National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

Pakistani authorities have taken the extraordinary step of indefinitely suspending mobile internet services in capital Islamabad and Rawalpindi amid fears of widespread unrest during the “Labbaik Ya Aqsa Million March” called by the far-right Islamist group Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan, or TLP. Besides internet blackouts, major roads were reportedly sealed. The Red Zone, home to government offices and foreign embassies, was barricaded. A ban is in place on public gatherings in Rawalpindi until Saturday (Oct 11). The harsh clampdown is a sign of the government’s deep fears about TLP’s ability to mobilise tens of thousands of followers and provoke violent confrontations with law enforcement, as it has done in the past.<h2>What is Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan?</h2>Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan is an Islamist political and militant group founded in 2015 by the late cleric Khadim Hussain Rizvi. Based on the Barelvi Sunni tradition, TLP is notorious for its extreme stance on Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. It has often taken uncompromising positions on issues perceived to offend Islam, often resorting to violence, lynching and mob justice.TLP first made national headlines in 2017, with massive protests that paralysed Islamabad for weeks. That movement was triggered by the government’s refusal to arrest a minister accused of blasphemy. The demonstration led to a political crisis, and the Pakistani military eventually mediated a deal to end it. This showed the group’s ability to mobilise thousands of supporters and disrupt public life.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/three-policemen-shot-dead-70-wounded-at-tlp-rally-in-pakistan-424577/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/three-policemen-shot-dead-70-wounded-at-tlp-rally-in-pakistan-424577/embed</a>Since then, TLP has led several violent protests, often resulting in deaths. In 2021, it held &nbsp;demonstrations against French and Danish embassies in protest against cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad. Those protests resulted in clashes that killed more than 20 people, mostly police officers. Due to its violent tactics and extremist rhetoric, the United States designated TLP a terrorist organisation in 2019. It was later delisted in 2021. Although the Pakistani government has banned TLP twice, it has struggled to contain its influence.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/tlp-to-end-sit-in-protest-as-pakistan-lifts-ban-on-group-427738">TLP to end sit-in protest as Pakistan lifts ban on group</a><h2>What is TLP protesting now?</h2>The new unrest is linked to the group’s vehement support for the Palestinian cause and opposition to Israel’s actions in Gaza, along with condemnation of US backing for Israel. TLP called for a “Labbaik Ya Aqsa Million March” on Friday to show solidarity with Palestinians and pressure the Pakistani government to take a harder stance.Clashes in Lahore on Thursday between TLP activists and police injured dozens, and over 150 TLP members were arrested across Pakistan. The government imposed Section 144, shut down internet access, and sealed off sensitive areas.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistans-ahmadiyya-minority-man-beaten-to-death-by-karachi-mob-at-place-of-worship-8977824">Pakistan's Ahmadiyya minority man beaten to death by Karachi mob at place of worship</a><h2>Why do Pakistani governments fear TLP?</h2>TLP protests in the past have paralysed cities. Their demonstrations often involve thousands of followers, many of whom are highly motivated by religious fervour and willing to confront security forces aggressively, leading to direct street battles. TLP-led protests can quickly turn deadly and destabilise urban centres, making them a severe public order challenge.The group is politically active too, having won seats in provincial elections. Outlawing or suppressing TLP is therefore not a simple option for the government. TLP’s base remains loyal despite the bans and restrictions. The current TLP leader, Saad Hussain Rizvi, the son of the founder, continues to rally supporters around anti-Western and pro-Palestinian issues.

Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan is a potent and volatile Islamist force in Pakistan, known for its hardline religious ideology and history of violent protests. The government’s preemptive crackdown reflects fears of another destabilising outbreak of violence

Pakistani authorities have taken the extraordinary step of indefinitely suspending mobile internet services in capital Islamabad and Rawalpindi amid fears of widespread unrest during the “Labbaik Ya Aqsa Million March” called by the far-right Islamist group Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan, or TLP. Besides internet blackouts, major roads were reportedly sealed. The Red Zone, home to government offices and foreign embassies, was barricaded. A ban is in place on public gatherings in Rawalpindi until Saturday (Oct 11). The harsh clampdown is a sign of the government’s deep fears about TLP’s ability to mobilise tens of thousands of followers and provoke violent confrontations with law enforcement, as it has done in the past. What is Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan? Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan is an Islamist political and militant group founded in 2015 by the late cleric Khadim Hussain Rizvi. Based on the Barelvi Sunni tradition, TLP is notorious for its extreme stance on Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. It has often taken uncompromising positions on issues perceived to offend Islam, often resorting to violence, lynching and mob justice. TLP first made national headlines in 2017, with massive protests that paralysed Islamabad for weeks. That movement was triggered by the government’s refusal to arrest a minister accused of blasphemy. The demonstration led to a political crisis, and the Pakistani military eventually mediated a deal to end it. This showed the group’s ability to mobilise thousands of supporters and disrupt public life. https://www.wionews.com/videos/three-policemen-shot-dead-70-wounded-at-tlp-rally-in-pakistan-424577/embed Since then, TLP has led several violent protests, often resulting in deaths. In 2021, it held demonstrations against French and Danish embassies in protest against cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad. Those protests resulted in clashes that killed more than 20 people, mostly police officers. Due to its violent tactics and extremist rhetoric, the United States designated TLP a terrorist organisation in 2019. It was later delisted in 2021. Although the Pakistani government has banned TLP twice, it has struggled to contain its influence. Also read: TLP to end sit-in protest as Pakistan lifts ban on group What is TLP protesting now? The new unrest is linked to the group’s vehement support for the Palestinian cause and opposition to Israel’s actions in Gaza, along with condemnation of US backing for Israel. TLP called for a “Labbaik Ya Aqsa Million March” on Friday to show solidarity with Palestinians and pressure the Pakistani government to take a harder stance. Clashes in Lahore on Thursday between TLP activists and police injured dozens, and over 150 TLP members were arrested across Pakistan. The government imposed Section 144, shut down internet access, and sealed off sensitive areas. Also read: Pakistan's Ahmadiyya minority man beaten to death by Karachi mob at place of worship Why do Pakistani governments fear TLP? TLP protests in the past have paralysed cities. Their demonstrations often involve thousands of followers, many of whom are highly motivated by religious fervour and willing to confront security forces aggressively, leading to direct street battles. TLP-led protests can quickly turn deadly and destabilise urban centres, making them a severe public order challenge. The group is politically active too, having won seats in provincial elections. Outlawing or suppressing TLP is therefore not a simple option for the government. TLP’s base remains loyal despite the bans and restrictions. The current TLP leader, Saad Hussain Rizvi, the son of the founder, continues to rally supporters around anti-Western and pro-Palestinian issues.

Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan is a potent and volatile Islamist force in Pakistan, known for its hardline religious ideology and history of violent protests. The government’s preemptive crackdown reflects fears of another destabilising outbreak of violence

What is Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan? Why Pakistan government fears its protests and why it imposed an internet ban

The Norwegian Nobel committee members are all set to announce on Friday (Oct 10) the winner of this year's Nobel Peace Prize. It is the first time in the award's 125-year history that the media have been allowed and several international networks shared glimpses of behind-the-scenes of the process that decides the Peace Prize winner. As the world awaits the announcement, a name that has figured along with every discussion around the Nobel Prize is US President Donald Trump. Norwegian politicians, with around an hour to go until the announcement feared for potential repercussions to US-Norway relations if Trump is not awarded the awarded. Earlier in July, Trump reportedly called Jens Stoltenberg, Norway’s finance minister and the former NATO secretary general, to ask about the Nobel prize. At his UN address, Trump claimed that he had halted seven “unendable wars”, adding “Everyone says I should get the Nobel peace prize.”&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-waits-for-nobel-peace-prize-ahead-of-announcement-four-us-presidents-and-a-vp-who-won-it-before-him-1760075917684">Trump waits for Nobel Peace Prize ahead of announcement: Four US presidents and a VP who won it before him</a>&nbsp;Speaking to the Guardian, Kirsti Bergstø, Norway’s Socialist Left Party leader warned that Norway must be ready for unpredictable reactions from Donald Trump if he is not awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. She criticised Trump’s leadership style, calling it authoritarian and extreme, and expressed concerns over his alleged attacks on democratic institutions and civil liberties in the US.&nbsp;Arild Hermstad, leader of Norway’s Green Party defended the Nobel Committee’s impartiality and stressed that the prize should reflect genuine, long-term contributions to peace—not public pressure or social media theatrics. While he acknowledged Trump’s recent role in supporting a Gaza ceasefire, he argued that one act cannot outweigh years of divisive rhetoric and actions.&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, Kristian Berg Harpviken, Director of Norwegian Nobel Institute, clarified that the decision for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize had already been finalised earlier in the week. He reaffirmed that the process is non-political, though he admitted that the fact the committee is appointed by the Norwegian parliament may blur perceptions of complete neutrality.&nbsp;Read More |&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/from-ceasefires-to-accords-can-us-president-donald-trump-really-win-the-nobel-peace-prize-1760072239028">From ceasefires to Accords: Can US President Donald Trump really win the Nobel Peace Prize?</a><h2>'They will find a reason...', says Donald Trump</h2>On Wednesday (October 8), Trump was asked about his chances of winning the Nobel Peace Prize this year. His response was characteristically self-assured, yet laced with a hint of skepticism. "I have no idea... Marco would tell you we settled seven wars. We're close to settling an eighth. I think we'll end up settling the Russia situation," he said, underscoring the scale of what he claims to be his diplomatic triumphs. "I don’t think anybody in history has settled that many," Trump said confidently. Despite this, he added that he feels the Nobel Peace Prize may not be in his future, alluding to the possibility that the Norwegian Nobel Committee will find a reason to overlook him. "But perhaps they’ll find a reason not to give it to me," he quipped, seemingly acknowledging that, despite his diplomatic record, the prestigious award might elude him."&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/nobel-peace-prize-2025-will-trump-get-his-wish-1760034020857">Nobel Peace Prize 2025: Will Trump Get His Wish?</a>

As the Nobel Peace Prize 2025 announcement nears, Donald Trump looms large, sparking concerns in Norway over possible backlash if he's overlooked. Despite recent ceasefire efforts, experts doubt his chances. Norway stresses the Nobel Committee's independence from political influence.

The Norwegian Nobel committee members are all set to announce on Friday (Oct 10) the winner of this year's Nobel Peace Prize. It is the first time in the award's 125-year history that the media have been allowed and several international networks shared glimpses of behind-the-scenes of the process that decides the Peace Prize winner. As the world awaits the announcement, a name that has figured along with every discussion around the Nobel Prize is US President Donald Trump. Norwegian politicians, with around an hour to go until the announcement feared for potential repercussions to US-Norway relations if Trump is not awarded the awarded. Earlier in July, Trump reportedly called Jens Stoltenberg, Norway’s finance minister and the former NATO secretary general, to ask about the Nobel prize. At his UN address, Trump claimed that he had halted seven “unendable wars”, adding “Everyone says I should get the Nobel peace prize.” Read More | Trump waits for Nobel Peace Prize ahead of announcement: Four US presidents and a VP who won it before him Speaking to the Guardian, Kirsti Bergstø, Norway’s Socialist Left Party leader warned that Norway must be ready for unpredictable reactions from Donald Trump if he is not awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. She criticised Trump’s leadership style, calling it authoritarian and extreme, and expressed concerns over his alleged attacks on democratic institutions and civil liberties in the US. Arild Hermstad, leader of Norway’s Green Party defended the Nobel Committee’s impartiality and stressed that the prize should reflect genuine, long-term contributions to peace—not public pressure or social media theatrics. While he acknowledged Trump’s recent role in supporting a Gaza ceasefire, he argued that one act cannot outweigh years of divisive rhetoric and actions. Meanwhile, Kristian Berg Harpviken, Director of Norwegian Nobel Institute, clarified that the decision for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize had already been finalised earlier in the week. He reaffirmed that the process is non-political, though he admitted that the fact the committee is appointed by the Norwegian parliament may blur perceptions of complete neutrality. Read More | From ceasefires to Accords: Can US President Donald Trump really win the Nobel Peace Prize? 'They will find a reason...', says Donald Trump On Wednesday (October 8), Trump was asked about his chances of winning the Nobel Peace Prize this year. His response was characteristically self-assured, yet laced with a hint of skepticism. "I have no idea... Marco would tell you we settled seven wars. We're close to settling an eighth. I think we'll end up settling the Russia situation," he said, underscoring the scale of what he claims to be his diplomatic triumphs. "I don’t think anybody in history has settled that many," Trump said confidently. Despite this, he added that he feels the Nobel Peace Prize may not be in his future, alluding to the possibility that the Norwegian Nobel Committee will find a reason to overlook him. "But perhaps they’ll find a reason not to give it to me," he quipped, seemingly acknowledging that, despite his diplomatic record, the prestigious award might elude him." Read More | Nobel Peace Prize 2025: Will Trump Get His Wish?

As the Nobel Peace Prize 2025 announcement nears, Donald Trump looms large, sparking concerns in Norway over possible backlash if he's overlooked. Despite recent ceasefire efforts, experts doubt his chances. Norway stresses the Nobel Committee's independence from political influence.

Countdown begins for Nobel Peace Prize announcement! Norway braces for diplomatic fallout if Trump doesn't win

Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar during a bilateral meeting with visiting Afghanistan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi on Friday (Oct 10) announced that India will upgrade its technical mission in the Afghanistan capital Kabul to an embassy. India had closed its embassy as well as consulates in Afghanistan in August 2021, after the Taliban took control of the government. With this, India is officially restoring diplomatic ties with Taliban-led Afghanistan government. Muttaqi's visit is being watched closely by the world at large as it is the first high-level diplomatic engagement between the India and Afghanistan since the Taliban took power in 2021 after the withdrawal of US troops.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Opening remarks at my meeting with Afghan FM Muttaqi, in New Delhi. <a href="https://t.co/incgPxvRnH">https://t.co/incgPxvRnH</a>&mdash; Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrSJaishankar/status/1976537194497024330?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 10, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-afghanistan-s-support-to-india-during-pahalgam-terror-attack-was-noteworthy-says-foreign-minister-jaishankar-at-meeting-with-taliban-counterpart-1760078480690">'Afghanistan's support to India during Pahalgam terror attack was noteworthy', says foreign minister Jaishankar at meeting with Taliban counterpart</a><h2>What is the significance of India's decision?</h2>India’s decision to reopen its embassy in Kabul marks a renewed diplomatic engagement with the Taliban-led administration, reversing its 2021 withdrawal of diplomatic staff and closure of missions. This move strengthens India’s involvement in Afghanistan’s future, positioning it to play a more active role in rebuilding efforts, humanitarian outreach, and infrastructure support. The restored diplomatic presence opens a clear path for bilateral discussions on critical security issues like border management, anti-terrorism cooperation, and regional safety.&nbsp;Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-afghans-have-always-been-loyal-to-india-explosions-rock-kabul-within-48-hours-of-pak-minister-vowing-big-action-what-happened-1760061090838">'Afghans have always been loyal to India': Explosions rock Kabul within 48 hours of Pak minister 'vowing big action' - What happened</a>&nbsp;Strategically, this development enhances India’s influence in the region, particularly in counterbalance to rivals like China and Pakistan, as the future of Afghanistan continues to evolve. Though the reopening does not signify official recognition of the Taliban regime, it signals a shift toward a more pragmatic approach in India’s foreign policy—focusing on engagement over isolation.&nbsp;However, the decision could spark international and domestic scrutiny due to the Taliban’s track record on human rights, particularly its treatment of women and minorities. Additionally, resuming full operations in Kabul enables India to protect its past investments and potentially restart infrastructure and aid projects that had been halted since the Taliban takeover.&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/afghanistan-s-taliban-led-government-hopes-india-will-recognise-them-says-key-official-1760026983154">Afghanistan's Taliban-led government hopes India will recognise them, says key official</a>&nbsp;

India announced the upgrade of its Kabul technical mission to a full embassy during Afghan FM Amir Khan Muttaqi's visit, officially restoring diplomatic ties with Taliban-led Afghanistan. This marks the first high-level India-Afghanistan engagement since the 2021 Taliban takeover.

Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar during a bilateral meeting with visiting Afghanistan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi on Friday (Oct 10) announced that India will upgrade its technical mission in the Afghanistan capital Kabul to an embassy. India had closed its embassy as well as consulates in Afghanistan in August 2021, after the Taliban took control of the government. With this, India is officially restoring diplomatic ties with Taliban-led Afghanistan government. Muttaqi's visit is being watched closely by the world at large as it is the first high-level diplomatic engagement between the India and Afghanistan since the Taliban took power in 2021 after the withdrawal of US troops.

India announced the upgrade of its Kabul technical mission to a full embassy during Afghan FM Amir Khan Muttaqi's visit, officially restoring diplomatic ties with Taliban-led Afghanistan. This marks the first high-level India-Afghanistan engagement since the 2021 Taliban takeover.

India reopens Kabul embassy, restores full diplomatic ties with Taliban-led Afghanistan - What this means

The Malaysian government has been urged to ban the serving of beef to respect the sentiments of Hindus and Buddhists at official events, amid debates about religious sensitivities in the country. The proposal to extend the restrictions to beef was put forward by the newly formed opposition party Parti Hati Rakyat Malaysia (Hati), led by Chan Tse Yuen. Chan urged the cabinet to consider banning beef at all official banquets, just as pork and alcohol are avoided out of respect for Muslim sensitivities. This followed controversy over alcohol being served at an official tourism event.<h2>What is the proposal on beef in Malaysia?</h2>In his proposal, Chan said beef should be barred to honour the dietary restrictions of Malaysia’s Hindus who are around 7 per cent of the population, as well as certain Buddhist communities. Seeing “true religious respect and equality” in Malaysia’s multiracial society, he criticised the inconsistency highlighted by the recent controversy over alcohol.<h2>What is the recent controversy over alcohol in Malaysia?</h2>Alcohol was served at a government-hosted gala dinner for the Global Travel Meet 2025, prompting outrage. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim publicly reprimanded tourism minister Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing on October 7 for allowing alcohol at the event.&nbsp;Muslim-majority Malaysia has a &nbsp;longstanding practice of prohibiting alcohol and non-halal foods like pork at official functions to respect Islamic norms.The alcohol incident sparked strong reactions from conservative Muslim groups and political figures. &nbsp;United Malays National Organisation president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi threatened to escalate the matter to the cabinet.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/thousands-of-live-turtles-in-suitcase-indian-national-arrested-at-kuala-lumpur-airport-1754636432419">Thousands of live turtles in suitcase: Indian national arrested at Kuala Lumpur airport</a><h2>Some prominent voices in Malaysia favour ban on beef at official events</h2>Political commentator Prof James Chin said in Focus Malaysia that the government’s enforcement of Islamic norms without similar consideration for non-Muslim religious dietary practices is “hypocritical.” Banning beef alongside alcohol at such events, &nbsp;would be a fair trade-off to respect all communities he argued. He also criticised the PM for reprimanding the minister, attributing it to pandering to right-wing political pressures.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pla-announces-south-china-sea-drill-with-malaysia-as-japan-philippines-exercise-begins-1759977322455/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/pla-announces-south-china-sea-drill-with-malaysia-as-japan-philippines-exercise-begins-1759977322455/embed</a><h2>Beef ban at government events: Proposal sparks debate in Malaysia</h2>While still at the discussion state, the proposal has sparked a lively debate about religious equity and multicultural coexistence in the southeast Asian nation.&nbsp;Some Hindu and Buddhist groups are supportive of the beef ban proposal, calling the idea an overdue recognition of their beliefs. Chan Tse Yuen said in a social media post, “Malaysia preaches tolerance but must practice mutual understanding.” Prof James Chin echoed this sentiment, saying, “If alcohol is banned for Muslims, beef should be for Hindus—it's hypocritical otherwise.”But others warned that such measures could lead to increasingly restrictive food bans at official events. One user joked, “Slippery slope... at this point ban EVERYTHING @ official events, just bring H2O.” Another asked, “Wow, what about chicken Chan?” questioning whether restrictions might extend beyond beef.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/trump-modi-likely-to-meet-at-asean-summit-in-malaysia-after-imposition-of-tariffs-by-us-1759375146742">Trump, Modi likely to meet at ASEAN summit in Malaysia after imposition of tariffs by US</a><h2>Food and religion: A delicate balance in Malaysia</h2>This debate is symptomatic of Malaysia’s challenge in balancing the Islamic majority’s norms with the rights and customs of minority communities. The tug of war is between consistency for all groups and mutual respect, while opponents fear that such moves could deepen societal divisions.If a beef ban at official functions does happen, it would mark a significant precedent in Malaysia’s management of its multicultural and multireligious landscape.

A proposal in Malaysia to ban beef at official events is leading to debate in the southeast Asian nation. It is a question of food habits versus religious sensitivity and equality.



The Malaysian government has been urged to ban the serving of beef to respect the sentiments of Hindus and Buddhists at official events, amid debates about religious sensitivities in the country. The proposal to extend the restrictions to beef was put forward by the newly formed opposition party Parti Hati Rakyat Malaysia (Hati), led by Chan Tse Yuen. Chan urged the cabinet to consider banning beef at all official banquets, just as pork and alcohol are avoided out of respect for Muslim sensitivities. This followed controversy over alcohol being served at an official tourism event. What is the proposal on beef in Malaysia? In his proposal, Chan said beef should be barred to honour the dietary restrictions of Malaysia’s Hindus who are around 7 per cent of the population, as well as certain Buddhist communities. Seeing “true religious respect and equality” in Malaysia’s multiracial society, he criticised the inconsistency highlighted by the recent controversy over alcohol. What is the recent controversy over alcohol in Malaysia? Alcohol was served at a government-hosted gala dinner for the Global Travel Meet 2025, prompting outrage. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim publicly reprimanded tourism minister Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing on October 7 for allowing alcohol at the event. Muslim-majority Malaysia has a longstanding practice of prohibiting alcohol and non-halal foods like pork at official functions to respect Islamic norms. The alcohol incident sparked strong reactions from conservative Muslim groups and political figures. United Malays National Organisation president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi threatened to escalate the matter to the cabinet. Also read: Thousands of live turtles in suitcase: Indian national arrested at Kuala Lumpur airport Some prominent voices in Malaysia favour ban on beef at official events Political commentator Prof James Chin said in Focus Malaysia that the government’s enforcement of Islamic norms without similar consideration for non-Muslim religious dietary practices is “hypocritical.” Banning beef alongside alcohol at such events, would be a fair trade-off to respect all communities he argued. He also criticised the PM for reprimanding the minister, attributing it to pandering to right-wing political pressures. https://www.wionews.com/videos/pla-announces-south-china-sea-drill-with-malaysia-as-japan-philippines-exercise-begins-1759977322455/embed Beef ban at government events: Proposal sparks debate in Malaysia While still at the discussion state, the proposal has sparked a lively debate about religious equity and multicultural coexistence in the southeast Asian nation. Some Hindu and Buddhist groups are supportive of the beef ban proposal, calling the idea an overdue recognition of their beliefs. Chan Tse Yuen said in a social media post, “Malaysia preaches tolerance but must practice mutual understanding.” Prof James Chin echoed this sentiment, saying, “If alcohol is banned for Muslims, beef should be for Hindus—it's hypocritical otherwise.” But others warned that such measures could lead to increasingly restrictive food bans at official events. One user joked, “Slippery slope... at this point ban EVERYTHING @ official events, just bring H2O.” Another asked, “Wow, what about chicken Chan?” questioning whether restrictions might extend beyond beef. Also read: Trump, Modi likely to meet at ASEAN summit in Malaysia after imposition of tariffs by US Food and religion: A delicate balance in Malaysia This debate is symptomatic of Malaysia’s challenge in balancing the Islamic majority’s norms with the rights and customs of minority communities. The tug of war is between consistency for all groups and mutual respect, while opponents fear that such moves could deepen societal divisions. If a beef ban at official functions does happen, it would mark a significant precedent in Malaysia’s management of its multicultural and multireligious landscape.

A proposal in Malaysia to ban beef at official events is leading to debate in the southeast Asian nation. It is a question of food habits versus religious sensitivity and equality.&nbsp;

Malaysia to ban beef at official functions to defer to Hindus and Buddhists? Idea, mooted after outrage over alcohol at event, sparks debate

Afghanistan have reported several explosions in District 8, near eastern Kabul. The explosion comes just as Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is in India on a six-day visit to strengthen economic and political ties. Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Taliban's Foreign Minister, is on his first visit to India. India has yet to formally recognise the Taliban regime, and the UN Security Council temporarily lifted its travel ban to allow the visit. The Taliban is seeking to break out of international isolation and to gain legitimacy.&nbsp;Pakistan have not officially claimed responsibility for the attack, but earlier, Pakistan's Defence Minister Khwaja Asif warned about sheltering terrorists in Afghan soil, suggesting a crossing of Pakistan's diplomatic threshold. &nbsp;"Enough is enough, our patience has run out. Terrorism from Afghan soil is intolerable,” Asif said in the National Assembly. Pakistan's media outlets and several other local sources have attributed the attack to the Pakistani Air Force. It supposedly targeted TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud.

Afghanistan have reported several explosions in District 8, near eastern Kabul. The explosion comes just as Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is in India on a six-day visit to strengthen economic and political ties. Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Taliban's Foreign Minister, is on his first visit to India. India has yet to formally recognise the Taliban regime, and the UN Security Council temporarily lifted its travel ban to allow the visit. The Taliban is seeking to break out of international isolation and to gain legitimacy. 

Pakistan have not officially claimed responsibility for the attack, but earlier, Pakistan's Defence Minister Khwaja Asif warned about sheltering terrorists in Afghan soil, suggesting a crossing of Pakistan's diplomatic threshold. 

"Enough is enough, our patience has run out. Terrorism from Afghan soil is intolerable,” Asif said in the National Assembly. Pakistan's media outlets and several other local sources have attributed the attack to the Pakistani Air Force. It supposedly targeted TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud.

Earlier on October 7, a Quetta-bound Jaffar Express was bombed using an improvised explosive device (IED), killing several soldiers, and Baloch rebel groups have claimed responsibility for the attack. Pakistan have long accused the Taliban of aiding its ideological partner Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan. So the recent air strikes are painted as self-defence against terrorism. 

For decades, Pakistan has seen Afghanistan as its strategic depth, a friendly buffer against the influence of India. But now, as the Taliban seeks independent foreign relations with India, this seems to have cornered Pakistan. Afghanistan have previously maintained strong relations with India during the Afghan Ghani's government, and India invested $3 billion in infrastructure, education and development projects. Now, if the Taliban receives similar economic and political benefits from India, Pakistan will see its leverage erode with Afghanistan and will be isolated in the region. India's approach to the Taliban had been pragmatic and cautious. Hosting the Taliban foreign minister without formally recognising the Taliban regime is a diplomatic win for India. So the bombing can be seen as an unilateral act of aggression as well as a defence against a security threat, this may push the Taliban closer to India, giving it a footprint on Pakistan's north-western border. 











<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">د کابل په ښار کې د یوې چاودنې غږ اوریدل شوی. خو څوک دې تشویش نه کوي، خیر او خیرت ده، د حادثې پلټنه روانه ده، تر اوسه د کوم زیان په اړه راپور نه دی ورکړل شوی. صدای یک انفجار در کابل شنیده شد. تحقیقات جریان دارد، تا کنون گزارش کدام زیانی داده نشده است خیر و خیرت می باشد.&mdash; Zabihullah (..ذبـــــیح الله م ) (@Zabehulah_M33) <a href="https://twitter.com/Zabehulah_M33/status/1976346755085238546?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Earlier on October 7, a Quetta-bound Jaffar Express was bombed using an improvised explosive device (IED), killing several soldiers, and Baloch rebel groups have claimed responsibility for the attack. Pakistan have long accused the Taliban of aiding its ideological partner Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan. So the recent air strikes are painted as self-defence against terrorism. Pakistan have also accused foregin intelligence like MOSSAD and RAW being involved in seeding separatist sentiment in Balochistan. Pakistan allegedly captured Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, a RAW spy in Balochistan in 2016 whose job was to destabilise Pakistan. Indian government denied those allegations saying that he was kidnapped from Iran.For decades, Pakistan has seen Afghanistan as its strategic depth, a friendly buffer against the influence of India. But now, as the Taliban seeks independent foreign relations with India, this seems to have cornered Pakistan. Afghanistan have previously maintained strong relations with India during the Afghan Ghani's government, and India invested nearly $3 billion in infrastructure, education and development projects. Now, if the Taliban receives similar economic and political benefits from India, Pakistan will see its leverage erode with Afghanistan and will be isolated in the region. India's approach to the Taliban had been pragmatic and cautious. Hosting the Taliban foreign minister without formally recognising the Taliban regime is a diplomatic win for India. So the bombing can be seen as an unilateral act of aggression as well as a defence against a security threat, this may push the Taliban closer to India, giving it a footprint on Pakistan's north-western border.&nbsp;

Multiple explosions have been reported in Kabul as Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi visits India. Pakistan is suspected of conducting airstrikes targeting TTP militants, reflecting growing tension over India–Afghanistan ties and Islamabad’s security concerns.

Afghanistan have reported several explosions in District 8, near eastern Kabul. The explosion comes just as Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is in India on a six-day visit to strengthen economic and political ties. Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Taliban's Foreign Minister, is on his first visit to India. India has yet to formally recognise the Taliban regime, and the UN Security Council temporarily lifted its travel ban to allow the visit. The Taliban is seeking to break out of international isolation and to gain legitimacy. Pakistan have not officially claimed responsibility for the attack, but earlier, Pakistan's Defence Minister Khwaja Asif warned about sheltering terrorists in Afghan soil, suggesting a crossing of Pakistan's diplomatic threshold. "Enough is enough, our patience has run out. Terrorism from Afghan soil is intolerable,” Asif said in the National Assembly. Pakistan's media outlets and several other local sources have attributed the attack to the Pakistani Air Force. It supposedly targeted TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud.

Multiple explosions have been reported in Kabul as Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi visits India. Pakistan is suspected of conducting airstrikes targeting TTP militants, reflecting growing tension over India–Afghanistan ties and Islamabad’s security concerns.

