-class submarines in the US Navy. American Guided-missile submarines After the Pentagon determined that the US Navy didn’t need as many Ohio-class SSBNs in the nuclear deterrent role in 1990, it converted four of them into guided-missile submarines (SSGNs). These can carry Tomahawk cruise missiles instead of the Trident ballistic missiles, and each can carry 154 Tomahawks with a high-explosive warhead of up to 1,000 pounds and a range of about 1,000 miles. Russian Ballistic Missile Submarines Russia is also not behind the US in terms of submarines, as it has one of the largest fleets in the world, comprising nearly 64 vessels. Around 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) are central to its strategic mechanism, including the Delta IV-class and Borei-class. Additionally, the Russian Navy operates eight Borei-class SSBNs, equipped with six 533 mm torpedo launchers and 16 Bulava SLBMs. These submarines also comprise a crew of over a hundred seamen and can fire anti-submarine rockets and bottom mines. Another class, the Delta IV-class submarines, which Boreis will replace, were built alongside the Typhoon-class. However, at least six of the Deltas are currently deployed. Russian Fast Attack Submarines The other class of the Russian Navy is ‘Fast Attack Submarines,’ which has four Yasen-class nuclear attack submarines. This class can carry either up to four P-800 32-40 Oniks missiles or five 3M54-1 Kalibr missiles, which have long-range land attack and anti-ship capabilities. The Akula-class is the Russian Navy's silent killing machine. Five of them are currently in service, which is also known as the Shark (akula in Russian translates to shark). These submarines can operate Kalibr, Oniks, or Granit missiles and torpedoes, countering the US Los Angeles-class.

Both nations have different classes of submarines with different levels and multiple specifications that can target the enemy with precision, causing heavy damage. Currently, the US has 71 nuclear-powered submarines, and Russia has around 64 submarines.

US vs Russia: Who rules under the sea? How do the submarine fleets of the countries compare in firepower

Indian media is awash with stories of how RIC - an imagined alliance of Russia, India and China - could take on the Donald Trump-led US amid tariff threats by the American president against New Delhi. While it might be a good clickbait headline for articles and videos, it is a bad idea. In case you are too busy, here is the fast answer: India-China trust deficit, &nbsp;low alignment of strategic goals, and huge disparities in the economies are factors. The public and political opinion in India is against China. India, China and Russia do not have military capabilities that can take on the US. Political values are different: India is the only true democracy among the three. India’s alliances are generally West-leaning, and therefore the threat perception against the US and West is almost non-existent for it, and not aligned with that of China and Russia. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; If you have more time, let me break it down for you.<h2>Why a likely RIC alliance of Russia, India and China against the US is strategically flawed</h2>If formalised, RIC would have the goal of countering the US under Trump’s administration. But it is a deeply flawed and unrealistic geopolitical idea because of mistrust, differing national interests, incompatible economic goals, and asymmetric power dynamics among India, Russia and China.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-why-is-us-imposing-tariff-on-india-trump-tariff-news-1754495938671/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-why-is-us-imposing-tariff-on-india-trump-tariff-news-1754495938671/embed</a>&nbsp;<h2>India-China hostility and mistrust trump even Trump tantrums</h2>There's a massive trust deficit between India and China in spite of their continuing economic cooperation and current alignment against the US. The two countries still have unresolved border disputes, particularly in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh, and military tensions despite recent attempts at a thaw.The 2020 Galwan Valley clash led to casualties on both sides, severely damaging diplomatic trust, coming close on the heels of the Doklam clash along the border with Bhutan. Despite ongoing diplomatic engagements since 2024, India and China have not fully restored trust.<h2>Indian public and politicians view China with suspicion</h2>In the court of Indian public opinion, China is still the enemy. Any move toward an alliance involving China would lead to political backlash in India, and public outrage.India is not anti-US, per se, but seeks to maintain its strategic autonomy. India has acted as a democratic counterbalance to China in the Indo-Pacific, which in fact is the reason why it's seen by the West as an important player in the region, and is invited to all kinds of strategic alliances like the Quad. China, on the other hand, seeks regional hegemony, and given the context of Taiwan invasion fears and South China Sea territorial ambitions, can best be called a regional bully. Beijing dreams of a China-led world order under the single-party rule of communism, which fundamentally clashes with India's multi-party democratic ethos. Russia and China jointly oppose the US-led world order, while India selectively aligns with the West when in its interest: this is why India is invited to G7, and is a key player in the G20. &nbsp;<h2>India is an active partner of the US and West</h2>India is an active partner in the India-US-Japan-Australia Quad, which is fundamentally about checkmating China in the region. The IPEF or Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, is another grouping that goes against a potential India-China alignment. India supports a rules-based international order and freedom of navigation, things that are in contrast to China’s assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific.<h2>Russia’s tilt towards China at India’s expense</h2>Russia and China have increasingly been sharing notes for a strategic alignment against the West's opposition to them, particularly since the Ukraine war. Russia has become economically and strategically dependent on China, specifically in oil and gas trade, where Beijing is the biggest buyer. China remains the economic lifeline for Russia amidst Western sanctions over the war. This has led Russia to covertly support China on Taiwan and the South China Sea. In both of these, India does not share the positions of China and Russia.&nbsp;<h2>Russia-China friendship can impact India-Russia ties</h2>While India has had a long-standing economic and defence partnership with Russia, the question remains if Russia will be neutral in an India-China conflict scenario. India has not had the best treatment recently in groupings like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. SCO, which is dominated by China and Russia, recently disappointed India by not including language on terrorism in the wake of the Pahalgam attack, during a ministerial meeting.&nbsp; India has also been diversifying defence suppliers away from Russia, buying its fighter jets from France and drones from the US and Israel, for instance. India's defence purchase dependence on Russia is already waning.<h2>Except for the current downturn, the India-US strategic partnership has been growing</h2>In the post-9/11 world, India and the US extended their cooperation in defence with arrangements and pacts like BECA and COMCASA. The two nations continue intelligence sharing, counterterrorism operations, and have advanced technology cooperation, like in the iCET initiative. In spite of the Trump-led tensions, the US is India’s largest export market, worth over $130 billion. The current levels of India-US cooperation in investment, technology, education and people-to-people cooperation cannot immediately be replaced by Russia or China. Suddenly aligning against the US could jeopardise India's critical economic sectors and affect its national development.<h2>No meaningful economic convergence between India, China and Russia</h2>India and China are regional economic competitors, not partners. India has a major trade deficit with China. The Chinese infrastructure project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was seen by India as a geopolitical threat. Except for energy and defence deals, there's not much that Russia’s economy can offer India.<h2>An issue of values and political systems: Democratic India vs autocratic Russia and China</h2>India is a vibrant democracy with civil liberties, electoral institutions, and a free press, while &nbsp;China is a single-party authoritarian regime, and Russia has become increasingly autocratic with one ruler, Vladimir Putin, at the helm for decades now. Thus, India is a natural ally of liberal democracies in the West rather than with authoritarian regimes. An alliance with Russia and China could damage India’s credibility as a leader of the democratic world.<h2>Can India, China and Russia have a military or strategic alliance?</h2>It's tough as the ingredients for such an alliance are missing: a shared threat perception, mutual trust, and operational compatibility. India does not trust China, and Russia lacks the capacity or neutrality to bridge this gap. There is no institutional structure or commitment, or military planning to coordinate the three nations in case of a joint external threat.<h2>China is really the big brother among the three</h2>With Russia boxed in by years of sanctions and economic apartheid from the West, China is really the big brother among the three, both in military and money.China’s GDP is nearly 10 times that of India. In spite of Western rhetoric, China still has more than 30 per cent of global manufacturing, while India is only 3 per cent. Russia's economic dependency on China is making it a junior partner in the arrangement. India could be marginalised or relegated to a junior role in a China-dominated alliance.<h2>US would retaliate against any strategic alliance between India, Russia and China</h2>US retaliation to any strategic, defence or economic alliance between India, Russia and China could be severe. Already, Trump has threatened BRICS - a grouping of the three nations that also includes South Africa and Brazil. He has slapped tariffs on India, China and Brazil.&nbsp; Any alignment by India with China and Russia might draw New Delhi into foreign conflicts it has nothing to do with, particularly Ukraine and Taiwan. Furthermore, it would be a contradiction of India’s non-alignment policy.<h2>A huge risk for India's international standing</h2>Any alignment with Russia and China would dent India's aspirations to play a global role. India's participation in groupings and fora like G7, G20, BRICS, Quad, IPEF will be affected. India's continuing aspiration for a permanent seat at the UN Security Council could take a hit.India’s image as a responsible, independent, democratic actor in the international system would be damaged if it aligns with Russia and China, and undermines India’s leadership of the Global South.<h2>Don't buy into the RIC narrative</h2>Therefore, next time you see that YouTube video with a thumbnail that screams ‘India, China, Russia to take on Trump’, please take these factors into account. RIC is neither feasible nor beneficial for India. It would be unstable and counterproductive.India’s current strategy is the best: multiple alignments, balancing relations with the West while having open lines with Russia and regional powers. Keeping its strategic autonomy intact is the way forward for India. Attempting to join an authoritarian bloc to counter the US - and probably only as long as Trump is in power - would undermine India’s global aspirations, harm its economy, alienate vital partners, and trap it in alliances that serve others’ interests more than its own.

