The US House of Representatives on Wednesday (Jul 22) narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework, with the bulk of the funding set aside for the Pentagon as the United States deepens its military campaign against Iran. The measure passed 216-214, and will now head to the Senate.So, what exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next?<h2>What did the House approve?</h2>The House passed a budget framework, not the final legislation. A budget framework establishes overall spending limits and gives lawmakers instructions to draft detailed legislation later.If the Senate also approves the framework, House Republicans can prepare the final spending package, which would later return to Congress for another vote.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/us-supreme-court-makes-it-easier-to-deport-green-card-holders-what-does-it-mean-for-indians-wion-horizons-1782271724642">US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons</a><h2>Where will the money go?</h2>The proposed package allocates $95 billion across several priorities. The biggest share, $73 billion, is earmarked for the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies.According to House Republicans, the funding is intended to support military operations linked to the ongoing war against Iran.Another $12 billion is allocated to farmers affected by President Donald Trump's trade policies.The remaining $10 billion would fund election-related programmes tied to Trump's push for nationwide voting restrictions after his broader SAVE America Act failed to secure enough support to move forward.<h2>Why is this vote politically important?</h2>The legislation, as per AFP, is widely viewed as the Republican Party's last major legislative effort before the November midterm elections. Control of Congress will be at stake in those elections, making the budget vote politically significant for President Donald Trump's second term.Republicans argue the package strengthens national security while advancing their election priorities.House Speaker Mike Johnson said the proposal puts Republicans "on a path to enacting two fundamentally simple and crucial goals: securing American elections and strengthening our homeland."<h2>Why is the Senate crucial?</h2>Despite clearing the House, the proposal still faces uncertainty. The Senate must first approve the budget framework before lawmakers can draft the final spending legislation.Republicans hope to eventually use the budget reconciliation process, which allows certain budget-related bills to pass the Senate with a simple majority instead of the usual 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster. That would reduce the need for Democratic support.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/can-india-withstand-another-west-asia-crisis-how-israel-hezbollah-iran-tensions-could-hit-its-energy-security-wion-decodes-1782374369218">Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes</a><h2>Why are Democrats opposing it?</h2>Democrats have criticised both the military spending and the administration's priorities.Representative Rosa DeLauro argued that Americans are more concerned about inflation and rising living costs than increased military spending. "The American people do not want more open-ended, aimless, expensive, and deadly wars in the Middle East. They want the price of basic necessities like food, housing, healthcare, childcare, and gasoline to go down," she said.<h2>What happens next?</h2>The budget framework now moves to the US Senate. If senators approve it, House Republicans can begin writing the detailed legislation that specifies how the money will be spent. That bill would then require approval from both chambers before becoming law.

The US House of Representatives has narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework that sets the stage for legislation funding Pentagon operations linked to the Iran war. What exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next?

The US House of Representatives on Wednesday (Jul 22) narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework, with the bulk of the funding set aside for the Pentagon as the United States deepens its military campaign against Iran. The measure passed 216-214, and will now head to the Senate. So, what exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next? What did the House approve? The House passed a budget framework, not the final legislation. A budget framework establishes overall spending limits and gives lawmakers instructions to draft detailed legislation later. If the Senate also approves the framework, House Republicans can prepare the final spending package, which would later return to Congress for another vote. Also read | US Supreme Court makes it easier to deport Green Card holders: What does it mean for Indians? | WION Horizons Where will the money go? The proposed package allocates $95 billion across several priorities. The biggest share, $73 billion, is earmarked for the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies. According to House Republicans, the funding is intended to support military operations linked to the ongoing war against Iran. Another $12 billion is allocated to farmers affected by President Donald Trump's trade policies. The remaining $10 billion would fund election-related programmes tied to Trump's push for nationwide voting restrictions after his broader SAVE America Act failed to secure enough support to move forward. Why is this vote politically important? The legislation, as per AFP, is widely viewed as the Republican Party's last major legislative effort before the November midterm elections. Control of Congress will be at stake in those elections, making the budget vote politically significant for President Donald Trump's second term. Republicans argue the package strengthens national security while advancing their election priorities. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the proposal puts Republicans "on a path to enacting two fundamentally simple and crucial goals: securing American elections and strengthening our homeland." Why is the Senate crucial? Despite clearing the House, the proposal still faces uncertainty. The Senate must first approve the budget framework before lawmakers can draft the final spending legislation. Republicans hope to eventually use the budget reconciliation process, which allows certain budget-related bills to pass the Senate with a simple majority instead of the usual 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster. That would reduce the need for Democratic support. Also read | Can India withstand another West Asia crisis? How Israel-Hezbollah-Iran tensions could hit its energy security | WION Decodes Why are Democrats opposing it? Democrats have criticised both the military spending and the administration's priorities. Representative Rosa DeLauro argued that Americans are more concerned about inflation and rising living costs than increased military spending. "The American people do not want more open-ended, aimless, expensive, and deadly wars in the Middle East. They want the price of basic necessities like food, housing, healthcare, childcare, and gasoline to go down," she said. What happens next? The budget framework now moves to the US Senate. If senators approve it, House Republicans can begin writing the detailed legislation that specifies how the money will be spent. That bill would then require approval from both chambers before becoming law.

The US House of Representatives has narrowly approved a $95 billion budget framework that sets the stage for legislation funding Pentagon operations linked to the Iran war. What exactly did lawmakers approve? Where will the money go? And what happens next?

US House approves $95 billion budget for Trump's war against Iran. Where will the money go?

The United States has signed a landmark civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia that could pave the way for the kingdom to enrich uranium, marking a significant step in bilateral ties while raising questions over nuclear oversight. The US Department of Energy said on Wednesday (July 22) that Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman signed a "peaceful nuclear cooperation agreement" alongside a bilateral safeguards agreement.&nbsp;According to the department, the partnership is aimed at expanding American nuclear technology exports, creating high-paying jobs in the United States and strengthening the country's energy and national security. "These agreements reflect our two nations' shared commitment to strengthening US-Saudi commercial relations, delivering prosperity at home and security to our allies abroad," Wright said in a statement.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pay-a-big-price-trump-issues-fresh-warning-as-he-receives-us-troops-killed-by-iran-1784760407508">'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran</a>&nbsp;He added that the agreements uphold "the highest standards of nuclear safety and nonproliferation" while relying on US-designed nuclear technology and expertise. "Thanks to President Trump, the American nuclear renaissance is under way and will deliver long-term benefits to the American and Saudi people," Wright said.&nbsp;The Energy Department said the agreement would also help meet Saudi Arabia's growing energy needs. The deal will now be sent to the US Congress for review, where it could face scrutiny from lawmakers concerned about oversight and safeguards, particularly because it could ultimately allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium.&nbsp;Dan Sumner, chief executive of Westinghouse Electric Company, which is expected to play a role in Saudi Arabia's nuclear programme, welcomed the announcement.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/they-re-getting-hit-so-hard-trump-says-iran-will-be-ready-to-make-deal-very-soon-1784757782967">'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’</a>&nbsp;"The US government's announcement to launch a civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia is a landmark step that strengthens energy security, expands opportunities for US industry and workers, and drives significant long-term economic growth and investment benefits for both countries," Sumner said in a statement to CBS.&nbsp;The agreement comes at a sensitive geopolitical moment as Washington remains engaged in its conflict with Iran. The timing is likely to draw additional attention given broader concerns over nuclear proliferation in the Middle East and the ongoing regional tensions.&nbsp;While the administration has presented the accord as a boost for energy cooperation and economic growth, further details of the agreement have not yet been made public, leaving key questions about implementation and monitoring unanswered.

The US signed a landmark civil nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia to export US technology, meet Saudi energy needs, and potentially allow local uranium enrichment, pending congressional review and nonproliferation oversight.

The United States has signed a landmark civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia that could pave the way for the kingdom to enrich uranium, marking a significant step in bilateral ties while raising questions over nuclear oversight. The US Department of Energy said on Wednesday (July 22) that Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman signed a "peaceful nuclear cooperation agreement" alongside a bilateral safeguards agreement. According to the department, the partnership is aimed at expanding American nuclear technology exports, creating high-paying jobs in the United States and strengthening the country's energy and national security. "These agreements reflect our two nations' shared commitment to strengthening US-Saudi commercial relations, delivering prosperity at home and security to our allies abroad," Wright said in a statement. Also read: 'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran He added that the agreements uphold "the highest standards of nuclear safety and nonproliferation" while relying on US-designed nuclear technology and expertise. "Thanks to President Trump, the American nuclear renaissance is under way and will deliver long-term benefits to the American and Saudi people," Wright said. The Energy Department said the agreement would also help meet Saudi Arabia's growing energy needs. The deal will now be sent to the US Congress for review, where it could face scrutiny from lawmakers concerned about oversight and safeguards, particularly because it could ultimately allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium. Dan Sumner, chief executive of Westinghouse Electric Company, which is expected to play a role in Saudi Arabia's nuclear programme, welcomed the announcement. Also read: 'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’ "The US government's announcement to launch a civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia is a landmark step that strengthens energy security, expands opportunities for US industry and workers, and drives significant long-term economic growth and investment benefits for both countries," Sumner said in a statement to CBS. The agreement comes at a sensitive geopolitical moment as Washington remains engaged in its conflict with Iran. The timing is likely to draw additional attention given broader concerns over nuclear proliferation in the Middle East and the ongoing regional tensions. While the administration has presented the accord as a boost for energy cooperation and economic growth, further details of the agreement have not yet been made public, leaving key questions about implementation and monitoring unanswered.

The US signed a landmark civil nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia to export US technology, meet Saudi energy needs, and potentially allow local uranium enrichment, pending congressional review and nonproliferation oversight.

US-Saudi nuclear deal opens door to Riyadh's uranium enrichment ambitions. Here’s how

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has claimed that the United States achieved no “strategic gains” from its military campaign against Iran, while accusing some European countries of endangering regional and global security by supporting Washington’s actions.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-launches-12th-straight-round-of-strikes-on-iranian-military-targets-details-inside-1784761432462">US launches 12th straight round of strikes on Iranian military targets. Details inside</a>&nbsp;In a post on X on Wednesday (July 22), Gharibabadi said he presented Iran’s position on the conflict during a meeting with 25 European ambassadors and chargés d’affaires in Tehran.“I reminded them that in the 40-day war, we imposed a severe defeat on the aggressors. In this new round of military aggression as well, we will resolutely defend our homeland and national interests,” he wrote.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/they-re-getting-hit-so-hard-trump-says-iran-will-be-ready-to-make-deal-very-soon-1784757782967">'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’</a>&nbsp;Gharibabadi argued that the military confrontations had failed to deliver any meaningful outcome for the United States.&nbsp;&nbsp;“These wars have created no strategic gains for America and only endanger regional and global peace and security,” he said. He added that Europe was expected to uphold the United Nations Charter and international law by condemning acts of aggression.&nbsp;The Iranian official said some European countries, including Spain, had adopted what he described as “principled positions” during the conflict. However, he criticised European states that allowed the US to launch attacks on Iran from their territory, describing them as “among the aggressors”.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;Gharibabadi also urged European governments to take a more independent diplomatic role, saying the continent should act as “the driving force of diplomacy, not a follower of the aggressor’s power”.&nbsp;His remarks come amid continued diplomatic tensions following the recent conflict, with Tehran maintaining that it acted in self-defence while accusing the United States and its allies of violating international law.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated the US achieved no strategic gains in recent military aggression, while criticising European nations for supporting Washington and endangering global security.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has claimed that the United States achieved no “strategic gains” from its military campaign against Iran, while accusing some European countries of endangering regional and global security by supporting Washington’s actions. Also read: US launches 12th straight round of strikes on Iranian military targets. Details inside In a post on X on Wednesday (July 22), Gharibabadi said he presented Iran’s position on the conflict during a meeting with 25 European ambassadors and chargés d’affaires in Tehran. “I reminded them that in the 40-day war, we imposed a severe defeat on the aggressors. In this new round of military aggression as well, we will resolutely defend our homeland and national interests,” he wrote. Also read: 'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’ Gharibabadi argued that the military confrontations had failed to deliver any meaningful outcome for the United States. “These wars have created no strategic gains for America and only endanger regional and global peace and security,” he said. He added that Europe was expected to uphold the United Nations Charter and international law by condemning acts of aggression. The Iranian official said some European countries, including Spain, had adopted what he described as “principled positions” during the conflict. However, he criticised European states that allowed the US to launch attacks on Iran from their territory, describing them as “among the aggressors”. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness Gharibabadi also urged European governments to take a more independent diplomatic role, saying the continent should act as “the driving force of diplomacy, not a follower of the aggressor’s power”. His remarks come amid continued diplomatic tensions following the recent conflict, with Tehran maintaining that it acted in self-defence while accusing the United States and its allies of violating international law.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi stated the US achieved no strategic gains in recent military aggression, while criticising European nations for supporting Washington and endangering global security.

'No strategic gains': Iran says US war backfired, slams Europe's role

The United States launched its 12th consecutive round of strikes on Iranian military targets on Wednesday (July 22), with the operation carried out under the direction of President Donald Trump, according to the US Central Command (CENTCOM).&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pay-a-big-price-trump-issues-fresh-warning-as-he-receives-us-troops-killed-by-iran-1784760407508">'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran</a>&nbsp;In a post on X, CENTCOM said the latest wave of attacks began at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time and forms part of Washington's ongoing military campaign against Iran.&nbsp;"At 5:30 p.m. ET today, U.S. forces began launching more strikes against Iranian military targets at the Commander in Chief's direction. The mission will continue to further degrade Iran's ability to threaten civilian mariners and commercial vessels transiting regional waters," CENTCOM said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-putin-help-iran-target-cia-bases-us-probes-russia-s-role-in-gulf-drone-strikes-1784752623754">Did Putin help Iran target CIA bases? US probes Russia's role in Gulf drone strikes</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">At 5:30 p.m. ET today, U.S. forces began launching more strikes against Iranian military targets at the Commander in Chief&#39;s direction. The mission will continue to further degrade Iran&#39;s ability to threaten civilian mariners and commercial vessels transiting regional waters.&mdash; U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) <a href="https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2080051307834970386?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;The military said the operation is aimed at weakening Iran's capability to threaten civilian shipping and commercial vessels operating in regional waters. It did not disclose the locations of the strikes or provide details on the targets hit or any immediate assessment of damage.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;The latest action marks the 12th consecutive round of US strikes against Iranian military infrastructure, underscoring the continued escalation between Washington and Tehran amid heightened tensions in the region.&nbsp;There was no immediate response from Iranian authorities regarding the latest strikes.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/national-mourning-in-america-iran-s-irgc-issues-chilling-9-11-style-threat-to-us-1784749825263">'National mourning in America': Iran's IRGC issues chilling 9/11-style threat to US</a>

Directed by President Trump, US forces launched a 12th consecutive round of strikes against Iranian military targets to protect commercial shipping, according to CENTCOM.

