Kate Middleton, Prince William celebrate King Charles' 78th birthday with a special social media post

Macron’s awkward embrace with Iceland PM Kristrún Frostadóttir goes viral – What happened?

‘I hope you die…’: Jensen Huang told Indian-origin Nvidia VP in an outburst during meeting

US flight chaos: Transport chief warns 'some delays, cancellations' to continue as thousands stranded after flight disruption

Why is the United States trying to control China's access to advanced AI chips?

Mumbai: 20-year-old arrested for allegedly surveying 26/11 target Chabad House, probe points to overseas links

IND vs NZ: New Zealand tour ends in disappointment as Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli fall cheaply in 5th ODI

Iran plotting to target Trump? Report claims Mossad shared intel with CIA

US-Iran war | Iran: Targeted US early-warning radar in Bahrain

Why are liquid-cooled GPUs becoming important for modern AI data centres?

ASEAN Summit 2026: PM Modi to Grace 3-Day ASEAN-India & East Asia Summit in Manila

Shape-shifting UFO sighting in Oregon leaves mother-daughter sick: 'Fell like a dead bird'

‘Outstanding day for Indian cricket’: PM Modi congratulates U19 team on Asia Cup win

'Currently has no role...': Megaspeed breaks silence on former boss Alice Huang and Nvidia CEO's affair

Who owns Jalsa, and who is Ramola Bachchan? Sister-in-law of Amitabh Bachchan questioning the 1993 gift deed

'Democracy was destroyed in 2014': Rahul Gandhi questions legitimacy of elections at Bharat Summit in Hyderabad

Why do AI GPUs consume so much electricity?

Netanyahu warns against Eisenkot's minority government plans

'I don’t negotiate with terrorists'- US school district faces lawsuit over teacher's remark to student

Indian ambassador to ASEAN Srinivas Gotru backs freedom of navigation in South China Sea, opposes isolating Myanmar

IndiGo flight makes emergency landing in Pune after mid-air scare – What happened?

AUS vs ENG: Perth hero Mahli Beardman rested for 2nd ODI; Nathan Ellis ruled out of T20I series

How is China trying to build its own Nvidia to challenge the US chip industry?

Blasts, sirens rock Bahrain as Iran claims drone attack on US military base

Oak Ridge Boys' Richard Sterban dies at 83 after battle with cancer, tributes pour in

Jensen Huang seen with wife Lori in Paris in photos shared by daughter Madison

'No civic sense': Viral video shows family bursting crackers inside highway tunnel, sparks outrage | Watch

Why do Nvidia and Apple depend so heavily on Taiwan?

Paris protests | Interior Ministry: 106,000 take part in protests, 121 arrested

WATCH | SpaceX catches Starship spacecraft midair for first time after 22-hour orbital flight

Meta fined €805 million in Italy over alleged access to users’ phone galleries

Israel elections: Netanyahu urges Eisenkot to join unity government, says only a coalition can eliminate Iran threat 'once and for all'

'It exploded in his mouth': Man dies after friend gives him bomb disguised as rasgulla on Diwali in Madhya Pradesh's Dindori

'He promised me a green card': Lebanese woman accuses Texas ICE officer of sexually assaulting her in detention

Aaryavir Sehwag chants ‘Sita Ram’ to stay calm during India-Pakistan U19 Asia Cup final | WATCH

Israel-Gaza war: Israeli airstrike on Nasser Hospital kills 6, wounds 20

First game after Cristiano Ronaldo's retirement ends in Portugal's 4-1 loss to Denmark

Indian student sentenced to 30 years in UK for online grooming of over 70 children

Harry Potter: HBO series unveils new Hogwarts scene, Dumbledore's conversation with McGonagall grabs attention

Today, SpaceX is one of the world's most valuable companies, while Elon Musk ranks among the richest people on the planet. The company's public listing in 2026 pushed its valuation into the trillion-dollar range and further boosted Musk's fortune.&nbsp;But two decades ago, SpaceX was a small start-up attempting something few thought possible. Its first rocket, Falcon 1, represented years of work, millions of dollars in investment and a major gamble by Musk, who had largely funded the company himself.<h2>How much did Falcon 1 actually cost?</h2>According to SpaceX, the Falcon 1 rocket was designed to be significantly cheaper than competing launch vehicles. The advertised launch price for Falcon 1 was around $6.7 million for early missions. Later versions were priced at roughly $7.9 million. However, the actual cost to develop Falcon 1 was much higher. Industry estimates and comments from Musk suggest SpaceX spent well over $100 million developing the company and its early launch capabilities. Musk invested much of the money he earned from the sale of PayPal into SpaceX, with around $100 million going into the venture during its early years. In simple terms, while a single Falcon 1 launch carried a price tag of several million dollars, the broader effort behind the rocket cost far more.<h2>The first launch ended in failure</h2>The first Falcon 1 mission lifted off from Omelek Island in the Marshall Islands on March 24, 2006. The rocket flew for less than a minute before a fuel leak caused a fire in the engine compartment. The vehicle lost control and the mission ended in failure. For a young company with limited resources, the setback was significant. Yet SpaceX engineers used the data from the mission to identify problems and improve the rocket.Three failures before successThe first launch was not the only setback.A second Falcon 1 launch in 2007 also failed to reach orbit. A third mission in August 2008 came close but ultimately failed because of a stage separation issue. By that point, SpaceX was under intense financial pressure. Many observers believed the company might not survive another failure.<h2>The launch that changed everything</h2>The breakthrough came on September 28, 2008. Falcon 1 successfully reached orbit on its fourth attempt, becoming the first privately developed liquid-fuel rocket to do so. The success transformed SpaceX's future. The company later developed the Falcon 9 rocket, Dragon spacecraft and Starlink satellite network. It became a key partner for NASA and grew into a global space industry leader.&nbsp;<h2>Why Falcon 1 still matters today</h2>Compared with modern space programmes costing billions of dollars, Falcon 1 was relatively inexpensive. Yet its impact was enormous. The rocket proved that a private company could build and launch orbital rockets at a lower cost than many traditional competitors. What began as a project costing millions eventually helped create a company now valued in the trillions. The first Falcon 1 launch may have failed, but it marked the beginning of SpaceX's rise from start-up to space powerhouse.

Falcon 1's early launch price was about $6.7 million, but the broader effort behind SpaceX's first rocket cost far more. The first mission failed in 2006, yet the lessons learned helped pave the way for a company now valued in the trillions.


Today, SpaceX is one of the world's most valuable companies, while Elon Musk ranks among the richest people on the planet. The company's public listing in 2026 pushed its valuation into the trillion-dollar range and further boosted Musk's fortune. But two decades ago, SpaceX was a small start-up attempting something few thought possible. Its first rocket, Falcon 1, represented years of work, millions of dollars in investment and a major gamble by Musk, who had largely funded the company himself. How much did Falcon 1 actually cost? According to SpaceX, the Falcon 1 rocket was designed to be significantly cheaper than competing launch vehicles. The advertised launch price for Falcon 1 was around $6.7 million for early missions. Later versions were priced at roughly $7.9 million. However, the actual cost to develop Falcon 1 was much higher. Industry estimates and comments from Musk suggest SpaceX spent well over $100 million developing the company and its early launch capabilities. Musk invested much of the money he earned from the sale of PayPal into SpaceX, with around $100 million going into the venture during its early years. In simple terms, while a single Falcon 1 launch carried a price tag of several million dollars, the broader effort behind the rocket cost far more. The first launch ended in failure The first Falcon 1 mission lifted off from Omelek Island in the Marshall Islands on March 24, 2006. The rocket flew for less than a minute before a fuel leak caused a fire in the engine compartment. The vehicle lost control and the mission ended in failure. For a young company with limited resources, the setback was significant. Yet SpaceX engineers used the data from the mission to identify problems and improve the rocket. Three failures before success The first launch was not the only setback. A second Falcon 1 launch in 2007 also failed to reach orbit. A third mission in August 2008 came close but ultimately failed because of a stage separation issue. By that point, SpaceX was under intense financial pressure. Many observers believed the company might not survive another failure. The launch that changed everything The breakthrough came on September 28, 2008. Falcon 1 successfully reached orbit on its fourth attempt, becoming the first privately developed liquid-fuel rocket to do so. The success transformed SpaceX's future. The company later developed the Falcon 9 rocket, Dragon spacecraft and Starlink satellite network. It became a key partner for NASA and grew into a global space industry leader. Why Falcon 1 still matters today Compared with modern space programmes costing billions of dollars, Falcon 1 was relatively inexpensive. Yet its impact was enormous. The rocket proved that a private company could build and launch orbital rockets at a lower cost than many traditional competitors. What began as a project costing millions eventually helped create a company now valued in the trillions. The first Falcon 1 launch may have failed, but it marked the beginning of SpaceX's rise from start-up to space powerhouse.

Falcon 1's early launch price was about $6.7 million, but the broader effort behind SpaceX's first rocket cost far more. The first mission failed in 2006, yet the lessons learned helped pave the way for a company now valued in the trillions.

How much did SpaceX's first Falcon 1 rocket launch actually cost?

SpaceX is now one of the biggest names in the space industry. The company recently made history with its public listing, becoming one of the world's most valuable businesses and helping push Elon Musk's wealth to record levels. Before the company successfully reached orbit, it suffered three consecutive rocket failures. By 2008, money was running low, pressure was mounting and the future of the company depended on one final attempt.<h2>SpaceX's first three launches all failed</h2>Founded in 2002 by Elon Musk, SpaceX set out to reduce the cost of space travel and challenge an industry long dominated by governments and large aerospace firms. The company's first rocket, Falcon 1, was designed as a small, relatively low-cost launch vehicle. Its first launch took place in March 2006. The mission failed shortly after lift-off due to a fuel leak and engine fire. A second launch followed in March 2007. Although the rocket performed better, it still failed to reach orbit. The third attempt came in August 2008. This launch got closer than the previous two, but a stage separation issue caused another failure. By then, SpaceX had spent years developing its technology without achieving its main goal.<h2>The fourth launch changed the company's future</h2>After three failures, many companies would have struggled to continue. SpaceX pressed ahead with a fourth Falcon 1 launch on September 28, 2008. This time, the mission succeeded. The rocket became the first privately developed liquid-fuel rocket to reach Earth orbit. The achievement was widely seen as a turning point for the commercial space industry. The success arrived at a crucial moment. Musk later revealed that both SpaceX and Tesla were under significant financial pressure during 2008, with resources becoming increasingly limited.<h2>From survival mode to a space industry leader</h2>The successful Falcon 1 mission helped prove that SpaceX's technology worked. In the years that followed, the company developed the Falcon 9 rocket, Dragon spacecraft and the Starlink satellite internet network. It also became a major partner of NASA.Today, SpaceX carries astronauts into orbit, launches satellites for customers around the world and plays a key role in the growing commercial space sector. Its public listing in 2026 marked another milestone. The company entered the market with a valuation measured in trillions of dollars, making it one of the most valuable firms in the world. The listing also boosted Musk's fortune, cementing his position as the world's richest person.<h2>Why those early failures still matter</h2>SpaceX's story is often cited as an example of persistence in the face of repeated setbacks.The company failed three consecutive Falcon 1 launches before finally reaching orbit on its fourth attempt. Today, that fourth launch is remembered as one of the most important moments in SpaceX's history. Without it, the company that now launches astronauts, operates thousands of satellites and commands a trillion-dollar valuation might never have survived.

Before becoming one of the world's most valuable companies, SpaceX endured three failed Falcon 1 launches. Its breakthrough came on the fourth attempt in 2008, a mission that helped transform the company and changed the future of commercial spaceflight.

SpaceX is now one of the biggest names in the space industry. The company recently made history with its public listing, becoming one of the world's most valuable businesses and helping push Elon Musk's wealth to record levels. Before the company successfully reached orbit, it suffered three consecutive rocket failures. By 2008, money was running low, pressure was mounting and the future of the company depended on one final attempt. SpaceX's first three launches all failed Founded in 2002 by Elon Musk, SpaceX set out to reduce the cost of space travel and challenge an industry long dominated by governments and large aerospace firms. The company's first rocket, Falcon 1, was designed as a small, relatively low-cost launch vehicle. Its first launch took place in March 2006. The mission failed shortly after lift-off due to a fuel leak and engine fire. A second launch followed in March 2007. Although the rocket performed better, it still failed to reach orbit. The third attempt came in August 2008. This launch got closer than the previous two, but a stage separation issue caused another failure. By then, SpaceX had spent years developing its technology without achieving its main goal. The fourth launch changed the company's future After three failures, many companies would have struggled to continue. SpaceX pressed ahead with a fourth Falcon 1 launch on September 28, 2008. This time, the mission succeeded. The rocket became the first privately developed liquid-fuel rocket to reach Earth orbit. The achievement was widely seen as a turning point for the commercial space industry. The success arrived at a crucial moment. Musk later revealed that both SpaceX and Tesla were under significant financial pressure during 2008, with resources becoming increasingly limited. From survival mode to a space industry leader The successful Falcon 1 mission helped prove that SpaceX's technology worked. In the years that followed, the company developed the Falcon 9 rocket, Dragon spacecraft and the Starlink satellite internet network. It also became a major partner of NASA. Today, SpaceX carries astronauts into orbit, launches satellites for customers around the world and plays a key role in the growing commercial space sector. Its public listing in 2026 marked another milestone. The company entered the market with a valuation measured in trillions of dollars, making it one of the most valuable firms in the world. The listing also boosted Musk's fortune, cementing his position as the world's richest person. Why those early failures still matter SpaceX's story is often cited as an example of persistence in the face of repeated setbacks. The company failed three consecutive Falcon 1 launches before finally reaching orbit on its fourth attempt. Today, that fourth launch is remembered as one of the most important moments in SpaceX's history. Without it, the company that now launches astronauts, operates thousands of satellites and commands a trillion-dollar valuation might never have survived.

Before becoming one of the world's most valuable companies, SpaceX endured three failed Falcon 1 launches. Its breakthrough came on the fourth attempt in 2008, a mission that helped transform the company and changed the future of commercial spaceflight.

How many times did SpaceX's rockets fail before their first successful launch?

Today, Elon Musk is the world's richest person and SpaceX is one of the world's most valuable companies. But in 2008, both Musk and SpaceX were running out of money, and one final rocket launch stood between success and failure.&nbsp;Following SpaceX's historic public listing in June 2026, Musk's fortune surged past the trillion-dollar mark, making him the world's first trillionaire. SpaceX itself is valued at well over $1 trillion after its record-breaking market debut.<h2>Yet less than two decades ago, the picture looked very different.</h2>In 2008, Musk was facing what he later described as one of the toughest periods of his life. SpaceX had suffered three consecutive rocket failures, Tesla was struggling financially, and Musk's personal fortune was rapidly shrinking. The entrepreneur who would later dominate the space industry was close to running out of options.&nbsp;Three failed launches and a rapidly shrinking bank accountMusk founded SpaceX in 2002 with about $100 million from the money he earned after PayPal was sold. His goal was ambitious: build cheaper rockets and eventually help humanity become a multi-planetary species.However, the company's early years were marked by repeated setbacks. The first Falcon 1 rocket launch failed in 2006. A second attempt also failed. Then came a third unsuccessful launch in August 2008. Each failure consumed precious money and raised doubts about whether the company could survive. By then, Musk was funding both SpaceX and Tesla. Cash was running low and investors were becoming nervous.<h2>The launch that changed everything</h2>SpaceX's fourth Falcon 1 mission took place on September 28, 2008. Unlike the previous attempts, this launch successfully reached orbit. It marked the first time a privately developed liquid-fuel rocket reached orbit, a milestone that changed how the aerospace industry viewed private space companies. The success arrived at exactly the right moment. According to accounts of SpaceX's early years, the company was under immense financial pressure. Had the fourth launch failed, the future of the company would have been highly uncertain.<h2>How SpaceX went from survival mode to a trillion-dollar giant</h2>The successful Falcon 1 mission helped build confidence in SpaceX and opened the door for future contracts and growth. The company later developed the Falcon 9 rocket, Dragon spacecraft and the Starlink satellite network. Today, SpaceX launches astronauts, delivers cargo to space and operates thousands of internet satellites through Starlink. It has become one of the most influential companies in the global space sector. Its 2026 public listing became the largest IPO in history, valuing the company at around $1.8 trillion and pushing Musk's wealth above $1 trillion.<h2>How quickly fortunes can change</h2>The story of SpaceX's early years remains one of the most dramatic chapters in modern business history. A company that was struggling to keep its rockets flying in 2008 is now among the world's most valuable firms. For Musk, the difference between failure and success may have come down to a single launch. Had Falcon 1's fourth flight failed, the history of SpaceX and perhaps the modern commercial space industry could have looked very different.

Today, Elon Musk is the world's richest person and SpaceX is one of the world's most valuable companies. But in 2008, both Musk and SpaceX were running out of money, and one final rocket launch stood between success and failure.

Today, Elon Musk is the world's richest person and SpaceX is one of the world's most valuable companies. But in 2008, both Musk and SpaceX were running out of money, and one final rocket launch stood between success and failure. Following SpaceX's historic public listing in June 2026, Musk's fortune surged past the trillion-dollar mark, making him the world's first trillionaire. SpaceX itself is valued at well over $1 trillion after its record-breaking market debut. Yet less than two decades ago, the picture looked very different. In 2008, Musk was facing what he later described as one of the toughest periods of his life. SpaceX had suffered three consecutive rocket failures, Tesla was struggling financially, and Musk's personal fortune was rapidly shrinking. The entrepreneur who would later dominate the space industry was close to running out of options. Three failed launches and a rapidly shrinking bank account Musk founded SpaceX in 2002 with about $100 million from the money he earned after PayPal was sold. His goal was ambitious: build cheaper rockets and eventually help humanity become a multi-planetary species. However, the company's early years were marked by repeated setbacks. The first Falcon 1 rocket launch failed in 2006. A second attempt also failed. Then came a third unsuccessful launch in August 2008. Each failure consumed precious money and raised doubts about whether the company could survive. By then, Musk was funding both SpaceX and Tesla. Cash was running low and investors were becoming nervous. The launch that changed everything SpaceX's fourth Falcon 1 mission took place on September 28, 2008. Unlike the previous attempts, this launch successfully reached orbit. It marked the first time a privately developed liquid-fuel rocket reached orbit, a milestone that changed how the aerospace industry viewed private space companies. The success arrived at exactly the right moment. According to accounts of SpaceX's early years, the company was under immense financial pressure. Had the fourth launch failed, the future of the company would have been highly uncertain. How SpaceX went from survival mode to a trillion-dollar giant The successful Falcon 1 mission helped build confidence in SpaceX and opened the door for future contracts and growth. The company later developed the Falcon 9 rocket, Dragon spacecraft and the Starlink satellite network. Today, SpaceX launches astronauts, delivers cargo to space and operates thousands of internet satellites through Starlink. It has become one of the most influential companies in the global space sector. Its 2026 public listing became the largest IPO in history, valuing the company at around $1.8 trillion and pushing Musk's wealth above $1 trillion. How quickly fortunes can change The story of SpaceX's early years remains one of the most dramatic chapters in modern business history. A company that was struggling to keep its rockets flying in 2008 is now among the world's most valuable firms. For Musk, the difference between failure and success may have come down to a single launch. Had Falcon 1's fourth flight failed, the history of SpaceX and perhaps the modern commercial space industry could have looked very different.