Next time you see that YouTube video with a thumbnail that screams ‘India, China, Russia to take on Trump’, please take these factors into account. RIC is neither feasible nor beneficial for India. It would be unstable and counterproductive.

Indian media is awash with stories of how RIC - an imagined alliance of Russia, India and China - could take on the Donald Trump-led US amid tariff threats by the American president against New Delhi. While it might be a good clickbait headline for articles and videos, it is a bad idea. In case you are too busy, here is the fast answer: India-China trust deficit, low alignment of strategic goals, and huge disparities in the economies are factors. The public and political opinion in India is against China. India, China and Russia do not have military capabilities that can take on the US. Political values are different: India is the only true democracy among the three. India’s alliances are generally West-leaning, and therefore the threat perception against the US and West is almost non-existent for it, and not aligned with that of China and Russia. If you have more time, let me break it down for you. Why a likely RIC alliance of Russia, India and China against the US is strategically flawed If formalised, RIC would have the goal of countering the US under Trump’s administration. But it is a deeply flawed and unrealistic geopolitical idea because of mistrust, differing national interests, incompatible economic goals, and asymmetric power dynamics among India, Russia and China. https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-why-is-us-imposing-tariff-on-india-trump-tariff-news-1754495938671/embed India-China hostility and mistrust trump even Trump tantrums There's a massive trust deficit between India and China in spite of their continuing economic cooperation and current alignment against the US. The two countries still have unresolved border disputes, particularly in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh, and military tensions despite recent attempts at a thaw. The 2020 Galwan Valley clash led to casualties on both sides, severely damaging diplomatic trust, coming close on the heels of the Doklam clash along the border with Bhutan. Despite ongoing diplomatic engagements since 2024, India and China have not fully restored trust. Indian public and politicians view China with suspicion In the court of Indian public opinion, China is still the enemy. Any move toward an alliance involving China would lead to political backlash in India, and public outrage. India is not anti-US, per se, but seeks to maintain its strategic autonomy. India has acted as a democratic counterbalance to China in the Indo-Pacific, which in fact is the reason why it's seen by the West as an important player in the region, and is invited to all kinds of strategic alliances like the Quad. China, on the other hand, seeks regional hegemony, and given the context of Taiwan invasion fears and South China Sea territorial ambitions, can best be called a regional bully. Beijing dreams of a China-led world order under the single-party rule of communism, which fundamentally clashes with India's multi-party democratic ethos. Russia and China jointly oppose the US-led world order, while India selectively aligns with the West when in its interest: this is why India is invited to G7, and is a key player in the G20. India is an active partner of the US and West India is an active partner in the India-US-Japan-Australia Quad, which is fundamentally about checkmating China in the region. The IPEF or Indo-Pacific Economic Framework, is another grouping that goes against a potential India-China alignment. India supports a rules-based international order and freedom of navigation, things that are in contrast to China’s assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific. Russia’s tilt towards China at India’s expense Russia and China have increasingly been sharing notes for a strategic alignment against the West's opposition to them, particularly since the Ukraine war. Russia has become economically and strategically dependent on China, specifically in oil and gas trade, where Beijing is the biggest buyer. China remains the economic lifeline for Russia amidst Western sanctions over the war. This has led Russia to covertly support China on Taiwan and the South China Sea. In both of these, India does not share the positions of China and Russia. Russia-China friendship can impact India-Russia ties While India has had a long-standing economic and defence partnership with Russia, the question remains if Russia will be neutral in an India-China conflict scenario. India has not had the best treatment recently in groupings like the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. SCO, which is dominated by China and Russia, recently disappointed India by not including language on terrorism in the wake of the Pahalgam attack, during a ministerial meeting. India has also been diversifying defence suppliers away from Russia, buying its fighter jets from France and drones from the US and Israel, for instance. India's defence purchase dependence on Russia is already waning. Except for the current downturn, the India-US strategic partnership has been growing In the post-9/11 world, India and the US extended their cooperation in defence with arrangements and pacts like BECA and COMCASA. The two nations continue intelligence sharing, counterterrorism operations, and have advanced technology cooperation, like in the iCET initiative. In spite of the Trump-led tensions, the US is India’s largest export market, worth over $130 billion. The current levels of India-US cooperation in investment, technology, education and people-to-people cooperation cannot immediately be replaced by Russia or China. Suddenly aligning against the US could jeopardise India's critical economic sectors and affect its national development. No meaningful economic convergence between India, China and Russia India and China are regional economic competitors, not partners. India has a major trade deficit with China. The Chinese infrastructure project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was seen by India as a geopolitical threat. Except for energy and defence deals, there's not much that Russia’s economy can offer India. An issue of values and political systems: Democratic India vs autocratic Russia and China India is a vibrant democracy with civil liberties, electoral institutions, and a free press, while China is a single-party authoritarian regime, and Russia has become increasingly autocratic with one ruler, Vladimir Putin, at the helm for decades now. Thus, India is a natural ally of liberal democracies in the West rather than with authoritarian regimes. An alliance with Russia and China could damage India’s credibility as a leader of the democratic world. Can India, China and Russia have a military or strategic alliance? It's tough as the ingredients for such an alliance are missing: a shared threat perception, mutual trust, and operational compatibility. India does not trust China, and Russia lacks the capacity or neutrality to bridge this gap. There is no institutional structure or commitment, or military planning to coordinate the three nations in case of a joint external threat. China is really the big brother among the three With Russia boxed in by years of sanctions and economic apartheid from the West, China is really the big brother among the three, both in military and money. China’s GDP is nearly 10 times that of India. In spite of Western rhetoric, China still has more than 30 per cent of global manufacturing, while India is only 3 per cent. Russia's economic dependency on China is making it a junior partner in the arrangement. India could be marginalised or relegated to a junior role in a China-dominated alliance. US would retaliate against any strategic alliance between India, Russia and China US retaliation to any strategic, defence or economic alliance between India, Russia and China could be severe. Already, Trump has threatened BRICS - a grouping of the three nations that also includes South Africa and Brazil. He has slapped tariffs on India, China and Brazil. Any alignment by India with China and Russia might draw New Delhi into foreign conflicts it has nothing to do with, particularly Ukraine and Taiwan. Furthermore, it would be a contradiction of India’s non-alignment policy. A huge risk for India's international standing Any alignment with Russia and China would dent India's aspirations to play a global role. India's participation in groupings and fora like G7, G20, BRICS, Quad, IPEF will be affected. India's continuing aspiration for a permanent seat at the UN Security Council could take a hit. India’s image as a responsible, independent, democratic actor in the international system would be damaged if it aligns with Russia and China, and undermines India’s leadership of the Global South. Don't buy into the RIC narrative Therefore, next time you see that YouTube video with a thumbnail that screams ‘India, China, Russia to take on Trump’, please take these factors into account. RIC is neither feasible nor beneficial for India. It would be unstable and counterproductive. India’s current strategy is the best: multiple alignments, balancing relations with the West while having open lines with Russia and regional powers. Keeping its strategic autonomy intact is the way forward for India. Attempting to join an authoritarian bloc to counter the US - and probably only as long as Trump is in power - would undermine India’s global aspirations, harm its economy, alienate vital partners, and trap it in alliances that serve others’ interests more than its own.

Next time you see that YouTube video with a thumbnail that screams ‘India, China, Russia to take on Trump’, please take these factors into account. RIC is neither feasible nor beneficial for India. Here is why:

Those touting India, Russia, China alliance, HOLD YOUR HORSES and read this. It's not...

Women in Afghanistan have been bearing the brunt of losing their right to education ever since the Taliban took over in 2021. In hope of a new life, many fled to Iran to seek refuge and fulfil their aspirations. On such Afghan woman is Habiba. She moved to Iran to pursue a master's degree in engineering in the neighbouring country. And in an unfortunate twist of events, she was deported from the country in July, even before she could complete her degree. “I was so close,” she recalled.&nbsp;While narrating how events unfolded, the 31-year-old told news agency Reuters that she was returned home with her laptop and her documents. Her dreams of securing a future came crumbling down after Iran began deporting Afghans amid the conflict with Israel.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/taliban-strikes-again-this-time-bans-playing-chess-in-afghanistan-9060668">Taliban strikes again, this time bans playing chess in Afghanistan because...</a>&nbsp;She said she was really close to completing her degree, and she had hoped that would have helped her navigate her future, which many girls and women in her homeland are still dreaming of. Girls have been restricted from studying beyond class six under the new Taliban regime. The Taliban had once shown a sliver of hope before they overturned it. Yet again, leaving many women in despair.

