National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

After over a year of mounting rhetoric about “funding Putin's war” and imposing tariffs on countries purchasing Russian oil, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Mar 10) took a U-turn on Moscow's energy exports, stating that Washington will waive some sanctions to boost supply and bring down prices due to upheaval in the global energy market caused by the war in West Asia.&nbsp;This move came as the war in West Asia entered its 11th day, causing upheaval in energy markets across the world as global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28, which resulted in the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the first day of the campaign.&nbsp;“We're also waiving certain oil-related sanctions to reduce prices,” Trump told reporters after talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, adding that, “We're going to take those sanctions off till this straightens out.”&nbsp;The Trump administration also took a U-turn on India after subjecting it to 25 per cent additional tariffs for months over the purchase of Russian oil. However, following the US-Israeli strikes on Iran, Washington urged New Delhi to ramp up imports from Moscow to stabilise global energy prices.&nbsp;In retaliation, Iran targeted US military bases and strategic locations across Gulf nations, including Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman, leading to disruptions across the region. Moreover, Tehran has effectively halted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for about 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply. In response, major producers such as Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have been forced to cut production as their storage tanks reach capacity with limited export routes.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/could-the-iran-war-s-oil-shock-trigger-a-recession-in-the-us-economy-1773151431599">Could the Iran war’s oil shock trigger a recession in the US economy?</a>&nbsp; Trump's decision has again put European allies at odds with the US after the Greenland dispute. The European Union, which is facing soaring energy prices due to the Iran war, opposed Donald Trump's decision to remove sanctions on Russian oil. The bloc has been under pressure from high energy prices since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022.“We must continue to exert maximum pressure on Russia,” EU economy chief Valdis Dombrovskis said, warning that easing restrictions would “reinforce Russia's capacity to wage war, undermining Ukraine”.&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

The Trump administration also took a U-turn on India after subjecting it to 25 per cent additional tariffs for months over the purchase of Russian oil.

After over a year of mounting rhetoric about “funding Putin's war” and imposing tariffs on countries purchasing Russian oil, US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Mar 10) took a U-turn on Moscow's energy exports, stating that Washington will waive some sanctions to boost supply and bring down prices due to upheaval in the global energy market caused by the war in West Asia. This move came as the war in West Asia entered its 11th day, causing upheaval in energy markets across the world as global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28, which resulted in the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the first day of the campaign. “We're also waiving certain oil-related sanctions to reduce prices,” Trump told reporters after talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, adding that, “We're going to take those sanctions off till this straightens out.” The Trump administration also took a U-turn on India after subjecting it to 25 per cent additional tariffs for months over the purchase of Russian oil. However, following the US-Israeli strikes on Iran, Washington urged New Delhi to ramp up imports from Moscow to stabilise global energy prices. In retaliation, Iran targeted US military bases and strategic locations across Gulf nations, including Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman, leading to disruptions across the region. Moreover, Tehran has effectively halted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for about 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply. In response, major producers such as Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have been forced to cut production as their storage tanks reach capacity with limited export routes. Also Read: Could the Iran war’s oil shock trigger a recession in the US economy? Trump's decision has again put European allies at odds with the US after the Greenland dispute. The European Union, which is facing soaring energy prices due to the Iran war, opposed Donald Trump's decision to remove sanctions on Russian oil. The bloc has been under pressure from high energy prices since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. “We must continue to exert maximum pressure on Russia,” EU economy chief Valdis Dombrovskis said, warning that easing restrictions would “reinforce Russia's capacity to wage war, undermining Ukraine”. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

The Trump administration also took a U-turn on India after subjecting it to 25 per cent additional tariffs for months over the purchase of Russian oil.

Trump’s U-turn on Russian oil deepens rift between US and European allies

For several years, the US economy has showed resilience, managing to endure pandemic-era inflation, gasoline prices that once reached $5 a gallon, a slowdown in hiring, and the Federal Reserve’s aggressive fight against inflation.Now it faces a new challenge: A real war. The conflict with Iran has triggered one of the largest disruptions to global oil supplies ever recorded. The resulting spike in prices is pushing up the cost of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other energy products, raising concerns about broader economic impacts.&nbsp;Economists warn that the crisis could heighten the risk of a recession, especially if the disruption persists. The US economy already appeared somewhat fragile before tensions escalated in the Middle East. &nbsp;Despite those concerns, many economists still believe a recession is not the most likely outcome. While stock markets have slipped, the decline has not been severe enough to signal that investors are expecting a near-term downturn. Analysts also say that if the Strait of Hormuz reopens quickly, oil prices could retreat closer to their pre-war levels.&nbsp;Even so, recession fears have climbed. According to prediction market Kalshi, the probability of a recession this year rose to about 35% early on Monday (March 9) when US oil prices briefly touched $119 per barrel. That’s significantly higher than the roughly 20% chance estimated in early February before the US started building up military forces in the Middle East.<h2>Pressure on consumer spending</h2>Gasoline prices have already risen sharply, increasing by about 50 cents, from $2.98 per gallon before the conflict began to $3.48 on Monday. According to Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, every sustained $10 increase in oil prices could add roughly $450 per year to the typical American household’s expenses. That matters because the US economy relies heavily on consumer spending. If households begin cutting back on shopping, travel and dining out, businesses could see declining revenues and may respond by reducing staff. Job losses can then trigger further spending cuts, creating a downward economic spiral.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-be-careful-not-to-get-eliminated-yourself-iranian-official-responds-to-trump-s-twenty-times-harder-threat-1773149066142">'Be careful not to...': Iranian official responds to Trump's 'TWENTY TIMES HARDER' threat</a>&nbsp;The labour market is already weaker than it was during the oil shock triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At that time, employers were adding hundreds of thousands of jobs each month. In contrast, the US added just 116,000 jobs during all of 2025, the lowest annual total outside a recession since 2002. The economy has also recorded job losses in five of the past nine months after years without negative job growth.&nbsp;The combination of rising fuel prices and job losses is worrying. “The job losses and surging gas prices are ‘a very nasty one-two punch to the economy,’” said David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management. “But I still bet that the economy will muddle its way through this.”<h2>Markets and business confidence at risk</h2>Another possible route to a recession would be a major stock market decline. If US equities fall 20% from their recent highs, threshold for a bear market, it could discourage consumer spending, particularly among wealthier households that drive a large share of economic activity. Business confidence is another concern. Companies that were already cautious about hiring or expanding operations may become even more hesitant if energy prices remain elevated.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-secretary-of-defense-pete-hegseth-briefs-media-on-10-days-of-operation-epic-fury-1773151188427/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-secretary-of-defense-pete-hegseth-briefs-media-on-10-days-of-operation-epic-fury-1773151188427/embed</a><h2>Why this oil shock is different?</h2>Still, there are factors that could limit the damage compared with past oil crises. In 2022, when gasoline prices surged to $5 per gallon after Russia invaded Ukraine, the United States had little influence over how quickly the conflict would end. In contrast, the US now has greater control over the course of events in the Persian Gulf.&nbsp;Donald Trump suggested the conflict may already be nearing an end, telling CBS News that the war is “very complete.” However, even if the fighting stops, the disruption in the Strait of Hormuz may take time to resolve. Trump’s comments appeared to calm markets somewhat. After briefly spiking to $119 per barrel late on Sunday and early on Monday, US oil prices later dropped to around $92 per barrel.&nbsp;Another key difference from past crises is that the United States is now a net energy exporter. That means while high energy prices strain household budgets, some sectors of the US economy benefit, particularly oil and natural gas producers and investors in fossil fuel companies. Although oil still trades in a global market, the US economy today is far less dependent on imported energy than it was in previous decades.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Could the Iran war’s oil shock trigger a recession in the US economy?

For several years, the US economy has showed resilience, managing to endure pandemic-era inflation, gasoline prices that once reached $5 a gallon, a slowdown in hiring, and the Federal Reserve’s aggressive fight against inflation. Now it faces a new challenge: A real war. The conflict with Iran has triggered one of the largest disruptions to global oil supplies ever recorded. The resulting spike in prices is pushing up the cost of gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and other energy products, raising concerns about broader economic impacts. Economists warn that the crisis could heighten the risk of a recession, especially if the disruption persists. The US economy already appeared somewhat fragile before tensions escalated in the Middle East. Despite those concerns, many economists still believe a recession is not the most likely outcome. While stock markets have slipped, the decline has not been severe enough to signal that investors are expecting a near-term downturn. Analysts also say that if the Strait of Hormuz reopens quickly, oil prices could retreat closer to their pre-war levels. Even so, recession fears have climbed. According to prediction market Kalshi, the probability of a recession this year rose to about 35% early on Monday (March 9) when US oil prices briefly touched $119 per barrel. That’s significantly higher than the roughly 20% chance estimated in early February before the US started building up military forces in the Middle East. Pressure on consumer spending Gasoline prices have already risen sharply, increasing by about 50 cents, from $2.98 per gallon before the conflict began to $3.48 on Monday. According to Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi, every sustained $10 increase in oil prices could add roughly $450 per year to the typical American household’s expenses. That matters because the US economy relies heavily on consumer spending. If households begin cutting back on shopping, travel and dining out, businesses could see declining revenues and may respond by reducing staff. Job losses can then trigger further spending cuts, creating a downward economic spiral. Also Read: 'Be careful not to...': Iranian official responds to Trump's 'TWENTY TIMES HARDER' threat The labour market is already weaker than it was during the oil shock triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At that time, employers were adding hundreds of thousands of jobs each month. In contrast, the US added just 116,000 jobs during all of 2025, the lowest annual total outside a recession since 2002. The economy has also recorded job losses in five of the past nine months after years without negative job growth. The combination of rising fuel prices and job losses is worrying. “The job losses and surging gas prices are ‘a very nasty one-two punch to the economy,’” said David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management. “But I still bet that the economy will muddle its way through this.” Markets and business confidence at risk Another possible route to a recession would be a major stock market decline. If US equities fall 20% from their recent highs, threshold for a bear market, it could discourage consumer spending, particularly among wealthier households that drive a large share of economic activity. Business confidence is another concern. Companies that were already cautious about hiring or expanding operations may become even more hesitant if energy prices remain elevated. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-us-secretary-of-defense-pete-hegseth-briefs-media-on-10-days-of-operation-epic-fury-1773151188427/embed Why this oil shock is different? Still, there are factors that could limit the damage compared with past oil crises. In 2022, when gasoline prices surged to $5 per gallon after Russia invaded Ukraine, the United States had little influence over how quickly the conflict would end. In contrast, the US now has greater control over the course of events in the Persian Gulf. Donald Trump suggested the conflict may already be nearing an end, telling CBS News that the war is “very complete.” However, even if the fighting stops, the disruption in the Strait of Hormuz may take time to resolve. Trump’s comments appeared to calm markets somewhat. After briefly spiking to $119 per barrel late on Sunday and early on Monday, US oil prices later dropped to around $92 per barrel. Another key difference from past crises is that the United States is now a net energy exporter. That means while high energy prices strain household budgets, some sectors of the US economy benefit, particularly oil and natural gas producers and investors in fossil fuel companies. Although oil still trades in a global market, the US economy today is far less dependent on imported energy than it was in previous decades. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

The Iran war’s oil shock is raising recession fears in the US, but economists say the resilient $30 trillion economy may still absorb the energy-driven pressure

Global strategic oil reserves revealed: how much crude the US, China, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and the UK store and how long their oil supplies could last in a crisis.

Global strategic oil reserves explained: How long US, China, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and UK can survive an oil supply crisis

Russia could emerge as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the ongoing Iran war under Trump, as rising oil prices and shifting sanctions policies reshape the global energy market. For most of the past year, since Donald Trump returned to the White House, Washington has tried to weaken Russia’s energy trade, arguing that oil revenues were fuelling Moscow’s war machine. The US targeted two of Russia’s largest oil firms with sanctions and imposed heavy tariffs on Indian exports in an attempt to pressure New Delhi and Beijing - two of Moscow’s most loyal energy buyers.&nbsp;The strategy appeared to be working. Russian energy revenues had been under strain because of Western sanctions, high interest rates and labour shortages. In January, Russia’s oil and gas income dropped to its lowest level since 2020, dealing a blow to the country’s finances.&nbsp;However, the escalating conflict involving Iran has dramatically changed the outlook.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/new-footage-shows-us-tomahawk-missile-striking-base-near-iran-school-says-report-1773049432597">New footage shows US Tomahawk missile striking base near Iran school, says report</a><h2>Middle East conflict reshapes energy markets</h2>US and Israeli strikes on Iran have disrupted exports from one of the world’s most critical oil-producing regions, pushing global crude prices sharply higher. The surge has unexpectedly strengthened Russia’s position in the global market. Last week, the US granted Indian refiners a 30-day waiver allowing them to purchase Russian oil that had been stranded at sea. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the waiver was intended to keep oil flowing into global markets during the crisis.&nbsp;He also indicated that Washington could ease certain Ukraine-related sanctions on Russian oil if necessary to stabilise global supply. The shift could allow Russian crude to command higher prices. Until recently, Moscow had been forced to sell oil at discounted rates due to Western restrictions. But as supplies tighten, major buyers such as India and China may turn increasingly to Russian shipments with tacit approval from Washington.<h2>Kremlin moves to capitalise</h2>Russian officials have been quick to highlight their country’s role as a stable energy supplier. “Russia was and continues to be a reliable supplier of both oil and gas,” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said, adding that global demand for Russian energy products was rising.&nbsp;At the same time, Moscow is positioning itself diplomatically in the unfolding crisis. Following a phone call with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed ideas for a “quick political and diplomatic settlement” to the conflict, according to his foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/from-khamenei-s-bunker-to-5-oil-sites-list-of-targets-struck-by-israel-since-iran-war-began-1772980052256">From Khamenei’s bunker to 5 oil sites - List of targets struck by Israel since Iran war began</a>&nbsp;Kremlin aide Kirill Dmitriev struck a more triumphant tone on social media, writing that the “oil shock tsunami is just beginning” and criticising Europe’s earlier decision to reduce dependence on Russian energy as a strategic mistake.&nbsp;

The US-Iran war could benefit Russia as Middle East instability drives global oil prices higher. Rising demand and possible easing of sanctions may allow Moscow to sell crude at better prices, strengthening its energy revenues. 

