National Handloom Day 2026: From Alia Bhatt to Samantha Ruth Prabhu; Actresses who celebrated India's textile heritage as brides

The Royals enter the Doctor Who universe: King Charles and Queen Camilla beam into Commonwealth Games in TARDIS

Unitree Robotics targets $9 billion valuation in landmark IPO backed by DeepSeek and Tencent

India names 27 sites in Arunachal Pradesh

Bharat Bhhagya Viddhaata OTT: When will Kangana Ranaut's film stream online?

How many soldiers operate one S-400 battery?

Shakib Al Hasan ready to return to Bangladesh—under one condition

‘Fake news’: MEA rejects report claiming India sought defence pact with Israel after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey deal

Rockstar to unveil GTA 6 extended look ahead of November launch

Russia forms Ukrainian Volunteer Spetsnaz Brigade to fight Ukraine

Drug-resistant fungus that hides in hair and enters bloodstream reported in 23 US states

Technology transfer deal boosts India's defence manufacturing ambitions

Border row erupts in Europe after Ceuta crossings, Spain imposes border controls on Italy

Morale plummets on USS Abraham Lincoln: Are US sailors reaching a breaking point? | GRAVITAS

'Security can't be bought with Pakistan, Turkey deal': Iran tells Saudi Arabia

Baba Vanga's 2026 prophecy: 2 predictions 'already came true', 3 terrifying ones remain. Details inside

Colombia’s new president Abelardo de la Espriella vows to ‘defeat narco-terrorists’, signals hardline shift

New Friday OTT releases (August 7, 2026): Operation Safed Sagar, Vadhandhi, Main Vaapis Aaunga- 6 movies and TV shows on Netflix, Prime Video and more

Squadron Leader Bhawana Kanth scripts history as Indian Air Force gets its first woman ‘Top Gun’ pilot

RSS says Gen Z protests reflect genuine distress

Trump says Iranian school bombing photos could be AI-generated - 'I don’t think...'

IAF officer held for sharing sensitive information in 'honey trap' case, booked under Official Secrets Act

Stray Kids under scrutiny? Fans react to Grammy submission silence after BTS boycott

Why the Su-30MKI doesn't need external fuel tanks to fly vast distances

Jugal Hansraj reunites with Shekhar Kapur after 40 years for Masoom: The Next Generation

New speed limits, automatic challans: Big traffic change coming to Delhi-Meerut Expressway. All you need to know

India officially names 27 places in Arunachal to counter China's renaming claims

Trump calls White House ballroom ruling a 'national disgrace' as court says Congress approval needed

US sanctions Iran’s crypto network after Strait of Hormuz attacks, offers $15m bounty for intel on IRGC finance

Why the Su-30MKI is one of the heaviest fighters ever built

Uttarakhand young innovator builds India's own flying vehicle, conducts first test flight: WATCH

Chilling video shows students take cover as teen opens fire at Thai school

Reese Witherspoon's father hospitalised after poolside incident in Nashville: Report

Getting a piece of stone to plop through water multiple times is an actual sport in Scotland, where the World Stone Skimming Competition is held every year. Over 2,200 people from 27 countries reached the island of Easdale to participate in what is a legitimate international sport. However, even something like this has not been left free from controversy, as the current edition has accusations of cheating swirling around. The “world’s first dedicated stone skimming arena" is located at a slate quarry that flooded in 1881. The competition has been held here since 1983. The rules state that for the stone skimming contest, only unaltered stones selected from among the island’s naturally occurring slate should be used. Each rock should be under three inches wide, and its dimensions are checked using a device called the “ring of truth”. Each participant gets three skims, all of which must bounce at least twice to qualify towards their cumulative score. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/strip-club-didnt-want-to-pay-8mn-in-taxes-so-they-gave-the-auditor-lap-dances-1758078233518">Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances</a>&nbsp;<h2>Doctored stones at World Stone Skimming Championship</h2>However, this year, rumours started swirling that some people were using "doctored stones". When asked about it, those who were cheating admitted to using unjustified tactics at the stone skimming contest. “Toss Master” Kyle Matthews told BBC Radio Scotland that he heard “rumours and murmurings of some nefarious deeds," Popular Science reported. Matthews told the publication that some stones were altered and looked like they had been ground into more circular shapes to improve their bounce potential. He says this is the first time that something like this has happened in the history of the stone skimming competition. Matthews said, "I think if it had been happening in previous years, they would have told me then.”&nbsp;<h2>Would-be cheaters admitted carving the stones</h2>Some skimmers raised concerns about the use of altered stone. An investigation happened, and those involved were asked to raise their hands, and they did. The competition then went ahead as usual.Stone skimming is Physics, as a lot of scientific dynamics go into making the perfect throw, and plop. This year's winner is Jon Jennings of Kentucky, who made history on his second visit to the World Stone Skimming Championship. With a cumulative score of 580.7 feet, he is also the first American to win the contest. When asked whether the rounded stones could have won the contest, Jennings said they just "gallop through the water, while more square stones with flat edges slice through the water and give more grip."&nbsp;

The World Stone Skimming Competition is held on a Scottish island every year, where cars are not allowed. The legit sport this year witnessed accusations that some people were planning on cheating using doctored stones. They admitted when confronted.

Getting a piece of stone to plop through water multiple times is an actual sport in Scotland, where the World Stone Skimming Competition is held every year. Over 2,200 people from 27 countries reached the island of Easdale to participate in what is a legitimate international sport. However, even something like this has not been left free from controversy, as the current edition has accusations of cheating swirling around. The “world’s first dedicated stone skimming arena" is located at a slate quarry that flooded in 1881. The competition has been held here since 1983. The rules state that for the stone skimming contest, only unaltered stones selected from among the island’s naturally occurring slate should be used. Each rock should be under three inches wide, and its dimensions are checked using a device called the “ring of truth”. Each participant gets three skims, all of which must bounce at least twice to qualify towards their cumulative score. Also Read: Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances Doctored stones at World Stone Skimming Championship However, this year, rumours started swirling that some people were using "doctored stones". When asked about it, those who were cheating admitted to using unjustified tactics at the stone skimming contest. “Toss Master” Kyle Matthews told BBC Radio Scotland that he heard “rumours and murmurings of some nefarious deeds," Popular Science reported. Matthews told the publication that some stones were altered and looked like they had been ground into more circular shapes to improve their bounce potential. He says this is the first time that something like this has happened in the history of the stone skimming competition. Matthews said, "I think if it had been happening in previous years, they would have told me then.” Would-be cheaters admitted carving the stones Some skimmers raised concerns about the use of altered stone. An investigation happened, and those involved were asked to raise their hands, and they did. The competition then went ahead as usual. Stone skimming is Physics, as a lot of scientific dynamics go into making the perfect throw, and plop. This year's winner is Jon Jennings of Kentucky, who made history on his second visit to the World Stone Skimming Championship. With a cumulative score of 580.7 feet, he is also the first American to win the contest. When asked whether the rounded stones could have won the contest, Jennings said they just "gallop through the water, while more square stones with flat edges slice through the water and give more grip."

The World Stone Skimming Championship is held on a Scottish island every year, where cars are not allowed. The legit sport this year witnessed accusations that some people were planning on cheating using doctored stones. They admitted when confronted.

Skim scandal rocks Scotland: First cheating accusations in 42 years as participants alter stone at world skimming championship

A plane flying from Paris to Corsica could not land on time and was forced to stay in the air for several minutes after the air traffic controller dozed off. &nbsp;France's civil aviation authority revealed on Wednesday that the Air Corsica flight, carrying tourists, was forced to hover over the airport for 18 minutes. The plane was coming from Paris Orly airport and was supposed to land in Ajaccio. It was flying in circles above the Mediterranean Sea for so long that officials considered diverting the plane to Bastia, a port city on the other side of the island. The airport's fire crew had a hard time getting in touch with the air traffic controller, who was asleep. They ultimately contacted the police and were finally able to climb the tower and wake up the sleeping ATC.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/engine-failure-forces-london-beijing-flight-to-land-in-remote-siberia-now-there-is-a-russia-ukraine-war-related-problem-1756285159970">Engine failure forces London-Beijing flight to land in remote Siberia. Now there is a Russia-Ukraine-war-related problem</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;The flight from Paris was an hour late, and the air traffic controller was working alone. While waiting for the plane, he fell asleep. When the flight finally reached the French airport in Ajaccio, the pilot could not land since the lights on the single 2,400-metre runway hadn't been turned on. The pilot had no choice but to stay in the air. Meanwhile, airport staff scrambled to contact the ATC. He was finally woken up, and the flight landed safely. "The intervention of the airport fire department at the control tower revealed that the air traffic controller on duty had fallen asleep at his post," the aviation authority said in a statement. It has opened an investigation into the incident.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/biman-bangladesh-airlines-air-hostesses-honeytrap-romance-marriage-scandal-1757909881859">High-flying honeytrap: Two air hostesses of a Bangladeshi airline embroiled in mile-high romantic scandal</a>&nbsp;<h2>Never handled anything like this, says pilot</h2>Meanwhile, the captain of the plane recounted the strange incident to The Times. He said that he had never handled such a situation in his career of several decades. "We did a little tour. At no time was there any panic. Everyone stayed calm." He added that the passengers were also not worried and instead found the issue funny. Meanwhile, the ATC tested negative for alcohol, but runs the risk of "a possible sanction".&nbsp;

A Corsica air traffic controller fell asleep while waiting for a plane from Paris. He was alone in the tower, and no one else could reach him. Airport officials had to contact the police to help ascend the tower. They finally managed to wake him up.

A plane flying from Paris to Corsica could not land on time and was forced to stay in the air for several minutes after the air traffic controller dozed off. France's civil aviation authority revealed on Wednesday that the Air Corsica flight, carrying tourists, was forced to hover over the airport for 18 minutes. The plane was coming from Paris Orly airport and was supposed to land in Ajaccio. It was flying in circles above the Mediterranean Sea for so long that officials considered diverting the plane to Bastia, a port city on the other side of the island. The airport's fire crew had a hard time getting in touch with the air traffic controller, who was asleep. They ultimately contacted the police and were finally able to climb the tower and wake up the sleeping ATC. Also Read: Engine failure forces London-Beijing flight to land in remote Siberia. Now there is a Russia-Ukraine-war-related problem The flight from Paris was an hour late, and the air traffic controller was working alone. While waiting for the plane, he fell asleep. When the flight finally reached the French airport in Ajaccio, the pilot could not land since the lights on the single 2,400-metre runway hadn't been turned on. The pilot had no choice but to stay in the air. Meanwhile, airport staff scrambled to contact the ATC. He was finally woken up, and the flight landed safely. "The intervention of the airport fire department at the control tower revealed that the air traffic controller on duty had fallen asleep at his post," the aviation authority said in a statement. It has opened an investigation into the incident. Also Read: High-flying honeytrap: Two air hostesses of a Bangladeshi airline embroiled in mile-high romantic scandal Never handled anything like this, says pilot Meanwhile, the captain of the plane recounted the strange incident to The Times. He said that he had never handled such a situation in his career of several decades. "We did a little tour. At no time was there any panic. Everyone stayed calm." He added that the passengers were also not worried and instead found the issue funny. Meanwhile, the ATC tested negative for alcohol, but runs the risk of "a possible sanction".

A Corsica air traffic controller fell asleep while waiting for a plane from Paris. He was alone in the tower, and no one else could reach him. Airport officials had to contact the police to help ascend the tower. They finally managed to wake him up.

What a DOOZY! Air traffic controller at Corsica airport falls asleep, leaving Paris flight hanging

State visits are often as much about the outfits as they are about official talks, and the recent visit of US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump to the UK showcased just that. With a spotlight on hats, jewels, dresses, and tiaras, fashion diplomacy was in full effect.<h2>Melania's Signature Hat and Classic Elegance</h2>Known for her bold sartorial statements, Melania Trump opted for a wide-brimmed purple hat during day one of her visit to Windsor Castle. The dramatic piece concealed part of her face, signaling her focus on her husband’s agenda rather than drawing attention to herself. Paired with a sleek grey Dior suit, the look was both stylish and strategic, as stylist Marian Kwei pointed out. The colour-matching of her hat and Trump’s tie reflected her support for his policies during the visit, with Dior also symbolising America’s ties to Europe.<h2>Burberry Trench: A Nod to British Fashion</h2>On a later occasion, Melania embraced classic British style, wearing a floor-length Burberry trench coat with its signature lining peeking out. This sartorial choice, completed with boots and sunglasses, was interpreted as a diplomatic gesture. As Vanessa Friedman from The New York Times noted, such a choice demonstrated engagement with British culture and could be seen as an example of fashion diplomacy—an approach often used by first ladies. For her last UK state visit in 2019, Melania similarly combined British, European, and American designers in her wardrobe, signaling both support for the UK and her own fashion-forward stance.<h2>The Royals' Coordinated Look in Blue and Burgundy</h2>Meanwhile, Queen Elizabeth II made a statement in a striking sapphire blue dress, a matching Fiona Clare coat, and a Philip Treacy hat, accentuated by a sapphire and diamond brooch. It was a clear representation of her royal elegance, yet it also held subtle diplomatic meaning.<h2>Princess of Wales: A Burgundy Statement</h2>Princess Catherine, always a paragon of grace, wore a burgundy Emilia Wickstead dress, topped with a matching Jane Taylor hat. Her outfit, complete with a feather brooch, matched the Prince of Wales’s burgundy tie, showing solidarity and alignment with both her husband and the UK’s interests.&nbsp;&nbsp;This coordinated approach, observed by fashion experts like Marian Kwei, echoes Melania Trump’s own choice to match her husband. The use of colour is seen as a clear gesture of unity with the spouse’s agenda and also, as royal expert Victoria Murphy highlighted, a diplomatic message that aligns with the US flag’s red and blue. In this high-profile state visit, fashion choices were more than just aesthetic—they were woven with meaning, showing how clothing can subtly reflect political alliances and cultural respect.

Fashion was a key player in the Trumps' UK state visit, with Melania's hats, the Queen and Princess of Wales's coordinated styles, and sartorial choices reflecting diplomatic gestures

State visits are often as much about the outfits as they are about official talks, and the recent visit of US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump to the UK showcased just that. With a spotlight on hats, jewels, dresses, and tiaras, fashion diplomacy was in full effect. Melania's Signature Hat and Classic Elegance Known for her bold sartorial statements, Melania Trump opted for a wide-brimmed purple hat during day one of her visit to Windsor Castle. The dramatic piece concealed part of her face, signaling her focus on her husband’s agenda rather than drawing attention to herself. Paired with a sleek grey Dior suit, the look was both stylish and strategic, as stylist Marian Kwei pointed out. The colour-matching of her hat and Trump’s tie reflected her support for his policies during the visit, with Dior also symbolising America’s ties to Europe. Burberry Trench: A Nod to British Fashion On a later occasion, Melania embraced classic British style, wearing a floor-length Burberry trench coat with its signature lining peeking out. This sartorial choice, completed with boots and sunglasses, was interpreted as a diplomatic gesture. As Vanessa Friedman from The New York Times noted, such a choice demonstrated engagement with British culture and could be seen as an example of fashion diplomacy—an approach often used by first ladies. For her last UK state visit in 2019, Melania similarly combined British, European, and American designers in her wardrobe, signaling both support for the UK and her own fashion-forward stance. The Royals' Coordinated Look in Blue and Burgundy Meanwhile, Queen Elizabeth II made a statement in a striking sapphire blue dress, a matching Fiona Clare coat, and a Philip Treacy hat, accentuated by a sapphire and diamond brooch. It was a clear representation of her royal elegance, yet it also held subtle diplomatic meaning. Princess of Wales: A Burgundy Statement Princess Catherine, always a paragon of grace, wore a burgundy Emilia Wickstead dress, topped with a matching Jane Taylor hat. Her outfit, complete with a feather brooch, matched the Prince of Wales’s burgundy tie, showing solidarity and alignment with both her husband and the UK’s interests. This coordinated approach, observed by fashion experts like Marian Kwei, echoes Melania Trump’s own choice to match her husband. The use of colour is seen as a clear gesture of unity with the spouse’s agenda and also, as royal expert Victoria Murphy highlighted, a diplomatic message that aligns with the US flag’s red and blue. In this high-profile state visit, fashion choices were more than just aesthetic—they were woven with meaning, showing how clothing can subtly reflect political alliances and cultural respect.