<h2>Education for girls in Afghanistan — hope in despair</h2>&nbsp;Former UN High Commissioner Michelle Bachelet had issued a statement; she said, “The denial of education violates the human rights of women and girls – beyond their equal right to education, it leaves them more exposed to violence, poverty and exploitation.”&nbsp;Since 2021, Afghanistan has been no stranger to such bans, all of which are cited as not acceptable under Islamic law. From women's education to their free movement, a lot is at stake. Women's voices, their rights have been silenced like never before.

Fighting all odds, an Afghan woman moved to Iran to pursue a degree in engineering. And in an unfortunate twist of events, she was deported from the country in July, even before she could complete her degree.

Women in Afghanistan have been bearing the brunt of losing their right to education ever since the Taliban took over in 2021. In hope of a new life, many fled to Iran to seek refuge and fulfil their aspirations. On such Afghan woman is Habiba. She moved to Iran to pursue a master's degree in engineering in the neighbouring country. And in an unfortunate twist of events, she was deported from the country in July, even before she could complete her degree. “I was so close,” she recalled. While narrating how events unfolded, the 31-year-old told news agency Reuters that she was returned home with her laptop and her documents. Her dreams of securing a future came crumbling down after Iran began deporting Afghans amid the conflict with Israel. Also read: Taliban strikes again, this time bans playing chess in Afghanistan because... She said she was really close to completing her degree, and she had hoped that would have helped her navigate her future, which many girls and women in her homeland are still dreaming of. Girls have been restricted from studying beyond class six under the new Taliban regime. The Taliban had once shown a sliver of hope before they overturned it. Yet again, leaving many women in despair.

Fighting all odds, an Afghan woman moved to Iran to pursue a degree in engineering. And in an unfortunate twist of events, she was deported from the country in July, even before she could complete her degree.

'I was so close': Afghan woman moved to Iran to pursue degree in engineering, deported before final submission

The B-2 stealth bombers showed how vital the fighter jet is during Operation Midnight Hammer strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. US Air Force’s top bomber officer says he is now super excited about the B-21 Raider entering the force, especially since a large number of them are being manufactured. With B-2 stealth bombers, the biggest problem that was highlighted despite their successful work, was how so less of them were built. The officer is now looking forward to having a large fleet of the B-21 Raider. The US Air Force currently has a fleet of 19 B-2 bombers. The B-21 Raider will replace it and more than 40 remaining B-1s. Last year, the Department of Defence released the first images of the B-21 Raider, which has a deep shelf-like extension which is most pronounced along its nose, unlike the beak-like nose of its predecessor, the B-2. Air Force Maj. Gen. Jason Armagost spoke about the B-21 during an online talk hosted by the Air &amp; Space Forces Association’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/spain-ditches-us-stealth-jet-in-defence-shake-up-with-europe-all-you-need-to-know-1754607983773">Spain ditches US stealth jet in defence shake-up with Europe - All you need to know</a><h2>Air Force wants 145 B-21 Raider bombers</h2>According to current plans, at least 100 B-21s will enter the Air Force. One pre-production Raider is currently in flight testing, and another one will also enter the test phase soon. Four other B-21s are in various stages of production. Senior US military officials do not think 100 B-21 Raiders are enough and are asking for a fleet of 145 bombers. Armagost said he is most looking forward to having a huge force of the Raiders. “Sixth-generation stealth brings with it, it brings its own set of pretty amazing capabilities, but what I’m most excited about is the ability to build a campaign force.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/b2-bombers-failed-only-1-out-of-3-iranian-nuclear-sites-hit-by-us-suffered-fordow-mostly-destroyed-natanz-and-isfahan-were-iran-israel-us-war-1752765012257">B2 bombers failed? Only 1 out of 3 Iranian nuclear sites hit by US suffered</a>&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-could-arm-israel-with-b-2s-bunker-busters-reports-1751546734315/embed<h2>B-21 Raider is like a stealthy flying gas can</h2>“If we get our numerical force build-out correct, which is always going to be a thing we have to be concerned about, we can build a campaign tempo. We can build diversity of munitions and options for attack," Armagost added. The B-21 is expected to have an extremely long unrefueled range because of its very large internal fuel capacity. It is like a stealthy flying gas can, TWZ reported. Its airframe is optimised for high-altitude flight and is equipped with advanced engines. However, there is uncertainty about the Air Force's plans for new stealthy tankers. “As the B-21 bomber enters service, which will modernise and increase our bomber fleet, we must also ensure that we have an adequate tanker fleet to support this platform and the important missions it will perform." The B-21 is smaller than the existing B-2 and so would carry less ordnance per sortie.

The B-21 Raider will soon replace the B-2 stealth bombers and more than 40 remaining B-1s in the United States Air Force. A top bomber officer says the fighter jets win simply because of how many of them are being produced. 

The B-2 stealth bombers showed how vital the fighter jet is during Operation Midnight Hammer strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. US Air Force’s top bomber officer says he is now super excited about the B-21 Raider entering the force, especially since a large number of them are being manufactured. With B-2 stealth bombers, the biggest problem that was highlighted despite their successful work, was how so less of them were built. The officer is now looking forward to having a large fleet of the B-21 Raider. The US Air Force currently has a fleet of 19 B-2 bombers. The B-21 Raider will replace it and more than 40 remaining B-1s. Last year, the Department of Defence released the first images of the B-21 Raider, which has a deep shelf-like extension which is most pronounced along its nose, unlike the beak-like nose of its predecessor, the B-2. Air Force Maj. Gen. Jason Armagost spoke about the B-21 during an online talk hosted by the Air & Space Forces Association’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies. Also Read: Spain ditches US stealth jet in defence shake-up with Europe - All you need to know Air Force wants 145 B-21 Raider bombers According to current plans, at least 100 B-21s will enter the Air Force. One pre-production Raider is currently in flight testing, and another one will also enter the test phase soon. Four other B-21s are in various stages of production. Senior US military officials do not think 100 B-21 Raiders are enough and are asking for a fleet of 145 bombers. Armagost said he is most looking forward to having a huge force of the Raiders. “Sixth-generation stealth brings with it, it brings its own set of pretty amazing capabilities, but what I’m most excited about is the ability to build a campaign force.” Also Read: B2 bombers failed? Only 1 out of 3 Iranian nuclear sites hit by US suffered https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-could-arm-israel-with-b-2s-bunker-busters-reports-1751546734315/embed B-21 Raider is like a stealthy flying gas can “If we get our numerical force build-out correct, which is always going to be a thing we have to be concerned about, we can build a campaign tempo. We can build diversity of munitions and options for attack," Armagost added. The B-21 is expected to have an extremely long unrefueled range because of its very large internal fuel capacity. It is like a stealthy flying gas can, TWZ reported. Its airframe is optimised for high-altitude flight and is equipped with advanced engines. However, there is uncertainty about the Air Force's plans for new stealthy tankers. “As the B-21 bomber enters service, which will modernise and increase our bomber fleet, we must also ensure that we have an adequate tanker fleet to support this platform and the important missions it will perform." The B-21 is smaller than the existing B-2 and so would carry less ordnance per sortie.

The B-21 Raider will soon replace the B-2 stealth bombers and more than 40 remaining B-1s in the United States Air Force. A top bomber officer says the fighter jets win simply because of how many of them are being produced.&nbsp;

B-21 Raider, a flying gas can, is a winner because of sheer number, top US bomber officer says

The White House announced on Thursday that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he may use the National Guard to police the streets of the capital, and a White House official said federal law enforcement would build its presence there this week. The move represents the latest step by Trump and his administration toward taking over running the city that serves as the seat of the US government.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;"President Trump has directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement to protect innocent citizens. Starting tonight, there will be no safe harbor for violent criminals in DC," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/another-country-backs-trump-s-nobel-peace-prize-dream-sends-official-letter-what-we-know-1754619412231">Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter – What we know</a>&nbsp;Multiple agencies are contributing to the effort, starting in the early hours of Friday morning. The operation will begin as a 7-day effort that may be extended, a separate White House official said.It will be led by the US Park Police and include officials from the Capitol Police, Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The National Guard was not listed by the official as taking part.

The United States announced on Thursday (August 8) that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight.

