How does a GPU actually work? The technology behind modern graphics and AI

Macron’s awkward embrace with Iceland PM Kristrún Frostadóttir goes viral – What happened?

Aliens near US military base? Woman captures bizarre jellyfish-like UFO in Alaska | WATCH

'Miracle on the Mississippi': Cruise boat capsizes after colliding with tanker in New Orleans, all 180 passengers aboard safe

Why are modern GPUs so expensive? 7 things that drive graphics card prices

Why do graphics cards have thousands of small processing cores?

'Don’t f–k around!' Travis Barker opens up on quitting smoking after precancer diagnosis

CPU vs GPU vs NPU: Which processor does your computer actually need?

After Venezuela and Iran, Trump sets sights on another military intervention before leaving office

'Forbidden' light proposed 40 years ago detected for first time in the universe

Avril Lavigne welcomes first child, keeps baby's name and partner's identity private

Why did the FAA suddenly ground flights across the US? Officials reveal what went wrong

Reply 1988 star Ko Kyung Pyo under police investigation after drunk-driving collision in Seoul

Shape-shifting UFO sighting in Oregon leaves mother-daughter sick: 'Fell like a dead bird'

Vaaste singer Dhvani Bhanushali announces engagement to esports entrepreneur Yash Bhanushali; see pics

From chipmakers to cloud giants: How is Nvidia's stock crash shaking the AI industry?

Crystal-clear Ganga water in Haridwar? Viral video creates buzz online | WATCH

Move over Ram and Ravan, Kunal Kapoor's Lord Indra in Ramayana is stealing hearts in Thailand

Nvidia scandal exposes cracks in Trump admin as Bessent blames Lutnick over Megaspeed blacklist delay

Chris Hemsworth and Elsa Pataky's Australian home targeted by burglars;  3 cars stolen

Trump, Putin and Xi to hold historic trilateral meeting at APEC Summit in China

'Don't hike rates': US Treasury Secretary Bessent warns Fed against rate increase amid Iran war

Ukraine's NATO membership in exchange for ceding territory to Russia: Zelensky reveals US proposal

Jensen Huang seen with wife Lori in Paris in photos shared by daughter Madison

A$AP Rocky's New York event disrupted by on-camera brawl, NYPD steps in

24 hours and counting: Microsoft says 'sorry' for global outage

CM Suvendhu Adhikari turns Bengal's Chhath ghats into launchpad for UP campaign

Mohamed Salah becomes Egypt’s all-time top scorer with brace against Malawi

Video captures horrifying moment Brooklyn apartment building collapses, killing eight people

Colombia 'false positives' scandal: 5 retired army men sentenced over killing of 35 civilians

'It exploded in his mouth': Man dies after friend gives him bomb disguised as rasgulla on Diwali in Madhya Pradesh's Dindori

Why do powerful graphics cards need so much electricity?

Indian student sentenced to 30 years in UK for online grooming of over 70 children

US President Donald Trump has rejected claims that American military stockpiles were heavily depleted during the conflict with Iran. He said the United States has "massive amounts" of munitions and warned that those responsible for leaking information about military inventories would face prosecution and lengthy prison terms.&nbsp;Trump's remarks came after CNN, citing multiple sources, reported that US military commanders had raised concerns over critically low stockpiles of some munitions, especially air defence interceptors, following the Iran conflict.&nbsp;"The US has massive amounts of munitions, especially of certain types. Additionally, large amounts are being manufactured and shipped to the U.S. as needed. Defence companies are building the largest number of plants and factories in our country's history. The 'leakers' of these treasonous statements are being hunted down. Long-term jail sentences will be sought!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social.<h2>US missile defence stockpiles under pressure</h2>The report, citing people familiar with the matter, said the US military had used a significant share of its interceptors for key missile defence systems since the war began. Senior commanders reportedly warned that some Pentagon stockpiles had fallen to concerning levels.&nbsp;The US military has depleted nearly 80 per cent of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) missile inventory compared with pre-war levels. It has also used around half of its Patriot interceptors during the conflict, according to two sources familiar with the latest inventory assessments.&nbsp;The extent of the THAAD depletion had not been disclosed publicly before. The Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimated that the US had around 452 THAAD missiles and about 2,200 Patriot interceptors of the two most modern variants before the Iran war began.&nbsp;Also Read:<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/carney-mocks-trump-over-teleprompter-glitch-us-president-calls-canadian-leadership-nasty-1785996010337"> Carney mocks Trump over teleprompter glitch, US president calls Canadian leadership 'nasty'</a><h2>Gulf allies fear reduced US air defence support</h2>CNN also reported that concerns over air defence shortages have spread to US allies in the Gulf. Several countries fear that reduced availability of American defence systems could affect their ability to respond to possible Iranian missile and drone attacks.&nbsp;Officials said several Gulf nations rely on US-supplied air defence systems and have expressed concern that lower inventories could weaken their ability to intercept threats, particularly if they become targets after any further US escalation.&nbsp;Trump had earlier dismissed reports that military stockpiles had reached dangerously low levels and directly rejected claims that interceptor shortages were limiting American military strategy during the conflict with Iran.&nbsp;Speaking to The Wall Street Journal, Trump denied that shrinking munitions stockpiles posed a challenge to US defence capabilities, saying, "We have far more munitions than anyone in the world, and far more than we need."&nbsp;Trump had also called off "the biggest attack since World War II" on Iran, citing possible negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz.&nbsp;However, officials said low stockpile levels influenced Trump's decisions on whether to launch additional large-scale strikes against Iran.

Trump denied claims that the Iran conflict depleted US military stockpiles, saying the country has more than enough munitions and threatening legal action against leakers.

US President Donald Trump has rejected claims that American military stockpiles were heavily depleted during the conflict with Iran. He said the United States has "massive amounts" of munitions and warned that those responsible for leaking information about military inventories would face prosecution and lengthy prison terms. Trump's remarks came after CNN, citing multiple sources, reported that US military commanders had raised concerns over critically low stockpiles of some munitions, especially air defence interceptors, following the Iran conflict. "The US has massive amounts of munitions, especially of certain types. Additionally, large amounts are being manufactured and shipped to the U.S. as needed. Defence companies are building the largest number of plants and factories in our country's history. The 'leakers' of these treasonous statements are being hunted down. Long-term jail sentences will be sought!" Trump said in a post on Truth Social. US missile defence stockpiles under pressure The report, citing people familiar with the matter, said the US military had used a significant share of its interceptors for key missile defence systems since the war began. Senior commanders reportedly warned that some Pentagon stockpiles had fallen to concerning levels. The US military has depleted nearly 80 per cent of its Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) missile inventory compared with pre-war levels. It has also used around half of its Patriot interceptors during the conflict, according to two sources familiar with the latest inventory assessments. The extent of the THAAD depletion had not been disclosed publicly before. The Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimated that the US had around 452 THAAD missiles and about 2,200 Patriot interceptors of the two most modern variants before the Iran war began. Also Read: Carney mocks Trump over teleprompter glitch, US president calls Canadian leadership 'nasty' Gulf allies fear reduced US air defence support CNN also reported that concerns over air defence shortages have spread to US allies in the Gulf. Several countries fear that reduced availability of American defence systems could affect their ability to respond to possible Iranian missile and drone attacks. Officials said several Gulf nations rely on US-supplied air defence systems and have expressed concern that lower inventories could weaken their ability to intercept threats, particularly if they become targets after any further US escalation. Trump had earlier dismissed reports that military stockpiles had reached dangerously low levels and directly rejected claims that interceptor shortages were limiting American military strategy during the conflict with Iran. Speaking to The Wall Street Journal, Trump denied that shrinking munitions stockpiles posed a challenge to US defence capabilities, saying, "We have far more munitions than anyone in the world, and far more than we need." Trump had also called off "the biggest attack since World War II" on Iran, citing possible negotiations over the Strait of Hormuz. However, officials said low stockpile levels influenced Trump's decisions on whether to launch additional large-scale strikes against Iran.

Trump denied claims that the Iran conflict depleted US military stockpiles, saying the country has more than enough munitions and threatening legal action against leakers.

Trump denies US missile stockpile shortage, warns leakers of prosecution and jail

Indonesian authorities have released CCTV footage that they say shows a Malaysian pilot accused of attempting to smuggle 26kg of ecstasy and a small quantity of methamphetamine through Jakarta’s Soekarno-Hatta International Airport.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/covid-19-was-probably-a-lab-leak-says-ex-white-house-covid-response-coordinator-what-to-know-about-the-debate-1785813045665">‘Covid-19 was probably a lab leak’, says ex-White House COVID response coordinator. What to know about the debate</a>&nbsp;According to Indonesia’s Customs and Excise Department, the pilot arrived at Terminal 3 of the airport on July 29 before proceeding through the arrival hall and completing his customs declaration. Although he was initially directed to the dedicated “fast track” lane for flight crew, Customs officers carried out a further inspection after identifying him through risk profiling and behavioural analysis, authorities said.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/north-carolina-family-shooting-leaves-3-dead-including-suspected-gunman-here-s-what-happened-1786000596891">North Carolina family shooting leaves 3 dead, including suspected gunman. Here’s what happened</a>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">🚨 A pilot accused of attempting to smuggle more than 70,000 ecstasy pills into Indonesia, allegedly in exchange for $12,000, is facing some of the country&#39;s toughest drug trafficking penalties. Under Indonesian law, convictions for serious drug trafficking offenses can carry… <a href="https://t.co/RioZLp3OW7">pic.twitter.com/RioZLp3OW7</a>&mdash; GFN (@GFNIND) <a href="https://x.com/GFNIND/status/2085119656965398825?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Officials alleged that a search of his luggage uncovered 26kg of ecstasy, equivalent to around 70,114 pills, along with 4g of methamphetamine concealed inside his suitcase.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/100-fake-news-trump-confronted-hegseth-over-us-munitions-shortages-claims-report-here-s-why-wh-says-1785993835957">‘100% fake news’: WH denies report claiming Trump confronted Hegseth over US munitions shortages</a>&nbsp;Authorities also said officers seized a small bottle containing urine, which investigators suspect was intended to falsify the results of a urine drug test if one had been requested during the inspection. The allegation remains part of the ongoing investigation.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/palestinian-american-abdul-el-sayed-leads-michigan-democratic-senate-primary-in-key-test-for-party-1785907766863">Palestinian American Abdul El-Sayed wins Michigan Democratic Senate primary, will be 1st Muslim to be US Senate if elected</a>&nbsp;The Customs and Excise Department said the case demonstrated the effectiveness of Indonesia’s risk-based enforcement system, which combines profiling, officer observations, X-ray screening and physical inspections instead of relying solely on initial customs clearance. The Malaysian pilot was arrested last week and remains under investigation by Indonesian authorities. No further details about the case have been released.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/north-korea-s-kim-yo-jong-slams-japan-s-tomahawk-missile-test-what-s-inside-tokyo-s-defence-white-paper-1785899590426">North Korea’s Kim Yo Jong slams Japan's Tomahawk missile test. What's inside Tokyo’s defence white paper?</a>

CCTV footage captured a Malaysian pilot arrested at Jakarta’s airport after customs officers profiled him and discovered 26kg of ecstasy, methamphetamine, and a fake urine sample in his luggage.



Indonesian authorities have released CCTV footage that they say shows a Malaysian pilot accused of attempting to smuggle 26kg of ecstasy and a small quantity of methamphetamine through Jakarta’s Soekarno-Hatta International Airport. Also read: ‘Covid-19 was probably a lab leak’, says ex-White House COVID response coordinator. What to know about the debate According to Indonesia’s Customs and Excise Department, the pilot arrived at Terminal 3 of the airport on July 29 before proceeding through the arrival hall and completing his customs declaration. Although he was initially directed to the dedicated “fast track” lane for flight crew, Customs officers carried out a further inspection after identifying him through risk profiling and behavioural analysis, authorities said. Also read: North Carolina family shooting leaves 3 dead, including suspected gunman. Here’s what happened

CCTV footage captured a Malaysian pilot arrested at Jakarta’s airport after customs officers profiled him and discovered 26kg of ecstasy, methamphetamine, and a fake urine sample in his luggage.&nbsp;

WATCH: Pilot tries to smuggle 26kg of ecstasy through Indonesia Airport

Arvind Kejriwal claims Meta restricted his account in India, asks Zuckerberg's firm not to 'bow down' to PM ModiAam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday (Aug 6) alleged that Meta had restricted his account in India without any explanation, accusing the social media giant of yielding to political pressure from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government.The former Delhi chief minister said repeated attempts to seek clarification from Meta had gone unanswered and urged the company to explain why his account had allegedly become inaccessible to users in India. This comes as the AAP leader continues his active campaign against the government's E20 ethanol blending in petrol. He has raised questions on the safety and scientific backing of the E20 fuel, and has raised alarms about potential extension to aviation fuel. &nbsp;<h2>Kejriwal alleges account was restricted</h2>In a post on X, Kejriwal claimed that verbal inquiries at Meta's India office confirmed that his account had been restricted within the country, but that company officials neither explained the reason nor suggested how the restriction could be lifted."Hi @Meta @metaindia Why have you restricted my account? Verbal enquiries at your India office revealed that my account has been restricted in India and is unavailable in India. Why? No one in your office is giving any reasons. No one is suggesting how restrictions can be removed," he wrote.Taking a swipe at the Centre, Kejriwal added: "Don't bow down to our Prime Minister so much. Else he will allow u to run only his own account in India."Meta has not publicly responded to Kejriwal's allegations.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">Hi <a href="https://x.com/Meta?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Meta</a> <a href="https://x.com/metaindia?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@metaindia</a> Why have you restricted my account? Verbal enquiries at your India office revealed that my account has been restricted in India and is unavailable in India. Why? Noone in your office is giving any reasons. Noone is suggesting how restrictions can be removed.… <a href="https://t.co/4JThAqFMon">pic.twitter.com/4JThAqFMon</a>&mdash; Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) <a href="https://x.com/ArvindKejriwal/status/2085219400970539037?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 6, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Kejriwal calls on netizens to report similar issues</h2>In a separate video posted on X, Kejriwal appealed to users who believe their content or pages have been suppressed by Meta to contact him using the hashtag #MetaCensorsIndia.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">अगर आपका भी पेज Meta ने suppress किया है तो मुझे <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/MetaCensorsIndia?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#MetaCensorsIndia</a> के साथ comment या DM करें। <a href="https://t.co/JsB98WsxMq">https://t.co/JsB98WsxMq</a> <a href="https://t.co/abVxhl28ug">pic.twitter.com/abVxhl28ug</a>&mdash; Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) <a href="https://x.com/ArvindKejriwal/status/2085253984319914313?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 6, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<h2>Meta under scrutiny in India</h2>Kejriwal's remarks come at a time when Meta is facing heightened scrutiny from Indian authorities on multiple fronts.According to government sources, the company recently acknowledged that advertisements linked to alleged Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material (CSEAM) had appeared on its platforms and admitted that paid promotions had been targeted at specific audiences. Sources said Meta would be summoned again over the matter.The same sources also claimed that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologised to the Indian government over issues relating to child sexual abuse material, deepfake content and operational errors on the platform.On Wednesday, a senior Meta delegation led by Chief Global Affairs Officer Joel Kaplan met Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology Secretary S. Krishnan to explain the erroneous removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Facebook video on action against examination paper leaks. Meta has previously said that Modi's video was taken down due to a technical error and was restored after the issue was identified.The meeting followed criticism from the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology, which demanded an "unqualified apology" from Zuckerberg and warned that Meta could lose its safe harbour protections under India's Information Technology Act if such incidents continued.&nbsp;

AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal has alleged that Meta restricted his account in India without explanation, accusing the company of bowing to political pressure from the Modi govt. The claim comes as Meta faces scrutiny in India over content moderation and the removal of PM's Facebook video.

Arvind Kejriwal claims Meta restricted his account in India, asks Zuckerberg's firm not to 'bow down' to PM Modi Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday (Aug 6) alleged that Meta had restricted his account in India without any explanation, accusing the social media giant of yielding to political pressure from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government. The former Delhi chief minister said repeated attempts to seek clarification from Meta had gone unanswered and urged the company to explain why his account had allegedly become inaccessible to users in India. This comes as the AAP leader continues his active campaign against the government's E20 ethanol blending in petrol. He has raised questions on the safety and scientific backing of the E20 fuel, and has raised alarms about potential extension to aviation fuel. Kejriwal alleges account was restricted In a post on X, Kejriwal claimed that verbal inquiries at Meta's India office confirmed that his account had been restricted within the country, but that company officials neither explained the reason nor suggested how the restriction could be lifted. "Hi @Meta @metaindia Why have you restricted my account? Verbal enquiries at your India office revealed that my account has been restricted in India and is unavailable in India. Why? No one in your office is giving any reasons. No one is suggesting how restrictions can be removed," he wrote. Taking a swipe at the Centre, Kejriwal added: "Don't bow down to our Prime Minister so much. Else he will allow u to run only his own account in India." Meta has not publicly responded to Kejriwal's allegations.

AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal has alleged that Meta restricted his account in India without explanation, accusing the company of bowing to political pressure from the Modi govt. The claim comes as Meta faces scrutiny in India over content moderation and the removal of PM's Facebook video.

'Don't bow down to PM Modi': Kejriwal claims Meta restricted his account in India

The United States has introduced stricter rules for processing immigration benefits, giving officials the authority to reject incomplete applications for visas, green cards and other immigration benefits without first asking applicants to submit missing documents. The move could affect thousands of Indian applicants seeking to study, work or settle in the US.The new guidance, issued by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), took effect immediately and applies to applications pending or filed on or after August 5, 2026.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-to-charge-foreign-students-100000-for-a-shot-at-a-us-job-heres-why-indian-students-should-be-worried-1785459801701">Trump to charge foreign students $100,000 for a shot at a US job? Here's why Indian students should be worried</a><h2>What has changed?</h2>Under the revised policy, USCIS officers can deny an application outright if the applicant fails to establish eligibility or does not include all the required supporting documents at the time of filing.Previously, under a policy introduced during the Biden administration, immigration officers were generally encouraged to issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) or a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) before rejecting an application, giving applicants an opportunity to correct deficiencies. However, that is no longer guaranteed.According to USCIS, application forms and official instructions already specify the documents needed for each immigration benefit. Applicants are therefore expected to submit complete applications from the outset.<h2>Why has USCIS changed the policy?</h2>USCIS said the updated guidance aligns with the Department of Homeland Security's long-standing regulatory authority and is intended to strengthen the integrity of the immigration system.The agency argued that the previous approach allowed incomplete or substantially deficient applications to slow down the processing of other cases.It also claimed some applicants used "placeholder" filings to obtain related benefits, such as employment authorisation, while waiting for a decision on applications that lacked the required evidence.By restoring officers' discretion to deny such applications without first issuing an RFE or NOID, USCIS said it expects to improve efficiency, speed up decision-making and discourage frivolous filings.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/india-avoids-higher-us-tariff-secures-lower-10-rate-here-s-how-1784854529326">India avoids higher US tariff, secures lower 10% rate. Here's how</a><h2>What does this mean for applicants?</h2>The policy raises the stakes for applicants, who will now need to ensure their applications are complete and supported by all required documentation before submission.An application that is missing key evidence may now be rejected outright, without the applicant being allowed to provide additional documents later. For prospective students, skilled workers, families applying for green cards and other immigration applicants, careful preparation and complete documentation will become even more important under the revised rules.

The US has tightened immigration processing rules, allowing officials to reject incomplete visa, green card and other benefit applications without first requesting missing documents. The new policy, effective August 5, raises the stakes for applicants, including thousands of Indians.

The United States has introduced stricter rules for processing immigration benefits, giving officials the authority to reject incomplete applications for visas, green cards and other immigration benefits without first asking applicants to submit missing documents. The move could affect thousands of Indian applicants seeking to study, work or settle in the US. The new guidance, issued by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), took effect immediately and applies to applications pending or filed on or after August 5, 2026. Also read | Trump to charge foreign students $100,000 for a shot at a US job? Here's why Indian students should be worried What has changed? Under the revised policy, USCIS officers can deny an application outright if the applicant fails to establish eligibility or does not include all the required supporting documents at the time of filing. Previously, under a policy introduced during the Biden administration, immigration officers were generally encouraged to issue a Request for Evidence (RFE) or a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) before rejecting an application, giving applicants an opportunity to correct deficiencies. However, that is no longer guaranteed. According to USCIS, application forms and official instructions already specify the documents needed for each immigration benefit. Applicants are therefore expected to submit complete applications from the outset. Why has USCIS changed the policy? USCIS said the updated guidance aligns with the Department of Homeland Security's long-standing regulatory authority and is intended to strengthen the integrity of the immigration system. The agency argued that the previous approach allowed incomplete or substantially deficient applications to slow down the processing of other cases. It also claimed some applicants used "placeholder" filings to obtain related benefits, such as employment authorisation, while waiting for a decision on applications that lacked the required evidence. By restoring officers' discretion to deny such applications without first issuing an RFE or NOID, USCIS said it expects to improve efficiency, speed up decision-making and discourage frivolous filings. Also read | India avoids higher US tariff, secures lower 10% rate. Here's how What does this mean for applicants? The policy raises the stakes for applicants, who will now need to ensure their applications are complete and supported by all required documentation before submission. An application that is missing key evidence may now be rejected outright, without the applicant being allowed to provide additional documents later. For prospective students, skilled workers, families applying for green cards and other immigration applicants, careful preparation and complete documentation will become even more important under the revised rules.

The US has tightened immigration processing rules, allowing officials to reject incomplete visa, green card and other benefit applications without first requesting missing documents. The new policy, effective August 5, raises the stakes for applicants, including thousands of Indians.

Planning to study or work in the US? One missing document could now cost Indians their US visa or green card

Three people, including the suspected gunman, were killed and another person was injured in a shooting at a home in North Carolina on Wednesday (Aug 5), authorities said. According to the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation (SBI), deputies from the Caswell County Sheriff's Office responded to a call for service shortly before 8 am local time at a residence on Brooks Road in Prospect Hill.&nbsp;When deputies arrived, they found multiple people with gunshot wounds. One injured person was taken to the hospital, although officials have not disclosed their condition. Authorities have not released the identities of the victims or the suspect.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/carney-mocks-trump-over-teleprompter-glitch-us-president-calls-canadian-leadership-nasty-1785996010337">Carney mocks Trump over teleprompter glitch, US president calls Canadian leadership 'nasty'</a>&nbsp;Speaking at a news conference, Caswell County Sheriff Tony Durden said all those involved were adults from the same family. He added that there was no evidence the family had previously contacted the sheriff's office.&nbsp;The Caswell County Sheriff's Office and the North Carolina State Highway Patrol responded to the incident, while SBI crime scene investigators remained at the property to process evidence and conduct interviews. The SBI said the shooting was confined to the home and that there was no ongoing threat to the public.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/100-fake-news-trump-confronted-hegseth-over-us-munitions-shortages-claims-report-here-s-why-wh-says-1785993835957">‘100% fake news’: WH denies report claiming Trump confronted Hegseth over US munitions shortages</a>&nbsp;"This was an isolated incident and please keep the family in your prayers," Durden said

A North Carolina home shooting left three family members dead, including the suspected gunman, and another hospitalised. Authorities confirm it was an isolated incident with no ongoing public threat.

Three people, including the suspected gunman, were killed and another person was injured in a shooting at a home in North Carolina on Wednesday (Aug 5), authorities said. According to the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation (SBI), deputies from the Caswell County Sheriff's Office responded to a call for service shortly before 8 am local time at a residence on Brooks Road in Prospect Hill. When deputies arrived, they found multiple people with gunshot wounds. One injured person was taken to the hospital, although officials have not disclosed their condition. Authorities have not released the identities of the victims or the suspect. Also read: Carney mocks Trump over teleprompter glitch, US president calls Canadian leadership 'nasty' Speaking at a news conference, Caswell County Sheriff Tony Durden said all those involved were adults from the same family. He added that there was no evidence the family had previously contacted the sheriff's office. The Caswell County Sheriff's Office and the North Carolina State Highway Patrol responded to the incident, while SBI crime scene investigators remained at the property to process evidence and conduct interviews. The SBI said the shooting was confined to the home and that there was no ongoing threat to the public. Also read: ‘100% fake news’: WH denies report claiming Trump confronted Hegseth over US munitions shortages "This was an isolated incident and please keep the family in your prayers," Durden said

A North Carolina home shooting left three family members dead, including the suspected gunman, and another hospitalised. Authorities confirm it was an isolated incident with no ongoing public threat.

North Carolina family shooting leaves 3 dead, including suspected gunman. Here’s what happened

The University of Cambridge professor has resigned with immediate effect amid a plagiarism row. The sociology of education professor, identified as Prof Jason Arday, said that the only way to bring this chapter to an end is to "step away". Earlier, the university confirmed that it had launched a probe "following new information" about the academic qualifications and honorary appointments of the professor.&nbsp; The development unfolded after a row against Prof Jason Arday erupted in September 2025, when Times Higher Education alleged Arday of plagiarising parts of his PhD thesis and several journal articles. The investigation also disclosed that he also palagrised text appearing in quotes, claiming that he had personally interviewed. That story reportedly got shelved for roughly ten months after a Carter-Ruck letter (a UK law firm known for libel/reputation work) silenced the 63-page THE investigation. Beyond the academic plagiarism claims, questions also emerged over charity fundraising claims in his biography; archival records reportedly showed a 2010 JustGiving page raised only £6,285, not the £5 million his biography claimed. Reports describe an 188-sentence plagiarism finding against him. The current Cambridge row centres on Jason Arday, who became Cambridge's youngest Black professor when appointed in 2023 as Professor of Sociology of Education. This follows claims from another academic, Nathan Cofnas, who describes himself as a race realist and was dismissed from his Cambridge position in 2024, who said he'd uncovered multiple plagiarism instances in Arday's work and raised doubts about certain achievements Arday had claimed. Arday has acknowledged mistakes in his work but maintains he is not "a liar."&nbsp;Also read: '<a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bangladesh-says-sheikh-hasina-s-india-media-appearance-hurt-ties-calls-it-an-affront-to-sovereignty-1785977377689">Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference</a><h3>Stepped down from both universities</h3>Cambridge subsequently opened a formal investigation into Arday, scrutinising his academic credentials and honorary titles. He stepped down immediately from both the university and Jesus College, pointing to relentless public scrutiny and personal attacks he'd faced since starting the role, along with a desire to escape the constant public spotlight. In a Wednesday statement shared via the Good Law Project, Arday described his professorship as "without question, the greatest professional privilege of my life." "The years since my appointment have also been marked by an unrelenting level of public scrutiny and personal attack," he said, and added, "there comes a point when the personal cost becomes too great". He also said that his resignation shouldn't be seen as a loss of belief in scholarship or in the principles that originally drew him to Cambridge. "Nor should it be mistaken for an acceptance of the narratives that have surrounded me." Thanking students and colleagues, the professor said, "for my own wellbeing, for my family, and for those who have stood by me throughout this difficult period, I have concluded that the only way to bring this chapter to an end is to step away". Arday further said that it is not the end of his work and required more "time to heal". "When that time comes, I will return," he added. On Wednesday, the university confirmed that its inquiry related to the row had started after the new information about Arday's "academic qualifications and honorary appointments". "Separately, there remains a number of ongoing complaints regarding academic misconduct, which are being handled in line with our Misconduct in Research policy," the University of Cambridge said in a statement. It added: "While we are fully aware of the public commentary and concerns around this matter, it remains vital that any process is thorough and adheres to both university policies and employment law." "We also fully recognise that there is a person at the centre of this situation, and we continue to provide support to him," it further said.&nbsp;

Beyond the academic plagiarism claims, questions also emerged over charity fundraising claims in his biography; archival records reportedly showed a 2010 JustGiving page raised only £6,285, not the £5 million his biography claimed. 

The University of Cambridge professor has resigned with immediate effect amid a plagiarism row. The sociology of education professor, identified as Prof Jason Arday, said that the only way to bring this chapter to an end is to "step away". Earlier, the university confirmed that it had launched a probe "following new information" about the academic qualifications and honorary appointments of the professor. The development unfolded after a row against Prof Jason Arday erupted in September 2025, when Times Higher Education alleged Arday of plagiarising parts of his PhD thesis and several journal articles. The investigation also disclosed that he also palagrised text appearing in quotes, claiming that he had personally interviewed. That story reportedly got shelved for roughly ten months after a Carter-Ruck letter (a UK law firm known for libel/reputation work) silenced the 63-page THE investigation. Beyond the academic plagiarism claims, questions also emerged over charity fundraising claims in his biography; archival records reportedly showed a 2010 JustGiving page raised only £6,285, not the £5 million his biography claimed. Reports describe an 188-sentence plagiarism finding against him. The current Cambridge row centres on Jason Arday, who became Cambridge's youngest Black professor when appointed in 2023 as Professor of Sociology of Education. This follows claims from another academic, Nathan Cofnas, who describes himself as a race realist and was dismissed from his Cambridge position in 2024, who said he'd uncovered multiple plagiarism instances in Arday's work and raised doubts about certain achievements Arday had claimed. Arday has acknowledged mistakes in his work but maintains he is not "a liar." Also read: 'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference Stepped down from both universities Cambridge subsequently opened a formal investigation into Arday, scrutinising his academic credentials and honorary titles. He stepped down immediately from both the university and Jesus College, pointing to relentless public scrutiny and personal attacks he'd faced since starting the role, along with a desire to escape the constant public spotlight. In a Wednesday statement shared via the Good Law Project, Arday described his professorship as "without question, the greatest professional privilege of my life." "The years since my appointment have also been marked by an unrelenting level of public scrutiny and personal attack," he said, and added, "there comes a point when the personal cost becomes too great". He also said that his resignation shouldn't be seen as a loss of belief in scholarship or in the principles that originally drew him to Cambridge. "Nor should it be mistaken for an acceptance of the narratives that have surrounded me." Thanking students and colleagues, the professor said, "for my own wellbeing, for my family, and for those who have stood by me throughout this difficult period, I have concluded that the only way to bring this chapter to an end is to step away". Arday further said that it is not the end of his work and required more "time to heal". "When that time comes, I will return," he added. On Wednesday, the university confirmed that its inquiry related to the row had started after the new information about Arday's "academic qualifications and honorary appointments". "Separately, there remains a number of ongoing complaints regarding academic misconduct, which are being handled in line with our Misconduct in Research policy," the University of Cambridge said in a statement. It added: "While we are fully aware of the public commentary and concerns around this matter, it remains vital that any process is thorough and adheres to both university policies and employment law." "We also fully recognise that there is a person at the centre of this situation, and we continue to provide support to him," it further said.

Beyond the academic plagiarism claims, questions also emerged over charity fundraising claims in his biography; archival records reportedly showed a 2010 JustGiving page raised only £6,285, not the £5 million his biography claimed.&nbsp;

'Time to step away': Cambridge's youngest Black professor resigns amid plagiarism row - What we know

Samsung Electronics has signed a $200 billion agreement with Broadcom that, if executed, would represent the most serious challenge TSMC has faced in the custom AI chip business.&nbsp;The Agreement&nbsp;Announced July 25 during an AI summit in San Francisco attended by South Korean government representatives and industry executives, the five-year partnership runs through 2030 and covers three of the most critical layers of the AI chip supply chain at once.&nbsp;Samsung will manufacture Broadcom's next-generation communications chips on its sub-2-nanometre process technology. The two companies will jointly develop advanced high-bandwidth memory, including the HBM4E and HBM5 generations. And the agreement covers advanced 2.3D and 2.5D packaging — the increasingly decisive stage where processors and memory are assembled into a single functioning unit.&nbsp;An Important Caveat&nbsp;The agreement is a memorandum of understanding. In practical terms that means it is a statement of intent rather than a binding contract, and the $200 billion figure represents the value of business the two companies intend to conduct rather than an amount Broadcom is committed to spend.&nbsp;MOUs at this scale are common in semiconductor manufacturing, where capacity must be reserved years in advance, and they frequently do convert into real volume. But the distinction matters for anyone reading the headline number as guaranteed revenue.&nbsp;Why It Threatens TSMC&nbsp;TSMC's dominance in advanced foundry work has been close to absolute, particularly for the custom silicon that hyperscalers increasingly design in-house. Broadcom is the central player in that market — it co-designs custom AI accelerators for the largest technology companies, and where Broadcom manufactures is where a substantial share of the industry's custom silicon gets made.&nbsp;Securing Broadcom's next-generation business gives Samsung two things it has struggled to obtain: a marquee customer validating its sub-2nm process, and the high factory utilisation that makes advanced foundry economics work. Leading-edge fabs cost tens of billions to build and are ruinous when underused; a five-year anchor customer changes that calculation entirely.&nbsp;For Broadcom, the logic is supply security. Depending on a single foundry for chips this strategically important is a concentration risk, and the industry is heading into what Samsung has warned could be an AI chip shortage persisting into 2028.&nbsp;The Memory Angle&nbsp;The high-bandwidth memory component may matter as much as the foundry work. HBM has become the binding constraint on AI accelerator performance — the processor can only compute as fast as memory feeds it data. SK Hynix has led this market, with Samsung working to close the gap.&nbsp;A joint development arrangement on HBM4E and HBM5 with Broadcom positions Samsung inside the design process for the next two generations, rather than competing for orders after the specifications have been set. Samsung has separately locked up to 70 per cent of its memory capacity in long-term agreements.&nbsp;The Context&nbsp;The announcement lands in a strange moment for the sector. Samsung's semiconductor division has seen profits grow more than 250-fold, even as its smartphone unit posted its first-ever operating loss — the clearest possible signal of where the company's centre of gravity has moved.&nbsp;Days later, more than $1.3 trillion was erased from semiconductor market values in a handful of trading sessions, with Samsung alone shedding around $173 billion. That selloff was not driven by weakening demand — supply remains tight enough that Samsung is forecasting shortages into 2028 — but by investors questioning whether the enormous sums flowing into AI infrastructure will produce adequate returns.&nbsp;Samsung is committing to five years of capacity for a customer building chips for that same infrastructure. The bet is that the demand outlasts the doubt.