Today, Elon Musk is the world's richest person and SpaceX is one of the world's most valuable companies. But in 2008, both Musk and SpaceX were running out of money, and one final rocket launch stood between success and failure.

Three failed rockets, shrinking cash: How close was Elon Musk to losing everything before SpaceX finally succeeded?

Ministers in the UK have been warned that doctors and the NHS could be sued for medical negligence over errors made by artificial intelligence tools used in diagnosing patients and recommending treatment. Under current laws, medics and the health service may still be held liable for patients suffering harm or dying as a result of mistakes made by AI tools. In a report, the Medical Protection Society (MPS), which supports doctors facing professional complaints and legal claims, warned that clinicians risk becoming a “liability sink” for AI-related errors unless legal frameworks are updated. The warning comes as the NHS increasingly adopts AI technologies for tasks such as interpreting scans and X-rays, producing summaries of doctor-patient consultations, and drafting correspondence for patients. “The law has always struggled to keep up with technological change. But with AI, the pace of change is so rapid that this gap feels less like a step and more like a widening gulf,” said Dr Sarah Townley, the MPS’s deputy medical director. Citing an example of a possible error made by AI tools, the MPS stated that this technology could miss a tumour in a patient’s lung while reading an X-ray of their chest. As a result, this mistake could lead to the death of the patient, as the false reassurance from the AI would mean no treatment would be given, resulting in the spread of cancer.&nbsp;Also read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/opinions/can-ai-be-your-best-friend-chatgpt-claude-gemini-and-real-humans-respond-1780904234395"> National Best Friends Day: Can AI be your best friend? ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini — and real humans respond</a><h3>Serious consequences of AI</h3>MPS also highlighted that patients could face serious consequences if AI systems make incorrect treatment recommendations. For example, a patient might require surgery and intensive care for severe bleeding if an AI tool mistakenly advised increasing the dosage of warfarin, a blood-thinning medication commonly prescribed for atrial fibrillation. According to the MPS, such cases present a genuine risk of legal action being taken against doctors who rely on AI-assisted tools in clinical decision-making. “Under the current product liability framework in the UK, there is a risk that clinical negligence claims could be brought against the clinicians in these cases and that they would be held wholly liable,” it warns. To address these concerns, the organisation has urged the government to classify AI systems as products under the Consumer Protection Act 1987. It argues that such a move would shift responsibility for AI-related errors towards developers and manufacturers, reducing the legal burden on doctors and the NHS. The MPS also warned that growing concerns among healthcare professionals about being held accountable for AI mistakes could undermine public confidence in the medical profession unless clearer liability rules are introduced. “Innovation and patient safety should move forward together. If AI is advancing at Formula One speed, then legislation, regulation and governance cannot be left sitting in the pit lane,” said Dr Ragit Varia, the president-elect of the Society for Acute Medicine. “Clinicians should not find themselves holding a liability hot potato when decisions have been influenced by AI systems developed, supplied and implemented by others without the appropriate structure. We must avoid creating an accountability vacuum where responsibility for harm is unclear.” Meanwhile, the Department of Health and Social Care said that NHS Resolution, the body responsible for handling negligence claims against NHS trusts in England, is drafting guidelines related to AI liability. “We welcome the MPS’s report and will review its recommendations to ensure patients continue receiving the benefits of AI in healthcare safely and quickly,” a DHSC spokesperson said. &nbsp;

The MPS stated that this technology could miss a tumour in a patient’s lung while reading an X-ray of their chest. As a result, this mistake could lead to the death of the patient, as the false reassurance from the AI would mean no treatment would be given, resulting in the spread of cancer.

Ministers in the UK have been warned that doctors and the NHS could be sued for medical negligence over errors made by artificial intelligence tools used in diagnosing patients and recommending treatment. Under current laws, medics and the health service may still be held liable for patients suffering harm or dying as a result of mistakes made by AI tools. In a report, the Medical Protection Society (MPS), which supports doctors facing professional complaints and legal claims, warned that clinicians risk becoming a “liability sink” for AI-related errors unless legal frameworks are updated. The warning comes as the NHS increasingly adopts AI technologies for tasks such as interpreting scans and X-rays, producing summaries of doctor-patient consultations, and drafting correspondence for patients. “The law has always struggled to keep up with technological change. But with AI, the pace of change is so rapid that this gap feels less like a step and more like a widening gulf,” said Dr Sarah Townley, the MPS’s deputy medical director. Citing an example of a possible error made by AI tools, the MPS stated that this technology could miss a tumour in a patient’s lung while reading an X-ray of their chest. As a result, this mistake could lead to the death of the patient, as the false reassurance from the AI would mean no treatment would be given, resulting in the spread of cancer. Also read: National Best Friends Day: Can AI be your best friend? ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini — and real humans respond Serious consequences of AI MPS also highlighted that patients could face serious consequences if AI systems make incorrect treatment recommendations. For example, a patient might require surgery and intensive care for severe bleeding if an AI tool mistakenly advised increasing the dosage of warfarin, a blood-thinning medication commonly prescribed for atrial fibrillation. According to the MPS, such cases present a genuine risk of legal action being taken against doctors who rely on AI-assisted tools in clinical decision-making. “Under the current product liability framework in the UK, there is a risk that clinical negligence claims could be brought against the clinicians in these cases and that they would be held wholly liable,” it warns. To address these concerns, the organisation has urged the government to classify AI systems as products under the Consumer Protection Act 1987. It argues that such a move would shift responsibility for AI-related errors towards developers and manufacturers, reducing the legal burden on doctors and the NHS. The MPS also warned that growing concerns among healthcare professionals about being held accountable for AI mistakes could undermine public confidence in the medical profession unless clearer liability rules are introduced. “Innovation and patient safety should move forward together. If AI is advancing at Formula One speed, then legislation, regulation and governance cannot be left sitting in the pit lane,” said Dr Ragit Varia, the president-elect of the Society for Acute Medicine. “Clinicians should not find themselves holding a liability hot potato when decisions have been influenced by AI systems developed, supplied and implemented by others without the appropriate structure. We must avoid creating an accountability vacuum where responsibility for harm is unclear.” Meanwhile, the Department of Health and Social Care said that NHS Resolution, the body responsible for handling negligence claims against NHS trusts in England, is drafting guidelines related to AI liability. “We welcome the MPS’s report and will review its recommendations to ensure patients continue receiving the benefits of AI in healthcare safely and quickly,” a DHSC spokesperson said.

The MPS stated that this technology could miss a tumour in a patient’s lung while reading an X-ray of their chest. As a result, this mistake could lead to the death of the patient, as the false reassurance from the AI would mean no treatment would be given, resulting in the spread of cancer.

Doctors and NHS could be sued for AI-driven diagnosis errors in UK? Here's what report warns

Scientists have discovered a strange anomaly in the North Atlantic, situated south of Greenland, where a 'cold blob' of ocean and air is cooling down while the rest of the world is experiencing a rise in temperature. Researchers used satellite data, multiple reanalysis records, and ocean heat content data extending back to 1955, in order to figure out the driving forces behind the blob. Up to this point, scientists have long debated two possible causes behind the Atlantic Ocean's "cold blob": either reduced heat transport into the region by ocean currents or increased heat loss from the ocean surface. The latest findings support the former theory, suggesting results support the first explanation, and they conclude that we're now very close to a dangerous tipping point. The study links the cold patch to a weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), a major ocean current system that appears to be edging closer to a potential collapse. Researchers warn that such a shutdown could have far-reaching global consequences beyond the cooling observed in the North Atlantic. "Given the well-established existence of a tipping point of the AMOC, as well as recent studies finding a range of different 'early warning signals' of the ocean circulation approaching such a tipping point, the strong evidence for a weakening AMOC is a serious concern for society and policy," the researchers wrote in a published paper.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/straight-out-of-science-fiction-scientists-want-to-spray-a-giant-shield-to-protect-earth-from-solar-storms-bizarre-science-news-1781081111671">Could chemicals sprayed around Earth stop dangerous solar storms? New study suggests it might</a><h3>Deep ocean currents drive surface heat loss</h3>Their analysis found that the cooling is driven by changes in deep ocean currents rather than heat escaping from the surface. In fact, surface heat loss in the region has declined, indicating that the main issue is a reduced inflow of warm water. Because the cold blob lies at the northern end of the AMOC's vast ocean conveyor belt, a slowdown in the system would naturally result in lower temperatures there, as less warm water is transported northward from tropical and equatorial regions. The new findings give us a few of the best pieces of evidence yet that the cold blob and this vast ocean current are directly interconnected. "The observed cooling trend cannot be explained by surface heat flux changes," write the authors of this new study. "Multidecadal heat content variations are generally larger and more tightly correlated with ocean heat transport than with surface heat flux variability." Most scientists agree that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is gradually approaching closer to a critical point and could eventually cease functioning altogether. Rising ocean water temperatures, coupled with melting glaciers (which release freshwater into the oceans), are disrupting the balance that drives the current system. A complete collapse of the AMOC could trigger far-reaching impacts, including much colder, harsher winters, with significant changes in global weather patterns, ecosystems, and food security across Europe. "While large uncertainty remains over how close the Earth is to this tipping point, standard CMIP6 simulations of future global warming scenarios suggest it is crossed in a substantial subset of these model simulations around the middle of this century," write the researchers. Since 2004, the current system has been directly monitored, leaving scientists with a very small record to clearly find out the long-term trajectory of its recent weakening.

Scientists found a "cold blob" in the North Atlantic cooling despite global warming, driven by a weakening Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) current system. Data since 1955 shows reduced warm water inflow, warning of a potential weather-altering tipping point by mid-century.

Scientists have discovered a strange anomaly in the North Atlantic, situated south of Greenland, where a 'cold blob' of ocean and air is cooling down while the rest of the world is experiencing a rise in temperature. Researchers used satellite data, multiple reanalysis records, and ocean heat content data extending back to 1955, in order to figure out the driving forces behind the blob. Up to this point, scientists have long debated two possible causes behind the Atlantic Ocean's "cold blob": either reduced heat transport into the region by ocean currents or increased heat loss from the ocean surface. The latest findings support the former theory, suggesting results support the first explanation, and they conclude that we're now very close to a dangerous tipping point. The study links the cold patch to a weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), a major ocean current system that appears to be edging closer to a potential collapse. Researchers warn that such a shutdown could have far-reaching global consequences beyond the cooling observed in the North Atlantic. "Given the well-established existence of a tipping point of the AMOC, as well as recent studies finding a range of different 'early warning signals' of the ocean circulation approaching such a tipping point, the strong evidence for a weakening AMOC is a serious concern for society and policy," the researchers wrote in a published paper. Also read: Could chemicals sprayed around Earth stop dangerous solar storms? New study suggests it might Deep ocean currents drive surface heat loss Their analysis found that the cooling is driven by changes in deep ocean currents rather than heat escaping from the surface. In fact, surface heat loss in the region has declined, indicating that the main issue is a reduced inflow of warm water. Because the cold blob lies at the northern end of the AMOC's vast ocean conveyor belt, a slowdown in the system would naturally result in lower temperatures there, as less warm water is transported northward from tropical and equatorial regions. The new findings give us a few of the best pieces of evidence yet that the cold blob and this vast ocean current are directly interconnected. "The observed cooling trend cannot be explained by surface heat flux changes," write the authors of this new study. "Multidecadal heat content variations are generally larger and more tightly correlated with ocean heat transport than with surface heat flux variability." Most scientists agree that the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is gradually approaching closer to a critical point and could eventually cease functioning altogether. Rising ocean water temperatures, coupled with melting glaciers (which release freshwater into the oceans), are disrupting the balance that drives the current system. A complete collapse of the AMOC could trigger far-reaching impacts, including much colder, harsher winters, with significant changes in global weather patterns, ecosystems, and food security across Europe. "While large uncertainty remains over how close the Earth is to this tipping point, standard CMIP6 simulations of future global warming scenarios suggest it is crossed in a substantial subset of these model simulations around the middle of this century," write the researchers. Since 2004, the current system has been directly monitored, leaving scientists with a very small record to clearly find out the long-term trajectory of its recent weakening.

Scientists found a "cold blob" in the North Atlantic cooling despite global warming, driven by a weakening Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) current system. Data since 1955 shows reduced warm water inflow, warning of a potential weather-altering tipping point by mid-century.

Mysterious North Atlantic 'cold blob' signals growing risk of major ocean current collapse: What's happening?

Scientists have uncovered what may be the largest, deepest and oldest whale graveyard ever discovered. The graveyard, as per newly published research, lies hidden more than seven kilometres beneath the surface of the south-eastern Indian Ocean. What's more remarkable about the find is that it includes hundreds of whale fossils dating back over five million years. Scientists also found modern whale carcasses that they said continue to support thriving deep-sea ecosystems in one of the most extreme environments on Earth.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/straight-out-of-science-fiction-scientists-want-to-spray-a-giant-shield-to-protect-earth-from-solar-storms-bizarre-science-news-1781081111671">Straight out of science fiction: Scientists want to 'spray' a giant shield to protect Earth from solar storms</a><h2>Where is the whale graveyard?</h2>The discovery was made in the Diamantina Fracture Zone, a vast network of trenches and ridges formed tens of millions of years ago as Australia and Antarctica drifted apart. Using a deep-sea submersible, an international team of researchers from China, Italy and New Zealand explored the region and documented an astonishing concentration of whale remains scattered across the ocean floor.Whale falls, the remains of whales that sink to the seabed after death, are known to create temporary ecosystems that sustain a wide range of marine life. Most previously documented whale falls have been found at depths shallower than 4,000 metres. The newly discovered site extends to depths of more than 7,000 metres, making it the deepest whale-fall ecosystem ever recorded.Researchers identified 485 fossil whale sites and five modern whale falls in advanced stages of decomposition. The remains were spread across a 1,200-kilometre corridor, leading scientists to describe the area as a previously unrecognised "whale-fall community supercorridor."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/fact-check-did-israeli-troops-shoot-a-7-month-old-baby-shocking-new-video-challenges-idf-account-watch-1781161317025">Fact Check: Did Israeli troops shoot a 7-month-old baby? Shocking new video challenges IDF account</a><h2>Extinct whales found</h2>Among the discoveries were fossils from extinct whale species, including a 5.3-million-year-old skull belonging to the beaked whale species Pterocetus benguelae. The team also identified a previously unknown species, which they named Pterocetus diamantinae.The modern whale carcasses were far from lifeless, suggests the research published in Nature. Researchers found them supporting dense communities of organisms including crustaceans, molluscs, brittle stars and bone-eating worms. Many of these species may be entirely new to science.<h2>Why it matters</h2>Scientists say the discovery highlights how little is known about life in the deep ocean. The extreme conditions of the site, where sunlight never penetrates, and water pressure reaches crushing levels, were once thought to limit biodiversity. Instead, the findings suggest these remote habitats may host complex ecosystems that have remained hidden for millions of years.

An international team of scientists has discovered what may be the largest, deepest and oldest whale graveyard ever found. Hidden beneath the south-eastern Indian Ocean, the site contains hundreds of whale fossils dating back more than five million years.

Scientists have uncovered what may be the largest, deepest and oldest whale graveyard ever discovered. The graveyard, as per newly published research, lies hidden more than seven kilometres beneath the surface of the south-eastern Indian Ocean. What's more remarkable about the find is that it includes hundreds of whale fossils dating back over five million years. Scientists also found modern whale carcasses that they said continue to support thriving deep-sea ecosystems in one of the most extreme environments on Earth. Also read | Straight out of science fiction: Scientists want to 'spray' a giant shield to protect Earth from solar storms Where is the whale graveyard? The discovery was made in the Diamantina Fracture Zone, a vast network of trenches and ridges formed tens of millions of years ago as Australia and Antarctica drifted apart. Using a deep-sea submersible, an international team of researchers from China, Italy and New Zealand explored the region and documented an astonishing concentration of whale remains scattered across the ocean floor. Whale falls, the remains of whales that sink to the seabed after death, are known to create temporary ecosystems that sustain a wide range of marine life. Most previously documented whale falls have been found at depths shallower than 4,000 metres. The newly discovered site extends to depths of more than 7,000 metres, making it the deepest whale-fall ecosystem ever recorded. Researchers identified 485 fossil whale sites and five modern whale falls in advanced stages of decomposition. The remains were spread across a 1,200-kilometre corridor, leading scientists to describe the area as a previously unrecognised "whale-fall community supercorridor." Also read | Fact Check: Did Israeli troops shoot a 7-month-old baby? Shocking new video challenges IDF account Extinct whales found Among the discoveries were fossils from extinct whale species, including a 5.3-million-year-old skull belonging to the beaked whale species Pterocetus benguelae. The team also identified a previously unknown species, which they named Pterocetus diamantinae. The modern whale carcasses were far from lifeless, suggests the research published in Nature. Researchers found them supporting dense communities of organisms including crustaceans, molluscs, brittle stars and bone-eating worms. Many of these species may be entirely new to science. Why it matters Scientists say the discovery highlights how little is known about life in the deep ocean. The extreme conditions of the site, where sunlight never penetrates, and water pressure reaches crushing levels, were once thought to limit biodiversity. Instead, the findings suggest these remote habitats may host complex ecosystems that have remained hidden for millions of years.