The White House announced on Thursday that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he may use the National Guard to police the streets of the capital, and a White House official said federal law enforcement would build its presence there this week. The move represents the latest step by Trump and his administration toward taking over running the city that serves as the seat of the US government. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed "President Trump has directed an increased presence of federal law enforcement to protect innocent citizens. Starting tonight, there will be no safe harbor for violent criminals in DC," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. Also read: Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter – What we know Multiple agencies are contributing to the effort, starting in the early hours of Friday morning. The operation will begin as a 7-day effort that may be extended, a separate White House official said. It will be led by the US Park Police and include officials from the Capitol Police, Drug Enforcement Administration and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The National Guard was not listed by the official as taking part.

The United States announced on Thursday (August 8) that a planned increase in federal law enforcement in Washington, DC, would focus on areas with heavy tourist traffic and other hot spots around the city beginning at midnight.

White House ups federal law enforcement at tourist hot spots in Washington, DC

India has put a hold on a $3.6 billion deal to procure Boeing jets from the United States after the imposition of 50 per cent tariffs, according to reports. The original deal included the purchase of six additional Boeing P-8I aircraft, used for maritime patrol, and was approved by the US State Department earlier in 2021 for $2.42 billion. But the price soared in the ensuing years due to disruptions in the supply chain, inflation, and the US tariffs.&nbsp;Financial Express reported, citing a report, that the decision to pause the Boeing deal was taken after the White House announced imposing additional tariffs on India, raising the earlier 25 per cent to 50 per cent.&nbsp;Reports citing defence sources highlighted that there has been a sharp spike in price due to the imposition of 25 per cent tariffs by Trump at the beginning of August. This resulted in parts and components related to the aircraft procurement being significantly more expensive for the US aircraft maker, which has been passed down to the buyers, including India.&nbsp;The reports suggested that the Ministry of Defence has decided to pause the acquisition and conduct a strategic reassessment of the deal with Boeing. This will include analysing factors like rising costs, geopolitical developments, and strategic autonomy before making a final decision.&nbsp;However, it is to be noted that there has been no official confirmation regarding the deal or its suspension from the Indian government.&nbsp;The developments come as Air India started sending its legacy Boeing 787-8 Dreamliners for retrofitting in the US. Sources familiar with the matter told news agency PTI that the first revamped jet was expected to join the fleet by the end of this year. Notably, there are a total of 33 Dreamliners with Air India, including 26 legacy Boeing 787-8s and seven Boeing 787-9s.&nbsp;Watch | Trump Rules Out Trade Talks With India Amid Tariff Dispute&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-rules-out-trade-talks-with-india-amid-tariff-dispute-pm-modi-calls-high-level-meet-1754623772233/embed&nbsp;

Reports suggest that after US President Donald Trump doubled the tariffs to 50 per cent on India, New Delhi has paused a $3.6 billion deal to procure Boeing jets from the US.

India has put a hold on a $3.6 billion deal to procure Boeing jets from the United States after the imposition of 50 per cent tariffs, according to reports. The original deal included the purchase of six additional Boeing P-8I aircraft, used for maritime patrol, and was approved by the US State Department earlier in 2021 for $2.42 billion. But the price soared in the ensuing years due to disruptions in the supply chain, inflation, and the US tariffs. Financial Express reported, citing a report, that the decision to pause the Boeing deal was taken after the White House announced imposing additional tariffs on India, raising the earlier 25 per cent to 50 per cent. Reports citing defence sources highlighted that there has been a sharp spike in price due to the imposition of 25 per cent tariffs by Trump at the beginning of August. This resulted in parts and components related to the aircraft procurement being significantly more expensive for the US aircraft maker, which has been passed down to the buyers, including India. The reports suggested that the Ministry of Defence has decided to pause the acquisition and conduct a strategic reassessment of the deal with Boeing. This will include analysing factors like rising costs, geopolitical developments, and strategic autonomy before making a final decision. However, it is to be noted that there has been no official confirmation regarding the deal or its suspension from the Indian government. The developments come as Air India started sending its legacy Boeing 787-8 Dreamliners for retrofitting in the US. Sources familiar with the matter told news agency PTI that the first revamped jet was expected to join the fleet by the end of this year. Notably, there are a total of 33 Dreamliners with Air India, including 26 legacy Boeing 787-8s and seven Boeing 787-9s. Watch | Trump Rules Out Trade Talks With India Amid Tariff Dispute https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-rules-out-trade-talks-with-india-amid-tariff-dispute-pm-modi-calls-high-level-meet-1754623772233/embed

Reports suggest that after US President Donald Trump doubled the tariffs to 50 per cent on India, New Delhi has paused a $3.6 billion deal to procure Boeing jets from the US.

Did India pause $3.6 billion Boeing jets deal amid Trump’s 50% tariff? Here’s what reports claim

Israel’s security cabinet has approved Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposal for the “defeat of Hamas” after an hours-long meeting. In a statement, the Prime Minister’s Office said on Friday (Aug 8) that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will prepare to take over Gaza City and provide humanitarian aid to starving civilians in the territory.&nbsp;“The Political-Security Cabinet approved the Prime Minister’s proposal for the defeat of Hamas. The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones,” Netanyahu’s office said on X.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">הקבינט המדיני-ביטחוני אישר את הצעת ראש הממשלה להכרעת החמאס. צה&quot;ל ייערך להשתלטות על העיר עזה תוך אספקת סיוע הומניטרי לאוכלוסייה האזרחית מחוץ לאזורי הלחימה.&mdash; ראש ממשלת ישראל (@IsraeliPM_heb) <a href="https://twitter.com/IsraeliPM_heb/status/1953645399891120210?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;The statement added that the majority of the cabinet members believed that the “alternative plan” presented to them would not achieve “the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages.”&nbsp;While the statement did not elaborate on the alternative plan presented to the security cabinet, it likely refers to the proposal presented by IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, who has opposed the Israeli prime minister’s plans over humanitarian concerns and risking the lives of the hostages.&nbsp;Despite his plans for taking over the territory, Netanyahu said that his country has no intention of annexing Gaza. “We want Gaza to be taken over by a governing body. No plans to annexe Gaza.” He added that rather than occupation, Israel aims to establish a “defence parameter around Gaza” to ensure security without territorial expansion.&nbsp;The majority of cabinet members also backed five principles for ending the war with Hamas: 1. Disarming Hamas of its weapons. 2. Return of all hostages - both the living and the deceased. 3. Demilitarisation of the Gaza Strip. 4. Israeli security control over the Gaza Strip. 5. Establishment of an alternative civilian administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority.&nbsp;Meanwhile, protests have erupted across the country as Israelis accuse the government of continuing the war for political gains. However, Netanyahu has pushed for a complete takeover of Gaza despite international and domestic pressure.&nbsp;&nbsp;Watch | Israel-Gaza War: Netanyahu Rules Out Annexing Gaza, Blames Hamas for Humanitarian Crisis&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-gaza-war-netanyahu-rules-out-annexing-gaza-blames-hamas-for-humanitarian-crisis-1754578756109/embed

In a statement, the Prime Minister’s Office said on Friday (Aug 8) that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will prepare to take over Gaza City and provide humanitarian aid to starving civilians in the territory.

Israel’s security cabinet has approved Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposal for the “defeat of Hamas” after an hours-long meeting. In a statement, the Prime Minister’s Office said on Friday (Aug 8) that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will prepare to take over Gaza City and provide humanitarian aid to starving civilians in the territory. “The Political-Security Cabinet approved the Prime Minister’s proposal for the defeat of Hamas. The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones,” Netanyahu’s office said on X.

In a statement, the Prime Minister’s Office said on Friday (Aug 8) that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will prepare to take over Gaza City and provide humanitarian aid to starving civilians in the territory.

Netanyahu’s proposal to take over Gaza City gets final cabinet approval: What’s next in Israel-Hamas war?

