Less than a Hour after US President Donald Trump announced a five-day postponement of strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure on Monday (March 23), the Israeli military in a social media post said it is “currently conducting strikes” on Iranian regime targets across Tehran.&nbsp;"The Air Force has begun, a short while ago, another wave of strikes targeting infrastructure of the Iranian terror regime across Tehran," the Israeli air force wrote in the post.&nbsp;Earlier in the day, Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/business-economy/oil-prices-tumble-and-global-stocks-rally-as-trump-pauses-iran-strikes-1774274524422">Oil prices tumble, global stocks rally as Trump pauses Iran strikes</a>&nbsp;Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Joe Kent, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center who resigned on March 17, over the handling of the West Asia conflict and the direction of US policy, said the first step toward de-escalation must be restraining Israel’s military actions. “Step 1 in de-escalation must be restraining the Israelis; all efforts to negotiate will follow this pattern,” he wrote on X.&nbsp;Kent warned that even when the US President publicly signals de-escalation, “Israel takes major strikes to destroy the negotiations &amp; in turn weaken our ability to negotiate. The war accelerates,” suggesting that continued escalation risks derailing diplomatic efforts and prolonging the conflict.&nbsp;In his resignation letter, Kent, a 20-year Green Beret veteran and Gold Star husband who lost his wife, Shannon, to a previous Middle Eastern conflict, asserted that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation" and claimed the war was manufactured due to "pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby."&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)&nbsp;

Joe Kent, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center who resigned on March 17, over the handling of the West Asia conflict and the direction of US policy, said the first step toward de-escalation must be restraining Israel’s military actions.

Less than a Hour after US President Donald Trump announced a five-day postponement of strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure on Monday (March 23), the Israeli military in a social media post said it is “currently conducting strikes” on Iranian regime targets across Tehran. "The Air Force has begun, a short while ago, another wave of strikes targeting infrastructure of the Iranian terror regime across Tehran," the Israeli air force wrote in the post. Earlier in the day, Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region. Also Read: Oil prices tumble, global stocks rally as Trump pauses Iran strikes Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week. Meanwhile, Joe Kent, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center who resigned on March 17, over the handling of the West Asia conflict and the direction of US policy, said the first step toward de-escalation must be restraining Israel’s military actions. “Step 1 in de-escalation must be restraining the Israelis; all efforts to negotiate will follow this pattern,” he wrote on X. Kent warned that even when the US President publicly signals de-escalation, “Israel takes major strikes to destroy the negotiations & in turn weaken our ability to negotiate. The war accelerates,” suggesting that continued escalation risks derailing diplomatic efforts and prolonging the conflict. In his resignation letter, Kent, a 20-year Green Beret veteran and Gold Star husband who lost his wife, Shannon, to a previous Middle Eastern conflict, asserted that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation" and claimed the war was manufactured due to "pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby." (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Joe Kent, the former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center who resigned on March 17, over the handling of the West Asia conflict and the direction of US policy, said the first step toward de-escalation must be restraining Israel’s military actions.

Israel strikes Tehran minutes after Trump’s ‘pause’; ex-US counterterrorism chief Joe Kent says ‘Step 1 in de-escalation must be…’

A fresh layer of confusion has emerged over backchannel diplomacy between the US and Iran after Donald Trump claimed he held talks with Iranian representatives, an assertion that Tehran has categorically denied.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-you-re-fired-irgc-mocks-trump-using-his-signature-phrase-after-us-president-s-hit-and-obliterate-warning-over-hormuz-1774249474894">‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz</a>&nbsp;Speaking to CNBC, Trump said discussions had taken place with “representatives” of Iran and described the situation as tantamount to “regime change,” citing the killing and replacement of several Iranian leaders. However, he stopped short of identifying who exactly the US had engaged with, only adding that the talks involved a “respected” Iranian figure.<h2>Iran rejects claim, raises questions over Trump’s contacts</h2>Iranian authorities have firmly denied any direct or indirect communication with Washington, creating a stark contradiction. The denial has intensified speculation over whether Trump’s claims refer to unofficial intermediaries, dissident figures, or parallel diplomatic channels operating outside Tehran’s control.&nbsp;The ambiguity surrounding Trump’s statement, particularly his refusal or inability to name specific interlocutors, has raised critical questions about the legitimacy and credibility of the alleged talks.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-lawmaker-moves-to-recognise-pakistan-s-1971-atrocities-against-bengali-hindus-as-genocide-details-inside-1774168728838">US lawmaker moves to recognise Pakistan’s 1971 atrocities against Bangladeshi Hindus as ‘Genocide’. Details inside</a>&nbsp;Trump’s reference to a “respected” Iranian leader has further deepened the mystery. Without confirmation from Tehran, it remains unclear whether this individual holds any formal authority within Iran’s power structure or represents an external opposition group. The lack of clarity has also fueled concerns among analysts that the US may be engaging with figures who do not have the mandate to negotiate on behalf of the Iranian state.&nbsp;In another striking remark, Trump said he had not heard from Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, and admitted uncertainty over whether he was still alive. He added that he did not want the Iranian leader to be killed. The statement has added to the overall opacity surrounding the situation, particularly at a time when leadership stability in Iran is under intense global scrutiny.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Donald Trump claims talks with Iranian representatives spark confusion as Iran denies contact, raising questions about intermediaries, legitimacy, and unclear diplomatic channels.

A fresh layer of confusion has emerged over backchannel diplomacy between the US and Iran after Donald Trump claimed he held talks with Iranian representatives, an assertion that Tehran has categorically denied. Also read: ‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz Speaking to CNBC, Trump said discussions had taken place with “representatives” of Iran and described the situation as tantamount to “regime change,” citing the killing and replacement of several Iranian leaders. However, he stopped short of identifying who exactly the US had engaged with, only adding that the talks involved a “respected” Iranian figure. Iran rejects claim, raises questions over Trump’s contacts Iranian authorities have firmly denied any direct or indirect communication with Washington, creating a stark contradiction. The denial has intensified speculation over whether Trump’s claims refer to unofficial intermediaries, dissident figures, or parallel diplomatic channels operating outside Tehran’s control. The ambiguity surrounding Trump’s statement, particularly his refusal or inability to name specific interlocutors, has raised critical questions about the legitimacy and credibility of the alleged talks. Also read: US lawmaker moves to recognise Pakistan’s 1971 atrocities against Bangladeshi Hindus as ‘Genocide’. Details inside Trump’s reference to a “respected” Iranian leader has further deepened the mystery. Without confirmation from Tehran, it remains unclear whether this individual holds any formal authority within Iran’s power structure or represents an external opposition group. The lack of clarity has also fueled concerns among analysts that the US may be engaging with figures who do not have the mandate to negotiate on behalf of the Iranian state. In another striking remark, Trump said he had not heard from Iran’s Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, and admitted uncertainty over whether he was still alive. He added that he did not want the Iranian leader to be killed. The statement has added to the overall opacity surrounding the situation, particularly at a time when leadership stability in Iran is under intense global scrutiny. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Donald Trump claims talks with Iranian representatives spark confusion as Iran denies contact, raising questions about intermediaries, legitimacy, and unclear diplomatic channels.

Who did Trump have ‘constructive’ talks with? US president says it’s Iran’s 'representative’, but not Mojtaba Khamenei

The latest escalation between Israel and Iran, marked by fresh missile barrages and intensified air defence activity, has significantly raised regional tensions. According to a recent report, multiple waves of Iranian missiles targeted central Israeli regions, triggering high-alert responses and causing injuries and damage on the ground.While the immediate focus remains on security and civilian safety, analysts suggest that such a conflict could also reshape the domestic political landscape for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Here’s a breakdown of five key problems the war could potentially help him address:&nbsp;1. Shifting focus away from domestic criticism&nbsp;Before the escalation, Netanyahu faced sustained criticism over internal governance issues, including judicial reforms and political divisions. A major external threat often unites the public, shifting attention from internal disputes to national security. The ongoing missile attacks, such as those reported in cities like Holon and near strategic areas like Dimona, have already pushed security concerns to the forefront, reducing space for political opposition.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-will-keep-bombing-our-little-hearts-out-if-trump-on-ending-iran-war-or-not-1774273998926">'Will keep bombing our little hearts out if...': Trump on ending Iran war, or not</a>&nbsp;2. Strengthening leadership image&nbsp;In times of war, leadership is judged on crisis management. Israel’s rapid response - activating air defence systems and deploying rescue crews - projects decisiveness. As the Israeli military intercepts incoming threats and manages civilian safety, Netanyahu can reinforce his image as a strong and experienced wartime leader, which is politically advantageous.&nbsp;3. Delaying political challenges&nbsp;Escalating conflict can delay elections, protests, or legal proceedings. Netanyahu has been under pressure from political rivals and legal scrutiny. A prolonged confrontation with Iran could effectively pause these challenges, as national emergency priorities override routine political processes.&nbsp;4. Consolidating political alliances&nbsp;War situations often force coalition partners and opposition figures to rally behind the government. National unity becomes a priority, reducing fragmentation in Israel’s often complex political system. The scale of the current attacks, with reports of around 150 injured individuals arriving at Soroka Medical Centre, underscores the urgency, making unity more likely.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/epstein-alive-viral-video-palm-beach-pete-florida-1774268590129">Who is Palm Beach Pete? Jeffrey Epstein look-alike who used to party with him</a>&nbsp;5. Reinforcing security narrative&nbsp;Netanyahu has long positioned himself as a leader focused on national security and countering Iran’s regional influence. Direct conflict with Iran reinforces this narrative. The missile barrages and Israel’s defensive response validate longstanding warnings about Iranian threats, potentially strengthening public support for Netanyahu’s security policies.&nbsp;While the human and economic costs of war remain severe, such conflicts often carry significant political consequences. For Netanyahu, the current escalation could reshape both his leadership standing and Israel’s internal political dynamics. However, analysts caution that prolonged conflict also carries risks - military, economic, and diplomatic - that could ultimately outweigh any short-term political gains.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

Iran-Israel escalation may help Benjamin Netanyahu shift focus from domestic criticism, strengthen leadership image, delay political challenges, unify alliances, and reinforce his long-standing security narrative despite serious risks.

The latest escalation between Israel and Iran, marked by fresh missile barrages and intensified air defence activity, has significantly raised regional tensions. According to a recent report, multiple waves of Iranian missiles targeted central Israeli regions, triggering high-alert responses and causing injuries and damage on the ground. While the immediate focus remains on security and civilian safety, analysts suggest that such a conflict could also reshape the domestic political landscape for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Here’s a breakdown of five key problems the war could potentially help him address: 1. Shifting focus away from domestic criticism Before the escalation, Netanyahu faced sustained criticism over internal governance issues, including judicial reforms and political divisions. A major external threat often unites the public, shifting attention from internal disputes to national security. The ongoing missile attacks, such as those reported in cities like Holon and near strategic areas like Dimona, have already pushed security concerns to the forefront, reducing space for political opposition. Also read: 'Will keep bombing our little hearts out if...': Trump on ending Iran war, or not 2. Strengthening leadership image In times of war, leadership is judged on crisis management. Israel’s rapid response - activating air defence systems and deploying rescue crews - projects decisiveness. As the Israeli military intercepts incoming threats and manages civilian safety, Netanyahu can reinforce his image as a strong and experienced wartime leader, which is politically advantageous. 3. Delaying political challenges Escalating conflict can delay elections, protests, or legal proceedings. Netanyahu has been under pressure from political rivals and legal scrutiny. A prolonged confrontation with Iran could effectively pause these challenges, as national emergency priorities override routine political processes. 4. Consolidating political alliances War situations often force coalition partners and opposition figures to rally behind the government. National unity becomes a priority, reducing fragmentation in Israel’s often complex political system. The scale of the current attacks, with reports of around 150 injured individuals arriving at Soroka Medical Centre, underscores the urgency, making unity more likely. Also read: Who is Palm Beach Pete? Jeffrey Epstein look-alike who used to party with him 5. Reinforcing security narrative Netanyahu has long positioned himself as a leader focused on national security and countering Iran’s regional influence. Direct conflict with Iran reinforces this narrative. The missile barrages and Israel’s defensive response validate longstanding warnings about Iranian threats, potentially strengthening public support for Netanyahu’s security policies. While the human and economic costs of war remain severe, such conflicts often carry significant political consequences. For Netanyahu, the current escalation could reshape both his leadership standing and Israel’s internal political dynamics. However, analysts caution that prolonged conflict also carries risks - military, economic, and diplomatic - that could ultimately outweigh any short-term political gains. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran-Israel escalation may help Benjamin Netanyahu shift focus from domestic criticism, strengthen leadership image, delay political challenges, unify alliances, and reinforce his long-standing security narrative despite serious risks.

EXPLAINER: 5 problems Iran war could solve for Israel’s Netanyahu

Donald Trump said the United States and Iran have reached ‘major points of agreement’ following extended discussions late on Sunday (March 22) involving senior American envoys. Speaking to reporters in West Palm Beach, Trump described the talks as highly successful and suggested they could significantly ease ongoing tensions if progress continues. “We’ll see where they lead,” Trump said, later adding, “They went, I would say, perfectly,” and noting that Iran had initiated the outreach. He added, “I would say that if they carry through with that, it’ll end that, that problem, that conflict, and I think it’ll end it very, very substantially.”&nbsp;Trump confirmed that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner participated in the talks. He declined to identify the Iranian counterpart in detail, describing the individual only as a respected leader and clarifying it was not Mojtaba Khamenei.“They want very much to make a deal. We’d like to make a deal too,” Trump said, adding that more phone discussions were expected on Monday, with a face-to-face meeting anticipated soon. He also outlined a short timeline for progress, stating, “We’re doing a five-day period, we’ll see how that goes. That if it goes well we’re going to end up with settling this. Otherwise, we just keep bombing our little hearts out.”&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-pauses-all-military-strikes-against-iranian-energy-sites-for-five-days-1774264303064">Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days</a>&nbsp;Trump emphasised that any agreement would hinge on Iran abandoning nuclear weapons ambitions. “We want to see no nuclear bomb, no nuclear weapon,” he said. He also indicated the US would seek control of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, saying, “The nuclear dust. We’re gonna want that. And I think we’re gonna get that. We’ve agreed to that.”<h2>Trump hints he would still seek $200bn in Pentagon funding</h2>Despite signaling interest in reducing conflict, Trump said he would still pursue a major increase in defense spending, potentially seeking $200 billion for the Pentagon. He argued such funding is necessary given global instability, while also criticizing political opponents. “It’s nice to have, it’s always nice to have, it’s a very inflamed world,” Trump told CNN, adding, “And the Democrats inflame it, you know, largely the Democrats inflame it.”&nbsp;However, passing such funding could prove difficult, as Republican lawmakers remain uncertain about backing the proposal without more detailed plans. Earlier, Trump said talks over the past two days had been productive and aimed at fully resolving hostilities in the Middle East. Reiterating his position, he noted the discussions were ongoing and expressed confidence that an agreement could be reached soon. He again stressed that Iran had initiated contact, saying, “I didn’t call, they called – and they wanted to make a deal.”&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

'Will keep bombing our little hearts out if...': Trump on ending Iran war, or not

Donald Trump said the United States and Iran have reached ‘major points of agreement’ following extended discussions late on Sunday (March 22) involving senior American envoys. Speaking to reporters in West Palm Beach, Trump described the talks as highly successful and suggested they could significantly ease ongoing tensions if progress continues. “We’ll see where they lead,” Trump said, later adding, “They went, I would say, perfectly,” and noting that Iran had initiated the outreach. He added, “I would say that if they carry through with that, it’ll end that, that problem, that conflict, and I think it’ll end it very, very substantially.” Trump confirmed that Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner participated in the talks. He declined to identify the Iranian counterpart in detail, describing the individual only as a respected leader and clarifying it was not Mojtaba Khamenei. “They want very much to make a deal. We’d like to make a deal too,” Trump said, adding that more phone discussions were expected on Monday, with a face-to-face meeting anticipated soon. He also outlined a short timeline for progress, stating, “We’re doing a five-day period, we’ll see how that goes. That if it goes well we’re going to end up with settling this. Otherwise, we just keep bombing our little hearts out.” Also Read: Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days Trump emphasised that any agreement would hinge on Iran abandoning nuclear weapons ambitions. “We want to see no nuclear bomb, no nuclear weapon,” he said. He also indicated the US would seek control of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, saying, “The nuclear dust. We’re gonna want that. And I think we’re gonna get that. We’ve agreed to that.” Trump hints he would still seek $200bn in Pentagon funding Despite signaling interest in reducing conflict, Trump said he would still pursue a major increase in defense spending, potentially seeking $200 billion for the Pentagon. He argued such funding is necessary given global instability, while also criticizing political opponents. “It’s nice to have, it’s always nice to have, it’s a very inflamed world,” Trump told CNN, adding, “And the Democrats inflame it, you know, largely the Democrats inflame it.” However, passing such funding could prove difficult, as Republican lawmakers remain uncertain about backing the proposal without more detailed plans. Earlier, Trump said talks over the past two days had been productive and aimed at fully resolving hostilities in the Middle East. Reiterating his position, he noted the discussions were ongoing and expressed confidence that an agreement could be reached soon. He again stressed that Iran had initiated contact, saying, “I didn’t call, they called – and they wanted to make a deal.” Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations, and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos, and videos.