An international team of scientists has discovered what may be the largest, deepest and oldest whale graveyard ever found. Hidden beneath the south-eastern Indian Ocean, the site contains hundreds of whale fossils dating back more than five million years.

Scientists discover world's largest 'whale graveyard' hidden 7km beneath the Indian Ocean

Astronomers have detected an unprecedented cosmic tempest in the deep universe. A distant quasar, powered by a feeding supermassive black hole, is blasting out galactic winds at a staggering 30% of the speed of light. Clocking in at approximately 201 million miles per hour (323 million kilometres per hour), this outbound torrent stands as the fastest black hole wind ever observed, specifically within ultraviolet wavelengths.&nbsp;To put these extreme speeds into a terrestrial context, researchers have looked to the Saffir-Simpson scale used to measure tropical cyclones on Earth. While a standard Category 5 hurricane features devastating sustained winds of 157 mph or higher, the sheer velocity of this deep-space outflow operates on an entirely different scale, says a study published in The Astrophysical Journal.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/straight-out-of-science-fiction-scientists-want-to-spray-a-giant-shield-to-protect-earth-from-solar-storms-bizarre-science-news-1781081111671">Giant shield around Earth? Scientists propose bizarre plan to stop solar storms</a>&nbsp;"In terms of its speed, this quasar's wind could be called a category 79 hurricane," said Lucas Seaton, the team leader and a researcher from York University, in a statement published by York U. The colossal engine driving this record-breaking phenomenon is a quasar known as J2318. Located roughly 3 billion light-years away from Earth, J2318 is an active galactic nucleus, a hyper-luminous region at the centre of a galaxy where a supermassive black hole aggressively devours surrounding matter.<h2>Why Black Hole winds matter</h2>&nbsp;Supermassive black holes do not just consume matter; their powerful feedback mechanisms actively reshape their host environments. Active galactic nuclei (AGN) routinely expel massive amounts of energy back into their host galaxies.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/next-weight-loss-breakthrough-astrazeneca-tests-a-daily-pill-1780986473092">Next weight-loss breakthrough? AstraZeneca tests a daily pill</a>&nbsp;When black hole winds reach extreme speeds like those clocked in J2318, they can clear vast reservoirs of cold gas out of the host galaxy's central regions. Because this cold gas is the foundational ingredient needed to form new stars, these high-velocity winds effectively "quench" star formation, steering the structural evolution of the entire galaxy.By studying outliers like J2318, astrophysicists gain a clearer understanding of the boundary limits of black hole accretion and the profound, tempestuous relationship between a galaxy and its central behemoth.

Astronomers detect the fastest black hole winds ever recorded, tearing through space at an astonishing 30% of the speed of light.

Astronomers have detected an unprecedented cosmic tempest in the deep universe. A distant quasar, powered by a feeding supermassive black hole, is blasting out galactic winds at a staggering 30% of the speed of light. Clocking in at approximately 201 million miles per hour (323 million kilometres per hour), this outbound torrent stands as the fastest black hole wind ever observed, specifically within ultraviolet wavelengths. To put these extreme speeds into a terrestrial context, researchers have looked to the Saffir-Simpson scale used to measure tropical cyclones on Earth. While a standard Category 5 hurricane features devastating sustained winds of 157 mph or higher, the sheer velocity of this deep-space outflow operates on an entirely different scale, says a study published in The Astrophysical Journal. Also read: Giant shield around Earth? Scientists propose bizarre plan to stop solar storms "In terms of its speed, this quasar's wind could be called a category 79 hurricane," said Lucas Seaton, the team leader and a researcher from York University, in a statement published by York U. The colossal engine driving this record-breaking phenomenon is a quasar known as J2318. Located roughly 3 billion light-years away from Earth, J2318 is an active galactic nucleus, a hyper-luminous region at the centre of a galaxy where a supermassive black hole aggressively devours surrounding matter. Why Black Hole winds matter Supermassive black holes do not just consume matter; their powerful feedback mechanisms actively reshape their host environments. Active galactic nuclei (AGN) routinely expel massive amounts of energy back into their host galaxies. Also read: Next weight-loss breakthrough? AstraZeneca tests a daily pill When black hole winds reach extreme speeds like those clocked in J2318, they can clear vast reservoirs of cold gas out of the host galaxy's central regions. Because this cold gas is the foundational ingredient needed to form new stars, these high-velocity winds effectively "quench" star formation, steering the structural evolution of the entire galaxy. By studying outliers like J2318, astrophysicists gain a clearer understanding of the boundary limits of black hole accretion and the profound, tempestuous relationship between a galaxy and its central behemoth.

Astronomers detect the fastest black hole winds ever recorded, tearing through space at an astonishing 30% of the speed of light.

Cosmic Tempest: Record-breaking black hole winds clocked at 30% the speed of light

Scientists have come up with an ingenious plan to protect our planet Earth from dangerous solar storms. They want to spray chemicals around the rock we call home. This, they suggest, could help deflect the brunt of the Sun's dangerous charged particles. The ambitious plan was developed by a team of researchers from Boston University and the University of Michigan, and the research was published in <a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2025SW004846">Space Weather</a>.<h2>Solar storms and Earth</h2>For decades, humanity's strategy for dealing with dangerous solar storms has been simple: predict them and prepare for the fallout. But the new scientific proposal suggests that future generations may be able to do something far more ambitious: actively strengthen Earth's natural defences before space weather strikes. But how would it happen? All we know.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/in-trump-s-america-more-babies-behind-bars-than-ever-before-report-reveals-horrifying-10-fold-rise-in-ice-detentions-of-infants-1781070307893">More babies behind bars than ever before? Report reveals 10-fold surge in ICE detentions under Trump</a><h2>Enter StormWall</h2>A team led by Brian Walsh of Boston University and consisting of D. T. Welling and Z. Huang of the University of Michigan has unveiled a concept called StormWall, a planetary-scale defence system designed to reinforce Earth's magnetosphere, the invisible magnetic shield that protects the planet from charged particles emitted by the Sun.The idea, detailed through computer simulations, aims to reduce the impact of severe geomagnetic storms that can disrupt satellites, GPS navigation, communications networks and power grids. According to the researchers, the system could cut the intensity of a major solar storm by more than half.The threat stems from a process known as magnetic reconnection. During powerful solar eruptions, magnetic fields carried by the solar wind can temporarily link with Earth's magnetic field, creating a pathway through which vast amounts of solar energy enter near-Earth space. The resulting geomagnetic storms have the potential to cause widespread technological disruptions. StormWall seeks to interfere with that process.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/what-is-the-tower-of-babel-and-why-did-pope-leo-warn-about-it-while-talking-about-ai-wion-decodes-1779790151646">Pope Leo warns humanity risks repeating ancient mistake: What is the Tower of Babel and what does it have to do with AI?</a><h2>But how will StormWall do that?</h2>According to research published in <a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2025SW004846">Space Weather</a>, scientists have proposed sending a fleet of six spacecraft to geosynchronous orbit. This fleet would make up the StormWall.When a dangerous solar storm is detected, the satellites would release specially selected materials such as barium, lithium, sodium or calcium. Once exposed to sunlight, the material would become ionised, creating a cloud of plasma.That artificial plasma would drift toward the sun-facing edge of the magnetosphere, effectively thickening the boundary that separates Earth from the incoming solar wind. By adding mass to this region, researchers believe the efficiency of magnetic reconnection could be significantly reduced.<h2>Have they tested it?</h2>To test the concept, the team simulated the powerful Mother's Day geomagnetic storm of May 2024. Their results suggested that while StormWall would not eliminate a storm entirely, it could reduce its strength by more than 50 per cent.The proposal remains theoretical and would require substantial investment. The spacecraft would collectively have to carry material equivalent to roughly a dozen oil trucks, and each deployment would be a one-time use. "If you built it, if it was deployed, it would help all people on the planet," said lead researcher Walsh in a statement. "You couldn't make it in a way that helped only one country, one group of satellites."

Researchers from Boston University have proposed StormWall, a spacecraft-based system that would release ionised materials into space to strengthen Earth's magnetosphere and reduce the impact of solar storms.

Scientists have come up with an ingenious plan to protect our planet Earth from dangerous solar storms. They want to spray chemicals around the rock we call home. This, they suggest, could help deflect the brunt of the Sun's dangerous charged particles. The ambitious plan was developed by a team of researchers from Boston University and the University of Michigan, and the research was published in Space Weather. Solar storms and Earth For decades, humanity's strategy for dealing with dangerous solar storms has been simple: predict them and prepare for the fallout. But the new scientific proposal suggests that future generations may be able to do something far more ambitious: actively strengthen Earth's natural defences before space weather strikes. But how would it happen? All we know. Also read | More babies behind bars than ever before? Report reveals 10-fold surge in ICE detentions under Trump Enter StormWall A team led by Brian Walsh of Boston University and consisting of D. T. Welling and Z. Huang of the University of Michigan has unveiled a concept called StormWall, a planetary-scale defence system designed to reinforce Earth's magnetosphere, the invisible magnetic shield that protects the planet from charged particles emitted by the Sun. The idea, detailed through computer simulations, aims to reduce the impact of severe geomagnetic storms that can disrupt satellites, GPS navigation, communications networks and power grids. According to the researchers, the system could cut the intensity of a major solar storm by more than half. The threat stems from a process known as magnetic reconnection. During powerful solar eruptions, magnetic fields carried by the solar wind can temporarily link with Earth's magnetic field, creating a pathway through which vast amounts of solar energy enter near-Earth space. The resulting geomagnetic storms have the potential to cause widespread technological disruptions. StormWall seeks to interfere with that process. Also read | Pope Leo warns humanity risks repeating ancient mistake: What is the Tower of Babel and what does it have to do with AI? But how will StormWall do that? According to research published in Space Weather, scientists have proposed sending a fleet of six spacecraft to geosynchronous orbit. This fleet would make up the StormWall. When a dangerous solar storm is detected, the satellites would release specially selected materials such as barium, lithium, sodium or calcium. Once exposed to sunlight, the material would become ionised, creating a cloud of plasma. That artificial plasma would drift toward the sun-facing edge of the magnetosphere, effectively thickening the boundary that separates Earth from the incoming solar wind. By adding mass to this region, researchers believe the efficiency of magnetic reconnection could be significantly reduced. Have they tested it? To test the concept, the team simulated the powerful Mother's Day geomagnetic storm of May 2024. Their results suggested that while StormWall would not eliminate a storm entirely, it could reduce its strength by more than 50 per cent. The proposal remains theoretical and would require substantial investment. The spacecraft would collectively have to carry material equivalent to roughly a dozen oil trucks, and each deployment would be a one-time use. "If you built it, if it was deployed, it would help all people on the planet," said lead researcher Walsh in a statement. "You couldn't make it in a way that helped only one country, one group of satellites."

What if humanity could weaken a solar storm before it strikes Earth? Scientists have unveiled StormWall, a radical proposal involving six spacecraft that would ‘spray’ chemicals around Earth to reduce the impact of dangerous space weather. Here's how it would work.

Could chemicals sprayed around Earth stop dangerous solar storms? New study suggests it might

Does coffee make you feel calm or sleepy? You are not alone. While many people feel a burst of energy after drinking coffee and other caffeinated drinks, it is not the case with everyone. Coffee may have a completely opposite reaction for some people, who may feel calm, relaxed, or even sleepy. While this may sound absurd to many, science reveals that it is actually quite possible. In fact, there are several biological explanations for how caffeinated drinks affect individuals differently.<h2>The biggest myth about coffee</h2>One of the biggest myths about coffee is that it gives a person energy. In reality, caffeine works by blocking a brain chemical, adenosine, which builds up in the brain during the day and produces an effect of tiredness. Caffeine affects the body and brain in such a way that it blocks the receptors for adenosine and prevents sending signals of fatigue to the brain. This provides an effect of increased energy by covering the feelings of tiredness.<h2>Caffeine rebound effect</h2>The next question arises about what happens to the adenosine when it is blocked by caffeine. Even when caffeine is blocking the adenosine receptors, the body continues producing it. Soon, when the effect wears off, the accumulated adenosine gets attached to its receptors. This phenomenon, often referred to as an adenosine rebound, can cause fatigue and sluggishness. For some people, especially those who are already sleep-deprived, the rebound effect may happen relatively quickly, making it seem as though coffee itself caused drowsiness.Also read |<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/greenwashing-are-we-being-fooled-into-buying-eco-friendly-products-that-aren-t-wion-decodes-1780663414074"> Greenwashing: Are we being fooled into buying eco-friendly products that aren’t? WION Decodes</a><h2>Can genes determine how coffee affects you?</h2>Absolutely, yes. Your genes can have an impact on the caffeine sensitivity of your body as they can determine the metabolic rate of caffeine in your body and its response from the brain.One such important gene is CYP1A2, which impacts the metabolism of caffeine in the liver. For individuals who metabolise caffeine faster, the effects would last for a much shorter period of time, and they would feel drowsy very soon. On the other hand, for individuals who metabolise it slowly, the effect may remain for much longer.Another gene, ADORA2A, affects adenosine receptors that determine the sensitivity of an individual to caffeine. The differences in these genes could have a major influence on how one feels after consuming coffee.<h2>Why coffee can feel calming</h2>Coffee can also indirectly influence dopamine, a neurotransmitter that regulates attention, motivation, and reward behaviours. In some individuals, especially those who have issues with being distracted or mentally overstimulated, caffeine intake can boost concentration and help declutter the brain. In this case, caffeine can help individuals feel more focused and calm rather than making them excited or jittery. Coffee does not make people sleepier, but it can increase the brain efficiency levels.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/the-science-behind-why-you-keep-scrolling-and-how-it-rewires-your-brain-1781455009989">The science behind why you keep scrolling – and how it rewires your brain</a><h2>Caffeine and ADHD</h2>The scientific community has already observed how individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) react differently to caffeine. Even though caffeine is not used in medical treatments for ADHD, it can influence the pathways regulated by dopamine.Caffeine can having a calming effect for majority of people with ADHD and also improve their concentration. Some may also feel drowsy after caffeine consumption. Despite the unclear reasons why stimulants have a relaxing effect on individuals with ADHD, such a phenomenon was also observed among prescribed stimulant drugs.<h2>Caffeine tolerance</h2>Your response to coffee may also depend on your caffeine tolerance levels. People who consume coffee on a regular basis experience less stimulating effects compared to infrequent consumers. This is because over time, the brain adapts to repeated caffeine exposure by adjusting its adenosine system. Consequently, a morning cup of coffee won’t have the ability to energise and stimulate you anymore, but will simply return your body to the average level of alertness.<h2>The bottom line</h2>One of the largest myths associated with caffeine is the notion that everyone should be able to stay awake after consuming coffee. Coffee is known to help people to become more alert; however, there is no predictability in its effects. While some people are energised after drinking coffee, others are calmer and more concentrated, yet there are those who want to fall asleep instead.Thus, feeling unusually relaxed or sleepy after drinking coffee does not mean that caffeine doesn’t have the desired effects. It might actually indicate something about how your body and mind react to caffeine.WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed</a>&nbsp;

Coffee is often linked to energy and alertness, but not everyone experiences it the same way. Scientists say there are several reasons why caffeine can have surprisingly different effects on people.

Does coffee make you feel calm or sleepy? You are not alone. While many people feel a burst of energy after drinking coffee and other caffeinated drinks, it is not the case with everyone. Coffee may have a completely opposite reaction for some people, who may feel calm, relaxed, or even sleepy. While this may sound absurd to many, science reveals that it is actually quite possible. In fact, there are several biological explanations for how caffeinated drinks affect individuals differently. The biggest myth about coffee One of the biggest myths about coffee is that it gives a person energy. In reality, caffeine works by blocking a brain chemical, adenosine, which builds up in the brain during the day and produces an effect of tiredness. Caffeine affects the body and brain in such a way that it blocks the receptors for adenosine and prevents sending signals of fatigue to the brain. This provides an effect of increased energy by covering the feelings of tiredness. Caffeine rebound effect The next question arises about what happens to the adenosine when it is blocked by caffeine. Even when caffeine is blocking the adenosine receptors, the body continues producing it. Soon, when the effect wears off, the accumulated adenosine gets attached to its receptors. This phenomenon, often referred to as an adenosine rebound, can cause fatigue and sluggishness. For some people, especially those who are already sleep-deprived, the rebound effect may happen relatively quickly, making it seem as though coffee itself caused drowsiness. Also read | Greenwashing: Are we being fooled into buying eco-friendly products that aren’t? WION Decodes Can genes determine how coffee affects you? Absolutely, yes. Your genes can have an impact on the caffeine sensitivity of your body as they can determine the metabolic rate of caffeine in your body and its response from the brain. One such important gene is CYP1A2, which impacts the metabolism of caffeine in the liver. For individuals who metabolise caffeine faster, the effects would last for a much shorter period of time, and they would feel drowsy very soon. On the other hand, for individuals who metabolise it slowly, the effect may remain for much longer. Another gene, ADORA2A, affects adenosine receptors that determine the sensitivity of an individual to caffeine. The differences in these genes could have a major influence on how one feels after consuming coffee. Why coffee can feel calming Coffee can also indirectly influence dopamine, a neurotransmitter that regulates attention, motivation, and reward behaviours. In some individuals, especially those who have issues with being distracted or mentally overstimulated, caffeine intake can boost concentration and help declutter the brain. In this case, caffeine can help individuals feel more focused and calm rather than making them excited or jittery. Coffee does not make people sleepier, but it can increase the brain efficiency levels. Also read | The science behind why you keep scrolling – and how it rewires your brain Caffeine and ADHD The scientific community has already observed how individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) react differently to caffeine. Even though caffeine is not used in medical treatments for ADHD, it can influence the pathways regulated by dopamine. Caffeine can having a calming effect for majority of people with ADHD and also improve their concentration. Some may also feel drowsy after caffeine consumption. Despite the unclear reasons why stimulants have a relaxing effect on individuals with ADHD, such a phenomenon was also observed among prescribed stimulant drugs. Caffeine tolerance Your response to coffee may also depend on your caffeine tolerance levels. People who consume coffee on a regular basis experience less stimulating effects compared to infrequent consumers. This is because over time, the brain adapts to repeated caffeine exposure by adjusting its adenosine system. Consequently, a morning cup of coffee won’t have the ability to energise and stimulate you anymore, but will simply return your body to the average level of alertness. The bottom line One of the largest myths associated with caffeine is the notion that everyone should be able to stay awake after consuming coffee. Coffee is known to help people to become more alert; however, there is no predictability in its effects. While some people are energised after drinking coffee, others are calmer and more concentrated, yet there are those who want to fall asleep instead. Thus, feeling unusually relaxed or sleepy after drinking coffee does not mean that caffeine doesn’t have the desired effects. It might actually indicate something about how your body and mind react to caffeine. WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed

Coffee is often linked to energy and alertness, but not everyone experiences it the same way. Scientists say there are several reasons why caffeine can have surprisingly different effects on people.