Russia could emerge as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the ongoing Iran war under Trump, as rising oil prices and shifting sanctions policies reshape the global energy market. For most of the past year, since Donald Trump returned to the White House, Washington has tried to weaken Russia’s energy trade, arguing that oil revenues were fuelling Moscow’s war machine. The US targeted two of Russia’s largest oil firms with sanctions and imposed heavy tariffs on Indian exports in an attempt to pressure New Delhi and Beijing - two of Moscow’s most loyal energy buyers. The strategy appeared to be working. Russian energy revenues had been under strain because of Western sanctions, high interest rates and labour shortages. In January, Russia’s oil and gas income dropped to its lowest level since 2020, dealing a blow to the country’s finances. However, the escalating conflict involving Iran has dramatically changed the outlook. Also read: New footage shows US Tomahawk missile striking base near Iran school, says report Middle East conflict reshapes energy markets US and Israeli strikes on Iran have disrupted exports from one of the world’s most critical oil-producing regions, pushing global crude prices sharply higher. The surge has unexpectedly strengthened Russia’s position in the global market. Last week, the US granted Indian refiners a 30-day waiver allowing them to purchase Russian oil that had been stranded at sea. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the waiver was intended to keep oil flowing into global markets during the crisis. He also indicated that Washington could ease certain Ukraine-related sanctions on Russian oil if necessary to stabilise global supply. The shift could allow Russian crude to command higher prices. Until recently, Moscow had been forced to sell oil at discounted rates due to Western restrictions. But as supplies tighten, major buyers such as India and China may turn increasingly to Russian shipments with tacit approval from Washington. Kremlin moves to capitalise Russian officials have been quick to highlight their country’s role as a stable energy supplier. “Russia was and continues to be a reliable supplier of both oil and gas,” Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said, adding that global demand for Russian energy products was rising. At the same time, Moscow is positioning itself diplomatically in the unfolding crisis. Following a phone call with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin proposed ideas for a “quick political and diplomatic settlement” to the conflict, according to his foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov. Also read: From Khamenei’s bunker to 5 oil sites - List of targets struck by Israel since Iran war began Kremlin aide Kirill Dmitriev struck a more triumphant tone on social media, writing that the “oil shock tsunami is just beginning” and criticising Europe’s earlier decision to reduce dependence on Russian energy as a strategic mistake.

The US-Iran war could benefit Russia as Middle East instability drives global oil prices higher. Rising demand and possible easing of sanctions may allow Moscow to sell crude at better prices, strengthening its energy revenues.&nbsp;

In US-Iran war, the winner would be Russia. Here's why

A top Iranian security official has threatened US President Donald Trump, telling him, "Be careful not to get eliminated." Reacting to Trump's statement that Iran would be hit "TWENTY TIMES HARDER” if Tehran stopped oil coming through the Strait of Hormuz, Ali Larijani wrote, “The sacrificial nation of Iran doesn’t fear your empty threats. Even those bigger than you couldn’t eliminate Iran. Be careful not to get eliminated yourself.” Larijani is Iran's Supreme National Security Council chief and is assumed to have taken a central role after Ali Khamenei's death. The American president has in the past accused Iran of plotting to assassinate him. The Iran war started with the US and Israel launching missiles on the country on February 28, which killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. Iran has been responding with strikes on US bases in Middle East countries, hitting countries like Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and Kuwait.<h2>See the post below &nbsp;</h2>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">ملت عاشورایی ایران، از تهدیدات پوشالی شما نمی‌ترسند. بزرگتر از شما هم نتوانستند ملت ایران را حذف کنند. مراقب خود باشید حذف نشوید! <a href="https://t.co/v1aWLoJk7K">pic.twitter.com/v1aWLoJk7K</a>&mdash; Ali Larijani | علی لاریجانی (@alilarijani_ir) <a href="https://twitter.com/alilarijani_ir/status/2031323351952568569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 10, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

On Monday, Trump gave a confusing message about the end of the war, saying the war will be a “short-term excursion” and end "very soon". However, he went on to warn Iran with bigger attacks if it continued to block shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Notably, the move has caused a major spike in oil prices as Brent crude, the international benchmark, topped out at $119 a barrel. “I will not allow a terrorist regime to hold the world hostage and attempt to stop the globe’s oil supply. And if Iran does anything to do that, they’ll get hit at a much, much harder level,” the US president said.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pete-hegseth-calls-it-most-intense-day-of-strikes-as-iran-records-lowest-attack-in-24-hours-1773144919915">Pete Hegseth calls it 'most intense day of strikes' as Iran records lowest attack in 24 hours</a>&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-video-indicates-us-missile-hit-girls-school-in-minab-1773147554177/embed<h2>Death toll and latest on Iran war</h2>US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also threatened to hit Iran “harder than ever” if it keeps blocking oil flow through the strait. He also said that “today will be the most intense day” of the US war on Iran. "Today will be yet again our most intense day of strikes inside Iran. The most fighters, the most bombers, the most strikes. Intelligence more refined, and better than ever." The BBC reported more strikes in the Iranian city of Karaj. Two explosions were reported in Tehran following a warning by the Israeli military that it had started a fresh wave of strikes. The number of people killed in Iran since the start of the war stands at 1,332, including 206 women and children, according to Iranian government officials.

Ali Larijani, an Iranian security official, has warned Trump to watch out and "be careful not to get eliminated." He threatened the US president, responding to his fear tactic to get the Strait of Hormuz reopened, a closure that has sent oil prices soaring.

A top Iranian security official has threatened US President Donald Trump, telling him, "Be careful not to get eliminated." Reacting to Trump's statement that Iran would be hit "TWENTY TIMES HARDER” if Tehran stopped oil coming through the Strait of Hormuz, Ali Larijani wrote, “The sacrificial nation of Iran doesn’t fear your empty threats. Even those bigger than you couldn’t eliminate Iran. Be careful not to get eliminated yourself.” Larijani is Iran's Supreme National Security Council chief and is assumed to have taken a central role after Ali Khamenei's death. The American president has in the past accused Iran of plotting to assassinate him. The Iran war started with the US and Israel launching missiles on the country on February 28, which killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. Iran has been responding with strikes on US bases in Middle East countries, hitting countries like Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and Kuwait. See the post below

Ali Larijani, an Iranian security official, has warned Trump to watch out and "be careful not to get eliminated." He threatened the US president, responding to his fear tactic to get the Strait of Hormuz reopened, a closure that has sent oil prices soaring.

'Be careful not to...': Iranian official responds to Trump's 'TWENTY TIMES HARDER' threat

Qatar on Tuesday (Mar 10) accused Iran of sustained targeting of its civilian infrastructure, claiming that its forces intercepted a new missile attack. The Gulf state stated that the apology of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had “not translated into action” as multiple loud explosions were reported in Doha.&nbsp;“The targeting of civilian infrastructure continues, and we rebuke any justification that the Iranians are offering for these attacks,” Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said, without specifying which civilian facilities had been targeted in Qatar.&nbsp;Qatar's foreign ministry described the attacks on energy facilities as a “dangerous precedent.” It warned that attacks on regional energy infrastructure during the West Asia war would be felt economically throughout the world.&nbsp;“The attacks on energy facilities that have happened, also on both sides, are a dangerous precedent. It will cause repercussions throughout the world,” the spokesman added.&nbsp;Doha expressed its willingness to talk with Tehran, saying “communication between Qatar and Iran has not been cut”, adding that for the Gulf state, all "conflicts can be solved at the negotiating table, but Qatar can't mediate when it is being attacked by Iran.”&nbsp;Communications are underway with all parties to ensure there is a way out of this conflict, the foreign ministry said, adding that “a viable solution would be to stop attacks on our energy facilities.”&nbsp;These developments come as the war in West Asia entered its 11th day, causing upheaval in energy markets across the world as global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/world-s-largest-oil-company-ceo-warns-of-catastrophic-consequences-of-iran-war-as-nations-impose-emergency-measures-1773141477127">World’s largest oil company CEO warns of 'catastrophic consequences' of Iran war as nations impose emergency measures</a>&nbsp;The strikes, codenamed Operation Roaring Lion by Israel and Operation Epic Fury by the United States, targeted government buildings, military installations, and suspected nuclear facilities, while aiming to decapitate the highest levels of Iranian leadership. The strikes resulted in the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the first day of the campaign.&nbsp;In retaliation, Iran targeted US military bases and strategic locations across Gulf nations, including Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman, leading to disruptions across the region. Moreover, Tehran has effectively halted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for about 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply. In response, major producers such as Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have been forced to cut production as their storage tanks reach capacity with limited export routes.&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)&nbsp;

Qatar's foreign ministry described the attacks on energy facilities as a “dangerous precedent.” It warned that attacks on regional energy infrastructure during the West Asia war would be felt economically throughout the world.

Qatar on Tuesday (Mar 10) accused Iran of sustained targeting of its civilian infrastructure, claiming that its forces intercepted a new missile attack. The Gulf state stated that the apology of Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian had “not translated into action” as multiple loud explosions were reported in Doha. “The targeting of civilian infrastructure continues, and we rebuke any justification that the Iranians are offering for these attacks,” Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari said, without specifying which civilian facilities had been targeted in Qatar. Qatar's foreign ministry described the attacks on energy facilities as a “dangerous precedent.” It warned that attacks on regional energy infrastructure during the West Asia war would be felt economically throughout the world. “The attacks on energy facilities that have happened, also on both sides, are a dangerous precedent. It will cause repercussions throughout the world,” the spokesman added. Doha expressed its willingness to talk with Tehran, saying “communication between Qatar and Iran has not been cut”, adding that for the Gulf state, all "conflicts can be solved at the negotiating table, but Qatar can't mediate when it is being attacked by Iran.” Communications are underway with all parties to ensure there is a way out of this conflict, the foreign ministry said, adding that “a viable solution would be to stop attacks on our energy facilities.” These developments come as the war in West Asia entered its 11th day, causing upheaval in energy markets across the world as global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28. Also Read: World’s largest oil company CEO warns of 'catastrophic consequences' of Iran war as nations impose emergency measures The strikes, codenamed Operation Roaring Lion by Israel and Operation Epic Fury by the United States, targeted government buildings, military installations, and suspected nuclear facilities, while aiming to decapitate the highest levels of Iranian leadership. The strikes resulted in the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the first day of the campaign. In retaliation, Iran targeted US military bases and strategic locations across Gulf nations, including Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman, leading to disruptions across the region. Moreover, Tehran has effectively halted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for about 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply. In response, major producers such as Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have been forced to cut production as their storage tanks reach capacity with limited export routes. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Qatar's foreign ministry described the attacks on energy facilities as a “dangerous precedent.” It warned that attacks on regional energy infrastructure during the West Asia war would be felt economically throughout the world.

‘Dangerous precedent’: Qatar slams Iran over repeated missile attacks on water and energy sites

As he was addressing the press on Tuesday (March 10), US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said attacks on Iran will ramp up with the heaviest strikes since Washington launched the war 10 days ago. He said, "Today will be yet again our most intense day of strikes inside Iran," Hegseth told a news conference at the Pentagon. While General Dan Caine said, “Ballistic missile attacks continue to trend downwards, 90% from where they started, and one-way attack drones have decreased 83% since the beginning of the operation.”&nbsp;Hegseth noted that today will be “the most intense day of strikes”, this as Iran fired its lowest number of weapons in the past 24 hours.&nbsp;Hegseth asserted, "It would be wise to heed the words of our president not to pursue nuclear weapons”. Taking about the war he said, “This is not endless, this is not protracted,” Hegseth says. “It’s not for me to posit whether it’s the beginning, middle or the end – that’s up to him (President Trump).”

Pete Hegseth warns of the "most intense day" for Operation Epic Fury as US strikes ramp up, while Iranian missile attacks hit a 24-hour record low. Is the tide turning?

