National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

US President Donald Trump, who is about to celebrate his 80th birthday on June 14, 2026, has set a new record. On Sunday, May 26, he was in the Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre in Bethesda, Maryland, where he had undergone a checkup for three hours and was examined by a record-breaking 22 medical specialists, an increase from the 14 specialists last time. "We have nothing to hide," said an official to the Washington Post.White House official said that among the doctors their were prominent doctors and experts affiliated with Harvard University and Duke University. For comparison, previous US President George HW Bush had 5 specialists checking him in 1989, while his son George W Bush showed his checking was done by 12. According to White House, all of these 22 doctors were not specialists, but some of them were generalists, and the large team reflected a complete preventive evaluation.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-nato-force-reduction-europe-f16-tankers-surveillance-1781262820118">US plans major NATO force reduction in Europe, including F-16s, tankers and surveillance aircraft</a>Sean Barbabella, Trump's physician, said that he was in “excellent health” with fully sound cardiac, pulmonary, and neurological functions. The White House Officials termed this as a regular executive-level check-up. "The involvement of multiple specialists reflects a comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation consistent with best practices for executive-level medical care," said the White House in a statement.&nbsp;According to White House reports, Trump was examined by 11 specialists in his 2019 checkup and 14 specialists in his 2025 checkup. Trump, just after completing the check-up, wrote in a Truth Social post, “Just finished my 6-month physical at Walter Reed Military Medical Centre…Everything checked out PERFECTLY. Thank you to the great Doctors and Staff! Heading back to the White House.” Trump called the trip “a 6-month physical,” while Barbarella described it on official documents as his “annual physical examination.”Trump had shown a visible pattern of cognitive decline, like ‘zigzag’ walks, falling asleep frequently, marks on his hands and swollen ankles, etc. White House defended the marks on his hands by calling them from preventive aspirin use, while the swollen ankle was chronic venous insufficiency. Public polling shows 59 per cent doubt Trump’s mental acuity and 55 per cent question his physical health, figures that could impact his political capital ahead of the midterm in November.&nbsp;

Donald Trump's latest medical examination at Walter Reed involved 22 doctors, the largest team ever reported for a US president's routine health check, according to the White House.

US President Donald Trump, who is about to celebrate his 80th birthday on June 14, 2026, has set a new record. On Sunday, May 26, he was in the Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre in Bethesda, Maryland, where he had undergone a checkup for three hours and was examined by a record-breaking 22 medical specialists, an increase from the 14 specialists last time. "We have nothing to hide," said an official to the Washington Post. White House official said that among the doctors their were prominent doctors and experts affiliated with Harvard University and Duke University. For comparison, previous US President George HW Bush had 5 specialists checking him in 1989, while his son George W Bush showed his checking was done by 12. According to White House, all of these 22 doctors were not specialists, but some of them were generalists, and the large team reflected a complete preventive evaluation. Also Read: US plans major NATO force reduction in Europe, including F-16s, tankers and surveillance aircraft Sean Barbabella, Trump's physician, said that he was in “excellent health” with fully sound cardiac, pulmonary, and neurological functions. The White House Officials termed this as a regular executive-level check-up. "The involvement of multiple specialists reflects a comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation consistent with best practices for executive-level medical care," said the White House in a statement. According to White House reports, Trump was examined by 11 specialists in his 2019 checkup and 14 specialists in his 2025 checkup. Trump, just after completing the check-up, wrote in a Truth Social post, “Just finished my 6-month physical at Walter Reed Military Medical Centre…Everything checked out PERFECTLY. Thank you to the great Doctors and Staff! Heading back to the White House.” Trump called the trip “a 6-month physical,” while Barbarella described it on official documents as his “annual physical examination.” Trump had shown a visible pattern of cognitive decline, like ‘zigzag’ walks, falling asleep frequently, marks on his hands and swollen ankles, etc. White House defended the marks on his hands by calling them from preventive aspirin use, while the swollen ankle was chronic venous insufficiency. Public polling shows 59 per cent doubt Trump’s mental acuity and 55 per cent question his physical health, figures that could impact his political capital ahead of the midterm in November.

Donald Trump's latest medical examination at Walter Reed involved 22 doctors, the largest team ever reported for a US president's routine health check, according to the White House.

Donald Trump's medical checkup involved 22 doctors, setting a White House record

The United States is planning to significantly reduce the number of aircraft it deploys in Europe for NATO. According to a New York Times US will pull back roughly 50 F-16 and F-15E fighter jets, eight refuelling tankers, reduce maritime reconnaissance aircraft from 26 to 15, reallocate one of the two groups of bombers, reallocate a missile-launching submarine and an aircraft carrier and the strike group that joins them. The decision is likely to reduce NATO's long-range striking ability and surveillance capacity significantly.&nbsp;According to the NYT report, the decision was communicated by the Trump administration in a written document. The European officials who were briefed on the document spoke on the condition of anonymity to the NYT to reveal details of the plan. The Pentagon official has reportedly not disclosed the proper timeline of the drawdown; however, it is likely to happen sooner than expected.&nbsp;“While each of these cuts can be managed individually, together they represent a significant posture change and pose challenges to European deterrence readiness across the spectrum,” said Giuseppe Spatafora, of the European Union Institute for Security Studies, a Paris-based think tank.While Europe is seemingly planning to wait out Trump's second term, NATO navigates one of the toughest patches in its alliance. Moreover, for the European, the specific number of assets allocated to them is less important, but rather whether the US opposes Europe in principle is more significant.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/elon-musk-first-trillionaire-spacex-nasdaq-trading-1781256572812">Elon Musk's net worth could top $1 trillion as SpaceX begins trading on Nasdaq</a>"NATO’s main problem is that, as long as Trump is president, there is no longer any faith that the U.S. would come to the Europeans’ aid in the event of an emergency,” said Anton Hofreiter, a German lawmaker. The drawdown comes at a time when US President Donald Trump is transitioning increasingly larger military assets in the region. This is also significant as Russia and Ukraine continues its long drawn war in the Eastern front of Europe. In late May, a Russian drone hit an apartment block in Romania, the first such strike in a major urban area in NATO territory. Russia is getting increasingly bold, as Europe is weakened by the turmoil in its political elite and the reduced military spending. The head of the Pentagon’s European Command, Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, said in early June that the European codependence has been unhealthy for US military forces, and it needs to be changed.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The US is reportedly planning a major reduction of NATO-linked military assets in Europe, including fighter jets, tankers, bombers and surveillance aircraft, raising concerns over deterrence against Russia.

The United States is planning to significantly reduce the number of aircraft it deploys in Europe for NATO. According to a New York Times US will pull back roughly 50 F-16 and F-15E fighter jets, eight refuelling tankers, reduce maritime reconnaissance aircraft from 26 to 15, reallocate one of the two groups of bombers, reallocate a missile-launching submarine and an aircraft carrier and the strike group that joins them. The decision is likely to reduce NATO's long-range striking ability and surveillance capacity significantly. According to the NYT report, the decision was communicated by the Trump administration in a written document. The European officials who were briefed on the document spoke on the condition of anonymity to the NYT to reveal details of the plan. The Pentagon official has reportedly not disclosed the proper timeline of the drawdown; however, it is likely to happen sooner than expected. “While each of these cuts can be managed individually, together they represent a significant posture change and pose challenges to European deterrence readiness across the spectrum,” said Giuseppe Spatafora, of the European Union Institute for Security Studies, a Paris-based think tank. While Europe is seemingly planning to wait out Trump's second term, NATO navigates one of the toughest patches in its alliance. Moreover, for the European, the specific number of assets allocated to them is less important, but rather whether the US opposes Europe in principle is more significant. Also Read: Elon Musk's net worth could top $1 trillion as SpaceX begins trading on Nasdaq "NATO’s main problem is that, as long as Trump is president, there is no longer any faith that the U.S. would come to the Europeans’ aid in the event of an emergency,” said Anton Hofreiter, a German lawmaker. The drawdown comes at a time when US President Donald Trump is transitioning increasingly larger military assets in the region. This is also significant as Russia and Ukraine continues its long drawn war in the Eastern front of Europe. In late May, a Russian drone hit an apartment block in Romania, the first such strike in a major urban area in NATO territory. Russia is getting increasingly bold, as Europe is weakened by the turmoil in its political elite and the reduced military spending. The head of the Pentagon’s European Command, Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, said in early June that the European codependence has been unhealthy for US military forces, and it needs to be changed.

The US is reportedly planning a major reduction of NATO-linked military assets in Europe, including fighter jets, tankers, bombers and surveillance aircraft, raising concerns over deterrence against Russia.

US plans major NATO force reduction in Europe, including F-16s, tankers and surveillance aircraft

US President Donald Trump has hinted at war with Iran coming to an end, as according to him the top Iranian leadership has agreed on the final terms of the peace deal. During a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones, Trump announced that he has "ended the war with Iran." While Iran said that the final agreement has not been made.&nbsp;However, if the accord goes through it will allow the release of $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets within a 60-day period.&nbsp;Citing a source close to Iran's negotiating team, Iran's Mehr news agency on Friday said the "accord would allow for the "release of $24 billion of Iran's blocked funds during the 60-day final negotiation period."&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/did-trump-leave-netanyahu-in-the-dark-report-claims-israeli-pm-was-blindsided-by-iran-deal-news-1781263607599">Did Trump leave Netanyahu in the dark? Report claims Israeli PM was blindsided by Iran deal news</a>&nbsp;Notably, half of that sum would be "made available to Iran before the start of negotiations," said the news agency further.<h2>What does the MoU have?</h2>&nbsp;Earlier on Friday Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe.&nbsp;The US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) states that MOU would extend the ceasefire for 60 days and would also include &nbsp;Lebanon. It also says that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened immediately without tolls, according to Axios.&nbsp;The Axios source claimed the MOU "goes into details on all the nuclear issues" and "satisfies all U.S. requirements."&nbsp;And though Trump claims that the deal is almost closed as Iran's top leadership has approved it, there are reports that it is still to get a nod from Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.&nbsp;

Citing a source close to Tehrans negotiating team, Irans Mehr news agency said the accord would allow for the release of billions of blocked funds.

US President Donald Trump has hinted at war with Iran coming to an end, as according to him the top Iranian leadership has agreed on the final terms of the peace deal. During a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones, Trump announced that he has "ended the war with Iran." While Iran said that the final agreement has not been made. However, if the accord goes through it will allow the release of $24 billion in frozen Iranian assets within a 60-day period. Citing a source close to Iran's negotiating team, Iran's Mehr news agency on Friday said the "accord would allow for the "release of $24 billion of Iran's blocked funds during the 60-day final negotiation period." ALSO READ: Did Trump leave Netanyahu in the dark? Report claims Israeli PM was blindsided by Iran deal news Notably, half of that sum would be "made available to Iran before the start of negotiations," said the news agency further. What does the MoU have? Earlier on Friday Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe. The US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) states that MOU would extend the ceasefire for 60 days and would also include Lebanon. It also says that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened immediately without tolls, according to Axios. The Axios source claimed the MOU "goes into details on all the nuclear issues" and "satisfies all U.S. requirements." And though Trump claims that the deal is almost closed as Iran's top leadership has approved it, there are reports that it is still to get a nod from Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

Citing a source close to Tehran's negotiating team, Iran's Mehr news agency said the accord would allow for the release of billions of blocked funds.

Iranian media reveals details of draft memorandum with US, billions in frozen assets to be released

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was caught off guard after US President Donald Trump abruptly announced that he had cancelled planned military strikes against Iran and claimed that a broader peace agreement could be finalised within days.According to a report by Axios, Netanyahu was not informed in advance before Trump publicly disclosed the development, which included assertions that Iran's leadership had approved a draft framework agreement aimed at extending a ceasefire and opening negotiations on Tehran's nuclear programme. "Netanyahu did not have advanced notice and was caught by surprise when Trump released his initial statement about the deal, according to a source with knowledge," Axios reported.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/south-korea-s-yoon-gets-30-years-in-prison-for-north-korea-drone-incident-1781249303771">South Korea’s Yoon gets 30 years in prison for North Korea drone incident</a>Trump announced on Thursday, saying he had called off scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran after being informed that discussions had reached the highest levels of the Iranian leadership and received approval."Based on the fact that discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved, I have, as President of the United States of America, cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening," Trump wrote on Truth Social.The US president claimed the proposed agreement would extend the current ceasefire, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and launch a 60-day negotiating process focused on Iran's nuclear activities. Trump also asserted that Iran would agree never to acquire a nuclear weapon.According to Trump, the framework had been approved "in both concept and great detail" by multiple parties, including the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan and Egypt.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-asylum-seeker-sentenced-to-10-years-in-jail-for-raping-uk-woman-had-asked-did-you-enjoy-that-1781250098255">Pakistan asylum seeker sentenced to 10 years in jail for raping UK woman</a>He added that the blockade would remain in place until the arrangement was formally completed.However, Iranian officials pushed back against Trump's characterisation of events. Tehran denied that any final agreement had been reached, although it left open the possibility that such a deal could eventually receive approval.Iran's Fars news agency rejected claims that a binding agreement had already been secured. It said discussions were centred on a memorandum of understanding designed to facilitate the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the lifting of the US blockade.According to the report, any future agreement covering Iran's nuclear programme and the removal of US sanctions would require separate negotiations.

US President Donald Trump abruptly cancelled planned military strikes against Iran, announcing a surprise draft peace framework. The move caught Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu completely off guard, while Iran disputed the claim.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was caught off guard after US President Donald Trump abruptly announced that he had cancelled planned military strikes against Iran and claimed that a broader peace agreement could be finalised within days. According to a report by Axios, Netanyahu was not informed in advance before Trump publicly disclosed the development, which included assertions that Iran's leadership had approved a draft framework agreement aimed at extending a ceasefire and opening negotiations on Tehran's nuclear programme. "Netanyahu did not have advanced notice and was caught by surprise when Trump released his initial statement about the deal, according to a source with knowledge," Axios reported. Also read: South Korea’s Yoon gets 30 years in prison for North Korea drone incident Trump announced on Thursday, saying he had called off scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran after being informed that discussions had reached the highest levels of the Iranian leadership and received approval. "Based on the fact that discussions with the Islamic Republic of Iran have been brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved, I have, as President of the United States of America, cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening," Trump wrote on Truth Social. The US president claimed the proposed agreement would extend the current ceasefire, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and launch a 60-day negotiating process focused on Iran's nuclear activities. Trump also asserted that Iran would agree never to acquire a nuclear weapon. According to Trump, the framework had been approved "in both concept and great detail" by multiple parties, including the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan and Egypt. Also read: Pakistan asylum seeker sentenced to 10 years in jail for raping UK woman He added that the blockade would remain in place until the arrangement was formally completed. However, Iranian officials pushed back against Trump's characterisation of events. Tehran denied that any final agreement had been reached, although it left open the possibility that such a deal could eventually receive approval. Iran's Fars news agency rejected claims that a binding agreement had already been secured. It said discussions were centred on a memorandum of understanding designed to facilitate the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the lifting of the US blockade. According to the report, any future agreement covering Iran's nuclear programme and the removal of US sanctions would require separate negotiations.