Trump says US–Iran talks made major progress, with a possible deal soon on nuclear limits, while also pushing for increased Pentagon funding

Oil prices dropped sharply moments after US President Donald Trump announced a five-day postponement of strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure on Monday (March 23). Brent crude fell over 15 per cent during the session, dropping to $96 per barrel and sliding below $100 for the first time since March 11, while the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fell 13.5 per cent, reaching a session low of $80.28.&nbsp;However, prices later rebounded, with Brent rising to $104 per barrel and WTI climbing to $90.55.&nbsp;US stock futures surged on the news. The S&amp;P 500 jumped 1.4%, while Dow Jones futures rose over 800 points (1.9%) before the opening bell, clawing back some of the losses sustained since the war began on February 28.&nbsp;European bourses staged a dramatic recovery. The FTSE 100 (London), DAX (Frankfurt), and CAC 40 (Paris) all swung from nearly 2% down in morning trading to positive territory within minutes of the Truth Social post. The relief came too late for most Asian markets, which had already closed with heavy losses.&nbsp;Earlier in the day, Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure.&nbsp;Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week.&nbsp;The US President has come under intense domestic and international pressure due to rising energy prices caused by Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20 per cent of global oil transits. Crude oil has been trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the conflict.&nbsp;This relief in markets comes after a period of volatility driven by Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Crude oil had remained above $100 a barrel since the conflict began.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-pauses-all-military-strikes-against-iranian-energy-sites-for-five-days-1774264303064">Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days</a>Confusing messaging from Trump also added to market volatility, as he kept the US stance on the Strait of Hormuz unclear. Earlier, he had called for multilateral naval support from European allies to force open the vital waterway. However, after being snubbed by partners, he said Washington was not concerned, as it does not depend on the strait for its energy needs. On Saturday, he again shifted his position by issuing a deadline to Iran.&nbsp;The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US-Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high-ranking military commanders.&nbsp;Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Brent crude fell over 15 per cent during the session, dropping to $96 per barrel and sliding below $100 for the first time since March 11, while the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fell 13.5 per cent, reaching a session low of $80.28.

Oil prices dropped sharply moments after US President Donald Trump announced a five-day postponement of strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure on Monday (March 23). Brent crude fell over 15 per cent during the session, dropping to $96 per barrel and sliding below $100 for the first time since March 11, while the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fell 13.5 per cent, reaching a session low of $80.28. However, prices later rebounded, with Brent rising to $104 per barrel and WTI climbing to $90.55. US stock futures surged on the news. The S&P 500 jumped 1.4%, while Dow Jones futures rose over 800 points (1.9%) before the opening bell, clawing back some of the losses sustained since the war began on February 28. European bourses staged a dramatic recovery. The FTSE 100 (London), DAX (Frankfurt), and CAC 40 (Paris) all swung from nearly 2% down in morning trading to positive territory within minutes of the Truth Social post. The relief came too late for most Asian markets, which had already closed with heavy losses. Earlier in the day, Trump announced in a social media post a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. Notably, the US President underlined that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to continue throughout the week. The US President has come under intense domestic and international pressure due to rising energy prices caused by Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20 per cent of global oil transits. Crude oil has been trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the conflict. This relief in markets comes after a period of volatility driven by Iran’s effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Crude oil had remained above $100 a barrel since the conflict began. Also Read: Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days Confusing messaging from Trump also added to market volatility, as he kept the US stance on the Strait of Hormuz unclear. Earlier, he had called for multilateral naval support from European allies to force open the vital waterway. However, after being snubbed by partners, he said Washington was not concerned, as it does not depend on the strait for its energy needs. On Saturday, he again shifted his position by issuing a deadline to Iran. The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US-Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high-ranking military commanders. Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

Brent crude fell over 15 per cent during the session, dropping to $96 per barrel and sliding below $100 for the first time since March 11, while the US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fell 13.5 per cent, reaching a session low of $80.28.

Oil prices tumble, global stocks rally as Trump pauses Iran strikes

A video from Florida has gone viral with a man with identical physical features to the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein driving on I-95 in South Florida. The video showed a grey-haired man wearing a reversed white baseball cap and dark sunglasses driving around in a convertible. As people shout in the background, “Epstein is alive”. The video accumulated millions of views within hours, adding to the theories that Epstein was alive. The man revealed that he is not Jeffrey Epstein, but &nbsp;Peter Simel, aka Palm Beach Pete. Some commentators suggested that Epstein has undergone plastic surgery and a rebranding and has been hiding till now.<h2>Who is Palm Beach Pete?</h2>Palm Beach Pete was a former Division 1 tennis player and a gold medalist. He was also a retired commercial real estate executive who previously lived and worked in New York City. Palm Beach Pete said that he was at a Hockey game with his kids, and someone filmed him with a banner that said “Jeffrey Epstein rising from the grave”, which supposedly went viral. &nbsp;He claimed that he also briefly appeared in The Real Housewives of New York City, where Sonja Morgan greeted him with a kiss. During COVID, someone posted that clip, which also went viral before being taken down. He said that he was used to such situations, but the level of attention this time was overwhelming. He said that he has gotten some hate online, but people are mostly respectful when they encounter him in person.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kharg-island-crisis-houthis-red-sea-threat-us-iran-war-1774256385090">Kharg Island crisis: Houthi threatens to disrupt Bab al-Mandab if US invades Kharg Island</a><h2>Is Palm Beach Pete linked to Jeffrey Epstein</h2>Pete said that he went to a couple of parties where Epstein was also present. He said that Epstein seemed “creepy” sitting on a couch and “staying to himself”. Epstein was supposedly not that magnitude he became later on. Pete called Epstein “mysterious” and people had no idea how he “made money”. He launched social media accounts under the names “Not Epstein” and “Not.Epstein,”. “I could be the guy, but I’m not the guy", said Pete. “I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. He’s a very bad person, and he is dead- and I’m alive.”&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">WATCH | &#39;I’m NOT Jeffrey Epstein, I&#39;m Palm Beach PETE!&#39; Florida man in VIRAL video. <a href="https://t.co/1BJJ0k4nLh">pic.twitter.com/1BJJ0k4nLh</a>&mdash; The Page Z (@ThePageZ_) <a href="https://twitter.com/ThePageZ_/status/2034856382416228836?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">BREAKING: Palm Beach Pete is making his rounds on social media after the viral video of him looking like Epstein. &quot;I want to thank everyone for their support. I am so not Epstein.&quot; &quot;He is dead and I am alive.&quot; <a href="https://t.co/T0CoL9Q0Ks">pic.twitter.com/T0CoL9Q0Ks</a>&mdash; AmericanPapaBear™ (@AmericaPapaBear) <a href="https://twitter.com/AmericaPapaBear/status/2035042056666791959?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Epstein-lookalike ‘Palm Beach Pete’ says he partied with Epstein, nobody knows how he got rich <a href="https://t.co/lBwSvgKAn3">pic.twitter.com/lBwSvgKAn3</a>&mdash; RT (@RT_com) <a href="https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/2035139756867080275?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 20, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

A viral Florida video sparked rumours that Jeffrey Epstein is alive. Here’s the truth about Palm Beach Pete, the man mistaken for the late financier.

A video from Florida has gone viral with a man with identical physical features to the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein driving on I-95 in South Florida. The video showed a grey-haired man wearing a reversed white baseball cap and dark sunglasses driving around in a convertible. As people shout in the background, “Epstein is alive”. The video accumulated millions of views within hours, adding to the theories that Epstein was alive. The man revealed that he is not Jeffrey Epstein, but Peter Simel, aka Palm Beach Pete. Some commentators suggested that Epstein has undergone plastic surgery and a rebranding and has been hiding till now. Who is Palm Beach Pete? Palm Beach Pete was a former Division 1 tennis player and a gold medalist. He was also a retired commercial real estate executive who previously lived and worked in New York City. Palm Beach Pete said that he was at a Hockey game with his kids, and someone filmed him with a banner that said “Jeffrey Epstein rising from the grave”, which supposedly went viral. He claimed that he also briefly appeared in The Real Housewives of New York City, where Sonja Morgan greeted him with a kiss. During COVID, someone posted that clip, which also went viral before being taken down. He said that he was used to such situations, but the level of attention this time was overwhelming. He said that he has gotten some hate online, but people are mostly respectful when they encounter him in person. Also Read: Kharg Island crisis: Houthi threatens to disrupt Bab al-Mandab if US invades Kharg Island Is Palm Beach Pete linked to Jeffrey Epstein Pete said that he went to a couple of parties where Epstein was also present. He said that Epstein seemed “creepy” sitting on a couch and “staying to himself”. Epstein was supposedly not that magnitude he became later on. Pete called Epstein “mysterious” and people had no idea how he “made money”. He launched social media accounts under the names “Not Epstein” and “Not.Epstein,”. “I could be the guy, but I’m not the guy", said Pete. “I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. He’s a very bad person, and he is dead- and I’m alive.”

A viral Florida video sparked rumours that Jeffrey Epstein is alive. Here’s the truth about Palm Beach Pete, the man mistaken for the late financier.

Who is Palm Beach Pete? Jeffrey Epstein look-alike who used to party with him

Operations at Newark Liberty International Airport were temporarily halted on Monday (March 23) morning after air traffic controllers evacuated the control tower due to a reported burning odor, officials said. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, the incident occurred around 7:30 am local time when staff detected a smell linked to an elevator. Although no fire was found, the situation prompted an immediate evacuation as a precaution.<h2>What's happening at Newark Liberty International Airport?</h2>As a result, both incoming and outgoing flights were paused while authorities assessed the situation. The FAA noted that air traffic control operations would be shifted to a backup facility during the disruption. A ground stop, one of the strictest traffic control measures, was implemented, requiring eligible aircraft to remain grounded until conditions were cleared. The disruption followed a separate overnight incident at LaGuardia Airport, where an Air Canada aircraft collided with a fire truck. The crash resulted in the deaths of both pilots and left dozens of passengers injured.&nbsp;Also See: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/laguardia-airport-plane-crash-air-canada-flight-collides-with-fire-truck-two-pilots-killed-dozens-injured-in-runway-disaster-what-we-know-so-far-1774267236232">LaGuardia airport plane crash: Air Canada flight collides with fire truck, two pilots killed, dozens injured in runway disaster. What we know so far</a>&nbsp;"Arrivals and departures are temporarily paused at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey after air traffic controllers evacuated the tower because of a burning smell coming from an elevator," the FAA said in a statement. "It happened around 7:30 am local time on Monday, March 23."&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-russian-attacks-on-kyiv-captured-from-space-by-international-space-station-1774270806502/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-russian-attacks-on-kyiv-captured-from-space-by-international-space-station-1774270806502/embed</a> Emergency responders transported 41 individuals to hospitals after the collision, with several reported in serious condition. Many were later discharged after receiving treatment. Newark Liberty is one of the primary airports serving the New York City region and ranks among the busiest, alongside John F. Kennedy International Airport.&nbsp;"Arrivals and departures ‌are temporarily paused at Newark Liberty International Airport in ​New Jersey after air traffic controllers evacuated the tower because of a burning ​smell coming from an elevator," ⁠the FAA said in a statement.

What’s going on at Newark airport? Flight operations stopped after control tower evacuation

Operations at Newark Liberty International Airport were temporarily halted on Monday (March 23) morning after air traffic controllers evacuated the control tower due to a reported burning odor, officials said. According to the Federal Aviation Administration, the incident occurred around 7:30 am local time when staff detected a smell linked to an elevator. Although no fire was found, the situation prompted an immediate evacuation as a precaution. What's happening at Newark Liberty International Airport? As a result, both incoming and outgoing flights were paused while authorities assessed the situation. The FAA noted that air traffic control operations would be shifted to a backup facility during the disruption. A ground stop, one of the strictest traffic control measures, was implemented, requiring eligible aircraft to remain grounded until conditions were cleared. The disruption followed a separate overnight incident at LaGuardia Airport, where an Air Canada aircraft collided with a fire truck. The crash resulted in the deaths of both pilots and left dozens of passengers injured. Also See: LaGuardia airport plane crash: Air Canada flight collides with fire truck, two pilots killed, dozens injured in runway disaster. What we know so far "Arrivals and departures are temporarily paused at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey after air traffic controllers evacuated the tower because of a burning smell coming from an elevator," the FAA said in a statement. "It happened around 7:30 am local time on Monday, March 23." https://www.wionews.com/videos/russia-ukraine-war-russian-attacks-on-kyiv-captured-from-space-by-international-space-station-1774270806502/embed Emergency responders transported 41 individuals to hospitals after the collision, with several reported in serious condition. Many were later discharged after receiving treatment. Newark Liberty is one of the primary airports serving the New York City region and ranks among the busiest, alongside John F. Kennedy International Airport. "Arrivals and departures ‌are temporarily paused at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey after air traffic controllers evacuated the tower because of a burning smell coming from an elevator," ⁠the FAA said in a statement.

