Iran’s nuclear programme is once again at the centre of a growing geopolitical confrontation, as Tehran faces international pressure while deepening nuclear cooperation with Russia.

Iran operates Russian-designed nuclear infrastructure at Bushehr, while further Russian-Iranian nuclear projects are also under development. Iranian officials have described expanding cooperation with Moscow, including work involving nuclear power and radiopharmaceuticals.

At the same time, Iran’s fortified nuclear facilities remain a major concern for the United States and its allies. The heavily fortified Pickaxe Mountain site near Natanz has emerged as a particular focus amid the continuing US-Iran conflict.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has also referred Iran to the UN Security Council over its failure to cooperate with a long-running investigation into undeclared uranium traces. Iran continues to insist that its nuclear programme is peaceful.

As Russia deepens its relationship with Tehran, the nuclear question is becoming an increasingly important part of the wider geopolitical contest.

Watch GRAVITAS for a closer look at Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Russia’s expanding role and what this partnership could mean for the future of the region.

Iran's Nuclear Fortress Is Getting Stronger as Russia Expands Its Nuclear Ties | GRAVITAS 

Fresh differences have emerged between Washington and Tehran over the future of Iran's nuclear programme, even as both sides prepare for negotiations aimed at turning their newly announced ceasefire into a broader peace agreement. US President Donald Trump on Monday (Jun 15) in a Truth Social post insisted that Iran "has agreed to never have a Nuclear Weapon!" while dismissing reports that the United States would provide Tehran with hundreds of billions of dollars in economic assistance.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-claims-strait-of-hormuz-will-be-toll-free-iran-says-ships-will-pay-maritime-service-fees-what-s-really-in-the-peace-deal-1781573888112">US claims Strait of Hormuz will be toll-free. Iran says ships will pay maritime service fees. What's really in the peace deal?</a><h2>Iran's nuclear future: According to the US</h2>"Iran has agreed to never have a Nuclear Weapon!" Trump wrote on social media, while also rejecting claims that Washington would pay Iran $300 billion under the deal.The comments came as Vice President JD Vance on NBC claimed that American and international nuclear inspectors would be allowed to return to Iran and oversee the dismantling of the country's stockpiles of enriched uranium.In a separate statement, Trump also told The New York Times that negotiations were continuing over how long Iran would suspend uranium enrichment, suggesting a potential arrangement lasting between 15 and 20 years.Tehran, however, signalled that the issue remains unresolved.<h2>Tehran rejects Trump's claims on Iran's nuclear future</h2>Speaking at a regular press briefing on Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei rejected Trump's claims on the recent peace agreement and pushed back against suggestions that Iran had already accepted limits on its uranium stockpiles.According to Baghaei, the memorandum of understanding signed this week serves only as a framework for future negotiations and does not contain detailed provisions on Iran's nuclear programme.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/after-ceasefire-iran-reveals-roadmap-to-final-us-agreement-and-possible-24-billion-payout-1781487819256">After ceasefire, Iran reveals roadmap to final US agreement and possible $24 billion payout</a>He said discussions over sanctions relief, uranium enrichment and the fate of Iran's highly enriched uranium reserves would take place during the 60 days of technical talks that is now set to begin.Baghaei also referred to what he described as a failed US operation during the war to seize Iranian uranium stockpiles, arguing that Washington would be unwise to attempt a similar action again.<h2>France wants Iran's enriched uranium gone</h2>French President Emmanuel Macron in a statement said Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles should ultimately be neutralised and placed under international supervision.Speaking after the announcement of the US-Iran deal, Macron said the material should either be removed from Iran or diluted, before being monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. "We will ensure that the enriched uranium capabilities that remain are properly neutralised," Macron said.&nbsp;

A day after announcing a ceasefire, Washington and Tehran are already at odds over Iran's nuclear future. Donald Trump says Iran has agreed never to build a nuclear weapon, while Tehran insists uranium enrichment and stockpile issues remain subject to future negotiations. All you need to know

Fresh differences have emerged between Washington and Tehran over the future of Iran's nuclear programme, even as both sides prepare for negotiations aimed at turning their newly announced ceasefire into a broader peace agreement. US President Donald Trump on Monday (Jun 15) in a Truth Social post insisted that Iran "has agreed to never have a Nuclear Weapon!" while dismissing reports that the United States would provide Tehran with hundreds of billions of dollars in economic assistance. Also read | US claims Strait of Hormuz will be toll-free. Iran says ships will pay maritime service fees. What's really in the peace deal? Iran's nuclear future: According to the US "Iran has agreed to never have a Nuclear Weapon!" Trump wrote on social media, while also rejecting claims that Washington would pay Iran $300 billion under the deal. The comments came as Vice President JD Vance on NBC claimed that American and international nuclear inspectors would be allowed to return to Iran and oversee the dismantling of the country's stockpiles of enriched uranium. In a separate statement, Trump also told The New York Times that negotiations were continuing over how long Iran would suspend uranium enrichment, suggesting a potential arrangement lasting between 15 and 20 years. Tehran, however, signalled that the issue remains unresolved. Tehran rejects Trump's claims on Iran's nuclear future Speaking at a regular press briefing on Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei rejected Trump's claims on the recent peace agreement and pushed back against suggestions that Iran had already accepted limits on its uranium stockpiles. According to Baghaei, the memorandum of understanding signed this week serves only as a framework for future negotiations and does not contain detailed provisions on Iran's nuclear programme. Also read | After ceasefire, Iran reveals roadmap to final US agreement and possible $24 billion payout He said discussions over sanctions relief, uranium enrichment and the fate of Iran's highly enriched uranium reserves would take place during the 60 days of technical talks that is now set to begin. Baghaei also referred to what he described as a failed US operation during the war to seize Iranian uranium stockpiles, arguing that Washington would be unwise to attempt a similar action again. France wants Iran's enriched uranium gone French President Emmanuel Macron in a statement said Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles should ultimately be neutralised and placed under international supervision. Speaking after the announcement of the US-Iran deal, Macron said the material should either be removed from Iran or diluted, before being monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency. "We will ensure that the enriched uranium capabilities that remain are properly neutralised," Macron said.

A day after announcing a ceasefire, Washington and Tehran are already at odds over Iran's nuclear future. Donald Trump says Iran has agreed never to build a nuclear weapon, while Tehran insists uranium enrichment and stockpile issues remain subject to future negotiations. All you need to know

Did Iran agree to 'never have a Nuclear Weapon'? Trump's claim and Tehran's counterclaim spark fresh confusion after truce announcement

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi said Tehran has ‘never wanted nuclear weapons’ and remains committed to a peaceful nuclear programme, while confirming that negotiations with the United States over enriched uranium have reached a temporary deadlock. Speaking at a press conference, during his visit to New Delhi for the 18th BRICS Summit-related meetings, Araghchi said Iran’s position had remained unchanged since the 2015 nuclear agreement.&nbsp;“Iran has never wanted nuclear weapon and we proved that when we signed the deal in 2015,” Araghchi said. “We have said time and again that we don’t want nuclear weapon and this is not our policy. We have a peaceful nuclear programme and we have always remained ready to build this confidence.”&nbsp;The Iranian foreign minister added that Tehran remained open to confidence-building measures regarding its nuclear activities. “This programme is peaceful and we remain peaceful,” he said.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-fm-says-strait-of-hormuz-open-to-all-vessels-except-nations-at-war-with-us-says-tehran-has-no-trust-in-us-1778839987625">Iran FM says Strait of Hormuz open to all vessels except nations 'at war with us'; says Tehran has 'no trust in US'</a>&nbsp;<h2>Deadlock in talks with the United States</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>Araghchi acknowledged that discussions surrounding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile had become one of the most difficult issues in negotiations with Washington. He said both sides had agreed to postpone the matter to later stages of dialogue because of the complexity involved.&nbsp;&nbsp;“The subject of our enriched material is a very complicated one,” he said. “We have come to a conclusion with the Americans that since it is very difficult, we are almost in a deadlock in this particular question, let’s postpone it to the later stages of our negotiations.” Araghchi also said that Tehran still hopes diplomacy can prevail, but warned that the possibility of a “full-scale war” should not be ignored amid escalating regional tensions.&nbsp;He added that the issue was currently 'not under discussions' and 'not on the negotiations', but said Tehran may return to it at a later stage and could then consider involving Moscow. “Obviously, we will have more consultations with Russia and we will see if the Russians can help or not. This is not something for the time being,” Araghchi said.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russian-fm-lavrov-says-india-russia-discussions-focused-on-defence-space-says-western-interference-fuelled-global-conflicts-1778835577141">Russian FM Lavrov says India-Russia discussions focused on defence, space, says 'western interference' fuelled global conflicts</a>&nbsp;<h2>Chabahar port and India-Iran ties</h2><h2>&nbsp;</h2>Araghchi also highlighted the strategic importance of the Chabahar port project, describing it as “one of the symbols of cooperation between Iran and India”. He praised India’s role in developing the port despite delays linked to US sanctions.&nbsp;“I am confident that this port would be like a golden gate for India to access Central Asia, the Caucasus and then Europe,” he said. Araghchi added that India, because of its “good reputation”, could play a “greater role” in promoting diplomacy, peace and security in the Persian Gulf region.&nbsp;Speaking on bilateral ties, he said: “What matters for us is good relations which exist between us and India. It is rooted in history, political, economic and cultural relations and we are determined to continue our good relations with India.”

Araghchi acknowledged that discussions surrounding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile had become one of the most difficult issues in negotiations with Washington. He said both sides had agreed to postpone the matter to later stages of dialogue because of the complexity involved.

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi said Tehran has ‘never wanted nuclear weapons’ and remains committed to a peaceful nuclear programme, while confirming that negotiations with the United States over enriched uranium have reached a temporary deadlock. Speaking at a press conference, during his visit to New Delhi for the 18th BRICS Summit-related meetings, Araghchi said Iran’s position had remained unchanged since the 2015 nuclear agreement. “Iran has never wanted nuclear weapon and we proved that when we signed the deal in 2015,” Araghchi said. “We have said time and again that we don’t want nuclear weapon and this is not our policy. We have a peaceful nuclear programme and we have always remained ready to build this confidence.” The Iranian foreign minister added that Tehran remained open to confidence-building measures regarding its nuclear activities. “This programme is peaceful and we remain peaceful,” he said. ALSO READ: Iran FM says Strait of Hormuz open to all vessels except nations 'at war with us'; says Tehran has 'no trust in US' Deadlock in talks with the United States Araghchi acknowledged that discussions surrounding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile had become one of the most difficult issues in negotiations with Washington. He said both sides had agreed to postpone the matter to later stages of dialogue because of the complexity involved. “The subject of our enriched material is a very complicated one,” he said. “We have come to a conclusion with the Americans that since it is very difficult, we are almost in a deadlock in this particular question, let’s postpone it to the later stages of our negotiations.” Araghchi also said that Tehran still hopes diplomacy can prevail, but warned that the possibility of a “full-scale war” should not be ignored amid escalating regional tensions. He added that the issue was currently 'not under discussions' and 'not on the negotiations', but said Tehran may return to it at a later stage and could then consider involving Moscow. “Obviously, we will have more consultations with Russia and we will see if the Russians can help or not. This is not something for the time being,” Araghchi said. ALSO READ: Russian FM Lavrov says India-Russia discussions focused on defence, space, says 'western interference' fuelled global conflicts Chabahar port and India-Iran ties Araghchi also highlighted the strategic importance of the Chabahar port project, describing it as “one of the symbols of cooperation between Iran and India”. He praised India’s role in developing the port despite delays linked to US sanctions. “I am confident that this port would be like a golden gate for India to access Central Asia, the Caucasus and then Europe,” he said. Araghchi added that India, because of its “good reputation”, could play a “greater role” in promoting diplomacy, peace and security in the Persian Gulf region. Speaking on bilateral ties, he said: “What matters for us is good relations which exist between us and India. It is rooted in history, political, economic and cultural relations and we are determined to continue our good relations with India.”

Araghchi acknowledged that discussions surrounding Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile had become one of the most difficult issues in negotiations with Washington. He said both sides had agreed to postpone the matter to later stages of dialogue because of the complexity involved.