The United States launched its 12th consecutive round of strikes on Iranian military targets on Wednesday (July 22), with the operation carried out under the direction of President Donald Trump, according to the US Central Command (CENTCOM). Also read: 'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran In a post on X, CENTCOM said the latest wave of attacks began at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time and forms part of Washington's ongoing military campaign against Iran. "At 5:30 p.m. ET today, U.S. forces began launching more strikes against Iranian military targets at the Commander in Chief's direction. The mission will continue to further degrade Iran's ability to threaten civilian mariners and commercial vessels transiting regional waters," CENTCOM said. Also read: Did Putin help Iran target CIA bases? US probes Russia's role in Gulf drone strikes

Directed by President Trump, US forces launched a 12th consecutive round of strikes against Iranian military targets to protect commercial shipping, according to CENTCOM.

US launches 12th straight round of strikes on Iranian military targets. Details inside

US President Donald Trump travelled to Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday (July 22) to receive the remains of four American service members killed in separate Iranian attacks, as he vowed that Tehran would “pay a big price” for the deaths.&nbsp;According to US officials, three of the troops were killed when an Iranian missile struck their barracks in Jordan, while a fourth service member died in Iraq during the controlled detonation of an Iranian attack drone.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/they-re-getting-hit-so-hard-trump-says-iran-will-be-ready-to-make-deal-very-soon-1784757782967">'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’</a>&nbsp;Before departing for Dover, Trump delivered a stern warning to Iran, saying the country would face serious consequences.&nbsp;“They’re going to pay a big price,” Trump told reporters, without elaborating on what action the United States might take. The visit came amid escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran following a series of military exchanges that have raised fears of a broader regional conflict.&nbsp;Despite the hardline warning, Trump struck a more optimistic tone when discussing the possibility of diplomacy. Speaking later at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, he said he believed Iran would eventually return to negotiations.&nbsp;Trump characterised the conflict as a “skirmish” rather than a full-scale war, arguing that Tehran wanted to reach an agreement but had not yet settled on its position. “I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-does-not-control-strait-of-hormuz-centcom-rebuts-irgc-s-bold-claim-1784754761236">'Iran does not control Strait of Hormuz': CENTCOM rebuts IRGC's bold claim</a>&nbsp;He added that Iran was “getting hit so hard” and would be ready to make a deal “very soon”, although he claimed the country’s leadership continued to shift its stance during negotiations.Trump’s remarks reflect the administration’s dual approach of increasing pressure on Tehran while maintaining that a negotiated settlement remains possible, even as military hostilities continue.

President Donald Trump warned Iran it will “pay a big price” after receiving the remains of four US service members killed in Jordan and Iraq, while still expressing hope for negotiations.

US President Donald Trump travelled to Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday (July 22) to receive the remains of four American service members killed in separate Iranian attacks, as he vowed that Tehran would “pay a big price” for the deaths. According to US officials, three of the troops were killed when an Iranian missile struck their barracks in Jordan, while a fourth service member died in Iraq during the controlled detonation of an Iranian attack drone. Also read: 'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’ Before departing for Dover, Trump delivered a stern warning to Iran, saying the country would face serious consequences. “They’re going to pay a big price,” Trump told reporters, without elaborating on what action the United States might take. The visit came amid escalating tensions between Washington and Tehran following a series of military exchanges that have raised fears of a broader regional conflict. Despite the hardline warning, Trump struck a more optimistic tone when discussing the possibility of diplomacy. Speaking later at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, he said he believed Iran would eventually return to negotiations. Trump characterised the conflict as a “skirmish” rather than a full-scale war, arguing that Tehran wanted to reach an agreement but had not yet settled on its position. “I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said. Also read: 'Iran does not control Strait of Hormuz': CENTCOM rebuts IRGC's bold claim He added that Iran was “getting hit so hard” and would be ready to make a deal “very soon”, although he claimed the country’s leadership continued to shift its stance during negotiations. Trump’s remarks reflect the administration’s dual approach of increasing pressure on Tehran while maintaining that a negotiated settlement remains possible, even as military hostilities continue.

President Donald Trump warned Iran it will “pay a big price” after receiving the remains of four US service members killed in Jordan and Iraq, while still expressing hope for negotiations.

'Pay a big price': Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (July 22) described the ongoing conflict with Iran as a “skirmish”, saying Tehran was eager to negotiate but was not yet prepared to finalise a deal because it continued to change its position.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;Speaking at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, Trump said he believed Iran would eventually return to the negotiating table despite the current hostilities.&nbsp;“I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said while referring to the conflict.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/he-s-the-architect-of-the-genocide-against-palestinians-despite-trump-s-remark-mamdani-repeats-netanyahu-will-be-arrested-if-visits-us-1784666149643">‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Trump on Iran War: I call it a skirmish. We have a skirmish with the Islamic Republic of Iran. They are getting hit so hard they want to make a deal, but I say they are not ready to make a deal. <a href="https://t.co/jPM8yAlW7n">pic.twitter.com/jPM8yAlW7n</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://x.com/clashreport/status/2080018886083149871?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He claimed Iran was under increasing military pressure and suggested that was pushing Tehran towards negotiations. “They’re getting hit so hard, and they want to make a deal,” Trump said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/intended-to-degrade-iranian-military-capabilities-us-continues-to-strike-iran-on-10th-consecutive-day-1784581451083">‘Intended to degrade Iranian military capabilities’: US continues to strike Iran on 10th consecutive day</a>&nbsp;However, the US president argued that Iran was not yet ready to reach an agreement because it kept altering the terms during negotiations.&nbsp;“But I say they’re not ready to make a deal, because every time they make a deal, they want to change it and everything. They’re not ready. They’ll be ready very soon,” Trump said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/eye-for-an-eye-iran-threatens-regional-energy-network-after-trump-s-strike-warning-1784748454678">'Eye for an eye': Iran threatens regional energy network after Trump's strike warning</a>&nbsp;Trump did not provide further details on the status of any ongoing diplomatic contacts or specify what terms Iran was seeking to change. His remarks come amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran as the conflict continues, with both sides exchanging threats alongside military action.

Donald Trump described the Iran conflict as a “skirmish,” claiming military pressure will push Tehran to negotiate soon, though altering terms has delayed a finalised deal.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (July 22) described the ongoing conflict with Iran as a “skirmish”, saying Tehran was eager to negotiate but was not yet prepared to finalise a deal because it continued to change its position. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness Speaking at a high school event in the US state of Georgia, Trump said he believed Iran would eventually return to the negotiating table despite the current hostilities. “I call it a skirmish. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Trump said while referring to the conflict. Also read: ‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US

Donald Trump described the Iran conflict as a “skirmish,” claiming military pressure will push Tehran to negotiate soon, though altering terms has delayed a finalised deal.

'They're getting hit so hard': Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) has rejected Iran’s claim that it controls the Strait of Hormuz, insisting that the strategic waterway remains open to international shipping despite repeated threats from Tehran.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/national-mourning-in-america-iran-s-irgc-issues-chilling-9-11-style-threat-to-us-1784749825263">'National mourning in America': Iran's IRGC issues chilling 9/11-style threat to US</a>&nbsp;In a post on X on Wednesday, CENTCOM dismissed assertions by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy that it controls access to the narrow maritime passage linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman. “The international waterway remains open for transit regardless of IRGC threats and attacks. Commercial vessels continue to use the strait with US military support,” CENTCOM said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;The statement comes amid heightened tensions in the Gulf, where Iran has repeatedly warned it could disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz if its interests are threatened. The waterway is one of the world’s most critical energy corridors, carrying a significant share of global oil and liquefied natural gas exports.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-war-cost-hits-37-5-billion-as-hegseth-seeks-67-billion-more-for-pentagon-1784676064348">US-Iran war cost hits $37.5 billion as Hegseth seeks $67 billion more for Pentagon</a>&nbsp;CENTCOM said US forces have continued to ensure freedom of navigation through the strait, adding that they have assisted more than 900 commercial vessels in safely transiting the waterway since early May.&nbsp;The latest exchange follows claims by the IRGC Navy that Iran controls entry to and exit from the Strait of Hormuz, a statement Washington has firmly rejected.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/he-s-the-architect-of-the-genocide-against-palestinians-despite-trump-s-remark-mamdani-repeats-netanyahu-will-be-arrested-if-visits-us-1784666149643">‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US</a>&nbsp;The competing claims underscore the ongoing maritime standoff in the Gulf, with the US maintaining a visible naval presence to safeguard commercial shipping amid high regional tensions.

US Central Command refuted claims by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard regarding authority over the Strait of Hormuz, affirming the critical waterway remains open to international commercial traffic with US military support.

The United States Central Command (CENTCOM) has rejected Iran’s claim that it controls the Strait of Hormuz, insisting that the strategic waterway remains open to international shipping despite repeated threats from Tehran. Also read: 'National mourning in America': Iran's IRGC issues chilling 9/11-style threat to US In a post on X on Wednesday, CENTCOM dismissed assertions by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy that it controls access to the narrow maritime passage linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman. “The international waterway remains open for transit regardless of IRGC threats and attacks. Commercial vessels continue to use the strait with US military support,” CENTCOM said. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness The statement comes amid heightened tensions in the Gulf, where Iran has repeatedly warned it could disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz if its interests are threatened. The waterway is one of the world’s most critical energy corridors, carrying a significant share of global oil and liquefied natural gas exports. Also read: US-Iran war cost hits $37.5 billion as Hegseth seeks $67 billion more for Pentagon CENTCOM said US forces have continued to ensure freedom of navigation through the strait, adding that they have assisted more than 900 commercial vessels in safely transiting the waterway since early May. The latest exchange follows claims by the IRGC Navy that Iran controls entry to and exit from the Strait of Hormuz, a statement Washington has firmly rejected. Also read: ‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US The competing claims underscore the ongoing maritime standoff in the Gulf, with the US maintaining a visible naval presence to safeguard commercial shipping amid high regional tensions.

US Central Command refuted claims by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard regarding authority over the Strait of Hormuz, affirming the critical waterway remains open to international commercial traffic with US military support.

'Iran does not control Strait of Hormuz': CENTCOM rebuts IRGC's bold claim

The United States intelligence community is investigating whether Russia assisted Iran in targeting CIA facilities in the Gulf by providing advanced drone technology or intelligence used in the attacks.&nbsp;According to a Reuters report citing four people familiar with the ongoing assessments, the US officials have not reached a definitive conclusion on whether Moscow directly supported the operations. However, intelligence analysts are examining whether the accuracy and effectiveness of the Iranian drone strikes, coupled with Russia’s broader military and technical cooperation with Tehran, point to possible Russian involvement, Reuters reported.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/national-mourning-in-america-iran-s-irgc-issues-chilling-9-11-style-threat-to-us-1784749825263">'National mourning in America': Iran's IRGC issues chilling 9/11-style threat to US</a>&nbsp;The investigation marks the first known effort by US intelligence agencies to determine whether Russia specifically played a role in attacks on CIA-linked facilities. This aspect has not previously been made public. Reuters had earlier reported that US officials acknowledged Russia’s support for Iranian strikes against American targets in the Gulf. Still, the latest inquiry focuses on whether that assistance extended to covert intelligence sites.&nbsp;According to Reuters and other reports, at least two CIA-linked locations were hit by Iranian drones in March. One of the sites was reportedly a CIA station operating within the US embassy compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, while another was located in eastern Iraq.&nbsp;People familiar with the matter told Reuters that additional CIA facilities may also have been targeted, although they declined to identify the locations because of the sensitive nature of the operations.&nbsp;The report also said that a Western intelligence memo reviewed by officials in the region concluded that Russia had likely helped Iran identify or target CIA facilities. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because of the classified nature of the intelligence.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;US intelligence agencies are also investigating whether Iran relied on Russian-provided targeting data during the drone attack on the US embassy compound in Riyadh. Officials cautioned that the inquiry remains ongoing and no final assessment has yet been made regarding Moscow’s level of involvement.&nbsp;If confirmed, the findings could further deepen tensions between Washington and Moscow at a time when Russia and Iran have expanded their military cooperation amid broader regional instability.

US intelligence is probing whether Russia provided Tehran with advanced navigation systems, drone technology, or targeting data to enable precise Iranian drone strikes against covert CIA facilities across the Gulf.

The United States intelligence community is investigating whether Russia assisted Iran in targeting CIA facilities in the Gulf by providing advanced drone technology or intelligence used in the attacks. According to a Reuters report citing four people familiar with the ongoing assessments, the US officials have not reached a definitive conclusion on whether Moscow directly supported the operations. However, intelligence analysts are examining whether the accuracy and effectiveness of the Iranian drone strikes, coupled with Russia’s broader military and technical cooperation with Tehran, point to possible Russian involvement, Reuters reported. Also read: 'National mourning in America': Iran's IRGC issues chilling 9/11-style threat to US The investigation marks the first known effort by US intelligence agencies to determine whether Russia specifically played a role in attacks on CIA-linked facilities. This aspect has not previously been made public. Reuters had earlier reported that US officials acknowledged Russia’s support for Iranian strikes against American targets in the Gulf. Still, the latest inquiry focuses on whether that assistance extended to covert intelligence sites. According to Reuters and other reports, at least two CIA-linked locations were hit by Iranian drones in March. One of the sites was reportedly a CIA station operating within the US embassy compound in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, while another was located in eastern Iraq. People familiar with the matter told Reuters that additional CIA facilities may also have been targeted, although they declined to identify the locations because of the sensitive nature of the operations. The report also said that a Western intelligence memo reviewed by officials in the region concluded that Russia had likely helped Iran identify or target CIA facilities. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity because of the classified nature of the intelligence. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness US intelligence agencies are also investigating whether Iran relied on Russian-provided targeting data during the drone attack on the US embassy compound in Riyadh. Officials cautioned that the inquiry remains ongoing and no final assessment has yet been made regarding Moscow’s level of involvement. If confirmed, the findings could further deepen tensions between Washington and Moscow at a time when Russia and Iran have expanded their military cooperation amid broader regional instability.