US President Donald Trump abruptly cancelled planned military strikes against Iran, announcing a surprise draft peace framework. The move caught Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu completely off guard, while Iran disputed the claim.

Did Trump leave Netanyahu in the dark? Report claims Israeli PM was blindsided by Iran deal news

War, terrorism, political instability and humanitarian crises continue to shape the world's least peaceful nations. Here are the 10 most dangerous countries in the world as per the latest Global Peace Index rankings.

From Russia to Syria: 10 Most dangerous countries in the world – Check full list

Elon Musk's SpaceX IPO is set to be traded on June 12, 2026, on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and Nasdaq Texas under the ticker “SPCX”. The rocket, satellite and AI company is pricing its 555,555,555 shares of its Class A common stock at $135 per share. The offering will continue till June 15, 2026 and is expected to raise $75 billion, putting its valuation around $1.77 trillion. Forbes Wealth pegged Musk's valuation at $850billion ahead of the offering, and if all goes well in the IPO, Musk's value will catapult to an unprecedented trillion-dollar territory, making him the first trillionaire in history. According to UK charity Oxfam, which puts the amount in perspective, if Musk spends approximately $1 million every day, it will take approximately 2,740 years to spend one trillion.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-spacex-starlink-military-targets-west-asia-1781251881890">Iran declares SpaceX and Starlink assets in West Asia legitimate military targets</a><h2>Elon Musk's net worth</h2>Born in Pretoria, South Africa, to a Canadian mother and South African father, Musk took over as the CEO of Tesla in 2008. He then gradually built his empire with SpaceX rockets, Starlink satellite, Twitter, which he rebranded as X and the Grok AI model. Most of Musk's wealth rests with SpaceX, where he holds a stake worth roughly $866 billion, along with Tesla's stocks, $260 billion, and the rest in Neuralink, Boring Company, and X, where he owns a roughly 1 per cent stake, which puts Elon Musk at approximately $1.1. It will make him not just richer, but richer than the combined next four in line, Larry Ellison, Larry Page and Sergey Brin.&nbsp;"The second richest person has been hovering around $300 billion, so about less than one-third of what Musk can potentially be worth ​tomorrow," said Matt Durot, deputy editor at Forbes Wealth.&nbsp;He is approximately worth 3-4 per cent of US GDP, almost 25-26 per cent of India's GDP and more than the annual output of many South American countries, like Chile, Argentina, almost all of the African countries, like South Africa, Egypt, Algeria, and some Asian countries like Sri Lanka and Pakistan.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Elon Musk could become the world's first trillionaire as SpaceX begins trading on Nasdaq under the ticker SPCX. The offering values the company at nearly $1.77 trillion.

Elon Musk's SpaceX IPO is set to be traded on June 12, 2026, on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and Nasdaq Texas under the ticker “SPCX”. The rocket, satellite and AI company is pricing its 555,555,555 shares of its Class A common stock at $135 per share. The offering will continue till June 15, 2026 and is expected to raise $75 billion, putting its valuation around $1.77 trillion. Forbes Wealth pegged Musk's valuation at $850billion ahead of the offering, and if all goes well in the IPO, Musk's value will catapult to an unprecedented trillion-dollar territory, making him the first trillionaire in history. According to UK charity Oxfam, which puts the amount in perspective, if Musk spends approximately $1 million every day, it will take approximately 2,740 years to spend one trillion. Also Read: Iran declares SpaceX and Starlink assets in West Asia legitimate military targets Elon Musk's net worth Born in Pretoria, South Africa, to a Canadian mother and South African father, Musk took over as the CEO of Tesla in 2008. He then gradually built his empire with SpaceX rockets, Starlink satellite, Twitter, which he rebranded as X and the Grok AI model. Most of Musk's wealth rests with SpaceX, where he holds a stake worth roughly $866 billion, along with Tesla's stocks, $260 billion, and the rest in Neuralink, Boring Company, and X, where he owns a roughly 1 per cent stake, which puts Elon Musk at approximately $1.1. It will make him not just richer, but richer than the combined next four in line, Larry Ellison, Larry Page and Sergey Brin. "The second richest person has been hovering around $300 billion, so about less than one-third of what Musk can potentially be worth tomorrow," said Matt Durot, deputy editor at Forbes Wealth. He is approximately worth 3-4 per cent of US GDP, almost 25-26 per cent of India's GDP and more than the annual output of many South American countries, like Chile, Argentina, almost all of the African countries, like South Africa, Egypt, Algeria, and some Asian countries like Sri Lanka and Pakistan.

Elon Musk could become the world's first trillionaire as SpaceX begins trading on Nasdaq under the ticker SPCX. The offering values the company at nearly $1.77 trillion.

Elon Musk's net worth could top $1 trillion as SpaceX begins trading on Nasdaq

The countdown for 52nd G7 Summit that is being held from June 15–17, 2026 in Évian-les-Bains, France has began. G7 literally means the Group of Seven. G7 refers to the seven nations namely Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States that forms member countries. Alongside these nations, European Union (EU) is also a part of the group as a non-enumerated member. Between 1997 and 2014, Russia was part of the group, temporarily making it the G8. However, Russia was indefinitely suspended in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea The informal grouping of these nations was formed in 1975 to address global macroeconomic challenges like the oil crisis and recessions in the 1970s. While it is not based on an official treaty and has no permanent secretariat or headquarters, it plays an important role worldwide as these seven nations represent roughly 40-50 per cent of the worldwide nominal GDP and about 10 per cent of the world's population.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-china-isn-t-in-the-g7-and-why-it-still-looms-over-every-discussion-1781231173090">Why China isn’t in the G7 – and why it still looms over every discussion</a><h2>How does the G7 differ from the G20 and BRICS?</h2>The G20 (Group of Twenty) is the premier forum for international economic cooperation, bringing together the world's major established and emerging economies and BRICS is an authoritative intergovernmental organization composed of 11 major emerging and developing economies. The groups essentially function as global forums focusing on economic stability, multilateral trade, and global governance reform. But, G7 caters to economy as well as security. Unlike the G20 or BRICS, which have diverse and often conflicting political systems such as China and India in BRICS, China, Russia vs G7 within G20, the G7 nations are aligned in their views on - democracy, human rights, and free-market capitalism.&nbsp;The G7 is ready to adapt and it actively co-opts emerging powers rather than fighting them. By regularly inviting influential Global South democracies (such as India, Brazil, and South Africa) to its annual summits as "guest nations," the G7 bridges its policy goals with the wider world. G7 nations are advanced economies facing similar domestic challenges, such as aging populations, high labour costs, and advanced technology regulations (like AI governance). G20 functions as an economic fire brigade while BRICS consists of rapidly growing emerging markets looking to build alternative financial systems.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/why-modi-s-invitation-matters-india-s-growing-role-at-the-g7-wion-decodes-1781235334874">Why Modi's invitation matters: India's growing role at the G7 | WION Decodes</a><h2>Why does the G7 remain influential?</h2>The G7 keeps itself relevant in midst of world's rising powers and fight between nations to exercise its hegemony because this group's greatest strength is its homogeneity. G7 consists strictly of wealthy and developed democracies. In terms of economy, the currency of G7 nations - the US dollar, Euro, British pound, and Japanese yen serve as the world's primary reserve and trade funding currencies. G7 nations also hold the largest voting shares in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, giving them unparalleled power to dictate global lending terms and bailouts.&nbsp;&nbsp;In the widely tech-savvy world, G7 serves "first responder" for technologies because major tech giants are headquartered within G7 borders (primarily the US). Thus, the group heavily dictates how advanced tech is governed globally. Programs like the Hiroshima AI Process and the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) were launched by the G7. From quantum computing to semiconductor supply chains, the G7 harmonizes risk assessments and technical benchmarks. The G7 has shifted from a pure focus on free trade to economic security, working collectively to counter economic coercion.&nbsp;&nbsp;G7 also acts quickly due to shared political systems and values. For example: their decision to alienate Russia after Crimea's annexation was swift leading to group changing its form. That was possible because the G7 serves as a strategic security apparatus. G7 members are deeply integrated via military alliances like NATO and AUKUS, allowing them to back up political declarations with coordinated intelligence sharing, naval deployments, and defense production.&nbsp;

The G7 is an informal group of seven major democracies that wields outsized influence through its economic strength, control of global financial institutions, technology governance and security alliances. Unlike the broader G20 and BRICS, its shared values enable faster action.

The countdown for 52nd G7 Summit that is being held from June 15–17, 2026 in Évian-les-Bains, France has began. G7 literally means the Group of Seven. G7 refers to the seven nations namely Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States that forms member countries. Alongside these nations, European Union (EU) is also a part of the group as a non-enumerated member. Between 1997 and 2014, Russia was part of the group, temporarily making it the G8. However, Russia was indefinitely suspended in 2014 following its annexation of Crimea The informal grouping of these nations was formed in 1975 to address global macroeconomic challenges like the oil crisis and recessions in the 1970s. While it is not based on an official treaty and has no permanent secretariat or headquarters, it plays an important role worldwide as these seven nations represent roughly 40-50 per cent of the worldwide nominal GDP and about 10 per cent of the world's population. Also Read: Why China isn’t in the G7 – and why it still looms over every discussion How does the G7 differ from the G20 and BRICS? The G20 (Group of Twenty) is the premier forum for international economic cooperation, bringing together the world's major established and emerging economies and BRICS is an authoritative intergovernmental organization composed of 11 major emerging and developing economies. The groups essentially function as global forums focusing on economic stability, multilateral trade, and global governance reform. But, G7 caters to economy as well as security. Unlike the G20 or BRICS, which have diverse and often conflicting political systems such as China and India in BRICS, China, Russia vs G7 within G20, the G7 nations are aligned in their views on - democracy, human rights, and free-market capitalism. The G7 is ready to adapt and it actively co-opts emerging powers rather than fighting them. By regularly inviting influential Global South democracies (such as India, Brazil, and South Africa) to its annual summits as "guest nations," the G7 bridges its policy goals with the wider world. G7 nations are advanced economies facing similar domestic challenges, such as aging populations, high labour costs, and advanced technology regulations (like AI governance). G20 functions as an economic fire brigade while BRICS consists of rapidly growing emerging markets looking to build alternative financial systems. Also Read: Why Modi's invitation matters: India's growing role at the G7 | WION Decodes Why does the G7 remain influential? The G7 keeps itself relevant in midst of world's rising powers and fight between nations to exercise its hegemony because this group's greatest strength is its homogeneity. G7 consists strictly of wealthy and developed democracies. In terms of economy, the currency of G7 nations - the US dollar, Euro, British pound, and Japanese yen serve as the world's primary reserve and trade funding currencies. G7 nations also hold the largest voting shares in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, giving them unparalleled power to dictate global lending terms and bailouts. In the widely tech-savvy world, G7 serves "first responder" for technologies because major tech giants are headquartered within G7 borders (primarily the US). Thus, the group heavily dictates how advanced tech is governed globally. Programs like the Hiroshima AI Process and the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) were launched by the G7. From quantum computing to semiconductor supply chains, the G7 harmonizes risk assessments and technical benchmarks. The G7 has shifted from a pure focus on free trade to economic security, working collectively to counter economic coercion. G7 also acts quickly due to shared political systems and values. For example: their decision to alienate Russia after Crimea's annexation was swift leading to group changing its form. That was possible because the G7 serves as a strategic security apparatus. G7 members are deeply integrated via military alliances like NATO and AUKUS, allowing them to back up political declarations with coordinated intelligence sharing, naval deployments, and defense production.

The G7 is an informal group of seven major democracies that wields outsized influence through its economic strength, control of global financial institutions, technology governance and security alliances. Unlike the broader G20 and BRICS, its shared values enable faster action.

G7 Summit: What is G7 and how it differs from G20 and BRICS? Why it still matters in the changing world | WION Decodes

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has summoned US Chargé d’Affaires Jason Meeks to strongly protest ongoing US Navy attacks on commercial vessels off Oman's coast on Friday (June 12). This diplomatic move follows a recent attack on a merchant ship carrying 20 Indian crew members, marking the second time the US mission has been summoned. The crisis turned fatal with the confirmed deaths of three Indian seafarers previously reported missing, marking New Delhi’s first public acknowledgement of the US military directly targeting vessels with Indian crews.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/centcom-says-forces-struck-disabled-m-t-jalveer-in-gulf-of-oman-1781188899941/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/centcom-says-forces-struck-disabled-m-t-jalveer-in-gulf-of-oman-1781188899941/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;According to official data, US forces targeted three foreign-flagged merchant vessels over four days. On June 8, US forces disabled the Palau-flagged tanker Marivex, which had 24 Indian crew members who were all safely rescued. On June 10, the US struck a second Palau-flagged tanker, Settebello, causing the three Indian fatalities. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated that a strong protest was lodged, emphasizing that these military actions "must stop" immediately. New Delhi has urged a return to dialogue and diplomacy to peacefully resolve the conflict and ensure unimpeded access through the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/tanker-mt-jalveer-carrying-indian-sailors-attacked-off-oman-coast-1781162858146">Tanker MT Jalveer carrying Indian sailors attacked off Oman coast</a>&nbsp;Jaiswal clarified that the strikes originated from US Navy units stationed in the region. The targeted ships were not Indian-owned but foreign-flagged: two under Palau and one under Guinea-Bissau. The operations were linked to regulatory enforcement, as two vessels were under US Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions, and the third was classified as non-compliant.&nbsp;Mukesh Mangal, Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Ports, Shipping &amp; Waterways, provided updates on rescue operations. Evacuation has commenced for personnel on the third vessel, Jalveer. On the Settebello, the remaining 25 crew members including 21 Indians, two Pakistanis, one Russian, and one Ukrainian have been safely evacuated. Furthermore, the Seamen Welfare Fund Society has been directed to release an ex-gratia payment of Rs 10 lakh to the families of each deceased Indian sailor.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/third-indian-commercial-vessel-hit-off-oman-coast-mea-calls-attack-deeply-worrisome-1781174683071">Third Indian commercial vessel hit off Oman Coast: MEA calls attack 'deeply worrisome'</a>&nbsp;This crisis underscores the massive presence of Indian maritime professionals in this volatile zone. Government data indicates that over 18,000 Indian seafarers are currently deployed across the Gulf region. This includes 562 crew members aboard 13 Indian-flagged vessels, with 329 personnel operating west of the Strait of Hormuz and 233 navigating the Gulf of Oman.