Iranian FM Araghchi says Tehran 'never wanted nuclear weapons', says enriched uranium issue postponed in US talks

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the US has beaten Iran badly and Tehran’s navy is now reduced to little boats with a machine gun in front. Trump also emphasised that if the United States had not engaged in the conflict “we would’ve had an Iran with a nuclear weapon.”“Maybe we wouldn’t all be here right now,” he added.&nbsp;The United Nations, the European Union, and the US imposed extensive economic sanctions on Iran from 2010 over suspicions that its nuclear programme was being used to develop a bomb. Iran claims its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only but carries out nuclear enrichment that is close to weapon standards.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-iran-cannot-be-allowed-to-block-hormuz-says-pete-hegseth-warns-tehran-would-face-overwhelming-firepower-1777983957232">‘Iran cannot be allowed to block Hormuz,’ says Pete Hegseth, warns Tehran would face ‘overwhelming firepower’</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;President Trump said the US “have beaten [Iran] badly”, adding that the Iranian navy is “reduced to little boats with a machine gun on the front of them.”&nbsp;The US had attacked small Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz. In a Truth Social post on Monday, Trump said, “We’ve shot down seven small Boats or, as they like to call them, ‘fast’ Boats.”In an interaction at the Oval Office, Trump claimed that Iran had started the war with 159 ships, and added, “Every single ship they had is resting underwater at the bottom of the sea.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/israel-and-us-preparing-for-potential-short-campaign-to-pressure-iran-into-talks-report-1777987157027">Israel and US preparing for potential ‘short campaign’ to pressure Iran into talks: Report</a><h2>‘Iran has no chance. They never did’&nbsp;</h2>&nbsp;Trump downplayed the conflict between the US and Iran and termed the war a ‘skirmish’.“I call it a skirmish because Iran has no chance. They never did. They know it," Trump told reporters during the signing of a proclamation related to youth fitness.&nbsp;“They express it to me when I talk to them and then they get on television and say how well they’re doing,” he added.He repeated that the US has wiped out Iran’s military, navy, air force, and leaders, and said, “We can’t let Iran have a nuclear weapon.”&nbsp;Trump derided the Iranian “fast boat” attacks on US Navy vessels and commercial ships, and called them “little boats with peashooters.”&nbsp;The president further described protesters in Iran being shot “between the eyes” by Iranian snipers.“They killed 42,000 people last month. 42,000 unarmed protesters,” he added.

President Donald Trump said in an Oval Office interaction on Tuesday that Iran had started the war with 159 ships and added that every single ship they had is resting underwater at the bottom of the sea. Trump also downplayed the conflict with Iran as a ‘skirmish’.

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the US has beaten Iran badly and Tehran’s navy is now reduced to little boats with a machine gun in front. Trump also emphasised that if the United States had not engaged in the conflict “we would’ve had an Iran with a nuclear weapon.” “Maybe we wouldn’t all be here right now,” he added. The United Nations, the European Union, and the US imposed extensive economic sanctions on Iran from 2010 over suspicions that its nuclear programme was being used to develop a bomb. Iran claims its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only but carries out nuclear enrichment that is close to weapon standards. Also Read: ‘Iran cannot be allowed to block Hormuz,’ says Pete Hegseth, warns Tehran would face ‘overwhelming firepower’ President Trump said the US “have beaten [Iran] badly”, adding that the Iranian navy is “reduced to little boats with a machine gun on the front of them.” The US had attacked small Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz. In a Truth Social post on Monday, Trump said, “We’ve shot down seven small Boats or, as they like to call them, ‘fast’ Boats.” In an interaction at the Oval Office, Trump claimed that Iran had started the war with 159 ships, and added, “Every single ship they had is resting underwater at the bottom of the sea.” Also Read: Israel and US preparing for potential ‘short campaign’ to pressure Iran into talks: Report ‘Iran has no chance. They never did’ Trump downplayed the conflict between the US and Iran and termed the war a ‘skirmish’. “I call it a skirmish because Iran has no chance. They never did. They know it," Trump told reporters during the signing of a proclamation related to youth fitness. “They express it to me when I talk to them and then they get on television and say how well they’re doing,” he added. He repeated that the US has wiped out Iran’s military, navy, air force, and leaders, and said, “We can’t let Iran have a nuclear weapon.” Trump derided the Iranian “fast boat” attacks on US Navy vessels and commercial ships, and called them “little boats with peashooters.” The president further described protesters in Iran being shot “between the eyes” by Iranian snipers. “They killed 42,000 people last month. 42,000 unarmed protesters,” he added.

President Donald Trump said in an Oval Office interaction on Tuesday that Iran had started the war with 159 ships and added that every single ship they had is resting underwater at the bottom of the sea. Trump also downplayed the conflict with Iran as a ‘skirmish’.

‘Iran beaten badly, its navy reduced to little boats with machine guns,’ says Trump

Intelligence assessments by the US indicate that Iran’s nuclear timeline remains largely unchanged despite months of conflict and targeted strikes, even as President Donald Trump continues to assert that military action has significantly set back Tehran’s ambitions. According to three sources familiar with the matter, analysts maintain that the time Iran would need to build a nuclear weapon has not shifted since last summer. At that time, estimates suggested that earlier US and Israeli strikes had pushed Tehran’s potential breakout timeline up to a year.&nbsp;The latest assessment comes after a two-month conflict launched by Trump, aimed in part at halting Iran’s nuclear programme. While Israeli forces struck several nuclear-linked facilities, US operations largely focused on conventional military targets, leadership structures and Iran’s defence industrial base.&nbsp;Strikes carried out in June targeted key enrichment sites at the Natanz Nuclear Facility, the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, and the Isfahan Nuclear Research Centre, damaging or destroying infrastructure. However, intelligence officials say these actions have not fundamentally altered Iran’s nuclear capabilities.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/white-house-braces-for-midterm-shake-up-as-trump-team-prepares-for-congressional-oversight-battles-1777935215154">White House counsels staff as GOP faces growing midterm election risk: Report</a>&nbsp;Before the 12-day June conflict, US intelligence agencies had assessed that Iran could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb within three to six months. Following the strikes, that estimate was extended to roughly nine months to a year, according to sources.&nbsp;Despite this, the timeline has remained static in subsequent evaluations, suggesting that further delays would require the elimination or seizure of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. The International Atomic Energy Agency has been unable to verify the location of approximately 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, which is believed to be partly stored in underground tunnels at Isfahan.&nbsp;The agency has warned that, if further enriched, Iran’s existing stockpile could be sufficient for up to 10 nuclear weapons.<h2>‘Iran can never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon’</h2>The conflict has since stalled following an April 7 truce between Washington and Tehran aimed at facilitating negotiations. However, tensions remain elevated, particularly after Iran disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, affecting nearly 20 per cent of global oil supplies and triggering a wider energy crisis.&nbsp;US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has said Washington’s objective remains to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon through a combination of military pressure and diplomacy. Vice President JD Vance echoed this stance, stating in March that Iran “can never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon”, framing it as a central goal of US operations.&nbsp;The White House has defended the impact of recent strikes. Spokeswoman Olivia Wales said Operation Midnight Hammer “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear facilities, while Operation Epic Fury further weakened its defence industrial base. She added that Trump “has long been clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon”.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/secret-service-shoots-armed-man-near-white-house-as-trump-attends-event-inside-suspect-hospitalised-1777933790736">Secret Service shoots armed man near White House; suspect hospitalised</a>&nbsp;However, independent analysts have cast doubt on the extent of the damage. Eric Brewer, a former US intelligence official now with the Nuclear Threat Initiative, said the unchanged assessments were unsurprising given that recent US strikes did not prioritise nuclear infrastructure.&nbsp;“Iran still possesses all of its nuclear material, as far as we know,” Brewer said, noting that much of it is likely stored in deeply buried sites beyond the reach of conventional munitions.&nbsp;

US intelligence indicates recent military strikes haven’t significantly delayed Iran’s nuclear timeline. While infrastructure was damaged, Tehran retains the material and expertise to produce a weapon within a year.

Intelligence assessments by the US indicate that Iran’s nuclear timeline remains largely unchanged despite months of conflict and targeted strikes, even as President Donald Trump continues to assert that military action has significantly set back Tehran’s ambitions. According to three sources familiar with the matter, analysts maintain that the time Iran would need to build a nuclear weapon has not shifted since last summer. At that time, estimates suggested that earlier US and Israeli strikes had pushed Tehran’s potential breakout timeline up to a year. The latest assessment comes after a two-month conflict launched by Trump, aimed in part at halting Iran’s nuclear programme. While Israeli forces struck several nuclear-linked facilities, US operations largely focused on conventional military targets, leadership structures and Iran’s defence industrial base. Strikes carried out in June targeted key enrichment sites at the Natanz Nuclear Facility, the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, and the Isfahan Nuclear Research Centre, damaging or destroying infrastructure. However, intelligence officials say these actions have not fundamentally altered Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Also read: White House counsels staff as GOP faces growing midterm election risk: Report Before the 12-day June conflict, US intelligence agencies had assessed that Iran could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb within three to six months. Following the strikes, that estimate was extended to roughly nine months to a year, according to sources. Despite this, the timeline has remained static in subsequent evaluations, suggesting that further delays would require the elimination or seizure of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. The International Atomic Energy Agency has been unable to verify the location of approximately 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, which is believed to be partly stored in underground tunnels at Isfahan. The agency has warned that, if further enriched, Iran’s existing stockpile could be sufficient for up to 10 nuclear weapons. ‘Iran can never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon’ The conflict has since stalled following an April 7 truce between Washington and Tehran aimed at facilitating negotiations. However, tensions remain elevated, particularly after Iran disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, affecting nearly 20 per cent of global oil supplies and triggering a wider energy crisis. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has said Washington’s objective remains to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon through a combination of military pressure and diplomacy. Vice President JD Vance echoed this stance, stating in March that Iran “can never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon”, framing it as a central goal of US operations. The White House has defended the impact of recent strikes. Spokeswoman Olivia Wales said Operation Midnight Hammer “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear facilities, while Operation Epic Fury further weakened its defence industrial base. She added that Trump “has long been clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon”. Also read: Secret Service shoots armed man near White House; suspect hospitalised However, independent analysts have cast doubt on the extent of the damage. Eric Brewer, a former US intelligence official now with the Nuclear Threat Initiative, said the unchanged assessments were unsurprising given that recent US strikes did not prioritise nuclear infrastructure. “Iran still possesses all of its nuclear material, as far as we know,” Brewer said, noting that much of it is likely stored in deeply buried sites beyond the reach of conventional munitions.

US intelligence indicates recent military strikes haven’t significantly delayed Iran’s nuclear timeline. While infrastructure was damaged, Tehran retains the material and expertise to produce a weapon within a year.

Has US-Iran-Israel war actually delayed Tehran’s nuclear timeline? Here’s what US Intel says

US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Tehran has agreed to suspend its nuclear programme indefinitely and will not receive any “frozen funds from the US" in return and added that the deal to end the war with Iran is “mostly complete.” &nbsp;Trump’s comments came after Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, announced the opening of the Strait of Hormuz for commercial vessels.&nbsp;Trump said in an interview with Bloomberg that a deal to end the war with Iran, which began in late February, is “mostly complete”.&nbsp;The US president further said that talks for a lasting agreement will probably be held this weekend.“Most of the main points are finalised. It’ll go pretty quickly,” Trump said.Iran, however, has not made a comment on any deal beyond the Hormuz opening.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-says-us-will-get-all-of-iran-s-nuclear-dust-won-t-pay-anything-for-it-1776442071680">Trump says US will get all of Iran’s ‘nuclear dust’, won’t pay anything for it</a><h2>Trump hints at travel to Pakistan for talks</h2>&nbsp;Trump also said in the interview that he has not yet decided who would lead the US delegation for talks with Iranian officials to sign an agreement. Asked if he would travel to Pakistan, which hosted the last round of negotiations, he said, “I may.”&nbsp;The first round of peace talks, held in Islamabad, brought together senior officials from both sides, including Vice President JD Vance and special envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff from the US, and Iranian Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, and officials from Tehran.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/strait-of-hormuz-completely-open-for-all-commercial-vessels-for-remaining-ceasefire-iran-fm-araghchi-1776431393427">Iran says Strait of Hormuz ‘completely open’; Trump thanks, says naval blockade to continue till deal</a>&nbsp;The US President had been dropping hints over the last few days that the deal to end the Iran war is almost complete and had commented that the war “should be ending pretty soon.”The president denied that the moratorium on Iran’s nuclear programme would expire after 20 years. Asked if the programme will halt completely, Trump responded, “No years, unlimited.”&nbsp;Meanwhile, oil, fuel, and natural gas prices plunged on hopes that the latest developments would mean more energy supplies can finally transit safely through the strait.

President Donald Trump said that a deal to end the war with Iran, which began in late February, is “mostly complete”.  He further said that talks for a lasting agreement will probably be held this weekend. Iran, however, has not made a comment on any deal beyond the Hormuz opening.

US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Tehran has agreed to suspend its nuclear programme indefinitely and will not receive any “frozen funds from the US" in return and added that the deal to end the war with Iran is “mostly complete.” Trump’s comments came after Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, announced the opening of the Strait of Hormuz for commercial vessels. Trump said in an interview with Bloomberg that a deal to end the war with Iran, which began in late February, is “mostly complete”. The US president further said that talks for a lasting agreement will probably be held this weekend. “Most of the main points are finalised. It’ll go pretty quickly,” Trump said. Iran, however, has not made a comment on any deal beyond the Hormuz opening. Also Read: Trump says US will get all of Iran’s ‘nuclear dust’, won’t pay anything for it Trump hints at travel to Pakistan for talks Trump also said in the interview that he has not yet decided who would lead the US delegation for talks with Iranian officials to sign an agreement. Asked if he would travel to Pakistan, which hosted the last round of negotiations, he said, “I may.” The first round of peace talks, held in Islamabad, brought together senior officials from both sides, including Vice President JD Vance and special envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff from the US, and Iranian Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, and officials from Tehran. Also Read: Iran says Strait of Hormuz ‘completely open’; Trump thanks, says naval blockade to continue till deal The US President had been dropping hints over the last few days that the deal to end the Iran war is almost complete and had commented that the war “should be ending pretty soon.” The president denied that the moratorium on Iran’s nuclear programme would expire after 20 years. Asked if the programme will halt completely, Trump responded, “No years, unlimited.” Meanwhile, oil, fuel, and natural gas prices plunged on hopes that the latest developments would mean more energy supplies can finally transit safely through the strait.