US intelligence is probing whether Russia provided Tehran with advanced navigation systems, drone technology, or targeting data to enable precise Iranian drone strikes against covert CIA facilities across the Gulf.

Did Putin help Iran target CIA bases? US probes Russia's role in Gulf drone strikes

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has threatened the United States with what it described as a “9/11-style” attack, warning that continued conflict with Tehran would result in “national mourning in America”, hours after US President Donald Trump warned of possible strikes on Iranian infrastructure.&nbsp;According to Iran’s state-linked Tasnim news agency, the IRGC said: “If the war continues, we will carry out regret-inducing operations that will lead to national mourning in America.” The warning appeared to invoke the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, after which the United States declared national mourning.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;The latest exchange marks a sharp escalation in rhetoric between Washington and Tehran as tensions continue to rise over the possibility of direct military action. Iran also hardened its stance following Trump’s latest warning, saying it would retaliate if the United States targeted critical infrastructure such as bridges or power plants inside the country.&nbsp;According to statements carried by Iranian state media, Tehran said any US strike on its infrastructure would be met with attacks on infrastructure and bridges across the region. It added that energy facilities linked to US interests would be among the targets.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/he-s-the-architect-of-the-genocide-against-palestinians-despite-trump-s-remark-mamdani-repeats-netanyahu-will-be-arrested-if-visits-us-1784666149643">‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US</a>&nbsp;The response came after Trump warned that if Iran attacked a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, the United States would respond by bombing an Iranian bridge or power plant.&nbsp;Iran’s latest warning signals that any US strike on its territory could trigger retaliation against multiple regional targets connected to American interests, raising fears of a broader conflict in West Asia.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-iran-war-cost-hits-37-5-billion-as-hegseth-seeks-67-billion-more-for-pentagon-1784676064348">US-Iran war cost hits $37.5 billion as Hegseth seeks $67 billion more for Pentagon</a>

Iran’s IRGC threatened a “9/11-style” attack and “national mourning” in America, warning it will target regional infrastructure and US-linked energy assets if President Trump carries out strikes on Iranian facilities.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has threatened the United States with what it described as a “9/11-style” attack, warning that continued conflict with Tehran would result in “national mourning in America”, hours after US President Donald Trump warned of possible strikes on Iranian infrastructure. According to Iran’s state-linked Tasnim news agency, the IRGC said: “If the war continues, we will carry out regret-inducing operations that will lead to national mourning in America.” The warning appeared to invoke the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, after which the United States declared national mourning. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness The latest exchange marks a sharp escalation in rhetoric between Washington and Tehran as tensions continue to rise over the possibility of direct military action. Iran also hardened its stance following Trump’s latest warning, saying it would retaliate if the United States targeted critical infrastructure such as bridges or power plants inside the country. According to statements carried by Iranian state media, Tehran said any US strike on its infrastructure would be met with attacks on infrastructure and bridges across the region. It added that energy facilities linked to US interests would be among the targets. Also read: ‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US The response came after Trump warned that if Iran attacked a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, the United States would respond by bombing an Iranian bridge or power plant. Iran’s latest warning signals that any US strike on its territory could trigger retaliation against multiple regional targets connected to American interests, raising fears of a broader conflict in West Asia. Also read: US-Iran war cost hits $37.5 billion as Hegseth seeks $67 billion more for Pentagon

Iran’s IRGC threatened a “9/11-style” attack and “national mourning” in America, warning it will target regional infrastructure and US-linked energy assets if President Trump carries out strikes on Iranian facilities.

'National mourning in America': Iran's IRGC issues chilling 9/11-style threat to US

Iran has threatened to target energy infrastructure across West Asia and cut electricity supplies to US allies in the region if Washington carries out President Donald Trump’s warning to strike Iranian infrastructure, escalating tensions as the conflict shows no sign of easing.&nbsp;In a statement on Wednesday (July 22), Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the country’s joint military command, said the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed and warned that oil, gas, electricity and wider economic infrastructure across the region would become targets if the United States attacked Iranian facilities.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/is-pentagon-hiding-missile-shortage-from-trump-us-officials-raise-alarm-over-iran-war-readiness-1784677584736">Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness</a>&nbsp;“The Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and if any vessel is to pass through it, it must travel only along the designated route and in accordance with the arrangements previously announced,” the military command said.&nbsp;It also declared that Iran’s armed forces would not allow “even a single drop of oil” to be exported from the region if the United States followed through on President Trump’s threats against Iranian infrastructure.&nbsp;The command further warned that repeated threats from Washington and the US military would only expand the conflict across West Asia and “even beyond it”. The warning came after Trump threatened to destroy an Iranian bridge or power plant for every vessel attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, raising fears of a broader confrontation in one of the world’s most strategically important energy corridors.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/he-s-the-architect-of-the-genocide-against-palestinians-despite-trump-s-remark-mamdani-repeats-netanyahu-will-be-arrested-if-visits-us-1784666149643">‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US</a>&nbsp;Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said any attack on the country’s infrastructure would trigger a forceful response. “Our defence doctrine is clear: eye for an eye,” Araghchi wrote on X. “Any aggression against Iran, including our infrastructure, will compel a powerful and decisive response.”&nbsp;He added that countries providing any form of support for such attacks would also be regarded as “legitimate targets”.&nbsp;Separately, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Aerospace Force commander, Major General Majid Mousavi, warned that Tehran would cut electricity supplies to US allies in the region if Iranian bridges or power plants were struck.&nbsp;The latest threats underline Iran’s willingness to widen the conflict beyond direct military exchanges by targeting regional energy networks and critical infrastructure, potentially disrupting oil exports and electricity supplies across the Gulf.&nbsp;

Iran threatened to target West Asia energy infrastructure, close the Strait of Hormuz, and cut electricity to US allies if Washington acts on Donald Trump’s warning to strike Iranian facilities.

Iran has threatened to target energy infrastructure across West Asia and cut electricity supplies to US allies in the region if Washington carries out President Donald Trump’s warning to strike Iranian infrastructure, escalating tensions as the conflict shows no sign of easing. In a statement on Wednesday (July 22), Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the country’s joint military command, said the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed and warned that oil, gas, electricity and wider economic infrastructure across the region would become targets if the United States attacked Iranian facilities. Also read: Is Pentagon hiding missile shortage from Trump? US officials raise alarm over Iran war readiness “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and if any vessel is to pass through it, it must travel only along the designated route and in accordance with the arrangements previously announced,” the military command said. It also declared that Iran’s armed forces would not allow “even a single drop of oil” to be exported from the region if the United States followed through on President Trump’s threats against Iranian infrastructure. The command further warned that repeated threats from Washington and the US military would only expand the conflict across West Asia and “even beyond it”. The warning came after Trump threatened to destroy an Iranian bridge or power plant for every vessel attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, raising fears of a broader confrontation in one of the world’s most strategically important energy corridors. Also read: ‘He's the architect of the genocide against Palestinians’: Mamdani repeats Netanyahu will be arrested if he visits US Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said any attack on the country’s infrastructure would trigger a forceful response. “Our defence doctrine is clear: eye for an eye,” Araghchi wrote on X. “Any aggression against Iran, including our infrastructure, will compel a powerful and decisive response.” He added that countries providing any form of support for such attacks would also be regarded as “legitimate targets”. Separately, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Aerospace Force commander, Major General Majid Mousavi, warned that Tehran would cut electricity supplies to US allies in the region if Iranian bridges or power plants were struck. The latest threats underline Iran’s willingness to widen the conflict beyond direct military exchanges by targeting regional energy networks and critical infrastructure, potentially disrupting oil exports and electricity supplies across the Gulf.

Iran threatened to target West Asia energy infrastructure, close the Strait of Hormuz, and cut electricity to US allies if Washington acts on Donald Trump’s warning to strike Iranian facilities.

'Eye for an eye': Iran threatens regional energy network after Trump's strike warning

Four months ago, Pakistani army chief Asim Munir’s forces crossed all limits in its war with Afghanistan by bombing Kabul’s Omid addiction treatment hospital. Now, calls are growing for Pakistan’s nefarious role in this humanitarian catastrophe to be investigated as a ‘war crime’.&nbsp;Let’s jog your memory back to March 16.&nbsp;At around 9 pm local time, thick smoke blanketed the area around the Kabul hospital, which catered to people with drug-dependence problems.&nbsp;Visuals showed a spate of destruction after Pakistan’s air strikes. Firefighters scrambled to douse the blaze.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ukrainian-drones-hit-warehouses-of-russia-s-top-online-retailer-wildberries-again-1784728533655">Ukrainian drones hit warehouses of Russia’s top online retailer Wildberries, again</a>&nbsp;Buildings on the site were reduced to rubble. Distraught people were seen searching for their loved ones. The human toll of Pakistan’s air strikes was huge.&nbsp;While Taliban stated that about 400 people were killed, the UN assistance mission in Afghanistan independently verified the killing of at least 269 civilians, whereas 122 others were wounded.&nbsp;Now, what did the Amnesty investigation find?&nbsp;It confirmed that the hospital was built in 2016, on the site of a former NATO base.&nbsp;While it originally operated as a vocational training facility for people being treated for substance dependence, it was expanded into a 2,000-bed treatment centre after Taliban seized power in 2021.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/oppn-using-students-as-political-tools-creating-manufactured-sense-of-anger-rajnath-singh-1784716925229">‘Oppn using students as political tools, creating ‘manufactured sense of anger’: Rajnath Singh</a>&nbsp;After analysing over 60 photos and videos and reviewing more than 30 satellite images, Amnesty rejected Pakistan’s claim that the site was used as a storage facility for weapons and ammunition.&nbsp;Speaking to eyewitnesses, it ascertained that over a thousand patients were housed in this hospital.&nbsp;Three locations, including a dining hall, kitchen and the place where patients lived, were also reportedly destroyed in Pakistan’s air strikes.&nbsp;Most importantly, Amnesty questioned the timing of the attack, which gave no chance for civilians to escape.&nbsp;According to this NGO, Pakistan’s airstrikes were against international humanitarian law, which accorded special protection to healthcare facilities.&nbsp;Stressing that this attack amounted to a war crime, Amnesty called for an impartial probe and the guilty to be punished.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sonam-wangchuk-puts-condition-for-ending-fast-seeks-assurance-of-no-punitive-action-against-protesters-1784724401578">Sonam Wangchuk puts condition for ending fast, seeks assurance of no punitive action against protesters</a>&nbsp;Previously, the UN also called for a swift and independent investigation into Pakistan’s dastardly attack.&nbsp;Although both nations agreed to a ceasefire in October 2025, the truce ended in February this year after Pakistan conducted air strikes in Afghanistan.&nbsp;Pakistan continues to target innocent civilians.&nbsp;In June-end, Munir’s forces killed at least 36 civilians with fresh air strikes on the three eastern provinces of Paktika, Kunar, and Paktia.&nbsp;Subsequently, Afghanistan claimed to have conducted air strikes in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces.&nbsp;In the first three months of 2026, the UN documented the killing of 372 Afghan civilians and injuries to 397 others due to Pakistan’s attacks.&nbsp;The latest report just goes to expose Pakistan’s real face on the global stage yet again, amid its farcical attempt to emerge as a ‘peacemaker’.

After analysing over 60 photos and videos and reviewing more than 30 satellite images, Amnesty rejected Pakistan’s claim that the site was used as a storage facility for weapons and ammunition. It ascertained that over a thousand patients were housed in this hospital.

Four months ago, Pakistani army chief Asim Munir’s forces crossed all limits in its war with Afghanistan by bombing Kabul’s Omid addiction treatment hospital. Now, calls are growing for Pakistan’s nefarious role in this humanitarian catastrophe to be investigated as a ‘war crime’. Let’s jog your memory back to March 16. At around 9 pm local time, thick smoke blanketed the area around the Kabul hospital, which catered to people with drug-dependence problems. Visuals showed a spate of destruction after Pakistan’s air strikes. Firefighters scrambled to douse the blaze. Also Read: Ukrainian drones hit warehouses of Russia’s top online retailer Wildberries, again Buildings on the site were reduced to rubble. Distraught people were seen searching for their loved ones. The human toll of Pakistan’s air strikes was huge. While Taliban stated that about 400 people were killed, the UN assistance mission in Afghanistan independently verified the killing of at least 269 civilians, whereas 122 others were wounded. Now, what did the Amnesty investigation find? It confirmed that the hospital was built in 2016, on the site of a former NATO base. While it originally operated as a vocational training facility for people being treated for substance dependence, it was expanded into a 2,000-bed treatment centre after Taliban seized power in 2021. Also Read: ‘Oppn using students as political tools, creating ‘manufactured sense of anger’: Rajnath Singh After analysing over 60 photos and videos and reviewing more than 30 satellite images, Amnesty rejected Pakistan’s claim that the site was used as a storage facility for weapons and ammunition. Speaking to eyewitnesses, it ascertained that over a thousand patients were housed in this hospital. Three locations, including a dining hall, kitchen and the place where patients lived, were also reportedly destroyed in Pakistan’s air strikes. Most importantly, Amnesty questioned the timing of the attack, which gave no chance for civilians to escape. According to this NGO, Pakistan’s airstrikes were against international humanitarian law, which accorded special protection to healthcare facilities. Stressing that this attack amounted to a war crime, Amnesty called for an impartial probe and the guilty to be punished. Also Read: Sonam Wangchuk puts condition for ending fast, seeks assurance of no punitive action against protesters Previously, the UN also called for a swift and independent investigation into Pakistan’s dastardly attack. Although both nations agreed to a ceasefire in October 2025, the truce ended in February this year after Pakistan conducted air strikes in Afghanistan. Pakistan continues to target innocent civilians. In June-end, Munir’s forces killed at least 36 civilians with fresh air strikes on the three eastern provinces of Paktika, Kunar, and Paktia. Subsequently, Afghanistan claimed to have conducted air strikes in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces. In the first three months of 2026, the UN documented the killing of 372 Afghan civilians and injuries to 397 others due to Pakistan’s attacks. The latest report just goes to expose Pakistan’s real face on the global stage yet again, amid its farcical attempt to emerge as a ‘peacemaker’.

