Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to visit India as the BRICS Summit gets underway in New Delhi on September 12.Ahead of Putin’s visit, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the trip will provide an important opportunity for India and Russia to discuss bilateral relations and address key issues on their agenda.&nbsp;Speaking to reporters during a virtual briefing from Moscow, Peskov highlighted the close personal relationship between Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing their engagement as pragmatic and open. He said the visit could create new opportunities for cooperation between the two countries. "In a couple of days, President Putin will begin his India visit. You know that our two leaders, Indian and Russian leaders, are in a very close personal contact. contact. They are very pragmatic in their relationship, and they are as sincere as to be able to discuss in a very open and constructive way the most sensitive issues of our agenda and our bilateral relations. Of course, it opens additional horizons for our cooperation."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/brics-summit-2026-from-delhi-to-g20-in-florida-is-india-emerging-as-the-voice-of-the-global-south-1788848244799">BRICS Summit 2026: From Delhi to G20 in Florida, is India emerging as the voice of the Global South?</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://x.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | On President Putin&#39;s upcoming visit to India, Dmitry Peskov, Spokesperson for the President of the Russian Federation, says, &quot;In a couple of days, President Putin will begin his visit to India. He will take part in the BRICS summit, and it will also be a significant time… <a href="https://t.co/mP1e9YZAk4">pic.twitter.com/mP1e9YZAk4</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2097249220747030947?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Peskov also expressed confidence in India’s ability to successfully host the summit and said Russia would continue supporting efforts to strengthen cooperation within the BRICS framework. "We have no doubt that the summit will be successful. Russia, we are doing our best to contribute to further development of BRICS cooperation in the three main pillars of our interaction. So, those are policy and security. economy and finance, and cultural and humanitarian contexts. So, we are supporting idea of inviting new countries to join different formats within BRICS," he added. His remarks come ahead of Putin’s India visit, with bilateral ties and broader BRICS cooperation expected to remain key areas of discussion during the summit.

Putin’s India visit for the BRICS Summit will focus on India-Russia ties, bilateral cooperation and strengthening BRICS across key sectors

Russian President Vladimir Putin is set to visit India as the BRICS Summit gets underway in New Delhi on September 12. Ahead of Putin’s visit, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the trip will provide an important opportunity for India and Russia to discuss bilateral relations and address key issues on their agenda. Speaking to reporters during a virtual briefing from Moscow, Peskov highlighted the close personal relationship between Putin and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, describing their engagement as pragmatic and open. He said the visit could create new opportunities for cooperation between the two countries. "In a couple of days, President Putin will begin his India visit. You know that our two leaders, Indian and Russian leaders, are in a very close personal contact. contact. They are very pragmatic in their relationship, and they are as sincere as to be able to discuss in a very open and constructive way the most sensitive issues of our agenda and our bilateral relations. Of course, it opens additional horizons for our cooperation." Also Read: BRICS Summit 2026: From Delhi to G20 in Florida, is India emerging as the voice of the Global South?

Putin’s India visit ahead of the BRICS Summit will focus on bilateral ties, cooperation and strengthening the grouping’s role across key sectors

BRICS Summit 2026: Russia says Putin will update PM Modi on Ukraine conflict during their meeting

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s expected return to New Delhi for the BRICS Summit 2026 comes at a particularly sensitive moment for India’s relationship with Moscow, and for its increasingly complicated economic relationship with Washington. Putin was last in India in December 2025 for the annual India-Russia summit. His expected appearance at the September BRICS gathering would therefore put the Russian president in Delhi for a second time in less than a year, underlining the continuing importance of the India-Russia relationship even as New Delhi simultaneously manages its ties with the United States and other Western powers. Russia’s Ambassador to India Denis Alipov said on Friday that Putin is expected to attend the summit.&nbsp;But beyond the optics of another Modi-Putin meeting, one issue will inevitably hang over the summit: Russian oil. India’s dependence on Russian crude has grown dramatically since the Ukraine war. In July 2026, Russian crude accounted for a record 50.83% of India’s total oil imports, or about 2.47 million barrels per day, according to trade data cited by news agency Reuters. That makes the oil question far more complicated than a simple diplomatic choice between Washington and Moscow.<h2>The 50% tariff episode, and what changed</h2>The Trump administration had imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports in August 2025 specifically over India’s purchases of Russian oil. Combined with the existing reciprocal tariff, the total reached 50%. The White House said the additional duty was intended to pressure countries purchasing Russian oil. But that is not the current tariff structure. In February 2026, Washington removed the additional 25% Russia-oil tariff after saying India had committed to stop directly or indirectly importing Russian oil. The US also lowered its reciprocal tariff on Indian goods to 18%. Crucially, however, the February executive order contains a warning: if India resumes direct or indirect purchases of Russian oil, US officials can recommend bringing back the additional 25% tariff. And India's subsequent oil-import numbers make that provision highly relevant.<h2>Why India cannot simply walk away from Russian crude</h2>India is the world's third-largest oil consumer and relies heavily on imports to meet its energy requirements. Russian crude became particularly attractive after Western sanctions and price restrictions disrupted Moscow's traditional markets. For Indian refiners, Russian crude has not simply been a geopolitical purchase. Price, availability, refinery economics and supply security have all mattered. The scale of the trade illustrates the problem. India's imports from Russia have become heavily concentrated in energy: crude oil alone accounted for $35.76 billion of imports in FY2025-26 through November, according to IBEF data. Fertilisers were another major category at $2.11 billion. And crude is not the only Russian commodity India has reasons to keep buying.<h2>What India buys from Russia</h2>Crude oil: By far the biggest component. Russian supplies have become crucial to Indian refiners, and July's record share shows how difficult it is to immediately replace those volumes. Fertilisers: Russia remains an important source of fertilisers for India's agriculture sector. Any disruption has implications beyond foreign policy, potentially affecting input costs and food security.&nbsp;Defence equipment: Russia has historically been India's biggest defence supplier, although India's dependence has declined as New Delhi has diversified its procurement. The relationship nevertheless includes decades of equipment, spares, maintenance and technology links. Diamonds, metals and other commodities: India also imports diamonds, iron and steel, vegetable oils and several other commodities from Russia, although their strategic significance is generally much smaller than oil, fertilisers and defence.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/europe-has-become-an-old-continent-belgian-pm-warns-us-china-are-surpassing-europe-1788505852108">'Europe has become an old continent': Belgian PM warns US, China are surpassing Europe</a><h2>What India can reduce, and what it cannot easily replace</h2>This is where the Russian oil debate becomes more nuanced. India can diversify its crude purchases. It already buys from suppliers in the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere. It can also adjust refinery configurations and procurement patterns depending on prices, sanctions and shipping costs. But replacing Russian oil overnight is another matter.&nbsp;The challenge is not simply finding another barrel. India needs barrels that are economically viable, available in sufficient volumes and compatible with its refinery system. Removing one of its largest sources could raise procurement costs and put pressure on refiners and consumers. The same logic applies, in a different way, to fertilisers and defence sustainment. India can diversify suppliers over time. But diversification is not the same as immediate substitution.<h2>Why Putin’s BRICS visit matters?</h2>This makes Putin’s expected Delhi visit particularly significant. India's BRICS presidency comes at a time when the grouping is discussing energy security, economic cooperation, local-currency trade and reducing vulnerabilities created by global financial and supply-chain disruptions. Russia, meanwhile, has a strong interest in preserving access to major markets such as India.&nbsp;For Moscow, India is not merely a diplomatic partner. It is a major energy customer and an increasingly important economic relationship. For New Delhi, Russia remains one pillar of a broader strategic-autonomy strategy: maintaining ties with Moscow while simultaneously engaging Washington, Europe, the Gulf, Japan and other partners.That does not mean India is choosing Russia over the US. It means India is trying to avoid being forced to choose.<h2>The bigger India-US question</h2>The oil issue therefore puts the Modi government in a delicate position. Washington has already demonstrated that Russian energy purchases can become a trade issue. The February 2026 executive order removed the additional 25% tariff but explicitly kept the door open to bringing it back if Russian oil imports resume.&nbsp;At the same time, India's latest import data suggest that Russian crude remains extremely difficult to displace. With Russian oil reaching more than half of India's imports in July, the economic relationship has moved far beyond the limited purchases that existed before the Ukraine war. That is why the Putin-Modi meeting on the sidelines of BRICS Summit 2026 will carry significance beyond the usual India-Russia agenda.&nbsp;The discussion is likely to encompass energy security, fertilisers, defence, trade imbalances and payment mechanisms. But underneath all of it will be one fundamental question: How much Russian oil can India continue buying without reopening the tariff confrontation with Washington, and how much Russian oil can India realistically afford to stop buying? For Moscow, the answer is strategically important. For Washington, it is a test of economic pressure. And for New Delhi, it is ultimately a question of energy security, economic interests and strategic autonomy.

BRICS Summit 2026: Putin’s expected Delhi visit comes as India’s Russian oil imports surge. Here’s what India buys from Russia and why it can’t easily stop

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s expected return to New Delhi for the BRICS Summit 2026 comes at a particularly sensitive moment for India’s relationship with Moscow, and for its increasingly complicated economic relationship with Washington. Putin was last in India in December 2025 for the annual India-Russia summit. His expected appearance at the September BRICS gathering would therefore put the Russian president in Delhi for a second time in less than a year, underlining the continuing importance of the India-Russia relationship even as New Delhi simultaneously manages its ties with the United States and other Western powers. Russia’s Ambassador to India Denis Alipov said on Friday that Putin is expected to attend the summit. But beyond the optics of another Modi-Putin meeting, one issue will inevitably hang over the summit: Russian oil. India’s dependence on Russian crude has grown dramatically since the Ukraine war. In July 2026, Russian crude accounted for a record 50.83% of India’s total oil imports, or about 2.47 million barrels per day, according to trade data cited by news agency Reuters. That makes the oil question far more complicated than a simple diplomatic choice between Washington and Moscow. The 50% tariff episode, and what changed The Trump administration had imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports in August 2025 specifically over India’s purchases of Russian oil. Combined with the existing reciprocal tariff, the total reached 50%. The White House said the additional duty was intended to pressure countries purchasing Russian oil. But that is not the current tariff structure. In February 2026, Washington removed the additional 25% Russia-oil tariff after saying India had committed to stop directly or indirectly importing Russian oil. The US also lowered its reciprocal tariff on Indian goods to 18%. Crucially, however, the February executive order contains a warning: if India resumes direct or indirect purchases of Russian oil, US officials can recommend bringing back the additional 25% tariff. And India's subsequent oil-import numbers make that provision highly relevant. Why India cannot simply walk away from Russian crude India is the world's third-largest oil consumer and relies heavily on imports to meet its energy requirements. Russian crude became particularly attractive after Western sanctions and price restrictions disrupted Moscow's traditional markets. For Indian refiners, Russian crude has not simply been a geopolitical purchase. Price, availability, refinery economics and supply security have all mattered. The scale of the trade illustrates the problem. India's imports from Russia have become heavily concentrated in energy: crude oil alone accounted for $35.76 billion of imports in FY2025-26 through November, according to IBEF data. Fertilisers were another major category at $2.11 billion. And crude is not the only Russian commodity India has reasons to keep buying. What India buys from Russia Crude oil: By far the biggest component. Russian supplies have become crucial to Indian refiners, and July's record share shows how difficult it is to immediately replace those volumes. Fertilisers: Russia remains an important source of fertilisers for India's agriculture sector. Any disruption has implications beyond foreign policy, potentially affecting input costs and food security. Defence equipment: Russia has historically been India's biggest defence supplier, although India's dependence has declined as New Delhi has diversified its procurement. The relationship nevertheless includes decades of equipment, spares, maintenance and technology links. Diamonds, metals and other commodities: India also imports diamonds, iron and steel, vegetable oils and several other commodities from Russia, although their strategic significance is generally much smaller than oil, fertilisers and defence. Also Read: 'Europe has become an old continent': Belgian PM warns US, China are surpassing Europe What India can reduce, and what it cannot easily replace This is where the Russian oil debate becomes more nuanced. India can diversify its crude purchases. It already buys from suppliers in the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere. It can also adjust refinery configurations and procurement patterns depending on prices, sanctions and shipping costs. But replacing Russian oil overnight is another matter. The challenge is not simply finding another barrel. India needs barrels that are economically viable, available in sufficient volumes and compatible with its refinery system. Removing one of its largest sources could raise procurement costs and put pressure on refiners and consumers. The same logic applies, in a different way, to fertilisers and defence sustainment. India can diversify suppliers over time. But diversification is not the same as immediate substitution. Why Putin’s BRICS visit matters? This makes Putin’s expected Delhi visit particularly significant. India's BRICS presidency comes at a time when the grouping is discussing energy security, economic cooperation, local-currency trade and reducing vulnerabilities created by global financial and supply-chain disruptions. Russia, meanwhile, has a strong interest in preserving access to major markets such as India. For Moscow, India is not merely a diplomatic partner. It is a major energy customer and an increasingly important economic relationship. For New Delhi, Russia remains one pillar of a broader strategic-autonomy strategy: maintaining ties with Moscow while simultaneously engaging Washington, Europe, the Gulf, Japan and other partners. That does not mean India is choosing Russia over the US. It means India is trying to avoid being forced to choose. The bigger India-US question The oil issue therefore puts the Modi government in a delicate position. Washington has already demonstrated that Russian energy purchases can become a trade issue. The February 2026 executive order removed the additional 25% tariff but explicitly kept the door open to bringing it back if Russian oil imports resume. At the same time, India's latest import data suggest that Russian crude remains extremely difficult to displace. With Russian oil reaching more than half of India's imports in July, the economic relationship has moved far beyond the limited purchases that existed before the Ukraine war. That is why the Putin-Modi meeting on the sidelines of BRICS Summit 2026 will carry significance beyond the usual India-Russia agenda. The discussion is likely to encompass energy security, fertilisers, defence, trade imbalances and payment mechanisms. But underneath all of it will be one fundamental question: How much Russian oil can India continue buying without reopening the tariff confrontation with Washington, and how much Russian oil can India realistically afford to stop buying? For Moscow, the answer is strategically important. For Washington, it is a test of economic pressure. And for New Delhi, it is ultimately a question of energy security, economic interests and strategic autonomy.