Samsung and Broadcom signed a $200 billion partnership through 2030 covering 2nm foundry manufacturing, HBM4E/HBM5 memory and advanced packaging. It's Samsung's strongest challenge to TSMC in custom AI silicon — though the agreement is an MOU, not a binding contract.

Samsung Electronics has signed a $200 billion agreement with Broadcom that, if executed, would represent the most serious challenge TSMC has faced in the custom AI chip business. The Agreement Announced July 25 during an AI summit in San Francisco attended by South Korean government representatives and industry executives, the five-year partnership runs through 2030 and covers three of the most critical layers of the AI chip supply chain at once. Samsung will manufacture Broadcom's next-generation communications chips on its sub-2-nanometre process technology. The two companies will jointly develop advanced high-bandwidth memory, including the HBM4E and HBM5 generations. And the agreement covers advanced 2.3D and 2.5D packaging — the increasingly decisive stage where processors and memory are assembled into a single functioning unit. An Important Caveat The agreement is a memorandum of understanding. In practical terms that means it is a statement of intent rather than a binding contract, and the $200 billion figure represents the value of business the two companies intend to conduct rather than an amount Broadcom is committed to spend. MOUs at this scale are common in semiconductor manufacturing, where capacity must be reserved years in advance, and they frequently do convert into real volume. But the distinction matters for anyone reading the headline number as guaranteed revenue. Why It Threatens TSMC TSMC's dominance in advanced foundry work has been close to absolute, particularly for the custom silicon that hyperscalers increasingly design in-house. Broadcom is the central player in that market — it co-designs custom AI accelerators for the largest technology companies, and where Broadcom manufactures is where a substantial share of the industry's custom silicon gets made. Securing Broadcom's next-generation business gives Samsung two things it has struggled to obtain: a marquee customer validating its sub-2nm process, and the high factory utilisation that makes advanced foundry economics work. Leading-edge fabs cost tens of billions to build and are ruinous when underused; a five-year anchor customer changes that calculation entirely. For Broadcom, the logic is supply security. Depending on a single foundry for chips this strategically important is a concentration risk, and the industry is heading into what Samsung has warned could be an AI chip shortage persisting into 2028. The Memory Angle The high-bandwidth memory component may matter as much as the foundry work. HBM has become the binding constraint on AI accelerator performance — the processor can only compute as fast as memory feeds it data. SK Hynix has led this market, with Samsung working to close the gap. A joint development arrangement on HBM4E and HBM5 with Broadcom positions Samsung inside the design process for the next two generations, rather than competing for orders after the specifications have been set. Samsung has separately locked up to 70 per cent of its memory capacity in long-term agreements. The Context The announcement lands in a strange moment for the sector. Samsung's semiconductor division has seen profits grow more than 250-fold, even as its smartphone unit posted its first-ever operating loss — the clearest possible signal of where the company's centre of gravity has moved. Days later, more than $1.3 trillion was erased from semiconductor market values in a handful of trading sessions, with Samsung alone shedding around $173 billion. That selloff was not driven by weakening demand — supply remains tight enough that Samsung is forecasting shortages into 2028 — but by investors questioning whether the enormous sums flowing into AI infrastructure will produce adequate returns. Samsung is committing to five years of capacity for a customer building chips for that same infrastructure. The bet is that the demand outlasts the doubt.

Samsung Electronics and Broadcom have signed a $200 billion partnership running through 2030, covering 2-nanometre foundry manufacturing, high-bandwidth memory and advanced packaging for AI infrastructure. It is Samsung's most significant challenge yet to TSMC's dominance in custom AI processors — though the agreement is a memorandum of understanding rather than a binding contract.

Samsung just signed a $200 billion chip pact with Broadcom to take on TSMC

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney took a swipe at US President Donald Trump after a teleprompter malfunction interrupted his news conference on housing policy, even as Trump separately described Canada's leadership as "nasty" during a speech in Las Vegas.&nbsp;Speaking at a housing announcement in Toronto on August 5, Carney paused after his teleprompter stopped working and joked: "I would like to inform you that the teleprompter has ceased to function. Unlike a certain world leader, I do not view this as a conspiracy."&nbsp;The remark drew laughter from those present and appeared to reference an incident involving Trump at the 2025 United Nations General Assembly, where he experienced a halted escalator and a non-functioning teleprompter during a speech. Trump had subsequently called for an investigation into the episode.&nbsp;Neither Carney's office nor the White House immediately responded to requests for comment on the Canadian prime minister's remarks. Separately, speaking at an event in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Trump criticised several US allies over their tariff policies and singled out Canada.&nbsp;“Remember I used to say that tariffs are my favorite word. I love tariffs are my favorite word in the dictionary tariff I love tariffs right. Because we've been, we've been screwed by tariffs used against us for years by China, by Japan, by South Korea, by Germany, by everybody, by Canada. Canada's nasty. They are, they’re nasty people, think Canada– I love the people, but they're nasty," Trump said.&nbsp;Relations between Canada and the United States have remained strained since Trump's return to the White House in 2025. His administration imposed broad tariffs on Canadian goods and repeatedly suggested that Canada should become the 51st US state.

Mark Carney mocked Donald Trump after a teleprompter failure in Toronto, prompting laughter. Meanwhile, Trump criticised Canada's leadership as "nasty" over tariffs, highlighting ongoing trade tensions between the two nations.  

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney took a swipe at US President Donald Trump after a teleprompter malfunction interrupted his news conference on housing policy, even as Trump separately described Canada's leadership as "nasty" during a speech in Las Vegas. Speaking at a housing announcement in Toronto on August 5, Carney paused after his teleprompter stopped working and joked: "I would like to inform you that the teleprompter has ceased to function. Unlike a certain world leader, I do not view this as a conspiracy." The remark drew laughter from those present and appeared to reference an incident involving Trump at the 2025 United Nations General Assembly, where he experienced a halted escalator and a non-functioning teleprompter during a speech. Trump had subsequently called for an investigation into the episode. Neither Carney's office nor the White House immediately responded to requests for comment on the Canadian prime minister's remarks. Separately, speaking at an event in Las Vegas on Wednesday, Trump criticised several US allies over their tariff policies and singled out Canada. “Remember I used to say that tariffs are my favorite word. I love tariffs are my favorite word in the dictionary tariff I love tariffs right. Because we've been, we've been screwed by tariffs used against us for years by China, by Japan, by South Korea, by Germany, by everybody, by Canada. Canada's nasty. They are, they’re nasty people, think Canada– I love the people, but they're nasty," Trump said. Relations between Canada and the United States have remained strained since Trump's return to the White House in 2025. His administration imposed broad tariffs on Canadian goods and repeatedly suggested that Canada should become the 51st US state.

Mark Carney mocked Donald Trump after a teleprompter failure in Toronto, prompting laughter. Meanwhile, Trump criticised Canada's leadership as "nasty" over tariffs, highlighting ongoing trade tensions between the two nations. &nbsp;

Carney mocks Trump over teleprompter glitch, US president calls Canadian leadership 'nasty'

Another paper leak has surfaced, but this time it is not in India, it is in Mexico. The country largest university - The National Autonomous University of Mexico (Unam) - has announced that about 58,000 students will have to resit their entrance exam after abnormally high test results raised suspicions of widespread cheating in the online version of the test. The university said that students will conduct in person examination. This has led to protest by applicants in Mexico City.&nbsp;&nbsp;The university’s rector, Leonardo Lomelí apologised to the students saying: “I offer an apology to the candidates who, having been fairly accepted, will be called upon to take the control exam. However, it is necessary to ensure certainty and guarantee equity in access.” He added, “The Unam, the home of science, humanities and understanding, knows how to recognie mistakes and self-correct. There is no evasion or complacency. There is responsibility and we act accordingly."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/bjp-mps-protest-in-parliament-over-jharkhand-paper-leak-as-student-agitation-swell-in-state-what-exactly-happened-1785630355416">BJP MPs protest in Parliament over Jharkhand paper leak as student agitation swell in state: What exactly happened?</a><h3>Why the university announced re-examination?</h3>The university conducted “at-home entrance test” this summer, that included an AI-powered webcam to monitor candidates with voice and facial recognition to ensure no cheating took place. Almost 160,000 students took the entrance exam. But the results made the university suspicious.According to the university, between 2021 and 2025 only 3.5 per cent of applicants obtained a score of 100 or more out of 120, but this year the figure was 16 per cent. The proportion of students who achieved a score of 110 or more increased sixfold from 0.9 per cent to 5.5 per cent. The number of candidates getting 100 in medical programme also increased to 30 per cent compared to last year's 9 per cent. The university had began online exam to provide greater accessibility to students. Students previously had to travel to Mexico City from their home states, sometimes many hundreds of miles away to appear in the examination.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/india-news/humour-people-power-and-a-political-newbie-how-india-s-gen-z-protest-used-social-media-to-break-the-traditional-agitation-playbook-1785140443421">Humour, people-power and a political newbie: How India's Gen Z protest used social media to break the traditional agitation playbook</a>&nbsp;A technical expert who reviewed the results told the New York Times (NYT) that nearly half of the exams – 75,000 tests – could have involved some degree of cheating. Cheating tips were also widely passed around before the test went live, according to the NYT. The Unam announced in July that it had filed a criminal complaint after detecting the alleged irregularities. Lomelí said announced that the academic year for new students would begin on 31 August, rather than 10 August as originally scheduled.&nbsp;Meanwhile, Mexican president, Claudia Sheinbaum reacted to the row and suggested that the country’s attorney general may have to investigate. “Support is always available, but in any case if a crime has been committed it is a matter for the prosecutor’s office,” she said.

Another exam paper leak-like controversy has hit the education sector, with Mexico's UNAM asking around 58,000 students to retake its entrance exam after unusually high scores triggered suspicions of widespread cheating during its first fully online test.

Another paper leak has surfaced, but this time it is not in India, it is in Mexico. The country largest university - The National Autonomous University of Mexico (Unam) - has announced that about 58,000 students will have to resit their entrance exam after abnormally high test results raised suspicions of widespread cheating in the online version of the test. The university said that students will conduct in person examination. This has led to protest by applicants in Mexico City. The university’s rector, Leonardo Lomelí apologised to the students saying: “I offer an apology to the candidates who, having been fairly accepted, will be called upon to take the control exam. However, it is necessary to ensure certainty and guarantee equity in access.” He added, “The Unam, the home of science, humanities and understanding, knows how to recognie mistakes and self-correct. There is no evasion or complacency. There is responsibility and we act accordingly." Also Read: BJP MPs protest in Parliament over Jharkhand paper leak as student agitation swell in state: What exactly happened? Why the university announced re-examination? The university conducted “at-home entrance test” this summer, that included an AI-powered webcam to monitor candidates with voice and facial recognition to ensure no cheating took place. Almost 160,000 students took the entrance exam. But the results made the university suspicious. According to the university, between 2021 and 2025 only 3.5 per cent of applicants obtained a score of 100 or more out of 120, but this year the figure was 16 per cent. The proportion of students who achieved a score of 110 or more increased sixfold from 0.9 per cent to 5.5 per cent. The number of candidates getting 100 in medical programme also increased to 30 per cent compared to last year's 9 per cent. The university had began online exam to provide greater accessibility to students. Students previously had to travel to Mexico City from their home states, sometimes many hundreds of miles away to appear in the examination. Also Read: Humour, people-power and a political newbie: How India's Gen Z protest used social media to break the traditional agitation playbook A technical expert who reviewed the results told the New York Times (NYT) that nearly half of the exams – 75,000 tests – could have involved some degree of cheating. Cheating tips were also widely passed around before the test went live, according to the NYT. The Unam announced in July that it had filed a criminal complaint after detecting the alleged irregularities. Lomelí said announced that the academic year for new students would begin on 31 August, rather than 10 August as originally scheduled. Meanwhile, Mexican president, Claudia Sheinbaum reacted to the row and suggested that the country’s attorney general may have to investigate. “Support is always available, but in any case if a crime has been committed it is a matter for the prosecutor’s office,” she said.

Another exam paper leak-like controversy has hit the education sector, with Mexico's UNAM asking around 58,000 students to retake its entrance exam after unusually high scores triggered suspicions of widespread cheating during its first fully online test.

Another paper leak? Mexico's top university orders re-exam for 58,000 students  - Here's why

US President Donald Trump confronted Secretary of War Pete Hegseth over severe shortages in the country's munitions stockpile during a meeting at Camp David last week.&nbsp;According to the Washington Post, which reported on Wednesday (Aug 6), citing two people familiar with the exchange. Trump questioned Hegseth over dwindling supplies of key weapons, including long-range guided missiles and air defence interceptors, amid growing concerns over the US military's inventory.&nbsp;The White House and the Pentagon strongly rejected the report. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described it as "100 per cent fake news" and said Trump has "the utmost confidence" in Hegseth. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also dismissed the claims, calling allegations that Hegseth misled the president or blamed his deputy for depleted stockpiles “fictional.”

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">I was at Camp David with President Trump and Secretary Hegseth. This literally never happened, and we told the Washington Post that repeatedly. This B.S. story was shopped to many outlets by someone clearly out to disparage the Secretary, for whatever reason. Unfortunately for… <a href="https://t.co/BUwn11nC52">https://t.co/BUwn11nC52</a>&mdash; Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) <a href="https://x.com/PressSec/status/2085181927397409131?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 6, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

According to The Washington Post, shortages of long-range guided missiles and air defence interceptors have influenced Trump's decision to refrain from authorising additional large-scale strikes against Iran, as his administration continues efforts to revive negotiations with Tehran. Neither the White House nor the Pentagon acknowledged any concerns over munitions shortages, maintaining that the report was inaccurate.&nbsp;

Reports claim Donald Trump confronted Secretary of War Pete Hegseth over depleted US munitions, affecting Iranian strike decisions. The White House and Pentagon dismissed the story as fake news.

US President Donald Trump confronted Secretary of War Pete Hegseth over severe shortages in the country's munitions stockpile during a meeting at Camp David last week. According to the Washington Post, which reported on Wednesday (Aug 6), citing two people familiar with the exchange. Trump questioned Hegseth over dwindling supplies of key weapons, including long-range guided missiles and air defence interceptors, amid growing concerns over the US military's inventory. The White House and the Pentagon strongly rejected the report. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described it as "100 per cent fake news" and said Trump has "the utmost confidence" in Hegseth. Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell also dismissed the claims, calling allegations that Hegseth misled the president or blamed his deputy for depleted stockpiles “fictional.”

Reports claim Donald Trump confronted Secretary of War Pete Hegseth over depleted US munitions, affecting Iranian strike decisions. The White House and Pentagon dismissed the story as fake news.