Flights at Newark Airport were temporarily halted after a tower evacuation due to a burning smell, following a deadly Air Canada crash at LaGuardia

A clear contradiction has emerged between Washington and Tehran after US President Donald Trump said on Monday (March 23) that the two countries held “very good and productive conversations,” while Iran categorically denied that any such talks took place.&nbsp;Posting on Truth Social, Trump said the US and Iran had engaged in “in-depth, detailed, and constructive conversations” over the past two days. He also announced a five-day postponement of planned US strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure, citing the “tone and tenor” of these discussions.&nbsp;However, Iran’s foreign ministry rejected the claim, stating there are no ongoing talks between Tehran and Washington. The statement, reported by Mehr News Agency, described Trump’s remarks as part of an effort to influence energy markets and gain time.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/laguardia-airport-plane-crash-air-canada-flight-collides-with-fire-truck-two-pilots-killed-dozens-injured-in-runway-disaster-what-we-know-so-far-1774267236232">LaGuardia airport plane crash: Air Canada flight collides with fire truck, two pilots killed, dozens injured in runway disaster. What we know so far</a>&nbsp;Separately, Fars News Agency, which is affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), reported that there has been “no direct or indirect contact” with Trump. An Iranian source reiterated that no communication had taken place.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/iran-war-and-nato-doublespeak-chief-rutte-says-will-secure-hormuz-strait-as-alliance-troops-quietly-exit-iraq-to-secure-locations-iran-israel-us-1774260682687">Iran and NATO: Alliance wants to secure Hormuz as troops move to 'secure areas'</a>&nbsp;Another IRGC-linked outlet, Tasnim News Agency, also quoted a senior security official as saying, “No negotiations have taken place and none are underway.” The official added that Iran had communicated through intermediaries that it would continue its defensive actions until what it described as a necessary level of deterrence is reached.&nbsp;Iranian officials acknowledged that some regional countries have attempted to mediate and reduce tensions. However, Tehran maintained that it is not engaged in negotiations and that such efforts should be directed toward Washington.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-urges-political-diplomatic-solution-as-trump-s-48-hour-hormuz-deadline-nears-1774263280134">Russia urges political, diplomatic solution as Trump’s 48-hour deadline nears</a>&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

Iran denied any talks with Donald Trump after he claimed “constructive conversations,” calling it misinformation aimed at influencing markets, while IRGC-linked outlets reiterated no direct or indirect contact occurred.

A clear contradiction has emerged between Washington and Tehran after US President Donald Trump said on Monday (March 23) that the two countries held “very good and productive conversations,” while Iran categorically denied that any such talks took place. Posting on Truth Social, Trump said the US and Iran had engaged in “in-depth, detailed, and constructive conversations” over the past two days. He also announced a five-day postponement of planned US strikes on Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure, citing the “tone and tenor” of these discussions. However, Iran’s foreign ministry rejected the claim, stating there are no ongoing talks between Tehran and Washington. The statement, reported by Mehr News Agency, described Trump’s remarks as part of an effort to influence energy markets and gain time. Also read: LaGuardia airport plane crash: Air Canada flight collides with fire truck, two pilots killed, dozens injured in runway disaster. What we know so far Separately, Fars News Agency, which is affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), reported that there has been “no direct or indirect contact” with Trump. An Iranian source reiterated that no communication had taken place. Also read: Iran and NATO: Alliance wants to secure Hormuz as troops move to 'secure areas' Another IRGC-linked outlet, Tasnim News Agency, also quoted a senior security official as saying, “No negotiations have taken place and none are underway.” The official added that Iran had communicated through intermediaries that it would continue its defensive actions until what it described as a necessary level of deterrence is reached. Iranian officials acknowledged that some regional countries have attempted to mediate and reduce tensions. However, Tehran maintained that it is not engaged in negotiations and that such efforts should be directed toward Washington. Also read: Russia urges political, diplomatic solution as Trump’s 48-hour deadline nears Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran denied any talks with Donald Trump after he claimed “constructive conversations,” calling it misinformation aimed at influencing markets, while IRGC-linked outlets reiterated no direct or indirect contact occurred.

‘No direct or indirect talks’: Iran denies conversation with Trump after US prez claims 'detailed, constructive’ talks

LaGuardia airport plane crash: Air Canada flight collides with fire truck, two pilots killed, dozens injured in runway disaster. What we know so far

Indian citizens who bought property in Dubai using an international credit card are now under the radar of the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The ED have sent a notice to the property buyers questioning their sources of funds. According to an ET report, at least three such buyers have received notifications from ED in February. According to the report, buyers unknowingly have either used an international credit card or used links sent by the realtor to pay the initial booking amount.“The recent round of ED notices has gone to individuals who may have unknowingly used credit cards to buy UAE properties. They should approach the RBI to regularise the mode of payment. RBI may take a lenient view as the money is legitimate even if the mode of payment is wrong,” said Rajesh Shah, partner at the &nbsp;CA firm Jayantilal Thakkar.<h2>Can Indians use foreign credit to buy foreign property?</h2>For Indian citizens, purchase of property abroad is governed by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the RBI's Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS). Under the LRS, people are allowed to transfer up to $250,000 a year for various permitted foreign exchange transactions. These transactions could be current account transactions like travel, education, healthcare, gifts and capital account transactions like purchase of land or investment in foreign shares, etc. There are various tax slabs for Tax Collection at Source for the purpose of remittance of amounts exceeding ₹10 lakh. Those transfers should happen through authorised banking channels. Using credit cards or borrowing funds makes those transactions non-compliant.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/kharg-island-crisis-houthis-red-sea-threat-us-iran-war-1774256385090">Kharg Island crisis: Houthi threatens to disrupt Bab al-Mandab if US invades Kharg Island</a><h2>How can buyers regularise transactions now?</h2>Buyers can regularise transactions buy going for compunding and paying a penalty. This could also suggest paying fresh funds through proper taxable channel while the builder send back the payments from the earlier transactions or in some cases the buyer may have to completely unwind from the transaction.&nbsp;"Such compounding is typically subject to a no-objection from the ED, which in recent cases has been granted where it is satisfied that permitting compounding is aligned with the true spirit and intent of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). In such cases, the RBI is empowered to cap the compounding amount at ₹2 lakhs," said &nbsp;Pankaj Bhuta, founder of the CA firm P. R. Bhuta &amp; Co.&nbsp;

ED has sent notices to Indians who bought Dubai property using credit cards. Here’s what FEMA and RBI rules say and how buyers can regularise transactions.

Indian citizens who bought property in Dubai using an international credit card are now under the radar of the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The ED have sent a notice to the property buyers questioning their sources of funds. According to an ET report, at least three such buyers have received notifications from ED in February. According to the report, buyers unknowingly have either used an international credit card or used links sent by the realtor to pay the initial booking amount. “The recent round of ED notices has gone to individuals who may have unknowingly used credit cards to buy UAE properties. They should approach the RBI to regularise the mode of payment. RBI may take a lenient view as the money is legitimate even if the mode of payment is wrong,” said Rajesh Shah, partner at the CA firm Jayantilal Thakkar. Can Indians use foreign credit to buy foreign property? For Indian citizens, purchase of property abroad is governed by the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the RBI's Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS). Under the LRS, people are allowed to transfer up to $250,000 a year for various permitted foreign exchange transactions. These transactions could be current account transactions like travel, education, healthcare, gifts and capital account transactions like purchase of land or investment in foreign shares, etc. There are various tax slabs for Tax Collection at Source for the purpose of remittance of amounts exceeding ₹10 lakh. Those transfers should happen through authorised banking channels. Using credit cards or borrowing funds makes those transactions non-compliant. Also Read: Kharg Island crisis: Houthi threatens to disrupt Bab al-Mandab if US invades Kharg Island How can buyers regularise transactions now? Buyers can regularise transactions buy going for compunding and paying a penalty. This could also suggest paying fresh funds through proper taxable channel while the builder send back the payments from the earlier transactions or in some cases the buyer may have to completely unwind from the transaction. "Such compounding is typically subject to a no-objection from the ED, which in recent cases has been granted where it is satisfied that permitting compounding is aligned with the true spirit and intent of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). In such cases, the RBI is empowered to cap the compounding amount at ₹2 lakhs," said Pankaj Bhuta, founder of the CA firm P. R. Bhuta & Co.

ED has sent notices to Indians who bought Dubai property using credit cards. Here’s what FEMA and RBI rules say and how buyers can regularise transactions.

ED flags Indians buying Dubai property via credit cards: FEMA, RBI rules explained

Iran war, Strait of Hormuz, and NATO troop withdrawals: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has said he was “absolutely convinced” that an international effort would soon secure the Strait of Hormuz amid the Iran-US-Israel war. He expressed the need to protect global trade and freedom of navigation in the strait, through which 20 per cent of global oil trade flows. Just a couple of days before his interviews with US broadcasters, a quieter development unfolded: NATO troops were filmed leaving positions in Iraq, reportedly for “safer locations”.<h2>NATO completes relocation of personnel from Iraq</h2>The troops of the alliance, of which the US is a key member, moved to safer positions in Europe, including Joint Force Command Naples. It was described as a temporary “posture adjustment” in response to escalating regional threats linked to Iran. This is essentially due to the growing risk of Iranian drone and missile attacks on Western facilities in the region.<h2>NATO’s dual narrative: Talking about strength but acting with caution</h2>Rutte spoke about a newly formed 22-country coalition, comprising several NATO members alongside Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Gulf states such as UAE and Bahrain. Their objective was to coordinate naval escorts, patrols, and minesweeping operations to stabilise shipping lanes in the Hormuz corridor. At the time of writing, however, not a single military deployment has taken place from this coalition to secure the strait.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/russia-urges-political-diplomatic-solution-as-trump-s-48-hour-hormuz-deadline-nears-1774263280134">Russia urges political, diplomatic solution as Trump’s 48-hour Hormuz deadline nears</a><h2>Despite Trump’s initial appeal, NATO has not acted on Article 5</h2>In his remarks, Rutte was accommodative of US President Donald Trump’s appeal to nations to help secure the strait. However, in reality, there has been no invocation of Article 5, the so-called “one for all, all for one” clause of NATO. There is no unified alliance deployment in the region either.Against this backdrop, NATO’s withdrawal from Iraq reflects a different reality. The alliance is sensitive to direct risk exposure of its troops in volatile theatres. NATO’s physical footprint has been reduced in the region, and the advisory and training mission continues remotely.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-tehran-blames-us-for-closure-of-strait-of-hormuz-1774251885773/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-tehran-blames-us-for-closure-of-strait-of-hormuz-1774251885773/embed</a><h2>Risk management is central to NATO approach</h2>The dual approach is partly because Iraq presented an immediate and direct threat environment for stationed NATO personnel. Their relocation reduces vulnerability. The public signalling from Rutte on securing Hormuz is more of a reassurance to global markets and key allies that energy supply chains remain a priority.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/indian-navy-guides-india-flagged-vessels-through-strait-of-hormuz-1774256529979">Indian Navy guides India-flagged vessels through Strait of Hormuz</a><h2>Securing Strait of Hormuz: Who is actually committing forces?</h2>Among NATO members, the UK has taken a leading role in planning and logistical support, but even London has been explicit that this is not a NATO warfighting mission. Other top NATO members France, Germany, and Italy have also shown caution, stressing diplomacy, post-conflict stabilisation, and limited engagement rather than direct naval deployment in the region. The G7, which includes key NATO members, has issued statements supporting the protection of global energy supplies, but without necessarily committing military assets.<h2>NATO is slow-pedalling the Iran situation&nbsp;</h2>The challenge for NATO is balancing competing priorities: maintaining global economic stability, avoiding deep military entanglement, and preserving alliance cohesion amid differing national interests. This is the main reason for what appears to be doublespeak. It is, at best, calibrated communication while maintaining strategic ambiguity.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-will-completely-close-the-strait-of-hormuz-iran-responds-to-trump-s-48-hour-ultimatum-1774196432013">‘We will completely close the Strait of Hormuz’: Iran responds to Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum</a><h2>Perspective: NATO story is about politics, not just words</h2>For observers, this is typical alliance behaviour, as alliances speak with one voice but act with many. Public assurances often coexist with private caution, as is evident in the NATO approach in the current Iran war context. In essence, NATO is not working as a unified bloc to reopen the strait. It is attempting a carefully assembled coalition, navigating geopolitical risk and political reality, one decision at a time.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

Iran war: NATO talked about securing the Strait of Hormuz with a coalition of nations, while quietly withdrawing its troops from Iraq. A calculated strategy of risk management? NATO's differing signalling is part of  coalition diplomacy and strategic ambiguity amid an ever-changing war

Iran war, Strait of Hormuz, and NATO troop withdrawals: NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has said he was “absolutely convinced” that an international effort would soon secure the Strait of Hormuz amid the Iran-US-Israel war. He expressed the need to protect global trade and freedom of navigation in the strait, through which 20 per cent of global oil trade flows. Just a couple of days before his interviews with US broadcasters, a quieter development unfolded: NATO troops were filmed leaving positions in Iraq, reportedly for “safer locations”. NATO completes relocation of personnel from Iraq The troops of the alliance, of which the US is a key member, moved to safer positions in Europe, including Joint Force Command Naples. It was described as a temporary “posture adjustment” in response to escalating regional threats linked to Iran. This is essentially due to the growing risk of Iranian drone and missile attacks on Western facilities in the region. NATO’s dual narrative: Talking about strength but acting with caution Rutte spoke about a newly formed 22-country coalition, comprising several NATO members alongside Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Gulf states such as UAE and Bahrain. Their objective was to coordinate naval escorts, patrols, and minesweeping operations to stabilise shipping lanes in the Hormuz corridor. At the time of writing, however, not a single military deployment has taken place from this coalition to secure the strait. Also read: Russia urges political, diplomatic solution as Trump’s 48-hour Hormuz deadline nears Despite Trump’s initial appeal, NATO has not acted on Article 5 In his remarks, Rutte was accommodative of US President Donald Trump’s appeal to nations to help secure the strait. However, in reality, there has been no invocation of Article 5, the so-called “one for all, all for one” clause of NATO. There is no unified alliance deployment in the region either. Against this backdrop, NATO’s withdrawal from Iraq reflects a different reality. The alliance is sensitive to direct risk exposure of its troops in volatile theatres. NATO’s physical footprint has been reduced in the region, and the advisory and training mission continues remotely. https://www.wionews.com/videos/iran-war-tehran-blames-us-for-closure-of-strait-of-hormuz-1774251885773/embed Risk management is central to NATO approach The dual approach is partly because Iraq presented an immediate and direct threat environment for stationed NATO personnel. Their relocation reduces vulnerability. The public signalling from Rutte on securing Hormuz is more of a reassurance to global markets and key allies that energy supply chains remain a priority. Also read: Indian Navy guides India-flagged vessels through Strait of Hormuz Securing Strait of Hormuz: Who is actually committing forces? Among NATO members, the UK has taken a leading role in planning and logistical support, but even London has been explicit that this is not a NATO warfighting mission. Other top NATO members France, Germany, and Italy have also shown caution, stressing diplomacy, post-conflict stabilisation, and limited engagement rather than direct naval deployment in the region. The G7, which includes key NATO members, has issued statements supporting the protection of global energy supplies, but without necessarily committing military assets. NATO is slow-pedalling the Iran situation The challenge for NATO is balancing competing priorities: maintaining global economic stability, avoiding deep military entanglement, and preserving alliance cohesion amid differing national interests. This is the main reason for what appears to be doublespeak. It is, at best, calibrated communication while maintaining strategic ambiguity. Also read: ‘We will completely close the Strait of Hormuz’: Iran responds to Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum Perspective: NATO story is about politics, not just words For observers, this is typical alliance behaviour, as alliances speak with one voice but act with many. Public assurances often coexist with private caution, as is evident in the NATO approach in the current Iran war context. In essence, NATO is not working as a unified bloc to reopen the strait. It is attempting a carefully assembled coalition, navigating geopolitical risk and political reality, one decision at a time. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Iran war: NATO talked about securing the Strait of Hormuz with a coalition of nations, while quietly withdrawing its troops from Iraq. A calculated strategy of risk management? NATO's differing signalling is part of &nbsp;coalition diplomacy and strategic ambiguity amid an ever-changing war