Putin’s expected BRICS 2026 visit comes as India’s Russian oil imports surge, reviving questions over US tariffs, energy security and strategic autonomy

BRICS Summit 2026: Putin’s second India visit in 10 months comes amid focus on Russian oil

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s expected visit to India for the BRICS Summit 2026 is about much more than a multilateral meeting in New Delhi. If Xi does arrive, his presence at the September 12–13 summit would mark his first visit to India in seven years and provide the clearest public signal yet that Beijing and New Delhi are trying to stabilise a relationship damaged by the 2020 border clashes. Reuters has reported that Chinese officials are preparing for the trip, including security and hotel arrangements, although Beijing has not formally confirmed Xi’s attendance.&nbsp;But the bigger question is: why now? The answer lies in months of quiet diplomacy and a series of practical bargains between India and China, from the Line of Actual Control to direct air links, border trade and Chinese supplies of strategically important commodities. And behind all of this is another factor: India’s attempt to protect its strategic room for manoeuvre at a time when its relationship with Washington is becoming more complicated.<h2>The border came first</h2>The most important piece of the India-China reset remains the LAC. The 2020 clashes transformed bilateral ties. Military deployments and a prolonged standoff along the disputed Himalayan frontier pushed the relationship to its lowest point in decades. The October 2024 disengagement agreement became the first major opening. It did not resolve the boundary dispute, but it created space for both governments to begin rebuilding political and economic engagement.&nbsp;Since then, Delhi has repeatedly maintained that peace and tranquility along the border are essential for the broader relationship. That remains a crucial Indian red line. Even in August 2026, amid reports of another patrol-related confrontation, India reiterated that border peace is critical to bilateral ties. This distinction matters. India is not abandoning its security concerns or suddenly treating China as a partner. Instead, Delhi appears to be pursuing a more calibrated approach: manage the border dispute, prevent another military crisis and selectively restore engagement where Indian interests are served.<h2>Then came the economic bargaining</h2>The thaw has also been built around very practical issues. In August 2025, India and China agreed to work towards restoring direct flight connectivity, facilitating visas, reopening designated border-trade points and easing trade and investment flows.For India, however, connectivity was only one part of the equation. Beijing also indicated that it would address Indian concerns over supplies of fertilisers, rare-earth minerals and magnets, and tunnel-boring machines, commodities and industrial inputs where Chinese dominance can create vulnerabilities for Indian manufacturers and infrastructure projects.&nbsp;That is where the relationship gets particularly interesting. India's China policy since 2020 has broadly sought to reduce strategic dependence on Beijing while simultaneously recognising that completely decoupling from the world's manufacturing giant is neither practical nor necessarily desirable. The emerging formula is therefore closer to ‘de-risk, not disengage’. India wants alternative supply chains and greater domestic capacity. But it also wants critical Chinese supplies to keep moving when they are necessary for the Indian economy.<h2>Direct flights are more than just connectivity</h2>The agreement to resume direct flights also carries diplomatic significance. For years, the India-China relationship became increasingly insulated from normal people-to-people contact. Tourism, business travel, academic exchanges and other interactions were disrupted after the pandemic and the border crisis. Restoring flights and easing visas is therefore part of rebuilding the infrastructure of the relationship itself. It does not mean the trust deficit has disappeared. Rather, it suggests that both sides have concluded that permanent confrontation is too costly.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/belgium-latest-eu-state-cautioned-by-india-over-arms-for-pakistan-gets-assurances-from-brussels-1788418519449">Belgium, latest EU state cautioned by India over arms for Pakistan; gets assurances from Brussels</a><h2>The SCO groundwork mattered</h2>The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation has provided another important diplomatic channel. The SCO platform allowed Modi and Xi to engage at a time when neither India nor China was ready to present the bilateral relationship as fully normalised. That gradual process of leader-level engagement has helped create the political space for the next stage: Xi potentially travelling to New Delhi. The trajectory has been visible since the Modi-Xi meeting in Kazan in October 2024 and the subsequent diplomatic push to stabilise ties. India and China also agreed to support each other’s BRICS presidencies, China backing India’s 2026 summit and India supporting China’s 2027 summit. So the BRICS meeting is not appearing out of nowhere. The groundwork has been laid for months.<h2>But there is a Washington angle too</h2>This is perhaps the most consequential part of the story. India's engagement with China is taking place against a complicated relationship with the United States. Washington remains a critical strategic and economic partner for New Delhi, particularly on defence, technology, supply chains and the Indo-Pacific. But tensions over trade and tariffs have complicated the relationship.&nbsp;At the same time, China has become one of the most important targets of Washington's economic and strategic pressure. That creates an unusual convergence between Delhi and Beijing. India does not want to become part of a US-China confrontation.And China has little interest in seeing India move completely into an American strategic camp. That does not mean India is switching sides.&nbsp;Quite the opposite. New Delhi's approach is better understood as strategic autonomy: maintain strong relations with Washington, deepen ties with other partners, and simultaneously stabilise relations with Beijing where Indian interests demand it. The India-China discussions have themselves reflected this broader outlook, with both sides stressing multilateralism, a rules-based trading system and a multipolar world.<h2>What does Xi want?</h2>For Xi, coming to Delhi would also carry several benefits. First, it would demonstrate that the China-India relationship is moving beyond the post-2020 confrontation. Second, Beijing has an interest in ensuring that BRICS remains cohesive as the grouping expands and becomes a more important platform for the Global South.&nbsp;Third, China's relationship with India cannot be managed entirely through the border. The two countries are competitors in Asia, but they also share interests in trade, multilateral institutions, energy security and the broader question of how global power should be distributed. Xi's presence would allow Beijing to send a message that China and India can compete while simultaneously maintaining dialogue.<h2>What does India want?</h2>For Delhi, the calculation is equally straightforward. India wants the border to remain stable. It wants critical Chinese imports, particularly rare earths and other industrial inputs, to remain accessible. It wants greater connectivity and trade without returning to the pre-2020 model of deep economic dependence.&nbsp;And it wants room to manoeuvre internationally. That makes Xi's potential visit less a symbol of “India and China are friends again” and more a symbol of something far more pragmatic: India and China have decided that managed competition is preferable to uncontrolled confrontation.<h2>The BRICS test</h2>That is why Xi's expected arrival in New Delhi matters. The BRICS Summit will put Modi and Xi in the same room at precisely the moment when both countries are testing whether their fragile reset can survive strategic competition. The border remains unresolved. Trust remains limited. China remains a major security challenge for India.&nbsp;But the channels of communication are reopening. Flights are being restored. Trade mechanisms are being revived. Critical supplies are back in the conversation. Border-management mechanisms are being strengthened. And the two sides are preparing for another round of high-level engagement. So when Xi potentially arrives in Delhi, the headline may be BRICS 2026.&nbsp;But the real story will be the bargain underneath it: India and China are not ending their rivalry. They are trying to make it manageable — while ensuring that neither Washington nor Beijing gets to dictate the limits of India's strategic choices.

Why is Xi Jinping coming to India for BRICS 2026? Here’s how LAC disengagement, direct flights, rare earths, fertilisers and US tensions shaped the thaw

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s expected visit to India for the BRICS Summit 2026 is about much more than a multilateral meeting in New Delhi. If Xi does arrive, his presence at the September 12–13 summit would mark his first visit to India in seven years and provide the clearest public signal yet that Beijing and New Delhi are trying to stabilise a relationship damaged by the 2020 border clashes. Reuters has reported that Chinese officials are preparing for the trip, including security and hotel arrangements, although Beijing has not formally confirmed Xi’s attendance. But the bigger question is: why now? The answer lies in months of quiet diplomacy and a series of practical bargains between India and China, from the Line of Actual Control to direct air links, border trade and Chinese supplies of strategically important commodities. And behind all of this is another factor: India’s attempt to protect its strategic room for manoeuvre at a time when its relationship with Washington is becoming more complicated. The border came first The most important piece of the India-China reset remains the LAC. The 2020 clashes transformed bilateral ties. Military deployments and a prolonged standoff along the disputed Himalayan frontier pushed the relationship to its lowest point in decades. The October 2024 disengagement agreement became the first major opening. It did not resolve the boundary dispute, but it created space for both governments to begin rebuilding political and economic engagement. Since then, Delhi has repeatedly maintained that peace and tranquility along the border are essential for the broader relationship. That remains a crucial Indian red line. Even in August 2026, amid reports of another patrol-related confrontation, India reiterated that border peace is critical to bilateral ties. This distinction matters. India is not abandoning its security concerns or suddenly treating China as a partner. Instead, Delhi appears to be pursuing a more calibrated approach: manage the border dispute, prevent another military crisis and selectively restore engagement where Indian interests are served. Then came the economic bargaining The thaw has also been built around very practical issues. In August 2025, India and China agreed to work towards restoring direct flight connectivity, facilitating visas, reopening designated border-trade points and easing trade and investment flows. For India, however, connectivity was only one part of the equation. Beijing also indicated that it would address Indian concerns over supplies of fertilisers, rare-earth minerals and magnets, and tunnel-boring machines, commodities and industrial inputs where Chinese dominance can create vulnerabilities for Indian manufacturers and infrastructure projects. That is where the relationship gets particularly interesting. India's China policy since 2020 has broadly sought to reduce strategic dependence on Beijing while simultaneously recognising that completely decoupling from the world's manufacturing giant is neither practical nor necessarily desirable. The emerging formula is therefore closer to ‘de-risk, not disengage’. India wants alternative supply chains and greater domestic capacity. But it also wants critical Chinese supplies to keep moving when they are necessary for the Indian economy. Direct flights are more than just connectivity The agreement to resume direct flights also carries diplomatic significance. For years, the India-China relationship became increasingly insulated from normal people-to-people contact. Tourism, business travel, academic exchanges and other interactions were disrupted after the pandemic and the border crisis. Restoring flights and easing visas is therefore part of rebuilding the infrastructure of the relationship itself. It does not mean the trust deficit has disappeared. Rather, it suggests that both sides have concluded that permanent confrontation is too costly. Also Read: Belgium, latest EU state cautioned by India over arms for Pakistan; gets assurances from Brussels The SCO groundwork mattered The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation has provided another important diplomatic channel. The SCO platform allowed Modi and Xi to engage at a time when neither India nor China was ready to present the bilateral relationship as fully normalised. That gradual process of leader-level engagement has helped create the political space for the next stage: Xi potentially travelling to New Delhi. The trajectory has been visible since the Modi-Xi meeting in Kazan in October 2024 and the subsequent diplomatic push to stabilise ties. India and China also agreed to support each other’s BRICS presidencies, China backing India’s 2026 summit and India supporting China’s 2027 summit. So the BRICS meeting is not appearing out of nowhere. The groundwork has been laid for months. But there is a Washington angle too This is perhaps the most consequential part of the story. India's engagement with China is taking place against a complicated relationship with the United States. Washington remains a critical strategic and economic partner for New Delhi, particularly on defence, technology, supply chains and the Indo-Pacific. But tensions over trade and tariffs have complicated the relationship. At the same time, China has become one of the most important targets of Washington's economic and strategic pressure. That creates an unusual convergence between Delhi and Beijing. India does not want to become part of a US-China confrontation. And China has little interest in seeing India move completely into an American strategic camp. That does not mean India is switching sides. Quite the opposite. New Delhi's approach is better understood as strategic autonomy: maintain strong relations with Washington, deepen ties with other partners, and simultaneously stabilise relations with Beijing where Indian interests demand it. The India-China discussions have themselves reflected this broader outlook, with both sides stressing multilateralism, a rules-based trading system and a multipolar world. What does Xi want? For Xi, coming to Delhi would also carry several benefits. First, it would demonstrate that the China-India relationship is moving beyond the post-2020 confrontation. Second, Beijing has an interest in ensuring that BRICS remains cohesive as the grouping expands and becomes a more important platform for the Global South. Third, China's relationship with India cannot be managed entirely through the border. The two countries are competitors in Asia, but they also share interests in trade, multilateral institutions, energy security and the broader question of how global power should be distributed. Xi's presence would allow Beijing to send a message that China and India can compete while simultaneously maintaining dialogue. What does India want? For Delhi, the calculation is equally straightforward. India wants the border to remain stable. It wants critical Chinese imports, particularly rare earths and other industrial inputs, to remain accessible. It wants greater connectivity and trade without returning to the pre-2020 model of deep economic dependence. And it wants room to manoeuvre internationally. That makes Xi's potential visit less a symbol of “India and China are friends again” and more a symbol of something far more pragmatic: India and China have decided that managed competition is preferable to uncontrolled confrontation. The BRICS test That is why Xi's expected arrival in New Delhi matters. The BRICS Summit will put Modi and Xi in the same room at precisely the moment when both countries are testing whether their fragile reset can survive strategic competition. The border remains unresolved. Trust remains limited. China remains a major security challenge for India. But the channels of communication are reopening. Flights are being restored. Trade mechanisms are being revived. Critical supplies are back in the conversation. Border-management mechanisms are being strengthened. And the two sides are preparing for another round of high-level engagement. So when Xi potentially arrives in Delhi, the headline may be BRICS 2026. But the real story will be the bargain underneath it: India and China are not ending their rivalry. They are trying to make it manageable — while ensuring that neither Washington nor Beijing gets to dictate the limits of India's strategic choices.

Xi Jinping’s expected India visit for BRICS 2026 follows a quiet India-China reset over the LAC, flights, rare earths and trade, amid US tensions

Xi at BRICS Summit: US factor, LAC normalisation and other variables ahead of Chinese president's likely visit

Days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Bishkek, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued a veiled warning India and other countries against helping Tehran generate revenue or bypass American sanctions. Rubio made the remarks during an interview with Brian Kilmeade on The Brian Kilmeade Show. He was asked about Modi's meeting with Pezeshkian and whether New Delhi was looking to establish a new trade arrangement with Tehran.&nbsp;"Well, I don't think there's a trade deal between India and Iran," Rubio said, while acknowledging that countries have the sovereign right to shape their foreign policies and maintain diplomatic relations with Iran. However, Rubio said Washington would take action against countries that assist Tehran in circumventing US sanctions or create financial mechanisms that allow Iran to generate revenue.&nbsp;The warning comes as the Trump administration intensifies its economic pressure campaign against Iran. Washington has cautioned countries and businesses continuing commercial dealings with Tehran that they could face secondary sanctions.US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced what he called "Operation Economic Outcast" on August 24, describing the campaign as an "economic D-Day" aimed at cutting off Iran's remaining economic lifelines.<h2>Rubio's veiled warning to India and other countries</h2>Rubio said the US was aware that several countries maintain diplomatic and other forms of contact with Iran. He noted that Washington itself has engaged with Iranian representatives during previous negotiations and discussions. "I mean, we've met with elements of the Iranian regime as well, in terms of some of these discussions that have occurred and there's been contact with them," he said.&nbsp;At the same time, Rubio distinguished between maintaining diplomatic relations with Tehran and undertaking economic activities that Washington believes could undermine its sanctions regime. "I think what ultimately happens though is, and the President's been very clear - is no country should be helping Iran evade sanctions. No country should be out there helping them create mechanisms by which they can generate revenue that they will then use to sponsor terrorism and try to build a nuclear weapon," Rubio said. "And if countries decide to do that, then we're going to have to sanction them too," he said.<h3>Modi-Pezeshkian meeting in Bishkek</h3>Rubio's comments came shortly after Modi met Pezeshkian during the SCO summit in Bishkek. The two leaders discussed ways to strengthen India-Iran relations, including expanding and diversifying bilateral trade. They also exchanged views on the ongoing conflict in West Asia, regional tensions and the safety of commercial shipping and seafarers.&nbsp;"Met President Masoud Pezeshkian in Bishkek. Reiterated our commitment to strengthening India's long standing friendship with Iran across diverse sectors. We want to expand and diversify our trade basket in the times to come. We had a discussion on the prevailing situation in the region. India will continue to support all efforts aimed at ensuring lasting peace," PM Modi said in a social media post. According to India's Ministry of External Affairs, Modi expressed concern over the escalation of tensions in West Asia and reiterated India's longstanding position that disputes should be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy.&nbsp;The safety of commercial vessels was also a key issue during the meeting. With the regional conflict affecting maritime traffic, Modi stressed the importance of protecting freedom of navigation and international commerce. "Calling for safeguarding the freedom of navigation and commerce, he emphasised that civilians and civilian infrastructure, including commercial shipping and seafarers must not be harmed under any circumstances," the ministry said.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/coast-guard-jet-carrying-dhs-secretary-markwayne-mullin-makes-emergency-landing-after-engine-failure-1788403522901">Coast Guard jet carrying DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin makes emergency landing after engine failure</a><h3>Pezeshkian seeks India's diplomatic support</h3>Pezeshkian, meanwhile, thanked India for its support and cooperation and called on New Delhi to use its diplomatic relationships to contribute to easing tensions in West Asia, according to an Iranian readout of the meeting. "From the very beginning of our administration, our efforts have been focused on ensuring peace and security and resolving issues through dialogue and negotiations," Pezeshkian said.&nbsp;The Iranian president criticised Washington's approach towards Tehran, arguing that the US had opted for confrontation rather than diplomacy. "Unfortunately, instead of making use of diplomatic mechanisms, the Americans have chosen the path of war, insecurity and imposing their will through force," he said. Pezeshkian said Iran did not want war and maintained that Tehran's priority was protecting its people while creating the conditions necessary for peace and regional stability. "The Islamic Republic of Iran has remained committed to the obligations it has undertaken within the framework of the agreements, but unfortunately, the American side has failed to fulfill its commitments," he said.<h3>Iran rejects US sanctions pressure</h3>Tehran has rejected Washington's latest sanctions campaign, accusing the US of violating international law and attempting to pressure other nations into restricting their dealings with Iran. "No honourable state that values its sovereignty and national interests will accept the normalisation of such gross lawlessness and systematic bullying," Iran's Foreign Ministry said.