President Donald Trump said that a deal to end the war with Iran, which began in late February, is “mostly complete”. &nbsp;He further said that talks for a lasting agreement will probably be held this weekend. Iran, however, has not made a comment on any deal beyond the Hormuz opening.

Iran has suspended nuclear programme, deal to end war ‘mostly complete,’ says Trump

US President Donald Trump said US military assets would remain deployed in and around Iran until it complies with what he described as a “real agreement”, warning of a stronger response if terms are not met.

US President Donald Trump said US military assets would remain deployed in and around Iran until it complies with what he described as a “real agreement”, warning of a stronger response if terms are not met.

How much has US crippled Iran’s military? Key takeaways on nuclear, missile, military strength and Strait of Hormuz control

Despite its low ranking, Iran’s arms exports recorded a 395 per cent increase compared to the previous five-year period. 

Despite its low ranking, Iran’s arms exports recorded a 395 per cent increase compared to the previous five-year period.&nbsp;

Where does Iran rank among the world’s top arms exporters? A look at its biggest weapons recipients

A confidential IAEA report has revealed that Iran stored a portion of its uranium enriched up to 60 per cent in an underground facility at its Isfahan nuclear site, marking the first time the agency has specified the location of such highly enriched material.

A confidential IAEA report has revealed that Iran stored a portion of its uranium enriched up to 60 per cent in an underground facility at its Isfahan nuclear site, marking the first time the agency has specified the location of such highly enriched material.

Iran has stored highly enriched uranium at underground Isfahan site. Confidential report reveals details

 The measures follow heightened warnings from Washington and come amid nearly stalled diplomatic efforts over Tehran’s nuclear programme.

&nbsp;The measures follow heightened warnings from Washington and come amid nearly stalled diplomatic efforts over Tehran’s nuclear programme.

Is Iran preparing for war with US? fortified nuclear sites, drills in Hormuz Strait as Shamkhani takes command

Satelllite images also show that Iran has buried tunnel entrances at a nuclear site that had been bombed by the US during the 12-day  Israel-Iran war in June last year, fortified tunnel entrances near another, and has repaired missile bases struck in the conflict.

Satelllite images also show that Iran has buried tunnel entrances at a nuclear site that had been bombed by the US during the 12-day &nbsp;Israel-Iran war in June last year, fortified tunnel entrances near another, and has repaired missile bases struck in the conflict.

Is war looming? Why is Iran concealing and repairing ‘sensitive’ nuclear and military sites amid rising US tensions?

Lindsey Graham signalled a possible US decision on Iran within weeks as nuclear talks continue in Geneva. While Washington weighs diplomacy and military options, Tehran has responded with warnings and drills, raising fears of escalation and potential regime change tensions.

Lindsey Graham signalled a possible US decision on Iran within weeks as nuclear talks continue in Geneva. While Washington weighs diplomacy and military options, Tehran has responded with warnings and drills, raising fears of escalation and potential regime change tensions.

Iran regime change on cards? Trump ally gives BIG HINT in Israel amid nuclear talks: 'Khamenei's murderous regime...'

US President Donald Trump on Monday (Feb 16) sounded an ominous warning against Iran, warning the nation of "consequences of not making a deal" ahead of looming talks between America and Tehran in Geneva. The POTUS confirmed that he would take part in the vital talks "indirectly".<h2>Is Iran a "bad negotiator"?</h2>Calling the impending talks "very important", the US President noted that Iran was a "tough negotiator" but also insisted that the leaders of the nation were "bad negotiators as we could have had a deal instead of sending out B-2s (B-2 Bombers) to knock out their nuclear potential." He added that he hoped Iran would be "more reasonable".Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-slams-contrived-media-war-confirms-us-talks-as-trump-warns-we-ll-see-what-happens-with-uss-abraham-lincoln-1769910250463">Iran slams ‘contrived media war’, confirms US talks as Trump warns ‘we’ll see what happens’ with USS Abraham Lincoln</a>"They want to make a deal... We have peace in the Middle East." He predicted some contention, saying, "You will see some flames here and there, but we essentially have peace in the Middle East. That happened because we did a B-2 attack on the nuclear potential." Trump once again insisted that without the United States' Operation Midnight Hammer - under which US forces targeted three key nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan - Tehran "would have had a nuclear weapon within one month." He added, "If that happened, it would have been a whole different deal."<h2>When will the US and Iran hold the next round of talks?</h2>The latest round of talks between the two nations is scheduled for Tuesday (Feb 17) in Geneva. They will be mediated by Oman and come after repeated threats from Trump of military action against Tehran over Iran's deadly crackdown on anti-government protests, and then more recently over the country's nuclear programme. Following Trump's threats of intervention, the United States has also deployed warships led by the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier off Iran’s shores.The previous nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States took place in Muscat, Oman, and Rome, Italy, in April 2025.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/nobel-committee-accuses-iran-of-life-threatening-mistreatment-of-jailed-peace-prize-winner-narges-mohammadi-1770883870516">Nobel Committee accuses Iran of 'life-threatening mistreatment' of jailed Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi</a> While the US and some European nations fear that Iran's nuclear programme is aimed at making a bomb, Tehran denies the claims. Earlier this month, talking to Reuters, a regional diplomat briefed by Iran insisted that the Islamic Republic would not budge on its right to enrich uranium inside Iran. However, the nation was willing to discuss the "level and purity" of enrichment or a regional consortium, said the diplomat, adding that Tehran believed the US negotiators "seemed to understand Iran’s stance on the enrichment … and they showed flexibility about Tehran’s demands."

Trump has issued a fresh warning to Iran ahead of crucial Geneva talks, claiming US strikes already crippled Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and hinting at “consequences” if negotiations fail. Will diplomacy work this time, or is escalation coming? Scroll down to read more.


US President Donald Trump on Monday (Feb 16) sounded an ominous warning against Iran, warning the nation of "consequences of not making a deal" ahead of looming talks between America and Tehran in Geneva. The POTUS confirmed that he would take part in the vital talks "indirectly". Is Iran a "bad negotiator"? Calling the impending talks "very important", the US President noted that Iran was a "tough negotiator" but also insisted that the leaders of the nation were "bad negotiators as we could have had a deal instead of sending out B-2s (B-2 Bombers) to knock out their nuclear potential." He added that he hoped Iran would be "more reasonable". Also read | Iran slams ‘contrived media war’, confirms US talks as Trump warns ‘we’ll see what happens’ with USS Abraham Lincoln "They want to make a deal... We have peace in the Middle East." He predicted some contention, saying, "You will see some flames here and there, but we essentially have peace in the Middle East. That happened because we did a B-2 attack on the nuclear potential." Trump once again insisted that without the United States' Operation Midnight Hammer - under which US forces targeted three key nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan - Tehran "would have had a nuclear weapon within one month." He added, "If that happened, it would have been a whole different deal." When will the US and Iran hold the next round of talks? The latest round of talks between the two nations is scheduled for Tuesday (Feb 17) in Geneva. They will be mediated by Oman and come after repeated threats from Trump of military action against Tehran over Iran's deadly crackdown on anti-government protests, and then more recently over the country's nuclear programme. Following Trump's threats of intervention, the United States has also deployed warships led by the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier off Iran’s shores. The previous nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States took place in Muscat, Oman, and Rome, Italy, in April 2025. Also read | Nobel Committee accuses Iran of 'life-threatening mistreatment' of jailed Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi While the US and some European nations fear that Iran's nuclear programme is aimed at making a bomb, Tehran denies the claims. Earlier this month, talking to Reuters, a regional diplomat briefed by Iran insisted that the Islamic Republic would not budge on its right to enrich uranium inside Iran. However, the nation was willing to discuss the "level and purity" of enrichment or a regional consortium, said the diplomat, adding that Tehran believed the US negotiators "seemed to understand Iran’s stance on the enrichment … and they showed flexibility about Tehran’s demands."

Trump has issued a fresh warning to Iran ahead of crucial Geneva talks, claiming US strikes already crippled Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and hinting at “consequences” if negotiations fail. Will diplomacy work this time, or is escalation coming? Scroll down to read more.

Trump, ahead of US-Iran talks in Geneva, warns Tehran of 'consequences' if nuclear deal fails

The United States and Iran are set to hold talks on Tehran’s nuclear program on Friday (Feb 6) in Oman, the White House confirmed on Wednesday (Feb 4). This comes following a report claiming that the negotiations were collapsing due to disagreements over the location and format. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also said the meeting was due to be held in Muscat. Earlier officials had said that the meeting would likely happen in Turkey.On Wednesday (Feb 4), Iran and the US said that they were going ahead with nuclear talks in Oman later this week. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has continued to ramp up pressure on Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying he should be “very worried”.According to an Axios report, several leaders from West Asia have called on the Trump administration not to follow through on threats to walk away. The talks between the US and Iran were collapsing due to disagreements about the format and venue. The tensions raised concerns that Trump would resort to military action against Tehran, the outlet reported, citing sources.The report added that at least nine nations in the region contacted the top White House officials to urge them not to cancel the meeting.“They asked us to keep the meeting and listen to what the Iranians have to say. We have told the Arabs that we will do the meeting if they insist. But we are very sceptical,” a US official was cited as saying.Another official said that the US agreed to hold the meeting “to be respectful” to its allies in the region and “in order to continue pursuing the diplomatic track.”<h2>Trump warns Khamenei</h2>Warning Iran’s supreme leader, Trump told NBC in an interview, “I would say he should be very worried.”Trump added that Iran also eyed a new nuclear facility after the June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites when the US joined Israel in the 12-day war against the Islamic Republic.“They were thinking about starting a new site in a different part of the country,” Trump said. “We found out about it, I said, you do that, we’re going to do very bad things to you.”

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also said the meeting was due to be held in Muscat. Earlier officials had said that the meeting would likely happen in Turkey.

The United States and Iran are set to hold talks on Tehran’s nuclear program on Friday (Feb 6) in Oman, the White House confirmed on Wednesday (Feb 4). This comes following a report claiming that the negotiations were collapsing due to disagreements over the location and format. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also said the meeting was due to be held in Muscat. Earlier officials had said that the meeting would likely happen in Turkey. On Wednesday (Feb 4), Iran and the US said that they were going ahead with nuclear talks in Oman later this week. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump has continued to ramp up pressure on Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying he should be “very worried”. According to an Axios report, several leaders from West Asia have called on the Trump administration not to follow through on threats to walk away. The talks between the US and Iran were collapsing due to disagreements about the format and venue. The tensions raised concerns that Trump would resort to military action against Tehran, the outlet reported, citing sources. The report added that at least nine nations in the region contacted the top White House officials to urge them not to cancel the meeting. “They asked us to keep the meeting and listen to what the Iranians have to say. We have told the Arabs that we will do the meeting if they insist. But we are very sceptical,” a US official was cited as saying. Another official said that the US agreed to hold the meeting “to be respectful” to its allies in the region and “in order to continue pursuing the diplomatic track.” Trump warns Khamenei Warning Iran’s supreme leader, Trump told NBC in an interview, “I would say he should be very worried.” Trump added that Iran also eyed a new nuclear facility after the June strikes on Iranian nuclear sites when the US joined Israel in the 12-day war against the Islamic Republic. “They were thinking about starting a new site in a different part of the country,” Trump said. “We found out about it, I said, you do that, we’re going to do very bad things to you.”

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also said the meeting was due to be held in Muscat. Earlier officials had said that the meeting would likely happen in Turkey.

White House clarifies stance on US-Iran nuclear talks after reports claimed it collapsed – Details inside

Amid reports of Iran and the United States agreeing to come to the negotiating table over Tehran's nuclear programme, Iranian officials say Tehran may suspend or shut down nuclear program to ease tensions between both the countries. This is in stark contrast with Iran's continued stand of not halting uranium enrichment in any deal with Washington.&nbsp;The officials told The New York Times (NYT) that Tehran is wiling to break away from its stance to ease tensions with US amid attack threats by Trump.&nbsp;However, they said that the alternative proposal floated by the United States last year, before the 12-day war with Israel and the attack by Washington on its nuclear facilities would be a much viable option. According to the proposal a consortium would be created to generate electricity using nuclear energy, with uranium enrichment carried out outside Iran.&nbsp;ALSO READ: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/nasa-artemis-2-wet-rehearsal-faces-leaks-why-fuel-test-matters-1770088948712">Artemis 2 wet rehearsal faces leaks: NASA loads 2.65mn litres fuel on rocket. Why the fuel test matters?</a>&nbsp;Speaking to NYT, the official further said that secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council in a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow last week had conveyed its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's message to the leader which said that Tehran is willing to transfer its enriched uranium to Russia.&nbsp;The report comes amid US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's expected meeting in Istanbul for high-stakes talks on the Tehran nuclear programme later this week.<h2>Trump hopeful of striking a deal but keeps threat of attack on Iran intact</h2>&nbsp;US President Donald Trump also spoke positively about the meeting and the potential of both the countries striking a deal. However, he kept his threat of attack on Iran intact.&nbsp;“We have ships heading to Iran right now, big ones – the biggest and the best – and we have talks going on with Iran and we’ll see how it all works out ... if we can work something out, that would be great and if we can’t, probably bad things would happen.”&nbsp;

Iranian officials speaking of the possibility of shutting down nuclear program to ease tensions with US is in stark contrast with Tehrans continued stand of not halting uranium enrichment in any deal with Washington.