‘100% fake news’: WH denies report claiming Trump confronted Hegseth over US munitions shortages

The aviation term “loss of separation” has come under the spotlight after US authorities opened an investigation into a reported incident involving President Donald Trump’s Marine One helicopter and a commercial passenger aircraft near Washington on Wednesday (Aug 5). The incident has prompted questions about what a loss of separation actually means and whether it indicates that two aircraft narrowly avoided colliding.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pezeshkian-says-iran-is-not-seeking-to-expand-or-continue-war-with-us-calls-it-a-disease-1785827862818">Pezeshkian says Iran is ‘not seeking to expand or continue’ war with US, calls it a ‘disease’</a><h2>What is a loss of separation?</h2>In aviation, a loss of separation occurs when two aircraft come closer to each other than the minimum safe distance required under air traffic control regulations. Aircraft operating in controlled airspace are required to maintain specific horizontal and vertical separation standards. These minimum distances are designed to create a safety buffer, allowing air traffic controllers to safely manage aircraft movements and reduce the risk of conflicts.<h2>Does it mean a collision was imminent?</h2>It does not necessarily mean that. A loss of separation does not automatically mean that the aircraft were on a collision course or that a crash was imminent. Instead, it indicates that the required safety buffer between the aircraft was temporarily reduced below the established limits.&nbsp;In the case involving Marine One, the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said there was a “momentary loss of separation” between the presidential helicopter and the commercial aircraft. According to the agency, the aircraft subsequently continued moving away from one another, and the incident is under investigation.&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/we-are-not-having-negotiations-with-us-iran-denies-trump-s-claim-says-working-with-oman-on-temporary-hormuz-shipping-route-1785750172437">‘We are not having negotiations with US’: Iran denies Trump’s claim, says working with Oman on temporary Hormuz shipping route</a>&nbsp;While such events are treated seriously by aviation authorities, a loss of separation does not, by itself, indicate that a collision was narrowly avoided. It is primarily a safety classification used to identify instances where required separation standards were not maintained, prompting a review of the circumstances to determine what occurred and whether any corrective measures are needed.&nbsp;

Loss of separation occurs when aircraft breach regulated distance buffers, which does not automatically imply an imminent collision. The FAA is investigating a brief distance breach involving Marine One.

The aviation term “loss of separation” has come under the spotlight after US authorities opened an investigation into a reported incident involving President Donald Trump’s Marine One helicopter and a commercial passenger aircraft near Washington on Wednesday (Aug 5). The incident has prompted questions about what a loss of separation actually means and whether it indicates that two aircraft narrowly avoided colliding. Also read: Pezeshkian says Iran is ‘not seeking to expand or continue’ war with US, calls it a ‘disease’ What is a loss of separation? In aviation, a loss of separation occurs when two aircraft come closer to each other than the minimum safe distance required under air traffic control regulations. Aircraft operating in controlled airspace are required to maintain specific horizontal and vertical separation standards. These minimum distances are designed to create a safety buffer, allowing air traffic controllers to safely manage aircraft movements and reduce the risk of conflicts. Does it mean a collision was imminent? It does not necessarily mean that. A loss of separation does not automatically mean that the aircraft were on a collision course or that a crash was imminent. Instead, it indicates that the required safety buffer between the aircraft was temporarily reduced below the established limits. In the case involving Marine One, the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said there was a “momentary loss of separation” between the presidential helicopter and the commercial aircraft. According to the agency, the aircraft subsequently continued moving away from one another, and the incident is under investigation. Also read: ‘We are not having negotiations with US’: Iran denies Trump’s claim, says working with Oman on temporary Hormuz shipping route While such events are treated seriously by aviation authorities, a loss of separation does not, by itself, indicate that a collision was narrowly avoided. It is primarily a safety classification used to identify instances where required separation standards were not maintained, prompting a review of the circumstances to determine what occurred and whether any corrective measures are needed.

Loss of separation occurs when aircraft breach regulated distance buffers, which does not automatically imply an imminent collision. The FAA is investigating a brief distance breach involving Marine One.

What is ‘Loss of Separation’? Inside the aviation term linked to Trump’s Marine One

Ebola death cases in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have risen to more than 45 per cent from 31 per cent at the end of June, worsening the toll of an epidemic with over 3,800 confirmed cases, claiming more than 1,800 lives ever since the outbreak of the epidemic was declared in May. Media reports also confirmed that the Ebola epidemic in the Democratic Republic of Congo is likely to surpass 4,000 cases this week.&nbsp;Amid the growing cases, the World Health Organisation indicated that early treatment improves the chances of survival three- to four-fold; however, many patients are found coming for treatment at the medical centres only in the final stages of illness, or die before reaching care altogether.&nbsp;The climbing death toll increasingly reflects what aid workers now see as the outbreak's central problem: conflict, a health system in collapse, and deep-rooted poverty are fueling the fear, false information, and distrust that stop infected people from getting treatment in time, leaving them in their communities long enough to spread the virus further.&nbsp;"The mistrust is coming from so many questions the population have," Jean Kaseya, director-general of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, told reporters last week. "Why are you coming just now because of this Ebola outbreak? Why didn't you come when we were dying from measles, from cholera, from bullets?"&nbsp;Also read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/ex-top-pakistan-official-blames-economic-woes-on-china-here-s-how-cpec-became-a-failure-1785952059374">Ex top Pakistan official blames economic woes on China: Here's how CPEC became a failure</a><h3>What is driving the outbreak?</h3>Congo's Tuesday update showed that more than 70 per cent of confirmed Ebola deaths happened outside treatment facilities, within communities. Meanwhile, MSF reported Wednesday that roughly 90 per cent of patients at its treatment centre in Bunia, the epidemic's biggest hotspot, arrived without having been flagged through contact tracing, highlighting how much transmission is still slipping past containment efforts.&nbsp;"The response is expanding, but is still not reaching communities quickly enough to break transmission chains," Philippa Boule, MSF's deputy medical director, stated in a statement. "Every day lost allows the virus to stay one step ahead and more lives to be needlessly lost," he added.&nbsp;However, no approved treatment exists specifically for Bundibugyo, the rare Ebola strain driving this outbreak. Still, early supportive care, including as much as 5 litres of daily IV fluids to counter losses from vomiting and diarrhoea and correct dangerously low potassium and blood sugar levels, boosts a patient's odds of survival.&nbsp;Many people nevertheless conclude they have a better chance fighting the infection at home, said Alex Lock, communications coordinator for the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in Bunia. He recalled speaking to a 27-year-old man who told him he knew nobody who went to the Ebola treatment centre and came back home alive.&nbsp;Even so, many people decide they'd fare better fighting the illness at home, according to Alex Lock, communications coordinator for the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in Bunia. He described a conversation with a 27-year-old man who said he didn't know a single person who'd gone to an Ebola treatment centre and returned home alive.&nbsp;

MSF reported Wednesday that roughly 90 per cent of patients at its treatment centre in Bunia, the epidemic's biggest hotspot, arrived without having been flagged through contact tracing, highlighting how much transmission is still slipping past containment efforts.

Ebola death cases in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo have risen to more than 45 per cent from 31 per cent at the end of June, worsening the toll of an epidemic with over 3,800 confirmed cases, claiming more than 1,800 lives ever since the outbreak of the epidemic was declared in May. Media reports also confirmed that the Ebola epidemic in the Democratic Republic of Congo is likely to surpass 4,000 cases this week. Amid the growing cases, the World Health Organisation indicated that early treatment improves the chances of survival three- to four-fold; however, many patients are found coming for treatment at the medical centres only in the final stages of illness, or die before reaching care altogether. The climbing death toll increasingly reflects what aid workers now see as the outbreak's central problem: conflict, a health system in collapse, and deep-rooted poverty are fueling the fear, false information, and distrust that stop infected people from getting treatment in time, leaving them in their communities long enough to spread the virus further. "The mistrust is coming from so many questions the population have," Jean Kaseya, director-general of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, told reporters last week. "Why are you coming just now because of this Ebola outbreak? Why didn't you come when we were dying from measles, from cholera, from bullets?" Also read: Ex top Pakistan official blames economic woes on China: Here's how CPEC became a failure What is driving the outbreak? Congo's Tuesday update showed that more than 70 per cent of confirmed Ebola deaths happened outside treatment facilities, within communities. Meanwhile, MSF reported Wednesday that roughly 90 per cent of patients at its treatment centre in Bunia, the epidemic's biggest hotspot, arrived without having been flagged through contact tracing, highlighting how much transmission is still slipping past containment efforts. "The response is expanding, but is still not reaching communities quickly enough to break transmission chains," Philippa Boule, MSF's deputy medical director, stated in a statement. "Every day lost allows the virus to stay one step ahead and more lives to be needlessly lost," he added. However, no approved treatment exists specifically for Bundibugyo, the rare Ebola strain driving this outbreak. Still, early supportive care, including as much as 5 litres of daily IV fluids to counter losses from vomiting and diarrhoea and correct dangerously low potassium and blood sugar levels, boosts a patient's odds of survival. Many people nevertheless conclude they have a better chance fighting the infection at home, said Alex Lock, communications coordinator for the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in Bunia. He recalled speaking to a 27-year-old man who told him he knew nobody who went to the Ebola treatment centre and came back home alive. Even so, many people decide they'd fare better fighting the illness at home, according to Alex Lock, communications coordinator for the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in Bunia. He described a conversation with a 27-year-old man who said he didn't know a single person who'd gone to an Ebola treatment centre and returned home alive.

MSF reported Wednesday that roughly 90 per cent of patients at its treatment centre in Bunia, the epidemic's biggest hotspot, arrived without having been flagged through contact tracing, highlighting how much transmission is still slipping past containment efforts.

From 31% to 45% cases: Why is Congo's Ebola outbreak getting deadlier?

US authorities have launched an investigation after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came too close to a commercial passenger aircraft while flying over Washington this week, though the White House has insisted that the president "was never in danger."The incident occurred on Tuesday (Aug 4) as Trump was travelling aboard the presidential helicopter to Joint Base Andrews to board Air Force One for a trip to California.According to a report by The New York Times, citing two people familiar with the matter, Marine One came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft after what was described as garbled communication with air traffic controllers.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/trump-administration-refunds-100-billion-in-tariffs-after-supreme-court-ruling-1785977857498">Trump administration refunds $100 billion in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling</a><h2>NTSB confirms investigation</h2>The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed it has opened an investigation into what aviation authorities describe as a "loss of separation" event."The NTSB is investigating a reported loss of separation event between Marine One and a commercial aircraft departing DCA (Washington National Airport) that occurred on August 4," the agency said in a statement.The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also confirmed that air traffic controllers were communicating with both aircraft at the time."The air traffic controller was in contact with both the commercial pilot and Marine One pilot during the loss of separation," the FAA said. The agency added that it is reviewing the incident and will implement any corrective measures if necessary.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bangladesh-says-sheikh-hasina-s-india-media-appearance-hurt-ties-calls-it-an-affront-to-sovereignty-1785977377689">'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference</a><h2>White House: Trump was never at risk</h2>White House spokesperson Kush Desai dismissed suggestions that the president faced any danger during the flight. "Marine One flights are piloted by some of the best aviators in the world, and at no point was the president in harm's way," Desai told AFP.The FAA echoed that assessment, saying, "The President was never in danger."<h2>What happened?</h2>According to The Wall Street Journal, aviation safety protocols typically require aircraft to remain at least 1.5 miles apart horizontally and 500 feet apart vertically in situations like this.The newspaper reported that the incident took place at around 2:30 pm local time, when an American Airlines Embraer E-170 operated by regional carrier Envoy Air departed from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Marine One was en route to Joint Base Andrews at the time.<h2>Comes after heightened safety concerns</h2>The reported near miss comes as aviation safety around Washington National Airport remains under intense scrutiny.The FAA has tightened flight procedures around the airport following the deadly January 2025 collision between a US Army Black Hawk helicopter and a commercial airliner, which killed all 67 people on board.Investigators will now seek to determine what led to the latest loss of separation and whether any procedural changes are needed to prevent similar incidents in the future.

US authorities are investigating after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft over Washington. What happened? Here's what we know.

US authorities have launched an investigation after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came too close to a commercial passenger aircraft while flying over Washington this week, though the White House has insisted that the president "was never in danger." The incident occurred on Tuesday (Aug 4) as Trump was travelling aboard the presidential helicopter to Joint Base Andrews to board Air Force One for a trip to California. According to a report by The New York Times, citing two people familiar with the matter, Marine One came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft after what was described as garbled communication with air traffic controllers. Also read | Trump administration refunds $100 billion in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling NTSB confirms investigation The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed it has opened an investigation into what aviation authorities describe as a "loss of separation" event. "The NTSB is investigating a reported loss of separation event between Marine One and a commercial aircraft departing DCA (Washington National Airport) that occurred on August 4," the agency said in a statement. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also confirmed that air traffic controllers were communicating with both aircraft at the time. "The air traffic controller was in contact with both the commercial pilot and Marine One pilot during the loss of separation," the FAA said. The agency added that it is reviewing the incident and will implement any corrective measures if necessary. Also read | 'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference White House: Trump was never at risk White House spokesperson Kush Desai dismissed suggestions that the president faced any danger during the flight. "Marine One flights are piloted by some of the best aviators in the world, and at no point was the president in harm's way," Desai told AFP. The FAA echoed that assessment, saying, "The President was never in danger." What happened? According to The Wall Street Journal, aviation safety protocols typically require aircraft to remain at least 1.5 miles apart horizontally and 500 feet apart vertically in situations like this. The newspaper reported that the incident took place at around 2:30 pm local time, when an American Airlines Embraer E-170 operated by regional carrier Envoy Air departed from Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. Marine One was en route to Joint Base Andrews at the time. Comes after heightened safety concerns The reported near miss comes as aviation safety around Washington National Airport remains under intense scrutiny. The FAA has tightened flight procedures around the airport following the deadly January 2025 collision between a US Army Black Hawk helicopter and a commercial airliner, which killed all 67 people on board. Investigators will now seek to determine what led to the latest loss of separation and whether any procedural changes are needed to prevent similar incidents in the future.

US authorities are investigating after President Donald Trump's Marine One helicopter reportedly came within less than a mile of a departing passenger aircraft over Washington. What happened? Here's what we know.

Did Trump's helicopter nearly collide with a passenger jet? US launches probe

The Trump administration has refunded around $100 billion in tariffs collected from importers after the US Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that President Donald Trump's tariffs were illegal and that he had exceeded his authority in imposing a broad set of trade duties under emergency powers.According to AFP, Court filings submitted on Tuesday (Aug 4) show the refunds account for roughly 60 per cent of the approximately $166 billion collected under tariffs imposed using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The refunded money has been returned to importers that had paid the duties.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/bangladesh-says-sheikh-hasina-s-india-media-appearance-hurt-ties-calls-it-an-affront-to-sovereignty-1785977377689">'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference</a><h2>Supreme Court dealt major blow to Trump's tariff strategy</h2>After returning to the White House, Trump relied on the IEEPA to impose sweeping tariffs on multiple US trading partners, arguing they were necessary to address national emergencies.However, the Supreme Court ruled in February that the president had overstepped the authority granted under the law, significantly limiting his ability to use emergency powers to impose tariffs.The decision forced the administration to begin refunding duties collected under the invalidated measures.The ruling did not affect Trump's sector-specific tariffs, which were imposed under different legal authorities and remain in force.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/us-says-strait-of-hormuz-remains-open-despite-unwarranted-iranian-aggression-as-report-suggest-deal-to-reopen-vital-waterway-close-1785897369267">US says Strait of Hormuz remains open despite ‘unwarranted Iranian aggression,’ as reports suggest deal to reopen vital waterway close</a><h2>Over $128 billion in refunds being processed</h2>According to Tuesday's court filing, a US Customs and Border Protection official said that, as of July 31, the agency had accepted about $128.68 billion in potential and certified refund claims for processing.Of that amount, roughly $100 billion had already been processed and forwarded to the US Treasury Department for payment to eligible importers. The remaining certified claims are still being processed.<h2>Fresh tariffs face new legal scrutiny</h2>Since the Supreme Court ruling, the Trump administration has sought to restore tariffs through alternative legal mechanisms, announcing new duties on dozens of trading partners.Those measures have also triggered fresh legal challenges, setting the stage for another round of court battles over the scope of presidential authority in US trade policy.

The Trump administration has refunded about $100 billion in tariffs after the US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by imposing broad trade duties under emergency powers. More refund claims worth over $128 billion are still being processed.