WION Decodes | Why does coffee calm some people instead of waking them up? Here’s what science says

A new oral drug developed by British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca could mark the firm's entry into the highly lucrative weight-loss market. According to Phase 2 trial results published in medical journal The Lancet, the pill called 'elepeglitron', helps patients lose weight comparable to other oral GLP-1 drugs. The surging popularity of injectable GLP-1 agonists, which work by suppressing appetite, has triggered an industry-wide race to develop more convenient tablet alternatives. Currently, the multi-billion-dollar market is dominated by Denmark’s Novo Nordisk and America’s Eli Lilly.&nbsp;The randomised trial for elecoglipron involved 310 participants. For overweight or obese adults without diabetes, the highest-dose group achieved average weight reductions of up to 10.5% at 26 weeks and 11.8% at 36 weeks. The side effects recorded during the trial were similar to those of competing GLP-1 pills, with nausea reported as the most common issue.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/not-a-lifestyle-drug-govt-issues-stern-advisory-as-generic-weight-loss-jabs-flood-indian-market-glp-1-receptor-agonist-1774418204024">Not a lifestyle drug: Govt issues stern advisory as generic weight loss jabs flood Indian market</a>&nbsp;Marie Spreckley, a weight management researcher from the University of Cambridge who was not involved in the study, noted that the Phase 2 trial was not primarily designed to compare elecoglipron directly against other anti-obesity medications. She emphasised and was quoted in news agency AFP, “Larger and longer phase 3 trials will therefore be needed to confirm the durability of these effects, establish longer-term safety and tolerability, and determine its place within the growing range of obesity and diabetes treatments.”&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/game-changer-daily-pancreatic-cancer-pill-could-nearly-doubles-survival-time-study-finds-1780316717783">'Game-changer': Daily pancreatic cancer pill could nearly doubles survival time, study finds</a>&nbsp;AstraZeneca faces intense competition, as rivals have already advanced their own tablet options. Eli Lilly’s oral version of its popular drug Mounjaro was approved in the United States in April under the brand name Foundayo. Meanwhile, Novo Nordisk's oral version of its blockbuster drug Wegovy is already available to consumers in the US and recently received regulatory approval from European Union health authorities last month.

AstraZeneca’s daily weight-loss pill elecoglipron delivers 11.8% body weight reduction in a Phase 2 trial, setting up a clash with Novo and Eli Lilly. 

A new oral drug developed by British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca could mark the firm's entry into the highly lucrative weight-loss market. According to Phase 2 trial results published in medical journal The Lancet, the pill called 'elepeglitron', helps patients lose weight comparable to other oral GLP-1 drugs. The surging popularity of injectable GLP-1 agonists, which work by suppressing appetite, has triggered an industry-wide race to develop more convenient tablet alternatives. Currently, the multi-billion-dollar market is dominated by Denmark’s Novo Nordisk and America’s Eli Lilly. The randomised trial for elecoglipron involved 310 participants. For overweight or obese adults without diabetes, the highest-dose group achieved average weight reductions of up to 10.5% at 26 weeks and 11.8% at 36 weeks. The side effects recorded during the trial were similar to those of competing GLP-1 pills, with nausea reported as the most common issue. Also read: Not a lifestyle drug: Govt issues stern advisory as generic weight loss jabs flood Indian market Marie Spreckley, a weight management researcher from the University of Cambridge who was not involved in the study, noted that the Phase 2 trial was not primarily designed to compare elecoglipron directly against other anti-obesity medications. She emphasised and was quoted in news agency AFP, “Larger and longer phase 3 trials will therefore be needed to confirm the durability of these effects, establish longer-term safety and tolerability, and determine its place within the growing range of obesity and diabetes treatments.” Also read: 'Game-changer': Daily pancreatic cancer pill could nearly doubles survival time, study finds AstraZeneca faces intense competition, as rivals have already advanced their own tablet options. Eli Lilly’s oral version of its popular drug Mounjaro was approved in the United States in April under the brand name Foundayo. Meanwhile, Novo Nordisk's oral version of its blockbuster drug Wegovy is already available to consumers in the US and recently received regulatory approval from European Union health authorities last month.

AstraZeneca’s daily weight-loss pill elecoglipron delivers 11.8% body weight reduction in a Phase 2 trial, setting up a clash with Novo and Eli Lilly.

Next weight-loss breakthrough? AstraZeneca tests a daily pill - Elecoglipron

Astronomers are tracking two near-Earth asteroids that will make relatively close approaches to our planet on June 9. The two asteroids, 2026 LD and 2026 KM3, are roughly the size of an airplane. While the term “close approach” may sound alarming, scientists have assured that neither object poses any threat to Earth. Both objects will safely pass the Earth millions of kilometres away.<h2>Asteroid 2026 LD to make closest pass</h2>Estimated to be about 52 metres (170 feet) big, asteroid 2026 LD is expected to pass the Earth at a distance of approximately 1.14 million kilometres (710,000 miles). Although the encounter is considered close in astronomical terms, the asteroid will still remain more than three times farther away than the Moon and poses no risk of collision with our planet.<h2>2026 KM3 to pass at a greater distance</h2>The second asteroid, 2026 KM3, is relatively smaller than the first one, measuring around 34 metres (110 feet) in diameter. It will pass Earth at an even greater distance of roughly 2.35 million kilometres (1.46 million miles). After calculating its trajectory, scientists have said there is zero chance of an impact during this flyby.<h2>Why scientists monitor near-Earth objects</h2>Space agencies continuously track near-Earth objects to better understand their orbits and identify any potential future threats. Even when asteroids are not dangerous, each observation helps in improving prediction models and strengthens planetary defence strategies. Objects that are 30 to 60 metres in size are of particular interest because they could cause significant regional damage if they entered Earth’s atmosphere and struck the surface.<h2>Does the June 9 asteroid pose any threat?</h2>Both asteroids that are set to pass the Earth on June 9 are considered harmless as they are passing at a safe distance and have no risk of collision. These asteroids will offer astronomers an opportunity to study these ancient remnants of the solar system.

Two airplane-sized asteroids, 2026 LD and 2026 KM3, will make close approaches to Earth on June 9, drawing the attention of astronomers worldwide. Do they pose a threat to our planet?

Astronomers are tracking two near-Earth asteroids that will make relatively close approaches to our planet on June 9. The two asteroids, 2026 LD and 2026 KM3, are roughly the size of an airplane. While the term “close approach” may sound alarming, scientists have assured that neither object poses any threat to Earth. Both objects will safely pass the Earth millions of kilometres away. Asteroid 2026 LD to make closest pass Estimated to be about 52 metres (170 feet) big, asteroid 2026 LD is expected to pass the Earth at a distance of approximately 1.14 million kilometres (710,000 miles). Although the encounter is considered close in astronomical terms, the asteroid will still remain more than three times farther away than the Moon and poses no risk of collision with our planet. 2026 KM3 to pass at a greater distance The second asteroid, 2026 KM3, is relatively smaller than the first one, measuring around 34 metres (110 feet) in diameter. It will pass Earth at an even greater distance of roughly 2.35 million kilometres (1.46 million miles). After calculating its trajectory, scientists have said there is zero chance of an impact during this flyby. Why scientists monitor near-Earth objects Space agencies continuously track near-Earth objects to better understand their orbits and identify any potential future threats. Even when asteroids are not dangerous, each observation helps in improving prediction models and strengthens planetary defence strategies. Objects that are 30 to 60 metres in size are of particular interest because they could cause significant regional damage if they entered Earth’s atmosphere and struck the surface. Does the June 9 asteroid pose any threat? Both asteroids that are set to pass the Earth on June 9 are considered harmless as they are passing at a safe distance and have no risk of collision. These asteroids will offer astronomers an opportunity to study these ancient remnants of the solar system.

Two airplane-sized asteroids, 2026 LD and 2026 KM3, will make close approaches to Earth on June 9, drawing the attention of astronomers worldwide. Do they pose a threat to our planet?

Two airplane-sized asteroids are closely approaching Earth on June 9 – Do they pose a threat?

A new study by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that people who incorporate strength in their weekly fitness regimen might survive longer than others. The study suggests that 90-120 minutes of resistance training may be the “sweet spot” required for a lower risk of heart disease, neurological disease, or any cause. Researchers studied 147,374 adults from three long-running US health studies, and subjects were 54 years or older; they reported every two years on strength training and aerobic exercise habits. They defined strength training as things like pushups, squats, lunges, and traditional weightlifting. Over the study period, researchers recorded about 36,000 deaths and examined the relation between strength training habits, both alone and in combination with aerobic activity.&nbsp;The findings were published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.<h2>The Weekly Spot</h2>According to the study, adults who averaged 90 to 119 minutes of strength training per week had a 13 per cent lower risk of death, 27 per cent lower risk of death from neurological diseases, primarily dementia and 19 per cent lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease.&nbsp;“For people who are less active, the key message is that small amounts can still matter. Building a routine gradually may be more important than trying to do a lot at once,” said the authors of the study. Researchers found that the greatest benefit occurs when they combine strength training with aerobic exercise. Adults who combine both have a 45 per cent lower risk of death.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/gandhi-family-asset-or-liability-ramachandra-guha-rahul-gandhi-congress-debate-1780912288610">Is the Gandhi family holding Congress together or holding it back?</a><h2>How does muscle mass protect the brain?</h2>Resistance training triggers the release of Insulin-Like Growth Factor -1, a hormone that directly supports the structural function and processing speed of the brain's white matter. &nbsp;Thus halting cognitive and physical decline. The study finds observable correlation, not causation. It can’t prove that strength training directly caused the lower mortality risk.&nbsp;Participants were mostly white, middle-aged, and older healthcare professionals, which means the findings may not apply to other groups.

A Harvard-led study of more than 147,000 adults found that 90-120 minutes of weekly strength training was linked to lower risks of death, heart disease, and neurological disorders.

A new study by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found that people who incorporate strength in their weekly fitness regimen might survive longer than others. The study suggests that 90-120 minutes of resistance training may be the “sweet spot” required for a lower risk of heart disease, neurological disease, or any cause. Researchers studied 147,374 adults from three long-running US health studies, and subjects were 54 years or older; they reported every two years on strength training and aerobic exercise habits. They defined strength training as things like pushups, squats, lunges, and traditional weightlifting. Over the study period, researchers recorded about 36,000 deaths and examined the relation between strength training habits, both alone and in combination with aerobic activity. The findings were published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine. The Weekly Spot According to the study, adults who averaged 90 to 119 minutes of strength training per week had a 13 per cent lower risk of death, 27 per cent lower risk of death from neurological diseases, primarily dementia and 19 per cent lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease. “For people who are less active, the key message is that small amounts can still matter. Building a routine gradually may be more important than trying to do a lot at once,” said the authors of the study. Researchers found that the greatest benefit occurs when they combine strength training with aerobic exercise. Adults who combine both have a 45 per cent lower risk of death. Also Read: Is the Gandhi family holding Congress together or holding it back? How does muscle mass protect the brain? Resistance training triggers the release of Insulin-Like Growth Factor -1, a hormone that directly supports the structural function and processing speed of the brain's white matter. Thus halting cognitive and physical decline. The study finds observable correlation, not causation. It can’t prove that strength training directly caused the lower mortality risk. Participants were mostly white, middle-aged, and older healthcare professionals, which means the findings may not apply to other groups.

A Harvard-led study of more than 147,000 adults found that 90-120 minutes of weekly strength training was linked to lower risks of death, heart disease, and neurological disorders.

Just 90 minutes of strength training a week may help you live longer, Harvard study finds

The world is bracing for a ‘Godzilla’ El Niño this year. El Niño occurs when sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern Pacific become unusually warm, disrupting atmospheric circulation and altering rainfall patterns across the globe. The phenomenon can influence everything from droughts to wildfires and floods in different parts of the world. Although El Niño develops far from India's shores, its effects are often felt across the subcontinent, making it a major concern for meteorologists, farmers and policymakers.<h2>What is ‘Godzilla’ El Niño?</h2>Despite the popularity of the term, ‘Godzilla El Niño’ is not an official scientific classification. The term was first widely used to describe the extraordinarily powerful 1997-98 El Niño event, which caused widespread droughts, floods, crop losses and economic damage across multiple continents. The weather pattern resurfaced during the 2015-16 El Niño, another exceptionally strong episode that contributed to record global temperatures and severe weather disruptions.El Niño occurs when sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean become significantly warmer than normal, weakening trade winds and altering global atmospheric circulation. This changes rainfall and temperature patterns thousands of kilometres away. When the warming becomes particularly intense, the event is often informally labelled a “Super El Niño” or “Godzilla El Niño”.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/greenwashing-are-we-being-fooled-into-buying-eco-friendly-products-that-aren-t-wion-decodes-1780663414074">Greenwashing: Are we being fooled into buying eco-friendly products that aren’t? WION Decodes</a><h2>How does El Niño impact India?</h2>An intense El Niño may weaken monsoons in India. The southwest monsoon accounts for nearly 70 per cent of India’s annual rainfall and is significant for the country’s agricultural sector. A weaker monsoon can affect crop production, and in turn, food prices. It can also impact the availability of water and the economic growth of the country. In the past, El Niño conditions have resulted in major droughts in India, including in 1982, 1987, 2002, 2009 and 2015.According to meteorologists, El Niño weakens the large-scale atmospheric circulation that helps pull moisture-laden winds towards the Indian subcontinent. This results in below-normal rainfall across large parts of the country.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/wion-decodes-iss-has-been-leaking-for-nearly-7-years-why-haven-t-we-fixed-it-1780836821307">WION Decodes | ISS has been leaking for nearly 7 years – Why haven’t we fixed it?</a><h2>How an intense El Niño result in a chain of reactions</h2>Although El Niño significantly impact the rain, it is not the only thing it can drive. The phenomenon can also make the weather more unpredictable. While seasonal rainfall may decline overall, some regions can still witness intense downpours, flash floods and extreme weather events. El Niño may increase the frequency of short-duration heavy rainfall events in some parts of the country, despite resulting in below-average rainfall. This means that India may face drought in some regions and flooding in others.Reduced rainfall can adversely affect key kharif crops such as rice, pulses and sugarcane, potentially driving up food prices and inflation. Moreover, lower reservoir levels due to less rainfall may increase water stress in drought-prone regions, while hydropower generation could decline even as electricity demand rises during heatwaves.&nbsp;WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed</a>

A potential “Godzilla” El Niño could disrupt weather patterns worldwide and impact India’s monsoon. Here’s everything you need to know about the intense climate pattern.

The world is bracing for a ‘Godzilla’ El Niño this year. El Niño occurs when sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern Pacific become unusually warm, disrupting atmospheric circulation and altering rainfall patterns across the globe. The phenomenon can influence everything from droughts to wildfires and floods in different parts of the world. Although El Niño develops far from India's shores, its effects are often felt across the subcontinent, making it a major concern for meteorologists, farmers and policymakers. What is ‘Godzilla’ El Niño? Despite the popularity of the term, ‘Godzilla El Niño’ is not an official scientific classification. The term was first widely used to describe the extraordinarily powerful 1997-98 El Niño event, which caused widespread droughts, floods, crop losses and economic damage across multiple continents. The weather pattern resurfaced during the 2015-16 El Niño, another exceptionally strong episode that contributed to record global temperatures and severe weather disruptions. El Niño occurs when sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean become significantly warmer than normal, weakening trade winds and altering global atmospheric circulation. This changes rainfall and temperature patterns thousands of kilometres away. When the warming becomes particularly intense, the event is often informally labelled a “Super El Niño” or “Godzilla El Niño”. Also read | Greenwashing: Are we being fooled into buying eco-friendly products that aren’t? WION Decodes How does El Niño impact India? An intense El Niño may weaken monsoons in India. The southwest monsoon accounts for nearly 70 per cent of India’s annual rainfall and is significant for the country’s agricultural sector. A weaker monsoon can affect crop production, and in turn, food prices. It can also impact the availability of water and the economic growth of the country. In the past, El Niño conditions have resulted in major droughts in India, including in 1982, 1987, 2002, 2009 and 2015. According to meteorologists, El Niño weakens the large-scale atmospheric circulation that helps pull moisture-laden winds towards the Indian subcontinent. This results in below-normal rainfall across large parts of the country. Also read | WION Decodes | ISS has been leaking for nearly 7 years – Why haven’t we fixed it? How an intense El Niño result in a chain of reactions Although El Niño significantly impact the rain, it is not the only thing it can drive. The phenomenon can also make the weather more unpredictable. While seasonal rainfall may decline overall, some regions can still witness intense downpours, flash floods and extreme weather events. El Niño may increase the frequency of short-duration heavy rainfall events in some parts of the country, despite resulting in below-average rainfall. This means that India may face drought in some regions and flooding in others. Reduced rainfall can adversely affect key kharif crops such as rice, pulses and sugarcane, potentially driving up food prices and inflation. Moreover, lower reservoir levels due to less rainfall may increase water stress in drought-prone regions, while hydropower generation could decline even as electricity demand rises during heatwaves. WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed

A potential “Godzilla” El Niño could disrupt weather patterns worldwide and impact India’s monsoon. Here’s everything you need to know about the intense climate pattern.

WION Decodes | What is 'Godzilla' El Niño and how can it impact the Indian monsoon?