After analysing over 60 photos and videos and reviewing more than 30 satellite images, Amnesty rejected Pakistan’s claim that the site was used as a storage facility for weapons and ammunition. It ascertained that over a thousand patients were housed in this hospital.

Fresh embarrassment for Munir as Amnesty dubs Pak attack on Kabul hospital as ‘war crime’ | Gravitas

What would your reaction be if your favourite dessert is garnished with dried ants?&nbsp;This exact scenario unfolded in South Korea, with a restaurant facing legal action.&nbsp;Now, this is no ordinary restaurant. Located in the capital Seoul, it holds two Michelin stars. This is awarded to restaurants that do 'excellent cooking' and are 'worth a detour'.&nbsp;The case came to light after officials from South Korea's Ministry of Food and Drug Safety found online photos of its dessert sprinkled with ants.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-threatens-regional-infrastructure-energy-facilities-if-us-strikes-bridges-power-plants-1784734867982">Iran threatens regional infrastructure, energy facilities if US strikes bridges, power plants</a>&nbsp;As per local authorities, the restaurant imported a staggering 49,000 ants from the U.S. and Thailand and used them in desserts for the last four years.&nbsp;As per reports, prosecutors have sought a one-year jail term for the owner and demanded the restaurant be fined over 10,000 U.S. dollars.&nbsp;But why has this become a controversy in the first place?&nbsp;South Korea has approved only 10 insect species for human consumption. While the list includes grasshoppers, locusts and crickets, ants are not on it.&nbsp;According to the country's health authorities, the ants used by the restaurant contained up to 55 times more heavy metals than typical edible insects.&nbsp;However, it is worth noting that ants are eaten in several Asian, African and South American countries.In its defence, the restaurant reportedly argued that its chef had used ants in dishes while working in the U.S. and Europe and was not aware that doing so was illegal in South Korea.&nbsp;The court will now deliver its verdict on September 2.

A two-Michelin-star Seoul restaurant owner faces trial after the eatery allegedly used 49,000 imported ants in desserts over four years, despite ants not being approved for human consumption in South Korea.

What would your reaction be if your favourite dessert is garnished with dried ants? This exact scenario unfolded in South Korea, with a restaurant facing legal action. Now, this is no ordinary restaurant. Located in the capital Seoul, it holds two Michelin stars. This is awarded to restaurants that do 'excellent cooking' and are 'worth a detour'. The case came to light after officials from South Korea's Ministry of Food and Drug Safety found online photos of its dessert sprinkled with ants. Also Read: Iran threatens regional infrastructure, energy facilities if US strikes bridges, power plants As per local authorities, the restaurant imported a staggering 49,000 ants from the U.S. and Thailand and used them in desserts for the last four years. As per reports, prosecutors have sought a one-year jail term for the owner and demanded the restaurant be fined over 10,000 U.S. dollars. But why has this become a controversy in the first place? South Korea has approved only 10 insect species for human consumption. While the list includes grasshoppers, locusts and crickets, ants are not on it. According to the country's health authorities, the ants used by the restaurant contained up to 55 times more heavy metals than typical edible insects. However, it is worth noting that ants are eaten in several Asian, African and South American countries. In its defence, the restaurant reportedly argued that its chef had used ants in dishes while working in the U.S. and Europe and was not aware that doing so was illegal in South Korea. The court will now deliver its verdict on September 2.

A two-Michelin-star Seoul restaurant owner faces trial after the eatery allegedly used 49,000 imported ants in desserts over four years, despite ants not being approved for human consumption in South Korea.

Restaurant owner on trial in South Korea after serving 49,000 ants to diners | Gravitas

A senior Iranian military official warned on Wednesday (July 22) that Tehran would strike regional infrastructure, including energy facilities, if Washington targeted bridges and power plants in the Islamic Republic. The warning came after US President Donald Trump threatened to target civilian infrastructure in Iran if Tehran attacks commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;“If the Americans target an Iranian bridge or power plant, Iran will respond by striking infrastructure and bridges across the region, including energy facilities in which the United States has interests,” the unnamed official was reported as saying by the Iranian semi-official news agency Tasnim.&nbsp;“The Americans should by now, after these past ten days, be fully convinced that Iran strikes wherever it decides to strike. Therefore, any such gamble by Trump will once again end in his embarrassment,” the official added.&nbsp;Tehran will also “exercise its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz,” the Iranian military official said on Wednesday, adding that authorities “will not relinquish (their) firm resolve to control the Strait.”&nbsp;These statements came after US President Donald Trump renewed his threats to strike Iran's civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants located inside or near the capital Tehran, if it attacks any ship transiting the vital Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Trump, in his Truth Social post, wrote, "From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-will-bomb-bridge-power-plant-after-every-attack-on-ships-in-strait-of-hormuz-trump-1784728449435">US will bomb Iran's bridge, power plant after every attack on ships in Strait of Hormuz: Trump</a>&nbsp;The US president's threat comes as the US military carried out its 11th consecutive night of strikes against the Islamic Republic over Tehran's attacks on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz.<h2>US and Iran tensions escalate over Strait of Hormuz</h2>Fighting over the strategic strait led to the collapse of a preliminary deal between the United States and Iran reached on June 17. However, top US diplomat Marco Rubio again reiterated Washington's stance that it was willing to find a negotiated agreement with Tehran.&nbsp;"We remain open to working it out in a negotiated way. But right now, they don't seem to be serious about that," Rubio said at a Southeast Asian ministers' meeting in Manila.&nbsp;He insisted that the US was right to strike Iran because it was attacking shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and planned to rebuild its missile and drone capabilities.

Iran warned it would strike regional infrastructure and energy facilities if the US targets bridges or power plants in the Islamic Republic, escalating tensions over the Strait of Hormuz.

A senior Iranian military official warned on Wednesday (July 22) that Tehran would strike regional infrastructure, including energy facilities, if Washington targeted bridges and power plants in the Islamic Republic. The warning came after US President Donald Trump threatened to target civilian infrastructure in Iran if Tehran attacks commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. “If the Americans target an Iranian bridge or power plant, Iran will respond by striking infrastructure and bridges across the region, including energy facilities in which the United States has interests,” the unnamed official was reported as saying by the Iranian semi-official news agency Tasnim. “The Americans should by now, after these past ten days, be fully convinced that Iran strikes wherever it decides to strike. Therefore, any such gamble by Trump will once again end in his embarrassment,” the official added. Tehran will also “exercise its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz,” the Iranian military official said on Wednesday, adding that authorities “will not relinquish (their) firm resolve to control the Strait.” These statements came after US President Donald Trump renewed his threats to strike Iran's civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants located inside or near the capital Tehran, if it attacks any ship transiting the vital Strait of Hormuz. Trump, in his Truth Social post, wrote, "From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran." Also Read: US will bomb Iran's bridge, power plant after every attack on ships in Strait of Hormuz: Trump The US president's threat comes as the US military carried out its 11th consecutive night of strikes against the Islamic Republic over Tehran's attacks on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz. US and Iran tensions escalate over Strait of Hormuz Fighting over the strategic strait led to the collapse of a preliminary deal between the United States and Iran reached on June 17. However, top US diplomat Marco Rubio again reiterated Washington's stance that it was willing to find a negotiated agreement with Tehran. "We remain open to working it out in a negotiated way. But right now, they don't seem to be serious about that," Rubio said at a Southeast Asian ministers' meeting in Manila. He insisted that the US was right to strike Iran because it was attacking shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and planned to rebuild its missile and drone capabilities.

Iran warned it would strike regional infrastructure and energy facilities if the US targets bridges or power plants in the Islamic Republic, escalating tensions over the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran threatens regional infrastructure, energy facilities if US strikes bridges, power plants

New Delhi: Panama has thrown its weight behind India’s bid for a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, describing New Delhi as a vital voice for the Global South and a key partner in upholding international law and democratic values.&nbsp;In an exclusive interview with WION’s Sidhant Sibal during his visit to Delhi, Panama’s Foreign Minister Javier Martínez-Acha Vásquez emphasised the need for UN reforms to reflect 21st-century realities.&nbsp;“Today, the global architecture does not reflect the reality of the 21st century,” he said. “We consider that Latin America should have a permanent seat...and India [being an] important actor.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ukrainian-drones-hit-warehouses-of-russia-s-top-online-retailer-wildberries-again-1784728533655">Ukrainian drones hit warehouses of Russia’s top online retailer Wildberries, again</a>&nbsp;The remarks come as bilateral relations gain momentum. Minister Vásquez met India’s External Affairs Minister this week, with both sides eyeing a strategic partnership that extends beyond diplomacy into economics, technology and connectivity.&nbsp;Panama is positioning itself as India’s gateway to Latin America and the Caribbean, leveraging the Panama Canal’s strategic importance. The foreign minister invited Indian businesses to establish operations in Panama, citing its logistics hub status, efficient ports and stable, rules-based economy.&nbsp;“Panama is not the end of the journey of India to Latin America. It is the beginning,” he stated. “We can provide to India... logistic connectivity, the stability, the rule of law... for establishing multinationals.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/oppn-using-students-as-political-tools-creating-manufactured-sense-of-anger-rajnath-singh-1784716925229">‘Oppn using students as political tools, creating ‘manufactured sense of anger’: Rajnath Singh</a>&nbsp;Panama operates one of the world’s busiest canals and plans two additional ports, one on the Atlantic and one on the Pacific. It offers Indian firms access to a market of 700 million people and a trusted ecosystem for transit and trade. The minister highlighted ongoing efforts to open a visa facility in Mumbai to ease business travel.&nbsp;On the technology front, Panama is exploring collaboration with the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs). “We visited the IIT. We are trying to reach an agreement... for the establishment of the IIT Panama,” he revealed. This forms part of broader ambitions in innovation, e-governance and long-term prosperity.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sonam-wangchuk-puts-condition-for-ending-fast-seeks-assurance-of-no-punitive-action-against-protesters-1784724401578">Sonam Wangchuk puts condition for ending fast, seeks assurance of no punitive action against protesters</a>&nbsp;The minister described both nations as natural partners sharing democratic principles. He urged India to join the Panama Canal Neutrality Treaty, which guarantees open access to vessels of all nations in peace and war. “By having the largest democracy [and] an important emerging superpower part of the treaty... it is very important,” he said, noting India’s Global South leadership would strengthen the canal’s impartial status.&nbsp;Panama hosts one of the largest Indian diasporas in the region, active in finance, commerce, electronics and shipping. The minister praised their contributions, “They are important to us... the best [form of] advertising.”&nbsp;The visit signals Panama’s ambition to elevate ties with India, transforming a solid diplomatic relationship into a vibrant economic and strategic partnership.

Panama is positioning itself as India’s gateway to Latin America and the Caribbean, leveraging the Panama Canal’s strategic importance. The minister invited Indian businesses to establish operations in Panama, citing its logistics hub status, efficient ports, and stable, rules-based economy.

New Delhi: Panama has thrown its weight behind India’s bid for a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, describing New Delhi as a vital voice for the Global South and a key partner in upholding international law and democratic values. In an exclusive interview with WION’s Sidhant Sibal during his visit to Delhi, Panama’s Foreign Minister Javier Martínez-Acha Vásquez emphasised the need for UN reforms to reflect 21st-century realities. “Today, the global architecture does not reflect the reality of the 21st century,” he said. “We consider that Latin America should have a permanent seat...and India [being an] important actor.” Also Read: Ukrainian drones hit warehouses of Russia’s top online retailer Wildberries, again The remarks come as bilateral relations gain momentum. Minister Vásquez met India’s External Affairs Minister this week, with both sides eyeing a strategic partnership that extends beyond diplomacy into economics, technology and connectivity. Panama is positioning itself as India’s gateway to Latin America and the Caribbean, leveraging the Panama Canal’s strategic importance. The foreign minister invited Indian businesses to establish operations in Panama, citing its logistics hub status, efficient ports and stable, rules-based economy. “Panama is not the end of the journey of India to Latin America. It is the beginning,” he stated. “We can provide to India... logistic connectivity, the stability, the rule of law... for establishing multinationals.” Also Read: ‘Oppn using students as political tools, creating ‘manufactured sense of anger’: Rajnath Singh Panama operates one of the world’s busiest canals and plans two additional ports, one on the Atlantic and one on the Pacific. It offers Indian firms access to a market of 700 million people and a trusted ecosystem for transit and trade. The minister highlighted ongoing efforts to open a visa facility in Mumbai to ease business travel. On the technology front, Panama is exploring collaboration with the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs). “We visited the IIT. We are trying to reach an agreement... for the establishment of the IIT Panama,” he revealed. This forms part of broader ambitions in innovation, e-governance and long-term prosperity. Also Read: Sonam Wangchuk puts condition for ending fast, seeks assurance of no punitive action against protesters The minister described both nations as natural partners sharing democratic principles. He urged India to join the Panama Canal Neutrality Treaty, which guarantees open access to vessels of all nations in peace and war. “By having the largest democracy [and] an important emerging superpower part of the treaty... it is very important,” he said, noting India’s Global South leadership would strengthen the canal’s impartial status. Panama hosts one of the largest Indian diasporas in the region, active in finance, commerce, electronics and shipping. The minister praised their contributions, “They are important to us... the best [form of] advertising.” The visit signals Panama’s ambition to elevate ties with India, transforming a solid diplomatic relationship into a vibrant economic and strategic partnership.

Panama is positioning itself as India’s gateway to Latin America and the Caribbean, leveraging the Panama Canal’s strategic importance. The minister invited Indian businesses to establish operations in Panama, citing its logistics hub status, efficient ports, and stable, rules-based economy.