Fashion was a key player in the Trumps' UK state visit, with Melania's hats, the Queen and Princess of Wales's coordinated styles, and sartorial choices reflecting diplomatic gestures

From Melania’s purple hat to Princess Kate's burgundy dress: How fashion played a message in Trumps' UK visit

The US President Donald Trump has arrived in the United Kingdom(UK) for his official state visit. He will be welcomed with full royal honours at Windsor Castle. This visit comes just few days after the killing of Trump’s ally, Charlie Kirk, at a college event in Utah. This incident has also raised extra concerns about Trump’s safety and security. This is Trump's second state visit to the UK amid his protectionist policies and tough anti-immigrant stance.&nbsp;The scale of force is quite similar to Trump’s 2019 visit, when more than 6,000 police officers were deployed at a cost of £3.4 million ($46,46,593). Officials have set up a “ring of steel” around the Windsor town, including road closures, barriers, police dogs, mounted patrols, and strict airspace restrictions. Drones and the National Police Air Service are also being used to monitor the area.&nbsp;Also Read - <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-s-uk-visit-us-president-s-special-relations-with-the-royals-on-display-in-shadow-of-epstein-scandal-trade-war-1758116841368">Trump's UK visit: US president's special relations with the Royals on display in shadow of Epstein scandal, trade war</a>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump has been hosted by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is under renovation. Events that are planned for Donald Trump are - a state banquet, a carriage procession, and a meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.<h2>What are the security measures for Trump and Melania?</h2>Trump and First Lady Melania landed in UK on Tuesday (September 16) night on Air Force One, a specially modified Boeing 747 plane with advanced defense systems, secure communication tools, radar-jamming, missile defense, midair refueling capability and important medical facilities. Despite looking similar to a commercial airliner on the outside, Air Force One is classed as a military aircraft.&nbsp;On the ground in UK, Trump travels in “the Beast,” his armored Cadillac limousine. The has an armour-plated body and bulletproof windows, which contribute to its whopping weight of about nine tonnes (20,000lb).&nbsp;For short routes, he will use Marine One, the Sikorsky VH-3D Sea King helicopter, which is companied by decoy aircraft and Osprey MV-22s carrying staff and Service Service teams.<h2>Why is security so tight for US President Donald Trump?&nbsp;</h2>US President Donald Trump visit to UK comes just after the killing of his ally Charlie Kirk and amid massive protests over Jeffrey Epstein files. He is also facing protest in UK against his tough immigration policies. Stop Trump UK coalition is a group of more than 50 campaign organisations, including climate, anti-racism and pro-Palestinian activists. He is also facing major opposition from Epstein protesters, who are demanding the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

US President Donald Trump has been hosted by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is under renovation.

The US President Donald Trump has arrived in the United Kingdom(UK) for his official state visit. He will be welcomed with full royal honours at Windsor Castle. This visit comes just few days after the killing of Trump’s ally, Charlie Kirk, at a college event in Utah. This incident has also raised extra concerns about Trump’s safety and security. This is Trump's second state visit to the UK amid his protectionist policies and tough anti-immigrant stance. The scale of force is quite similar to Trump’s 2019 visit, when more than 6,000 police officers were deployed at a cost of £3.4 million ($46,46,593). Officials have set up a “ring of steel” around the Windsor town, including road closures, barriers, police dogs, mounted patrols, and strict airspace restrictions. Drones and the National Police Air Service are also being used to monitor the area. Also Read - Trump's UK visit: US president's special relations with the Royals on display in shadow of Epstein scandal, trade war US President Donald Trump has been hosted by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is under renovation. Events that are planned for Donald Trump are - a state banquet, a carriage procession, and a meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. What are the security measures for Trump and Melania? Trump and First Lady Melania landed in UK on Tuesday (September 16) night on Air Force One, a specially modified Boeing 747 plane with advanced defense systems, secure communication tools, radar-jamming, missile defense, midair refueling capability and important medical facilities. Despite looking similar to a commercial airliner on the outside, Air Force One is classed as a military aircraft. On the ground in UK, Trump travels in “the Beast,” his armored Cadillac limousine. The has an armour-plated body and bulletproof windows, which contribute to its whopping weight of about nine tonnes (20,000lb). For short routes, he will use Marine One, the Sikorsky VH-3D Sea King helicopter, which is companied by decoy aircraft and Osprey MV-22s carrying staff and Service Service teams. Why is security so tight for US President Donald Trump? US President Donald Trump visit to UK comes just after the killing of his ally Charlie Kirk and amid massive protests over Jeffrey Epstein files. He is also facing protest in UK against his tough immigration policies. Stop Trump UK coalition is a group of more than 50 campaign organisations, including climate, anti-racism and pro-Palestinian activists. He is also facing major opposition from Epstein protesters, who are demanding the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

US President Donald Trump has been hosted by King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Windsor Castle, as Buckingham Palace is under renovation.

From 'ring of steel' to 'Sea King helicopter': Trump's high-tech security in UK - Details inside

Global innovation systems are undergoing rapid change as cutting-edge technologies in AI and quantum computing are advancing. As per the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), these nations top the list in the Global Innovation Index (GII) 2025.

Global Innovation Index 2025: US and China in Top 10, know who topped the list

Jerry Greenfield, one of the co-founders of Ben &amp; Jerry’s, has announced his resignation on Wednesday (September 17) after nearly five decades with the company. His decision follows escalating tensions with Unilever, the multinational corporation that owns Ben &amp; Jerry's. Greenfield expressed deep disappointment with Unilever's increasing control over the brand’s social and political activism, especially in light of recent events. He believes the company’s direction has compromised Ben &amp; Jerry’s core values, particularly its commitment to social justice and advocacy on issues such as climate change and human rights.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/a-diplomatic-first-melania-trump-princess-kate-spark-global-attention-with-joint-royal-appearance-at-windsor-1758111051556">Melania Trump, Princess Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor</a>&nbsp;The tension came to a head over the company’s response to political matters, most notably the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Ben &amp; Jerry’s had taken strong public stances on such issues in the past, but under Unilever, Greenfield feels the company has become more cautious and less willing to take bold positions. His resignation marks a significant break from a company known for its progressive values.&nbsp;Unilever, while acknowledging Greenfield’s departure, has yet to address the specifics of the dispute. The company maintains that its global presence requires balancing the diverse views of its stakeholders, but critics argue this stance limits the company’s capacity to support meaningful causes. Greenfield’s resignation follows months of behind-the-scenes disagreements and reflects broader concerns about corporate governance and the influence of multinational corporations on smaller, mission-driven brands. His departure is seen as a personal sacrifice, with Greenfield saying he felt his conscience no longer aligned with Unilever's approach.&nbsp;In a statement, Greenfield shared that he was “heartbroken” over the turn of events, emphasizing that it was a decision made with great sorrow but in the hope of preserving Ben &amp; Jerry’s legacy of activism. For Greenfield, the company’s social consciousness has always been central to its identity—an identity he believes is now under threat.

Ben & Jerry's co-founder Jerry Greenfield resigns amid growing tensions with parent company

Jerry Greenfield, one of the co-founders of Ben & Jerry’s, has announced his resignation on Wednesday (September 17) after nearly five decades with the company. His decision follows escalating tensions with Unilever, the multinational corporation that owns Ben & Jerry's. Greenfield expressed deep disappointment with Unilever's increasing control over the brand’s social and political activism, especially in light of recent events. He believes the company’s direction has compromised Ben & Jerry’s core values, particularly its commitment to social justice and advocacy on issues such as climate change and human rights. Also Read: Melania Trump, Princess Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor The tension came to a head over the company’s response to political matters, most notably the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Ben & Jerry’s had taken strong public stances on such issues in the past, but under Unilever, Greenfield feels the company has become more cautious and less willing to take bold positions. His resignation marks a significant break from a company known for its progressive values. Unilever, while acknowledging Greenfield’s departure, has yet to address the specifics of the dispute. The company maintains that its global presence requires balancing the diverse views of its stakeholders, but critics argue this stance limits the company’s capacity to support meaningful causes. Greenfield’s resignation follows months of behind-the-scenes disagreements and reflects broader concerns about corporate governance and the influence of multinational corporations on smaller, mission-driven brands. His departure is seen as a personal sacrifice, with Greenfield saying he felt his conscience no longer aligned with Unilever's approach. In a statement, Greenfield shared that he was “heartbroken” over the turn of events, emphasizing that it was a decision made with great sorrow but in the hope of preserving Ben & Jerry’s legacy of activism. For Greenfield, the company’s social consciousness has always been central to its identity—an identity he believes is now under threat.

Ben &amp; Jerry's co-founder Jerry Greenfield has resigned after 47 years, citing a growing conflict with parent company Unilever over political activism

A Utah court has prohibited Tyler James Robinson, accused of murdering the conservative activist Charlie Kirk, from contacting Kirk's widow, Erika, under a preliminary protection order. This order was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice.<h3>What is the protective order?</h3>According to a report in Newsweek, the order prevents Robinson from harassing, threatening, stalking, or engaging in any conduct that would cause fear or threat to a protected person or designated family or household members. In the document that Judge Tony F. Graf signed claims that the court determined Robinson to be a credible threat to the physical safety of the protected person.&nbsp;The restrictions also stop Robinson from developing any contacts with Erika Kirk in any manner, including via mail, phone, email, text, or social media.&nbsp;Along with his imprisonment, Robinson is barred from going near Erika Kirk’s residence, workplace, or school, and must steer clear of any place where they could potentially meet. The court document also warns that breaching the order could lead to further arrests and fresh criminal charges.&nbsp;The 22-year-old Robinson was taken into custody 33 hours after he killed Kirk. He faces charges of aggravated homicide, felony firearm discharge, and committing violent acts in the presence of a child. Prosecutors have also added two counts of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, according to Utah County Attorney Jeff Grey.&nbsp;The incident unfolded when 30-year-old Kirk was addressing a Turning Point USA event on September 10 at Utah Valley University. The killing was reportedly carried out by Robinson with a lethal bolt-action rifle, according to the prosecution. After the assassination, Robinson was first appeared in court for the first time on September 16 for the hearing.

The 'protective order' was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice.

A Utah court has prohibited Tyler James Robinson, accused of murdering the conservative activist Charlie Kirk, from contacting Kirk's widow, Erika, under a preliminary protection order. This order was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice. What is the protective order? According to a report in Newsweek, the order prevents Robinson from harassing, threatening, stalking, or engaging in any conduct that would cause fear or threat to a protected person or designated family or household members. In the document that Judge Tony F. Graf signed claims that the court determined Robinson to be a credible threat to the physical safety of the protected person. The restrictions also stop Robinson from developing any contacts with Erika Kirk in any manner, including via mail, phone, email, text, or social media. Along with his imprisonment, Robinson is barred from going near Erika Kirk’s residence, workplace, or school, and must steer clear of any place where they could potentially meet. The court document also warns that breaching the order could lead to further arrests and fresh criminal charges. The 22-year-old Robinson was taken into custody 33 hours after he killed Kirk. He faces charges of aggravated homicide, felony firearm discharge, and committing violent acts in the presence of a child. Prosecutors have also added two counts of witness tampering and obstruction of justice, according to Utah County Attorney Jeff Grey. The incident unfolded when 30-year-old Kirk was addressing a Turning Point USA event on September 10 at Utah Valley University. The killing was reportedly carried out by Robinson with a lethal bolt-action rifle, according to the prosecution. After the assassination, Robinson was first appeared in court for the first time on September 16 for the hearing.

The 'protective order' was issued by the Fourth Judicial District Court in Provo on September 16, which is slated to remain in effect until further notice.

What’s behind the court’s 'protective order' against Tyler Robinson and Erika Kirk?

During US President Donald Trump’s state visit to the UK on Wednesday (September 17), the presence of two influential women is expected to capture major attention: Melania Trump, the First Lady, and the Princess of Wales, Catherine. Their public appearances reflect both a strategic effort to strengthen diplomatic relations and spotlight their global roles. Melania’s first state visit in her husband’s second term has been meticulously planned for months.&nbsp;&nbsp;She’s known for her careful attention to the details of such high-profile events, particularly when it comes to the clothing she wears and the image she projects. Ahead of the trip, she receives extensive briefings on her counterparts, their interests, and even the specifics of their wardrobe choices to ensure no clashing colors or tones.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/uk-rolls-out-royal-carpet-for-us-president-donald-trump-and-first-lady-melania-arrives-at-windsor-castle-1758109153150">UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania</a><h2>Melania-Kate meeting</h2>In parallel, Kate’s role as Princess of Wales has grown ever more visible. Recently returning to a full schedule after recovering from health treatments, she is now positioned as one of the most influential figures within the royal family. As the princess attends engagements related to youth causes and outdoor activities, this appearance alongside Melania is not just a diplomatic moment but a visual one, highlighting both the regal and relatable sides of the royal family. The state visit involves formal ceremonies such as a royal procession, air force flyover, and a state banquet, but one of the most anticipated moments will be when Kate and Melania tour the Royal Estate's Frogmore Gardens with young scouts. Here, the princess’s focus on children’s mental health aligns with Melania’s own advocacy for children, making the joint appearance a natural and meaningful one.<h2>‘Impactful appearances by Melania and Kate’</h2>The event is not just symbolic of the royal family’s enduring influence in modern diplomacy but marks a new chapter in Kate’s recovery and her role as a global figure. As royal expert Elizabeth Holmes notes, this will be one of the most impactful appearances by the two women, underscoring their ability to “humanise” their respective roles on the world stage. Both women’s participation highlights their shared interest in children’s welfare, with Melania recently addressing issues like deepfake pornography and advocating for foster children. Likewise, Kate’s post-health recovery marks a return to public engagements with causes close to her heart.&nbsp;This marks another key moment in the ongoing evolution of the royal family, which has become adept at leveraging its influence for diplomacy, with Kate leading the charge as a modern, compassionate figure on the global stage.