Airstrikes in Kabul: Islamabad uneasy at growing India-Taliban proximity?

On Monday (October 6) night in the Chang U township of Myanmar’s Sagaing region, nearly 100 people gathered to observe Thadingyut, a festival celebrating the full moon. The event also doubled as a protest against the military, which seized power in 2021, plunging the country into a civil conflict. What started as a peaceful gathering quickly turned into a nightmare when a paramotor— a small, motorised paraglider— appeared overhead, dropping bombs on the crowd. In just seven minutes, at least 26 people were killed, and dozens more were injured.&nbsp;This bombing was not an isolated incident but part of a disturbing trend. The Myanmar military has increasingly relied on paramotors for airstrikes against resistance groups. These low-tech devices, while seemingly simple, have become a crucial weapon in the junta’s aerial strategy to reassert control over the country.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/h-1b-visa-is-trump-admin-preparing-to-make-it-tougher-to-qualify-here-s-what-you-should-know-1760069316050">H-1B visa: Is Trump admin preparing to make it tougher to qualify? Here's what&nbsp;you&nbsp;should&nbsp;know</a><h2>What is a Paramotor?</h2>A paramotor consists of a pilot suspended beneath a motorised paraglider, which can carry around 160kg (350lb). This allows the paramotor to transport a paratrooper and multiple small bombs. Typically, paramotors are equipped with GPS and carry 120mm bombs weighing up to 16kg each. The paramotor’s ability to fly low and close to its target makes it an ideal weapon for precision strikes. While its speed is relatively slow (about 65 km/h or 40 mph), it is able to fly under 1,000 feet (300 meters), allowing for a high degree of accuracy. These devices are also capable of flying for hours on a regular fuel supply.&nbsp;According to military sources, paramotor pilots can be trained within days, a stark contrast to the years required to train traditional aircraft pilots. This makes them an attractive option for the Myanmar military, especially given the increasing challenges they face with traditional aircraft. While paramotors are cheaper to produce and maintain, they come with their own set of challenges. Their low-altitude flights and slow speed make them vulnerable to gunfire, and they are typically used during the night to minimise visibility.<h2>Widespread use of paramotors</h2>The deadly attack in Chang U is among the deadliest to date but is far from the first. The first documented paramotor bombing happened on Christmas Day in 2024, in Myingyan, a key resistance area. In January 2025 alone, at least eight attacks occurred across multiple townships, leading to several deaths.&nbsp;The military’s aircraft fleet is likely under strain due to high maintenance costs and resource shortages. As such, paramotors offer a cheaper and more efficient alternative for the junta, especially when many of their traditional aircraft are either grounded or too costly to operate. However, these devices are not without their limitations. Their slow speed and noise, often described as similar to a chainsaw, make them easy to hear, giving civilians a brief chance to seek cover. They also struggle in poor weather conditions, limiting their operational window.<h2>Defensive measures</h2>In response to these attacks, some residents have turned to building air raid shelters, though these come at a significant cost. A small bunker suitable for a family can cost as much as 500,000 kyats ($239), a steep price in a country where the minimum wage is around 4,800 kyats per day. In areas with advanced air defenses, paramotors are less effective, but in regions with fewer resources, they have proven to be a lethal and efficient tool for the junta’s ongoing campaign against resistance forces.&nbsp;As Myanmar’s civil war drags on, the use of paramotors by the military signals a disturbing shift toward cheaper, more accessible airstrikes. With increasing losses in conventional aircraft and mounting resource constraints, paramotors are likely to remain a fixture in the junta's brutal tactics for years to come.

Paramotor bombings: Myanmar's military turns to low-tech paragliders for deadly airstrikes. All you need to know about it

On Monday (October 6) night in the Chang U township of Myanmar’s Sagaing region, nearly 100 people gathered to observe Thadingyut, a festival celebrating the full moon. The event also doubled as a protest against the military, which seized power in 2021, plunging the country into a civil conflict. What started as a peaceful gathering quickly turned into a nightmare when a paramotor— a small, motorised paraglider— appeared overhead, dropping bombs on the crowd. In just seven minutes, at least 26 people were killed, and dozens more were injured. This bombing was not an isolated incident but part of a disturbing trend. The Myanmar military has increasingly relied on paramotors for airstrikes against resistance groups. These low-tech devices, while seemingly simple, have become a crucial weapon in the junta’s aerial strategy to reassert control over the country. Also Read: H-1B visa: Is Trump admin preparing to make it tougher to qualify? Here's what you should know What is a Paramotor? A paramotor consists of a pilot suspended beneath a motorised paraglider, which can carry around 160kg (350lb). This allows the paramotor to transport a paratrooper and multiple small bombs. Typically, paramotors are equipped with GPS and carry 120mm bombs weighing up to 16kg each. The paramotor’s ability to fly low and close to its target makes it an ideal weapon for precision strikes. While its speed is relatively slow (about 65 km/h or 40 mph), it is able to fly under 1,000 feet (300 meters), allowing for a high degree of accuracy. These devices are also capable of flying for hours on a regular fuel supply. According to military sources, paramotor pilots can be trained within days, a stark contrast to the years required to train traditional aircraft pilots. This makes them an attractive option for the Myanmar military, especially given the increasing challenges they face with traditional aircraft. While paramotors are cheaper to produce and maintain, they come with their own set of challenges. Their low-altitude flights and slow speed make them vulnerable to gunfire, and they are typically used during the night to minimise visibility. Widespread use of paramotors The deadly attack in Chang U is among the deadliest to date but is far from the first. The first documented paramotor bombing happened on Christmas Day in 2024, in Myingyan, a key resistance area. In January 2025 alone, at least eight attacks occurred across multiple townships, leading to several deaths. The military’s aircraft fleet is likely under strain due to high maintenance costs and resource shortages. As such, paramotors offer a cheaper and more efficient alternative for the junta, especially when many of their traditional aircraft are either grounded or too costly to operate. However, these devices are not without their limitations. Their slow speed and noise, often described as similar to a chainsaw, make them easy to hear, giving civilians a brief chance to seek cover. They also struggle in poor weather conditions, limiting their operational window. Defensive measures In response to these attacks, some residents have turned to building air raid shelters, though these come at a significant cost. A small bunker suitable for a family can cost as much as 500,000 kyats ($239), a steep price in a country where the minimum wage is around 4,800 kyats per day. In areas with advanced air defenses, paramotors are less effective, but in regions with fewer resources, they have proven to be a lethal and efficient tool for the junta’s ongoing campaign against resistance forces. As Myanmar’s civil war drags on, the use of paramotors by the military signals a disturbing shift toward cheaper, more accessible airstrikes. With increasing losses in conventional aircraft and mounting resource constraints, paramotors are likely to remain a fixture in the junta's brutal tactics for years to come.

Paramotors, low-tech but lethal, are now used by Myanmar's military to drop bombs, as part of their aerial campaign amid resource constraints

Lawmakers in Peru voted on Friday (October 10) to remove president Dina Boluarte, whose term has been marked by protests and accusations of failing to stem crime. Boluarte refused to appear before Congress for an overnight hearing, after a majority of lawmakers including some once loyal to her voted to initiate impeachment proceedings. They summoned Boluarte to appear before Congress at 11:30 pm (0430 GMT Friday), but she skipped the proceedings, which ended with 118 lawmakers voting for her impeachment.&nbsp;"The president's impeachment has been approved," announced Congress leader Jose Jeri, who could take over as interim president until elections in April 2026. Protests have marked Boluarte's presidency, along with various scandals, investigations and a surge in gang violence. She had already faced down multiple attempts to remove her from office.The latest effort cited her "permanent moral incapacity" to carry out her duties since assuming office in December 2022.&nbsp;Peru has had six presidents in about nine years. Boluarte, who took office after her predecessor Pedro Castillo was impeached over a crackdown on protests that killed at least 50 people, had seen her approval rating plummet.She is the subject of multiple probes, including one for her alleged failure to declare gifts of luxury jewels and watches, a scandal dubbed “Rolexgate.” She also gave herself a large pay increase in July. Anti-government protests have mounted in recent weeks after the government passed a law on September 5 requiring young people to contribute to private pension funds, despite job insecurity and an unofficial employment rate of more than 70 percent. Protests have also escalated over the past six months in the wake of a wave of extortion and murders by organized crime groups.&nbsp;Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

Peru lawmakers impeach president Dina Boluarte

Lawmakers in Peru voted on Friday (October 10) to remove president Dina Boluarte, whose term has been marked by protests and accusations of failing to stem crime. Boluarte refused to appear before Congress for an overnight hearing, after a majority of lawmakers including some once loyal to her voted to initiate impeachment proceedings. They summoned Boluarte to appear before Congress at 11:30 pm (0430 GMT Friday), but she skipped the proceedings, which ended with 118 lawmakers voting for her impeachment. "The president's impeachment has been approved," announced Congress leader Jose Jeri, who could take over as interim president until elections in April 2026. Protests have marked Boluarte's presidency, along with various scandals, investigations and a surge in gang violence. She had already faced down multiple attempts to remove her from office. The latest effort cited her "permanent moral incapacity" to carry out her duties since assuming office in December 2022. Peru has had six presidents in about nine years. Boluarte, who took office after her predecessor Pedro Castillo was impeached over a crackdown on protests that killed at least 50 people, had seen her approval rating plummet. She is the subject of multiple probes, including one for her alleged failure to declare gifts of luxury jewels and watches, a scandal dubbed “Rolexgate.” She also gave herself a large pay increase in July. Anti-government protests have mounted in recent weeks after the government passed a law on September 5 requiring young people to contribute to private pension funds, despite job insecurity and an unofficial employment rate of more than 70 percent. Protests have also escalated over the past six months in the wake of a wave of extortion and murders by organized crime groups. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

n overwhelming majority of 118 out of 122 lawmakers voted for her impeachment, removing her from the presidency, Congress leader Jose Jeri announced

New Zealand’s Parliament witnessed yet another haka, a traditional Maori dance. It happened after the newest Maori Party MP, Oriini Kaipara, delivered her maiden speech. Spectators in the public gallery broke out into an unsanctioned haka, as the speaker of the House, Gerry Brownlee, got visibly agitated and said, “No, not that." Kaipara joined the Parliament in September to fill a vacant seat. She gave her first official address to the parliament on Thursday. Several MPs sang a Maori song which had been pre-approved to welcome her. However, there was a sudden twist in things when people in the gallery broke into a Haka dance, which was not agreed upon. A few other MPs also joined in the spontaneous haka.&nbsp;This made speaker Gerry Brownlee visibly livid, who immediately tried to stop it. “No, not that. The guarantee was that it would not be taking place,” Brownlee said. However, no one paid heed to him, forcing him to suspend the session. Brownlee said that he will have the incident investigated to see whether any of the MPs knew about the "spontaneous" Haka dance in the gallery. He termed the unapproved actions as contemptuous. Notably, any kind of song or dance performance in the New Zealand parliament needs approval under parliamentary rules. While the song was given the green light, there was no mention of a Haka dance.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/new-zealand-set-to-suspend-maori-lawmakers-over-protest-haka-9070079">New Zealand set to suspend Maori lawmakers over protest haka</a> &nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">NEW: New Zealand parliament suspended after an unplanned haka broke out following newly elected PM Te Pati Maori&#39;s Oriini Kaipara&#39;s speech. Kaipara: ✋😵‍💫 Speaker of the House Gerry Brownlee: &quot;No, not that. The guarantee was that would not be taking place... Unreal.&quot; Kaipara:… <a href="https://t.co/36YMOJUhyH">pic.twitter.com/36YMOJUhyH</a>&mdash; Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) <a href="https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1976430247282343964?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Maori Haka dance in New Zealand Parliament</h2>The Maori Party, known as Te Pati Maori, has often used symbolic performances to assert Indigenous pride and challenge colonial-era norms in governance. The Haka has evolved into an expression of New Zealand’s Indigenous heritage. It is commonly performed at sporting events and some cultural events. The national rugby team, the All Blacks, often kicks off games with the Haka. In earlier times, the Haka symbolised a war cry, and was also a gesture to welcome other tribes.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/new-zealand-indigenous-maori-haka-chants-echoed-in-wellington-777453/embed&nbsp;In November last year, three Maori Party members broke into a Maori Haka dance during a heated vote on a controversial bill seeking to reinterpret the 184-year-old Treaty of Waitangi, also referred to as Te Tiriti. It was an agreement between the British Crown and the Maori people, signed in 1840 that offered them protection. All three of them were handed historically lengthy suspensions.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">The way I love them so much for this! <a href="https://t.co/PfvtxZS7uT">pic.twitter.com/PfvtxZS7uT</a>&mdash; sunni the homie (@_ananamous) <a href="https://twitter.com/_ananamous/status/1856970606836645974?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 14, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The New Zealand Parliament once again witnessed the Maori Haka dance. On Thursday, people in the public gallery broke into a dance which was not approved. It happened after the newest Maori Party MP, Oriini Kaipara, gave her inaugural speech.

New Zealand’s Parliament witnessed yet another haka, a traditional Maori dance. It happened after the newest Maori Party MP, Oriini Kaipara, delivered her maiden speech. Spectators in the public gallery broke out into an unsanctioned haka, as the speaker of the House, Gerry Brownlee, got visibly agitated and said, “No, not that." Kaipara joined the Parliament in September to fill a vacant seat. She gave her first official address to the parliament on Thursday. Several MPs sang a Maori song which had been pre-approved to welcome her. However, there was a sudden twist in things when people in the gallery broke into a Haka dance, which was not agreed upon. A few other MPs also joined in the spontaneous haka. This made speaker Gerry Brownlee visibly livid, who immediately tried to stop it. “No, not that. The guarantee was that it would not be taking place,” Brownlee said. However, no one paid heed to him, forcing him to suspend the session. Brownlee said that he will have the incident investigated to see whether any of the MPs knew about the "spontaneous" Haka dance in the gallery. He termed the unapproved actions as contemptuous. Notably, any kind of song or dance performance in the New Zealand parliament needs approval under parliamentary rules. While the song was given the green light, there was no mention of a Haka dance. Also Read: New Zealand set to suspend Maori lawmakers over protest haka

The New Zealand Parliament once again witnessed the Maori Haka dance. On Thursday, people in the public gallery broke into a dance which was not approved. It happened after the newest Maori Party MP, Oriini Kaipara, gave her inaugural speech.