India’s MEA has summoned US Chargé d’Affaires Jason Meeks for the second time following US Navy strikes off Oman that killed three Indian seafarers

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has summoned US Chargé d’Affaires Jason Meeks to strongly protest ongoing US Navy attacks on commercial vessels off Oman's coast on Friday (June 12). This diplomatic move follows a recent attack on a merchant ship carrying 20 Indian crew members, marking the second time the US mission has been summoned. The crisis turned fatal with the confirmed deaths of three Indian seafarers previously reported missing, marking New Delhi’s first public acknowledgement of the US military directly targeting vessels with Indian crews. https://www.wionews.com/videos/centcom-says-forces-struck-disabled-m-t-jalveer-in-gulf-of-oman-1781188899941/embed According to official data, US forces targeted three foreign-flagged merchant vessels over four days. On June 8, US forces disabled the Palau-flagged tanker Marivex, which had 24 Indian crew members who were all safely rescued. On June 10, the US struck a second Palau-flagged tanker, Settebello, causing the three Indian fatalities. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal stated that a strong protest was lodged, emphasizing that these military actions "must stop" immediately. New Delhi has urged a return to dialogue and diplomacy to peacefully resolve the conflict and ensure unimpeded access through the Strait of Hormuz. Also read: Tanker MT Jalveer carrying Indian sailors attacked off Oman coast Jaiswal clarified that the strikes originated from US Navy units stationed in the region. The targeted ships were not Indian-owned but foreign-flagged: two under Palau and one under Guinea-Bissau. The operations were linked to regulatory enforcement, as two vessels were under US Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions, and the third was classified as non-compliant. Mukesh Mangal, Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Ports, Shipping & Waterways, provided updates on rescue operations. Evacuation has commenced for personnel on the third vessel, Jalveer. On the Settebello, the remaining 25 crew members including 21 Indians, two Pakistanis, one Russian, and one Ukrainian have been safely evacuated. Furthermore, the Seamen Welfare Fund Society has been directed to release an ex-gratia payment of Rs 10 lakh to the families of each deceased Indian sailor. Also read: Third Indian commercial vessel hit off Oman Coast: MEA calls attack 'deeply worrisome' This crisis underscores the massive presence of Indian maritime professionals in this volatile zone. Government data indicates that over 18,000 Indian seafarers are currently deployed across the Gulf region. This includes 562 crew members aboard 13 Indian-flagged vessels, with 329 personnel operating west of the Strait of Hormuz and 233 navigating the Gulf of Oman.

India’s MEA has summoned US Chargé d’Affaires Jason Meeks for the second time following US Navy strikes off Oman that killed three Indian seafarers

MEA summons US Chargé d’Affaires Jason Meeks again over strikes affecting Indian seafarers

US President Donald Trump once again cancelled a scheduled attack on Iran on Thursday night (Jun 11). This makes one wonder: Is Trump the one who's under pressure to reach a deal with Iran? He faces economic, political, and strategic pressures ahead of the November 3 midterm elections. Despite leverage through sanctions, military threats, and economic pressure on Iran, the costs of a prolonged conflict are falling on his own political coalition and agenda.<h2>The midterms clock is ticking</h2>Republicans are entering the midterms defending a narrow House majority that is vulnerable to the traditional anti-incumbency. Morgan Stanley's policy team warned that the war's energy shock could cost Republicans their Senate majority and significantly worsen the national debt. Trump and Republicans were elected on promises to cut inflation. They now face an inflation surge tied to the war, and several opinion polls are against them.&nbsp;Democrats will make the rising cost of living a central campaign issue in the midterms. &nbsp;A prolonged war will disrupt Trump's legislative agenda and GOP control of Congress.Trump once said he "doesn't care about the midterms," but Iran war escalation can affect his party's prospects. He needs a face-saving deal before November.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-ended-the-war-today-trump-s-big-declaration-after-halting-iran-strikes-what-s-really-happening-1781229576328">'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes - What's really happening</a><h2>Americans feel pinch at pump as Iran uses Strait of Hormuz as leverage</h2>Two weeks into the war, gasoline prices rose nearly 60 cents per gallon in the US, or about 19 per cent, while inflation reached 4.2 per cent in May, the highest since April 2023. A GOP strategist said, "You can't hide gas prices… there's a giant sign on every street corner saying how bad things are."&nbsp;Even if a deal is reached now, reopening the Strait of Hormuz won't normalise markets immediately. Iran has successfully used the strategic waterway as leverage. Tankers are trapped. Inventories are swelling. Infrastructure is damaged due to Operation Epic Fury, the US blockade of the strait, and Iran's counterstrikes. A full recovery will happen pretty close to the November 3 elections.&nbsp;Consultancy firm Wood Mackenzie estimated that even if the war is resolved, Brent crude would only fall to $80 by year-end.<h2>Trump is the one pushing for a deal, while Iran is softpeddaling&nbsp;</h2>Trump has asked Iran to reach a deal at least eight times through Truth Social rants or public remarks. He gave several deadlines to Tehran, while often saying the deal was "close," "largely negotiated," or could happen "this weekend." Nothing happened. He claimed Iran had "no choice" but to agree to the deal. But every time, Iran shrugged off the threats, refusing to budge on issues like its nuclear and missile programmes, and unfreezing of Iranian assets. It has now become predictable that Trump threatens military action and then postpones or cancels it. &nbsp;He explains the threat-pause-cancel cycles as arising from requests by Gulf allies, and even the mediator, Pakistan.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-trump-says-iran-deal-could-be-signed-very-soon-amid-ongoing-talks-1781246509761/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-trump-says-iran-deal-could-be-signed-very-soon-amid-ongoing-talks-1781246509761/embed</a><h2>What, or who, are putting pressure on Trump to reach a deal?</h2>Volatility and disruptions in the oil and energy markets are among the main pressures. Shipping and trans-shipment industries are dealing with trapped tankers, supply bottlenecks, and infrastructure damage. &nbsp;From businesses to national governments, the demand is for lower energy costs and market predictability. Supply chain disruptions caused by the Strait of Hormuz &nbsp;blockades are raising costs for food, fertilisers and shipping for the world. Gulf allies of the US - particularly UAE, Qatar, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia- appear to favour stability, lower energy volatility, and the reopening of shipping routes.&nbsp;<h2>Brand Trump is being affected badly</h2>Trump is known for the book ‘Art of the Deal’. But today, his personal brand and reputation as a dealmaker are under threat. Trump risks triggering a wider regional war, given the Iranian attacks on US bases and ally fatigue with prolonged conflict. He risks being associated with another ‘endless’ war, not lasting peace. &nbsp;Iran's ability to make any attack on it costly for the American interests in the Gulf region and global economy is a constraint on Trump from further escalating the issue.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-s-in-the-latest-iran-deal-trump-says-he-s-ready-to-sign-with-tehran-1781244692584">What's in the latest Iran deal Trump says he's ready to sign with Tehran</a><h2>What leverage does Trump have over Iran?</h2>The top one is the US sanctions and economic pain for Iran through the "maximum pressure" framework. Trump appears to be using military threats and deadlines as negotiating tools,raising the question: Is there a method to the madness? His alternating ‘deal talk’ and military threats could be a deliberate bargaining strategy designed to extract stronger concessions from Iran.Though Iran continues to fight, it is dealing with the effects of leadership decimation, economic deterioration, international isolation, and pressure to accept restrictions on its nuclear programme. Iran's crisis is existential, whereas Trump's is primarily political and economic.<h2>Several actors continue pushing against a rapid deal</h2>The main party opposing a US-Iran deal is Israel and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Iran hawks in Trump's Republican party also object to allowing Tehran to continue uranium enrichment. Trump could be applying more pressure than he is absorbing, through sanctions and military power. &nbsp;Every time he threatens to attack and then holds back, Trump is possibly trying to extract better concessions from Iran, such as nuclear restrictions and performance-based sanctions relief. But he probably knows that it is time to finish off what he started on February 28.

Donald Trump appears to be under rising political and economic pressure to secure an Iran deal. The US inflation, gasoline prices and Strait of Hormuz disruptions threaten Republican midterm prospects and his dealmaker image.

US President Donald Trump once again cancelled a scheduled attack on Iran on Thursday night (Jun 11). This makes one wonder: Is Trump the one who's under pressure to reach a deal with Iran? He faces economic, political, and strategic pressures ahead of the November 3 midterm elections. Despite leverage through sanctions, military threats, and economic pressure on Iran, the costs of a prolonged conflict are falling on his own political coalition and agenda. The midterms clock is ticking Republicans are entering the midterms defending a narrow House majority that is vulnerable to the traditional anti-incumbency. Morgan Stanley's policy team warned that the war's energy shock could cost Republicans their Senate majority and significantly worsen the national debt. Trump and Republicans were elected on promises to cut inflation. They now face an inflation surge tied to the war, and several opinion polls are against them. Democrats will make the rising cost of living a central campaign issue in the midterms. A prolonged war will disrupt Trump's legislative agenda and GOP control of Congress. Trump once said he "doesn't care about the midterms," but Iran war escalation can affect his party's prospects. He needs a face-saving deal before November. Also read: 'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes - What's really happening Americans feel pinch at pump as Iran uses Strait of Hormuz as leverage Two weeks into the war, gasoline prices rose nearly 60 cents per gallon in the US, or about 19 per cent, while inflation reached 4.2 per cent in May, the highest since April 2023. A GOP strategist said, "You can't hide gas prices… there's a giant sign on every street corner saying how bad things are." Even if a deal is reached now, reopening the Strait of Hormuz won't normalise markets immediately. Iran has successfully used the strategic waterway as leverage. Tankers are trapped. Inventories are swelling. Infrastructure is damaged due to Operation Epic Fury, the US blockade of the strait, and Iran's counterstrikes. A full recovery will happen pretty close to the November 3 elections. Consultancy firm Wood Mackenzie estimated that even if the war is resolved, Brent crude would only fall to $80 by year-end. Trump is the one pushing for a deal, while Iran is softpeddaling Trump has asked Iran to reach a deal at least eight times through Truth Social rants or public remarks. He gave several deadlines to Tehran, while often saying the deal was "close," "largely negotiated," or could happen "this weekend." Nothing happened. He claimed Iran had "no choice" but to agree to the deal. But every time, Iran shrugged off the threats, refusing to budge on issues like its nuclear and missile programmes, and unfreezing of Iranian assets. It has now become predictable that Trump threatens military action and then postpones or cancels it. He explains the threat-pause-cancel cycles as arising from requests by Gulf allies, and even the mediator, Pakistan. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-trump-says-iran-deal-could-be-signed-very-soon-amid-ongoing-talks-1781246509761/embed What, or who, are putting pressure on Trump to reach a deal? Volatility and disruptions in the oil and energy markets are among the main pressures. Shipping and trans-shipment industries are dealing with trapped tankers, supply bottlenecks, and infrastructure damage. From businesses to national governments, the demand is for lower energy costs and market predictability. Supply chain disruptions caused by the Strait of Hormuz blockades are raising costs for food, fertilisers and shipping for the world. Gulf allies of the US - particularly UAE, Qatar, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia- appear to favour stability, lower energy volatility, and the reopening of shipping routes. Brand Trump is being affected badly Trump is known for the book ‘Art of the Deal’. But today, his personal brand and reputation as a dealmaker are under threat. Trump risks triggering a wider regional war, given the Iranian attacks on US bases and ally fatigue with prolonged conflict. He risks being associated with another ‘endless’ war, not lasting peace. Iran's ability to make any attack on it costly for the American interests in the Gulf region and global economy is a constraint on Trump from further escalating the issue. Also read: What's in the latest Iran deal Trump says he's ready to sign with Tehran What leverage does Trump have over Iran? The top one is the US sanctions and economic pain for Iran through the "maximum pressure" framework. Trump appears to be using military threats and deadlines as negotiating tools, raising the question: Is there a method to the madness? His alternating ‘deal talk’ and military threats could be a deliberate bargaining strategy designed to extract stronger concessions from Iran. Though Iran continues to fight, it is dealing with the effects of leadership decimation, economic deterioration, international isolation, and pressure to accept restrictions on its nuclear programme. Iran's crisis is existential, whereas Trump's is primarily political and economic. Several actors continue pushing against a rapid deal The main party opposing a US-Iran deal is Israel and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Iran hawks in Trump's Republican party also object to allowing Tehran to continue uranium enrichment. Trump could be applying more pressure than he is absorbing, through sanctions and military power. Every time he threatens to attack and then holds back, Trump is possibly trying to extract better concessions from Iran, such as nuclear restrictions and performance-based sanctions relief. But he probably knows that it is time to finish off what he started on February 28.

Donald Trump appears to be under rising political and economic pressure to secure an Iran deal. The US inflation, gasoline prices and Strait of Hormuz disruptions threaten Republican midterm prospects and his dealmaker image.

'We ended the war today', really? Is Trump under more pressure than Iran to reach a deal? The Big Question

A UK court has jailed a Pakistani asylum seeker for 10 years for raping an intoxicated 18-year-old girl at a park. The incident took place in a UK park in June 2025. The Pakistani asylum seeker has been identified as Sheraz Malik. The 28 year old man and and a group with him encountered the girl and her friend at Sutton Lawn Park while they had been out drinking. Her male friend had asked him and his group to "look after her" while he went to meet another friend.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/prioritise-wisdom-saudi-arabia-urges-return-to-diplomacy-under-pakistan-and-qatar-mediation-1781176727632">‘Prioritise wisdom’: Saudi Arabia urges return to diplomacy under Pakistan and Qatar mediation</a>&nbsp;According to reports, the teenage girl was raped by Malik as she was in a vulnerable state. Malik took him to a secluded part of the park and raped her. According to The Sun, the survivor repeatedly protested during the assault while Malik asked her: "Did you enjoy that?" During the trials, Malik denied the allegations and claimed the sex was consensual. He was convicted by a jury in January on two counts of rape. On Thursday, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison and ordered to serve an additional four years on extended licence after his release. &nbsp;Giving evidence during the trial, the woman told jurors: "I was scared, I felt scared of saying no."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/16-killed-over-30-injured-as-pakistani-forces-open-fire-on-protesters-in-pakistan-occupied-kashmir-1781193970614">16 killed, over 30 injured as Pakistani forces open fire on protesters in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir</a>&nbsp;The trial heard that Malik is an asylum seeker born in Pakistan who had previously lived in Italy, Germany and France before arriving in the UK.He had been in Britain for less than a year when the attack took place. A court order prevented the media from reporting his immigration status until the trial had concluded to avoid prejudicing the proceedings.