A diplomatic first: Melania Trump, Princess Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor

During US President Donald Trump’s state visit to the UK on Wednesday (September 17), the presence of two influential women is expected to capture major attention: Melania Trump, the First Lady, and the Princess of Wales, Catherine. Their public appearances reflect both a strategic effort to strengthen diplomatic relations and spotlight their global roles. Melania’s first state visit in her husband’s second term has been meticulously planned for months. She’s known for her careful attention to the details of such high-profile events, particularly when it comes to the clothing she wears and the image she projects. Ahead of the trip, she receives extensive briefings on her counterparts, their interests, and even the specifics of their wardrobe choices to ensure no clashing colors or tones. Also Read: UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Melania-Kate meeting In parallel, Kate’s role as Princess of Wales has grown ever more visible. Recently returning to a full schedule after recovering from health treatments, she is now positioned as one of the most influential figures within the royal family. As the princess attends engagements related to youth causes and outdoor activities, this appearance alongside Melania is not just a diplomatic moment but a visual one, highlighting both the regal and relatable sides of the royal family. The state visit involves formal ceremonies such as a royal procession, air force flyover, and a state banquet, but one of the most anticipated moments will be when Kate and Melania tour the Royal Estate's Frogmore Gardens with young scouts. Here, the princess’s focus on children’s mental health aligns with Melania’s own advocacy for children, making the joint appearance a natural and meaningful one. ‘Impactful appearances by Melania and Kate’ The event is not just symbolic of the royal family’s enduring influence in modern diplomacy but marks a new chapter in Kate’s recovery and her role as a global figure. As royal expert Elizabeth Holmes notes, this will be one of the most impactful appearances by the two women, underscoring their ability to “humanise” their respective roles on the world stage. Both women’s participation highlights their shared interest in children’s welfare, with Melania recently addressing issues like deepfake pornography and advocating for foster children. Likewise, Kate’s post-health recovery marks a return to public engagements with causes close to her heart. This marks another key moment in the ongoing evolution of the royal family, which has become adept at leveraging its influence for diplomacy, with Kate leading the charge as a modern, compassionate figure on the global stage.

Melania Trump and Princess Kate make a high-profile debut together at the UK state visit, showcasing their influence on global diplomacy while aligning with key causes related to children’s well-being

Melania Trump, Princess Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (September 17) received an extravagant welcome during his second state visit to the UK, with a gun salute and a display of mounted cavalry marking the start of his arrival, all amidst tight security. Prince William and his wife Catherine greeted Trump and First Lady Melania as the Marine One helicopter landed at Windsor Castle.&nbsp;Shielded from the protests outside by layers of security, the couple escorted the Trumps to meet King Charles III and Queen Camilla. The formal proceedings kicked off with Trump shaking hands with the monarch just as a 41-gun salute was fired from six historic World War One artillery pieces positioned on the castle’s eastern lawn, with another similar salute taking place at the Tower of London in central London.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russian-opposition-leader-alexei-navalny-s-death-in-custody-linked-to-poisoning-labs-confirm-says-wife-yulia-navalnaya-1758106068761">Russian Opposition leader Alexei Navalny's death in custody linked to poisoning, labs confirm, claims wife Yulia Navalnaya</a><h2>A royal welcome for Donald Trump and Melania</h2>A massive spectacle unfolded, with around 120 horses and 1,300 British military personnel participating in what officials described as the grandest military ceremonial welcome for a state visitor in recent history. Following the formalities, the royal couple and the Trumps made their way in a carriage procession across the Windsor estate toward the ancient castle.&nbsp;Britain is pulling out all the stops to impress and charm the unpredictable Donald Trump during his latest visit, aiming to keep him engaged amid a series of global crises. The 79-year-old president, however, is being kept at a distance from the British public, as polls show that he is highly unpopular among them. The entire trip is being carried out behind closed doors, out of view from regular Britons.&nbsp;Knowing Trump's affinity for British royalty and his love for extravagant displays, the UK has outdone itself with a ceremonial welcome even grander than the one offered during his 2019 state visit, when Queen Elizabeth II hosted him. Trump and his wife Melania will pay their respects by laying a wreath at the tomb of Queen Elizabeth II, who passed away in 2022. The trip will conclude with a formal white-tie banquet, where both Trump and King Charles III are scheduled to make speeches.<h2>Political Tensions and the Epstein Shadow</h2>The question for Britain is whether this lavish reception will win over Trump, whose unpredictable policies on issues like tariffs, Ukraine, and Gaza have created global chaos. Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be hoping that Trump leaves the UK feeling positively towards the country, though the outcome remains uncertain.&nbsp;Trump appeared to appreciate the gesture as he arrived at the US ambassador’s residence in London by helicopter with Melania on Tuesday. "A lot of things here warm my heart," he said, noting that his mother was from Scotland and that he owns two golf resorts there. He also referred to King Charles as "my friend," despite the monarch’s ongoing cancer treatment. However, Trump's association with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein continues to hover over the visit. Images of Trump and Epstein were projected onto Windsor Castle on Tuesday (September 16), and protests were expected to take place across London on Wednesday (September 17).

UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania; arrives at Windsor Castle

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (September 17) received an extravagant welcome during his second state visit to the UK, with a gun salute and a display of mounted cavalry marking the start of his arrival, all amidst tight security. Prince William and his wife Catherine greeted Trump and First Lady Melania as the Marine One helicopter landed at Windsor Castle. Shielded from the protests outside by layers of security, the couple escorted the Trumps to meet King Charles III and Queen Camilla. The formal proceedings kicked off with Trump shaking hands with the monarch just as a 41-gun salute was fired from six historic World War One artillery pieces positioned on the castle’s eastern lawn, with another similar salute taking place at the Tower of London in central London. Also Read: Russian Opposition leader Alexei Navalny's death in custody linked to poisoning, labs confirm, claims wife Yulia Navalnaya A royal welcome for Donald Trump and Melania A massive spectacle unfolded, with around 120 horses and 1,300 British military personnel participating in what officials described as the grandest military ceremonial welcome for a state visitor in recent history. Following the formalities, the royal couple and the Trumps made their way in a carriage procession across the Windsor estate toward the ancient castle. Britain is pulling out all the stops to impress and charm the unpredictable Donald Trump during his latest visit, aiming to keep him engaged amid a series of global crises. The 79-year-old president, however, is being kept at a distance from the British public, as polls show that he is highly unpopular among them. The entire trip is being carried out behind closed doors, out of view from regular Britons. Knowing Trump's affinity for British royalty and his love for extravagant displays, the UK has outdone itself with a ceremonial welcome even grander than the one offered during his 2019 state visit, when Queen Elizabeth II hosted him. Trump and his wife Melania will pay their respects by laying a wreath at the tomb of Queen Elizabeth II, who passed away in 2022. The trip will conclude with a formal white-tie banquet, where both Trump and King Charles III are scheduled to make speeches. Political Tensions and the Epstein Shadow The question for Britain is whether this lavish reception will win over Trump, whose unpredictable policies on issues like tariffs, Ukraine, and Gaza have created global chaos. Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be hoping that Trump leaves the UK feeling positively towards the country, though the outcome remains uncertain. Trump appeared to appreciate the gesture as he arrived at the US ambassador’s residence in London by helicopter with Melania on Tuesday. "A lot of things here warm my heart," he said, noting that his mother was from Scotland and that he owns two golf resorts there. He also referred to King Charles as "my friend," despite the monarch’s ongoing cancer treatment. However, Trump's association with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein continues to hover over the visit. Images of Trump and Epstein were projected onto Windsor Castle on Tuesday (September 16), and protests were expected to take place across London on Wednesday (September 17).

Donald Trump’s second UK state visit featured a grand welcome with a gun salute, military display, and a royal procession at Windsor Castle

UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania

Do you know about the biggest telescopes on Earth? These are giant instruments that use huge mirrors to capture faint light and reveal stunning details of faraway stars, galaxies, and space mysteries.

'Earth’s Giant Eyes': Meet the 5 biggest telescopes that help us see the universe

The H3N2 virus is spreading rapidly across Delhi and nearby areas of NCR cities, where several people are suffering from common flu-like symptoms. A recent health report released by the Local Circles survey indicated that there has been a staggering increase in the H3N2 virus from 50-70 per cent of households, where at least one member fell sick with flu-like symptoms over the past few months in Delhi-NCR.&nbsp;&nbsp;Multiple hospitals and doctors are observing an increased in number of patients with this virus, particularly people with respiratory problems, children and the elderly. Reports also indicated that the main culprit for this significant jump is influenza, which is leading to prolonged fevers, hospitalisation and even respiratory issues among individuals.&nbsp;&nbsp;In a survey of 11,000 people across Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, Faridabad, and Ghaziabad discovered that at least one family member in many households was either currently ill or had recently suffered from fever, cough, and fatigue. This reflects a sharp increase from March 2025, when only 54 per cent of families reported flu-like illnesses.<h3>What is the H3N2 virus?</h3>H3N2 is a subtype of the Influenza A virus, which is categorised by surface proteins (haemagglutinin "H" and neuraminidase "N") referring to type-3 H and type-2 N. H3N2 is a seasonal flu which circulates in humans, mutates over time, and it also differs in severity each year. It tends to cause more severe symptoms in high-risk populations, which include Children, Older adults, Pregnant women, People with weakened immune systems, and someone who are suffering from asthma, COPD, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes.<h3>What are the symptoms of the H3N2 virus?</h3><ul><li>Fever (often above 38-39 Celsius)</li><li>Dry or wet cough</li><li>Sore throat</li><li>Fatigue and muscle aches</li><li>Chills</li><li>Vomiting and loose motions (occasional)</li><li>In children, symptoms may include nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea</li><li>Many patients in the current outbreak have reported fever lasting over 5–7 days, with cough persisting even after other signs subside.</li></ul><h3>What are risk related to H3N2 virus?</h3>The main risks of the H3N2 virus are severe illness, such as pneumonia, bronchitis, and worsening of chronic conditions, particularly for vulnerable groups like the elderly, young children, pregnant women, and those with asthma, heart disease, diabetes, or lung disorders.<h3>How to prevent the spread of the H3N2 virus?</h3><ul><li>Get vaccinated every year</li><li>Use masks in crowded or poorly ventilated places</li><li>Maintain good hygiene</li><li>Support the immune system</li><li>Avoid close contact with sick people; if someone at home is ill, try to isolate them</li></ul>

As per the Local Circles survey report, there has been a staggering increase in the H3N2 virus from 50-70 per cent of households, where at least one member fell sick with flu-like symptoms over the past few months in Delhi-NCR. 

The H3N2 virus is spreading rapidly across Delhi and nearby areas of NCR cities, where several people are suffering from common flu-like symptoms. A recent health report released by the Local Circles survey indicated that there has been a staggering increase in the H3N2 virus from 50-70 per cent of households, where at least one member fell sick with flu-like symptoms over the past few months in Delhi-NCR. Multiple hospitals and doctors are observing an increased in number of patients with this virus, particularly people with respiratory problems, children and the elderly. Reports also indicated that the main culprit for this significant jump is influenza, which is leading to prolonged fevers, hospitalisation and even respiratory issues among individuals. In a survey of 11,000 people across Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, Faridabad, and Ghaziabad discovered that at least one family member in many households was either currently ill or had recently suffered from fever, cough, and fatigue. This reflects a sharp increase from March 2025, when only 54 per cent of families reported flu-like illnesses. What is the H3N2 virus? H3N2 is a subtype of the Influenza A virus, which is categorised by surface proteins (haemagglutinin "H" and neuraminidase "N") referring to type-3 H and type-2 N. H3N2 is a seasonal flu which circulates in humans, mutates over time, and it also differs in severity each year. It tends to cause more severe symptoms in high-risk populations, which include Children, Older adults, Pregnant women, People with weakened immune systems, and someone who are suffering from asthma, COPD, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. What are the symptoms of the H3N2 virus? Fever (often above 38-39 Celsius) Dry or wet cough Sore throat Fatigue and muscle aches Chills Vomiting and loose motions (occasional) In children, symptoms may include nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea Many patients in the current outbreak have reported fever lasting over 5–7 days, with cough persisting even after other signs subside. What are risk related to H3N2 virus? The main risks of the H3N2 virus are severe illness, such as pneumonia, bronchitis, and worsening of chronic conditions, particularly for vulnerable groups like the elderly, young children, pregnant women, and those with asthma, heart disease, diabetes, or lung disorders. How to prevent the spread of the H3N2 virus? Get vaccinated every year Use masks in crowded or poorly ventilated places Maintain good hygiene Support the immune system Avoid close contact with sick people; if someone at home is ill, try to isolate them

As per the Local Circles survey report, there has been a staggering increase in the H3N2 virus from 50-70 per cent of households, where at least one member fell sick with flu-like symptoms over the past few months in Delhi-NCR.&nbsp;

What is H3N2 virus? Affected nearly 70% of Delhi-NCR. Know its symptoms, risks and treatment

A new order by the Trump administration issued late last month states that NASA will operate as a national intelligence and security agency. According to it, the space agency will now have a different set of primary functions, which includes "intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work." The revelation was made by NASA Watch founder Keith Cowing, as the issue didn't exactly make headlines at the time. Keith was once a scientist at the space agency, and now closely watches everything that happens there. So, does this mean that NASA will go forward and develop spycraft instead of spacecraft? According to reports, the order is more about labour concerns rather than about the work NASA does. A report from Futurism states that the order adds "NASA to the Federal Service Labour-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS), excluding it from collective bargaining representation."Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/nasa-says-a-new-island-has-emerged-in-alaska-in-just-40-years-1758021271478">NASA says a new island has emerged in Alaska in just 40 years</a>&nbsp;This sparked discontent among NASA employees, who staged a protest outside NASA's Washington, DC, headquarters earlier this week. The change in the status of the space agency came as the president eliminated the union rights for thousands of federal employees. Several lawsuits had been filed to stop the order. As this news made headlines, the thing about NASA becoming a spy agency was sidelined. However, that is expected to have labour implications for the people working at the agency. Government Executive quoted the vice president of the Goddard Engineers, Scientists and Technicians Association, Monica Gorman, as telling those gathered at the protest, “A huge part of the reason that I have that independence, and that my colleagues do, is that as a union-represented worker I know that I am protected from unfair retaliation.”Also Read: '<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-no-way-not-going-to-happen-acting-nasa-chief-duffy-says-china-will-not-beat-us-to-the-moon-1757520784597">No way, not going to happen': Acting NASA chief Duffy says China will not beat US to the Moon</a>Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/-president-loves-space-he-asked-me-us-will-reach-the-moon-under-trump-asserts-nasa-chief-1757566924166">'President loves space. He asked me...' — NASA has enough budget to reach the Moon, asserts acting chief</a>&nbsp;<h2>Trump administration's budget for NASA</h2>Donald Trump has already announced a lower budget for NASA in the year 2026. On May 2, the Trump administration proposed cutting NASA funding by nearly 25 per cent. This will reduce the money allocated from $24.8 billion to $18.8 billion. Most of this reduction will affect the agency's science programs. According to The Planetary Society, a nonprofit exploration advocacy organisation, the 2026 budget would be the agency's lowest since 1961.&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump is instead interested in militarising space, as appears from his "Golden Dome" missile defence program. According to Sean Duffy, the acting chief of NASA, Trump wants to send men to the Moon before China. He said during a press conference that Trump is also eager to reach for Mars. Just last month, Duffy said that NASA will give up on "all of these Earth sciences." Duffy recently stressed that NASA's Artemis mission is a go, although there are fears that China will make it there before the US.&nbsp;

NASA is not a space agency any more, at least not on paper. An executive order quietly changed things for NASA. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has lowered the budget for NASA for 2026, but the president wants to reach the Moon and Mars.