Panama FM Vásquez backs India for permanent UN Security Council seat; seeks IIT campus, Indian investments

Drones from Ukraine hit warehouses of Russia’s biggest online retailer, Wildberries, in two southwest cities in overnight attacks, causing injuries to 15 people, according to the company’s founder and regional authorities in the country.It is the second time that Ukraine has attacked the logistics hubs of Wildberries in four days, after strikes on its warehouses in Tambov and Elektrostal on Saturday killed eight people besides causing fire and damage.&nbsp;Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Wednesday that Ukraine had hit logistics hubs in the Krasnodar and Stavropol regions “involved in providing the Russian army with drone components, navigation equipment, and other gear”.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/oppn-using-students-as-political-tools-creating-manufactured-sense-of-anger-rajnath-singh-1784716925229">‘Oppn using students as political tools, creating ‘manufactured sense of anger’: Rajnath Singh</a>&nbsp;Wildberries founder Tatyana Kim confirmed the attacks on two logistics centres in Krasnodar and Nevinnomyssk in the Stavropol region.&nbsp;Wildberries, often described as Russia’s Amazon, is at the heart of Russia’s consumer economy and is one of the country’s biggest employers.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/anti-democratic-conduct-nadda-slams-opposition-over-neet-protest-says-centre-ready-to-talk-as-lok-sabha-adjourns-1784710103629">‘Anti-democratic conduct’: Nadda slams Opposition over NEET protest, says ‘Centre ready to talk’ as Lok Sabha adjourns</a>&nbsp;Social media footage showed a huge plume of smoke rising into the air in Krasnodar.&nbsp;The attacks on Wildberries’ huge warehouses are a part of Ukraine’s recent campaign of deep strikes inside Russia to undermine Moscow’s war effort and bring the conflict home to ordinary Russians by disrupting their lives.&nbsp;Ukraine says it is targeting companies and infrastructure that support the Russian military.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/sonam-wangchuk-puts-condition-for-ending-fast-seeks-assurance-of-no-punitive-action-against-protesters-1784724401578">Sonam Wangchuk puts condition for ending fast, seeks assurance of no punitive action against protesters</a>&nbsp;However, the Kremlin has denied that Wildberries handles military supplies. Russia has repeatedly targeted Ukraine’s logistics hubs as well as its energy system and power grid.&nbsp;Wildberries started as an online shop reselling apparel from European catalogues. It has since expanded and evolved into a marketplace that includes third-party vendors.Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said sales of goods and services on digital platforms equated to around 8.5% of GDP.

The attacks on Wildberries’ huge warehouses are a part of Ukraine’s campaign of deep strikes inside Russia to undermine Moscow’s war effort and bring the conflict home to ordinary Russians. Ukraine says it is targeting companies and infrastructure that support the Russian military.

Drones from Ukraine hit warehouses of Russia’s biggest online retailer, Wildberries, in two southwest cities in overnight attacks, causing injuries to 15 people, according to the company’s founder and regional authorities in the country. It is the second time that Ukraine has attacked the logistics hubs of Wildberries in four days, after strikes on its warehouses in Tambov and Elektrostal on Saturday killed eight people besides causing fire and damage. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Wednesday that Ukraine had hit logistics hubs in the Krasnodar and Stavropol regions “involved in providing the Russian army with drone components, navigation equipment, and other gear”. Also Read: ‘Oppn using students as political tools, creating ‘manufactured sense of anger’: Rajnath Singh Wildberries founder Tatyana Kim confirmed the attacks on two logistics centres in Krasnodar and Nevinnomyssk in the Stavropol region. Wildberries, often described as Russia’s Amazon, is at the heart of Russia’s consumer economy and is one of the country’s biggest employers. Also Read: ‘Anti-democratic conduct’: Nadda slams Opposition over NEET protest, says ‘Centre ready to talk’ as Lok Sabha adjourns Social media footage showed a huge plume of smoke rising into the air in Krasnodar. The attacks on Wildberries’ huge warehouses are a part of Ukraine’s recent campaign of deep strikes inside Russia to undermine Moscow’s war effort and bring the conflict home to ordinary Russians by disrupting their lives. Ukraine says it is targeting companies and infrastructure that support the Russian military. Also Read: Sonam Wangchuk puts condition for ending fast, seeks assurance of no punitive action against protesters However, the Kremlin has denied that Wildberries handles military supplies. Russia has repeatedly targeted Ukraine’s logistics hubs as well as its energy system and power grid. Wildberries started as an online shop reselling apparel from European catalogues. It has since expanded and evolved into a marketplace that includes third-party vendors. Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said sales of goods and services on digital platforms equated to around 8.5% of GDP.

The attacks on Wildberries’ huge warehouses are a part of Ukraine’s campaign of deep strikes inside Russia to undermine Moscow’s war effort and bring the conflict home to ordinary Russians. Ukraine says it is targeting companies and infrastructure that support the Russian military.

Ukrainian drones hit warehouses of Russia’s top online retailer Wildberries, again

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (July 22) renewed his threats of striking Iran's civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants located inside or near the capital Tehran, if it attacks any ship transiting the vital Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Trump, in his Truth Social post, wrote, "From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran."&nbsp;The US president's threat comes as the US military carried out its 11th consecutive night of strikes against the Islamic Republic over Tehran's attacks on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz.<h3>US-Iran tensions push oil prices higher</h3>Fighting over the strategic strait led to the collapse of a preliminary deal between the United States and Iran reached on June 17. However, top US diplomat Marco Rubio again reiterated Washington's stance that it was willing to find a negotiated agreement with Tehran.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/152-paper-leaks-zero-convictions-rahul-gandhi-seeks-pm-apology-over-police-action-against-students-1784721200613">'152 paper leaks, zero convictions': Rahul Gandhi seeks PM apology over police action against students</a>&nbsp;"We remain open to working it out in a negotiated way. But right now, they don't seem to be serious about that," Rubio said at a Southeast Asian ministers' meeting in Manila.&nbsp;He insisted that the US was right to strike Iran because it was attacking shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and planned to rebuild its missile and drone capabilities.&nbsp;The United States has repeatedly maintained that the Strait of Hormuz remains open for commercial vessel transit. However, traffic has dipped significantly, leading to a surge in world oil prices.&nbsp;On Wednesday, with the main contract, Brent North Sea crude, surpassing $95 for the first time in nearly six weeks as the United States and Iran carried out more strikes, oil prices rose sharply.&nbsp;Brent oil jumped 4.4 per cent to $95.02 per barrel, while the key US contract, West Texas Intermediate, rallied 4.5 per cent to $88.16.

US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb a bridge or power plant in Iran after every attack on ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions as Washington and Tehran continue their military confrontation.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (July 22) renewed his threats of striking Iran's civilian infrastructure, including bridges and power plants located inside or near the capital Tehran, if it attacks any ship transiting the vital Strait of Hormuz. Trump, in his Truth Social post, wrote, "From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran." The US president's threat comes as the US military carried out its 11th consecutive night of strikes against the Islamic Republic over Tehran's attacks on commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz. US-Iran tensions push oil prices higher Fighting over the strategic strait led to the collapse of a preliminary deal between the United States and Iran reached on June 17. However, top US diplomat Marco Rubio again reiterated Washington's stance that it was willing to find a negotiated agreement with Tehran. Also Read: '152 paper leaks, zero convictions': Rahul Gandhi seeks PM apology over police action against students "We remain open to working it out in a negotiated way. But right now, they don't seem to be serious about that," Rubio said at a Southeast Asian ministers' meeting in Manila. He insisted that the US was right to strike Iran because it was attacking shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and planned to rebuild its missile and drone capabilities. The United States has repeatedly maintained that the Strait of Hormuz remains open for commercial vessel transit. However, traffic has dipped significantly, leading to a surge in world oil prices. On Wednesday, with the main contract, Brent North Sea crude, surpassing $95 for the first time in nearly six weeks as the United States and Iran carried out more strikes, oil prices rose sharply. Brent oil jumped 4.4 per cent to $95.02 per barrel, while the key US contract, West Texas Intermediate, rallied 4.5 per cent to $88.16.

US President Donald Trump threatened to bomb a bridge or power plant in Iran after every attack on ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions as Washington and Tehran continue their military confrontation.

US will bomb Iran's bridge, power plant after every attack on ships in Strait of Hormuz: Trump

While political rhetoric continues to highlight tensions between Washington and Europe over defence spending, a different story is unfolding on the exhibition floor at the Farnborough International Airshow.Two of America’s leading defence companies—Boeing and General Atomics—have positioned some of their most advanced next-generation unmanned combat aircraft alongside European missile systems.&nbsp;Boeing’s MQ-28 Ghost Bat and General Atomics’ YFQ-42A Dark Merlin are both being displayed in close proximity to missiles developed by MBDA, a move that industry sources suggest was a last-minute decision.&nbsp;The MQ-28 is positioned with the MBDA Meteor, &nbsp;an advanced, ramjet-powered beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM).&nbsp;The FQ-42A is positioned with the MBDA SPEAR missile, an air-launched cruise missile.MBDA is a prominent European multinational corporation headquartered just outside Paris, France.U.S. does not generally operate European-designed missiles. In fact, the relationship is usually the reverse, with European nations heavily relying on U.S.-supplied missile systems. But at the Farnborough Airshow, its U.S. UCAV's showcased with European missiles.&nbsp;Although seemingly a matter of exhibition layout, the positioning reflects a broader shift in defence strategy. As European nations rapidly expand military spending following the war in Ukraine and seek greater strategic autonomy, U.S. defence firms are increasingly looking to align their platforms with European weapon systems rather than relying solely on American munitions.&nbsp;The timing is significant. Across Europe, governments have repeatedly stressed the need to reduce dependence on U.S.-supplied defence equipment by investing in domestic capabilities. This has raised questions about the future dominance of American manufacturers in one of the world’s fastest-growing defence markets.&nbsp;Against this backdrop, the Farnborough displays suggest that American defence giants are adapting rather than resisting. By demonstrating compatibility with European missiles and encouraging modular integration, companies such as Boeing and General Atomics are positioning themselves to remain central players in Europe’s evolving defence architecture.&nbsp;The strategy also reflects changing procurement priorities. European governments increasingly favour platforms capable of integrating weapons from multiple suppliers, giving operators greater flexibility while strengthening local defence industries. For U.S. manufacturers, interoperability may prove to be the key to retaining access to European defence budgets worth hundreds of billions of euros over the coming decade.&nbsp;The juxtaposition of American unmanned aircraft with European missiles may therefore be more than an exhibition choice—it could be an indication of where the global defence market is heading. As Europe pursues greater defence sovereignty, American companies appear determined to ensure they remain part of that future, even if it means embracing European technology rather than competing directly against it.

At the Farnborough International Airshow, US defence giants Boeing and General Atomics showcased their next-generation unmanned combat aircraft alongside European missiles, signalling efforts to adapt to Europe's growing defence spending.

While political rhetoric continues to highlight tensions between Washington and Europe over defence spending, a different story is unfolding on the exhibition floor at the Farnborough International Airshow. Two of America’s leading defence companies—Boeing and General Atomics—have positioned some of their most advanced next-generation unmanned combat aircraft alongside European missile systems. Boeing’s MQ-28 Ghost Bat and General Atomics’ YFQ-42A Dark Merlin are both being displayed in close proximity to missiles developed by MBDA, a move that industry sources suggest was a last-minute decision. The MQ-28 is positioned with the MBDA Meteor, an advanced, ramjet-powered beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM). The FQ-42A is positioned with the MBDA SPEAR missile, an air-launched cruise missile. MBDA is a prominent European multinational corporation headquartered just outside Paris, France. U.S. does not generally operate European-designed missiles. In fact, the relationship is usually the reverse, with European nations heavily relying on U.S.-supplied missile systems. But at the Farnborough Airshow, its U.S. UCAV's showcased with European missiles. Although seemingly a matter of exhibition layout, the positioning reflects a broader shift in defence strategy. As European nations rapidly expand military spending following the war in Ukraine and seek greater strategic autonomy, U.S. defence firms are increasingly looking to align their platforms with European weapon systems rather than relying solely on American munitions. The timing is significant. Across Europe, governments have repeatedly stressed the need to reduce dependence on U.S.-supplied defence equipment by investing in domestic capabilities. This has raised questions about the future dominance of American manufacturers in one of the world’s fastest-growing defence markets. Against this backdrop, the Farnborough displays suggest that American defence giants are adapting rather than resisting. By demonstrating compatibility with European missiles and encouraging modular integration, companies such as Boeing and General Atomics are positioning themselves to remain central players in Europe’s evolving defence architecture. The strategy also reflects changing procurement priorities. European governments increasingly favour platforms capable of integrating weapons from multiple suppliers, giving operators greater flexibility while strengthening local defence industries. For U.S. manufacturers, interoperability may prove to be the key to retaining access to European defence budgets worth hundreds of billions of euros over the coming decade. The juxtaposition of American unmanned aircraft with European missiles may therefore be more than an exhibition choice—it could be an indication of where the global defence market is heading. As Europe pursues greater defence sovereignty, American companies appear determined to ensure they remain part of that future, even if it means embracing European technology rather than competing directly against it.

At the Farnborough International Airshow, US defence giants Boeing and General Atomics showcased their next-generation unmanned combat aircraft alongside European missiles, signalling efforts to adapt to Europe's growing defence spending.

At Farnborough, US defence giants quietly court Europe’s rearmament

A French professional model scout who spent more than ten years connecting the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein with various models was found dead in his residence near Paris on Monday (July 20). Marie-Céline Lawrysz, deputy public prosecutor at the Nanterre Judicial Court, confirmed on Wednesday (July 22) that Daniel Siad's body was discovered at his home in Colombes, a suburb of the French capital. An autopsy is set to be conducted to establish the cause of death. Just days before his death, Siad had told CNN that he saw no indication that two women he had referred to Epstein were abused by him or had come to any harm through their association with him.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/he-predicted-covid-19-2008-economic-crisis-issues-ai-warning-1784726940738">He predicted COVID-19 and 2008 economic crisis, was labeled fearmonger. Now he has another dire warning</a><h3>Invitation for different events</h3>Even after Epstein was convicted of sex crimes in 2008, modelling-industry insiders like Siad continued doing business with him, inviting him to fashion events, and allowing him to connect with their companies. Siad claimed that Epstein had promised him his payments for his crimes, that “this would never happen with anybody” that he referred to him. “I trusted him and believed this guy was a professional person,” he told CNN. “I never heard anything from anyone I introduced to him who came back to me that they had a bad situation. I believed this guy was a professional person.” Siad also claimed that he thought of Epstein as a casting director for Victoria’s Secret and the modelling agency MC2. Meanwhile, files released by the Department of Justice revealed that late sex offender Epstein paid tens of thousands of dollars to Siad. In one message, Siad wrote: “Cute French girl in Marrakesh… She said that she will (be) happy to meet you.” Separately, Siad added that Epstein asked for his help in finding an assistant. In a 2018 email, Siad found writing that he was looking for a “good-looking young assistant” for Epstein. Similarly, in another message, he sent a photo to Epstein of a woman, explaining her as “very polite” with “potential” as a “model” or “assistant.”