Iran war and NATO doublespeak: Chief Rutte says ‘will secure Hormuz Strait’ as alliance troops quietly exit Iraq to 'secure locations’

Russia on Monday (March 23) called for a "political and diplomatic" settlement to the West Asia war as the deadline for US President Donald Trump's ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz nears. Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for the shipping of around 20 per cent of the global oil supply, since the start of the war on February 28.&nbsp;"We believe that the situation should transition to a political and diplomatic settlement," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists.&nbsp;"This is the only thing that can effectively contribute to defusing the catastrophically tense situation that has now developed in the region," Peskov said.&nbsp;Russia also warned against striking Iran's only operational nuclear power plant at Bushehr, built with Moscow's assistance, after a UN watchdog announced last week that it was hit by a projectile.&nbsp;"Of course, this poses a very serious security threat if this trend continues," Peskov said on Monday.&nbsp;"We consider strikes on nuclear facilities to be potentially extremely dangerous and fraught with, perhaps even irreversible, consequences," he added.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-you-re-fired-irgc-mocks-trump-using-his-signature-phrase-after-us-president-s-hit-and-obliterate-warning-over-hormuz-1774249474894">‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after the US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz</a>&nbsp;These statements follow US President Donald Trump’s latest 48-hour ultimatum to Iran, issued on Saturday, warning that the United States will "obliterate" Iran's power plants, starting with the largest first, if the Strait of Hormuz is not fully reopened.&nbsp;Based on the timing of the post, the 48-hour window is set to expire late Monday night, as global oil prices surge due to the effective closure of the waterway.&nbsp;"If Iran doesn't FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!" Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.&nbsp;The US President came under intense domestic and international pressure due to rising energy prices, with crude oil trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the war on February 28. Confusing messaging from Donald Trump also added to market volatility, as he kept the US stance on the Strait of Hormuz unclear. Earlier, he had called for multilateral naval support from European allies to force open the vital waterway.&nbsp;&nbsp;However, after being snubbed by partners, he said Washington was not concerned, as it does not depend on the strait for its energy needs. On Saturday, he again shifted his position by issuing a deadline to Iran.&nbsp;Iran's military responded with a warning to completely close the vital waterway if the US military targets power infrastructure.&nbsp;"If the United States' threats regarding Iran's power plants are carried out, the Strait of Hormuz will be completely closed, and it will not be reopened until our destroyed power plants are rebuilt," it said.

Russia also warned against striking Iran's only operational nuclear power plant at Bushehr, built with Moscow's assistance, after a UN watchdog announced last week that it was hit by a projectile.

Russia on Monday (March 23) called for a "political and diplomatic" settlement to the West Asia war as the deadline for US President Donald Trump's ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz nears. Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts for the shipping of around 20 per cent of the global oil supply, since the start of the war on February 28. "We believe that the situation should transition to a political and diplomatic settlement," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists. "This is the only thing that can effectively contribute to defusing the catastrophically tense situation that has now developed in the region," Peskov said. Russia also warned against striking Iran's only operational nuclear power plant at Bushehr, built with Moscow's assistance, after a UN watchdog announced last week that it was hit by a projectile. "Of course, this poses a very serious security threat if this trend continues," Peskov said on Monday. "We consider strikes on nuclear facilities to be potentially extremely dangerous and fraught with, perhaps even irreversible, consequences," he added. Also Read: ‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after the US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz These statements follow US President Donald Trump’s latest 48-hour ultimatum to Iran, issued on Saturday, warning that the United States will "obliterate" Iran's power plants, starting with the largest first, if the Strait of Hormuz is not fully reopened. Based on the timing of the post, the 48-hour window is set to expire late Monday night, as global oil prices surge due to the effective closure of the waterway. "If Iran doesn't FULLY OPEN, WITHOUT THREAT, the Strait of Hormuz within 48 HOURS from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST!" Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. The US President came under intense domestic and international pressure due to rising energy prices, with crude oil trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the war on February 28. Confusing messaging from Donald Trump also added to market volatility, as he kept the US stance on the Strait of Hormuz unclear. Earlier, he had called for multilateral naval support from European allies to force open the vital waterway. However, after being snubbed by partners, he said Washington was not concerned, as it does not depend on the strait for its energy needs. On Saturday, he again shifted his position by issuing a deadline to Iran. Iran's military responded with a warning to completely close the vital waterway if the US military targets power infrastructure. "If the United States' threats regarding Iran's power plants are carried out, the Strait of Hormuz will be completely closed, and it will not be reopened until our destroyed power plants are rebuilt," it said.

Russia also warned against striking Iran's only operational nuclear power plant at Bushehr, built with Moscow's assistance, after a UN watchdog announced last week that it was hit by a projectile.

Russia urges political, diplomatic solution as Trump’s 48-hour Hormuz deadline nears

In a significant shift in the West Asia war , US President Donald Trump announced on Monday (March 23) a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The decision comes after what he described as "very good and productive" high-level discussions between the United States and Iran over the past 48 hours.&nbsp;The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region.&nbsp;President Trump noted that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to persist throughout the week.&nbsp;“I am pleased to report that the United States of America and the country of Iran have had, over the last two days, very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.&nbsp;“Based on the tenor and tone of these in-depth, detailed, and constructive conversations, which will continue throughout the week, I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions,” he added.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-we-will-completely-close-the-strait-of-hormuz-iran-responds-to-trump-s-48-hour-ultimatum-1774196432013">‘We will completely close the Strait of Hormuz’: Iran responds to Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum</a>&nbsp;Trump's announcement comes hours before his 48‑hour ultimatum on reopening the Strait of Hormuz is set to expire late Monday night, and Iran’s military has responded by warning that it will completely close the waterway if the US proceeds with its threats.&nbsp;The US president has come under intense domestic and international pressure from rising energy prices caused by Iran’s closure of the Strait, through which around 20 per cent of global oil transits. Crude oil has been trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the conflict.&nbsp;The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US‑Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high‑ranking military commanders. The strikes, aimed at weakening Iran’s command structure and undermining its war capabilities, also hit key nuclear and energy infrastructure, a campaign widely seen as intended to trigger regime change in Tehran.&nbsp;Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes.&nbsp;&nbsp;(Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region.

In a significant shift in the West Asia war , US President Donald Trump announced on Monday (March 23) a five-day postponement of all planned military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure. The decision comes after what he described as "very good and productive" high-level discussions between the United States and Iran over the past 48 hours. The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region. President Trump noted that the instruction to the Department of War is contingent upon the continued success of these detailed and constructive meetings, which are scheduled to persist throughout the week. “I am pleased to report that the United States of America and the country of Iran have had, over the last two days, very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. “Based on the tenor and tone of these in-depth, detailed, and constructive conversations, which will continue throughout the week, I have instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions,” he added. Also Read: ‘We will completely close the Strait of Hormuz’: Iran responds to Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum Trump's announcement comes hours before his 48‑hour ultimatum on reopening the Strait of Hormuz is set to expire late Monday night, and Iran’s military has responded by warning that it will completely close the waterway if the US proceeds with its threats. The US president has come under intense domestic and international pressure from rising energy prices caused by Iran’s closure of the Strait, through which around 20 per cent of global oil transits. Crude oil has been trading above $100 a barrel since the start of the conflict. The pause comes after 24 days of intense fighting, which began on February 28 following a joint US‑Israeli bombing campaign that targeted top Iranian leadership, including the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and senior security chief Ali Larijani, along with several high‑ranking military commanders. The strikes, aimed at weakening Iran’s command structure and undermining its war capabilities, also hit key nuclear and energy infrastructure, a campaign widely seen as intended to trigger regime change in Tehran. Despite the US and Israel targeting its leadership and critical infrastructure, Iran remains defiant. The country has adopted a tit-for-tat strategy, attacking oil and energy facilities across Gulf nations and surprising the US by targeting the Diego Garcia military base, around 4,000 km from Iran. This demonstrated Tehran’s missile capabilities, which the US had previously claimed were significantly reduced in its strikes. (Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, the US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.)

The pause is intended to provide a window for ongoing diplomatic talks aimed at reaching a "complete and total resolution" of hostilities in the region.

Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days

Iran has threatened to mine the entire Persian Gulf if the US attacks the country’s coasts or islands. Iran’s Defence Council warned on Monday that “any attempt to attack Iran’s coasts or islands will cause all access routes in the Gulf ... to be mined." Notably, the United States is reported to be contemplating deploying ground forces in Iran and a blockade or occupation of Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub, to force it to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. “The only way to pass through the Strait of Hormuz for non-belligerent countries is coordination with Iran,” the statement from the high-level security body said. “Any enemy attempt to attack Iranian coasts or islands” will lead to “all access routes and communication lines in the Persian Gulf and coasts being mined with various naval mines,” a report by CNN stated. A fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas is transported through the waterway, and its closure has led to an oil crisis and price rise. However, a day earlier, Iran stressed that "the Strait of Hormuz is not closed, and maritime traffic through it has not been suspended."&nbsp;&nbsp;It mentioned that "Iran has prevented the passage of vessels belonging to or affiliated with the aggressing parties and those participating in their acts of aggression" and is "exercising its inherent right of self-defence." It added, that "vessels, equipment, and any capacities belonging to the aggressing parties—namely the United States and the Zionist regime—and other participants in this aggression do not qualify as engaging in normal and non-hostile passage. "Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/-fake-news-alert-india-did-not-pay-in-chinese-yuan-for-oil-tankers-to-cross-strait-of-hromuz-1774257749929">India DID NOT pay in Chinese Yuan for oil tankers to cross Strait of Hormuz</a><h2>Trump's deadline on Strait of Hormuz</h2>US President Donald Trump has given Tehran a 48-hour deadline to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which expires Tuesday at 5.14 am IST. He has warned of a major attack on "their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST". If this happens, the conflict will further escalate and shut down the transportation of whatever oil and gas is passing through the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranian military earlier vowed to hit back with attacks on American-operated energy and desalination infrastructure in the area. "If you hit electricity, we hit electricity," Iran's Revolutionary Guards said in a statement. "We are determined to respond to any threat at the same level as it creates in terms of deterrence."&nbsp;https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-tehran-charges-2-million-toll-to-pass-strait-of-hormuz-1774256353359/embed&nbsp;Iran has said that "non-hostile vessels" belonging to countries not participating in "acts of aggression" will "benefit from safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz." However, if Trump marches ahead with the threat of hitting Iran's power plants, it could completely close down the strait for other ships, too.&nbsp; &nbsp;

Iran has warned that it will line the entire Gulf with mines if Donald Trump attacks Iran’s coasts or islands. Reports suggest that Trump is thinking about putting forces on the ground in Iran and attempting an occupation of the Kharg Island.

Iran has threatened to mine the entire Persian Gulf if the US attacks the country’s coasts or islands. Iran’s Defence Council warned on Monday that “any attempt to attack Iran’s coasts or islands will cause all access routes in the Gulf ... to be mined." Notably, the United States is reported to be contemplating deploying ground forces in Iran and a blockade or occupation of Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub, to force it to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. “The only way to pass through the Strait of Hormuz for non-belligerent countries is coordination with Iran,” the statement from the high-level security body said. “Any enemy attempt to attack Iranian coasts or islands” will lead to “all access routes and communication lines in the Persian Gulf and coasts being mined with various naval mines,” a report by CNN stated. A fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas is transported through the waterway, and its closure has led to an oil crisis and price rise. However, a day earlier, Iran stressed that "the Strait of Hormuz is not closed, and maritime traffic through it has not been suspended." It mentioned that "Iran has prevented the passage of vessels belonging to or affiliated with the aggressing parties and those participating in their acts of aggression" and is "exercising its inherent right of self-defence." It added, that "vessels, equipment, and any capacities belonging to the aggressing parties—namely the United States and the Zionist regime—and other participants in this aggression do not qualify as engaging in normal and non-hostile passage. " Also Read: India DID NOT pay in Chinese Yuan for oil tankers to cross Strait of Hormuz Trump's deadline on Strait of Hormuz US President Donald Trump has given Tehran a 48-hour deadline to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which expires Tuesday at 5.14 am IST. He has warned of a major attack on "their various POWER PLANTS, STARTING WITH THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST". If this happens, the conflict will further escalate and shut down the transportation of whatever oil and gas is passing through the Strait of Hormuz. The Iranian military earlier vowed to hit back with attacks on American-operated energy and desalination infrastructure in the area. "If you hit electricity, we hit electricity," Iran's Revolutionary Guards said in a statement. "We are determined to respond to any threat at the same level as it creates in terms of deterrence." https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-tehran-charges-2-million-toll-to-pass-strait-of-hormuz-1774256353359/embed Iran has said that "non-hostile vessels" belonging to countries not participating in "acts of aggression" will "benefit from safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz." However, if Trump marches ahead with the threat of hitting Iran's power plants, it could completely close down the strait for other ships, too.

Iran has warned that it will line the entire Gulf with mines if Donald Trump attacks Iran’s coasts or islands. Reports suggest that Trump is thinking about putting forces on the ground in Iran and attempting an occupation of the Kharg Island.

Iran threatens to plant mines in entire Persian Gulf if Trump launches ground attack

Yemen's Houthi movement has threatened to join the war if Trump plans to invade Kharg Island. In a statement released by Houthi, a representative of the group said that they are ready to take up arms against the US-Israel front and turn Bab al-Mandab into another flashpoint in the conflict. “We will strike American ships in the Red Sea. This war is a fight for the entire Ummah.”&nbsp;Iran is keeping the threat of ordering Houthis to take up arms in reserve, potentially closing &nbsp;10 per cent of all global trade. The US has spent around $1bn trying to thwart the attacks of Houthis in the Red Sea in 2024, but failed. Ships were forced to reroute around Africa, with shipping costs going up by 400 per cent.There had been rumours of the Trump administration capturing the Kharg Island to pressure Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;"He wants Hormuz open. If he has to take Kharg Island to make it happen, that's going to happen. If he decides to have a coastal invasion, that's going to happen. But that decision hasn't been made," Axios reported, quoting an unknown senior administration official.According to a report by the Washington Post US has already dispatched 4,500 sailors and Marines, an infantry battalion landing team with Helicopters, F-35 fighter jets and arnoured vehicle. An Israeli official familiar with the intelligence said to the Washington Post that the plan is “to take the island and the strait."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/why-gold-prices-falling-iran-war-dollar-yields-2026-1774246702380">Gold bearish, dollar index bullish, treasury yields higher amid Iran war - Why is the safe haven crashing?</a><h2>What are the dangers of a potential mission on Kharg Island?</h2>As Trump mulls over the operation to take over Kharg Island, it does not guarantee any potential success in lowering the oil price or opening up the Strait of Hormuz. Further military analysts and experts suggest that it could result in what they fear is a classic case of mission creep. The Kharg Island sits 25-30 km off the Iranian mainland coast. Along with the coastline lies the Zagros mountain range, approximately 45-50km away. &nbsp;The Marines and military assets deployed on the island will be directly in the line of fire due to the strategic and geographic advantage of the Iranian. Then, more troops will be deployed to assist those already deployed ground troops and turn the scenario into a potentially catastrophic one.&nbsp;“If we seize Kharg Island, they're going to turn off the spigot on the other end. It's not like we control their oil production,” said Rear Admiral (Ret.) Mark Montgomery to Axios. So bottomline the whole operation has the potential to expose the US military vulnerabilities, dragging them into a prolonged operation. The US is also considering other options, like imposing a naval blockade and preventing tankers from reaching the island.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Houthis threaten attacks in the Red Sea if the US targets Iran’s Kharg Island. Experts warn that the invasion of Kharg will be a move that could escalate conflict and result in the gradual expansion of the mission due to the failure to reach its objective.