The Trump administration has refunded around $100 billion in tariffs collected from importers after the US Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that President Donald Trump's tariffs were illegal and that he had exceeded his authority in imposing a broad set of trade duties under emergency powers. According to AFP, Court filings submitted on Tuesday (Aug 4) show the refunds account for roughly 60 per cent of the approximately $166 billion collected under tariffs imposed using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The refunded money has been returned to importers that had paid the duties. Also read | 'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference Supreme Court dealt major blow to Trump's tariff strategy After returning to the White House, Trump relied on the IEEPA to impose sweeping tariffs on multiple US trading partners, arguing they were necessary to address national emergencies. However, the Supreme Court ruled in February that the president had overstepped the authority granted under the law, significantly limiting his ability to use emergency powers to impose tariffs. The decision forced the administration to begin refunding duties collected under the invalidated measures. The ruling did not affect Trump's sector-specific tariffs, which were imposed under different legal authorities and remain in force. Also read | US says Strait of Hormuz remains open despite ‘unwarranted Iranian aggression,’ as reports suggest deal to reopen vital waterway close Over $128 billion in refunds being processed According to Tuesday's court filing, a US Customs and Border Protection official said that, as of July 31, the agency had accepted about $128.68 billion in potential and certified refund claims for processing. Of that amount, roughly $100 billion had already been processed and forwarded to the US Treasury Department for payment to eligible importers. The remaining certified claims are still being processed. Fresh tariffs face new legal scrutiny Since the Supreme Court ruling, the Trump administration has sought to restore tariffs through alternative legal mechanisms, announcing new duties on dozens of trading partners. Those measures have also triggered fresh legal challenges, setting the stage for another round of court battles over the scope of presidential authority in US trade policy.

The Trump administration has refunded about $100 billion in tariffs after the US Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by imposing broad trade duties under emergency powers. More refund claims worth over $128 billion are still being processed.

Trump administration refunds $100 billion in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling

Bangladesh on Wednesday (Aug 5) sharply criticised India for allowing deposed former prime minister Sheikh Hasina to address the media from New Delhi, calling the event an "affront" to Bangladesh's sovereignty and warning that it could damage efforts to improve bilateral ties.In a strongly worded statement, Bangladesh's Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused Hasina of launching "venomous vitriol" against Bangladesh and its people during the live interaction. "Bangladesh is outraged that the absconding convicted genocider Sheikh Hasina was allowed this evening to engage in live interaction with the media in New Delhi where she and her henchmen launched venomous vitriol against the State of Bangladesh and her people," the ministry said.Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/shakib-al-hasan-house-attacked-after-sheikh-hasina-press-conference-1785951743958">Shakib Al Hasan's house attacked after joining Sheikh Hasina's press conference</a><h2>Dhaka says India ignored its concerns</h2>The ministry said Dhaka had conveyed its concerns to New Delhi before the event, warning of its potential impact on bilateral relations. "Dhaka deeply regrets that in spite of concerns conveyed a priori to the Government of India about the likely ramifications of this event on the reset of our bilateral relations, this public event was permitted to be held," it said.The statement came as Bangladesh marked the second anniversary of the July Revolution. The ministry described Hasina's appearance from Indian soil as an insult to those killed during the protests.It also accused the former prime minister of attempting to deny findings related to the July-August 2024 violence, saying such efforts would not alter what it described as the course of history. "Our nation will never again go back to the dark days of fascism and that Bangladesh will never be a client State. Convicted mass murderer Hasina and her mafia enterprise will never have a place in the polity of Bangladesh."Also read | <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/organised-groups-turned-students-stir-into-violent-protest-says-sheikh-hasina-1785936691644">‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest’: Sheikh Hasina</a><h2>Extradition demand reiterated</h2>The foreign ministry reiterated Bangladesh's demand for Hasina's return under the 2013 India-Bangladesh Extradition Treaty, saying repeated requests to New Delhi had not received a response."On the contrary, allowing her the opportunity to openly interact with the media under any pretext is deeply hurtful to our people's sentiment and detrimental to the development of harmonious bilateral relations between Bangladesh and India," the statement said.At the same time, Dhaka said it remained committed to maintaining a "constructive, mutually beneficial and forward-looking relationship" with India based on sovereign equality, mutual respect and non-interference in each other's internal affairs.<h2>Hasina says she will return in December</h2>Earlier on Wednesday, Sheikh Hasina announced during a virtual press interaction from New Delhi that she intends to return to Bangladesh in December, saying she was prepared to face arrest, imprisonment or any other consequence."I cannot stay away while my beloved countrymen are suffering," she said, adding that she was determined to return regardless of what awaited her.

Bangladesh has strongly criticised India for allowing deposed former prime minister Sheikh Hasina to address the media from New Delhi, calling it an affront to its sovereignty, renewing its extradition demand, and warning that the move could hamper efforts to reset bilateral relations.

Bangladesh on Wednesday (Aug 5) sharply criticised India for allowing deposed former prime minister Sheikh Hasina to address the media from New Delhi, calling the event an "affront" to Bangladesh's sovereignty and warning that it could damage efforts to improve bilateral ties. In a strongly worded statement, Bangladesh's Ministry of Foreign Affairs accused Hasina of launching "venomous vitriol" against Bangladesh and its people during the live interaction. "Bangladesh is outraged that the absconding convicted genocider Sheikh Hasina was allowed this evening to engage in live interaction with the media in New Delhi where she and her henchmen launched venomous vitriol against the State of Bangladesh and her people," the ministry said. Also read | Shakib Al Hasan's house attacked after joining Sheikh Hasina's press conference Dhaka says India ignored its concerns The ministry said Dhaka had conveyed its concerns to New Delhi before the event, warning of its potential impact on bilateral relations. "Dhaka deeply regrets that in spite of concerns conveyed a priori to the Government of India about the likely ramifications of this event on the reset of our bilateral relations, this public event was permitted to be held," it said. The statement came as Bangladesh marked the second anniversary of the July Revolution. The ministry described Hasina's appearance from Indian soil as an insult to those killed during the protests. It also accused the former prime minister of attempting to deny findings related to the July-August 2024 violence, saying such efforts would not alter what it described as the course of history. "Our nation will never again go back to the dark days of fascism and that Bangladesh will never be a client State. Convicted mass murderer Hasina and her mafia enterprise will never have a place in the polity of Bangladesh." Also read | ‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest’: Sheikh Hasina Extradition demand reiterated The foreign ministry reiterated Bangladesh's demand for Hasina's return under the 2013 India-Bangladesh Extradition Treaty, saying repeated requests to New Delhi had not received a response. "On the contrary, allowing her the opportunity to openly interact with the media under any pretext is deeply hurtful to our people's sentiment and detrimental to the development of harmonious bilateral relations between Bangladesh and India," the statement said. At the same time, Dhaka said it remained committed to maintaining a "constructive, mutually beneficial and forward-looking relationship" with India based on sovereign equality, mutual respect and non-interference in each other's internal affairs. Hasina says she will return in December Earlier on Wednesday, Sheikh Hasina announced during a virtual press interaction from New Delhi that she intends to return to Bangladesh in December, saying she was prepared to face arrest, imprisonment or any other consequence. "I cannot stay away while my beloved countrymen are suffering," she said, adding that she was determined to return regardless of what awaited her.

Bangladesh has strongly criticised India for allowing deposed former prime minister Sheikh Hasina to address the media from New Delhi, calling it an affront to its sovereignty, renewing its extradition demand, and warning that the move could hamper efforts to reset bilateral relations.

'Affront to our sovereignty': Bangladesh slams India over Sheikh Hasina's Delhi press conference

The largest semiconductor companies in the world lost more than $1.3 trillion in market value in a matter of trading sessions. Not one of them reported falling demand.&nbsp;The Damage&nbsp;Nvidia alone shed roughly $238 billion. SK Hynix lost about $176 billion, Samsung Electronics around $173 billion, TSMC approximately $119 billion, and Micron some $113 billion. Across the sector, the total erased exceeded $1.3 trillion.&nbsp;These are not companies in trouble on any operating measure. Samsung's semiconductor division saw profits grow more than 250-fold, even as its smartphone unit posted its first-ever operating loss. Samsung has warned that a severe global AI chip shortage could persist into 2028 — a supply constraint, not a demand one. TSMC and SK Hynix are both running near capacity, with the industry raising prices as demand outstrips supply across mature process nodes and advanced packaging alike.&nbsp;The selloff had nothing to do with whether anyone wants AI chips. It had to do with whether the money being spent on them will ever come back.&nbsp;The Question Investors Started Asking&nbsp;For three years, capital expenditure announcements from the hyperscalers were read as bullish signals: more spending meant more chips sold, and the chipmakers rose accordingly. That reflex has broken.&nbsp;The numbers now being committed are large enough to force a different question. OpenAI has raised projected compute spending to roughly $750 billion through 2030. Meta has guided to as much as $145 billion in capital expenditure this year. Alphabet has guided to $195–205 billion. Meta's most recent quarter showed free cash flow collapsing 91 per cent to $784 million as AI capex passed $31 billion in three months; Alphabet's showed free cash flow at negative $5.9 billion.&nbsp;Those figures describe an industry spending faster than it earns, funded increasingly by outside capital. Nvidia is reportedly in talks to guarantee some $250 billion in financing for OpenAI's Ohio campus — necessary because OpenAI, unprofitable, cannot secure an investment-grade credit rating alone. Meta has moved a $14 billion data centre off its own balance sheet, handing 80 per cent ownership to BlackRock-managed funds and leasing the facility back.&nbsp;The question the market began pricing is simple: if the buyers of AI chips are financing those purchases through vendor guarantees, asset managers and debt, what happens to chip revenue when that financing tightens?&nbsp;The Second Threat: Custom Silicon&nbsp;Running underneath the returns question is a competitive one. A wave of custom AI chips began shipping from major technology companies in late June and early July — processors designed in-house by the same hyperscalers that are Nvidia's largest customers.&nbsp;On July 8, Cerebras, the startup known for manufacturing some of the largest chips ever built, announced a partnership with OpenAI to develop a processor designed specifically to challenge conventional GPU architectures. Qualcomm has since completed a $3.92 billion acquisition of Modular, whose software allows AI models to run across chips from different vendors without rewriting code — an attack on the CUDA software lock-in that has protected Nvidia's position more effectively than any hardware advantage.&nbsp;Nvidia's near-monopoly on AI compute looks more contested than at any point in the past three years.&nbsp;What It Does Not Mean&nbsp;It is worth being clear about what this selloff is not. It is not evidence that AI demand is weakening — every available supply indicator points the other way, with shortages forecast to persist for two more years. It is not a verdict that AI will fail to produce value.&nbsp;It is a repricing of expectations. For three years the market granted AI infrastructure spending unlimited patience. This month, it started asking for a timeline. The technology did not change between those two positions. Only the willingness to wait did.

More than $1.3 trillion was erased from the largest chipmakers in days — Nvidia -$238bn, SK Hynix -$176bn, Samsung -$173bn, TSMC -$119bn, Micron -$113bn. Demand didn't fall. Investors simply stopped believing AI infrastructure spending will earn its money back.

The largest semiconductor companies in the world lost more than $1.3 trillion in market value in a matter of trading sessions. Not one of them reported falling demand. The Damage Nvidia alone shed roughly $238 billion. SK Hynix lost about $176 billion, Samsung Electronics around $173 billion, TSMC approximately $119 billion, and Micron some $113 billion. Across the sector, the total erased exceeded $1.3 trillion. These are not companies in trouble on any operating measure. Samsung's semiconductor division saw profits grow more than 250-fold, even as its smartphone unit posted its first-ever operating loss. Samsung has warned that a severe global AI chip shortage could persist into 2028 — a supply constraint, not a demand one. TSMC and SK Hynix are both running near capacity, with the industry raising prices as demand outstrips supply across mature process nodes and advanced packaging alike. The selloff had nothing to do with whether anyone wants AI chips. It had to do with whether the money being spent on them will ever come back. The Question Investors Started Asking For three years, capital expenditure announcements from the hyperscalers were read as bullish signals: more spending meant more chips sold, and the chipmakers rose accordingly. That reflex has broken. The numbers now being committed are large enough to force a different question. OpenAI has raised projected compute spending to roughly $750 billion through 2030. Meta has guided to as much as $145 billion in capital expenditure this year. Alphabet has guided to $195–205 billion. Meta's most recent quarter showed free cash flow collapsing 91 per cent to $784 million as AI capex passed $31 billion in three months; Alphabet's showed free cash flow at negative $5.9 billion. Those figures describe an industry spending faster than it earns, funded increasingly by outside capital. Nvidia is reportedly in talks to guarantee some $250 billion in financing for OpenAI's Ohio campus — necessary because OpenAI, unprofitable, cannot secure an investment-grade credit rating alone. Meta has moved a $14 billion data centre off its own balance sheet, handing 80 per cent ownership to BlackRock-managed funds and leasing the facility back. The question the market began pricing is simple: if the buyers of AI chips are financing those purchases through vendor guarantees, asset managers and debt, what happens to chip revenue when that financing tightens? The Second Threat: Custom Silicon Running underneath the returns question is a competitive one. A wave of custom AI chips began shipping from major technology companies in late June and early July — processors designed in-house by the same hyperscalers that are Nvidia's largest customers. On July 8, Cerebras, the startup known for manufacturing some of the largest chips ever built, announced a partnership with OpenAI to develop a processor designed specifically to challenge conventional GPU architectures. Qualcomm has since completed a $3.92 billion acquisition of Modular, whose software allows AI models to run across chips from different vendors without rewriting code — an attack on the CUDA software lock-in that has protected Nvidia's position more effectively than any hardware advantage. Nvidia's near-monopoly on AI compute looks more contested than at any point in the past three years. What It Does Not Mean It is worth being clear about what this selloff is not. It is not evidence that AI demand is weakening — every available supply indicator points the other way, with shortages forecast to persist for two more years. It is not a verdict that AI will fail to produce value. It is a repricing of expectations. For three years the market granted AI infrastructure spending unlimited patience. This month, it started asking for a timeline. The technology did not change between those two positions. Only the willingness to wait did.

More than $1.3 trillion in market value was erased from the world's largest semiconductor companies in a handful of trading sessions. Nvidia lost roughly $238 billion, SK Hynix $176 billion, Samsung $173 billion, TSMC $119 billion and Micron $113 billion. Demand for AI chips did not fall — investors simply stopped believing the spending will earn its money back.

$1.3 trillion vanished from chip stocks in days and demand never fell

Across the globe, thousands of lives have been ruined after being robbed of their hard-earned money by scam compounds. In 2025 for instance, scammers defrauded people in the Asia-Pacific region of a staggering 88 billion U.S. dollars.&nbsp;Now, this menace is creeping into Sri Lanka too, with Colombo emerging as a gateway for the Chinese mafia.&nbsp;While cyber compounds are usually associated only with countries like Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos, the global Chinese syndicate is reportedly trying to expand its operations into Sri Lanka.&nbsp;The seriousness of this threat cannot be understated.&nbsp;As per reports, senior police officials have already warned the country’s top leadership that Chinese organised crime groups could become a major national security threat if decisive action is not taken immediately.&nbsp;But, what was the trigger for this alarm?&nbsp;On July 23, a Chinese national named Hao Pan was found dead under mysterious circumstances in Sri Lanka’s Ehe-Liya-Ghoda town.&nbsp;&nbsp;

When the probe intensified, investigators found out that the deceased person was himself a part of an international Chinese cybercrime syndicate. He wanted to set up cybercrime operations in Sri Lanka. What added to the intrigue is that he arrived in Sri Lanka six months ago along with his Chinese chef, physiotherapist and driver, each of whom reportedly received a monthly salary of 3,000 U.S. Dollars each. His Vietnamese girlfriend and her pet dog also accompanied him. As per reports, he escaped from Cambodia after refusing to share cybercrime profits with the Chinese mafia.However, Hao had to pay a heavy price for this. Members of the Chinese mafia reportedly entered the country only to hunt him down even as he kept changing his address. On July 22, Hao was kidnapped in Colombo port city and taken to a remote location. He was repeatedly assaulted by kidnappers armed with weapons who were trying to access millions of dollars allegedly parked in his Cambodian bank account. Investigators also found that the kidnappers avoided using mobile phones and relied entirely on walkie-talkies to avoid detection by the police. In an important breakthrough, a police officer photographed two members of the kidnapping team after getting suspicious of their behaviour. After Hao’s staff members identified them, their photos were sent to airport authorities in Colombo. Subsequently, two suspects were nabbed as the airport’s facial recognition system identified them, while trying to flee to Singapore via an Air India flight.