A Thai woman thought she was battling weight issues because of her unhealthy eating habits. However, it turned out to be a 8 kg tumour. Ratchanaporn was told that she had a massive ovarian cyst that had been growing for years. She and her family assumed that she was simply overweight because of her bad eating habits, totally oblivious that it was a much bigger problem. The woman finally landed at a hospital due to a sudden health scare, and that's when it was revealed that she had been carrying a large cyst for years. She was operated upon, and the surgery was a success. The tumour was so huge that after it was removed, her weight drastically reduced by 11 kgs. One day, Ratchanaporn started having trouble breathing and was taken to the Satun Hospital in southern Thailand. Doctors ran tests and discovered that a giant 30cm-wide cyst was pressing on her internal organs. The sheer size of the tumour meant an operation would be complicated. It took the doctors six hours to remove the massive tumour.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/man-dies-after-consuming-nothing-but-beer-for-a-month-following-divorce-1753425374104">Thai man dies after consuming only beer without a morsel of food for a month</a><h2>Thai woman looked like she was ‘pregnant with twins’</h2>The operation on July 31 was a success, and the cyst was removed without causing any complications. The 31-year-old's mother told local media, "My baby was experiencing tightness, difficulty breathing, and bulging eyes. Her stomach looked like she was pregnant with twins." She stated that Ratchanaporn looked extremely big, but they "thought it was because she ate too much. We never imagined it was something this serious." Her body weight came down from 86 kg to 75 kg after the tumour was removed.<h2>Mexican woman discovers 34kg tumour in ovary</h2>In a similar incident, a 24-year-old woman in Mexico was shocked when the doctors told her that she had a humongous 34kg tumour growing in her ovary. The woman was on a diet, but despite that, her weight kept increasing. Scans found an ovarian cyst so large that she could not walk, breathe or eat. It was putting pressure on her other organs, and she was at risk of heart failure. Dr. Erik Hanson Viana at Mexico's General Hospital performed the surgery and removed the cyst whole. It is believed to be the largest tumour ever removed. The doctor later said that the cyst measured half a metre in diameter and the circumference was 157 cm. "'This is the biggest cyst I have operated on, it was so large that it took up 95% of the patient's abdomen," Dr Hanson said. &nbsp;

A Thai woman had been lugging around a 7.5 kg tumour in her ovary for a long time. She appeared overweight to others, and everyone blamed it on her eating too much. Her mother said that one day she had difficulty breathing, and that is when they took her to the hospital.

A Thai woman thought she was battling weight issues because of her unhealthy eating habits. However, it turned out to be a 8 kg tumour. Ratchanaporn was told that she had a massive ovarian cyst that had been growing for years. She and her family assumed that she was simply overweight because of her bad eating habits, totally oblivious that it was a much bigger problem. The woman finally landed at a hospital due to a sudden health scare, and that's when it was revealed that she had been carrying a large cyst for years. She was operated upon, and the surgery was a success. The tumour was so huge that after it was removed, her weight drastically reduced by 11 kgs. One day, Ratchanaporn started having trouble breathing and was taken to the Satun Hospital in southern Thailand. Doctors ran tests and discovered that a giant 30cm-wide cyst was pressing on her internal organs. The sheer size of the tumour meant an operation would be complicated. It took the doctors six hours to remove the massive tumour. Also Read: Thai man dies after consuming only beer without a morsel of food for a month Thai woman looked like she was ‘pregnant with twins’ The operation on July 31 was a success, and the cyst was removed without causing any complications. The 31-year-old's mother told local media, "My baby was experiencing tightness, difficulty breathing, and bulging eyes. Her stomach looked like she was pregnant with twins." She stated that Ratchanaporn looked extremely big, but they "thought it was because she ate too much. We never imagined it was something this serious." Her body weight came down from 86 kg to 75 kg after the tumour was removed. Mexican woman discovers 34kg tumour in ovary In a similar incident, a 24-year-old woman in Mexico was shocked when the doctors told her that she had a humongous 34kg tumour growing in her ovary. The woman was on a diet, but despite that, her weight kept increasing. Scans found an ovarian cyst so large that she could not walk, breathe or eat. It was putting pressure on her other organs, and she was at risk of heart failure. Dr. Erik Hanson Viana at Mexico's General Hospital performed the surgery and removed the cyst whole. It is believed to be the largest tumour ever removed. The doctor later said that the cyst measured half a metre in diameter and the circumference was 157 cm. "'This is the biggest cyst I have operated on, it was so large that it took up 95% of the patient's abdomen," Dr Hanson said.

A Thai woman had been lugging around a 7.5 kg tumour in her ovary for a long time. She appeared overweight to others, and everyone blamed it on her eating too much. Her mother said that one day she had difficulty breathing, and that is when they took her to the hospital.

8 kg ovarian tumour removed from the body of woman who thought she was just overweight

After Pakistan and Israel, another country has backed US President Donald Trump in his bid to receive a Nobel Peace Prize. On Thursday (Aug 8), Cambodia became the third nation to officially nominate Trump for his commitment to resolving conflicts and avoiding “catastrophic” wars through his “visionary and innovative diplomacy.” This comes after the US president brokered a ceasefire between the Southeast Asian nation and its neighbour Thailand, after five days of military escalation. &nbsp;In a letter dated August 7 sent to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet wrote, “President Trump’s extraordinary statesmanship – marked by his commitment to resolving conflicts and preventing catastrophic wars through visionary and innovative diplomacy – was most recently demonstrated by his decisive role in brokering an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand.”&nbsp;“This timely intervention, which averted a potentially devastating conflict, was vital in preventing great loss of lives and paved the pay towards the restoration of peace,” it added.&nbsp;This comes after Deputy Prime Minister of Cambodia Sun Chanthol said last week that the country would nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for helping in reaching a truce with Thailand. “He should get the Nobel, not only for his work on Cambodia, but also elsewhere,” he said.&nbsp;Earlier on July 31, the White House backed the US president for his Nobel Peace Prize demand, saying he has resolved several conflicts around the world. Trump has claimed the credit for brokering a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia.&nbsp;Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “This means President Trump has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It is well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.”&nbsp;Pakistan was the first nation to nominate Trump for the top peace prize, citing his involvement in the ceasefire deal with India. Meanwhile, India has consistently rejected any foreign intervention in reaching a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan.&nbsp;“No leader in the world told India to stop its operation,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said last month. He added that he spoke with US Vice President JD Vance, “The Vice President of America told me on the phone that Pakistan is going to launch a big attack. My answer was that if Pakistan has this intention, it will cost them a lot. If Pakistan attacks, we will respond by launching a big attack.”&nbsp;Watch | India-Pakistan ceasefire and Trump's claims create a storm in Indian parliament&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-pakistan-ceasefire-and-trump-s-claims-create-a-storm-in-indian-parliament-1753890244949/embed

Another nation has joined Pakistan and Israel to officially back US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize nomination.

After Pakistan and Israel, another country has backed US President Donald Trump in his bid to receive a Nobel Peace Prize. On Thursday (Aug 8), Cambodia became the third nation to officially nominate Trump for his commitment to resolving conflicts and avoiding “catastrophic” wars through his “visionary and innovative diplomacy.” This comes after the US president brokered a ceasefire between the Southeast Asian nation and its neighbour Thailand, after five days of military escalation. In a letter dated August 7 sent to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet wrote, “President Trump’s extraordinary statesmanship – marked by his commitment to resolving conflicts and preventing catastrophic wars through visionary and innovative diplomacy – was most recently demonstrated by his decisive role in brokering an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand.” “This timely intervention, which averted a potentially devastating conflict, was vital in preventing great loss of lives and paved the pay towards the restoration of peace,” it added. This comes after Deputy Prime Minister of Cambodia Sun Chanthol said last week that the country would nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for helping in reaching a truce with Thailand. “He should get the Nobel, not only for his work on Cambodia, but also elsewhere,” he said. Earlier on July 31, the White House backed the US president for his Nobel Peace Prize demand, saying he has resolved several conflicts around the world. Trump has claimed the credit for brokering a ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo, and Egypt and Ethiopia. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “This means President Trump has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. It is well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.” Pakistan was the first nation to nominate Trump for the top peace prize, citing his involvement in the ceasefire deal with India. Meanwhile, India has consistently rejected any foreign intervention in reaching a ceasefire understanding with Pakistan. “No leader in the world told India to stop its operation,” Prime Minister Narendra Modi said last month. He added that he spoke with US Vice President JD Vance, “The Vice President of America told me on the phone that Pakistan is going to launch a big attack. My answer was that if Pakistan has this intention, it will cost them a lot. If Pakistan attacks, we will respond by launching a big attack.” Watch | India-Pakistan ceasefire and Trump's claims create a storm in Indian parliament https://www.wionews.com/videos/india-pakistan-ceasefire-and-trump-s-claims-create-a-storm-in-indian-parliament-1753890244949/embed

Another nation has joined Pakistan and Israel to officially back US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize nomination.

Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter – What we know

Days after imposing a total of 50 per cent tariff on India, United States President Donald Trump has said that there is no possibility of trade negotiations with New Delhi unless the issue of tariffs is resolved. Speaking to reporters at the White House on Thursday (Aug 7), Trump said that he does not expect increased trade negotiations with India after imposing the tariff. He shrugged his shoulders at the reporter's question and said that he wants to first resolve the issues. While Trump did not clearly mention what issues he is referring to, his statement seems to hint at India's oil purchase from Russia, due to which the US has imposed an additional 25 per cent levy on the country. Meanwhile, the US has said that addressing ‘real concerns’ and having a ‘frank and full dialogue’ on trade imbalances and other things is Trump's way of looking at ties with partner countries such as India.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Responding to ANI&#39;s question, &#39;Just to follow up India&#39;s tariff, do you expect increased trade negotiations since you have announced the 50% tariffs?&#39;, US President Donald Trump says, &quot;No, not until we get it resolved.&quot; (Source: US Network Pool via Reuters) <a href="https://t.co/exAQCiKSJd">pic.twitter.com/exAQCiKSJd</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ANI/status/1953556227692413017?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2><a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-president-donald-trump-s-tariff-war-hits-every-quad-member-1754588691897/embed</a></h2><h2>‘India would not compromise’: PM Modi</h2>Notably, Trump's remark came hours after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that he won't compromise the interests of farmers, dairy farmers and fishermen of his country, even if he has to pay a price for it. Earlier, reports indicated that India is not agreeing to any terms by the US in the trade deal that would affect its farmers and dairy sector. Speaking at the MS Swaminathan Centenary International Conference, Prime Minister Modi said, "For us, the interest of our farmers is our top priority. India will never compromise on the interests of farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers. I know personally, I will have to pay a heavy price for it, but I am ready for it. Today, India is ready for the country's farmers, fishermen and dairy farmers..."&nbsp;Read More |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-will-advice-pm-modi-on-how-to-deal-with-trump-but-israel-s-benjamin-netanyahu-reacts-to-us-tariffs-on-india-1754615947353"> 'Will advice PM Modi on how to deal with Trump but...': Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu reacts to US tariffs on India</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Ready to pay heavy price: Indian Prime Minister <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NarendraModi?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NarendraModi</a> says won&#39;t compromise interests of farmers, fishermen in firm stand amid Trump tariff threats Source: ANI <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DonaldTrump?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DonaldTrump</a> <a href="https://t.co/zhv1dwdEZx">pic.twitter.com/zhv1dwdEZx</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1953319329291739598?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>India-US trade talks and tariff war&nbsp;</h2>On August 1, Trump issued an executive order late on Thursday (July 31) to increase and modify tariffs on its trading partners, citing an ongoing national emergency. This was in continuation of his ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs that he announced on April 2. He had paused the April 2 tariffs, giving countries a window of 90 days to sign a trade deal with America. The new tariff structure ranged from 10 per cent to 41 per cent, depending on the country and product type. India faced 25 per cent tariff in the announcement made on that day as it was unable to strike a trade deal with the US. He then announced an additional tariff of 25 per cent on India for buying Russian oil and warned about doing the same with other nations. While the 25 per cent tariff announced on Aug 1 has come into effect today, the additional sanction will come into place 21 days from now.

Donald Trump is not looking forward to any trade negotiations with India, even after his administration has imposed a whopping 50 per cent tariff on the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led country. He says that he first wants to get the ‘issues’ solved. 

Days after imposing a total of 50 per cent tariff on India, United States President Donald Trump has said that there is no possibility of trade negotiations with New Delhi unless the issue of tariffs is resolved. Speaking to reporters at the White House on Thursday (Aug 7), Trump said that he does not expect increased trade negotiations with India after imposing the tariff. He shrugged his shoulders at the reporter's question and said that he wants to first resolve the issues. While Trump did not clearly mention what issues he is referring to, his statement seems to hint at India's oil purchase from Russia, due to which the US has imposed an additional 25 per cent levy on the country. Meanwhile, the US has said that addressing ‘real concerns’ and having a ‘frank and full dialogue’ on trade imbalances and other things is Trump's way of looking at ties with partner countries such as India.

Donald Trump is not looking forward to any trade negotiations with India, even after his administration has imposed a whopping 50 per cent tariff on the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led country. He says that he first wants to get the ‘issues’ solved.&nbsp;

Trump rules out trade talks after PM Modi's 'India would not compromise' statement on tariffs: What this means?

Spain has decided to replace its ageing fighter jets with European aircraft instead of buying US-made F-35s, in a move that reflects worsening defence ties with Washington. The Spanish defence ministry told the Financial Times that it plans to rely on the existing Eurofighter and the Future Combat Air System (FCAS), a joint European programme involving France, Germany, and Spain. “The Spanish option consists of the current Eurofighter and the FCAS in the future,” the ministry said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-dream-prison-in-trouble-judge-halts-alligator-alcatraz-construction-to-protect-florida-panthers-and-endangered-bats-1754602049436">Trump's dream prison in trouble? Judge halts ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ construction to protect Florida panthers and endangered bats</a><h2>Trump’s demands on spending add to the tensions</h2>The shift comes months after Donald Trump criticised Spain for refusing to raise its military spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, a demand he made to NATO allies. The US president had called Spain’s stance “terrible”, adding pressure on an already strained relationship. Spain’s decision now sets it apart from other NATO countries, many of which rely heavily on American arms.<h2>Critics in Spain demand answers</h2>The opposition People’s Party has asked Spain’s defence minister, Margarita Robles, to appear before Congress and explain the decision. “We are witnessing yet another example of the Sánchez government’s core doctrine, which prioritises sectarianism and confrontation with the United States over the general interest and even the country’s security,” said senior PP lawmaker Cuca Gamarra. The news was first reported by El País.<h2>Why Spain passed on the F-35</h2>The F-35, developed by Lockheed Martin, is the world’s most advanced long-range stealth jet and serves as the mainstay of several Western air forces. It’s used by the US and 19 allied countries, including non-NATO members like Japan. Spain was previously rumoured to be considering the F-35 for its future fleet, as it prepares to retire AV-8B Harriers and F-18s in the 2030s. However, the government recently opted to buy 25 additional Eurofighters, expanding its current fleet to 115. These jets, though advanced, are classified as 4.5th generation and lack the full capabilities of the F-35.The Eurofighters are built by Airbus, BAE Systems, and Leonardo, and are assembled at a plant near Madrid. Deliveries are expected between 2026 and 2030.<h2>What is FCAS and why is it a gamble?</h2>Spain is also part of the FCAS programme, which aims to deliver a next-generation combat system by 2040. This project includes a more powerful jet, drone integration, and cutting-edge software. But the programme has been slowed by disputes among its main partners, Airbus, Dassault Aviation, and Indra, raising concerns&nbsp;about&nbsp;delays.

The shift comes months after Donald Trump criticised Spain for refusing to raise its military spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, a demand he made to NATO allies.

Spain has decided to replace its ageing fighter jets with European aircraft instead of buying US-made F-35s, in a move that reflects worsening defence ties with Washington. The Spanish defence ministry told the Financial Times that it plans to rely on the existing Eurofighter and the Future Combat Air System (FCAS), a joint European programme involving France, Germany, and Spain. “The Spanish option consists of the current Eurofighter and the FCAS in the future,” the ministry said. Also read: Trump's dream prison in trouble? Judge halts ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ construction to protect Florida panthers and endangered bats Trump’s demands on spending add to the tensions The shift comes months after Donald Trump criticised Spain for refusing to raise its military spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, a demand he made to NATO allies. The US president had called Spain’s stance “terrible”, adding pressure on an already strained relationship. Spain’s decision now sets it apart from other NATO countries, many of which rely heavily on American arms. Critics in Spain demand answers The opposition People’s Party has asked Spain’s defence minister, Margarita Robles, to appear before Congress and explain the decision. “We are witnessing yet another example of the Sánchez government’s core doctrine, which prioritises sectarianism and confrontation with the United States over the general interest and even the country’s security,” said senior PP lawmaker Cuca Gamarra. The news was first reported by El País. Why Spain passed on the F-35 The F-35, developed by Lockheed Martin, is the world’s most advanced long-range stealth jet and serves as the mainstay of several Western air forces. It’s used by the US and 19 allied countries, including non-NATO members like Japan. Spain was previously rumoured to be considering the F-35 for its future fleet, as it prepares to retire AV-8B Harriers and F-18s in the 2030s. However, the government recently opted to buy 25 additional Eurofighters, expanding its current fleet to 115. These jets, though advanced, are classified as 4.5th generation and lack the full capabilities of the F-35. The Eurofighters are built by Airbus, BAE Systems, and Leonardo, and are assembled at a plant near Madrid. Deliveries are expected between 2026 and 2030. What is FCAS and why is it a gamble? Spain is also part of the FCAS programme, which aims to deliver a next-generation combat system by 2040. This project includes a more powerful jet, drone integration, and cutting-edge software. But the programme has been slowed by disputes among its main partners, Airbus, Dassault Aviation, and Indra, raising concerns about delays.

The shift comes months after Donald Trump criticised Spain for refusing to raise its military spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, a demand he made to NATO allies.

