
Ahead of US Presidential election, celebrity endorsements became a key talking point in the race.
DemocratKamala Harris and Republican Donald Trump attracted high-profile supporters, and the contrast in their celebrity backing highlights the cultural divides within American politics.
Kamala Harris garnered the support of a star-studded roster, including pop icons like Taylor Swift, Beyoncé, Jennifer Lopez, Lady Gaga and Bruce Springsteen.
Endorsements by these celebrities, who command large social media followingand have significant cultural influence, may resonate with younger voters who might play a big role in this election and alsothose seeking progressive change.
Artists like Swift have personally articulated their endorsement, emphasising leadership qualities and a commitment to social issues, from women's rights to climate action.
In stark contrast, Donald Trump is backed by a different set of celebrities, including tech mogul Elon Musk, country-rocker Kid Rock, and wrestling legend Hulk Hogan.
While his supporters may not have the same broad appeal in mainstream culture, they are deeply connected to Trump's base, appealing to a demographic that values strong, often provocative personalities.
Musk's transition from a Democratic supporter to a vocal advocate for Trump underscores the shifting political landscape, highlighting how celebrity endorsements can also reflect personal and ideological transformations.
Watch |Is Donald Trump or Kamala Harris Better for the Economy?
Can celebrity endorsements sway voters?
According to recent polls, a minority of Americans report that celebrity endorsements have influenced their political views or decisions.
This scepticism indicates that while celebrities can bring attention to issues and energise specific voter blocs, their overall impact on the electorate might be limited.
Historically, the Democratic Party has leveraged celebrity power effectively, using it to mobilise support and draw attention to critical issues.
However, as seen in the 2016 election with Hillary Clinton, having star power does not guarantee electoral success.
Trump's appeal often lies in his ability to connect with voters through his populist rhetoric and strong messaging, which resonates with his supporters regardless of celebrity endorsements.
As the election draws closer, both candidates will undoubtedly continue to leverage their celebrity supporters to amplify their messages.
For Harris, the backing of cultural icons may help paint a vision of a more inclusive, progressive future. For Trump, the endorsements from figures who represent strength and resilience appeal to his base's desire for a return to perceived American greatness.
Ultimately, the influence of these endorsements will be tested at the ballot box.
As voters weigh their options, the question remains: will celebrity support translate into votes, or will it be overshadowed by deeper ideological divides?
The answer will shape the outcome of this pivotal election.