A new order by the Trump administration issued late last month states that NASA will operate as a national intelligence and security agency. According to it, the space agency will now have a different set of primary functions, which includes "intelligence, counterintelligence, investigative, or national security work." The revelation was made by NASA Watch founder Keith Cowing, as the issue didn't exactly make headlines at the time. Keith was once a scientist at the space agency, and now closely watches everything that happens there. So, does this mean that NASA will go forward and develop spycraft instead of spacecraft? According to reports, the order is more about labour concerns rather than about the work NASA does. A report from Futurism states that the order adds "NASA to the Federal Service Labour-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS), excluding it from collective bargaining representation." Also Read: NASA says a new island has emerged in Alaska in just 40 years This sparked discontent among NASA employees, who staged a protest outside NASA's Washington, DC, headquarters earlier this week. The change in the status of the space agency came as the president eliminated the union rights for thousands of federal employees. Several lawsuits had been filed to stop the order. As this news made headlines, the thing about NASA becoming a spy agency was sidelined. However, that is expected to have labour implications for the people working at the agency. Government Executive quoted the vice president of the Goddard Engineers, Scientists and Technicians Association, Monica Gorman, as telling those gathered at the protest, “A huge part of the reason that I have that independence, and that my colleagues do, is that as a union-represented worker I know that I am protected from unfair retaliation.” Also Read: 'No way, not going to happen': Acting NASA chief Duffy says China will not beat US to the Moon Also Read: 'President loves space. He asked me...' — NASA has enough budget to reach the Moon, asserts acting chief Trump administration's budget for NASA Donald Trump has already announced a lower budget for NASA in the year 2026. On May 2, the Trump administration proposed cutting NASA funding by nearly 25 per cent. This will reduce the money allocated from $24.8 billion to $18.8 billion. Most of this reduction will affect the agency's science programs. According to The Planetary Society, a nonprofit exploration advocacy organisation, the 2026 budget would be the agency's lowest since 1961. Trump is instead interested in militarising space, as appears from his "Golden Dome" missile defence program. According to Sean Duffy, the acting chief of NASA, Trump wants to send men to the Moon before China. He said during a press conference that Trump is also eager to reach for Mars. Just last month, Duffy said that NASA will give up on "all of these Earth sciences." Duffy recently stressed that NASA's Artemis mission is a go, although there are fears that China will make it there before the US.

NASA is not a space agency any more, at least not on paper. An executive order quietly changed things for NASA. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has lowered the budget for NASA for 2026, but the president wants to reach the Moon and Mars.

NASA is no longer a space agency. Its new official status is pretty shocking. Here's what happened

Special dates, such as March 14 - 3/14 - (Pi Day), and May 4 (Star Wars Day) generate a lot of excitement every year. For mathematicians, there is also the Square Root Day (4/4/16 or 5/5/25). We just had another such special date - 9/16/25 (September 16, 2025). There is no ring to it, or you might not instantly associate it with any special theorem or mathematical figure. Yet, there was something about this date that fascinated maths fanatics. &nbsp;Colin Adams, a mathematician at Williams College, told NPR that he was first told about the speciality of the date by a former student named Jake Malarkey. He said, "All three of the entries in that date are perfect squares — and what I mean by that is 9 is equal to 32, 16 is equal to 42, and 25 is equal to 52." But, that's not all. The other noticeable thing about the date is that all three numbers - 9, 16 and 25 - come from consecutive numbers — three, four, and five.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/on-19-january-2038-we-will-return-137-years-back-in-time-because-of-y2k-like-crisis-1754552664119">Another Y2K? On 19 Jan, 2038, we'll return 137 years back in time if...</a>&nbsp;Next, three, four, and five are examples of what's called a Pythagorean triple. Adams says the figures come together to form the "most famous theorem in all of mathematics" - the Pythagorean Theorem. The numbers form a2 + b2 = c2. He explains, "If I take the sum of the squares of the first two numbers, 32 + 42, which is 9 + 16… is equal to 25, which is 52, so 32 + 42 = 52." The Pythagorean Theorem is a2 + b2 = c2.<h2>Pythagorean triple</h2>In geometry, any Pythagorean triple gives the lengths of the three sides of a right triangle. That is, the squares of the two shorter lengths add up to the square of the final, longer side. This is true for 3, 4 and 5 as well. Adams says this is a once-in-a-lifetime date as there are no other dates in this century that will meet all these conditions. More maths magic is dripping here, as the year 2025 is also a perfect square - 45 times 45.&nbsp;Adams also has a name ready for this mathematically magical date. He says he would love to call it Pythagorean Triple Square Day. He said celebrations would include a rectangular cake cut along the diagonal to yield two right triangles. Blackman, completely in awe of the date, says it reveals "some kind of hidden mathematical poetry".

Mathematicians got a special date on 9/16/25. The numbers in the date are mathematically magical and unique. They form the "most famous theorem in all of mathematics", and is the only such date in this century.  

Special dates, such as March 14 - 3/14 - (Pi Day), and May 4 (Star Wars Day) generate a lot of excitement every year. For mathematicians, there is also the Square Root Day (4/4/16 or 5/5/25). We just had another such special date - 9/16/25 (September 16, 2025). There is no ring to it, or you might not instantly associate it with any special theorem or mathematical figure. Yet, there was something about this date that fascinated maths fanatics. Colin Adams, a mathematician at Williams College, told NPR that he was first told about the speciality of the date by a former student named Jake Malarkey. He said, "All three of the entries in that date are perfect squares — and what I mean by that is 9 is equal to 32, 16 is equal to 42, and 25 is equal to 52." But, that's not all. The other noticeable thing about the date is that all three numbers - 9, 16 and 25 - come from consecutive numbers — three, four, and five. Also Read: Another Y2K? On 19 Jan, 2038, we'll return 137 years back in time if... Next, three, four, and five are examples of what's called a Pythagorean triple. Adams says the figures come together to form the "most famous theorem in all of mathematics" - the Pythagorean Theorem. The numbers form a2 + b2 = c2. He explains, "If I take the sum of the squares of the first two numbers, 32 + 42, which is 9 + 16… is equal to 25, which is 52, so 32 + 42 = 52." The Pythagorean Theorem is a2 + b2 = c2. Pythagorean triple In geometry, any Pythagorean triple gives the lengths of the three sides of a right triangle. That is, the squares of the two shorter lengths add up to the square of the final, longer side. This is true for 3, 4 and 5 as well. Adams says this is a once-in-a-lifetime date as there are no other dates in this century that will meet all these conditions. More maths magic is dripping here, as the year 2025 is also a perfect square - 45 times 45. Adams also has a name ready for this mathematically magical date. He says he would love to call it Pythagorean Triple Square Day. He said celebrations would include a rectangular cake cut along the diagonal to yield two right triangles. Blackman, completely in awe of the date, says it reveals "some kind of hidden mathematical poetry".

Mathematicians got a special date on 9/16/25. The numbers in the date are mathematically magical and unique. They form the "most famous theorem in all of mathematics", and is the only such date in this century. &nbsp;

9-16-25 was a rare, once-in-a-century date. Did you notice?

An unusual trend is being observed in Kabul, Afghanistan. According to reports, cosmetic surgery facilities are becoming increasingly popular in an orthodox Taliban-ruled state. Approximately 20 clinics have popped up in Kabul offering procedures like Botox, facelifts, and hair transplants. These clinics feature luxurious design elements like velvet sofas and crystal chandeliers, which create an environment unlikely to be appreciated under the Taliban authorities.&nbsp;In July 2023, the Taliban imposed a nationwide ban on beauty parlours, giving owners one month to close their businesses. When the bans were being imposed, there were approximately 12,000–13,000 beauty parlours available in Kabul. According to reports by the UN and Afghan women’s groups, these salons were one of the few remaining sources of income and social space for Afghan women.&nbsp;&nbsp;Read Also: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/complete-list-prime-minister-modi-s-international-travel-1758020879275">Prime Minister Modi’s international travel: Complete list of Prime Ministerial visits abroad</a>&nbsp;However, despite the Taliban conservatism, something around 20 clinics have flourished. Doctors from foreign countries like Turkey have travelled to Kabul to train Afghans. Professionals have claimed that these procedures are permitted under medical treatment without any intervention from the Taliban authorities.&nbsp;The clientele is diverse, encompassing both men and women. Men are often there to address their thinning hairline. However, the majority are women who are mostly covered in traditional burqas.&nbsp;&nbsp;25-year-old Silsila Hamidi is getting another facelift, as she is stressed from being a woman in Afghanistan, and her face had started to sag. "Even if others can't see us, we see ourselves: looking beautiful in the mirror gives us energy," said Hamidi.&nbsp;In a country where the majority live in poverty, such procedures are being conducted under the medical treatment and cost between $43 and $87 for Botox treatments, and hair implants costing $260 to $509.&nbsp;&nbsp;Read Also: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/diamonds-daria-i-noor-bangladesh-vault-1757651980488">Kohinoor's long-lost sister Daria-i-noor diamond to reappear in Bangladesh in a 117-year-old vault</a><h2>Salons banned, but not Botox&nbsp;</h2>Even though women can't travel long distances without a male guardian, can't speak loudly, can't visit universities, parks and gyms, surgical cosmetic procedures are booming. The hair salons, which provided a much-needed social space for working-class women, have withered away under the guise of immorality. A new breed of wealthy, influential Afghan women and men use these services.&nbsp;Since the Taliban has ordered men to grow beards at least fist length, transplants have become fashionable, said Bilal Khan, co-director of the EuroAsia clinic. He is about to open his second clinic.&nbsp;These are private, regulated, and behind closed-door clinics which do not attract ideological contradiction. The rise of social media influencers has also played a role in popularising cosmetic procedures. Many patients being swayed by social media seek surgeries even though they do not have any medical requirements. Showing a stark shift in societal values for a country, half of which is in abject poverty.&nbsp;&nbsp;Read Also: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/weirdest-guinness-world-records-top-10-1757167165334">Top 10 weirdest Guinness World Records that will leave you speechless</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;

In Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, beauty salons are banned, but Botox and cosmetic surgery clinics are thriving. Discover how private clinics in Kabul are booming despite strict restrictions on women

An unusual trend is being observed in Kabul, Afghanistan. According to reports, cosmetic surgery facilities are becoming increasingly popular in an orthodox Taliban-ruled state. Approximately 20 clinics have popped up in Kabul offering procedures like Botox, facelifts, and hair transplants. These clinics feature luxurious design elements like velvet sofas and crystal chandeliers, which create an environment unlikely to be appreciated under the Taliban authorities. In July 2023, the Taliban imposed a nationwide ban on beauty parlours, giving owners one month to close their businesses. When the bans were being imposed, there were approximately 12,000–13,000 beauty parlours available in Kabul. According to reports by the UN and Afghan women’s groups, these salons were one of the few remaining sources of income and social space for Afghan women. Read Also: Prime Minister Modi’s international travel: Complete list of Prime Ministerial visits abroad However, despite the Taliban conservatism, something around 20 clinics have flourished. Doctors from foreign countries like Turkey have travelled to Kabul to train Afghans. Professionals have claimed that these procedures are permitted under medical treatment without any intervention from the Taliban authorities. The clientele is diverse, encompassing both men and women. Men are often there to address their thinning hairline. However, the majority are women who are mostly covered in traditional burqas. 25-year-old Silsila Hamidi is getting another facelift, as she is stressed from being a woman in Afghanistan, and her face had started to sag. "Even if others can't see us, we see ourselves: looking beautiful in the mirror gives us energy," said Hamidi. In a country where the majority live in poverty, such procedures are being conducted under the medical treatment and cost between $43 and $87 for Botox treatments, and hair implants costing $260 to $509. Read Also: Kohinoor's long-lost sister Daria-i-noor diamond to reappear in Bangladesh in a 117-year-old vault Salons banned, but not Botox Even though women can't travel long distances without a male guardian, can't speak loudly, can't visit universities, parks and gyms, surgical cosmetic procedures are booming. The hair salons, which provided a much-needed social space for working-class women, have withered away under the guise of immorality. A new breed of wealthy, influential Afghan women and men use these services. Since the Taliban has ordered men to grow beards at least fist length, transplants have become fashionable, said Bilal Khan, co-director of the EuroAsia clinic. He is about to open his second clinic. These are private, regulated, and behind closed-door clinics which do not attract ideological contradiction. The rise of social media influencers has also played a role in popularising cosmetic procedures. Many patients being swayed by social media seek surgeries even though they do not have any medical requirements. Showing a stark shift in societal values for a country, half of which is in abject poverty. Read Also: Top 10 weirdest Guinness World Records that will leave you speechless

In Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, beauty salons are banned, but Botox and cosmetic surgery clinics are thriving. Discover how private clinics in Kabul are booming despite strict restrictions on women