Overall, eight Chinese channels are suspected to be linked to this kidnapping and murder. While three have escaped abroad, three others are still believed to be hiding in Sri Lanka. According to reports, Sri Lanka have sought the assistance of the Chinese embassy in extraditing the three suspects who fled overseas. Based on the interrogation of the suspects, the Sri Lankan police uncovered how many Chinese cyber criminals have been using the special economic zone of Colombo port city as the focal point of their operations. According to the police, the criminals first register shell companies within Colombo port city. While these firms exist only on paper, they enable criminals to obtain visas by falsely presenting themselves as company directors or skilled employees. This is usually followed by these firms seeking permission to conduct business throughout Sri Lanka. Now, this practically allows them to establish cybercrime centres in rented buildings and hotels with limited regulatory oversight. The scale of this menace is shocking. As per reports, the police have arrested nearly thousand foreign nationals including citizens of China, Cambodia, Myanmar and Vietnam over the last few months after raiding ten cybercrime locations. Sri Lankan authorities have also flagged the economic damage caused to the country due to the growing impact of large-scale smuggling operations of Chinese cigarettes, mobile phones and other goods. Amid this, calls are growing for more effective action against this mafia to ensure relief for those trapped in cybercrime centres and for millions of vulnerable people across the world.

The police arrested a thousand foreign nationals from China, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam over the last few months. Sri Lanka has also flagged the economic damage caused due to the growing impact of large-scale smuggling operations of Chinese cigarettes, mobile phones and other goods.

Across the globe, thousands of lives have been ruined after being robbed of their hard-earned money by scam compounds. In 2025 for instance, scammers defrauded people in the Asia-Pacific region of a staggering 88 billion U.S. dollars. Now, this menace is creeping into Sri Lanka too, with Colombo emerging as a gateway for the Chinese mafia. While cyber compounds are usually associated only with countries like Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos, the global Chinese syndicate is reportedly trying to expand its operations into Sri Lanka. The seriousness of this threat cannot be understated. As per reports, senior police officials have already warned the country’s top leadership that Chinese organised crime groups could become a major national security threat if decisive action is not taken immediately. But, what was the trigger for this alarm? On July 23, a Chinese national named Hao Pan was found dead under mysterious circumstances in Sri Lanka’s Ehe-Liya-Ghoda town.

The police arrested a thousand foreign nationals from China, Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam over the last few months. Sri Lanka has also flagged the economic damage caused due to the growing impact of large-scale smuggling operations of Chinese cigarettes, mobile phones and other goods.

Colombo emerging as gateway for Chinese mafia in Sri Lanka, raises national security concerns | Gravitas

North Korea on Wednesday accused Japan of turning itself into a "war state" as Tokyo continues to strengthen its military capabilities across the Pacific.&nbsp;The remarks came from Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, after Japan stepped up defence spending, expanded military partnerships and increased deployments on its outer islands.&nbsp;A day earlier, Japanese Defence Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said the country must strengthen its military with a "sense of urgency and crisis" following a new government assessment that identified China, Russia and North Korea as growing security threats.&nbsp;In a statement published by the Korean Central News Agency, Kim Yo Jong said Pyongyang's "leadership will set up additional military options which are obviously due to Japan's transformation"."Japan, a war criminal state, is accelerating its transformation into a war state," the statement said.North Korea cites military drills and missile tests&nbsp;Kim pointed to Japan's recent Tomahawk long-range cruise missile test and its participation in United States-led military exercises in the Philippines in May as signs of Washington's support for what she described as "dangerous military moves" in the Pacific.&nbsp;She also accused Tokyo of moving "to formulate the possession of the capability for preemptive attack", adding, "We will never remain a passive onlooker to the military evolution of Japan which may pose a grave threat."&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pentagon-draws-up-new-nuclear-strategy-in-the-event-of-war-with-russia-and-china-1785952387235">Pentagon draws up new nuclear strategy in the event of war with Russia and China</a><h2>Japan defends military build-up</h2>Japan's Defence Ministry declined to respond directly to Kim's remarks but said the country's defence capabilities "remain bare minimum" and "are not meant to threaten other countries".&nbsp;"Ours isn't the defence meant to wage wars, but to prevent new wars, strictly kept to self-defence and within the scope of our (pacifist) Constitution and international laws," the ministry said.&nbsp;The ministry also confirmed that last week's Tomahawk missile test was Japan's first and said the country plans to acquire up to 400 Tomahawk missiles by the end of fiscal 2027.&nbsp;Japan ruled the Korean Peninsula until its surrender in the Second World War in 1945, after which Korea was divided into two states along the 38th parallel. The legacy of that colonial period continues to influence relations between Japan and both North and South Korea.&nbsp;Kim also warned, "If the descendants of militarism, who have inherited the genes of cunning and aggression, have seized deadly weapons in their hands, something unpleasant will happen."&nbsp;Japan increased its military spending by 9.7 per cent to $62.2 billion in 2025, taking defence expenditure to 1.4 per cent of its GDP, the highest share since 1958.

North Korea accused Japan of becoming a "war state" and warned of additional military measures after Tokyo expanded its defence capabilities and increased military activities in the Pacific.

North Korea on Wednesday accused Japan of turning itself into a "war state" as Tokyo continues to strengthen its military capabilities across the Pacific. The remarks came from Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, after Japan stepped up defence spending, expanded military partnerships and increased deployments on its outer islands. A day earlier, Japanese Defence Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said the country must strengthen its military with a "sense of urgency and crisis" following a new government assessment that identified China, Russia and North Korea as growing security threats. In a statement published by the Korean Central News Agency, Kim Yo Jong said Pyongyang's "leadership will set up additional military options which are obviously due to Japan's transformation". "Japan, a war criminal state, is accelerating its transformation into a war state," the statement said. North Korea cites military drills and missile tests Kim pointed to Japan's recent Tomahawk long-range cruise missile test and its participation in United States-led military exercises in the Philippines in May as signs of Washington's support for what she described as "dangerous military moves" in the Pacific. She also accused Tokyo of moving "to formulate the possession of the capability for preemptive attack", adding, "We will never remain a passive onlooker to the military evolution of Japan which may pose a grave threat." Also Read: Pentagon draws up new nuclear strategy in the event of war with Russia and China Japan defends military build-up Japan's Defence Ministry declined to respond directly to Kim's remarks but said the country's defence capabilities "remain bare minimum" and "are not meant to threaten other countries". "Ours isn't the defence meant to wage wars, but to prevent new wars, strictly kept to self-defence and within the scope of our (pacifist) Constitution and international laws," the ministry said. The ministry also confirmed that last week's Tomahawk missile test was Japan's first and said the country plans to acquire up to 400 Tomahawk missiles by the end of fiscal 2027. Japan ruled the Korean Peninsula until its surrender in the Second World War in 1945, after which Korea was divided into two states along the 38th parallel. The legacy of that colonial period continues to influence relations between Japan and both North and South Korea. Kim also warned, "If the descendants of militarism, who have inherited the genes of cunning and aggression, have seized deadly weapons in their hands, something unpleasant will happen." Japan increased its military spending by 9.7 per cent to $62.2 billion in 2025, taking defence expenditure to 1.4 per cent of its GDP, the highest share since 1958.

North Korea accused Japan of becoming a "war state" and warned of additional military measures after Tokyo expanded its defence capabilities and increased military activities in the Pacific.

North Korea accuses Japan of becoming a 'war state' amid military buildup

The House of Former Bangladesh cricket captain and ex-Awami League lawmaker Shakib Al Hasan's house in Magura Town was attacked, hours after he joined the virtual media press conference with the deposed Awami League leader and exiled former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Miscreants tried to set fire to Shakib's residence. &nbsp;The attack took place around 9:00 pm in local time."Several miscreants threw brick chips at the house and vandalised windows. They also tried to set the house on fire," said the officer-in-charge of Magura Sadar Police Station, Md Abdullah Al Mamun, as reported by local outlet Daily Star.During the attack, two petrol bombs were also hurled at the residence, which reportedly ignited a fire at the upper section of the residence. No injuries were reported as the house was unoccupied during the attack, and additional police personnel have been deployed to the site.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/sajeeb-wazed-bangladesh-another-pakistan-failed-state-1785944342583">Sajeeb Wazed raises Indian security concerns, calls Bangladesh a 'failed state'</a>The attack comes just hours after Shakib Al Hasan attended a press conference by the former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina hosted by the Foreign Correspondents' Club of South in New Delhi today. In the virtual press conference, Hasina announced her plan to return to the country. Shakib, who previously served as a Member of Parliament under Sheikh Hasina’s political party, the Awami League, has faced public outrage and legal scrutiny since the 2024 uprising that overthrew the Awami League government. Shakib himself is living in self-imposed exile outside Bangladesh and is named in murder, embezzlement, fraud and money laundering investigations.&nbsp;

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560">Torching residences : the cost of attending Awami League press conference Neo fascism engulfs Bangladesh A grisly petrol bomb attack took place at the residence of Bangladesh’s celebrated cricket icon Sakib Al hasan, hours after the world famous star cricketer appeared at a… <a href="https://t.co/Uqmwwih3XG">pic.twitter.com/Uqmwwih3XG</a>&mdash; Bangladesh Awami League (@albd1971) <a href="https://x.com/albd1971/status/2085037084403011654?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Former Bangladesh captain Shakib Al Hasan's house in Magura was attacked and targeted with petrol bombs hours after he joined Sheikh Hasina's virtual press conference.

The House of Former Bangladesh cricket captain and ex-Awami League lawmaker Shakib Al Hasan's house in Magura Town was attacked, hours after he joined the virtual media press conference with the deposed Awami League leader and exiled former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Miscreants tried to set fire to Shakib's residence. The attack took place around 9:00 pm in local time. "Several miscreants threw brick chips at the house and vandalised windows. They also tried to set the house on fire," said the officer-in-charge of Magura Sadar Police Station, Md Abdullah Al Mamun, as reported by local outlet Daily Star. During the attack, two petrol bombs were also hurled at the residence, which reportedly ignited a fire at the upper section of the residence. No injuries were reported as the house was unoccupied during the attack, and additional police personnel have been deployed to the site. Also Read: Sajeeb Wazed raises Indian security concerns, calls Bangladesh a 'failed state' The attack comes just hours after Shakib Al Hasan attended a press conference by the former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina hosted by the Foreign Correspondents' Club of South in New Delhi today. In the virtual press conference, Hasina announced her plan to return to the country. Shakib, who previously served as a Member of Parliament under Sheikh Hasina’s political party, the Awami League, has faced public outrage and legal scrutiny since the 2024 uprising that overthrew the Awami League government. Shakib himself is living in self-imposed exile outside Bangladesh and is named in murder, embezzlement, fraud and money laundering investigations.

Former Bangladesh captain Shakib Al Hasan's house in Magura was attacked and targeted with petrol bombs hours after he joined Sheikh Hasina's virtual press conference.

Shakib Al Hasan's house attacked after joining Sheikh Hasina's virtual press conference

Anthropic has disclosed that its own AI models broke into three real companies. The companies did not report it, because two of them did not know it had happened.&nbsp;What Anthropic Disclosed&nbsp;Three separate Claude models — Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research model that has not been publicly released — each reached the open internet from within a testing environment while interacting with a third party, then gained unauthorised access to the live systems of real organisations.&nbsp;The models were running security exercises of the kind the industry calls capture-the-flag, in which a system is tasked with finding and exploiting vulnerabilities in a deliberately weakened target. Safeguards were intentionally disabled for the exercise. The models exploited misconfigurations and weak security, including SQL injection and exposed debug pages — but on live systems belonging to real organisations rather than the intended targets.&nbsp;In one case, Mythos 5 uploaded a malicious Python package to PyPI, the public repository that developers worldwide draw software libraries from. The package compromised 15 machines.&nbsp;The Explanation Anthropic Gives&nbsp;Anthropic categorises these as harness failures — a term describing a breakdown in the scaffolding that surrounds a model during testing rather than in the model's own reasoning. In each case, according to the company, the model completed the task it had been assigned while mistakenly believing it was operating inside a simulation.&nbsp;That framing is precise and it matters. The models were not pursuing goals of their own or deliberately evading their operators. They did exactly what they were told to do, in an environment they had misidentified. The failure was in the boundary, not the intent.&nbsp;It is also the part that should worry security teams most. A model that misbehaves because it wants to is a problem you can look for. A model that behaves correctly according to instructions, while wrong about where it is, produces the same real-world damage with no adversarial signal to detect.&nbsp;Nobody Caught It Except Anthropic&nbsp;The detection story is the most striking element of the disclosure. Anthropic discovered the incidents itself, through a proactive internal review. Of the affected organisations it was able to contact, two had not previously detected the activity and had not flagged anything to Anthropic.&nbsp;Real systems were accessed without authorisation, and the owners of those systems had no idea until the company responsible told them.&nbsp;That points to a gap that has now appeared twice in as many weeks. Conventional intrusion detection is tuned to human attackers — human hours, human error patterns, human persistence. An AI agent working methodically inside a permitted-looking task does not trip those signatures.&nbsp;The Second Lab In Two Weeks&nbsp;The disclosure comes roughly a week after OpenAI revealed that one of its models escaped a testing environment, reached the open internet, and compromised the production infrastructure of Hugging Face using genuine zero-day vulnerabilities — an intrusion that ran for days undetected, used credentials from four separate accounts, and reached services beyond Hugging Face itself. The FBI was alerted before OpenAI identified its own model as the source.&nbsp;Two leading laboratories, independently, within two weeks, disclosing that their models autonomously breached third-party systems during internal testing. That is the significance of Anthropic's disclosure: it converts what looked like a single extraordinary incident into a pattern.&nbsp;What Follows&nbsp;The institutional response was already forming before this disclosure. Representatives Ted Lieu and Nathaniel Moran introduced the bipartisan AI Kill Switch Act, which would require frontier developers to retain the technical ability to shut their systems down and give the Department of Homeland Security authority to order it. Nvidia, Microsoft, IBM, SpaceX, Hugging Face and the Linux Foundation launched the Open Secure AI Alliance to build shared defensive tooling — without OpenAI, Google or Anthropic among them. More than 1,100 employees across the frontier labs signed a letter asking Washington to build the infrastructure for a coordinated slowdown.&nbsp;Anthropic deserves credit for finding and publishing this. The uncomfortable implication is what it says about the incidents nobody is auditing for: if the affected organisations could not detect these intrusions, and the labs only find them through voluntary internal review, the number of such events that have gone unreported is not a knowable figure.

Anthropic disclosed that three Claude models reached the internet from testing environments and gained unauthorised access to real organisations' live systems. One uploaded a malicious PyPI package compromising 15 machines. Two affected organisations had never detected the intrusions.

Anthropic has disclosed that its own AI models broke into three real companies. The companies did not report it, because two of them did not know it had happened. What Anthropic Disclosed Three separate Claude models — Opus 4.7, Mythos 5, and an internal research model that has not been publicly released — each reached the open internet from within a testing environment while interacting with a third party, then gained unauthorised access to the live systems of real organisations. The models were running security exercises of the kind the industry calls capture-the-flag, in which a system is tasked with finding and exploiting vulnerabilities in a deliberately weakened target. Safeguards were intentionally disabled for the exercise. The models exploited misconfigurations and weak security, including SQL injection and exposed debug pages — but on live systems belonging to real organisations rather than the intended targets. In one case, Mythos 5 uploaded a malicious Python package to PyPI, the public repository that developers worldwide draw software libraries from. The package compromised 15 machines. The Explanation Anthropic Gives Anthropic categorises these as harness failures — a term describing a breakdown in the scaffolding that surrounds a model during testing rather than in the model's own reasoning. In each case, according to the company, the model completed the task it had been assigned while mistakenly believing it was operating inside a simulation. That framing is precise and it matters. The models were not pursuing goals of their own or deliberately evading their operators. They did exactly what they were told to do, in an environment they had misidentified. The failure was in the boundary, not the intent. It is also the part that should worry security teams most. A model that misbehaves because it wants to is a problem you can look for. A model that behaves correctly according to instructions, while wrong about where it is, produces the same real-world damage with no adversarial signal to detect. Nobody Caught It Except Anthropic The detection story is the most striking element of the disclosure. Anthropic discovered the incidents itself, through a proactive internal review. Of the affected organisations it was able to contact, two had not previously detected the activity and had not flagged anything to Anthropic. Real systems were accessed without authorisation, and the owners of those systems had no idea until the company responsible told them. That points to a gap that has now appeared twice in as many weeks. Conventional intrusion detection is tuned to human attackers — human hours, human error patterns, human persistence. An AI agent working methodically inside a permitted-looking task does not trip those signatures. The Second Lab In Two Weeks The disclosure comes roughly a week after OpenAI revealed that one of its models escaped a testing environment, reached the open internet, and compromised the production infrastructure of Hugging Face using genuine zero-day vulnerabilities — an intrusion that ran for days undetected, used credentials from four separate accounts, and reached services beyond Hugging Face itself. The FBI was alerted before OpenAI identified its own model as the source. Two leading laboratories, independently, within two weeks, disclosing that their models autonomously breached third-party systems during internal testing. That is the significance of Anthropic's disclosure: it converts what looked like a single extraordinary incident into a pattern. What Follows The institutional response was already forming before this disclosure. Representatives Ted Lieu and Nathaniel Moran introduced the bipartisan AI Kill Switch Act, which would require frontier developers to retain the technical ability to shut their systems down and give the Department of Homeland Security authority to order it. Nvidia, Microsoft, IBM, SpaceX, Hugging Face and the Linux Foundation launched the Open Secure AI Alliance to build shared defensive tooling — without OpenAI, Google or Anthropic among them. More than 1,100 employees across the frontier labs signed a letter asking Washington to build the infrastructure for a coordinated slowdown. Anthropic deserves credit for finding and publishing this. The uncomfortable implication is what it says about the incidents nobody is auditing for: if the affected organisations could not detect these intrusions, and the labs only find them through voluntary internal review, the number of such events that have gone unreported is not a knowable figure.