As he was addressing the press on Tuesday (March 10), US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said attacks on Iran will ramp up with the heaviest strikes since Washington launched the war 10 days ago. He said, "Today will be yet again our most intense day of strikes inside Iran," Hegseth told a news conference at the Pentagon. While General Dan Caine said, “Ballistic missile attacks continue to trend downwards, 90% from where they started, and one-way attack drones have decreased 83% since the beginning of the operation.” Hegseth noted that today will be “the most intense day of strikes”, this as Iran fired its lowest number of weapons in the past 24 hours. Hegseth asserted, "It would be wise to heed the words of our president not to pursue nuclear weapons”. Taking about the war he said, “This is not endless, this is not protracted,” Hegseth says. “It’s not for me to posit whether it’s the beginning, middle or the end – that’s up to him (President Trump).”

Pete Hegseth warns of the "most intense day" for Operation Epic Fury as US strikes ramp up, while Iranian missile attacks hit a 24-hour record low. Is the tide turning?

Pete Hegseth calls it 'most intense day of strikes' as Iran records lowest attack in 24 hours

A FBI memo in the Epstein Files released by the Department of Justice last week has references to an incident in which a 16-year-old-girl being harassed by Epstein as he was talking to Donald Trump. The girl whose name is redacted was from Chile and brought up in a middle-class family in Queens. She revealed this information in an interview with the FBI on July 8, 2020. These are part of the 40,000- 50,000 new files released and has references to other interviews where a girl bit Donald Trump in his genitals as he was forcing oral sex from him.&nbsp;It is unclear the duration of the call, how she figured out the other person in the call was Donald Trump. The victim alleges that she was taken to Epstein by a girl to earn some money. She was then in Junior-high school. On her third visit to Epstein's East Side home in Manhattan. "EPSTEIN came into the room and was like "let's go, let's go"." Read the memo. He got into the massage table while being “on a speakerphone call with DONALD TRUMP.” Epstein then suddenly grabbed her hand and dragged her on top of him. He later paid $300 to her. Her abuse continued from 2016 to 2019.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-missile-attacks-irgc-israel-war-escalation-1773138645349">Iran vows to launch missiles with one tonne warhead as war continues in West Asia</a>

Screenshot of EFTA02857857

The victim supposedly broke off relations with Epstein at the age of 19, when she went to seek a job in his office. “Victim went to his office once to tell him that she wanted a job. Victim was approximately 19 years old. EPSTEIN grabbed breasts, gave her $100, and told her to bring him girls, and that's how she could make money.” The victim then never returned, eventhough Epstein's assistant tried to contact her.&nbsp;According to him, he has been completely exonerated. “These are completely baseless accusations, backed by zero credible evidence, from a sadly disturbed woman who has an extensive criminal history,” said White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt. This was among the new releases of the Epstein Files; the DOJ didn't publish them initially, as these had references to US President Donald Trump. Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing and association with Jeffrey Epstein.

Newly released Epstein files include an FBI memo referencing a call allegedly involving Donald Trump during an encounter with Jeffrey Epstein and a minor. The White House has dismissed the allegations as baseless.

A FBI memo in the Epstein Files released by the Department of Justice last week has references to an incident in which a 16-year-old-girl being harassed by Epstein as he was talking to Donald Trump. The girl whose name is redacted was from Chile and brought up in a middle-class family in Queens. She revealed this information in an interview with the FBI on July 8, 2020. These are part of the 40,000- 50,000 new files released and has references to other interviews where a girl bit Donald Trump in his genitals as he was forcing oral sex from him. It is unclear the duration of the call, how she figured out the other person in the call was Donald Trump. The victim alleges that she was taken to Epstein by a girl to earn some money. She was then in Junior-high school. On her third visit to Epstein's East Side home in Manhattan. "EPSTEIN came into the room and was like "let's go, let's go"." Read the memo. He got into the massage table while being “on a speakerphone call with DONALD TRUMP.” Epstein then suddenly grabbed her hand and dragged her on top of him. He later paid $300 to her. Her abuse continued from 2016 to 2019. Also Read: Iran vows to launch missiles with one tonne warhead as war continues in West Asia

Newly released Epstein files include an FBI memo referencing a call allegedly involving Donald Trump during an encounter with Jeffrey Epstein and a minor. The White House has dismissed the allegations as baseless.

FBI memo claims Epstein abused a minor while speaking to Trump on speaker phone

Global tensions, rising nationalism, and geopolitical rivalries are deepening divisions across nations and societies. On WION World Pulse, we examine whether the world today is more fragmented than ever before.

WION World Pulse | are we living in more divided world today? 

WION World Pulse: Are we living in more divided world today?

This session will examine how the international rules-based order is increasingly being challenged, as conventional diplomacy is giving way to personality-driven engagement, signalling a broader disruption in global diplomatic norms.

WION World Pulse | power pulse – India & the world order

WION World Pulse | Power Pulse – India & the world order

This session explores whether the world can reach consensus on tech geopolitics, and how innovation, trust, and global cooperation can shape responsible and secure technological progress.

WION World Pulse | tech pulse - tech, trust & transformation

Rising global conflicts, from the Middle East to Eastern Europe, are raising fears of a wider war. On WION World Pulse, we examine whether the growing tensions could push the world closer to a potential World War 3 scenario.

WION World Pulse: could World War 3 become a reality soon?  |WION 

WION World Pulse: Could World War 3 become a reality soon?  |WION

NATO, the top military alliance of the West led by the US, is not helping Washington’s military interests in its ongoing joint operations with Israel against Iran. This is a sharp contrast with how the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was eager to help Ukraine against Russia, even though Kyiv is not even a member of the military alliance. What explains the dichotomy? Here is what you should know.<h2>NATO only gives political support, but avoids joining the military campaign led by US</h2>So far, NATO appears to have limited its role to defensive measures, rhetorical backing and possible logistical support. Forces of the 32-member alliance are not directly participating in airstrikes on Iran.NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said many European leaders ‘support the goals’ of the operation.“I feel widespread support in Europe,” Rutte said, while expressing backing for taking out Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities.But Rutte spoke mainly about defending Nato territory, not about direct military help. He described Iran as "an exporter of chaos that posed far-reaching danger" and warned the alliance would protect its members if needed.Noting that Iran is ‘an exporter of chaos that posed far-reaching danger’, he stressed that NATO’s focus remains defensive, and vowed to defend ‘every inch of NATO territory if needed.’"NATO is well-postured to defend Allied populations against ballistic threats," he added.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/europe-s-reluctance-to-support-us-israel-military-operations-on-iran-what-about-democracy-human-rights-etc-iran-war-analysis-1773124922550">Europe's reluctance to support US-Israel military operations on Iran. What about democracy, human rights, etc.?</a><h2>The Turkey question: How NATO defended its member's airspace</h2>Interestingly, when it comes to ‘NATO territory’, one must remember that Turkey, which borders the Middle East, is also a NATO member.Some ballistic missiles launched from Iran entered Turkish airspace and were intercepted by NATO defence systems. However, most of the incidents are being viewed as unintended spillover, even as Turkish officials warned Iran against violating their airspace.Debris from intercepted missiles fell in southern Turkey. It is unclear whether Iran was directly targeting Turkey to provoke a NATO response. Some analysts believe the ballistic missiles were intended for the Incirlik Air Base in southern Turkey or targets near Gaziantep.Iran officially denied targeting Turkey. NATO condemned the actions, and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan warned Tehran that violations of Turkish sovereignty would not be tolerated."Turkey does not want to be dragged into this war," Erdoğan said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/middle-east-spillover-us-orders-evacuation-of-adana-consulate-as-iran-conflict-hits-turkey-1773077400350">Middle East spillover: US orders evacuation of Adana Consulate as Iran conflict hits Turkey</a><h2>NATO has not invoked Article 5, the collective defence clause of “one for all, all for one”</h2>Rutte has made it clear that “nobody's talking about Article 5.” &nbsp;Article 5 is Nato’s collective defence clause, under which an armed attack on one member is considered an attack on all.One reason it has not been invoked so far in the Iran war is that Article 5 requires a direct armed attack on a NATO member in Europe or North America.&nbsp;One could stretch that argument to Turkey, but missile interceptions over Turkish airspace did not trigger collective defence discussions. Most Iranian strikes so far have targeted US facilities in the Middle East, not NATO territory.Some analysts and officials say invoking Article 5 would require a ‘large-scale attack or invasion of a NATO member,’ which has not happened.<h2>Trump is not too keen to take help from NATO</h2>The UK, Italy and France have reportedly allowed the use of some bases and equipment. The UK also deployed four additional Typhoon fighter jets to Qatar for regional defence.However, this support came after initial hesitation. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at first restricted US access to some bases, including facilities linked to Cyprus. He called for diplomacy and questioned the legality of the conflict."The conflict could continue for some time... the best way forward for Iran would be a negotiated settlement," Starmer said earlier.Later, the UK allowed limited use of its facilities by American forces.US President Donald Trump criticised the delay. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote: "We don’t need your help if you’re going to hesitate and then claim credit later."<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-strikes-iran-but-european-allies-choose-defence-over-war-nato-split-over-tehran-1772984675816/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-strikes-iran-but-european-allies-choose-defence-over-war-nato-split-over-tehran-1772984675816/embed</a><h2>NATO member Spain openly resisted military involvement</h2>What also stood out like a sore thumb on the presumed NATO unity was Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s refusal to allow the US access to Spanish bases. Calling the US actions in Iran illegal under international law, he reiterated Spain’s position of "No to war."Another NATO member Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned about the lack of a clear exit strategy.&nbsp;<h2>Trump has been openly critical of the NATO stance</h2>"Some traditional US allies are hemming and hawing about the use of force," he said. He also said he was unhappy with Starmer, saying the British leader "took far too much time to reverse course" on base access.Trump also attacked Spain’s position. "Spain has been terrible... cut off all dealings with Spain," he said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nato-to-enter-iran-war-alliance-adjusts-force-posture-eu-chief-affirms-unity-after-cyprus-attack-1772457342134">NATO to enter Iran war? Alliance adjusts force posture, EU slams attack on Cyprus base</a><h2>NATO double standards? How it supported non-NATO member Ukraine to the hilt</h2>NATO member countries strongly supported Ukraine after Russia’s invasion in 2022, even though Kyiv is not a member of the alliance. The alliance helped arm Ukraine heavily despite its military asymmetry with Russia. NATO countries — including the US, mainly under President Joe Biden — supplied Ukraine with billions of dollars and euros in weapons, training, intelligence and air-defence systems. The power acquired through military and financial aid helped Ukraine prolong its resistance to the Russian invasion for more than four years.The argument is that Ukraine had the right to self-defence against what the alliance called Russia’s "brutal and unprovoked war of aggression."NATO also sees Russia as the most significant and direct threat to Allied security. The Russian invasion was viewed by many European NATO members as a direct and potentially existential threat, making Ukraine’s defence central to European stability.The cautious NATO stance in the Iran war, by contrast, stems partly from the fact that the US-Israel campaign is viewed by many allies as an offensive operation launched outside NATO territory.That distinction limits NATO’s legal mandate under Article 5. There has also been no formal request from the US for NATO military intervention. Trump has occasionally said the US can finish the job in Iran on its own.Rutte described the situation as an “and-and” approach: enabling US actions in the Middle East while ensuring Ukraine "has what it needs to stay strong in the fight."The difference reflects NATO’s doctrine: strong support for defensive wars that directly affect European security, but far greater caution about joining offensive conflicts abroad. NATO nations in Europe are already worn out by the Russia-Ukraine war. They just cannot afford to get drawn into another conflict, happening away from its core area of operation.

NATO supported US goals in the Iran war politically but has so far avoided a combat role. The alliance’s restraint contrasts with its strong support for non-member Ukraine against Russia. Why? Because, priorities…