Artificial intelligence is reshaping biology at both ends of the moral spectrum, by accelerating cures for diseases while lowering the barrier to potential global devastation. With deep machine learning in areas like gene editing, AI is rewriting the code of life. But it can also be misused as a tool for crafting biological weapons. In a rare consensus, many AI bosses are joining the concerns and debate among researchers. Here is a situation report:<h2>AI is already a working tool in genome editing</h2>OpenCRISPR-1 is possibly the first gene editor designed entirely by AI. Its large language models (LLMs) were trained on around 239,000 Cas9 proteins, producing an editor hundreds of mutations from any natural one. Deep-learning tools such as ABEdeepoff and CBEdeepoff can now predict gene editing outcomes with mindboggling accuracy. Critics are pushing back, with UC Berkeley's Fyodor Urnov dismissing embryo editing as “a solution in search of a problem.”.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/ai-tells-scientists-how-to-make-biological-weapons-1779736553469/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/ai-tells-scientists-how-to-make-biological-weapons-1779736553469/embed</a><h2>AI the Destroyer: The bioweapons alarm</h2>The same AI tools that design medicines can also design pathogens. On June 3, an open letter organised by the Institute for Progress and the Foundation for American Innovation had a curious mix of signatories in that it included many top players in AI. They were: Sam Altman of OpenAI, Dario Amodei of Anthropic, Demis Hassabis of Google DeepMind, Mustafa Suleyman of Microsoft AI, and Alexandr Wang of Meta. Also among the signatories were national security officials, scientists and DNA-synthesis firms including Twist Bioscience and Ansa Biotechnologies.Their shared concern? AI is fast dissolving the expertise that once kept bioweapons out of reach. The letter warned that those knowledge barriers "will meaningfully erode."Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/found-30-biological-labs-in-ukraine-possibly-for-bioweapons-claim-russian-forces-460189">Found 30 biological labs in Ukraine, possibly for bioweapons, claim Russian forces</a><h2>Are we talking about chatbots or AI agents building viruses?&nbsp;</h2>It is quite possible, as LLMs can help design new toxins and pathogens, though some lab skill is still required to build a functional one. Stanford biosecurity expert David Relman recently warned that AI can point users to suppliers that won't screen orders and coach them on altering an order to slip through. In the worst-case senatio, an AI-designed pathogen can spark a global pandemic, intentionally or by accident.&nbsp;<h2>What the open letter on the possible bioweapons risk of AI seeks</h2>The signatories wanted the US Congress to mandate the screening of all synthetic DNA/RNA orders, which is currently a voluntary process. They require record-keeping of orders and specifications to aid biosecurity investigations. Still there is danger that such screening can miss brand-new sequences and short DNA fragments.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/ai-based-chatbots-could-help-plan-bioweapon-attacks-report-648082">AI-based chatbots could help plan bioweapon attacks: Report</a><h2>The promise and peril of AI that runs on the same engine</h2>The AI labs are lobbying for guardrails against the destroyer side of the technlogy, even as they keep racing to build on the creator side of AI. The way out could be regulator scruity of all types gene editing and pathogen modifications, whether to create medicines or babies.

Artificial intelligence is transforming biomedicine, including areas like gene editing and medicine. Now, fears are being expressed about possible AI-designed pathogens and bioweapons. AI leaders, scientists, and policymakers are urging stronger safeguards.

Artificial intelligence is reshaping biology at both ends of the moral spectrum, by accelerating cures for diseases while lowering the barrier to potential global devastation. With deep machine learning in areas like gene editing, AI is rewriting the code of life. But it can also be misused as a tool for crafting biological weapons. In a rare consensus, many AI bosses are joining the concerns and debate among researchers. Here is a situation report: AI is already a working tool in genome editing OpenCRISPR-1 is possibly the first gene editor designed entirely by AI. Its large language models (LLMs) were trained on around 239,000 Cas9 proteins, producing an editor hundreds of mutations from any natural one. Deep-learning tools such as ABEdeepoff and CBEdeepoff can now predict gene editing outcomes with mindboggling accuracy. Critics are pushing back, with UC Berkeley's Fyodor Urnov dismissing embryo editing as “a solution in search of a problem.”. https://www.wionews.com/videos/ai-tells-scientists-how-to-make-biological-weapons-1779736553469/embed AI the Destroyer: The bioweapons alarm The same AI tools that design medicines can also design pathogens. On June 3, an open letter organised by the Institute for Progress and the Foundation for American Innovation had a curious mix of signatories in that it included many top players in AI. They were: Sam Altman of OpenAI, Dario Amodei of Anthropic, Demis Hassabis of Google DeepMind, Mustafa Suleyman of Microsoft AI, and Alexandr Wang of Meta. Also among the signatories were national security officials, scientists and DNA-synthesis firms including Twist Bioscience and Ansa Biotechnologies. Their shared concern? AI is fast dissolving the expertise that once kept bioweapons out of reach. The letter warned that those knowledge barriers "will meaningfully erode." Also read: Found 30 biological labs in Ukraine, possibly for bioweapons, claim Russian forces Are we talking about chatbots or AI agents building viruses? It is quite possible, as LLMs can help design new toxins and pathogens, though some lab skill is still required to build a functional one. Stanford biosecurity expert David Relman recently warned that AI can point users to suppliers that won't screen orders and coach them on altering an order to slip through. In the worst-case senatio, an AI-designed pathogen can spark a global pandemic, intentionally or by accident. What the open letter on the possible bioweapons risk of AI seeks The signatories wanted the US Congress to mandate the screening of all synthetic DNA/RNA orders, which is currently a voluntary process. They require record-keeping of orders and specifications to aid biosecurity investigations. Still there is danger that such screening can miss brand-new sequences and short DNA fragments. Also read: AI-based chatbots could help plan bioweapon attacks: Report The promise and peril of AI that runs on the same engine The AI labs are lobbying for guardrails against the destroyer side of the technlogy, even as they keep racing to build on the creator side of AI. The way out could be regulator scruity of all types gene editing and pathogen modifications, whether to create medicines or babies.

Artificial intelligence is transforming biomedicine, including areas like gene editing and medicine. Now, fears are being expressed about possible AI-designed pathogens and bioweapons. AI leaders, scientists, and policymakers are urging stronger safeguards.

AI gene editing, bioweapons concerns spook AI bosses, researchers: Creator or destroyer?

Researchers have found the presence of a vast geological formation hidden nearly two miles beneath the frigid ice of Antarctica. According to a study published in the journal Nature, the structure incorporates several well-known glacial landforms, including the Wilkes and Aurora subglacial basins in East Antarctica and Lake Vostok, the largest known subglacial lake buried beneath ice on Earth. While these features have long been studied individually, researchers have now linked them as parts of a much larger system. Named the East Antarctic Fan-shaped Basin Province, the newly identified formation could rank among the largest geological structures of its kind on the planet. Although further research is needed to confirm the findings, scientists believe the discovery may provide important insights into Antarctica's geological evolution and how its major ice sheets could respond to future climate change.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/japanese-researchers-turn-discarded-udon-noodles-into-biodegradable-paper-how-it-works-1780821154114">Japanese researchers turn discarded udon noodles into biodegradable paper: How it works</a> To map the formation, researchers have compiled datasets from a buffet of sources that include geological observations, gravity measurements, magnetic data, and models of the Earth’s crust, among others. Those datasets led researchers to conclude that the geological feature was likely made through a process known as “distributed rotational extension,” where continental crust gradually extended outward from a central point over millions of years. “Because these basins underlie about half of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, they are likely to heavily influence both ice-flow and landscape evolution, making them essential to Antarctic glacial and hydrological processes,” the study’s authors write.

 The newly identified formation could rank among the largest geological structures of its kind on the planet. Scientists also believe the discovery may provide important insights into Antarctica's geological evolution and how its major ice sheets could respond to future climate change.

Researchers have found the presence of a vast geological formation hidden nearly two miles beneath the frigid ice of Antarctica. According to a study published in the journal Nature, the structure incorporates several well-known glacial landforms, including the Wilkes and Aurora subglacial basins in East Antarctica and Lake Vostok, the largest known subglacial lake buried beneath ice on Earth. While these features have long been studied individually, researchers have now linked them as parts of a much larger system. Named the East Antarctic Fan-shaped Basin Province, the newly identified formation could rank among the largest geological structures of its kind on the planet. Although further research is needed to confirm the findings, scientists believe the discovery may provide important insights into Antarctica's geological evolution and how its major ice sheets could respond to future climate change. Also read: Japanese researchers turn discarded udon noodles into biodegradable paper: How it works To map the formation, researchers have compiled datasets from a buffet of sources that include geological observations, gravity measurements, magnetic data, and models of the Earth’s crust, among others. Those datasets led researchers to conclude that the geological feature was likely made through a process known as “distributed rotational extension,” where continental crust gradually extended outward from a central point over millions of years. “Because these basins underlie about half of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, they are likely to heavily influence both ice-flow and landscape evolution, making them essential to Antarctic glacial and hydrological processes,” the study’s authors write.

&nbsp;The newly identified formation could rank among the largest geological structures of its kind on the planet. Scientists also believe the discovery may provide important insights into Antarctica's geological evolution and how its major ice sheets could respond to future climate change.

Scientists discover vast geological structure hidden beneath Antarctica's ice

The International Space Station has been quietly leaking air into space for nearly seven years. What started as a minor issue in 2019 has now turned into a significantly concerning issue on the orbiting lab. Despite multiple repair attempts, patches, and continuous monitoring, the leak has never been permanently fixed. The problem has gained renewed focus when new leaks were detected in the same region. But the question remains, why is the leak still not fixed despite causing trouble for nearly a decade now?On Friday (Jun 5), astronauts were briefly placed on alert and instructed to follow “safe haven” procedures, moving into the docked SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft to prepare for a potential emergency evacuation if conditions worsened. While the situation was stabilised and no evacuation was ultimately required, the incident underscored a troubling reality: this is not a resolved issue, but an ongoing one.The leak originates from the Russian Zvezda module, specifically in a transfer tunnel used for docking spacecraft. Over time, engineers have identified not one but multiple microscopic cracks in the station’s structure that expand and shift under stress. The ISS is not dealing with a single failure, but an evolving one.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/the-science-behind-why-you-keep-scrolling-and-how-it-rewires-your-brain-1781455009989">The science behind why you keep scrolling – and how it rewires your brain</a><h2>Why is ISS experiencing leaks?</h2>In the unforgiving space environment for materials, the lab experiences extreme temperature changes, from roughly -150 degrees Celcius in shadow to over 120 degrees Celsius in sunlight. Constant pressurisation cycle and decades of use also result in metal fatigue. In addition, small imperfections in welds or structure can slowly grow into cracks, and those cracks can turn into leaks. Being more than 25 years in orbit, way beyond its intended design life, the ISS is showing its age.<h2>Why is repairing leaks on ISS so complex?</h2>Repairing damage on a space lab is far more complex than repairing any other structure when on land. On Earth, engineers could disassemble parts, replace components, or apply precise fixes under controlled conditions. In orbit, none of that is possible. Astronauts must work in microgravity, where liquids like sealants behave unpredictably. Repairs are often carried out from inside the station using epoxy-like materials, which can temporarily plug leaks but cannot restore structural integrity. External repairs require spacewalks, which are risky, expensive, and limited in scope.Complicating matters further is the uncertainty around the exact cause. Even after years of investigation, engineers have not reached a definitive conclusion. It is not known whether it is a manufacturing defect, stress from repeated docking, or simply long-term degradation. Without a clear root cause, any fix becomes a form of trial and error rather than a permanent solution.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/wion-decodes-why-does-coffee-calm-some-people-instead-of-waking-them-up-here-s-what-science-says-1780995139137">WION Decodes | Why does coffee calm some people instead of waking them up? Here’s what science says</a><h2>Not just a technical issue</h2>The issue is not merely a technical issue, but also a political one. The leak is located in the Russian segment of the ISS, which would require coordination between NASA and Roscosmos. Differences in assessment and approach can slow decision-making. Meanwhile, the station is expected to be retired around 2030, which raises a question of whether it is even worth investing in a complex and high-risk permanent fix.As a result, space agencies have resorted to adopting a strategy of risk management. The leaking section can be isolated by closing hatches, and astronauts are trained to respond quickly in case of worsening conditions. The station continues to function safely, even with a small, controlled loss of air.WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains <a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed</a>

The International Space Station is facing renewed concern over a persistent air leak first detected in 2019. Why haven’t the space agencies fixed it for nearly seven years? Here’s everything you need to know.

The International Space Station has been quietly leaking air into space for nearly seven years. What started as a minor issue in 2019 has now turned into a significantly concerning issue on the orbiting lab. Despite multiple repair attempts, patches, and continuous monitoring, the leak has never been permanently fixed. The problem has gained renewed focus when new leaks were detected in the same region. But the question remains, why is the leak still not fixed despite causing trouble for nearly a decade now? On Friday (Jun 5), astronauts were briefly placed on alert and instructed to follow “safe haven” procedures, moving into the docked SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft to prepare for a potential emergency evacuation if conditions worsened. While the situation was stabilised and no evacuation was ultimately required, the incident underscored a troubling reality: this is not a resolved issue, but an ongoing one. The leak originates from the Russian Zvezda module, specifically in a transfer tunnel used for docking spacecraft. Over time, engineers have identified not one but multiple microscopic cracks in the station’s structure that expand and shift under stress. The ISS is not dealing with a single failure, but an evolving one. Also read | The science behind why you keep scrolling – and how it rewires your brain Why is ISS experiencing leaks? In the unforgiving space environment for materials, the lab experiences extreme temperature changes, from roughly -150 degrees Celcius in shadow to over 120 degrees Celsius in sunlight. Constant pressurisation cycle and decades of use also result in metal fatigue. In addition, small imperfections in welds or structure can slowly grow into cracks, and those cracks can turn into leaks. Being more than 25 years in orbit, way beyond its intended design life, the ISS is showing its age. Why is repairing leaks on ISS so complex? Repairing damage on a space lab is far more complex than repairing any other structure when on land. On Earth, engineers could disassemble parts, replace components, or apply precise fixes under controlled conditions. In orbit, none of that is possible. Astronauts must work in microgravity, where liquids like sealants behave unpredictably. Repairs are often carried out from inside the station using epoxy-like materials, which can temporarily plug leaks but cannot restore structural integrity. External repairs require spacewalks, which are risky, expensive, and limited in scope. Complicating matters further is the uncertainty around the exact cause. Even after years of investigation, engineers have not reached a definitive conclusion. It is not known whether it is a manufacturing defect, stress from repeated docking, or simply long-term degradation. Without a clear root cause, any fix becomes a form of trial and error rather than a permanent solution. Also read | WION Decodes | Why does coffee calm some people instead of waking them up? Here’s what science says Not just a technical issue The issue is not merely a technical issue, but also a political one. The leak is located in the Russian segment of the ISS, which would require coordination between NASA and Roscosmos. Differences in assessment and approach can slow decision-making. Meanwhile, the station is expected to be retired around 2030, which raises a question of whether it is even worth investing in a complex and high-risk permanent fix. As a result, space agencies have resorted to adopting a strategy of risk management. The leaking section can be isolated by closing hatches, and astronauts are trained to respond quickly in case of worsening conditions. The station continues to function safely, even with a small, controlled loss of air. WATCH | G7 Summit 2026: World Leaders Gather For The High Stakes Summit In Evian-Les-Bains https://www.wionews.com/videos/g7-summit-2026-world-leaders-gather-for-the-high-stakes-summit-in-evian-les-bains-1781592997144/embed/embed

The International Space Station is facing renewed concern over a persistent air leak first detected in 2019. Why haven’t the space agencies fixed it for nearly seven years? Here’s everything you need to know.

WION Decodes | ISS has been leaking for nearly 7 years – Why haven’t we fixed it?

Scientists involved in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence have released updated guidelines on how researchers should handle potential signals from intelligent life beyond Earth, aiming to prevent panic, misinformation and confusion if such a discovery is ever made. The new protocols, published by the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA), update guidance first issued in 2010 and set out procedures for verifying, announcing and communicating any possible evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial civilisations.According to the guidance, researchers should make every effort to authenticate and substantiate any detected signals before making public claims. Verification reports should undergo peer review, while supporting data should be made publicly available to ensure transparency.Prof Michael Garrett, director of the Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics and chair of the IAA committee for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI), said the aim was to strike a balance between openness and scientific rigour. "I think we hope to avoid researchers 'crying alien' prematurely, and yet to let the public know we want to be as transparent and open as we can be," Garrett said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/did-scientists-just-discover-the-missing-piece-of-a-black-hole-mystery-this-is-what-we-know-1780763064299">Did scientists just discover the missing piece of a black hole mystery? This is what we know</a>The guidance comes amid growing concerns about how rapidly rumours and speculation can spread online. Garrett noted that social media has transformed the information landscape since the previous protocols were introduced 15 years ago."In 2010 it seemed to be a great thing, and now we realise that you actually have to be quite careful with social media. And you have to try and control the narrative of whatever your discovery might be so that it doesn't get distorted in some way," he said.The updated protocols also encourage institutions and organisations to engage actively with news outlets, social media platforms and other communication channels, stressing that public responses should be prompt, accurate and honest.At the same time, the guidelines recognise the personal safety concerns faced by researchers. While institutions are encouraged to communicate openly, individual scientists retain the right to decline media interactions, and organisations are advised to take steps to protect staff."I don't think anyone really thought about the personal safety of scientists back in 2010, but I suspect that's more of an issue now because it's pretty easy to pinpoint the location of people, where people work, where they live," Garrett said.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/what-would-happen-if-carrington-scale-solar-storm-slams-earth-1780650585546">What would happen if Carrington-scale solar storm slams Earth?</a>Despite decades of searching, no confirmed signal from intelligent extraterrestrial life has been detected. However, Garrett suggested that the vast amount of astronomical data now being examined by scientists around the world makes a future discovery increasingly plausible."I don't know if it's this year, next year, or the next decade, or the next century, or whatever," he said. "But eventually, someone's going to find something."

The International Academy of Astronautics issued updated SETI protocols for managing potential alien signal discoveries, emphasising rigorous peer-reviewed verification, control of social media narratives, and scientists' safety to prevent public misinformation.

