The West Asia conflict is approaching its sixth month with no clear diplomatic or military exit in sight as US President Donald Trump dramatically escalates pressure on Iran. Trump has announced what he described as an unprecedented economic warfare and isolation campaign against Iran, warning that countries continuing to do business with Tehran could face “tremendous punishment.”

The latest escalation comes amid a growing dispute over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy routes. Trump says the waterway remains open and that numerous vessels are passing through, while Iranian officials maintain that the strait remains closed until Washington meets Tehran’s conditions.

Iran has demanded an end to the blockade of its ports, the lifting of oil sanctions and the release of frozen Iranian assets. Meanwhile, US-Iran negotiations remain uncertain, with Trump saying talks could resume at some point but reiterating that Iran must not be allowed to possess nuclear weapons.


Trump Launches “Economic Warfare” Against Iran As Strait Of Hormuz Crisis Deepens

The prolonged Iran war is putting growing pressure on the US military’s weapons stockpile, with reports indicating significant losses of drones and the rapid use of key munitions.

According to the report cited in the segment, the US military has lost 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones, roughly a quarter of its fleet. The losses come alongside heavy expenditure of Tomahawk cruise missiles, Patriot interceptors and other long-range weapons.

The depletion is raising questions over US military readiness, future operations and Washington’s ability to sustain a prolonged conflict. Analysts are also warning that replenishing some advanced weapons could take considerable time.

Meanwhile, reports surrounding conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln have added another layer of pressure, although US military officials have disputed claims of deaths aboard the carrier.

As weapons stocks decline and public concerns grow, the Iran war is becoming an increasingly difficult test for the Trump administration.

 Gorkhas Rise Up in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army

Gorkhas Rise in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army  | GRAVITAS 

The prolonged Iran war is putting growing pressure on the US military’s weapons stockpile, with reports indicating significant losses of drones and the rapid use of key munitions.

According to the report cited in the segment, the US military has lost 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones, roughly a quarter of its fleet. The losses come alongside heavy expenditure of Tomahawk cruise missiles, Patriot interceptors and other long-range weapons.

The depletion is raising questions over US military readiness, future operations and Washington’s ability to sustain a prolonged conflict. Analysts are also warning that replenishing some advanced weapons could take considerable time.

Meanwhile, reports surrounding conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln have added another layer of pressure, although US military officials have disputed claims of deaths aboard the carrier.

Iran War Drains US Weapons Stockpile | Trump Faces Growing Military Pressure | GRAVITAS

Donald Trump’s foreign policy and economic agenda are facing growing challenges as tariffs, the Iran conflict and stalled Russia-Ukraine peace efforts reshape the global political landscape.

From sweeping tariff policies and their impact on global trade to the escalating Iran conflict, Trump’s approach to international affairs is facing intense scrutiny. At the same time, efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war have struggled to produce a lasting breakthrough, raising questions over Washington’s ability to deliver a negotiated settlement.

The developments come as allies, rivals and financial markets closely watch the Trump administration’s next moves. Tariffs have created uncertainty for businesses and economies, while conflicts in the Middle East and Europe continue to test US diplomatic influence.

Is Trump losing momentum on some of his biggest foreign-policy promises? Or could his administration still turn these challenges into political and diplomatic victories?

Watch the full analysis for a closer look at Trump, tariffs, Iran, the Russia-Ukraine war, peace talks and the wider geopolitical fallout.

Trump's Fall: Tariffs, Iran War, Failed Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks & More...

The conflict between the United States and Iran has entered its fifth consecutive day of military escalation, with fresh U.S. strikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure linked to threats against shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian state media reported explosions across multiple cities, while Tehran retaliated by launching attacks on U.S. military positions in Bahrain and Kuwait, further raising fears of a wider regional conflict. President Donald Trump has vowed to continue military operations unless Iran returns to negotiations, while Vice President JD Vance has publicly argued that diplomacy—not prolonged military intervention or ground troops—offers the only sustainable path to ending the crisis. Meanwhile, Iranian officials have questioned the future of previous diplomatic understandings, signaling that the prospects for renewed negotiations remain uncertain.

U.S.-Iran war: Trump threatens more strikes while Iran targets U.S. bases across the Gulf region

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attacked a Singapore-flagged cargo ship, Ever Lovely, in the Strait of Hormuz using a drone, Fox News reported, citing two US officials. The incident came just days after a Memorandum of Understanding to pause the 110-day West Asia war was finalised and signed on June 17 by US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.&nbsp;According to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), the attack took place about 7.5 nautical miles southeast of Dahit, Oman, as the vessel was leaving the Strait of Hormuz. The drone strike damaged the ship's bridge, but no casualties or environmental impact were reported.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">UKMTO WARNING 074-26 - ATTACK Click here to view the full warning.⤵️ <a href="https://t.co/0hDEAb7xO9">https://t.co/0hDEAb7xO9</a><a href="https://x.com/hashtag/MaritimeSecurity?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MaritimeSecurity</a> <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/MarSec?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MarSec</a> <a href="https://t.co/HlPzQDLBja">pic.twitter.com/HlPzQDLBja</a>&mdash; UKMTO Operations Centre (@UK_MTO) <a href="https://x.com/UK_MTO/status/2070160682264269241?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

"A cargo vessel has been hit on the starboard side by an unknown projectile, causing damage to the bridge," UKMTO said in an advisory, noting there were no reported casualties or environmental impact.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-proposes-joint-hormuz-toll-plan-with-gulf-neighbours-to-share-40-billion-revenue-1782427719649">Iran proposes joint Hormuz toll plan with Gulf neighbours to share $40 billion revenue</a><h2>IMO pauses vessel evacuation plan</h2>Following the attack, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), the United Nations agency responsible for global shipping safety, temporarily suspended its vessel evacuation operation in the region.&nbsp;IMO Secretary General Arsenio Dominguez said the decision was taken to verify that safety guarantees remain in place for ships covered under the evacuation framework and for other vessels operating in the area.&nbsp;"I have decided to temporarily pause (the evacuation plan's) implementation in order to reconfirm that the necessary safety guarantees continue to be in place for the ships on our evacuation list and all those in the region," Dominguez said in a statement.&nbsp;He added that Ever Lovely had already passed through the Strait of Hormuz and was not part of the IMO evacuation framework.&nbsp;The attack came after the Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA), a body established by Iran to manage the strait, warned that vessels travelling outside designated routes would not be guaranteed safe passage.&nbsp;In a post on X, the PGSA said: "Any consequences arising from the use of unauthorised routes shall be the responsibility of the vessel's owner, operator and master".&nbsp;Earlier, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington wanted an agreement with Iran but not at any cost.&nbsp;"We want to ensure... that there is no part of this deal that's undertaken that in any way undermines the security, the stability or the prosperity of any of our partners in the Gulf region," Rubio said.&nbsp;He also reassured Gulf countries that the Strait of Hormuz would remain free of transit charges.

According to the UKMTO, a drone struck the cargo ship about 7.5 nautical miles southeast of Dahit, Oman, as it exited the Strait of Hormuz, damaging its bridge without causing any casualties or environmental impact.

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attacked a Singapore-flagged cargo ship, Ever Lovely, in the Strait of Hormuz using a drone, Fox News reported, citing two US officials. The incident came just days after a Memorandum of Understanding to pause the 110-day West Asia war was finalised and signed on June 17 by US President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. According to the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO), the attack took place about 7.5 nautical miles southeast of Dahit, Oman, as the vessel was leaving the Strait of Hormuz. The drone strike damaged the ship's bridge, but no casualties or environmental impact were reported.