Botox under burqas, unlikely boom of cosmetic surgery in Taliban conservatism

Podcasting, once a niche medium for storytelling, education, and light-hearted banter, has evolved into a potent vehicle for ideological warfare—sometimes with deadly consequences. What began in the early 2000s as an accessible, soothing pastime has, by 2025, become a channel for weaponised words, amplifying conspiracy theories, radicalising audiences trapped in echo chambers, and deepening political divides. Charlie Kirk, both a martyr for the US right-wing and a hate figure for the extreme left, was an active podcaster before he was murdered this month.<h2>Words can kill: The far-right vs far-left podcast ecosystem</h2>While several longstanding hosts like Joe Rogan and Glenn Beck found refuge in podcasting—often because they were shunned or limited by mainstream media—podcasts have become algorithm-driven battlegrounds. Hosts like Charlie Kirk and the Chapo Trap House crew stand on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum, reaching vast audiences. Beyond mere commentary, these podcasts serve as recruitment tools, propaganda mills, and community-building hubs. Their evolution mirrors broader digital media trends: voices colliding with unregulated extremism, fuelled by monetisation and social media virality.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/after-trump-blames-left-for-radicalising-charlie-kirk-killer-damning-study-on-how-domestic-terrorists-are-mostly-right-wing-vanishes-from-doj-website-1758086933683/amp">DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death</a><h2>The origin of innocence: Evolution of podcasting</h2>Podcasting’s boom began around 2004, rooted in RSS feeds and MP3 downloads. Early shows focused on entertainment, learning, or storytelling—especially true crime (Serial), science (Radiolab), or comedy. Podcasts were perfect for passive listening during commutes or chores, resembling public radio without ads. As digital tech advanced and big tech platforms like Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts emerged, anyone with a microphone could create content, bypassing traditional gatekeepers.The transformation of pocasts into a cultural war zone began in the 2010s, especially after Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. Ideology-driven and divisive rhetoric became central to many shows.<h2>How Kirk went from campus provocateur to icon</h2>The Charlie Kirk Show helped mobilise MAGA youth, inspiring over 37,000 chapters of Kirk’s NGO Turning Point USA. After his death, the show’s influence surged. Kirk’s early podcasts focused on campus debates and “free speech” battles but gradually hardened in tone. His content began blending Christian nationalism, Trumpist narratives, and youth outreach.&nbsp;<h2>How podcasts became the far-right’s arsenal to weaponise words</h2>Algorithmic bias and underserved market demand led to dominance of rightwing podcasts online. Left-wing podcasts, while praised for originality, often lack comparable real-world influence.Far-right podcasts aggressively weaponised the medium, creating a networked system of radicalisation. The Charlie Kirk Show exemplifies this: a slickly produced mix of anti-woke rants, conspiratorial framing, and culture war commentary turned Kirk into a Gen Z conservative icon. His assassination in September only intensified the show’s influence, propelling it to number 1 on Apple Podcasts and immortalising Kirk as a martyr among conservatives.The refrain of conservative and far-right podcasts is consistent: frame progressives as existential threats, delegitimise mainstream media, and encourage both online and on-street activism. Phrases like “fight back” or “defend your country” are common, paired with disdain for “globalists,” “woke elites,” or “leftist propaganda,” creating a coordinated content ecosystem preaching mostly to the converted.Shows like The Daily Shoah and Fash the Nation are known for promoting white nationalist ideologies, often masked as humour or coded language.&nbsp;Their rhetoric imagines violent futures for the US and normalises real-life confrontation.&nbsp;Hosts frequently cross-promote on apps like Telegram, swap guest spots, and build digital communities primed for activism.&nbsp;Even deplatforming by YouTube or Facebook does not stop them; RSS feeds, Rumble, and peer-to-peer hosting keep content alive.The Daily Shoah, hosted by Mike Enoch and others, uses white nationalist comedy. Fash the Nation popularised the “Great Replacement” theory, which posits that white populations are being systematically replaced through immigration and demographic change, a racist conspiracy. Killstream uses shock-jock tactics and live-stream debates to promote street-level confrontations.These podcasts have strong reach among disillusioned youth and are amplified by social media and recommendation algorithms.&nbsp;They create “rabbit holes” where ironic or casual listening can shift into genuine belief and recruitment for far-right causes.&nbsp;Their popularity became evident when right-wing shows outnumbered and topped listenership on platforms like Spotify and Apple, catering to an underserved anti-woke demographic.<h2>The far-left is far behind in the podcast war</h2>The far-left uses intellectualism, satire, and irony to reach audiences. Chapo Trap House pioneered the “dirtbag left” style—a mix of socialist critique, comedic takedowns of liberal centrists, and profanity-laden disdain for both Democratic and Republican parties.The show was a Patreon success, once earning over $160,000 per month, funding live tours and shaping millennial socialist discourse.Other shows include The Antifada, which combines Marxist theory with event commentary, and Revolutionary Left Radio, which offers dense philosophical monologues critiquing capitalism and imperialism through radical, often academic frameworks.But when compared to right-wing podcasts, these leftist shows lack mainstream platform support and have a more limited reach.They, however, influence activist networks and political consciousness among younger listeners.<h2>Podcasts are trusted—and that’s where the danger lies</h2>A 2023 Pew Research Center study showed that over 30 per cent of listeners trust podcasts more than traditional news. This trust makes podcasts fertile ground for alternate reality construction, ideological grooming, and weaponising words that can have violent outcomes.Far-right podcasts normalise political violence, white racial grievance, and conspiratorial thinking. Their hosts have been linked to real-world incidents—from the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville in August 2017 to the January 6, 2021 US Capitol riot.&nbsp;Their messaging often frames violence as defensive and necessary.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fbi-s-arctic-fox-case-targeted-gop-and-charlie-kirk-trump-lashes-out-at-biden-1758094242635">FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden</a><h2>Parasocial bonds: When host becomes indoctrinator</h2>Both far-right and far-left podcasts exploit parasocial bonds—the illusion of friendship between host and listener—to create loyalty and identity.&nbsp;The line between opinion and indoctrination dissolves, when your “friend” tells you who to fear, mock, or ignore.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-some-hate-can-t-be-negotiated-charlie-kirk-s-shooter-tyler-robinson-s-text-to-partner-exposes-motive-here-s-what-he-said-1758083338852">'Some hate can’t be negotiated': Charlie Kirk's 'shooter' Tyler Robinson's text to partner exposes motive - Here's what he said</a><h2>Podcasts spew venom: Is censorship required?</h2>Podcasting began as an open, humanising format for casual listening but has become a digital battlefield at the hands of some hosts and listeners. &nbsp;Each episode can be a weapon; each listener a potential recruit.Currently, podcasts operate largely in a legal vacuum, with no formal censorship beyond some deplatforming of controversial hosts.&nbsp;It is time to balance free speech with responsibility—curbing algorithmic extremism without blanket bans.Listeners need better media literacy—to understand framing, bias, and rhetorical manipulation.Creators must acknowledge their influence and avoid exploiting parasocial relationships.The genie is out of the bottle. Podcasts are no longer mere audio backdrops to our days; they are frontlines in a culture war.

Charlie Kirk assassination has brought attention to podcast as a medium. Podcasting evolved from a casual pastime to a tool for ideological warfare, amplifying extremism via both far-right and far-left shows, with real-world consequences like radicalisation and violence



Podcasting, once a niche medium for storytelling, education, and light-hearted banter, has evolved into a potent vehicle for ideological warfare—sometimes with deadly consequences. What began in the early 2000s as an accessible, soothing pastime has, by 2025, become a channel for weaponised words, amplifying conspiracy theories, radicalising audiences trapped in echo chambers, and deepening political divides. Charlie Kirk, both a martyr for the US right-wing and a hate figure for the extreme left, was an active podcaster before he was murdered this month. Words can kill: The far-right vs far-left podcast ecosystem While several longstanding hosts like Joe Rogan and Glenn Beck found refuge in podcasting—often because they were shunned or limited by mainstream media—podcasts have become algorithm-driven battlegrounds. Hosts like Charlie Kirk and the Chapo Trap House crew stand on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum, reaching vast audiences. Beyond mere commentary, these podcasts serve as recruitment tools, propaganda mills, and community-building hubs. Their evolution mirrors broader digital media trends: voices colliding with unregulated extremism, fuelled by monetisation and social media virality. Also read: DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death The origin of innocence: Evolution of podcasting Podcasting’s boom began around 2004, rooted in RSS feeds and MP3 downloads. Early shows focused on entertainment, learning, or storytelling—especially true crime (Serial), science (Radiolab), or comedy. Podcasts were perfect for passive listening during commutes or chores, resembling public radio without ads. As digital tech advanced and big tech platforms like Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts emerged, anyone with a microphone could create content, bypassing traditional gatekeepers. The transformation of pocasts into a cultural war zone began in the 2010s, especially after Donald Trump’s 2016 election victory. Ideology-driven and divisive rhetoric became central to many shows. How Kirk went from campus provocateur to icon The Charlie Kirk Show helped mobilise MAGA youth, inspiring over 37,000 chapters of Kirk’s NGO Turning Point USA. After his death, the show’s influence surged. Kirk’s early podcasts focused on campus debates and “free speech” battles but gradually hardened in tone. His content began blending Christian nationalism, Trumpist narratives, and youth outreach. How podcasts became the far-right’s arsenal to weaponise words Algorithmic bias and underserved market demand led to dominance of rightwing podcasts online. Left-wing podcasts, while praised for originality, often lack comparable real-world influence. Far-right podcasts aggressively weaponised the medium, creating a networked system of radicalisation. The Charlie Kirk Show exemplifies this: a slickly produced mix of anti-woke rants, conspiratorial framing, and culture war commentary turned Kirk into a Gen Z conservative icon. His assassination in September only intensified the show’s influence, propelling it to number 1 on Apple Podcasts and immortalising Kirk as a martyr among conservatives. The refrain of conservative and far-right podcasts is consistent: frame progressives as existential threats, delegitimise mainstream media, and encourage both online and on-street activism. Phrases like “fight back” or “defend your country” are common, paired with disdain for “globalists,” “woke elites,” or “leftist propaganda,” creating a coordinated content ecosystem preaching mostly to the converted. Shows like The Daily Shoah and Fash the Nation are known for promoting white nationalist ideologies, often masked as humour or coded language. Their rhetoric imagines violent futures for the US and normalises real-life confrontation. Hosts frequently cross-promote on apps like Telegram, swap guest spots, and build digital communities primed for activism. Even deplatforming by YouTube or Facebook does not stop them; RSS feeds, Rumble, and peer-to-peer hosting keep content alive. The Daily Shoah, hosted by Mike Enoch and others, uses white nationalist comedy. Fash the Nation popularised the “Great Replacement” theory, which posits that white populations are being systematically replaced through immigration and demographic change, a racist conspiracy. Killstream uses shock-jock tactics and live-stream debates to promote street-level confrontations. These podcasts have strong reach among disillusioned youth and are amplified by social media and recommendation algorithms. They create “rabbit holes” where ironic or casual listening can shift into genuine belief and recruitment for far-right causes. Their popularity became evident when right-wing shows outnumbered and topped listenership on platforms like Spotify and Apple, catering to an underserved anti-woke demographic. The far-left is far behind in the podcast war The far-left uses intellectualism, satire, and irony to reach audiences. Chapo Trap House pioneered the “dirtbag left” style—a mix of socialist critique, comedic takedowns of liberal centrists, and profanity-laden disdain for both Democratic and Republican parties. The show was a Patreon success, once earning over $160,000 per month, funding live tours and shaping millennial socialist discourse. Other shows include The Antifada, which combines Marxist theory with event commentary, and Revolutionary Left Radio, which offers dense philosophical monologues critiquing capitalism and imperialism through radical, often academic frameworks. But when compared to right-wing podcasts, these leftist shows lack mainstream platform support and have a more limited reach. They, however, influence activist networks and political consciousness among younger listeners. Podcasts are trusted—and that’s where the danger lies A 2023 Pew Research Center study showed that over 30 per cent of listeners trust podcasts more than traditional news. This trust makes podcasts fertile ground for alternate reality construction, ideological grooming, and weaponising words that can have violent outcomes. Far-right podcasts normalise political violence, white racial grievance, and conspiratorial thinking. Their hosts have been linked to real-world incidents—from the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville in August 2017 to the January 6, 2021 US Capitol riot. Their messaging often frames violence as defensive and necessary. Also read: FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden Parasocial bonds: When host becomes indoctrinator Both far-right and far-left podcasts exploit parasocial bonds—the illusion of friendship between host and listener—to create loyalty and identity. The line between opinion and indoctrination dissolves, when your “friend” tells you who to fear, mock, or ignore. Also read: 'Some hate can’t be negotiated': Charlie Kirk's 'shooter' Tyler Robinson's text to partner exposes motive - Here's what he said Podcasts spew venom: Is censorship required? Podcasting began as an open, humanising format for casual listening but has become a digital battlefield at the hands of some hosts and listeners. Each episode can be a weapon; each listener a potential recruit. Currently, podcasts operate largely in a legal vacuum, with no formal censorship beyond some deplatforming of controversial hosts. It is time to balance free speech with responsibility—curbing algorithmic extremism without blanket bans. Listeners need better media literacy—to understand framing, bias, and rhetorical manipulation. Creators must acknowledge their influence and avoid exploiting parasocial relationships. The genie is out of the bottle. Podcasts are no longer mere audio backdrops to our days; they are frontlines in a culture war.

Charlie Kirk assassination has brought attention to podcast as a medium. Podcasting evolved from a casual pastime to a tool for ideological warfare, amplifying extremism via both far-right and far-left shows, with real-world consequences like radicalisation and violence&nbsp;

Death by Podcast: Charlie Kirk murder is also about how a new medium went from soothing pastime to weaponised words

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday (Sep 17) invoked the viral video of a Jaish commander admitting that Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) chief Masood Azhar's family was wiped out in India's Operation Sindoor, and declared that it was proof that "new India...does not fear anyone's nuclear threats".<h2>PM Modi lauds Operation Sindoor</h2>Speaking at a massive rally in Dhar on his 75th birthday, Modi said the confession showed that India's response to terrorism had changed. "New India that strikes terrorists inside their own homes," he said."Pakistani terrorists had wiped the sindoor of our sisters and daughters. We carried out Operation Sindoor and destroyed the terror camps. Our brave armed forces brought Pakistan to its knees within the blink of an eye," the Prime Minister told the crowd."Just yesterday, the nation and the world witnessed another Pakistani terrorist tearfully narrating his ordeal. This is a new India. It does not fear anyone's nuclear threats. This is a new India that strikes terrorists inside their own homes," he added, drawing loud applause.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Pakistani terror commander breaks down over India&#39;s airstrike on Masood Azhar family; PM Narendra Modi says, ‘This is a new India. We don’t fear anyone.’ . . . . .<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/OperationSindoor?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#OperationSindoor</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PMModi?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PMModi</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/MasoodAzhar?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MasoodAzhar</a> <a href="https://t.co/CVLBGnS0ZV">pic.twitter.com/CVLBGnS0ZV</a>&mdash; WION (@WIONews) <a href="https://twitter.com/WIONews/status/1968215165092143212?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 17, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>JeM commander accepts India wiped out Jaish chief Masood Azhar's family</h2>PM Modi's remarks came after a video surfaced of JeM commander Masood Ilyas Kashmiri, flanked by Pakistani security personnel, admitting that Azhar's family had been "torn into pieces" in the May 7 airstrike on the group's Bahawalpur headquarters, Jamia Masjid Subhan Allah. The operation was launched after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 25 tourists.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Big Expose 🚨 Jaish-E-Mohammad (JeM) commander Masood Ilyas Kashmiri admits: On May 7, Masood Azhar’s family was ripped apart in Bahawalpur strike by Indian forces. But ISPR still shamelessly parades gun-toting terrorists as innocent civilians. <a href="https://t.co/02qIMaUTWg">pic.twitter.com/02qIMaUTWg</a>&mdash; Baba Banaras™ (@RealBababanaras) <a href="https://twitter.com/RealBababanaras/status/1967809361625092240?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Kashmiri's confession also linked Jaish to the Delhi and Mumbai terror attacks and revealed that Pakistan's Balakot region had long served as the base for Masood Azhar's operations.Operation Sindoor, India's most daring cross-border strike to date, targeted nine sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, including Bahawalpur, which was reduced to rubble. At the time, Pakistan's military public relations wing, ISPR, claimed civilians were killed. The new admission, months later, directly contradicts that account."...we fought Delhi, Kabul and Kandahar for protecting the borders of this country. After sacrificing everything, on May 7, Maulana Masood Azhar's family was destroyed in Bahawalpur," Kashmiri said in the video, acknowledging JeM's heavy losses.

During a rally on his 75th birthday, PM Modi, referred to the viral video of Jaish commander admitting that the JeM chief Masood Azhar was "torn into pieces" in an Indian airstrike and declared that "new India...does not fear anyone's nuclear threats."

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday (Sep 17) invoked the viral video of a Jaish commander admitting that Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) chief Masood Azhar's family was wiped out in India's Operation Sindoor, and declared that it was proof that "new India...does not fear anyone's nuclear threats". PM Modi lauds Operation Sindoor Speaking at a massive rally in Dhar on his 75th birthday, Modi said the confession showed that India's response to terrorism had changed. "New India that strikes terrorists inside their own homes," he said. "Pakistani terrorists had wiped the sindoor of our sisters and daughters. We carried out Operation Sindoor and destroyed the terror camps. Our brave armed forces brought Pakistan to its knees within the blink of an eye," the Prime Minister told the crowd. "Just yesterday, the nation and the world witnessed another Pakistani terrorist tearfully narrating his ordeal. This is a new India. It does not fear anyone's nuclear threats. This is a new India that strikes terrorists inside their own homes," he added, drawing loud applause.