Pakistani asylum seeker Sheraz Malik has been sentenced to 10 years in prison in the UK for raping an intoxicated 18-year-old woman in Sutton Lawn Park in June 2025. A jury convicted him on two counts of rape after rejecting his claim that the encounter was consensual.

A UK court has jailed a Pakistani asylum seeker for 10 years for raping an intoxicated 18-year-old girl at a park. The incident took place in a UK park in June 2025. The Pakistani asylum seeker has been identified as Sheraz Malik. The 28 year old man and and a group with him encountered the girl and her friend at Sutton Lawn Park while they had been out drinking. Her male friend had asked him and his group to "look after her" while he went to meet another friend. Also Read: ‘Prioritise wisdom’: Saudi Arabia urges return to diplomacy under Pakistan and Qatar mediation According to reports, the teenage girl was raped by Malik as she was in a vulnerable state. Malik took him to a secluded part of the park and raped her. According to The Sun, the survivor repeatedly protested during the assault while Malik asked her: "Did you enjoy that?" During the trials, Malik denied the allegations and claimed the sex was consensual. He was convicted by a jury in January on two counts of rape. On Thursday, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison and ordered to serve an additional four years on extended licence after his release. Giving evidence during the trial, the woman told jurors: "I was scared, I felt scared of saying no." Also Read: 16 killed, over 30 injured as Pakistani forces open fire on protesters in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir The trial heard that Malik is an asylum seeker born in Pakistan who had previously lived in Italy, Germany and France before arriving in the UK. He had been in Britain for less than a year when the attack took place. A court order prevented the media from reporting his immigration status until the trial had concluded to avoid prejudicing the proceedings.

Pakistani asylum seeker Sheraz Malik has been sentenced to 10 years in prison in the UK for raping an intoxicated 18-year-old woman in Sutton Lawn Park in June 2025. A jury convicted him on two counts of rape after rejecting his claim that the encounter was consensual.

Pakistan asylum seeker sentenced to 10 years in jail for raping UK woman, had asked 'did you enjoy that'

China on Friday (Jun 12) said that it had detained an American national accused of spying on the country. The individual, identified as Min Zin, is a political analyst and founder of the Institute for Strategy and Policy Myanmar (ISP-M), an independent research organisation focused on developments in Myanmar. Speaking at a press briefing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said that the authorities were holding him on “suspicion of engaging in espionage activities that endanger China’s national security.”Lin Jian said that Min Zin “has been subjected to criminal compulsory measures.” He did not provide any further details about the allegations or evidence supporting them.Min Zin’s research work focuses on Myanmar’s political landscape, conflict dynamics and regional security issues. The ISP-M regularly publishes research on the country’s civil war, governance challenges and the influence of foreign powers, including China, in Myanmar’s border regions.AFP reported, citing a person with professional ties to ISP-M, that Min Zin was arrested on Jun 3 after arriving at Kunming airport in China’s Yunnan province, which shares a border with Myanmar. Individuals close to the case said he had travelled to the city to attend a meeting, though it remains unclear whether his visit was connected to research activities. Chinese authorities have informed the US consulate in Guangzhou of the case.“His family and colleagues are following up with the consulate office there,” AFP cited a source as saying. “I know his family is worried.”The US State Department or the ISP-M have not yet made any official statement on the matter.The ISP-M is located in Chiang Mai, a northern Thai city that has emerged as a refuge for Myanmar political exiles after the 2021 coup ended civilian rule under Aung San Suu Kyi.According to analysts, including those at the ISP-M, Beijing’s role had been in question. They have alleged that China has at times supported both Myanmar’s military and certain rebel groups, depending on its strategic, economic and security priorities.

China has detained US researcher Min Zin on espionage allegations, claiming he endangered national security. The case has drawn attention amid ongoing scrutiny of foreign researchers in China.

China on Friday (Jun 12) said that it had detained an American national accused of spying on the country. The individual, identified as Min Zin, is a political analyst and founder of the Institute for Strategy and Policy Myanmar (ISP-M), an independent research organisation focused on developments in Myanmar. Speaking at a press briefing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian said that the authorities were holding him on “suspicion of engaging in espionage activities that endanger China’s national security.” Lin Jian said that Min Zin “has been subjected to criminal compulsory measures.” He did not provide any further details about the allegations or evidence supporting them. Min Zin’s research work focuses on Myanmar’s political landscape, conflict dynamics and regional security issues. The ISP-M regularly publishes research on the country’s civil war, governance challenges and the influence of foreign powers, including China, in Myanmar’s border regions. AFP reported, citing a person with professional ties to ISP-M, that Min Zin was arrested on Jun 3 after arriving at Kunming airport in China’s Yunnan province, which shares a border with Myanmar. Individuals close to the case said he had travelled to the city to attend a meeting, though it remains unclear whether his visit was connected to research activities. Chinese authorities have informed the US consulate in Guangzhou of the case. “His family and colleagues are following up with the consulate office there,” AFP cited a source as saying. “I know his family is worried.” The US State Department or the ISP-M have not yet made any official statement on the matter. The ISP-M is located in Chiang Mai, a northern Thai city that has emerged as a refuge for Myanmar political exiles after the 2021 coup ended civilian rule under Aung San Suu Kyi. According to analysts, including those at the ISP-M, Beijing’s role had been in question. They have alleged that China has at times supported both Myanmar’s military and certain rebel groups, depending on its strategic, economic and security priorities.

China has detained US researcher Min Zin on espionage allegations, claiming he endangered national security. The case has drawn attention amid ongoing scrutiny of foreign researchers in China.

China detains US researcher on espionage allegations – What we know

Iran will treat all SpaceX and Starlink assets in the West Asia region as legitimate military targets, Fars News reported on Thursday, June 11. Elon Musk's Starlink Satellite had been a key tool of the US military in its operation in the region, starting from assisting the agitators to supporting the high-tech drones, to unmanned surveillance and attack vessels.&nbsp;“With the economic interests and infrastructure related to Elon Musk in West Asia and Israel on Iran's list of new targets, Tehran announced the US and Israeli military use of the capabilities of Starlink and other Musk projects as the basis for this decision,” read a report from Iran's state-linked News Agency Fars.Iran claimed that the US used the Starlink satellite to carry out war crimes, Fars reported, citing an anonymous “source”, including targeting the water infrastructure of Iran. “Musk's military assistance to the US military was previously revealed through the Starshield projects and the launch of military satellites in the form of measures such as Earth observation, encrypted communications, and secure data transmission,” read the report.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/mahender-makhijani-arrested-100-million-bank-fraud-us-1781243367804">Bentley, private jets and mansions: Who is Mahender Makhijani, Indian businessman accused of $100 mn bank fraud?</a>"The Islamic Republic of Iran reserves the right to attack all facilities related to Mask-managed holdings in the region and occupied territories." The report suggests possible targets as Starlink ground stations located in the occupied territories of Palestine, Qatar, Jordan, the UAE, and Oman, along with SpaceX partners, including the infrastructure of two companies, Alfalah and Mubadala, which are some of Iran's new targets. It will prove that the US and Israeli military are using infrastructure managed by Elon Musk, including Starlink and Twitter software.The Fars report came around the same time US President Donald Trump claimed that the US will attack Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT,” in the same message, he said that the US will seize Kharg Island and other oil transporting hubs. Soon after, Trump called back on the attack and said that a deal had been agreed between the two sides. Iran denied Trump's claims, suggesting that no such framework has been agreed upon. This comes as SpaceX shares are expected to commence trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and Nasdaq Texas on June 12, 2026, under the ticker symbol "SPCX."&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Iran has declared SpaceX and Starlink assets in West Asia legitimate military targets, accusing Elon Musk's companies of assisting US and Israeli military operations in the region.

Iran will treat all SpaceX and Starlink assets in the West Asia region as legitimate military targets, Fars News reported on Thursday, June 11. Elon Musk's Starlink Satellite had been a key tool of the US military in its operation in the region, starting from assisting the agitators to supporting the high-tech drones, to unmanned surveillance and attack vessels. “With the economic interests and infrastructure related to Elon Musk in West Asia and Israel on Iran's list of new targets, Tehran announced the US and Israeli military use of the capabilities of Starlink and other Musk projects as the basis for this decision,” read a report from Iran's state-linked News Agency Fars. Iran claimed that the US used the Starlink satellite to carry out war crimes, Fars reported, citing an anonymous “source”, including targeting the water infrastructure of Iran. “Musk's military assistance to the US military was previously revealed through the Starshield projects and the launch of military satellites in the form of measures such as Earth observation, encrypted communications, and secure data transmission,” read the report. Also Read: Bentley, private jets and mansions: Who is Mahender Makhijani, Indian businessman accused of $100 mn bank fraud? "The Islamic Republic of Iran reserves the right to attack all facilities related to Mask-managed holdings in the region and occupied territories." The report suggests possible targets as Starlink ground stations located in the occupied territories of Palestine, Qatar, Jordan, the UAE, and Oman, along with SpaceX partners, including the infrastructure of two companies, Alfalah and Mubadala, which are some of Iran's new targets. It will prove that the US and Israeli military are using infrastructure managed by Elon Musk, including Starlink and Twitter software. The Fars report came around the same time US President Donald Trump claimed that the US will attack Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT,” in the same message, he said that the US will seize Kharg Island and other oil transporting hubs. Soon after, Trump called back on the attack and said that a deal had been agreed between the two sides. Iran denied Trump's claims, suggesting that no such framework has been agreed upon. This comes as SpaceX shares are expected to commence trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and Nasdaq Texas on June 12, 2026, under the ticker symbol "SPCX."

Iran has declared SpaceX and Starlink assets in West Asia legitimate military targets, accusing Elon Musk's companies of assisting US and Israeli military operations in the region.

Iran declares SpaceX and Starlink assets in West Asia legitimate military targets

US authorities have arrested California-based businessman Mahender Makhijani in Southern California over allegations of conning banks out of nearly $100 million. &nbsp;Professionally, he operated &nbsp;Newport Beach-based Cantor Group V LLC, which would help take out high-value loans, backed by commercial real estate.“Mahender Makhijani, 44, a lawful permanent resident from India living in Corona del Mar [California], was arrested this morning on a federal criminal complaint charging him with defrauding a bank out of nearly $100 million,” wrote first assistant US attorney for the Central District of California, Bill Essayli, in a post on Social media<h2>Why was Makhijani arrested?</h2>Federal prosecutors allege that Makhijani manipulated title insurance documents to make it appear that his company had a stronger hold on the collateral than it actually had, thus funnelling millions of dollars. He used digital software to alter the property title in insurance documents and metadata before submitting, while also providing misleading information during calls and in spreadsheets. The alleged scam involved concealed lien position, shell companies and deceptive financial transactions designed to mislead the lender.“Makhijani has significant financial resources, but the government has not fully traced and accounted for those resources, which are almost certainly not held in Makhijani’s name,” the complaint states.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/jee-vs-gaokao-hardest-exam-in-the-world-1781184165339">China's Gaokao vs India's JEE: Comparing the world's toughest entrance examinations</a><h2>Extravagant Life of Makhijani&nbsp;</h2>Makhijani led a luxurious life; he wore designer clothes, travelled in private jets, owned luxury vehicles including a Bentley, Porsche and Mercedes G-Wagon. He owned two neighbouring mansions in Corona del Mar. According to a New York Post report, he was accused of hosting exclusive parties involving drugs and sex workers to extort people, like business partners, associates and employees.<h2>Pattern of threat and intimidation</h2>Apart from the arrest, Makhijani is also involved in another legal battle where he is liable for paying $1.3 billion in damages in connection with his real-estate dealings with Laguna Beach businessman Mohammad Honarkar. Court documents also allege that Makhijani used threats, violence and intimidation to gain leverage over rivals. He has also been accused of using armed associates to seize hotels and restaurants in California. However, all of these allegations remain unproven; he might be looking at a 30-year sentence if proven guilty in a 30-year case.

Indian-origin businessman Mahender Makhijani was arrested in California over allegations of defrauding banks of nearly $100 million through manipulated title insurance documents and deceptive real estate transactions.

US authorities have arrested California-based businessman Mahender Makhijani in Southern California over allegations of conning banks out of nearly $100 million. Professionally, he operated Newport Beach-based Cantor Group V LLC, which would help take out high-value loans, backed by commercial real estate. “Mahender Makhijani, 44, a lawful permanent resident from India living in Corona del Mar [California], was arrested this morning on a federal criminal complaint charging him with defrauding a bank out of nearly $100 million,” wrote first assistant US attorney for the Central District of California, Bill Essayli, in a post on Social media Why was Makhijani arrested? Federal prosecutors allege that Makhijani manipulated title insurance documents to make it appear that his company had a stronger hold on the collateral than it actually had, thus funnelling millions of dollars. He used digital software to alter the property title in insurance documents and metadata before submitting, while also providing misleading information during calls and in spreadsheets. The alleged scam involved concealed lien position, shell companies and deceptive financial transactions designed to mislead the lender. “Makhijani has significant financial resources, but the government has not fully traced and accounted for those resources, which are almost certainly not held in Makhijani’s name,” the complaint states. Also Read: China's Gaokao vs India's JEE: Comparing the world's toughest entrance examinations Extravagant Life of Makhijani Makhijani led a luxurious life; he wore designer clothes, travelled in private jets, owned luxury vehicles including a Bentley, Porsche and Mercedes G-Wagon. He owned two neighbouring mansions in Corona del Mar. According to a New York Post report, he was accused of hosting exclusive parties involving drugs and sex workers to extort people, like business partners, associates and employees. Pattern of threat and intimidation Apart from the arrest, Makhijani is also involved in another legal battle where he is liable for paying $1.3 billion in damages in connection with his real-estate dealings with Laguna Beach businessman Mohammad Honarkar. Court documents also allege that Makhijani used threats, violence and intimidation to gain leverage over rivals. He has also been accused of using armed associates to seize hotels and restaurants in California. However, all of these allegations remain unproven; he might be looking at a 30-year sentence if proven guilty in a 30-year case.

Indian-origin businessman Mahender Makhijani was arrested in California over allegations of defrauding banks of nearly $100 million through manipulated title insurance documents and deceptive real estate transactions.