According to the UKMTO, a drone struck the cargo ship about 7.5 nautical miles southeast of Dahit, Oman, as it exited the Strait of Hormuz, damaging its bridge without causing any casualties or environmental impact.

Iran targets commercial vessel in Strait of Hormuz days after ceasefire: Report

US President Donald Trump's Iran war has become major point that would not only decide the his future but also the future of his Republican party. While the US Senate passed the war powers resolution to pose symbolic pressure on the Trump, despite knowing that he would veto it, Trump and his administration state that the war has strengthened America's position worldwide.&nbsp;<h2>What the law says?</h2>Congress argue that Trump violated the US Constitution by launching military operations against Iran without congressional approval. Under the 1973 War Powers Act, presidents must seek authorisation from Congress within 60 days of deploying US forces into hostilities, although successive administrations have disputed how the law should be interpreted. Enacted after the Vietnam War, the WPR requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying forces into hostilities. president must terminate the use of force within 60 days (extendable to 90).<h2>What Iran war means for Republican Party and Trump?</h2>Before deciding how the war would impact the Republican Party, it is important to see that Trump has sidelined everyone in his own party. Right from his candidacy for the top role, several Republican elites have been alienated. A clear divide is visible within the party between party elites and MAGA base. Trump became the face of a specific "Republican problem" where the party was less able to control emerging, unstable political forces than the Democrats. Trump's nomination exposed the fragility of the Republican Party's electoral coalition and his tenure has deepened it. From immigration to war, a clear divide exists between the party and the government. The debate over Iran has once again brought these fault lines into the open, with some Republicans backing Trump's actions while others have questioned both the strategy and the constitutional basis for military operations. Moreover, the latest resolution was passed with the support of four Republicans, thus opening the cracks out in open.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/on-day-61-trump-says-won-t-call-iran-conflict-a-war-what-is-war-powers-resolution-iran-us-peace-talk-1777609357687">On Day 61, Trump says he won't call Iran conflict a 'war': Has the US 'terminated' Iran war? What's happening</a>&nbsp;Adding to this, majority of opinion polls have showed Trump's falling ratings due to the war. As Trump is serving his final term in office, the political consequences of the Iran war may extend beyond his presidency. The conflict could influence the Republican Party's internal balance of power, shape its post-Trump identity, and affect its electoral prospects in future elections.<h2>How Trump reacted?</h2>Trump slammed the resolution saying that it was "poorly timed and meaningless." Calling Iran “the number one sponsor of terror”, the US president said that the resolution provides comfort to the enemy by telling them that the US Senate does not respect the US president. He blamed that Senators for “making the job difficult” but added that he will get it done, likely referring to a final deal with Iran.&nbsp;Soon after Trump's public remarks, two Republican senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy changed their positions. The two had previously voted to restrain Trump’s war powers on Iran. While Paul changed the vote to present, Cassidy voted against the resolution, bringing the final tally to 47-50-1. Expressing his happiness, Trump wrote on Truth Social, Trump welcomed the move, “Wow! The Senate just changed its vote on Iran… This vote puts Iran on notice!”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/if-they-re-not-behaving-trump-issues-big-warning-to-iran-amid-disagreements-on-nuclear-inspection-hormuz-1782179991681/amp">'If they’re not behaving...': Trump issues BIG warning to Iran amid disagreements on nuclear inspection, Hormuz</a><h2>Resolution to end Iran war</h2>On June 23, the US Senate approved a symbolic resolution urging an end to President Donald Trump's military conflict with Iran. Earlier on June 3, the US House of Representatives passed a resolution ordering the withdrawal of American troops from the Iran war. In what was seen as an unprecedented move, four members of Trump's Republicans also joined Democrats in backing the measure. The move marked the first time the Republican-controlled House has attempted to force Trump to end the military operations against Tehran. As the Congress pushed for War Powers Resolution, the Trump administration insisted that the war against Iran is already over, despite ongoing exchanges of fire between the two sides' forces and no peace deal.&nbsp;

Trump's Iran war has exposed divisions within the Republican Party, with lawmakers challenging his military authority through a War Powers Resolution. As polls show declining approval ratings, the conflict could shape both Trump's legacy and the GOP's future electoral prospects

US President Donald Trump's Iran war has become major point that would not only decide the his future but also the future of his Republican party. While the US Senate passed the war powers resolution to pose symbolic pressure on the Trump, despite knowing that he would veto it, Trump and his administration state that the war has strengthened America's position worldwide. What the law says? Congress argue that Trump violated the US Constitution by launching military operations against Iran without congressional approval. Under the 1973 War Powers Act, presidents must seek authorisation from Congress within 60 days of deploying US forces into hostilities, although successive administrations have disputed how the law should be interpreted. Enacted after the Vietnam War, the WPR requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of deploying forces into hostilities. president must terminate the use of force within 60 days (extendable to 90). What Iran war means for Republican Party and Trump? Before deciding how the war would impact the Republican Party, it is important to see that Trump has sidelined everyone in his own party. Right from his candidacy for the top role, several Republican elites have been alienated. A clear divide is visible within the party between party elites and MAGA base. Trump became the face of a specific "Republican problem" where the party was less able to control emerging, unstable political forces than the Democrats. Trump's nomination exposed the fragility of the Republican Party's electoral coalition and his tenure has deepened it. From immigration to war, a clear divide exists between the party and the government. The debate over Iran has once again brought these fault lines into the open, with some Republicans backing Trump's actions while others have questioned both the strategy and the constitutional basis for military operations. Moreover, the latest resolution was passed with the support of four Republicans, thus opening the cracks out in open. Also Read: On Day 61, Trump says he won't call Iran conflict a 'war': Has the US 'terminated' Iran war? What's happening Adding to this, majority of opinion polls have showed Trump's falling ratings due to the war. As Trump is serving his final term in office, the political consequences of the Iran war may extend beyond his presidency. The conflict could influence the Republican Party's internal balance of power, shape its post-Trump identity, and affect its electoral prospects in future elections. How Trump reacted? Trump slammed the resolution saying that it was "poorly timed and meaningless." Calling Iran “the number one sponsor of terror”, the US president said that the resolution provides comfort to the enemy by telling them that the US Senate does not respect the US president. He blamed that Senators for “making the job difficult” but added that he will get it done, likely referring to a final deal with Iran. Soon after Trump's public remarks, two Republican senators Rand Paul and Bill Cassidy changed their positions. The two had previously voted to restrain Trump’s war powers on Iran. While Paul changed the vote to present, Cassidy voted against the resolution, bringing the final tally to 47-50-1. Expressing his happiness, Trump wrote on Truth Social, Trump welcomed the move, “Wow! The Senate just changed its vote on Iran… This vote puts Iran on notice!” Also Read: 'If they’re not behaving...': Trump issues BIG warning to Iran amid disagreements on nuclear inspection, Hormuz Resolution to end Iran war On June 23, the US Senate approved a symbolic resolution urging an end to President Donald Trump's military conflict with Iran. Earlier on June 3, the US House of Representatives passed a resolution ordering the withdrawal of American troops from the Iran war. In what was seen as an unprecedented move, four members of Trump's Republicans also joined Democrats in backing the measure. The move marked the first time the Republican-controlled House has attempted to force Trump to end the military operations against Tehran. As the Congress pushed for War Powers Resolution, the Trump administration insisted that the war against Iran is already over, despite ongoing exchanges of fire between the two sides' forces and no peace deal.