Amid reports of Iran and the United States agreeing to come to the negotiating table over Tehran's nuclear programme, Iranian officials say Tehran may suspend or shut down nuclear program to ease tensions between both the countries. This is in stark contrast with Iran's continued stand of not halting uranium enrichment in any deal with Washington. The officials told The New York Times (NYT) that Tehran is wiling to break away from its stance to ease tensions with US amid attack threats by Trump. However, they said that the alternative proposal floated by the United States last year, before the 12-day war with Israel and the attack by Washington on its nuclear facilities would be a much viable option. According to the proposal a consortium would be created to generate electricity using nuclear energy, with uranium enrichment carried out outside Iran. ALSO READ: Artemis 2 wet rehearsal faces leaks: NASA loads 2.65mn litres fuel on rocket. Why the fuel test matters? Speaking to NYT, the official further said that secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council in a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow last week had conveyed its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's message to the leader which said that Tehran is willing to transfer its enriched uranium to Russia. The report comes amid US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's expected meeting in Istanbul for high-stakes talks on the Tehran nuclear programme later this week. Trump hopeful of striking a deal but keeps threat of attack on Iran intact US President Donald Trump also spoke positively about the meeting and the potential of both the countries striking a deal. However, he kept his threat of attack on Iran intact. “We have ships heading to Iran right now, big ones – the biggest and the best – and we have talks going on with Iran and we’ll see how it all works out ... if we can work something out, that would be great and if we can’t, probably bad things would happen.”

Iranian officials speaking of the possibility of shutting down nuclear program to ease tensions with US is in stark contrast with Tehran's continued stand of not halting uranium enrichment in any deal with Washington.

Iran willing to be flexible, could shut parts of nuclear programme to ease tension with US: Report

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Friday (Nov 7) repeated his stance that Tehran will not abandon its nuclear and missile programmes. He said that Iran has just sought peace. His remark came a day after the American president, Donald Trump, said that Iran had been asking if US sanctions against the country could be lifted."We are willing to hold talks under international frameworks, but not if they say you can't have a (nuclear) science, or the right to defend yourself (with missiles) or else we will bomb you," Pezeshkian said.&nbsp;Iran has always been rigid about not holding any discussions on its defence capabilities, especially its nuclear programme.&nbsp;"We want to live in this world in peace and security, but not be humiliated, and it is not acceptable that they impose upon us whatever they want and we just serve them," Pezeshkian said.&nbsp;"They supply arms to Israel while they tell us not to have missiles for defence, then they bomb us whenever they want," he added.&nbsp;This came after Russia defended a reported ballistic missile test by North Korea on Friday (Nov 7). South Korea imposed the allegation on its neighbouring nation just a week after US President Donald Trump approved South Korea's plan to build a nuclear-powered submarine.&nbsp;In its statement, the Kremlin said that Pyongyang, a key ally for Russia during its Ukraine campaign, had the "legitimate right" to do so.&nbsp;"We are respectful of the legitimate right of our friends in the DPRK (North Korea) to ensure their security and take measures for it," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told AFP.&nbsp;Meanwhile, the US said that North Korea's act was "absolutely unforgivable". The missile was reportedly launched at 12:35 pm (0335 GMT) from an area north of Pyongyang and flew around 700 kilometres (435 miles), South Korea's military said.&nbsp;Why is Russia taking an interest in this?&nbsp;North Korea's reported missile test came just a day after the Russian President Vladimir Putin hinted that Moscow could resume its nuclear tests if the United States does the same. Putin's remark, made at a security council meeting in Moscow on Wednesday (Nov 5), came after US President Donald Trump said America will restart its nuclear tests. Moreover, reports said that Putin directed his defence and foreign ministries and security services to "gather information" on the same.&nbsp;“The so-called modernity of our nuclear deterrent forces is at the highest level," Putin said, higher than any other nuclear power.&nbsp;Which country has done it before?&nbsp;In the 21st century, only North Korea has carried out a nuclear test - and that was in 2017. Although Russia recently tested two nuclear weapons, it was on a "low-yield" scale and not a full-fledged explosion.&nbsp;What did Trump say?&nbsp;On Sunday (Nov 2), Trump said that other nations were testing nuclear weapons. He alleged that Pakistan, North Korea, China, and Russia were conducting secret underground nuclear tests.&nbsp;“No, we’re going to test because they test and others test. And certainly North Korea’s been testing. Pakistan’s been testing," Trump said.&nbsp;“You don’t necessarily know where they’re testing. They test way underground where people don’t know exactly what’s happening with the test," he added.

Iran has always been rigid about not holding any discussions on its defence capabilities, especially its nuclear programme.



Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Friday (Nov 7) repeated his stance that Tehran will not abandon its nuclear and missile programmes. He said that Iran has just sought peace. His remark came a day after the American president, Donald Trump, said that Iran had been asking if US sanctions against the country could be lifted. "We are willing to hold talks under international frameworks, but not if they say you can't have a (nuclear) science, or the right to defend yourself (with missiles) or else we will bomb you," Pezeshkian said. Iran has always been rigid about not holding any discussions on its defence capabilities, especially its nuclear programme. "We want to live in this world in peace and security, but not be humiliated, and it is not acceptable that they impose upon us whatever they want and we just serve them," Pezeshkian said. "They supply arms to Israel while they tell us not to have missiles for defence, then they bomb us whenever they want," he added. This came after Russia defended a reported ballistic missile test by North Korea on Friday (Nov 7). South Korea imposed the allegation on its neighbouring nation just a week after US President Donald Trump approved South Korea's plan to build a nuclear-powered submarine. In its statement, the Kremlin said that Pyongyang, a key ally for Russia during its Ukraine campaign, had the "legitimate right" to do so. "We are respectful of the legitimate right of our friends in the DPRK (North Korea) to ensure their security and take measures for it," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told AFP. Meanwhile, the US said that North Korea's act was "absolutely unforgivable". The missile was reportedly launched at 12:35 pm (0335 GMT) from an area north of Pyongyang and flew around 700 kilometres (435 miles), South Korea's military said. Why is Russia taking an interest in this? North Korea's reported missile test came just a day after the Russian President Vladimir Putin hinted that Moscow could resume its nuclear tests if the United States does the same. Putin's remark, made at a security council meeting in Moscow on Wednesday (Nov 5), came after US President Donald Trump said America will restart its nuclear tests. Moreover, reports said that Putin directed his defence and foreign ministries and security services to "gather information" on the same. “The so-called modernity of our nuclear deterrent forces is at the highest level," Putin said, higher than any other nuclear power. Which country has done it before? In the 21st century, only North Korea has carried out a nuclear test - and that was in 2017. Although Russia recently tested two nuclear weapons, it was on a "low-yield" scale and not a full-fledged explosion. What did Trump say? On Sunday (Nov 2), Trump said that other nations were testing nuclear weapons. He alleged that Pakistan, North Korea, China, and Russia were conducting secret underground nuclear tests. “No, we’re going to test because they test and others test. And certainly North Korea’s been testing. Pakistan’s been testing," Trump said. “You don’t necessarily know where they’re testing. They test way underground where people don’t know exactly what’s happening with the test," he added.

Iran has always been rigid about not holding any discussions on its defence capabilities, especially its nuclear programme.&nbsp;

‘Not if they say we will bomb you’: Pezeshkian says Iran seeks peace, but won’t abandon nuke programme

Iran said on Saturday that it was no longer bound by restrictions on its nuclear programme as a landmark 10-year deal between it and world powers expired, though Tehran reiterated its “commitment to diplomacy.” The 2015 deal -- signed in Vienna by Iran, China, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and the United States -- saw the lifting of international sanctions against the Islamic republic in exchange for restrictions on its nuclear programme. But the pact had already been in tatters after Washington unilaterally withdrew during President Donald Trump's first term, with Iran later pulling back from its commitments. The reimposition last month of UN sanctions at the urging of three of the deal's European signatories rendered the accord effectively moot.&nbsp;From now on, "all of the provisions (of the deal), including the restrictions on the Iranian nuclear programme and the related mechanisms are considered terminated", Iran's foreign ministry said in a statement on the day of the pact's expiration."Iran firmly expresses its commitment to diplomacy," it added.&nbsp;Western powers have long accused Iran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons -- something it has repeatedly denied, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production.The deal's "termination day" was set for October 18, 2025, exactly 10 years after it was enshrined in the UN's Security Council resolution 2231.&nbsp;The accord capped Iran's uranium enrichment at 3.67 percent in exchange for sanctions relief and provided for strict supervision of its nuclear activities by the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).But Washington left the deal in 2018 and reinstated sanctions, after which Tehran began stepping up its nuclear programme.According to the IAEA, Iran is the only country without a nuclear weapons programme to enrich uranium to 60 percent. That is close to the threshold of 90 percent required for a bomb, and well above the level needed for civilian nuclear use.&nbsp;In July, Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA following the war with Israel, with Tehran pointing to the agency's failure to condemn Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear facilities. The unprecedented bombing campaign by Israel and the retaliation by Iran during the 12-day war derailed ongoing nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington.At the initiative of France, Britain and Germany, widespread UN sanctions against Iran returned into force in late September for the first time in a decade.&nbsp;Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a letter addressed to the United Nations on Saturday that the expiration of the 2015 deal renders the sanctions "null and void". Britain, France and Germany accuse Iran of not cooperating with the IAEA and would like it to return to negotiations with the United States. "Iran's efforts to revive the exchanges (with the IAEA) that led to the agreement in Cairo were also sabotaged by the irresponsible actions of the three European countries," the Iranian foreign ministry said in Saturday's statement, referring to a recent framework to resume cooperation.

Iran declared it no longer bound by the 2015 nuclear deal as it expired on Oct 18. The pact had already weakened after the US withdrew in 2018. Iran reaffirmed its diplomatic stance but blamed Western actions for failed talks and renewed UN sanctions. 

Iran said on Saturday that it was no longer bound by restrictions on its nuclear programme as a landmark 10-year deal between it and world powers expired, though Tehran reiterated its “commitment to diplomacy.” The 2015 deal -- signed in Vienna by Iran, China, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and the United States -- saw the lifting of international sanctions against the Islamic republic in exchange for restrictions on its nuclear programme. But the pact had already been in tatters after Washington unilaterally withdrew during President Donald Trump's first term, with Iran later pulling back from its commitments. The reimposition last month of UN sanctions at the urging of three of the deal's European signatories rendered the accord effectively moot. From now on, "all of the provisions (of the deal), including the restrictions on the Iranian nuclear programme and the related mechanisms are considered terminated", Iran's foreign ministry said in a statement on the day of the pact's expiration. "Iran firmly expresses its commitment to diplomacy," it added. Western powers have long accused Iran of secretly seeking nuclear weapons -- something it has repeatedly denied, insisting its nuclear programme is solely for civilian purposes such as energy production. The deal's "termination day" was set for October 18, 2025, exactly 10 years after it was enshrined in the UN's Security Council resolution 2231. The accord capped Iran's uranium enrichment at 3.67 percent in exchange for sanctions relief and provided for strict supervision of its nuclear activities by the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). But Washington left the deal in 2018 and reinstated sanctions, after which Tehran began stepping up its nuclear programme. According to the IAEA, Iran is the only country without a nuclear weapons programme to enrich uranium to 60 percent. That is close to the threshold of 90 percent required for a bomb, and well above the level needed for civilian nuclear use. In July, Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA following the war with Israel, with Tehran pointing to the agency's failure to condemn Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear facilities. The unprecedented bombing campaign by Israel and the retaliation by Iran during the 12-day war derailed ongoing nuclear negotiations between Tehran and Washington. At the initiative of France, Britain and Germany, widespread UN sanctions against Iran returned into force in late September for the first time in a decade. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a letter addressed to the United Nations on Saturday that the expiration of the 2015 deal renders the sanctions "null and void". Britain, France and Germany accuse Iran of not cooperating with the IAEA and would like it to return to negotiations with the United States. "Iran's efforts to revive the exchanges (with the IAEA) that led to the agreement in Cairo were also sabotaged by the irresponsible actions of the three European countries," the Iranian foreign ministry said in Saturday's statement, referring to a recent framework to resume cooperation.