NATO, the top military alliance of the West led by the US, is not helping Washington’s military interests in its ongoing joint operations with Israel against Iran. This is a sharp contrast with how the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was eager to help Ukraine against Russia, even though Kyiv is not even a member of the military alliance. What explains the dichotomy? Here is what you should know. NATO only gives political support, but avoids joining the military campaign led by US So far, NATO appears to have limited its role to defensive measures, rhetorical backing and possible logistical support. Forces of the 32-member alliance are not directly participating in airstrikes on Iran. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said many European leaders ‘support the goals’ of the operation. “I feel widespread support in Europe,” Rutte said, while expressing backing for taking out Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities. But Rutte spoke mainly about defending Nato territory, not about direct military help. He described Iran as "an exporter of chaos that posed far-reaching danger" and warned the alliance would protect its members if needed. Noting that Iran is ‘an exporter of chaos that posed far-reaching danger’, he stressed that NATO’s focus remains defensive, and vowed to defend ‘every inch of NATO territory if needed.’ "NATO is well-postured to defend Allied populations against ballistic threats," he added. Also read: Europe's reluctance to support US-Israel military operations on Iran. What about democracy, human rights, etc.? The Turkey question: How NATO defended its member's airspace Interestingly, when it comes to ‘NATO territory’, one must remember that Turkey, which borders the Middle East, is also a NATO member. Some ballistic missiles launched from Iran entered Turkish airspace and were intercepted by NATO defence systems. However, most of the incidents are being viewed as unintended spillover, even as Turkish officials warned Iran against violating their airspace. Debris from intercepted missiles fell in southern Turkey. It is unclear whether Iran was directly targeting Turkey to provoke a NATO response. Some analysts believe the ballistic missiles were intended for the Incirlik Air Base in southern Turkey or targets near Gaziantep. Iran officially denied targeting Turkey. NATO condemned the actions, and President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan warned Tehran that violations of Turkish sovereignty would not be tolerated. "Turkey does not want to be dragged into this war," Erdoğan said. Also read: Middle East spillover: US orders evacuation of Adana Consulate as Iran conflict hits Turkey NATO has not invoked Article 5, the collective defence clause of “one for all, all for one” Rutte has made it clear that “nobody's talking about Article 5.” Article 5 is Nato’s collective defence clause, under which an armed attack on one member is considered an attack on all. One reason it has not been invoked so far in the Iran war is that Article 5 requires a direct armed attack on a NATO member in Europe or North America. One could stretch that argument to Turkey, but missile interceptions over Turkish airspace did not trigger collective defence discussions. Most Iranian strikes so far have targeted US facilities in the Middle East, not NATO territory. Some analysts and officials say invoking Article 5 would require a ‘large-scale attack or invasion of a NATO member,’ which has not happened. Trump is not too keen to take help from NATO The UK, Italy and France have reportedly allowed the use of some bases and equipment. The UK also deployed four additional Typhoon fighter jets to Qatar for regional defence. However, this support came after initial hesitation. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at first restricted US access to some bases, including facilities linked to Cyprus. He called for diplomacy and questioned the legality of the conflict. "The conflict could continue for some time... the best way forward for Iran would be a negotiated settlement," Starmer said earlier. Later, the UK allowed limited use of its facilities by American forces. US President Donald Trump criticised the delay. In a post on Truth Social, he wrote: "We don’t need your help if you’re going to hesitate and then claim credit later." https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-strikes-iran-but-european-allies-choose-defence-over-war-nato-split-over-tehran-1772984675816/embed NATO member Spain openly resisted military involvement What also stood out like a sore thumb on the presumed NATO unity was Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s refusal to allow the US access to Spanish bases. Calling the US actions in Iran illegal under international law, he reiterated Spain’s position of "No to war." Another NATO member Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned about the lack of a clear exit strategy. Trump has been openly critical of the NATO stance "Some traditional US allies are hemming and hawing about the use of force," he said. He also said he was unhappy with Starmer, saying the British leader "took far too much time to reverse course" on base access. Trump also attacked Spain’s position. "Spain has been terrible... cut off all dealings with Spain," he said. Also read: NATO to enter Iran war? Alliance adjusts force posture, EU slams attack on Cyprus base NATO double standards? How it supported non-NATO member Ukraine to the hilt NATO member countries strongly supported Ukraine after Russia’s invasion in 2022, even though Kyiv is not a member of the alliance. The alliance helped arm Ukraine heavily despite its military asymmetry with Russia. NATO countries — including the US, mainly under President Joe Biden — supplied Ukraine with billions of dollars and euros in weapons, training, intelligence and air-defence systems. The power acquired through military and financial aid helped Ukraine prolong its resistance to the Russian invasion for more than four years. The argument is that Ukraine had the right to self-defence against what the alliance called Russia’s "brutal and unprovoked war of aggression." NATO also sees Russia as the most significant and direct threat to Allied security. The Russian invasion was viewed by many European NATO members as a direct and potentially existential threat, making Ukraine’s defence central to European stability. The cautious NATO stance in the Iran war, by contrast, stems partly from the fact that the US-Israel campaign is viewed by many allies as an offensive operation launched outside NATO territory. That distinction limits NATO’s legal mandate under Article 5. There has also been no formal request from the US for NATO military intervention. Trump has occasionally said the US can finish the job in Iran on its own. Rutte described the situation as an “and-and” approach: enabling US actions in the Middle East while ensuring Ukraine "has what it needs to stay strong in the fight." The difference reflects NATO’s doctrine: strong support for defensive wars that directly affect European security, but far greater caution about joining offensive conflicts abroad. NATO nations in Europe are already worn out by the Russia-Ukraine war. They just cannot afford to get drawn into another conflict, happening away from its core area of operation.

NATO supported US goals in the Iran war politically but has so far avoided a combat role. The alliance’s restraint contrasts with its strong support for non-member Ukraine against Russia. Why? Because, priorities…

Iran war and NATO: ‘One for all, all for one’, really? Why alliance is not eager to help top ally US as much as non-member Ukraine

The chief of the world's largest oil corporation warned that the war in West Asia could be disastrous for oil markets and said it is paramount to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively closed to shipments of key commodities, disrupting nearly 20 per cent of the world's energy supply.&nbsp;&nbsp;“There would be catastrophic consequences for the world’s oil markets the longer the disruption goes on, and the more drastic the consequences for the global economy,” Saudi Aramco’s CEO and President Amin H. Nasser said on Tuesday.&nbsp;“It’s absolutely critical that shipping resumes in the Strait of Hormuz,” Nasser added.&nbsp;Nasser’s comments came after crude oil prices surged past $100 per barrel on March 9, while analysts cautioned that a sustained blockage could push prices towards a record-breaking $150 per barrel.&nbsp;Similarly, gas prices in Europe nearly doubled in the first week of March, peaking above €60/MWh before stabilising slightly at €48/MWh. Asian LNG prices climbed even higher, as the region relies heavily on West Asia for nearly 90 per cent of its LNG requirements.The energy crisis prompted several countries to take drastic measures, including&nbsp;Pakistan, which implemented the steepest fuel price hike in its history at around Rs 55 per litre and ordered the shutting of schools and colleges across the country, while enforcing work-from-home policies for both government and private offices.&nbsp;Likewise, India on Tuesday invoked the Essential Commodities Act (ECA), 1955, effective March 2026, to address potential energy supply disruptions by ordering oil refining companies to maximise the production of LPG and make it available primarily to domestic consumers.&nbsp;Several countries in Europe and East Asia also announced similar measures. Japan, which relies on imports for about 87 per cent of its energy needs, and South Korea have activated emergency response protocols.&nbsp;These developments come after global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28.&nbsp;The strikes, codenamed Operation Roaring Lion by Israel and Operation Epic Fury by the United States, targeted government buildings, military installations, and suspected nuclear facilities, while aiming to decapitate the highest levels of Iranian leadership. The strikes resulted in the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the first day of the campaign.&nbsp;In retaliation, Iran targeted US military bases and strategic locations across Gulf nations, including Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman, leading to disruptions across the region. Moreover, Tehran has effectively halted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for about 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply. In response, major producers such as Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have been forced to cut production as their storage tanks reach capacity with limited export routes.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

These developments come after global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28.

The chief of the world's largest oil corporation warned that the war in West Asia could be disastrous for oil markets and said it is paramount to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively closed to shipments of key commodities, disrupting nearly 20 per cent of the world's energy supply. “There would be catastrophic consequences for the world’s oil markets the longer the disruption goes on, and the more drastic the consequences for the global economy,” Saudi Aramco’s CEO and President Amin H. Nasser said on Tuesday. “It’s absolutely critical that shipping resumes in the Strait of Hormuz,” Nasser added. Nasser’s comments came after crude oil prices surged past $100 per barrel on March 9, while analysts cautioned that a sustained blockage could push prices towards a record-breaking $150 per barrel. Similarly, gas prices in Europe nearly doubled in the first week of March, peaking above €60/MWh before stabilising slightly at €48/MWh. Asian LNG prices climbed even higher, as the region relies heavily on West Asia for nearly 90 per cent of its LNG requirements. The energy crisis prompted several countries to take drastic measures, including Pakistan, which implemented the steepest fuel price hike in its history at around Rs 55 per litre and ordered the shutting of schools and colleges across the country, while enforcing work-from-home policies for both government and private offices. Likewise, India on Tuesday invoked the Essential Commodities Act (ECA), 1955, effective March 2026, to address potential energy supply disruptions by ordering oil refining companies to maximise the production of LPG and make it available primarily to domestic consumers. Several countries in Europe and East Asia also announced similar measures. Japan, which relies on imports for about 87 per cent of its energy needs, and South Korea have activated emergency response protocols. These developments come after global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28. The strikes, codenamed Operation Roaring Lion by Israel and Operation Epic Fury by the United States, targeted government buildings, military installations, and suspected nuclear facilities, while aiming to decapitate the highest levels of Iranian leadership. The strikes resulted in the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on the first day of the campaign. In retaliation, Iran targeted US military bases and strategic locations across Gulf nations, including Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Oman, leading to disruptions across the region. Moreover, Tehran has effectively halted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for about 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply. In response, major producers such as Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE have been forced to cut production as their storage tanks reach capacity with limited export routes. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

These developments come after global oil prices jumped above $100 per barrel for the first time since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022, marking more than a 50 per cent increase since the start of joint US-Israeli military strikes in Iran on February 28.

World’s largest oil company CEO warns of 'catastrophic consequences' of Iran war as nations impose emergency measures

Amid the escalated military conflict in Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the end of the Iranian regime is in the hands of the Iranian people. “Our aspiration is to bring the Iranian people to throw off the yoke of tyranny,” said Netanyahu during a visit late last night to the National Health Emergency Operations Centre.&nbsp;He said that throwing off the regime depends on the Iranians. But, he said, there was no doubt that Israel is "breaking their bones". “If we succeed together with the Iranian people, we will bring about a permanent end, if such things exist in the life of nations, and we will bring about change,” the Israeli PM said. The Israeli PM also said that Israel’s war on Iran is "not done yet".&nbsp;&nbsp;Earlier, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that with the appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei as the new Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, Israel's goal of regime change has failed. During an interview with the PBS News Hour on Monday (March 9), the FM said he did not think that the US and Israel have a realistic endgame and are now just sowing chaos.<h2>Mojtaba Khamenei - the new supreme leader</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-to-attack-mojtaba-khamenei-ex-ambassador-warns-says-duty-bound-to-eliminate-1773058915216">Israel to attack Mojtaba Khamenei? Ex-ambassador warns, says ‘duty-bound to eliminate...’</a> &nbsp;Mojtaba Khamenei became the new Supreme Leader of Iran following the death of his father, Ali Khamenei, who was killed on February 28 during the opening phase of the ongoing war involving Iran, Israel, and the US. The decision was taken by Iran’s powerful Assembly of Experts, which oversees the selection of the country’s highest authority.&nbsp;Mojtaba Khamenei, a 56-year-old cleric known for his close ties to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, had long been considered a possible successor to his father despite never holding an elected government position.&nbsp;

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran’s regime change ultimately depends on the Iranian people, though Israel is “breaking their bones” militarily. Iran’s foreign minister rejected the claim, saying Israel’s goal has failed after Mojtaba Khamenei became the new supreme leader.

Amid the escalated military conflict in Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the end of the Iranian regime is in the hands of the Iranian people. “Our aspiration is to bring the Iranian people to throw off the yoke of tyranny,” said Netanyahu during a visit late last night to the National Health Emergency Operations Centre. He said that throwing off the regime depends on the Iranians. But, he said, there was no doubt that Israel is "breaking their bones". “If we succeed together with the Iranian people, we will bring about a permanent end, if such things exist in the life of nations, and we will bring about change,” the Israeli PM said. The Israeli PM also said that Israel’s war on Iran is "not done yet". Earlier, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that with the appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei as the new Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, Israel's goal of regime change has failed. During an interview with the PBS News Hour on Monday (March 9), the FM said he did not think that the US and Israel have a realistic endgame and are now just sowing chaos. Mojtaba Khamenei - the new supreme leader Also read: Israel to attack Mojtaba Khamenei? Ex-ambassador warns, says ‘duty-bound to eliminate...’ Mojtaba Khamenei became the new Supreme Leader of Iran following the death of his father, Ali Khamenei, who was killed on February 28 during the opening phase of the ongoing war involving Iran, Israel, and the US. The decision was taken by Iran’s powerful Assembly of Experts, which oversees the selection of the country’s highest authority. Mojtaba Khamenei, a 56-year-old cleric known for his close ties to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, had long been considered a possible successor to his father despite never holding an elected government position.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran’s regime change ultimately depends on the Iranian people, though Israel is “breaking their bones” militarily. Iran’s foreign minister rejected the claim, saying Israel’s goal has failed after Mojtaba Khamenei became the new supreme leader.