Marco Rubio issued a veiled warning to India and other countries against helping Iran evade US sanctions after PM Modi met Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in Bishkek

Days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Bishkek, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has issued a veiled warning India and other countries against helping Tehran generate revenue or bypass American sanctions. Rubio made the remarks during an interview with Brian Kilmeade on The Brian Kilmeade Show. He was asked about Modi's meeting with Pezeshkian and whether New Delhi was looking to establish a new trade arrangement with Tehran. "Well, I don't think there's a trade deal between India and Iran," Rubio said, while acknowledging that countries have the sovereign right to shape their foreign policies and maintain diplomatic relations with Iran. However, Rubio said Washington would take action against countries that assist Tehran in circumventing US sanctions or create financial mechanisms that allow Iran to generate revenue. The warning comes as the Trump administration intensifies its economic pressure campaign against Iran. Washington has cautioned countries and businesses continuing commercial dealings with Tehran that they could face secondary sanctions. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced what he called "Operation Economic Outcast" on August 24, describing the campaign as an "economic D-Day" aimed at cutting off Iran's remaining economic lifelines. Rubio's veiled warning to India and other countries Rubio said the US was aware that several countries maintain diplomatic and other forms of contact with Iran. He noted that Washington itself has engaged with Iranian representatives during previous negotiations and discussions. "I mean, we've met with elements of the Iranian regime as well, in terms of some of these discussions that have occurred and there's been contact with them," he said. At the same time, Rubio distinguished between maintaining diplomatic relations with Tehran and undertaking economic activities that Washington believes could undermine its sanctions regime. "I think what ultimately happens though is, and the President's been very clear - is no country should be helping Iran evade sanctions. No country should be out there helping them create mechanisms by which they can generate revenue that they will then use to sponsor terrorism and try to build a nuclear weapon," Rubio said. "And if countries decide to do that, then we're going to have to sanction them too," he said. Modi-Pezeshkian meeting in Bishkek Rubio's comments came shortly after Modi met Pezeshkian during the SCO summit in Bishkek. The two leaders discussed ways to strengthen India-Iran relations, including expanding and diversifying bilateral trade. They also exchanged views on the ongoing conflict in West Asia, regional tensions and the safety of commercial shipping and seafarers. "Met President Masoud Pezeshkian in Bishkek. Reiterated our commitment to strengthening India's long standing friendship with Iran across diverse sectors. We want to expand and diversify our trade basket in the times to come. We had a discussion on the prevailing situation in the region. India will continue to support all efforts aimed at ensuring lasting peace," PM Modi said in a social media post. According to India's Ministry of External Affairs, Modi expressed concern over the escalation of tensions in West Asia and reiterated India's longstanding position that disputes should be resolved through dialogue and diplomacy. The safety of commercial vessels was also a key issue during the meeting. With the regional conflict affecting maritime traffic, Modi stressed the importance of protecting freedom of navigation and international commerce. "Calling for safeguarding the freedom of navigation and commerce, he emphasised that civilians and civilian infrastructure, including commercial shipping and seafarers must not be harmed under any circumstances," the ministry said. Also Read: Coast Guard jet carrying DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin makes emergency landing after engine failure Pezeshkian seeks India's diplomatic support Pezeshkian, meanwhile, thanked India for its support and cooperation and called on New Delhi to use its diplomatic relationships to contribute to easing tensions in West Asia, according to an Iranian readout of the meeting. "From the very beginning of our administration, our efforts have been focused on ensuring peace and security and resolving issues through dialogue and negotiations," Pezeshkian said. The Iranian president criticised Washington's approach towards Tehran, arguing that the US had opted for confrontation rather than diplomacy. "Unfortunately, instead of making use of diplomatic mechanisms, the Americans have chosen the path of war, insecurity and imposing their will through force," he said. Pezeshkian said Iran did not want war and maintained that Tehran's priority was protecting its people while creating the conditions necessary for peace and regional stability. "The Islamic Republic of Iran has remained committed to the obligations it has undertaken within the framework of the agreements, but unfortunately, the American side has failed to fulfill its commitments," he said. Iran rejects US sanctions pressure Tehran has rejected Washington's latest sanctions campaign, accusing the US of violating international law and attempting to pressure other nations into restricting their dealings with Iran. "No honourable state that values its sovereignty and national interests will accept the normalisation of such gross lawlessness and systematic bullying," Iran's Foreign Ministry said.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a veiled warning to India and others against helping Iran evade sanctions days after Modi met Iranian President Pezeshkian

Rubio on Modi-Pezeshkian meeting: 'No country should help Iran evade sanctions'

Can Central Asia become India's next major trade partner? As New Delhi looks to diversify supply chains, reduce trade vulnerabilities and expand its economic footprint across Eurasia, Central Asia is emerging as a region of growing strategic importance. Improved connectivity, energy cooperation, transport corridors and stronger regional engagement could unlock new opportunities for Indian businesses. As leaders gather for the SCO Summit, the focus is increasingly shifting to how India can deepen economic ties with Central Asian nations and strengthen its position in regional trade networks.

Can Central Asia help India diversify trade? 

Ruchika Singh, who went viral earlier for using abusive language directed at PM Modi and his late mother during the Cockroach Janta Party protest in Jantar Mantar, has resurfaced again. A viral video shows the 15-year-old accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of turning her life into a living “hell”. She was last seen apologising in a video message for her remarks; now she could be heard saying she will not “back down”.“Modi ji, you have made my life hell. You have hounded a 15-year-old girl so much that she has been tortured everywhere. I have to hide my face everywhere," she is heard saying in a video.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨 The same girl who previously used extremely abusive language against PM Modi and his late mother, Ruchika Singh, is back to grab headlines after apologising. She is now calling the Prime Minister a “coward” and says, “I have nothing left to lose; I have lost everything. I…&mdash; Megh Updates 🚨™ (@MeghUpdates) <a href="https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/2094006572435533881?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 30, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israeli-strikes-gaza-kill-three-year-old-ben-gvir-prison-video-1788091638487">Israeli strikes kill 2 Palestinians in Gaza, including 3-year-old child; Ben Gvir posts video berating female inmates</a>In the unverified video, she could be seen claiming that she has “nothing to lose” and would not back down, before allegedly calling Prime Minister Modi a “coward". The video circulating online could not be verified independently. Its origin and recording date remain unknown. People online were divided in their response; some users expressed support, “Ruchika, don't worry, we stand with you,” while others hit back at her, “Like seriously she has guts to come live again.”During the July protest, her abusive and derogatory language resulted in a Zero FIR being registered against her in Noida. Several media reports suggested that Ruchika Singh and her mother were forced to flee and abandon their home due to heavy hounding, extreme public pressure, and targeted harassment following her viral video. She then publicly apologised with folded hands. But despite her apology and PM Modi's subsequent call for forgiveness, according to a report by The Telegraph India, Ruchika’s mother stated that police officers, television reporters, and aggressive strangers descended upon their rented flat in Sector 150, Noida, daily.&nbsp;

Ruchika Singh, who went viral for abusive remarks against PM Modi, has resurfaced in an unverified video claiming she was hounded after the Jantar Mantar protest.

Ruchika Singh, who went viral earlier for using abusive language directed at PM Modi and his late mother during the Cockroach Janta Party protest in Jantar Mantar, has resurfaced again. A viral video shows the 15-year-old accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of turning her life into a living “hell”. She was last seen apologising in a video message for her remarks; now she could be heard saying she will not “back down”. “Modi ji, you have made my life hell. You have hounded a 15-year-old girl so much that she has been tortured everywhere. I have to hide my face everywhere," she is heard saying in a video.

Ruchika Singh, who went viral for abusive remarks against PM Modi, has resurfaced in an unverified video claiming she was hounded after the Jantar Mantar protest.

Ruchika Singh resurfaces in viral video, says PM Modi ‘made my life hell’ after Jantar Mantar row

Prime Minister Narendra Modi begins his four-day visit to Uzbekistan and the Kyrgyz Republic starting from August 29 to September 1, 2026. His four-day trip focused on strengthening India’s strategic partnerships in Central Asia, expanding economic and security cooperation, and advancing regional peace and stability. He will visit Uzbekistan from August 29 to 30 on a bilateral visit and later will join the Kyrgyz Republic for the 26th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit from August 31 to September 1. After framing the “Connect Central Asia” policy, India started its focused engagement with these five countries, which include Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan<h3>Why Central Asia matters for India?</h3>Central Asia has always been considered the backyard of Russia as nearly 20-30 per cent of its population speaks Russian. In addition, the region is widely considered to be extremely rich in mineral and natural resources. In terms of resources, Kazakhstan holds one of the largest uranium reserves in the world, along with coal, lead, zinc, gold, and iron ore. The Kyrgyz Republic is rich in gold and hydro-power potential, while Turkmenistan possesses vast natural gas reserves. Tajikistan also has significant hydro-power capacity, and Uzbekistan is endowed with gold, uranium, and natural gas resources. Other than minerals, India's engagement with the Central Asian countries also includes security cooperation after the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, countering China’s influence, connectivity plans including the International North South Transit Corridor, energy needs (Kazakhstan has uranium reserves and Turkmenistan is part of the proposed Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Iran gas pipeline), old cultural links and future trade.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/order-of-oliy-darajali-dustlik-pm-modi-conferred-with-uzbekistan-s-highest-state-of-honour-1788081764729">Order of 'Oliy Darajali Dustlik': PM Modi conferred with Uzbekistan's highest state of honour</a> In addition, after China's major investments in the region with its Belt and Road initiative, India is attempting to avoid the post-Soviet space that could be captured by the Chinese. Therefore, India wants to connect the International North-South Corridor with the Chabahar port in Iran in order to access this resource-rich region. In a separate development, the Russia-Ukraine conflict might cause some local churn in Central Asian countries, as reports suggest that some Russians with the money and the skills, are moving to these Central Asian countries for the time being. With this inflow of skills, these regions may benefit along with funding into their local economies, but it may create some tension within the countries.<h3>Cultural links</h3>There has been a deep cultural and civilisational connection between India and Uzbekistan for centuries. The only Buddhist monastery known in Central Asia is in Kara Tepa, Termez, Uzbekistan. This was an important centre in the Kushana era, when the Buddhist influence had spread further to Central Asia. There are close to 3,000 shared words in Hindi and Uzbek. There are similarities in cuisine, like ghee-sariyok, samosa-samsa, naan-non and pulao-pilaf. India is also among the top 10 trading partners of Uzbekistan. The bilateral trade in 2025-26 stood close to $1 billion.

India's engagement with the Central Asian countries includes security cooperation after the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, countering China’s influence, connectivity plans including the International North South Transit Corridor, energy needs, old cultural links and future trade.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi begins his four-day visit to Uzbekistan and the Kyrgyz Republic starting from August 29 to September 1, 2026. His four-day trip focused on strengthening India’s strategic partnerships in Central Asia, expanding economic and security cooperation, and advancing regional peace and stability. He will visit Uzbekistan from August 29 to 30 on a bilateral visit and later will join the Kyrgyz Republic for the 26th Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit from August 31 to September 1. After framing the “Connect Central Asia” policy, India started its focused engagement with these five countries, which include Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan Why Central Asia matters for India? Central Asia has always been considered the backyard of Russia as nearly 20-30 per cent of its population speaks Russian. In addition, the region is widely considered to be extremely rich in mineral and natural resources. In terms of resources, Kazakhstan holds one of the largest uranium reserves in the world, along with coal, lead, zinc, gold, and iron ore. The Kyrgyz Republic is rich in gold and hydro-power potential, while Turkmenistan possesses vast natural gas reserves. Tajikistan also has significant hydro-power capacity, and Uzbekistan is endowed with gold, uranium, and natural gas resources. Other than minerals, India's engagement with the Central Asian countries also includes security cooperation after the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, countering China’s influence, connectivity plans including the International North South Transit Corridor, energy needs (Kazakhstan has uranium reserves and Turkmenistan is part of the proposed Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Iran gas pipeline), old cultural links and future trade. Also read: Order of 'Oliy Darajali Dustlik': PM Modi conferred with Uzbekistan's highest state of honour In addition, after China's major investments in the region with its Belt and Road initiative, India is attempting to avoid the post-Soviet space that could be captured by the Chinese. Therefore, India wants to connect the International North-South Corridor with the Chabahar port in Iran in order to access this resource-rich region. In a separate development, the Russia-Ukraine conflict might cause some local churn in Central Asian countries, as reports suggest that some Russians with the money and the skills, are moving to these Central Asian countries for the time being. With this inflow of skills, these regions may benefit along with funding into their local economies, but it may create some tension within the countries. Cultural links There has been a deep cultural and civilisational connection between India and Uzbekistan for centuries. The only Buddhist monastery known in Central Asia is in Kara Tepa, Termez, Uzbekistan. This was an important centre in the Kushana era, when the Buddhist influence had spread further to Central Asia. There are close to 3,000 shared words in Hindi and Uzbek. There are similarities in cuisine, like ghee-sariyok, samosa-samsa, naan-non and pulao-pilaf. India is also among the top 10 trading partners of Uzbekistan. The bilateral trade in 2025-26 stood close to $1 billion.

India's engagement with the Central Asian countries includes security cooperation after the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, countering China’s influence, connectivity plans including the International North South Transit Corridor, energy needs, old cultural links and future trade.

Why is PM Modi in Uzbekistan before the SCO Summit? Key reasons explained

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has arrived in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, marking the first leg of his four-day Central Asia tour. During his visit, PM Modi is expected to hold high-level talks with Uzbekistan’s leadership, with trade and investment, defence cooperation, digital connectivity, energy, education and people-to-people ties high on the agenda.

The visit comes as India and Uzbekistan look to deepen their strategic partnership and expand cooperation across key sectors. Discussions are also expected to focus on strengthening connectivity and setting a roadmap for the next phase of bilateral relations.

After Uzbekistan, PM Modi will travel to Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Heads of State Summit. Regional security, counterterrorism, connectivity, economic cooperation and stronger engagement with Central Asia are expected to remain key priorities for India.

PM MODI ARRIVES IN TASHKENT | Modi Begins 4-Day Central Asia Tour With Uzbekistan Visit

PM MODI IN UZBEKISTAN: Prime Minister Narendra Modi has arrived in Tashkent, the capital of Uzbekistan, for a two-day visit aimed at strengthening India-Uzbekistan bilateral relations.

PM Modi was welcomed by Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev, with the two leaders set to hold discussions on a wide range of issues of mutual importance.

The visit will focus on the entire spectrum of India-Uzbekistan relations, including their longstanding civilizational and people-to-people ties. Key areas of cooperation include trade and investment, defence, digital connectivity, energy, education and people-to-people exchanges.

Tashkent has been decorated with Indian flags ahead of the Prime Minister's visit, reflecting the importance attached to the bilateral relationship.

During his visit, PM Modi is also scheduled to visit Yangi Uzbekistan Park and participate in a wreath-laying ceremony at the Independence Monument, a traditional diplomatic gesture of respect.

The Yangi Uzbekistan Park spans approximately 104 hectares and is described as one of the country's major recreational spaces.