Yemen's Houthi movement has threatened to join the war if Trump plans to invade Kharg Island. In a statement released by Houthi, a representative of the group said that they are ready to take up arms against the US-Israel front and turn Bab al-Mandab into another flashpoint in the conflict. “We will strike American ships in the Red Sea. This war is a fight for the entire Ummah.” Iran is keeping the threat of ordering Houthis to take up arms in reserve, potentially closing 10 per cent of all global trade. The US has spent around $1bn trying to thwart the attacks of Houthis in the Red Sea in 2024, but failed. Ships were forced to reroute around Africa, with shipping costs going up by 400 per cent. There had been rumours of the Trump administration capturing the Kharg Island to pressure Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz. "He wants Hormuz open. If he has to take Kharg Island to make it happen, that's going to happen. If he decides to have a coastal invasion, that's going to happen. But that decision hasn't been made," Axios reported, quoting an unknown senior administration official. According to a report by the Washington Post US has already dispatched 4,500 sailors and Marines, an infantry battalion landing team with Helicopters, F-35 fighter jets and arnoured vehicle. An Israeli official familiar with the intelligence said to the Washington Post that the plan is “to take the island and the strait." Also Read: Gold bearish, dollar index bullish, treasury yields higher amid Iran war - Why is the safe haven crashing? What are the dangers of a potential mission on Kharg Island? As Trump mulls over the operation to take over Kharg Island, it does not guarantee any potential success in lowering the oil price or opening up the Strait of Hormuz. Further military analysts and experts suggest that it could result in what they fear is a classic case of mission creep. The Kharg Island sits 25-30 km off the Iranian mainland coast. Along with the coastline lies the Zagros mountain range, approximately 45-50km away. The Marines and military assets deployed on the island will be directly in the line of fire due to the strategic and geographic advantage of the Iranian. Then, more troops will be deployed to assist those already deployed ground troops and turn the scenario into a potentially catastrophic one. “If we seize Kharg Island, they're going to turn off the spigot on the other end. It's not like we control their oil production,” said Rear Admiral (Ret.) Mark Montgomery to Axios. So bottomline the whole operation has the potential to expose the US military vulnerabilities, dragging them into a prolonged operation. The US is also considering other options, like imposing a naval blockade and preventing tankers from reaching the island.

Houthis threaten attacks in the Red Sea if the US targets Iran’s Kharg Island. Experts warn that the invasion of Kharg will be a move that could escalate conflict and result in the gradual expansion of the mission due to the failure to reach its objective.

Kharg Island crisis: Houthi threatens to disrupt Bab al-Mandab if US invades Kharg Island

TSA screening chaos at US airports: While recent headlines focus on Iran-related travel advisories to American fliers, they face more immediate disruption at home. Scroll down for videos. US airports face chaos due to a partial government shutdown affecting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which funds the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), responsible for security screenings. Without funding, TSA screeners have missed work or resigned, and ICE officers are being deployed to assist. Smaller airports could face temporary closures.<h2>TSA staffing crisis, resignations lead to long lines</h2>Since mid-February, tens of thousands of TSA officers have either worked without pay, stayed away, or resigned. Nationwide absenteeism averages around 10 per cent, spiking up to 40 per cent at major hubs. Over 360 TSA officers have resigned, and nearly 50,000 remain unpaid. The result is multi-hour security queues, temporary checkpoint closures, missed flights, and cascading delays. Peak spring break travel has worsened the situation.<h2>Major US airports affected: From Atlanta to Houston</h2>Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport reported absences up to 38 per cent, with waits exceeding two hours. George Bush Intercontinental in Houston saw lines stretching outside terminals, with TSA absenteeism near 40 per cent. William P. Hobby Airport in Houston reported more than three-hour waits. JFK in New York faced staffing shortages of up to 20 per cent. Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport reported over two-hour waits. Similar disruptions affected Chicago O’Hare, Philadelphia, and airports in Puerto Rico.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iranian-missiles-target-dubai-airport-flights-disrupted-briefly-1773664161540/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iranian-missiles-target-dubai-airport-flights-disrupted-briefly-1773664161540/embed</a><h2>Small airports at risk of complete shutdown</h2>Federal law requires TSA screening for commercial flights. Without it, smaller airports, which operate with minimal staff, could shut down. Acting deputy TSA administrator Adam Stahl warned that airport closures are no longer hypothetical if absentee rates continue rising, especially after another missed pay cycle. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy described the current disruption as “child’s play” compared to potential nationwide three- to four-hour waits, widespread flight delays, cancellations, and near-gridlock across the US aviation system.<h2>Airports with private contractors fare better</h2>Airports participating in the TSA Screening Partnership Program (SPP), where private contractors handle screening under federal oversight, are largely unaffected. Examples include San Francisco International and Kansas City International. Contractors are paid via pre-funded agreements and are not impacted by the shutdown.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/aviation-crisis-tsa-unpaid-donald-trump-proposes-ice-takeover-of-airport-security-1774119162561">Aviation crisis: TSA unpaid, Donald Trump proposes ICE takeover of airport security</a><h2>ICE deployment at airports: A questionable choice</h2>To help alleviate congestion, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) began deploying officers to major airports. ICE presence aims to support TSA but does not replace screeners. ICE officers are not trained to operate X-ray machines, conduct baggage checks, or perform full screening. Their tasks include guarding exits, checking IDs before screening areas, managing queues, and coordinating crowd flow to allow TSA staff to focus on screening duties.Confirmed or reported airports with ICE presence include Atlanta, JFK and other New York-area airports, Houston, New Orleans, Chicago and Philadelphia. Overall, ICE could be deployed at around 14 major airports, involving hundreds of officers.<h2>Public reaction to ICE deployment at airports: Concerns, fear</h2>ICE deployment has drawn mixed responses. Supporters see it as a practical, short-term measure to reduce delays and maximise federal resources. Critics, including civil liberties groups, worry that ICE’s immigration enforcement role could intimidate travellers and raise tensions in crowded environments. Some express concern about “scope creep,” fearing ICE involvement may extend beyond logistical support.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/air-canada-plane-collides-with-firetruck-in-new-york-city-s-laguardia-airport-video-1774241250775/amp">'Stop, stop, stop': Air Canada plane collides with firetruck in New York City's LaGuardia airport - VIDEO</a><h2>What US air passengers should know right now</h2>If you are planning to go ato an American airport, arrive at least three hours early, monitor real-time TSA and airline updates, and expect additional ID checks and longer queues. Flexibility for delays or rescheduling is advised.<h2>Perspective: A home-made crisis amid global headlines over Iran travel</h2>While the US State Department issues travel warnings about Iran, domestic airport disruption presents a more immediate challenge. The DHS shutdown, TSA absenteeism, and ICE deployment are creating a fragile, escalating situation for US air travel. The situatio can worsen if congressional funding is not restored soon for DHS.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨🇺🇸 New Orleans airport. The line starts before the airport does. Everyone expects to miss their flight. Houston was 3 hours outside. ICE got deployed this morning. The American airport is having a week.<a href="https://t.co/DPwYzVV1IT">pic.twitter.com/DPwYzVV1IT</a> <a href="https://t.co/FXww3Bjah3">https://t.co/FXww3Bjah3</a>&mdash; Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) <a href="https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/2035900920215765310?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨HOLY SMOKES!!! The TSA lines in Houston TX have now stretched to a mind-blowing 3 HOURS LONG!!!!! People are literally waiting in lines WRAPPED AROUND THE OUTSIDE OF THE AIRPORT!!!! THIS IS CRAZY!!!!!!!!!!! <a href="https://t.co/NOgPagsnVl">pic.twitter.com/NOgPagsnVl</a>&mdash; Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattvanswol/status/2035879953535775039?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">2-3 hour wait times for TSA security lines currently at IAH airport in Houston Texas. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TSA?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TSA</a> <a href="https://t.co/f2yAb3VTNl">pic.twitter.com/f2yAb3VTNl</a>&mdash; Sam Dienst (@samdienst) <a href="https://twitter.com/samdienst/status/2034675429793996929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

DHS funding crisis leads to TSA screening chaos: US airports face severe delays caused by absenteeism and resignations. ICE officers are being deployed to assist with crowd control but that's not a permanent solution. What you should know if you, or someone you know, is using a US airport

TSA screening chaos at US airports: While recent headlines focus on Iran-related travel advisories to American fliers, they face more immediate disruption at home. Scroll down for videos. US airports face chaos due to a partial government shutdown affecting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which funds the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), responsible for security screenings. Without funding, TSA screeners have missed work or resigned, and ICE officers are being deployed to assist. Smaller airports could face temporary closures. TSA staffing crisis, resignations lead to long lines Since mid-February, tens of thousands of TSA officers have either worked without pay, stayed away, or resigned. Nationwide absenteeism averages around 10 per cent, spiking up to 40 per cent at major hubs. Over 360 TSA officers have resigned, and nearly 50,000 remain unpaid. The result is multi-hour security queues, temporary checkpoint closures, missed flights, and cascading delays. Peak spring break travel has worsened the situation. Major US airports affected: From Atlanta to Houston Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport reported absences up to 38 per cent, with waits exceeding two hours. George Bush Intercontinental in Houston saw lines stretching outside terminals, with TSA absenteeism near 40 per cent. William P. Hobby Airport in Houston reported more than three-hour waits. JFK in New York faced staffing shortages of up to 20 per cent. Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport reported over two-hour waits. Similar disruptions affected Chicago O’Hare, Philadelphia, and airports in Puerto Rico. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iranian-missiles-target-dubai-airport-flights-disrupted-briefly-1773664161540/embed Small airports at risk of complete shutdown Federal law requires TSA screening for commercial flights. Without it, smaller airports, which operate with minimal staff, could shut down. Acting deputy TSA administrator Adam Stahl warned that airport closures are no longer hypothetical if absentee rates continue rising, especially after another missed pay cycle. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy described the current disruption as “child’s play” compared to potential nationwide three- to four-hour waits, widespread flight delays, cancellations, and near-gridlock across the US aviation system. Airports with private contractors fare better Airports participating in the TSA Screening Partnership Program (SPP), where private contractors handle screening under federal oversight, are largely unaffected. Examples include San Francisco International and Kansas City International. Contractors are paid via pre-funded agreements and are not impacted by the shutdown. Also read: Aviation crisis: TSA unpaid, Donald Trump proposes ICE takeover of airport security ICE deployment at airports: A questionable choice To help alleviate congestion, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) began deploying officers to major airports. ICE presence aims to support TSA but does not replace screeners. ICE officers are not trained to operate X-ray machines, conduct baggage checks, or perform full screening. Their tasks include guarding exits, checking IDs before screening areas, managing queues, and coordinating crowd flow to allow TSA staff to focus on screening duties. Confirmed or reported airports with ICE presence include Atlanta, JFK and other New York-area airports, Houston, New Orleans, Chicago and Philadelphia. Overall, ICE could be deployed at around 14 major airports, involving hundreds of officers. Public reaction to ICE deployment at airports: Concerns, fear ICE deployment has drawn mixed responses. Supporters see it as a practical, short-term measure to reduce delays and maximise federal resources. Critics, including civil liberties groups, worry that ICE’s immigration enforcement role could intimidate travellers and raise tensions in crowded environments. Some express concern about “scope creep,” fearing ICE involvement may extend beyond logistical support. Also read: 'Stop, stop, stop': Air Canada plane collides with firetruck in New York City's LaGuardia airport - VIDEO What US air passengers should know right now If you are planning to go ato an American airport, arrive at least three hours early, monitor real-time TSA and airline updates, and expect additional ID checks and longer queues. Flexibility for delays or rescheduling is advised. Perspective: A home-made crisis amid global headlines over Iran travel While the US State Department issues travel warnings about Iran, domestic airport disruption presents a more immediate challenge. The DHS shutdown, TSA absenteeism, and ICE deployment are creating a fragile, escalating situation for US air travel. The situatio can worsen if congressional funding is not restored soon for DHS.

US airports see TSA screening chaos after DHS funding crisis: Flyers see severe delays caused by absenteeism and resignations. ICE officers are being deployed to assist with crowd control. What you should know if you, or peole you know, are using a US airport

It's a MESS: Forget Iran travel warning, US flyers face chaos at home airports due to TSA funding crisis as ICE deploys -  What they should know

Amid the escalated Iran war and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, unverified reports circulated on the internet claiming that India paid in Chinese Yuan as a fee to pass an oil tanker through the Strait. The Indian government strictly rejected the claims and warned against fake news circulation amid the sensitive time. This came after multiple accounts on the social media platform claimed that the Indian oil tanker crossed the Strait after payment and that the countries that are paying in the Chinese currency are only getting the permit to pass the Strait.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/oil-tanker-with-indian-captain-went-dark-to-cross-high-risk-strait-of-hormuz-reach-mumbai-1773315721972">Oil tanker, with Indian captain, went ‘dark’ to cross high-risk Strait of Hormuz, reach Mumbai</a>&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Fake News Alert! Please stay alert against such false and baseless claims and posts on social media! <a href="https://t.co/3PwAaWp9Bu">pic.twitter.com/3PwAaWp9Bu</a>&mdash; MEA FactCheck (@MEAFactCheck) <a href="https://twitter.com/MEAFactCheck/status/2034604040697581677?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 19, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

The fact-check account of the Indian Ministry of External Affairs shared a few such posts on the fake news and denounced them. The ministry wrote on X, "Fake News Alert! Please stay alert against such false and baseless claims and posts on social media!"&nbsp;Among the shared posts, one was by the Russian TV which wrote, "Reports claim that an Indian oil tanker was reportedly allowed to cross after paying in Chinese Yuan, marking a notable shift in regional trade pr payment practices."<h2>Two Indian tankers pass through Strait</h2>Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/india-s-crude-vessel-reaches-mumbai-port-after-iran-s-nod-two-more-allowed-to-pass-strait-of-hormuz-1773292223873">India's crude vessel reaches Mumbai port after Iran's nod, MEA says 'shipping safety was discussed' in call with Iran FM, Jaishankar</a>&nbsp;Under the watchful eye of the Indian Navy, two Indian-flagged LPG tankers, Jag Vasant and Pine Gas, were reported navigating the high-stakes waters of the Strait of Hormuz on Monday (March 23). Given the escalating regional tensions fueled by the ongoing conflict in West Asia, the Indian Navy has coordinated its movement through this critical maritime chokepoint. Once the vessels exit into the Gulf of Oman, they are scheduled to receive a direct naval escort to ensure their safe arrival.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

India's Ministry of External Affairs debunked "fake news" claiming Indian tankers paid Chinese Yuan to transit the Strait of Hormuz, confirming the Navy is safely coordinating vessel movements amid regional tensions.