Bentley, private jets and mansions: Who is Mahender Makhijani, Indian businessman accused of $100 mn bank fraud?

A South Korean court on Friday (Jun 12) sentenced former president Yoon Suk Yeol to 30 years in prison after finding him guilty of unauthorised drone operations over North Korea. The judge ruled that Yoon planned the action as a pretext for his disastrous martial law declaration in 2024. The judgment comes months after the ousted president was sentenced to life in prison after being found guilty of insurrection.The ruling marks another dramatic chapter in the political downfall of the former leader, who has faced multiple legal challenges since leaving office. Prosecutors have alleged that the drone flights were not routine military activities but part of a broader effort to create tensions with North Korea during a period of domestic political uncertainty.Investigators have said that the operation involved drones crossing into the airspace of North Korea in 2024. Authorities claimed the mission risked escalating military tensions on the Korean Peninsula and was carried out without proper justification. Prosecutors further alleged that the resulting security concerns were later used to support extraordinary political measures at home.The incident, which happened two months before Yoon suspended civilian rule, sparked outrage from Pyongyang, which also accused its neighbour of dropping propaganda leaflets.According to the judge, Yoon intended to provoke Pyongyang “into carrying out armed or equivalent acts against South Korea’s military of people,” AFP reported, citing a summary of the ruling.The court accepted key parts of the prosecution’s case, concluding that the actions amounted to an abuse of presidential authority and endangered national security interests. Judges said the operation had the potential to trigger a serious cross-border confrontation and undermine public trust in state institutions.Yoon planned to “heighten inter-Korean military tensions and manufacture a national crisis” so his martial law could have been justified, they added.Yoon rejected the accusations throughout the proceedings. His legal team argued that the charges were politically motivated and maintained that any military decisions made during his presidency were intended to safeguard national security in response to threats from North Korea. He insists that he declared martial law “solely for the sake of the nation.”The case has attracted widespread attention across South Korea, where relations with Pyongyang remain a highly sensitive issue. Political analysts say the verdict is likely to deepen divisions between supporters and critics of the former president while reigniting debate over executive power and military decision-making.Yoon is expected to challenge the ruling through the appeals process. However, the conviction represents one of the most significant legal judgments against a former South Korean leader in recent years and underscores the intense scrutiny facing public officials accused of misusing state power.

South Korea’s former president Yoon Suk Yeol was sentenced to 30 years for an alleged drone operation targeting North Korea, which the court said was used to justify martial law.

A South Korean court on Friday (Jun 12) sentenced former president Yoon Suk Yeol to 30 years in prison after finding him guilty of unauthorised drone operations over North Korea. The judge ruled that Yoon planned the action as a pretext for his disastrous martial law declaration in 2024. The judgment comes months after the ousted president was sentenced to life in prison after being found guilty of insurrection. The ruling marks another dramatic chapter in the political downfall of the former leader, who has faced multiple legal challenges since leaving office. Prosecutors have alleged that the drone flights were not routine military activities but part of a broader effort to create tensions with North Korea during a period of domestic political uncertainty. Investigators have said that the operation involved drones crossing into the airspace of North Korea in 2024. Authorities claimed the mission risked escalating military tensions on the Korean Peninsula and was carried out without proper justification. Prosecutors further alleged that the resulting security concerns were later used to support extraordinary political measures at home. The incident, which happened two months before Yoon suspended civilian rule, sparked outrage from Pyongyang, which also accused its neighbour of dropping propaganda leaflets. According to the judge, Yoon intended to provoke Pyongyang “into carrying out armed or equivalent acts against South Korea’s military of people,” AFP reported, citing a summary of the ruling. The court accepted key parts of the prosecution’s case, concluding that the actions amounted to an abuse of presidential authority and endangered national security interests. Judges said the operation had the potential to trigger a serious cross-border confrontation and undermine public trust in state institutions. Yoon planned to “heighten inter-Korean military tensions and manufacture a national crisis” so his martial law could have been justified, they added. Yoon rejected the accusations throughout the proceedings. His legal team argued that the charges were politically motivated and maintained that any military decisions made during his presidency were intended to safeguard national security in response to threats from North Korea. He insists that he declared martial law “solely for the sake of the nation.” The case has attracted widespread attention across South Korea, where relations with Pyongyang remain a highly sensitive issue. Political analysts say the verdict is likely to deepen divisions between supporters and critics of the former president while reigniting debate over executive power and military decision-making. Yoon is expected to challenge the ruling through the appeals process. However, the conviction represents one of the most significant legal judgments against a former South Korean leader in recent years and underscores the intense scrutiny facing public officials accused of misusing state power.

South Korea’s former president Yoon Suk Yeol was sentenced to 30 years for an alleged drone operation targeting North Korea, which the court said was used to justify martial law.

South Korea’s Yoon gets 30 years in prison for North Korea drone incident

The Global Peace Index 2026 has ranked the world's safest countries, with Iceland retaining the top spot. Here's the complete top 10 list and where India ranks. 

World's Safest Countries in 2026: Did India make it to the top 10? Here's where it ranks

US President Donald Trump has hinted that the final terms on the deal with Iran has been agreed on by the top Iranian leadership. Even as Iran said that the final agreement has not been made, an Axios report has stated what is inside the new deal. Trump on Thursday (June 11) declared that he has "ended the war with Iran." He made the statement during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones. Trump added that Iran agreed they will never have nuclear weapons. Earlier, Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-ended-the-war-today-trump-s-big-declaration-after-halting-iran-strikes-what-s-really-happening-1781229576328">'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes</a><h2>What's in the deal?</h2>The US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) states that MOU would extend the ceasefire for 60 days. It states clearly that ceasefire includes in Lebanon. The deal also includes that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened immediately without tolls. Axios quoted one of the official from the mediating countries and said that Iran will receive sanctions relief based on compliance. The text includes a framework for addressing Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, though any action on Iran's nuclear program would depend on a second, more detailed accord. Under the MOU, Iran would make certain commitments on its nuclear program — first and foremost to never acquire a nuclear weapon and to resolve the standoff around its enriched uranium. The Axios source claimed the MOU "goes into details on all the nuclear issues" and "satisfies all U.S. requirements."The report said that the deal had been approved on the Iranian side at high levels but likely not by Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. The tentative agreement was reached on Wednesday night after hours of negotiations between Qatari mediator Ali Al-Thawadi and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-will-receive-a-painful-response-tehran-on-trump-s-threat-of-hitting-iran-very-hard-1781192346656">US will receive a 'painful response': Tehran on Trump's threat&nbsp;</a><h2>Iran disagrees with Trump's claims</h2>However, even as Trump claimed that the war is over, Iran pushed back against saying no final decision had yet been taken on any agreement. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said that the proposed understanding was still under review and had not received final approval. "Until Iran announces the matter of a potential understanding, any news from Trump on this subject should be regarded the same as his previous messaging," Baqaei was quoted saying according to Iran's Tasnim news agency said.

A proposed US-Iran agreement reportedly includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz without tolls, phased sanctions relief for Tehran and a 60-day ceasefire extension. President Donald Trump says the deal could be signed soon, though Iran maintains that a final decision has not yet been made.

US President Donald Trump has hinted that the final terms on the deal with Iran has been agreed on by the top Iranian leadership. Even as Iran said that the final agreement has not been made, an Axios report has stated what is inside the new deal. Trump on Thursday (June 11) declared that he has "ended the war with Iran." He made the statement during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones. Trump added that Iran agreed they will never have nuclear weapons. Earlier, Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe. Also Read: 'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes What's in the deal? The US-Iran memorandum of understanding (MoU) states that MOU would extend the ceasefire for 60 days. It states clearly that ceasefire includes in Lebanon. The deal also includes that the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened immediately without tolls. Axios quoted one of the official from the mediating countries and said that Iran will receive sanctions relief based on compliance. The text includes a framework for addressing Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, though any action on Iran's nuclear program would depend on a second, more detailed accord. Under the MOU, Iran would make certain commitments on its nuclear program — first and foremost to never acquire a nuclear weapon and to resolve the standoff around its enriched uranium. The Axios source claimed the MOU "goes into details on all the nuclear issues" and "satisfies all U.S. requirements." The report said that the deal had been approved on the Iranian side at high levels but likely not by Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. The tentative agreement was reached on Wednesday night after hours of negotiations between Qatari mediator Ali Al-Thawadi and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Also Read: US will receive a 'painful response': Tehran on Trump's threat Iran disagrees with Trump's claims However, even as Trump claimed that the war is over, Iran pushed back against saying no final decision had yet been taken on any agreement. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said that the proposed understanding was still under review and had not received final approval. "Until Iran announces the matter of a potential understanding, any news from Trump on this subject should be regarded the same as his previous messaging," Baqaei was quoted saying according to Iran's Tasnim news agency said.

A proposed US-Iran agreement reportedly includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz without tolls, phased sanctions relief for Tehran and a 60-day ceasefire extension. President Donald Trump says the deal could be signed soon, though Iran maintains that a final decision has not yet been made.

What's in the latest Iran deal Trump says he's ready to sign with Tehran

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has strongly defended India’s sovereign energy choices, revealing that New Delhi’s strategic procurement of Russian crude oil since 2022 was actually aligned with explicit requests from the US to stabilise global markets and prevent a catastrophic surge in international prices. Speaking at the Kultaranta Talks in Finland during a session titled 'Emerging Powers and the New Geopolitical Competition,' Jaishankar provided a pragmatic breakdown of the market dynamics triggered by the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Following Western sanctions on Moscow, European nations aggressively pivoted away from Russian energy, scrambling to buy up alternative supplies from West Asia, traditionally India's primary energy partner.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-jaishankar-have-been-in-regular-touch-with-rubio-us-india-ties-1779610539258/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-jaishankar-have-been-in-regular-touch-with-rubio-us-india-ties-1779610539258/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Decoding the complex international landscape, Jaishankar said, "At that time, the US specifically asked India to buy Russian oil to stabilise the oil market." Providing a clear, factual breakdown of the market dynamics, the minister demonstrated India's strategy for the global energy crisis. Jaishankar rejected the notion that Western pressure was built on core values, criticising the shifting policies where the US initially requested India's market intervention, subsequently introduced tariffs, and later rescinded them. He stressed that India has successfully diversified its energy basket, with Russia remaining a steady partner for crude imports while the US stands as its top supplier of natural gas.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-against-weaponisation-of-resources-jaishankar-details-india-s-global-priorities-during-rubio-meeting-1779622888760">‘Against weaponisation of resources’: Jaishankar details India’s global priorities during Rubio meeting</a>&nbsp;Ultimately, New Delhi’s calibrated strategy demonstrates that prioritising national interest and citizen welfare can coexist with responsible international conduct, effectively resisting unilateral Western-led sanctions while keeping global trade secure.&nbsp;Responding firmly to a journalist's accusation that India was "too sympathetic to Russia," the minister explained that market circumstances dictated India's shift. With Europe consuming West Asian oil, the bulk of the available global supply was Russian. India's decision to buy based on cost and availability not only protected domestic consumers from soaring inflation but also functioned as a critical stabilising force for the global economy.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-russia-cooperation-even-more-valuable-amid-volatile-global-environment-eam-jaishankar-1778702712485">India-Russia cooperation ‘even more valuable’ amid volatile global environment: EAM Jaishankar</a>&nbsp;Furthermore, Jaishankar also dismantled Western double standards and selective moralising regarding India's trade and defence relationships. Highlighting India's unblemished, peaceful global footprint, he countered European criticism by pointing out historical security hypocrisies. "No European country has been attacked with Indian weapons. I wish I could say that for Europe weapons vis-a-vis India," he remarked, noting that European arms have been used against India for decades.&nbsp;&nbsp;

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar called out US "double standards" over Russian oil imports, detailing how Washington flipped from tariffs to waivers.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has strongly defended India’s sovereign energy choices, revealing that New Delhi’s strategic procurement of Russian crude oil since 2022 was actually aligned with explicit requests from the US to stabilise global markets and prevent a catastrophic surge in international prices. Speaking at the Kultaranta Talks in Finland during a session titled 'Emerging Powers and the New Geopolitical Competition,' Jaishankar provided a pragmatic breakdown of the market dynamics triggered by the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Following Western sanctions on Moscow, European nations aggressively pivoted away from Russian energy, scrambling to buy up alternative supplies from West Asia, traditionally India's primary energy partner. https://www.wionews.com/videos/breaking-jaishankar-have-been-in-regular-touch-with-rubio-us-india-ties-1779610539258/embed Decoding the complex international landscape, Jaishankar said, "At that time, the US specifically asked India to buy Russian oil to stabilise the oil market." Providing a clear, factual breakdown of the market dynamics, the minister demonstrated India's strategy for the global energy crisis. Jaishankar rejected the notion that Western pressure was built on core values, criticising the shifting policies where the US initially requested India's market intervention, subsequently introduced tariffs, and later rescinded them. He stressed that India has successfully diversified its energy basket, with Russia remaining a steady partner for crude imports while the US stands as its top supplier of natural gas. Also read: ‘Against weaponisation of resources’: Jaishankar details India’s global priorities during Rubio meeting Ultimately, New Delhi’s calibrated strategy demonstrates that prioritising national interest and citizen welfare can coexist with responsible international conduct, effectively resisting unilateral Western-led sanctions while keeping global trade secure. Responding firmly to a journalist's accusation that India was "too sympathetic to Russia," the minister explained that market circumstances dictated India's shift. With Europe consuming West Asian oil, the bulk of the available global supply was Russian. India's decision to buy based on cost and availability not only protected domestic consumers from soaring inflation but also functioned as a critical stabilising force for the global economy. Also read: India-Russia cooperation ‘even more valuable’ amid volatile global environment: EAM Jaishankar Furthermore, Jaishankar also dismantled Western double standards and selective moralising regarding India's trade and defence relationships. Highlighting India's unblemished, peaceful global footprint, he countered European criticism by pointing out historical security hypocrisies. "No European country has been attacked with Indian weapons. I wish I could say that for Europe weapons vis-a-vis India," he remarked, noting that European arms have been used against India for decades.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar called out US "double standards" over Russian oil imports, detailing how Washington flipped from tariffs to waivers.