‘Bring the Iranian people to throw off the yoke of tyranny’: Netanyahu calls for regime change

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force has vowed to launch missiles with only one tonne of warhead, according to reports by Iran International, which quotes Aerospace Force Commander Majid Mousavi. He added that the "wavelength" and the "intensity" of the attacks will increase. Israeli Defence Force has claimed that 75 per cent of Iran's missile launchers were destroyed, eventhough there was a spike in missile sirens in Israel.&nbsp;Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force has claimed that it is ready for a prolonged conflict. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, which cites Martin Sampson, former UK defence adviser and leading Middle East military analyst, the striking capacity of Iran still remains large. According to the report by the Wall Street Journal, Iran had been using bombs that have a warhead of at least 2 kilograms. Iran has started using cluster munitions, which are designed to maximise damage in a certain locality withing a approximate distance of eight kilometres. Israeli media claims that it is to maximise damage on the civilians and called it a war crime according to the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions. However, neither Iran nor the US nor Israel are part of the Convention.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-diesel-export-bangladesh-energy-crisis-pipeline-1773131561351">India sends 5,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh amid energy crisis and global oil market volatility</a>US President Donald Trump has claimed that the war in Iran is “very complete" and “pretty much" over. The US army has significantly reduced the capacity of Iran to launch any major offensive. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force has said that it will be the one who “determines the end of the war”.&nbsp;“The equations and future status of the region are now in the hands of our armed forces; American forces will not end the war," read the statement. On March 10, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force claimed an attack on the United States military installation in northern Iraq. The headquarters of the US Army at the Harir Air Base in Erbil, in Iraq's Kurdistan, serves as the vital hub for the coalition forces and US command capabilities.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Iran's IRGC has vowed to attack with further wavelength and intensity to maximise damage. While US President Donald Trump claims to have reduced the capability of Iran to engage in major offensive.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force has vowed to launch missiles with only one tonne of warhead, according to reports by Iran International, which quotes Aerospace Force Commander Majid Mousavi. He added that the "wavelength" and the "intensity" of the attacks will increase. Israeli Defence Force has claimed that 75 per cent of Iran's missile launchers were destroyed, eventhough there was a spike in missile sirens in Israel. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force has claimed that it is ready for a prolonged conflict. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, which cites Martin Sampson, former UK defence adviser and leading Middle East military analyst, the striking capacity of Iran still remains large. According to the report by the Wall Street Journal, Iran had been using bombs that have a warhead of at least 2 kilograms. Iran has started using cluster munitions, which are designed to maximise damage in a certain locality withing a approximate distance of eight kilometres. Israeli media claims that it is to maximise damage on the civilians and called it a war crime according to the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions. However, neither Iran nor the US nor Israel are part of the Convention. Also Read: India sends 5,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh amid energy crisis and global oil market volatility US President Donald Trump has claimed that the war in Iran is “very complete" and “pretty much" over. The US army has significantly reduced the capacity of Iran to launch any major offensive. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force has said that it will be the one who “determines the end of the war”. “The equations and future status of the region are now in the hands of our armed forces; American forces will not end the war," read the statement. On March 10, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Force claimed an attack on the United States military installation in northern Iraq. The headquarters of the US Army at the Harir Air Base in Erbil, in Iraq's Kurdistan, serves as the vital hub for the coalition forces and US command capabilities.

Iran's IRGC has vowed to attack with further wavelength and intensity to maximise damage. While US President Donald Trump claims to have reduced the capability of Iran to engage in major offensive.

Iran vows to launch missiles with one tonne warhead as war continues in West Asia

US Democrats on Sunday (Mar 9) used an unofficial holiday to poke fun at President Donald Trump for his tendency to appear drowsy during public events. On Monday, the official account of the Democratic Party on X marked National Napping Day with a jab at the 79-year-old president, giving him the nickname "Commander-in-Sleep".<h2>Big day for Commander-in-Sleep</h2>Taking to X, TheDemocrats account in response to a post noting the holiday said, "Big day for the Commander-in-Sleep". The message quickly spread online, adding to an ongoing political back-and-forth over the president's stamina and work habits.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/economy/amid-iran-war-dubai-gold-at-discount-of-30-but-it-s-bad-news-for-india-here-s-why-gold-prices-latest-1772863560146">Amid Iran war Dubai selling gold at discount, but it’s bad news for India. Here’s why</a>Another Democratic aligned account, run by aides to former vice president Kamala Harris, joined the criticism.The account shared a photo showing Trump with his eyes closed during a November event in the Oval Office that focused on agreements with drugmakers Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk involving GLP 1 medications.Images of Trump appearing to doze off have repeatedly circulated during his second term, often becoming fodder for political opponents.Netizens too joined in on the fun, &nbsp;trolling Trump. Here are some choice memes you can't miss.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">😂 <a href="https://t.co/aNmzA5zoA3">pic.twitter.com/aNmzA5zoA3</a>&mdash; AllAboutTheZen (@ShineTheLoveFam) <a href="https://twitter.com/ShineTheLoveFam/status/2031041752644100307?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Big day for the Commander-in-Sleep <a href="https://t.co/VrnA5XsIYr">https://t.co/VrnA5XsIYr</a> <a href="https://t.co/iTAW6qJZln">pic.twitter.com/iTAW6qJZln</a>&mdash; Democrats (@TheDemocrats) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheDemocrats/status/2031035660442747021?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"> <a href="https://t.co/LqZ1CO34TX">pic.twitter.com/LqZ1CO34TX</a>&mdash; Peacediva ☮️ (@peacediva7) <a href="https://twitter.com/peacediva7/status/2031053328172327003?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Republicans defend the president’s work pace</h2>Trump’s allies have pushed back strongly against the criticism. Mike Johnson praised the president’s energy during a gathering of House Republicans at Trump’s golf resort in Miami.Johnson described Trump as "the most active president" he has seen and suggested the president’s limited sleep is part of the reason. Trump is "the most energised president, the most successful president, I believe, in my lifetime, and he’s proven it over and over and over. And part of it is because he doesn’t sleep, thankfully," he said."I get calls from him at 2 a.m. and 7 a.m., sometimes in the same day. He doesn’t require a lot of sleep, thankfully. And he is the man for the moment," he added.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/america-s-deadliest-war-crime-investigation-finds-us-likely-responsible-for-devastating-school-strike-that-killed-150-iranian-girls-1772766411530">US investigation admits America may be responsible for devastating school strike that killed over 150 Iranian girls</a><h2>Trump addresses the criticism</h2>Trump himself has previously dismissed the claims that he falls asleep during meetings.During a cabinet gathering, he said that while critics often highlight moments where his eyes appear closed, he was not actually sleeping."Some people said he closed his eyes," Trump told reporters. "Look, it got pretty boring."He added that photographs sometimes capture a brief moment when his eyes are shut, which can create the impression he had dozed off. "I didn’t sleep," he said. "I just closed them."

Why are Democrats calling Donald Trump the “Commander-in-Sleep”? The jab came on National Napping Day after pics of the US president appearing to doze off during events went viral. Trump’s allies say he barely sleeps. So what sparked the latest political mockery? Scroll down to find out.

US Democrats on Sunday (Mar 9) used an unofficial holiday to poke fun at President Donald Trump for his tendency to appear drowsy during public events. On Monday, the official account of the Democratic Party on X marked National Napping Day with a jab at the 79-year-old president, giving him the nickname "Commander-in-Sleep". Big day for Commander-in-Sleep Taking to X, TheDemocrats account in response to a post noting the holiday said, "Big day for the Commander-in-Sleep". The message quickly spread online, adding to an ongoing political back-and-forth over the president's stamina and work habits. Also read | Amid Iran war Dubai selling gold at discount, but it’s bad news for India. Here’s why Another Democratic aligned account, run by aides to former vice president Kamala Harris, joined the criticism. The account shared a photo showing Trump with his eyes closed during a November event in the Oval Office that focused on agreements with drugmakers Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk involving GLP 1 medications. Images of Trump appearing to doze off have repeatedly circulated during his second term, often becoming fodder for political opponents. Netizens too joined in on the fun, trolling Trump. Here are some choice memes you can't miss.

Why are Democrats calling Donald Trump the “Commander-in-Sleep”? The jab came on National Napping Day after pics of the US president appearing to doze off during events went viral. Trump’s allies say he barely sleeps. So what sparked the latest political mockery? Scroll down to find out.

‘Commander-in-Sleep’: Democrats roast sleepy Trump on National Napping Day

India is exporting 5000 tonnes of diesel amid volatility in the global energy market. The diesel will reach Bangladesh through a pipeline and will enter via the Parbatipur border. The war in West Asia continues to damage global trade, with disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;"We have an agreement with India, and according to that agreement, India will supply 180,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh via the pipeline each year. The 5,000 tonnes of diesel that is arriving now is a part of that agreement", said &nbsp;Muhammad Rezanur Rahman, the chairman of Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC). He further added that, as per the agreement, at least 90,000 tons of diesel will arrive within six months.&nbsp;Bangladesh is facing a severe energy crisis. The authorities have closed all private and public universities to reduce energy consumption as well as ease traffic congestion. Authorities have said that university campuses consume the largest amount of electricity for the residential halls, laboratories, air conditioning and the classrooms.&nbsp;Also Read: Uncertainty<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-pentagon-conflict-operation-epic-fury-iran-war-1773123879222"> around the war in Iran, as Trump and his team contradict each other</a>The nation imports 95 per cent of its energy needs. On Friday, Bangladesh imposed daily limits on the sale of oil amid reports of panic buying and stockpiling. "Nevertheless, it has been observed that at various petrol pumps/filling stations, fuel is being sold in excess of the government-approved limit, additional stock is being hoarded for excessive profit, and there are tendencies of selling fuel on the open market and engaging in smuggling," said Bangladesh's Energy Ministry.&nbsp;As per the government-imposed limits, motorcycles can buy up to 2 litres of octane or petrol a day; private ​cars 10 litres; SUVs, jeeps and microbuses 20–25 litres; pickups and local ​buses 70–80 litres; and long-distance buses, trucks and container carriers 200–220 litres of diesel.&nbsp;The country also faces a rise in the cost of Liquefied Natural Gas as Qatar has suspended deliveries. All three of Bangladesh's long-term LNG suppliers, QatarEnergy, OQ Trading, and Excelerate Energy, have invoked force majeure. The country is acquiring emergency spot cargoes at a record price of $23-$28 MMBtu.&nbsp;

India has begun exporting 5,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh through the Parbatipur pipeline as the country faces a severe energy crisis, LNG supply disruptions, and rising fuel prices amid the West Asia conflict.

India is exporting 5000 tonnes of diesel amid volatility in the global energy market. The diesel will reach Bangladesh through a pipeline and will enter via the Parbatipur border. The war in West Asia continues to damage global trade, with disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz. "We have an agreement with India, and according to that agreement, India will supply 180,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh via the pipeline each year. The 5,000 tonnes of diesel that is arriving now is a part of that agreement", said Muhammad Rezanur Rahman, the chairman of Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC). He further added that, as per the agreement, at least 90,000 tons of diesel will arrive within six months. Bangladesh is facing a severe energy crisis. The authorities have closed all private and public universities to reduce energy consumption as well as ease traffic congestion. Authorities have said that university campuses consume the largest amount of electricity for the residential halls, laboratories, air conditioning and the classrooms. Also Read: Uncertainty around the war in Iran, as Trump and his team contradict each other The nation imports 95 per cent of its energy needs. On Friday, Bangladesh imposed daily limits on the sale of oil amid reports of panic buying and stockpiling. "Nevertheless, it has been observed that at various petrol pumps/filling stations, fuel is being sold in excess of the government-approved limit, additional stock is being hoarded for excessive profit, and there are tendencies of selling fuel on the open market and engaging in smuggling," said Bangladesh's Energy Ministry. As per the government-imposed limits, motorcycles can buy up to 2 litres of octane or petrol a day; private cars 10 litres; SUVs, jeeps and microbuses 20–25 litres; pickups and local buses 70–80 litres; and long-distance buses, trucks and container carriers 200–220 litres of diesel. The country also faces a rise in the cost of Liquefied Natural Gas as Qatar has suspended deliveries. All three of Bangladesh's long-term LNG suppliers, QatarEnergy, OQ Trading, and Excelerate Energy, have invoked force majeure. The country is acquiring emergency spot cargoes at a record price of $23-$28 MMBtu.

India has begun exporting 5,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh through the Parbatipur pipeline as the country faces a severe energy crisis, LNG supply disruptions, and rising fuel prices amid the West Asia conflict.

India sends 5,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh amid energy crisis and global oil market volatility

At least 175 people were killed in the bombing of a primary school in Minab on 28 February in Iran. 150 among the dead were young girls, from ages seven to 12. It was the worst mass killing of the US and Israel's joint war on the Islamic Republic so far. UNESCO described the attack as a "grave violation" of international law.&nbsp;After the massive outrage, the US President Donald Trump said that Iran was responsible for the school bombing. “In my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran ... they’re very inaccurate, as you know, with their munitions. They have no accuracy whatsoever. It was done by Iran," the American president said.&nbsp;Although Trump presented no evidence for his claim. His claim was not even repeated by spokespeople for the US military, who repeatedly said that they are "investigating" the bombing. Amid all this, several pieces of evidence have emerged which indicate that the US could be responsible for the deadly strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school.<h2>Location of the school</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-iran-also-has-tomahawks-trump-confronted-by-reporters-as-he-floats-wild-theory-on-minab-school-strike-contradicts-pentagon-on-missile-use-1773120388711">Trump floats wild theory on Minab school strike says ‘Iran also has Tomahawks’</a>&nbsp;The Shajareh Tayyebeh school was near a cluster of buildings that were used as local Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval barracks. As per old satellite images, the school was once part of the IRGC complex, but it was walled off from the barracks nine years ago. It was evident for years that the building was an educational facility. It has colourful murals on the walls and small sports playing fields - and all of these were visible in satellite images. Moreover, there is no evidence that the school was used by the Iranian military.<h2>Aftermath videos</h2>After the bombing, multiple videos of the school were shared online. Four of the videos showed the school from various agles and it was evident that ot was a school building as one could easily see murals on the walls. One of the videos shows rubble of the destroyed school and smoke rising over the fence of the building. The video was one of the first indications that the bomb that hit the school was one of a series of strikes that also targeted the IRGC complex next to it.<h2>Satellite image of the site</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fact-check-trump-says-tomahawk-missile-is-very-generic-and-even-iran-has-some-is-it-really-1773113733048">Fact Check: Trump says Tomahawk missile is 'very generic' and even 'Iran has some'. Is it really?</a>&nbsp;The first satellite images of the premises were released on March 4, which showed the aftermath of the bombing at the school. They show the destroyed school building and four other destroyed buildings in its immediate vicinity, all within the walls of the IRGC complex.<h2>The Tomahawk video</h2>On March 8, &nbsp;Iranian state media Mehr news agency released a video of a missile hitting a location in Minab. The missile in the video was identified by munitions experts as a Tomahawk missile. “Given the belligerents, that indicates it is a US strike, as Israel is not known to possess Tomahawk missiles,” said NR Jenzen-Jones, the director of Armament Research Services, The Guardian reported.<h2>Location of US operation at the time of school bombing</h2>The US has not admitted so far that it struck the school or near it, in the Pentagon, led by Pete Hegseth on 4 March, the US military shared a graphic showing where the US and Israel had conducted strikes. On the map shared by the US, Minab was not mentioned, but one of the points marked as the site of US operation was adjacent to Minab.&nbsp;

Evidence surrounding the Minab school bombing that killed at least 175 people suggests possible US involvement. Investigators cite a video showing a Tomahawk missile, satellite imagery of coordinated strikes near an IRGC complex, and the presence of US military operations nearby. 