PM Modi in Uzbekistan | PM Narendra Modi Arrives In Tashkent For Two-Day Visit 

Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Tashkent on Saturday to begin a four-day, two-nation tour of Central Asia, combining a state visit to Uzbekistan with attendance at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Kyrgyzstan.&nbsp;Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev received the Indian PM at the airport. The welcome marked the start of the first leg of the visit, which officials describe as an effort to deepen India’s strategic partnerships in a region New Delhi regards as part of its extended neighbourhood.&nbsp;The trip runs from 29 August to 1 September. Mr Modi will hold delegation-level talks with Mr Mirziyoyev in Tashkent on Sunday before flying to Bishkek for the 26th SCO summit on 31 August and 1 September. It is the Indian prime minister’s fourth visit to Uzbekistan.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-must-order-fir-rahul-gandhi-demands-sc-st-act-case-over-haldwani-purification-row-1788007212232">‘PM Modi must order FIR’: Rahul Gandhi demands SC/ST Act case over Haldwani purification row</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaches Tashkent, Uzbekistan (Source: ANI) <a href="https://t.co/wPjnYXuI4Q">pic.twitter.com/wPjnYXuI4Q</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://x.com/WIONews/status/2093690791348826611?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 29, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In a departure statement issued as he left New Delhi, PM Modi said the India–Uzbekistan strategic partnership had advanced significantly in recent years. He said he looked forward to discussions on trade and investment, digital connectivity, defence and energy, and on aligning India’s Viksit Bharat 2047 vision with Uzbekistan’s development plans. He is also expected to visit the Lal Bahadur Shastri Memorial in Tashkent and the Mahatma Gandhi Centre at the Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies.&nbsp;From Uzbekistan, Mr Modi will travel to the Kyrgyz capital at the invitation of President Sadyr Zhaparov. The SCO meeting marks 25 years of the grouping, of which India has been a full member since 2017.&nbsp;Indian PM said he would advance India’s priorities of security, connectivity and opportunity, and work with fellow members for a region free from terrorism, separatism and extremism. He is also due to attend the opening of the sixth World Nomad Games.&nbsp;Ahead of the visit, India’s ambassador to Kyrgyzstan, Birender Singh Yadav, speaking to WION, said that the visit would give “fresh direction” to India–Kyrgyzstan strategic ties. The envoy said defence and security cooperation and people-to-people contacts had “expanded markedly,” including specialised counter-terrorism courses tailored to Kyrgyz requirements and an increase in joint exercises.&nbsp;The visit comes as New Delhi seeks to strengthen trade, energy and connectivity links across Central Asia while using the SCO platform to press its long-standing concerns about terrorism.

PM Modi arrived in Tashkent for a four-day Central Asia tour that includes a state visit to Uzbekistan and the SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan, with India seeking to strengthen ties on trade, defence, energy, connectivity and regional security.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in Tashkent on Saturday to begin a four-day, two-nation tour of Central Asia, combining a state visit to Uzbekistan with attendance at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in Kyrgyzstan. Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev received the Indian PM at the airport. The welcome marked the start of the first leg of the visit, which officials describe as an effort to deepen India’s strategic partnerships in a region New Delhi regards as part of its extended neighbourhood. The trip runs from 29 August to 1 September. Mr Modi will hold delegation-level talks with Mr Mirziyoyev in Tashkent on Sunday before flying to Bishkek for the 26th SCO summit on 31 August and 1 September. It is the Indian prime minister’s fourth visit to Uzbekistan. Also Read: ‘PM Modi must order FIR’: Rahul Gandhi demands SC/ST Act case over Haldwani purification row

PM Modi arrived in Tashkent for a four-day Central Asia tour that includes a state visit to Uzbekistan and the SCO summit in Kyrgyzstan, with India seeking to strengthen ties on trade, defence, energy, connectivity and regional security.

PM Modi reaches Uzbekistan as he begins 2 nation visit to Central Asia

Poland is seeking deeper defence, space and cyber ties with India, including joint production of drones and reconnaissance satellites, Polish Deputy Foreign Minister Władysław Bartoszewski has said during his ongoing visit to New Delhi. Bartoszewski, in India on 27-28 August with officials from Poland’s defence sector, said the trip was focused on “very concrete cooperation agreements” two years after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Warsaw launched a strategic partnership and a joint action plan.&nbsp;“We are halfway through our action plan, and we have managed to do more than 50 per cent of what we agreed. So we want to move forward,” he said. Poland, he added, understood India’s insistence that sales be paired with local manufacturing. “When we sell something, we have to produce some of these elements made in India.”&nbsp;Drones are among the most immediate areas of work. A Polish firm is already operating in India and “is going to move into manufacturing” there. “Drone and anti-drone [capability] is one of the changing faces of war nowadays. So we do cooperate with the Indian government on that.”&nbsp;Space is the other priority. Poland has launched its own satellites to monitor security threats and is discussing production in India of reconnaissance satellites. “Space is now playing an increasing role in warfare,” Bartoszewski said. “India is very much interested in that as well.”&nbsp;Warsaw also wants Indian industry to tap Poland’s €44 billion allocation under the European Union’s SAFE defence programme. “Indian companies are interested in participating in that programme as well,” he said. Talks cover Polish firms producing in India and Indian firms producing in Poland, with products potentially sold to third markets.&nbsp;The two sides also plan to work on cyber defence, port security and the protection of undersea cables. “We face very serious cyber threats. We face terrorist attacks. We have problems with port security [and] underwater cable security,” Bartoszewski said. An Indian defence delegation is expected in Poland in September, and Indian manufacturers have been invited to a major defence exhibition in Central Europe.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/cia-director-met-russian-intelligence-officials-during-secret-moscow-trip-but-trump-calls-it-semi-routine-1787814070157">CIA director met Russian intelligence officials during secret Moscow trip, but Trump calls it ‘semi-routine’</a><h3>EAM S. Jaishankar to visit Poland next week</h3>External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar is due in Poland next week. Bartoszewski described contacts between the two foreign ministries as unusually frequent. “He sees our minister a few times a year. This is a very close working relationship.”&nbsp;Trade is another target. Officials have discussed nearly doubling bilateral trade to $10 billion a year within four years, aided by the EU-India free trade agreement. “We think we haven’t realised our mutual potential,” he said. The partnership also rests on wartime history. Indian rulers sheltered Polish refugees, including children, during the Second World War, before India’s independence.&nbsp;A museum is being prepared in Kolhapur, and Polish parliamentarians have collected artefacts for the project. Bartoszewski recalled Prime Minister Modi meeting some of those former child refugees in Poland. “They told him they saw the Indian flag being hoisted on the day of independence. He was quite moved.”

Drones are among the most immediate areas of work. A Polish firm is already operating in India and is going to move into manufacturing there. Space is the other priority as well for Poland.

Poland is seeking deeper defence, space and cyber ties with India, including joint production of drones and reconnaissance satellites, Polish Deputy Foreign Minister Władysław Bartoszewski has said during his ongoing visit to New Delhi. Bartoszewski, in India on 27-28 August with officials from Poland’s defence sector, said the trip was focused on “very concrete cooperation agreements” two years after Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Warsaw launched a strategic partnership and a joint action plan. “We are halfway through our action plan, and we have managed to do more than 50 per cent of what we agreed. So we want to move forward,” he said. Poland, he added, understood India’s insistence that sales be paired with local manufacturing. “When we sell something, we have to produce some of these elements made in India.” Drones are among the most immediate areas of work. A Polish firm is already operating in India and “is going to move into manufacturing” there. “Drone and anti-drone [capability] is one of the changing faces of war nowadays. So we do cooperate with the Indian government on that.” Space is the other priority. Poland has launched its own satellites to monitor security threats and is discussing production in India of reconnaissance satellites. “Space is now playing an increasing role in warfare,” Bartoszewski said. “India is very much interested in that as well.” Warsaw also wants Indian industry to tap Poland’s €44 billion allocation under the European Union’s SAFE defence programme. “Indian companies are interested in participating in that programme as well,” he said. Talks cover Polish firms producing in India and Indian firms producing in Poland, with products potentially sold to third markets. The two sides also plan to work on cyber defence, port security and the protection of undersea cables. “We face very serious cyber threats. We face terrorist attacks. We have problems with port security [and] underwater cable security,” Bartoszewski said. An Indian defence delegation is expected in Poland in September, and Indian manufacturers have been invited to a major defence exhibition in Central Europe. Also read: CIA director met Russian intelligence officials during secret Moscow trip, but Trump calls it ‘semi-routine’ EAM S. Jaishankar to visit Poland next week External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar is due in Poland next week. Bartoszewski described contacts between the two foreign ministries as unusually frequent. “He sees our minister a few times a year. This is a very close working relationship.” Trade is another target. Officials have discussed nearly doubling bilateral trade to $10 billion a year within four years, aided by the EU-India free trade agreement. “We think we haven’t realised our mutual potential,” he said. The partnership also rests on wartime history. Indian rulers sheltered Polish refugees, including children, during the Second World War, before India’s independence. A museum is being prepared in Kolhapur, and Polish parliamentarians have collected artefacts for the project. Bartoszewski recalled Prime Minister Modi meeting some of those former child refugees in Poland. “They told him they saw the Indian flag being hoisted on the day of independence. He was quite moved.”

Drones are among the most immediate areas of work. A Polish firm is already operating in India and is going to move into manufacturing there. Space is the other priority as well for Poland.

Poland offers India role in €44bn EU defence drive before EAM Jaishankar's visit

A controversy erupted in Gujarat's Surat after the board of a local fish market built by the Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC) was named after Prime Minister Narendra Modi. According to news agency PTI, a large board with PM Modi's photo in the corner and the words reading 'Shree Narendra Modi Wholesale Fish Market' was put up at the entrance of the newly-built market at Lakkadkot in the Nanpura area. The board also carried the name of The Surat Fish Merchant Association (SFMA).&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/insult-to-sanatan-fish-serving-at-congress-event-in-ayodhya-during-holy-sawan-month-sparks-row-1787496245350">‘Insult to Sanatan’: Fish serving at Congress event in Ayodhya during holy ‘Sawan’ month sparks row</a><h2>Why some traders opposed it and what was the explanation given?</h2>A section of traders objected to the move citing PM Modi's vegetarianism. &nbsp;"Narendra Modi has never consumed seafood in his life and is a pure vegetarian. Because Modi is a vegetarian, this board should not be put up," Surendra Lashkari, a fish trader, was quoted as saying by PTI.&nbsp;As controversy erupted, SMC, the Surat civic body that built the fish market, has clarified that the naming process is yet to be completed. SMC Executive Engineer of the Central Zone RD Ganjawala said that the SFMA, the fish merchant association which also featured on the hoarding, had submitted a written application to the SMC Standing Committee chairman and Central Zone authorities seeking to name the facility after PM Modi. "The board was put up without an official resolution. We have informed them about it and they have given a verbal assurance that they will take it down themselves," Ganjawala said.&nbsp;Nevertheless, Surat Fish Merchant Association (SFMA) defended the move, citing the ₹3 crore provided by the government under the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana for the construction of the market.&nbsp;<h2>'Fish' controversy in Indian politics?</h2>&nbsp;Controversy related to fish has been a common thing in Indian politics. Just last week, fish servings during a welcome programme for Uttar Pradesh Congress chief Ajay Rai in Ayodhya during the holy month of Sawan sparked a major row. The UP Congress president visited the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple and Hanuman Garhi but a video surfaced on social media showing fish being prepared at a banquet hall, where the welcome programme was organised for Rai, Congress state in-charge Rajpal Gautam, national spokesperson Akhilesh Pratap Singh and Purvanchal in-charge Abhishek Dutt. BJP MLA Ved Prakash Gupta slammed the grand-old party for making fun of “Sanatan faith.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/some-great-lakes-fish-could-be-upward-of-400-years-old-1786471207691">Some great lakes fish could be upward of 400 years old</a>&nbsp;Two weeks ago, UP Cabinet Minister and Nishad Party Chief Sanjay Nishad controversially claimed that fish cooked without onion and garlic can be considered vegetarian, inviting a major ire on social media.&nbsp;&nbsp;In 2024, Bihar's Opposition leader and son of former CM Lalu Prasad Yadav - Tejashwi Yadav - sparked a controversy after he posted a video of Vikassheel Insaan Party (VIP) chief Mukesh Sahni and himself &nbsp;eating fish and chapati inside a helicopter during 2024 Lok Sabha Election campaign. As the video was shared on the first day of Chaitra Navratri, BJP called it an insult to Hinduism.

A fish market built by Surat Municipal Corporation has sparked controversy after traders put up a board naming it after PM Narendra Modi. While SMC says the name is not final, the Surat Fish Merchant Association defended the move, citing ₹3 crore government funding for the project.

A controversy erupted in Gujarat's Surat after the board of a local fish market built by the Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC) was named after Prime Minister Narendra Modi. According to news agency PTI, a large board with PM Modi's photo in the corner and the words reading 'Shree Narendra Modi Wholesale Fish Market' was put up at the entrance of the newly-built market at Lakkadkot in the Nanpura area. The board also carried the name of The Surat Fish Merchant Association (SFMA). Also Read: ‘Insult to Sanatan’: Fish serving at Congress event in Ayodhya during holy ‘Sawan’ month sparks row Why some traders opposed it and what was the explanation given? A section of traders objected to the move citing PM Modi's vegetarianism. "Narendra Modi has never consumed seafood in his life and is a pure vegetarian. Because Modi is a vegetarian, this board should not be put up," Surendra Lashkari, a fish trader, was quoted as saying by PTI. As controversy erupted, SMC, the Surat civic body that built the fish market, has clarified that the naming process is yet to be completed. SMC Executive Engineer of the Central Zone RD Ganjawala said that the SFMA, the fish merchant association which also featured on the hoarding, had submitted a written application to the SMC Standing Committee chairman and Central Zone authorities seeking to name the facility after PM Modi. "The board was put up without an official resolution. We have informed them about it and they have given a verbal assurance that they will take it down themselves," Ganjawala said. Nevertheless, Surat Fish Merchant Association (SFMA) defended the move, citing the ₹3 crore provided by the government under the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana for the construction of the market. 'Fish' controversy in Indian politics? Controversy related to fish has been a common thing in Indian politics. Just last week, fish servings during a welcome programme for Uttar Pradesh Congress chief Ajay Rai in Ayodhya during the holy month of Sawan sparked a major row. The UP Congress president visited the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi temple and Hanuman Garhi but a video surfaced on social media showing fish being prepared at a banquet hall, where the welcome programme was organised for Rai, Congress state in-charge Rajpal Gautam, national spokesperson Akhilesh Pratap Singh and Purvanchal in-charge Abhishek Dutt. BJP MLA Ved Prakash Gupta slammed the grand-old party for making fun of “Sanatan faith.” Also Read: Some great lakes fish could be upward of 400 years old Two weeks ago, UP Cabinet Minister and Nishad Party Chief Sanjay Nishad controversially claimed that fish cooked without onion and garlic can be considered vegetarian, inviting a major ire on social media. In 2024, Bihar's Opposition leader and son of former CM Lalu Prasad Yadav - Tejashwi Yadav - sparked a controversy after he posted a video of Vikassheel Insaan Party (VIP) chief Mukesh Sahni and himself eating fish and chapati inside a helicopter during 2024 Lok Sabha Election campaign. As the video was shared on the first day of Chaitra Navratri, BJP called it an insult to Hinduism.

A fish market built by Surat Municipal Corporation has sparked controversy after traders put up a board naming it after PM Narendra Modi. While SMC says the name is not final, the Surat Fish Merchant Association defended the move, citing ₹3 crore government funding for the project.

Fish market named after PM Modi? What's the latest fish controversy in Indian politics

Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari has sparked speculation about his political future after saying the younger generation should be allowed to take over, amid reports of a possible reshuffle and expansion of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Union Cabinet.&nbsp;Gadkari made the remarks while addressing the Eklavya Ekal Vidyalaya Teacher-Supervisor Training Class in Katol, Nagpur. He said he could no longer work as much as he used to and recalled his three decades in public life, during which he experienced both successes and setbacks.&nbsp;“I have been continuously working in public life for the last 30 years. I have seen many ups and downs and received many awards. But I can’t work much now; the new generation should be given a chance to work,” he was quoted as saying by News18 Marathi.&nbsp;The comments come amid speculation over a possible expansion of the Union Cabinet and changes in ministerial responsibilities. His remarks have consequently triggered discussion over whether he was signalling a gradual shift from active politics.&nbsp;Gadkari has not announced his retirement from politics or said that he plans to leave the Union Cabinet. His comments have also been interpreted as a call for generational change rather than a formal announcement about stepping down.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-asim-munir-present-a-new-us-peace-plan-to-iran-on-ending-naval-blockade-strait-of-hormuz-disruptions-reports-claim-1787653201608">Did Asim Munir present a new US peace plan to Iran on ending naval blockade, Strait of Hormuz disruptions? Reports claim...</a><h2>Gadkari reflects on health and lifestyle&nbsp;</h2>Reflecting on changes in his lifestyle, Gadkari said he once had a less disciplined routine while working for the party. “Earlier, while doing party work, I used to eat samosas and sleep anywhere. But after the Corona period, I became disciplined and now do yoga every day without fail. If you are not in good health, power and position are of no use,” Gadkari said.&nbsp;He also referred to the popular Hindi song “Sajan re jhooth mat bolo, na haathi hai na ghoda hai” while speaking about the importance of life.&nbsp;“Life is precious,” he added.&nbsp;Gadkari is a senior member of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Cabinet and serves as the Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways. His ministry has been central to the government’s road and expressway expansion programme. The Prime Minister’s Office’s latest ministerial records list him as the minister in charge of the Road Transport and Highways portfolio.<h2>Ethanol Controversy&nbsp;</h2>Gadkari has also faced criticism over the government’s ethanol-blended petrol policy. The debate around E20 fuel intensified in recent months, with critics alleging that higher ethanol content could affect some vehicles.&nbsp;Gadkari has rejected what he described as misinformation surrounding the policy and has taken legal action over allegedly defamatory online content linked to E20.&nbsp;The issue resurfaced this month after activist Tehseen Poonawalla criticised Gadkari over his comments on ethanol standards.