Amid the escalated Iran war and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, unverified reports circulated on the internet claiming that India paid in Chinese Yuan as a fee to pass an oil tanker through the Strait. The Indian government strictly rejected the claims and warned against fake news circulation amid the sensitive time. This came after multiple accounts on the social media platform claimed that the Indian oil tanker crossed the Strait after payment and that the countries that are paying in the Chinese currency are only getting the permit to pass the Strait. Also read: Oil tanker, with Indian captain, went ‘dark’ to cross high-risk Strait of Hormuz, reach Mumbai

India's Ministry of External Affairs debunked "fake news" claiming Indian tankers paid Chinese Yuan to transit the Strait of Hormuz, confirming the Navy is safely coordinating vessel movements amid regional tensions.

'Fake News Alert!': India DID NOT pay in Chinese Yuan for oil tankers to cross Strait of Hormuz

Gold and silver have seen a significant decline in their prices as the war in West Asia stretches into the fourth week and the energy crisis continues. Gold is trading at $4,354 per ounce, falling from $5,200 per ounce on March 13. The precious metal rallied at the beginning of 2026, reaching its all-time high of $5,595.51 before losing momentum, falling roughly 22 per cent and entering the bearish market. As of March 23, the price of 24 karat gold is ₹14,017 per gram, and 22 karat gold is ₹12,850 per gram in New Delhi.<h2>Why is gold crashing?</h2>The war between the US and Iran has entered its 4th week, while gold was supposed to act as a hedge against inflation and volatility, it is acting volatile itself. Several forces are contributing to the fall of the precious metal, like soaring energy prices indicating inflation is going to be stickier, Feds maintaining a steady rate in fear of inflation, high treasury yields, and the dollar index remains bullish. So, making non-yielding assets like gold less attractive to the dollars and treasuries.&nbsp;Energy prices remain high-As the blockade on the Strait of Hormuz continues, and a looming blockade on the Bab-el-Mandeb, the benchmark of oil Brent crude is hovering over $110-$115 per barrel. Indicating that inflation is going to be stickier, the US Federal Reserve is expecting the inflation to be above the 2 per cent target.Fed hold the interest rates-&nbsp;The US President Donald Trump said in his Truth Social post on Wednesday, &nbsp;“When is ‘Too Late’ Powell lowering INTEREST RATES?" The Federal Reserve was forced to keep the rate steady at 3.5–3.75 per cent, as the job market stagnates, with unemployment rising to 4.4 per cent, and the growing uncertainty over the US war on Iran.&nbsp;Dollar Index remains bullish-Dollar Index remains higher, since the start of the war on February 28, the Dollar have increased by at least 2.8 -3 per cent. As investors are betting on the US military's invincibility. It was 97.61 before Operation Fury, then it moved to the highest 100.43 on March 18, before falling to 99.72 on March 23.&nbsp;Treasury yields higher-The sell-off in the Treasury market continues, the 2-year Treasury yield is 3.98 per cent, and the 10-year yield is rising to 4.423 per cent, which is the highest level since July 2025.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-worldwide-caution-iran-war-trump-strait-of-hormuz-threat-1774242460698">US issues worldwide travel alert as Iran war escalates, after Trump's 48-hour ultimatum</a><h2>What is the outlook for Gold?</h2>Both JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank continue the year-end target price for gold at $6,300 and $6,000 per ounce, respectively. Neither bank has revised its projection, taking into consideration the recent volatility in the prices of the precious metal and the energy market. For the scenario that the US wins the war in Iran, and there is no significant damage to the energy infrastructure in West Asia, as well as the GCCs. Oil prices fall back to $65-$70 per barrel, and the advanced economies absorb the shock, dollar weakens as the rate cut resumes to monetise the ballooning debt. So gold begins its rally again, but slowly. If the war drags on for a long time, the oil market rises to $140-$150 per barrel, high energy prices keep the inflation high, then the stock market remains bearish, dollars remain strong at first but sees a free fall as the war extends, yields remain high as long as there is no rate cut, and accelerate debt accumulation, gold remains bearish before heading for bullish as the debt bubble pops. So in the super cycle, gold is most likely to rally, and this might just be the appropriate window to purchase gold.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

Gold has declined 22 per cent from its highest price of $5,595.51 on January 28. With growing tension in West Asia and volatility in the energy market, investors are moving towards more liquid assets. 

Gold and silver have seen a significant decline in their prices as the war in West Asia stretches into the fourth week and the energy crisis continues. Gold is trading at $4,354 per ounce, falling from $5,200 per ounce on March 13. The precious metal rallied at the beginning of 2026, reaching its all-time high of $5,595.51 before losing momentum, falling roughly 22 per cent and entering the bearish market. As of March 23, the price of 24 karat gold is ₹14,017 per gram, and 22 karat gold is ₹12,850 per gram in New Delhi. Why is gold crashing? The war between the US and Iran has entered its 4th week, while gold was supposed to act as a hedge against inflation and volatility, it is acting volatile itself. Several forces are contributing to the fall of the precious metal, like soaring energy prices indicating inflation is going to be stickier, Feds maintaining a steady rate in fear of inflation, high treasury yields, and the dollar index remains bullish. So, making non-yielding assets like gold less attractive to the dollars and treasuries. Energy prices remain high- As the blockade on the Strait of Hormuz continues, and a looming blockade on the Bab-el-Mandeb, the benchmark of oil Brent crude is hovering over $110-$115 per barrel. Indicating that inflation is going to be stickier, the US Federal Reserve is expecting the inflation to be above the 2 per cent target. Fed hold the interest rates- The US President Donald Trump said in his Truth Social post on Wednesday, “When is ‘Too Late’ Powell lowering INTEREST RATES?" The Federal Reserve was forced to keep the rate steady at 3.5–3.75 per cent, as the job market stagnates, with unemployment rising to 4.4 per cent, and the growing uncertainty over the US war on Iran. Dollar Index remains bullish- Dollar Index remains higher, since the start of the war on February 28, the Dollar have increased by at least 2.8 -3 per cent. As investors are betting on the US military's invincibility. It was 97.61 before Operation Fury, then it moved to the highest 100.43 on March 18, before falling to 99.72 on March 23. Treasury yields higher- The sell-off in the Treasury market continues, the 2-year Treasury yield is 3.98 per cent, and the 10-year yield is rising to 4.423 per cent, which is the highest level since July 2025. Also Read: US issues worldwide travel alert as Iran war escalates, after Trump's 48-hour ultimatum What is the outlook for Gold? Both JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank continue the year-end target price for gold at $6,300 and $6,000 per ounce, respectively. Neither bank has revised its projection, taking into consideration the recent volatility in the prices of the precious metal and the energy market. For the scenario that the US wins the war in Iran, and there is no significant damage to the energy infrastructure in West Asia, as well as the GCCs. Oil prices fall back to $65-$70 per barrel, and the advanced economies absorb the shock, dollar weakens as the rate cut resumes to monetise the ballooning debt. So gold begins its rally again, but slowly. If the war drags on for a long time, the oil market rises to $140-$150 per barrel, high energy prices keep the inflation high, then the stock market remains bearish, dollars remain strong at first but sees a free fall as the war extends, yields remain high as long as there is no rate cut, and accelerate debt accumulation, gold remains bearish before heading for bullish as the debt bubble pops. So in the super cycle, gold is most likely to rally, and this might just be the appropriate window to purchase gold.

Gold has declined 22 per cent from its highest price of $5,595.51 on January 28. With growing tension in West Asia and volatility in the energy market, investors are moving towards more liquid assets.&nbsp;

Gold bearish, dollar index bullish, treasury yields higher amid Iran war- Why is the safe haven crashing?

Four ambulances belonging to a Jewish volunteer rescue organisation were set on fire in Golders Green, London’s largest Jewish community. The incident happened outside a synagogue early Monday. Dozens of firefighters rushed to the area to douse the fire that lit up the night sky after a loud explosion.&nbsp;Some residents have been evacuated as “the arson attack is being treated as an antisemitic hate crime,” said the London’s Met Police in a statement.&nbsp;As soon as the incident was reported, six fire engines and about 40 firefighters were rushed to spot where four vehicles were damaged according to the London fire brigade (LFB).&nbsp;Several cylinders on the vehicles exploded due to the fire causing caused windows to break in flats that were in its vicinity, the LFB said. No injuries have been reported in the incident so far.Police say they are looking for three suspects but have to confirm about any arrests yet.&nbsp;Home to many synagogues, schools and kosher restaurants, Golders Green is known for its large Jewish and Orthodox Jewish community.&nbsp;“We know this incident will cause a great deal of community concern and officers remain on scene to carry out urgent inquiries.&nbsp;“We are in the process of examining CCTV and are aware of online footage. We believe we are looking for three suspects at this early stage," said Sarah Jackson Police Supt of the area.

As soon as the incident was reported, six fire engines and about 40 firefighters were rushed to spot where four vehicles were damaged according to the London fire brigade (LFB).

Four ambulances belonging to a Jewish volunteer rescue organisation were set on fire in Golders Green, London’s largest Jewish community. The incident happened outside a synagogue early Monday. Dozens of firefighters rushed to the area to douse the fire that lit up the night sky after a loud explosion. Some residents have been evacuated as “the arson attack is being treated as an antisemitic hate crime,” said the London’s Met Police in a statement. As soon as the incident was reported, six fire engines and about 40 firefighters were rushed to spot where four vehicles were damaged according to the London fire brigade (LFB). Several cylinders on the vehicles exploded due to the fire causing caused windows to break in flats that were in its vicinity, the LFB said. No injuries have been reported in the incident so far. Police say they are looking for three suspects but have to confirm about any arrests yet. Home to many synagogues, schools and kosher restaurants, Golders Green is known for its large Jewish and Orthodox Jewish community. “We know this incident will cause a great deal of community concern and officers remain on scene to carry out urgent inquiries. “We are in the process of examining CCTV and are aware of online footage. We believe we are looking for three suspects at this early stage," said Sarah Jackson Police Supt of the area.

As soon as the incident was reported, six fire engines and about 40 firefighters were rushed to spot where four vehicles were damaged according to the London fire brigade (LFB).

Jewish volunteer ambulances set on fire in London, police suspect hate crime

It was a US-operated Patriot missile from the air defence system in a Bahraini US military base that injured dozens of civilians in the early days of the Iran–US–Israel war, not an Iranian drone as reported earlier, claimed a recent report based on open-source analysis. This is being seen in some circles as part of an alleged wider ‘false flag’ operations, in which Iran is being blamed for strikes it did not carry out, in order to enable the regional spread of the conflict, and to drag reluctant European nations and NATO members into it. Such claims are also being made about the alleged Iranian missile strikes targeting Diego Garcia military base and Turkey. The US, Israel, and allies have frequently accused Iran of directing or launching attacks on locations hosting US military assets or supporting anti-Iran operations. Iran has repeatedly denied responsibility for several incidents. Here is a situation analysis:<h2>Key incidents of possible false flag operations: Accusations and Iran’s denials</h2><h2>Missile attacks on Diego Garcia</h2>The accusation: American, British, and Israeli officials recently claimed that Iran launched two intermediate-range or ballistic missiles towards the joint US–UK base, located in the British Indian Ocean Territory. Later, The Wall Street Journal and others reported that one missile failed mid-flight, while another was intercepted by an American warship. Israel framed this ‘unsuccessful’ attack as evidence of Iranian missile capabilities potentially reaching up to 4,000 km, posing a threat to Europe. Notably, this news was reported at a time when Britain and many European nations were reluctant to join the war or open up their military bases to US forces.Iran’s denial: Soon after, senior Iranian officials said Iran was not responsible for the missile launches. Tehran issued a clear and repeated denial of involvement.Also read: <a href="">US issues worldwide travel alert as Iran war escalates, after Trump's 48-hour ultimatum</a><h2>Ballistic missile incidents involving Turkey</h2>The accusations: In mid-March, NATO member Turkey reported multiple interceptions of Iranian ballistic missiles. It said the missiles were detected over Turkish airspace and the Eastern Mediterranean. Reports at the time said NATO air defence systems were activated amid fears of escalation. Notably, this occurred when NATO was still not directly involved in the war in any military capacity.Iran’s denial of involvement: Both the Iranian military and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei denied firing missiles or drones towards Turkey. Iran formally communicated this to Turkey and proposed a joint probe. It also warned of possible Israeli “false flag” operations aimed at damaging Iran–Turkey relations.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/trump-issues-new-warning-of-total-decimation-if-iran-ignores-48-hour-strait-of-hormuz-ultimatum-1774220783475">'You’ll find out...': Trump issues new warning of ‘total decimation’ if Iran ignores 48-hour Strait of Hormuz ultimatum</a><h3>Attacks on Bahrain’s US Fifth Fleet base and nearby areas</h3>Accusations against Iran: In the initial days of the war, which began with US–Israeli joint strikes on Iran on 28 February, Bahrain reported that large numbers of missiles and drones from Iran were intercepted. Some incidents caused civilian injuries, fires near refineries, and at least one death in the Bahraini capital of Manama. The US and Gulf allies accused Iran of directly targeting states hosting US military infrastructure.Iran’s denials, explanations, and open-source analysis: A recent report in Reuters, citing the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, said open-source research concluded “with moderate-to-high confidence” that at least one of the missiles was likely launched from a US Patriot battery located about 7 km to the south-west of the impacted neighbourhood, where several injuries were reported. Alongside such research, Iran has frequently denied targeting Bahrain. Its Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said, “We are not attacking our neighbours in the Persian Gulf countries, we are targeting the presence of the US in these countries.” Tehran has framed its actions as strategic responses to US and Israeli military presence, not aggression against Gulf nations or their people.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iran-warns-of-catastrophe-as-trump-threat-looms-new-war-targets-emerge-1774241955862/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iran-warns-of-catastrophe-as-trump-threat-looms-new-war-targets-emerge-1774241955862/embed</a><h2>Perspective: broader geopolitical context of ‘false flag’ operations</h2>Iran has denied initiating the war and rejected claims of pre-emptive attacks on American forces.Araghchi called US allegations of planned attacks “a sheer and utter lie”. Iran has accused Israel of driving escalation and staging such false flag operations, including in Turkey and Oman.Across the Gulf region, including the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, similar missile and drone incidents have been reported. Even as the US–Israel–Iran conflict has expanded beyond the Middle East, Iran has often denied involvement in several attacks. It maintains that the targets are US military presence, not neighbouring countries, while alleging “false flag” operations by the US and Israel.Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

False flag debate is raging on Iran strikes in the Gulf region. Open-source analysis suggests a US Patriot missile, not an Iranian drone, caused civilian injuries in Bahrain. Iran also denied attacks in Diego Garcia, and Turkey. Here is some perspective for you