Trump's Iran war has exposed divisions within the Republican Party, with lawmakers challenging his military authority through a War Powers Resolution. As polls show declining approval ratings, the conflict could shape both Trump's legacy and the GOP's future electoral prospects

What war powers resolution means for Trump's future and Republican party | WION Decodes

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (April 23) ordered the American Navy to open fire on any vessel found laying mines in the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, signalling a sharp escalation in maritime security measures as tensions with Iran continue.&nbsp;Trump said there should be “no hesitation” in carrying out such action and asserted that the US was intensifying its naval operations in the region. He added that mine-clearing efforts were already underway and would now be significantly ramped up.&nbsp;“I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be (Their naval ships are ALL, 159 of them, at the bottom of the sea!), that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz. There is to be no hesitation,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.&nbsp;“Additionally, our mine ‘sweepers’ are clearing the Strait right now. I am hereby ordering that activity to continue, but at a tripled-up level!” he added.&nbsp;The latest directive comes at a critical moment, with a second round of talks between the United States and Iran anticipated soon, as Pakistan attempts to bring both sides to the negotiating table after the failure of the first round of talks in Islamabad.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/eu-approves-105-billion-ukraine-loan-after-orb-n-defeat-announces-fresh-russia-sanctions-1776948096586">EU approves $105 billion Ukraine loan after Orbán defeat, announces fresh Russia sanctions</a>&nbsp;The initial session was led by US Vice President JD Vance, accompanied by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, while Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi led the Iranian delegation.&nbsp;The statement also follows Trump’s recent decision to extend the ceasefire, during which he said Iran’s leadership had been “fractured” by the war and required time to formulate a proposal for achieving peace between the two countries.&nbsp;Despite the extension, Trump has maintained a firm stance on continuing the naval blockade, a key sticking point in negotiations, with Iran insisting that the blockade must be lifted before it can consider any agreement to end the conflict that began on February 28 following joint military action by Israel and the United States.

Trump said there should be “no hesitation” in carrying out such action and asserted that the US was intensifying its naval operations in the region. He added that mine-clearing efforts were already underway and would now be significantly ramped up.

US President Donald Trump on Thursday (April 23) ordered the American Navy to open fire on any vessel found laying mines in the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, signalling a sharp escalation in maritime security measures as tensions with Iran continue. Trump said there should be “no hesitation” in carrying out such action and asserted that the US was intensifying its naval operations in the region. He added that mine-clearing efforts were already underway and would now be significantly ramped up. “I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be (Their naval ships are ALL, 159 of them, at the bottom of the sea!), that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz. There is to be no hesitation,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. “Additionally, our mine ‘sweepers’ are clearing the Strait right now. I am hereby ordering that activity to continue, but at a tripled-up level!” he added. The latest directive comes at a critical moment, with a second round of talks between the United States and Iran anticipated soon, as Pakistan attempts to bring both sides to the negotiating table after the failure of the first round of talks in Islamabad. Also Read: EU approves $105 billion Ukraine loan after Orbán defeat, announces fresh Russia sanctions The initial session was led by US Vice President JD Vance, accompanied by Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, while Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi led the Iranian delegation. The statement also follows Trump’s recent decision to extend the ceasefire, during which he said Iran’s leadership had been “fractured” by the war and required time to formulate a proposal for achieving peace between the two countries. Despite the extension, Trump has maintained a firm stance on continuing the naval blockade, a key sticking point in negotiations, with Iran insisting that the blockade must be lifted before it can consider any agreement to end the conflict that began on February 28 following joint military action by Israel and the United States.

Trump said there should be “no hesitation” in carrying out such action and asserted that the US was intensifying its naval operations in the region. He added that mine-clearing efforts were already underway and would now be significantly ramped up.

‘Shoot and kill any boat’: Trump orders US Navy to target mine-laying vessels in Strait of Hormuz

US President Donald Trump started a war in Iran on Feb 28, 2026 along with Israel. Prior to the war, he made several statements hinting that it would be a cakewalk for America to attack the Islamic Republic and come out victorious. Though, he never specified his goals, the attack came in midst of nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington. Trump hinted that his objective was regime change and declared that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. On several occasions after the war began, he insisted that it would end soon. It's been 54 days now. Trump, the oldest person to hold the post of US president, has on Apr 22 said that there is “no time frame” for the Iran war to wind up.&nbsp;<h2>A timeline of Trump's shifting statements about how long the Iran war will last</h2>Talking to&nbsp;Fox News, Trump said that there is “no time pressure” on the extended ceasefire. “People say I want to get it over because of the midterms, not true,” adding that the administration wanted to “get a good deal for the American people.” He added, with no remorse, that there is “no time frame” for the war to end. This comes from the same president who on Mar 1, a day after war began, said it would take "four to five weeks." For a week, he insisted that America is “far ahead of schedule and time projections.” On Mar 9, Trump said that the “war is very complete” and then tweaked his statement a bit and said: “We've already won in many ways.” On Mar 11, he again declared victory at a rally in Kentucky. By Mar 20, he said that he “thinks” US has won.&nbsp;&nbsp;Post Mar 20, Trump's narrative shifted to opening of Strait of Hormuz. While he kept beating his trumpet of winning the war and achieving huge success, he repeated that US will end the war “soon.” By the end of the month, Trump claimed that it is Iran who wants a deal. In his big address on Apr 1, his first since the beginning of the war, the POTUS told the world that America's military objectives will be completed “very shortly.” He then spent the entire Easter weekend hurling F-word at Iran for blocking the strait and warning to “blow up the country" if Hormuz is not opened.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-wants-iran-in-stone-age-but-forgets-to-make-iran-great-again-a-look-at-buzzwords-misses-takeaways-from-potus-speech-1775104297198">Trump wants Iran in 'stone age' but forgets to 'Make Iran Great Again': A look at buzzwords, misses, takeaways from POTUS speech</a>&nbsp;On the last day in the first week of April, Trump negotiated with the Iranians despite claiming he has won the war and declared a 14-day ceasefire. Threats and violations at Hormuz continued up until April 22, with Iran not agreeing for second round of talks. And then, Trump decided to reveal to the world that there's no endgame to this war.&nbsp;<h2>What now?</h2>Trump had already walked back on his claims of regime change despite American and Israeli strikes killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. The only point that he sticks on is: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. There's been a major shift in narrative from the US that claimed to attack Iran to ‘make it great again’. But, as the war progressed, the entire Trump administration and the president himself seemingly gave up on the idea. Trump ultimately chose a new one: to send Iran back to stone age. Here too, he declared that Iran's nuclear sites are obliterated - exactly the same claim that he made in June 2025 after the 12-day war.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/from-we-ll-start-shooting-to-they-want-to-negotiate-what-trump-said-on-iran-protest-and-will-he-strike-tehran-1768187628395">From 'we'll start shooting' to 'they want to negotiate': What Trump said on Iran protest and will he strike Tehran</a>&nbsp;Currently, the negotiations between Iran and US are on hold. The first round of the peace talks that was held in Pakistan yielded no result, with Tehran blaming US administration's “excessive demands” for inconclusive talks. While the US is ready to go to Pakistan and hold second round of negotiations despite Vice President JD Vance stating that America has given it “best offer”, Iran doubts America's intent and claims it to be a ploy for a surprise attack on Iran. On the other side, the Hormuz remains a tense area. The US has refused to remove the naval blockade and Iran Revolutionary Guards are stepping up attack on ships in the region. Trump, predictably so, has resorted to threats again. However, this time he has agreed that he isn't aware of at least one thing in the world - the end of war.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Donald Trump has shifted from predicting a quick victory in the Iran war to saying there’s no timeline for its end. With tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and stalled talks, US strategy remains uncertain.