Nitin Gadkari’s remarks that he cannot work as much as before and that the younger generation should get a chance have sparked retirement speculation amid reports of a possible Union Cabinet reshuffle, though he has made no announcement about stepping down.

Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari has sparked speculation about his political future after saying the younger generation should be allowed to take over, amid reports of a possible reshuffle and expansion of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Union Cabinet. Gadkari made the remarks while addressing the Eklavya Ekal Vidyalaya Teacher-Supervisor Training Class in Katol, Nagpur. He said he could no longer work as much as he used to and recalled his three decades in public life, during which he experienced both successes and setbacks. “I have been continuously working in public life for the last 30 years. I have seen many ups and downs and received many awards. But I can’t work much now; the new generation should be given a chance to work,” he was quoted as saying by News18 Marathi. The comments come amid speculation over a possible expansion of the Union Cabinet and changes in ministerial responsibilities. His remarks have consequently triggered discussion over whether he was signalling a gradual shift from active politics. Gadkari has not announced his retirement from politics or said that he plans to leave the Union Cabinet. His comments have also been interpreted as a call for generational change rather than a formal announcement about stepping down. Also Read: Did Asim Munir present a new US peace plan to Iran on ending naval blockade, Strait of Hormuz disruptions? Reports claim... Gadkari reflects on health and lifestyle Reflecting on changes in his lifestyle, Gadkari said he once had a less disciplined routine while working for the party. “Earlier, while doing party work, I used to eat samosas and sleep anywhere. But after the Corona period, I became disciplined and now do yoga every day without fail. If you are not in good health, power and position are of no use,” Gadkari said. He also referred to the popular Hindi song “Sajan re jhooth mat bolo, na haathi hai na ghoda hai” while speaking about the importance of life. “Life is precious,” he added. Gadkari is a senior member of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Cabinet and serves as the Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways. His ministry has been central to the government’s road and expressway expansion programme. The Prime Minister’s Office’s latest ministerial records list him as the minister in charge of the Road Transport and Highways portfolio. Ethanol Controversy Gadkari has also faced criticism over the government’s ethanol-blended petrol policy. The debate around E20 fuel intensified in recent months, with critics alleging that higher ethanol content could affect some vehicles. Gadkari has rejected what he described as misinformation surrounding the policy and has taken legal action over allegedly defamatory online content linked to E20. The issue resurfaced this month after activist Tehseen Poonawalla criticised Gadkari over his comments on ethanol standards.

Nitin Gadkari’s remarks that he cannot work as much as before and that the younger generation should get a chance have sparked retirement speculation amid reports of a possible Union Cabinet reshuffle, though he has made no announcement about stepping down.

‘Can’t work much now’: Nitin Gadkari sparks retirement speculation amid Cabinet reshuffle buzz

The Union Government on Monday clarified that the discussion between two nations about the arrangement of a public appearance by their leader is a “normal practice”, PTI reported, citing government sources. This follows the government's clarification of US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks about the bilateral meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Evian, France.&nbsp;"Discussions regarding arrangements for public appearances of leaders are normal practice ahead of any VVIP visit," a government source told PTI."In this regard, the Indian side communicated its standard practice for such visits," the source added.The June 17 bilateral meeting between the US and India came after three Indian sailors were killed by a US Navy attack on the commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-strikes-alleged-drug-trafficking-boat-eastern-pacific-1787567752917">US strikes alleged drug trafficking boat in Eastern Pacific, killing 2</a><h2>What did US envoy Sergio Gor say?</h2>During the Economic Times World Leaders Forum, Gor said that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs specifically requested that there should be no press interaction following the bilateral meet. But Trump supposedly forgot about that and, following the opening remarks, asked reporters if they had any questions, which followed a 45-minute press conference with reporters. Gor claimed, adding that the remark “opened everything up”.“I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does, he looks up at the camera and say, any questions?” said Gor.US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The Indian government said discussions over public appearances by leaders are normal practice after US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks on the Modi-Trump G7 meeting.

The Union Government on Monday clarified that the discussion between two nations about the arrangement of a public appearance by their leader is a “normal practice”, PTI reported, citing government sources. This follows the government's clarification of US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks about the bilateral meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Evian, France. "Discussions regarding arrangements for public appearances of leaders are normal practice ahead of any VVIP visit," a government source told PTI. "In this regard, the Indian side communicated its standard practice for such visits," the source added. The June 17 bilateral meeting between the US and India came after three Indian sailors were killed by a US Navy attack on the commercial vessel in the Strait of Hormuz. Also Read: US strikes alleged drug trafficking boat in Eastern Pacific, killing 2 What did US envoy Sergio Gor say? During the Economic Times World Leaders Forum, Gor said that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs specifically requested that there should be no press interaction following the bilateral meet. But Trump supposedly forgot about that and, following the opening remarks, asked reporters if they had any questions, which followed a 45-minute press conference with reporters. Gor claimed, adding that the remark “opened everything up”. “I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does, he looks up at the camera and say, any questions?” said Gor. US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

The Indian government said discussions over public appearances by leaders are normal practice after US Ambassador Sergio Gor's remarks on the Modi-Trump G7 meeting.

India calls leader media arrangements ‘normal practice’ after Sergio Gor remarks

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs had made a request ahead of the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump during the G7 summit. He claimed that the Ministry of External Affairs had asked for “no questions” after the leaders finished their opening remarks.“We were behind the scenes, behind the stage, and at one point it was just the president and I, and he asked me, he goes, what are the Indians going to raise? We went over some topics. And he said, " Do they have any asks? And the MEA had one ask. He said, and it was, let's bring in the media, but let's not do a full press conference," said Gor at the Economic Times World Leaders Forum.“I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does he looks up at the camera and says, any questions?” said Sergio Gor.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-airstrikes-gaza-kill-two-amid-ceasefire-1787498033928">Israel airstrikes kill 2 in Gaza, including 4-year-old boy, amid ceasefire</a>Gor added that a 45-minute press conference with reporters raised a wide range of issues and “everything was on the table”.&nbsp;US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi.&nbsp;"The numbers don't lie. If you look at the trajectory of our relationship, just go by the numbers," he said."15 years ago, our bilateral trade was 20 billion dollars. Today, it's 240 billion dollars. That's not an accident, and it's continuing to grow," said Gor. The forum took place right after Gor's historic trip to Srinagar, where he publicly called Jammu &amp; Kashmir "an important part of India," sparking a diplomatic protest from Pakistan.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">“India specifically requested that there should be no press conference and no press questions during the Trump Modi meet at G7.” ~ US ambassador Sergio Gor. Rahul Gandhi was so right about him, when he said he will be destroyed within seconds if he faces the Press. <a href="https://t.co/TwDdIkAYQ0">pic.twitter.com/TwDdIkAYQ0</a>&mdash; Jitesh (@Chaotic_mind99) <a href="https://x.com/Chaotic_mind99/status/2091548020169134563?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed India’s MEA requested no questions from the media after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Donald Trump delivered opening remarks at their G7 meeting.

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs had made a request ahead of the meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump during the G7 summit. He claimed that the Ministry of External Affairs had asked for “no questions” after the leaders finished their opening remarks. “We were behind the scenes, behind the stage, and at one point it was just the president and I, and he asked me, he goes, what are the Indians going to raise? We went over some topics. And he said, " Do they have any asks? And the MEA had one ask. He said, and it was, let's bring in the media, but let's not do a full press conference," said Gor at the Economic Times World Leaders Forum. “I told the president, I said, the Indians prefer no questions. He said, sure, no problem. So the meeting starts, the press comes in, there must have been 50 cameras, the president is sitting here, the prime minister is sitting there, they both speak for a few minutes. As soon as they get done, the first thing the president does he looks up at the camera and says, any questions?” said Sergio Gor. Also Read: Israel airstrikes kill 2 in Gaza, including 4-year-old boy, amid ceasefire Gor added that a 45-minute press conference with reporters raised a wide range of issues and “everything was on the table”. US Ambassador Sergio Gor shared the anecdote while discussing the India-US relationship and the personal friendship between US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "The numbers don't lie. If you look at the trajectory of our relationship, just go by the numbers," he said. "15 years ago, our bilateral trade was 20 billion dollars. Today, it's 240 billion dollars. That's not an accident, and it's continuing to grow," said Gor. The forum took place right after Gor's historic trip to Srinagar, where he publicly called Jammu & Kashmir "an important part of India," sparking a diplomatic protest from Pakistan.

US envoy Sergio Gor claimed India’s MEA requested no questions from the media after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Donald Trump delivered opening remarks at their G7 meeting.

US envoy Sergio Gor claims India sought ‘no questions’ after Modi-Trump G7 meeting

Kerala Chief Minister V.D. Satheesan has raised concerns over the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill, warning that its provisions could weaken the state’s revenue-raising powers. The proposed changes have sparked debate over the balance between the Centre’s authority and states’ financial and regulatory rights over mineral resources.

Mines & Minerals Amendment Bill: Kerala CM Satheesan flags adverse impact on revenue raising powers

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram on Sunday A row broke out after Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Independence Day speech said that its time for the country to identify ‘dimagi naxals (intellectual naxals). Congress leaders and Cockroach Janta Party members have reacted to it. Former cabinet minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram said that he is proud to be a “dimagi naxal” while TMC MP Mahua Moitra identified herself as one. CJP spokesperson Saurav Das said that these comments won't distract the people of the country.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/independence-day-2026-pm-modi-says-indian-defence-production-has-increased-fourfold-in-12-years-1786850129094">Independence Day 2026: PM Modi says Indian defence production has increased fourfold in 12 years</a><h2>How Opposition reacted?</h2>In a post on X, Chidambaram said, “I am proud to be a dimagi naxal.” Saurav Das rejected the Prime Minister’s classification of critical youth. “dimagi Naxal or whatever is not going to work, Prime Minister. How could you loosely brand educated young people ‘Naxalis’ etc.? Just because they question your government? Sheer arrogance! Sheer incompetence at resolving their problems?” Das said in a statement on X. CPI general secretary D Raja accused Modi of adding another label to right-wing tropes used to silence critics while ignoring pressing youth issues like education and employment. “PM Modi finds time and opportunity to target dissenters even on a solemn national occasion like Independence Day, conveniently forgetting what the people of India are asking of him and his government.” Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra sarcastically embraced the label, posting, “I am a dimaagi Naxal. All cockroaches by definition are.” Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh labelled the new terminology a “sure sign of desperation,” noting Modi’s evolving rhetoric against his critics.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-delivers-shortest-independence-day-speech-in-years-address-to-nation-lasts-78-minutes-1786766347786">PM Modi delivers shortest Independence Day speech in years: Address to nation lasts 78 minutes</a><h3>What PM Modi had said?</h3>In his Independence Day speech, Prime Minister Narendra Modi cautioned that Maoist ideology had historically embedded itself in the corridors of power and advisory committees, influencing government policies for decades. “We must isolate these dimagi (intellectual) Naxals and connect the country’s young generation to the mainstream of transforming our nation into a developed nation.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://x.com/hashtag/WATCH?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#WATCH</a> | Delhi: From the ramparts of the Red Fort, Prime Minister Narendra Modi says, &quot;For years, individuals with a Maoist mindset had entrenched themselves within the corridors of power in the country. This Maoist ideology influenced policies, even through their roles as… <a href="https://t.co/1vqeavpj0U">pic.twitter.com/1vqeavpj0U</a>&mdash; ANI (@ANI) <a href="https://x.com/ANI/status/2088468836790194477?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 15, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

PM Modi’s ‘dimagi Naxals’ remark in his Independence Day speech triggered a political row, with Congress leader P Chidambaram and TMC MP Mahua Moitra sarcastically embracing the label. Opposition leaders, including Jairam Ramesh and CPI’s D Raja, criticised Modi’s remarks.

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram on Sunday A row broke out after Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Independence Day speech said that its time for the country to identify ‘dimagi naxals (intellectual naxals). Congress leaders and Cockroach Janta Party members have reacted to it. Former cabinet minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram said that he is proud to be a “dimagi naxal” while TMC MP Mahua Moitra identified herself as one. CJP spokesperson Saurav Das said that these comments won't distract the people of the country. Also Read: Independence Day 2026: PM Modi says Indian defence production has increased fourfold in 12 years How Opposition reacted? In a post on X, Chidambaram said, “I am proud to be a dimagi naxal.” Saurav Das rejected the Prime Minister’s classification of critical youth. “dimagi Naxal or whatever is not going to work, Prime Minister. How could you loosely brand educated young people ‘Naxalis’ etc.? Just because they question your government? Sheer arrogance! Sheer incompetence at resolving their problems?” Das said in a statement on X. CPI general secretary D Raja accused Modi of adding another label to right-wing tropes used to silence critics while ignoring pressing youth issues like education and employment. “PM Modi finds time and opportunity to target dissenters even on a solemn national occasion like Independence Day, conveniently forgetting what the people of India are asking of him and his government.” Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra sarcastically embraced the label, posting, “I am a dimaagi Naxal. All cockroaches by definition are.” Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh labelled the new terminology a “sure sign of desperation,” noting Modi’s evolving rhetoric against his critics. Also Read: PM Modi delivers shortest Independence Day speech in years: Address to nation lasts 78 minutes What PM Modi had said? In his Independence Day speech, Prime Minister Narendra Modi cautioned that Maoist ideology had historically embedded itself in the corridors of power and advisory committees, influencing government policies for decades. “We must isolate these dimagi (intellectual) Naxals and connect the country’s young generation to the mainstream of transforming our nation into a developed nation.”

PM Modi’s ‘dimagi Naxals’ remark in his Independence Day speech triggered a political row, with Congress leader P Chidambaram and TMC MP Mahua Moitra sarcastically embracing the label. Opposition leaders, including Jairam Ramesh and CPI’s D Raja, criticised Modi’s remarks.