‘US asked us to buy Russian oil, imposed tariffs, then lifted them’: Jaishankar exposes Western double standards

The much-anticipated 52nd Group of Seven or G7 Summit is set to begin next week in France, where global leaders will hold dialogue to strengthen multilateral cooperation and discuss the world’s most pressing issues. The summit will be held on 15-17 June 2026 in Évian-les-Bains, Haute-Savoie, marking the second time the location has hosted the group. As member nations, along with invited participants, prepare to take part in the annual summit, one country has remained out of it. China, which is not a member of the G7, does not participate as a core member in the group’s official summits. While it occasionally engages in diplomatic and economic dialogues, it has largely remained absent from the meetings.The question remains: why is China not part of the key G7 group despite being the world’s second-largest economy, a major global power, and continuing to influence nearly every major discussion among its members?To answer the question why China has been excluded from the G7 meetings, we have to understand the group’s origin, history and purpose.<h2>How was the G7 formed?</h2>The origins of the Group of Seven trace back to 1975, when leading industrialised democracies established an informal platform for cooperation amid the economic disruptions caused by the 1973 oil crisis. The group, originally called G6, was established with six members, including France, West Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, at a summit in Rambouillet, France. In 1976, Canada was formally added to the coalition. The European Community (now the European Union) was included in the group in 1981.In 1997, Russia was admitted to the group, briefly making it the G8. However, Moscow’s membership was suspended in 2014 after its annexation of Crimea, and the bloc returned to its G7 format.Notably, at that time, China had a largely closed economy and was still years away from the market reforms that would turn it into one of the world’s leading industrialised nations. Moreover, G7 was not intended to include every large economy but rather nations with shared values on industrial development, market-based economies and democratic political systems – criteria that China did not fit then.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/from-debt-to-ai-the-global-south-s-wishlist-for-the-g7-summit-wion-decodes-1781360595260">From debt to AI: The Global South’s wishlist for the G7 Summit | WION Decodes</a><h2>Why can’t China still be invited?</h2>Even though China is the world’s second-largest economy, it still differs from the G7 core ideology. Membership is not based solely on economic size. The G7 is also a political grouping of advanced democracies. China’s one-party political system differs fundamentally from the democratic governance structures of G7 nations, making membership unlikely despite its economic influence.<h2>China’s influence on G7</h2>Over the years, China has become one of the most influential players in global discussions. On the economic front, China is a key trading partner for many G7 nations, being the world’s largest exporter and manufacturer, accounting for roughly 30 per cent of global output. It also plays a central role in global supply chains, producing a range of products like consumer electronics, industrial machinery, electric vehicle batteries, solar panels, and more. As a result, G7 discussions over trade, manufacturing, industrial policy, economic security and inflation have often been dominated by China.In recent years, G7 leaders have increasingly stressed “de-risking”, seeking to reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains. The idea is to limit strategic vulnerabilities without severing economic ties with one of the world’s most important markets.Apart from economics, Beijing is also shaping security discussions with key issues, including tensions in the Taiwan Strait, military activity in the South China Sea, cybersecurity threats and technological competition. With Taiwan becoming a major market for the semiconductor industry, any disruption in the region could have adverse consequences for several industries worldwide, from automobiles and smartphones to artificial intelligence and defence systems.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-in-europe-what-are-india-s-objectives-at-the-g7-summit-1781594601788">PM Modi in Europe: What are India’s objectives at the G7 Summit?</a>Although China is not a member of the G7, it is shaping many of its discussions. Whether it is supply chains, artificial intelligence, technology, climate goals, critical minerals, trade imbalances or regional security, Beijing’s presence is impossible to ignore in key international meetings.While being absent from the G7, China is one of the founding members of the Group of Twenty or G20, which comprises G7 members and other major emerging economies and regional unions. In contrast to the G7, which reflects the post-World War II economic order, the G20 reflects the modern global economy. Apart from China, the group includes emerging powers including India, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa.WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed</a>&nbsp;

China may not have a seat at the G7 table, but its economic reach, strategic influence and global role ensure it remains central to many of the issues world leaders discuss. 

The much-anticipated 52nd Group of Seven or G7 Summit is set to begin next week in France, where global leaders will hold dialogue to strengthen multilateral cooperation and discuss the world’s most pressing issues. The summit will be held on 15-17 June 2026 in Évian-les-Bains, Haute-Savoie, marking the second time the location has hosted the group. As member nations, along with invited participants, prepare to take part in the annual summit, one country has remained out of it. China, which is not a member of the G7, does not participate as a core member in the group’s official summits. While it occasionally engages in diplomatic and economic dialogues, it has largely remained absent from the meetings. The question remains: why is China not part of the key G7 group despite being the world’s second-largest economy, a major global power, and continuing to influence nearly every major discussion among its members? To answer the question why China has been excluded from the G7 meetings, we have to understand the group’s origin, history and purpose. How was the G7 formed? The origins of the Group of Seven trace back to 1975, when leading industrialised democracies established an informal platform for cooperation amid the economic disruptions caused by the 1973 oil crisis. The group, originally called G6, was established with six members, including France, West Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, at a summit in Rambouillet, France. In 1976, Canada was formally added to the coalition. The European Community (now the European Union) was included in the group in 1981. In 1997, Russia was admitted to the group, briefly making it the G8. However, Moscow’s membership was suspended in 2014 after its annexation of Crimea, and the bloc returned to its G7 format. Notably, at that time, China had a largely closed economy and was still years away from the market reforms that would turn it into one of the world’s leading industrialised nations. Moreover, G7 was not intended to include every large economy but rather nations with shared values on industrial development, market-based economies and democratic political systems – criteria that China did not fit then. Also read | From debt to AI: The Global South’s wishlist for the G7 Summit | WION Decodes Why can’t China still be invited? Even though China is the world’s second-largest economy, it still differs from the G7 core ideology. Membership is not based solely on economic size. The G7 is also a political grouping of advanced democracies. China’s one-party political system differs fundamentally from the democratic governance structures of G7 nations, making membership unlikely despite its economic influence. China’s influence on G7 Over the years, China has become one of the most influential players in global discussions. On the economic front, China is a key trading partner for many G7 nations, being the world’s largest exporter and manufacturer, accounting for roughly 30 per cent of global output. It also plays a central role in global supply chains, producing a range of products like consumer electronics, industrial machinery, electric vehicle batteries, solar panels, and more. As a result, G7 discussions over trade, manufacturing, industrial policy, economic security and inflation have often been dominated by China. In recent years, G7 leaders have increasingly stressed “de-risking”, seeking to reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains. The idea is to limit strategic vulnerabilities without severing economic ties with one of the world’s most important markets. Apart from economics, Beijing is also shaping security discussions with key issues, including tensions in the Taiwan Strait, military activity in the South China Sea, cybersecurity threats and technological competition. With Taiwan becoming a major market for the semiconductor industry, any disruption in the region could have adverse consequences for several industries worldwide, from automobiles and smartphones to artificial intelligence and defence systems. Also read | PM Modi in Europe: What are India’s objectives at the G7 Summit? Although China is not a member of the G7, it is shaping many of its discussions. Whether it is supply chains, artificial intelligence, technology, climate goals, critical minerals, trade imbalances or regional security, Beijing’s presence is impossible to ignore in key international meetings. While being absent from the G7, China is one of the founding members of the Group of Twenty or G20, which comprises G7 members and other major emerging economies and regional unions. In contrast to the G7, which reflects the post-World War II economic order, the G20 reflects the modern global economy. Apart from China, the group includes emerging powers including India, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa. WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed

China may not have a seat at the G7 table, but its economic reach, strategic influence and global role ensure it remains central to many of the issues world leaders discuss. Here’s what you need to know.

Why China isn’t in the G7 – and why it still looms over every discussion | WION Decodes

US President Donald Trump, who will be celebrating his 80th birthday on June 14, admitted that he’s not looking forward to the upcoming milestone. The statement by the US president comes despite organising a grand celebration and an UFC fight at the White House to mark the occasion. In a new video, Trump says that he is not happy with his birthday and he does not like the number 80. The video was posted by former TV star and Administrator of the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Dr Mehmet Oz. The administrator had joined Trump in the Oval Office for his own birthday. Dr. Oz turned 66 years old on Wednesday and met Trump at the Oval Office. In the video, he is seen seated beside Trump while mentioning the upcoming UFC fight. Trump invites Dr Oz to attend and then wishes him a happy birthday&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-not-reached-final-conclusion-foreign-ministry-says-after-trump-claim-of-imminent-deal-1781221927724">'Iran not reached final conclusion': Foreign ministry says after Trump claim</a><h2>What Trump said?</h2>Trump said: "You’re a young man, you have many, many years to go, you’re doing a fantastic job.” He continued, “I just wanted to wish you a happy birthday. You don’t have to wish me a happy birthday, because I’m not happy about that birthday. It’s a number that I never thought really too much about. It’s not a number I like, but I’m here nonetheless.”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">President Trump offered a great birthday present... I get to attend his! <a href="https://t.co/PHuMeGLreU">pic.twitter.com/PHuMeGLreU</a>&mdash; DrOzCMS (@DrOzCMS) <a href="https://x.com/DrOzCMS/status/2065044105365688349?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 11, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-ended-the-war-today-trump-s-big-declaration-after-halting-iran-strikes-what-s-really-happening-1781229576328">'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes</a><h2>How will Trump celebrate his birthday?</h2>The US president is hosting a series of UFC matches on the ocassion of 250th year of United States and will be spending his birthday on Sunday hosting one such fight at the White House. First lady Melania Trump is expected to attend, alongside Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Eric and Lara Trump, and Donald Trump Jr. and his new wife, Bettina Trump. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt is also on the guest list.

Trump joked that he is “not happy” about his upcoming milestone birthday while speaking with Dr. Mehmet Oz. Trump is set to celebrate the occasion by hosting a UFC event at the White House, attended by family members, close allies and senior administration officials.

US President Donald Trump, who will be celebrating his 80th birthday on June 14, admitted that he’s not looking forward to the upcoming milestone. The statement by the US president comes despite organising a grand celebration and an UFC fight at the White House to mark the occasion. In a new video, Trump says that he is not happy with his birthday and he does not like the number 80. The video was posted by former TV star and Administrator of the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Dr Mehmet Oz. The administrator had joined Trump in the Oval Office for his own birthday. Dr. Oz turned 66 years old on Wednesday and met Trump at the Oval Office. In the video, he is seen seated beside Trump while mentioning the upcoming UFC fight. Trump invites Dr Oz to attend and then wishes him a happy birthday Also Read: 'Iran not reached final conclusion': Foreign ministry says after Trump claim What Trump said? Trump said: "You’re a young man, you have many, many years to go, you’re doing a fantastic job.” He continued, “I just wanted to wish you a happy birthday. You don’t have to wish me a happy birthday, because I’m not happy about that birthday. It’s a number that I never thought really too much about. It’s not a number I like, but I’m here nonetheless.”

Trump joked that he is “not happy” about his upcoming milestone birthday while speaking with Dr. Mehmet Oz. Trump is set to celebrate the occasion by hosting a UFC event at the White House, attended by family members, close allies and senior administration officials.

'It's not a number I like...': Trump reveals why he's unhappy about turning 80 - VIDEO

Princess Bajrakitiyabha, &nbsp;the eldest child of Thai King Maha Vajiralongkorn, has passed away at 47, the royal household confirmed. The royal palace announced the death on June 12, more than three years after she was hospitalised following a sudden illness.&nbsp;Known as Princess Bha, she had been in a coma since collapsing in Dec 2022 during a walk with her dogs. &nbsp;She was King Vajiralongkorn's first daughter and the only child of his first marriage to Princess Soamsawali.<h3>Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies after more than three years in a Coma</h3>&nbsp;Three years ago, Thai Princess was hospitalised, after which doctors said that she suffered a serious irregular heartbeat brought on by a mycoplasma infection affecting her heart. &nbsp;This happened when she was on her visit to the north-eastern province of Nakhon Ratchasima.&nbsp;On Friday, the royal palace announced her death, saying that she was suffering from an abdominal infection and "her condition continued to worsen", the Bureau of the Royal Household said in a statement, until she "passed away peacefully" on Thursday evening at Chulalongkorn Hospital.&nbsp;&nbsp;"T he medical team provided the closest and most intensive care possible, but her condition continued to decline progressively," the palace said. They also revealed that the princess had an intra-abdominal infection, colitis, and low blood pressure.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">IN MEMORIAM Princess Bajrakitiyabha of Thailand 1978 - 2026 Photo: Royal Office of Thailand <a href="https://t.co/0MlcElzHJk">pic.twitter.com/0MlcElzHJk</a>&mdash; The Royal News Organisation (@royalnews_org) <a href="https://x.com/royalnews_org/status/2065239077125820727?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 12, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Her remains will be placed at Piman Rattaya Throne Hall in the Grand Palace, in Bangkok, and her funeral will be held "with the highest honours according to royal tradition", it added.&nbsp;In May, the Bureau of the Royal Household, shared that her health condition had deteriorated and shewas relying on medical devices to support her lung and kidney functions, as well as medication.&nbsp;Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha: A voice for women&nbsp;Born on December 7, ‌1978, Princess Bha was known for her significant contributions to justice reform efforts and for her project to help rehabilitate incarcerated Thai women before their release. A prominent lawyer and diplomat, she was educated in Britain, Thailand and the United States, earning a law degree from Cornell University, and serving for a time as Thailand's ambassador to Austria.&nbsp;"Society cannot grow if there is instability and injustice," she told the AP in 2013. “Without the rule of law, without a good justice system, it's always chaos. I think the rule of law is a very important pillar to development, to economic growth, and of course to human rights.” She also held several positions with the United Nations and became a voice for women's empowerment.&nbsp;&nbsp;The late princess was close to her father, and was appointed to a senior role in his bodyguard command a year before her hospitalisation. However, the king has not announced his heir. He has seven children from four marriages.&nbsp;

She had remained in a coma since collapsing in December 2022 during a walk with her dogs. Doctors said she suffered a serious irregular heartbeat brought on by a mycoplasma infection affecting her heart.



Princess Bajrakitiyabha, the eldest child of Thai King Maha Vajiralongkorn, has passed away at 47, the royal household confirmed. The royal palace announced the death on June 12, more than three years after she was hospitalised following a sudden illness. Known as Princess Bha, she had been in a coma since collapsing in Dec 2022 during a walk with her dogs. She was King Vajiralongkorn's first daughter and the only child of his first marriage to Princess Soamsawali. Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies after more than three years in a Coma Three years ago, Thai Princess was hospitalised, after which doctors said that she suffered a serious irregular heartbeat brought on by a mycoplasma infection affecting her heart. This happened when she was on her visit to the north-eastern province of Nakhon Ratchasima. On Friday, the royal palace announced her death, saying that she was suffering from an abdominal infection and "her condition continued to worsen", the Bureau of the Royal Household said in a statement, until she "passed away peacefully" on Thursday evening at Chulalongkorn Hospital. "T he medical team provided the closest and most intensive care possible, but her condition continued to decline progressively," the palace said. They also revealed that the princess had an intra-abdominal infection, colitis, and low blood pressure.

Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha had remained in a coma since collapsing in December 2022 during a walk with her dogs. Doctors said she suffered a serious irregular heartbeat brought on by a mycoplasma infection affecting her heart.

Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies after more than three years in a Coma

India is not a member of the G7 grouping. Yet once again this year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been invited to attend the summit, scheduled from June 15 to 17 in Évian-les-Bains, France. The invitation came from the host country, France, with President Emmanuel Macron formally inviting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to attend the summit as a special guest. Significantly, this will mark Modi's seventh consecutive participation in a Group of Seven leaders' summit. Does this signal that India has moved from being a guest invitee to becoming an indispensable partner for the G7? WION decodes. &nbsp;Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-china-isn-t-in-the-g7-and-why-it-still-looms-over-every-discussion-1781231173090">Why China isn’t in the G7 – and why it still looms over every discussion</a><h2>Why France invited India</h2>Highlighting India's rise as one of the G7's most significant non-member partners, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to attend the summit in Évian-les-Bains, France. France extended the invitation in February of this year when Macron visited India. The French President also invited India to participate actively in the discussions and preparatory work ahead of the Summit, mainly on the key issues of tackling global macroeconomic imbalances and defining a new paradigm for international partnerships and solidarity.&nbsp;Previously, in 2025, Canada also extended an invitation to India despite tensions between Ottawa and New Delhi over the killing of Khalistani activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in 2023. At the time, while facing criticism over the decision to invite India to the Kananaskis summit, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney firmly argued that New Delhi is indispensable to discussions on global priorities such as energy security, critical minerals and infrastructure partnerships. Addressing the media, Carney stressed that India is the world's fifth-largest economy and "effectively the most populous country in the world, central to a number of those supply chains, at the heart of a number of those supply chains, so it makes sense."<h2>India's growing role at the G7</h2>India has steadily positioned itself as the voice of the Global South — a diplomatic bridge between industrialised Western economies and the developing world. In recent years, by pushing issues central to the Global South — such as climate finance, food security and fair debt restructuring — onto the G7 agenda, New Delhi has helped ensure the forum remains globally inclusive rather than narrowly Eurocentric.Additionally, as the world's most populous nation and fifth-largest economy, India remains central to Western efforts to diversify global supply chains away from China ("China+1" strategy).Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/pm-modi-and-president-trump-could-meet-next-week-on-the-sidelines-of-g7-summit-1781037600662">PM Modi and President Trump could meet next week on the sidelines of G7 Summit</a><h2>What is the China+1 strategy?</h2>The China Plus One (C+1) strategy is a supply-chain approach that encourages companies to reduce overdependence on China by developing at least one additional manufacturing or sourcing base, thereby spreading risk. The approach began to take shape around 2013 amid concerns over the world's growing reliance on China. It has since gained momentum due to trade tensions, COVID-19 disruptions and rising labour costs in China. Countries such as India and Vietnam have emerged as key alternative destinations for global companies looking to diversify beyond China.

India is not a G7 member, yet PM Narendra Modi will attend the summit for the seventh consecutive year. From supply chains and critical minerals to the Global South and China+1 strategy, India's growing economic and geopolitical influence has made it a key partner for the grouping.

India is not a member of the G7 grouping. Yet once again this year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been invited to attend the summit, scheduled from June 15 to 17 in Évian-les-Bains, France. The invitation came from the host country, France, with President Emmanuel Macron formally inviting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to attend the summit as a special guest. Significantly, this will mark Modi's seventh consecutive participation in a Group of Seven leaders' summit. Does this signal that India has moved from being a guest invitee to becoming an indispensable partner for the G7? WION decodes. Also read | Why China isn’t in the G7 – and why it still looms over every discussion Why France invited India Highlighting India's rise as one of the G7's most significant non-member partners, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to attend the summit in Évian-les-Bains, France. France extended the invitation in February of this year when Macron visited India. The French President also invited India to participate actively in the discussions and preparatory work ahead of the Summit, mainly on the key issues of tackling global macroeconomic imbalances and defining a new paradigm for international partnerships and solidarity. Previously, in 2025, Canada also extended an invitation to India despite tensions between Ottawa and New Delhi over the killing of Khalistani activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in 2023. At the time, while facing criticism over the decision to invite India to the Kananaskis summit, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney firmly argued that New Delhi is indispensable to discussions on global priorities such as energy security, critical minerals and infrastructure partnerships. Addressing the media, Carney stressed that India is the world's fifth-largest economy and "effectively the most populous country in the world, central to a number of those supply chains, at the heart of a number of those supply chains, so it makes sense." India's growing role at the G7 India has steadily positioned itself as the voice of the Global South — a diplomatic bridge between industrialised Western economies and the developing world. In recent years, by pushing issues central to the Global South — such as climate finance, food security and fair debt restructuring — onto the G7 agenda, New Delhi has helped ensure the forum remains globally inclusive rather than narrowly Eurocentric. Additionally, as the world's most populous nation and fifth-largest economy, India remains central to Western efforts to diversify global supply chains away from China ("China+1" strategy). Also read | PM Modi and President Trump could meet next week on the sidelines of G7 Summit What is the China+1 strategy? The China Plus One (C+1) strategy is a supply-chain approach that encourages companies to reduce overdependence on China by developing at least one additional manufacturing or sourcing base, thereby spreading risk. The approach began to take shape around 2013 amid concerns over the world's growing reliance on China. It has since gained momentum due to trade tensions, COVID-19 disruptions and rising labour costs in China. Countries such as India and Vietnam have emerged as key alternative destinations for global companies looking to diversify beyond China.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi will attend the G7 Summit in France as a special guest for the seventh consecutive year. Here's why India has become increasingly important to the G7's agenda despite not being a member.

Why Modi's invitation matters: India's growing role at the G7 | WION Decodes

The Centre has extended central excise duty exemptions to petrol blended with 22 per cent, 25 per cent, 27 per cent and 30 per cent ethanol, marking another major step in India's ethanol blending programme.&nbsp;In notifications issued by the Department of Revenue, the government provided a nil excise duty rate for E22, E25, E27 and E30 fuel blends that meet Bureau of Indian Standards norms. The decision clears the way for the wider use of petrol containing up to 30 per cent ethanol after India achieved its E20 blending target ahead of schedule.&nbsp;Under the new framework, E22 fuel will contain 78 per cent petrol and 22 per cent ethanol, while E25, E27 and E30 blends will contain 25 per cent, 27 per cent and 30 per cent ethanol respectively.&nbsp;So why is India pushing for higher ethanol blending?<h2>Reducing dependence on imported crude oil</h2>India imports over 85 per cent of its crude oil requirements, making it vulnerable to global supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Replacing a portion of petrol consumption with domestically produced ethanol helps reduce dependence on imported energy.&nbsp;Since 2014, ethanol blending has helped substitute 302 lakh metric tonnes of crude oil imports and generated foreign exchange savings of more than Rs 1.84 trillion.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/8647-anti-trump-marking-resurfaces-in-washington-us-police-probe-national-mall-graffiti-1781225203925">'8647' anti-Trump marking resurfaces in Washington; US police probe National Mall graffiti</a><h2>Agrarian and Rural Economy</h2>Ethanol is produced from sugarcane molasses, maize and damaged food grains. The programme has created a large domestic market for agricultural produce while providing an additional source of income for farmers.&nbsp;According to government data, more than Rs 1.58 trillion has flowed to farmers through the ethanol supply chain. The programme has also improved cash flow for sugar mills, helping them clear payments to farmers more efficiently.<h2>Supporting India's climate goals</h2>The government views ethanol as an important transition fuel in its broader strategy to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070.&nbsp;Ethanol-blended petrol produces lower emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter compared with conventional fuel. The programme has helped mitigate more than 909 lakh metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions so far, while lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions can be up to 61 per cent lower than those from standard petrol.<h2>Preparing for higher blend fuels</h2>With the E20 target already achieved, policymakers are now preparing for the next phase of ethanol adoption through higher blend fuels such as E22, E25, E27 and E30.&nbsp;The government has also introduced E85 fuel, which is priced Rs 20 per litre lower than standard petrol, to encourage the adoption of Flex Fuel Vehicles. Automobile manufacturers, including Maruti Suzuki and Hero MotoCorp, have already begun rolling out vehicles designed to run on such fuels.

India imports over 85 per cent of its crude oil needs, and ethanol blending has helped cut import dependence by replacing 302 lakh metric tonnes of crude oil while saving over Rs 1.84 trillion in foreign exchange since 2014.

The Centre has extended central excise duty exemptions to petrol blended with 22 per cent, 25 per cent, 27 per cent and 30 per cent ethanol, marking another major step in India's ethanol blending programme. In notifications issued by the Department of Revenue, the government provided a nil excise duty rate for E22, E25, E27 and E30 fuel blends that meet Bureau of Indian Standards norms. The decision clears the way for the wider use of petrol containing up to 30 per cent ethanol after India achieved its E20 blending target ahead of schedule. Under the new framework, E22 fuel will contain 78 per cent petrol and 22 per cent ethanol, while E25, E27 and E30 blends will contain 25 per cent, 27 per cent and 30 per cent ethanol respectively. So why is India pushing for higher ethanol blending? Reducing dependence on imported crude oil India imports over 85 per cent of its crude oil requirements, making it vulnerable to global supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Replacing a portion of petrol consumption with domestically produced ethanol helps reduce dependence on imported energy. Since 2014, ethanol blending has helped substitute 302 lakh metric tonnes of crude oil imports and generated foreign exchange savings of more than Rs 1.84 trillion. Also Read: '8647' anti-Trump marking resurfaces in Washington; US police probe National Mall graffiti Agrarian and Rural Economy Ethanol is produced from sugarcane molasses, maize and damaged food grains. The programme has created a large domestic market for agricultural produce while providing an additional source of income for farmers. According to government data, more than Rs 1.58 trillion has flowed to farmers through the ethanol supply chain. The programme has also improved cash flow for sugar mills, helping them clear payments to farmers more efficiently. Supporting India's climate goals The government views ethanol as an important transition fuel in its broader strategy to achieve net-zero emissions by 2070. Ethanol-blended petrol produces lower emissions of carbon monoxide and particulate matter compared with conventional fuel. The programme has helped mitigate more than 909 lakh metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions so far, while lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions can be up to 61 per cent lower than those from standard petrol. Preparing for higher blend fuels With the E20 target already achieved, policymakers are now preparing for the next phase of ethanol adoption through higher blend fuels such as E22, E25, E27 and E30. The government has also introduced E85 fuel, which is priced Rs 20 per litre lower than standard petrol, to encourage the adoption of Flex Fuel Vehicles. Automobile manufacturers, including Maruti Suzuki and Hero MotoCorp, have already begun rolling out vehicles designed to run on such fuels.

India imports over 85 per cent of its crude oil needs, and ethanol blending has helped cut import dependence by replacing 302 lakh metric tonnes of crude oil while saving over Rs 1.84 trillion in foreign exchange since 2014.

WION Decodes: What's behind India's ethanol push? Centre exempts E22, E25, E27 and E30 fuels from excise duty

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (June 11) declared that he has "ended the war with Iran." He made the statement during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones. Trump added that Iran agreed they will never have nuclear weapons. Earlier, Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-deal-in-pretty-final-stage-trump-says-signing-possible-in-europe-this-weekend-1781207346213">Iran deal in 'pretty final stage'; Trump says signing possible in Europe</a>&nbsp;Prior to the briefing, Trump had shared a post on Truth Social stating that he cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran after discussions with “highest level of Iranian leadership and approved.” He also said that final terms and conditions have been “approved by all parties involved, including the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt."<h2>What Trump said in tele-rally?</h2>In the telerally supporting Georgia Lt. Governor Burt Jones, who is running for governor, Trump said, "I don’t know if you heard, but we ended the war with Iran today. They have agreed never to have a nuclear weapon, something that we insisted on; that was the whole purpose. That was 95 percent of it.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">&#39;I dunno if you heard, but we ENDED the war with Iran today&#39; — Trump <a href="https://t.co/RFnb2yWJ7D">pic.twitter.com/RFnb2yWJ7D</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://x.com/RT_com/status/2065216716725268610?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 11, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-cancels-strikes-against-iran-says-points-of-discussions-approved-by-all-parties-involved-in-peace-deal-1781200013647">Trump cancels strikes against Iran, says points of discussions approved</a>

<h2>Iran disagrees with Trump's claims</h2>However, even as Trump claimed that the war is over, Iran pushed back against saying no final decision had yet been taken on any agreement. Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said that the proposed understanding was still under review and had not received final approval. "Until Iran announces the matter of a potential understanding, any news from Trump on this subject should be regarded the same as his previous messaging," Baqaei was quoted saying according to Iran's Tasnim news agency said.&nbsp;

Trump declared that the war with Iran had ended, claiming Tehran agreed never to develop or possess nuclear weapons. Speaking during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones, Trump said preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear arms was the primary goal.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (June 11) declared that he has "ended the war with Iran." He made the statement during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones. Trump added that Iran agreed they will never have nuclear weapons. Earlier, Trump briefed the press at the White House and said that negotiations with Iran had reached their final stage and suggested that a deal could be signed within the next few days. Trump also said that the signing ceremony could take place in Europe. Also Read: Iran deal in 'pretty final stage'; Trump says signing possible in Europe Prior to the briefing, Trump had shared a post on Truth Social stating that he cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran after discussions with “highest level of Iranian leadership and approved.” He also said that final terms and conditions have been “approved by all parties involved, including the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Turkey, Pakistan, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt." What Trump said in tele-rally? In the telerally supporting Georgia Lt. Governor Burt Jones, who is running for governor, Trump said, "I don’t know if you heard, but we ended the war with Iran today. They have agreed never to have a nuclear weapon, something that we insisted on; that was the whole purpose. That was 95 percent of it.”

Trump declared that the war with Iran had ended, claiming Tehran agreed never to develop or possess nuclear weapons. Speaking during a telephone rally for Georgia gubernatorial candidate Burt Jones, Trump said preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear arms was the primary goal.