Marie-Céline Lawrysz, deputy public prosecutor at the Nanterre Judicial Court, confirmed on Wednesday (July 22) that Daniel Siad's body was discovered at his home in Colombes, a suburb of the French capital.

A French professional model scout who spent more than ten years connecting the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein with various models was found dead in his residence near Paris on Monday (July 20). Marie-Céline Lawrysz, deputy public prosecutor at the Nanterre Judicial Court, confirmed on Wednesday (July 22) that Daniel Siad's body was discovered at his home in Colombes, a suburb of the French capital. An autopsy is set to be conducted to establish the cause of death. Just days before his death, Siad had told CNN that he saw no indication that two women he had referred to Epstein were abused by him or had come to any harm through their association with him. Also read: He predicted COVID-19 and 2008 economic crisis, was labeled fearmonger. Now he has another dire warning Invitation for different events Even after Epstein was convicted of sex crimes in 2008, modelling-industry insiders like Siad continued doing business with him, inviting him to fashion events, and allowing him to connect with their companies. Siad claimed that Epstein had promised him his payments for his crimes, that “this would never happen with anybody” that he referred to him. “I trusted him and believed this guy was a professional person,” he told CNN. “I never heard anything from anyone I introduced to him who came back to me that they had a bad situation. I believed this guy was a professional person.” Siad also claimed that he thought of Epstein as a casting director for Victoria’s Secret and the modelling agency MC2. Meanwhile, files released by the Department of Justice revealed that late sex offender Epstein paid tens of thousands of dollars to Siad. In one message, Siad wrote: “Cute French girl in Marrakesh… She said that she will (be) happy to meet you.” Separately, Siad added that Epstein asked for his help in finding an assistant. In a 2018 email, Siad found writing that he was looking for a “good-looking young assistant” for Epstein. Similarly, in another message, he sent a photo to Epstein of a woman, explaining her as “very polite” with “potential” as a “model” or “assistant.”

Marie-Céline Lawrysz, deputy public prosecutor at the Nanterre Judicial Court, confirmed on Wednesday (July 22) that Daniel Siad's body was discovered at his home in Colombes, a suburb of the French capital.

French model recruiter linked to Jeffrey Epstein found dead in Paris

Nineteen people on Tuesday (July 22) have been sentenced to prison in Indonesia for their alleged involvement in a baby-smuggling racket that trafficked infants to Singapore. The Indonesian court judge, Gatot Ardian Agustriono, has handed down sentences ranging from three years and four months to seven years in prison after he found all 19 defendants guilty of human trafficking. According to several media reports, at least 34 babies are expected to have been trafficked to Singapore for up to 18,000 Singapore dollars (approximately $14,000) each. The trial revealed that the smuggling syndicate reportedly procured babies from various areas in West Java before transporting them to Depok city. From there, the babies were moved to a residence in Pontianak, the capital of West Kalimantan province, where syndicate-appointed caregivers looked after them. Some were allegedly then taken to Singapore via Jakarta. An estimated 12 babies are still believed to be in Singapore after being trafficked there. Lie Siu Luan, 70, also known as Popo, received the harshest sentence, seven years, after being named as the ringleader behind the operation.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/days-after-c-sections-5-of-10-women-develop-complications-at-telangana-hospital-probe-ordered-1784710901697">Days after C-sections, 5 of 10 women develop complications at Telangana hospital; probe ordered</a><h3>Baby-trafficking network</h3>The judge stated that Lie played a hands-on role in recruiting several individuals and overseeing a baby-trafficking network that spanned both domestic and international operations. Astri Fitrinika, identified as having recruited babies for the syndicate, was handed a six-year and seven-month prison term. Lai Siu Ha, accused of falsifying documentation for the infants, including birth certificates and family registration cards, received the same sentence of six years and seven months. A similar sentence was ordered for Djaka Hamdani Hutabarat, the sole male defendant, and his wife, Elin Marlina, both considered to have served as intermediaries in the trafficking scheme, were given identical sentences.&nbsp;Prosecutors had originally pushed for 10-year terms for five of the accused. Meanwhile, six other defendants, who had posed as the babies' biological mothers or as babysitters, were sentenced to three years and four months each.

The Indonesian court judge, Gatot Ardian Agustriono, has handed down sentences ranging from three years and four months to seven years in prison after he found all 19 defendants guilty of human trafficking.

Nineteen people on Tuesday (July 22) have been sentenced to prison in Indonesia for their alleged involvement in a baby-smuggling racket that trafficked infants to Singapore. The Indonesian court judge, Gatot Ardian Agustriono, has handed down sentences ranging from three years and four months to seven years in prison after he found all 19 defendants guilty of human trafficking. According to several media reports, at least 34 babies are expected to have been trafficked to Singapore for up to 18,000 Singapore dollars (approximately $14,000) each. The trial revealed that the smuggling syndicate reportedly procured babies from various areas in West Java before transporting them to Depok city. From there, the babies were moved to a residence in Pontianak, the capital of West Kalimantan province, where syndicate-appointed caregivers looked after them. Some were allegedly then taken to Singapore via Jakarta. An estimated 12 babies are still believed to be in Singapore after being trafficked there. Lie Siu Luan, 70, also known as Popo, received the harshest sentence, seven years, after being named as the ringleader behind the operation. Also read: Days after C-sections, 5 of 10 women develop complications at Telangana hospital; probe ordered Baby-trafficking network The judge stated that Lie played a hands-on role in recruiting several individuals and overseeing a baby-trafficking network that spanned both domestic and international operations. Astri Fitrinika, identified as having recruited babies for the syndicate, was handed a six-year and seven-month prison term. Lai Siu Ha, accused of falsifying documentation for the infants, including birth certificates and family registration cards, received the same sentence of six years and seven months. A similar sentence was ordered for Djaka Hamdani Hutabarat, the sole male defendant, and his wife, Elin Marlina, both considered to have served as intermediaries in the trafficking scheme, were given identical sentences. Prosecutors had originally pushed for 10-year terms for five of the accused. Meanwhile, six other defendants, who had posed as the babies' biological mothers or as babysitters, were sentenced to three years and four months each.

The Indonesian court judge, Gatot Ardian Agustriono, has handed down sentences ranging from three years and four months to seven years in prison after he found all 19 defendants guilty of human trafficking.

Baby-smuggling racket busted: 19 sentenced in Indonesia, 12 infants still missing

Nepal Prime Minister Balen Shah, who has maintained a strict protocol of meeting only his counterparts while refusing to sit for one-on-one meetings with foreign envoys, is set to break his self-imposed rule and meet the envoys from both India and China this week, The Kathmandu Post reported, citing aides and diplomatic sources.&nbsp;The decision comes shortly after his government, which came to power following Gen Z protests, completed 100 days in office. During this period, Shah repeatedly refused to meet foreign envoys individually and instead preferred joint meetings with ambassadors on April 9 and May 29.&nbsp;According to The Kathmandu Post, the dates for the meetings with the diplomats from New Delhi and Beijing have yet to be announced, with Nepal's Ministry of Foreign Affairs working to make arrangements. However, to underscore that New Delhi and Beijing are equally important to Nepal, Shah is scheduled to meet Indian Ambassador Naveen Srivastava and Chinese Ambassador Zhang Maoming on the same day.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-s-eam-jaishankar-voices-strong-concern-over-seafarer-safety-in-talks-with-russian-fm-lavrov-1784715131857">India’s EAM Jaishankar voices ‘strong concern’ over seafarer safety in talks with Russian FM Lavrov</a>&nbsp;Shah not only avoided meetings with Nepal's neighbours but also turned down requests from the US Embassy in Kathmandu to meet US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Samir Paul Kapur and US President Donald Trump's special envoy for South and Central Asia, Sergio Gor.&nbsp;The move marked a departure from Nepal's traditional diplomatic engagement. In the past, newly elected prime ministers would meet foreign ambassadors individually at the Prime Minister's Office or their official residence within days of assuming office.&nbsp;The Nepali Prime Minister has also walked back on his policy of avoiding meetings with domestic stakeholders. He recently held engagements with members of the business community, including traders, contractors, industrialists and exporters.&nbsp;These decisions came after his government witnessed two rounds of protests in its first 100 days in office. One protest centred on the enforcement of customs duties at the Indo-Nepal border, while the other erupted after a ride-share driver's suicide sparked anger over police action.

Nepal Prime Minister Balen Shah, who had so far avoided one-on-one meetings with foreign envoys and preferred joint meetings with ambassadors, is now set to meet the Indian and Chinese ambassadors individually.

Nepal Prime Minister Balen Shah, who has maintained a strict protocol of meeting only his counterparts while refusing to sit for one-on-one meetings with foreign envoys, is set to break his self-imposed rule and meet the envoys from both India and China this week, The Kathmandu Post reported, citing aides and diplomatic sources. The decision comes shortly after his government, which came to power following Gen Z protests, completed 100 days in office. During this period, Shah repeatedly refused to meet foreign envoys individually and instead preferred joint meetings with ambassadors on April 9 and May 29. According to The Kathmandu Post, the dates for the meetings with the diplomats from New Delhi and Beijing have yet to be announced, with Nepal's Ministry of Foreign Affairs working to make arrangements. However, to underscore that New Delhi and Beijing are equally important to Nepal, Shah is scheduled to meet Indian Ambassador Naveen Srivastava and Chinese Ambassador Zhang Maoming on the same day. Also Read: India’s EAM Jaishankar voices ‘strong concern’ over seafarer safety in talks with Russian FM Lavrov Shah not only avoided meetings with Nepal's neighbours but also turned down requests from the US Embassy in Kathmandu to meet US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Samir Paul Kapur and US President Donald Trump's special envoy for South and Central Asia, Sergio Gor. The move marked a departure from Nepal's traditional diplomatic engagement. In the past, newly elected prime ministers would meet foreign ambassadors individually at the Prime Minister's Office or their official residence within days of assuming office. The Nepali Prime Minister has also walked back on his policy of avoiding meetings with domestic stakeholders. He recently held engagements with members of the business community, including traders, contractors, industrialists and exporters. These decisions came after his government witnessed two rounds of protests in its first 100 days in office. One protest centred on the enforcement of customs duties at the Indo-Nepal border, while the other erupted after a ride-share driver's suicide sparked anger over police action.

Nepal Prime Minister Balen Shah, who had so far avoided one-on-one meetings with foreign envoys and preferred joint meetings with ambassadors, is now set to meet the Indian and Chinese ambassadors individually.

Balen Shah's diplomatic U-turn? Nepal PM to hold one-on-one meetings with India, China envoys

External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar met his Chinese counterpart, Politburo member Wang Yi, on the sidelines ASEAN Foreign ministers meet in the Philippine capital, Manila signalling continued efforts to stabilise relations between Asia's two giants more than six years after deadly border clashes.&nbsp;India's External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar noted the progress in ties since the leaders’ meeting in Kazan in October 2024, &amp; Tianjin last August. “Since the meeting of our leaders in Kazan in October 2024, relations between India and China have been gradually normalising,” Jaishankar stated. “This direction was further affirmed when they met in Tianjin last August.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/how-china-controls-a-critical-ingredient-for-western-ammunition-gravitas-1784659110869">How China controls a critical ingredient for Western ammunition | Gravitas</a>&nbsp;The Indian minister stressed that a stable relationship must rest on firm foundations. “Such a relationship can make a valuable contribution to a multi-polar Asia and a multi-polar world,” he observed, adding that ties should be guided by “mutual respect, mutual interest and mutual sensitivity.”Jaishankar reiterated a consistent Indian position on border issues that, “peace and tranquillity in the border areas is obviously the pre-requisite for normal ties. Since October 2024, both sides have engaged to ensure that important objective. This will continue to need our constant attention.”He invoked the leaders’ understanding that “differences should not become disputes,” placing responsibility on diplomacy to manage them responsibly.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/xi-jinping-s-new-ai-bloc-china-launches-world-ai-body-with-pakistan-and-russia-in-india-out-1784480997641">Xi Jinping's new AI bloc: China launches 'World AI Body' with Pakistan and Russia in, India out</a>&nbsp;Jaishankar welcomed practical steps already taken, the resumption of direct flights, updated visa arrangements, the restart of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra, and the recommencement of border trade but flagged issues like fair market access, addressing the trade imbalance, predictable supply chains.&nbsp;The meeting came against a backdrop of re set of ties. Since the 2020 Galwan Valley violence that killed 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese troops, both sides have disengaged forces from several friction points along the Line of Actual Control.&nbsp;India is the chair of BRICS grouping this year and will hold the summit in September. China is extended support to India's BRICS Presidency. &nbsp;

EAM S Jaishankar met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Manila as India-China ties show signs of stabilisation after the 2020 Galwan clash. Jaishankar stressed mutual respect, border peace and managing differences, while welcoming renewed flights, visas, Kailash Mansarovar Yatra and border trade.

External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar met his Chinese counterpart, Politburo member Wang Yi, on the sidelines ASEAN Foreign ministers meet in the Philippine capital, Manila signalling continued efforts to stabilise relations between Asia's two giants more than six years after deadly border clashes. India's External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar noted the progress in ties since the leaders’ meeting in Kazan in October 2024, & Tianjin last August. “Since the meeting of our leaders in Kazan in October 2024, relations between India and China have been gradually normalising,” Jaishankar stated. “This direction was further affirmed when they met in Tianjin last August.” Also Read: How China controls a critical ingredient for Western ammunition | Gravitas The Indian minister stressed that a stable relationship must rest on firm foundations. “Such a relationship can make a valuable contribution to a multi-polar Asia and a multi-polar world,” he observed, adding that ties should be guided by “mutual respect, mutual interest and mutual sensitivity.” Jaishankar reiterated a consistent Indian position on border issues that, “peace and tranquillity in the border areas is obviously the pre-requisite for normal ties. Since October 2024, both sides have engaged to ensure that important objective. This will continue to need our constant attention.” He invoked the leaders’ understanding that “differences should not become disputes,” placing responsibility on diplomacy to manage them responsibly. Also Read: Xi Jinping's new AI bloc: China launches 'World AI Body' with Pakistan and Russia in, India out Jaishankar welcomed practical steps already taken, the resumption of direct flights, updated visa arrangements, the restart of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra, and the recommencement of border trade but flagged issues like fair market access, addressing the trade imbalance, predictable supply chains. The meeting came against a backdrop of re set of ties. Since the 2020 Galwan Valley violence that killed 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese troops, both sides have disengaged forces from several friction points along the Line of Actual Control. India is the chair of BRICS grouping this year and will hold the summit in September. China is extended support to India's BRICS Presidency.