US President Donald Trump started a war in Iran on Feb 28, 2026 along with Israel. Prior to the war, he made several statements hinting that it would be a cakewalk for America to attack the Islamic Republic and come out victorious. Though, he never specified his goals, the attack came in midst of nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington. Trump hinted that his objective was regime change and declared that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. On several occasions after the war began, he insisted that it would end soon. It's been 54 days now. Trump, the oldest person to hold the post of US president, has on Apr 22 said that there is “no time frame” for the Iran war to wind up. A timeline of Trump's shifting statements about how long the Iran war will last Talking to Fox News, Trump said that there is “no time pressure” on the extended ceasefire. “People say I want to get it over because of the midterms, not true,” adding that the administration wanted to “get a good deal for the American people.” He added, with no remorse, that there is “no time frame” for the war to end. This comes from the same president who on Mar 1, a day after war began, said it would take "four to five weeks." For a week, he insisted that America is “far ahead of schedule and time projections.” On Mar 9, Trump said that the “war is very complete” and then tweaked his statement a bit and said: “We've already won in many ways.” On Mar 11, he again declared victory at a rally in Kentucky. By Mar 20, he said that he “thinks” US has won. Post Mar 20, Trump's narrative shifted to opening of Strait of Hormuz. While he kept beating his trumpet of winning the war and achieving huge success, he repeated that US will end the war “soon.” By the end of the month, Trump claimed that it is Iran who wants a deal. In his big address on Apr 1, his first since the beginning of the war, the POTUS told the world that America's military objectives will be completed “very shortly.” He then spent the entire Easter weekend hurling F-word at Iran for blocking the strait and warning to “blow up the country" if Hormuz is not opened. Also Read: Trump wants Iran in 'stone age' but forgets to 'Make Iran Great Again': A look at buzzwords, misses, takeaways from POTUS speech On the last day in the first week of April, Trump negotiated with the Iranians despite claiming he has won the war and declared a 14-day ceasefire. Threats and violations at Hormuz continued up until April 22, with Iran not agreeing for second round of talks. And then, Trump decided to reveal to the world that there's no endgame to this war. What now? Trump had already walked back on his claims of regime change despite American and Israeli strikes killing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. The only point that he sticks on is: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. There's been a major shift in narrative from the US that claimed to attack Iran to ‘make it great again’. But, as the war progressed, the entire Trump administration and the president himself seemingly gave up on the idea. Trump ultimately chose a new one: to send Iran back to stone age. Here too, he declared that Iran's nuclear sites are obliterated - exactly the same claim that he made in June 2025 after the 12-day war. Also Read: From 'we'll start shooting' to 'they want to negotiate': What Trump said on Iran protest and will he strike Tehran Currently, the negotiations between Iran and US are on hold. The first round of the peace talks that was held in Pakistan yielded no result, with Tehran blaming US administration's “excessive demands” for inconclusive talks. While the US is ready to go to Pakistan and hold second round of negotiations despite Vice President JD Vance stating that America has given it “best offer”, Iran doubts America's intent and claims it to be a ploy for a surprise attack on Iran. On the other side, the Hormuz remains a tense area. The US has refused to remove the naval blockade and Iran Revolutionary Guards are stepping up attack on ships in the region. Trump, predictably so, has resorted to threats again. However, this time he has agreed that he isn't aware of at least one thing in the world - the end of war. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Donald Trump has shifted from predicting a quick victory in the Iran war to saying there’s no timeline for its end. With tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and stalled talks, US strategy remains uncertain.

Trump finally admits there's no endgame to Iran war: 'Four to five weeks' is now 'no time frame'

Iran avoids a direct naval clash with the USS Abraham Lincoln because it lacks the real-time satellite tracking to strike moving targets and cannot match America's overwhelming conventional military.

Iran avoids a direct naval clash with the USS Abraham Lincoln because it lacks the real-time satellite tracking to strike moving targets and cannot match America's overwhelming conventional military.

'Escalation trap': Why Iran cannot afford a direct naval fight with the USS Abraham Lincoln

Only days ago, Donald Trump sounded like a leader with no patience for diplomacy. Standing on the White House lawn, he dismissed the very idea of a ceasefire, arguing that you don’t stop when you’re “obliterating” the other side. It was a familiar posture - hardline, combative, and rooted in pressure rather than negotiation. And yet, within 72 hours, the tone shifted dramatically.&nbsp;By Monday (March 23), Trump was speaking not of escalation but of settlement. “They want to settle, and we’re going to get it done,” he said confidently. The pivot was swift, almost jarring. But it wasn’t accidental; it was the result of a mix of pressure, pragmatism, and political instinct.<h2>The pressure from allies and reality</h2>One of the biggest factors behind Trump’s sudden openness appears to have come from America’s regional partners. Gulf allies warned that striking Iran’s civilian power infrastructure could trigger uncontrollable escalation. In a region already on edge, that risk was not theoretical; it was immediate.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-no-direct-or-indirect-talks-iran-denies-conversation-with-trump-after-us-prez-claims-detailed-constructive-talks-1774268919778">‘No direct or indirect talks’: Iran denies conversation with Trump after US prez claims 'detailed, constructive’ talks</a>&nbsp;At the same time, the global economic impact of the conflict was becoming impossible to ignore. Oil markets reacted sharply, and the threat to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global energy supplies, sent shockwaves through financial systems. Rising oil prices and market instability are not just foreign policy concerns; they are domestic political risks. For a president deeply attentive to economic signals, the message was clear: continued escalation could carry serious costs at home.<h2>The politics of markets and momentum</h2>The timing of Trump’s announcement is telling. News of potential talks came just before US markets opened, triggering a rally on Wall Street and easing oil prices. This wasn’t just diplomacy - it was also economic messaging.&nbsp;Trump has long measured success through market performance. A cooling of tensions, even the perception of it, offered immediate political dividends. In that sense, embracing talks wasn’t a retreat; it was a recalibration.<h2>The mystery of ‘talks’</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-you-re-fired-irgc-mocks-trump-using-his-signature-phrase-after-us-president-s-hit-and-obliterate-warning-over-hormuz-1774249474894">‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz</a>&nbsp;But if Trump’s shift was clear, the reality of the talks remains murky. Trump claimed his administration was in contact with a “respected” Iranian official. Tehran, however, flatly denied any direct negotiations. Figures like Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf rejected the claim outright, suggesting instead that Washington was backing down under pressure. The truth likely lies somewhere in between.&nbsp;Diplomacy between the US and Iran has rarely been direct. Instead, it flows through intermediaries, and this time is no different. Countries like Pakistan, Oman, Turkey, and Egypt are actively passing messages, testing positions, and exploring possibilities. This indirect engagement allows both sides to probe without committing, and to deny, if necessary.<h2>A familiar negotiating style</h2>Trump’s approach also fits a broader pattern. His foreign policy has often followed a cycle: escalate tensions, apply pressure, and then pivot to negotiation from a position of perceived strength. The reported 15-point proposal, including demands on Iran’s nuclear programme, its regional proxies, and recognition of Israel, mirrors earlier US positions. There is little that is fundamentally new in substance. What has changed is the willingness to talk about it now.&nbsp;This suggests that the shift is less about a change in objectives and more about timing.&nbsp;Despite the rhetoric, there is no clear evidence of a breakthrough. Even those involved in mediation describe the situation as fluid, with proposals still far from agreement. Military movements in the region continue, underscoring the gap between words and reality.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Trump quickly shifted from aggressive rhetoric to openness for Iran talks, driven by ally pressure, economic risks, and market signals, using his familiar strategy of escalation followed by negotiation.