'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes - What's really happening

US Park Police have opened an investigation after large "8647" markings appeared on the grass of the National Mall in Washington, reviving controversy around a number sequence that has been linked by some to opposition against President Donald Trump.&nbsp;The markings were discovered on the National Mall, prompting authorities to launch a probe into what officials described as an act of vandalism.&nbsp;A spokesperson for the Department of the Interior, which oversees the National Mall, condemned the incident and said those responsible would be held accountable.&nbsp;"Any threat against the president is taken very seriously by the department, and our US Park Police will investigate this incident and hold those responsible accountable," the spokesperson said in a statement.&nbsp;The official also described the markings as "deranged vandalism" and said it “will not be tolerated.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-not-reached-final-conclusion-foreign-ministry-says-after-trump-claim-of-imminent-deal-1781221927724">'Iran not reached final conclusion': Foreign ministry says after Trump claim of imminent deal</a><h2>Meaning of '8647' and past controversies</h2>The number sequence has drawn scrutiny from the Trump administration. The Justice Department has argued that "8647" could be interpreted as a threat against the president, with "86" allegedly meaning to kill and "47" referring to Trump as the 47th president of the United States.&nbsp;The phrase gained national attention earlier this year when former FBI director James Comey faced legal scrutiny over an Instagram post showing the numbers "8647" arranged in seashells.&nbsp;Comey later apologised for the post and denied making any threat against Trump.At the time, he said he "didn't realise some folks associate those numbers with violence."Meanwhile, investigators have collected grass samples from the National Mall to determine what caused the discolouration that formed the markings.&nbsp;Before the National Mall incident, the "8647" symbol appeared in several high-profile anti-Trump displays, most notably on May 1, 2026, when a massive 15-by-30-foot version of the graffiti was spray-painted across the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool during a major federal renovation project.&nbsp;Additionally, throughout the spring of 2026, the protest group Accountability NOW USA prominently featured the numbers on flags during demonstrations near the Capitol, triggering a major First Amendment legal battle after federal law enforcement attempted to confiscate them.

According to the Justice Department, "8647" may be interpreted as a threat to President Trump, with "86" allegedly signifying "kill" and "47" referring to his position as the 47th president of the United States.

US Park Police have opened an investigation after large "8647" markings appeared on the grass of the National Mall in Washington, reviving controversy around a number sequence that has been linked by some to opposition against President Donald Trump. The markings were discovered on the National Mall, prompting authorities to launch a probe into what officials described as an act of vandalism. A spokesperson for the Department of the Interior, which oversees the National Mall, condemned the incident and said those responsible would be held accountable. "Any threat against the president is taken very seriously by the department, and our US Park Police will investigate this incident and hold those responsible accountable," the spokesperson said in a statement. The official also described the markings as "deranged vandalism" and said it “will not be tolerated.” Also Read: 'Iran not reached final conclusion': Foreign ministry says after Trump claim of imminent deal Meaning of '8647' and past controversies The number sequence has drawn scrutiny from the Trump administration. The Justice Department has argued that "8647" could be interpreted as a threat against the president, with "86" allegedly meaning to kill and "47" referring to Trump as the 47th president of the United States. The phrase gained national attention earlier this year when former FBI director James Comey faced legal scrutiny over an Instagram post showing the numbers "8647" arranged in seashells. Comey later apologised for the post and denied making any threat against Trump. At the time, he said he "didn't realise some folks associate those numbers with violence." Meanwhile, investigators have collected grass samples from the National Mall to determine what caused the discolouration that formed the markings. Before the National Mall incident, the "8647" symbol appeared in several high-profile anti-Trump displays, most notably on May 1, 2026, when a massive 15-by-30-foot version of the graffiti was spray-painted across the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool during a major federal renovation project. Additionally, throughout the spring of 2026, the protest group Accountability NOW USA prominently featured the numbers on flags during demonstrations near the Capitol, triggering a major First Amendment legal battle after federal law enforcement attempted to confiscate them.

According to the Justice Department, "8647" may be interpreted as a threat to President Trump, with "86" allegedly signifying "kill" and "47" referring to his position as the 47th president of the United States.

'8647' anti-Trump marking resurfaces in Washington; US police probe National Mall graffiti

Iran has pushed back the state funeral of late supreme leader Ali Khamenei, with authorities now planning to hold the ceremony in late June or early July, according to Tehran Mayor Alireza Zakani. The announcement marks another delay in funeral arrangements for Khamenei, who was killed in US-Israeli strikes on February 28, the opening day of the Middle East war.<h2>When will Ali Khamenei's funeral be held?</h2>Iranian officials had previously indicated that the funeral would take place in early Muharram, the first month of the Islamic calendar. However, Zakani said the ceremony would instead be held after the first 10 days of Muharram, a period of mourning that commemorates Imam Hussein, one of the most revered figures in Shia Islam. The change is intended to allow religious observances to conclude before the state funeral begins.Based on the revised timeline, the funeral is expected to take place sometime between June 26 and July 5.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fact-check-did-israeli-troops-shoot-a-7-month-old-baby-shocking-new-video-challenges-idf-account-watch-1781161317025">Fact Check: Did Israeli troops shoot a 7-month-old baby? Shocking new video challenges IDF account</a><h2>20 million people expected to participate in the funeral</h2>Iranian authorities have been preparing for what is expected to be one of the largest public gatherings in the country's history. Officials have previously said as many as 20 million people could participate in funeral events across multiple cities.Khamenei, who led the Islamic Republic for nearly 37 years, was killed at his residence in central Tehran on February 28. A state funeral had originally been scheduled for March 4 but was postponed as the conflict continued.Earlier this month, Tehran officials confirmed plans for a three-day public funeral, although no specific dates were announced at the time.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-plans-to-deport-iranian-migrants-to-central-african-republic-despite-persecution-torture-concerns-1781223346924">US plans to deport Iranian migrants to Central African Republic despite persecution, torture concerns</a>Deputy Tehran Mayor Mohammad Amin Tavakolizadeh said ceremonies would be held not only in the capital but also in the holy cities of Qom and Mashhad. Khamenei is expected to be buried in Mashhad, a city that holds deep religious significance for many Iranian Shia Muslims.According to Tavakolizadeh, events in Tehran alone are expected to last at least 24 hours. Authorities are preparing for massive crowds, with security and logistical arrangements likely to be among the largest undertaken by the Iranian state in recent years. &nbsp;

Iran has postponed the state funeral of Ali Khamenei until late June or early July, citing Muharram observances. Officials expect millions to participate in ceremonies across Tehran, Qom and Mashhad.

Iran has pushed back the state funeral of late supreme leader Ali Khamenei, with authorities now planning to hold the ceremony in late June or early July, according to Tehran Mayor Alireza Zakani. The announcement marks another delay in funeral arrangements for Khamenei, who was killed in US-Israeli strikes on February 28, the opening day of the Middle East war. When will Ali Khamenei's funeral be held? Iranian officials had previously indicated that the funeral would take place in early Muharram, the first month of the Islamic calendar. However, Zakani said the ceremony would instead be held after the first 10 days of Muharram, a period of mourning that commemorates Imam Hussein, one of the most revered figures in Shia Islam. The change is intended to allow religious observances to conclude before the state funeral begins. Based on the revised timeline, the funeral is expected to take place sometime between June 26 and July 5. Also read | Fact Check: Did Israeli troops shoot a 7-month-old baby? Shocking new video challenges IDF account 20 million people expected to participate in the funeral Iranian authorities have been preparing for what is expected to be one of the largest public gatherings in the country's history. Officials have previously said as many as 20 million people could participate in funeral events across multiple cities. Khamenei, who led the Islamic Republic for nearly 37 years, was killed at his residence in central Tehran on February 28. A state funeral had originally been scheduled for March 4 but was postponed as the conflict continued. Earlier this month, Tehran officials confirmed plans for a three-day public funeral, although no specific dates were announced at the time. Also read | US plans to deport Iranian migrants to Central African Republic despite persecution, torture concerns Deputy Tehran Mayor Mohammad Amin Tavakolizadeh said ceremonies would be held not only in the capital but also in the holy cities of Qom and Mashhad. Khamenei is expected to be buried in Mashhad, a city that holds deep religious significance for many Iranian Shia Muslims. According to Tavakolizadeh, events in Tehran alone are expected to last at least 24 hours. Authorities are preparing for massive crowds, with security and logistical arrangements likely to be among the largest undertaken by the Iranian state in recent years.

Iran has delayed the state funeral of Ali Khamenei until after the first 10 days of Muharram, pushing the ceremony to late June or early July. Officials expect up to 20 million mourners to take part in what could become one of the largest public gatherings in the country's history.

Iran again delays Ali Khamenei's funeral: Why the slain supreme leader remains unburied after 100 days

Iran on Friday strongly condemned the attack on a commercial vessel near the Strait of Hormuz that left three Indian nationals dead, accusing the United States of endangering international shipping and maritime safety.&nbsp;Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei described the incident as an act of "armed robbery and State piracy" and extended condolences to the families of the deceased sailors.&nbsp;In a post on X, Baghaei said, "The brutal U.S. attacks on Indian commercial vessels, which have killed at least three Indian nationals, stand as clear evidence of America's ongoing policy of armed robbery and State piracy. We extend our sympathies to the families and friends of the slain Indian sailors and offer our sincere condolences to the Indian people and government."&nbsp;"The international community must hold the United States accountable for its lawless conduct, which continues to threaten global peace and security while endangering the freedom of navigation," the post added.&nbsp;The remarks came after Wednesday's attack on the Palau-flagged tanker MT Settebello, which was carrying 24 Indian crew members.&nbsp;Earlier, India strongly condemned the strike on the commercial vessel off the coast of Oman and summoned US Chargé d'Affaires Jason Meeks to register its protest.&nbsp;The Ministry of External Affairs handed over a demarche to Meeks during a meeting at its headquarters in New Delhi. The move followed the attack on the tanker, which left several crew members affected and triggered diplomatic concerns over the safety of Indian nationals working in international waters.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-summons-us-diplomat-over-suspected-strike-on-tanker-off-oman-three-indian-crew-missing-1781105535820">India summons US diplomat over strike on tanker off Oman; three Indian crew missing</a><h2>IMO condemns the attack</h2>The International Maritime Organisation also condemned the strike on MT Settebello and called for accountability over the incident.&nbsp;IMO Secretary General Arsenio Dominguez expressed deep concern over the attack and its impact on civilian shipping.&nbsp;“I strongly condemn any act from any party that endangers the lives of seafarers and the safety of international shipping. This is simply unacceptable. My thoughts are with the families of the three seafarers who lost their lives and with all those awaiting news of the crew members.”&nbsp;He stressed that the safety of seafarers and freedom of navigation must remain protected under international law.&nbsp;“All actions affecting international shipping must fully respect international law and the safety of life at sea. The protection of seafarers is a shared responsibility that must remain paramount,” he said.&nbsp;The IMO said it was closely monitoring the situation and called for a full and transparent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the attack.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei described the strike as an act of "armed robbery and State piracy", while the International Maritime Organisation called for a full and transparent investigation into the incident.

Iran on Friday strongly condemned the attack on a commercial vessel near the Strait of Hormuz that left three Indian nationals dead, accusing the United States of endangering international shipping and maritime safety. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei described the incident as an act of "armed robbery and State piracy" and extended condolences to the families of the deceased sailors. In a post on X, Baghaei said, "The brutal U.S. attacks on Indian commercial vessels, which have killed at least three Indian nationals, stand as clear evidence of America's ongoing policy of armed robbery and State piracy. We extend our sympathies to the families and friends of the slain Indian sailors and offer our sincere condolences to the Indian people and government." "The international community must hold the United States accountable for its lawless conduct, which continues to threaten global peace and security while endangering the freedom of navigation," the post added. The remarks came after Wednesday's attack on the Palau-flagged tanker MT Settebello, which was carrying 24 Indian crew members. Earlier, India strongly condemned the strike on the commercial vessel off the coast of Oman and summoned US Chargé d'Affaires Jason Meeks to register its protest. The Ministry of External Affairs handed over a demarche to Meeks during a meeting at its headquarters in New Delhi. The move followed the attack on the tanker, which left several crew members affected and triggered diplomatic concerns over the safety of Indian nationals working in international waters. Also Read: India summons US diplomat over strike on tanker off Oman; three Indian crew missing IMO condemns the attack The International Maritime Organisation also condemned the strike on MT Settebello and called for accountability over the incident. IMO Secretary General Arsenio Dominguez expressed deep concern over the attack and its impact on civilian shipping. “I strongly condemn any act from any party that endangers the lives of seafarers and the safety of international shipping. This is simply unacceptable. My thoughts are with the families of the three seafarers who lost their lives and with all those awaiting news of the crew members.” He stressed that the safety of seafarers and freedom of navigation must remain protected under international law. “All actions affecting international shipping must fully respect international law and the safety of life at sea. The protection of seafarers is a shared responsibility that must remain paramount,” he said. The IMO said it was closely monitoring the situation and called for a full and transparent investigation into the circumstances surrounding the attack.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei described the strike as an act of "armed robbery and State piracy", while the International Maritime Organisation called for a full and transparent investigation into the incident.

Iran condemns US strike that killed three Indian sailors; International Maritime Organisation calls for investigation

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Donald Trump's medical checkup involved 22 doctors, setting a White House record

US to withdraw dozens of fighter jets and tankers from Europe

Frozen Iranian assets worth billions to be released?

Trump’s Iran deal leaves Netanyahu in the dark, report claims

From Russia to Syria: 10 Most dangerous countries in the world – Check full list

Elon Musk's net worth could top $1 trillion as SpaceX begins trading on Nasdaq

G7 Summit: What is G7 and how it differs from G20 and BRICS? WION Decodes

MEA summons US envoy Jason Meeks again over strikes affecting Indian seafarers

Is Trump under more pressure than Iran to reach a deal? The Big Question

Pakistan asylum seeker sentenced to 10 years in jail for raping UK woman

China detains US researcher on espionage allegations – What we know

Iran declares SpaceX and Starlink assets in West Asia as military targets

Who is Mahender Makhijani, Indian businessman accused of $100 mn bank fraud?

South Korea’s Yoon gets 30 years in prison for North Korea drone incident

World's Safest Countries in 2026: Did India make it to the top 10?

What's in the latest Iran deal Trump says he's ready to sign with Tehran

S Jaishankar calls out US policy shifts on India's Russian oil purchases

Why China isn’t in the G7 – and why it still looms over every discussion

Trump reveals why he's unhappy about turning 80

Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha dies after more than three years in a Coma

Why Modi's invitation matters: India's growing role at the G7 | WION Decodes

What's behind India's ethanol push? Govt exempts higher blends from excise duty

'We ended the war today': Trump's BIG declaration after halting Iran strikes

'8647' anti Trump marking resurfaces in Washington; US police probe graffiti

Iran delays Ali Khamenei funeral: When will he be finally laid to rest?

Iran condemns US strike that killed Indian sailors; IMO calls for investigation