Spain ditches US stealth jet in defence shake-up with Europe - All you need to know

A federal judge has ordered a temporary halt to construction work at a controversial detention centre in Florida’s Everglades, nicknamed “Alligator Alcatraz”, over concerns it could be damaging the fragile ecosystem. US District Judge Kathleen Williams ruled on Thursday that all new development at the site must stop for at least 14 days while court hearings continue. She said the plaintiffs, who include several environmental groups, had shown enough evidence of “ongoing environmental harms” to justify the pause.“I think that evidence is sufficient to support the plaintiffs’ claims,” said Judge Williams, an Obama-era appointee. She pointed out how many US presidents had supported efforts to keep the Everglades “pristine”.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-president-pushes-to-leave-out-illegal-undocumented-immigrants-from-census-1754588689356">Can Trump order a new census? US president pushes to leave out ‘illegal' undocumented immigrants</a><h2>What work is now on hold?</h2>The judge’s order halts any further paving, lighting installation, filling, fencing or excavation at the site, which is near the Big Cypress National Preserve, a protected area that is home to endangered animals like the Florida panther and Florida bonneted bat. She described the plaintiffs’ request for a restraining order as “pretty reasonable” and noted the importance of avoiding further damage while legal arguments play out.<h2>What the environmental experts are saying</h2>Experts told the court on Thursday that the newly paved areas were already affecting the landscape. Using aerial photos and videos, they warned of increased stormwater runoff and pollution caused by the fresh pavement, which they said does not allow water to soak in. Wetlands ecologist Christopher McVoy explained that water in the flat Everglades can rise up to two feet in the rainy season, carrying oil and debris from the roads into the sensitive ecosystem.“It’s like pouring water on glass,” McVoy said, referring to the non-porous pavement. “It doesn’t go in; it runs off. And wherever it runs into is potentially a concern,” he added. Geologist Dillon Reio estimated that more than 20 acres of pavement had been added and warned that this would lead to chemicals contaminating the land and water, harming both aquatic and land-based species.<h2>What happens next in court?</h2>This was the second day of hearings about the environmental impact of the detention facility. The state has yet to present its witnesses, with the next court session set for Tuesday. Although Judge Williams offered to continue hearings into Thursday afternoon to avoid a restraining order, state lawyers had already released their witnesses and were not prepared to proceed. The case has drawn significant attention due to the sensitive location of the site within America’s largest wetlands and its proximity to endangered wildlife habitats.

A judge ordered a 14-day halt to construction at Florida’s “Alligator Alcatraz” detention center, citing evidence of environmental harm to the Everglades raised by environmental groups during ongoing court hearings.

A federal judge has ordered a temporary halt to construction work at a controversial detention centre in Florida’s Everglades, nicknamed “Alligator Alcatraz”, over concerns it could be damaging the fragile ecosystem. US District Judge Kathleen Williams ruled on Thursday that all new development at the site must stop for at least 14 days while court hearings continue. She said the plaintiffs, who include several environmental groups, had shown enough evidence of “ongoing environmental harms” to justify the pause. “I think that evidence is sufficient to support the plaintiffs’ claims,” said Judge Williams, an Obama-era appointee. She pointed out how many US presidents had supported efforts to keep the Everglades “pristine”. Also read: Can Trump order a new census? US president pushes to leave out ‘illegal' undocumented immigrants What work is now on hold? The judge’s order halts any further paving, lighting installation, filling, fencing or excavation at the site, which is near the Big Cypress National Preserve, a protected area that is home to endangered animals like the Florida panther and Florida bonneted bat. She described the plaintiffs’ request for a restraining order as “pretty reasonable” and noted the importance of avoiding further damage while legal arguments play out. What the environmental experts are saying Experts told the court on Thursday that the newly paved areas were already affecting the landscape. Using aerial photos and videos, they warned of increased stormwater runoff and pollution caused by the fresh pavement, which they said does not allow water to soak in. Wetlands ecologist Christopher McVoy explained that water in the flat Everglades can rise up to two feet in the rainy season, carrying oil and debris from the roads into the sensitive ecosystem. “It’s like pouring water on glass,” McVoy said, referring to the non-porous pavement. “It doesn’t go in; it runs off. And wherever it runs into is potentially a concern,” he added. Geologist Dillon Reio estimated that more than 20 acres of pavement had been added and warned that this would lead to chemicals contaminating the land and water, harming both aquatic and land-based species. What happens next in court? This was the second day of hearings about the environmental impact of the detention facility. The state has yet to present its witnesses, with the next court session set for Tuesday. Although Judge Williams offered to continue hearings into Thursday afternoon to avoid a restraining order, state lawyers had already released their witnesses and were not prepared to proceed. The case has drawn significant attention due to the sensitive location of the site within America’s largest wetlands and its proximity to endangered wildlife habitats.

A judge ordered a 14-day halt to construction at Florida’s “Alligator Alcatraz” detention center, citing evidence of environmental harm to the Everglades raised by environmental groups during ongoing court hearings.

Trump's dream prison in trouble? Judge halts ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ construction to protect Florida panthers and endangered bats

A Chicago man arrested for the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in the US capital Washington, could potentially face the death penalty if convicted of murder and hate crime charges, officials said Thursday.&nbsp;US Attorney General Pam Bondi will ultimately decide whether to seek the death penalty for Elias Rodriguez, the suspect in the May 21 attack, federal prosecutor Jeanine Pirro told reporters.&nbsp;Rodriguez, 31, was arrested immediately after the shooting of Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and his fiancee, Sarah Milgrim, 26, outside the Capital Jewish Museum.&nbsp;Pirro said that in addition to two counts of first-degree murder, a grand jury has charged Rodriguez with hate crimes “because of his bias against the people of Israel.” "We have a problem with anti-Semitism in this country," Pirro said. “It's a problem and we're not going to tolerate it.”&nbsp;Rodriguez allegedly shouted "Free Palestine" as he was taken away by police after the shooting and told officers “I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza.”&nbsp;FBI agent Reid Davis said Rodriguez is believed to have acted alone.&nbsp;"Based on his writings and communications, we believe he was a lone wolf actor motivated by anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian ideology with the goal of conducting a mass shooting to call attention to his political agenda," Davis said.&nbsp;Lischinsky, an Israeli citizen, was a researcher at the Israeli embassy, while Milgrim, an American, worked for its public diplomacy department. The couple were engaged to be married.

A Chicago man arrested for the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in the US capital Washington, could potentially face the death penalty if convicted of murder and hate crime charges, officials said Thursday.

A Chicago man arrested for the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staffers in the US capital Washington, could potentially face the death penalty if convicted of murder and hate crime charges, officials said Thursday. US Attorney General Pam Bondi will ultimately decide whether to seek the death penalty for Elias Rodriguez, the suspect in the May 21 attack, federal prosecutor Jeanine Pirro told reporters. Rodriguez, 31, was arrested immediately after the shooting of Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and his fiancee, Sarah Milgrim, 26, outside the Capital Jewish Museum. Pirro said that in addition to two counts of first-degree murder, a grand jury has charged Rodriguez with hate crimes “because of his bias against the people of Israel.” "We have a problem with anti-Semitism in this country," Pirro said. “It's a problem and we're not going to tolerate it.” Rodriguez allegedly shouted "Free Palestine" as he was taken away by police after the shooting and told officers “I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza.” FBI agent Reid Davis said Rodriguez is believed to have acted alone. "Based on his writings and communications, we believe he was a lone wolf actor motivated by anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian ideology with the goal of conducting a mass shooting to call attention to his political agenda," Davis said. Lischinsky, an Israeli citizen, was a researcher at the Israeli embassy, while Milgrim, an American, worked for its public diplomacy department. The couple were engaged to be married.

US Attorney General Pam Bondi will ultimately decide whether to seek the death penalty for Elias Rodriguez.