At least 175 people were killed in the bombing of a primary school in Minab on 28 February in Iran. 150 among the dead were young girls, from ages seven to 12. It was the worst mass killing of the US and Israel's joint war on the Islamic Republic so far. UNESCO described the attack as a "grave violation" of international law. After the massive outrage, the US President Donald Trump said that Iran was responsible for the school bombing. “In my opinion, based on what I’ve seen, that was done by Iran ... they’re very inaccurate, as you know, with their munitions. They have no accuracy whatsoever. It was done by Iran," the American president said. Although Trump presented no evidence for his claim. His claim was not even repeated by spokespeople for the US military, who repeatedly said that they are "investigating" the bombing. Amid all this, several pieces of evidence have emerged which indicate that the US could be responsible for the deadly strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school. Location of the school Also read: Trump floats wild theory on Minab school strike says ‘Iran also has Tomahawks’ The Shajareh Tayyebeh school was near a cluster of buildings that were used as local Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval barracks. As per old satellite images, the school was once part of the IRGC complex, but it was walled off from the barracks nine years ago. It was evident for years that the building was an educational facility. It has colourful murals on the walls and small sports playing fields - and all of these were visible in satellite images. Moreover, there is no evidence that the school was used by the Iranian military. Aftermath videos After the bombing, multiple videos of the school were shared online. Four of the videos showed the school from various agles and it was evident that ot was a school building as one could easily see murals on the walls. One of the videos shows rubble of the destroyed school and smoke rising over the fence of the building. The video was one of the first indications that the bomb that hit the school was one of a series of strikes that also targeted the IRGC complex next to it. Satellite image of the site Also read: Fact Check: Trump says Tomahawk missile is 'very generic' and even 'Iran has some'. Is it really? The first satellite images of the premises were released on March 4, which showed the aftermath of the bombing at the school. They show the destroyed school building and four other destroyed buildings in its immediate vicinity, all within the walls of the IRGC complex. The Tomahawk video On March 8, Iranian state media Mehr news agency released a video of a missile hitting a location in Minab. The missile in the video was identified by munitions experts as a Tomahawk missile. “Given the belligerents, that indicates it is a US strike, as Israel is not known to possess Tomahawk missiles,” said NR Jenzen-Jones, the director of Armament Research Services, The Guardian reported. Location of US operation at the time of school bombing The US has not admitted so far that it struck the school or near it, in the Pentagon, led by Pete Hegseth on 4 March, the US military shared a graphic showing where the US and Israel had conducted strikes. On the map shared by the US, Minab was not mentioned, but one of the points marked as the site of US operation was adjacent to Minab.

Evidence surrounding the Minab school bombing that killed at least 175 people suggests possible US involvement. Investigators cite a video showing a Tomahawk missile, satellite imagery of coordinated strikes near an IRGC complex, and the presence of US military operations nearby.&nbsp;

Minab school bombing: List of evidence that indicate US was responsible

The Government of India has invoked the Essential Commodities Act (ECA), 1955, effective March 2026, to address potential energy supply disruptions caused by raging war in West Asia after Israel and the US attacked Iran on Feb 28. The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas has issued specific directives to regulate the production and distribution of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and natural gas to ensure their availability for domestic and critical sectors. This simply means the oil refining&nbsp;companies have been ordered to maximise production of LPG and make&nbsp;it&nbsp;available to domestic consumers only. The order invokes clauses 3 and 5 of the&nbsp;ECA&nbsp;which also&nbsp;sets&nbsp;supply limits for Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs).&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2026/20260310/image-1773131873280.png"></figure>&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-will-determine-iran-rejects-trump-s-war-very-much-complete-claims-says-this-about-oil-export-to-us-1773110587663">'We will determine...': Iran rejects Trump's 'war very much complete' claims, says THIS about oil export to US</a><h2>What is Essential Commodities Act (ECA)?</h2>The Essential Commodities Act (ECA), 1955 is a central legislation designed to ensure the delivery of specific goods whose supply, if obstructed by hoarding or black marketing or any other external factor. In 2020, the Indian Parliament amended the Act, restricting the Centre’s authority to regulate cereals, pulses, potatoes, onions, edible oilseeds and oils only during situations like war, famine, or severe natural calamities.&nbsp;The Act empowers the government to regulate the production, supply, distribution, and pricing of these commodities to ensure they are available to consumers at fair prices in crucial times as well. The Central Government can add or remove items from the "Schedule" of the Act based on public interest. Since 2020, the Centre has invoked the ECA five times citing the need to control food prices and safeguard domestic supply.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/from-four-weeks-to-war-is-very-complete-to-not-won-enough-trump-contradicts-himself-about-endgame-of-iran-war-khamenei-dead-netanyahu-israel-1773117026231">From 'four weeks' to 'war is very complete' to 'not won enough': Trump contradicts himself about endgame of Iran war</a>&nbsp;As the Act has been invoked now, all oil refining companies must maximise production of LPG using available propane and butane streams. Refiners are prohibited from diverting propane or butane for manufacturing petrochemical products or other downstream derivatives. Public sector OMCs — IOCL, HPCL, and BPCL— must supply the procured LPG exclusively to domestic households. A new Natural Gas (Supply Regulation) Order, 2026 prioritises gas allocation to domestic PNG, CNG, and fertiliser plants. To prevent hoarding, government has mandated a 25-days window for fresh cylinder bookings.

India has invoked the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to safeguard LPG and natural gas supplies amid fears of energy disruptions due to the West Asia war. Refiners have been ordered to maximise LPG output, while OMCs must prioritise domestic consumers 

The Government of India has invoked the Essential Commodities Act (ECA), 1955, effective March 2026, to address potential energy supply disruptions caused by raging war in West Asia after Israel and the US attacked Iran on Feb 28. The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas has issued specific directives to regulate the production and distribution of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and natural gas to ensure their availability for domestic and critical sectors. This simply means the oil refining companies have been ordered to maximise production of LPG and make it available to domestic consumers only. The order invokes clauses 3 and 5 of the ECA which also sets supply limits for Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs). Also Read: 'We will determine...': Iran rejects Trump's 'war very much complete' claims, says THIS about oil export to US What is Essential Commodities Act (ECA)? The Essential Commodities Act (ECA), 1955 is a central legislation designed to ensure the delivery of specific goods whose supply, if obstructed by hoarding or black marketing or any other external factor. In 2020, the Indian Parliament amended the Act, restricting the Centre’s authority to regulate cereals, pulses, potatoes, onions, edible oilseeds and oils only during situations like war, famine, or severe natural calamities. The Act empowers the government to regulate the production, supply, distribution, and pricing of these commodities to ensure they are available to consumers at fair prices in crucial times as well. The Central Government can add or remove items from the "Schedule" of the Act based on public interest. Since 2020, the Centre has invoked the ECA five times citing the need to control food prices and safeguard domestic supply. Also Read: From 'four weeks' to 'war is very complete' to 'not won enough': Trump contradicts himself about endgame of Iran war As the Act has been invoked now, all oil refining companies must maximise production of LPG using available propane and butane streams. Refiners are prohibited from diverting propane or butane for manufacturing petrochemical products or other downstream derivatives. Public sector OMCs — IOCL, HPCL, and BPCL— must supply the procured LPG exclusively to domestic households. A new Natural Gas (Supply Regulation) Order, 2026 prioritises gas allocation to domestic PNG, CNG, and fertiliser plants. To prevent hoarding, government has mandated a 25-days window for fresh cylinder bookings.

India has invoked the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to safeguard LPG and natural gas supplies amid fears of energy disruptions due to the West Asia war. Refiners have been ordered to maximise LPG output, while OMCs must prioritise domestic consumers&nbsp;

Indian govt invokes Essential Commodities Act to ensure uninterrupted LPG supply amid West Asia war: What this means

Human Rights Watch has accused Israel of using white phosphorus munitions over residential areas in Lebanon’s Yohmor town amid the escalating West Asia war. Israel said it cannot confirm the claims. The allegations come as fighting between Israel and Hezbollah intensifies

Is Israel using white phosphorus in Lebanon amid Iran war? Alarming allegation surfaces

Before the US and Israel started bombarding Iran in late February, European leaders were often vocal critics of the Islamic Republic regime's alleged human rights violations and protest suppressions. But there has been a conspicuous absence of united rhetoric or action on the ground to change the regime since the war began. What accounts for Europe's muted response, particularly stark when compared with the high-pitched rhetoric during the Russia–Ukraine war? How did European leaders respond to the war, essentially started by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu? Is Europe only worried about the continuous flow of heating oil, crude oil products and gas, and not so much about democracy or human rights in Iran?<h2>Europe's cautious, balanced language on the Iran war</h2>Official statements from the European Union or specific European leaders condemned Iranian actions such as retaliatory strikes on Gulf states. The statements mostly urged de-escalation and restraint without either endorsing or directly criticising the US–Israeli airstrikes. They paid lip service to democracy and human rights in Iran while expressing solidarity with the Iranian people. European leaders called for a “credible transition” or peaceful change rather than offering any justification for US-Israel military action.<h2>Europe engages in diplomatic hedging on Iran war</h2>Europe's response is best described as diplomatic hedging. Many of its 27 member states are also part of the security alliance NATO, of which the US is the main partner. European leaders do not want to alienate the Trump administration, which could affect ongoing Russia–Ukraine negotiations and broader security cooperation. At the same time, they are worried about how trade flows could be affected, for instance if Iran blocks ships carrying goods to Europe via the Strait of Hormuz — something Tehran has repeatedly threatened to do.The European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Kaja Kallas, described Iran as an “exporter of war” and accused it of seeking to escalate the conflict by attacking regional neighbours. But Kallas stopped short of supporting the US–Israeli strikes, instead stressing the need for de-escalation.A European Union joint statement on March 1 urged Iran to end its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes and stop repression against its citizens. But again, the emphasis was on “maximum restraint” from all parties, without naming the US or Israel as aggressors.EU Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen held a videoconference with Middle Eastern leaders on Monday (Mar 9) in which they condemned “indiscriminate attacks by Iran” and expressed solidarity with affected Gulf states. There too, they stressed diplomatic solutions without endorsing the war launched by the US and Israel.This is a sharp contrast with Europe’s collective fury over Russia’s actions in Ukraine, where terms like “unprovoked aggression” were regularly used.<h2>Mixed message from the European Union on Iran war?</h2>Analysts also pointed to internal leadership tussles and turf wars between Kallas and von der Leyen, which could be contributing to mixed messaging from Europe on the Iran war.&nbsp;Von der Leyen, in a post on X, said: “Europe stands with the people of Iran in their legitimate fight for freedom,” and called for a “credible transition in Iran.”Kallas appeared to explicitly oppose another war, saying Europe should use Iran’s “weakest point” to pursue a “diplomatic solution”.Overall, the tone of EU statements has been one of supporting the Iranian people’s “right to determine their own future” and condemning regime violence. But European leaders appear reluctant to endorse the use of force for regime change, which Israel and the US are widely believed to be attempting.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/centcom-5000-targets-iran-operation-epic-fury-strike-video-1773119657977">CENTCOM claims 5,000 targets hit in Iran during first 10 days of ‘Operation Epic Fury’, releases strike video</a><h2>No major European leader openly supported US–Israel attacks on Iran</h2>No top European leaders spoke in favour of the war or endorsed the US–Israeli strikes as a means to promote democracy or human rights in Iran. The statements were carefully calculated, choreographed and deliberately neutral. French President Emmanuel Macron called the strikes an “outbreak of war” with serious consequences for international peace. He sought an urgent UN Security Council meeting while urging negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme. He also offered French military assistance to Middle Eastern partners. However, he did not praise the US–Israel offensive.German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who before the war had predicted that the regime in Iran would fall soon, made statements such as “international law is no longer respected” and said Germany must prioritise its own interests. This implied a reluctance to openly support the Israel–US offensive, as Merz also expressed hope that the war would “end quickly”.In a joint statement with France and Germany, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned Iran against missile attacks. But there too the call was for intensive diplomacy and military coordination in a defensive context rather than support for offensive action.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/from-four-weeks-to-war-is-very-complete-to-not-won-enough-trump-contradicts-himself-about-endgame-of-iran-war-khamenei-dead-netanyahu-israel-1773117026231">From 'four weeks' to 'war is very complete' to 'not won enough': Trump contradicts himself on endgame of Iran war</a><h2>Some European leaders openly opposed the war</h2>Contrary to the general expectation that the West would stand united with the US, some European leaders openly opposed the war. They warned that it could cause global instability, trigger more migration and disrupt energy supplies.Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, one of the most vocal critics of the war, rejected the US–Israel strikes on Iran outright. “The world has seen this type of conflict before when the US attacked Iraq, promising democracy and stability. The conflict only led to a rise in jihadist terrorism, a migration crisis in Europe and higher energy prices,” he said.Sánchez went one step further, accusing Trump and Netanyahu of using the war to “hide their own failures” domestically, even as he rejected US requests for assistance.&nbsp;Reportedly, Italy, the UK, Germany and France excluded Sánchez from some discussions because of his stance.Europe’s stress appears to be on de-escalation. While von der Leyen and Costa jointly urged “maximum restraint” to avoid undermining global nuclear non-proliferation efforts, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, in talks with China, agreed to work towards de-escalation and a political solution while respecting Iranian aspirations.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-strikes-back-irgc-warns-gulf-states-of-200-oil-if-attacks-continue-wion-1773102593952/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-strikes-back-irgc-warns-gulf-states-of-200-oil-if-attacks-continue-wion-1773102593952/embed</a><h2>So what is Europe’s worry — gas and oil, or more?</h2>It would not be far off the mark to say Europe appears to be more worried about uninterrupted gas and oil supplies than spreading Western ideas of human rights and democracy in Iran. Energy security for Europe has become a central concern in discussions because of the continent’s vulnerability if supplies are disrupted.The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments pass. Any disruption there immediately affects global markets, including Europe. Oil prices have been hovering around $100 per barrel after jumping sharply during the escalation, while European natural gas prices have also risen significantly.Disruptions to Qatar’s LNG exports are affecting Europe at a time when gas storage levels remain relatively low.All this could lead to a cascading effect in Europe, including stagflation, higher inflation and economic slowdown — especially in gas-dependent economies such as Germany.<h2>If the war continues, food costs would rise for Europe</h2>Western ideas such as freedom for Iranians have now become secondary to more pragmatic concerns about energy shocks, new waves of migration and broader economic fragility. Europe is already dealing with the economic consequences of the Ukraine war. Energy-import-dependent economies in Europe cannot easily afford to endorse yet another war in the Middle East.Europe is vulnerable to high energy prices and is not well placed to cushion a major shock, according to analysts. The best course for Europe, therefore, may be a more pragmatic rather than ideological approach to the situation. That is why the entire region now appears cautious and largely silent about any bolder approach towards “regime change” in Iran.