Iran declared it no longer bound by the 2015 nuclear deal as it expired on Oct 18. The pact had already weakened after the US withdrew in 2018. Iran reaffirmed its diplomatic stance but blamed Western actions for failed talks and renewed UN sanctions.&nbsp;

'No longer bound by restrictions on nuclear programme': Iran

Sweeping United Nations sanctions on Iran have been reintroduced, ten years after they were lifted under the 2015 nuclear agreement. The move came as Britain, France and Germany activated the so-called “snapback” mechanism, accusing Tehran of failing to meet its commitments.<h2>Why have sanctions returned?</h2>The European allies said Iran had engaged in “continued nuclear escalation” and refused to co-operate with inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The decision follows Tehran’s suspension of nuclear inspections after Israeli and US airstrikes in June on several nuclear and military sites. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian dismissed the renewed measures as “unfair, unjust, and illegal,” insisting last week that the country had no plans to build nuclear weapons.<h2>What does the nuclear deal aim to achieve?</h2>The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) placed strict limits on Iran’s uranium enrichment, nuclear facilities and research activity. In return, sanctions were eased, opening the way for closer trade and diplomacy. But the deal has steadily unravelled since Donald Trump pulled the US out in 2018, branding it a “flawed” agreement. Washington and Israel said their strikes in June were aimed at halting Iran’s progress and punishing its support for regional groups targeting Israel. Trump later claimed the strikes caused “monumental damage,” though experts questioned their long-term impact.<h2>Europe says diplomacy is not dead</h2>The three European governments stressed that the snapback move was not the end of dialogue. “We urge Iran to refrain from any escalatory action,” they said in a joint statement, adding, “The reimposition of UN sanctions is not the end of diplomacy.”Talks between the sides at the UN General Assembly earlier this week ended without a breakthrough, leaving European ministers to conclude they had “no choice” but to act.<h2>Iran pushes back</h2>Tehran rejected the sanctions, saying it did not recognise the “illegal” measures. The foreign ministry warned that “any action aimed at undermining the rights and interests of its people will face a firm and appropriate response.”Pezeshkian softened earlier threats to leave the Non-Proliferation Treaty but warned the new measures put negotiations at risk. He also rejected a US proposal to hand over all enriched uranium stockpiles in exchange for a short sanctions waiver. “Why would we put ourselves in such a trap and have a noose around our neck each month?” he asked.Israel welcomed the snapback, calling it a “major development in response to Iran’s ongoing violations.” Officials urged the global community to use “every tool” to stop Tehran from becoming a&nbsp;nuclear&nbsp;power.

United Nations sanctions on Iran have been reinstated after European powers triggered the snapback mechanism, citing Tehran’s nuclear breaches and lack of cooperation with IAEA inspectors. Iran rejected the measures as unfair and illegal.

Sweeping United Nations sanctions on Iran have been reintroduced, ten years after they were lifted under the 2015 nuclear agreement. The move came as Britain, France and Germany activated the so-called “snapback” mechanism, accusing Tehran of failing to meet its commitments. Why have sanctions returned? The European allies said Iran had engaged in “continued nuclear escalation” and refused to co-operate with inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The decision follows Tehran’s suspension of nuclear inspections after Israeli and US airstrikes in June on several nuclear and military sites. Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian dismissed the renewed measures as “unfair, unjust, and illegal,” insisting last week that the country had no plans to build nuclear weapons. What does the nuclear deal aim to achieve? The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) placed strict limits on Iran’s uranium enrichment, nuclear facilities and research activity. In return, sanctions were eased, opening the way for closer trade and diplomacy. But the deal has steadily unravelled since Donald Trump pulled the US out in 2018, branding it a “flawed” agreement. Washington and Israel said their strikes in June were aimed at halting Iran’s progress and punishing its support for regional groups targeting Israel. Trump later claimed the strikes caused “monumental damage,” though experts questioned their long-term impact. Europe says diplomacy is not dead The three European governments stressed that the snapback move was not the end of dialogue. “We urge Iran to refrain from any escalatory action,” they said in a joint statement, adding, “The reimposition of UN sanctions is not the end of diplomacy.” Talks between the sides at the UN General Assembly earlier this week ended without a breakthrough, leaving European ministers to conclude they had “no choice” but to act. Iran pushes back Tehran rejected the sanctions, saying it did not recognise the “illegal” measures. The foreign ministry warned that “any action aimed at undermining the rights and interests of its people will face a firm and appropriate response.” Pezeshkian softened earlier threats to leave the Non-Proliferation Treaty but warned the new measures put negotiations at risk. He also rejected a US proposal to hand over all enriched uranium stockpiles in exchange for a short sanctions waiver. “Why would we put ourselves in such a trap and have a noose around our neck each month?” he asked. Israel welcomed the snapback, calling it a “major development in response to Iran’s ongoing violations.” Officials urged the global community to use “every tool” to stop Tehran from becoming a nuclear power.

United Nations sanctions on Iran have been reinstated after European powers triggered the snapback mechanism, citing Tehran’s nuclear breaches and lack of cooperation with IAEA inspectors. Iran rejected the measures as unfair and illegal.

'Unfair, unjust, and illegal': Iran slams UN sanctions after Europe triggers snapback

Iran and Russia have signed a $25 billion agreement to build four nuclear power plants in the Islamic Republic, Iran’s state media reported on Friday (Sep 26). This comes after the United Nations Security Council voted to reimpose UN sanctions on Tehran last week.“A deal for the construction of four nuclear power plants with a value of $25 billions in Sirik, Hormozgan was signed between the Iran Hormoz company and Rosatom,” state television reported.Currently, Iran has only one operational nuclear power plant in Bushehr in the south, which has a capacity of 1,000 megawatts – a fraction of the energy needs of the country.Rosatom, the Russian state nuclear industry company, earlier said on Wednesday that it has signed a memorandum of understanding on the construction of small nuclear power plants in Iran, without specifying the number of plants.According to Iran’s state news agency IRNA, each plant would have a capacity of 1,255 megawatts. No further details were provided regarding the timeline of the project.The development comes as the so-called snapback sanctions are set to return by the end of Saturday (Sep 27) after European powers initiated the process in a 2015 nuclear deal, accusing Iran of non-compliance. Britain, France and Germany accused Tehran of failing to comply with its commitments as per the agreement, triggering the sanctions last month.On Friday, China and Russia pushed for a draft resolution at the UN Security Council session to allow an additional six months for negotiations. However, it is unlikely to gain enough support to pass.The Western nations have long accused Iran of seeking to build a nuclear weapon, despite Tehran’s repeated denials. In 2018, the United States pulled out of the 2015 nuclear accord with Iran.The talks between the US and Iran were ongoing to negotiate a deal on Tehran’s nuclear programme. However, the Israeli strikes in Iran that led to a 12-day conflict in June this year, briefly joined by the US, derailed the progress.Iran had earlier signed a nuclear energy deal with Russia in 1993 that allowed the construction of the Bushehr plant after Germany pulled out during the Islamic revolution of 1979.

Rosatom, the Russian state nuclear industry company, earlier said on Wednesday that it has signed a memorandum of understanding on the construction of small nuclear power plants in Iran.

Iran and Russia have signed a $25 billion agreement to build four nuclear power plants in the Islamic Republic, Iran’s state media reported on Friday (Sep 26). This comes after the United Nations Security Council voted to reimpose UN sanctions on Tehran last week. “A deal for the construction of four nuclear power plants with a value of $25 billions in Sirik, Hormozgan was signed between the Iran Hormoz company and Rosatom,” state television reported. Currently, Iran has only one operational nuclear power plant in Bushehr in the south, which has a capacity of 1,000 megawatts – a fraction of the energy needs of the country. Rosatom, the Russian state nuclear industry company, earlier said on Wednesday that it has signed a memorandum of understanding on the construction of small nuclear power plants in Iran, without specifying the number of plants. According to Iran’s state news agency IRNA, each plant would have a capacity of 1,255 megawatts. No further details were provided regarding the timeline of the project. The development comes as the so-called snapback sanctions are set to return by the end of Saturday (Sep 27) after European powers initiated the process in a 2015 nuclear deal, accusing Iran of non-compliance. Britain, France and Germany accused Tehran of failing to comply with its commitments as per the agreement, triggering the sanctions last month. On Friday, China and Russia pushed for a draft resolution at the UN Security Council session to allow an additional six months for negotiations. However, it is unlikely to gain enough support to pass. The Western nations have long accused Iran of seeking to build a nuclear weapon, despite Tehran’s repeated denials. In 2018, the United States pulled out of the 2015 nuclear accord with Iran. The talks between the US and Iran were ongoing to negotiate a deal on Tehran’s nuclear programme. However, the Israeli strikes in Iran that led to a 12-day conflict in June this year, briefly joined by the US, derailed the progress. Iran had earlier signed a nuclear energy deal with Russia in 1993 that allowed the construction of the Bushehr plant after Germany pulled out during the Islamic revolution of 1979.

Rosatom, the Russian state nuclear industry company, earlier said on Wednesday that it has signed a memorandum of understanding on the construction of small nuclear power plants in Iran.

Russia to build nuclear plants in Iran? Tehran, Moscow sign $25 billion deal amid looming UN sanctions

Russia on Saturday (Sep 20) slammed the United Nations Security Council vote to reimpose economic sanctions on Iran, warning of “escalation of tensions” surrounding the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme. Moscow added that the sanctions against its key ally had “nothing to do with diplomacy”. This comes after the UNSC voted to reimpose the sanctions on Iran on Friday after European pressure.In a statement, the Russian foreign ministry said that it has repeatedly highlighted the “illegal nature of actions of the European powers participating in Iran’s nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).“The Russian side has repeatedly pointed out the provocative and illegal nature of the actions of the European countries participating in the JCPOA,” it said.The JCPOA provides relief from UN sanctions for Iran in exchange for UN-monitored restrictions on its nuclear activities. The 2015 deal involved Britain, France and Germany among its parties, who allege that Iran has reneged on its commitments under the deal. The agreement has been moribund after the US pulled out in 2018 during the first term of President Donald Trump.The Russian ministry said, “These actions have nothing to do with diplomacy and lead exclusively to a further escalation of tensions surrounding the Iranian nuclear program.”Earlier in August, Moscow warned of “irreparable consequences” if sanctions are reimposed on its key ally.Iran and Russia’s political, economic, and defence ties have strengthened over the last decade as Moscow’s relations soured with the West. The two counties grew even closer after Russia launched its offensive in Ukraine.

In a statement, the Russian foreign ministry said that it has repeatedly highlighted the “illegal nature” of actions of the European powers participating in Iran’s nuclear deal.

Russia on Saturday (Sep 20) slammed the United Nations Security Council vote to reimpose economic sanctions on Iran, warning of “escalation of tensions” surrounding the Islamic Republic’s nuclear programme. Moscow added that the sanctions against its key ally had “nothing to do with diplomacy”. This comes after the UNSC voted to reimpose the sanctions on Iran on Friday after European pressure. In a statement, the Russian foreign ministry said that it has repeatedly highlighted the “illegal nature of actions of the European powers participating in Iran’s nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). “The Russian side has repeatedly pointed out the provocative and illegal nature of the actions of the European countries participating in the JCPOA,” it said. The JCPOA provides relief from UN sanctions for Iran in exchange for UN-monitored restrictions on its nuclear activities. The 2015 deal involved Britain, France and Germany among its parties, who allege that Iran has reneged on its commitments under the deal. The agreement has been moribund after the US pulled out in 2018 during the first term of President Donald Trump. The Russian ministry said, “These actions have nothing to do with diplomacy and lead exclusively to a further escalation of tensions surrounding the Iranian nuclear program.” Earlier in August, Moscow warned of “irreparable consequences” if sanctions are reimposed on its key ally. Iran and Russia’s political, economic, and defence ties have strengthened over the last decade as Moscow’s relations soured with the West. The two counties grew even closer after Russia launched its offensive in Ukraine.

In a statement, the Russian foreign ministry said that it has repeatedly highlighted the “illegal nature” of actions of the European powers participating in Iran’s nuclear deal.