EAM S Jaishankar met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Manila as India-China ties show signs of stabilisation after the 2020 Galwan clash. Jaishankar stressed mutual respect, border peace and managing differences, while welcoming renewed flights

India and China relations 'gradually normalising', EAM Jaishankar tells Chinese FM Wang Yi

EAM Dr S Jaishankar has strongly raised India's concerns over the safety of its seafarers, following the deaths of four Indian nationals in a Russian missile strike on a cargo vessel in the Black Sea.External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar raised the issue during bilateral discussions with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on the sidelines of the ASEAN FMs meet in Manila, emphasising the need to protect civilian merchant mariners operating in high-risk zones.The deaths occurred on 19 July when the Guinea-Bissau-flagged MV Golden Leo, carrying grain from Ukraine's Odesa port, was hit by Russian cruise missiles. Of the 17 crew members, five were Indian; four died, and one was critically injured. India swiftly summoned Russia's chargé d'affaires, Vladimir Ladanov, to the Ministry of External Affairs, conveying "grave concerns" and a strong condemnation of attacks on commercial shipping. The Kremlin responded that it remained in touch with Indian partners, noting that its forces target vessels involved in transporting ammunition or weapons for Ukraine.In the wider bilateral meeting, the two sides discussed various aspects of the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. Indian readout said they "discussed various aspects of our partnership, including trade &amp; investment, energy &amp; connectivity, science &amp; technology, and mobility".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/how-russia-ukraine-war-is-reshaping-energy-flows-food-prices-defence-spending-and-india-s-strategy-wion-decodes-1783337395169">How Russia-Ukraine war is reshaping energy flows, food prices, defence spending and India’s strategy | WION Decodes</a>Both countries are aiming to push bilateral commerce towards a $100 billion target. Energy cooperation, connectivity projects such as the International North-South Transport Corridor and the Northern Sea Route, science and technology initiatives, and greater mobility of skilled professionals remain key elements of ties.The ministers exchanged views on regional and global issues, including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the volatile situation in the Gulf/West Asia.India reiterated its consistent position favouring dialogue and diplomacy to resolve conflicts, while stressing the protection of sea lanes and civilian lives.The talks come ahead of the BRICS Summit, where Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to visit India later in 2026. The grouping, now expanded, offers a platform for both nations to advance multipolar cooperation on economic resilience and global governance.

The deaths occurred on 19 July when the Guinea-Bissau-flagged MV Golden Leo, carrying grain from Ukraine's Odesa port, was hit by Russian cruise missiles. Of the 17 crew members, five were Indian; four died, and one was critically injured.

EAM Dr S Jaishankar has strongly raised India's concerns over the safety of its seafarers, following the deaths of four Indian nationals in a Russian missile strike on a cargo vessel in the Black Sea. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar raised the issue during bilateral discussions with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on the sidelines of the ASEAN FMs meet in Manila, emphasising the need to protect civilian merchant mariners operating in high-risk zones. The deaths occurred on 19 July when the Guinea-Bissau-flagged MV Golden Leo, carrying grain from Ukraine's Odesa port, was hit by Russian cruise missiles. Of the 17 crew members, five were Indian; four died, and one was critically injured. India swiftly summoned Russia's chargé d'affaires, Vladimir Ladanov, to the Ministry of External Affairs, conveying "grave concerns" and a strong condemnation of attacks on commercial shipping. The Kremlin responded that it remained in touch with Indian partners, noting that its forces target vessels involved in transporting ammunition or weapons for Ukraine. In the wider bilateral meeting, the two sides discussed various aspects of the India-Russia Special and Privileged Strategic Partnership. Indian readout said they "discussed various aspects of our partnership, including trade & investment, energy & connectivity, science & technology, and mobility". Also read | How Russia-Ukraine war is reshaping energy flows, food prices, defence spending and India’s strategy | WION Decodes Both countries are aiming to push bilateral commerce towards a $100 billion target. Energy cooperation, connectivity projects such as the International North-South Transport Corridor and the Northern Sea Route, science and technology initiatives, and greater mobility of skilled professionals remain key elements of ties. The ministers exchanged views on regional and global issues, including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the volatile situation in the Gulf/West Asia. India reiterated its consistent position favouring dialogue and diplomacy to resolve conflicts, while stressing the protection of sea lanes and civilian lives. The talks come ahead of the BRICS Summit, where Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to visit India later in 2026. The grouping, now expanded, offers a platform for both nations to advance multipolar cooperation on economic resilience and global governance.

The deaths occurred on 19 July when the Guinea-Bissau-flagged MV Golden Leo, carrying grain from Ukraine's Odesa port, was hit by Russian cruise missiles. Of the 17 crew members, five were Indian; four died, and one was critically injured.

India’s EAM Jaishankar voices ‘strong concern’ over seafarer safety in talks with Russian FM Lavrov

A heated exchange between Senator Gary Peters and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth became the defining moment of a Senate hearing on the Trump administration’s handling of the Iran war, with Peters accusing the Pentagon leadership of failing to deliver a clear path to victory. During the hours-long hearing, the Democrat sharply criticised the administration’s approach, saying its efforts had been “an utter and complete failure to win this war.”Hegseth pushed back strongly, arguing that such remarks undermined the efforts of US troops deployed on the front lines. “I think your characterisation of this incredible effort as a failure is reckless and I think it’s irresponsible and I think it smears the sacrifice of the troops that are out there making on behalf of the American people to ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon,” he said. “Shame on you and others who call this a quagmire and a failure and then you want to turn around and say you support the warfighter. Either you do or you don’t.”But Peters fired back, turning the criticism directly toward the defence secretary.“You, sir, are the failure,” Peters said, clarifying that his criticism was aimed at Pentagon leadership and not the military personnel carrying out missions overseas.“Not the men and women who are on that front line, not the men and women who hold up their honour with distinction,” Peters added, raising his voice during the exchange.The senator accused Hegseth and the administration of lacking a long-term strategy for the conflict, repeatedly demanding answers on how Washington planned to end the war.“You don’t have a strategy. You don’t have a long-term plan to actually win this war. The men and women are going to be able to do it, but they need to have leadership. When will you show leadership?” Peters questioned.Dismissing the allegations, the defence secretary accused Democrats of engaging in partisan attacks and claiming they were failing to support funding for American troops. He also accused Peters of having “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”The confrontation came as Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine defended the Pentagon’s request for $87.6 billion in additional funding, much of which would support ongoing military operations in the Middle East. Hegseth told lawmakers that the Iran war had already cost the US an estimated $37.5 billion, with expenses projected through the end of the fiscal year.The hearing saw lawmakers from both parties demand greater transparency, with several Democrats questioning conflicting statements from the administration over the impact of US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Sen. Gary Peters clashed with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Iran war, declaring, “You, sir, are the failure,” as lawmakers questioned the Trump administration’s strategy and rising war costs.

A heated exchange between Senator Gary Peters and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth became the defining moment of a Senate hearing on the Trump administration’s handling of the Iran war, with Peters accusing the Pentagon leadership of failing to deliver a clear path to victory. During the hours-long hearing, the Democrat sharply criticised the administration’s approach, saying its efforts had been “an utter and complete failure to win this war.” Hegseth pushed back strongly, arguing that such remarks undermined the efforts of US troops deployed on the front lines. “I think your characterisation of this incredible effort as a failure is reckless and I think it’s irresponsible and I think it smears the sacrifice of the troops that are out there making on behalf of the American people to ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon,” he said. “Shame on you and others who call this a quagmire and a failure and then you want to turn around and say you support the warfighter. Either you do or you don’t.” But Peters fired back, turning the criticism directly toward the defence secretary. “You, sir, are the failure,” Peters said, clarifying that his criticism was aimed at Pentagon leadership and not the military personnel carrying out missions overseas. “Not the men and women who are on that front line, not the men and women who hold up their honour with distinction,” Peters added, raising his voice during the exchange. The senator accused Hegseth and the administration of lacking a long-term strategy for the conflict, repeatedly demanding answers on how Washington planned to end the war. “You don’t have a strategy. You don’t have a long-term plan to actually win this war. The men and women are going to be able to do it, but they need to have leadership. When will you show leadership?” Peters questioned. Dismissing the allegations, the defence secretary accused Democrats of engaging in partisan attacks and claiming they were failing to support funding for American troops. He also accused Peters of having “Trump Derangement Syndrome.” The confrontation came as Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine defended the Pentagon’s request for $87.6 billion in additional funding, much of which would support ongoing military operations in the Middle East. Hegseth told lawmakers that the Iran war had already cost the US an estimated $37.5 billion, with expenses projected through the end of the fiscal year. The hearing saw lawmakers from both parties demand greater transparency, with several Democrats questioning conflicting statements from the administration over the impact of US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Sen. Gary Peters clashed with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Iran war, declaring, “You, sir, are the failure,” as lawmakers questioned the Trump administration’s strategy and rising war costs.

‘You, sir, are the failure’: Democrat senator lashes out at Hegseth over Iran war strategy

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the Philippine capital, focusing on strengthening bilateral ties amid ongoing global challenges. The meeting took place on the sidelines of ASEAN-related ministerial gatherings in Manila, where both top diplomats are attending high-level discussions involving Southeast Asian nations and the Quad grouping of India, the US, Japan and Australia.&nbsp;In a post on X, Jaishankar described the discussions as centred on priority areas within the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership. These included trade and tariffs, energy, defence and security, critical minerals and artificial intelligence. The two sides also exchanged views on regional, global and multilateral issues of mutual interest.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/amnesty-international-accuses-pakistan-of-possible-war-crimes-over-strike-on-afghan-rehab-centre-1784696756316">269 killed, no military target? Amnesty International accuses Pakistan of war crimes for THIS reason</a>&nbsp;Relations between New Delhi and Washington have faced recent strains over trade. Last year, the US imposed tariffs on Indian goods, partly linked to India's purchases of Russian oil. Officials from both countries have now been working towards an interim trade agreement to address these issues and expand market access.&nbsp;The two leaders have met several times in recent months, including in New Delhi, reflecting sustained high-level engagement despite differences on issues such as tariffs and energy imports. The India-US partnership has deepened significantly over the past 2 decades, spanning defence sales, technology collaboration and people-to-people ties. Trade volumes have grown, though imbalances and tariff barriers remain points of negotiation. &nbsp;

Relations between New Delhi and Washington have faced recent strains over trade. Last year, the US imposed tariffs on Indian goods, partly linked to India's purchases of Russian oil.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the Philippine capital, focusing on strengthening bilateral ties amid ongoing global challenges. The meeting took place on the sidelines of ASEAN-related ministerial gatherings in Manila, where both top diplomats are attending high-level discussions involving Southeast Asian nations and the Quad grouping of India, the US, Japan and Australia. In a post on X, Jaishankar described the discussions as centred on priority areas within the India-US Comprehensive Global Strategic Partnership. These included trade and tariffs, energy, defence and security, critical minerals and artificial intelligence. The two sides also exchanged views on regional, global and multilateral issues of mutual interest. Also read: 269 killed, no military target? Amnesty International accuses Pakistan of war crimes for THIS reason Relations between New Delhi and Washington have faced recent strains over trade. Last year, the US imposed tariffs on Indian goods, partly linked to India's purchases of Russian oil. Officials from both countries have now been working towards an interim trade agreement to address these issues and expand market access. The two leaders have met several times in recent months, including in New Delhi, reflecting sustained high-level engagement despite differences on issues such as tariffs and energy imports. The India-US partnership has deepened significantly over the past 2 decades, spanning defence sales, technology collaboration and people-to-people ties. Trade volumes have grown, though imbalances and tariff barriers remain points of negotiation.

Relations between New Delhi and Washington have faced recent strains over trade. Last year, the US imposed tariffs on Indian goods, partly linked to India's purchases of Russian oil.