Scientists involved in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence have released updated guidelines on how researchers should handle potential signals from intelligent life beyond Earth, aiming to prevent panic, misinformation and confusion if such a discovery is ever made. The new protocols, published by the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA), update guidance first issued in 2010 and set out procedures for verifying, announcing and communicating any possible evidence of intelligent extraterrestrial civilisations. According to the guidance, researchers should make every effort to authenticate and substantiate any detected signals before making public claims. Verification reports should undergo peer review, while supporting data should be made publicly available to ensure transparency. Prof Michael Garrett, director of the Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics and chair of the IAA committee for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI), said the aim was to strike a balance between openness and scientific rigour. "I think we hope to avoid researchers 'crying alien' prematurely, and yet to let the public know we want to be as transparent and open as we can be," Garrett said. Also read: Did scientists just discover the missing piece of a black hole mystery? This is what we know The guidance comes amid growing concerns about how rapidly rumours and speculation can spread online. Garrett noted that social media has transformed the information landscape since the previous protocols were introduced 15 years ago. "In 2010 it seemed to be a great thing, and now we realise that you actually have to be quite careful with social media. And you have to try and control the narrative of whatever your discovery might be so that it doesn't get distorted in some way," he said. The updated protocols also encourage institutions and organisations to engage actively with news outlets, social media platforms and other communication channels, stressing that public responses should be prompt, accurate and honest. At the same time, the guidelines recognise the personal safety concerns faced by researchers. While institutions are encouraged to communicate openly, individual scientists retain the right to decline media interactions, and organisations are advised to take steps to protect staff. "I don't think anyone really thought about the personal safety of scientists back in 2010, but I suspect that's more of an issue now because it's pretty easy to pinpoint the location of people, where people work, where they live," Garrett said. Also read: What would happen if Carrington-scale solar storm slams Earth? Despite decades of searching, no confirmed signal from intelligent extraterrestrial life has been detected. However, Garrett suggested that the vast amount of astronomical data now being examined by scientists around the world makes a future discovery increasingly plausible. "I don't know if it's this year, next year, or the next decade, or the next century, or whatever," he said. "But eventually, someone's going to find something."

The International Academy of Astronautics issued updated SETI protocols for managing potential alien signal discoveries, emphasising rigorous peer-reviewed verification, control of social media narratives, and scientists' safety to prevent public misinformation.

Alien hunters issue new rules for sharing possible signs of intelligent life beyond Earth

Astronomers have, for the first time, found evidence of a powerful wind blowing from the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, a discovery that could help answer one of the biggest mysteries in modern space science. The black hole, known as Sagittarius A, sits at the heart of our galaxy. Researchers behind the new study say they have obtained the most detailed view yet of how the black hole interacts with and reshapes its surrounding environment.&nbsp;Black holes are often described as cosmic vacuum cleaners because of their ability to pull in nearby matter. However, scientists have long known that they can also eject material in the form of powerful jets and winds. Until now, no such wind had been directly detected coming from Sagittarius A.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/could-parents-one-day-choose-their-baby-s-traits-scientists-achieve-major-human-embryo-gene-editing-milestone-1780744874462">Could parents one day choose their baby’s traits? Scientists achieve major human embryo gene-editing milestone</a>&nbsp;"Unless a black hole exists in a perfect vacuum, it must blow a wind somehow," said Mark Gorski of Northwestern University in Illinois, who co-led the study. "And there is no perfect vacuum in the Universe. With new observations, this is the first time we've had a clean enough view to see the wind's imprint," Gorski said. "We looked at the data and said, 'There it is. There is the thing that everybody's been looking for for 50 years'."&nbsp;The breakthrough came after researchers analysed five years of observations from the Atacama Large Millimetre/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) observatory in Chile. Using the data, they created what they describe as the sharpest image ever produced of the cold molecular gas surrounding the black hole.&nbsp;The observations captured gas within roughly three light-years of Sagittarius A, an extremely close distance in cosmic terms. Scientists then used advanced image-processing techniques to remove the bright radio emissions from the black hole, revealing previously hidden structures.According to the research team, the resulting image is 100 times deeper and 80 times sharper than previous maps of the region.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/world-environment-day-sheep-are-making-hay-while-the-sun-shines-fixing-a-major-solar-panel-problem-1780637430293">Sheep are 'making hay while the sun shines', fixing a major solar panel problem</a>&nbsp;One of the most striking features uncovered was a giant cone-shaped cavity almost completely devoid of cold molecular gas. The researchers believe the structure points directly towards the black hole and was carved out by a stream of hot, energetic material flowing outward from Sagittarius A.&nbsp;&nbsp;"If you blow hot material from the black hole, it's not going to want to exit with the cold material," Gorski explained. "It's either going to push the cold material out or heat it up. And, if it's too hot, you will no longer see the cold gas."&nbsp;Co-lead researcher Elena Murchikova said the findings also provide insight into how the black hole is fed by surrounding material. "We were the first to show that molecular gas very, very close to the black hole is feeding it," Murchikova said. "The wind is not powerful, and its direction probably wanders with time. It shows that our black hole is not unique, and our place in the universe is not unique."&nbsp;Scientists say the discovery offers fresh evidence that even relatively quiet supermassive black holes can influence their surroundings, helping researchers better understand how galaxies evolve and how matter behaves in some of the most extreme environments in the universe. &nbsp;

Astronomers have detected the first direct evidence of a powerful wind from Sagittarius A, the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole, revealing how it interacts with and reshapes its galaxy.

Astronomers have, for the first time, found evidence of a powerful wind blowing from the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Milky Way, a discovery that could help answer one of the biggest mysteries in modern space science. The black hole, known as Sagittarius A, sits at the heart of our galaxy. Researchers behind the new study say they have obtained the most detailed view yet of how the black hole interacts with and reshapes its surrounding environment. Black holes are often described as cosmic vacuum cleaners because of their ability to pull in nearby matter. However, scientists have long known that they can also eject material in the form of powerful jets and winds. Until now, no such wind had been directly detected coming from Sagittarius A. Also read: Could parents one day choose their baby’s traits? Scientists achieve major human embryo gene-editing milestone "Unless a black hole exists in a perfect vacuum, it must blow a wind somehow," said Mark Gorski of Northwestern University in Illinois, who co-led the study. "And there is no perfect vacuum in the Universe. With new observations, this is the first time we've had a clean enough view to see the wind's imprint," Gorski said. "We looked at the data and said, 'There it is. There is the thing that everybody's been looking for for 50 years'." The breakthrough came after researchers analysed five years of observations from the Atacama Large Millimetre/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) observatory in Chile. Using the data, they created what they describe as the sharpest image ever produced of the cold molecular gas surrounding the black hole. The observations captured gas within roughly three light-years of Sagittarius A, an extremely close distance in cosmic terms. Scientists then used advanced image-processing techniques to remove the bright radio emissions from the black hole, revealing previously hidden structures. According to the research team, the resulting image is 100 times deeper and 80 times sharper than previous maps of the region. Also read: Sheep are 'making hay while the sun shines', fixing a major solar panel problem One of the most striking features uncovered was a giant cone-shaped cavity almost completely devoid of cold molecular gas. The researchers believe the structure points directly towards the black hole and was carved out by a stream of hot, energetic material flowing outward from Sagittarius A. "If you blow hot material from the black hole, it's not going to want to exit with the cold material," Gorski explained. "It's either going to push the cold material out or heat it up. And, if it's too hot, you will no longer see the cold gas." Co-lead researcher Elena Murchikova said the findings also provide insight into how the black hole is fed by surrounding material. "We were the first to show that molecular gas very, very close to the black hole is feeding it," Murchikova said. "The wind is not powerful, and its direction probably wanders with time. It shows that our black hole is not unique, and our place in the universe is not unique." Scientists say the discovery offers fresh evidence that even relatively quiet supermassive black holes can influence their surroundings, helping researchers better understand how galaxies evolve and how matter behaves in some of the most extreme environments in the universe.

Astronomers have detected the first direct evidence of a powerful wind from Sagittarius A, the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole, revealing how it interacts with and reshapes its galaxy.

Did scientists just discover the missing piece of a black hole mystery? This is what we know

Scientists at Columbia University have successfully edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented precision, marking a significant breakthrough in genetic engineering that could one day allow doctors to correct inherited diseases before birth. The research, led by geneticist Dieter Egli, used a newer gene-editing technique known as base editing to make highly targeted changes to DNA without causing the extensive genetic damage often associated with traditional CRISPR technology.&nbsp;The findings, which have been posted online and are currently under peer review, are already reigniting ethical concerns over the possibility of creating genetically enhanced or so-called "designer" babies. According to the researchers, base editing allows scientists to alter individual DNA letters rather than cutting out entire sections of genetic material. This approach significantly reduced the risk of major chromosomal damage that had plagued earlier embryo-editing experiments.&nbsp;"We're not saying this is going to be used tomorrow in the clinics," Egli cautioned, stressing that important questions about safety and unintended consequences remain unanswered. The debate over editing human embryos has intensified since the development of CRISPR technology in 2012. While the technique opened the door to treating inherited diseases, it also raised fears that genetic engineering could eventually be used to select desirable traits, a prospect some ethicists have likened to modern-day eugenics.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/scientists-rescue-seeds-from-this-last-remaining-tree-in-wild-before-it-goes-extinct-1780742850347">Scientists rescue seeds from THIS last remaining tree in wild before it goes extinct</a>&nbsp;The controversy reached a peak in 2018 when Chinese scientist He Jiankui announced that he had edited the genomes of human embryos to create babies resistant to HIV infection. His work was widely condemned by the scientific community, and he was later imprisoned by Chinese authorities.<h2>'Absolutely catastrophic consequences’</h2>Egli's team previously investigated the use of CRISPR in human embryos in 2020. In those experiments, researchers attempted to repair a mutation in the EYS gene linked to hereditary blindness. While some embryos were successfully corrected, many suffered severe genetic damage, including the loss of entire chromosomes.&nbsp;"It had absolutely catastrophic consequences," Egli said of the earlier findings, according to the New York Times. The new study sought to avoid those problems by using base editing. Researchers targeted two genes, PCSK9, which is linked to cholesterol levels and heart disease risk, and HBG, a gene involved in foetal haemoglobin production.&nbsp;The team introduced base-editing molecules into fertilised eggs and two-cell embryos donated by prospective parents. Unlike earlier CRISPR-based experiments, the researchers found no evidence of large-scale DNA damage and successfully altered both genes. In some cases, they edited both genes within the same embryo.&nbsp;However, the technique was not flawless. Some embryos developed "mosaicism", a condition in which different cells carry different genetic versions because the edits did not occur uniformly throughout the embryo. Scientists warn that such genetic inconsistencies could potentially lead to health complications if edited embryos were carried to term.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/world-environment-day-sheep-are-making-hay-while-the-sun-shines-fixing-a-major-solar-panel-problem-1780637430293">Sheep are 'making hay while the sun shines', fixing a major solar panel problem</a>&nbsp;Paula Amato, a fertility specialist at Oregon Health &amp; Science University who was not involved in the study, described the approach as "promising" but said the scientific community would need to carefully examine the full data once the research undergoes peer review.&nbsp;Bioethicist Ana Iltis of Wake Forest University also urged caution, warning that some harmful effects may not become apparent until after birth. Supporters argue that the technology could eventually benefit families undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Nathan Treff, chief clinical officer at Nucleus Genomics and a co-author of the study, said gene correction could allow parents to use embryos that might otherwise be discarded because of disease-causing mutations.&nbsp;"There's still work to do before getting to that point, but this research gets us closer," Treff said.

Columbia University scientists successfully used precise “base editing” on human embryos to alter disease-linked genes without major chromosomal damage, though minor issues like mosaicism still require further safety research.

Scientists at Columbia University have successfully edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented precision, marking a significant breakthrough in genetic engineering that could one day allow doctors to correct inherited diseases before birth. The research, led by geneticist Dieter Egli, used a newer gene-editing technique known as base editing to make highly targeted changes to DNA without causing the extensive genetic damage often associated with traditional CRISPR technology. The findings, which have been posted online and are currently under peer review, are already reigniting ethical concerns over the possibility of creating genetically enhanced or so-called "designer" babies. According to the researchers, base editing allows scientists to alter individual DNA letters rather than cutting out entire sections of genetic material. This approach significantly reduced the risk of major chromosomal damage that had plagued earlier embryo-editing experiments. "We're not saying this is going to be used tomorrow in the clinics," Egli cautioned, stressing that important questions about safety and unintended consequences remain unanswered. The debate over editing human embryos has intensified since the development of CRISPR technology in 2012. While the technique opened the door to treating inherited diseases, it also raised fears that genetic engineering could eventually be used to select desirable traits, a prospect some ethicists have likened to modern-day eugenics. Also read: Scientists rescue seeds from THIS last remaining tree in wild before it goes extinct The controversy reached a peak in 2018 when Chinese scientist He Jiankui announced that he had edited the genomes of human embryos to create babies resistant to HIV infection. His work was widely condemned by the scientific community, and he was later imprisoned by Chinese authorities. 'Absolutely catastrophic consequences’ Egli's team previously investigated the use of CRISPR in human embryos in 2020. In those experiments, researchers attempted to repair a mutation in the EYS gene linked to hereditary blindness. While some embryos were successfully corrected, many suffered severe genetic damage, including the loss of entire chromosomes. "It had absolutely catastrophic consequences," Egli said of the earlier findings, according to the New York Times. The new study sought to avoid those problems by using base editing. Researchers targeted two genes, PCSK9, which is linked to cholesterol levels and heart disease risk, and HBG, a gene involved in foetal haemoglobin production. The team introduced base-editing molecules into fertilised eggs and two-cell embryos donated by prospective parents. Unlike earlier CRISPR-based experiments, the researchers found no evidence of large-scale DNA damage and successfully altered both genes. In some cases, they edited both genes within the same embryo. However, the technique was not flawless. Some embryos developed "mosaicism", a condition in which different cells carry different genetic versions because the edits did not occur uniformly throughout the embryo. Scientists warn that such genetic inconsistencies could potentially lead to health complications if edited embryos were carried to term. Also read: Sheep are 'making hay while the sun shines', fixing a major solar panel problem Paula Amato, a fertility specialist at Oregon Health & Science University who was not involved in the study, described the approach as "promising" but said the scientific community would need to carefully examine the full data once the research undergoes peer review. Bioethicist Ana Iltis of Wake Forest University also urged caution, warning that some harmful effects may not become apparent until after birth. Supporters argue that the technology could eventually benefit families undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Nathan Treff, chief clinical officer at Nucleus Genomics and a co-author of the study, said gene correction could allow parents to use embryos that might otherwise be discarded because of disease-causing mutations. "There's still work to do before getting to that point, but this research gets us closer," Treff said.

Columbia University scientists successfully used precise “base editing” on human embryos to alter disease-linked genes without major chromosomal damage, though minor issues like mosaicism still require further safety research.

Could parents one day choose their baby’s traits? Scientists achieve major human embryo gene-editing milestone

One of the world’s rarest tree species may have been given a second chance at survival. Scientists have managed to successfully collect and preserve seeds from the last known wild specimen growing on a remote Chilean island. The critically endangered tree, Dendroseris neriifolia, is native to the Juan Fernández Islands, a volcanic archipelago located about 673 kilometres (420 miles) off the coast of Chile. Once found widespread across Robinson Crusoe Island, the species has been pushed to the brink of extinction due to habitat loss, invasive species, erosion, grazing animals, fires and historical deforestation. Today, only a single known wild tree remains.In a major breakthrough for conservation efforts, seeds from the lone survivor have been transferred to the Millennium Seed Bank at Kew Wakehurst in England. Scientists at the facility are conducting germination trials while preserving the seeds for long-term storage.X-ray examinations showed that 25 of the 29 seeds sent to the seed bank were potentially viable. In promising results, seven seedlings have already begun growing at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, offering hope that the species can be propagated and safeguarded for the future.“Through this project, we hope to be able to produce more seed from the plants which we have growing now once they reach flowering age,” Alice Hudson, the Millennium Seed Bank partnerships officer at Kew Wakehurst, told Live Science.Collecting the seeds was no easy task. The last remaining tree clings to a steep cliff on Robinson Crusoe Island, accessible only after a four-hour journey followed by a challenging two-hour climb. Chilean park rangers must carefully navigate the rugged terrain and use ropes to reach the tree’s branches during the annual seed-collection season.Conservationists remain concerned about the species’ long-term prospects. With only one surviving wild individual, genetic diversity is extremely limited, raising the risks of inbreeding and low fertility. However, seed banking provides a crucial safety net. Even if the remaining wild tree is lost, scientists now possess viable seeds and young plants that could help revive the species.Researchers hope the seedlings growing in England will eventually flower and produce more seeds, paving the way for future restoration efforts and helping ensure that one of the world’s rarest trees does not disappear forever.

Scientists collected and preserved seeds from the last known wild Dendroseris neriifolia tree in Chile. Seven seedlings have already sprouted, offering hope for saving the species from extinction.

One of the world’s rarest tree species may have been given a second chance at survival. Scientists have managed to successfully collect and preserve seeds from the last known wild specimen growing on a remote Chilean island. The critically endangered tree, Dendroseris neriifolia, is native to the Juan Fernández Islands, a volcanic archipelago located about 673 kilometres (420 miles) off the coast of Chile. Once found widespread across Robinson Crusoe Island, the species has been pushed to the brink of extinction due to habitat loss, invasive species, erosion, grazing animals, fires and historical deforestation. Today, only a single known wild tree remains. In a major breakthrough for conservation efforts, seeds from the lone survivor have been transferred to the Millennium Seed Bank at Kew Wakehurst in England. Scientists at the facility are conducting germination trials while preserving the seeds for long-term storage. X-ray examinations showed that 25 of the 29 seeds sent to the seed bank were potentially viable. In promising results, seven seedlings have already begun growing at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, offering hope that the species can be propagated and safeguarded for the future. “Through this project, we hope to be able to produce more seed from the plants which we have growing now once they reach flowering age,” Alice Hudson, the Millennium Seed Bank partnerships officer at Kew Wakehurst, told Live Science. Collecting the seeds was no easy task. The last remaining tree clings to a steep cliff on Robinson Crusoe Island, accessible only after a four-hour journey followed by a challenging two-hour climb. Chilean park rangers must carefully navigate the rugged terrain and use ropes to reach the tree’s branches during the annual seed-collection season. Conservationists remain concerned about the species’ long-term prospects. With only one surviving wild individual, genetic diversity is extremely limited, raising the risks of inbreeding and low fertility. However, seed banking provides a crucial safety net. Even if the remaining wild tree is lost, scientists now possess viable seeds and young plants that could help revive the species. Researchers hope the seedlings growing in England will eventually flower and produce more seeds, paving the way for future restoration efforts and helping ensure that one of the world’s rarest trees does not disappear forever.