‘Escalation of tensions’: Russia warns UN over vote to reimpose sanctions on Iran

Iran has warned that it will respond “in a more decisive manner” if the United States or Israel attacks again, following earlier military strikes on its nuclear facilities. The warning came from Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday, in reaction to US President Donald Trump’s threat to “wipe out” Iran’s nuclear programme if it resumes atomic activity. “If aggression is repeated, we will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner and in a way that will be IMPOSSIBLE to cover up,” Araghchi said in a post on X.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-hamas-must-relinquish-control-palestinian-pm-calls-on-hamas-to-surrender-disarm-as-france-two-state-solution-for-israel-palestine-at-un-1753736040288">'Hamas must relinquish control': Palestinian PM calls on Hamas to surrender, disarm as France two-state solution for Israel, Palestine at UN</a><h2>Iran says military pressure won’t stop its nuclear progress</h2>Araghchi also said that if there were genuine concerns about Iran’s nuclear work, then negotiations, not threats, would be more effective. “If there are concerns about the possible diversion of our nuclear program into non-peaceful purposes, the ‘military option’ proved incapable, but a negotiated solution may work,” he said.It is still unclear how much damage was caused by the US strikes, which followed a surprise Israeli bombing campaign. Israel had claimed it was acting to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. The Israeli attacks disrupted the ongoing US-Iran nuclear talks that had restarted in April.<h2>Trump defends strikes, says US will act again if needed</h2>Speaking during a visit to Scotland on Monday, Donald Trump insisted the previous air strikes had been successful. “They can start again. If they do, we’ll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it,” Trump said. Iran had responded to the earlier attacks with missile strikes on Israeli cities and a US base in Qatar, though Trump had downplayed the response at the time.<h2>Dispute over uranium enrichment remains key obstacle</h2>The key sticking point between the US and Iran has long been over uranium enrichment. Iran insists it has a right to enrich uranium, while Washington considers that a “red line”. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has noted that Iran is currently the only country without nuclear weapons enriching uranium up to 60%, just below the 90% needed for a bomb. Tehran has denied it is pursuing nuclear weapons and said it is open to talks on enrichment levels, but not the right itself. In his post, Araghchi added, “No one in their right mind would abandon the fruits of tremendous investment in homegrown and peaceful technology just because of foreign&nbsp;bullying.”

Iran warned it will respond more decisively if attacked again by the US or Israel, following strikes on nuclear sites and threats from President Trump to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran has warned that it will respond “in a more decisive manner” if the United States or Israel attacks again, following earlier military strikes on its nuclear facilities. The warning came from Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday, in reaction to US President Donald Trump’s threat to “wipe out” Iran’s nuclear programme if it resumes atomic activity. “If aggression is repeated, we will not hesitate to react in a more decisive manner and in a way that will be IMPOSSIBLE to cover up,” Araghchi said in a post on X. Also read: 'Hamas must relinquish control': Palestinian PM calls on Hamas to surrender, disarm as France two-state solution for Israel, Palestine at UN Iran says military pressure won’t stop its nuclear progress Araghchi also said that if there were genuine concerns about Iran’s nuclear work, then negotiations, not threats, would be more effective. “If there are concerns about the possible diversion of our nuclear program into non-peaceful purposes, the ‘military option’ proved incapable, but a negotiated solution may work,” he said. It is still unclear how much damage was caused by the US strikes, which followed a surprise Israeli bombing campaign. Israel had claimed it was acting to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. The Israeli attacks disrupted the ongoing US-Iran nuclear talks that had restarted in April. Trump defends strikes, says US will act again if needed Speaking during a visit to Scotland on Monday, Donald Trump insisted the previous air strikes had been successful. “They can start again. If they do, we’ll wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it,” Trump said. Iran had responded to the earlier attacks with missile strikes on Israeli cities and a US base in Qatar, though Trump had downplayed the response at the time. Dispute over uranium enrichment remains key obstacle The key sticking point between the US and Iran has long been over uranium enrichment. Iran insists it has a right to enrich uranium, while Washington considers that a “red line”. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has noted that Iran is currently the only country without nuclear weapons enriching uranium up to 60%, just below the 90% needed for a bomb. Tehran has denied it is pursuing nuclear weapons and said it is open to talks on enrichment levels, but not the right itself. In his post, Araghchi added, “No one in their right mind would abandon the fruits of tremendous investment in homegrown and peaceful technology just because of foreign bullying.”

Iran warned it will respond more decisively if attacked again by the US or Israel, following strikes on nuclear sites and threats from President Trump to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.

'Will not hesitate': Iran warns US, Israel of ‘impossible to cover up’ retaliation if attacked again after Trump's total 'wipe out' warning

US President Donald Trump, while talking alongside the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, said that if Iran restarted its nuclear programme, &nbsp;he would wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it." The American president commented while saying that the Islamic Republic “interjected themselves” into the latest round of ceasefire-hostage release talks in Qatar. “I think they got involved in this negotiation, telling Hamas and giving Hamas signals and orders. And that’s not good,” Trump said. “We will do that gladly. Openly and gladly," he added. He said that Tehran has been “talking about things that they shouldn’t be talking about” in recent media interviews.<h2>Trump on Gaza hunger</h2>Trump, when he was asked if he agreed with Netanyahu's claim that there was no starvation in Gaza, said, “I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly because those children look very hungry.”&nbsp;Starmer intervened and added, “It's a humanitarian crisis. It's an absolute catastrophe. I think people in Britain are revolted by seeing what they're seeing on their screens.” The American president also said that the Palestinian militant group was unlikely to release the remaining 20 Israeli hostages. "That's like their shield," Trump said.&nbsp;He further said that a ceasefire might be possible in the war. He said he has told the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to approach the ongoing conflict in a “different way.” Moreover, the US president continued crediting himself for the ceasefire negotiation in previous wars - like the India-Pakistan conflict, as he said if he was not around, there would be "six major wars going on."<h2>'Very disappointed in Putin'</h2>Talking about the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump threatened to reduce the 50-day deadline given to Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a ceasefire deal with Ukraine. "I've spoken to President Putin a lot, I've gotten along with him very well," Trump said while adding that Putin "goes out and starts launching rockets into some city, like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever, you have bodies lying all over the street".&nbsp;

US President Donald Trump said in a press briefing in Scotland that if Iran restarts its nuclear programme, America will wipe it out faster than one can wave their finger at it. 

US President Donald Trump, while talking alongside the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, said that if Iran restarted its nuclear programme, he would wipe it out faster than you can wave your finger at it." The American president commented while saying that the Islamic Republic “interjected themselves” into the latest round of ceasefire-hostage release talks in Qatar. “I think they got involved in this negotiation, telling Hamas and giving Hamas signals and orders. And that’s not good,” Trump said. “We will do that gladly. Openly and gladly," he added. He said that Tehran has been “talking about things that they shouldn’t be talking about” in recent media interviews. Trump on Gaza hunger Trump, when he was asked if he agreed with Netanyahu's claim that there was no starvation in Gaza, said, “I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly because those children look very hungry.” Starmer intervened and added, “It's a humanitarian crisis. It's an absolute catastrophe. I think people in Britain are revolted by seeing what they're seeing on their screens.” The American president also said that the Palestinian militant group was unlikely to release the remaining 20 Israeli hostages. "That's like their shield," Trump said. He further said that a ceasefire might be possible in the war. He said he has told the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to approach the ongoing conflict in a “different way.” Moreover, the US president continued crediting himself for the ceasefire negotiation in previous wars - like the India-Pakistan conflict, as he said if he was not around, there would be "six major wars going on." 'Very disappointed in Putin' Talking about the Russia-Ukraine war, Trump threatened to reduce the 50-day deadline given to Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a ceasefire deal with Ukraine. "I've spoken to President Putin a lot, I've gotten along with him very well," Trump said while adding that Putin "goes out and starts launching rockets into some city, like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever, you have bodies lying all over the street".

US President Donald Trump said in a press briefing in Scotland that if Iran restarts its nuclear programme, America will wipe it out faster than one can wave their finger at it.&nbsp;

'We’ll wipe it out faster than...': Trump's latest warning to Iran on nuke programme

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi lashed out at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his demand for a limitation on missile production by the Islamic Republic. Taking to social media, Aragchi slammed Netanyahu for running back to his "Daddy" - US President Donald Trump. The Iranian minister said that two years ago, Netanyahu pledged his victory in Gaza - but in the end, he faced an arrest warrant for war crimes, and there were 200,000 new Hamas recruits. &nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, "In Iran, he dreamed that he could erase 40+ years of peaceful nuclear achievements. The end result: every one of the dozen Iranian academics that his mercenaries martyred had trained 100+ capable disciples. They will show Netanyahu what they are capable of," Agarchi said. He said it while sharing a picture that said: "BREAKING; ISRAEL PM Netanyahu demands IRAN must not produce missiles with a range of more than 480 km!!"&nbsp;&nbsp;"But his arrogance doesn't stop there. Having miserably failed to achieve any of his war aims in Iran and compelled to run to "Daddy" when our powerful missiles flattened secret Israeli regime sites, which Netanyahu is still censoring, is openly dictating what the US should or shouldn't say or do in talks with Iran," the Iranian minister added.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Netanyahu pledged victory in Gaza almost two years ago. The end result: military quagmire, facing arrest warrant for war crimes, and 200,000 new Hamas recruits. In Iran, he dreamed that he could erase 40+ years of peaceful nuclear achievements. The end result: every one of the… <a href="https://t.co/1eJZB9qphy">pic.twitter.com/1eJZB9qphy</a>&mdash; Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) <a href="https://twitter.com/araghchi/status/1944501894946115844?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 13, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

&nbsp;He further asked in his post what exactly is Netanyahu smoking because he thinks that Iran will accept anything a "war criminal" would say.&nbsp;"Apart from the farce that Iran will accept anything a wanted war criminal has to say, the inevitable question arises: what exactly is Netanyahu smoking? And if nothing, what exactly does the Mossad have on the White House?" Araghchi said.&nbsp;This came amid the rising tensions between Israel and Iran over the nuclear programme of the Islamic Republic. &nbsp;Israel has long accused Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons - a claim Tehran denies.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The Iranian minister said that two years ago, Netanyahu pledged his victory in Gaza - but in the end, he faced arrest warrant for war crimes, and there were 200,000 new Hamas recruits.  

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi lashed out at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for his demand for a limitation on missile production by the Islamic Republic. Taking to social media, Aragchi slammed Netanyahu for running back to his "Daddy" - US President Donald Trump. The Iranian minister said that two years ago, Netanyahu pledged his victory in Gaza - but in the end, he faced an arrest warrant for war crimes, and there were 200,000 new Hamas recruits. Meanwhile, "In Iran, he dreamed that he could erase 40+ years of peaceful nuclear achievements. The end result: every one of the dozen Iranian academics that his mercenaries martyred had trained 100+ capable disciples. They will show Netanyahu what they are capable of," Agarchi said. He said it while sharing a picture that said: "BREAKING; ISRAEL PM Netanyahu demands IRAN must not produce missiles with a range of more than 480 km!!" "But his arrogance doesn't stop there. Having miserably failed to achieve any of his war aims in Iran and compelled to run to "Daddy" when our powerful missiles flattened secret Israeli regime sites, which Netanyahu is still censoring, is openly dictating what the US should or shouldn't say or do in talks with Iran," the Iranian minister added.

The Iranian minister said that two years ago, Netanyahu pledged his victory in Gaza - but in the end, he faced arrest warrant for war crimes, and there were 200,000 new Hamas recruits. &nbsp;

'What exactly is Netanyahu smoking?' Abbas Araghchi lashes out at Israeli PM, says 'war criminal' runs to 'Daddy' after failing

Iran on Saturday (Jul 12) said that it would resume nuclear talks with the United States if there was a guarantee of no more attacks on the Islamic Republic. In a speech to Tehran-based foreign diplomats, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Iran was ready for the talks, but added that “assurance should be provided that in case of a resumption of talks, the trend will not lead to war.” He added that the deal must also respect Tehran’s right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. Araghchi further said that cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, which was suspended following the US strikes, “will take on a new form”.&nbsp;Speaking of Israel’s 12-day military operations that targeted Iran’s key nuclear and military sites, and the US strikes on June 22, Tehran’s foreign minister said that is the US and other nations wish to resume talks with Iran, “there should be a firm guarantee that such actions will not be repeated.” He added, “The attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities has made it more difficult and complicated to achieve a solution based on negotiations.”&nbsp;<h2>Iran ‘ready’ for talks</h2>&nbsp;Araghchi further said, “The Islamic Republic of Iran remains ready to build this confidence through diplomacy but, before that, our counterparts must convince us that they want diplomacy and not that diplomacy is a cover for other goals and objectives they have.”&nbsp;He added that details of a possible resumption of talks with the US were being reviewed. This included time, location, form, ingredients, and assurances required for negotiations.&nbsp;“If negotiations are held... the subject of the negotiations will be only nuclear and creating confidence in Iran’s nuclear programme in return for the lifting of sanctions,” Araghchi told diplomats in Tehran. “No other issues will be subject to negotiation.”&nbsp;He warned that a so-called snapback of UN sanctions could end Europe’s involvement in the issue of Tehran’s nuclear programme. As per a clause in the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and global powers, the UN can reimpose sanctions in case Tehran breaches the deal.&nbsp;<h2>Cooperation with IAEA will take ‘new form’</h2>&nbsp;Following the US strikes on Iran, Tehran suspended its ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Araghchi said that Iran’s cooperation with the agency has not stopped, “but will take on a new form.” He added that requests to monitor nuclear sites “will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis... taking into account safety and security issues.”&nbsp;<h2>Nuclear deal must respect ‘right’ to enrichment</h2>&nbsp;The foreign minister insisted that any new nuclear deal must respect its right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. “I would like to emphasise that in any negotiated solution, the rights of the Iranian people on the nuclear issue, including the right to enrichment, must be respected,” he said. “We will not have any agreement in which enrichment is not included.”