'No, not that...' - Public breaks into Maori Haka dance in New Zealand Parliament, MPs join in

As the world awaits the announcement of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday (October 10), US President Donald J. Trump has once again become a focal point of speculation. Multiple nominations have been filed in his name this year, with proponents citing his administration’s role in brokering high-stakes agreements in the Middle East and the Caucasus. While Trump has long coveted the global recognition the prize confers, the Nobel Committee’s history of cautious selections raises questions about how realistic his chances truly are.<h2>Trump's role in peace deals and ceasefires</h2>Trump’s most cited diplomatic achievement remains the Abraham Accords of 2020, which normalised relations between Israel and several Arab countries— a landmark moment in Middle Eastern diplomacy. But more recent developments under his current term have revived the conversation. Besides this, his administration also helped broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas after weeks of intense fighting in Gaza. The deal, which included a large-scale prisoner exchange and international monitoring, drew praise from European diplomats and global leaders for preventing a prolonged war.&nbsp;Trump also played a behind-the-scenes role in ending the Armenia–Azerbaijan border conflict, with US envoys mediating a peace framework in tandem with the European Union. In both cases, the White House framed these agreements as evidence of Trump’s unconventional but effective diplomacy — the kind of decisive, transactional approach that supporters argue has produced results where prolonged negotiations failed.&nbsp;Several foreign lawmakers and political figures, including Malta’s foreign minister and a Norwegian parliamentarian, publicly announced they had submitted Trump’s name for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. Though the Nobel Committee does not publish its nomination list for 50 years, nominators often go public to build political momentum and shape the narrative around a candidate’s achievements. For Trump, who has repeatedly expressed frustration that he did not win the prize during his previous term, these announcements serve both a symbolic and strategic purpose.<h2>What the Nobel Committee looks for?</h2>Yet nominations are only the first step in a lengthy and highly confidential selection process. The Nobel Peace Prize is guided by Alfred Nobel’s will, which calls for honouring those who have done “the most or the best work for fraternity between countries, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Over the years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has interpreted these criteria with caution, often favouring diplomats, activists, or organisations that have fostered sustained peace or humanitarian progress over time.&nbsp;Trump’s polarising global image and his deeply divisive domestic standing complicate the picture. While his supporters highlight his role in reshaping alliances and reducing direct US military entanglements, critics argue that his diplomatic moves are transactional, short-term, and lacking multilateral backing — elements the Nobel Committee traditionally values. Historically, the Committee has avoided awarding sitting leaders embroiled in intense political controversies, preferring to wait until their legacies can be judged in full.&nbsp;Another hurdle is timing. Nobel nominations must be submitted by January 31 each year. Some of Trump’s recent nominations came after that deadline, which means they might only count for the 2026 prize cycle. Even if his achievements are considered this year, he faces stiff competition. With 338 candidates nominated for the 2025 prize, Trump’s path is narrow. Nonetheless, the possibility cannot be dismissed entirely. If the Nobel Committee chooses to make a bold statement recognising unconventional diplomacy and concrete ceasefire deals, Trump could be a surprise pick. But if past patterns are any indication, the Committee is more likely to favour long-term peace builders over polarising political figures still in office.&nbsp;For now, Trump’s Nobel ambitions remain a blend of diplomatic milestones and political theater. The answer will come from Oslo on Friday (October 10) — but the debate over whether Donald Trump deserves the world’s most symbolic peace prize is already raging far beyond Norway’s borders.&nbsp;Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

From ceasefires to Accords: Can US President Donald Trump really win the Nobel Peace Prize?

As the world awaits the announcement of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday (October 10), US President Donald J. Trump has once again become a focal point of speculation. Multiple nominations have been filed in his name this year, with proponents citing his administration’s role in brokering high-stakes agreements in the Middle East and the Caucasus. While Trump has long coveted the global recognition the prize confers, the Nobel Committee’s history of cautious selections raises questions about how realistic his chances truly are. Trump's role in peace deals and ceasefires Trump’s most cited diplomatic achievement remains the Abraham Accords of 2020, which normalised relations between Israel and several Arab countries— a landmark moment in Middle Eastern diplomacy. But more recent developments under his current term have revived the conversation. Besides this, his administration also helped broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas after weeks of intense fighting in Gaza. The deal, which included a large-scale prisoner exchange and international monitoring, drew praise from European diplomats and global leaders for preventing a prolonged war. Trump also played a behind-the-scenes role in ending the Armenia–Azerbaijan border conflict, with US envoys mediating a peace framework in tandem with the European Union. In both cases, the White House framed these agreements as evidence of Trump’s unconventional but effective diplomacy — the kind of decisive, transactional approach that supporters argue has produced results where prolonged negotiations failed. Several foreign lawmakers and political figures, including Malta’s foreign minister and a Norwegian parliamentarian, publicly announced they had submitted Trump’s name for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize. Though the Nobel Committee does not publish its nomination list for 50 years, nominators often go public to build political momentum and shape the narrative around a candidate’s achievements. For Trump, who has repeatedly expressed frustration that he did not win the prize during his previous term, these announcements serve both a symbolic and strategic purpose. What the Nobel Committee looks for? Yet nominations are only the first step in a lengthy and highly confidential selection process. The Nobel Peace Prize is guided by Alfred Nobel’s will, which calls for honouring those who have done “the most or the best work for fraternity between countries, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Over the years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has interpreted these criteria with caution, often favouring diplomats, activists, or organisations that have fostered sustained peace or humanitarian progress over time. Trump’s polarising global image and his deeply divisive domestic standing complicate the picture. While his supporters highlight his role in reshaping alliances and reducing direct US military entanglements, critics argue that his diplomatic moves are transactional, short-term, and lacking multilateral backing — elements the Nobel Committee traditionally values. Historically, the Committee has avoided awarding sitting leaders embroiled in intense political controversies, preferring to wait until their legacies can be judged in full. Another hurdle is timing. Nobel nominations must be submitted by January 31 each year. Some of Trump’s recent nominations came after that deadline, which means they might only count for the 2026 prize cycle. Even if his achievements are considered this year, he faces stiff competition. With 338 candidates nominated for the 2025 prize, Trump’s path is narrow. Nonetheless, the possibility cannot be dismissed entirely. If the Nobel Committee chooses to make a bold statement recognising unconventional diplomacy and concrete ceasefire deals, Trump could be a surprise pick. But if past patterns are any indication, the Committee is more likely to favour long-term peace builders over polarising political figures still in office. For now, Trump’s Nobel ambitions remain a blend of diplomatic milestones and political theater. The answer will come from Oslo on Friday (October 10) — but the debate over whether Donald Trump deserves the world’s most symbolic peace prize is already raging far beyond Norway’s borders. Disclaimer: The views of the writer do not represent the views of WION or ZMCL. Nor does WION or ZMCL endorse the views of the writer.

US President Donald Trump’s diplomatic moves have revived Nobel Peace Prize talk recently, but history and politics may temper expectations

The Trump administration is preparing to introduce new rules that could make it significantly tougher for foreign nationals to qualify for the H-1B visa. The changes are expected to focus on tightening eligibility, scrutinising employers, and enforcing stricter regulations, particularly around third-party placements and working conditions. These adjustments are part of a broader effort to reform the H-1B visa program, ensuring it better serves US workers while maintaining its role in attracting high-skilled foreign talent.&nbsp;The new regulations could further limit the ability of foreign workers to be placed at client sites, an issue that has sparked controversy in the past. The Trump administration aims to enforce policies that align with the original intent of the H-1B program: to fill high-skilled jobs in the US that are not easily filled by American workers. However, the implications of these changes are still being debated, with some arguing that it could make it harder for employers to recruit and retain qualified workers.<h3>Proposed Changes to H-1B Visa Regulations</h3>The Trump administration’s proposed reforms to the H-1B visa program are set to bring significant changes to both employers and foreign nationals seeking long-term employment in the US. Among the key proposals are stricter eligibility criteria for visa recipients, a crackdown on companies that violate existing program rules, and enhanced scrutiny of third-party placements. These reforms aim to prevent abuse of the system and protect US workers’ job opportunities and wages.&nbsp;One major aspect of the reform is the potential restriction on H-1B holders working at customer sites, a controversial issue that was part of the previous administration’s regulatory push. Employers may find it more difficult to place workers at customer locations, which could lead to shorter visa approval periods and tighter restrictions on job roles. This could impact industries such as IT and consulting, where third-party placements are common.<h3>Challenges and Legal Hurdles</h3>While the Trump administration hopes to avoid the legal setbacks that occurred during his first term, the proposed changes could still face challenges in the courts. A similar rule attempted in 2020 was blocked by a judge, who argued that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The Trump government is working to ensure the new rule is legally sound, with an aim to implement it without facing similar opposition. These challenges highlight the ongoing debate over how the H-1B program should be structured to balance the needs of foreign workers, US employers, and American job seekers.&nbsp;As these regulations move forward, companies and foreign workers will need to stay informed about the evolving landscape of US immigration laws. The proposed changes, once finalised, could reshape the H-1B visa process for years to come, making it critical for stakeholders to adapt to the new rules as soon as they are announced.

H-1B visa: Is Trump admin preparing to make it tougher to qualify? Here's what you should know

The Trump administration is preparing to introduce new rules that could make it significantly tougher for foreign nationals to qualify for the H-1B visa. The changes are expected to focus on tightening eligibility, scrutinising employers, and enforcing stricter regulations, particularly around third-party placements and working conditions. These adjustments are part of a broader effort to reform the H-1B visa program, ensuring it better serves US workers while maintaining its role in attracting high-skilled foreign talent. The new regulations could further limit the ability of foreign workers to be placed at client sites, an issue that has sparked controversy in the past. The Trump administration aims to enforce policies that align with the original intent of the H-1B program: to fill high-skilled jobs in the US that are not easily filled by American workers. However, the implications of these changes are still being debated, with some arguing that it could make it harder for employers to recruit and retain qualified workers. Proposed Changes to H-1B Visa Regulations The Trump administration’s proposed reforms to the H-1B visa program are set to bring significant changes to both employers and foreign nationals seeking long-term employment in the US. Among the key proposals are stricter eligibility criteria for visa recipients, a crackdown on companies that violate existing program rules, and enhanced scrutiny of third-party placements. These reforms aim to prevent abuse of the system and protect US workers’ job opportunities and wages. One major aspect of the reform is the potential restriction on H-1B holders working at customer sites, a controversial issue that was part of the previous administration’s regulatory push. Employers may find it more difficult to place workers at customer locations, which could lead to shorter visa approval periods and tighter restrictions on job roles. This could impact industries such as IT and consulting, where third-party placements are common. Challenges and Legal Hurdles While the Trump administration hopes to avoid the legal setbacks that occurred during his first term, the proposed changes could still face challenges in the courts. A similar rule attempted in 2020 was blocked by a judge, who argued that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act. The Trump government is working to ensure the new rule is legally sound, with an aim to implement it without facing similar opposition. These challenges highlight the ongoing debate over how the H-1B program should be structured to balance the needs of foreign workers, US employers, and American job seekers. As these regulations move forward, companies and foreign workers will need to stay informed about the evolving landscape of US immigration laws. The proposed changes, once finalised, could reshape the H-1B visa process for years to come, making it critical for stakeholders to adapt to the new rules as soon as they are announced.

Trump's administration is seeking to tighten H-1B visa rules, including limiting third-party placements and increasing oversight, potentially making it harder to qualify

The United States has issued a firm denial regarding reports suggesting that Pakistan would receive new Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAMs) under a recent contract modification. On Friday, the US embassy clarified that the amendment to an existing Foreign Military Sales (FMS) contract, announced by the Department of War on September 30, pertains exclusively to sustainment and spare parts support, with no new missile deliveries involved. In an official statement, the US embassy emphasised that "contrary to false media reports, no part of this referenced contract modification is for deliveries of new AMRAAMs to Pakistan." It further clarified that the sustainment work under this contract does not include any upgrade to Pakistan’s current missile capabilities.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/north-korea-plans-massive-military-parade-as-kim-jong-un-celebrates-workers-party-80th-anniversary-1760062733977">North Korea plans massive military parade as Kim Jong Un celebrates Workers’ Party 80th anniversary</a>&nbsp;The clarification comes after media outlets, including Dawn newspaper, incorrectly interpreted the US Department of War’s September 30 contract update as a new sale of AMRAAM missiles to Pakistan. The Department had announced that Raytheon Co., based in Tucson, Arizona, was awarded a $41 million modification to a previous AMRAAM production contract. This raised the total value of the contract to over $2.5 billion, which involves the production and delivery of missiles to several countries, including the UK, Germany, Israel, Australia, Qatar, Oman, Singapore, Japan, Canada, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Italy, Kuwait, Turkey, and Pakistan.&nbsp;Despite Pakistan’s listing in the announcement, the US Embassy has now confirmed that the inclusion pertains solely to sustainment services, not new missile deliveries. Pakistan had previously purchased approximately 700 AMRAAMs in 2007, which were used to enhance its F-16 fighter fleet. At the time, this was the largest international order for the AMRAAM missile system.&nbsp;&nbsp;The reports of a new supply deal came shortly after a meeting last month between US President Donald Trump, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and Army Chief General Asim Munir, which further fueled speculation about the state of US-Pakistan defense relations. The US clarification underscores that the current modification is intended solely for the support of existing systems and not for any upgrade or expansion of Pakistan’s missile capabilities.

No new air-to-air missiles for Pakistan: US embassy issues clarification on missile sale

The United States has issued a firm denial regarding reports suggesting that Pakistan would receive new Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAMs) under a recent contract modification. On Friday, the US embassy clarified that the amendment to an existing Foreign Military Sales (FMS) contract, announced by the Department of War on September 30, pertains exclusively to sustainment and spare parts support, with no new missile deliveries involved. In an official statement, the US embassy emphasised that "contrary to false media reports, no part of this referenced contract modification is for deliveries of new AMRAAMs to Pakistan." It further clarified that the sustainment work under this contract does not include any upgrade to Pakistan’s current missile capabilities. Also Read: North Korea plans massive military parade as Kim Jong Un celebrates Workers’ Party 80th anniversary The clarification comes after media outlets, including Dawn newspaper, incorrectly interpreted the US Department of War’s September 30 contract update as a new sale of AMRAAM missiles to Pakistan. The Department had announced that Raytheon Co., based in Tucson, Arizona, was awarded a $41 million modification to a previous AMRAAM production contract. This raised the total value of the contract to over $2.5 billion, which involves the production and delivery of missiles to several countries, including the UK, Germany, Israel, Australia, Qatar, Oman, Singapore, Japan, Canada, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Italy, Kuwait, Turkey, and Pakistan. Despite Pakistan’s listing in the announcement, the US Embassy has now confirmed that the inclusion pertains solely to sustainment services, not new missile deliveries. Pakistan had previously purchased approximately 700 AMRAAMs in 2007, which were used to enhance its F-16 fighter fleet. At the time, this was the largest international order for the AMRAAM missile system. The reports of a new supply deal came shortly after a meeting last month between US President Donald Trump, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and Army Chief General Asim Munir, which further fueled speculation about the state of US-Pakistan defense relations. The US clarification underscores that the current modification is intended solely for the support of existing systems and not for any upgrade or expansion of Pakistan’s missile capabilities.