India, US discuss trade, security in Manila meeting

Amnesty International has called for Pakistan to be investigated for a possible war crime over an alleged missile strike on a drug rehabilitation centre in Afghanistan earlier this year, saying there is no evidence to support Islamabad's claim that it targeted a military facility. In a report released on Wednesday (Jul 22), the rights group said the Omid Rehabilitation and Treatment Centre was struck on March 16 during escalating tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan.According to Amnesty, the attack killed 269 people and injured hundreds more, with most of the victims being patients undergoing treatment for substance abuse.<h2>Pakistan rejects allegations</h2>Pakistan has denied targeting the rehabilitation centre, insisting its forces struck a militant facility. Following the incident, Pakistan's Information Ministry said the military had targeted a "military terrorist ammunition and equipment storage site" known as Camp Phoenix. However, Amnesty said its investigation found no evidence to support that claim.The organisation alleged that Pakistan failed to verify whether the target was a legitimate military objective and accused it of violating international humanitarian law, which provides special protection to medical facilities during armed conflict.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/in-first-visit-by-canadian-fm-in-20-years-pakistan-urges-anita-anand-s-support-on-indus-waters-treaty-1784608437594">Pakistan urges Canadian FM Anita Anand’s support on Indus Waters Treaty</a><h2>Amnesty cites satellite images, witness accounts</h2>The Omid Rehabilitation and Treatment Centre, described as a newly renovated 2,000-bed facility, formed part of the Taliban government's campaign to tackle drug addiction in Afghanistan. It was located next to the former NATO base Camp Phoenix, where US forces once trained members of the Afghan National Army.Amnesty said its investigation relied on satellite imagery, photographs, videos and witness testimonies gathered after the strike. According to the organisation's research, it verified more than 60 photographs and videos and interviewed current and former staff members of the rehabilitation centre as well as the neighbouring Ibn-e-Sina Hospital.The rights group said satellite images taken three days before the strike showed dozens of patients inside the facility, including in the main treatment area and administrative building.Witnesses living nearby also told Amnesty that the complex was functioning as a medical facility at the time of the attack.<h2>'Bodies everywhere'</h2>According to Amnesty's findings shared with The Independent, many of those killed were in the dining hall and kitchen when the strike occurred at around 9 pm, suggesting patients had gathered for dinner.One witness told investigators that one of the damaged buildings had been used to store wood and coal rather than military equipment.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nearly-3-in-10-pakistanis-now-live-below-poverty-line-amid-deepening-economic-crisis-1784579017211">Nearly 3 in 10 Pakistanis now live below poverty line</a>"When I visited, I saw remnants of wood and coal. There were many clothes. There were many shoes. These were not military shoes," the witness said.A staff member told Amnesty that more than 1,000 patients were inside the rehabilitation centre when it was struck. A healthcare worker describing the aftermath of the attack said, "I rushed to help anywhere I heard noise and calls for help. After a while I was no longer hearing any voices. Anywhere I stepped, there was a dead body."<h2>Amnesty calls for independent investigation</h2>Amnesty said signboards identifying the facility as a drug rehabilitation and treatment centre had been displayed outside the complex for years, arguing that Pakistan should have known it was a protected civilian site."This was a lethal failure by Pakistan to comply with its obligation to do everything feasible to verify whether the target was a military objective," said Isabelle Lassee, Amnesty International's acting regional director for South Asia.She said the attack constituted "a serious violation of international humanitarian law, possibly amounting to a war crime."Amnesty has urged Pakistan to conduct what it described as a transparent, thorough, independent and impartial investigation into the strike, publish its findings and prosecute anyone found criminally responsible, including under the doctrine of command responsibility. &nbsp;

Amnesty International has called for Pakistan to be investigated for a possible war crime, saying there is no evidence that the missile strike on Afghanistan's Omid Rehabilitation and Treatment Centre targeted a legitimate military facility, contrary to Islamabad's claims.

Amnesty International has called for Pakistan to be investigated for a possible war crime over an alleged missile strike on a drug rehabilitation centre in Afghanistan earlier this year, saying there is no evidence to support Islamabad's claim that it targeted a military facility. In a report released on Wednesday (Jul 22), the rights group said the Omid Rehabilitation and Treatment Centre was struck on March 16 during escalating tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan. According to Amnesty, the attack killed 269 people and injured hundreds more, with most of the victims being patients undergoing treatment for substance abuse. Pakistan rejects allegations Pakistan has denied targeting the rehabilitation centre, insisting its forces struck a militant facility. Following the incident, Pakistan's Information Ministry said the military had targeted a "military terrorist ammunition and equipment storage site" known as Camp Phoenix. However, Amnesty said its investigation found no evidence to support that claim. The organisation alleged that Pakistan failed to verify whether the target was a legitimate military objective and accused it of violating international humanitarian law, which provides special protection to medical facilities during armed conflict. Also read | Pakistan urges Canadian FM Anita Anand’s support on Indus Waters Treaty Amnesty cites satellite images, witness accounts The Omid Rehabilitation and Treatment Centre, described as a newly renovated 2,000-bed facility, formed part of the Taliban government's campaign to tackle drug addiction in Afghanistan. It was located next to the former NATO base Camp Phoenix, where US forces once trained members of the Afghan National Army. Amnesty said its investigation relied on satellite imagery, photographs, videos and witness testimonies gathered after the strike. According to the organisation's research, it verified more than 60 photographs and videos and interviewed current and former staff members of the rehabilitation centre as well as the neighbouring Ibn-e-Sina Hospital. The rights group said satellite images taken three days before the strike showed dozens of patients inside the facility, including in the main treatment area and administrative building. Witnesses living nearby also told Amnesty that the complex was functioning as a medical facility at the time of the attack. 'Bodies everywhere' According to Amnesty's findings shared with The Independent, many of those killed were in the dining hall and kitchen when the strike occurred at around 9 pm, suggesting patients had gathered for dinner. One witness told investigators that one of the damaged buildings had been used to store wood and coal rather than military equipment. Also read | Nearly 3 in 10 Pakistanis now live below poverty line "When I visited, I saw remnants of wood and coal. There were many clothes. There were many shoes. These were not military shoes," the witness said. A staff member told Amnesty that more than 1,000 patients were inside the rehabilitation centre when it was struck. A healthcare worker describing the aftermath of the attack said, "I rushed to help anywhere I heard noise and calls for help. After a while I was no longer hearing any voices. Anywhere I stepped, there was a dead body." Amnesty calls for independent investigation Amnesty said signboards identifying the facility as a drug rehabilitation and treatment centre had been displayed outside the complex for years, arguing that Pakistan should have known it was a protected civilian site. "This was a lethal failure by Pakistan to comply with its obligation to do everything feasible to verify whether the target was a military objective," said Isabelle Lassee, Amnesty International's acting regional director for South Asia. She said the attack constituted "a serious violation of international humanitarian law, possibly amounting to a war crime." Amnesty has urged Pakistan to conduct what it described as a transparent, thorough, independent and impartial investigation into the strike, publish its findings and prosecute anyone found criminally responsible, including under the doctrine of command responsibility.

Amnesty International has called for Pakistan to be investigated for a possible war crime, saying there is no evidence that the missile strike on Afghanistan's Omid Rehabilitation and Treatment Centre targeted a legitimate military facility, contrary to Islamabad's claims.

269 killed, no military target? Amnesty International accuses Pakistan of war crimes for THIS reason

Amid rising fears of the threat posed by AI, OpenAI has revealed that an autonomous AI agent powered by its advanced models went rogue during a security test and carried out a cyberattack on AI platform Hugging Face. The incident has raised fresh concerns over the risks involved in using advanced artificial intelligence systems.<h2>What happened during the incident?</h2>In a blog post on Tuesday (Jul 21), OpenAI explained an “unprecedented cyber incident” &nbsp;involving advanced AI-driven hacking capabilities. The company said that the incident occurred during an internal cybersecurity evaluation designed to test the limits of its AI models’ cyber abilities. The company said the models were placed in a highly isolated environment but managed to exploit a zero-day vulnerability in a package registry cache proxy to gain internet access.The AI agents then identified and chained multiple vulnerabilities across OpenAI’s research systems and Hugging Face’s infrastructure while attempting to complete their assigned task. OpenAI said the models used stolen credentials and other attack methods to access restricted information from Hugging Face’s production environment. The company said the activity was detected by security teams, while Hugging Face’s security systems also identified and contained the breach.Also read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/missed-the-mark-meta-removes-instagram-ai-image-feature-after-backlash-1783737556704"> ‘Missed the mark’: Meta removes Instagram AI image feature after backlash over privacy</a><h2>What did OpenAI say?</h2>Following the incident, OpenAI said it was strengthening its safeguards and improving security measures. It added that it was tightening infrastructure controls, patching a disclosed zero-day vulnerability, and enhancing AI safety measures. Both companies said that they were investigating the incident.“The primary lesson from this incident is that model security and safety must keep pace with rapidly advancing capabilities. We are strengthening the containment, monitoring, access controls, and evaluation practices used during model development,” OpenAI said.Hugging Face, a popular platform that hosts open-source AI models and datasets, had earlier disclosed that it suffered a sophisticated cyberattack unlike previous incidents. The company said the attack appeared to have been conducted entirely by an autonomous AI agent.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-orders-meta-to-remove-child-sexual-abuse-ads-from-instagram-demands-explaination-in-7-days-1783235163711">India orders Meta to remove Instagram ads promoting child sexual abuse, demands explanation in 7 days: Report</a>In a statement, Hugging Face Co-founder and CEO Clem Delangue said, “We’re grateful for the collaboration with OpenAI on this and other topics. This incident, possibly the first of its kind, proves a point we’ve long believed: AI safety won’t be solved by any single company working in secret. It will be solved in the open, collaboratively, with broad access to AI for every defender, everywhere.”<h2>Concerns over AI</h2>The disclosure has intensified concerns among cybersecurity experts and policymakers about the ability of frontier AI models to operate independently and potentially cause harm.US Representative Greg Casar called the incident alarming and urged stronger safeguards, including mandatory independent safety testing, reporting of AI-related security breaches and global cooperation on AI regulation.Cybersecurity experts warned that the incident could represent a preview of future threats. Katie Moussouris, CEO of Luta Security, compared advanced AI models to highly adaptive systems capable of finding ways around restrictions.Matt Suiche, an engineer at AI cybersecurity firm Tolmo, said the incident showed that frontier AI models are rapidly approaching the capabilities of sophisticated attackers. He added that similar AI-driven cyber risks are no longer limited to top research labs and can emerge from widely available technologies.Watch | The Internet’s Darkest Secret: Inside the global network exploiting children online<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/the-internet-s-darkest-secret-inside-the-global-network-exploiting-children-online-1784689947807/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/the-internet-s-darkest-secret-inside-the-global-network-exploiting-children-online-1784689947807/embed</a>&nbsp;

OpenAI said an AI agent went rogue during a security test, escaped containment and hacked Hugging Face’s infrastructure, raising concerns over the cybersecurity risks posed by advanced autonomous AI systems.

Amid rising fears of the threat posed by AI, OpenAI has revealed that an autonomous AI agent powered by its advanced models went rogue during a security test and carried out a cyberattack on AI platform Hugging Face. The incident has raised fresh concerns over the risks involved in using advanced artificial intelligence systems. What happened during the incident? In a blog post on Tuesday (Jul 21), OpenAI explained an “unprecedented cyber incident” involving advanced AI-driven hacking capabilities. The company said that the incident occurred during an internal cybersecurity evaluation designed to test the limits of its AI models’ cyber abilities. The company said the models were placed in a highly isolated environment but managed to exploit a zero-day vulnerability in a package registry cache proxy to gain internet access. The AI agents then identified and chained multiple vulnerabilities across OpenAI’s research systems and Hugging Face’s infrastructure while attempting to complete their assigned task. OpenAI said the models used stolen credentials and other attack methods to access restricted information from Hugging Face’s production environment. The company said the activity was detected by security teams, while Hugging Face’s security systems also identified and contained the breach. Also read | ‘Missed the mark’: Meta removes Instagram AI image feature after backlash over privacy What did OpenAI say? Following the incident, OpenAI said it was strengthening its safeguards and improving security measures. It added that it was tightening infrastructure controls, patching a disclosed zero-day vulnerability, and enhancing AI safety measures. Both companies said that they were investigating the incident. “The primary lesson from this incident is that model security and safety must keep pace with rapidly advancing capabilities. We are strengthening the containment, monitoring, access controls, and evaluation practices used during model development,” OpenAI said. Hugging Face, a popular platform that hosts open-source AI models and datasets, had earlier disclosed that it suffered a sophisticated cyberattack unlike previous incidents. The company said the attack appeared to have been conducted entirely by an autonomous AI agent. Also read | India orders Meta to remove Instagram ads promoting child sexual abuse, demands explanation in 7 days: Report In a statement, Hugging Face Co-founder and CEO Clem Delangue said, “We’re grateful for the collaboration with OpenAI on this and other topics. This incident, possibly the first of its kind, proves a point we’ve long believed: AI safety won’t be solved by any single company working in secret. It will be solved in the open, collaboratively, with broad access to AI for every defender, everywhere.” Concerns over AI The disclosure has intensified concerns among cybersecurity experts and policymakers about the ability of frontier AI models to operate independently and potentially cause harm. US Representative Greg Casar called the incident alarming and urged stronger safeguards, including mandatory independent safety testing, reporting of AI-related security breaches and global cooperation on AI regulation. Cybersecurity experts warned that the incident could represent a preview of future threats. Katie Moussouris, CEO of Luta Security, compared advanced AI models to highly adaptive systems capable of finding ways around restrictions. Matt Suiche, an engineer at AI cybersecurity firm Tolmo, said the incident showed that frontier AI models are rapidly approaching the capabilities of sophisticated attackers. He added that similar AI-driven cyber risks are no longer limited to top research labs and can emerge from widely available technologies. Watch | The Internet’s Darkest Secret: Inside the global network exploiting children online https://www.wionews.com/videos/the-internet-s-darkest-secret-inside-the-global-network-exploiting-children-online-1784689947807/embed

OpenAI said an AI agent went rogue during a security test, escaped containment and hacked Hugging Face’s infrastructure, raising concerns over the cybersecurity risks posed by advanced autonomous AI systems.

OpenAI’s AI agent gone rogue? Company reveals chilling hack at startup

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

US House approves $95 billion budget for Trump's war against Iran. Where will the money go?

US-Saudi nuclear deal opens door to Riyadh's uranium enrichment ambitions

'No strategic gains': Iran says US war backfired, slams Europe's role

US launches 12th straight round of strikes on Iranian military targets

Trump issues fresh warning as he receives US troops killed by Iran

Trump says Iran will be ready to make deal ‘very soon’

'Iran does not control Strait of Hormuz': CENTCOM rebuts IRGC's bold claim

Did Putin help Iran target CIA bases? US probes Russia's role

Iran's IRGC issues chilling 9/11-style threat to US

Iran threatens regional energy network after Trump's strike warning

Amnesty dubs Pak attack on Kabul hospital as ‘war crime’ in fresh embarrassment

Restaurant owner on trial in South Korea after serving 49,000 ants to diners

Iran threatens regional infrastructure, energy facilities if US strikes bridges, power plants

Panama FM Vásquez backs India for permanent UNSC seat; seeks IIT campus

Ukrainian drones hit warehouses of Russia’s top retailer Wildberries, again

US will bomb bridge, power plant if Iran attacks ships in Hormuz: Trump

At Farnborough, US defence giants quietly court Europe’s rearmament

French model recruiter linked to Jeffrey Epstein found dead in Paris

Baby-smuggling ring busted: 19 sentenced in Indonesia, 12 infants still missing

Balen Shah to break self-imposed rule, meet Indian, Chinese envoys individually

India-China relations 'gradually normalizing', EAM Jaishankar tells Chinese FM

Jaishankar voices ‘strong concern’ over seafarer safety in talks with Russian FM

‘You, sir, are the failure’: Democrat senator slams Hegseth over Iran war

India, US discuss trade, security in Manila meeting