The foreign minister insisted that any new nuclear deal must respect its right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

Iran on Saturday (Jul 12) said that it would resume nuclear talks with the United States if there was a guarantee of no more attacks on the Islamic Republic. In a speech to Tehran-based foreign diplomats, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Iran was ready for the talks, but added that “assurance should be provided that in case of a resumption of talks, the trend will not lead to war.” He added that the deal must also respect Tehran’s right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. Araghchi further said that cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, which was suspended following the US strikes, “will take on a new form”. Speaking of Israel’s 12-day military operations that targeted Iran’s key nuclear and military sites, and the US strikes on June 22, Tehran’s foreign minister said that is the US and other nations wish to resume talks with Iran, “there should be a firm guarantee that such actions will not be repeated.” He added, “The attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities has made it more difficult and complicated to achieve a solution based on negotiations.” Iran ‘ready’ for talks Araghchi further said, “The Islamic Republic of Iran remains ready to build this confidence through diplomacy but, before that, our counterparts must convince us that they want diplomacy and not that diplomacy is a cover for other goals and objectives they have.” He added that details of a possible resumption of talks with the US were being reviewed. This included time, location, form, ingredients, and assurances required for negotiations. “If negotiations are held... the subject of the negotiations will be only nuclear and creating confidence in Iran’s nuclear programme in return for the lifting of sanctions,” Araghchi told diplomats in Tehran. “No other issues will be subject to negotiation.” He warned that a so-called snapback of UN sanctions could end Europe’s involvement in the issue of Tehran’s nuclear programme. As per a clause in the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and global powers, the UN can reimpose sanctions in case Tehran breaches the deal. Cooperation with IAEA will take ‘new form’ Following the US strikes on Iran, Tehran suspended its ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Araghchi said that Iran’s cooperation with the agency has not stopped, “but will take on a new form.” He added that requests to monitor nuclear sites “will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis... taking into account safety and security issues.” Nuclear deal must respect ‘right’ to enrichment The foreign minister insisted that any new nuclear deal must respect its right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. “I would like to emphasise that in any negotiated solution, the rights of the Iranian people on the nuclear issue, including the right to enrichment, must be respected,” he said. “We will not have any agreement in which enrichment is not included.”

The foreign minister insisted that any new nuclear deal must respect its right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

‘Assurance should be provided’: Iran ‘ready’ to resume nuclear talks with US on THIS condition

After the 12-day-long war with Israel, Iran has once again issued a stark warning to Benjamin Netanyahu as the Islamic Republic braces for any possible attack. Tehran's Armed Forces Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi said that Iran has prepared a "decisive retaliation" to any future attacks. As per Tasnim news agency, the commander said the retaliation plan, which aligns with Khamenei's directive, was ready but was not implemented due to the truce.&nbsp;“If they attack Iran again, they will see what we are capable of doing,” Mousavi was quoted as saying by the state-run agency. Mousavi further said that Iran's response to any new attacks will "paralyse" Israel to a point where even "the United States may not be able to save Netanyahu.”&nbsp;The remarks came days after the 12-day Israel-Iran war, which was later joined by the US targeting nuclear sites of the Islamic Republic.&nbsp;Iran has started nuclear programme at different location?&nbsp;US President Donald Trump said on Friday (June 4) that Iran had not agreed to inspection of its nuclear program or even to give up enriching uranium. Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location.&nbsp;"I would say it's set back permanently," Trump said as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. "I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem."&nbsp;'Enemies of God'? &nbsp;&nbsp;A top cleric of Iran has called the US President Donald Trump and the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the "enemies of God" in a newly issued fatwa (an Islamic judgement). Iran's Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi issued the fatwa while urging Muslims across the world to take action. The fatwa said that anyone who threatens or attacks the leadership and authority of the Islamic community is considered a “warlord" or “criminal of mohareb." Mohareb is a term used in the Iranian law for a person who wages war against God. “Any person or regime that threatens or attacks the leadership and authority in order to harm the Islamic Ummah and its sovereignty is considered a warlord," Ayatollah Makarem said in his fatwa. He said that any support or cooperation with such figures is forbidden for Muslims. He stressed the need for global Muslims to make Trump and Netanyahu “regret their words and mistakes" and said they would be rewarded as “mujahid fi sabilillah" — warriors in the path of God.&nbsp;

The remarks came days after the 12-day Israel-Iran war, which was later joined by the US targeting nuclear sites of the Islamic Republic.



After the 12-day-long war with Israel, Iran has once again issued a stark warning to Benjamin Netanyahu as the Islamic Republic braces for any possible attack. Tehran's Armed Forces Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi said that Iran has prepared a "decisive retaliation" to any future attacks. As per Tasnim news agency, the commander said the retaliation plan, which aligns with Khamenei's directive, was ready but was not implemented due to the truce. “If they attack Iran again, they will see what we are capable of doing,” Mousavi was quoted as saying by the state-run agency. Mousavi further said that Iran's response to any new attacks will "paralyse" Israel to a point where even "the United States may not be able to save Netanyahu.” The remarks came days after the 12-day Israel-Iran war, which was later joined by the US targeting nuclear sites of the Islamic Republic. Iran has started nuclear programme at different location? US President Donald Trump said on Friday (June 4) that Iran had not agreed to inspection of its nuclear program or even to give up enriching uranium. Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location. "I would say it's set back permanently," Trump said as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. "I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem." 'Enemies of God'? A top cleric of Iran has called the US President Donald Trump and the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the "enemies of God" in a newly issued fatwa (an Islamic judgement). Iran's Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi issued the fatwa while urging Muslims across the world to take action. The fatwa said that anyone who threatens or attacks the leadership and authority of the Islamic community is considered a “warlord" or “criminal of mohareb." Mohareb is a term used in the Iranian law for a person who wages war against God. “Any person or regime that threatens or attacks the leadership and authority in order to harm the Islamic Ummah and its sovereignty is considered a warlord," Ayatollah Makarem said in his fatwa. He said that any support or cooperation with such figures is forbidden for Muslims. He stressed the need for global Muslims to make Trump and Netanyahu “regret their words and mistakes" and said they would be rewarded as “mujahid fi sabilillah" — warriors in the path of God.

The remarks came days after the 12-day Israel-Iran war, which was later joined by the US targeting nuclear sites of the Islamic Republic.&nbsp;

'US may not be able to save Netanyahu': Iran's stark WARNING to Israel against possible attack to its nuke sites

US President Donald Trump said on Friday (June 4) that Iran had not agreed to inspection of its nuclear program or even to give up enriching uranium. Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location.&nbsp;"I would say it's set back permanently," Trump said as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. "I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem."&nbsp;‘Take it or leave it’ tariff letters&nbsp;Trump also said that he has signed letters to 12 countries describing various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the US. He said that the letters with a “take it or leave it” offer will be sent to the countries on Monday (July 7). Trump rejected the request to name the countries that are expected to receive the letters. He said he would make the names public on Monday only.&nbsp;Earlier, Trump had told reporters on Thursday (July 3) that the first batch of the letters would be dispatched on Friday (July 4), only on the national holiday in the US. But the date has now shifted.&nbsp;In April this year, Trump announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some hitting as high as 50 per cent. The move was part of a global trade war. Although all but the 10 per cent base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That 90-day period ends on July 9.&nbsp;

Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said the Tehran nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location.



US President Donald Trump said on Friday (June 4) that Iran had not agreed to inspection of its nuclear program or even to give up enriching uranium. Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location. "I would say it's set back permanently," Trump said as he travelled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. "I would think they'd have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem." ‘Take it or leave it’ tariff letters Trump also said that he has signed letters to 12 countries describing various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the US. He said that the letters with a “take it or leave it” offer will be sent to the countries on Monday (July 7). Trump rejected the request to name the countries that are expected to receive the letters. He said he would make the names public on Monday only. Earlier, Trump had told reporters on Thursday (July 3) that the first batch of the letters would be dispatched on Friday (July 4), only on the national holiday in the US. But the date has now shifted. In April this year, Trump announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some hitting as high as 50 per cent. The move was part of a global trade war. Although all but the 10 per cent base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That 90-day period ends on July 9.

Referring to the reports about Air Force One, en route to New Jersey, Trump said Tehran's nuclear programme had been set back permanently after the Israel-Iran war, but the Islamic Republic could start it at a different location.&nbsp;

Iran has started nuclear programme at different location after war with Israel? Here's what Trump says

Nearly 10 days after striking Iran’s nuclear facilities, the Pentagon said it has degraded Tehran’s nuclear programme by up to two years. It suggests that the US military operation conducted in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan was successful and the goals were achieved.&nbsp;&nbsp;Pentagon spokesperson, Sean Parnell, in a briefing said, “We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department of Defense assess that.”&nbsp;He added, “All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's facilities, especially, have been completely obliterated.”&nbsp;While not too long ago, President Trump had said, “I can report to the world that these strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear facilities have been completed and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.”&nbsp;Reiterating Vice President JD Vance said, “Our goal was to bury the uranium, and I do think the uranium is buried. The goal was to eliminate the enrichment and eliminate their ability to convert that enriched fuel into a nuclear weapon. I actually just, I think that’s an important point.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/jd-vance-says-location-not-important-but-iran-s-uranium-is-buried-after-us-airstrikes-1750726173516">JD Vance says location 'not important', but Iran's 'uranium is buried' after US airstrikes</a>&nbsp;On June 26, a senior Israeli official told news outlet The Times of Israel that US and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back the nuclear programme by ‘several years,’ but have not destroyed or dismantled it completely. These are contrary to the claims made by Trump after the June 22 strikes on nuclear sites.&nbsp;&nbsp;Parnell added, "All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's facilities especially, have been completely obliterated."&nbsp;The US military bombers had targeted three Iranian nuclear facilities and had used over a dozen 13,600-kg bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles.&nbsp;

Nearly 10 days after striking Iran’s nuclear facilities, the Pentagon said it has degraded Tehran’s nuclear programme by up to two years. It suggests that the US military operation conducted in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan was successful and the goals were achieved. 

Nearly 10 days after striking Iran’s nuclear facilities, the Pentagon said it has degraded Tehran’s nuclear programme by up to two years. It suggests that the US military operation conducted in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan was successful and the goals were achieved. Pentagon spokesperson, Sean Parnell, in a briefing said, “We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department of Defense assess that.” He added, “All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's facilities, especially, have been completely obliterated.” While not too long ago, President Trump had said, “I can report to the world that these strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear facilities have been completed and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.” Reiterating Vice President JD Vance said, “Our goal was to bury the uranium, and I do think the uranium is buried. The goal was to eliminate the enrichment and eliminate their ability to convert that enriched fuel into a nuclear weapon. I actually just, I think that’s an important point.” Also read: JD Vance says location 'not important', but Iran's 'uranium is buried' after US airstrikes On June 26, a senior Israeli official told news outlet The Times of Israel that US and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have set back the nuclear programme by ‘several years,’ but have not destroyed or dismantled it completely. These are contrary to the claims made by Trump after the June 22 strikes on nuclear sites. Parnell added, "All of the intelligence that we've seen led us to believe that Iran's facilities especially, have been completely obliterated." The US military bombers had targeted three Iranian nuclear facilities and had used over a dozen 13,600-kg bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles.