PM Modi’s ‘dimagi naxals’ remark sparks political row, Chidambaram says 'proud' to be one

Opposition leaders hit out at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech on Saturday (Aug 15), particularly his references to “dimaagi Naxals” and the women’s reservation bill. Congress president and Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge accused the PM of taking credit for work done by previous governments. Others targeted the political messaging of Modi’s speech.<h2>Kharge accuses PM of taking credit: ‘The world survives…’</h2>Speaking at the Congress headquarters after flag-hoisting, Kharge targeted Modi's Independence Day address. “From the Red Fort, the PM claims credit for everything; it is a mercy he doesn’t claim that the world survives only because of him,” Kharge said.Kharge credited the previous Congress-led governments with introducing rights-based programmes and legislation covering food, education and employment, including the job guarantee scheme MGNREGA. He attributed these initiatives to Congress and its leader Sonia Gandhi and claimed that the current government “hasn’t done even one such thing”.The Congress president claimed that the party had contributed around 90 per cent &nbsp;to the country’s development.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/bharat-has-seen-a-dream-pm-modi-vows-india-will-achieve-viksit-bharat-by-2047-1786760897677">'Bharat has seen a dream': PM Modi vows India will achieve Viksit Bharat by 2047</a><h2>Rahul Gandhi skips Red Fort event for second year running</h2>Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi did not attend the Red Fort Independence Day ceremony for the second straight year.In an Independence Day message on X, he focused on democratic values, constitutional principles and the responsibility of citizens. “Freedom is not merely a gift bestowed upon us by our freedom fighters, but also a responsibility,” Gandhi said, calling on citizens to follow the path of truth and non-violence, uphold the Constitution and the Tricolour, and safeguard democracy.He said he was proud that citizens, particularly young people, were united in protecting these values.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/independence-day-2026-from-fragile-five-to-fastest-growing-economy-pm-modi-1786770935864/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/independence-day-2026-from-fragile-five-to-fastest-growing-economy-pm-modi-1786770935864/embed</a><h2>Congress attacks PM Modi's ‘dimaagi naxals’ remark</h2>The Prime Minister’s reference to “dimaagi naxals” emerged as one of the main flashpoints in the opposition response. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh accused Modi of escalating his language against political opponents. “First he called his opponents ‘urban naxals.’ Now he calls them ‘dimaagi naxals.’ It is a sure sign of his desperation,” Ramesh said in a post on X.Congress MP Rajeev Shukla also questioned the use of the term. “Is everyone a Naxal? He should describe the phrase ‘dimaagi Naxal’,” Shukla told ANI new agency, arguing that such language should not be used from the Red Fort.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/some-people-seemed-to-take-pleasure-in-frightening-the-country-pm-modi-slams-opposition-for-fake-news-during-covid-19-west-asia-crisis-1786764410905">‘Some people seemed to take pleasure in frightening the country’: PM Modi slams Opposition for ‘fake news’ during COVID-19, West Asia crisis</a><h2>Women’s reservation becomes another point of attack</h2>Modi’s appeal for the implementation of women’s reservation in parliament drew criticism from Congress leaders, who linked the issue to the proposed delimitation exercise.Shukla said that if the government genuinely wanted to implement women’s reservation, it could do so, but alleged that delimitation was being pursued “in the garb of women’s reservation”.Pawan Khera mocks Tricolour handkerchiefCongress media in-charge Pawan Khera focused on another visual moment from the Prime Minister’s appearance, taking a swipe at the way the Tricolour handkerchief appeared.“Lagta hai sahib ne Urdu mein Tiranga pehna hai (seems like the lord has worn the tricolour in Urdu),” Khera posted on X, and suggested the arrangement of the colours could resemble Ireland’s flag.<h2>Don't tell lies from Red Fort: Akhilesh Yadav's sharp remarks</h2>Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav criticised PM Modi’s Red Fort address “Lal Kile se jhooth nahi bolna chahiye”, he said (the Red Fort is not a place for lies). The BJP and freedom are “opposites”, said Yadav, contrasting what he called the BJP’s “monochromatic” nationalism with the “multi-coloured” nationalism of others. Yadav accused the BJP and RSS of focusing on “Partition Horrors” rather than the Independence Day celebrations and said the Constitution must be protected and strengthened.In his Independence Day message, Aam Aadmi Party's Arvind Kejriwal said the emergence of Gen Alpha in movements demanding better schools showed that “our children have learned to fight for their rights”, describing this as “true freedom”.CPI (M) leader and former Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan spoke about the broader threats to constitutional and democratic values. In his I-Day message, Vijayan called for introspection over the country’s current political and social conditions, warning that freedom of expression and pluralism face serious challenges. He also cautioned against efforts to weaken “unity in diversity” and divide people along caste and religious lines.

Opposition leaders reacted to PM Modi’s 80th Independence Day speech, with Congress targeting his remarks on ‘dimaagi naxals. They linked women’s reservation to delimitation. Akhilesh Yadav had some sharp words too

Opposition leaders hit out at Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech on Saturday (Aug 15), particularly his references to “dimaagi Naxals” and the women’s reservation bill. Congress president and Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge accused the PM of taking credit for work done by previous governments. Others targeted the political messaging of Modi’s speech. Kharge accuses PM of taking credit: ‘The world survives…’ Speaking at the Congress headquarters after flag-hoisting, Kharge targeted Modi's Independence Day address. “From the Red Fort, the PM claims credit for everything; it is a mercy he doesn’t claim that the world survives only because of him,” Kharge said. Kharge credited the previous Congress-led governments with introducing rights-based programmes and legislation covering food, education and employment, including the job guarantee scheme MGNREGA. He attributed these initiatives to Congress and its leader Sonia Gandhi and claimed that the current government “hasn’t done even one such thing”. The Congress president claimed that the party had contributed around 90 per cent to the country’s development. Also read: 'Bharat has seen a dream': PM Modi vows India will achieve Viksit Bharat by 2047 Rahul Gandhi skips Red Fort event for second year running Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi did not attend the Red Fort Independence Day ceremony for the second straight year. In an Independence Day message on X, he focused on democratic values, constitutional principles and the responsibility of citizens. “Freedom is not merely a gift bestowed upon us by our freedom fighters, but also a responsibility,” Gandhi said, calling on citizens to follow the path of truth and non-violence, uphold the Constitution and the Tricolour, and safeguard democracy. He said he was proud that citizens, particularly young people, were united in protecting these values. https://www.wionews.com/videos/independence-day-2026-from-fragile-five-to-fastest-growing-economy-pm-modi-1786770935864/embed Congress attacks PM Modi's ‘dimaagi naxals’ remark The Prime Minister’s reference to “dimaagi naxals” emerged as one of the main flashpoints in the opposition response. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh accused Modi of escalating his language against political opponents. “First he called his opponents ‘urban naxals.’ Now he calls them ‘dimaagi naxals.’ It is a sure sign of his desperation,” Ramesh said in a post on X. Congress MP Rajeev Shukla also questioned the use of the term. “Is everyone a Naxal? He should describe the phrase ‘dimaagi Naxal’,” Shukla told ANI new agency, arguing that such language should not be used from the Red Fort. Also read: ‘Some people seemed to take pleasure in frightening the country’: PM Modi slams Opposition for ‘fake news’ during COVID-19, West Asia crisis Women’s reservation becomes another point of attack Modi’s appeal for the implementation of women’s reservation in parliament drew criticism from Congress leaders, who linked the issue to the proposed delimitation exercise. Shukla said that if the government genuinely wanted to implement women’s reservation, it could do so, but alleged that delimitation was being pursued “in the garb of women’s reservation”. Pawan Khera mocks Tricolour handkerchief Congress media in-charge Pawan Khera focused on another visual moment from the Prime Minister’s appearance, taking a swipe at the way the Tricolour handkerchief appeared. “Lagta hai sahib ne Urdu mein Tiranga pehna hai (seems like the lord has worn the tricolour in Urdu),” Khera posted on X, and suggested the arrangement of the colours could resemble Ireland’s flag. Don't tell lies from Red Fort: Akhilesh Yadav's sharp remarks Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav criticised PM Modi’s Red Fort address “Lal Kile se jhooth nahi bolna chahiye”, he said (the Red Fort is not a place for lies). The BJP and freedom are “opposites”, said Yadav, contrasting what he called the BJP’s “monochromatic” nationalism with the “multi-coloured” nationalism of others. Yadav accused the BJP and RSS of focusing on “Partition Horrors” rather than the Independence Day celebrations and said the Constitution must be protected and strengthened. In his Independence Day message, Aam Aadmi Party's Arvind Kejriwal said the emergence of Gen Alpha in movements demanding better schools showed that “our children have learned to fight for their rights”, describing this as “true freedom”. CPI (M) leader and former Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan spoke about the broader threats to constitutional and democratic values. In his I-Day message, Vijayan called for introspection over the country’s current political and social conditions, warning that freedom of expression and pluralism face serious challenges. He also cautioned against efforts to weaken “unity in diversity” and divide people along caste and religious lines.

Opposition leaders reacted to PM Modi’s 80th Independence Day speech, with Congress targeting his remarks on ‘dimaagi naxals. They linked women’s reservation to delimitation. Akhilesh Yadav had some sharp words too

Opposition hits out at PM Modi's Independence Day speech over ‘Dimaagi Naxals’, women’s reservation

In 2026, as August 15 approaches, multiple people began wondering whether India is celebrating its 79th or 80th Independence Day. The answer is a bit of a twist, but both are true, in a way. Since the first Independence Day was observed on August 15, 1947, India has completed 79 years of independence and celebrates its 80th Independence Day.<h3>Is it 79th anniversary vs 80th Independence Day?&nbsp;</h3>To understand the count, one must distinguish between the number of celebration events and the number of full years completed. August 15, 1947, marked the first Independence Day, while August 15, 1948, marking one year of freedom, was celebrated as the second Independence Day. Accordingly, India completes 79 years of independence on August 15, 2026, while celebrating its 80th Independence Day. This is because subtracting 1947 from 2026 gives 79 years of independence, but since August 15, 1947, was itself the first celebration, 2026 marks the 80th time the national flag is being unfurled for the occasion.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-is-captain-sonia-singh-chauhan-army-officer-s-red-fort-appearance-goes-viral-india-80th-independence-day-1786765512308"> Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Army officer's Red Fort appearance goes viral | India 80th Independence Day</a><h3>Theme for Independence Day 2026</h3>The core theme of the 80th Independence Day is "Yuva Shakti for Viksit Bharat@2047" alongside commemorating "150 Years of Vande Mataram". The theme signifies the important role of India's young generation in leading the nation towards becoming a developed nation by its centenary of independence in 2047. The important sectors include technological progress, self-reliance in defence, green energy transitions and youth innovation. At the same time, commemorating Vande Mataram pays tribute to the national song which has inspired millions during the freedom struggle.<h3>Why August 15 holds historical importance</h3>India won freedom from nearly 200 years of British rule at the stroke of midnight between August 14 and 15, 1947. This moment came after years of struggle led by iconic freedom fighters such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh. The nation's sovereignty was formally established through the Indian Independence Act of 1947. It was Jawaharlal Nehru who, after Independence, set the precedent of addressing the country and raising the national flag at the Red Fort every year.

The answer is a bit of a twist, but both are true, in a way. Since the first Independence Day was observed on August 15, 1947, India has completed 79 years of independence and celebrates its 80th Independence Day.

In 2026, as August 15 approaches, multiple people began wondering whether India is celebrating its 79th or 80th Independence Day. The answer is a bit of a twist, but both are true, in a way. Since the first Independence Day was observed on August 15, 1947, India has completed 79 years of independence and celebrates its 80th Independence Day. Is it 79th anniversary vs 80th Independence Day? To understand the count, one must distinguish between the number of celebration events and the number of full years completed. August 15, 1947, marked the first Independence Day, while August 15, 1948, marking one year of freedom, was celebrated as the second Independence Day. Accordingly, India completes 79 years of independence on August 15, 2026, while celebrating its 80th Independence Day. This is because subtracting 1947 from 2026 gives 79 years of independence, but since August 15, 1947, was itself the first celebration, 2026 marks the 80th time the national flag is being unfurled for the occasion. Also read: Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Army officer's Red Fort appearance goes viral | India 80th Independence Day Theme for Independence Day 2026 The core theme of the 80th Independence Day is "Yuva Shakti for Viksit Bharat@2047" alongside commemorating "150 Years of Vande Mataram". The theme signifies the important role of India's young generation in leading the nation towards becoming a developed nation by its centenary of independence in 2047. The important sectors include technological progress, self-reliance in defence, green energy transitions and youth innovation. At the same time, commemorating Vande Mataram pays tribute to the national song which has inspired millions during the freedom struggle. Why August 15 holds historical importance India won freedom from nearly 200 years of British rule at the stroke of midnight between August 14 and 15, 1947. This moment came after years of struggle led by iconic freedom fighters such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh. The nation's sovereignty was formally established through the Indian Independence Act of 1947. It was Jawaharlal Nehru who, after Independence, set the precedent of addressing the country and raising the national flag at the Red Fort every year.

The answer is a bit of a twist, but both are true, in a way. Since the first Independence Day was observed on August 15, 1947, India has completed 79 years of independence and celebrates its 80th Independence Day.

Is it 79th year of freedom or 80th Independence Day of India? The confusion explained

Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the nation from the Red Fort on Saturday, delivering his 13th consecutive Independence Day speech since taking office in 2014. This year's address lasted 78 minutes, making it his shortest Independence Day speech in the past four years.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-appeals-to-opposition-to-back-33-women-s-reservation-in-parliament-india-80th-independence-day-1786764365901">PM Modi appeals to Opposition to back 33% women's reservation in Parliament | India 80th Independence Day</a><h2>PM Modi's longest Independece Day speech was THIS year</h2>The duration marks a notable change from last year's marathon address. In 2025, Modi spoke for 103 minutes, his longest Independence Day speech since becoming Prime Minister and the longest delivered by him from the Red Fort.His previous record came in 2024, when his address lasted 98 minutes, surpassing the 96-minute speech he delivered in 2016.<h2>PM Modi's Independence Day speeches: Year-wise duration</h2>

<figure class="table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Year &nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>Duration</td></tr><tr><td>2014 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>65 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2015 &nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;88 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2016 &nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;96 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2017 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>56 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2018 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>83 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2019</td><td>92 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2020 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>90 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2021</td><td>88 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2022 &nbsp;&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;74 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2023 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>90 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2024 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>98 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2025 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>103 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>2026 &nbsp; &nbsp;</td><td>78 minutes</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>

Modi's shortest Independence Day address so far was in 2017, when he spoke for 56 minutes. His longest was last year, when the Prime Minister's speech crossed the 100-minute mark for the first time.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-is-captain-sonia-singh-chauhan-army-officer-s-red-fort-appearance-goes-viral-india-80th-independence-day-1786765512308">Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Army officer's Red Fort appearance goes viral | India 80th Independence Day</a>

PM Modi's Independence Day address lasted 78 minutes this year, marking a sharp drop from his record 103-minute speech in 2025. Here's how the length of his Red Fort speeches has changed every year since 2014.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the nation from the Red Fort on Saturday, delivering his 13th consecutive Independence Day speech since taking office in 2014. This year's address lasted 78 minutes, making it his shortest Independence Day speech in the past four years. Also read | PM Modi appeals to Opposition to back 33% women's reservation in Parliament | India 80th Independence Day PM Modi's longest Independece Day speech was THIS year The duration marks a notable change from last year's marathon address. In 2025, Modi spoke for 103 minutes, his longest Independence Day speech since becoming Prime Minister and the longest delivered by him from the Red Fort. His previous record came in 2024, when his address lasted 98 minutes, surpassing the 96-minute speech he delivered in 2016. PM Modi's Independence Day speeches: Year-wise duration

PM Modi's Independence Day address lasted 78 minutes this year, marking a sharp drop from his record 103-minute speech in 2025. Here's how the length of his Red Fort speeches has changed every year since 2014.

PM Modi delivers shortest Independence Day speech in years: Address to nation lasts 78 minutes

Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan, an Indian Army officer drew attention during the 80th Independence Day celebrations at the Red Fort on August 15, 2026, after assisting Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the flag-hoisting ceremony.Her appearance in the official ceremony placed a spotlight on the military personnel who play a crucial role in the tightly choreographed Independence Day proceedings. Here's what we know about Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan?<h2>Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan?</h2>Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan is a commissioned officer in the Indian Army. On !5th August, 2026, she was involved in the formal flag-hoisting proceedings at the Red Fort.<h2>What was her role at the Red Fort?</h2>The Independence Day ceremony involves strict military protocol, with personnel assigned specific duties around the Prime Minister, the national flag and the ceremonial proceedings.Captain Sonia's presence in the frame with Modi therefore reflects her role in the official military protocol surrounding the event. Her appearance has also been viewed in the broader context of the increasing visibility of women officers in the Indian armed forces and an ode to India's 'Nari Shakti' push.<h2>Why has she attracted attention?</h2>The image of a woman Army officer standing prominently behind the Prime Minister during one of India's most watched national ceremonies quickly became a talking point, particularly amid the government's emphasis on Nari Shakti and the growing participation of women in the armed forces.