During a rally on his 75th birthday, PM Modi, referred to the viral video of Jaish commander admitting that the JeM chief Masood Azhar was "torn into pieces" in an Indian airstrike and declared that "new India...does not fear anyone's nuclear threats."

JeM chief Masood Azhar's family was wiped out in Operation Sindoor, says PM Modi

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Sep 16) lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden and former Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice for investigating slain MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk and his organisation Turning Point USA (TPUSA). In his usual fashion, Trump called Smith "deranged" while labelling Biden "incompetent," as he questioned why the "wonderful" Turning Point was under investigation.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-elect-a-rapist-expect-to-get-fu-ed-britons-troll-trump-as-windsor-castle-lights-up-with-epstein-images-1758075915188">'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images</a><h2>Arctic Fox</h2>Trump's statement comes as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, on Tuesday (Sep 16) revealed that the FBI's election-related investigation into President Donald Trump, launched in 2022, also roped in dozens of Republican entities, including Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA.Grassley said that the investigation code-named "Arctic Fox" by the bureau was partisan in nature and claimed that there was plenty of proof towards that."In other words, Arctic Frost wasn't just a case to politically investigate Trump," he said. “It was a vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors could achieve their partisan ends and improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus.”Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kash-patel-denies-politicising-fbi-as-hearing-turns-into-war-of-words-liar-buffoon-false-rant-1758071374525">Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns into war of words: 'Liar,' 'buffoon,' 'false rant'</a><h3>Trump reiterates DOJ was weaponised by Biden claims</h3>Using his nickname for Biden, he once again repeated his claim that the previous administration "Weaponised the Justice Department against Sleepy Joe Biden’s Political Opponents, including ME!".Without taking their names, Trump then set his sights on Loren Merchan and her father, Judge Juan Merchan, alleging, "They allowed the daughter of a Judge, on one of the corrupt trials against me, to become the biggest fund raiser for Biden and Kamala, making many Millions of Dollars for herself and her family". Loren Merchan presided over the Manhattan hush-money case against Trump.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/after-trump-blames-left-for-radicalising-charlie-kirk-killer-damning-study-on-how-domestic-terrorists-are-mostly-right-wing-vanishes-from-doj-website-1758086933683">DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death</a>Trump added that not only did her father refuse to recuse himself but also put a "gag order on me, not allowing ANY talk about their family corruption and unprecedented conflict of interest." However, this statement has little truth. Reports suggest that Judge Merchan issued a gag order against Trump to prevent him from making statements that could threaten witnesses, jurors, court staff, prosecutors, and their families. The order was also supposed to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings and ensure a fair trial.

"Every leading legal analyst and pundit said this trial was wrong and should not have been allowed to go forward," claimed Trump, adding, "But it did because of a Corrupt Judge who will hopefully pay a very big price for his illegal actions, someday!"

Donald Trump lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden, and former Special Counsel Jack Smith for investigating slain Charlie Kirk and reiterated claims that the previous administration "weaponised" the Justice Department.

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (Sep 16) lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden and former Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice for investigating slain MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk and his organisation Turning Point USA (TPUSA). In his usual fashion, Trump called Smith "deranged" while labelling Biden "incompetent," as he questioned why the "wonderful" Turning Point was under investigation. Also read | 'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images Arctic Fox Trump's statement comes as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, on Tuesday (Sep 16) revealed that the FBI's election-related investigation into President Donald Trump, launched in 2022, also roped in dozens of Republican entities, including Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA. Grassley said that the investigation code-named "Arctic Fox" by the bureau was partisan in nature and claimed that there was plenty of proof towards that. "In other words, Arctic Frost wasn't just a case to politically investigate Trump," he said. “It was a vehicle by which partisan FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors could achieve their partisan ends and improperly investigate the entire Republican political apparatus.” Also read | Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns into war of words: 'Liar,' 'buffoon,' 'false rant' Trump reiterates DOJ was weaponised by Biden claims Using his nickname for Biden, he once again repeated his claim that the previous administration "Weaponised the Justice Department against Sleepy Joe Biden’s Political Opponents, including ME!". Without taking their names, Trump then set his sights on Loren Merchan and her father, Judge Juan Merchan, alleging, "They allowed the daughter of a Judge, on one of the corrupt trials against me, to become the biggest fund raiser for Biden and Kamala, making many Millions of Dollars for herself and her family". Loren Merchan presided over the Manhattan hush-money case against Trump. Also read | DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death Trump added that not only did her father refuse to recuse himself but also put a "gag order on me, not allowing ANY talk about their family corruption and unprecedented conflict of interest." However, this statement has little truth. Reports suggest that Judge Merchan issued a gag order against Trump to prevent him from making statements that could threaten witnesses, jurors, court staff, prosecutors, and their families. The order was also supposed to protect the integrity of the judicial proceedings and ensure a fair trial.

Donald Trump lashed out at his predecessor Joe Biden, and former Special Counsel Jack Smith for investigating slain Charlie Kirk and reiterated claims that the previous administration "weaponised" the Justice Department.

FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden

A day after US President Donald Trump lashed out at the left, labelling Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a damning research paper of domestic terrorism detailing far-right extremist violence has vanished from the US Justice Department's website. According to an AFP report, the research from the National Institute of Justice, which has since been removed, concluded that since 1990, "far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/tyler-robinson-s-chilling-discord-confession-goes-viral-as-trump-lashes-out-at-left-says-charlie-kirk-s-killer-radicalised-over-the-internet-1758010151866">Tyler Robinson's chilling Discord confession goes viral as Trump lashes out at left, says Charlie Kirk's killer 'radicalised over the internet'</a><h2>Left to blame or merely a scapegoat?</h2>On Monday (Sep 15) Trump labelled suspected killer Tyler Robinson a leftist "radicalised over the internet." Speaking to reporters at the White House, the POTUS said that Robinson, who comes from a family of Republican Party supporters, had "wonderful parents," but over a "fairly short period of time," was "radicalised." Blaming the left for Kirk's assassination, the right-wing leader alleged, "He's (Robinson) a left," adding, "A lot of problems with the left, and they get protected, and they shouldn't be protected".However, the claim stands in stark contrast to the research paper titled "What NIJ research tells us about domestic terrorism".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-queer-resistance-fbi-eyes-transgender-far-left-groups-in-charlie-kirk-killing-after-these-alarming-online-posts-lance-twiggs-1757910295251">‘Queer resistance’? FBI eyes transgender, far-left groups in Charlie Kirk killing after THESE alarming online posts</a><h2>Why was the paper removed from the DoJ website?</h2>The Trump administration has yet to reveal the reason the paper was taken down from the Department of Justice website. However, it is known that the research was removed following the deadly assassination of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk on September 10.Archived versions of the Office of Justice Programs website captured by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine show that the document remained accessible the day after the killing (September 11). However, it disappeared the following day, reports the independent 404 Media.Meanwhile, the White House on Monday announced that it would pursue an alleged left-wing "domestic terror movement" in the wake of Kirk's killing. However, this has prompted alarm that the far-right Trump admin could use this as a method of silencing political descent.&nbsp;

A day after President Donald Trump labelled Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a research paper on right-wing domestic terrorism has been removed from the US Justice Department's website.

A day after US President Donald Trump lashed out at the left, labelling Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a damning research paper of domestic terrorism detailing far-right extremist violence has vanished from the US Justice Department's website. According to an AFP report, the research from the National Institute of Justice, which has since been removed, concluded that since 1990, "far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists". Also read | Tyler Robinson's chilling Discord confession goes viral as Trump lashes out at left, says Charlie Kirk's killer 'radicalised over the internet' Left to blame or merely a scapegoat? On Monday (Sep 15) Trump labelled suspected killer Tyler Robinson a leftist "radicalised over the internet." Speaking to reporters at the White House, the POTUS said that Robinson, who comes from a family of Republican Party supporters, had "wonderful parents," but over a "fairly short period of time," was "radicalised." Blaming the left for Kirk's assassination, the right-wing leader alleged, "He's (Robinson) a left," adding, "A lot of problems with the left, and they get protected, and they shouldn't be protected". However, the claim stands in stark contrast to the research paper titled "What NIJ research tells us about domestic terrorism". Also read | ‘Queer resistance’? FBI eyes transgender, far-left groups in Charlie Kirk killing after THESE alarming online posts Why was the paper removed from the DoJ website? The Trump administration has yet to reveal the reason the paper was taken down from the Department of Justice website. However, it is known that the research was removed following the deadly assassination of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk on September 10. Archived versions of the Office of Justice Programs website captured by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine show that the document remained accessible the day after the killing (September 11). However, it disappeared the following day, reports the independent 404 Media. Meanwhile, the White House on Monday announced that it would pursue an alleged left-wing "domestic terror movement" in the wake of Kirk's killing. However, this has prompted alarm that the far-right Trump admin could use this as a method of silencing political descent.

A day after President Donald Trump labelled Charlie Kirk's killer, Tyler Robinson, a leftist "radicalised over the internet," a research paper on right-wing domestic terrorism has been removed from the US Justice Department's website.

DOJ quietly deletes study on how most domestic terrorists are right-wing after Trump blames left for Kirk's death

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing backlash from the Israel Business Forum (IBF), representing workers from 200 of Israel’s largest companies, for isolating the country from the rest of the world. On Monday, Netanyahu warned that amid criticism from the world for its actions in Gaza, it might have to be become a self-reliant economy with “autarkic characteristics” and a kind of “super-Sparta.” He was faced with an uphill task of defending his words and himself in front of the opposition and top business leaders of the country. The IBF hit back at Netanyahu's "super-Sparta" stance, and declared that “We are not Sparta”, Times of Israel reported. The leaders added that Netanyahu’s policies were pushing the country “towards a political, economic, and social abyss that will endanger our existence in Israel.” Notably, Netanyahu's Monday speech and the IDF’s Gaza City offensive led to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange seeing a massive dip.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-israel-is-committing-genocide-in-gaza-says-probe-launched-by-united-nations-rights-body-1758006485370">'Israel is committing genocide in Gaza', says probe launched by United Nations rights body</a>&nbsp;<h2>Netanyahu angers Israeli business community with “isolation” remarks</h2>The prime minister faced anger from the business community, who said they had had enough of the tensions and wanted peace. Arnon Bar-David, the head of the Histadrut trade union federation, said, "I don’t want to be Sparta… We deserve peace. Israeli society is exhausted, and our status in the world is very bad." Meanwhile, Netanyahu tried to appease the businessmen by stating that he had complete confidence in the Israeli economy. He added that the fall in the stock market was simply because of a “misunderstanding". Netanyahu said the dip "didn't shake us." Netanyahu also invited the ire of the opposition on his "isolation" comments. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid asked what he meant by saying that Israel was “becoming” isolated. "Did some higher power cause this?” Lapid asked in a speech at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. "You caused this. You are the main cause of the diplomatic isolation," he said.&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-gaza-war-israel-continues-to-pound-gaza-strip-with-missiles-1758078334856/embed<h2>Israel might have to rely solely on its own weapons: Netanyahu&nbsp;</h2>Netanyahu clarified that his Monday speech was mostly "political at its core" and not about the larger economy. He stated that the area where there could be restrictions, "not economic ones, but political at their core", was in the "defence industries." The prime minister said that the country is aiming to be self-reliant in defence, and should be ready to "defend itself with its own forces and with its own weapons," warning that there could be more "political restrictions during the war", as encountered before.&nbsp;He made many more claims to push forward his case that Israel was not witnessing any downfall. Netanyahu told the leaders that the shekel (Israeli currency) was stronger than it was before the war. He added that the stock market was performing at record levels, and unemployment was at a historic low, and the country had seen huge foreign investment recently. "My remarks were on the attempt to restrict the import of parts, components, weapons, or raw materials," he told the gathered business leaders.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has angered business leaders in the country after saying that the country is being isolated. The premier said Israel might need to become "super-Sparta", but the Israel Business Forum said the Israeli society is exhausted and wants peace.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing backlash from the Israel Business Forum (IBF), representing workers from 200 of Israel’s largest companies, for isolating the country from the rest of the world. On Monday, Netanyahu warned that amid criticism from the world for its actions in Gaza, it might have to be become a self-reliant economy with “autarkic characteristics” and a kind of “super-Sparta.” He was faced with an uphill task of defending his words and himself in front of the opposition and top business leaders of the country. The IBF hit back at Netanyahu's "super-Sparta" stance, and declared that “We are not Sparta”, Times of Israel reported. The leaders added that Netanyahu’s policies were pushing the country “towards a political, economic, and social abyss that will endanger our existence in Israel.” Notably, Netanyahu's Monday speech and the IDF’s Gaza City offensive led to the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange seeing a massive dip. Also Read: 'Israel is committing genocide in Gaza', says probe launched by United Nations rights body Netanyahu angers Israeli business community with “isolation” remarks The prime minister faced anger from the business community, who said they had had enough of the tensions and wanted peace. Arnon Bar-David, the head of the Histadrut trade union federation, said, "I don’t want to be Sparta… We deserve peace. Israeli society is exhausted, and our status in the world is very bad." Meanwhile, Netanyahu tried to appease the businessmen by stating that he had complete confidence in the Israeli economy. He added that the fall in the stock market was simply because of a “misunderstanding". Netanyahu said the dip "didn't shake us." Netanyahu also invited the ire of the opposition on his "isolation" comments. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid asked what he meant by saying that Israel was “becoming” isolated. "Did some higher power cause this?” Lapid asked in a speech at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. "You caused this. You are the main cause of the diplomatic isolation," he said. https://www.wionews.com/videos/israel-gaza-war-israel-continues-to-pound-gaza-strip-with-missiles-1758078334856/embed Israel might have to rely solely on its own weapons: Netanyahu Netanyahu clarified that his Monday speech was mostly "political at its core" and not about the larger economy. He stated that the area where there could be restrictions, "not economic ones, but political at their core", was in the "defence industries." The prime minister said that the country is aiming to be self-reliant in defence, and should be ready to "defend itself with its own forces and with its own weapons," warning that there could be more "political restrictions during the war", as encountered before. He made many more claims to push forward his case that Israel was not witnessing any downfall. Netanyahu told the leaders that the shekel (Israeli currency) was stronger than it was before the war. He added that the stock market was performing at record levels, and unemployment was at a historic low, and the country had seen huge foreign investment recently. "My remarks were on the attempt to restrict the import of parts, components, weapons, or raw materials," he told the gathered business leaders.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has angered business leaders in the country after saying that the country is being isolated. The premier said Israel might need to become "super-Sparta", but the Israel Business Forum said the Israeli society is exhausted and wants peace.