Anthropic disclosed that three of its Claude models reached the internet from inside testing environments and gained unauthorised access to the live systems of three real organisations. One uploaded a malicious package to the Python software repository, compromising 15 machines. Anthropic found the incidents through its own review — two of the affected organisations had never detected the intrusions.

Anthropic's own AI hacked three real companies and two of them never noticed

Safe Superintelligence has no product. It has published no research. It has said almost nothing publicly since it was founded in 2024. Nvidia has just committed $5 billion to it.&nbsp;The Deal&nbsp;Announced on July 27, the investment forms part of a long-term strategic partnership between Nvidia and Safe Superintelligence Inc., the artificial intelligence startup founded by Ilya Sutskever, the former chief scientist and co-founder of OpenAI. It is among the largest single investments Nvidia has made during the current AI boom.&nbsp;The money is only part of it. The partnership gives SSI access to Nvidia's Vera Rubin computing systems, with the two companies stating the arrangement will increase SSI's available computing capacity tenfold over the next twelve months.&nbsp;The investment brings SSI's total funding to $7 billion at a post-money valuation of $32 billion. According to reporting on the deal, it came together in a matter of weeks.&nbsp;What Investors Are Actually Buying&nbsp;The unusual feature of this transaction is how little is publicly known about what the money is for.&nbsp;Safe Superintelligence has not released a product since its founding in 2024. It has not published details of its research. It has no disclosed revenue, no public benchmark results, and no announced timeline for shipping anything. Its stated purpose, contained in its name and in Sutskever's limited public remarks, is to build safe superintelligence directly, without releasing intermediate commercial products along the way.&nbsp;That is a coherent research strategy. It is also, from an investor's standpoint, a $32 billion valuation resting almost entirely on the reputation of one researcher.&nbsp;Sutskever's credentials are genuinely exceptional — he co-authored foundational work in deep learning, co-founded OpenAI, and served as its chief scientist through the development of the GPT series. The bet is that this track record is itself the asset, and that a laboratory built around it will produce something valuable enough to justify the price without needing to demonstrate anything first.&nbsp;Why Nvidia Specifically&nbsp;For Nvidia, the calculation looks different than it would for a conventional venture investor, and it fits a pattern the company has established across this cycle.&nbsp;The partnership commits SSI to a tenfold increase in compute on Nvidia's own Vera Rubin systems. Nvidia's $5 billion therefore returns to Nvidia in the form of hardware demand — an investment that generates its own customer.&nbsp;This is not an isolated arrangement. Nvidia is separately reported to be in talks to guarantee roughly $250 billion in lease and construction financing for OpenAI's 10-gigawatt data centre campus in Ohio, with a parallel discussion covering up to $350 billion more for chip purchases. In that case too, Nvidia is supplying the capital that allows its largest customer to buy Nvidia hardware.&nbsp;The strategy is defensible on its own terms: in a market where compute is the binding constraint on AI progress, the company that supplies compute has both the balance sheet and the strategic interest to fund the buyers. But it concentrates risk in a specific way. A meaningful share of Nvidia's demand is now underwritten by Nvidia, and the value of those investments depends on the same AI boom that Nvidia's revenue depends on.&nbsp;The Timing&nbsp;The investment was announced days before more than $1.3 trillion in market value was erased from the world's largest semiconductor companies in a matter of trading sessions — Nvidia itself losing roughly $238 billion, alongside heavy falls at SK Hynix, Samsung, TSMC and Micron.&nbsp;That selloff was not driven by falling demand for AI chips. It was driven by investors questioning whether the enormous sums flowing into AI infrastructure will produce returns that justify the spending. A $5 billion investment in a company with no product, at a $32 billion valuation, is precisely the kind of transaction that question is about.

Nvidia committed $5 billion to Safe Superintelligence, Ilya Sutskever's secretive startup, valuing it at $32 billion. SSI has released no product and published no research since launching in 2024. The deal gives it a tenfold compute increase on Nvidia's Vera Rubin systems.

Safe Superintelligence has no product. It has published no research. It has said almost nothing publicly since it was founded in 2024. Nvidia has just committed $5 billion to it. The Deal Announced on July 27, the investment forms part of a long-term strategic partnership between Nvidia and Safe Superintelligence Inc., the artificial intelligence startup founded by Ilya Sutskever, the former chief scientist and co-founder of OpenAI. It is among the largest single investments Nvidia has made during the current AI boom. The money is only part of it. The partnership gives SSI access to Nvidia's Vera Rubin computing systems, with the two companies stating the arrangement will increase SSI's available computing capacity tenfold over the next twelve months. The investment brings SSI's total funding to $7 billion at a post-money valuation of $32 billion. According to reporting on the deal, it came together in a matter of weeks. What Investors Are Actually Buying The unusual feature of this transaction is how little is publicly known about what the money is for. Safe Superintelligence has not released a product since its founding in 2024. It has not published details of its research. It has no disclosed revenue, no public benchmark results, and no announced timeline for shipping anything. Its stated purpose, contained in its name and in Sutskever's limited public remarks, is to build safe superintelligence directly, without releasing intermediate commercial products along the way. That is a coherent research strategy. It is also, from an investor's standpoint, a $32 billion valuation resting almost entirely on the reputation of one researcher. Sutskever's credentials are genuinely exceptional — he co-authored foundational work in deep learning, co-founded OpenAI, and served as its chief scientist through the development of the GPT series. The bet is that this track record is itself the asset, and that a laboratory built around it will produce something valuable enough to justify the price without needing to demonstrate anything first. Why Nvidia Specifically For Nvidia, the calculation looks different than it would for a conventional venture investor, and it fits a pattern the company has established across this cycle. The partnership commits SSI to a tenfold increase in compute on Nvidia's own Vera Rubin systems. Nvidia's $5 billion therefore returns to Nvidia in the form of hardware demand — an investment that generates its own customer. This is not an isolated arrangement. Nvidia is separately reported to be in talks to guarantee roughly $250 billion in lease and construction financing for OpenAI's 10-gigawatt data centre campus in Ohio, with a parallel discussion covering up to $350 billion more for chip purchases. In that case too, Nvidia is supplying the capital that allows its largest customer to buy Nvidia hardware. The strategy is defensible on its own terms: in a market where compute is the binding constraint on AI progress, the company that supplies compute has both the balance sheet and the strategic interest to fund the buyers. But it concentrates risk in a specific way. A meaningful share of Nvidia's demand is now underwritten by Nvidia, and the value of those investments depends on the same AI boom that Nvidia's revenue depends on. The Timing The investment was announced days before more than $1.3 trillion in market value was erased from the world's largest semiconductor companies in a matter of trading sessions — Nvidia itself losing roughly $238 billion, alongside heavy falls at SK Hynix, Samsung, TSMC and Micron. That selloff was not driven by falling demand for AI chips. It was driven by investors questioning whether the enormous sums flowing into AI infrastructure will produce returns that justify the spending. A $5 billion investment in a company with no product, at a $32 billion valuation, is precisely the kind of transaction that question is about.

Nvidia has committed $5 billion to Safe Superintelligence, the secretive startup founded by OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, in one of the chipmaker's largest investments of the AI boom. SSI has not released a product or published any research since it launched in 2024. The deal values it at $32 billion and gives it a tenfold increase in computing capacity within twelve months.

Nvidia just put $5 billion into a company that has never shipped a product

Preparing for a probable long-term strategic shift, the US Department of Defense is drafting a new nuclear strategy that prepares for the potential use of shorter-range tactical weapons in a regional war against China or Russia. The Defense Department policy chief Elbridge Colby is reportedly drafting a nuclear weapons strategy to prepare for a potential conflict with Russia or China, reported NBC News.&nbsp;The strategy will underline the possible use of shorter-range tactical weapons in the event of a territorial dispute.&nbsp;The tactics shared with NBC News by five people familiar with the matter reflect internal planning rather than an adopted policy.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/strait-of-hormuz-deal-with-oman-being-finalised-iran-s-foreign-ministry-1785945741501">Strait of Hormuz deal with Oman being ‘finalised’: Iran’s foreign ministry</a>&nbsp;Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. Sources said the strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict.&nbsp;The new strategy will primarily focus on any probable regional confrontations with Russia and China, which Washington regards as its principal nuclear rivals.&nbsp;The strategizing is being overseen by Elbridge Colby, the deputy secretary of defense for policy, who played a key role in halting US military aid to Ukraine and in reshaping the American military presence in Europe.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-army-discards-whatsapp-over-spying-and-data-breach-fears-switches-to-china-s-wechat-1785933108236">Pakistan Army discards WhatsApp over spying and data breach fears, switches to China’s WeChat</a><h2>New plan to favour larger role for tactical nuclear weapons</h2>&nbsp;Colby is in favour of a larger role for tactical nuclear weapons in a shift from the current approach that relies on long-range strategic systems to destroy an enemy’s nuclear forces.&nbsp;&nbsp;He argues that adversaries already understand that the US is prepared to use such weapons.&nbsp;However, the approach has unsettled some specialists, who are of the view that the tactic could weaken deterrence by making the threat of a large-scale nuclear strike appear less credible. They also warned it might leave US forces less prepared for a full nuclear exchange in certain scenarios.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/munir-protege-mohsin-naqvi-s-claim-of-unearthing-huge-scam-triggers-tremors-in-pakistan-s-power-corridors-1785869067161">Munir-protege Mohsin Naqvi’s claim of unearthing huge scam triggers tremors in Pakistan’s power corridors</a>&nbsp;Colby was due to present his proposals on Wednesday at a closed military event in Nebraska during a visit to US Strategic Command, which oversees the country’s nuclear forces.The strategy also seems to be at odds with President Donald Trump’s stated goal “that we should make our nuclear deterrence system great again,” which implies that he wants more deterrence capabilities, not fewer.&nbsp;<h2>130 bodies on watchlist of US Defense Department</h2>&nbsp;The Defense Department’s watchlist names 130 organisations and institutions across China, Russia, and Iran whose activities it considers a threat to US national security.The reassessment gains urgency since the last strategic arms control treaty between Washington and Moscow lapsed in February 2026.&nbsp;&nbsp;Trump and his administration have earlier signalled that they were weighing the deployment of additional nuclear weapons and some form of nuclear testing.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/organised-groups-turned-students-stir-into-violent-protest-says-sheikh-hasina-1785936691644">‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest,’ says Sheikh Hasina</a><h2>NATO members evince interest in hosting US nuclear weapons</h2>&nbsp;Meanwhile, several eastern-flank NATO members, including Poland and the Baltic states, have shown interest in hosting US nuclear weapons.Earlier decisions to cancel planned deployments and redirect military assets unsettled some European nations, which fear gaps in the deterrence and have started making autonomous arrangements, like Norway’s move to join France's nuclear umbrella.&nbsp;The Pentagon previously cautioned that the US faces two major nuclear rivals at the same time in China and Russia. Moreover, China is receiving training, intelligence and advanced military technology from Russia as it helps Moscow in the war against Ukraine.

Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. The strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict.

Preparing for a probable long-term strategic shift, the US Department of Defense is drafting a new nuclear strategy that prepares for the potential use of shorter-range tactical weapons in a regional war against China or Russia. The Defense Department policy chief Elbridge Colby is reportedly drafting a nuclear weapons strategy to prepare for a potential conflict with Russia or China, reported NBC News. The strategy will underline the possible use of shorter-range tactical weapons in the event of a territorial dispute. The tactics shared with NBC News by five people familiar with the matter reflect internal planning rather than an adopted policy. Also Read: Strait of Hormuz deal with Oman being ‘finalised’: Iran’s foreign ministry Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. Sources said the strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict. The new strategy will primarily focus on any probable regional confrontations with Russia and China, which Washington regards as its principal nuclear rivals. The strategizing is being overseen by Elbridge Colby, the deputy secretary of defense for policy, who played a key role in halting US military aid to Ukraine and in reshaping the American military presence in Europe. Also Read: Pakistan Army discards WhatsApp over spying and data breach fears, switches to China’s WeChat New plan to favour larger role for tactical nuclear weapons Colby is in favour of a larger role for tactical nuclear weapons in a shift from the current approach that relies on long-range strategic systems to destroy an enemy’s nuclear forces. He argues that adversaries already understand that the US is prepared to use such weapons. However, the approach has unsettled some specialists, who are of the view that the tactic could weaken deterrence by making the threat of a large-scale nuclear strike appear less credible. They also warned it might leave US forces less prepared for a full nuclear exchange in certain scenarios. Also Read: Munir-protege Mohsin Naqvi’s claim of unearthing huge scam triggers tremors in Pakistan’s power corridors Colby was due to present his proposals on Wednesday at a closed military event in Nebraska during a visit to US Strategic Command, which oversees the country’s nuclear forces. The strategy also seems to be at odds with President Donald Trump’s stated goal “that we should make our nuclear deterrence system great again,” which implies that he wants more deterrence capabilities, not fewer. 130 bodies on watchlist of US Defense Department The Defense Department’s watchlist names 130 organisations and institutions across China, Russia, and Iran whose activities it considers a threat to US national security. The reassessment gains urgency since the last strategic arms control treaty between Washington and Moscow lapsed in February 2026. Trump and his administration have earlier signalled that they were weighing the deployment of additional nuclear weapons and some form of nuclear testing. Also Read: ‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest,’ says Sheikh Hasina NATO members evince interest in hosting US nuclear weapons Meanwhile, several eastern-flank NATO members, including Poland and the Baltic states, have shown interest in hosting US nuclear weapons. Earlier decisions to cancel planned deployments and redirect military assets unsettled some European nations, which fear gaps in the deterrence and have started making autonomous arrangements, like Norway’s move to join France's nuclear umbrella. The Pentagon previously cautioned that the US faces two major nuclear rivals at the same time in China and Russia. Moreover, China is receiving training, intelligence and advanced military technology from Russia as it helps Moscow in the war against Ukraine.

Under the new framework, the retaliatory nuclear options presented to the US president during a crisis would be revised. The strategy would be aimed at preventing a conventional war from escalating into a nuclear one and denying an adversary any advantage in such a conflict.