A woman Army officer seen assisting PM Modi during the Independence Day ceremony at the Red Fort has drawn widespread attention. Here is what is known about Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan and her role in the historic August 15 proceedings.

Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan, an Indian Army officer drew attention during the 80th Independence Day celebrations at the Red Fort on August 15, 2026, after assisting Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the flag-hoisting ceremony. Her appearance in the official ceremony placed a spotlight on the military personnel who play a crucial role in the tightly choreographed Independence Day proceedings. Here's what we know about Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan is a commissioned officer in the Indian Army. On !5th August, 2026, she was involved in the formal flag-hoisting proceedings at the Red Fort. What was her role at the Red Fort? The Independence Day ceremony involves strict military protocol, with personnel assigned specific duties around the Prime Minister, the national flag and the ceremonial proceedings. Captain Sonia's presence in the frame with Modi therefore reflects her role in the official military protocol surrounding the event. Her appearance has also been viewed in the broader context of the increasing visibility of women officers in the Indian armed forces and an ode to India's 'Nari Shakti' push. Why has she attracted attention? The image of a woman Army officer standing prominently behind the Prime Minister during one of India's most watched national ceremonies quickly became a talking point, particularly amid the government's emphasis on Nari Shakti and the growing participation of women in the armed forces.

A woman Army officer seen assisting PM Modi during the Independence Day ceremony at the Red Fort has drawn widespread attention. Here is what is known about Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan and her role in the historic August 15 proceedings.

Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Army officer's Red Fort appearance goes viral | India 80th Independence Day

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, addressing the nation from the Red Fort on the 80th Independence Day, recalled the era when India was known for its prowess in the form of the "Sapta Sindhu," and said that to build a Viksit Bharat, "we need a new current." "Today, I would also like to recall that era when the nation knew, understood, and heard of India's prowess in the form of the 'Sapta Sindhu'. Now, to build a Viksit Bharat, we need a new current. Today, from the ramparts of the Red Fort, I invoke the 'Sapta Dhara' of strength before the nation." He added that in the coming five to seven years, what could not be achieved in the last five to seven decades will be achieved through the prowess and power of this Sapta Dhara, giving the nation "new heights, new momentum, and the capability to surpass new goals."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/bharat-has-seen-a-dream-pm-modi-vows-india-will-achieve-viksit-bharat-by-2047-1786760897677">'Bharat has seen a dream': PM Modi vows India will achieve Viksit Bharat by 2047</a><h3>Prowess and power of Sapta Dhara</h3>"In the coming 5 to 7 years, what could not be achieved in the last 5 to 7 decades, through the prowess and power of this Sapta Dhara, we will give the nation new heights, new momentum, and the capability to surpass new goals. Alongside this, the power and potential of our youth will be fully harnessed and integrated into nation-building.", the Prime Minister said.&nbsp;He also said," The seventh strength of the Sapta Dhara is India's soft power. Today, Yoga has connected the world to India. Our Ayurveda, holistic healthcare, handicrafts, culture, films, animation, gaming, digital content. The world is recognising and looking forward to India's WAVES summit. We have more than 100 national parks. We have an opportunity to attract foreign tourists through the power of soft power."

PM Modi said that in the coming five to seven years, what could not be achieved in the last five to seven decades will be achieved through the prowess and power of this Sapta Dhara, giving the nation "new heights, new momentum, and the capability to surpass new goals."

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, addressing the nation from the Red Fort on the 80th Independence Day, recalled the era when India was known for its prowess in the form of the "Sapta Sindhu," and said that to build a Viksit Bharat, "we need a new current." "Today, I would also like to recall that era when the nation knew, understood, and heard of India's prowess in the form of the 'Sapta Sindhu'. Now, to build a Viksit Bharat, we need a new current. Today, from the ramparts of the Red Fort, I invoke the 'Sapta Dhara' of strength before the nation." He added that in the coming five to seven years, what could not be achieved in the last five to seven decades will be achieved through the prowess and power of this Sapta Dhara, giving the nation "new heights, new momentum, and the capability to surpass new goals." Also read: 'Bharat has seen a dream': PM Modi vows India will achieve Viksit Bharat by 2047 Prowess and power of Sapta Dhara "In the coming 5 to 7 years, what could not be achieved in the last 5 to 7 decades, through the prowess and power of this Sapta Dhara, we will give the nation new heights, new momentum, and the capability to surpass new goals. Alongside this, the power and potential of our youth will be fully harnessed and integrated into nation-building.", the Prime Minister said. He also said," The seventh strength of the Sapta Dhara is India's soft power. Today, Yoga has connected the world to India. Our Ayurveda, holistic healthcare, handicrafts, culture, films, animation, gaming, digital content. The world is recognising and looking forward to India's WAVES summit. We have more than 100 national parks. We have an opportunity to attract foreign tourists through the power of soft power."

PM Modi said that in the coming five to seven years, what could not be achieved in the last five to seven decades will be achieved through the prowess and power of this Sapta Dhara, giving the nation "new heights, new momentum, and the capability to surpass new goals."

'From Sapta Sindhu to Sapta Dhara': PM Modi's new vision for viksit bharat on 80th Independence Day

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday (Aug 15) said India has set its sights on becoming a developed nation by 2047, when the country completes 100 years of independence, and called for bigger ambitions to achieve that goal.Addressing the nation from the Red Fort on India's 80th Independence Day, Modi said the country has "seen a dream" and now needs to work towards turning it into reality. "Bharat has seen a dream, one dream, and we need to achieve it," Modi said. "When we complete 100 years in 2047, we will create Viksit Bharat. We need to achieve this goal."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-appeals-to-opposition-to-back-33-women-s-reservation-in-parliament-india-80th-independence-day-1786764365901">PM Modi appeals to Opposition to back 33% women's reservation in Parliament | India 80th Independence Day</a><h2>25 crore people moved out of poverty</h2>Modi credited the efforts of Indians over the past 12 years for helping push the country forward. He thanked citizens for their contribution and said around 25 crore people had come out of poverty. "In the last 12 years everyone has tried their best to take the country forward. I thank everyone for their efforts," he said.The prime minister also described India as a fast-paced economy, saying the country had struggled to build momentum after gaining independence but had accelerated its growth in recent years. "Our country became independent but we were not able to take up speed. In the last 12 years India is growing at a fast pace," Modi said.<h2>Defence, railways and digital economy</h2>Modi pointed to developments across several sectors as evidence of India's progress. He cited an increase in defence production, growth in railway development and advances in digital technology and innovation. He also highlighted the expansion of digital transactions, saying they had increased by 100 per cent.The prime minister said changes in governance, along with the development of metro networks and public transport, had contributed to the country's transformation. He said these developments provided confidence that India would achieve the Viksit Bharat target by 2047.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/who-is-captain-sonia-singh-chauhan-army-officer-s-red-fort-appearance-goes-viral-india-80th-independence-day-1786765512308">Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Army officer's Red Fort appearance goes viral | India 80th Independence Day</a><h2>Push for Atma Nirbhar Bharat</h2>Modi also stressed the need for India to reduce its dependence on other countries and strengthen domestic manufacturing. "We don't have to be dependent on other nations, we have to become Atma Nirbhar," he said, pointing to initiatives such as Make in India, Swadeshi and Vocal for Local.He said India should build greater capacity in critical technologies and manufacturing, including medical equipment and semiconductors."We have our own semiconductor plants," Modi said, adding that India would develop "5-8 semiconductor plants" in the future.

India has set itself a giant deadline: becoming a developed nation by 2047. From the Red Fort, PM Modi said the dream now needs bigger ambitions, faster growth and greater self-reliance to become reality.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday (Aug 15) said India has set its sights on becoming a developed nation by 2047, when the country completes 100 years of independence, and called for bigger ambitions to achieve that goal. Addressing the nation from the Red Fort on India's 80th Independence Day, Modi said the country has "seen a dream" and now needs to work towards turning it into reality. "Bharat has seen a dream, one dream, and we need to achieve it," Modi said. "When we complete 100 years in 2047, we will create Viksit Bharat. We need to achieve this goal." Also read | PM Modi appeals to Opposition to back 33% women's reservation in Parliament | India 80th Independence Day 25 crore people moved out of poverty Modi credited the efforts of Indians over the past 12 years for helping push the country forward. He thanked citizens for their contribution and said around 25 crore people had come out of poverty. "In the last 12 years everyone has tried their best to take the country forward. I thank everyone for their efforts," he said. The prime minister also described India as a fast-paced economy, saying the country had struggled to build momentum after gaining independence but had accelerated its growth in recent years. "Our country became independent but we were not able to take up speed. In the last 12 years India is growing at a fast pace," Modi said. Defence, railways and digital economy Modi pointed to developments across several sectors as evidence of India's progress. He cited an increase in defence production, growth in railway development and advances in digital technology and innovation. He also highlighted the expansion of digital transactions, saying they had increased by 100 per cent. The prime minister said changes in governance, along with the development of metro networks and public transport, had contributed to the country's transformation. He said these developments provided confidence that India would achieve the Viksit Bharat target by 2047. Who is Captain Sonia Singh Chauhan? Army officer's Red Fort appearance goes viral | India 80th Independence Day Push for Atma Nirbhar Bharat Modi also stressed the need for India to reduce its dependence on other countries and strengthen domestic manufacturing. "We don't have to be dependent on other nations, we have to become Atma Nirbhar," he said, pointing to initiatives such as Make in India, Swadeshi and Vocal for Local. He said India should build greater capacity in critical technologies and manufacturing, including medical equipment and semiconductors. "We have our own semiconductor plants," Modi said, adding that India would develop "5-8 semiconductor plants" in the future.

India has set itself a giant deadline: becoming a developed nation by 2047. From the Red Fort, PM Modi said the dream now needs bigger ambitions, faster growth and greater self-reliance to become reality.

'Bharat has seen a dream': PM Modi vows India will achieve Viksit Bharat by 2047

India is preparing to celebrate its 80th Independence Day on August 15, 2026, marking 79 completed years of freedom. Prime Minister Narendra Modi leads national events from the Red Fort, featuring the historic inclusion of "Vande Mataram" in the formal program for the 150th anniversary of the national song, alongside the nationwide Har Ghar Tiranga campaign.


India gears up for 80th Independence day celebrations

Prime Minister Narendra Modi attended the 57th Convocation of IIT Delhi, where he presented top honours to the institute’s most meritorious students and addressed the graduating students. PM Modi urged greater participation and representation of women in academics, while highlighting the important role of India’s youth in building a Viksit Bharat.

PM Modi said India’s future capabilities depend heavily on its young population and highlighted how government policies are opening new sectors and creating opportunities for young Indians. He pointed to the transformation of India’s space sector, noting that areas once largely handled by the government are now creating opportunities for thousands of young people.

The Prime Minister encouraged IIT Delhi graduates to contribute to nation-building and stressed that a stronger youth population will lead to a stronger India. His remarks focused on youth empowerment, innovation, education, women’s participation in academia and India’s development journey.

PM Modi at IIT Delhi Convocation | Urges Youth to Lead India’s Viksit Bharat Journey

Jammu and Kashmir marked the 7th anniversary of the abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A under heavy security across the Valley.

While the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) celebrated August 5 as a landmark in Jammu and Kashmir's integration and development, opposition parties including the National Conference (NC) and the People's Democratic Party (PDP) observed the day as a "Black Day", demanding the restoration of statehood and special constitutional status.

Security was tightened across Srinagar, with checkpoints reinforced and restrictions imposed to prevent protests. Opposition leaders accused authorities of denying them the democratic right to demonstrate, while BJP leaders highlighted improvements in security, tourism, and economic activity since 2019.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi described August 5, 2019, as the beginning of a transformative chapter for Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, emphasizing peace, prosperity, and development over the past seven years.


Article 370 Anniversary: BJP Celebrates, Opposition Observes Black Day

Maharashtra Cyber Police have registered an FIR and launched an investigation into the alleged circulation of deepfake and AI-morphed videos targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on social media platforms.&nbsp;The case follows a complaint filed by Beena Jayesh Gogri, a 55-year-old BJP social media co-coordinator from Kharghar in Navi Mumbai.&nbsp;According to the FIR, Gogri came across a video on July 25 that was posted by a Facebook account named "Maharashtra Dharm". The video allegedly attributed provocative and hateful remarks to Piyush Goyal, including the statement, "These cockroaches should be hanged in public."&nbsp;The complainant later cross-checked the footage and found that the original video from the event had allegedly been altered, edited or generated using AI. According to the complaint, the changes distorted the minister's actual statement and misled viewers.&nbsp;The video in question allegedly showed Piyush Goyal during a protest led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Delhi. The protesters had demanded the resignation of former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over the NEET UG 2026 paper leak.&nbsp;The development came amid discussions between CJP representatives and central ministers. Following the talks, the government assured the protesters that it would not initiate legal action against them.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/60-000-migrants-flood-spain-s-ceuta-eu-calls-it-unacceptable-trump-warns-us-1785507085760">60,000 migrants from Morocco flood Spain's Ceuta, EU calls influx unacceptable, Trump warns US</a><h3>Accounts under probe</h3>The investigation has identified several Facebook profiles and Instagram handles allegedly involved in sharing offensive, morphed images and derogatory content targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi.The Facebook profiles named in the complaint include those of Karan Gaikar, Adv Raavindra Raaje, Pravin Kurud, Santosh Solapurkar and 'Chala Hawa Yeu Dya'. The Instagram handles under scrutiny include @ambedkar_for_india and laksh_news_.&nbsp;According to the complaint, the posts contained objectionable images, false claims and abusive language targeting constitutional authorities. The content allegedly aimed to provoke public unrest and defame the officials.<h3>FIR under BNS, IT Act</h3>Maharashtra Cyber Police have registered the case under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000.&nbsp;The FIR includes Sections 318(2), 336, 352, 353(1), 353(2), 356(1) and 356(2) of the BNS, along with Sections 66D and 67 of the Information Technology Act.&nbsp;Cyber officials have secured digital evidence as part of the investigation. They have also approached social media platforms to identify the administrators of the accounts, trace the original uploaders and examine the technical tools allegedly used to create the AI-morphed content.

Maharashtra Cyber Police have filed an FIR and launched a probe into alleged AI-morphed videos targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Minister Piyush Goyal that were circulated on social media.

Maharashtra Cyber Police have registered an FIR and launched an investigation into the alleged circulation of deepfake and AI-morphed videos targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on social media platforms. The case follows a complaint filed by Beena Jayesh Gogri, a 55-year-old BJP social media co-coordinator from Kharghar in Navi Mumbai. According to the FIR, Gogri came across a video on July 25 that was posted by a Facebook account named "Maharashtra Dharm". The video allegedly attributed provocative and hateful remarks to Piyush Goyal, including the statement, "These cockroaches should be hanged in public." The complainant later cross-checked the footage and found that the original video from the event had allegedly been altered, edited or generated using AI. According to the complaint, the changes distorted the minister's actual statement and misled viewers. The video in question allegedly showed Piyush Goyal during a protest led by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Delhi. The protesters had demanded the resignation of former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over the NEET UG 2026 paper leak. The development came amid discussions between CJP representatives and central ministers. Following the talks, the government assured the protesters that it would not initiate legal action against them. Also Read: 60,000 migrants from Morocco flood Spain's Ceuta, EU calls influx unacceptable, Trump warns US Accounts under probe The investigation has identified several Facebook profiles and Instagram handles allegedly involved in sharing offensive, morphed images and derogatory content targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The Facebook profiles named in the complaint include those of Karan Gaikar, Adv Raavindra Raaje, Pravin Kurud, Santosh Solapurkar and 'Chala Hawa Yeu Dya'. The Instagram handles under scrutiny include @ambedkar_for_india and laksh_news_. According to the complaint, the posts contained objectionable images, false claims and abusive language targeting constitutional authorities. The content allegedly aimed to provoke public unrest and defame the officials. FIR under BNS, IT Act Maharashtra Cyber Police have registered the case under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000. The FIR includes Sections 318(2), 336, 352, 353(1), 353(2), 356(1) and 356(2) of the BNS, along with Sections 66D and 67 of the Information Technology Act. Cyber officials have secured digital evidence as part of the investigation. They have also approached social media platforms to identify the administrators of the accounts, trace the original uploaders and examine the technical tools allegedly used to create the AI-morphed content.