Scientists collected and preserved seeds from the last known wild Dendroseris neriifolia tree in Chile. Seven seedlings have already sprouted, offering hope for saving the species from extinction.

Scientists rescue seeds from THIS last remaining tree in wild before it goes extinct

As meteorological agencies sound the alarm over a looming El Niño during the 2026 monsoon, experts are increasingly advocating for massive tree-planting initiatives to safeguard India’s vulnerable agricultural sector. The World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) recently issued an El Niño Watch, projecting an 80% probability of development between June and August, which surges to nearly 90% by year-end. This warming of the Pacific Ocean historically disrupts the Indian monsoon, threatening a country where nearly half of all cultivable land relies entirely on rain. Regions already plagued by acute water scarcity and recurring droughts—such as Rajasthan, Bundelkhand, and Marathwada face the highest risk. To mitigate this, agricultural experts are championing trees as vital ecological infrastructure. Beyond providing shade, trees restore the hydrological cycle; their deep roots facilitate groundwater recharge, while their dense canopies reduce soil temperature and drastically slow down evaporation during extreme heat spells.&nbsp;Moreover, scientists have found that some trees use a trick called hydraulic lift, pulling up water from deep underground and releasing some of it closer to the surface. That moisture gives nearby crops and soil organisms a real boost during dry times.&nbsp;“But the benefits don’t stop there. Tree plantations turn into havens for birds, insects, and pollinators. That means more bees and other species helping with pollination, which keeps fields productive; birds help by spreading seeds and keeping ecosystems healthy,” said Dr. Aneesha Dalmia, member of Partners for Water Access and Better Harvests in India.&nbsp;“For farmers facing a future with uncertain weather, fruit trees can make all the difference. Unlike annual crops that might fail if the rains don’t come, fruit trees are often sturdier. Even during the bad year, the farmers offer some harvest, which helps in giving families food and another source of income to fall back on when traditional crops let them down. Moreover, experts believe that tree plantations need to be part of a bigger plan—mixed with agroforestry, soil conservation, rainwater harvesting and drought-resistant crops. This way, whole communities become more resilient, not just individual farms,” she added.&nbsp;India’s approach to climate resilience is evolving from short-term crisis management to long-term strategic planning. Central to this shift is a growing realisation that trees are far more than mere tools for carbon capture or land restoration; they are vital green infrastructure. By recharging groundwater, supporting biodiversity, boosting local economies, and buffering communities against extreme weather, trees are foundational to ecological survival. With another El Niño looming in 2026, investing heavily in agroforestry and tree cover stands out as one of the most effective strategies to safeguard Indian agriculture for the future.

With the WMO projecting up to a 90% chance of El Niño disrupting the 2026 monsoon, experts urge massive tree-planting to safeguard India's rain-dependent farms.

As meteorological agencies sound the alarm over a looming El Niño during the 2026 monsoon, experts are increasingly advocating for massive tree-planting initiatives to safeguard India’s vulnerable agricultural sector. The World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) recently issued an El Niño Watch, projecting an 80% probability of development between June and August, which surges to nearly 90% by year-end. This warming of the Pacific Ocean historically disrupts the Indian monsoon, threatening a country where nearly half of all cultivable land relies entirely on rain. Regions already plagued by acute water scarcity and recurring droughts—such as Rajasthan, Bundelkhand, and Marathwada face the highest risk. To mitigate this, agricultural experts are championing trees as vital ecological infrastructure. Beyond providing shade, trees restore the hydrological cycle; their deep roots facilitate groundwater recharge, while their dense canopies reduce soil temperature and drastically slow down evaporation during extreme heat spells. Moreover, scientists have found that some trees use a trick called hydraulic lift, pulling up water from deep underground and releasing some of it closer to the surface. That moisture gives nearby crops and soil organisms a real boost during dry times. “But the benefits don’t stop there. Tree plantations turn into havens for birds, insects, and pollinators. That means more bees and other species helping with pollination, which keeps fields productive; birds help by spreading seeds and keeping ecosystems healthy,” said Dr. Aneesha Dalmia, member of Partners for Water Access and Better Harvests in India. “For farmers facing a future with uncertain weather, fruit trees can make all the difference. Unlike annual crops that might fail if the rains don’t come, fruit trees are often sturdier. Even during the bad year, the farmers offer some harvest, which helps in giving families food and another source of income to fall back on when traditional crops let them down. Moreover, experts believe that tree plantations need to be part of a bigger plan—mixed with agroforestry, soil conservation, rainwater harvesting and drought-resistant crops. This way, whole communities become more resilient, not just individual farms,” she added. India’s approach to climate resilience is evolving from short-term crisis management to long-term strategic planning. Central to this shift is a growing realisation that trees are far more than mere tools for carbon capture or land restoration; they are vital green infrastructure. By recharging groundwater, supporting biodiversity, boosting local economies, and buffering communities against extreme weather, trees are foundational to ecological survival. With another El Niño looming in 2026, investing heavily in agroforestry and tree cover stands out as one of the most effective strategies to safeguard Indian agriculture for the future.

With the WMO projecting up to a 90% chance of El Niño disrupting the 2026 monsoon, experts urge massive tree-planting to safeguard India's rain-dependent farms.

90% El Niño certainty: Why trees are India’s best defence against agrarian crisis

NASA has said that repair efforts aboard the ISS have been paused. Bethany Stevens added that the astronauts who were sheltering wearing space suits had been told to come out.&nbsp;Update: Roscosmos has said that the first leak spot has been sealed. Interfax reported that they have now moved onto the second leak spot.&nbsp;NASA has asked astronauts on the International Space Station to take shelter as a leak worsens and prepare for potential evacuation. There has been an ongoing, persistent air leak, which has turned more serious now. NASA said the leak was taking place on the Russian segment of the station, and a cosmonaut is working to fix it. The leak is located in the PrK module, a small Russian transfer tunnel connected to the Zvezda service module. It connects the main part of the station to a docking port used by Russian Progress cargo spacecraft. This leak has reportedly persisted for over five years, and the apparent source is a series of microscopic structural cracks in the hull and welded joints.&nbsp;NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens said in an X post, "The Zvezda service module transfer tunnel, known as PrK, has suffered from cracks and leaks for some time, and has been mitigated by Roscosmos as much as possible to date." She added, "The cracks have always been a concern that NASA watches very closely. NASA and Roscosmos have been working to determine the root cause of the cracks, and Roscosmos manages the issue through operational mitigation measures and periodic partial-repair efforts."&nbsp;Bethany further said that the new leaks have led to Russian cosmonauts carrying out "a more extensive repair operation on Friday, June 5." She added, "Out of an abundance of caution, NASA has directed all four of the agency's SpaceX Crew-12 members and NASA astronaut Chris Williams to assume an elevated safety posture in the Dragon spacecraft while the repair is underway." &nbsp;If the astronauts are evacuated, it will be the second one this year. In January, veteran NASA astronaut Mike Fincke fell sick, leading to first-ever medical evacuation from the ISS.<h2>What is the leak on International Space Station?</h2>&nbsp;NASA and Roscosmos have always had a disagreement over the root cause of the leak on the ISS. The Russian space agency believes the cracks are caused by structural fatigue from high micro-vibrations, probably from cargo ships docking or thruster burns. Meanwhile, NASA suspects a mix of environmental exposure, mechanical stress, and original material properties. &nbsp;

Astronauts on the International Space Station have been asked to prepare for potential evacuation because of a leak that has been a cause for concern for over five years. 

NASA has said that repair efforts aboard the ISS have been paused. Bethany Stevens added that the astronauts who were sheltering wearing space suits had been told to come out. Update: Roscosmos has said that the first leak spot has been sealed. Interfax reported that they have now moved onto the second leak spot. NASA has asked astronauts on the International Space Station to take shelter as a leak worsens and prepare for potential evacuation. There has been an ongoing, persistent air leak, which has turned more serious now. NASA said the leak was taking place on the Russian segment of the station, and a cosmonaut is working to fix it. The leak is located in the PrK module, a small Russian transfer tunnel connected to the Zvezda service module. It connects the main part of the station to a docking port used by Russian Progress cargo spacecraft. This leak has reportedly persisted for over five years, and the apparent source is a series of microscopic structural cracks in the hull and welded joints. NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens said in an X post, "The Zvezda service module transfer tunnel, known as PrK, has suffered from cracks and leaks for some time, and has been mitigated by Roscosmos as much as possible to date." She added, "The cracks have always been a concern that NASA watches very closely. NASA and Roscosmos have been working to determine the root cause of the cracks, and Roscosmos manages the issue through operational mitigation measures and periodic partial-repair efforts." Bethany further said that the new leaks have led to Russian cosmonauts carrying out "a more extensive repair operation on Friday, June 5." She added, "Out of an abundance of caution, NASA has directed all four of the agency's SpaceX Crew-12 members and NASA astronaut Chris Williams to assume an elevated safety posture in the Dragon spacecraft while the repair is underway." If the astronauts are evacuated, it will be the second one this year. In January, veteran NASA astronaut Mike Fincke fell sick, leading to first-ever medical evacuation from the ISS. What is the leak on International Space Station? NASA and Roscosmos have always had a disagreement over the root cause of the leak on the ISS. The Russian space agency believes the cracks are caused by structural fatigue from high micro-vibrations, probably from cargo ships docking or thruster burns. Meanwhile, NASA suspects a mix of environmental exposure, mechanical stress, and original material properties.

Astronauts on the International Space Station have been asked to prepare for potential evacuation because of a leak that has been a cause for concern for over five years.&nbsp;

ISS leak updates: Roscosmos says first leak has been fixed, NASA says repair efforts have been paused

Super El Niño is certain to happen now, NASA has confirmed. The American space agency said that a swell of warm water hundreds of kilometres wide was spotted in the Pacific Ocean, off the coast of South America, via satellite images. Experts say this is a sure-shot sign that Super El Niño will arrive later this year. Previously, climatologists had flagged the possibility of a monster El Niño arriving this year, which will be nothing like ever seen in the past decades. It is predicted to be on the same scale as the one seen in 1877, the worst one ever recorded since data keeping started. Scientists say the upcoming Super El Niño will be like looking into the future 10 years later. NASA said in a statement, "Waves of higher, warmer water move eastward across the Pacific Ocean a few months before an El Niño emerges. Several have shown up in 2026 satellite data." The data was captured by the Sentinel–6 Michael Freilich satellite launched in 2020.&nbsp;El Niño cycle is a common weather system where strong trade winds, instead of moving east to west, start flowing in the opposite direction. Instead of pushing warm surface water away from South America toward Asia and Australia, it causes it to slosh and pool back eastward towards South America. This temporary disruption to Earth's normal ocean and atmospheric systems occurs every two to seven years.&nbsp;<h2>What NASA satellite saw about El Niño</h2>&nbsp;NASA and other agencies have started noticing signs of one of the strongest El Niño patterns ever recorded. The phenomenon will affect every part of the world, with global average temperatures expected to rise by 3°C this summer. Besides the extreme heat, Super El Niño will also bring extreme rain and flooding to some parts. The NASA satellite tracks warm Kelvin waves to finds signs of an impending El Niño. Nadya Vinogradova Shiffer, lead program scientist at NASA Headquarters in Washington, said, "Sentinel–6 Michael Freilich can track massive Kelvin waves as they cross the Pacific, capture changes in Earth's ocean thermodynamics, improve forecasts of weather extremes, and help communities prepare for potential coastal hazards."&nbsp;<h2>World Meteorological Organization issues warning about El Niño - "World needs to prepare"</h2>A new WMO El Niño/La Niña Update this week stated that there is an 80 per cent likelihood of an El Niño event during June–August 2026. "“The science is clear: El Niño is arriving on our doorstep in the coming months with 90% certainty. &nbsp;The world must treat it as the urgent climate warning it is. El Niño conditions will pour fuel on the fire of a warming world. &nbsp;Impacts will hit even harder, travel even farther, and cross borders with devastating speed," it said in a statement. Talking about what to expect, WMO Secretary-General Celeste Saulo said, “We need to prepare for a potentially strong El Niño event, which will exacerbate drought and heavy rainfall and increase the risk of heatwaves both on land and in the ocean."<h2>What NASA said about Kelvin Waves</h2>&nbsp;NASA explains that El Niño develops when multiple Kelvin waves appear over several months, and the warm water accumulates off the shores of Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. The first Kelvin wave this year was seen in January around Micronesia and lasted a few weeks. Then a new wave formed in March. "While this year's event started a bit later than the big El Niños of 2015 and 1997, it's beginning to catch up," Josh Willis, a sea level researcher at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said.&nbsp;Western North America, Central America, the Caribbean, Europe, North Africa, and most parts of Asia will see extreme temperatures. Warmer–than–normal conditions can be expected in the Southern Hemisphere also.&nbsp; &nbsp;

NASA has confirmed that Super El Niño is coming for the world this year. Its Sentinel–6 Michael Freilich satellite has spotted a large pool of warm water in the Pacific Ocean near South America, confirming that the worst is coming.

Super El Niño is certain to happen now, NASA has confirmed. The American space agency said that a swell of warm water hundreds of kilometres wide was spotted in the Pacific Ocean, off the coast of South America, via satellite images. Experts say this is a sure-shot sign that Super El Niño will arrive later this year. Previously, climatologists had flagged the possibility of a monster El Niño arriving this year, which will be nothing like ever seen in the past decades. It is predicted to be on the same scale as the one seen in 1877, the worst one ever recorded since data keeping started. Scientists say the upcoming Super El Niño will be like looking into the future 10 years later. NASA said in a statement, "Waves of higher, warmer water move eastward across the Pacific Ocean a few months before an El Niño emerges. Several have shown up in 2026 satellite data." The data was captured by the Sentinel–6 Michael Freilich satellite launched in 2020. El Niño cycle is a common weather system where strong trade winds, instead of moving east to west, start flowing in the opposite direction. Instead of pushing warm surface water away from South America toward Asia and Australia, it causes it to slosh and pool back eastward towards South America. This temporary disruption to Earth's normal ocean and atmospheric systems occurs every two to seven years. What NASA satellite saw about El Niño NASA and other agencies have started noticing signs of one of the strongest El Niño patterns ever recorded. The phenomenon will affect every part of the world, with global average temperatures expected to rise by 3°C this summer. Besides the extreme heat, Super El Niño will also bring extreme rain and flooding to some parts. The NASA satellite tracks warm Kelvin waves to finds signs of an impending El Niño. Nadya Vinogradova Shiffer, lead program scientist at NASA Headquarters in Washington, said, "Sentinel–6 Michael Freilich can track massive Kelvin waves as they cross the Pacific, capture changes in Earth's ocean thermodynamics, improve forecasts of weather extremes, and help communities prepare for potential coastal hazards." World Meteorological Organization issues warning about El Niño - "World needs to prepare" A new WMO El Niño/La Niña Update this week stated that there is an 80 per cent likelihood of an El Niño event during June–August 2026. "“The science is clear: El Niño is arriving on our doorstep in the coming months with 90% certainty. The world must treat it as the urgent climate warning it is. El Niño conditions will pour fuel on the fire of a warming world. Impacts will hit even harder, travel even farther, and cross borders with devastating speed," it said in a statement. Talking about what to expect, WMO Secretary-General Celeste Saulo said, “We need to prepare for a potentially strong El Niño event, which will exacerbate drought and heavy rainfall and increase the risk of heatwaves both on land and in the ocean." What NASA said about Kelvin Waves NASA explains that El Niño develops when multiple Kelvin waves appear over several months, and the warm water accumulates off the shores of Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru. The first Kelvin wave this year was seen in January around Micronesia and lasted a few weeks. Then a new wave formed in March. "While this year's event started a bit later than the big El Niños of 2015 and 1997, it's beginning to catch up," Josh Willis, a sea level researcher at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said. Western North America, Central America, the Caribbean, Europe, North Africa, and most parts of Asia will see extreme temperatures. Warmer–than–normal conditions can be expected in the Southern Hemisphere also.

NASA has confirmed that Super El Niño is coming for the world this year. Its Sentinel–6 Michael Freilich satellite has spotted a large pool of warm water in the Pacific Ocean near South America, confirming that the worst is coming.

NASA satellite spots strongest sign of Super El Nino, confirming all predictions - What to expect?

Geomagnetic storms are a hidden risk Earth faces during solar maximum. Experts say that while scientists are aware that the Sun can unleash plasma and Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) on a large scale, what we don't know is how to prepare for them. David Wallace, an Assistant Clinical Professor of Electrical Engineering, warns in an article for ZME Science that the power grid and the internet infrastructure have not been tested against a major solar event, similar to the Carrington Event that slammed Earth in 1859. In May 2024, a G5 geomagnetic storm occurred. It was reported between May 10 and May 13, and is the most powerful geomagnetic storm to affect our planet since the 2003 Halloween storms. But this was nothing compared to the Carrington Event. Wallace examined how Earth will be affected if one day a similar solar storm occurs in the future.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/sun-unleashes-m-class-solar-flare-auroras-could-light-up-earth-this-week-details-1778572341489">Sun unleashes M-class solar flare, auroras could light up Earth this week. Details</a><h2>Can a Carrington-scale event happen in the future?</h2> Scientists are sure that something like this can happen again, as CMEs are never going to stop during the lifetime of the Sun. Statistical modelling in a 2012 study shows that the probability of a same-scale storm hitting Earth is roughly 12 per cent per decade. Then, a study published in 2019 in Scientific Reports re-analysed historical geomagnetic data and lowered that risk, placing the odds at somewhere between 0.46% and 1.88% per decade. But NOAA and NASA scientists say that during the solar maximum, the short-term probability spikes to 2 to 12 per cent.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/earth-has-been-hit-by-cannibal-cmes-as-sun-reaches-its-maximum-heres-what-will-happen-to-our-planet-745902">Earth has been hit by cannibal CMEs as Sun reaches its maximum. Here's what will happen to our planet</a>&nbsp;In 2012, the Sun unleashed a massive CME that was physically similar to the 1859 Carrington Event. Earth was just lucky since it had moved out of its way, and the storm reached near our orbit nine days late. It slammed NASA’s STEREO-A spacecraft, which recorded the event.If a Carrington-level event was to happen today and Earth took the direct hit, it would lead to a major upheaval and damage. Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GIC) will move through submarine and terrestrial cables, knocking out data centres. Satellites will be dragged as the Earth's atmosphere expands, causing them to slow down, and some could even fall out of orbit. Navigation systems will be hit, as disrupted GPS signals will affect commercial flights, national defence detection systems and even your smartwatch.&nbsp;Currents exceeding 100 amperes can enter electricity grids, damaging high-voltage transformers internally. This has happened in the past with smaller-level solar storms, when the Hydro-Quebec grid collapsed, leaving 5 million people without power for nine hours. Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/trending/strongest-solar-storm-radiation-in-over-20-years-slams-earth-where-to-see-auroras-1768879918682">Strongest solar storm radiation in over 20 years slams Earth: Where to see auroras?</a><h2>How can damage from massive solar storm be prevented?</h2> NOAA Space Weather Prediction Centre monitors solar activity. Even if it spots a major eruption from the Sun early, scientists would only have a few minutes to a few hours to take action. Wallace says we need to shield equipment like transformers with hardware. A total collapse can be avoided by developing "grid-load shedding" strategies.