It was a US-operated Patriot missile from the air defence system in a Bahraini US military base that injured dozens of civilians in the early days of the Iran–US–Israel war, not an Iranian drone as reported earlier, claimed a recent report based on open-source analysis. This is being seen in some circles as part of an alleged wider ‘false flag’ operations, in which Iran is being blamed for strikes it did not carry out, in order to enable the regional spread of the conflict, and to drag reluctant European nations and NATO members into it. Such claims are also being made about the alleged Iranian missile strikes targeting Diego Garcia military base and Turkey. The US, Israel, and allies have frequently accused Iran of directing or launching attacks on locations hosting US military assets or supporting anti-Iran operations. Iran has repeatedly denied responsibility for several incidents. Here is a situation analysis: Key incidents of possible false flag operations: Accusations and Iran’s denials Missile attacks on Diego Garcia The accusation: American, British, and Israeli officials recently claimed that Iran launched two intermediate-range or ballistic missiles towards the joint US–UK base, located in the British Indian Ocean Territory. Later, The Wall Street Journal and others reported that one missile failed mid-flight, while another was intercepted by an American warship. Israel framed this ‘unsuccessful’ attack as evidence of Iranian missile capabilities potentially reaching up to 4,000 km, posing a threat to Europe. Notably, this news was reported at a time when Britain and many European nations were reluctant to join the war or open up their military bases to US forces. Iran’s denial: Soon after, senior Iranian officials said Iran was not responsible for the missile launches. Tehran issued a clear and repeated denial of involvement. Also read: US issues worldwide travel alert as Iran war escalates, after Trump's 48-hour ultimatum Ballistic missile incidents involving Turkey The accusations: In mid-March, NATO member Turkey reported multiple interceptions of Iranian ballistic missiles. It said the missiles were detected over Turkish airspace and the Eastern Mediterranean. Reports at the time said NATO air defence systems were activated amid fears of escalation. Notably, this occurred when NATO was still not directly involved in the war in any military capacity. Iran’s denial of involvement: Both the Iranian military and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei denied firing missiles or drones towards Turkey. Iran formally communicated this to Turkey and proposed a joint probe. It also warned of possible Israeli “false flag” operations aimed at damaging Iran–Turkey relations. Also read: 'You’ll find out...': Trump issues new warning of ‘total decimation’ if Iran ignores 48-hour Strait of Hormuz ultimatum Attacks on Bahrain’s US Fifth Fleet base and nearby areas Accusations against Iran: In the initial days of the war, which began with US–Israeli joint strikes on Iran on 28 February, Bahrain reported that large numbers of missiles and drones from Iran were intercepted. Some incidents caused civilian injuries, fires near refineries, and at least one death in the Bahraini capital of Manama. The US and Gulf allies accused Iran of directly targeting states hosting US military infrastructure. Iran’s denials, explanations, and open-source analysis: A recent report in Reuters, citing the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, said open-source research concluded “with moderate-to-high confidence” that at least one of the missiles was likely launched from a US Patriot battery located about 7 km to the south-west of the impacted neighbourhood, where several injuries were reported. Alongside such research, Iran has frequently denied targeting Bahrain. Its Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said, “We are not attacking our neighbours in the Persian Gulf countries, we are targeting the presence of the US in these countries.” Tehran has framed its actions as strategic responses to US and Israeli military presence, not aggression against Gulf nations or their people. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iran-warns-of-catastrophe-as-trump-threat-looms-new-war-targets-emerge-1774241955862/embed Perspective: broader geopolitical context of ‘false flag’ operations Iran has denied initiating the war and rejected claims of pre-emptive attacks on American forces. Araghchi called US allegations of planned attacks “a sheer and utter lie”. Iran has accused Israel of driving escalation and staging such false flag operations, including in Turkey and Oman. Across the Gulf region, including the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, similar missile and drone incidents have been reported. Even as the US–Israel–Iran conflict has expanded beyond the Middle East, Iran has often denied involvement in several attacks. It maintains that the targets are US military presence, not neighbouring countries, while alleging “false flag” operations by the US and Israel. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

False flag debate is raging on Iran strikes in the Gulf region. Open-source analysis suggests a US Patriot missile, not an Iranian drone, caused civilian injuries in Bahrain. Iran also denied attacks in Diego Garcia, and Turkey. Here is some perspective for you

US, Bahrain probably LIED about Iran drone attack. It was not the only ‘false flag’ – Diego Garcia, Turkey 'missile strikes' could be...

New Delhi: A senior commander at the UN-listed terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) was shot and stabbed to death inside the organisation's heavily guarded headquarters in Muridke, Pakistan, shortly after Eid prayers over the weekend. Chaudhary Bilal Arif Salafi, was attacked in a coordinated assault carried out by Ghazi Ubaidullah Khan, a long-time operative in the group, and Khan's wife. Both had attended the same Eid gathering at the Markaz Taiba complex before waiting for Salafi to emerge. Khan fired three shots at him, while his wife stabbed him repeatedly, killing him on the spot.&nbsp;&nbsp;The incident exposes deep tensions within LeT, one of Pakistan's most notorious terror groups, responsible for major terror attacks in India, including the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. It is learnt that the killing stemmed from a personal grudge dating back three to four years. At that time, Salafi allegedly murdered&nbsp;Abu Bakr, who was Khan's son-in-law. Despite the seriousness of the act, killing a fellow member's family inside the same network, no disciplinary action was taken against Salafi.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/-if-america-attacks-pakistan-we-ll-target-delhi-and-mumbai-in-india-says-former-high-commissioner-abdul-basit-1774109240302">‘If America attacks Pakistan, we’ll target Delhi and Mumbai in India,’ says former high commissioner Abdul Basit</a>&nbsp;Salafi's value to the group lay in his role handling financial operations. He oversaw fundraising in the Sheikhupura area, reportedly collecting around four million Pakistani rupees each year for LeT terror activities. His close ties to senior leader Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi ensured protection, allowing him to continue operating freely even after the earlier killing.&nbsp;In contrast, Khan was a notorious&nbsp;field operative. He had been active in Jammu and Kashmir from 1993 to 2003, taking part in multiple terror attacks, before returning to Pakistan to work as a trainer at Muridke. Despite decades of service, he received no institutional backing or justice when his family suffered loss. The killing of Chaudhary Bilal Arif Salafi raises eyebrows, and several questions, including Pakistan's own inability to deal with spiral violence &amp; economic distress.

Senior LeT commander Bilal Arif Salafi was shot and stabbed to death at Markaz Taiba in Muridke following Eid prayers.

New Delhi: A senior commander at the UN-listed terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) was shot and stabbed to death inside the organisation's heavily guarded headquarters in Muridke, Pakistan, shortly after Eid prayers over the weekend. Chaudhary Bilal Arif Salafi, was attacked in a coordinated assault carried out by Ghazi Ubaidullah Khan, a long-time operative in the group, and Khan's wife. Both had attended the same Eid gathering at the Markaz Taiba complex before waiting for Salafi to emerge. Khan fired three shots at him, while his wife stabbed him repeatedly, killing him on the spot. The incident exposes deep tensions within LeT, one of Pakistan's most notorious terror groups, responsible for major terror attacks in India, including the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. It is learnt that the killing stemmed from a personal grudge dating back three to four years. At that time, Salafi allegedly murdered Abu Bakr, who was Khan's son-in-law. Despite the seriousness of the act, killing a fellow member's family inside the same network, no disciplinary action was taken against Salafi. Also read: ‘If America attacks Pakistan, we’ll target Delhi and Mumbai in India,’ says former high commissioner Abdul Basit Salafi's value to the group lay in his role handling financial operations. He oversaw fundraising in the Sheikhupura area, reportedly collecting around four million Pakistani rupees each year for LeT terror activities. His close ties to senior leader Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi ensured protection, allowing him to continue operating freely even after the earlier killing. In contrast, Khan was a notorious field operative. He had been active in Jammu and Kashmir from 1993 to 2003, taking part in multiple terror attacks, before returning to Pakistan to work as a trainer at Muridke. Despite decades of service, he received no institutional backing or justice when his family suffered loss. The killing of Chaudhary Bilal Arif Salafi raises eyebrows, and several questions, including Pakistan's own inability to deal with spiral violence & economic distress.

Senior LeT commander Bilal Arif Salafi was shot and stabbed to death at Markaz Taiba in Muridke following Eid prayers.&nbsp;

LeT commander gunned down and stabbed by fellow operative in Pakistan's terror hub Muridke

As tensions intensify in the Middle East, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has openly mocked US President Donald Trump, using his own signature phrase to respond to Washington’s latest warning.&nbsp;IRGC spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari delivered the message in English, saying, “Hey Trump, you are fired! You are familiar with this sentence. Thank you for your attention to this matter,” echoing the US leader’s well-known line from The Apprentice.&nbsp;The remark came after Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum demanding Iran reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz or face US strikes on its power infrastructure. He warned that Washington could “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants if Tehran failed to comply.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">IRGC Spokesman Ebrahim Zolfaghari mocks Trump in English: Hey Trump, you are fired! You are familiar with this sentence. Thank you for your attention to this matter. <a href="https://t.co/t7p3z7YloR">pic.twitter.com/t7p3z7YloR</a>&mdash; Clash Report (@clashreport) <a href="https://twitter.com/clashreport/status/2035818247493177412?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 22, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Iran responded with a stark counter-threat. Zolfaghari warned that any attack on Iran’s energy network would trigger retaliation against US-linked assets across the Gulf region, including energy facilities, IT infrastructure, and water desalination plants.“If Iran’s fuel and energy infrastructure is attacked, all corresponding infrastructure belonging to the US and its regional allies will be targeted,” he said, referencing earlier warnings issued by Tehran.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-orders-4-500-us-marines-sailors-troops-to-west-asia-amid-strait-of-hormuz-crisis-as-iran-ultimatum-looms-1774245239369">Trump orders 4,500 US troops to West Asia amid Strait of Hormuz crisis as Iran ultimatum looms</a>&nbsp;Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, reinforced the stance, cautioning that strikes on Iranian power plants could lead to “irreversible destruction” of key infrastructure across the Middle East.<h2>Strait of Hormuz - the centre of conflict</h2>At the heart of the standoff lies the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow yet crucial maritime route through which roughly one-fifth of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas supplies transit. Iran has already moved to effectively shut the passage, triggering the most severe energy disruption since the 1970s.&nbsp;The IRGC has indicated the waterway will remain closed until Iran’s damaged infrastructure is restored, raising fears of prolonged instability in global energy markets.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

The IRGC mocked Donald Trump using his "You’re fired!" catchphrase, responding to his 48-hour ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on Iran’s critical power infrastructure.

As tensions intensify in the Middle East, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has openly mocked US President Donald Trump, using his own signature phrase to respond to Washington’s latest warning. IRGC spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari delivered the message in English, saying, “Hey Trump, you are fired! You are familiar with this sentence. Thank you for your attention to this matter,” echoing the US leader’s well-known line from The Apprentice. The remark came after Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum demanding Iran reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz or face US strikes on its power infrastructure. He warned that Washington could “hit and obliterate” Iranian power plants if Tehran failed to comply.

The IRGC mocked Donald Trump using his "You’re fired!" catchphrase, responding to his 48-hour ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or face strikes on Iran’s critical power infrastructure.

‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase after US president’s ‘hit and obliterate’ warning over Hormuz

Deployment of US soldiers to West Asia began days before the joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28. In the bid to decapitate the Islamic regime, many high-ranking officers have been killed in the joint military operation. In the latest development, Trump has ordered the deployment of a contingent of 4,500 US sailors and Marines to West Asia, as reported by the news outlet Washington Post.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iran-awaits-trump-s-threat-to-blow-up-power-plants-warns-of-catastrophe-from-strikes-1774240203290/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iran-awaits-trump-s-threat-to-blow-up-power-plants-warns-of-catastrophe-from-strikes-1774240203290/embed</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;This comes amid the global energy crisis due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Though Iran has been selective about the closure, the passage is open for a few countries, while for those countries Iran considers its “enemy”, the crucial trade route remains closed.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-to-release-140-million-barrels-of-sanctioned-iranian-oil-floating-on-water-says-bessent-1773930578453">US to release 140 million barrels of sanctioned Iranian oil floating on water, says Bessent</a>&nbsp;The contingent moving to the war zone includes an infantry battalion landing team, which will be backed by helicopters, F-35 fighter jets and armoured landing vehicles. The Pentagon has also accelerated the deployment of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, according to defence officials were quoted by the Washington Post. While an Israeli official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said, “Those Marines aren’t coming for decoration."&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/west-asia-war-some-of-india-s-lpg-is-coming-from-us-says-government-amid-strait-of-hormuz-blockade-1773914697239">West Asia war | 'Some of India's LPG is coming from US', says government amid Strait of Hormuz blockade</a>&nbsp;This move by America comes after Trump's 48-hour ultimatum to Iran, he posted, “If Iran doesn’t fully open, without threat, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 hours from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various power plants, starting with the biggest one first!&nbsp;”&nbsp;As the crucial shipping passage controlled by Tehran remains closed, energy prices have skyrocketed. Americans have been bearing the brunt of surging gas prices after it was hiked by 33%. The president has also been facing criticism from the citizens.&nbsp;&nbsp;

The Pentagon speeds up the deployment of 4,500 US Marines and the 11th MEU to West Asia following Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum to Iran over the Strait of Hormuz.

Deployment of US soldiers to West Asia began days before the joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28. In the bid to decapitate the Islamic regime, many high-ranking officers have been killed in the joint military operation. In the latest development, Trump has ordered the deployment of a contingent of 4,500 US sailors and Marines to West Asia, as reported by the news outlet Washington Post. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-iran-awaits-trump-s-threat-to-blow-up-power-plants-warns-of-catastrophe-from-strikes-1774240203290/embed This comes amid the global energy crisis due to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Though Iran has been selective about the closure, the passage is open for a few countries, while for those countries Iran considers its “enemy”, the crucial trade route remains closed. Also read: US to release 140 million barrels of sanctioned Iranian oil floating on water, says Bessent The contingent moving to the war zone includes an infantry battalion landing team, which will be backed by helicopters, F-35 fighter jets and armoured landing vehicles. The Pentagon has also accelerated the deployment of the 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit, according to defence officials were quoted by the Washington Post. While an Israeli official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said, “Those Marines aren’t coming for decoration." Also read: West Asia war | 'Some of India's LPG is coming from US', says government amid Strait of Hormuz blockade This move by America comes after Trump's 48-hour ultimatum to Iran, he posted, “If Iran doesn’t fully open, without threat, the Strait of Hormuz, within 48 hours from this exact point in time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various power plants, starting with the biggest one first! ” As the crucial shipping passage controlled by Tehran remains closed, energy prices have skyrocketed. Americans have been bearing the brunt of surging gas prices after it was hiked by 33%. The president has also been facing criticism from the citizens.