Suspect in killing of Israeli embassy staffers could face death penalty

A planned summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin may not go ahead after the Russian president refused to meet Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, a potential condition for the US-Russia talks.<h2>Mixed signals from both sides as summit talks stall</h2>On Thursday, conflicting statements from Washington and Moscow suggested deep confusion over the planned summit. While the Kremlin claimed talks were progressing for a bilateral Trump-Putin meeting next week, Putin dismissed the idea of a meeting with Zelensky. “I have nothing against it in general,” Putin said, “but certain conditions must be created for this… we are still far from creating such conditions.”Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-war-must-end-ukraine-s-zelensky-calls-for-lasting-peace-after-call-with-trump-1754505061359">'War must end': Ukraine’s Zelensky calls for ‘lasting peace’ after call with Trump</a><h2>White House wants Putin to meet Zelensky first</h2>Following a Kremlin meeting with Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, Washington indicated that Trump would only sit down with Putin if the Russian president agreed to meet Zelensky, something Putin has long resisted. A White House official told The New York Post that Trump’s condition for talks was a meeting with Zelensky. But Moscow rejected the idea, saying the three-way summit had only been “mentioned by the American side” and wasn’t up for discussion. “We propose focusing on preparations for a bilateral meeting with Trump in the first place,” said Putin aide Yuri Ushakov.<h2>Could the UAE host the Trump-Putin summit?</h2>While no venue has been finalised, Putin hinted that the United Arab Emirates, where he met Mohamed bin Zayed this week, could host the summit. “We have many friends… one of them is the president of the UAE,” he said.<h2>Ukraine and Europe alarmed by backdoor diplomacy</h2>The idea of Trump and Putin deciding Ukraine’s future without Kyiv or European input has rattled officials in Ukraine and EU capitals. Zelensky stressed the need for leaders to directly engage on key decisions. “We in Ukraine have repeatedly said that the search for real solutions can become truly effective only at the level of leaders,” he posted on Telegram.Later, he said he spoke to Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz and France’s President Emmanuel Macron, coordinating a joint European position. “We both understand the need for a common European vision of key European security issues,” Zelensky said.<h2>Putin still cold on meeting Zelensky directly</h2>Despite repeated calls from Kyiv, Putin has shown no interest in sitting down with Zelensky. He insists lower-level negotiations must continue, but progress has stalled, with Moscow sending only junior officials to talks in Turkey.<h2>Trump signals frustration with Moscow</h2>In recent weeks, Trump has criticised Russia more openly, calling its strikes on Ukrainian civilians “disgusting.” He also threatened sanctions if a deal wasn’t reached by Friday. While new tariffs were imposed on India over its purchase of Russian oil, Trump seemed pleased with Witkoff’s visit. Ushakov described the discussions as “businesslike” and hinted at a future of closer ties between the US and Russia. “Russian-US relations could be based on a completely different, mutually advantageous scenario,” Ushakov said.<h2>Will the Trump-Putin summit still happen?</h2>Trump told reporters the summit could happen “very soon.” However, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was more cautious: “Obviously, a lot has to happen before that can occur.” If the meeting does go ahead, it would be the first US-Russia leaders’ summit since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva back in 2021.

A planned Trump-Putin summit may be called off after Putin refused to meet Ukraine’s Zelensky. Putin dismissed the idea of a meeting with Zelensky. He said, “I have nothing against it in general, but certain conditions must be created for this… we are still far from creating such conditions.”

A planned summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin may not go ahead after the Russian president refused to meet Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, a potential condition for the US-Russia talks. Mixed signals from both sides as summit talks stall On Thursday, conflicting statements from Washington and Moscow suggested deep confusion over the planned summit. While the Kremlin claimed talks were progressing for a bilateral Trump-Putin meeting next week, Putin dismissed the idea of a meeting with Zelensky. “I have nothing against it in general,” Putin said, “but certain conditions must be created for this… we are still far from creating such conditions.” Also read: 'War must end': Ukraine’s Zelensky calls for ‘lasting peace’ after call with Trump White House wants Putin to meet Zelensky first Following a Kremlin meeting with Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, Washington indicated that Trump would only sit down with Putin if the Russian president agreed to meet Zelensky, something Putin has long resisted. A White House official told The New York Post that Trump’s condition for talks was a meeting with Zelensky. But Moscow rejected the idea, saying the three-way summit had only been “mentioned by the American side” and wasn’t up for discussion. “We propose focusing on preparations for a bilateral meeting with Trump in the first place,” said Putin aide Yuri Ushakov. Could the UAE host the Trump-Putin summit? While no venue has been finalised, Putin hinted that the United Arab Emirates, where he met Mohamed bin Zayed this week, could host the summit. “We have many friends… one of them is the president of the UAE,” he said. Ukraine and Europe alarmed by backdoor diplomacy The idea of Trump and Putin deciding Ukraine’s future without Kyiv or European input has rattled officials in Ukraine and EU capitals. Zelensky stressed the need for leaders to directly engage on key decisions. “We in Ukraine have repeatedly said that the search for real solutions can become truly effective only at the level of leaders,” he posted on Telegram. Later, he said he spoke to Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz and France’s President Emmanuel Macron, coordinating a joint European position. “We both understand the need for a common European vision of key European security issues,” Zelensky said. Putin still cold on meeting Zelensky directly Despite repeated calls from Kyiv, Putin has shown no interest in sitting down with Zelensky. He insists lower-level negotiations must continue, but progress has stalled, with Moscow sending only junior officials to talks in Turkey. Trump signals frustration with Moscow In recent weeks, Trump has criticised Russia more openly, calling its strikes on Ukrainian civilians “disgusting.” He also threatened sanctions if a deal wasn’t reached by Friday. While new tariffs were imposed on India over its purchase of Russian oil, Trump seemed pleased with Witkoff’s visit. Ushakov described the discussions as “businesslike” and hinted at a future of closer ties between the US and Russia. “Russian-US relations could be based on a completely different, mutually advantageous scenario,” Ushakov said. Will the Trump-Putin summit still happen? Trump told reporters the summit could happen “very soon.” However, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was more cautious: “Obviously, a lot has to happen before that can occur.” If the meeting does go ahead, it would be the first US-Russia leaders’ summit since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva back in 2021.

A planned Trump-Putin summit may be called off after Putin refused to meet Ukraine’s Zelensky. Putin dismissed the idea of a meeting with Zelensky. He said, “I have nothing against it in general, but certain conditions must be created for this… we are still far from creating such conditions.”

Trump-Putin meet in jeopardy? Russia refuses US President's one condition for Ukraine peace talks - What does it mean?

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

US authorities revoke visa of Mexican mayor of bordering state

Did Trump tariff on India lead Putin to direct talks for ending Ukraine war?

Trump WANTS Nobel Peace Prize: Four US presidents and a VP already received it

Trump strikes another peace deal, announces Armenia, Azerbaijan to sign treaty

Scary images show devastating wildfires across the world

Drug dealer’s parrot helps British cops uncover gang’s illegal activities

Pahalgam attack: 'Involved directly' in ending India, Pak war, reiterates Rubio

AgustaWestland case: Court rejects Christian Michel's plea for release

World leaders reject Netanyahu's Gaza take-over plan: All reactions here

Not the first time: When India was punished, isolated by US and still survived

Thousands of live turtles in suitcase: Indian arrested at Kuala Lumpur airport

Australian mushroom murder: Served poisoned chicken korma to husband

US vs Russia: Who rules under the sea? Submarine fleets firepower compared

Those touting India, Russia, China alliance, HOLD YOUR HORSES and read this. It's not...

'I was so close': Afghan woman moved to Iran to pursue engineering, deported

B-21 Raider, a flying gas can, wins in the numbers game, top bomber officer says

White House ups federal law enforcement at tourist hot spots in Washington, DC

Did India pause $3.6 billion Boeing jets deal amid Trump’s 50% tariff?

Netanyahu’s proposal to take over Gaza City gets final cabinet approval

8 kg ovarian tumour found in woman who thought she was just overweight

Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter

Trump rules out trade talks after PM's 'India would not compromise' remark

Spain ditches US stealth jet in defence shake-up with Europe

Judge halts ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ construction to protect Florida panthers, bats

Suspect in killing of Israeli embassy staffers could face death penalty

Putin refuses Trump’s one condition for Ukraine peace talks - What does it mean?

world news

US authorities revoke visa of Mexican mayor of bordering state

Did Trump tariff on India lead Putin to direct talks for ending Ukraine war?

Trump WANTS Nobel Peace Prize: Four US presidents and a VP already received it

Trump strikes another peace deal, announces Armenia, Azerbaijan to sign treaty

Scary images show devastating wildfires across the world

Drug dealer’s parrot helps British cops uncover gang’s illegal activities

Pahalgam attack: 'Involved directly' in ending India, Pak war, reiterates Rubio

AgustaWestland case: Court rejects Christian Michel's plea for release

World leaders reject Netanyahu's Gaza take-over plan: All reactions here

Not the first time: When India was punished, isolated by US and still survived

Thousands of live turtles in suitcase: Indian arrested at Kuala Lumpur airport

Australian mushroom murder: Served poisoned chicken korma to husband

US vs Russia: Who rules under the sea? Submarine fleets firepower compared

Those touting India, Russia, China alliance, HOLD YOUR HORSES and read this. It's not...

'I was so close': Afghan woman moved to Iran to pursue engineering, deported

B-21 Raider, a flying gas can, wins in the numbers game, top bomber officer says

White House ups federal law enforcement at tourist hot spots in Washington, DC

Did India pause $3.6 billion Boeing jets deal amid Trump’s 50% tariff?

Netanyahu’s proposal to take over Gaza City gets final cabinet approval

8 kg ovarian tumour found in woman who thought she was just overweight

Another country backs Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize dream, sends official letter

Trump rules out trade talks after PM's 'India would not compromise' remark

Spain ditches US stealth jet in defence shake-up with Europe

Judge halts ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ construction to protect Florida panthers, bats

Suspect in killing of Israeli embassy staffers could face death penalty

Putin refuses Trump’s one condition for Ukraine peace talks - What does it mean?

8 kg ovarian tumour found in woman who thought she was just overweight