Only days ago, Donald Trump sounded like a leader with no patience for diplomacy. Standing on the White House lawn, he dismissed the very idea of a ceasefire, arguing that you don’t stop when you’re “obliterating” the other side. It was a familiar posture - hardline, combative, and rooted in pressure rather than negotiation. And yet, within 72 hours, the tone shifted dramatically. By Monday (March 23), Trump was speaking not of escalation but of settlement. “They want to settle, and we’re going to get it done,” he said confidently. The pivot was swift, almost jarring. But it wasn’t accidental; it was the result of a mix of pressure, pragmatism, and political instinct. The pressure from allies and reality One of the biggest factors behind Trump’s sudden openness appears to have come from America’s regional partners. Gulf allies warned that striking Iran’s civilian power infrastructure could trigger uncontrollable escalation. In a region already on edge, that risk was not theoretical; it was immediate. Also read: ‘No direct or indirect talks’: Iran denies conversation with Trump after US prez claims 'detailed, constructive’ talks At the same time, the global economic impact of the conflict was becoming impossible to ignore. Oil markets reacted sharply, and the threat to the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for global energy supplies, sent shockwaves through financial systems. Rising oil prices and market instability are not just foreign policy concerns; they are domestic political risks. For a president deeply attentive to economic signals, the message was clear: continued escalation could carry serious costs at home. The politics of markets and momentum The timing of Trump’s announcement is telling. News of potential talks came just before US markets opened, triggering a rally on Wall Street and easing oil prices. This wasn’t just diplomacy - it was also economic messaging. Trump has long measured success through market performance. A cooling of tensions, even the perception of it, offered immediate political dividends. In that sense, embracing talks wasn’t a retreat; it was a recalibration. The mystery of ‘talks’ Also read: ‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz But if Trump’s shift was clear, the reality of the talks remains murky. Trump claimed his administration was in contact with a “respected” Iranian official. Tehran, however, flatly denied any direct negotiations. Figures like Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf rejected the claim outright, suggesting instead that Washington was backing down under pressure. The truth likely lies somewhere in between. Diplomacy between the US and Iran has rarely been direct. Instead, it flows through intermediaries, and this time is no different. Countries like Pakistan, Oman, Turkey, and Egypt are actively passing messages, testing positions, and exploring possibilities. This indirect engagement allows both sides to probe without committing, and to deny, if necessary. A familiar negotiating style Trump’s approach also fits a broader pattern. His foreign policy has often followed a cycle: escalate tensions, apply pressure, and then pivot to negotiation from a position of perceived strength. The reported 15-point proposal, including demands on Iran’s nuclear programme, its regional proxies, and recognition of Israel, mirrors earlier US positions. There is little that is fundamentally new in substance. What has changed is the willingness to talk about it now. This suggests that the shift is less about a change in objectives and more about timing. Despite the rhetoric, there is no clear evidence of a breakthrough. Even those involved in mediation describe the situation as fluid, with proposals still far from agreement. Military movements in the region continue, underscoring the gap between words and reality. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Trump quickly shifted from aggressive rhetoric to openness for Iran talks, driven by ally pressure, economic risks, and market signals, using his familiar strategy of escalation followed by negotiation.

From ‘obliteration’ to talks in 72 hours - How and why Trump suddenly embraced the idea of talking with Iran

Hours after US President Donald Trump announced a five-day postponement of strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure on Monday (March 23), Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed reports of negotiations with the United States as "fake news" and asserted that the "Iranian people demand complete and remorseful punishment of the aggressors".&nbsp;"No negotiations have been held with the US, and fake news is being used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped," Ghalibaf said in a post on X, adding, "All Iranian officials stand firmly behind their supreme leader and people until this goal is achieved".&nbsp;Speaking to reporters at Palm Beach, Trump claimed that the United States and Iran had reached ‘major points of agreement’ and confirmed that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner participated in the talks. He declined to identify the Iranian counterpart in detail, describing the individual only as a respected leader and clarifying that it was not Mojtaba Khamenei.&nbsp;“They want very much to make a deal. We’d like to make a deal too,” Trump said, adding that more phone discussions were expected on Monday, with a face-to-face meeting anticipated soon. He also outlined a short timeline for progress, stating, “We’re doing a five-day period, we’ll see how that goes. If it goes well, we’re going to end up settling this. Otherwise, we’ll just keep bombing our little hearts out.”&nbsp;However, Iran has categorically denied these assertions, saying Tehran did not have any negotiations with the United States.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">1/ Iranian people demand complete and remorseful punishment of the aggressors. All Irainan officials stand firmly behind their supreme leader and people until this goal is achieved.&mdash; محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf (@mb_ghalibaf) <a href="https://twitter.com/mb_ghalibaf/status/2036108696040747128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This series of claims and counterclaims from Washington and Tehran was set off by Trump’s social media post, in which he announced a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure.&nbsp;Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week.&nbsp;“I am pleased to report that the United States of America and the country of Iran have had, over the last two days, very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.&nbsp;“Based on the tenor and tone of these in-depth, detailed, and constructive conversations, which will continue throughout the week, I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions,” he added.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)&nbsp;

Speaking to reporters at Palm Beach, Trump claimed that the United States and Iran had reached ‘major points of agreement’ and confirmed that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner participated in the talks.

Hours after US President Donald Trump announced a five-day postponement of strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure on Monday (March 23), Iran's Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf dismissed reports of negotiations with the United States as "fake news" and asserted that the "Iranian people demand complete and remorseful punishment of the aggressors". "No negotiations have been held with the US, and fake news is being used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped," Ghalibaf said in a post on X, adding, "All Iranian officials stand firmly behind their supreme leader and people until this goal is achieved". Speaking to reporters at Palm Beach, Trump claimed that the United States and Iran had reached ‘major points of agreement’ and confirmed that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner participated in the talks. He declined to identify the Iranian counterpart in detail, describing the individual only as a respected leader and clarifying that it was not Mojtaba Khamenei. “They want very much to make a deal. We’d like to make a deal too,” Trump said, adding that more phone discussions were expected on Monday, with a face-to-face meeting anticipated soon. He also outlined a short timeline for progress, stating, “We’re doing a five-day period, we’ll see how that goes. If it goes well, we’re going to end up settling this. Otherwise, we’ll just keep bombing our little hearts out.” However, Iran has categorically denied these assertions, saying Tehran did not have any negotiations with the United States.

Speaking to reporters at Palm Beach, Trump claimed that the United States and Iran had reached ‘major points of agreement’ and confirmed that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner participated in the talks.