The Pentagon speeds up the deployment of 4,500 US Marines and the 11th MEU to West Asia following Trump’s 48-hour ultimatum to Iran over the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump orders 4,500 US troops to West Asia amid Strait of Hormuz crisis as Iran ultimatum looms

Left-wing parties retained control of France’s biggest cities in municipal elections, while the far-right National Rally failed to secure major urban victories despite gains in smaller towns. Key wins in Paris, Marseille and Lyon reinforced leftist dominance

Paris to Lyon: Left wins big cities in French mayoral polls, sets tone for 2027 presidential race

Panetta on Trump Iran strategy: Leon Panetta, the former CIA director and US defence secretary, has squarely blamed Donald Trump for the escalating Iran crisis, outlining seven key reasons why the current US–Iran conflict has spiralled into a geopolitical and energy emergency. However, Panetta’s own record in prolonging US foreign wars, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan, is worth mentioning if one is talking about accountability in American national security. Here is a clear breakdown of Panetta’s claims—followed by an evidence-based look at his past role in US military interventions. Seeing this, one would wonder why Panetta suddenly developed a conscience.<h2>7 reasons why Panetta blames Trump for the Iran crisis</h2>Underestimating the Strait of Hormuz risk Panetta, in remarks published in The Guardian, argued that Trump failed to anticipate Iran’s most predictable strategic move: disrupting the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway is critical to global energy security, with roughly 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply passing through it. According to Panetta, the risk of its closure has long been central to US national security planning.Overreliance on short-war assumptions Panetta claims Trump’s Iran war strategy relied on the assumption of a quick military victory.Instead, the conflict is dragging on, exposing the absence of a clear US exit strategy.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/photos/iran-issues-first-respond-to-trump-s-will-obliterate-power-plants-threat-strait-of-hormuz-1774143212657">'Any violation by enemy...': Iran issues first response to Trump's 'will obliterate power plants' threat</a>&nbsp;Decapitation strikes backfired The killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the first day of the current war was intended to destabilise Iran’s leadership. However, Panetta argued, it had the opposite effect, leading to the rise of the leader's son Mojtaba Khamenei, who is more hardline and ideologically rigid.Iran gained leverage over global oil markets By restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran effectively weaponised energy supply chains, in Penetta's view. This has triggered volatility in global oil prices, raising concerns about inflation, fuel costs, and the risk of a wider economic slowdown.Limited strategic options for the US Panetta describes Trump’s position as between “a rock and a hard place”, with two main options:Escalate military operations to reopen the strait, or withdraw and risk strategic failure. Both scenarios carry high geopolitical and economic risks, in his view.Strained alliances weakened US leverage Panetta highlighted Trump's tensions with NATO and other allies during the planning phase of the Iran strikes. Now, as the crisis deepens, the US faces reduced international support—underscoring the importance of multilateral cooperation in modern conflict, according to the former CIA chief.Trump's inconsistent messaging undermined credibilityPanetta criticised Trump’s communication strategy, citing mixed signals on war aims and controversial public messaging, which included meme-inspired videos on official handles. He argued that failure to acknowledge civilian casualties and policy missteps weakened US credibility in global diplomacy.<a href="https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-64-of-us-voters-oppose-war-in-west-asia-wion-1774205103898/embed">https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-64-of-us-voters-oppose-war-in-west-asia-wion-1774205103898/embed</a><h2>Perspective: Panetta’s own record on foreign wars is nothing to sing home about&nbsp;</h2>While Panetta’s analysis of Trump reflected mainstream national security concerns, his own role in shaping US foreign policy during the post-9/11 era, which contributed to extending its ‘endless war’ needs some analyisis.<h3>Panetta's leadership during prolonged wars</h3>Panetta served as CIA director (2009–2011) and US defence secretary (2011–2013) under president Barack Obama, a period marked by extension of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan that were started by his predecessor George W Bush. These wars evolved into long-term military engagements with significant human and financial costs.<h3>Expansion of drone warfare</h3>As CIA director, Panetta oversaw a major expansion of drone strikes, particularly in Pakistan, with multiple civilian casualties. At the time, he described drones as one of the “most effective” tools against al-Qaeda terror group, but critics argued that such operations contributed to deaths and antagonism towards the US, and prolonged instability in the region.<h3>Support for Libya intervention</h3>Panetta backed the disastrous 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya, which led to the fall of the Muammar Gaddafi dictatorship but also led to years of political instability and conflict.<h3>Advocacy of interventionist policy</h3>Panetta has consistently supported a “forward defence” strategy—arguing for sustained US military presence abroad, contraty to what he is currently saying about Trump and Iran. He has criticised isolationist tendencies in US politics and warned against reducing America’s global military role, calling it ‘Vietnam syndrome’.Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/live-blog-us-israel-iran-attack-live-updates-attack-india-russia-china-netanyahu-trump-khamenei-hezbollah-idf-saudi-gulf-qatar-strait-of-hormuz-update-1774240031195">US-Iran-Israel war LIVE: America issues worldwide travel alert; Gulf countries targeted again</a><h2>Continuity with current strategies</h2>The tatics Panetta previously endorsed—such as drone strikes and special operations—are similar to approaches reportedly under consideration in the current Iran conflict, incuding Trump's reported plans to deploy Marines to secure Strait of Hormuz and/ or Iranian nuclear fuel.&nbsp;Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos. &nbsp;

Leon Panetta, ex-CIA chief and former US defence secretary under Obama, blamed Donald Trump for the Iran crisis, citing strategic missteps and risks to oil market and global economy. But his own record in US wars raises questions about credibility and accountability. A sudden conscience?

Panetta on Trump Iran strategy: Leon Panetta, the former CIA director and US defence secretary, has squarely blamed Donald Trump for the escalating Iran crisis, outlining seven key reasons why the current US–Iran conflict has spiralled into a geopolitical and energy emergency. However, Panetta’s own record in prolonging US foreign wars, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan, is worth mentioning if one is talking about accountability in American national security. Here is a clear breakdown of Panetta’s claims—followed by an evidence-based look at his past role in US military interventions. Seeing this, one would wonder why Panetta suddenly developed a conscience. 7 reasons why Panetta blames Trump for the Iran crisis Underestimating the Strait of Hormuz risk Panetta, in remarks published in The Guardian, argued that Trump failed to anticipate Iran’s most predictable strategic move: disrupting the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway is critical to global energy security, with roughly 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply passing through it. According to Panetta, the risk of its closure has long been central to US national security planning. Overreliance on short-war assumptions Panetta claims Trump’s Iran war strategy relied on the assumption of a quick military victory. Instead, the conflict is dragging on, exposing the absence of a clear US exit strategy. Also read: 'Any violation by enemy...': Iran issues first response to Trump's 'will obliterate power plants' threat Decapitation strikes backfired The killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in the first day of the current war was intended to destabilise Iran’s leadership. However, Panetta argued, it had the opposite effect, leading to the rise of the leader's son Mojtaba Khamenei, who is more hardline and ideologically rigid. Iran gained leverage over global oil markets By restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz, Iran effectively weaponised energy supply chains, in Penetta's view. This has triggered volatility in global oil prices, raising concerns about inflation, fuel costs, and the risk of a wider economic slowdown. Limited strategic options for the US Panetta describes Trump’s position as between “a rock and a hard place”, with two main options: Escalate military operations to reopen the strait, or withdraw and risk strategic failure. Both scenarios carry high geopolitical and economic risks, in his view. Strained alliances weakened US leverage Panetta highlighted Trump's tensions with NATO and other allies during the planning phase of the Iran strikes. Now, as the crisis deepens, the US faces reduced international support—underscoring the importance of multilateral cooperation in modern conflict, according to the former CIA chief. Trump's inconsistent messaging undermined credibility Panetta criticised Trump’s communication strategy, citing mixed signals on war aims and controversial public messaging, which included meme-inspired videos on official handles. He argued that failure to acknowledge civilian casualties and policy missteps weakened US credibility in global diplomacy. https://www.wionews.com/videos/us-iran-war-64-of-us-voters-oppose-war-in-west-asia-wion-1774205103898/embed Perspective: Panetta’s own record on foreign wars is nothing to sing home about While Panetta’s analysis of Trump reflected mainstream national security concerns, his own role in shaping US foreign policy during the post-9/11 era, which contributed to extending its ‘endless war’ needs some analyisis. Panetta's leadership during prolonged wars Panetta served as CIA director (2009–2011) and US defence secretary (2011–2013) under president Barack Obama, a period marked by extension of conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan that were started by his predecessor George W Bush. These wars evolved into long-term military engagements with significant human and financial costs. Expansion of drone warfare As CIA director, Panetta oversaw a major expansion of drone strikes, particularly in Pakistan, with multiple civilian casualties. At the time, he described drones as one of the “most effective” tools against al-Qaeda terror group, but critics argued that such operations contributed to deaths and antagonism towards the US, and prolonged instability in the region. Support for Libya intervention Panetta backed the disastrous 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya, which led to the fall of the Muammar Gaddafi dictatorship but also led to years of political instability and conflict. Advocacy of interventionist policy Panetta has consistently supported a “forward defence” strategy—arguing for sustained US military presence abroad, contraty to what he is currently saying about Trump and Iran. He has criticised isolationist tendencies in US politics and warned against reducing America’s global military role, calling it ‘Vietnam syndrome’. Also read: US-Iran-Israel war LIVE: America issues worldwide travel alert; Gulf countries targeted again Continuity with current strategies The tatics Panetta previously endorsed—such as drone strikes and special operations—are similar to approaches reportedly under consideration in the current Iran conflict, incuding Trump's reported plans to deploy Marines to secure Strait of Hormuz and/ or Iranian nuclear fuel. Disclaimer: WION takes utmost care to accurately and responsibly report ongoing conflicts in West Asia involving Israel, Iran, US, Gulf nations and non-state actors like Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, Islamic State, and others. Claims and counterclaims, disinformation and misinformation are being made online and offline. Given this context, WION cannot independently verify the authenticity of all statements, social media posts, photos and videos.

Leon Panetta, ex-CIA chief and former US defence secretary under Obama, blamed Donald Trump for the Iran crisis, citing strategic missteps and risks to oil market and global economy. But his own record in US wars raises questions about credibility and accountability. A sudden conscience?

Trump and Iran crisis: Ex-CIA chief Leon Panetta lists 7 reasons why US president is responsible— but what about his own foreign wars record?

The US State Department issued a “worldwide caution” alert on Sunday, instructing Americans who are abroad or travelling in the Middle East to “exercise increased caution” as the US war on Iran continues. It suggests that Iran and linked groups will try to attack “US interests overseas or locations associated with the United States”. The advisory comes as the US President Donald Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or else the US will "hit and obliterate" Iranian power plants. Tehran also issued a threat of sweeping retaliation against energy infrastructure in the region.&nbsp;“Worldwide Caution:&nbsp;The Department of State advises Americans worldwide, and especially in the Middle East, to exercise increased caution. Americans abroad should follow the guidance in security alerts issued by the nearest US embassy or consulate," read the security alert. It further warned about frequent travel disruption due to periodic airspace closures and that the US diplomatic consulate has been targeted in several countries. &nbsp;The government also asked citizens to enroll for the program called STEP, or the Smart Traveller Enrollment Program, which will provide “the latest security alerts.”Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/cuba-us-dialogue-blackout-crisis-trump-embargo-1774180617547">Cuba blackout crisis deepens as Havana offers ‘serious dialogue’ to US</a>Iranian Commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Major General Abdollahi, said that Iran's military doctrine has shifted from defensive to offensive. As the war escalates into a stalemate, both sides are threatening to take extreme measures, as no one can secure a decisive victory. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov criticised the US for attempting to dominate the energy market by any means, including coups, abductions, and assassinations of leaders in resource-rich countries.The US and Israel had launched a joint operation against Iran on February 28 and killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with other senior leaders and at least 1,300 people. Ayatollah in the Shia faith is similar to the Bishop of Anglicans or the Pope of Catholics, which the West is not acknowledging, either out of hubris or racism. Further, a “worldwide caution” creates a rally-around-the-flag effect, which will be needed for the Trump administration to consolidate domestic support as the war continues.&nbsp;

The US issues a worldwide caution alert as the Iran war escalates, with Donald Trump warning Tehran over the Strait of Hormuz and potential energy strikes.

The US State Department issued a “worldwide caution” alert on Sunday, instructing Americans who are abroad or travelling in the Middle East to “exercise increased caution” as the US war on Iran continues. It suggests that Iran and linked groups will try to attack “US interests overseas or locations associated with the United States”. The advisory comes as the US President Donald Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to reopen the Strait of Hormuz or else the US will "hit and obliterate" Iranian power plants. Tehran also issued a threat of sweeping retaliation against energy infrastructure in the region. “Worldwide Caution: The Department of State advises Americans worldwide, and especially in the Middle East, to exercise increased caution. Americans abroad should follow the guidance in security alerts issued by the nearest US embassy or consulate," read the security alert. It further warned about frequent travel disruption due to periodic airspace closures and that the US diplomatic consulate has been targeted in several countries. The government also asked citizens to enroll for the program called STEP, or the Smart Traveller Enrollment Program, which will provide “the latest security alerts.” Also Read: Cuba blackout crisis deepens as Havana offers ‘serious dialogue’ to US Iranian Commander of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Major General Abdollahi, said that Iran's military doctrine has shifted from defensive to offensive. As the war escalates into a stalemate, both sides are threatening to take extreme measures, as no one can secure a decisive victory. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov criticised the US for attempting to dominate the energy market by any means, including coups, abductions, and assassinations of leaders in resource-rich countries. The US and Israel had launched a joint operation against Iran on February 28 and killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, along with other senior leaders and at least 1,300 people. Ayatollah in the Shia faith is similar to the Bishop of Anglicans or the Pope of Catholics, which the West is not acknowledging, either out of hubris or racism. Further, a “worldwide caution” creates a rally-around-the-flag effect, which will be needed for the Trump administration to consolidate domestic support as the war continues.

The US issues a worldwide caution alert as the Iran war escalates, with Donald Trump warning Tehran over the Strait of Hormuz and potential energy strikes.

US issues worldwide travel alert as Iran war escalates, after Trump's 48-hour ultimatum

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Israel strikes Tehran minutes after Trump’s ‘pause’; ex-US counterterrorism chief Joe Kent says ‘Step 1 in de-escalation must be…’

Who did Trump have ‘constructive’ talks with? US president says...

EXPLAINER: 5 problems Iran war could solve for Israel’s Netanyahu

'Will keep bombing our little hearts out if..': Trump on ending Iran war, or not

Oil prices tumble, global stocks rally as Trump pauses Iran strikes

Who is Palm Beach Pete? Jeffrey Epstein look-alike who used to party with him

What’s happening at Newark airport? Flights suspended as control tower evacuated

Iran denies conversation with Trump after he claims 'constructive’ talks

LaGuardia airport plane crash: Two pilots killed and dozens injured

ED flags Indians buying Dubai property via credit cards

Iran and NATO: Alliance wants to secure Hormuz as troops move to 'secure areas'

Russia urges political, diplomatic solution as Trump’s 48-hour deadline nears

Trump pauses all military strikes against Iranian energy sites for five days

Iran threatens to plant mines in entire Persian Gulf if Trump launches ground attack

Houthi threatens to disrupt Bab al-Mandab if US invades Kharg Island

US airport chaos: DHS shutdown triggers massive screening delays as ICE deploys

India DID NOT pay in Chinese Yuan for oil tankers to cross Strait of Hormuz

Gold bearish, dollar index bullish, treasury yields higher amid Iran war

Jewish volunteer ambulances set on fire in London, police suspect hate crime

'False flag': Bahrain, Diego Garcia, Turkey attacks were not by Iran?

LeT commander gunned down and stabbed by fellow operative in Pakistan's Muridke

‘You’re fired!’: IRGC mocks Trump using his signature phrase

Trump orders 4,500 US troops to West Asia as Iran ultimatum looms

France mayoral polls: Left sweeps big cities from Paris to Lyon — who won where

Panetta lists reasons why Trump is responsible for Iran, but his own record is…

US issues worldwide travel alert as Iran war escalates