US has clarified in a statement that the recent contract amendment with Pakistan involves sustainment and spare parts for AMRAAMs, not new missile deliveries or upgrades to capabilities

This week, Kim Jong Un has extended a warm welcome to foreign dignitaries, preparing to showcase North Korea's latest military advancements during the 80th anniversary of the Workers' Party of Korea. Despite the secretive nature of the regime, reports suggest that the celebrations will feature a grand parade, potentially held at night, in Pyongyang. This display will likely involve tens of thousands of people, with highly coordinated performances—a hallmark of North Korean spectacles.&nbsp;The Workers’ Party, the country's sole ruling party, blends the ideology of communism with the cult of personality surrounding the Kim dynasty, which has maintained its tight grip on power for three generations. Military analysts are particularly focused on what new weaponry might be unveiled at the event. Speculation points toward the unveiling of advanced weapons systems, including the Hwasong-20 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and the Hwasong-11 Ma hypersonic glide vehicle. These technologies would represent significant advancements in North Korea’s military capabilities.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-approves-first-phase-of-trump-s-gaza-plan-for-ceasefire-hostage-release-but-these-questions-remain-unanswered-1760056421325">Israel approves first phase of Trump’s Gaza plan for ceasefire, hostage release but THESE questions remain unanswered</a>&nbsp;Kim's anniversary celebrations follow a significant diplomatic move last month, when he visited China for a large military parade. There, he strengthened ties with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin, solidifying alliances with Beijing and Moscow. These countries have become key partners in North Korea’s growing missile and nuclear ambitions, with Russia also receiving military aid from Pyongyang.&nbsp;Chinese and Russian officials have already arrived in Pyongyang for the event, underscoring the importance of the growing political and military relationships between these countries. Recent images show Kim meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, and Vietnam's Communist Party chief, To Lam, at a cultural event. In terms of the military display, observers expect the introduction of new advanced weaponry, including short-range ballistic missiles and potentially unmanned systems or AI-powered technologies. North Korea's past parades have been opportunities to showcase innovations designed to threaten the US and its allies, and this one could be no different.&nbsp;Kim’s focus on solid-fuel missiles, such as the Hwasong-20, reflects North Korea's push to develop more reliable and mobile missile systems. This would allow for quicker deployment and launch, a strategic advantage over previous liquid-fueled missiles. While the Hwasong-20 has not been fully tested, there is anticipation that the North may attempt a live launch during or around the anniversary celebrations.&nbsp;Kim’s nuclear program, though condemned worldwide, has propelled North Korea to the top of the global sanctions list. However, Pyongyang continues to press forward with expanding its missile capabilities and constructing a secret missile base near China’s border, raising concerns about the potential threats it poses to East Asia and the US. As usual, North Korea maintains a shroud of secrecy around its military developments, especially when such high-profile events take place, ensuring that much of what is unveiled remains a closely guarded surprise.

North Korea plans massive military parade as Kim Jong Un celebrates Workers’ Party 80th anniversary

This week, Kim Jong Un has extended a warm welcome to foreign dignitaries, preparing to showcase North Korea's latest military advancements during the 80th anniversary of the Workers' Party of Korea. Despite the secretive nature of the regime, reports suggest that the celebrations will feature a grand parade, potentially held at night, in Pyongyang. This display will likely involve tens of thousands of people, with highly coordinated performances—a hallmark of North Korean spectacles. The Workers’ Party, the country's sole ruling party, blends the ideology of communism with the cult of personality surrounding the Kim dynasty, which has maintained its tight grip on power for three generations. Military analysts are particularly focused on what new weaponry might be unveiled at the event. Speculation points toward the unveiling of advanced weapons systems, including the Hwasong-20 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and the Hwasong-11 Ma hypersonic glide vehicle. These technologies would represent significant advancements in North Korea’s military capabilities. Also Read: Israel approves first phase of Trump’s Gaza plan for ceasefire, hostage release but THESE questions remain unanswered Kim's anniversary celebrations follow a significant diplomatic move last month, when he visited China for a large military parade. There, he strengthened ties with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin, solidifying alliances with Beijing and Moscow. These countries have become key partners in North Korea’s growing missile and nuclear ambitions, with Russia also receiving military aid from Pyongyang. Chinese and Russian officials have already arrived in Pyongyang for the event, underscoring the importance of the growing political and military relationships between these countries. Recent images show Kim meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, and Vietnam's Communist Party chief, To Lam, at a cultural event. In terms of the military display, observers expect the introduction of new advanced weaponry, including short-range ballistic missiles and potentially unmanned systems or AI-powered technologies. North Korea's past parades have been opportunities to showcase innovations designed to threaten the US and its allies, and this one could be no different. Kim’s focus on solid-fuel missiles, such as the Hwasong-20, reflects North Korea's push to develop more reliable and mobile missile systems. This would allow for quicker deployment and launch, a strategic advantage over previous liquid-fueled missiles. While the Hwasong-20 has not been fully tested, there is anticipation that the North may attempt a live launch during or around the anniversary celebrations. Kim’s nuclear program, though condemned worldwide, has propelled North Korea to the top of the global sanctions list. However, Pyongyang continues to press forward with expanding its missile capabilities and constructing a secret missile base near China’s border, raising concerns about the potential threats it poses to East Asia and the US. As usual, North Korea maintains a shroud of secrecy around its military developments, especially when such high-profile events take place, ensuring that much of what is unveiled remains a closely guarded surprise.

Kim Jong Un is set to host foreign dignitaries for North Korea's 80th Workers' Party anniversary, with a major military parade and new weapons likely to be showcased

Israel's government has officially ratified a ceasefire agreement with Hamas, setting the stage to pause the devastating war in Gaza within 24 hours and secure the release of all the hostages within the following 72 hours. The Israeli cabinet approved the deal early Friday morning, roughly 24 hours after mediators announced the first phase of Donald Trump's peace agreement.&nbsp;<figure class="image"><img src="https://cdn1.wionews.com/prod/wion/images/2025/20251010/image-1760063861908.png"></figure>Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/live-blog-live-israel-hamas-phase-one-peace-deal-signed-1760024316623">Gaza ceasefire: Israel-Hamas phase one peace deal signed, Trump to visit Middle East on Sunday</a>&nbsp;In a post on X, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wrote, “The government has just now approved the framework for the release of all of the hostages – the living and the deceased.” Outlining the timeline of events that would follow as per the agreement, an Israeli government spokesperson said the ceasefire would go into force within 24 hours of government approval of the deal. After that 24-hour period, the hostages held in Gaza would be freed within 72 hours. Hamas' exiled Gaza chief Khalil Al-Hayya said he had received guarantees from the United States and other mediators that the war was over. According to Reuters, 20 Israeli hostages are still believed to be alive in Gaza, while 26 are presumed dead, and the fate of two is unknown. While Hamas agreed for releasing all the hostages, it also said that recovering the bodies of the dead may take time.&nbsp;Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-ended-another-war-americans-should-be-proud-trump-announces-he-ended-the-israel-hamas-conflict-1760028960678">'Americans should be proud': Trump announces he ended Israel-Hamas war</a><h2>Key questions remain unanswered</h2>While the first phase of Trump’s 20-point plan has been approved and sparked celebrations in both Gaza and Tel Aviv, several critical issues remain unresolved regarding the long-term future of the Gaza Strip.<ul><li>Uncertainty surrounds Hamas’ commitment to disarmament as outlined in the plan.</li><li>Questions persist about Hamas relinquishing its governance over the Gaza Strip.</li><li>Reports indicate the US military is preparing to deploy up to 200 troops to Israel to assist with logistics, transportation, engineering, and planning. But how long will that take or till what time will US deploy its military is not known.</li><li>As Gaza peace plan has failed multiple times, uncertainity remains if Trump’s 20-point plan will really be successful in resolving the long-term future of the Gaza Strip</li><li>Despite the deal, explosions were still reported in southern Gaza, raising concerns about stability.</li></ul>Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-hamas-war-how-did-2-years-of-conflict-affect-gaza-in-numbers-1759849558528">Israel-Hamas war: How did 2 years of conflict affect Gaza - In numbers</a>&nbsp;

Israel approved a ceasefire deal with Hamas on Friday, paving the way to stop fighting in Gaza within a day and start releasing Israeli hostages within three days. The U.S.-backed agreement aims to end the two-year conflict and gradually withdraw Israeli forces from Gaza.

Israel's government has officially ratified a ceasefire agreement with Hamas, setting the stage to pause the devastating war in Gaza within 24 hours and secure the release of all the hostages within the following 72 hours. The Israeli cabinet approved the deal early Friday morning, roughly 24 hours after mediators announced the first phase of Donald Trump's peace agreement. Read more | Gaza ceasefire: Israel-Hamas phase one peace deal signed, Trump to visit Middle East on Sunday In a post on X, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wrote, “The government has just now approved the framework for the release of all of the hostages – the living and the deceased.” Outlining the timeline of events that would follow as per the agreement, an Israeli government spokesperson said the ceasefire would go into force within 24 hours of government approval of the deal. After that 24-hour period, the hostages held in Gaza would be freed within 72 hours. Hamas' exiled Gaza chief Khalil Al-Hayya said he had received guarantees from the United States and other mediators that the war was over. According to Reuters, 20 Israeli hostages are still believed to be alive in Gaza, while 26 are presumed dead, and the fate of two is unknown. While Hamas agreed for releasing all the hostages, it also said that recovering the bodies of the dead may take time. Read more | 'Americans should be proud': Trump announces he ended Israel-Hamas war Key questions remain unanswered While the first phase of Trump’s 20-point plan has been approved and sparked celebrations in both Gaza and Tel Aviv, several critical issues remain unresolved regarding the long-term future of the Gaza Strip. Uncertainty surrounds Hamas’ commitment to disarmament as outlined in the plan. Questions persist about Hamas relinquishing its governance over the Gaza Strip. Reports indicate the US military is preparing to deploy up to 200 troops to Israel to assist with logistics, transportation, engineering, and planning. But how long will that take or till what time will US deploy its military is not known. As Gaza peace plan has failed multiple times, uncertainity remains if Trump’s 20-point plan will really be successful in resolving the long-term future of the Gaza Strip Despite the deal, explosions were still reported in southern Gaza, raising concerns about stability. Read more | Israel-Hamas war: How did 2 years of conflict affect Gaza - In numbers

Israel approved a ceasefire deal with Hamas on Friday, paving the way to stop fighting in Gaza within a day and start releasing Israeli hostages within three days. The US-backed agreement aims to end the two-year conflict and gradually withdraw Israeli forces from Gaza.

Israel approves first phase of Trump’s Gaza plan for ceasefire, hostage release but THESE questions remain unanswered

A major earthquake with a magnitude of 7.6 struck off the coast of Mindanao in the southern Philippines, prompting authorities to issue a tsunami warning and caution residents about potential aftershocks. The quake’s epicenter was located approximately 62 kilometers southeast of Manay town in Davao Oriental province, occurring at a shallow depth of 10 kilometers, according to the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS). Reacting to the earthquake and tsunami warnings, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr said the government is working around the clock to ensure that aid reaches everyone affected by the recent earthquake. He stated that he has directed relevant agencies and the military to conduct evacuations in coastal areas as a precaution against potential tsunami threats. Marcos added that authorities are currently assessing the situation on the ground and taking all necessary steps to ensure the safety and well-being of the population.&nbsp;According to Reuters, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center stated that dangerous tsunami waves could potentially impact coastlines within 300 kilometers of the earthquake's epicenter following the powerful quake in the Philippines. The US Tsunami Warning System also indicated there was a tsunami threat. Both agencies warned that coastal areas near the epicenter should remain on alert for possible hazardous sea level changes and wave activity.&nbsp;&nbsp;Just a day before the Mindanao tremor, a separate earthquake with a magnitude of 4.4 was recorded at 10:30 a.m. local time on 9 October, 2025. The epicenter was located three kilometers north-northeast of Pugo in La Union province at a depth of 23 kilometers. The quake caused strong shaking in Baguio City, prompting evacuations in schools and universities. Mayor Benjamin Magalong ordered the suspension of classes for the day. Weaker tremors were also felt in parts of Benguet, Mountain Province, and Pangasinan.<h3>Tsunami threat for nearby coastal areas</h3>The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center based in Honolulu announced that dangerous waves could form within 300 kilometers of the epicenter. Coastal regions in the Philippines closest to the quake could experience surges up to 3 meters (10 feet) above normal sea levels. Smaller waves may also reach nearby countries such as Indonesia and Palau.&nbsp;Despite the intensity of the tremors, no fatalities or significant property damage were reported from either earthquake. However, PHIVOLCS continues to monitor the situation closely and has warned the public to remain alert for possible aftershocks, due to country’s location along the Pacific Ring of Fire—a highly active seismic zone responsible for about 90 per cent of the world's earthquakes.&nbsp;(This is a developing story)

A 7.2-magnitude earthquake struck Mindanao in the Philippines. Officials have issued a tsunami alert and cautioned residents about potential aftershocks following the series of tremors.

A major earthquake with a magnitude of 7.6 struck off the coast of Mindanao in the southern Philippines, prompting authorities to issue a tsunami warning and caution residents about potential aftershocks. The quake’s epicenter was located approximately 62 kilometers southeast of Manay town in Davao Oriental province, occurring at a shallow depth of 10 kilometers, according to the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS). Reacting to the earthquake and tsunami warnings, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr said the government is working around the clock to ensure that aid reaches everyone affected by the recent earthquake. He stated that he has directed relevant agencies and the military to conduct evacuations in coastal areas as a precaution against potential tsunami threats. Marcos added that authorities are currently assessing the situation on the ground and taking all necessary steps to ensure the safety and well-being of the population. According to Reuters, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center stated that dangerous tsunami waves could potentially impact coastlines within 300 kilometers of the earthquake's epicenter following the powerful quake in the Philippines. The US Tsunami Warning System also indicated there was a tsunami threat. Both agencies warned that coastal areas near the epicenter should remain on alert for possible hazardous sea level changes and wave activity. Just a day before the Mindanao tremor, a separate earthquake with a magnitude of 4.4 was recorded at 10:30 a.m. local time on 9 October, 2025. The epicenter was located three kilometers north-northeast of Pugo in La Union province at a depth of 23 kilometers. The quake caused strong shaking in Baguio City, prompting evacuations in schools and universities. Mayor Benjamin Magalong ordered the suspension of classes for the day. Weaker tremors were also felt in parts of Benguet, Mountain Province, and Pangasinan. Tsunami threat for nearby coastal areas The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center based in Honolulu announced that dangerous waves could form within 300 kilometers of the epicenter. Coastal regions in the Philippines closest to the quake could experience surges up to 3 meters (10 feet) above normal sea levels. Smaller waves may also reach nearby countries such as Indonesia and Palau. Despite the intensity of the tremors, no fatalities or significant property damage were reported from either earthquake. However, PHIVOLCS continues to monitor the situation closely and has warned the public to remain alert for possible aftershocks, due to country’s location along the Pacific Ring of Fire—a highly active seismic zone responsible for about 90 per cent of the world's earthquakes. (This is a developing story)

A 7.6-magnitude earthquake struck Mindanao in the Philippines. Officials have issued a tsunami alert and cautioned residents about potential aftershocks following the series of tremors.