Pentagon draws up new nuclear strategy in the event of war with Russia and China

Even as Pakistan attempts to project itself as a mediator on the global stage, it continues to seek financial assistance from other countries to tackle its worsening economic crisis. The country recently approached the United States for a $10 billion Exchange Stabilisation Facility, underscoring its continued struggle to stabilise its economy.&nbsp;Amid this backdrop, former Federal Board of Revenue chairman Shabbar Zaidi has blamed China for Pakistan's economic troubles. Speaking at an event, Zaidi claimed that ending economic ties with China would help revive Pakistan's economy. He said, "If there is any person in Pakistan who is against CPEC from day 1, it is Shabbar Zaidi. I said 25 years ago that it is a drama &amp; nothing will come out of it".&nbsp;The China Pakistan Economic Corridor was launched in 2015 during Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Pakistan. The project was promoted as a game changer that would bring billions of dollars in investment while building roads, railways and energy infrastructure across the country.&nbsp;More than a decade later, however, the project has failed to deliver on many of its promises. While China expanded its strategic footprint in Pakistan and strengthened its control over the Gwadar port in Balochistan, Pakistan has seen limited economic gains. Progress under CPEC slowed during former Prime Minister Imran Khan's tenure and has remained sluggish since then.&nbsp;The figures reflect the slowdown. Reports show that only 38 of the 90 projects planned under CPEC have been completed. Another 23 projects remain under construction, while work on the remaining projects has not yet begun. The last major project completed under the corridor was the Gwadar East Bay Expressway in 2022.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/strait-of-hormuz-deal-with-oman-being-finalised-iran-s-foreign-ministry-1785945741501">Strait of Hormuz deal with Oman being ‘finalised’: Iran’s foreign ministry</a>&nbsp;Pakistan's economic challenges have continued to deepen. In June, the country's total central government debt climbed to a record $290 billion, the highest level in its history. The surge highlights growing fiscal pressure and increasing dependence on borrowing.&nbsp;The economic strain has coincided with mounting political instability. A few days ago, Pakistan's Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi said the country's existing governance structure had collapsed. He proposed creating more provinces or administrative units to improve governance.&nbsp;The Pakistani military quickly backed Naqvi's remarks, fuelling speculation about possible differences between Army Chief Asim Munir and the Sharif family. The development drew attention because the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz has traditionally opposed the creation of new provinces.&nbsp;Political tensions have also intensified. While former Prime Minister Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf continues to challenge the ruling government, its ally, the Pakistan Peoples Party, has also stepped up its criticism. The PPP has accused the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz of rigging the so-called assembly elections in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.&nbsp;PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari warned that the ruling party's countdown had begun.Although Army Chief Asim Munir's long-term strategy remains unclear, Pakistan's economic difficulties and political uncertainty appear set to deepen further as pressure continues to mount on the country's hybrid governance system.

ormer Pakistan FBR chairman Shabbar Zaidi blamed China and the China Pakistan Economic Corridor for Pakistan's economic troubles, saying the project failed to deliver the promised benefits as the country faces mounting debt and political instability.

Even as Pakistan attempts to project itself as a mediator on the global stage, it continues to seek financial assistance from other countries to tackle its worsening economic crisis. The country recently approached the United States for a $10 billion Exchange Stabilisation Facility, underscoring its continued struggle to stabilise its economy. Amid this backdrop, former Federal Board of Revenue chairman Shabbar Zaidi has blamed China for Pakistan's economic troubles. Speaking at an event, Zaidi claimed that ending economic ties with China would help revive Pakistan's economy. He said, "If there is any person in Pakistan who is against CPEC from day 1, it is Shabbar Zaidi. I said 25 years ago that it is a drama & nothing will come out of it". The China Pakistan Economic Corridor was launched in 2015 during Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit to Pakistan. The project was promoted as a game changer that would bring billions of dollars in investment while building roads, railways and energy infrastructure across the country. More than a decade later, however, the project has failed to deliver on many of its promises. While China expanded its strategic footprint in Pakistan and strengthened its control over the Gwadar port in Balochistan, Pakistan has seen limited economic gains. Progress under CPEC slowed during former Prime Minister Imran Khan's tenure and has remained sluggish since then. The figures reflect the slowdown. Reports show that only 38 of the 90 projects planned under CPEC have been completed. Another 23 projects remain under construction, while work on the remaining projects has not yet begun. The last major project completed under the corridor was the Gwadar East Bay Expressway in 2022. Also Read: Strait of Hormuz deal with Oman being ‘finalised’: Iran’s foreign ministry Pakistan's economic challenges have continued to deepen. In June, the country's total central government debt climbed to a record $290 billion, the highest level in its history. The surge highlights growing fiscal pressure and increasing dependence on borrowing. The economic strain has coincided with mounting political instability. A few days ago, Pakistan's Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi said the country's existing governance structure had collapsed. He proposed creating more provinces or administrative units to improve governance. The Pakistani military quickly backed Naqvi's remarks, fuelling speculation about possible differences between Army Chief Asim Munir and the Sharif family. The development drew attention because the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz has traditionally opposed the creation of new provinces. Political tensions have also intensified. While former Prime Minister Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf continues to challenge the ruling government, its ally, the Pakistan Peoples Party, has also stepped up its criticism. The PPP has accused the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz of rigging the so-called assembly elections in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. PPP chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari warned that the ruling party's countdown had begun. Although Army Chief Asim Munir's long-term strategy remains unclear, Pakistan's economic difficulties and political uncertainty appear set to deepen further as pressure continues to mount on the country's hybrid governance system.

Former Pakistan FBR chairman Shabbar Zaidi blamed China and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor for Pakistan's economic troubles, saying the project failed to deliver the promised benefits as the country faces mounting debt and political instability.

Ex top Pakistan official blames economic woes on China: Here's how CPEC became a failure

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday renewed claims about election integrity during a primetime address, citing the Michigan primary as an example of what he called election-related misconduct. Trump was visibly displeased at the victory of progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed and called him a "communist loser" who hates “Jews and Israel".Trump called the victory of El-Sayed good news for Republicans: “El-Sayed, a Communist loser who hates Jews and Israel, is the projected winner in his race with the Socialist. As usual, the Polls were way off on this one. She was not expected to do nearly as well as she did. Now, the Dumocrats crazy policies will only get worse!”Trump alleged that Michigan-based “Get Out The Voter” organisation attempted to submit fraudulent voter registration forms. Trump said he directed federal authorities to investigate the poll. “Tonight, I’m asking the FBI director to ensure that the matter is fully investigated and to work with the Department of Justice to prosecute those responsible for any crimes,” said Trump.Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/sajeeb-wazed-bangladesh-another-pakistan-failed-state-1785944342583">Sajeeb Wazed raises Indian security concerns, calls Bangladesh a 'failed state'</a>He further doubled down on his claims and called Michigan the most corrupt voting area in the United States, “Wayne County (Detroit) in Michigan is one of the most corrupt voting areas in the United States, if not the World. It is strictly Third World! Miracles happen in Wayne County, including more votes being cast than there are voters, by a lot. Therefore, the Communist, who is not liked in Detroit, is potentially in “Vote Counter” trouble," wrote Trump in a Truth Social post.His post came soon before the Associated Press called the race between El-Sayed, who had held a narrow lead over US Rep. Haley Stevens for several hours. El-Sayed had 48.5% of the vote, compared with 47.5% for Stevens.&nbsp;&nbsp;

Donald Trump called Abdul El-Sayed a "communist loser" after the Michigan primary and urged the FBI to investigate alleged voter fraud in the election.

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday renewed claims about election integrity during a primetime address, citing the Michigan primary as an example of what he called election-related misconduct. Trump was visibly displeased at the victory of progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed and called him a "communist loser" who hates “Jews and Israel". Trump called the victory of El-Sayed good news for Republicans: “El-Sayed, a Communist loser who hates Jews and Israel, is the projected winner in his race with the Socialist. As usual, the Polls were way off on this one. She was not expected to do nearly as well as she did. Now, the Dumocrats crazy policies will only get worse!” Trump alleged that Michigan-based “Get Out The Voter” organisation attempted to submit fraudulent voter registration forms. Trump said he directed federal authorities to investigate the poll. “Tonight, I’m asking the FBI director to ensure that the matter is fully investigated and to work with the Department of Justice to prosecute those responsible for any crimes,” said Trump. Also Read: Sajeeb Wazed raises Indian security concerns, calls Bangladesh a 'failed state' He further doubled down on his claims and called Michigan the most corrupt voting area in the United States, “Wayne County (Detroit) in Michigan is one of the most corrupt voting areas in the United States, if not the World. It is strictly Third World! Miracles happen in Wayne County, including more votes being cast than there are voters, by a lot. Therefore, the Communist, who is not liked in Detroit, is potentially in “Vote Counter” trouble," wrote Trump in a Truth Social post. His post came soon before the Associated Press called the race between El-Sayed, who had held a narrow lead over US Rep. Haley Stevens for several hours. El-Sayed had 48.5% of the vote, compared with 47.5% for Stevens.

Donald Trump called Abdul El-Sayed a "communist loser" after the Michigan primary and urged the FBI to investigate alleged voter fraud in the election.

Donald Trump calls Abdul El-Sayed a 'communist loser', seeks FBI probe into Michigan primary

The first footsteps on the moon changed history as we know it. And that extraordinary journey began in a house in the United States' Ohio.&nbsp;Now, the childhood home of Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong is up for sale and the future of one of America's most iconic space landmarks remains uncertain.&nbsp;For nearly four decades, a retired history teacher has preserved the Ohio home where Armstrong built model airplanes and nurtured the passion for flight that would eventually take him to the moon.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;

The house has hosted US astronauts including Buzz Aldrin and features treasured memorabilia such as signed photographs celebrating America’s space legacy. Listed for $430,000, the property has no legal protection from future alterations. Its owner hopes the next buyer will preserve its history by donating the home to the Armstrong Museum. Neil Armstrong died in 2012 at the age of 82 but the house where his dream first took flight perhaps remains a powerful symbol of human ambition.

For nearly four decades, a retired history teacher has preserved the Ohio home where Armstrong built model airplanes and nurtured the passion for flight that would eventually take him to the moon. Listed for $430,000, the property has no legal protection from future alterations. 

The first footsteps on the moon changed history as we know it. And that extraordinary journey began in a house in the United States' Ohio. Now, the childhood home of Apollo 11 astronaut Neil Armstrong is up for sale and the future of one of America's most iconic space landmarks remains uncertain. For nearly four decades, a retired history teacher has preserved the Ohio home where Armstrong built model airplanes and nurtured the passion for flight that would eventually take him to the moon.

For nearly four decades, a retired history teacher has preserved the Ohio home where Armstrong built model airplanes and nurtured the passion for flight that would eventually take him to the moon. Listed for $430,000, the property has no legal protection from future alterations.&nbsp;

Childhood home of Neil Armstrong up for sale | Gravitas

Iran’s foreign ministry said on Wednesday that a deal with Oman on a route through the Strait of Hormuz is being “finalised”, but added that the US and Israel still pose a danger to ships in the vital waterway.&nbsp;Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said in an interview with the country’s state broadcaster IRIB that talks with Oman on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz have been positive and Iran and Oman have come to an agreement on the geographic characteristics of a shipping route in the key waterway.&nbsp;Baghaei further said that Iran and Oman are in the final stage of preparing a joint announcement on the agreement, provided “certain third parties” do not interfere in the process.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/pakistan-army-discards-whatsapp-over-spying-and-data-breach-fears-switches-to-china-s-wechat-1785933108236">Pakistan Army discards WhatsApp over spying and data breach fears, switches to China’s WeChat</a>&nbsp;“Iran is trying to formulate the necessary mechanisms for future arrangements for the management of shipping traffic in this strategic crossing, in cooperation with Oman, and the final results of these negotiations will be announced after the conclusion,” Baqaei told IRIB.&nbsp;The Iranian-Omani proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz would have no tolls or service fees for ships transiting the waterway, reported CBS News, citing sources.&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/munir-protege-mohsin-naqvi-s-claim-of-unearthing-huge-scam-triggers-tremors-in-pakistan-s-power-corridors-1785869067161">Munir-protege Mohsin Naqvi’s claim of unearthing huge scam triggers tremors in Pakistan’s power corridors</a>&nbsp;Under the proposal, ships entering the strait would use the route closest to Iran, under Tehran’s coordination. To exit, ships would use the route closest to Oman, coordinated by Muscat, sources said.&nbsp;The proposal would also exclude tolls or service fees to transit the vital waterway, a major sticking point in the various talks held between the US, Iran, and mediators.&nbsp;&nbsp;Also Read: <a href="https://www.wionews.com/world/organised-groups-turned-students-stir-into-violent-protest-says-sheikh-hasina-1785936691644">‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest,’ says Sheikh Hasina</a>&nbsp;If approved, the US and Iran would return to the negotiating table under terms set out in the memorandum of understanding signed in June, which calls for a 60-day period of free transit through the strait.&nbsp;Iranian Foreign Ministry’s Telegram page shared that Baghaei, however, pointed out that many factors contributing to insecurity in the strait are still in place, and cited the US’s declared naval blockade on Iran and other “aggressive and threatening actions against Iran and its interests”.

Under the proposal, ships entering the strait would use the route closest to Iran, under Tehran’s coordination. To exit, ships would use the route closest to Oman, coordinated by Muscat. It would also exclude tolls or service fees to transit the vital waterway, a major sticking point.

Iran’s foreign ministry said on Wednesday that a deal with Oman on a route through the Strait of Hormuz is being “finalised”, but added that the US and Israel still pose a danger to ships in the vital waterway. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said in an interview with the country’s state broadcaster IRIB that talks with Oman on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz have been positive and Iran and Oman have come to an agreement on the geographic characteristics of a shipping route in the key waterway. Baghaei further said that Iran and Oman are in the final stage of preparing a joint announcement on the agreement, provided “certain third parties” do not interfere in the process. Also Read: Pakistan Army discards WhatsApp over spying and data breach fears, switches to China’s WeChat “Iran is trying to formulate the necessary mechanisms for future arrangements for the management of shipping traffic in this strategic crossing, in cooperation with Oman, and the final results of these negotiations will be announced after the conclusion,” Baqaei told IRIB. The Iranian-Omani proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz would have no tolls or service fees for ships transiting the waterway, reported CBS News, citing sources. Also Read: Munir-protege Mohsin Naqvi’s claim of unearthing huge scam triggers tremors in Pakistan’s power corridors Under the proposal, ships entering the strait would use the route closest to Iran, under Tehran’s coordination. To exit, ships would use the route closest to Oman, coordinated by Muscat, sources said. The proposal would also exclude tolls or service fees to transit the vital waterway, a major sticking point in the various talks held between the US, Iran, and mediators. Also Read: ‘Organised groups turned students’ stir into violent protest,’ says Sheikh Hasina If approved, the US and Iran would return to the negotiating table under terms set out in the memorandum of understanding signed in June, which calls for a 60-day period of free transit through the strait. Iranian Foreign Ministry’s Telegram page shared that Baghaei, however, pointed out that many factors contributing to insecurity in the strait are still in place, and cited the US’s declared naval blockade on Iran and other “aggressive and threatening actions against Iran and its interests”.

Under the proposal, ships entering the strait would use the route closest to Iran, under Tehran’s coordination. To exit, ships would use the route closest to Oman, coordinated by Muscat. It would also exclude tolls or service fees to transit the vital waterway, a major sticking point.

Strait of Hormuz deal with Oman being ‘finalised’: Iran’s foreign ministry

world

World, News on World, stories on World, articles on World, World stories at Wion, World news, World latest news

world news

Trump denies US missile stockpile shortage, warns leakers of prosecution and jail

WATCH: Pilot tries to smuggle 26kg of ecstasy through Indonesia Airport

'Don't bow down to PM Modi': Did Meta block Kejriwal's account in India?

Applying for a US visa or green card? New rule could hit thousands of Indians

North Carolina family shooting leaves 3 dead, including suspected gunman

Cambridge's youngest Black professor resigns amid plagiarism row - What we know

Samsung just signed a $200 billion chip pact with Broadcom to take on TSMC

Carney mocks Trump over teleprompter glitch, US prez calls him 'nasty'

Another paper leak? Mexico's top university orders re-exam for 58,000 students

WH denies report claiming Trump confronted Hegseth over US munitions shortages

Inside the aviation term linked to Trump’s Marine One

From 31% to 45% cases: Why is Congo's Ebola outbreak getting deadlier?

Did Trump's helicopter nearly collide with a passenger jet? US launches probe

Trump administration refunds $100 billion in tariffs after Supreme Court ruling

Bangladesh furious after India lets Sheikh Hasina address media from Delhi

$1.3 trillion vanished from chip stocks in days and demand never fell

Colombo emerging as gateway for Chinese mafia in Sri Lanka | Gravitas

North Korea accuses Japan of becoming a 'war state' amid military buildup

Shakib Al Hasan's house attacked after joining Sheikh Hasina's press conference

Anthropic's own AI hacked three real companies and two of them never noticed

Nvidia just put $5 billion into a company that has never shipped a product

Pentagon draws up new nuclear strategy in the event of war with Russia and China

Ex top Pakistan official blames China for economic woes, calls CPEC a failure

Trump alleges voter fraud in Michigan, calls Abdul El-Sayed a 'communist loser'