‘US and Israel are trapped’: Iran trashes Trump’s ‘negotiation’ claims, vows crushing punishment

In a significant shift in the West Asia war , US President Donald Trump announced on Monday (March 23) a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The decision comes after what he described as "very good and productive" high-level discussions between the United States and Iran over the past 48 hours.&nbsp;The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region.&nbsp;President Trump noted that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to persist throughout the week.&nbsp;“I am pleased to report that the United States of America and the country of Iran have had, over the last two days, very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.&nbsp;“Based on the tenor and tone of these in-depth, detailed, and constructive conversations, which will continue throughout the week, I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions,” he added.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-will-completely-close-the-strait-of-hormuz-iran-responds-to-trump-s-48-hour-ultimatum-1774196432013">‘We will completely close the Strait of Hormuz’: Iran responds to Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum</a>&nbsp;Trump's announcement comes hours before his 48‑hour ultimatum on reopening the Strait of Hormuz is set to expire late Monday night, and Iran’s military has responded by warning that it will completely close the waterway if the US proceeds with its threats.&nbsp;The US president has come under intense domestic and international pressure from rising energy prices caused by Iran’s closure of the Strait, through which around 20 per cent of global oil transits. Crude oil has been trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the conflict.&nbsp;The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US‑Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high‑ranking military commanders. The strikes, aimed at weakening Iran’s command structure and undermining its war capabilities, also hit key nuclear and energy infrastructure, a campaign widely seen as intended to trigger regime change in Tehran.&nbsp;Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region.

In a significant shift in the West Asia war , US President Donald Trump announced on Monday (March 23) a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The decision comes after what he described as "very good and productive" high-level discussions between the United States and Iran over the past 48 hours. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region. President Trump noted that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to persist throughout the week. “I am pleased to report that the United States of America and the country of Iran have had, over the last two days, very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “Based on the tenor and tone of these in-depth, detailed, and constructive conversations, which will continue throughout the week, I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions,” he added. Also Read: ‘We will completely close the Strait of Hormuz’: Iran responds to Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum Trump's announcement comes hours before his 48‑hour ultimatum on reopening the Strait of Hormuz is set to expire late Monday night, and Iran’s military has responded by warning that it will completely close the waterway if the US proceeds with its threats. The US president has come under intense domestic and international pressure from rising energy prices caused by Iran’s closure of the Strait, through which around 20 per cent of global oil transits. Crude oil has been trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the conflict. The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US‑Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high‑ranking military commanders. The strikes, aimed at weakening Iran’s command structure and undermining its war capabilities, also hit key nuclear and energy infrastructure, a campaign widely seen as intended to trigger regime change in Tehran. Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region.

Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days

As tensions intensify in the Middle East, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has openly mocked US President Donald Trump, using his own signature phrase to respond to Washington’s latest warning.&nbsp;IRGC spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari delivered the message in English, saying, “Hey Trump, you are fired! You are familiar with this sentence. Thank you for your attention to this matter,” echoing the US leader’s well-known line from The Apprentice.&nbsp;The remark came after Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum demanding Iran reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz or face US strikes on its power infrastructure. He warned that Washington could “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants if Tehran failed to comply.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">IRGC Spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaghari mocks Trump in English: Hey Trump, you are fired! You are familiar with this sentence. Thank you for your attention to this matter. <a href="https://t.co/t7p3z7YloR">pic.twitter.com/t7p3z7YloR</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://twitter.com/clashreport/status/2035818247493177412?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Iran responded with a stark counter-threat. Zolfaghari warned that any attack on Iran’s energy network would trigger retaliation against US-linked assets across the Gulf region, including energy facilities, IT infrastructure, and water desalination plants.“If Iran’s fuel and energy infrastructure is attacked, all corresponding infrastructure belonging to the US and its regional allies will be targeted,” he said, referencing earlier warnings issued by Tehran.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-orders-4-500-us-marines-sailors-troops-to-west-asia-amid-strait-of-hormuz-crisis-as-iran-ultimatum-looms-1774245239369">Trump orders 4,500 US troops to West Asia amid Strait of Hormuz crisis as Iran ultimatum looms</a>&nbsp;Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, reinforced the stance, cautioning that strikes on Iranian power plants could lead to “irreversible destruction” of key infrastructure across the Middle East.<h2>Strait of Hormuz - the centre of conflict</h2>At the heart of the standoff lies the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow yet crucial maritime route through which roughly one-fifth of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas supplies transit. Iran has already moved to effectively shut the passage, triggering the most severe energy disruption since the 1970s.&nbsp;The IRGC has indicated the waterway will remain closed until Iran’s damaged infrastructure is restored, raising fears of prolonged instability in global energy markets.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

The IRGC mocked Donald Trump using his "You’re fired!" catchphrase, responding to his 48-hour ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on Iran’s critical power infrastructure.

As tensions intensify in the Middle East, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has openly mocked US President Donald Trump, using his own signature phrase to respond to Washington’s latest warning. IRGC spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari delivered the message in English, saying, “Hey Trump, you are fired! You are familiar with this sentence. Thank you for your attention to this matter,” echoing the US leader’s well-known line from The Apprentice. The remark came after Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum demanding Iran reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz or face US strikes on its power infrastructure. He warned that Washington could “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants if Tehran failed to comply.

The IRGC mocked Donald Trump using his "You’re fired!" catchphrase, responding to his 48-hour ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on Iran’s critical power infrastructure.

‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz

Panetta on Trump Iran strategy: Leon Panetta, the former CIA director and US defence secretary, has squarely blamed Donald Trump for the escalating Iran crisis, outlining seven key reasons why the current US–Iran conflict has spiralled into a geopolitical and energy emergency. However, Panetta’s own record in prolonging US foreign wars, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan, is worth mentioning if one is talking about accountability in American national security. Here is a clear breakdown of Panetta’s claims—followed by an evidence-based look at his past role in US military interventions. Seeing this, one would wonder why Panetta suddenly developed a conscience.<h2>7 reasons why Panetta blames Trump for the Iran crisis</h2>Underestimating the Strait of Hormuz risk Panetta, in remarks published in The Guardian, argued that Trump failed to anticipate Iran’s most predictable strategic move: disrupting the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway is critical to global energy security, with roughly 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply passing through it. According to Panetta, the risk of its closure has long been central to US national security planning.Overreliance on short-war assumptions Panetta claims Trump’s Iran war strategy relied on the assumption of a quick military victory.Instead, the conflict is dragging on, exposing the absence of a clear US exit strategy.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-issues-first-respond-to-trump-s-will-obliterate-power-plants-threat-strait-of-hormuz-1774143212657">'Any violation by enemy...': Iran issues first response to Trump's 'will obliterate power plants' threat</a>&nbsp;Decapitation strikes backfired The killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the first day of the current war was intended to destabilise Iran’s leadership. However, Panetta argued, it had the opposite effect, leading to the rise of the leader's son Mojtaba Khamenei, who is more hardline and ideologically rigid.Iran gained leverage over global oil markets By restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran effectively weaponised energy supply chains, in Penetta's view. This has triggered volatility in global oil prices, raising concerns about inflation, fuel costs, and the risk of a wider economic slowdown.Limited strategic options for the US Panetta describes Trump’s position as between “a rock and a hard place”, with two main options:Escalate military operations to reopen the strait, or withdraw and risk strategic failure. Both scenarios carry high geopolitical and economic risks, in his view.Strained alliances weakened US leverage Panetta highlighted Trump's tensions with NATO and other allies during the planning phase of the Iran strikes. Now, as the crisis deepens, the US faces reduced international support—underscoring the importance of multilateral cooperation in modern conflict, according to the former CIA chief.Trump's inconsistent messaging undermined credibilityPanetta criticised Trump’s communication strategy, citing mixed signals on war aims and controversial public messaging, which included meme-inspired videos on official handles. He argued that failure to acknowledge civilian casualties and policy missteps weakened US credibility in global diplomacy.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-64-of-us-voters-oppose-war-in-west-asia-wion-1774205103898/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-64-of-us-voters-oppose-war-in-west-asia-wion-1774205103898/embed</a><h2>Perspective: Panetta’s own record on foreign wars is nothing to sing home about&nbsp;</h2>While Panetta’s analysis of Trump reflected mainstream national security concerns, his own role in shaping US foreign policy during the post-9/11 era, which contributed to extending its ‘endless war’ needs some analyisis.<h3>Panetta's leadership during prolonged wars</h3>Panetta served as CIA director (2009–2011) and US defence secretary (2011–2013) under president Barack Obama, a period marked by extension of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan that were started by his predecessor George W Bush. These wars evolved into long-term military engagements with significant human and financial costs.<h3>Expansion of drone warfare</h3>As CIA director, Panetta oversaw a major expansion of drone strikes, particularly in Pakistan, with multiple civilian casualties. At the time, he described drones as one of the “most effective” tools against al-Qaeda terror group, but critics argued that such operations contributed to deaths and antagonism towards the US, and prolonged instability in the region.<h3>Support for Libya intervention</h3>Panetta backed the disastrous 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya, which led to the fall of the Muammar Gaddafi dictatorship but also led to years of political instability and conflict.<h3>Advocacy of interventionist policy</h3>Panetta has consistently supported a “forward defence” strategy—arguing for sustained US military presence abroad, contraty to what he is currently saying about Trump and Iran. He has criticised isolationist tendencies in US politics and warned against reducing America’s global military role, calling it ‘Vietnam syndrome’.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/live-blog-us-israel-iran-attack-live-updates-attack-india-russia-china-netanyahu-trump-khamenei-hezbollah-idf-saudi-gulf-qatar-strait-of-hormuz-update-1774240031195">US-Iran-Israel war LIVE: America issues worldwide travel alert; Gulf countries targeted again</a><h2>Continuity with current strategies</h2>The tatics Panetta previously endorsed—such as drone strikes and special operations—are similar to approaches reportedly under consideration in the current Iran conflict, incuding Trump's reported plans to deploy Marines to secure Strait of Hormuz and/ or Iranian nuclear fuel.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