Earthquake of 7.6 magnitude hits Philippines: Is there a tsunami warning? Here's what we know

Two powerful explosions shook central Kabul on Thursday evening (Oct 9), approximately 48 hours within Pakistan's big threat to the country. On social media, several people reported hearing the explosions and seeing drones. AFP reported that security forces were alerted and mobile telephone service was down in several neighborhoods. The first blast happened around 9:50 pm local time (1720 GMT) and the second explosion occured a few minutes later. Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid said that the incident was under investigation and there was no cause for concern. In a post on X, he reassured the public that there was no need to worry. He explained that while the sound of an explosion had been heard in Kabul, everything was under control, the situation was being looked into, and no reports of damage had been received so far. The explosion comes as Afghanistan's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi arrived in India for a two-day visit.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">د کابل په ښار کې د یوې چاودنې غږ اوریدل شوی. خو څوک دې تشویش نه کوي، خیر او خیرت ده، د حادثې پلټنه روانه ده، تر اوسه د کوم زیان په اړه راپور نه دی ورکړل شوی. صدای یک انفجار در کابل شنیده شد. تحقیقات جریان دارد، تا کنون گزارش کدام زیانی داده نشده است خیر و خیرت می باشد.&mdash; Zabihullah (..ذبـــــیح الله م ) (@Zabehulah_M33) <a href="https://twitter.com/Zabehulah_M33/status/1976346755085238546?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-china-iran-and-russia-oppose-establishment-of-military-bases-near-afghanistan-1759058449524">Pakistan, China, Iran, and Russia oppose establishment of military bases near Afghanistan</a><h2>Pakistan's threat against Afghanistan</h2>Though Pakistan has not yet officially claimed responsibility of the attack, it is being said that Pakistan’s military establishment is responsible for the offensive as it comes after Pak PM Shehbaz Sharif said in Pakistani Parliament that ‘big action’ will be taken against Kabul. Pak Defence Minister Khawaja Asif also said in an interview that Afghans “have always been loyal to India and against Pakistan in the past and present, and they would continue to remain the same in the future as well."&nbsp;Read More | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/taliban-in-india-s-abstention-from-un-resolution-vote-on-afghanistan-a-hint-at-pakistan-sponsored-terroism-1751965873096">In India's abstention from UN resolution on Afghanistan, a hint at Pakistan-sponsored terroism</a>&nbsp;Addressing his Federal Cabinet, Sharif reportedly described the Afghan people as “enemies” of Pakistan, claiming that despite Pakistan showing them respect, they had responded with betrayal. He vowed strong action against Afghan refugees and the Kabul government, asserting that “terrorists were entering Pakistan from neighbouring Afghanistan” to carry out attacks. Stating “enough was enough” and that it was time to eliminate the terrorist threat, Sharif said that military leadership, including Field Marshal Asim Munir, was committed to crushing the militants.&nbsp;Escalating tensions further, Khawaja Asif intensified his criticism in Parliament, describing Afghanistan as a “hub of terrorism and a safe haven for militants,” a claim he said was acknowledged even by the United Nations. Issuing a stark ultimatum, Asif declared, “There is no grey area—Kabul must choose. Either the Afghan Taliban are with us or with the TTP and terrorists.” He also revealed what he described as a disturbing negotiation attempt, alleging that the Afghan Taliban had demanded 10 billion rupees in exchange for controlling the 6,000 to 7,000 fighters of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">The Pakistan Army chief, Mullah Munir, delivered a speech and soon after, the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pahalgam?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Pahalgam</a> terrorist attack took place. 9 October 2025; Today, shortly after Pakistan’s defense minister Khawaja Asif spoke, an explosion was reported in Kabul. In fact the defense minister’s comments… <a href="https://t.co/Adnrnf5VIY">pic.twitter.com/Adnrnf5VIY</a>&mdash; Mir Yar Baloch (@miryar_baloch) <a href="https://twitter.com/miryar_baloch/status/1976357426359321018?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Read more | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/pakistan-china-iran-russia-oppose-afghan-bases-no-response-from-us-yet-1759068321830">Pakistan, China, Iran, Russia oppose Afghan bases; No response from US yet</a>

Two explosions shook central Kabul amid high tensions with Pakistan, disrupting mobile networks. Taliban said the blasts are under investigation with no damage reported. The incident coincided with Afghan FM Amir Khan Muttaqi’s India visit, amid Pakistan’s threats 

Two powerful explosions shook central Kabul on Thursday evening (Oct 9), approximately 48 hours within Pakistan's big threat to the country. On social media, several people reported hearing the explosions and seeing drones. AFP reported that security forces were alerted and mobile telephone service was down in several neighborhoods. The first blast happened around 9:50 pm local time (1720 GMT) and the second explosion occured a few minutes later. Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid said that the incident was under investigation and there was no cause for concern. In a post on X, he reassured the public that there was no need to worry. He explained that while the sound of an explosion had been heard in Kabul, everything was under control, the situation was being looked into, and no reports of damage had been received so far. The explosion comes as Afghanistan's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi arrived in India for a two-day visit.

Two explosions shook central Kabul amid high tensions with Pakistan, disrupting mobile networks. Taliban said the blasts are under investigation with no damage reported. The incident coincided with Afghan FM Amir Khan Muttaqi’s India visit, amid Pakistan’s threats&nbsp;

'Afghans have always been loyal to India': Explosions rock Kabul within 48 hours of Pak PM 'vowing big action' - What happened

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir announced on Thursday (October 9) that his Otzma Yehudit party will vote against the first phase of the ceasefire deal announced. In the first phase, Hamas will release all hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Ben Gvir said that for now, he was not exiting Benjamin Netanyahu's political party, but if Hamas is not dismantled, Otzma Yehudit will “bring down the government.”&nbsp;Moreover, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a fellow far-right leader, likewise announced that his Religious Zionism party would oppose the deal. “Our hearts are filled with joy, happiness, and excitement that all the hostages are expected to return home,” the minister says in a statement.&nbsp;“But alongside this joy, we must not — under any circumstances — ignore the question of the price: the release of thousands of terrorists, including 250 murderers who are expected to be freed from prisons," he added.&nbsp;‘Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza’&nbsp;Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has achieved the three war goals he had in Gaza, his spokesperson Shosh Bedrosian claimed. Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on Netanyahu's behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced. In her statement, Bedrosian said, “We have hit a critical point in this war. From day one in this war, the prime minister laid out three objectives — the return of all of our hostages, the defeat and dismantling of Hamas and ensuring Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.”&nbsp;In a statement suggesting a declaration of victory, she said, “All of the prime minister’s objectives have now been achieved.”&nbsp;Hamas rejects Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for Gaza&nbsp;A senior Hamas official has reportedly said that the Palestinian militant group rejects the proposal of US President Donald Trump for an interim "Board of Peace" to oversee Gaza's administration, headed by the US president himself. Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told the Qatar-based broadcaster Al Arab on Thursday (October 9), "No Palestinian would accept this. All the factions, including the Palestinian Authority, reject this." The statement came after Israel and Hamas agreed on a ceasefire deal to free hostages held in Gaza in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails following indirect negotiations in Egypt.

Ben Gvir said that for now, he was not exiting Benjamin Netanyahu political party, but if Hamas is not dismantled, Otzma Yehudit will bring down the government.

Far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir announced on Thursday (October 9) that his Otzma Yehudit party will vote against the first phase of the ceasefire deal announced. In the first phase, Hamas will release all hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Ben Gvir said that for now, he was not exiting Benjamin Netanyahu's political party, but if Hamas is not dismantled, Otzma Yehudit will “bring down the government.” Moreover, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a fellow far-right leader, likewise announced that his Religious Zionism party would oppose the deal. “Our hearts are filled with joy, happiness, and excitement that all the hostages are expected to return home,” the minister says in a statement. “But alongside this joy, we must not — under any circumstances — ignore the question of the price: the release of thousands of terrorists, including 250 murderers who are expected to be freed from prisons," he added. ‘Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza’ Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has achieved the three war goals he had in Gaza, his spokesperson Shosh Bedrosian claimed. Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on Netanyahu's behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced. In her statement, Bedrosian said, “We have hit a critical point in this war. From day one in this war, the prime minister laid out three objectives — the return of all of our hostages, the defeat and dismantling of Hamas and ensuring Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.” In a statement suggesting a declaration of victory, she said, “All of the prime minister’s objectives have now been achieved.” Hamas rejects Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for Gaza A senior Hamas official has reportedly said that the Palestinian militant group rejects the proposal of US President Donald Trump for an interim "Board of Peace" to oversee Gaza's administration, headed by the US president himself. Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told the Qatar-based broadcaster Al Arab on Thursday (October 9), "No Palestinian would accept this. All the factions, including the Palestinian Authority, reject this." The statement came after Israel and Hamas agreed on a ceasefire deal to free hostages held in Gaza in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails following indirect negotiations in Egypt.

Ben Gvir said that for now, he was not exiting Benjamin Netanyahu's political party, but if Hamas is not dismantled, Otzma Yehudit will “bring down the government.”

Netanyahu's aide Ben Gvir opposes hostage release and Gaza peace, warns to 'bring down' Israeli government

A senior Hamas official has reportedly said that the Palestinian militant group rejects the proposal of US President Donald Trump for an interim "Board of Peace" to oversee Gaza's administration, headed by the US president himself. Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told the Qatar-based broadcaster Al Arab on Thursday (October 9), "No Palestinian would accept this. All the factions, including the Palestinian Authority, reject this." The statement came after Israel and Hamas agreed on a ceasefire deal to free hostages held in Gaza in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails following indirect negotiations in Egypt.&nbsp;The supervisory "Board of Peace" committee, which Trump has said he would chair, will also include former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. "No one would accept a return to the era of mandates and colonialism," Hamdan said.&nbsp;‘Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza'&nbsp;Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has achieved the three war goals he had in Gaza, his spokesperson Shosh Bedrosian claimed. Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on Netanyahu's behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced.In her statement, Bedrosian said, “We have hit a critical point in this war. From day one in this war, the prime minister laid out three objectives — the return of all of our hostages, the defeat and dismantling of Hamas and ensuring Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.”&nbsp;In a statement suggesting a declaration of victory, she said, “All of the prime minister’s objectives have now been achieved.”&nbsp;Netanyahu's 3 war objectives&nbsp;In August, Netanyahu held a government meeting on how he would brief his army on achieving the three specific war objectives in Gaza as he vowed to work to ensure Gaza "never again threatens Israel." Talking in the meeting, Netanyahu said, "1,955 years ago, just after the Ninth of [the Hebrew month of] Av, we suffered our greatest fall ever, which changed the face of Jewish history. Since then, we have been divided, separated and fighting each other."

The statement came after Israel and Hamas agreed on a ceasefire deal to free hostages held in Gaza in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails following indirect negotiations in Egypt.

A senior Hamas official has reportedly said that the Palestinian militant group rejects the proposal of US President Donald Trump for an interim "Board of Peace" to oversee Gaza's administration, headed by the US president himself. Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told the Qatar-based broadcaster Al Arab on Thursday (October 9), "No Palestinian would accept this. All the factions, including the Palestinian Authority, reject this." The statement came after Israel and Hamas agreed on a ceasefire deal to free hostages held in Gaza in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails following indirect negotiations in Egypt. The supervisory "Board of Peace" committee, which Trump has said he would chair, will also include former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. "No one would accept a return to the era of mandates and colonialism," Hamdan said. ‘Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza' Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has achieved the three war goals he had in Gaza, his spokesperson Shosh Bedrosian claimed. Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on Netanyahu's behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced. In her statement, Bedrosian said, “We have hit a critical point in this war. From day one in this war, the prime minister laid out three objectives — the return of all of our hostages, the defeat and dismantling of Hamas and ensuring Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.” In a statement suggesting a declaration of victory, she said, “All of the prime minister’s objectives have now been achieved.” Netanyahu's 3 war objectives In August, Netanyahu held a government meeting on how he would brief his army on achieving the three specific war objectives in Gaza as he vowed to work to ensure Gaza "never again threatens Israel." Talking in the meeting, Netanyahu said, "1,955 years ago, just after the Ninth of [the Hebrew month of] Av, we suffered our greatest fall ever, which changed the face of Jewish history. Since then, we have been divided, separated and fighting each other."

The statement came after Israel and Hamas agreed on a ceasefire deal to free hostages held in Gaza in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails following indirect negotiations in Egypt.

‘No Palestinian would accept this’: Hamas rejects Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for Gaza

On Thursday (Oct 9), Hungary's Laszlo Krasznahorkai was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. The author is considered by many in the country as the most important living author. In his works, Krasznahorkai's has explored themes of postmodern dystopia and melancholy. The Swedish Academy honoured him “for his compelling and visionary oeuvre that, in the midst of apocalyptic terror, reaffirms the power of art.” The official X handle of Nobel Prize in a tweet wrote, …"in Literature is awarded to the Hungarian author László Krasznahorkai “for his compelling and visionary oeuvre that, in the midst of apocalyptic terror, reaffirms the power of art.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">BREAKING NEWS The 2025 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NobelPrize?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NobelPrize</a> in Literature is awarded to the Hungarian author László Krasznahorkai “for his compelling and visionary oeuvre that, in the midst of apocalyptic terror, reaffirms the power of art.” <a href="https://t.co/vVaW1zkWPS">pic.twitter.com/vVaW1zkWPS</a>&mdash; The Nobel Prize (@NobelPrize) <a href="https://twitter.com/NobelPrize/status/1976241486552531287?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Who is Laszlo Krasznahorkai?</h2>Krasznahorkai was born on January 5, 1954 in Hungary's Gyula - a town near the Romanian border. He studied law, along with Hungarian language and literature. He became independent author after completing his education and published his debut novel, Satantango, in 1985. The book put him on the map of authors and became an immediate success. It was translated into English by George Szirtes and won the Best Translated Book award in 2013. The novel was also later developed into a film in 1994. The author lived in Germany for long and currently lives in the hills of Szentlaszlo, Hungary, away from the public eye.<h2>Other books and awards</h2>Before winning the prestigious Nobel award, the author has also boon Booker Prize as well as Hungary's highest award- the Kossuth Prize. For his latest achievement (Nobel), Krasznahorkai will be given 11 million Swedish kronor (approximately ₹1.03 crore).As for the author's other works, his essays and short stories are famous throughout Germany where he lived for many years. His book The Melancholy of Resistance was also turned into a movie as well. He published 'Herscht 07769' this year - which is described as a great contemporary German novel.

On Thursday (Oct 9), The Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to Laszlo Krasznahorkai, considered by many as Hungary's most important living author whose works explore themes of postmodern dystopia and melancholy.

On Thursday (Oct 9), Hungary's Laszlo Krasznahorkai was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. The author is considered by many in the country as the most important living author. In his works, Krasznahorkai's has explored themes of postmodern dystopia and melancholy. The Swedish Academy honoured him “for his compelling and visionary oeuvre that, in the midst of apocalyptic terror, reaffirms the power of art.” The official X handle of Nobel Prize in a tweet wrote, …"in Literature is awarded to the Hungarian author László Krasznahorkai “for his compelling and visionary oeuvre that, in the midst of apocalyptic terror, reaffirms the power of art.”

On Thursday (Oct 9), the Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to Laszlo Krasznahorkai, considered by many as Hungary's most important living author, whose works explore themes of postmodern dystopia and melancholy.

Nobel Prize in Literature goes to Hungary's Laszlo Krasznahorkai

In Israel, the biggest conversation today is about the deal to be finalised with Hamas. The conflict that began on October 7 2023, has completed two years, and it has seen immense bloodshed. Now, as the international community is looking forward to ending this war, US President Donald Trump has taken centre stage. Even the Israeli PM, ahead of his cabinet meeting, tweeted that Trump deserves a Nobel Prize, he wrote, "Give Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize - he deserves it!"