'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Israeli business leaders slam Netanyahu for 'super-Sparta' remarks, say we want peace

Banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) on Wednesday (Sep 19) issued a chilling warning against Indian diplomats in Canada. In a post on X, the Khalistani group announced a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18. The group, whose account is restricted in India, also released a poster that features India’s High Commissioner to Ottawa, Dinesh Patnaik, with a target on his face. The message also warned Indo-Canadians to avoid the consulate on September 18, the date of the planned protest.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/-elect-a-rapist-expect-to-get-fu-ed-britons-troll-trump-as-windsor-castle-lights-up-with-epstein-images-1758075915188">'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images</a><h2>What did SFJ say?</h2>In a notice shared on social media, SFJ linked the action to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's statement in Parliament two years ago, alleging Indian involvement in the killing of Khalistani separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar.In its notice, the Khalistani group claimed that two years after Trudeau's announcement, "Indian Consulates continue to run spy networks and surveillance targeting Khalistan Referendum campaigners."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-blames-incompetent-biden-for-dallas-beheading-of-indian-origin-chandra-nagamallaiah-vows-crackdown-on-illegal-criminals-1757900557177">Trump blames 'incompetent' Biden for Dallas beheading of Indian-origin Chandra Nagamallaiah, vows crackdown on illegal criminals</a>"The threat is so grave that the RCMP has offered ‘Witness Protection’ to Inderjeet Singh Gosal, who assumed leadership of the Khalistan Referendum campaign after Shaheed Nijjar’s martyrdom," it adds, before announcing what it called a “Historic SIEGE” to “demand accountability for Indian state-directed espionage and intimidation on Canadian soil.”<h2>Canada says 'Khalistani extremists'&nbsp;a national security threat</h2>The call for the siege comes just weeks after a Canadian government report highlighted the presence and foreign funding of Khalistani groups on its soil.The "2025 Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in Canada" identified Babbar Khalsa International and the International Sikh Youth Federation among organisations that have received financial support within Canada. It also noted that Canadian law enforcement and intelligence agencies have tracked money flows to globally designated groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.According to the assessment, Khalistani extremists continue to pursue "violent means to establish an independent state within Punjab, India" and are believed to raise funds across multiple countries, including Canada. While the groups once ran extensive fundraising networks, authorities now believe they operate in smaller clusters, often tapping diaspora communities and exploiting non-profit organisations to move money.&nbsp;

The banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) has issued a "chilling warning" against Indian diplomats in Canada, announcing a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18.

Banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) on Wednesday (Sep 19) issued a chilling warning against Indian diplomats in Canada. In a post on X, the Khalistani group announced a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18. The group, whose account is restricted in India, also released a poster that features India’s High Commissioner to Ottawa, Dinesh Patnaik, with a target on his face. The message also warned Indo-Canadians to avoid the consulate on September 18, the date of the planned protest. Also read | 'Elect a rapist, expect to get fu**ed': Britons troll Trump, Windsor Castle lights up with Epstein images What did SFJ say? In a notice shared on social media, SFJ linked the action to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's statement in Parliament two years ago, alleging Indian involvement in the killing of Khalistani separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar. In its notice, the Khalistani group claimed that two years after Trudeau's announcement, "Indian Consulates continue to run spy networks and surveillance targeting Khalistan Referendum campaigners." Also read | Trump blames 'incompetent' Biden for Dallas beheading of Indian-origin Chandra Nagamallaiah, vows crackdown on illegal criminals "The threat is so grave that the RCMP has offered ‘Witness Protection’ to Inderjeet Singh Gosal, who assumed leadership of the Khalistan Referendum campaign after Shaheed Nijjar’s martyrdom," it adds, before announcing what it called a “Historic SIEGE” to “demand accountability for Indian state-directed espionage and intimidation on Canadian soil.” Canada says 'Khalistani extremists' a national security threat The call for the siege comes just weeks after a Canadian government report highlighted the presence and foreign funding of Khalistani groups on its soil. The "2025 Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in Canada" identified Babbar Khalsa International and the International Sikh Youth Federation among organisations that have received financial support within Canada. It also noted that Canadian law enforcement and intelligence agencies have tracked money flows to globally designated groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. According to the assessment, Khalistani extremists continue to pursue "violent means to establish an independent state within Punjab, India" and are believed to raise funds across multiple countries, including Canada. While the groups once ran extensive fundraising networks, authorities now believe they operate in smaller clusters, often tapping diaspora communities and exploiting non-profit organisations to move money.

The banned Khalistani outfit Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) has issued a "chilling warning" against Indian diplomats in Canada, announcing a "siege" of the Indian consulate in Vancouver on September 18.

Khalistani group Sikhs for Justice issues chilling threat, announces ‘siege’ of Indian consulate in Vancouver

A 28-year-old Greek heiress tragically died after a mosquito bit her, and two hospitals turned her away, thinking that it wasn't anything serious. Marissa Laimou had previously battled cancer and was dead in her bed by her housekeeper at her London apartment on September 11. According to Greek media reports, Marissa has developed dizziness, itching, fever and other signs of infection. She called a doctor who checked her at her house and gave her paracetamol. However, when her condition didn't improve, she visited a hospital. Marissa also visited her oncologist, who sent her to another hospital. She was given a diagnosis that referred to an insect bite. She was prescribed antibiotics and sent back home. She was found dead the next day. Her family allege that at the hospital, instead of a doctor, only the nurses checked her and didn't find a need to admit her. The hospital has admitted that lapses occurred and is investigating the incident. Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/strip-club-didnt-want-to-pay-8mn-in-taxes-so-they-gave-the-auditor-lap-dances-1758078233518"> Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances</a>&nbsp;<h2>How did the Greek heiress die?</h2>Marissa's mother, Bessy, told Greek media that her daughter died of toxic shock caused by an insect bite. "My daughter had survived cancer and died from an insect," she said, that she was "a girl with so many gifts, all of England is crying, all her doctors too." It is not known which kind of insect bit her. An autopsy will be carried out in about a week, her relatives informed the media. The post-mortem will conclusively find what killed Marissa. Talking about the Greek heiress, her friends said that she was into theatre and had recently staged a production of Romeo and Juliet in London. She was working on another theatre project. Marissa had turned to theatre after battling breast cancer. Meanwhile, her family is a big name in the Greek shipping industry and has been in the business since the early 20th century.&nbsp;

A Greek heiress died in London after being bitten by a mosquito. Although it is not clear whether the bite was what killed her. Marissa Laimou was a cancer survivor and visited two hospitals, but neither deemed her condition serious enough to admit her.

A 28-year-old Greek heiress tragically died after a mosquito bit her, and two hospitals turned her away, thinking that it wasn't anything serious. Marissa Laimou had previously battled cancer and was dead in her bed by her housekeeper at her London apartment on September 11. According to Greek media reports, Marissa has developed dizziness, itching, fever and other signs of infection. She called a doctor who checked her at her house and gave her paracetamol. However, when her condition didn't improve, she visited a hospital. Marissa also visited her oncologist, who sent her to another hospital. She was given a diagnosis that referred to an insect bite. She was prescribed antibiotics and sent back home. She was found dead the next day. Her family allege that at the hospital, instead of a doctor, only the nurses checked her and didn't find a need to admit her. The hospital has admitted that lapses occurred and is investigating the incident. Also Read: Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances How did the Greek heiress die? Marissa's mother, Bessy, told Greek media that her daughter died of toxic shock caused by an insect bite. "My daughter had survived cancer and died from an insect," she said, that she was "a girl with so many gifts, all of England is crying, all her doctors too." It is not known which kind of insect bit her. An autopsy will be carried out in about a week, her relatives informed the media. The post-mortem will conclusively find what killed Marissa. Talking about the Greek heiress, her friends said that she was into theatre and had recently staged a production of Romeo and Juliet in London. She was working on another theatre project. Marissa had turned to theatre after battling breast cancer. Meanwhile, her family is a big name in the Greek shipping industry and has been in the business since the early 20th century.

A Greek heiress died in London after being bitten by a mosquito. Although it is not clear whether the bite was what killed her. Marissa Laimou was a cancer survivor and visited two hospitals, but neither deemed her condition serious enough to admit her.

Did toxic shock from a mosquito bite kill a Greek heiress? Two hospitals blamed of serious lapses

An American company that owns strip clubs across the country gave away free lap dances to an auditor in order to avoid paying $8 million in sales taxes to New York City and the state of New York. A prosecutor in the case alleged that the executives bribed a government official with free trips to some of the clubs and spent thousands of dollars on him. New York Attorney General Letitia James said the alleged scheme involved Houston-based RCI Hospitality Holdings. She said that company executives and the corporate leaders did so from 2010 to 2024 for at least six tax audits. RCI Hospitality owns and operates more than 60 clubs, sports bars and restaurants in the US. Their most popular establishment is Rick's Cabaret, which is located in more than a dozen cities, including New York City. Prosecutors alleged that the auditor was given at least 13 complimentary, multiday trips to Florida, besides up to $5,000 per day use for private dances at the company's strip clubs. A company executive also accompanied the unnamed auditor on these trips. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/luigi-mangione-terror-charges-dropped-but-he-could-still-face-death-penalty-all-about-the-case-1758035769727">Luigi Mangione's terror charges dropped, but he could still face death penalty: Here's how</a>&nbsp;<h2>RCI Hospitality rebuffs the accusations of bribery</h2> A grand jury indictment in the case was unsealed on Tuesday and charges RCI, five of its executives and the three clubs in Manhattan with conspiracy, bribery, tax fraud and other crimes. “RCI’s executives shamelessly used their strip clubs to bribe their way out of paying millions of dollars in taxes,” James said in a statement. “I will always take action to fight corruption and ensure everyone pays their fair share.” Meanwhile, the lawyer for RCI, Daniel Horwitz, termed the allegations false and “baseless” and said his clients were "innocent." “We are clearly disappointed with the New York Attorney General’s decision to move forward with an indictment and look forward to addressing the allegations," Horwitz said in a statement. He added that RCIs always paid “all legitimate and non-contested taxes".&nbsp;Those indicted at RCI in the bribery case include Eric Langan of Bellaire, Texas, chief executive officer, president and board chairman; and Timothy Winata of Houston, a controller and accountant. According to the prosecutor, Langan authorised the money for the bribes, while Winata directly handed the bribes and even went with the auditor on these trips to their strip clubs. Winata also travelled from Texas to Manhattan to give the bribe to the auditor when he was at Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar, in Manhattan, prosecutors said. A sixth person has also been arrested in the case, although James's office did not say whether it was the auditor. His name has been redacted in the indictment, but what is known is that he worked for the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. Amid the charges, the company continues to keep the shutters up of all three of its Manhattan clubs.&nbsp;

RCI Hospitality, which operates the Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar in Manhattan, and several more establishments in the US, has been accused of bribing a tax auditor with cash and lap dances at their strip clubs.

An American company that owns strip clubs across the country gave away free lap dances to an auditor in order to avoid paying $8 million in sales taxes to New York City and the state of New York. A prosecutor in the case alleged that the executives bribed a government official with free trips to some of the clubs and spent thousands of dollars on him. New York Attorney General Letitia James said the alleged scheme involved Houston-based RCI Hospitality Holdings. She said that company executives and the corporate leaders did so from 2010 to 2024 for at least six tax audits. RCI Hospitality owns and operates more than 60 clubs, sports bars and restaurants in the US. Their most popular establishment is Rick's Cabaret, which is located in more than a dozen cities, including New York City. Prosecutors alleged that the auditor was given at least 13 complimentary, multiday trips to Florida, besides up to $5,000 per day use for private dances at the company's strip clubs. A company executive also accompanied the unnamed auditor on these trips. Also Read: Luigi Mangione's terror charges dropped, but he could still face death penalty: Here's how RCI Hospitality rebuffs the accusations of bribery A grand jury indictment in the case was unsealed on Tuesday and charges RCI, five of its executives and the three clubs in Manhattan with conspiracy, bribery, tax fraud and other crimes. “RCI’s executives shamelessly used their strip clubs to bribe their way out of paying millions of dollars in taxes,” James said in a statement. “I will always take action to fight corruption and ensure everyone pays their fair share.” Meanwhile, the lawyer for RCI, Daniel Horwitz, termed the allegations false and “baseless” and said his clients were "innocent." “We are clearly disappointed with the New York Attorney General’s decision to move forward with an indictment and look forward to addressing the allegations," Horwitz said in a statement. He added that RCIs always paid “all legitimate and non-contested taxes". Those indicted at RCI in the bribery case include Eric Langan of Bellaire, Texas, chief executive officer, president and board chairman; and Timothy Winata of Houston, a controller and accountant. According to the prosecutor, Langan authorised the money for the bribes, while Winata directly handed the bribes and even went with the auditor on these trips to their strip clubs. Winata also travelled from Texas to Manhattan to give the bribe to the auditor when he was at Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar, in Manhattan, prosecutors said. A sixth person has also been arrested in the case, although James's office did not say whether it was the auditor. His name has been redacted in the indictment, but what is known is that he worked for the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. Amid the charges, the company continues to keep the shutters up of all three of its Manhattan clubs.

RCI Hospitality, which operates the Rick's Cabaret, Vivid Cabaret and Hoops Cabaret and Sports Bar in Manhattan, and several more establishments in the US, has been accused of bribing a tax auditor with cash and lap dances at their strip clubs.

Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances

Smoke-choked air that fills their lungs, floods threatening their homes and debilitating heat: a group of young Americans testified Tuesday that President Donald Trump's fossil-fuel push is trampling their inalienable rights.Lighthiser v Trump is emblematic of a growing global trend of legal action as a tool to push action on planetary warming amid political inertia or outright hostility.At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy.They are also contesting the government's actions undermining federal climate science, from firing scientists to removing critical reports.A two-day hearing opened in a federal courtroom in Missoula, Montana where Julia Olson, lead attorney for the 22 plaintiffs, framed the dispute as a constitutional test."Does the United States Constitution guard against executive abuses of power by executive order that deprive children and youth of their fundamental rights to life and to their liberties?" she asked.Michael Sawyer, representing the Trump administration, countered that the case itself undermined democracy."This is, at its core, an anti-democratic lawsuit," he argued."We just had an election. One of the major issues in that election was a duelling perspective on emissions, energy policy, and they are now stepping in and asking the court to overrule the results."<h2>Witnesses grilled</h2>The spotlight then shifted to the young plaintiffs, represented by the nonprofit Our Children's Trust, who described how climate change is reshaping their lives.J.M., a teenager from Livingston, Montana, said that even in her short life she has seen snowfall decline, wildfire seasons lengthen, and flooding worsen.One blaze forced her family to evacuate, and she remembers packing her stuffed toys and worrying about the family's animals."Just experiencing that from a young age put the fear of wildfire in me," she said.Another plaintiff, Joseph Lee, 19, recalled wildfires in California last year that destroyed the home of a friend."I don't know if I'm going to be next -- are my parents going to be safe?"&nbsp;he told the court.Asked why he chose to participate in the lawsuit, Lee, who has been hospitalized for heat stroke that nearly caused organ failure, said: "A better future is possible."The young people faced tough questioning from government lawyers, who grilled J.M. over her family's decision to keep three horses -- arguing that raising them contributed to greenhouse emissions and implying she was being hypocritical.<h2>Long odds</h2>Expert witnesses also took the stand Tuesday, including renowned climate scientist Steven Running, who shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for being a co-author on a major UN climate report, and former senior White House official John Podesta."In your expert opinion would their injuries get worse if more fossil fuels were to be unleashed under these executive orders?" Olson asked Running."Unquestionably," he answered.The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary injunction that could open the door to a full trial.The federal government, joined by 19 conservative-leaning states and the territory of Guam, wants the case thrown out, but has not called their own witnesses.The plaintiffs hope to build on recent state-level wins: a 2023 Montana ruling that oil and gas permits violated the state's constitutional right to a clean environment, and a 2024 Hawaii settlement mandating faster decarbonization of its transport sector.On the federal level, however, the record is bleak. The landmark 2015 Juliana v. United States case was dismissed after the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal earlier this year.During cross-examination, government lawyer Sawyer pressed Podesta for previously arguing against Juliana when he served in the government.But Podesta countered that while Juliana was too broad, and would have required reversing five decades of policy, in the new case the "remedy is direct and narrow" -- "To pull back on specific actions that are heavily burdening these kids and will have direct impact on their lives."It remains to be seen whether this central argument, key to the plaintiff's case, plays.Judge Dana Christensen, an Obama appointee with a record of pro-environment rulings, is presiding -- but even if the plaintiffs notch a win, the case could eventually land before the conservative-dominated Supreme Court.Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy.