Maharashtra Cyber Police have filed an FIR and launched a probe into alleged AI-morphed videos targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Minister Piyush Goyal that were circulated on social media.

Maharashtra Cyber files FIR over alleged AI-morphed videos targeting PM Modi, Piyush Goyal

The Indian government has officially summoned senior executives from Meta following a major controversy involving the sudden and unexplained blocking of an official video featuring Prime Minister Narendra Modi.


India summons Meta after PM Modi video block

The Monsoon Session of Parliament witnessed another heated confrontation as the government and the opposition clashed over the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill.

The proposed legislation aims to strengthen India's anti-paper leak law through stricter punishments, faster investigations, and expedited trials. However, the opposition argued that tougher laws alone cannot restore confidence in the examination system without fixing administrative failures.

Parliament Erupts Over Anti-Paper Leak Bill | Opposition Targets Government on Student Protests

Meta on Tuesday (Jul 28) said Prime Minister Indian Narendra Modi's Facebook video on the government's response to examination paper leaks was briefly removed due to a technical error and has now been restored. "The content was removed in error and has since been restored," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement.The Meta-owned platform had briefly restricted access to the video in the early hours of July 28 before making it available again.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/cjp-warns-agitation-could-return-claims-bihar-assam-to-withdraw-firs-against-neet-protesters-1785206639381">CJP warns agitation could return; claims Bihar, Assam to withdraw FIRs against NEET protesters</a><h2>PM's first direct message to students</h2>The video, released on July 23, marked Prime Minister Modi's first direct address to Gen Z during the 36-day-long Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led agitation over the alleged NEET-UG 2026 examination irregularities.In his address, Modi assured students that the government would introduce stronger legal measures to tackle examination paper leaks."I have issued directions to departments to set up Fast-Track Courts," the Prime Minister said, adding that a draft law providing for stringent punishment and special courts to deal with paper leak cases would be placed before the Union Cabinet and later introduced in Parliament.He also said the government had ensured that the academic year of nearly 22 lakh students was not disrupted. "Nothing is more important than the welfare and future of our youth," Modi said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/rahul-gandhi-slams-bjp-for-felicitating-dharmendra-pradhan-in-parliament-accuses-modi-government-of-celebrating-ruined-futures-1785202503666">Rahul Gandhi slams BJP for felicitating Dharmendra Pradhan in Parliament, accuses Modi government of 'celebrating ruined futures'</a><h2>Centre introduces anti-paper leak Bill</h2>The Prime Minister's remarks came amid nationwide protests demanding accountability over alleged examination irregularities.The Centre has since introduced the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Parliament.The proposed legislation seeks to strengthen the existing law by providing for imprisonment of up to 10 years, higher financial penalties and the establishment of Special Fast-Track Courts to hear paper leak cases.<h2>Protests ended after Pradhan's resignation</h2>The student agitation was formally called off on July 25 after Dharmendra Pradhan resigned as Union Education Minister.The Centre also reached an understanding with the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and activist Sonam Wangchuk, agreeing to withdraw cases against protesters, prevent police intimidation and bring in stronger anti-paper leak legislation.

Meta said Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Facebook video outlining the government's response to the alleged NEET-UG paper leak was briefly removed due to a technical error before being restored, as the Centre moves ahead with tougher anti-paper leak legislation.

Meta on Tuesday (Jul 28) said Prime Minister Indian Narendra Modi's Facebook video on the government's response to examination paper leaks was briefly removed due to a technical error and has now been restored. "The content was removed in error and has since been restored," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. The Meta-owned platform had briefly restricted access to the video in the early hours of July 28 before making it available again. Also read | CJP warns agitation could return; claims Bihar, Assam to withdraw FIRs against NEET protesters PM's first direct message to students The video, released on July 23, marked Prime Minister Modi's first direct address to Gen Z during the 36-day-long Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-led agitation over the alleged NEET-UG 2026 examination irregularities. In his address, Modi assured students that the government would introduce stronger legal measures to tackle examination paper leaks. "I have issued directions to departments to set up Fast-Track Courts," the Prime Minister said, adding that a draft law providing for stringent punishment and special courts to deal with paper leak cases would be placed before the Union Cabinet and later introduced in Parliament. He also said the government had ensured that the academic year of nearly 22 lakh students was not disrupted. "Nothing is more important than the welfare and future of our youth," Modi said. Also read | Rahul Gandhi slams BJP for felicitating Dharmendra Pradhan in Parliament, accuses Modi government of 'celebrating ruined futures' Centre introduces anti-paper leak Bill The Prime Minister's remarks came amid nationwide protests demanding accountability over alleged examination irregularities. The Centre has since introduced the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Parliament. The proposed legislation seeks to strengthen the existing law by providing for imprisonment of up to 10 years, higher financial penalties and the establishment of Special Fast-Track Courts to hear paper leak cases. Protests ended after Pradhan's resignation The student agitation was formally called off on July 25 after Dharmendra Pradhan resigned as Union Education Minister. The Centre also reached an understanding with the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and activist Sonam Wangchuk, agreeing to withdraw cases against protesters, prevent police intimidation and bring in stronger anti-paper leak legislation.

Meta said Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Facebook video outlining the government's response to the alleged NEET-UG paper leak was briefly removed due to a technical error before being restored, as the Centre moves ahead with tougher anti-paper leak legislation.

Why did Meta remove PM Modi's Facebook video on paper leaks? Tech company blames 'technical error'

Meta is facing simultaneous pressure from India's ruling party, its IT ministry, and its own users — and the legal shield that lets it operate in the country is now openly in question.&nbsp;‘Who Gave Meta The Authority?’&nbsp;Priti Gandhi, the BJP's IT and social media national in-charge for the party's seven Morchas and an official spokesperson for Maharashtra BJP, publicly confronted the company after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Facebook post was restricted for users in India.&nbsp;‘The Prime Minister of the world’s largest democracy uploads his first direct selfie video to connect with India's youth… and Facebook restricts it???' she wrote, tagging Meta directly. ‘Who gave Meta the authority to decide what millions of Indians should or should not see??? This isn’t just content moderation. It raises serious questions about your political bias, transparency &amp; accountability. Respond!!!'&nbsp;The post in question — ‘More strict actions against paper leaks to come in tomorrow’s Cabinet!' — carries a notice reading: ‘The attached media isn’t available in your region due to a legal request.' No authority is named. No law is cited. No reason is given. The same message, on Instagram, set a world record with 303 million views in 24 hours, overtaking the previous mark held by YouTuber IShowSpeed.&nbsp;The Summons Meta Is Already Facing&nbsp;The blocking controversy lands while Meta is already answering to the Indian government on a far graver matter.&nbsp;Following a BBC Eye investigation published July 3, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology summoned Meta officials over paid advertisements on Instagram promoting child sexual abuse material in India. A BBC test account was reportedly served around 30 distinct paid ads using explicit search terms, redirecting users to Telegram channels selling illegal material for as little as ₹99.&nbsp;Union IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw directed ministry officials to seek an explanation from the company. MeitY ordered Instagram to disable all such advertisements and content, and demanded a detailed response within seven days — warning that failure to comply could threaten Meta's safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act.&nbsp;That protection is the legal foundation of Meta's presence in India. Section 79 exempts platforms from liability for content posted by users, but only while they meet due diligence obligations under the IT Rules. Without it, Meta becomes directly liable for what appears on its platforms in its largest market by user base.&nbsp;The Businesses Already Paying The Price&nbsp;Beneath the political confrontation sits a longer-running grievance: Meta's automated enforcement has been removing genuine accounts and businesses at scale.&nbsp;Meta has stated it removed more than 10 million accounts in a crackdown it says targeted bots, spam and fake engagement. But a New York Times investigation published this month documented users whose livelihoods vanished overnight, accounts disabled under broad categories such as ‘fraud and deception,’ with no specific violating post identified, and appeals rejected within days as final.&nbsp;Meta's own Oversight Board reached similar conclusions in its first ruling on disabled accounts, identifying systemic concerns around due process, proportionality and transparency, and recommending that Meta disclose what role AI plays in its enforcement decisions. The Board also found that Meta Verified , the paid subscription businesses buy specifically for support, failed to provide meaningful assistance to users with disabled accounts.&nbsp;The Question Now On The Table&nbsp;Meta now faces, at once: a ruling-party office-bearer demanding a public explanation, an IT ministry summons over child abuse advertising, an explicit warning about its safe harbour status, and a documented record of destroying legitimate businesses through automated enforcement it will not explain.&nbsp;Meta has not answered Priti Gandhi's questions. It has not disclosed who requested the restriction on the Prime Minister's post, under what provision, or why it was applied on one of its platforms and not the other. Until it does, the question being asked in India is no longer whether Meta made a mistake — it is what authority Meta holds in the country at all, and on whose permission.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">What the hell, <a href="https://x.com/Meta?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Meta</a>??! The Prime Minister of the world&#39;s largest democracy uploads his first direct selfie video to connect with India&#39;s youth... and Facebook restricts it??? Who gave Meta the authority to decide what millions of Indians should or should not see??? This… <a href="https://t.co/jrGJFYhqDI">pic.twitter.com/jrGJFYhqDI</a>&mdash; Priti Gandhi (@MrsGandhi) <a href="https://x.com/MrsGandhi/status/2081822819080671609?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Facebook has crossed every limit. It has blocked Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s post on strict action against paper leaks from being seen in India. Who gave this foreign platform the authority to censor India’s Prime Minister and decide what Indians are allowed to read? This is… <a href="https://t.co/6uNiqYk13Q">pic.twitter.com/6uNiqYk13Q</a>&mdash; Tajinder Bagga (@TajinderBagga) <a href="https://x.com/TajinderBagga/status/2081830378114011402?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 27, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Meta is facing its sharpest reckoning yet in India. Citizens of the country have publicly demanded Meta to explain why PM Modi's post was restricted in India. Separately, MeitY has summoned Meta over Instagram ads promoting child sexual abuse material, with the company's safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act now openly at risk.

Meta is facing simultaneous pressure from India's ruling party, its IT ministry, and its own users — and the legal shield that lets it operate in the country is now openly in question. ‘Who Gave Meta The Authority?’ Priti Gandhi, the BJP's IT and social media national in-charge for the party's seven Morchas and an official spokesperson for Maharashtra BJP, publicly confronted the company after Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Facebook post was restricted for users in India. ‘The Prime Minister of the world’s largest democracy uploads his first direct selfie video to connect with India's youth… and Facebook restricts it???' she wrote, tagging Meta directly. ‘Who gave Meta the authority to decide what millions of Indians should or should not see??? This isn’t just content moderation. It raises serious questions about your political bias, transparency & accountability. Respond!!!' The post in question — ‘More strict actions against paper leaks to come in tomorrow’s Cabinet!' — carries a notice reading: ‘The attached media isn’t available in your region due to a legal request.' No authority is named. No law is cited. No reason is given. The same message, on Instagram, set a world record with 303 million views in 24 hours, overtaking the previous mark held by YouTuber IShowSpeed. The Summons Meta Is Already Facing The blocking controversy lands while Meta is already answering to the Indian government on a far graver matter. Following a BBC Eye investigation published July 3, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology summoned Meta officials over paid advertisements on Instagram promoting child sexual abuse material in India. A BBC test account was reportedly served around 30 distinct paid ads using explicit search terms, redirecting users to Telegram channels selling illegal material for as little as ₹99. Union IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw directed ministry officials to seek an explanation from the company. MeitY ordered Instagram to disable all such advertisements and content, and demanded a detailed response within seven days — warning that failure to comply could threaten Meta's safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act. That protection is the legal foundation of Meta's presence in India. Section 79 exempts platforms from liability for content posted by users, but only while they meet due diligence obligations under the IT Rules. Without it, Meta becomes directly liable for what appears on its platforms in its largest market by user base. The Businesses Already Paying The Price Beneath the political confrontation sits a longer-running grievance: Meta's automated enforcement has been removing genuine accounts and businesses at scale. Meta has stated it removed more than 10 million accounts in a crackdown it says targeted bots, spam and fake engagement. But a New York Times investigation published this month documented users whose livelihoods vanished overnight, accounts disabled under broad categories such as ‘fraud and deception,’ with no specific violating post identified, and appeals rejected within days as final. Meta's own Oversight Board reached similar conclusions in its first ruling on disabled accounts, identifying systemic concerns around due process, proportionality and transparency, and recommending that Meta disclose what role AI plays in its enforcement decisions. The Board also found that Meta Verified , the paid subscription businesses buy specifically for support, failed to provide meaningful assistance to users with disabled accounts. The Question Now On The Table Meta now faces, at once: a ruling-party office-bearer demanding a public explanation, an IT ministry summons over child abuse advertising, an explicit warning about its safe harbour status, and a documented record of destroying legitimate businesses through automated enforcement it will not explain. Meta has not answered Priti Gandhi's questions. It has not disclosed who requested the restriction on the Prime Minister's post, under what provision, or why it was applied on one of its platforms and not the other. Until it does, the question being asked in India is no longer whether Meta made a mistake — it is what authority Meta holds in the country at all, and on whose permission.

Meta is facing its sharpest reckoning yet in India. Citizens of the country have publicly demanded Meta to explain why PM Modi's post was restricted in India. Separately, MeitY has summoned Meta over Instagram ads promoting child sexual abuse material, with the company's safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act now openly at risk.

'First dumb AI': Meta AI blocks Indian PM Modi's video in his own country, allows abuse ads and deletes livelihoods without explanation

narendra-modi

Narendra Modi, News on Narendra Modi, stories on Narendra Modi, articles on Narendra Modi, Narendra Modi stories at Wion, Narendra Modi news, Narendra Modi latest news

narendra modi

BRICS Summit 2026: Russia says Putin will update PM Modi on Ukraine conflict during their meeting

BRICS Summit 2026: Putin’s second India trip in 10 months, Russian oil in focus

BRICS Summit 2026:Why is Xi coming to India now? LAC, Rare earths and US link

Rubio on Modi-Pezeshkian meeting: 'No country should help Iran evade sanctions'

Can Central Asia help India diversify trade?

Ruchika Singh resurfaces in viral video, says PM Modi ‘made my life hell’

Why is PM Modi in Uzbekistan before the SCO Summit? Key reasons explained

PM MODI ARRIVES IN TASHKENT | Modi Begins 4-Day Central Asia Tour With Uzbekistan Visit

PM Modi in Uzbekistan | PM Narendra Modi Arrives In Tashkent For Two-Day Visit

PM Modi reaches Uzbekistan as he begins 2 nation visit to Central Asia

Poland offers India role in €44bn EU defence drive before EAM Jaishankar's visit

PM Modi’s name on Surat fish market board sparks row

‘Can’t work much now’: Nitin Gadkari’s remark fuels retirement speculation

India calls leader media arrangements ‘normal practice’ after Sergio Gor remarks

Sergio Gor claims India sought ‘no questions’ after Modi-Trump G7 meeting

Mines & Minerals Amendment Bill: Kerala CM Satheesan flags adverse impact on revenue raising powers

PM Modi’s ‘dimagi naxals’ remark sparks political row

Oppn reacts to PM Modi's Independence Day remarks on Naxals, women’s reservation

79th year of freedom or 80th Independence Day of India? Confusion explained

PM Modi delivers shortest Independence Day speech in years: 78 minutes

Who is Capt Sonia Singh Chauhan? Army officer's Red Fort appearance goes viral

'From Sapta Sindhu to Sapta Dhara': PM Modi's new vision for viksit bharat

'Bharat has seen a dream': PM Modi vows India will achieve Viksit Bharat by 2047

India gears up for 80th Independence day celebrations

PM Modi at IIT Delhi Convocation | Urges Youth to Lead India’s Viksit Bharat Journey

Article 370 Anniversary: BJP Celebrates, Opposition Observes Black Day