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Give <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> the Nobel Peace Prize - he deserves it! 🏅 <a href="https://t.co/Hbuc7kmPt1">pic.twitter.com/Hbuc7kmPt1</a>&mdash; Prime Minister of Israel (@IsraeliPM) <a href="https://twitter.com/IsraeliPM/status/1976281973766369527?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;Netanyahu's office highlighted the conversation between the two leaders: "The two had a very emotional and warm conversation, congratulating each other on the historic achievement of signing the agreement for the release of all the hostages. The Prime Minister thanked President Trump for all his efforts and for his global leadership, and President Trump congratulated the Prime Minister for his determined leadership and the actions he led. The two agreed to continue their close cooperation."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-ended-another-war-americans-should-be-proud-trump-announces-he-ended-the-israel-hamas-conflict-1760028960678">'Americans should be proud': Trump announces he ended the Israel-Hamas war</a>&nbsp;Trump had always been vocal about his quest to end wars. As the Israeli cabinet meeting ended, it was Trump who announced that he had ended the eighth war. He also mentioned his plans for ending the ninth, which is between Russia and Ukraine.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-announces-hostage-release-in-cabinet-meeting-america-should-be-proud-1760031418877/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-announces-hostage-release-in-cabinet-meeting-america-should-be-proud-1760031418877/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Coming back to Trump's Nobel Prize ambition, Netanyahu isn't the first to nominate him and also not the last. During a telephonic conversation, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi also told Trump that he ‘deserves the Nobel Peace Prize’ as quoted by news agency AFP. This came after the successful Gaza deal. In the past, Pakistan's PM Shehbaz Sharif also nominated the 79-year-old. Sharif has time and again thanked Trump for his contribution to the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, while New Delhi distances itself from the claim.&nbsp;

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu comes in support of US President Donald Trump. "Give Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize - he deserves it!"

In Israel, the biggest conversation today is about the deal to be finalised with Hamas. The conflict that began on October 7 2023, has completed two years, and it has seen immense bloodshed. Now, as the international community is looking forward to ending this war, US President Donald Trump has taken centre stage. Even the Israeli PM, ahead of his cabinet meeting, tweeted that Trump deserves a Nobel Prize, he wrote, "Give Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize - he deserves it!"

Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu comes in support of US President Donald Trump. "Give Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize - he deserves it!"

'Give Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize': Netanyahu's big shoutout for US president

India and the United Kingdom (UK), on Thursday (Oct 9), signed a $468 million defence deal under their Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) which was signed in July earlier this year. The deal was signed when the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is on a visit to India, met India Prime Minister Narendra Modi Mumbai. The latest deal is being seen as part of the two countries deepening ties in weapons and defence sector as well as the UK's push to its defence sector to drive higher economic growth.&nbsp;<h2>What is India-UK defence deal?</h2>&nbsp;Under the $468 million defence deal, India will get UK-made lightweight missiles which will manufactured by Thales. The new contract will help being in 700 jobs at the manufacturer's Northern Ireland factory as well as improve India's defence capabilities."The contract is set to deliver UK-manufactured Lightweight Multirole Missiles (LMM) built in Belfast to the Indian Army, representing another significant boost for the UK defence industry and delivering on the Government’s Plan for Change,” the UK Ministry of Defence said.&nbsp;The Indian government also issued a joint statement on the deal which highlighted that it will 'improve India's air defence capabilities' &nbsp;and 'meet the current and future requirements' of India's Ministry of Defence.&nbsp;<h2>What are these lightweight missiles and what else will India get?</h2>&nbsp;The lightweight missiles which India will get, also known as LMMs (Lightweight Multirole Missiles), are available in &nbsp;air-to-surface, air-to-air, surface-to-air, and surface-to-surface options. They are called Martlet by the manufacturer, a mythical bird from English heraldry which never roosts. The UK also supplies the same missiles to Ukraine as well.The British government, as reported by news agency Reuters, also said that it has signed a a new phase of another deal pertaining to electric-powered engines for naval ships, worth $332 million.

Under the $468 million defence deal, India will get UK-made lightweight missiles which will manufactured by Thales. 

India and the United Kingdom (UK), on Thursday (Oct 9), signed a $468 million defence deal under their Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement (CETA) which was signed in July earlier this year. The deal was signed when the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is on a visit to India, met India Prime Minister Narendra Modi Mumbai. The latest deal is being seen as part of the two countries deepening ties in weapons and defence sector as well as the UK's push to its defence sector to drive higher economic growth. What is India-UK defence deal? Under the $468 million defence deal, India will get UK-made lightweight missiles which will manufactured by Thales. The new contract will help being in 700 jobs at the manufacturer's Northern Ireland factory as well as improve India's defence capabilities. "The contract is set to deliver UK-manufactured Lightweight Multirole Missiles (LMM) built in Belfast to the Indian Army, representing another significant boost for the UK defence industry and delivering on the Government’s Plan for Change,” the UK Ministry of Defence said. The Indian government also issued a joint statement on the deal which highlighted that it will 'improve India's air defence capabilities' and 'meet the current and future requirements' of India's Ministry of Defence. What are these lightweight missiles and what else will India get? The lightweight missiles which India will get, also known as LMMs (Lightweight Multirole Missiles), are available in air-to-surface, air-to-air, surface-to-air, and surface-to-surface options. They are called Martlet by the manufacturer, a mythical bird from English heraldry which never roosts. The UK also supplies the same missiles to Ukraine as well. The British government, as reported by news agency Reuters, also said that it has signed a a new phase of another deal pertaining to electric-powered engines for naval ships, worth $332 million.

Under the $468 million defence deal, India will get UK-made lightweight missiles which will manufactured by Thales.&nbsp;

India signs $468 million defence deal to get UK-made lightweight missiles

Another war was stopped by US President Donald Trump, as Israel’s cabinet approved the Gaza peace deal after a discussion. But the announcement came from America. “We ended the war in Gaza and created peace,” Trump said. He also hopes for everlasting peace in the Middle East. Lauding his nation, he said “All Americans should be proud of the role our country has played in bringing this horrible war to an end.”&nbsp;While talking about the peace deal, he mentioned the war between Israel and Hamas as the eighth war he ended and is now looking to end the one ongoing between Russia and Ukraine. Talking of the Middle East, Trump didn’t hesitate before saying, ‘the rich ones, the less than rich ones, they are all coming together’. He was elated to announce how the Middle East has come together to end the war in Gaza. Trump will be visiting Egypt for the ‘official signing’.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-truth-social-rubio-handwritten-note-1760014850591">Who writes Trump's Truth Social rants? Rubio's secret note prompts Trump's truth social post&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;Trump is now confident about ending the Russia-Ukraine war and reiterated that the conflict would have happened had he been in power when it began. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKING</a> | US President <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/DonaldTrump?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#DonaldTrump</a> holds cabinet meeting at the White House after Israel and Hamas agree to phase one of the Gaza peace plan. &#39;America should be proud of ending Gaza war,&#39; says Trump.<a href="https://twitter.com/MollyGambhir?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MollyGambhir</a> has more. <a href="https://t.co/WuZLGLkdKT">pic.twitter.com/WuZLGLkdKT</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1976327695035158552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/will-donald-trump-win-nobel-peace-prize-or-will-it-go-to-surprise-candidate-here-s-what-experts-suggest-1759993077533">Will Donald Trump win Nobel Peace Prize or will it go to surprise candidate? Here's what experts suggest</a>&nbsp;The US president further emphasised on the hostage deal and said they they would be back with their families on either Monday or Tuesday. But just as he said this, Trump went ahead to clarify, “The hostages are coming; they consider them hostages. They talk about them as hostages, but they are approximately 28 dead people.” Did the 79-year-old imply that the hostages are dead?&nbsp; And instantaneously, he said, “…look forward to welcoming the hostages.”

US President Donald Trump hopes for everlasting peace in the Middle East. Lauding his nation, he said “All Americans should be proud of the role our country has played in bringing this horrible war to an end.”

Another war was stopped by US President Donald Trump, as Israel’s cabinet approved the Gaza peace deal after a discussion. But the announcement came from America. “We ended the war in Gaza and created peace,” Trump said. He also hopes for everlasting peace in the Middle East. Lauding his nation, he said “All Americans should be proud of the role our country has played in bringing this horrible war to an end.” While talking about the peace deal, he mentioned the war between Israel and Hamas as the eighth war he ended and is now looking to end the one ongoing between Russia and Ukraine. Talking of the Middle East, Trump didn’t hesitate before saying, ‘the rich ones, the less than rich ones, they are all coming together’. He was elated to announce how the Middle East has come together to end the war in Gaza. Trump will be visiting Egypt for the ‘official signing’. Also read: Who writes Trump's Truth Social rants? Rubio's secret note prompts Trump's truth social post Trump is now confident about ending the Russia-Ukraine war and reiterated that the conflict would have happened had he been in power when it began.

US President Donald Trump hopes for everlasting peace in the Middle East. Lauding his nation, he said “All Americans should be proud of the role our country has played in bringing this horrible war to an end.”

'Americans should be proud': Trump announces he ended Israel-Hamas war

Afghanistan's Taliban government has hoped that India will recognise them soon, Suhail Shaheen, who is the country's ambassador to Qatar has said. Speaking to WION's Sidhant Sibal, he said, "Afghanistan and India want to have a good relationship, to expand relations. So they should remove the obstacle of recognition". While India has not formally recognised the Taliban-led Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which came to power in August, 2021, it continues to engage with them. In 2022, India established a Technical Support Unit (TSU) in Kabul to coordinate aid, signaling de facto engagement without recognition. His comments come on the eve of Foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi's meeting with EAM Jaishankar, &amp; NSA Ajit Doval in Delhi on friday.&nbsp;&nbsp;Full interview:&nbsp;<h2>How significant do you see this visit as?</h2> Suhail Shaheen: I think it is a very significant visit. It is the first visit of our foreign minister to India. And during this visit, various matters will be discussed which will lead to strengthening relations between the two countries. There are a lot of areas where the two countries can have cooperation and good relations.&nbsp;<h2>You said, a lot of areas. What are these areas? India has been giving humanitarian support to Afghanistan. So if you can perhaps talk about these areas where you're talking about cooperation can be done?</h2> Suhail Shaheen: Yes, first of all, there were projects by India, they can start those projects. There are investment opportunities for Indian businessmen. You know, Afghanistan has a lot of natural resources. There is opportunity in the agricultural field and also in education in other fields. So I think there is a need to set up a committee which seeks to explore all these areas, to see how the relation between the two countries can be strengthened and what are those areas, these areas be identified in relation.&nbsp;<h2>Are you looking for any recognition by the Government of India? So far, India has not recognized the government in Kabul.</h2> Suhail Shaheen: Not being recognised as an obstacle, in the way of relation between the two countries. Many countries have their own political objectives, while Afghanistan and India want to have a good relationship, to expand relations. So they should remove the obstacle of recognition. By granting recognition, they will remove the obstacle which is in the way of relation between the two countries.&nbsp;<h2>My last and final question is, do you expect a reciprocal visit as well, given your foreign minister has reached New Delhi, so do you think that the Indian Foreign Minister should also come to Kabul, and what's the focus like during FM Muttaqui's visit to Deoband?</h2> Suhail Shaheen: I think if it is reciprocated, that would lead to strengthening the relation, which is the objective of both countries, and also the visit of foreign minister Muttaqui to Deoband will also will also lead to visit of Deoband Ulema to Afghanistan and our side Ulema to Deoband, contribute to relations between the 2 countries in various areas.

Speaking to WION's Sidhant Sibal, Taliban government's Suhail Shaheen said, "Afghanistan and India want to have a good relationship, to expand relations. So they should remove the obstacle of recognition". 

Afghanistan's Taliban government has hoped that India will recognise them soon, Suhail Shaheen, who is the country's ambassador to Qatar has said. Speaking to WION's Sidhant Sibal, he said, "Afghanistan and India want to have a good relationship, to expand relations. So they should remove the obstacle of recognition". While India has not formally recognised the Taliban-led Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which came to power in August, 2021, it continues to engage with them. In 2022, India established a Technical Support Unit (TSU) in Kabul to coordinate aid, signaling de facto engagement without recognition. His comments come on the eve of Foreign minister Amir Khan Muttaqi's meeting with EAM Jaishankar, & NSA Ajit Doval in Delhi on friday. Full interview: How significant do you see this visit as? Suhail Shaheen: I think it is a very significant visit. It is the first visit of our foreign minister to India. And during this visit, various matters will be discussed which will lead to strengthening relations between the two countries. There are a lot of areas where the two countries can have cooperation and good relations. You said, a lot of areas. What are these areas? India has been giving humanitarian support to Afghanistan. So if you can perhaps talk about these areas where you're talking about cooperation can be done? Suhail Shaheen: Yes, first of all, there were projects by India, they can start those projects. There are investment opportunities for Indian businessmen. You know, Afghanistan has a lot of natural resources. There is opportunity in the agricultural field and also in education in other fields. So I think there is a need to set up a committee which seeks to explore all these areas, to see how the relation between the two countries can be strengthened and what are those areas, these areas be identified in relation. Are you looking for any recognition by the Government of India? So far, India has not recognized the government in Kabul. Suhail Shaheen: Not being recognised as an obstacle, in the way of relation between the two countries. Many countries have their own political objectives, while Afghanistan and India want to have a good relationship, to expand relations. So they should remove the obstacle of recognition. By granting recognition, they will remove the obstacle which is in the way of relation between the two countries. My last and final question is, do you expect a reciprocal visit as well, given your foreign minister has reached New Delhi, so do you think that the Indian Foreign Minister should also come to Kabul, and what's the focus like during FM Muttaqui's visit to Deoband? Suhail Shaheen: I think if it is reciprocated, that would lead to strengthening the relation, which is the objective of both countries, and also the visit of foreign minister Muttaqui to Deoband will also will also lead to visit of Deoband Ulema to Afghanistan and our side Ulema to Deoband, contribute to relations between the 2 countries in various areas.

Speaking to WION's Sidhant Sibal, Taliban government's Suhail Shaheen said, "Afghanistan and India want to have a good relationship, to expand relations. So they should remove the obstacle of recognition".&nbsp;

Afghanistan's Taliban-led government hopes India will recognise them, says key official

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has achieved the three war goals he had in Gaza, his spokesperson &nbsp;Shosh Bedrosian claimed. Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on Netanyahu's behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced.&nbsp;In her statement, Bedrosian said, “We have hit a critical point in this war. From day one in this war, the prime minister laid out three objectives — the return of all of our hostages, the defeat and dismantling of Hamas and ensuring Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.”&nbsp;In a statement suggesting a declaration of victory, she said, “All of the prime minister’s objectives have now been achieved.”&nbsp;Netanyahu's 3 war objectives&nbsp;In August, Netanyahu held a government meeting on how he would brief his army on achieving the three specific war objectives in Gaza as he vowed to work to ensure Gaza "never again threatens Israel." Talking in the meeting, Netanyahu said, "1,955 years ago, just after the Ninth of [the Hebrew month of] Av, we suffered our greatest fall ever, which changed the face of Jewish history. Since then, we have been divided, separated and fighting each other."&nbsp;What are the 3 war objectives?&nbsp;As per an official statement released by his office, Netanyahu said that Israel has three major goals in the war with Hamas in Gaza. The objectives are: Defeating the "enemy", releasing hostages, and "ensuring that Gaza will never again threaten Israel."&nbsp;"During the week, I will convene the Security Cabinet in order to direct the IDF on how to achieve these three objectives, all of them, without exception," the Israeli PM said.The Israeli PM said his country is "continuing to build our land."&nbsp;&nbsp;Apart from this, Netanyahu also made an announcement saying, "Today, the Government will approve two very important plans for rebuilding and developing the south, at an overall value of NIS 3.2 billion.”

Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has achieved the three war goals he had in Gaza, his spokesperson Shosh Bedrosian claimed. Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on Netanyahu's behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced. In her statement, Bedrosian said, “We have hit a critical point in this war. From day one in this war, the prime minister laid out three objectives — the return of all of our hostages, the defeat and dismantling of Hamas and ensuring Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel.” In a statement suggesting a declaration of victory, she said, “All of the prime minister’s objectives have now been achieved.” Netanyahu's 3 war objectives In August, Netanyahu held a government meeting on how he would brief his army on achieving the three specific war objectives in Gaza as he vowed to work to ensure Gaza "never again threatens Israel." Talking in the meeting, Netanyahu said, "1,955 years ago, just after the Ninth of [the Hebrew month of] Av, we suffered our greatest fall ever, which changed the face of Jewish history. Since then, we have been divided, separated and fighting each other." What are the 3 war objectives? As per an official statement released by his office, Netanyahu said that Israel has three major goals in the war with Hamas in Gaza. The objectives are: Defeating the "enemy", releasing hostages, and "ensuring that Gaza will never again threaten Israel." "During the week, I will convene the Security Cabinet in order to direct the IDF on how to achieve these three objectives, all of them, without exception," the Israeli PM said. The Israeli PM said his country is "continuing to build our land." Apart from this, Netanyahu also made an announcement saying, "Today, the Government will approve two very important plans for rebuilding and developing the south, at an overall value of NIS 3.2 billion.”

Speaking in a televised briefing, Bedrosian stated on Netanyahu's behalf. This came amid the Israeli preparations to ratify the hostage release and the ceasefire agreement announced.

‘Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza,’ says Israeli PM’s office

On Thursday (Oct 9), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said that the Gaza deal will come into effect on receiving a green signal from the cabinet. Israel says 'all parties' signed phase one of Gaza deal. After 2 years of war, the UN and world leaders are actively supporting the end to this war. US President Donald Trump has also been stern in his messaging that Hamas has no way out but to agree to the said deal.As quoted by news agency AFP, Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas met with Israeli activists in Ramallah, he said, "I welcome the agreement signed today, the end of the war, and the release of the hostages," Abbas told dozens of representatives from Israeli peace organisations assembled at the presidential palace in Ramallah in the occupied West Bank."A few months ago, (US President Donald) Trump had a plan to expel the Palestinians, but later he forgot about it," he added.

US President Donald Trump says he plans to leave for the Middle East on Sunday and hopes to be in Israel when the hostages are released on Monday or Tuesday. &nbsp;

Trump says he plans to fly on Sunday, hopes to be in Israel for hostage release

<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/netanyahu-s-aide-ben-gvir-opposes-hostage-release-and-gaza-peace-warns-to-bring-down-israeli-government-1760038669050">Netanyahu's aide Ben Gvir opposes hostage release and Gaza peace, warns to 'bring down' Israeli government</a>

Far-right Israeli minister says he will vote against ceasefire resolution

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Jared Kushner and US special envoy Steve Witkoff in Jerusalem ahead of an Israeli government meeting on the Gaza ceasefire plan on Thursday, an Israeli official told CNN.

Netanyahu meets with Kushner and Witkoff ahead of government meeting

Hamas’ chief negotiator says the group has received guarantees from the United States and international mediators confirming that “the war has ended permanently.”

Hamas’ chief negotiator says group received guarantees that war has ended

Former US President Barack Obama on Thursday welcomed the deal that will return hostages from Gaza and pause the conflict there, saying work can now begin on building a “lasting peace.”&nbsp;

Obama praises Gaza deal without mentioning Trump

Donald Trump projected optimism that outstanding issues not covered by phase one of his Gaza ceasefire agreement will be sorted out, even as he declined to take a position on an eventual Palestinian state and acknowledged Hamas may not be able to produce all the bodies of deceased hostages.

Trump says momentum will continue into next phase of talks: "There will be disarming"

US envoy Steve Witkoff said President Donald Trump is set to travel to Egypt next week, after Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi extended an invitation to attend celebrations over a Gaza ceasefire deal."The President is really excited to come to Egypt, and that is the plan, that he comes next week," Witkoff said in a meeting with Sisi, a video of which was released by the Egyptian presidency.

US envoy Witkoff says Trump to travel to Egypt next week

Trump says hostages will be released Monday or Tuesday, and he's still aiming to travel to the region soon.

Hostages will be released Monday or Tuesday: Trump

Read here: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-netanyahu-has-achieved-his-objectives-in-gaza-says-israeli-pm-s-office-1760025349460">‘Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza,’ says Israeli PM’s office</a>

Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza: PMO

The agreement in Egypt follows a 20-point peace plan for Gaza announced last month by US President Donald Trump, after more than two years of war sparked by Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel.

The 20-point peace plan

Israel said Thursday that all parties have signed the first phase of a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal, in a major step to end a war that has killed tens of thousands of people.

LIVE | Israel-Hamas phase one peace deal signed by 'all parties'

On Thursday (Oct 9), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said that the Gaza deal will come into effect on receiving a green signal from the cabinet.

On Thursday (Oct 9), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said that the Gaza deal will come into effect on receiving a green signal from the cabinet. Israel says 'all parties' signed phase one of Gaza deal. After 2 years of war, the UN and world leaders are actively supporting the end to this war. US President Donald Trump has also been stern in his messaging that Hamas has no way out but to agree to the said deal. As quoted by news agency AFP, Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas met with Israeli activists in Ramallah, he said, "I welcome the agreement signed today, the end of the war, and the release of the hostages," Abbas told dozens of representatives from Israeli peace organisations assembled at the presidential palace in Ramallah in the occupied West Bank. "A few months ago, (US President Donald) Trump had a plan to expel the Palestinians, but later he forgot about it," he added.

On Thursday (Oct 9), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said that the Gaza deal will come into effect on receiving a green signal from the cabinet.

Gaza ceasefire: Israel-Hamas phase one peace deal signed, Trump to visit Middle East on Sunday

President Vladimir Putin, on Thursday (Oct 9), accepted that Russia was partly to be blamed for Azerbaijan Airlines plane crash last year on December 25 that killed 38 people. The plane was flying from Azerbaijan capital city Baku to Grozny in the republic of Chechnya when it disappeared from radar while flying over Caspian Sea near Russia before being found crashed near the Kazakh city of Aktau. The Russian officials had earlier cited poor visibility or bird strike as the reason for the crash before accepting later on that Ukrainian drones were being targeted by the Russian air defence system in the area.&nbsp;<h2>Putin accepts Russia's part in Azerbaijan plane crash</h2>&nbsp;In a meeting with Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in Tajikistan, Putin, for the first day, accepted that Russia was partly to blame for the tragedy. Putin said that the Ukrainian drones entered the Russian airspace and the defense system got activated which later malfunctioned and launched two missiles which later detonated near the plane and the fragments hit the plane which caused the crash.&nbsp;“They (missiles) exploded, perhaps via self-destruct, roughly at a distance of 10 meters [33 feet]. Thus, the aircraft was damaged not predominantly by direct warhead impact but rather by missile fragments,” Putin said.&nbsp;<h2>How did Azerbaijan react to it?</h2>&nbsp;Azerbaijan President Aliyev had demanded Russian accountability in the matter after the government sources, at the time of crash, had told news agency Reuters that the investigators had found the fragment of a Russian Pantsir-S anti-air rocket in the debris. As a result, Baku closes a Moscow-funded research centre and barred Russian officials from entering the country over offensive remarks as well among other measures.Meanwhile, Putin announced compensation for the victims' families and assessment of the actions of Russian officials at the time of incident. Now, after Putin's acceptance of Russia's role, Aliyev thanked the Russian President for overseeing the investigation on personal level.&nbsp;

In a meeting with Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in Tajikistan, Putin, for the first day, accepted that Russia was partly to blame for the tragedy.

President Vladimir Putin, on Thursday (Oct 9), accepted that Russia was partly to be blamed for Azerbaijan Airlines plane crash last year on December 25 that killed 38 people. The plane was flying from Azerbaijan capital city Baku to Grozny in the republic of Chechnya when it disappeared from radar while flying over Caspian Sea near Russia before being found crashed near the Kazakh city of Aktau. The Russian officials had earlier cited poor visibility or bird strike as the reason for the crash before accepting later on that Ukrainian drones were being targeted by the Russian air defence system in the area. Putin accepts Russia's part in Azerbaijan plane crash In a meeting with Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in Tajikistan, Putin, for the first day, accepted that Russia was partly to blame for the tragedy. Putin said that the Ukrainian drones entered the Russian airspace and the defense system got activated which later malfunctioned and launched two missiles which later detonated near the plane and the fragments hit the plane which caused the crash. “They (missiles) exploded, perhaps via self-destruct, roughly at a distance of 10 meters [33 feet]. Thus, the aircraft was damaged not predominantly by direct warhead impact but rather by missile fragments,” Putin said. How did Azerbaijan react to it? Azerbaijan President Aliyev had demanded Russian accountability in the matter after the government sources, at the time of crash, had told news agency Reuters that the investigators had found the fragment of a Russian Pantsir-S anti-air rocket in the debris. As a result, Baku closes a Moscow-funded research centre and barred Russian officials from entering the country over offensive remarks as well among other measures. Meanwhile, Putin announced compensation for the victims' families and assessment of the actions of Russian officials at the time of incident. Now, after Putin's acceptance of Russia's role, Aliyev thanked the Russian President for overseeing the investigation on personal level.

In a meeting with Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev in Tajikistan, Putin, for the first day, accepted that Russia was partly to blame for the tragedy.

Putin accepts Russian 'missile fragments' hit Azerbaijan plane which crashed last year on Christmas and killed 38

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio passed a handwritten note to President Donald Trump during a white house roundtable with conservative influencers over Antifa. The note was snapped by several photo journalists, has gained attention. "You need to approve a Truth Social post soon so you can announce the deal first,” urging Trump to publicly announce a Middle East peace agreement. The note was signed ‘very close’ at the top, underlining the urgency of the message. The meeting with influencers had already extended over an hour, and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was waiting eagerly to deliver the important news, emphasising that this had to be done in private; however, as he grew restless, he passed on a handwritten note on white house stationery.Just after receiving the note, Trump said, "I was just given a note by the secretary of state saying that we're very close to a deal on the Middle East, and they're gonna need me pretty quickly."A couple of hours after the incident, Trump made a lengthy post on Truth Social. declaring that Israel and Hamas have agreed to the first phase of the peace plan. The announcement was made after consultation with people such as Jared Kushner, Witkoff. It also highlights the close coordination between Trump and his team before the public announcement.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">AP photos show Rubio&#39;s urgent note to Trump before announcement of Mideast peace deal<a href="https://t.co/xHCZJ8L154">https://t.co/xHCZJ8L154</a> <a href="https://t.co/pNql5VW5wk">pic.twitter.com/pNql5VW5wk</a>&mdash; Derek Karikari (@news_scout) <a href="https://twitter.com/news_scout/status/1976267051233579441?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 9, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This also shows that eventhough Trump sometimes goes on a mid night rampage of Truth Social posts, the important ones are carefully crafted with assistance from staffs. For instance, Natalie Harp, a former staffer, has been reported to have posted on Trump's behalf in the past. Additionally, Meredith McIver, a former staff writer for The Trump Organization, has been credited with ghostwriting several of Trump's books and speeches.

Trump responds to Rubio’s urgent handwritten note with a Truth Social announcement, highlighting behind-the-scenes White House coordination.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio passed a handwritten note to President Donald Trump during a white house roundtable with conservative influencers over Antifa. The note was snapped by several photo journalists, has gained attention. "You need to approve a Truth Social post soon so you can announce the deal first,” urging Trump to publicly announce a Middle East peace agreement. The note was signed ‘very close’ at the top, underlining the urgency of the message. The meeting with influencers had already extended over an hour, and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was waiting eagerly to deliver the important news, emphasising that this had to be done in private; however, as he grew restless, he passed on a handwritten note on white house stationery. Just after receiving the note, Trump said, "I was just given a note by the secretary of state saying that we're very close to a deal on the Middle East, and they're gonna need me pretty quickly." A couple of hours after the incident, Trump made a lengthy post on Truth Social. declaring that Israel and Hamas have agreed to the first phase of the peace plan. The announcement was made after consultation with people such as Jared Kushner, Witkoff. It also highlights the close coordination between Trump and his team before the public announcement.

Trump responds to Rubio’s urgent handwritten note with a Truth Social announcement, highlighting behind-the-scenes White House coordination.

Who writes Trump's Truth Social rants? Rubio's secret note prompts Trump's truth social post

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

What is Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan? Why Pakistan government fears its protests and why it imposed an internet ban

Norway braces for diplomatic fallout if Trump doesn't win Nobel Peace Prize

India reopens Kabul embassy, restores diplomatic ties with Afghanistan

Malaysia to ban beef at official functions to defer to Hindus and Buddhists?

Airstrikes in Kabul: Islamabad uneasy at growing India-Taliban proximity?

Paramotor bombings: Myanmar's military turns to paragliders for airstrikes

Peru lawmakers impeach president Dina Boluarte

'No, not that...' - Another Maori Haka dance in New Zealand Parliament

From ceasefires to Accords: Can Donald Trump really win the Nobel Peace Prize?

H-1B visa: Is Trump admin preparing to make it tougher to qualify?

No new air-to-air missiles for Pakistan: US issues clarification on missile sale

North Korea to hold massive military parade for Workers' Party 80th anniversary

Israel approves first phase of Trump’s Gaza plan for ceasefire, hostage release

Earthquake of 7.6 magnitude hits Philippines: Is there a tsunami warning? Here's what we know

Explosions rock Kabul within 48 hours of Pak PM 'vowing big action'

Netanyahu's aide Ben Gvir opposes hostage release and Gaza peace, warns to...

‘No Palestinian would...’: Hamas rejects Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ for Gaza

Nobel Prize in Literature goes to Hungary's Laszlo Krasznahorkai

'Give Donald Trump the Nobel Peace Prize': Netanyahu's big shoutout

India signs $468 million defence deal to get UK-made lightweight missiles

'Americans should be proud': Trump announces he ended the Israel-Hamas war

Taliban-led government hopes India will recognise them, says key official

‘Netanyahu has achieved his objectives in Gaza,’ says Israeli PM’s office

Gaza ceasefire: Israel-Hamas phase one peace deal signed

Putin accepts Russian 'missile fragments' hit Azerbaijan plane

Rubio's hand written secret note prompts Trump's truth social post