Smoke-choked air that fills their lungs, floods threatening their homes and debilitating heat: a group of young Americans testified Tuesday that President Donald Trump's fossil-fuel push is trampling their inalienable rights. Lighthiser v Trump is emblematic of a growing global trend of legal action as a tool to push action on planetary warming amid political inertia or outright hostility. At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy. They are also contesting the government's actions undermining federal climate science, from firing scientists to removing critical reports. A two-day hearing opened in a federal courtroom in Missoula, Montana where Julia Olson, lead attorney for the 22 plaintiffs, framed the dispute as a constitutional test. "Does the United States Constitution guard against executive abuses of power by executive order that deprive children and youth of their fundamental rights to life and to their liberties?" she asked. Michael Sawyer, representing the Trump administration, countered that the case itself undermined democracy. "This is, at its core, an anti-democratic lawsuit," he argued. "We just had an election. One of the major issues in that election was a duelling perspective on emissions, energy policy, and they are now stepping in and asking the court to overrule the results." Witnesses grilled The spotlight then shifted to the young plaintiffs, represented by the nonprofit Our Children's Trust, who described how climate change is reshaping their lives. J.M., a teenager from Livingston, Montana, said that even in her short life she has seen snowfall decline, wildfire seasons lengthen, and flooding worsen. One blaze forced her family to evacuate, and she remembers packing her stuffed toys and worrying about the family's animals. "Just experiencing that from a young age put the fear of wildfire in me," she said. Another plaintiff, Joseph Lee, 19, recalled wildfires in California last year that destroyed the home of a friend. "I don't know if I'm going to be next -- are my parents going to be safe?" he told the court. Asked why he chose to participate in the lawsuit, Lee, who has been hospitalized for heat stroke that nearly caused organ failure, said: "A better future is possible." The young people faced tough questioning from government lawyers, who grilled J.M. over her family's decision to keep three horses -- arguing that raising them contributed to greenhouse emissions and implying she was being hypocritical. Long odds Expert witnesses also took the stand Tuesday, including renowned climate scientist Steven Running, who shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for being a co-author on a major UN climate report, and former senior White House official John Podesta. "In your expert opinion would their injuries get worse if more fossil fuels were to be unleashed under these executive orders?" Olson asked Running. "Unquestionably," he answered. The plaintiffs are seeking a preliminary injunction that could open the door to a full trial. The federal government, joined by 19 conservative-leaning states and the territory of Guam, wants the case thrown out, but has not called their own witnesses. The plaintiffs hope to build on recent state-level wins: a 2023 Montana ruling that oil and gas permits violated the state's constitutional right to a clean environment, and a 2024 Hawaii settlement mandating faster decarbonization of its transport sector. On the federal level, however, the record is bleak. The landmark 2015 Juliana v. United States case was dismissed after the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal earlier this year. During cross-examination, government lawyer Sawyer pressed Podesta for previously arguing against Juliana when he served in the government. But Podesta countered that while Juliana was too broad, and would have required reversing five decades of policy, in the new case the "remedy is direct and narrow" -- "To pull back on specific actions that are heavily burdening these kids and will have direct impact on their lives." It remains to be seen whether this central argument, key to the plaintiff's case, plays. Judge Dana Christensen, an Obama appointee with a record of pro-environment rulings, is presiding -- but even if the plaintiffs notch a win, the case could eventually land before the conservative-dominated Supreme Court. Disclaimer: This story has been published from a news agency feed with minimal edits to adhere to WION's style guide. The headline may have been changed to better reflect the content of the story or to make it more suitable for WION audience.

At issue are three executive orders that together seek to "unleash" fossil fuel development at the expense of renewable energy.

'Executive abuse of power’: Trump sued by youth over climate change in landmark case

FBI Director Kash Patel on Tuesday (Sep 16) pushed back hard against accusations from Senate Democrats that his removal of senior FBI agents was politically motivated, insisting he had no plans to step down despite reports of unease in the White House over his leadership. "I'm not going anywhere. If you want to criticise my 16 years of service, bring it on," Patel said in his opening remarks before the Senate judiciary committee, where he faced lawmakers for the first time since his February confirmation. What followed was a tense, four-hour hearing marked by angry exchanges.<h2>Kash Patel hearing turns into a war of words</h2>Patel accused Democrats of "weaponising intelligence," at one point calling California senator Adam Schiff "a liar" and "a political buffoon at best" after being pressed about the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to a lower-security prison. He insisted he had no role in that decision and that a court order prevented him from releasing more documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein.<h2>FBI agents who investigated Trump were fired?</h2>Other Democrats questioned Patel's fitness for the job, citing lawsuits by three fired senior FBI officials who allege the bureau has been politicised. According to the lawsuit, they also claim that at one point Kash Patel stated that he had been instructed to fire agents who investigated Trump. Patel refused to comment on the allegations, saying they were the subject of litigation, but said terminations were only made when agents violated their oath, broke the law, or failed to meet bureau standards."The only way, generally speaking, an individual is terminated at the FBI is if they have violated their oath of office, violated the law, or failed to uphold the standards that we need them to have at the FBI," he said."I don't think you're fit to head the bureau," Senator Cory Booker told him, predicting Patel was "not going to be around long. I think this might be your last oversight hearing". Patel shot back: "That rant of false information does not bring this country together".Patel also resisted providing figures on how many agents had been fired, resigned, or retired since Trump became POTUS, accusing Hawaii senator Mazie Hirono of seeking a "media hit" rather than answers.Patel is due to appear Wednesday (Sep 17) before the House Judiciary Committee, where Democrats have signalled plans to press him further on Epstein and the bureau's independence.

FBI Director Kash Patel testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday in a tense four-hour hearing, where he denied that he has politicised the bureau and conducted a "campaign of retribution" against those who investigated President Donald Trump.

FBI Director Kash Patel on Tuesday (Sep 16) pushed back hard against accusations from Senate Democrats that his removal of senior FBI agents was politically motivated, insisting he had no plans to step down despite reports of unease in the White House over his leadership. "I'm not going anywhere. If you want to criticise my 16 years of service, bring it on," Patel said in his opening remarks before the Senate judiciary committee, where he faced lawmakers for the first time since his February confirmation. What followed was a tense, four-hour hearing marked by angry exchanges. Kash Patel hearing turns into a war of words Patel accused Democrats of "weaponising intelligence," at one point calling California senator Adam Schiff "a liar" and "a political buffoon at best" after being pressed about the transfer of Ghislaine Maxwell to a lower-security prison. He insisted he had no role in that decision and that a court order prevented him from releasing more documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein. FBI agents who investigated Trump were fired? Other Democrats questioned Patel's fitness for the job, citing lawsuits by three fired senior FBI officials who allege the bureau has been politicised. According to the lawsuit, they also claim that at one point Kash Patel stated that he had been instructed to fire agents who investigated Trump. Patel refused to comment on the allegations, saying they were the subject of litigation, but said terminations were only made when agents violated their oath, broke the law, or failed to meet bureau standards. "The only way, generally speaking, an individual is terminated at the FBI is if they have violated their oath of office, violated the law, or failed to uphold the standards that we need them to have at the FBI," he said. "I don't think you're fit to head the bureau," Senator Cory Booker told him, predicting Patel was "not going to be around long. I think this might be your last oversight hearing". Patel shot back: "That rant of false information does not bring this country together". Patel also resisted providing figures on how many agents had been fired, resigned, or retired since Trump became POTUS, accusing Hawaii senator Mazie Hirono of seeking a "media hit" rather than answers. Patel is due to appear Wednesday (Sep 17) before the House Judiciary Committee, where Democrats have signalled plans to press him further on Epstein and the bureau's independence.

FBI Director Kash Patel testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday in a tense four-hour hearing, where he denied that he has politicised the bureau and conducted a "campaign of retribution" against those who investigated President Donald Trump.

Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns into war of words: 'Liar,' 'buffoon,' 'false rant'

A New York judge on Tuesday (Sep 16) has dropped the terror charges against Luigi Mangione but ruled that a lower murder charge will still remain on him. Prosecutors had tried to prove that Mangione killed health-care executive Brian Thompson and mention it as an act of terrorism, but the court said that they did not provide enough evidence for that claim.<h2>What are the charges still on Luigi Mangione</h2>Judge Gregory Carro announced the decision on Tuesday, that the second-degree murder and other charges will still charge against him. This means Mangione will not face the possibility of life imprisonment without parole under state law. Although, he still faces federal murder charges against him. The court order is seen as a setback for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who had pushed for a strong terrorism case.&nbsp;Also Read - <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/luigi-mangione-s-terror-charges-dropped-why-did-he-kill-unitedhealthcare-ceo-brian-thompson-1758036869035">Luigi Mangione appears in New York court, terror charges dropped: Why did he kill UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson</a>&nbsp;The 27-year-old is accused of shooting Thompson, an UnitedHealth Group executive, outside a Manhattan hotel, last year. He was later caught at a McDonald’s restaurant in Pennsylvania.<h2>What are Mangione’s charges in New York</h2><ul><li>Murder in the Second Degree, a class A-I felony</li><li>Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree, as class C felony, two counts</li><li>Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Third Degree, a class D felony, four counts</li><li>Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree, a class E felony, one count</li><li>Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree, a class D felony, one count</li></ul><h3>What are Mangione’s Pennsylvania charges</h3><ul><li>Possession of fraudulent document (ID), two counts</li><li>Possession of a firearm without a license, one count</li><li>Forgery, one count</li><li>Possession of a firearm, one count</li></ul><h3>What are Mangione’s Federal charges</h3><ul><li>Stalking, two counts</li><li>Murder through use of a firearm, one count</li><li>Using a firearm equipped with a silencer while committing a crime of violence, one count</li></ul>&nbsp;Prosecutors also argued that the killing was meant to send a message to the health-care industry and the public. But Judge Carro agreed with defense lawyers that the facts did not meet the legal standard for terrorism. After the hearing, Mangione, was seen dressed in prison clothing.

Luigi Mangione is accused of shooting Brian Thompson, an UnitedHealth Group executive, outside a Manhattan hotel, last year in December. He was later caught at a McDonald’s restaurant in Pennsylvania.

A New York judge on Tuesday (Sep 16) has dropped the terror charges against Luigi Mangione but ruled that a lower murder charge will still remain on him. Prosecutors had tried to prove that Mangione killed health-care executive Brian Thompson and mention it as an act of terrorism, but the court said that they did not provide enough evidence for that claim. What are the charges still on Luigi Mangione Judge Gregory Carro announced the decision on Tuesday, that the second-degree murder and other charges will still charge against him. This means Mangione will not face the possibility of life imprisonment without parole under state law. Although, he still faces federal murder charges against him. The court order is seen as a setback for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who had pushed for a strong terrorism case. Also Read - Luigi Mangione appears in New York court, terror charges dropped: Why did he kill UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson The 27-year-old is accused of shooting Thompson, an UnitedHealth Group executive, outside a Manhattan hotel, last year. He was later caught at a McDonald’s restaurant in Pennsylvania. What are Mangione’s charges in New York Murder in the Second Degree, a class A-I felony Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second Degree, as class C felony, two counts Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Third Degree, a class D felony, four counts Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Fourth Degree, a class E felony, one count Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree, a class D felony, one count What are Mangione’s Pennsylvania charges Possession of fraudulent document (ID), two counts Possession of a firearm without a license, one count Forgery, one count Possession of a firearm, one count What are Mangione’s Federal charges Stalking, two counts Murder through use of a firearm, one count Using a firearm equipped with a silencer while committing a crime of violence, one count Prosecutors also argued that the killing was meant to send a message to the health-care industry and the public. But Judge Carro agreed with defense lawyers that the facts did not meet the legal standard for terrorism. After the hearing, Mangione, was seen dressed in prison clothing.

Luigi Mangione is accused of shooting Brian Thompson, an UnitedHealth Group executive, outside a Manhattan hotel, last year in December. He was later caught at a McDonald’s restaurant in Pennsylvania.

Terrorism charges against Luigi Mangione dropped: What state and federal charges does he still face in United Healthcare CEO's murder case?

Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old alleged assassinator of Charlie Kirk, was allegedly living with a transgender partner, the New York Post reported. 

trending

Skim scandal rocks Scotland: First cheating accusations in 42 years as participants alter stone at world skimming championship

What a DOOZY! ATC at Corsica airport falls asleep, leaving Paris flight hanging

From Melania’s hat to Kate's dress: Fashion speaks volumes at Trump’s UK visit

From 'ring of steel' to 'Sea King helicopter': Trump's high-tech security in UK

Global Innovation Index 2025: US and China in Top 10, know who topped the list

Ben & Jerry's co-founder Jerry Greenfield resigns amid tensions with parent firm

What’s behind court’s 'protective order' against Tyler Robinson and Erika Kirk?

Melania, Kate spark global attention with joint royal appearance at Windsor

UK rolls out royal carpet for US President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania

'Earth’s Giant Eyes': Meet the 5 biggest telescopes that help us see universe

What is H3N2 flu? Know symptoms, treatment as it hits nearly 70% of Delhi-NCR

NASA is no longer a space agency. Its new official status is pretty shocking

9-16-25 was a rare, once-in-a-century date. Did you notice?

Botox under burqas, unlikely boom of cosmetic surgery in Taliban conservatism

Death by Podcast: Charlie Kirk murder and the rise of violence-inspiring content

Masood Azhar's family was wiped out in Operation Sindoor, says PM Modi

FBI’s 'Arctic Fox' case targeted GOP and Charlie Kirk? Trump lashes out at Biden

DOJ quietly deletes study on right-wing terror after Trump said this about Kirk

'We don’t want to be Sparta' - Netanyahu angers Israeli business leaders

Khalistani group SFJ announces ‘siege’ of Indian consulate in Vancouver

Did toxic shock from a mosquito bite kill a Greek heiress?

Strip club didn't want to pay $8mn in taxes. So they gave the auditor lap dances

'Executive abuse of power’: Trump sued by youth over climate change

Kash Patel denies politicising FBI as hearing turns ugly: 'Liar,' 'buffoon'

Terrorism charges against Mangione dropped: What charges does he still face

Tyler Robinson: Charlie Kirk’s ‘shooter’ was living with transgender partner