Leon Panetta, ex-CIA chief and former US defence secretary under Obama, blamed Donald Trump for the Iran crisis, citing strategic missteps and risks to oil market and global economy. But his own record in US wars raises questions about credibility and accountability. A sudden conscience?

Panetta on Trump Iran strategy: Leon Panetta, the former CIA director and US defence secretary, has squarely blamed Donald Trump for the escalating Iran crisis, outlining seven key reasons why the current US–Iran conflict has spiralled into a geopolitical and energy emergency. However, Panetta’s own record in prolonging US foreign wars, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan, is worth mentioning if one is talking about accountability in American national security. Here is a clear breakdown of Panetta’s claims—followed by an evidence-based look at his past role in US military interventions. Seeing this, one would wonder why Panetta suddenly developed a conscience. 7 reasons why Panetta blames Trump for the Iran crisis Underestimating the Strait of Hormuz risk Panetta, in remarks published in The Guardian, argued that Trump failed to anticipate Iran’s most predictable strategic move: disrupting the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway is critical to global energy security, with roughly 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply passing through it. According to Panetta, the risk of its closure has long been central to US national security planning. Overreliance on short-war assumptions Panetta claims Trump’s Iran war strategy relied on the assumption of a quick military victory. Instead, the conflict is dragging on, exposing the absence of a clear US exit strategy. Also read: 'Any violation by enemy...': Iran issues first response to Trump's 'will obliterate power plants' threat Decapitation strikes backfired The killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the first day of the current war was intended to destabilise Iran’s leadership. However, Panetta argued, it had the opposite effect, leading to the rise of the leader's son Mojtaba Khamenei, who is more hardline and ideologically rigid. Iran gained leverage over global oil markets By restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran effectively weaponised energy supply chains, in Penetta's view. This has triggered volatility in global oil prices, raising concerns about inflation, fuel costs, and the risk of a wider economic slowdown. Limited strategic options for the US Panetta describes Trump’s position as between “a rock and a hard place”, with two main options: Escalate military operations to reopen the strait, or withdraw and risk strategic failure. Both scenarios carry high geopolitical and economic risks, in his view. Strained alliances weakened US leverage Panetta highlighted Trump's tensions with NATO and other allies during the planning phase of the Iran strikes. Now, as the crisis deepens, the US faces reduced international support—underscoring the importance of multilateral cooperation in modern conflict, according to the former CIA chief. Trump's inconsistent messaging undermined credibility Panetta criticised Trump’s communication strategy, citing mixed signals on war aims and controversial public messaging, which included meme-inspired videos on official handles. He argued that failure to acknowledge civilian casualties and policy missteps weakened US credibility in global diplomacy. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-64-of-us-voters-oppose-war-in-west-asia-wion-1774205103898/embed Perspective: Panetta’s own record on foreign wars is nothing to sing home about While Panetta’s analysis of Trump reflected mainstream national security concerns, his own role in shaping US foreign policy during the post-9/11 era, which contributed to extending its ‘endless war’ needs some analyisis. Panetta's leadership during prolonged wars Panetta served as CIA director (2009–2011) and US defence secretary (2011–2013) under president Barack Obama, a period marked by extension of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan that were started by his predecessor George W Bush. These wars evolved into long-term military engagements with significant human and financial costs. Expansion of drone warfare As CIA director, Panetta oversaw a major expansion of drone strikes, particularly in Pakistan, with multiple civilian casualties. At the time, he described drones as one of the “most effective” tools against al-Qaeda terror group, but critics argued that such operations contributed to deaths and antagonism towards the US, and prolonged instability in the region. Support for Libya intervention Panetta backed the disastrous 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya, which led to the fall of the Muammar Gaddafi dictatorship but also led to years of political instability and conflict. Advocacy of interventionist policy Panetta has consistently supported a “forward defence” strategy—arguing for sustained US military presence abroad, contraty to what he is currently saying about Trump and Iran. He has criticised isolationist tendencies in US politics and warned against reducing America’s global military role, calling it ‘Vietnam syndrome’. Also read: US-Iran-Israel war LIVE: America issues worldwide travel alert; Gulf countries targeted again Continuity with current strategies The tatics Panetta previously endorsed—such as drone strikes and special operations—are similar to approaches reportedly under consideration in the current Iran conflict, incuding Trump's reported plans to deploy Marines to secure Strait of Hormuz and/ or Iranian nuclear fuel. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Leon Panetta, ex-CIA chief and former US defence secretary under Obama, blamed Donald Trump for the Iran crisis, citing strategic missteps and risks to oil market and global economy. But his own record in US wars raises questions about credibility and accountability. A sudden conscience?

Trump and Iran crisis: Ex-CIA chief Leon Panetta lists 7 reasons why US president is responsible— but what about his own foreign wars record?