European leaders responded cautiously to the US–Israel war on Iran, urging restraint and diplomacy. But why? Their own energy security, trade risks and geopolitical calculations seem to have outweighed usual paeans to democracy or regime change

Before the US and Israel started bombarding Iran in late February, European leaders were often vocal critics of the Islamic Republic regime's alleged human rights violations and protest suppressions. But there has been a conspicuous absence of united rhetoric or action on the ground to change the regime since the war began. What accounts for Europe's muted response, particularly stark when compared with the high-pitched rhetoric during the Russia–Ukraine war? How did European leaders respond to the war, essentially started by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu? Is Europe only worried about the continuous flow of heating oil, crude oil products and gas, and not so much about democracy or human rights in Iran? Europe's cautious, balanced language on the Iran war Official statements from the European Union or specific European leaders condemned Iranian actions such as retaliatory strikes on Gulf states. The statements mostly urged de-escalation and restraint without either endorsing or directly criticising the US–Israeli airstrikes. They paid lip service to democracy and human rights in Iran while expressing solidarity with the Iranian people. European leaders called for a “credible transition” or peaceful change rather than offering any justification for US-Israel military action. Europe engages in diplomatic hedging on Iran war Europe's response is best described as diplomatic hedging. Many of its 27 member states are also part of the security alliance NATO, of which the US is the main partner. European leaders do not want to alienate the Trump administration, which could affect ongoing Russia–Ukraine negotiations and broader security cooperation. At the same time, they are worried about how trade flows could be affected, for instance if Iran blocks ships carrying goods to Europe via the Strait of Hormuz — something Tehran has repeatedly threatened to do. The European Union's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Kaja Kallas, described Iran as an “exporter of war” and accused it of seeking to escalate the conflict by attacking regional neighbours. But Kallas stopped short of supporting the US–Israeli strikes, instead stressing the need for de-escalation. A European Union joint statement on March 1 urged Iran to end its nuclear and ballistic missile programmes and stop repression against its citizens. But again, the emphasis was on “maximum restraint” from all parties, without naming the US or Israel as aggressors. EU Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen held a videoconference with Middle Eastern leaders on Monday (Mar 9) in which they condemned “indiscriminate attacks by Iran” and expressed solidarity with affected Gulf states. There too, they stressed diplomatic solutions without endorsing the war launched by the US and Israel. This is a sharp contrast with Europe’s collective fury over Russia’s actions in Ukraine, where terms like “unprovoked aggression” were regularly used. Mixed message from the European Union on Iran war? Analysts also pointed to internal leadership tussles and turf wars between Kallas and von der Leyen, which could be contributing to mixed messaging from Europe on the Iran war. Von der Leyen, in a post on X, said: “Europe stands with the people of Iran in their legitimate fight for freedom,” and called for a “credible transition in Iran.” Kallas appeared to explicitly oppose another war, saying Europe should use Iran’s “weakest point” to pursue a “diplomatic solution”. Overall, the tone of EU statements has been one of supporting the Iranian people’s “right to determine their own future” and condemning regime violence. But European leaders appear reluctant to endorse the use of force for regime change, which Israel and the US are widely believed to be attempting. Also read: CENTCOM claims 5,000 targets hit in Iran during first 10 days of ‘Operation Epic Fury’, releases strike video No major European leader openly supported US–Israel attacks on Iran No top European leaders spoke in favour of the war or endorsed the US–Israeli strikes as a means to promote democracy or human rights in Iran. The statements were carefully calculated, choreographed and deliberately neutral. French President Emmanuel Macron called the strikes an “outbreak of war” with serious consequences for international peace. He sought an urgent UN Security Council meeting while urging negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme. He also offered French military assistance to Middle Eastern partners. However, he did not praise the US–Israel offensive. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who before the war had predicted that the regime in Iran would fall soon, made statements such as “international law is no longer respected” and said Germany must prioritise its own interests. This implied a reluctance to openly support the Israel–US offensive, as Merz also expressed hope that the war would “end quickly”. In a joint statement with France and Germany, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned Iran against missile attacks. But there too the call was for intensive diplomacy and military coordination in a defensive context rather than support for offensive action. Also read: From 'four weeks' to 'war is very complete' to 'not won enough': Trump contradicts himself on endgame of Iran war Some European leaders openly opposed the war Contrary to the general expectation that the West would stand united with the US, some European leaders openly opposed the war. They warned that it could cause global instability, trigger more migration and disrupt energy supplies. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, one of the most vocal critics of the war, rejected the US–Israel strikes on Iran outright. “The world has seen this type of conflict before when the US attacked Iraq, promising democracy and stability. The conflict only led to a rise in jihadist terrorism, a migration crisis in Europe and higher energy prices,” he said. Sánchez went one step further, accusing Trump and Netanyahu of using the war to “hide their own failures” domestically, even as he rejected US requests for assistance. Reportedly, Italy, the UK, Germany and France excluded Sánchez from some discussions because of his stance. Europe’s stress appears to be on de-escalation. While von der Leyen and Costa jointly urged “maximum restraint” to avoid undermining global nuclear non-proliferation efforts, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, in talks with China, agreed to work towards de-escalation and a political solution while respecting Iranian aspirations. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-strikes-back-irgc-warns-gulf-states-of-200-oil-if-attacks-continue-wion-1773102593952/embed So what is Europe’s worry — gas and oil, or more? It would not be far off the mark to say Europe appears to be more worried about uninterrupted gas and oil supplies than spreading Western ideas of human rights and democracy in Iran. Energy security for Europe has become a central concern in discussions because of the continent’s vulnerability if supplies are disrupted. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint through which roughly one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments pass. Any disruption there immediately affects global markets, including Europe. Oil prices have been hovering around $100 per barrel after jumping sharply during the escalation, while European natural gas prices have also risen significantly. Disruptions to Qatar’s LNG exports are affecting Europe at a time when gas storage levels remain relatively low. All this could lead to a cascading effect in Europe, including stagflation, higher inflation and economic slowdown — especially in gas-dependent economies such as Germany. If the war continues, food costs would rise for Europe Western ideas such as freedom for Iranians have now become secondary to more pragmatic concerns about energy shocks, new waves of migration and broader economic fragility. Europe is already dealing with the economic consequences of the Ukraine war. Energy-import-dependent economies in Europe cannot easily afford to endorse yet another war in the Middle East. Europe is vulnerable to high energy prices and is not well placed to cushion a major shock, according to analysts. The best course for Europe, therefore, may be a more pragmatic rather than ideological approach to the situation. That is why the entire region now appears cautious and largely silent about any bolder approach towards “regime change” in Iran.

European leaders responded cautiously to the US–Israel war on Iran, urging restraint and diplomacy. But why? Their own energy security, trade risks and geopolitical calculations seem to have outweighed usual paeans to democracy or regime change

Europe's reluctance to support US-Israel military operations on Iran. What about democracy, human rights, etc.?

US President Donald Trump and the Pentagon are offering differing opinions on the progress of "Operation Epic Fury" and the possibility of the end of the conflict. On the other hand, Iran is determined to drag out the war as long as possible to hurt the GCC countries and make the global economy bleed.&nbsp;US President Donald Trump on Monday said that the “excursion” is "very much complete". He claimed that the US has achieved ‘major strides’ in achieving its objectives in Iran. When asked when will the war in Iran end, he said ”very soon".On the contrary, a Department of War run social media account, posted that, “We have Only Just Begun to Fight,” along side picture of missile with word ”No Mercy" superimposed on it.When asked about the contradiction between the statement Trump and his Defence Secretary, he said, “it could be both”. He claimed that its a new begining for the country. Then he again claimed that they have reduced the capability of Iran to launch an offensive, Iran has “no navy, no communications, they’ve got no air force. Their missiles are down to a scatter. Their drones are being blown up all over the place, including their manufacturing of drones.”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Q: You said the war is &#39;very complete.&#39; But your defense secretary says &#39;this is just the beginning.&#39; So which is it? TRUMP: You could say both <a href="https://t.co/4orXm5ZM4b">pic.twitter.com/4orXm5ZM4b</a>&mdash; Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/2031132139274543287?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Trump and Rubio offered conflicting reasons for entering into war&nbsp;</h2>This contradiction between Trump and his Defence Secretary, Secretary of State has been characteristic of the “Operation Epic Fury”. It has happened from the very beginning of the US war on Iran, which Trump now calls an “incursion”. Secretary of State Marco Rubio claimed that the US had information to believe Israel would launch an attack on Iran, and in retaliation, Iran would target US military assets in the region. So the US attacked preemptively."We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action; we knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties," said Rubio.On the contrary, Trump denied these claims, saying that, “I might have forced their (Israel's) hand”. He further added that he had a "feeling" those “lunatics” (Iran) will launch an attack against the US.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/centcom-5000-targets-iran-operation-epic-fury-strike-video-1773119657977">CENTCOM claims 5,000 targets hit in Iran during first 10 days of ‘Operation Epic Fury’, releases strike video</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">RUBIO: “The only reason we’re at war with Iran is because Israel forced our hand.” Unbelievable. It’s time to cut Israel off and treat them like the blood-thirsty parasitic terrorists that they are. <a href="https://t.co/gzHAx9Z6yt">pic.twitter.com/gzHAx9Z6yt</a>&mdash; Stew Peters (@realstewpeters) <a href="https://twitter.com/realstewpeters/status/2028620997780193638?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 2, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Trump and Hegseth gave conflicting accounts of the double-tap bombing at the Minab girls' school</h2>On February 28, at the early hours of the attack at the Minab girls' school. The US forces struck the Minab Girls' school twice, 40 minutes apart, killing more than 150 children and staff members. These kinds of double-tap attacks on civilian infrastructure are considered War Crime by the United Nations. When at first confronted by reporters, Pete Hegseth said, “We are investigating”.Then Trump claimed that the missile was from Iran, who have poor accuracy with its munitions. But when asked by Hegseth, he again said, “We are investigating”, further adding that only people who kill civilians are Iranians. When confronted with the fact that no one other than Trump is saying that, even his Defence Secretary, Pete Hegseth, standing on his shoulder, on his plane, did not agree with him. He said, “Because I just don't know”. Further suggesting that Tomahawk is a missile that a lot of other country including Iran, have purchased. &nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Q: You just suggested Iran got a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school. But you&#39;re the only person in your govt saying this. Even your defense secretary wouldn&#39;t say that. Why are you the only person saying this? TRUMP: Because I just don&#39;t know enough about it. It&#39;s… <a href="https://t.co/C9yy4RFFSj">pic.twitter.com/C9yy4RFFSj</a>&mdash; Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/2031135239347519739?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 9, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Uncertainty around the Iran war remains</h2>The war in Iran has reached its 10th day, and there were mixed hints in almost every important aspect of the war. There were conflicting accounts from Trump in a few hours apart, and between Trump and his own team, from the war being over, the state of Iran's defences, depleted Iranian leadership and the bombing of the elementary school. A cloud of uncertainty has engulfed the war, US is unable to rationalise its own actions, even within its own country, to its own citizens. The war remains unpopular, and the US has almost lost the narrative.&nbsp;

Trump again contradicts his own team, who have offered conflicting narratives on the rationale of war, the bombing of Minab elementary school, and the progress or ending of the war. 