Nearly 10 days after striking Iran’s nuclear facilities, the Pentagon said it has degraded Tehran’s nuclear programme by up to two years. It suggests that the US military operation conducted in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan was successful and the goals were achieved.&nbsp;

Iranian nuclear programme degraded by up to two years, says Pentagon after 10 days of strikes

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian has granted final approval to a law to suspend cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), state media said Wednesday (July 2). "Masoud Pezeshkian promulgated the law suspending cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency," state TV said, meaning the measure drawn up in the aftermath of the Iran-Israel war last month is now in effect. This comes a week after the Iranian Parliament approved a bill suspending cooperation with IAEA. The decision followed recent US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in Esfahan, Fordow, and Natanz. During an open session of Parliament, Iranian lawmakers agreed on the general outline of a plan with 223 representatives present at the session, 221 voted in favour, one voted against, and one abstained.&nbsp;&nbsp;Earlier, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi slammed IAEA chief Rafael Grossi and said, “Grossi’s insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent…Iran reserves the right to take any steps in defence of its interests, its people and its sovereignty.” On the same lines, Iranian President Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran had halted cooperation with the IAEA due to what he called Grossi’s “destructive” behaviour towards Iran. Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA not only for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes, but also for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing Tehran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations, the day before Israel attacked. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel was announced on June 24 and has held forth since then.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">The Parliament of Iran has voted for a halt to collaboration with the IAEA until the safety and security of our nuclear activities can be guaranteed. This is a direct result of <a href="https://twitter.com/rafaelmgrossi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@rafaelmgrossi</a>&#39;s regrettable role in obfuscating the fact that the Agency—a full decade ago—already…&mdash; Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) <a href="https://twitter.com/araghchi/status/1938619328397488281?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 27, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>What are the implications of Iran suspending cooperation with IAEA?</h2>The IAEA plays a central role in maintaining international peace and security by verifying that nuclear programmes around the world are strictly peaceful in nature. Amid the West's allegations that Iran was close to develop a nuclear weapon, it was important that IAEA keeps a check on Iranian facilities. Though the US has said that Iran's nuclear capabilities are 'obliterated', IAEA checks would have helped Iran improve its own standards, benefitting its civilian nuclear ambitions while avoiding environmental or safety disasters. Iran suspended its formal nuclear weapons program in 2003, and claims its program is for peaceful purposes only. By banning IAEA, Iran is effectively suspending all transparency mechanisms related to its nuclear program. &nbsp;

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian promulgated the law suspending cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency days after US struck three nuclear facilities in Iran namely Esfahan, Fordow, and Natanz

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian has granted final approval to a law to suspend cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), state media said Wednesday (July 2). "Masoud Pezeshkian promulgated the law suspending cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency," state TV said, meaning the measure drawn up in the aftermath of the Iran-Israel war last month is now in effect. This comes a week after the Iranian Parliament approved a bill suspending cooperation with IAEA. The decision followed recent US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in Esfahan, Fordow, and Natanz. During an open session of Parliament, Iranian lawmakers agreed on the general outline of a plan with 223 representatives present at the session, 221 voted in favour, one voted against, and one abstained. Earlier, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi slammed IAEA chief Rafael Grossi and said, “Grossi’s insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent…Iran reserves the right to take any steps in defence of its interests, its people and its sovereignty.” On the same lines, Iranian President Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran had halted cooperation with the IAEA due to what he called Grossi’s “destructive” behaviour towards Iran. Iranian officials have sharply criticised the IAEA not only for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes, but also for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing Tehran of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations, the day before Israel attacked. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel was announced on June 24 and has held forth since then.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian promulgated the law suspending cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency days after US struck three nuclear facilities in Iran namely Esfahan, Fordow, and Natanz

Iran suspends cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog IAEA days after US strikes - What this means | WION Explains

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei-led Iran is building the biggest ballistic missile arsenal on the planet and one-tonne warheads that are capable of hitting London, Israel has said in its latest claim. This came amid the controversy over the nuclear programme of the Islamic Republic after the 12-day war with Israel, which was later joined by America. After hitting Iran, Donald Trump claimed that the country's nuke programme was “completely obliterated”. But Oren Marmorstein, spokesman for Israel’s foreign ministry, said that this was not the only objective of the attack on Iran on June 13.&nbsp;Marmorstein told The Sunday Times that Israel attacked Iran for two existential threats. “One was nuclear, and we acted when we did because Iran was at the 11th hour of being able to build a bomb. But the other was the ballistic threat," he told the newspaper.&nbsp;Before the Israel-Iran war, Tehran was estimated to have 3,000 ballistic missiles, as estimated by the US. But the Khamenei government was in the middle of an operation to increase the production of the missiles to 20,000, the Israeli official said. He said on the morning of the ceasefire declaration, a missile killed four people in their safe room in the southern Israeli town of Beersheba. “Imagine if Tehran sent 10,000 of those,” he said. “That threat was as existential to us as a nuclear bomb," he said.&nbsp;“They were moving into industrial scale and about to become the No. 1 ballistic missile producer in the world. Some of these are intercontinental, which are not for us," he added. “They were getting closer and closer, almost to the point of no return,” Marmorstein told the newspaper.&nbsp;The Israeli officials claimed that Iran stepped up its nuclear program after Israel assassinated the Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah.&nbsp;“On uranium enrichment, they had stockpiled enough for nine nuclear bombs, and we saw extreme acceleration on weaponisation. This was all part and parcel of a bigger plan for the annihilation of Israel with three elements — nuclear, ballistic and physical invasion,” Marmorstein said.&nbsp;&nbsp;

This came amid the controversy over the nuclear programme of the Islamic Republic after the 12-day war with Israel, which was later joined by America.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei-led Iran is building the biggest ballistic missile arsenal on the planet and one-tonne warheads that are capable of hitting London, Israel has said in its latest claim. This came amid the controversy over the nuclear programme of the Islamic Republic after the 12-day war with Israel, which was later joined by America. After hitting Iran, Donald Trump claimed that the country's nuke programme was “completely obliterated”. But Oren Marmorstein, spokesman for Israel’s foreign ministry, said that this was not the only objective of the attack on Iran on June 13. Marmorstein told The Sunday Times that Israel attacked Iran for two existential threats. “One was nuclear, and we acted when we did because Iran was at the 11th hour of being able to build a bomb. But the other was the ballistic threat," he told the newspaper. Before the Israel-Iran war, Tehran was estimated to have 3,000 ballistic missiles, as estimated by the US. But the Khamenei government was in the middle of an operation to increase the production of the missiles to 20,000, the Israeli official said. He said on the morning of the ceasefire declaration, a missile killed four people in their safe room in the southern Israeli town of Beersheba. “Imagine if Tehran sent 10,000 of those,” he said. “That threat was as existential to us as a nuclear bomb," he said. “They were moving into industrial scale and about to become the No. 1 ballistic missile producer in the world. Some of these are intercontinental, which are not for us," he added. “They were getting closer and closer, almost to the point of no return,” Marmorstein told the newspaper. The Israeli officials claimed that Iran stepped up its nuclear program after Israel assassinated the Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah. “On uranium enrichment, they had stockpiled enough for nine nuclear bombs, and we saw extreme acceleration on weaponisation. This was all part and parcel of a bigger plan for the annihilation of Israel with three elements — nuclear, ballistic and physical invasion,” Marmorstein said.

This came amid the controversy over the nuclear programme of the Islamic Republic after the 12-day war with Israel, which was later joined by America.

Iran is building world's biggest missile arsenal, warheads 'can hit London' | Inside plan for '20,000 missiles and nuclear bombs'

Iran has said it is open to a new nuclear agreement that could see its stockpile of highly enriched uranium transferred abroad. The announcement came through Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, in a written interview with Al-Monitor. It is the most detailed official statement since the end of a 12-day war involving strikes by the United States and Israel on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.“We would be prepared to transfer our stockpiles of 60% and 20% enriched uranium to another country and have them transferred out of Iranian territory in return for receiving yellowcake,” Iravani said. This marked a departure from Iran’s previous position, which strongly opposed such a transfer.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-holds-mass-funeral-for-military-leaders-killed-in-israeli-strikes-1751096752493">Iran holds mass funeral for military leaders killed in Israeli strikes</a><h2>400kg of enriched uranium still missing</h2>While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium. Roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity is reportedly missing. Former top UN nuclear official Olli Heinonen told Eye for Iran, “One should not relax because this material as such is enough for 10 nuclear weapons if it is enriched further to 90%.” The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has yet to confirm the location of this stockpile.<h2>Iran backs regional nuclear cooperation</h2>In addition to exporting uranium, Iran has also shown interest in a regional nuclear consortium. Iravani said Tehran is willing to collaborate with countries in the region that operate nuclear reactors, including on fuel supply and safety standards. “We are willing to collaborate with all countries in our region… if such a move is a complementary initiative and not a substitute for Iran’s domestic nuclear program,” Iravani said.The United States reportedly pitched this idea before the war, with the potential involvement of Saudi Arabia, Oman, the UAE, Qatar, and the US. The plan includes supplying enriched uranium for civilian use in exchange for partial sanctions relief.<h2>No clear location for proposed consortium</h2>The question of where the enrichment would take place remains unresolved. Iran has insisted that enrichment must continue on its soil. Despite this, Iravani gave the strongest endorsement yet of the consortium plan, saying, “A consortium could very well be one of the forms such cooperation might take.”Asked whether Iran would limit enrichment to such a consortium operating inside the country, he said, “In principle, we have no objection to that; however, we should consider it based on the details of any potential proposals we receive.”<h2>NPT membership still stands, says Iran</h2>Iran’s parliament recently passed a law restricting cooperation with the IAEA, raising concerns that it could be distancing itself from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iravani clarified that this was not the case. “It does not signify Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT,” he said, adding that any deal with the US must still respect Iran’s rights under the treaty.

While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium.

Iran has said it is open to a new nuclear agreement that could see its stockpile of highly enriched uranium transferred abroad. The announcement came through Iran’s ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, in a written interview with Al-Monitor. It is the most detailed official statement since the end of a 12-day war involving strikes by the United States and Israel on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. “We would be prepared to transfer our stockpiles of 60% and 20% enriched uranium to another country and have them transferred out of Iranian territory in return for receiving yellowcake,” Iravani said. This marked a departure from Iran’s previous position, which strongly opposed such a transfer. Also read: Iran holds mass funeral for military leaders killed in Israeli strikes 400kg of enriched uranium still missing While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium. Roughly 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity is reportedly missing. Former top UN nuclear official Olli Heinonen told Eye for Iran, “One should not relax because this material as such is enough for 10 nuclear weapons if it is enriched further to 90%.” The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has yet to confirm the location of this stockpile. Iran backs regional nuclear cooperation In addition to exporting uranium, Iran has also shown interest in a regional nuclear consortium. Iravani said Tehran is willing to collaborate with countries in the region that operate nuclear reactors, including on fuel supply and safety standards. “We are willing to collaborate with all countries in our region… if such a move is a complementary initiative and not a substitute for Iran’s domestic nuclear program,” Iravani said. The United States reportedly pitched this idea before the war, with the potential involvement of Saudi Arabia, Oman, the UAE, Qatar, and the US. The plan includes supplying enriched uranium for civilian use in exchange for partial sanctions relief. No clear location for proposed consortium The question of where the enrichment would take place remains unresolved. Iran has insisted that enrichment must continue on its soil. Despite this, Iravani gave the strongest endorsement yet of the consortium plan, saying, “A consortium could very well be one of the forms such cooperation might take.” Asked whether Iran would limit enrichment to such a consortium operating inside the country, he said, “In principle, we have no objection to that; however, we should consider it based on the details of any potential proposals we receive.” NPT membership still stands, says Iran Iran’s parliament recently passed a law restricting cooperation with the IAEA, raising concerns that it could be distancing itself from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Iravani clarified that this was not the case. “It does not signify Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT,” he said, adding that any deal with the US must still respect Iran’s rights under the treaty.

While Iran has voiced openness to exporting its stockpile, there are growing concerns over the location of a large quantity of enriched uranium.

'In return for yellowcake': Iran ready to send enriched uranium abroad after war

US' Central Intelligence Agency releases a statement backing President Donald Trump's claims of destroying Iran's nuclear programme. On the day America launched strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, Trump said, 'Iran's key nuclear facilities have been completed and totally obliterated.' It's only days later that reports by an Israeli intelligence official claimed that the aerial strikes were a setback to the nuclear programme by ‘several years,’ but have not destroyed or dismantled it completely.&nbsp;And now, a statement from CIA Director John Ratcliffe says, “CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear programme has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes. This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">My statement confirming CIA intelligence which contradicts illegally sourced public reporting regarding the destruction of key Iranian nuclear facilities. <a href="https://t.co/Ln3b4hfELc">pic.twitter.com/Ln3b4hfELc</a>&mdash; CIA Director John Ratcliffe (@CIADirector) <a href="https://twitter.com/CIADirector/status/1937964888967823652?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 25, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

It added, "CIA continues to collect additional reliably sourced information to keep appropriate decision-makers and oversight bodies fully informed. When possible, we will also provide updates and information to the American public, given the national importance of this matter and in every attempt to provide transparency."&nbsp;The Israeli intelligence official claims, these military strikes on the nuclear facilities will serve as a deterrent against the Islamic Republic that is trying to enrich uranium. And the assessment is constantly being monitored and updated and in the coming weeks, more inputs will ascertain the extent of damage and the status of Iran’s nuclear program in question.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-national-intelligence-head-tulsi-gabbard-says-iran-s-nuclear-sites-destroyed-slams-media-1750880476581">US national intelligence director Tulsi Gabbard backs Trump, says Iran’s nuclear sites destroyed</a>&nbsp;On the contrary, Trump in his address had said, "Our objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity, a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror.”&nbsp;He also confirmed that these strikes were a spectacular military success.

US' Central Intelligence Agency releases a statement backing President Donald Trump's claims of destroying Iran's nuclear programme. On the day America launched strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, Trump said, 'Iran's key nuclear facilities have been completed and totally obliterated.'

US' Central Intelligence Agency releases a statement backing President Donald Trump's claims of destroying Iran's nuclear programme. On the day America launched strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, Trump said, 'Iran's key nuclear facilities have been completed and totally obliterated.' It's only days later that reports by an Israeli intelligence official claimed that the aerial strikes were a setback to the nuclear programme by ‘several years,’ but have not destroyed or dismantled it completely. And now, a statement from CIA Director John Ratcliffe says, “CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear programme has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes. This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.”

US' Central Intelligence Agency releases a statement backing President Donald Trump's claims of destroying Iran's nuclear programme. On the day America launched strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, Trump said, 'Iran's key nuclear facilities have been completed and totally obliterated.'

'Historically reliable and accurate source': CIA backs Trump's claims of destroying Iran's nuclear programme