Amid heightened tensions between Iran and the US, President Donald Trump on Monday (Feb 24) refuted media reports claiming that General Daniel Caine has cautioned Washington against the war with Tehran. Trump claimed that the reports are ‘fake’ and "100 per cent incorrect." Trump said that no one in his team wants a war with Iran, and the decision to strike Iran will solely be his decision. This comes after major media outlets claimed that General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had privately warned of the "acute risks" associated with a military campaign against Iran. Meanwhile, another report by Guardian stated that Trump will make the final decision on Iran strike based on what his special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner informs him about the nuclear talks scheduled on February 26, in Geneva.<h2>What Trump said about disagreements in his team?</h2>Praising General Daniel Caine's role, Trump highlighted his role in Operation Midnight Hammer, the June 2025 strike that US conducted on Iranian nuclear sites. He said that Caine has expressed willingness to "lead the pack" if a strike is ordered. In a Truth Social post, Trump said, “Numerous stories from the Fake News Media have been circulating stating that General Daniel Caine, sometimes referred to as Razin, is against us going to War with Iran. The story does not attribute this vast wealth of knowledge to anyone, and is 100% incorrect. I am the one that makes the decision, I would rather have a Deal than not but, if we don’t make a Deal, it will be a very bad day for that Country and, very sadly, its people, because they are great and wonderful, and something like this should never have happened to them.”&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-tensions-trump-denies-rift-with-top-general-over-iran-strike-risks-1771901979656/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-tensions-trump-denies-rift-with-top-general-over-iran-strike-risks-1771901979656/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-don-t-let-evil-go-unchecked-is-disagreement-within-trump-s-team-reason-for-delay-in-striking-iran-1771747479393">‘Don’t let evil go unchecked...': Is disagreement within Trump's team reason for delay in striking Iran?</a><h2>Disagreements within Trump's team</h2>Earlier this week, Republican senator Lindsey Graham urged Trump to go ahead with military action against Iran. He said that Trump should not let the “evil go unchecked.” "I understand concerns about major military operations in the Middle East, given past entanglements. However, the voices who counsel against getting entangled seem to ignore the consequences of letting evil go unchecked,” Graham reportedly told Axios. Last week, Graham said that if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stays in power, it is a big win for Tehran. His remarks suggested that America is planning a military action against Iran within “weeks, not months.” He said that the “risk of regime change is real." "There are unknowns. But let me just say this, I’m willing to take that risk. I think the Iranian people have the potential to be a great ally of the United States, Israel and the region,” Graham said.&nbsp;Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-preparing-for-war-with-israel-and-us-irgc-takes-over-hezbollah-amid-escalating-tensions-what-this-means-1771746085884">&nbsp;Iran preparing for war with Israel and US? IRGC takes over Hezbollah amid escalating tensions - What this means</a> Iran has warned of regional war if it is struck. It has also ruled out giving up uranium enrichment and said that US has not demanded zero enrichment. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have taken charge of Hezbollah amid heightened tensions, according to Saudi outlet Al-Arabiya, in what is being seen as preparation of war. The Iranian officers are reportedly briefing Hezbollah operatives across Lebanon. The report added that IRGC officers also met Hezbollah’s missile unit at a site in Lebanon’s Beqaa Valley that was bombed by Israel overnight.

Trump dismissed reports that General Daniel Caine warned against a US strike on Iran, calling them false. He said the US could easily win but prefers to avoid war. As tensions rise, Washington boosts military presence while Iran warns of regional conflict.

Amid heightened tensions between Iran and the US, President Donald Trump on Monday (Feb 24) refuted media reports claiming that General Daniel Caine has cautioned Washington against the war with Tehran. Trump claimed that the reports are ‘fake’ and "100 per cent incorrect." Trump said that no one in his team wants a war with Iran, and the decision to strike Iran will solely be his decision. This comes after major media outlets claimed that General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had privately warned of the "acute risks" associated with a military campaign against Iran. Meanwhile, another report by Guardian stated that Trump will make the final decision on Iran strike based on what his special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner informs him about the nuclear talks scheduled on February 26, in Geneva. What Trump said about disagreements in his team? Praising General Daniel Caine's role, Trump highlighted his role in Operation Midnight Hammer, the June 2025 strike that US conducted on Iranian nuclear sites. He said that Caine has expressed willingness to "lead the pack" if a strike is ordered. In a Truth Social post, Trump said, “Numerous stories from the Fake News Media have been circulating stating that General Daniel Caine, sometimes referred to as Razin, is against us going to War with Iran. The story does not attribute this vast wealth of knowledge to anyone, and is 100% incorrect. I am the one that makes the decision, I would rather have a Deal than not but, if we don’t make a Deal, it will be a very bad day for that Country and, very sadly, its people, because they are great and wonderful, and something like this should never have happened to them.” https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-tensions-trump-denies-rift-with-top-general-over-iran-strike-risks-1771901979656/embed Also Read: ‘Don’t let evil go unchecked...': Is disagreement within Trump's team reason for delay in striking Iran? Disagreements within Trump's team Earlier this week, Republican senator Lindsey Graham urged Trump to go ahead with military action against Iran. He said that Trump should not let the “evil go unchecked.” "I understand concerns about major military operations in the Middle East, given past entanglements. However, the voices who counsel against getting entangled seem to ignore the consequences of letting evil go unchecked,” Graham reportedly told Axios. Last week, Graham said that if Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei stays in power, it is a big win for Tehran. His remarks suggested that America is planning a military action against Iran within “weeks, not months.” He said that the “risk of regime change is real." "There are unknowns. But let me just say this, I’m willing to take that risk. I think the Iranian people have the potential to be a great ally of the United States, Israel and the region,” Graham said. Also Read: Iran preparing for war with Israel and US? IRGC takes over Hezbollah amid escalating tensions - What this means Iran has warned of regional war if it is struck. It has also ruled out giving up uranium enrichment and said that US has not demanded zero enrichment. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have taken charge of Hezbollah amid heightened tensions, according to Saudi outlet Al-Arabiya, in what is being seen as preparation of war. The Iranian officers are reportedly briefing Hezbollah operatives across Lebanon. The report added that IRGC officers also met Hezbollah’s missile unit at a site in Lebanon’s Beqaa Valley that was bombed by Israel overnight.

Trump dismissed reports that General Daniel Caine warned against a US strike on Iran, calling them false. He said the US could easily win but prefers to avoid war. As tensions rise, Washington boosts military presence while Iran warns of regional conflict.

'Will be very bad day...': Trump rejects claims of rift within his team, warns Iran of possible strike if nuclear talks collapse

trump-iran-war

Trump Iran War, News on Trump Iran War, stories on Trump Iran War, articles on Trump Iran War, Trump Iran War stories at Wion, Trump Iran War news, Trump Iran War latest news

trump iran-war

Trump Launches “Economic Warfare” Against Iran As Strait Of Hormuz Crisis Deepens

Gorkhas Rise Up in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army

Gorkhas Rise in Nepal, Demand Return to Indian Army | GRAVITAS

Iran War Drains US Weapons Stockpile | Trump Faces Growing Military Pressure | GRAVITAS

Trump's Fall: Tariffs, Iran War, Failed Russia-Ukraine Peace Talks & More...

U.S.-Iran war: Trump threatens more strikes while Iran targets U.S. bases across the Gulf region

Iran targets commercial vessel in Strait of Hormuz days after ceasefire: Report

What war powers resolution means for Trump's future and Republican party

‘Shoot and kill’: Trump orders US Navy to target mine-laying vessels in Hormuz

Trump finally admits there's no endgame to Iran war

Why Iran cannot afford a direct naval fight with the USS Abraham Lincoln

How and why Trump suddenly embraced the idea of talking with Iran

‘US, Israel trapped’: Iran rejects Trump’s ‘negotiation’ claims, vows punishment

Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days

‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase

Panetta lists reasons why Trump is responsible for Iran, but his own record is…

Trump rejects claims of rift in his team, warns Iran of possible strike again