US President Donald Trump and the Pentagon are offering differing opinions on the progress of "Operation Epic Fury" and the possibility of the end of the conflict. On the other hand, Iran is determined to drag out the war as long as possible to hurt the GCC countries and make the global economy bleed. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that the “excursion” is "very much complete". He claimed that the US has achieved ‘major strides’ in achieving its objectives in Iran. When asked when will the war in Iran end, he said ”very soon". On the contrary, a Department of War run social media account, posted that, “We have Only Just Begun to Fight,” along side picture of missile with word ”No Mercy" superimposed on it. When asked about the contradiction between the statement Trump and his Defence Secretary, he said, “it could be both”. He claimed that its a new begining for the country. Then he again claimed that they have reduced the capability of Iran to launch an offensive, Iran has “no navy, no communications, they’ve got no air force. Their missiles are down to a scatter. Their drones are being blown up all over the place, including their manufacturing of drones.”

Trump again contradicts his own team, who have offered conflicting narratives on the rationale of war, the bombing of Minab elementary school, to the progress or ending of war.&nbsp;

Uncertainty around the war in Iran, as Trump and his team contradict each other

As the war in West Asia escalates, it has sent the oil prices spiralling to above $100/per barrel. On Monday (March 9), Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in his address to the nation, underlined the current global situation and emphasised on saving fuel.

Middle East war forces Pakistan to close schools in bid to save fuel

US-Iran-Israel war LIVE updates | Eleven days since the United States and Israel launched a ‘pre-emptive’ attack on Iran and killed its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in subsequent air strikes on Mar 1, Iran has chosen its new Supreme Leader to lead the country. Khamenei's son, Mojtaba Khamenei, has been chosen to lead the country. While Trump has said that the new leader of Iran won't last long without his approval, Israel has threatened that he is the “target.” Israel and the US say that a peaceful transition from “terror regime” is their goal, while the Iranian leadership insists that they won't be initiating talks with the Americans. Both sides are relentlessly bombing each other, with Tehran bombing US assets in Gulf countries, and Israel expanding its offensive to target Hezbollah in Lebanon. Slamming Iran’s decision to retaliate against its regional neighbours a “very foolish, very stupid” move, the POTUS said that the war is "going to be ended soon". However, he did not set a date for the cessation of the hostilities.Can the world expect peace in West Asia as a result of this war? What will be the ultimate outcome? All updates, analysis and developments on the ongoing situation as the Israel-US war on Iran continues:

Iran launched a new salvo of missiles on Tuesday at Israeli cities, including Tel Aviv and US targets in the region, the Revolutionary Guards said, as fighting between the foes showed no signs of letting up.

Iran fires new missile barrage at Israel and US targets: Revolutionary Guards

“I congratulate His Eminence Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei on his assumption of the responsibilities of Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. I also reiterate deepest condolences and prayers on behalf of the people of Pakistan on the martyrdom of his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other family members. I am confident that the new Supreme Leader would guide Iran towards peace, stability and prosperity, in the years ahead”, Shehbaz Sharif posted on X.

Shehbaz Sharif congratulates Mojtaba Khamenei, offers condolences on Ali Khamenei’s death

The International Energy Agency (IEA) will hold an emergency meeting to assess the global oil supply situation amid disruptions caused by the ongoing conflict in West Asia.

IEA to hold emergency meeting evaluate oil supply 

A UAE refinery that is one of the world's largest has halted operations as a "precaution" following a drone attack on the industrial complex housing the facility, a source familiar with the matter told AFP on Tuesday.

UAE's Ruwais refinery shut as 'precaution' after drone attack in area

EU economy chief Valdis Dombrovskis said Tuesday the European Union did not support removing sanctions on Russian oil despite soaring energy prices.

EU rejects calls to lift Russian oil sanctions to ease energy prices

Iran has pressed its attacks against Qatar's infrastructure, the Gulf state's foreign ministry spokesman said on Tuesday, over a week after Iranian drone strikes forced a halt to Qatari gas production.

Qatar accuses Iran of escalating attacks on civilian infrastructure

Bringing down the regime in Iran is in the hands of the Iranian people, said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

End of Iranian regime depends on Iranian people’s will to throw off the yoke of tyranny': Netanyahu

The Kremlin said that Russian ⁠President ⁠Vladimir Putin has offered different options to mediate ⁠and reduce tensions in ⁠the war. Speaking to reporters, spokesman Dmitry Peskov declined ⁠to offer details ⁠on the specifics of ⁠the “considerations” that Putin raised on the call, but said these proposals are still on the table.

Putin’s Iran proposals still on the table, Kremlin says

Russian President Vladimir Putin had a phone call with US leader Donald Trump. According to Kremlin Aide Yury Ushakov, the hour-long call held at the US initiative focused on the conflicts around Iran and in Ukraine, and the situation in Venezuela. The conversation was the first between Putin and Trump in more than two months, and their first publicly reported phone call since the US-Israeli attack on Iran.

Putin, Trump discuss Iran, Ukraine, Venezuela in their first phone call this year

Saudi Aramco CEO has said that it is 'absolutely critical' that oil shipping resumes in Strait of Hormuz

'Absolutely critical' that oil shipping resumes in Strait of Hormuz: Saudi Aramco CEO

Iran's UN Ambassador, Amir Saeid Iravani, has condemned the US-Israeli "war of aggression" for creating a grave situation for civilians. Tehran has urged the Security Council to take urgent measures to halt the ongoing military campaign.

US-Israeli war of aggression creating grave, dangerous situation for civilians: Iran's UN envoy

Iran's general prosecutor office said that women's soccer team is invited back to homeland ‘with peace and confidence’, Judiciary news outlet said

Iran women's soccer team invited back to homeland ‘with peace and confidence’

South Lebanon's Tyre has been hit by strike after Israeli army warning

Strike hits south Lebanon's Tyre after Israeli army warning

Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority announced the extension of the closure of the country’s airspace for 72 hours. "The temporary precautionary measure started at noon (09:00 GMT) today and will last until the same time on Friday. This decision is based on the ongoing assessment of the security situation and regional developments, and it will be reviewed in light of any new updates,” the authority added.

Iraqi airspace closure extended

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the future of Iran's current political leadership ultimately rests in the hands of the Iranian people, asserting that any change in the regime would depend on their willingness to challenge what he described as oppressive rule.

"Bringing down regime in Iran in the hands of Iranian people", says Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu

Qatar strongly condemns attack targeting UAE consulate-general in Iraqi Kurdistan

Qatar strongly condemns attack targeting UAE consulate-general in Iraqi Kurdistan

Karnataka’s Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has written to Union Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas Hardeep Singh Puri seeking urgent intervention to address the disruption in supply of commercial LPG to hotels and restaurants in Bengaluru.

Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah flags commercial LPG disruption in Bengaluru

Amid raging war in West Asia and a possible oil and energy crisis, Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri are holding a meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi

Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri meet PM Modi

Sirens sounded in Jerusalem and central Israel on Tuesday, after the military warned of incoming missiles from Iran on the 11th day of the US-Israeli strike

Sirens sound in Jerusalem after Israel military warns of missiles from Iran

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel was inflicting heavy pressure on Iran's Islamic Republic, saying actions taken so far were "breaking their bones.""There is no doubt that through the actions taken so far we are breaking their bones - and our arm is still outstretched," Netanyahu said during a visit late on Monday to Israel's National Health Emergency Operations Center.

'Israel is breaking the bones of Islamic Republic: Netanyahu 

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, speaker of Iran's parliament, said on Tuesday (March 10) that Tehran was not seeking a ceasefire in the war. "We are certainly not seeking a ceasefire. We believe the aggressor must be struck so it learns a lesson and never again thinks of attacking Iran," Ghalibaf wrote on X.

Tehran not seeking ceasefire, Iran parliament speaker says

Iraq’s PM al-Sudani has told US Secretary of State Rubio that Iraq should not be used as a launch pad for attacks in the West Asia war

Iraq PM tells US Iraqi airspace must not be used against neighbours

Saudi Arabia’s Civil Defense agency said that a drone has fallen on a residential site in the city of Az Zulfi in the Riyadh province. No injuries reported.

Drone falls in Saudi Arabia’s Az Zulfi city

Figures released by the Israeli Ministry of Health and published by the Times of Israel reveal that a total of 191 individuals sustained injuries over the last 24 hours amid the continuing hostilities with Iran

191 injured in Israel over last 24 hours as conflict with Iran intensifies: Israeli Health Ministry

In a post on X, IDF wrote, "The IDF conducted an additional wave of airstrikes targeting assets and storage facilities of the Hezbollah affiliated Al-Quard Al-Hassan Association in Lebanon, used to finance the purchasing of weapons and terrorist salaries, as part of ongoing efforts to further degrade Hezbollah's military capabilities."

IDF attacks Hezbollah's Al-Quard Al-Hassan Association in Lebanon

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has claimed responsibility for a missile strike on a United States military installation in northern Iraq, according to reports from Al Jazeera

IRGC claims strike on US army headquarters in Iraq's Kurdistan

The US-Israel war with Iran has entered day 11, days after strikes killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran has named Mojtaba Khamenei as his successor as fighting continues to intensify. Scroll down for all LIVE Updates on the US-Israel-Iran war.

US-Iran-Israel war LIVE updates | Eleven days since the United States and Israel launched a ‘pre-emptive’ attack on Iran and killed its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in subsequent air strikes on Mar 1, Iran has chosen its new Supreme Leader to lead the country. Khamenei's son, Mojtaba Khamenei, has been chosen to lead the country. While Trump has said that the new leader of Iran won't last long without his approval, Israel has threatened that he is the “target.” Israel and the US say that a peaceful transition from “terror regime” is their goal, while the Iranian leadership insists that they won't be initiating talks with the Americans. Both sides are relentlessly bombing each other, with Tehran bombing US assets in Gulf countries, and Israel expanding its offensive to target Hezbollah in Lebanon. Slamming Iran’s decision to retaliate against its regional neighbours a “very foolish, very stupid” move, the POTUS said that the war is "going to be ended soon". However, he did not set a date for the cessation of the hostilities. Can the world expect peace in West Asia as a result of this war? What will be the ultimate outcome? All updates, analysis and developments on the ongoing situation as the Israel-US war on Iran continues:

The US-Israel war with Iran has entered day 11, days after strikes killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran has named Mojtaba Khamenei as his successor as fighting continues to intensify. Scroll down for all LIVE Updates on the US-Israel-Iran war.

world news

Trump’s U-turn on Russian oil deepens rift between US and European allies

Could the Iran war’s oil shock trigger a recession in the US economy?

Global strategic oil reserves: Which countries can survive an oil supply crisis

In US-Iran war, the winner would be Russia. Here's why

'Be careful...': Ali Larijani responds to Trump's 'TWENTY TIMES HARDER' threat

‘Dangerous precedent’: Qatar slams Iran over missile attacks on energy sites

'This is not endless...' Pete Hegseth calls it the most intense day of strikes

FBI memo claims Epstein abused a minor while speaking to Trump on speaker phone

WION World Pulse: Are we living in more divided world today?

WION World Pulse | Power Pulse – India & the world order

WION World Pulse | tech pulse - tech, trust & transformation

WION World Pulse: Could World War 3 become a reality soon? |WION

NATO ‘Iran war avoidance syndrome’: What about ‘one for all, all for one’?

World’s largest oil company CEO warns of 'catastrophic consequences' of Iran war as nations impose emergency measures

‘Bring the Iranian people to throw off the yoke of tyranny’: Netanyahu

Iran vows to launch missiles with 1 tonne warhead as war continues in West Asia

‘Commander-in-Sleep’: Democrats roast sleepy Trump on National Napping Day

India sends 5,000 tonnes of diesel to Bangladesh amid energy crisis

Minab school bombing: List of evidence that indicate US was responsible

India invokes Essential Commodities Act to secure LPG supply amid West Asia war

Israel accused of using white phosphorus in Lebanon: What we know

Europe's cagey response to Iran-Israel operation against Iran. Pray, why?

Uncertainity around the war in Iran, as Trump and his team contradict each other

Middle East war forces Pakistan to close schools in bid to save fuel

US-Iran-Israel war highlights: Iran launches fresh missile salvo at Israel

Trump explains why US chose to sink Iranian vessels over capturing them