Earth is highly vulnerable to a major solar storm similar to the Carrington event that occurred in 1859. At that time, there were no power grids or internet cables. So if today the same scale storm slams us, extensive damage will happen across the world.

Geomagnetic storms are a hidden risk Earth faces during solar maximum. Experts say that while scientists are aware that the Sun can unleash plasma and Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) on a large scale, what we don't know is how to prepare for them. David Wallace, an Assistant Clinical Professor of Electrical Engineering, warns in an article for ZME Science that the power grid and the internet infrastructure have not been tested against a major solar event, similar to the Carrington Event that slammed Earth in 1859. In May 2024, a G5 geomagnetic storm occurred. It was reported between May 10 and May 13, and is the most powerful geomagnetic storm to affect our planet since the 2003 Halloween storms. But this was nothing compared to the Carrington Event. Wallace examined how Earth will be affected if one day a similar solar storm occurs in the future. Also Read: Sun unleashes M-class solar flare, auroras could light up Earth this week. Details Can a Carrington-scale event happen in the future? Scientists are sure that something like this can happen again, as CMEs are never going to stop during the lifetime of the Sun. Statistical modelling in a 2012 study shows that the probability of a same-scale storm hitting Earth is roughly 12 per cent per decade. Then, a study published in 2019 in Scientific Reports re-analysed historical geomagnetic data and lowered that risk, placing the odds at somewhere between 0.46% and 1.88% per decade. But NOAA and NASA scientists say that during the solar maximum, the short-term probability spikes to 2 to 12 per cent. Also Read: Earth has been hit by cannibal CMEs as Sun reaches its maximum. Here's what will happen to our planet In 2012, the Sun unleashed a massive CME that was physically similar to the 1859 Carrington Event. Earth was just lucky since it had moved out of its way, and the storm reached near our orbit nine days late. It slammed NASA’s STEREO-A spacecraft, which recorded the event. If a Carrington-level event was to happen today and Earth took the direct hit, it would lead to a major upheaval and damage. Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GIC) will move through submarine and terrestrial cables, knocking out data centres. Satellites will be dragged as the Earth's atmosphere expands, causing them to slow down, and some could even fall out of orbit. Navigation systems will be hit, as disrupted GPS signals will affect commercial flights, national defence detection systems and even your smartwatch. Currents exceeding 100 amperes can enter electricity grids, damaging high-voltage transformers internally. This has happened in the past with smaller-level solar storms, when the Hydro-Quebec grid collapsed, leaving 5 million people without power for nine hours. Also Read: Strongest solar storm radiation in over 20 years slams Earth: Where to see auroras? How can damage from massive solar storm be prevented? NOAA Space Weather Prediction Centre monitors solar activity. Even if it spots a major eruption from the Sun early, scientists would only have a few minutes to a few hours to take action. Wallace says we need to shield equipment like transformers with hardware. A total collapse can be avoided by developing "grid-load shedding" strategies.

Earth is highly vulnerable to a major solar storm similar to the Carrington event that occurred in 1859. At that time, there were no power grids or internet cables. So if today the same scale storm slams us, extensive damage will happen across the world.

What would happen if Carrington-scale solar storm slams Earth? Transformers will melt and satellites will fall

Artificial intelligence is fundamentally rewriting the timeline of immunology, moving vaccine development away from traditional, slow-paced lab trials and toward predictive computational modeling. What once took a decade of trial-and-error can now be simulated in a matter of days, promising to shift global healthcare into a proactive stance against both infectious diseases and chronic illnesses like cancer.&nbsp;Historically, the journey from identifying a viral target to manufacturing a viable vaccine has been an arduous, years-long endeavour. However, the integration of advanced deep learning algorithms such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer models has allowed researchers to bypass traditional batch screening. By analysing massive multi-omics data sets, researchers in Cambridge have found thta AI can now predict exactly how human immune cells will interact with specific pathogen fragments, optimising vaccine formulations before they are ever synthesised in a physical laboratory.Redesigning the Platforms of Immunity The impact of this technological leap is most visible across next-generation vaccine platforms. In nucleic acid technology, AI is being leveraged to refine the structural stability of messenger RNA (mRNA) and circular RNA (circRNA) vaccines. While early linear mRNA vaccines revolutionised medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, they remained prone to rapid degradation and required extreme ultra-cold storage networks.&nbsp;By utilising machine learning to design covalently closed circular RNA structures, AI helps maximise molecular stability while minimising adverse, hyper-inflammatory innate immune reactions. Simultaneously, deep learning models are transforming protein subunit vaccine designs by pinpointing the precise, highly immunogenic fragments of an antigen needed to trigger a robust immune response. The role of artificial intelligence extends far beyond molecular structures. Pharmaceutical giants are actively deploying AI-driven process optimisation to streamline manufacturing and safeguard cold-chain distribution networks. Algorithms are now used to track real-time internal temperatures and handle preventative maintenance for thousands of ultra-low temperature freezers globally, ensuring that fragile vaccine yields are not compromised during transit.&nbsp;Concurrently, public health organisations are deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to combat the digital epidemic of vaccine hesitancy. By using natural language processing to monitor sentiment and identify emotionally charged misinformation on digital networks, public health agencies can construct highly empathetic, targeted communication strategies to rebuild institutional trust.&nbsp;Moving forward, the scientific community is pushing for a hybrid "AI-traditional-experimental" paradigm. This approach ensures that while AI supercharges the initial architecture and speeds up predictive mapping, rigorous human oversight and real-world clinical trials remain the final arbiter of safety, solidifying global preparedness against emerging biosecurity threats.

A world-first human trial by Cambridge researchers proves an AI-designed universal vaccine can target entire virus families and stop mutations before they start.

Artificial intelligence is fundamentally rewriting the timeline of immunology, moving vaccine development away from traditional, slow-paced lab trials and toward predictive computational modeling. What once took a decade of trial-and-error can now be simulated in a matter of days, promising to shift global healthcare into a proactive stance against both infectious diseases and chronic illnesses like cancer. Historically, the journey from identifying a viral target to manufacturing a viable vaccine has been an arduous, years-long endeavour. However, the integration of advanced deep learning algorithms such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer models has allowed researchers to bypass traditional batch screening. By analysing massive multi-omics data sets, researchers in Cambridge have found thta AI can now predict exactly how human immune cells will interact with specific pathogen fragments, optimising vaccine formulations before they are ever synthesised in a physical laboratory. Redesigning the Platforms of Immunity The impact of this technological leap is most visible across next-generation vaccine platforms. In nucleic acid technology, AI is being leveraged to refine the structural stability of messenger RNA (mRNA) and circular RNA (circRNA) vaccines. While early linear mRNA vaccines revolutionised medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, they remained prone to rapid degradation and required extreme ultra-cold storage networks. By utilising machine learning to design covalently closed circular RNA structures, AI helps maximise molecular stability while minimising adverse, hyper-inflammatory innate immune reactions. Simultaneously, deep learning models are transforming protein subunit vaccine designs by pinpointing the precise, highly immunogenic fragments of an antigen needed to trigger a robust immune response. The role of artificial intelligence extends far beyond molecular structures. Pharmaceutical giants are actively deploying AI-driven process optimisation to streamline manufacturing and safeguard cold-chain distribution networks. Algorithms are now used to track real-time internal temperatures and handle preventative maintenance for thousands of ultra-low temperature freezers globally, ensuring that fragile vaccine yields are not compromised during transit. Concurrently, public health organisations are deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to combat the digital epidemic of vaccine hesitancy. By using natural language processing to monitor sentiment and identify emotionally charged misinformation on digital networks, public health agencies can construct highly empathetic, targeted communication strategies to rebuild institutional trust. Moving forward, the scientific community is pushing for a hybrid "AI-traditional-experimental" paradigm. This approach ensures that while AI supercharges the initial architecture and speeds up predictive mapping, rigorous human oversight and real-world clinical trials remain the final arbiter of safety, solidifying global preparedness against emerging biosecurity threats.

A world-first human trial by Cambridge researchers proves an AI-designed universal vaccine can target entire virus families and stop mutations before they start.

End of trial-and-error? How AI is predicting the next pandemic’s vaccine today

India has witnessed a major expansion in solar energy in the past few years, and it is one of the fastest and most massive infrastructure transitions in global history. In the last 10 years, the country's solar capacity has scaled over 50 times. India is the world’s 3rd largest solar power producer and the 2nd largest contributor to annual new solar capacity. Its cumulative installed solar capacity has surged past 150 Gigawatts. India added 44.61 GW of solar capacity in a single fiscal year, way more than the targeted 34 GW. The growth means that non-fossil fuel sources now account for over 50 per cent of India's total installed power capacity. But the country is facing major hurdles in achieving its goal of 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030. Experts say that merely increasing installed gigawatts won't solve the problem.&nbsp;“The future of solar in India is promising - but it will be determined less by how many gigawatts we install and more by how intelligently we manage the demand that those gigawatts have to serve. India has made remarkable progress in installed solar power generation, yet installing more solar panels alone won't solve the demand problem, not when the grid can't absorb the power cleanly," Prof Teevrat Garg, Associate Professor of Economics at UC San Diego, told WION News.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/world-environment-day-data-centres-are-coming-to-india-but-at-what-cost-1780567891256">World Environment Day in the age of AI - Are humans sacrificing the climate for data centres?</a><h2>The Duck Curve and green energy&nbsp;</h2>Pointing to the problem, Garg adds, "The culprit is the duck curve: solar drops to zero every evening just as demand hits its second daily peak." The sun is dialled fully up, and solar panels produce a massive surplus of clean energy, during which time the grid’s reliance on traditional power plants plummets. But as evening sets in, solar production falls to zero, but at the same time, when people reach their homes, they switch on their air conditioners, and run appliances, and the demand spikes.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/world-environment-day-sheep-are-making-hay-while-the-sun-shines-fixing-a-major-solar-panel-problem-1780637430293">World Environment Day: Sheep are 'making hay while the sun shines', fixing a major solar panel problem</a>&nbsp;However, Garg says that we have energy sponges in our homes that fix this problem without having to build massive utility batteries or run dirty backup plants. "Think of every air conditioner and water heater in our homes as an untapped buffer — one that can shift when it runs, easing pressure on the grid precisely when renewable energy is scarce," he says. Water heaters and air conditioners can hold onto temperature. A smart grid can signal your AC to run at 3 pm when solar energy is abundant and cheap, cooling your house down a few extra degrees. It can safely shut off or dial back for an hour at 6 pm. If millions of homes can do the same, the evening energy demand would flatten.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/science/ai-could-chug-water-enough-to-sustain-all-8-1-billion-people-on-earth-for-over-a-year-un-report-warns-1780583211386">AI could chug water enough to sustain all 8.1 billion people on Earth for over a year, UN report warns</a>&nbsp;"Early evidence from research with Tata Power found automated appliance switch-offs cut household peak demand by up to 15%, with a net CO₂ mitigation cost that was negative for 75% of participants," Garg stated, adding that the SARWA initiative at J-PAL South Asia is trying to ascertain whether this method can be scaled up.<h2>Is 24x7 green power possible in India?</h2>&nbsp;"To maximise green energy use on India's grid, we need to stop thinking about the problem as purely a supply challenge," Garg said. India is already generating more clean power than ever. But there is a demand-supply mismatch, since the times we need it most are precisely the moments it isn't available. "To use more of the clean energy we're already generating, &nbsp;we need the demand side to flex: shifting consumption away from those peak hours through smart devices, financial incentives, and better-designed tariffs," Garg said. So what India needs is a change in when and how the energy is used.&nbsp;India is maintaining a balance at the moment, with a dual approach to ensure energy security. So it invests three dollars into renewable energy for every dollar spent on fossil fuel power generation.

World Environment Day: Can India reach a day when it sustains purely on solar or green energy? Experts say the problem lies in the Duck curve which needs to be fixed by changing how and when we use solar energy. WION Decodes

India has witnessed a major expansion in solar energy in the past few years, and it is one of the fastest and most massive infrastructure transitions in global history. In the last 10 years, the country's solar capacity has scaled over 50 times. India is the world’s 3rd largest solar power producer and the 2nd largest contributor to annual new solar capacity. Its cumulative installed solar capacity has surged past 150 Gigawatts. India added 44.61 GW of solar capacity in a single fiscal year, way more than the targeted 34 GW. The growth means that non-fossil fuel sources now account for over 50 per cent of India's total installed power capacity. But the country is facing major hurdles in achieving its goal of 500 GW of non-fossil capacity by 2030. Experts say that merely increasing installed gigawatts won't solve the problem. “The future of solar in India is promising - but it will be determined less by how many gigawatts we install and more by how intelligently we manage the demand that those gigawatts have to serve. India has made remarkable progress in installed solar power generation, yet installing more solar panels alone won't solve the demand problem, not when the grid can't absorb the power cleanly," Prof Teevrat Garg, Associate Professor of Economics at UC San Diego, told WION News. Also Read: World Environment Day in the age of AI - Are humans sacrificing the climate for data centres? The Duck Curve and green energy Pointing to the problem, Garg adds, "The culprit is the duck curve: solar drops to zero every evening just as demand hits its second daily peak." The sun is dialled fully up, and solar panels produce a massive surplus of clean energy, during which time the grid’s reliance on traditional power plants plummets. But as evening sets in, solar production falls to zero, but at the same time, when people reach their homes, they switch on their air conditioners, and run appliances, and the demand spikes. Also Read: World Environment Day: Sheep are 'making hay while the sun shines', fixing a major solar panel problem However, Garg says that we have energy sponges in our homes that fix this problem without having to build massive utility batteries or run dirty backup plants. "Think of every air conditioner and water heater in our homes as an untapped buffer — one that can shift when it runs, easing pressure on the grid precisely when renewable energy is scarce," he says. Water heaters and air conditioners can hold onto temperature. A smart grid can signal your AC to run at 3 pm when solar energy is abundant and cheap, cooling your house down a few extra degrees. It can safely shut off or dial back for an hour at 6 pm. If millions of homes can do the same, the evening energy demand would flatten. Also Read: AI could chug water enough to sustain all 8.1 billion people on Earth for over a year, UN report warns "Early evidence from research with Tata Power found automated appliance switch-offs cut household peak demand by up to 15%, with a net CO₂ mitigation cost that was negative for 75% of participants," Garg stated, adding that the SARWA initiative at J-PAL South Asia is trying to ascertain whether this method can be scaled up. Is 24x7 green power possible in India? "To maximise green energy use on India's grid, we need to stop thinking about the problem as purely a supply challenge," Garg said. India is already generating more clean power than ever. But there is a demand-supply mismatch, since the times we need it most are precisely the moments it isn't available. "To use more of the clean energy we're already generating, we need the demand side to flex: shifting consumption away from those peak hours through smart devices, financial incentives, and better-designed tariffs," Garg said. So what India needs is a change in when and how the energy is used. India is maintaining a balance at the moment, with a dual approach to ensure energy security. So it invests three dollars into renewable energy for every dollar spent on fossil fuel power generation.

World Environment Day: Can India reach a day when it sustains purely on solar or green energy? Experts say the problem lies in the Duck curve, which needs to be fixed by changing how and when we use solar energy. WION Decodes

World Environment Day: Is 24x7 solar power possible in India? WION Decodes

science

Science, News on Science, stories on Science, articles on Science, Science stories at Wion, Science news, Science latest news

science

How much did SpaceX's first Falcon 1 rocket launch actually cost?

How many times did SpaceX's rockets fail before their first successful launch?

How close was Elon Musk to losing everything before SpaceX finally succeeded?

Doctors and NHS could be sued for AI-driven diagnosis errors in UK? Report warns

Mysterious North Atlantic 'cold blob' signals major ocean current collapse risk

Scientists discover largest 'whale graveyard' hidden beneath Indian Ocean

Record-breaking black hole winds clocked at 30% the speed of light

What is StormWall? Scientists' plan to protect Earth from dangerous solar storms

WION Decodes | Why does coffee calm some people instead of waking them up?

Next weight-loss breakthrough? AstraZeneca tests a daily pill

Two airplane-sized asteroids approaching Earth on June 9: Do they pose a threat?

Just 90 minutes of strength training a week may help you live longer

WION Decodes | What is 'Godzilla' El Niño and how can it impact the Indian monsoon?

Bioweapons concerns spook AI bosses, researchers: Creator or destroyer?

Scientists discover vast geological structure hidden beneath Antarctica's ice

WION Decodes: ISS has been leaking for nearly 7 years – Why haven’t we fixed it?

Alien hunters issue new rules for sharing possible signs of life beyond Earth

Did scientists just discover the missing piece of a black hole mystery?

Could parents one day choose their baby’s traits?

Scientists rescue seeds from THIS last remaining tree in wild

Green Shield: Can tree planting defuse India’s 2026 El Niño?

ISS leak updates: Roscosmos says first leak has been fixed

NASA satellite spots strongest sign of Super El Nino, confirming all predictions

What would happen if Carrington-scale solar storm slams Earth?